Poverty in the Prosperous Years: the Working Poor of the 1920S and Today

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poverty in the Prosperous Years: the Working Poor of the 1920S and Today Bridgewater Review Volume 32 | Issue 2 Article 6 Nov-2013 Poverty in the Prosperous Years: The orW king Poor of the 1920s and Today Brian Payne Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Recommended Citation Payne, Brian (2013). Poverty in the Prosperous Years: The orkW ing Poor of the 1920s and Today. Bridgewater Review, 32(2), 11-15. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol32/iss2/6 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Cutting Fish: Two boys work alongside their father (Photograph by Lewis Hine, c. 1911). Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. and 1907. There was a recession in Poverty in the Prosperous Years: 1920-21, a Great Depression through- out the 1930s, a recession in 1982 and, The Working Poor of the 1920s of course, the house market fallout of 2008. And this is just the short list. and Today Historians spend a lot of time debating the differences among panics, recessions Brian Payne and depression, and why or when any erhaps the only thing predictable about one individual downturn existed. modern American market capitalism is its In the end, all of these debates describe a dichotomy between good years and Pradical boom-bust cycle of growth and decline. bad years that paper over or obfuscate A whole history of the United States could be what it was really like to live through such economic upheaval. Historians structured around it: expansion, recession, expansion of American capitalism tend to focus again. Historically, our economy’s recessions have on the most obvious swings of eco- been linked to financial crises known as “panics,” nomic boom and bust: how good the good times got, and in the bad times, which subsequently created periods of unemployment conversely, how far poverty and want and poverty for great numbers of American workers. reached into American society. In There were panics in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1901 doing so, they see only segmented pic- tures of the long and complex history November 2013 11 Seasonal Cannery Workers’ Company Housing (Photograph by Lewis Hine, c. 1911). Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. of the working poor in America. Good consumption rates, or inflation fig- can’t keep stirred up over six million.” years were often as difficult as bad years ures. The resulting picture is seldom This conundrum remains as prob- for the working poor. Take, for exam- clear and historians are forced to make lematic for historians of the 1920s and ple, the supposed “roaring” decade of broad generalizations about individuals’ 1930s today as it was for Hopkins and the 1920s, which historians now see lives from some rather sweeping and the New Dealers. To capture the story as an awfully problematic decade that all-inclusive data. Nothing can turn a of working poor, a historian has to played a considerable part in shaping reader off like complex statistics, and weave a narrative that combines empa- the tragedy of the 1930s. In that osten- data about anonymous masses often thy for individuals into an understand- sibly prosperous decade, long periods leaves us perplexed. Perhaps Harry ing of the broader context in which of unemployment and underemploy- ment combined with the increasing control of large corporations in shaping the nature of work left many working In modern American history, Americans totally unprepared for the 1930s. In modern American history, economic upswings have never economic upswings have never even come close to eradicating poverty, even come close to eradicating though they have done much to hide it. A rising tide never floats all boats. So, poverty, though they have done what does poverty look like during the much to hide it. “good years”? Imagining the Working Poor in History Hopkins (1890-1946), the direc- they lived and worked. What follows is Reliable unemployment figures are tor of the Federal Emergency Relief a picture of one such group, Maine can- hard to come by for any period in Administration during the first years of neries workers in the not-so-Roaring American history before 1930. When Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, said Twenties, an age when systemic pov- we try to access the impacts that micro it best. Statistics lose meaning, he said, erty persisted amidst national prosper- and macroeconomic trends had on when they run up against “the natural ity. The processed food industry was people’s real, lived experiences his- limits of personal imagination and sym- one of the fastest-growing industries in torians often turn to price indexes, pathy. You can pity six men, but you 12 Bridgewater Review the late-nineteenth century, and it was subsequently one of the biggest busts of The Tinker extended-family unit, the 1920s. By combining a close exami- nation of individual families with the a family unit of nine workers, general economic data of those work- averaged a weekly pay of $47.19 ing in a food industry during the 1920s, with the general economic data of that for the month of July 1922. industry, along with the larger socio- political context, a historian might be able to expose the links between the six The year 1922 was at the end of a essential to determine if they represent and the six million. recession, but as bad as that was things a norm or an exception. By analyz- actually got worse for the Tinker fam- ing the data from the company’s pay The Tinkers’ Tale ily (see Figure 1). In 1924, a sample set ledger a historian can roughly estimate By July of 1922 the Maine sardine- of one week’s pay per month yielded an individual’s weekly pay. To make packing season was well underway, and an average of $43.57 and an average the analysis manageable, averages were the Tinker family was hard at work. per worker weekly pay of $9.92. The taken for one week per month for every Three of its men, Edward, Henry, and year 1924 proved to be the best year other year between 1922 and 1930. Charles, all worked as general laborers for the Tinker family. In 1926, right In 1922, at the very end of the reces- in the Columbian Canning Company in the midst of the great boom of the sion, male general laborers earned on in the port town of Lubec. They 1920s, the sample set of one week’s pay average $12.08 per week during the worked an average of 53 hours a week per month yielded an average of just season, or about $10.07 a week aver- for an average pay of $8.36 a week. $29.33, or $5.68 per worker. Although aged out over the entire year. Female Along with the men, there were six the extended family’s weekly income laborers in the packinghouses earned on Tinker women working, either packing appeared to have risen again in 1928 average $1.09 a week during the season, herring fish into sardine cans or sardine to an average of $45.67, a closer look or about $0.18 averaged out over the cans into shipping crates. The women actually discloses real trouble for the entire year. By 1926, in the midst of this earned an average of $3.68 a week. In Tinkers. In order to address the decline purported boom era, the average male total, the Tinker extended-family unit, in total family income in 1926-1927, general laborer saw his average weekly a family unit of nine workers, averaged the Tinkers put more family mem- pay drop to $9.02 per week during the a weekly pay of $47.19 for the month bers to work. Although their total season. Female laborers, on the other of July 1922. Working in the sardine extended-family income rose between hand, saw a general increase in seasonal industry was a seasonal occupation. 1926 and 1928 from $29.33 to $45.67, pay by 1926, up to $7.86 per week. The busy months were from June to the average weekly pay per worker In 1928, well into an era of economic September. By law the fishing season remained nearly constant; $5.68 per growth, male general laborers saw their did not even begin until April 15 and week in 1926 and $5.78 in 1928. weekly wages increase beyond the the plants had to close down by the end 1922 level to an average of $14.11. Yet, Placing the Tinker family working unit of October. Occasionally, local families once again, it was the female packing within the larger context of labor at like the Tinkers could get some extra laborers who saw the largest growth the Columbian Canning Company is cash during the off-season working in the coal yards, cutting and hauling wood, or storing extra cases of sardines Figure 1: The Tinker Extended-Family Working Unit in their own basements and charging Average Weekly Pay Average Weekly Pay rent to the company. A sample set of Year For Family Unit Per Worker the weekly payrolls yielded an aver- age of $32.37 per week for the Tinkers 1922 $32.37 $7.36 throughout the entire year of 1922, 1924 $43.57 $9.92 or about $3.60 per worker. We can 1926 $29.33 $5.68 roughly estimate that this extended- family unit earned about $1,686.88, 1928 $45.67 $5.78 or about $187.43 per person, working 1930 $10.23 $3.09 for the Columbian Canning Company Source: Lubec Sardine Industry Record Books. Ledger 61: Columbian Canning Company Payroll, in 1922.
Recommended publications
  • Boca Raton and the Florida Land Boom of the 1920S
    20 TEQUESTA Boca Raton and the Florida Land Boom of the 1920s by Donald W. Curl The Florida land boom of 1924-25 is commonly mentioned by historians of the twenties and of the South. Most of them see the boom as a phenomenon of the Miami area, though they usually mention in passing that no part of the state remained immune to the speculation fever. Certainly Miami's developments received major attention from the national press and compiled amazing financial statistics for sales and inflated prices. Still, similar activity took place throughout the state. Moreover, the real estate boom in Palm Beach County began as early as that in Miami, contained schemes that equaled that city's in their imagination and fantasy, and also captured national attention. Finally, one of these schemes, that of Addison Mizner's Boca Raton, probably served as the catalyst for exploiting the boom bubble. The Florida land boom resulted from a number of complex fac- tors. Obviously, the mild winter climate had drawn visitors to the state since the Civil War. Summer was said "to spend the winter in West Palm Beach." Now with the completion of the network of roads known as the Dixie Highway and the increasing use of the automobile, Florida became easily accessible to the cities of the northeast and midwest. For some, revolting against the growing urbanization of the north, Florida became "the last frontier." Others found romance in the state's long and colorful history and "fascination in her tropical vege- tation and scenery." Many were confident in the lasting nature of the Coolidge prosperity, and, hearing the success stories of the earliest Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition, American Cultural Expansion, and the New Hegemony in the 1920S: an Interpretation
    Prohibition, American Cultural Expansion, and the New Hegemony in the 1920s: An Interpretation IAN TYRRELL* In the [920s American prohibitionists, through the World League against Alcohol­ ism, sought to extend their war on liquor beyond the boundaries of the United States. Prohibitionistsfailed in their efforts due to anti-American sentiment, complex class and cultural opposition to prohibition, and negative reporting of the experi­ ment with prohibition in the U.S. Nevertheless, restrictive anti-alcohol laws were introduced in a number ofcountries. Moreover, the efforts ofAmerican prohibition­ ists furthered the larger process of American cultural expansion by emphasizing achievements of the U.S. in economic modernization and technical advancement. This episode in American cultural expansion occurred with the support of anti­ alcohol groups in foreign countries that embraced the message equating American reform with modernity. Prohibitionists abroad colluded in the process, thereby accepting a form ofAmerican cultural hegemony. En 1920, par l'intermédiaire de la World League against Alcoholism, les prohibi­ tionnistes américains se sont efforcés de pousser leur lutte contre l'alcool au-delà des frontières des États-Unis. Cependant, le sentiment anti-américain, l'opposition complexe des classes et de la culture à l'endroit de la prohibition ainsi que la mauvaise presse dont l'expérience américaine a fait l'objet ont fait échouer leurs efforts. Néanmoins, plusieurs pays ont adopté des lois restrictives contre l'alcool. Qui plus est, les efforts des prohibitionnistes américains ont favorisé l'expansion de la culture américaine en mettant en valeur les réussites des É.-u. au chapitre de la modernisation économique et de l'avancement de la technologie.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Music in the United States Before the Great Depression
    American Music in the 20th Century 6 Chapter 2 Music in the United States Before the Great Depression Background: The United States in 1900-1929 In 1920 in the US - Average annual income = $1,100 - Average purchase price of a house = $4,000 - A year's tuition at Harvard University = $200 - Average price of a car = $600 - A gallon of gas = 20 cents - A loaf of Bread = 20 cents Between 1900 and the October 1929 stock market crash that triggered the Great Depression, the United States population grew By 47 million citizens (from 76 million to 123 million). Guided by the vision of presidents Theodore Roosevelt1 and William Taft,2 the US 1) began exerting greater political influence in North America and the Caribbean.3 2) completed the Panama Canal4—making it much faster and cheaper to ship its goods around the world. 3) entered its "Progressive Era" by a) passing anti-trust laws to Break up corporate monopolies, b) abolishing child labor in favor of federally-funded puBlic education, and c) initiating the first federal oversight of food and drug quality. 4) grew to 48 states coast-to-coast (1912). 5) ratified the 16th Amendment—estaBlishing a federal income tax (1913). In addition, by 1901, the Lucas brothers had developed a reliaBle process to extract crude oil from underground, which soon massively increased the worldwide supply of oil while significantly lowering its price. This turned the US into the leader of the new energy technology for the next 60 years, and opened the possibility for numerous new oil-reliant inventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Reserve Bulletin October 1922
    FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN (FINAL EDITION) ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON OCTOBER, 1922 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD. Ex officio members: -, Governor. A. W. MELLON, EDMUND PLATT, Vice Governor. Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. ADOLPH C. MILLER. D. R. CRISSINGER, CHARLES S. HAMLIN. Comptroller of the Currency. I JOHN R. MITCHELL. W. W. HOXTON, Secretary. j WALTER WYATT, General Counsel. W. L. EDDY, Assistant Secretary. j WALTER W. STEWART, I Director, Division of Analysis and Research. W. M. IMLAY, Fiscal Agent. M. JACOBSON, Statistician. J. F. HERSON, E. A. GOLDENWEISER, Associate Statistician. Chief, Division of Examination and Chief Federal E. L. SMEAD, Reserve Examiner. Chief, Division cf Bank Operations. FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL. (For the year 1922.) DISTRICT NO. 1 (BOSTON) PHILIP STOCKTON. DISTRICT NO. 2 (NEW YORK) PAUL M. WARBURG, Vice President. DISTRICT NO. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) L. L. RUE, President. DISTRICT NO. 4 (CLEVELAND) CORLISS E. SULLIVAN. DISTRICT NO. 5 (RICHMOND) J. G. BROWN. DISTRICT NO. 6 (ATLANTA) EDWARD W. LANE. DISTRICT NO. 7 (CHICAGO) „ JOHN J. MITCHELL. DISTRICT NO. 8 (ST. LOUIS) FESTUS J. WADE. DISTRICT NO. 9 (MINNEAPOLIS) G. II. PRINCE. DISTRICT NO. 10 (KANSAS CITY) E. F. SWINNEY. DISTRICT NO. 11 (DALLAS) R. L. BALL. DISTRICT NO. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO) D. W. TWOHY. II Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS. Federal Reserve Bank of— | Chairman. Governor. Deputy governor. Cashier. Boston Frederic H. Curtiss.. Chas. A. Mores C.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Reserve Bulletin August 1925
    FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN AUGUST, 1925 ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON Position of the Reserve Banks at Mid-Year Business Conditions in the United States Report of the Agent General for Reparation Payments WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1925 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD Ex officio members: D. R. CRISSINGER, Governor. EDMUND PLATT, Vice Governor. A. W. MELLON, Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. ADOLPH G. MILLER. CHARLES S. HAMLIN. J. W. MCINTOSH, GEORGE R. JAMEB. Comptroller of the Currency. EDWARD H. CUNNINGHAM. WALTER L. EDDY, Secretary. WALTER WYATT, General Counsel. J. C. NOELL, Assistant Secretary. WALTER W. STEWART, Director, Division of Research W. M. IMLAY, Fiscal Agent. and Statistics, J. F. HERSON, E. A. GOLDENWEISER, Assistant Director, Division of Chief, Division of Examination, and Chief Federal Research and Statistics. Reserve Examiner. E. L. SMEAD, Chief, Division of BanVOperations. FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL District No. 1 (BOSTON) CHAS. A. MORSS. District No. 2 (NEW YORK) PAUL M. WARBURG, President, District No. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) L. L. RUE. District No. 4 (CLEVELAND) GEORGE A. COULTON. District No. 5 (RICHMOND) JOHN M. MILLER, Jr. District No. 6 (ATLANTA) OSCAR WELLS. District No. 7 (CHICAGO) FRANK O. WETMORE. District No. 8 (ST. LOUIS) BRECKINRIDGE JONES. District No. 9 (MINNEAPOLIS) G. H. PRINCE. District No. 10 (KANSAS CITY) E. F. SWINNEY, Vice President, District No. 11 (DALLAS) W. M. MCGREGOR. District No. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO).-: HENRY S. MCKEE. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS Federal Reserve Bank of— Chairman Governor Deputy governor Cashier Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Servants Personal Lives
    Explore More Domestic Servants Personal Lives In their leisure time, domestic servants likely enjoyed the same hobbies and pleasures as people in other jobs during this era. Sewing, reading, playing musical instruments, chatting over tea, or having evening gatherings in their employer’s kitchen or servants’ hall were common diversions, and may have occurred here at Lucknow. A space like the servants' hall, set aside solely for the enjoyment and rest of the servants, would have been a luxury that existed in only the wealthiest homes. Though the servants’ hall was a spot to rest and have a meal, note that the intercom, telephone, and home alarm system were in this space so a servant’s break might be frequently interrupted. For many servants in the early 20th century, Sunday would have been a typical day off to attend church, a local festival, or perhaps go to the movies. Unfortunately, domestic service workers battled the social stigma attached to their job titles, a problem which had persisted for centuries. Service was considered by some to be a disgraceful and dishonorable profession. For the most part, its workers endured a low social status in American society. A group of domestic servants, probably early 1920s. MORE ON OTHER SIDE Explore More Domestic Servants Personal Lives We don’t know for sure what it was like to live and work at Lucknow as a domestic servant, but first person accounts from people in domestic service during this era, as well as historic documents and photographs, help illustrate the experience. By the twentieth century, domestic servants had more personal freedom than they had in previous eras.
    [Show full text]
  • Business in the 1920S Is This Photo of President and Mrs
    BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION ONTEMPORAR Y IN OMMENTARY THE T WENTIES C — BUSINESS — * Aptly illustrating the faith in American business in the 1920s is this photo of President and Mrs. Coolidge in 1924 welcoming members of the Republican Businessmen’s Association of New York. In an address the next year, Coolidge delivered his most frequently quoted statement: “After all, the chief business of the American people is business.” For by 1925 the nation’s economy had lifted itself out of the dreadful postwar recession and was setting new highs for production and consumption. American free enterprise was robust, confident, and delivering the goods, literally. Collected here is period commentary on the “chief business of the American people,” the rewards and pitfalls of its predominance, and the proper relationship of business and government in promoting the general welfare. An early proponent of applying scientific management principles to market analysis, Percival Percival White White published this essay on Americans’ embrace of business as a national ideal, satirizing “The Almighty Minute” while applauding its centrality in Americans’ sense of the successful modern life. Atlantic Monthly, July 1920 Business is not a part of American life; it is American life. The American businessman devotes 1440 minutes a day to business. Before daybreak, an alarm clock wrests him from his fitful business dreams. He gulps down business news along with his eggs and coffee. He plans business on his way to the office. His morning is spent in reading business, dictating business, and talking business. He keeps a business engagement for luncheon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1920S Politics and the Great Depression
    Unit 12.2 1920s Politics and the Great Depression 1920s Politics: Prosperity and Depression Theme 1 The Republican administrations of the prosperous 1920s pursued conservative, pro-business policies at home and economic unilateralism abroad. Political Ideology Liberalism/Progressivism Conservatism Gov’t regulation of business Laissez Faire (“Rugged Individualism”) Federal gov’t as an agency of human welfare States’ Rights Graduated income tax/lower tariff Lower taxes/higher tariffs Equality Liberty Progressive-Republicans and “Old Guard” Republicans: Wilson Democrats:1900-20 Gilded Age and 1920s Democrats: 1932-present Republicans: 20th century Southern Democrats: 1877-1994 CYCLES IN AMERICAN HISTORY Liberalism/Progressivism Conservatism Gov’t regulation of business “Rugged Individualism” Gov’t Programs to Help People States’ Rights Higher taxes Lower taxes Civil Rights Moral reform 5 3 1 8 4 6 9 7 2 Equality Liberty 1. Progressive Era: 1900-1920 2. Republicans: 1920-1932 3. Democrats: 1932-1952 4. Republicans: 1952-1960 5. Democrats: 1960-1968 6-7.Republicans:1968-76;1980-92 8. Democrats: 1992-2000 9. Republicans: 2000-2008 10. Democrats: 2008-? WHO WERE THEY BETWEEN 1900-1932? Democrats Republicans Working class Middle Class/Upper Class Irish/“New Immigrants” White Protestants Catholics African Americans Populists (western farmers) Southern Whites WHO ARE THEY NOW? Democrats Republicans Working class Middle Class/Upper Class African Americans White males Latinos Evangelical Christians Women White Southerners Intellectuals Gays/Lesbians I. Election of 1920: A. Republicans nominated Senator Warren G. Harding of Ohio (and Calvin Coolidge as vice presidential running mate) 1. Party platform was ambiguous regarding the League of Nations 2. Harding spoke of returning America to “Normalcy” 3.
    [Show full text]
  • All Texts by Genre, Becoming Modern: America in the 1920S
    BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION k National Humanities Center Primary Source Collection BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S americainclass.org/sources/becomingmodern A collection of primary resources—historical documents, literary texts, and works of art— thematically organized with notes and discussion questions 1 __Resources by Genre__ ___Each genre is ordered by Theme: THE AGE, MODERNITY, MACHINE, PROSPERITY, DIVISION.___ External sites are noted in small caps. COLLECTIONS: CONTEMPORARY COMMENTARY NONFICTION, FICTION, ILLUSTRATIONS, CARTOONS, etc.* THE AGE 1 “The Age” PROSPERITY 1 “Age of Prosperity” MODERNITY 1 Modern Youth PROSPERITY 2 Business MODERNITY 2 Modern Woman PROSPERITY 3 Consumerism MODERNITY 3 Modern Democracy PROSPERITY 4 Crash MODERNITY 4 Modern Faith DIVISIONS 1 Ku Klux Klan MODERNITY 5 Modern City: The Skyscraper DIVISIONS 2 Black & White MACHINE 1 “Machine Age” DIVISIONS 3 City & Town MACHINE 3 Automobile DIVISIONS 5 Religion & Science MACHINE 5 Radio DIVISIONS 6 Labor & Capital DIVISIONS 7 Native & Foreign DIVISIONS 8 “Reds” & “Americans” POLITICAL CARTOON COLLECTIONS THE AGE 3 –Chicago Tribune political cartoons: 24 cartoons (two per year, 1918-1929) PROSPERITY 1 –“Age of Prosperity”: 12 cartoons PROSPERITY 4 –Crash: 12 cartoons DIVISIONS 1 –Ku Klux Klan: 16 cartoons DIVISIONS 2 –Black & White: 18 cartoons DIVISIONS 4 –Wets & Drys: 8 cartoons DIVISIONS 6 –Labor & Capital: 14 cartoons DIVISIONS 7 –Native & Foreign: 6 cartoons DIVISIONS 8 –“Reds” & “Americans”: 8 cartoons 1 Image: Florine Stettheimer, The Cathedrals of Broadway, oil on canvas, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Gift of Ettie Stettheimer, 1953. 53.24.3. Image: Art Resource, NY. Reproduced by permission of the Metropolitan Museum of Art; cropping permission request in process.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Germany in the 1920S
    3. Germany in the 1920s The shadowy figures that look out at us from the tarnished mirror of history are – in the final analysis – ourselves. DETLEV J. K. PEUKERT OVERVIEW Few events in history are inevitable. Most are determined by real people making real decisions. At the time, those choices may not seem important. Yet together, little by little, they shape a period in history and define an age. Those decisions also have consequences that may affect generations to come. Chapter 2 looked at the way three nations – the United States, France, and Germany – decided who belonged in the nineteenth century and who did not. It also considered the outcomes of those choices. This chapter marks the beginning of a case study that examines the choices people made after World War I. It highlights Germany’s efforts to build a democracy after the humiliation of defeat and explores the values, myths, and fears that threatened those efforts. It focuses in particular on the choices that led to the destruction of the republic and the rise of the Nazis. The 1920s were a time of change everywhere in the world. Many of those changes began much earlier and were speeded up by the war. Others were linked to innovations in science that altered the way people saw the world. In 1905, Albert Einstein, a German physicist, published his theory of relativity. By 1920, other scientists had proved that time and space are indeed relative and not absolute. The theory quickly became a part of the way ordinary people viewed the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrangement of 5 July 1922 with Regard to the Issue of Certificates of Identity to Russian Refugees
    Arrangement of 12 May 1926 relating to the Issue of Identity Certificates to Russian and Armenian Refugees League of Nations, Treaty Series Vol. LXXXIX, No. 2004 Supplementing and Amending the previous arrangements dated July 5th, 1922 and May 31st, 1924. The undersigned, representing the Governments which took part in the Conference regarding Russian and Armenian refugee questions convened at Geneva on May 10th, 1926 by the High Commissioner of the League of Nations and adopted by the Council of the league of Nations on September 28th, 1925; Having considered the excellent results obtained by the system of identity certificates for Russian and Armenian refugees; Considering the necessity: (1) Of regularising the system of identity certificates for Russian and Armenian refugees; (2) Of determining in a more accurate and complete manner the number and situation of Russian and American refugees in the various countries; (3) Of creating a revolving fund to provide for the cost of the transportation and settlement of refugees: Adopt the following resolution, supplementing and amending the Arrangements of July 5th, 1922, and May 31st, 1924; "1. The Conference urges all the States which have not yet adhered to the Arrangements of July 5th, 1922 and May 31st, 1924, concerning identity certificates for Russian and Armenian refugees to ratify these Arrangements as soon as possible. "2. The Conference adopts the following definitions of the term "refugees": "Russian: Any person of Russian origin who does not enjoy or who no longer enjoys the protection of the Government of the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics and who has not acquired another nationality.
    [Show full text]