DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0344/2015 30.11.2015 REPORT on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014 and the European Union’s policy on the matter (2015/2229(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs Rapporteur: Cristian Dan Preda RR\1080184EN.doc PE567.654v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT .....................................................35 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY39 ANNEX I ..................................................................................................................................48 ANNEX II.................................................................................................................................66 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ...........................................69 PE567.654v03-00 2/69 RR\1080184EN.doc EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014 and the European Union’s policy on the matter (2015/2229(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other United Nations (UN) human rights treaties and instruments, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted in New York on 16 December 1966, – having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and to the European Parliament resolution of 27 November 2014 on the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child1, – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, – having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights, – having regard to Articles 2, 3, 8, 21 and 23 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), – having regard to the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy as adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council on 25 June 20122, – having regard to the European Union’s Human Rights Guidelines, – having regard to the EU Human Rights Guidelines on Freedom of Expression Online and Offline, adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council on 12 May 20143, – having regard to the EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief4, – having regard to the Guidelines for EP Interparliamentary Delegations on promoting human rights and democracy in their visits outside the European Union5, – having regard to the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World in 2014, adopted by the Council on 22 June 20156, – having regard to the Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2015-2019, adopted 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2014)0070. 2 http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11855-2012-INIT/en/pdf 3 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/142549.pdf 4 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/137585.pdf 5 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201203/20120329ATT42170/20120329ATT42170EN.p df 6 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/pdf/st10152-en15_pdf/ RR\1080184EN.doc 3/69 PE567.654v03-00 EN by the Council on 20 July 20151, – having regard to the Action Plan on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: Transforming the Lives of Girls and Women through EU External Relations 2016-2020 (GAPII), adopted by the Council on 26 October 20152, – having regard to the Council conclusions of 14 May 2012 on ‘Increasing the impact of EU development policy: an agenda for change’3, – having regard to the Council conclusions of 5 December 2014 on the promotion and protection of children's rights4 , – having regard to Council Decision 2015/260 of 17 February 2015 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights5, – having regard to the Council conclusions of 26 May 2015 on Gender in Development6, – having regard to UN Security Council resolution 1325 of 31 October 2000 on women and peace and security7, – having regard to its urgency resolutions on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law, – having regard to its resolution of 17 June 2010 on EU policies in favour of human rights defenders8, – having regard to its resolution of 7 July 2011 on external policies in favour of democratisation9, – having regard to its resolution of 11 December 2012 on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy10, – having regard to its resolution of 13 June 2013 on the freedom of press and media in the world11, – having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2013 on corruption in the public and private sectors: the impact on human rights in third countries12, 1 http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10897-2015-INIT/en/pdf 2 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2015/10/st13201-en15_pdf/ 3 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/130243.pdf 4 http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2015559%202014%20INIT 5 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32015D0260 6 http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9242-2015-INIT/en/pdf 7 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1325(2000) 8 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0226. 9 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0334. 10 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0470. 11 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0274. 12 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0394. PE567.654v03-00 4/69 RR\1080184EN.doc EN – having regard to its resolution of 10 October 2013 on caste-based discrimination1 , – having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2014 on the EU’s priorities for the 25th session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)2 , – having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2015 on the EU’s priorities for the UNHRC in 20153 , – having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 2 April 2014 on the 69th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA)4 , – having regard to its resolution of 11 March 2014 on the eradication of torture in the world5 , – having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2015 on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2013 and the European Union’s policy on the matter6, – having regard to its resolution of 18 June 2015 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy7, – having regard to its resolution of 8 September 2015 on human rights and technology: the impact of intrusion and surveillance systems on human rights in third countries8, – having regard to its resolution of 10 September 2015 on migration and refugees in Europe9, – having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2015 on the renewal of the EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in Development10, – having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2015 on the death penalty11, – having regard to the communication of 8 October 2014 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions on the enlargement strategy and main challenges 2014-201512, – having regard to the Joint Communication of 8 March 2011 of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission to the 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0420. 2 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0252. 3 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0079. 4 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0259. 5 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0206. 6 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0076. 7 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0272. 8 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0288. 9 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0317. 10 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0350. 11 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0348. 12 http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-strategy-paper_en.pdf RR\1080184EN.doc 5/69 PE567.654v03-00 EN European Council, the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean1 , – having regard to the Joint Communication of 25 May 2011 of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new response to a changing Neighbourhood2 , – having regard to the Commission staff working document of 30 April 2014 on a rights- based approach, encompassing all human rights for EU development cooperation3 , – having regard to the UN Human Rights Council Resolution of 26 June 2014 calling for the establishment of an open-ended intergovernmental working group with the aim of drawing up an international legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights4, – having regard to its report of 9 July 2015 on the EU’s new approach to human rights and democracy – evaluating the activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) since its establishment5, – having regard to the 2014 annual report of UNFPA-UNICEF on the Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation6, – having regard to Rule 52 of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (A8-0344/2015), A. whereas Article 21 TEU commits the EU to developing a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Recommended publications
  • Social Justice in an Open World – the Role Of

    Social Justice in an Open World – the Role Of

    E c o n o m i c & Social Affairs The International Forum for Social Development Social Justice in an Open World The Role of the United Nations Sales No. E.06.IV.2 ISBN 92-1-130249-5 05-62917—January 2006—2,000 United Nations ST/ESA/305 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Division for Social Policy and Development The International Forum for Social Development Social Justice in an Open World The Role of the United Nations asdf United Nations New York, 2006 DESA The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environ- mental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint course of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises inter- ested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks devel- oped in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the mate- rial do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    ASEAS 11(1) 2018 Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies FOCUS THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF NEW AUTHORITARIANISM ASEAS Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies ASEAS Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies The Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies (ASEAS) is an international, interdisciplinary, and open access social sciences journal covering a variety of topics (culture, economics, geography, politics, society) from both historical and contemporary perspectives. Topics are related to Southeast Asia, but are not restricted to the geographical region, when spatial and political borders of Southeast Asia are crossed or transcended, e.g., in the case of linguistics, diaspora groups, or forms of socio-cultural transfer. ASEAS publishes two focus issues per year and we welcome out-of-focus submissions at any time. The journal invites both established as well as young scholars to present research results and theoretical and methodical discussions, to report about on-going research projects or field studies, to publish conference reports, to conduct interviews with experts in the field, and to review relevant books. Articles can be submitted in German or English. MEDIENINHABERIN & HERAUSGEBERIN / PUBLISHER SEAS – Gesellschaft für Südostasienwissenschaften / Society for South-East Asian Studies ZVR-Zahl 786121796, Kreitnergasse 44/31, 1160 Wien, Austria GEGENSTAND / PURPOSE Der Verein SEAS bezweckt unter anderem die Förderung der Südostasienwissenschaften und der Bildung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses, sowie des Stellenwertes und der Auseinandersetzung mit der Region Südostasien in Österreich und darüber hinaus. OFFENLEGUNG / DISCLOSURE (§ 25MEDG) Der Verein SEAS ist zu 100 Prozent Eigentümer von ASEAS.
  • Capacity Building for Human Rights Defenders on Enforced Disappearance

    Capacity Building for Human Rights Defenders on Enforced Disappearance

    Capacity Building for Human Rights Defenders on Enforced Disappearance Odhikar angladesh returned to democracy following the fall of an auto- cratic regime through a popular upsurge in 1990. Since then, three Bcredible elections were held successfully. However the growth of constitutional liberties still faces some challenges. Democracy or free and fair elections alone are not enough to protect the rights of the disadvantaged and vulnerable groups. Continued occur- rences of election violence, arbitrary arrests, custodial death, and torture by state and non-state actors hamper the enjoyment of civil and political rights, often with ominous consequences. he need for an independent and objec- tive human rights organization in safeguarding basic human rights, particu- larly civil and political rights of the people of Bangladesh was strongly felt. In 1994, a group of human rights activists underscored in a meeting the need to uphold the civil and political rights of the people of Bangladesh along with social, cultural and economic rights. Eventually, a decision was arrived at to form an organization in order to advance such rights. On 10 October 1994, Odhikar (a Bangla word that means rights) came into being with the aim of creating a wide monitoring and awareness raising system on the abuse of civil and political rights. Odhikar adopted the following principal objectives: to raise the aware- ness of human rights and its various abuses, on the one hand, and to create a vibrant democratic system through election monitoring on the other. he organization also performs policy advocacy to address the current human rights situation. By not establishing ield or branch oices, Odhikar instead trained more than ive hundred people all over the country to become hu- man rights defenders, who are relied upon for information outside Dhaka.
  • The Principle of Solidarity : a Restatement of John Rawls' Law Of

    The Principle of Solidarity : a Restatement of John Rawls' Law Of

    DISSERTATION: THE PRINCIPLE OF SOLIDARITY: A RESTATEMENT OF JOHN RAWLS´ LAW OF PEOPLES ZUR ERLANGUNG DES AKADEMISCHEN GRADES DOCTOR PHILOSOPHIAE (DR. PHIL) VON MILICA TRIFUNOVIĆ EINGEREICHT IM DEZEMBER 2011. AN DER PHILOSOPHISCHEN FAKULTÄT I DER HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN PRÄSIDENT DER HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN: PROF. DR. JAN-HENDRIK OLBERTZ DEKAN: PROF. MICHAEL SEADLE GUTACHTER: 1. PROF. DR. VOLKER GERHARDT 2. PROF. DR. WULF KELLERWESSEL TAG DER MÜNDLICHEN PRÜFUNG: 20. JUNI 2012. 1 CONTENT CHAPTER ONE.............................................................................................................................................5 Instead of Introduction: Global Justice Debate- Conceptions and Misconceptions........................................5 1. Global Justice Debate – Conceptions and Misconceptions............................................................5 1.1. CONCEPTUAL ANALYSES....................................................................................................6 1.1.1. Aristotelian Paradigm................................................................................................7 1.1.2. Rawlsian Paradigm ...................................................................................................9 1.1.3. Aristotelian and Rawlsian Paradigm in A Global Context .......................................13 1.2. METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................21 1.2.1. Political Constructivism in a Global Context............................................................22
  • Annual Report Table of Contents

    Annual Report Table of Contents

    Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances AFAD 2015 Annual Report Table of Contents I. AFAD’s Mission, Vision, Goals ..................................................................................................... 1 II. AFAD’s Work in 2014 ................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 2. Programs and Services ............................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Campaign and Lobby ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Lobbying work at various levels ............................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Formation of National Coalitions Working on Enforced Disappearances .................................................................. 13 2.1. 3 Country Specific Campaigns................................................................................ 16 A. Country Specific Campaign on Laos ...................................................................... 16 B. Country Specific Campaign on the Philippines ..................................................... 20 C. Country Specific Campaign on Indonesia ............................................................. 28 2.1.4 Information Dissemination and Breaking Impunity .............................................
  • Amnesty International Report 2014/15 the State of the World's Human Rights

    Amnesty International Report 2014/15 the State of the World's Human Rights

    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS THE STATE REPORT 2014/15 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2014/15 THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS The Amnesty International Report 2014/15 documents the state of human rights in 160 countries and territories during 2014. Some key events from 2013 are also reported. While 2014 saw violent conflict and the failure of many governments to safeguard the rights and safety of civilians, significant progress was also witnessed in the safeguarding and securing of certain human rights. Key anniversaries, including the commemoration of the Bhopal gas leak in 1984 and the Rwanda genocide in 1994, as well as reflections on 30 years since the adoption of the UN Convention against Torture, reminded us that while leaps forward have been made, there is still work to be done to ensure justice for victims and survivors of grave abuses. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL This report also celebrates those who stand up REPORT 2014/15 for human rights across the world, often in difficult and dangerous circumstances. It represents Amnesty International’s key concerns throughout 2014/15 the world, and is essential reading for policy- THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S makers, activists and anyone with an interest in human rights. HUMAN RIGHTS Work with us at amnesty.org AIR_2014/15_cover_final.indd All Pages 23/01/2015 15:04 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards.
  • 2019 Solomon Solon 1270287

    2019 Solomon Solon 1270287

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ International criminal courts and the introduction of the Daubert standard as a mode of assessing the psychological impact of warfare on civilians a comparative perspective Solomon, Solon Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS AND THE INTRODUCTION OF THE DAUBERT STANDARD AS A MODE OF ASSESSING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF WARFARE ON CIVILIANS A Comparative Perspective Solon Solomon A thesis submitted to King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: The Question of the Daubert Standard Application in International Criminal Law as a Mode for Assessing Warfare’s Psychological Toll on Civilians ......................................
  • Annual Progress Report for 2011

    Annual Progress Report for 2011

    ¦ø−-ºö®-»ö´-»È¸´-²ñ©-ê½-−¾ Participatory Development Training Centre (PADETC) P.O.Box 2147 Vientiane Lao PDR.180 Nakham of Luang Prabang Road.Sikhot Vientiane.Tel & Fax (856-21) 219130 E-mail: [email protected] ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Name of the Project: Padetc 2009 - 2012 Project Number: LAO-501623-0006078 Report Period: January – December 2011 Date of Submission: April 2011 Logos of Donors who support this project: Oxfam Novib 1 TABLE OF CONTENT PAGE Section I: Analytical Summary ……………. .…………………………………………………...03 Section II: PADETC's programming……………………………………………………………..04 Section III: Principal risks and the milestones of risks mitigation for the reporting period…...…18 Section IV: Conclusion and Lesson learnt………………………………………………..............23 ANNEXES: - Annex 1- Interview of Management Committee - Annex 2 - Impact Assessment Report 2011 - Annex 2.1 - Field modeling report by Miki - Annex 2.2 - XIENGKHOUANG REPORT - Annex 3 - film script - Annex 4 - TOKYO TALK - Final - Annex 5 - API Invitation Letter Keynote Speaker Aj Sombat - Annex 5 - Walk the Talk - Annex 6 - API Keynote Speech - Annex 7 - Sombath Interview by API - Annex 8 - Wisdom Box Action Research - Annex 9 - LH Sharing of Village Mapping edit - Annex 10 - Lao debate - 07 Dec 2011 - Annex 11- Financial summary - Annex 12 - Operational Budget for the Next Project Year, including the Opening Balance 2 SECTION I ANALYTICAL SUMMARY With the policy focus on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) led economic growth, Lao PDR has continued to record Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates of 6-8 percent over the past five years, with 8.1 percent recorded in 2010. Foreign Direct Investment in hydropower, mining, commercial agriculture and timber have increased, as have revenues from tourism.
  • Administration of Justice in Latin America Is Facing Its Gravest Crisis As It Is Perceived As Unable to Respond to Popular Demands

    Administration of Justice in Latin America Is Facing Its Gravest Crisis As It Is Perceived As Unable to Respond to Popular Demands

    ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN LATIN AMERICA A PRIMER ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM LUIS SALAS & JOSE MARIA RICO CENTER FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE GENERAL CONTEXT 3 A. History 3 1. Conquest and Colonization 3 2. Independence 5 3. Twentieth Century 6 B. Crime 8 C. The Civil Law Model 9 II. LEGISLATION 12 III. POLICE 14 IV. PROSECUTION 18 V. LEGAL DEFENSE 22 VI. COURTS 25 A. Court Organization 25 B. Court Administration 27 C. Selection and Tenure 28 D. Background of Judges 31 VII. CORRECTIONS 33 VIII. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 36 A. Types of Procedures 36 B. Fundamental Guarantees 36 C. The Stages of the Process 37 1. The Instructional or Summary Stage 38 2. The Trial 40 3. Appellate remedies 40 D. Duration and Compliance with Procedural Periods 41 IX. PROBLEMS FACING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 42 A. General Problems 42 1. Norms 42 2. Social and Economic Problems 43 3. Political Problems 44 4. Human Rights 45 B. Judicial Independence 46 1. Unification of the Judicial Function 47 2. Judicial Career 48 C. Justice System Access 49 1. Knowledge of Rights and Institutions 49 2. Confidence 50 3. Costs 50 4. Location and Number of Courts 50 5. Corruption 50 D. Efficiency 51 1. Administration 51 2. Coordination 52 3. Budgeting, Planning and Evaluation 52 4. Caseloads and Delays 52 E. Fairness 53 F. Accountability 54 Glossary of Spanish Terms Used 56 Suggested Readings 59 Page TABLES 1. Issuance Dates of Current Latin American Constitutions and Codes 13 2.
  • Evangelicals in Nicaraguan Politics Jacob Siegel SIT Study Abroad

    Evangelicals in Nicaraguan Politics Jacob Siegel SIT Study Abroad

    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2006 Searching for a Path: Evangelicals in Nicaraguan Politics Jacob Siegel SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Siegel, Jacob, "Searching for a Path: Evangelicals in Nicaraguan Politics" (2006). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 315. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/315 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Searching for a Path: Evangelicals in Nicaraguan Politics Jacob Siegel School for Internacional Training Academic Director: Aynn Setright Advisor: Rev. José Miguel Torres Pérez Sending Institution: Williams College Majors: Religion and Mathematics Managua, Nicaragua Fall 2006 Table of Contents Introduction and Methodology………………………………….…………………...1 A Brief Background on Protestants in Nicaraguan Politics: 1936-1996……….……5 Roots of Evangelical Political Participation…………………………………………8 Political Marginalization…………………...………………………………...9 Campaign for Conservative Social Values………………………………….12 Search for Economic Betterment..............…………………………………..15
  • State of the World's Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2013

    State of the World's Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2013

    Focus on health minority rights group international State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2013 Events of 2012 State of theWorld’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 20131 Events of 2012 Front cover: A Dalit woman who works as a Community Public Health Promoter in Nepal. Jane Beesley/Oxfam GB. Inside front cover: Indigenous patient and doctor at Klinik Kalvary, a community health clinic in Papua, Indonesia. Klinik Kalvary. Inside back cover: Roma child at a community centre in Slovakia. Bjoern Steinz/Panos Acknowledgements Support our work Minority Rights Group International (MRG) Donate at www.minorityrights.org/donate gratefully acknowledges the support of all organizations MRG relies on the generous support of institutions and individuals who gave financial and other assistance and individuals to help us secure the rights of to this publication, including CAFOD, the European minorities and indigenous peoples around the Union and the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. world. All donations received contribute directly to our projects with minorities and indigenous peoples. © Minority Rights Group International, September 2013. All rights reserved. Subscribe to our publications at www.minorityrights.org/publications Material from this publication may be reproduced Another valuable way to support us is to subscribe for teaching or for other non-commercial purposes. to our publications, which offer a compelling No part of it may be reproduced in any form for analysis of minority and indigenous issues and commercial purposes without the prior express original research. We also offer specialist training permission of the copyright holders. materials and guides on international human rights instruments and accessing international bodies.
  • The Structural Pre-Conditions for the Emergence of Asean Public Spheres

    The Structural Pre-Conditions for the Emergence of Asean Public Spheres

    THE STRUCTURAL PRE-CONDITIONS FOR THE EMERGENCE OF ASEAN PUBLIC SPHERES Master Thesis Research Master Public Administration and Organizational Science Utrecht University | Erasmus University Rotterdam | Tilburg University Utrecht School of Governance Faculty of Social Sciences Tilburg Law School Author: Supervisor Abdul Muein Bin Abadi Prof. Dr. Koen Stapelbroek 4007573 Erasmus University Rotterdam Second Supervisor Prof. Dr. Steven Van de Walle Erasmus University Rotterdam Bestuurs- en Organisatiewetenschap (USBO) Utrecht University Netherlands August 2014 Acknowledgement My utmost gratitude to Allah the Almighty for the immense strength He has granted me during the course of my Research Masters studies in the Netherlands. I owe a profound appreciation to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Koen Stapelbroek for his undivided support throughout the completion of this thesis. I also would like to express my humble gratitude to Prof. Arjen Boin who has encouraged me to be part of this research master program. Also, thank you to all professors and lecturers in this Research Master Program of Public Administration and Organizational Science – from Utrecht School of Governance, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, as well as Tilburg University – for such inspiring and informative discussions during and after the seminars that I had attended. My extended gratitude to the Malaysian Ministry of Education (MOE) and the National University of Malaysia (UKM) for the scholarship they provide to support my studies in the Netherlands. Also to Prof. Dr. Mohammad Agus Yusoff, a Political Science Senior Lecturer, and Prof. Dr. Sity Daud, the Chairperson of the School of History, Politics, and Strategy, the National University of Malaysia, who both have strongly supported me to pursue my study abroad.