Henry A. Kautz, Ph.D. [email protected] (585) 520-1200
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
INTELLIGENT MEDICINE the Wings of Global Health
INTELLIGENT MEDICINE The Wings of Global Health AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.6 ISSN: 2667-1026 DESCRIPTION . Intelligent Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal sponsored and owned by the Chinese Medical Association and designated to publish high-quality research and application in the field of medical-industrial crossover concerning the internet technology, artificial intelligence (AI), data science, medical information, and intelligent devices in the clinical medicine, biomedicine, and public health. Intelligent Medicine appreciates the innovation, pioneering, science, and application, encourages the unique perspectives and suggestions. The topics focus on the computer and data science enabled intelligent medicine, including while not limited to the clinical decision making, computer-assisted surgery, telemedicine, drug development, image analysis and computation, and health management. The journal sets academic columns according to the different disciplines and hotspots. Article types include Research Article: These articles are expected to be original, innovative, and significant, including medical and algorithmic research. The real-world medical research rules and clinical assessment of the usefulness and reliability are recommended for those medical research. The full text is about 6,000 words, with structured abstract of 300 words including Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. Editorial: Written by the Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editors, editorial board members, or prestigious invited scientists and policy makers on a broad range of topics from science to policy. Review: Extensive reviews of the recent progress in specific areas of science, involving historical reviews, recent advances made by scientists internationally, and perspective for future development; the full text is about 5,000~6,000 words. -
IJCAI-05 Programme
PROGRAMME IJCAI – 0 5 NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND 30 JULY – 5 AUGUST 2005 www.ijcai-05.org Sponsored by: INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI) Hosted by: THE BRITISH COMPUTER SOCIETY SPECIALIST GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE In Collaboration with: THE SCHOOL OF INFORMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH In Partnership with: SCOTTISH ENTERPRISE AND THE BRITISH COMPUTER SOCIETY IJCAI – 0 5 WELCOME TO IJCAI-05 Dear Attendees, We are very pleased to welcome you all to IJCAI-05 and Edinburgh. We have put together an excellent technical program and exciting social events. We hope you will find IJCAI-05 to be a pleasant experience through significant technical and social interactions with your fellow AI researchers and practitioners from around the world. Edinburgh, the capital city of Scotland, is a city filled with historical sights and stories and hosts the world-famous Edinburgh International Festival immediately after IJCAI-05. It will be a very busy but enjoyable week. IJCAI-05, the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, is sponsored by the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) and hosted by The British Computer Society Specialist Group on Artificial Intelligence and the School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh and in Partnership with the British Computer Society and Scottish Enterprise. IJCAI sponsors biennial conferences on Artificial Intelligence, which are the premier forums for -
Analyzing Public Opinion on COVID-19 Through Different Perspectives and Stages Yuqi Gao, Hang Hua and Jiebo Luo
SIP (2021), vol. 10, e8, page 1 of 13 © The Author(s), 2021 published by Cambridge University Press in association with Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. doi:10.1017/ATSIP.2021.5 selection from chinamm 2020 Analyzing public opinion on COVID-19 through different perspectives and stages yuqi gao, hang hua and jiebo luo In recent months, COVID-19 has become a global pandemic and had a huge impact on the world. People under different con- ditions have very different attitudes toward the epidemic. Due to the real-time and large-scale nature of social media, we can continuously obtain a massive amount of public opinion information related to the epidemic from social media. In particu- lar, researchers may ask questions such as “how is the public reacting to COVID-19 in China during different stages of the pandemic?”, “what factors affect the public opinion orientation in China?”, and so on. To answer such questions, we analyze the pandemic-related public opinion information on Weibo, China’s largest social media platform. Specifically, we have first collected a large amount of COVID-19-related public opinion microblogs. We then use a sentiment classifier to recognize and analyze different groups of users’ opinions. -
Organization of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence
Organization of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Officers President Tom M. Mitchell, Carnegie Mellon University President–Elect Ron Brachman, Corporation for National Research Initiatives Past President Bruce Buchanan, University of Pittsburgh Secretary–Treasurer Ted Senator Councilors (through 2003) Craig Boutilier, University of Toronto Rina Dechter, University of California, Irvine Richard Doyle, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology David Poole, University of British Columbia (through 2004) Marie desJardins, University of Maryland Baltimore County Craig Knoblock, University of Southern California / Institute for Scientific Information (USC/ISI) Daphne Koller, Stanford University Peter Norvig, Google, Inc. (through 2005) Carla Gomes, Cornell University Michael Littman, Rutgers University Maja Mataric, University of Southern California Yoav Shoham, Stanford University Standing Committees Conference Chair James A. Hendler, University of Maryland ix Fellows and Nominating Chair Bruce G. Buchanan, University of Pittsburgh Finance Chair Ted Senator Grants Chair Manuela Veloso, Carnegie Mellon University Membership Chair Reid Simmons, Carnegie Mellon University Publications Chair David Leake, Indiana University Symposium Chair Holly Yanco, University of Massachusetts Lowell Symposium Associate Chair Marie desJardins, University of Maryland Baltimore County AI Magazine Editor David Leake, Indiana University Reports Editor Robert A. Morris, NASA Ames Research Center Book Review Editor Michael Wellman, -
Introduction
Introduction IJCAI-01 Conference Committee IJCAI-01 Program Committee: Contents: CONFERENCE CHAIR: Elisabeth André, DFKI GmbH (Germany) Introduction 2 Hector J. Levesque, University of Toronto (Canada) Minoru Asada, Osaka University (Japan) Sponsors & Committees 2-3 Franz Baader, RWTH Aachen (Germany) PROGRAM CHAIR: IJCAI-01 Awards 4 Craig Boutilier, University of Toronto (Canada) Bernhard Nebel,Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg Didier Dubois, IRIT-CNRS (France) Conference at a Glance 5 (Germany) Maria Fox, University of Durham (United Kingdom) Workshop Program 6-7 LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS CHAIR: Hector Geffner, Universidad Simón Bolívar Doctoral Consortium 8 James Hoard, The Boeing Company, Seattle (USA) (Venezuela) Tutorial Program 8 SECRETARY-TREASURER: Georg Gottlob,Vienna University of Technology (Austria) Conference Program Highlights 9 Ronald J. Brachman,AT&T Labs – Research (USA) Invited Speakers 10 Haym Hirsh, Rutgers University (USA) IAAI-01 Conference 11 Eduard Hovy, Information Sciences Institute (USA) Advisory Committee: Joxan Jaffar, National University of Singapore Technical Program 12-19 Bruce Buchanan, University of Pittsburgh (USA) (Singapore) Exhibit Program 20-23 Silvia Coradeschi, Örebro University (Sweden) Daphne Koller, Stanford University (USA) RoboCup 2001 24 Olivier Faugeras, INRIA (France) Fangzhen Lin, Hong Kong University of Science and Registration Information 25 Cheng Hu, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) Technolog y (Hong Kong) General Information 25-27 Nicholas Jennings, University of London (England) Heikki Mannila, Nokia Research Center (Finland) Conference Maps 28-30 Henry Kautz, University of Washington (USA) Robert Milne, Intelligent Applications (United Kingdom) IJCAI-03 Conference 31 Robert Mercer, University of Western Ontario (Canada) Daniele Nardi, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Special Meetings 31 Silvia Miksch,Vienna University of Technology (Italy) (Austria) Dana Nau, University of Maryland (USA) Devika Subramanian, Rice University (USA) Patrick Prosser, University of Glasgow (UK) Welcome to IJCAI-01 L. -
Automatic Image Orientation Detection Via Confidence-Based Integration of Low-Level and Semantic Cues
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 27, NO. 5, MAY 2005 715 Automatic Image Orientation Detection via Confidence-Based Integration of Low-Level and Semantic Cues Jiebo Luo, Senior Member, IEEE, and Matthew Boutell, Student Member, IEEE Computer Society Abstract—Automatic image orientation detection for natural images is a useful, yet challenging research topic. Humans use scene context and semantic object recognition to identify the correct image orientation. However, it is difficult for a computer to perform the task in the same way because current object recognition algorithms are extremely limited in their scope and robustness. As a result, existing orientation detection methods were built upon low-level vision features such as spatial distributions of color and texture. Discrepant detection rates have been reported for these methods in the literature. We have developed a probabilistic approach to image orientation detection via confidence-based integration of low-level and semantic cues within a Bayesian framework. Our current accuracy is 90 percent for unconstrained consumer photos, impressive given the findings of a psychophysical study conducted recently. The proposed framework is an attempt to bridge the gap between computer and human vision systems and is applicable to other problems involving semantic scene content understanding. Index Terms—Image orientation, semantic cues, low-level cues, Bayesian networks, probabilistic inference, classification confidence. æ 1INTRODUCTION 1.1 Problem Statement 1.2 Recent Research ITH an explosion in the popularity of both online and Automatically determining the orientation of an arbitrary Woffline consumer image collections, organizing and image is a problem that only recently attracted attention in accessing these images become challenging tasks. -
Opportunities for Computing Research and Education in a Sustainability Context
Opportunities for Computing Research and Education in a Sustainability Context Panel on The Present and Future of Sustainability R&D at the First USENIX Workshop on Sustainable Information Technology Douglas H. Fisher Program Director National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Division of Information & Intelligent Systems (IIS) Robust Intelligence Program (RI) [email protected] Douglas H. Fisher (NSF) Questions to ask As educators What should be sustained? What are the “needs” of future generations referenced in the Brundtland report? Why? Are the reasons compelling? As computing professionals Is the low hanging fruit being implemented (e.g., distance meetings)? What are the factors influencing implementation decisions? What are the lifecycle costs? What are aspirations? Lifecycles→∞? As computer scientists What is the (likely) growth rate (of adoption, of resource depletion, of energy demand, of improvement)? (across all societal/technical areas) What is the complexity class (of growth rate, of change to growth rate)? What other communities are prospective partners? Douglas H. Fisher (NSF) Computing and the Environment ICT along for the ride ICT Possible Future Current Human footprint ICT reduces human footprint IT is a bigger (e.g., through percentage dematerialization) without Possible of a smaller matching rebound effects Future total Don’t (too) short shrift direct effects, because the 2% of “today” (2007) is the 30% of tomorrow (growth rates, growth rates, growth rates!) Douglas H. Fisher (NSF) * Context * * http://www.nsf.gov Douglas H. Fisher (NSF) Finding 1: … A comprehensive coordinated Federal strategy is required … Finding 2: … Private and Federal support … R&D is inadequate. Finding 3: … The U.S. -
A 20-Year Community Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Research in the US
A 20-Year Community Roadmap for Begin forwarded message: From: AAAI Press <[email protected]> Subject: Recap Date: July 8, 2019 at 3:52:40 PM PDT To: Carol McKenna Hamilton <[email protected]>Artificial Intelligence Research in the US Could you check this for me? Hi Denise, While it is fresh in my mind, I wanted to provide you with a recap on the AAAI proceedings work done. Some sections of the proceedings were better than others, which is to be expected because authors in some subject areas are less likely to use gures, the use of which is a signicant factor in error rate. The vision section was an excellent example of this variability. The number of problems in this section was quite high. Although I only called out 13 papers for additional corrections, there were many problems that I simply let go. What continues to be an issue, is why the team didn’t catch many of these errors before compilation began. For example, some of the errors involved the use of the caption package, as well as the existence of setlength commands. These are errors that should have been discovered and corrected before compilation. As I’ve mentioned before, running search routines on the source of all the papers in a given section saves a great deal of time because, in part, it insures consistency. That is something that has been decidedly lacking with regard to how these papers have been (or haven’t been) corrected. It is a cause for concern because the error rate should have been improving, not getting worse. -
Computational Sustainability: Computing for a Better World and a Sustainable Future
Computational Sustainability: Computing for a Better World and a Sustainable Future CARLA GOMES, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; THOMAS DIETTERICH, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; BISTRA DILKINA, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CALIFORNIA; STEFANO ERMON, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; FEI FANG, CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY; ANDREW FARNSWORTH, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; ALAN FERN, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; XIAOLI FERN, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; DANIEL FINK, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; DOUGLAS FISHER, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY; ALEXANDER FLECKER, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; DANIEL FREUND, MASSACHUSSETS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; ANGELA FULLER, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY; JOHN GREGOIRE, CALTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; JOHN HOPCROFT, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; ZICO KOLTER, CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY; WARREN POWELL, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; NICOLE SANTOV, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY; JOHN SELKER, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; BART SELMAN, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; DANIEL SHELDON, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS AMHERST; DAVID SHMOYS, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; MILIND TAMBE, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CALIFORNIA; CHRISTOPHER WOOD, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; WENG-KEEN WONG, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; XIAOJIAN WU, MICROSOFT; STEVE KELLING, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; YEXIANG XUE, PURDUE UNIVERSITY; AMULYA YADAV, PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY; AZIZ YAKUBU, HOWARD UNIVERSITY; MARY LOU ZEEMAN, BOWDOIN COLLEGE Computational sustainability aims to develop computational methods to help solve environmental, economic, and societal problems and thereby facilitate a path towards a sustainable future. Sustainability problems are unique in scale, impact, complexity, and richness, offering -
AAAI News AAAI News
AAAI News AAAI News Spring News from the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence AAAI Announces The Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Holte, Ariel Felner, Guni Sharon, Robot (Wolfram Burgard, Armin B. Nathan R. Sturtevant) New Senior Member! Cremers, Dieter Fox, Dirk Hähnel, Gerhard Lakemeyer, Dirk Schulz, Wal- AAAI-16 Outstanding AAAI congratulates Wheeler Ruml ter Steiner, and Sebastian Thrun) Student Paper Award (University of New Hampshire, USA) Toward a Taxonomy and Computa- Boosting Combinatorial Search on his election to AAAI Senior Member tional Models of Abnormalities in through Randomization (Carla P. status. This honor was announced at Images (Babak Saleh, Ahmed Elgam- Gomes, Bart Selman, and Henry the recent AAAI-16 Conference in mal, Jacob Feldman, Ali Farhadi) Phoenix. Senior Member status is Kautz) designed to recognize AAAI members Burgard and colleagues were honored IAAI-16 Innovative who have achieved significant accom- for significant contributions to proba- Application Awards plishments within the field of artificial bilistic robot navigation and the inte- Each year the AAAI Conference on intelligence. To be eligible for nomina- gration with high-level planning Innovative Applications selects the tion for Senior Member, candidates methods, while Gomes, Selman, and recipients of the IAAI Innovative must be consecutive members of AAAI Kautz were recognized for their signifi- Application Award. These deployed for at least five years and have been cant contributions to the area of auto- application case study papers must active in the professional arena for at mated reasoning and constraint solv- describe deployed applications with least ten years. ing through the introduction of measurable benefits that include some randomization and restarts into com- aspect of AI technology. -
Invited Speakers
Invited Speakers In addition to six paper presentations, which will be accompanied by discussions, the work- shop features two keynote speakers: Anthony Cohn (University of Leeds, UK) and Henry Kautz (University of Rochester, USA). Anthony Cohn holds a Personal Chair at the University of Leeds, where he is professor of automated reasoning and served a term as head of the School of Computing, from August 1999 to July 2004. He is presently director of the Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Biological Systems. He holds BSc and PhD degrees from the University of Essex, where he studied under Pat Hayes. He spent 10 years at the University of Warwick before moving to Leeds in 1990. He now leads a research group working on knowledge representation and reasoning with a particular focus on qualitative spatial/spatio-temporal reasoning, the best known being the well cited Region Connection Calculus (RCC). His current research inter- ests range from theoretical work on spatial calculi and spatial ontologies, to cognitive vision, modeling spatial information in the hippocampus, and integrating utility data recording the location of underground assets. He has received substantial funding from a variety of sources, including EPSRC, the DTI, DARPA, the European Union and various industrial sources. Work from the Cogvis project won the British Computer Society Machine Intelligence prize in 2004. Henry Kautz is chair of the Department of Computer Science at the University of Rochester. He performs research in knowledge representation, machine learning, pervasive computing, and assistive technology. His academic degrees include an A.B. in mathematics from Cornell University, an M.A. -
Recent Progress in Propositional Reasoning and Search
Ten Challenges Redux: Recent Progress in Propositional Reasoning and Search Henry Kautz1 and Bart Selman2 1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 USA [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 USA [email protected] Abstract. In 1997 we presented ten challenges for research on satisfia- bility testing [1]. In this paper we review recent progress towards each of these challenges, including our own work on the power of clause learning and randomized restart policies. 1 Introduction The past few years have seen enormous progress in the performance of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers. Despite the worst-case exponential run time of all known algorithms, SAT solvers are now in routine use for applications such as hardware verification [2] that involve solving hard structured problems with up to a million variables [3, 4]. Each year the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing hosts a SAT competition that highlights a new group of “world’s fastest” SAT solvers, and presents detailed performance results on a wide range of solvers [5, 6]. In the the 2003 competition, over 30 solvers competed on instances selected from thousands of benchmark problems. In 1997, we presented ten challenges for research on satisfiability testing [1], on topics that at the time appeared to be ripe for progress. In this paper we revisit these challenges, review progess, and offer some suggestions for future research. A full review of the literature related to the original challenges, let alone satisfiability testing as a whole, is beyond the scope of this paper.