Roorooo RECORITS ON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roorooo RECORITS ON IO February 1993 rooroooRECORITS ON COMPUTER. ONLTA MILTION TO GO! In SepLember 1992 Leicester Museumwas asked what number of records were kept in the Biological Records Centre. This was a very difficult guestion to answer but we came to a very rough estimate of. 420,000 Leicestershire records of 9,000 species. This does not include approximately 750,000 records associated with specimens in the collections! Of the 420,000 records, approxinately 120,000 refer to about 4,000 species of invertebrates. Group No Records No specres Rcl.d1* remtrcs Conputerised Dragonflies 4,760 zl 100 Orthoptera 104 11 9s Heteroptera 366 104 20 Beetles 38,323 1,556 98 Lepidoptera 7,902 800 20 Hoverflies 1,952 125 100 t'tillipedes 861 34 90 Harvestmen 879 21 100 Woodlice 2,405 21 80 Molluscs 2,270 116 70 Totals 59,722 2,809 hi Nearly 100,000 species records are data base developed at the Museun. now indexed on BIOSPIN, a comPuter eontd p2 Computerlsed records the Museum and take on a group is welcome to contact us. tle are contd particularly anxious to receive help with Lepidoptera and nolluscs These records are much more but, obviously, you are free to accessible than paper records for follow your own interest, many different types of analysis such as mapping, sj.te evaluation, Recently we have begrun to accept phenology etc. They are also much records on computer discs directly easier to count! The table on the fron recorders. He1en Ikin and front cover of this Newsletter Adrian Russell have each sent us shows the number of computerised over 2,000 records of dragonflies species records for each and Lepidoptera respectively. As invertebrate group as at January more recorders start using PCs at 1993. home, this will become an increasingly useful and painless Beetles have the largest number of way of exchanging records. computerised records but the Lepid- optera will overtake them as more For further information on BIOSPIN records are entered into BIOSPIN. and species records please contact However, the best covered group so me on Leicester 473031. far is the dragonflies with an average of over 200 records per Derek Lott species. To date, records have been computerised for a specific purpose. For example, dragonfly records were originally comp- Too slow! uterised in order to contribute to a national At1as. Recently the records have been updated for the Quick forthcoming Museum publication on Splat Leicestershire dragonflies. How about that Beetles have been covered in order Never mind to provide data for evaluating It got away survey results. This means that the limited staff resources of the Quick, guick Museun have been allocated to That was nearly it special target groups. But never mind It got away The target groups amongst the invertebrates have been beetles Biff, biff (Derek Lott and Jeremy woodhead), f take a huge swiff molluscs (John Mathias) and, more But I miss recently, dragonflies (Steve Hit the tripod Grover) and lepidoptera (Nona And it flew away Finch, Jane McPhail and Peter Thompson). Biff, biff Another swiff A large number of groups, however, The generator knocked out have been covered by enthusiasts. And it would not stay They have come into the Museum and spent a great deal of time and Swipe, swipe effort sorti.ng and checking records With all my might before entering into BIOSPIN. I'le What a calamity are grateful to Helen fkin ft got away (dragonflies, Orthoptera), Neil Frankum (hoverflies), Ingrid Birker Swipe, swipe (millipedes) and Jon Daws At the speed of light (woodlice, harvestmen) in this What a pity respect. David Hemsley and Liz It did not pay Poxon have also cone in as Oh I'll get one like it another volunteers and helped with data day ! entry. Roy McPhail (l2yrs) Anyone who would like to come into Diptera in 1qg2 1992 proved to be quite a good year for the Diptera with several species turning up that I had not seen for a few years, both at home (see separate item in this newsletter, p9) and elsewhere in Leicestershire. Prior's Coppice The sunny weather on the MaY field larger Brachycera. Scenopinus meeting at Prior's Coppice brought fenestralis, the window fIy, was out the hoverflies. Twenty specles recorded for the first time as was were seen including DasYsYrPhus the soldier f1y Oxycera rara. venustus artd CheiTosia variabil-is. Several specimens of the latter, PTatycheirus tarsaJis btas fairly both male and female, were seen numerous along the rides. The best over a period of a few weeks, records of the day were not usually basking in the sun on the hoverflies, however. The beeflY, plants around the pond. Bonbylius najor, was seen flYing around the flowers along the main A single example of Strationys ride near to the new coPPice Plot. potanida $ras seen in Augrust, being Several fIy larvae were seen under only the second record for the the bark of a fallen tree trunk. garden of this spectacular soldier One of these was taken and reared fly. Another soldier fly, through and proved to be the RDB2 Pachygaster Leachii, which I had dead wood sPecialist SoLva only previously seen as the narginata. occasional dead specimen, ltas seen on a number of occasions duringr the Lea Meadows/Lount Meadows sunmer, often five or six at a time. The June field meeting to Lea Meadows $tas again blessed with And finally, in November, the sunny weather. An impressive total identification of three specimens of 29 hoverfly species r.tas seen on taken at the September 1991 field the reserve and on the roadside meeting at the Grantham Cana1 verges of Polly Botts tane. The (Plungar) were confirmed by Alan best of these was a male of the Stubbs, the national hoverfly nationally notable Neoascia experE,. These were Anasinyia genicuJata. This was ftying around Jineata, A contracta and A the marshy area in the south transfuga. The first has only been western field of the reserve. recorded a few times in Other flies seen included the Leicestershire and I know of no asilids Diobria tufiPes and previ.ous records for the county of Leptogaster cylindtica, and the the other two species. extremely large craneflY TiPuTa naxina. Neif Frankun CJipshan Big Pit/Charnwood Lodge A week later CliPsham Big Pit provided guite a contrast in habitat. The old guarry had large areas of bare ground with Patches of vegetation starting to invade, the ideal habitat for the hover- f ties Parargius haenorrhus and TrigTyphus prinus. The latter is a nationally notable species. The Augnrst meeting at Charnwood Lodge was not as Productive mainlY because of the dull weather. Knighton At home it was a good Year for the Insect recording in the far north-lYCSt Members may be interested to hear what Pat and f have managed to discover about the insect life of this part of Sutherland, now that we have survived a whole season! Nedd during which we record any aspects of the fauna that we can identify. To set the scene, I should exPlain Insect groups that come into this that Nedd, where we 1ive, is a category include dragonflies, small settlement on the winding grasshoppers, beetles, butterflies coast road between Lochinver and and moths. What I should like to Kylesku. Our house is situated on do in this article is to summarise half an acre of former croft our observations of the last two pasture land. This land, which groups during 1992. provides seasonal gtazing for ewes and lambs, occupies some 60 acres ButterfJies in the vicinity of Nedd. The grassland is studded with rockY Our knowledge of the butterflies is outcrops, often bearing trees. based largely on sightings of adults with just a few vanessid On the north-east face of the high larvae. There are two limiting ridge which shelters much of Nedd factors: our competence in from the prevailing south-west- identifying species in flj-ght and erlies there are extensive areas of the vagaries of the weather, since woodland. This woodland is mainlY it is often windy even when the sun oId coppiced hazel but includes ID VUL. substantlal amounts of birch and rowan, sma1l stands of asPen and I{e logged 75 records of 12 occasional oak, hollY and bird butterfly species in 1992. Perhaps cherry. The shrub laYer, such as the most unexpected was the clouded it is, is provided bY eared and yellow, one of which occurred in conmon sallows or indeterminate our garden in May and another 900ft hybrids between them. up Quinag in September. By all accounts 1992 was an annus Much of the rest of the townshiP of nirabiLis for the species in Nedd, which covers some 1481 acres' Scotland. Our records of whites is "hi11-grazing", moorland and bog are curiously sparse, just one interspersed with numerous rockY Iarge white in the garden in JuIy crags and outcops, rising in pJ-aces and a couple of green-veined whites to over 500ft. There are, however, elsewhere. However, crops of further considerable areas of cabbage and its relatives (other woodland, dominated bY birch (Part than turnips) are few and far of the Ardvar Woodlands SSSr) and between and the small white is, patches of former neutral grass- anyway, rare this far north. The land, now invaded bY bracken. large white was probably an There is a sea frontage of more immigrant and although lady's than a nile on the west side of smock, the likeIy foodplant of the Loch Nedd, which we overlook. The green veined, is common, a nurnber township includes the whole or part of possibles went unconfirmed for of nine freshwater lochs, including lack of a net and the effort Gorm Loch Mor which is over a mile necessary to catch them! long.
Recommended publications
  • Environment Agency Midlands Region Wetland Sites Of
    LA - M icllanAs <? X En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y ENVIRONMENT AGENCY MIDLANDS REGION WETLAND SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST REGIONAL MONITORING STRATEGY John Davys Groundwater Resources Olton Court July 1999 E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 3 1.) The Agency's Role in Wetland Conservation and Management....................................................3 1.2 Wetland SSSIs in the Midlands Region............................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Threat to Wetlands....................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Monitoring & Management of Wetlands...........................................................................................4 1.5 Scope of the Report..............................................................................................................................4 1.6 Structure of the Report.......................................................................................................................5 2 SELECTION OF SITES....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Definition of a Wetland Site................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Templates for the Extraction of Knowledge
    Reusable templates for the extraction of knowledge by Paul J Palmer A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University © Paul J Palmer 2020 November 2020 Abstract ‘Big Data’ is typically noted to contain undesirable imperfections that are usually described using terminology such as ‘messy’, ‘untidy’ or ‘ragged’ requiring ‘cleaning’ as preparation for analysis. Once the data has been cleaned, a vast amount of literature exists exploring how best to proceed. The use of this pejorative terminology implies that it is imperfect data hindering analysis, rather than recognising that the encapsulated knowledge is presented in an inconvenient state for the chosen analytical tools, which in turn leads to a presumption about the unsuitability of desktop computers for this task. As there is no universally accep- ted definition of ‘Big Data’ this inconvenient starting state is described hereas‘nascent data’ as it carries no baggage associated with popular usage. This leads to the primary research question: Can an empirical theory of the knowledge extraction process be developed that guides the creation of tools that gather, transform and analyse nascent data? A secondary pragmatic question follows naturally from the first: Will data stakeholders use these tools? This thesis challenges the typical viewpoint and develops a theory of data with an under- pinning mathematical representation that is used to describe the transformation of data through abstract states to facilitate manipulation and analysis. Starting from inconvenient ‘nascent data’ which is seen here as the true start of the knowledge extraction process, data are transformed to two further abstract states: data sensu lato used to describe informally defined data; and data sensu stricto, where the data are all consistently defined, in a process which imbues data with properties that support manipulation and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rove Beetles of Leicestershire and Rutland
    LEICESTERSHIRE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY The Rove Beetles (Staphylinidae) of Leicestershire and Rutland Part 1: Sub-families Paederinae, Pseudopsinae and Staphylininae Derek A. Lott Creophilus maxillosus (Graham Calow) LESOPS 24 (2011) ISSN 0957 – 1019 Correspondence: 5 Welland Road, Barrow upon Soar, LE12 8NA VC55 Staphylinids Part 1 2 Introduction With over 56,000 described species in the world, the Staphylinidae are the largest family in the animal kingdom (Grebennikov & Newton, 2009). Around a quarter of the British beetles are rove beetles, so they represent an important component of biodiversity in Britain. However, because of perceived difficulties in their identification, they have not received the attention that they merit. This paper aims to play a part in redressing that imbalance by listing all reliable records from Leicestershire and Rutland for the different species and analysing which species have declined locally over 100 years of recording rove beetles and which have prospered. The subfamilies treated in this first part include the largest and most conspicuous species in the family. The geographical area covered is the vice county of Leicestershire and Rutland (VC55). Some records from adjacent banks of the River Soar that technically lie in Nottinghamshire are also included. These records can be distinguished by the use of Nottinghamshire parish names. Identification Staphylinidae can be easily recognised among beetles in the field by their short wing cases that leave five or six segments of the abdomen exposed and flexible. In fact they look more like earwigs than other beetles. For identification to species, all the members of the subfamilies in this part will be covered by the forthcoming Royal Entomological Society handbook to Staphylinidae parts 6 and 7 due for publication in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Leicestershire Draft Local Plan Background Paper 11
    NORTH WEST LEICESTERSHIRE DRAFT LOCAL PLAN BACKGROUND PAPER 11 Policy En1: Nature Conservation 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is one of a number of background papers which have been published to support the draft Local Plan. The purpose of these papers is to provide more information in support of Policy En1 (Nature Conservation) than can be included in the draft Local Plan document itself if it is to remain of a manageable size. 2.0 THE POLICY 2.1 Policy En1 seeks to minimise the potential impacts of development on areas of biodiversity importance and, where possible, achieve net gains in biodiversity. Policy En3: Nature Conservation (1) Proposals for development will be supported which conserve, restore or enhance the biodiversity in the district. (2) Where a proposal for development would result in significant harm to one of the following and which cannot be avoided, or mitigated or compensated for, then planning permission will be refused: Special Areas of Conservation (SAC); Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Local and Regionally Important Geodiversity Sites (RIGS)and candidate Regionally Important Geodiversity Sites (cRIGS) Local Wildlife Sites (LWSs), Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) and candidate Local Wildlife Sites (cLWSs) which meet the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland LWS criteria; Local and National Biodiversity Action Plan-related (BAP) priority habitats; River corridors; Irreplaceable habits (defined as Ancient woodlands; Mature plantation or secondary woodland; Species –rich ancient hedgerows; Ancient or veteran trees; Species –rich neutral grassland; Acid grassland and heath grassland; Dry and wet heathland; Bogs and Sphagnum pools and Rock outcrops) (3) New development will be expected to maintain existing ecological networks , hotspots and landscape features (such as water courses and waterways, disused railway lines, hedgerows and tree lines) for biodiversity, as well as for other green infrastructure and recreational uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report)
    Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report) Sustainability Appraisal Report September, 2018 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 September Interim SA Report for Leicester and Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Alan Houghton 2017 Leicestershire Strategic Planning Group Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Regional Director (Alternatives assessment findings) Consultant Consultant Matthew Stopforth Planning Consultant 2 January, Draft SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 3 February 2nd, Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 4 September Updated SA Report for Strategic Planning Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 12th Group review Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director 2018 Consultant Consultant 5 September Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 26th Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director Consultant Consultant Table of contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Scoping .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3 Description of the options ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BSBI Recorders' Conference 2018
    Citizen Science and the Recorder: Issues and Insights Geoffrey Hall Recorder for VC55 A Deluge of Records Recording Card Report Excel Spreadsheet FaceBook Messenger Text Principal Sources of Records • Individual recorders • Local recording groups – Leicestershire Botanical Recording Group – Rutland Natural History Society • Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust • Leics & Rutland Environmental Records Centre • NatureSpot • National Plant Monitoring Scheme Images Records Events Local Wildlife Twitter Feed Record Numbers: Nature Spot Records 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2007 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NatureSpot Records 2011-2017 Total % Moths 39,356 22.1% Birds 43,034 24.2% Wildflowers 25,817 14.5% Butterflies 8,388 4.7% Bugs 5,936 3.3% Beetles 7,541 4.2% Vascular Fungi 4,578 2.6% Bees, Wasps, Ants 4,677 2.6% Trees, Shrubs & Climbers 5,295 3.0% plants Flies, Gnats and Midges 3,533 2.0% Hoverflies 4,321 2.4% comprise Spiders, Harvestmen & Mites 3,116 1.8% Slugs & Snails 4,542 2.6% Mammals 2,736 1.5% 34, 618 Dragonflies and Damselflies 3,597 2.0% Grasses, Rushes & Sedges 2,680 1.5% Mosses & Liverworts 1,199 0.7% (20%) of all Lichens 1,016 0.6% Ferns & Horsetails 823 0.5% Grasshoppers & Crickets 698 0.4% records Amphibians 658 0.4% Woodlice, Crustaceans 506 0.3% Sawflies 716 0.4% Craneflies 573 0.3% Caddisflies 728 0.4% Issues Verification Authentication Duplication Submission Process Recorders Verifiers Certain Verifiers Likely Recorder Maybe Biological Records Centre for iRecord Verification
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Woodland Strategy
    Leicester Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape and Woodland Strategy If you require further copies or larger print copies or have any other enquiries regarding this document please contact : Director of Planning and Transportation Leicestershire County Council County Hall Glenfield LEICESTERSHIRE LE3 8RJ Tel : 0116 265 7067 Fax : 0116 265 7965 Minicom : 0116 265 7334 e-mail : [email protected] Published by Leicestershire County Council County Hall, Glenfield, Leicestershire LE3 8RJ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced, stored in a retrieval system, or be transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, record- ing or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 0 85022 4357 © Leicestershire County Council 2001 Designed by Edward Moody Design, Leicester. Printed by deVoyle, Rutland. Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape and Woodland Strategy Contents 1. Introduction and Executive Summary . .1 2. Policy Background . .2 2.01 Introduction . .3 2.02 Structure and Local Plans . .3 2.03 Leicestershire County Council Strategies . .4 2.03.01 Sustainability Appraisal Scheme . .4 2.03.02 Countryside 2000 . .4 2.03.03 Nature Conservation Strategy . .4 2.03.04 Rural Strategy . .4 2.03.05 Tourism Strategy . .5 2.04 Local Agenda 21 . .5 2.05 Leicester Riverside Strategy . .5 2.06 Regional CharacterAreas and Natural Areas . .6 2.07 The UK Forestry Standard . .6 2.08 England Forestry Strategy . .9 2.09 Leicester,Leicestershire and Rutland BiodiversityAction Plan . .9 2.10 National Forest Strategy and BiodiversityAction Plan . .9 2.11 Local EnvironmentAgency Plans (LEAPs) . .10 3. The Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape 3.01 Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Charnwood Forest Landscape & Settlement Character Assessment
    ECOLOGY STEWARDSHIP LANDSCAPE & URBAN DESIGN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING A Submission by: Charnwood Forest Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment Date: 20/03/08 CHARNWOOD FOREST LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL CHARNWOOD FOREST LANDSCAPE AND SETTLEMENT CHARACTER ASSESSMENT SECTION 1: CHARACTER ASSESSMENT REPORT 1.0 Introduction Page 5 2.0 Purpose and Objectives Page 6 3.0 Method Page 8 4.0 Policy Context Page 18 5.0 Existing Landscape Character Studies Page 26 6.0 Landscape Context Page 34 7.0 Landscape Character Area Boundary Analysis Page 42 8.0 Landscape Character Assessment Page 48 9.0 Settlement Character Assessment Page 51 10.0 Charnwood Forest Regional Park: Proposals for a working boundary Page 55 11.0 Conclusions Page 63 SECTION 2: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT SECTION 3: SETTLEMENT CHARACTER ASSESSMENT SECTION 4: FIGURES SECTION 5: APPENDICES 1645.014D 1 October 2008 CHARNWOOD FOREST LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT SHEETS • Bradgate & Beacon • Ulverscroft • Charley • Swithland • Rothley Brook • Thornton & Markfield • Bardon SETTLEMENT CHARACTER ASSESSMENT SHEETS • Agar Nook • Anstey • Cropston • Groby • Loughborough (Charnwood Forest fringes) • Markfield • Mountsorrel • Newton Linford • Quorn • Ratby • Rothley • Shepshed (Charnwood Forest fringes) • Swithland • Thornton • Thringstone • Thurcaston • Whitwick • Woodhouse • Woodhouse Eaves 1645.014D 2 October 2008 CHARNWOOD FOREST LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT FIGURES Figure 1 Charnwood Forest Map Figure 2 Local Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage 205 Q1 2012
    No. 205 1 January - 31 March 2012 Editorial Panel: Helen Ikin, Steve Woodward, Jim Graham. Hon. Sec. Judy Johnson, 27 Sandalwood Road, Loughborough, Leics. LE11 3PR (01509-214711) FIFTY-YEAR ARCHIVE OF CLUB RECORDS NOW EASILY ACCESSIBLE Thanks to Rocio! What sets the Loughborough Naturalists' Club apart from most other similar societies is our focus on gathering and publishing biological records. Members are encouraged to write down their wildlife observations and submit their records to the editor(s) of the quarterly journal Heritage. Records for the various groups (Birds, Flowers, and so on) are collated then forwarded to specialist writers who prepare a summary for Heritage. The summaries are stitched together by the editor(s) and Heritage is published. We must have been round this loop more than 200 times now, so I guess nearly 100,000 records have been processed. The accounts in Heritage are only summaries - it is impossible to publish the full details of every record Rocio Rodriguez © Helen Ikin - but the original paper records have been archived at the Leicestershire & Rutland Environmental IN THIS EDITION Records Centre (LRERC), formerly at Holly Hayes but now housed at County Hall. These records are CLASSIFIED RECORDS available to any member willing to wade through them - there are three filing cabinets full! Ÿ Mammals Page 3 In practice, it is a time-consuming business to Ÿ visit the archive, find the relevant folder and pull Birds Page 3 out the records of interest. Searching through the Ÿ Reptiles and Amphibians Page 7 whole archive for records of a particular species, or place, or recorder, is not really practical.
    [Show full text]
  • JRS-16-Web.Pdf
    JOURNAL OF The Russell Society Volume 16, 2013 www.russellsoc.org JOURNAL OF THE RUSSELL SOCIETY The journal of British Isles topographical mineralogy EDITOR Norman Moles School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ JOURNAL MANAGER Frank Ince 78 Leconfield Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3SQ EDITORIAL BOARD R.E. Bevins, Cardiff, U.K. I.R. Plimer, Parkville, Australia R.S.W. Braithwaite, Manchester, U.K. M.T. Price, OUMNH, Oxford, U.K T.E. Bridges, Ovington, U.K. R.E. Starkey, Bromsgrove, U.K A. Dyer, Hoddleston, Darwin, U.K. R.F. Symes, Sidmouth, U.K. N.J. Elton, St Austell, U.K. P.A. Williams, Kingswood, Australia A.D. Hart, NHM, London, U.K. Aims and Scope: The Journal publishes refereed articles by both amateur and professional mineralogists dealing with all aspects of mineralogy relating to the British Isles. Contributions are welcome from both members and non-members of the Russell Society. Notes for contributors can be found at the back of this issue, on the Society website (www.russellsoc.org) or obtained from the Editor or Journal Manager. Subscription rates: The Journal is free to members of the Russell Society. The subscription rate for non-members is £13 (including P&P) for this volume. Enquiries should be made to the Journal Manager at the above address. Back numbers of the Journal may also be ordered through the Journal Manager. The Russell Society, named after the eminent amateur mineralogist Sir Arthur Russell (1878–1964), is a society of amateur and professional mineralogists which encourages the study, recording and conservation of mineralogical sites and material.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Leicestershire SSSI name European Licence condition Designated Site name (where applicable) Allexton Wood All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps SSSI to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Ashby Canal SSSI No additional conditions proposed Bardon Hill Where this SSSI overlaps Bardon Hill SSSI, all vehicles must be Quarry SSSI restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint, or to areas of dense bracken/dense scrub/secondary woodland. Bardon Hill SSSI All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of dense bracken, dense scrub or conifer plantation. Barrow Gravel All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps Pits SSSI to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas of dense scrub, Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. No trapping or driving of vehicles within wetland habitat. Beacon Hill, No licensed activities from 1st March to 31st August to avoid bird Hangingstone breeding season. All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. and Out Woods Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or, if present, to areas SSSI of dense bracken/dense scrub, Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Benscliffe Wood No additional conditions proposed SSSI Blackbrook No additional conditions proposed Reservoir SSSI Botcheston Bog All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Scoping Report of Draft Local Plan
    North West Leicestershire Sustainability Appraisal including Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report On behalf of North West Leicestershire District Council Project Ref: 29859/001 | Rev: AA | Date: June 2014 Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 928 1560 F: +44 (0)117 928 1570 E: [email protected] North West Leicestershire SA/SEA Scoping Report Document Control Sheet Project Name: North West Leicestershire Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Project Ref: 29859 Report Title: Scoping Report Doc Ref: 01 Date: 4th June 2014 Name Position Signature Date RJ Prepared by: Rosalind James Graduate 4/06/147 Reviewed by: Cicely Postan Principal CP 23/07/14 Approved by: John Baker Partner JB 25/07/14 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved 01 25/07/14 Amended following client review CP CP JB Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2014 H:\Katie\SA\Scoping report\URS\URS amends to ii Scoping Report FINAL V1.docx North West Leicestershire SA/SEA Scoping Report Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]