2015 Texas Transit Statistics, 2nd Edition Prepared by: Public Transportation Division In Cooperation With: Public transit agencies and local officials throughout the state of Texas
2015 TEXAS TRANSIT STATISTICS
PREPARED BY: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN COOPERATION WITH: Public transit agencies and local officials throughout the State of Texas.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The Texas Department of Transportation wishes to express its appreciation to city and regional officials, as well as transit operators and public transportation coordinators (PTCs), for their cooperation and assistance during the year. Without their help, this report would not be possible.
DISCLAIMER: The information presented in this report is a tabulation of the data provided by transit systems throughout the State of Texas. Information on public transportation grants was provided by the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Texas Department of Transportation. This information has not been audited by Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division.
CONTACT: Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division 125 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas 78701-2483 Web E-Mail: [email protected] Phone: (512) 374-5230
PUBLISHED: March 2015, 2nd Edition
NOTICE
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.
This document also meets the reporting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §456.008, and Rider 14 (e), Senate Bill 1 (General Appropriations Act), 83rd Legislature, Regular Session.
The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant for technical studies from the United States Department of Transportation under the provision 49 U.S.C. 5304.
Copies of this report are filed in the Texas State Library, Box 12927, Austin, TX 78711-2927
Information on the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is available on the Web at http://www.txdot.gov
For further information concerning this report, please write or call:
Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division 125 East 11th Street Austin, Texas 78701-2483
(512) 374-5230
Web E-Mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface ...... i
Introduction ...... 11
Chart 1: Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula ...... 2
Fiscal Year 2015 - Review and Analysis ...... 5
Figure 1: Cities and Counties Served by Public Transportation Systems...... 8
Figure 2: Statewide Ridership FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 9
Statewide Statistics ...... 10
Table 1: FY 2015 Summary of Programs ...... 10
Table 2: Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 10
Table 3: Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 10
Table 4: Unlinked Passengers per Revenue Vehicle Mile FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 10
Table 5: Vehicles, Trips & Mileage by Program FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 11
Table 6: Federal Financial Assistance to Texas Transit FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 12
Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) & Urbanized Area Program (Section 5307) ...... 13
Summary: MTAs and Urbanized Area Transit Programs ...... 14
Figure 3: MTAs - Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 15
Figure 4: Urbanized Area Program - Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 17
Table 7: MTAs - Performance Summary at A Glance FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 18
Table 7a: Urbanized Area Program - Performance Summary at A Glance FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 19
Figure 5: MTAs - Efficiency & Effectiveness Measures FY 2006-2015 ...... 21
Figure 6: Urbanized Area Program - Efficiency & Effectiveness Measures FY 2006 thru 2015 ...... 21
Table 8: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Service Efficiency by System FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 22
Table 9: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Cost Effectiveness by System FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 23
Table 10: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Service Effectiveness by System FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 24
Table 11: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Source Data FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 25
Table 12: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Unlinked Passenger Trips FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 26
Table 12a: MTAs - Passenger Boardings FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 27
Figure 7: MTAs - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service ...... 27
Table 12b: Urbanized Area Program - Passenger Boardings FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 28
Figure 8: Urbanized Area Program - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service ...... 28
Table 13: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Revenue Sources FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 29
Table 14: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Farebox Recovery Ratio FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 30
Table 15: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Revenue Vehicle Fleet FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 31
Table 16: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Revenue Vehicle System Failures FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 32
Table 17: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Safety Incidents FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 33
Table 17a: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Safety Incidents continued FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 34
Monthly Statistics for MTAs & Urbanized Transit Agencies ...... 35
MTAs FY 2015 ...... 36
Urbanized Transit Agencies FY 2015 ...... 39
Rural Area Program (Section 5311) ...... 47
Summary: Rural Area Program ...... 48
Figure 9: Rural Area Program - Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile - FY 2006-2015 ...... 50
Figure 10: Rural Public Transportation Systems (Section 5311) Map ...... 51
Figure 11: Rural Area Program - Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2006-2015...... 52
Table 18: Rural Area Program - Performance at a Glance FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 53
Table 19: Rural Area Program - Service Efficiency & Cost Effectiveness FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 54
Table 20: Rural Area Program - Service Effectiveness FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 55
Table 21: Rural Area Program - Source Data FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 56
Table 21a: Rural Area Program - Source Data continued FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 57
Table 21b: Rural Area Program - Passenger Boardings FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 58
Figure 12: Rural Area Program - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service ...... 58
Table 22: Rural Area Program - Annual Local Revenue FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 59
Table 23: Rural Area Program - Farebox Revenue and Recovery Ratio FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 60
Table 24: Rural Area Program - Incidents & Revenue Vehicle System Failures FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 61
Monthly Statistics for Rural Area Program ...... 63
Rural Transit Districts FY 2015...... 64
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310) ...... 75
Summary: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program ...... 76
Figure 13: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities - Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2006-2015 ...... 78
Table 25: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program - Performance at a Glance FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 79
Figure 14: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2006-2015 ...... 80
Table 26: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2014 ...... 81
Table 27: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2015………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... 83
Table 28: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program Revenue & Farebox Recovery FY 2014 ...... 85
Table 29: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program Revenue and Farebox Recovery FY 2015 ...... 87
Monthly Statistics for Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program ...... 89
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2015 ...... 90
Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (Section 5316) ...... 105
Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Summary ...... 106
Table 30: Job Access & Reverse Commute Program Performance at a Glance FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 107
Table 31: Job Access & Reverse Commute Program Efficiency and Effectiveness FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 108
Table 32: Job Access & Reverse Commute Program Operational Data FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 109
Table 33: Job Access & Reverse Commute Program Financial Resources FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 110
New Freedom Program (Section 5317) ...... 111
New Freedom Program Summary ...... 112
Table 34: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Performance at a Glance FY FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 113
Table 35: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Efficiency and Effectiveness FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 114
Table 36: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Operational Data FY FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 115
Table 37: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Financial Resources FY 2014 and 2015 ...... 116
Definitions ...... 117
Contact listing...... 125
Contact information for Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) ...... 126
Contact information for Urbanized Area Systems (5307) ...... 128
Contact information for Rural Transit Districts (5311) ...... 134
Contact information for Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Persons with Disabilities Programs (5310) ...... 141
PREFACE
The information presented in this report is a tabulation of the data provided by transit systems throughout the State of Texas. Information on public transportation grants was provided by the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This information has not been audited by the Texas Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division (PTN).
This 2015 report provides detailed comparisons of annualized fiscal year (FY) 2014 and 2015 data along with the monthly FY 2015 transit statistics.
PTN is engaged in an ongoing process of improving the accuracy and consistency of this report by employing validation tools and conducting training to improve the collection, reporting and analysis of the data. PTN continues to employ the service of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) to provide technical assistance and training on performance reporting, along with an annual transit report on the data submittals and performance results for the rural and urbanized transit agencies.
FY 2015 is the ninth fiscal year in which the transit agencies used the PTN-128 web-based system to report data to PTN. Having these eight years of web-based data has enabled transit agencies, PTN, and TTI to compare annual differences by data category and analyze annual variances.
TxDOT has chosen to retain Federal Transit Administration program numbers and reporting terminology described in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). In July 2012, Congress passed and the President signed into law a new transportation bill, known as Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, or MAP-21. This bill became effective October 1, 2012. Program authorization was originally set to expire on September 30, 2014, but it has been extended to November 20, 2015.
The Texas Transit Statistics report has been required by statute for several years. However, the statute was recently amended, as noted in the State transportation code:
- “Section 456.008. Commission Report On Public Transportation Providers. (a) Not later than January 1 of each year, the commission by rule shall prepare and issue to the legislature a report on public transportation providers in this state that received state or federal funding during the previous 12-month period.”
Consistent with this direction, the report for transit activities in the period September 1, 2014 through August 31, 2015 (state fiscal year 2015) was presented to the legislature prior to January 1, 2016. This report is the 2nd Edition of the Texas Transit Statistics Report, featuring updated data as reported to Texas Department of Transportation as of January 2016. In addition, pages have been added to indicate review and analysis of the transit performance data for Fiscal Year 2015.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report i
This page intentionally left blank. INTRODUCTION
The Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT) 2015 mission is: work with others to provide safe, reliable transportation solutions for the state of Texas. To support this mission, the Public Transportation Division (PTN) of TxDOT provides financial and technical assistance to public transportation agencies throughout the state.
The Texas Transit Statistics Report is published annually by PTN. Its primary purpose is to provide information to public officials, transit agencies and other interested persons. This 2015 report summarizes the key operating and financial characteristics of Texas’ publicly-assisted transit agencies.
Every quarter, PTN collects monthly data from individual transit agencies and then compiles it into the annual totals published here. The information contained in this report is based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding categories and the National Transit Database (NTD) reporting system. The operations data for Urbanized (Section 5307), Rural (Section 5311), Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), Job Access and Reverse Commute (Section 5316), and the New Freedom (Section 5317) programs come from TxDOT’s PTN-128 form, a web-based quarterly operations report.
This report shows performance-based measures of efficiency, effectiveness and safety of the transit agencies that receive financial assistance from TxDOT and/or the FTA per the reporting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §456.008 and the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) rule §31.48.
In June of 2004, the Texas Transportation Commission, known as the “Commission”, established formulas to allocate state and federal funds for public transportation. In June of 2006, the Commission amended the formula to better reflect the requirements of Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 461, and other statutes, and to mirror TxDOT's 2015 goals: to reduce congestion, enhance safety, expand economic opportunity, improve air quality, and increase the value of transportation assets. The revised funding formula was developed by TxDOT-PTN with the advice and counsel of the Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC) and the technical assistance of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI).
The performance-based funding portion of the Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula is based on data submitted by the rural and the urbanized transit agencies. These rural and urbanized transit agencies have performance-based elements in their respective funding formulas that rely on the measures of “needs” and “performance”
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 1 PTN uses these funding formulas to distribute the federal and state funds to the 38 rural (Section 5311) transit agencies in Texas and allocate state funds to the 30 eligible urbanized (Section 5307) transit agencies. Chart 1 (below) illustrates the State funding performance-based formula for the rural (Section 5311) and the urbanized (Section 5307) transit agencies in Texas.
Chart 1. Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula
State Transit Funds State Transit Funds
35% 35% 65% Eligible Urban 65% EligibleProviders Urban Rural Providers Rural Providers
50% Needs 50% Performance 65% Needs 35% Performance Needs Performance Needs Performance
30% local $/ 33% local $/ 100% population 30% local $/ 75% population 33% local $/ 100% population expense 75% population expense expense expense
20% passengers / 33% rev. mi./ 20% passengers / 25% land area 33% rev. mi./ capita 25% land area expense capita expense
30% passengers / 33% passengers / rev. mi. rev. mi. rev. mi. rev. mi.
20% rev. mi. / 20%expense rev. mi. / expense
The web-based data reporting form (PTN-128) is used by transit agencies to report financial and operating data to the state. This web-based data collection and reporting tool improves data accuracy and reasonableness.
2 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report This report includes performance data on the following types of transit agencies, based on size or the type of FTA funding received.
x Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) provide public transportation in Texas’ seven largest urbanized areas. All MTAs serve urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000. They are organized under specific state laws and granted authority to levy a dedicated sales tax. MTAs are located in Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio. None are eligible to receive state funding through TxDOT. All receive federal funds directly from FTA’s Section 5307 formula program.
x Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) is listed with the MTAs in this report, due to its similarities to the MTAs; however, it is a Coordinated County Transportation Authority in a urbanized area serving the “collar” counties adjacent to counties with populations of 1,000,000 or more, which includes Denton County. DCTA was successful in obtaining a sales and usage tax in 2004 for the cities of Denton, Highland Village and Lewisville.
x In this report, the term “Urbanized” refers to transit agencies serving a single political subdivision within an urbanized area (50,000 population and above, established by the US Census Bureau) that do not meet the state definition of an MTA. All the transit agencies in this group receive state funds through TxDOT and federal Section 5307 funds that come directly from FTA. With the exception of Laredo, none of these agencies are supported by a dedicated sales tax.
x Rural agencies (Section 5311) serve areas which are outside defined urbanized areas. Most serve multiple counties. Section 5311 agencies receive state and federal funds through TxDOT.
x Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) Program recipients operate throughout the state in both urbanized and rural areas. Private nonprofit organizations or associations, public bodies that coordinate services for seniors and/or persons with disabilities, or any public body that certifies that nonprofit organizations in the area are not readily available to carry out the services are eligible to receive grants. Only federal funds are given to recipients of these grants.
x The Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) (Section 5316) Program provides federal funding for the provision of transportation services designed to increase access to jobs and employment-related activities. Only federal funds are given to recipients of these grants, although state funds awarded through the urbanized or rural programs can be used for match.
x The New Freedom (NF) (Section 5317) Program provides federal funding for the provision of transportation services designed to increase services to individuals with disabilities. Only federal funds are given to recipients of these grants, although state funds awarded through the urbanized or rural programs can be used for match.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 3 The introduction to each program section contains a short narrative of significant changes in the program along with detailed statistics. To meet the legislative requirement to provide an annual report showing monthly activities associated with the Section 5307, Section 5311, and Section 5310 programs, reports listing selected monthly statistics are provided at the end of each program section.
For the purpose of this report, JARC (Section 5316) data is presented by the applicable MTA, Section 5307, Section 5311 and Section 5310 program as indicated in tables 32 and 33. Due to the inclusion of JARC and New Freedom data into other programs, monthly JARC and New Freedom program statistics have not been captured and are not shown.
Tables 36 and 37 provide the (New Freedom) operational and financial data for these transit agencies. Monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) was signed into law by President Obama on February 17th, 2009. The intent of this act is to preserve and create jobs, promote economic recovery, and invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits. On March 5, 2009, $8.4 billion was appropriated for transit programs nationwide. The Recovery Act (2009) provided a total of $342,146,637 in funding for transit capital and operating projects for the MTA, Section 5307, and Section 5311 transit agencies in Texas.
Since the 2010 report, three new tables and figures were added to show the break-out of ridership by source for the MTA, Section 5307 and Section 5311 programs. These tables document the passenger boarding by source and the figures show the percentage of passenger boardings by service.
Figures 3, 4, 9, and 14 for the MTA, Section 5307, Section 5311, and Section 5310 transit agencies show the unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile for FY 2006 through FY 2015.
Special notes for the FY 2015 Report:
Significant changes are expected to impact the future provision of public transportation services and the reported data from those services, due to several factors. These factors include:
Impacts from the 2010 U.S. Census – including changes in urbanized area (UZA) boundaries, and creation of a new UZA or loss of UZA status, and reduction in rural area,
Continued implementation of federal transportation statutes as revised by the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century” act, or MAP-21, and the resulting changes in programs,
Changes in participation in rural transit districts (RTD), such as counties moving from one RTD to another, or creating a new RTD.
These changes have impacted, and will impact data reported in the Texas Transit Statistics Reports.
4 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
FISCAL YEAR 2015 REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 5 FISCAL YEAR 2015 - REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
This section will review transit systems funded by federal programs in the state by comparing Fiscal Year 2015 to the previous year, and the current year to ten years earlier.
Changes in Transit Systems (2014 - 2015)
In June 2014, two rural transit districts, Alamo Area Council of Governments and Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc., added counties after the Bee Community Action Agency ceased operations.
In June 2015, the rural transit district known as the Community Action Council of South Texas ceased operations. The Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. and the Rio Grande Valley Development Council adopted the former agency’s counties into their rural transit districts.
In August 2015, a new rural transit district, McLennan County, became eligible for state and federal formula funds. The McLennan County Transit District was created by local stakeholders, dissolving their relationship with the Heart of Texas Council of Governments.
Ridership Activity
For Fiscal Year 2015, a total of 291,676,379 passenger trips were taken. That total figure is down from 299,258,136 passengers as recorded in the 2014 Edition of the Report, a 2.53% decrease. The figure remains steady compared to 291,081,869 recorded in Fiscal Year 2006. Research has established that as motor fuel prices increase, transit ridership generally increases; and as motor fuel prices decrease, so does transit ridership. In FY 2006, the average gasoline price was $2.49 per gallon. In 2015, it was $2.45. This may help explain why transit ridership increased only 0.2% from 2006 to 2015.
Vehicle Revenue Miles Travelled
A total of 255,859,052 vehicle revenue miles have been travelled utilizing public transportation throughout the state. That total figure is up from 254,186,173 miles as recorded in the 2014 Edition of the Report, a 0.65% increase. Overall, the Fiscal Year 2015 figure is up 23 percent from 207,496,734, recorded in Fiscal Year 2006, an annual rate of increase of 2.33%.
Transit Ridership and Population Connection
Demographic changes, as captured in the 2010 Census, have impacted transit operations, including ridership. Growth in most urbanized areas is largely represented by traditional single-family residences; along with similar lower density development. Transit is more effective and efficient when serving people in higher density areas, but the observed growth in lower density areas means transit operations must provide more and more vehicle revenue miles, even though ridership is flat.
As overall ridership remained steady and vehicle revenue miles have increased over the past decade, passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile have decreased from 1.41 in FY 2006 to 1.14 in FY 2015.
Passengers per capita in the 5307 urban service areas was 15.1 for FY 2015, in contrast to 20.1 for FY 2006. Passengers per capita in the 5311 rural service areas was 1.02 for FY 2015, in contrast to 0.81 for FY 2006.
6 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
Operating Costs
As ridership remained steady through the past decade, the cost to operate transit has increased in order to serve the population growth. Operating expenses totalled $2,209,767,080 in FY 2015, up from $1,455,307,130 in FY 2006. Transit operating expenses continue to increase at an average of five (5) percent annually. As in many other industries, salaries, wages and benefit costs contribute to the increase.
Safety
Transit safety is important in maintaining public transportation service in the state. Revenue vehicle system failures are a primary key safety issue that has measured the level of transit activity in all agencies served. In FY 2015, there were approximately 28,765 mechanical system failures recorded. That figure is up 6.8 percent from the 26,932 failures recorded in 2006, with an annual rate of 0.68 percent increase over the past decade.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 7 Cities and Counties Served by General Public Transportation Systems
Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Lipscomb Figure 1 Hartley Moore Roberts Hemphill Hutchinson
Oldham Potter Carson Gray Wheeler AMARILLO Collings- Donley Deaf Smith Randall Armstrong worth
Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress Hardeman
Bailey Lamb Hale Wilbarger Floyd Motley Cottle Wichita LUBBOCK Foard Clay Lamar Red TEXARKANA WICHITA FALLS Grayson River Hockley Crosby Dickens King Knox Baylor SHERMAN-DENISON Lubbock Cooke Fannin Cochran Archer Montague DENTON Delta Bowie Collin Titus Jack Wise McKINNEY Yoakum Terry Lynn Garza Kent Stonewall Haskell Throck- Denton Hunt Hopkins Cass Young Morris morton NETS GRAND PRAIRIE Franklin Camp Rock- Rains Marion Palo Parker wall Wood Upshur Gaines Dawson Pinto Tarrant Borden Scurry Fisher Jones FORT Dallas MESQUITE Harrison Van Stephens WORTH Kaufman Gregg LONGVIEW Shackelford DALLAS Zandt Smith Taylor ARLINGTON Hood Andrews Martin Howard Mitchell Callahan Eastland Johnson Ellis ODESSA MIDLAND Nolan Erath Henderson TYLER Rusk Panola ABILENE EL PASO Somervell Navarro Hill El Cherokee Loving Winkler Ector Anderson Shelby Paso Midland Glasscock Coke Runnels Brown Comanche Bosque Nacogdoches Hudspeth Sterling Coleman Mc Limestone Freestone Tom Hamilton Lennan Ward Culberson Crane Green Mills WACO Houston San Sabine Reeves Upton Reagan Coryell
Irion Concho Leon Augustine Falls Angelina SAN ANGELO Mc TEMPLE Culloch San Saba Lampasas Trinity Bell Polk Robertson Madison Tyler Pecos Schleicher Menard COLLEGE STATION-BRYAN
KILLEEN Newton Burnet Milam Jasper Jeff Davis Walker Crockett Mason Llano se Williamson Brazos San
mirG Jacinto CONROE- Hardin Sutton Kimble Burleson Blanco Travis Lee THE WOODLANDS Gillespie Montgomery Liberty Terrell AUSTIN Washington Waller Orange SAN MARCOS BEAUMONT Presidio Kerr Bastrop Harris Jefferson Edwards Hays Austin Brewster Val Verde Kendall HOUSTON PORT ARTHUR Caldwell Fayette Chambers Real Comal Bandera Colorado Fort Guadalupe Bend Bexar Galveston Gonzales Kinney Lavaca TEXAS CITY Uvalde Medina SAN ANTONIO Wharton Brazoria Wilson Dewitt LAKE JACKSON-ANGLETON Maverick Jackson Zavala Frio Atascosa Karnes Matagorda Victoria Goliad Calhoun VICTORIA Mc Bee Refugio Dimmit La Salle Mullen Live Oak San Patricio Aransas Webb Jim Wells Nueces LAREDO Duval CORPUS CHRISTI
Kleberg
Jim Texas Department of Transportation Zapata Brooks Hogg Kenedy March 2016
Starr Hidalgo Willacy
Cameron McALLEN HARLINGEN BROWNSVILLE
Cities served by metropolitan transit authorities Cities/Counties served by coordinated county transportation authority Cities served by urban transit systems Counties served by rural transit systems
8 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 2: STATEWIDE RIDERSHIP FISCAL YEARS 2014 AND 2015
Unlinked Passenger Trip Data
300
250
200
150
100
50 o. ofUnlinkedo.Passenger Trips millions)(in NN
MTA Urbanized Nonurbanized Seniors & IWD JARC NF 2015 MTA Urbanized Nonurbanized Seniors & IWD JARC NF
Texas 2015 258,893,848 24,375,089 6,057,232 434,178 1,853,236 62,796 2014 265,193,052 24,624,416 6,512,617 611,197 2,221,040 95,666 Transit
Note: Figure 2: represents Unlinked Passenger Trip data - JARC's unlinked passenger trip data shown for informational purpose only; Statistics actual data is included in the MTA, 5307, 5311 & 5310 Programs. Report 9 STATEWIDE STATISTICS: The following represents Fiscal Year 2015: TABLE 1 - FY 2015 SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS Total Unlinked Vehicle Agencies Revenue Passenger Operating Expense Revenue Miles Vehicles Trips Program MTA* 8 4,698 258,893,848 188,757,788 $1,990,879,906 Urbanized (5307) 30 846 24,375,089 27,608,096 $113,340,954 Rural (5311) 38 1,710 6,057,232 30,922,835 $92,064,119 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with 61 141 434,178 2,894,051 $3,744,276 Disabilities Program (5310) Total 137 7,395 289,760,347 250,182,770 $2,200,029,255 JARC (5316) 31 27 1,853,236 3,302,917 $7,073,634 New Freedom (5317) 16 18 62,796 700,486 $2,274,005
The following tables provide an overview of service efficiency, cost effectiveness and service effectiveness by funding categories. TABLE 2 - OPERATING EXPENSES PER VEHICLE REVENUE MILE Annualized % Change 2014 to Service Efficiency: 2006 2014 2015 Change 2006- 2015 2015 Program MTA $7.71 $9.07 $9.00 1.67% -0.77% Urbanized (5307) $4.02 $4.56 $4.52 1.24% -0.88% Rural (5311) $2.17 $3.17 $3.13 4.42% -1.26% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with $1.59 $1.62 $2.64 6.60% 62.96% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA $2.17 $4.44 NA 104.61% New Freedom (5317)** NA $1.89 $2.23 NA 17.99%
TABLE 3 - OPERATING EXPENSES PER UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIP Annualized % Change 2014 to Cost Effectiveness: 2006 2014 2015 Change 2006- 2015 2015 Program MTA $4.58 $6.51 $6.46 4.10% -0.77% Urbanized (5307) $4.08 $11.52 $10.70 16.23% -7.12% Rural (5311) $10.87 $22.95 $23.17 11.32% 0.96% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with $8.26 $15.85 $30.12 26.46% 90.03% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA $15.34 $19.50 NA 27.12% New Freedom (5317)** NA $24.70 $31.83 NA 28.87%
TABLE 4 - UNLINKED PASSENGERS PER VEHICLE REVENUE MILE Annualized % Change 2014 to Service Effectiveness: 2006 2014 2015 Change 2006- 2015 2015 Program MTA 1.68 1.41 1.37 -1.85% -2.84% Urbanized (5307) 0.98 0.64 0.60 -3.88% -6.25% Rural (5311) 0.20 0.23 0.24 2.00% 4.35% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with 0.19 0.27 0.22 1.58% -18.52% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA 0.30 0.32 NA 6.67% New Freedom (5317)** NA 0.08 0.09 NA 12.50%
*Includes count for one Coordinated County Transportation Authority **Data shown for informational purpose only. Operational data are included in the MTA, 5307, 5311 & 5310 Programs.
10 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 5: VEHICLES, TRIPS AND MILEAGE BY PROGRAM - FISCAL YEARS 2006-2015
Section 5307 Metropolitan Transit REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Authorities - (MTA) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2006 8 4,330 267,978,421 159,248,873 1.68 2007 8 4,459 270,002,029 168,545,419 1.60 2008 8 4,621 278,397,166 176,658,901 1.58 2009 8 4,773 261,566,425 180,221,900 1.45 2010 8 5,125 243,799,069 179,297,315 1.36 2011 8 4,965 252,717,548 182,114,343 1.39 2012 8 5,012 266,433,903 183,818,668 1.45 2013 8 5,060 267,641,927 185,169,025 1.45 2014 8 5,184 265,193,052 186,606,187 1.42 2015 8 4,698 258,893,848 188,757,788 1.37
Section 5307 REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Urbanized Area Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2006 30 669 16,987,980 17,280,985 0.98 2007 30 690 17,142,361 18,949,631 0.90 2008 30 746 17,783,925 19,940,814 0.89 2009 30 780 18,754,210 20,860,217 0.90 2010 30 846 21,292,163 22,993,459 0.93 2011 30 852 22,291,873 23,226,901 0.96 2012 30 830 23,617,231 24,610,937 0.96 2013 30 874 23,721,626 25,414,450 0.93 2014 30 925 24,624,416 27,163,117 0.91 2015 30 846 24,375,089 27,608,096 0.88
Section 5311 REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Rural Area Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2006 39 1,202 4,665,527 23,413,980 0.20 2007 39 1,258 4,836,320 25,284,561 0.19 2008 39 1,315 4,947,317 25,712,995 0.19 2009 39 1,476 4,906,223 26,615,625 0.19 2010 38 1,684 5,072,004 28,770,279 0.18 2011 38 1,623 5,825,030 32,321,991 0.18 2012 38 1,640 6,033,721 32,724,554 0.18 2013 39 1,786 7,297,163 33,354,326 0.22 2014 38 1,853 6,512,765 33,061,924 0.20 2015 38 1,710 6,057,232 30,922,835 0.20
Section 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals With Disabilities REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2006 150 592 1,449,941 7,552,895 0.19 2007 140 556 1,255,028 6,713,365 0.19 2008 135 515 1,239,574 6,470,051 0.19 2009 123 610 1,387,753 6,474,119 0.21 2010 115 592 1,221,697 6,562,641 0.19 2011 88 270 1,037,421 5,705,267 0.18 2012 77 317 914,020 6,092,655 0.15 2013 73 180 614,462 4,054,411 0.15 2014 69 224 611,197 3,439,563 0.18 2015 61 141 434,178 2,894,051 0.15
Section 5316 - Job Access and Reverse Commute REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER (JARC) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 11 NA 545,070 844,242 0.65 2008 20 NA 1,061,076 1,840,352 0.58 2009 18 NA 1,120,885 2,210,385 0.51 2010 27 NA 1,329,006 2,269,945 0.59 2011 33 90 1,697,260 3,364,822 0.50 2012 34 90 1,858,853 3,071,703 0.61 2013 34 90 2,290,225 4,075,602 0.56 2014 41 90 2,221,040 4,216,417 0.53 2015 28 27 1,853,236 3,302,917 0.56
Section 5317- New REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Freedom (NF) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2009 2 NA 19,042 70,227 0.27 2010 9 NA 64,669 473,646 0.14 2011 20 67 97,507 619,221 0.16 2012 13 57 75,794 541,813 0.14 2013 16 32 89,177 986,387 0.09 2014 22 32 95,666 1,371,844 0.07 2015 10 18 62,796 700,486 0.09
MTA count of eight (8) includes one Coordinated County Transportation Authority. JARC & NF data shown for informational purpose only. Operational data are included in the MTA, 5307, 5311 & 5310 Programs. NA=Not Applicable
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 11 TABLE 6: FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO TEXAS TRANSIT TRANSIT APPORTIONMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2014 and 2015 2014 2015 Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments MTA* $227,818,665 $228,932,632 Urbanized $56,474,811 $56,094,282 Total Urbanized Area Received $284,293,476 $285,026,914 Section 5303 Metropolitan Planning Program (MPO) and Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning Program Apportionments Section 5303 MPO** $9,020,722 $8,973,408 Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning $1,859,942 $1,797,923 Total Section 5303/5304 Received $10,880,664 $10,771,331 Section 5309, 5320, 5329, 5337 and Section 5339 Apportionments and Allocations 5309 Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants MTAs $211,260,026 $50,000,000 5337 State of Good Repair MTAs $30,477,201 $29,374,584 5329 State Safety Oversight Program Apportionments $915,220 $1,029,873 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Allocations MTAs $20,502,613 $22,069,272 Urbanized $5,829,887 $5,819,522 Rural $1,250,000 $1,250,000 Total Apportionment and Allocations Received $270,234,947 $109,543,251 Section 5310 Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Apportionments Section 5310 - Grants $17,080,390 $18,040,080 Section 5310 - State Administration $991,705 $715,053 Total Federal Apportionment $18,072,095 $18,755,133 Section 5311 Rural Area Formula Apportionments, Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP), and Section 5311 - Intercity Bus Allocations Section 5311 - State Administration $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Section 5311 - Intercity Bus (15%) $6,140,674 $6,138,807 Total Available to Section 5311 Rural Recipients $33,667,153 $33,656,576 Section 5311 Federal Apportionments $40,937,827 $40,925,383 RTAP Apportionments $568,729 $549,206 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (JARC)
Program eliminated for FY 2013 and subsequent years from MAP-21; funding apportioned in 5307 and 5311 programs.
Section 5317 New Freedom Program (NF)
Program eliminated for FY 2013 and subsequent years from MAP-21; funding apportioned in 5310 program.
Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data and Apportionments Urbanized (Funds allocated in 5307 program, above) $768,065 $566,363 Total Federal Apportionments $768,065 $566,363 Section 5309 Ladders of Opportunity Bus and Bus Facilities Discretionary Program MTA (Fort Worth) $1,162,078 $0 Urbanized Area (Texarkana) $1,200,000 $0 Total Federal Apportionments $2,362,078 $0
Notes: *MTA includes (7) plus (1) DCTA. **Note: Section 5303/MPO Planning funds are now awarded through FHWA Source: Federal Register for FTA Apportionments & Allocations Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
12 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5307)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 13 SUMMARY MTA and URBANIZED AREA TRANSIT PROGRAMS (Section 5307)
Metropolitan Transit Authorities (MTAs):
The Section 5307 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5307) provides capital and operating
grants for public transportation projects in urbanized areas. The department continues to report data for metropolitan transit authorities (MTAs) and the urbanized transit agencies separately. The difference in the scale of operations between the two groups is such that it is inappropriate to consider them as a single, combined reporting group. TxDOT-PTN does not provide state funding to the transit authorities; however, the Texas Transportation Commission has requested reports on all transit activities, and this is done in voluntary cooperation with the MTAs. To obtain more extensive information regarding MTA services, their websites are included with contact information at the end of this report.
This report lists the Denton County Coordinated County Transportation Authority (CTA) along with the seven MTAs due to its similarity in size and taxing abilities. Data collection from the CTA data was implemented in FY 2006.
In FY 2015, the combined ridership number for the MTAs and the CCTA is 259 million riders, which stands significantly lower than the FY 2014 ridership total of 265 million passenger trips. Overall, ridership has declined by 3.3 percent from FY 2006-2015, with an average annual decrease of less than one percent. The ridership of public transportation in the state is primarily used in the urbanized areas. The indicated trend of service usage is affected by local and national economic conditions (i.e. gas prices and labor fluctuations).
From FY 2014 to 2015, ridership decreased by 2.3 percent, and miles travelled increased by over one percent, during the same period. Overall, vehicle revenue miles travelled has increased by nearly 19 percent from FY 2006-2015, with an average annual increase of nearly two (2) percent. This trend signifies that mass transit usage has decreased over time, with an increase of vehicle miles travelled within the metropolitan transit authorities.
Over the past fiscal year, the Denton County Transit Authority has demonstrated the greatest ridership gain among the MTAs, a seven (7) percent increase in transit users. In contrast, El Paso (at 5 percent) and Fort Worth (at 8 percent) has shown the greatest significant decrease in ridership. Capital Metro in Austin, has demonstrated the heaviest trend regarding the increase in vehicle miles travelled in contrast to their ridership activity, with ridership down three (3) percent, and vehicle miles travelled up 12 percent, from FY 2014 to FY 2015.
14 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Figure 3 below displays the MTAs annualized rate of “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” for FY 2006-2015. The graph shows a trend factoring an overall decrease of 18 percent, and an annual average decrease of two (2) percent, over a ten-year period.
Urbanized Area Transit Programs
Also noted in the introduction of this report, the funding formula is used to allocate state funds to 30 eligible urbanized transit agencies. Included in this total are four providers in a large urbanized area with transit authorities (Arlington, NETS, Grand Prairie, and Mesquite). Population and performance statistics are compared only among these four agencies when allocating funds in this category.
The state funding formula distributes urban performance funds based on a weighted average of four indicators. The funds are then allocated based on the relative performance of the urban service providers. These four performance-based indicators are:
• Local investment per operational expense • Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile • Vehicle revenue mile per operational expense • Unlinked passenger trip per capita (Urban only)
The indicators listed above are consistent with the performance measurement goals recommended by the Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC). “Local investment per operational expense” encourages cooperation and coordination. “Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” is a measure of service effectiveness. “Vehicle revenue mile per operational expense” reflects the efficiency of the operation. These three indicators address the goal of fiscal responsibility as well. The “unlinked passenger trips per capita”
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 15 indicator acknowledges the requirement for funding assistance in cities where transit demand is generated by other than residential population, such as border, tourist, and university cities.
Local investments may fluctuate from year to year and agency to agency as a result of large capital expenditures, change in local funding, and receipt of grants or contracts (i.e. medical transportation, Job Access Reverse Commute, Section 5310, and New Freedom programs). The “unlinked passenger trips per capita“ indicator is based on the 2000 census population which does not change from year to year; therefore, only a change in the number of passengers impacts this indicator.
Besides the performance-based funding elements noted above, the urbanized transit agencies are also responsible for reporting four additional performance-based indicators that measure cost efficiency, service effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety per the Texas Transportation Code §456.008 and §31.48 of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC).
The indicators listed below are required of recipients that receive financial assistance from TxDOT and/or FTA:
(i) Service efficiency--Operating expense per vehicle revenue hour and operating expense per vehicle revenue mile.
(ii) Cost effectiveness--Operating expense per unlinked passenger trip.
(iii) Service effectiveness--Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile and unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue hour.
(iv) Safety--Total incidents per 100,000 miles of service and average number of miles between revenue vehicle mechanical system failures that prevent the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip.
In FY 2015, the ridership number for the urbanized transit agencies is 24.4 million riders, which stands slightly lower than the FY 2014 ridership total of 24.6 million passenger trips. While ridership decreased from FY 2014 to FY 2015, miles travelled increased slightly during the same time period.
Overall, ridership increased an annual average of over four (4) percent, from FY 2006 through FY 2015. The number of “vehicle revenue miles” increased an annual average of six (6) percent, during the same period. This trend signifies that mass transit usage has decreased over time, with an increase of vehicle miles travelled within the urbanized transit agencies.
Over the past fiscal year, the transit agencies serving Mesquite (at 35 percent) and North Richland Hills (at 21 percent) has demonstrated the greatest ridership gains among the urbanized areas. In contrast, Sherman (at 41 percent), San Marcos (at 33 percent), Midland- Odessa (at 13 percent), Brownsville (at 10 percent) and Amarillo (at 10 percent) has shown the greatest double-digit decrease in ridership.
16 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report From FY 2014 to FY 2015, the Conroe Connection transit agency, has demonstrated the heaviest trend regarding an increase in vehicle miles travelled in contrast to their ridership activity, with ridership down three (3) percent, and vehicle miles travelled up 582 percent. Other agencies following Conroe, with this significant trend, are McAllen (ridership down 9 percent and vehicle miles travelled up 55 percent) and Brownsville (ridership down 10 percent and vehicle miles travelled up 21 percent).
This is the ninth year the web-based PTN-128 reporting system has been used, allowing all involved parties to review and resolve any variances in the data by data category. This on- line reporting process also allows reasonableness and data quality checks that may be performed anytime throughout the year.
Figure 4 below depicts the Urbanized Area Programs annualized rate of “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” for FY 2006-2015. The graph shows a trend factoring an overall decrease of 10 percent, and an annual average decrease of one (1) percent, over a ten-year period.
FIGURE 4: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile - FY 2006-2015
1.20 0.98 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.93 1.00 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.91 0.88 0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Notes:
The monthly statistics are located at the end of this section. “Local and Total Revenue” is also identified as “Local and Total Investments.” The monthly statistics for “Total Revenue” and “Annual Total Revenue” differ slightly from one another in this report. Monthly statistics include federal, state, and local funding in the “Total Revenue,” whereas the “Annual Total Revenue” statistics include only the local funding. Table 13 gives a brief description of the types of local contribution included in “Annual Total Revenue.”
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 17 TABLE 7: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES - (MTAs) PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 186,606,187 188,757,788 1.15 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 12,507,067 12,842,402 2.68 Expenses $2,069,177,817 $1,990,879,906 -3.78 Total Revenue Vehicles 5,184 4,698 -9.38 Total Revenue $1,991,755,150 $2,131,389,223 7.01
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 265,193,052 258,893,848 -2.38 Incidents 1,034 NR NR Actual Vehicle Miles 212,148,230 218,748,852 3.11 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 13,550,001 13,933,353 2.83 Failures 21,481 19,869 -7.50
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 2014 2015 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle $11.09 $10.55 Unlinked Passenger $7.80 $7.69 Revenue Mile Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $165.44 $155.02 10% 9% Revenue Hour Ratio**
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS *SAFETY INDICATOR 2014 2015 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Incidents/Per 1.42 1.37 0.554 NR Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 21.20 20.16 Revenue Vehicle 11.511 10.526 Vehicle Revenue Hour System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2014 2015 Dead Head Hours 7.7% 7.8% Dead Head Miles 12.0% 13.7%
Notes: Performance measures are requirements of the Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures shows combined major & other mechanical system failures. For detailed breakout see Table 16. *Safety data shows safety incidents for fatalities, injuries, major and non-major in Table 17 and non-arson fires and property damages, major and non-major in Table 17a. **See Table 14 for details. NR - Not Reported
18 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 7a: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAMS (5307) PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 27,163,117 27,608,096 1.64 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 1,693,384 1,784,879 5.40Expenses $120,751,851 $113,340,954 -6.14 Total Revenue Vehicles 925 846 -8.54Total Revenue $71,675,738 $69,071,763 -3.63
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 24,624,416 24,375,089 -1.01 Incidents 80 NR NR Actual Vehicle Miles 29,429,328 30,029,646 2.04 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 1,815,782 1,926,897 6.12 Failures 6,164 5,055 -17.99
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY (i) COST EFFECTIVENESS (ii) 2014 2015 2014 2015 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle $4.45 $4.11 Unlinked Passenger $4.90 $4.65 Revenue Mile Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery Ratio $71.31 $63.50 5% 13% Revenue Hour #
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS (iii) *SAFETY INDICATOR (iv) 2014 2015 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Incidents/Per 0.91 0.88 0.295 NR Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 14.54 13.66 Revenue Vehicle 22.69 18.31 Vehicle Revenue Hour System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2014 2015 Dead Head Hours 7.0% 7.4% Dead Head Miles 8.1% 8.1%
Notes: (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are performance measures requirements of the Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. # Farebox Recovery Ratio (see Table 14 for details). Not a performance-based requirement for Transportation Code §456.008. Total Mechanical Failures shows combined major & other mechanical system failures. For detailed breakout see Table 16. *Safety data shows safety incidents for fatalities, injuries, major and non-major in Table 17 and non-arson fires and property damages, major and non-major in Table 17a. NR - Not Reported
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 19 FIGURE 5: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2006-2015
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Service Efficiency $10.00 $9.07 $9.00 $9.00 $7.93 $8.13 $8.00 $7.37 $6.57 $6.70 $6.66 $6.93 $7.00 $6.47 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Cost Effectiveness $7.00 $6.51 $6.46 $5.64 $6.00 $5.35 $5.50 $5.53 $4.73 $4.99 $5.00 $4.24 $4.51 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Service Effectiveness 2.0 1.8 1.58 1.6 1.50 1.44 1.47 1.46 1.34 1.33 1.39 1.41 1.37 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 5 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
20 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 6: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2006-2015
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Service Efficiency $5.00 $4.56 $4.52 $4.17 $4.22 $4.31 $4.50 $3.88 $3.98 $4.02 $3.90 $4.00 $3.73 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Cost Effectiveness
$14.00 $12.34 $11.15$11.65 $11.51 $11.52 $12.00 $10.45 $10.46 $10.70 $9.86 $10.02 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Service Effectiveness 0.8 0.69 0.68 0.70 0.67 0.70 7 0.65 0.66 0.64 0.63 0.63 0.60 0.60 6 0.50 5 0.40 4 0.30 3 0.20 2 0.10 1 0.00 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 6 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 21 2015 2015 5.51 5.51 8.94 3.69 2014 2014 5.58 8.95 6.70 9.63 5.44 10.76 6.70 7.89 19.69 20.35 6.83 5.94 9.07 9.07 $ 9.00 Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Operating ExpenseOperating Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (i) .51 .51 4.56 $ $ 4.52 2015 2015 53.66 $ 3.48 $ 119.84 $ 9.80 $ 84.28 84.28 5.51 $ $
68.8559.3375.4399.2755.8073.9772.4561.9168.0781.5581.5363.4668.18 76.5777.39 51.60 76.00 80.41 54.22 74.19 66.57 n/a 64.39 66.38 79.87 91.38 62.79 47.50 4.50 3.48 5.97 6.12 3.24 5.88 3.64 3.59 2.93 7.26 5.14 4.79 4.30 3.07 5.11 3.20 5.69 5.05 3.50 5.72 n/a 3.36 3.69 2.90 7.25 5.54 4.66 2.71 42.5476.9352.2599.2858.7563.2145.03 n/a 27.64 83.78 52.10 84.57 60.17 72.21 4.04 5.19 3.75 7.06 3.82 4.76 1.81 n/a 2.00 5.74 3.44 5.93 3.72 5.68 92.08 91.58 92.34 83.30 5.41 5.99 79.77 77.08 68.2471.3967.2357.1372.9351.52 68.87 70.94 57.82 53.42 70.14 56.62 4.44 4.55 4.69 3.68 3.87 3.25 4.52 4.50 4.03 3.61 3.79 3.49 221.02 179.63 8.86 7.44 300.89 313.00 145.02 116.37 103.81 90.96 120.66 139.87 106.93 118.78 5.49 6.51 2014 2014 Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Years Fiscal $ 133.02 $ 129.00 $ $ 86.18 $ $ $ 73.69 $ 71 $ 129.57 $ $ 49.05 $ Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Hour (i) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Hour TABLE 8: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SERVICE EFFICIENCY BY SYSTEM - SYSTEM BY EFFICIENCY SERVICE PROGRAM AREA & URBANIZED (MTAs) AUTHORITIES TRANSIT 8: METROPOLITAN TABLE otes: MTAs Average for MTAs Average for Urbanized Areas Urbanized Areas Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies N This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators. Efficiency. Service for Requirement TAC (i) *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available Austin Christi Corpus Dallas Denton County* Paso El Worth Fort Houston San Antonio Abilene Amarillo Arlington Beaumont Brownsville College Station-Bryan Conroe-The Woodlands Prairie Grand Harlingen Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) Lake Jackson-Angleton Laredo Longview Lubbock McAllen McKinney Mesquite Midland-Odessa North Richland Hills - NETS** Arthur Port San Angelo Marcos San Sherman Temple Texarkana City Texas Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls
22 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 9: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin 23.89 23.22 $ 5.85 $ 6.17 Corpus Christi 18.67 18.30 4.19 4.49 Dallas 24.23 24.56 12.96 13.43 Denton County* 7.58 8.18 5.84 6.95 El Paso 21.84 20.78 3.90 4.11 Fort Worth 8.23 7.57 7.28 5.67 Houston 17.12 16.49 6.82 5.90 San Antonio 25.17 24.15 5.23 4.96 Average for MTAs 18.34 17.91 $ 6.51 $ 6.46
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip (ii) Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene 5.60 5.53 $ 5.68 $ 5.75 Amarillo 2.08 1.88 10.62 11.91 Arlington 0.72 0.68 23.80 22.29 Beaumont 3.78 3.75 9.35 9.54 Brownsville 8.01 7.17 4.70 5.23 College Station-Bryan 39.89 43.03 1.31 1.30 Conroe-The Woodlands 3.75 3.17 9.00 8.57 Grand Prairie 0.30 0.29 17.89 18.56 Harlingen 0.70 0.69 11.37 11.39 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 2.64 2.62 7.81 8.43 Lake Jackson-Angleton 1.67 1.71 8.63 8.07 Laredo 13.66 13.40 4.43 4.45 Longview 2.56 2.64 7.40 7.47 Lubbock 16.94 16.29 2.93 2.98 McAllen 1.44 1.32 4.03 4.29 McKinney 0.69 0.63 34.42 n/a Mesquite 0.08 0.11 22.79 16.89 Midland-Odessa 1.76 1.53 10.37 12.41 North Richland Hills - NETS** 0.09 0.11 31.33 29.59 Port Arthur 0.86 0.81 18.93 16.91 San Angelo 2.90 2.76 9.18 9.19 San Marcos 2.74 1.83 9.57 15.99 Sherman 3.41 2.21 14.09 n/a Temple 2.39 2.25 13.04 14.32 Texarkana 6.05 5.56 5.34 5.80 Texas City 1.76 1.83 16.91 18.29 Tyler 1.46 1.52 11.44 11.13 2015 Victoria 4.06 4.34 9.33 8.59 Waco 6.55 6.57 6.04 5.93 Wichita Falls 4.56 4.84 4.00 4.20 Texas Average for Urbanized Areas 4.77 4.76 $ 11.52 $ 10.70 Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies 7.63 7.48 $ 10.47 $ 9.75 Transit Notes: This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators
Statistics (ii) TAC Requirement for Cost Effectiveness. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available Report 23 24
TABLE 10: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM - 2015 Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Texas Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Transit Austin 1.67 1.45 22.15 19.44 Corpus Christi 1.33 1.21 19.05 17.16 Dallas 1.52 1.52 23.23 23.30
Statistics Denton County** 1.53 1.55 20.67 20.12 El Paso 1.72 1.63 23.68 22.27 Fort Worth 0.74 1.06 12.68 14.70 Houston 1.41 1.34 21.28 19.74 San Antonio 1.31 1.20 19.86 18.36
Report Average for MTAs 1.41 1.37 20.32 19.39
Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (iii) Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour (iii) Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene 0.61 0.64 8.63 9.33 Amarillo 0.42 0.43 6.48 6.43 Arlington 0.15 0.14 2.49 2.31 Beaumont 0.64 0.60 8.07 7.96 Brownsville 1.30 0.97 21.14 15.37 College Station-Bryan 2.48 2.69 42.72 41.68 Conroe-The Woodlands 0.98 0.87 24.55 20.96 Grand Prairie 0.33 0.31 4.14 4.00 Harlingen 0.32 0.29 6.37 5.85 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 0.46 0.44 7.92 7.64 Lake Jackson-Angleton 0.34 0.36 7.88 8.23 Laredo 1.64 1.63 18.42 17.95 Longview 0.69 0.74 11.01 12.23 Lubbock 1.63 1.56 21.63 21.05 McAllen 1.07 0.63 16.93 11.08 McKinney 0.09 0.13 2.25 1.37 Mesquite 0.18 0.12 1.87 1.64 Midland-Odessa 0.50 0.46 7.42 6.75 North Richland Hills - NETS*** 0.12 0.12 1.67 1.76 Port Arthur 0.37 0.35 5.25 5.00 San Angelo 0.42 0.40 6.40 6.55 San Marcos 0.50 0.35 6.61 4.52 Sherman 0.13 0.08 3.20 2.02 Temple 0.34 0.32 5.23 4.81 Texarkana 0.85 0.78 13.38 12.24 Texas City 0.32 0.36 6.32 6.49 Tyler 0.41 0.36 5.88 5.20 Victoria 0.39 0.42 6.12 6.22 Waco 0.64 0.64 12.07 11.83 Wichita Falls 0.81 0.83 12.89 13.50 Average for Urbanized Areas 0.64 0.60 10.16 9.40 Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies 0.80 0.76 12.30 11.50
Notes: This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators (iii) TAC Requirement for Service Effectiveness.
**Coordinated County Transportation Authority ***NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available TABLE 11: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - SOURCE DATA Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
(1) Total Operating Expense Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue Miles MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin # $190,394,078 $195,033,639 1,469,471 1,627,501 19,434,690 21,823,217 Corpus Christi @ 25,029,920 26,303,771 313,769 341,248 4,485,710 4,832,697 Dallas # # 901,403,353 947,164,865 2,995,769 3,026,119 45,769,087 46,533,123 Denton County* # # 16,198,175 20,833,837 134,250 148,956 1,809,355 1,935,789 El Paso # 65,586,907 65,974,257 712,278 720,388 9,788,063 9,842,847 Fort Worth 62,409,292 44,632,472 675,874 535,835 11,544,720 7,449,045 Houston 576,888,223 480,511,016 3,977,940 4,129,049 59,927,630 60,908,564 San Antonio @ 231,267,869 210,426,049 2,227,716 2,313,306 33,846,932 35,432,506 MTA Sub-Total $ 2,069,177,817 $ 1,990,879,906 12,507,067 12,842,402 186,606,187 188,757,788
(1) Total Operating Expense Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue Miles Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene # $3,511,520 $3,512,081 71,588 65,445 1,007,988 952,200 Amarillo 4,336,939 4,394,694 62,987 57,394 962,820 859,190 Arlington 2,999,455 2,664,608 50,554 51,642 862,149 833,107 Beaumont 5,232,871 5,297,477 69,378 69,703 876,126 931,316 Brownsville @ 8,180,623 8,158,763 82,405 101,470 1,335,660 1,615,419 College Station-Bryan 8,925,898 9,592,256 159,971 176,901 2,755,047 2,742,539 Conroe-The Woodlands 7,355,624 6,519,476 10,206 36,293 128,332 875,735 Grand Prairie 754,936 758,682 14,971 10,226 298,088 132,630 Harlingen 1,084,687 1,062,288 72,484 15,957 1,250,669 316,597 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 4,487,128 4,804,937 15,825 74,625 830,314 1,303,695 Lake Jackson-Angleton 1,077,137 1,033,070 33,281 15,562 367,342 355,991 Laredo # # 14,263,048 14,052,586 174,904 175,942 1,965,831 1,937,654 Longview 1,877,260 1,949,879 23,025 21,339 365,156 352,213 Lubbock @ 11,794,395 11,531,248 185,870 183,634 2,460,903 2,473,635 McAllen # 4,232,469 4,121,325 62,082 86,762 983,383 1,522,652 McKinney # # 4,039,320 n/a 52,191 78,034 1,316,351 824,050 Mesquite 678,684 680,306 15,953 24,610 168,021 340,430 Midland-Odessa 4,456,590 4,649,329 57,931 55,495 857,967 810,194 North Richland Hills - NETS** 943,057 1,074,342 18,050 20,621 251,679 312,334 Port Arthur 2,491,730 2,108,984 25,098 24,937 352,911 355,841 San Angelo # 2,475,511 2,357,044 42,137 39,170 648,537 633,558
2015 San Marcos 1,386,521 1,546,301 21,936 21,415 291,234 272,438 Sherman # # 3,270,289 n/a 72,621 67,725 1,804,671 1,734,818 Temple 2,817,966 2,912,054 41,294 42,283 635,314 643,730
Texas Texarkana 1,682,084 1,680,246 23,562 23,687 369,583 373,132 Texas City @ 3,174,417 3,565,511 29,686 30,018 577,860 547,445 Tyler 2,179,271 2,208,482 32,417 38,196 464,338 548,391
Transit Victoria # 2,414,956 2,373,903 42,271 44,441 656,853 656,874 Waco # 6,821,944 6,713,478 93,545 95,716 1,761,315 1,772,943 Wichita Falls 1,811,521 2,017,604 35,161 35,636 556,675 577,345
Statistics Urbanized Area Sub-Total $ 120,757,851 $ 113,340,954 1,693,384 1,784,879 27,163,117 27,608,096 Grand Total $ 2,189,935,668 $ 2,104,220,860 14,200,451 14,627,281 213,769,304 216,365,884
Notes:
Report (1) Total Operating Expense includes Administrative, Purchased Transportation and Planning. # Includes JARC data. See Table 32 and Table 33 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 36 and Table 37 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service 25 26 2015 TABLE 12: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIPS -
Texas Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
Transit Urbanized Area Population (1) Unlinked Passenger Trips MTAs Census 2010 2014 2015 Austin # 1,362,416 32,543,921 31,632,038 Corpus Christi @
Statistics 320,069 5,977,206 5,857,146 Dallas (2) # # 2,871,343 69,578,080 70,508,674 Denton County (2)** # # 366,174 2,775,047 2,996,301 El Paso # 772,374 16,867,731 16,046,207 Fort Worth (2) 1,040,837 8,567,222 7,874,930
Report Houston 4,944,332 84,633,736 81,511,483 San Antonio @ 1,758,210 44,250,109 42,467,069 MTA's Total 13,435,755 265,193,052 258,893,848
Urbanized Area Population (1) Unlinked Passenger Trips Urbanized Areas Census 2010 2014 2015 Abilene # 110,421 617,971 610,493 Amarillo 196,651 408,440 368,864 Arlington (2) 175,396 126,036 119,526 Beaumont 147,922 559,616 555,006 Brownsville @ 217,585 1,742,179 1,559,837 College Station-Bryan 171,345 6,834,163 7,373,555 Conroe-The Woodlands 239,938 42,206 40,868 Grand Prairie (2) 139,824 95,379 93,272 Harlingen 135,663 574,409 569,926 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 217,630 124,773 128,069 Lake Jackson-Angleton 74,830 817,069 760,616 Laredo # # 235,730 3,221,013 3,157,912 Longview 98,884 253,521 261,047 Lubbock @ 237,356 4,020,550 3,865,945 McAllen # 728,825 1,050,954 960,891 McKinney # # 170,030 117,369 106,844 Mesquite (2) 365,438 29,777 40,274 Midland-Odessa 244,212 429,696 374,775 North Richland Hills - NETS (2)*** 327,306 30,096 36,305 Port Arthur 153,150 131,647 124,712 San Angelo # 92,984 269,801 256,588 San Marcos 52,826 144,936 96,692 Sherman # # 61,900 232,069 137,104 Temple 90,390 216,045 203,289 Texarkana 52,090 315,215 289,866 Texas City @ 106,383 187,671 194,932 Tyler 130,247 190,518 198,506 Victoria # 63,683 258,748 276,204 Waco # 172,378 1,129,343 1,132,255 Wichita Falls 99,437 453,206 480,916 Urbanized Areas Total 5,310,454 24,624,416 24,375,089 GRAND TOTAL 18,746,209 289,817,468 283,268,937
Notes: (1) Source - 2010 U.S. Census SF1. (2) Population is aggregated from component census places in the agency service area. # Includes JARC ridership. See Table 32 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 36 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. **Coordinated County Transportation Authority ***NETS-North East Transportation Service -2.27% -2.38% -2.03% 1,018 14.52% 3,143 20.69% -24,778 -381,967 -5,896,620 -6,299,204 Differences % Change 0 0 8,029 18,333 FY2015 Seniors & Disabled, Enhanced Mobility of of Mobility Enhanced Departmentof Aging & Program, Section 5316 5316 Section Program, Medical Transportation Transportation Medical Freedom, Section 5310 5310 Section Freedom, Disabilities, CMAQ, Head CMAQ, Disabilities, (JARC), Section 5317 New New 5317 Section (JARC), Start and Other Contract … … Start Contract Other and 0 0 00 00 00 00 7,011 15,190 FY2014 4,297,110 3,915,143 1,221,353 1,196,575 259,652,388 253,755,768 265,193,052 258,893,848 ercentageofPassenger P
- Boardings by Service,Boardingsby FY 2015 Figure 7: MTAs MTAs Figure7: General Public, 98.0% TABLE 12a: MTAs - PASSENGER BOARDINGS - Fiscal Year 2014 to 2015 TABLE 12a: MTAs - PASSENGER BOARDINGS CMAQ Head Start Section 5317 New Freedom Passenger Boardings General Public Section 5316 (JARC) Section 5310 Enhance Mobility of Seniors & Disabled Department of Aging & Disabilities Programs State Other TOTAL Other Contract Service Medical Transportation Program Transportation Medical
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 27 28 2015 Texas TABLE 12b: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - PASSENGER BOARDINGS - Fiscal Year 2014 to Fiscal Year 2015 Transit Statistics Passenger Boardings FY2014 FY2015 Differences % Change General Public 16,907,497 16,298,713 -608,784 -3.60% Medical Transportation Program 174,013 138,310 -35,703 -20.52% Report Head Start Other Contract Service 6,891,156 7,489,189 598,033 8.68% Section 5316 (JARC) 503,086 302,786 -200,300 -39.81% Section 5317 (New Freedom) 5,302 4,780 -522 -9.85% Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Disabled 138,341 139,598 1,257 0.91% Department of Aging & Disabilities 5,021 1,713 -3,308 -65.88% Department of State Health Services Dept. of Family & Protective Srvc. Dept. of Assistive & Rehab. Srvc. TOTAL 24,624,416 24,375,089 -249,327 -1.01% 0
Figure 8: Urbanized - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service, FY 2015 Section 5310 Enhanced Section 5316 (JARC), Mobility of Seniors & 1.2% Disabled, 0.6% Other Contract Service, 30.7%
Medical Transportation General Public , 66.9% Program, 0.6% TABLE 13: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM REVENUE SOURCES - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
Total Revenue (1)* Sales Tax Revenue (2) MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin # $ 222,742,558 $ 242,881,236 $ 194,208,926 $ 208,955,503 Corpus Christi @ 33,570,286 34,399,345 31,516,148 32,300,421 Dallas # # 637,434,399 678,936,474 480,951,451 522,682,161 Denton County* # # 24,958,249 27,269,248 0 0 El Paso # 50,261,721 53,073,266 38,500,863 40,255,797 Fort Worth 84,087,241 84,873,331 61,733,304 65,027,584 Houston 750,445,032 814,505,704 672,783,406 723,206,504 San Antonio @ 188,255,664 195,450,619 159,394,751 167,176,666 MTA Sub-Total $ 1,991,755,150 $ 2,131,389,223 $ 1,639,088,849 $ 1,759,604,636
Total Revenue (1) Sales Tax Revenue (2) Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene # $ 1,759,316 $ 1,516,982 Amarillo 1,933,663 1,558,965 Arlington 1,584,015 1,300,713 Beaumont 4,494,101 2,869,123 Brownsville @ 4,484,240 7,480,119 College Station-Bryan 6,362,302 7,569,150 Conroe-The Woodlands 6,180,678 4,605,640 Grand Prairie 181,668 186,801 Harlingen 291,124 223,244 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 1,400,004 1,951,603 Lake Jackson-Angleton 359,072 355,681 Laredo** # # 10,736,803 9,725,650 $ 6,425,615 $ 5,383,805 Longview 819,105 760,610 Lubbock @ 8,594,750 7,619,320 McAllen # 3,280,732 3,318,096 McKinney # # 1,730,228 n/a Mesquite 269,968 266,515 Midland-Odessa 1,660,113 1,590,907 North Richland Hills - NETS*** 535,601 621,577 Port Arthur 1,030,404 1,088,390 San Angelo # 836,113 1,120,936 San Marcos 340,049 564,470 Sherman # # 2,197,234 n/a 2015 Temple 1,208,775 1,510,588 Texarkana 521,824 496,895
Texas Texas City @ 1,597,838 3,622,132 Tyler 795,088 772,416 Victoria # 1,758,285 1,272,322 Transit Waco # 3,827,230 4,175,753 Wichita Falls 905,415 927,165
Statistics Urbanized Areas Sub-Total $ 71,675,738 $ 69,071,763 $ 6,425,615 $ 5,383,805 GRAND TOTAL $ 2,063,430,888 $ 2,200,460,986 $ 1,645,514,464 $ 1,764,988,441 Notes:
Report (1)* Derived revenue from sales tax, advertising on vehicles and/or property. Also includes passenger fares, non-transportation revenue such as donation, parking fees from park & ride lots, investment earnings, etc. (2) Source used for sales tax revenue data is the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. # Includes JARC data. See Table 33 for Breakout. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 37 for Breakout. **Laredo is the only urbanized area that collects transit sales tax. ***NETS-North East Transportation Service 29 @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. n/a - Not Available 30 2015 TABLE 14: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM Texas FAREBOX REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Transit Farebox Revenue Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin $ 14,307,443 $ 16,248,884 8% 8% Statistics Corpus Christi 1,684,877 1,674,314 7% 6% Dallas 70,555,760 65,050,457 8% 7% Denton County* 1,463,635 1,430,882 9% 7% El Paso 9,766,060 9,466,067 15% 14% Fort Worth 9,351,775 5,704,500 15% 13% Report Houston 68,560,417 65,971,079 12% 14% San Antonio 24,457,137 23,215,866 11% 11% MTA Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 200,147,104 $ 188,762,049 11% 10%
Farebox Revenue Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene $ 414,274 $404,059 12% 12% Amarillo 210,617 193,519 5% 4% Arlington 215,105 203,264 7% 8% Beaumont 514,765 535,536 10% 10% Brownsville 1,130,438 1,059,985 14% 13% College Station-Bryan 285,067 289,557 3% 3% Conroe-The Woodlands 4,179,318 3,853,874 57% 59% Grand Prairie 1,773 1,985 0% 0% Harlingen 42,555 37,363 4% 4% Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 314,894 243,851 7% 5% Lake Jackson-Angleton 63,496 65,255 6% 6% Laredo 3,342,498 3,317,725 23% 24% Longview 205,367 203,328 11% 10% Lubbock 995,014 970,781 8% 8% McAllen 548,679 549,190 13% 13% McKinney** 135,875 n/a 3% n/a Mesquite 15,665 1,248 2% n/a Midland-Odessa 317,041 287,536 7% 6% North Richland Hills - NETS*** 41,011 51,725 4% 5% Port Arthur 133,819 129,006 5% 6% San Angelo 152,848 157,995 6% 7% San Marcos 47,149 57,354 3% 4% Sherman 281,698 n/a 9% n/a Temple 165,729 126,268 6% 4% Texarkana 115,994 136,522 7% 8% Texas City 279,292 382,142 9% 11% Tyler 158,387 171,970 7% 8% Victoria 162,053 168,235 7% 7% Waco 693,181 759,376 10% 11% Wichita Falls 275,704 276,109 15% 14% Urbanized Areas Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 15,439,306 $ 14,634,758 9% 10% Grand Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 215,586,410 $ 203,396,807 10% 10%
Notes: (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **McKinney does not collect fares. ***NETS-North East Transportation Service TABLE 15: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM REVENUE VEHICLE FLEET - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
Total Number of Buses Total Number of Rail/Trolleys MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin 697 703 6 6 Corpus Christi 109 64 0 0 Dallas 1,087 1,038 213 210 Denton County* 92 60 15 8 El Paso 250 235 0 0 Fort Worth 397 239 0 0 Houston 1,545 1,335 18 73 San Antonio 755 727 0 0 MTAs Sub-Total 4,932 4,401 252 297
Total Number of Buses Total Number of Rail/Trolleys Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene 57 46 Amarillo 29 28 Arlington 28 28 Beaumont 29 30 Brownsville 27 33 College Station-Bryan 16 16 Conroe-The Woodlands 40 42 Grand Prairie 12 12 Harlingen 10 10 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 49 57 Lake Jackson-Angleton 13 10 Laredo 67 70 Longview 13 13 Lubbock 102 101 McAllen 35 45 McKinney 28 n/a Mesquite 23 n/a Midland-Odessa 27 27 North Richland Hills - NETS** 77 Port Arthur 15 15 San Angelo 23 27 San Marcos 14 14 2015 Sherman 64 n/a Temple 37 44
Texas Texarkana 11 11 Texas City 15 15 Tyler 22 24 Transit Victoria 36 43 Waco 63 63 Wichita Falls 13 15 Statistics Urbanized Areas Sub-Total 925 846 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 5,857 5,247 252 297
Report Notes: *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available 31 32 2015 TABLE 16: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM Texas REVENUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Transit Major Mechanical System Failures Other Mechanical System Failures MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Statistics Austin 2,560 3,269 997 147 Corpus Christi 80 n/a 406 n/a Dallas 2,338 1,832 1,698 1,462 Denton County* 243 219 12 27 Report El Paso 139 98 18 6 Fort Worth 987 818 635 563 Houston 3,018 4,114 1,263 1,642 San Antonio 3,779 3,562 3,308 2,110 MTAs Sub-Total 13,144 13,912 8,337 5,957
Major Mechanical System Failures Other Mechanical System Failures Urbanized Areas 2014 2015 2014 2015 Abilene 40 23 17 13 Amarillo 15 107 60 193 Arlington 01 00 Beaumont 25 24 426 409 Brownsville 979 963 1687 564 College Station-Bryan 21 17 15 15 Conroe-The Woodlands 28 26 63 33 Grand Prairie 03 00 Harlingen 28 6 0 57 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 129 101 13 14 Lake Jackson-Angleton 8 7 13 14 Laredo 129 99 176 139 Longview 42 27 93 82 Lubbock 359 575 204 110 McAllen 89 39 94 123 McKinney 39 n/a 36 n/a Mesquite 13 15 103 55 Midland-Odessa 32 34 197 134 North Richland Hills - NETS** 00 00 Port Arthur 0 1 50 54 San Angelo 35 8 10 3 San Marcos 35 151 Sherman 35 n/a 55 n/a Temple 69 47 11 5 Texarkana 3 3 111 81 Texas City 12 7 17 17 Tyler 159 213 117 240 Victoria 26 19 71 111 Waco 93 92 16 26 Wichita Falls 47 58 36 42 Urbanized Areas Sub-Total 2,458 2,520 3,706 2,535 GRAND TOTAL 15,602 16,432 12,043 8,492
Notes: *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service TABLE 17: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SAFETY INCIDENTS - Fiscal Years 2013 through 2015
Fatalities Injuries Injuries Major (1) Non-Major (2) MTAs 2013 2014 2015 2014 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Austin 1 40 40 77 82 Corpus Christi 310 2245 Dallas 4 1 39 75 138 117 Denton County* El Paso 311 2825 Fort Worth 6 4 51 75 Houston 4 251 216 145 210 San Antonio 2 2 36 29 105 92 MTA Sub-Total 11 3 NR 378 385 NR 566 646 NR
Fatalities Injuries Injuries Major (1) Non-Major (2) Urbanized Areas 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 Abilene 1 Amarillo Arlington Beaumont 417 6 Brownsville 23 College Station-Bryan 11 1 Conroe-The Woodlands 1 Grand Prairie Harlingen Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 12 2 1 7 Lake Jackson-Angleton Laredo Longview Lubbock 43 McAllen McKinney 12 Mesquite Midland-Odessa North Richland Hills - NETS** Port Arthur 2015 San Angelo 1 San Marcos 6 Sherman 232
Texas Temple 2 Texarkana Texas City Tyler Transit Victoria 4 712 Waco 312 1311 Wichita Falls
Statistics Urbanized Area Sub-Total 0 0 NR 41 37 NR 35 43 NR Grand Total 11 3 NR 419 422 NR 601 689 NR
Notes: Source: (1) Major include: 2 or more persons injured. FTA-NTD Safety and Security Reporting Report (2) Non-major include: 1 person injured and non-arson fire. Public Transportation Management System (PTMS) *Coordinated County Transportation Authority Blank field represents NR for this report. **NETS-North East Transportation Service 2015 data will be featured in the 2016 Texas Transit Statisitics Report 33 NR NR NR 2015 2015 2014 2014 20,000 84,759 84,759 - -
2,450 3,500 2013 2013 15,000 $35,044 $10,494 Non-Major (2) Non-Major (2) Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Transit Vehicles and Property Damages NR $ 58,029 $ NR $ 703,850 $ 3 NR $ 761,879 $ 3 2015 2015
2014 2014 26,000 13,500
2016 Texas Transit Statisitics Report 1,412 34,374 20,079 anagement System (PTMS) System anagement 2013 2013 40,000 45,000 36,600 60,000 $33,690 $65,000 $80,000 $40,000 160,000 130,000 $7,000 265,985124,434 30,000 53,290 15,436 177,310 17,728 103,550 1,015,813 388,803 379,877 232,987 be featured in the be featured ource: Public Transportation M Public Transportation Major (1) Major (1) Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Transit Vehicles and Property Damages FTA-NTD Safety and Security Reporting and Safety FTA-NTD Blank field represents NR for this report. S will 2015 data NR $ 1,682,432 $ 1,686,093 NR $ 618,012 $ 145,374 NR $ 2,300,444 $ 1,831,467 2015 2015 1 45,000 8 1 9 SAFETY INCIDENTS cont'd. - Fiscal Years 2013 through 2015 2013 through Years Fiscal - cont'd. INCIDENTS SAFETY 2014 2014 3 2,000 $80,000 1 1 21 5 240,510 1,134,000 92,683 3 2 5 2013 2013 TABLE 17a: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM PROGRAM AREA & URBANIZED (MTAs) AUTHORITIES TRANSIT METROPOLITAN 17a: TABLE Non-Arson Fires Non-Arson Fires otes: MTAs MTA Sub-Total MTA Areas Urbanized Sub-Total Area Urbanized Total Grand **NETS-North East Transportation Service (2) include: Non-major 1 person injured, of $7,500 property fireup and/or to $24,999. non-arson damage (1) Major include: $25,000. injured persons than greater 2 or more propertydamage and/or N Temple Texarkana Texas City Tyler Victoria Waco FallsWichita Austin Christi Corpus Dallas Denton County El Paso Worth Fort Houston San Antonio Abilene Amarillo Arlington Beaumont Brownsville Station-Bryan College Conroe-The Woodlands Prairie Grand Harlingen Killeen Copperas (includes Cove & Harker Heights) Lake Jackson-Angleton Laredo Longview Lubbock McAllen McKinney Mesquite Midland-Odessa Hills - NETS** Richland North Arthur Port San Angelo San Marcos Sherman
34 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES
(MTAs), (CTA) &
(SECTION 5307)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 35 0 0 0 1.55 1.45 1.52 1.21 127,266 1,430,409 1,430,882 1,674,314 8,604,458 3,577,936 4,832,697 1,935,789 5,857,146 2,996,301 3,129,317 5,396,594 25,838,366 10,416,356 32,597,765 16,248,884 65,050,457 21,823,217 46,533,123 31,632,038 70,508,674 32,665,842 46,133,120 216,215,996 612,455,608 277,234,243 783,574,003 101,059,593 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ------1.30 1.34 1.50 1.19 39,359 561,037 175,513 122,460 285,624 2,572,229 2,164,145 1,660,760 6,288,084 6,185,251 21,489,692 17,286,650 55,178,004 42,489,797
$ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ 34,353,007
- - - - 1.27 0.85 1.49 1.21 9,531 81,429 (55,392) 588,817 123,763 112,195 177,439 277,959 2,266,761 2,908,819 1,876,607 2,777,241 1,495,211 5,694,973 6,504,284 24,975,775 19,112,000 59,983,333 47,578,884
$ $ $
$
$ $ $ $ 1,981,245
- - - - 0.83 1.25 1.51 1.20 8,815 293,863 113,077 159,423 286,264 341,185 3,378,136 3,602,220 2,105,980 3,429,394 3,092,797 1,274,705 5,724,640 8,515,397 1,159,079 28,304,545 20,384,886 77,538,337 62,718,173
$ $
$
$ $ $ $ 3,779,747 $
- - - 1.13 1.34 1.43 1.18 9,253 575,597 187,448 100,704 148,970 290,747 3,443,811 2,132,917 2,719,524 1,296,765 5,814,526 8,580,741 3,052,603 1,210,190 21,397,331 16,557,220 55,762,106 11,749,235 46,043,009
$ $ $
$
$ $ $ $ 3,215,560
- - - - 1.65 1.47 1.48 1.20 9,559 32,887 125,482 141,036 342,724 343,250 2,695,892 3,297,585 2,227,160 1,034,773 2,780,549 1,850,732 5,802,569 24,103,210 18,210,176 75,113,840 46,437,621 22,840,763
$ $ $
$ $
$ $ $ 2,967,749
664,520 - - - - 1.40 1.57 1.47 1.15 8,792 37,531 662,190 134,342 148,762 408,871 449,782 2,687,598 3,820,723 2,144,385 3,213,387 2,173,366 6,016,110 5,090,718 24,375,325 19,392,271 72,864,505 60,788,146
$ $
$ $
$ $ $ $ 3,007,529
23,717 - - - - - 1.79 1.44 1.46 1.18 9,393 16,691 69,580 496,530 110,610 138,683 2,195,978 3,025,089 2,015,788 2,639,867 1,139,039 5,532,890 7,287,225 - FISCAL YEAR 2015 21,350,388 14,928,585 54,487,913 41,651,107 )
$ $ $
$
$ $ $ $ 2,147,498
932,000
------1.39 1.33 1.44 1.18 20,195 503,830 124,573 982,780 152,700 252,925 2,340,965 2,852,510 1,963,467 2,699,810 5,761,140 4,233,375 MTAs 20,764,490 16,755,178 57,876,924 47,593,057 (
$ $ $ 237,146 $
$ $ $ $ 4,786,234
- - - - - 1.25 1.37 1.44 1.23 72,450 537,354 107,029 150,719 197,436 651,882 2,933,150 4,672,929 2,663,264 3,833,385 1,123,855 6,315,832 5,335,008 25,565,243 21,578,842 77,900,468 66,142,599
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ 2,522,702
269,157
- - - - - 1.64 1.93 1.56 1.21 18,383 513,781 108,300 132,802 173,890 338,125 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,498,271 3,620,878 2,051,846 2,788,690 1,003,631 5,495,376 6,220,928 17,710,972 15,758,357 56,324,715 44,416,138
$ $ $ $ 2,325,192 $
$ $ $
36,943
------1.79 2.20 1.76 1.33 456,918 383,935 167,866 173,148 327,034 101,295 2,380,358 2,914,898 2,111,197 2,741,750 1,234,611 7,171,462 18,739,434 17,044,996 65,938,547 44,651,518 13,404,598
$ $ $ $ 699,386 $
$ $ $ 435,203
- - - - 2.39 1.77 1.63 1.29 34,980 33,171 405,799 432,091 374,018 393,755 391,042 367,276 398,941 403,763 394,899172,187 406,557 188,220 427,649 152,315 436,907 134,718 142,987 159,136 169,114 192,800 164,219 156,630 152,322 151,141 522,316 574,755 452,541 483,072 461,383 432,229 458,621 484,389 464,952411,023 487,923 413,562 515,875 293,253 519,090 167,793 198,903 285,549 266,343 317,232 186,138 129,893 129,552 197,060 752,260 171,857 138,823 150,632 804,283 (567,145) 1,763,099 1,954,291 1,683,080 1,786,736 1,786,035 1,755,034 1,919,258 1,882,706 1,768,806 1,825,700 1,876,293 1,822,179 4,003,369 4,187,556 3,530,288 3,909,517 3,824,478 3,461,708 3,890,836 3,959,594 3,872,352 3,928,452 4,008,434 3,956,539 3,127,787 3,492,143 2,763,413 2,453,433 2,366,974 2,522,688 2,682,372 2,763,390 2,361,869 2,274,383 2,382,435 2,441,151 6,538,069 7,368,774 5,510,947 5,620,234 5,492,672 5,055,421 5,719,143 5,863,497 5,535,711 5,919,371 5,958,325 5,926,510 3,272,693 3,668,234 1,013,429 28,457,838 74,605,311 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
$ $
$ $ $
$ $ $ 2,909
Other Revenue Other Revenue 19,206,835 Other Revenue 61,945,559 Contract Revenue 2,381,610 Contract Revenue 1,056,135 Other Revenue 3,310,765 Contract Revenue Contract Revenue Farebox Farebox Farebox Farebox Other Grants Other Grants Other Grants Other Grants Federal Grants 12,389,443 Federal Grants Federal Grants 7,181,439 Federal Grants Data Item System Effectiveness Riders per Mile System Effectiveness Riders per Mile System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Total Revenue Total Revenue System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Total Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES MTA Capital Metro Transportation Authority - Austin Regional Transportation Authority (The B) - Corpus Christi Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) - Dallas Denton County Transit Authority - Dallas
36 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 0 0 0 0 0 1.20 1.34 1.63 1.06 3374239 2,821,639 9,466,067 9,466,067 67759170 9,842,847 7,449,045 7,874,930 23,215,866 43,607,199 65,971,079 43,607,199 60,908,564 35,432,506 16,046,207 81,511,483 42,467,059 71,508,956 24,899,307 65,476,526 18,435,690 169,413,114 745,160,386 220,349,926 939,640,634 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - R NR 1.16 1.41 1.55 1.04 255,563 161,357 465,741 753,948 1,917,320 5,796,677 3,886,231 4,650,364 2,150,255 8,161,680 2,018,923 6,662,334 1,156,498 17,637,908 13,314,770 71,690,597 64,371,099
$ $ $ 57,375,760
$ $ $ $
$ 12,403,260
- - - RN NR 1.17 1.29 1.65 1.03 414,632 183,390 454,388 780,755 2,035,416 5,192,652 3,282,007 5,661,463 2,148,000 8,822,472 5,225,825 7,334,479 1,129,890 18,641,987 14,043,939 69,243,506 56,398,253
$ $
$ $ $ $ 488,854 $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.13 1.29 1.56 1.02 600,717 965,083 461,884 747,228 1,874,318 5,220,011 3,146,312 5,132,210 2,148,000 7,396,671 6,678,847 5,901,182 1,326,471 19,638,323 15,015,288 75,780,833 61,230,118
$ $
$ $ $ $ 1,774,575 $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.12 1.25 1.59 1.03 4,798 79,673 477,263 792,695 1,930,329 7,314,179 4,091,008 4,965,222 2,138,000 8,074,357 4,321,597 6,563,489 2,430,476 16,376,108 12,228,106 71,204,062 58,550,023
$ $
$ $ $ $ 1,774,575 $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.17 1.31 1.61 1.06 165,422 367,113 483,003 783,683 1,996,356 5,749,631 3,084,290 5,588,067 2,038,000 8,740,752 4,046,468 7,224,144 1,881,658 17,338,978 13,139,200 67,567,217 57,562,370
$ $
$ $ $ $ 3,362,422 $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.16 1.37 1.61 1.02 236,960 242,547 481,693 809,328 981,577 1,858,934 4,689,640 2,898,735 6,302,096 2,038,000 8,235,441 7,409,238 6,720,143 21,793,625 17,659,731 91,537,589 65,604,746
$ $ $ 3,199 $
$ $ $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.20 1.34 1.65 1.03 220,812 183,685 702,970 453,864 750,439 1,726,333 9,098,583 7,116,260 5,195,263 2,038,000 6,454,955 4,967,486 1,231,884 - FISCAL YEAR 2015 16,287,365 12,302,220 67,962,354 54,885,647 )
$ $
$ $ $ $ 11,978,962 $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.15 1.29 1.55 1.04 52,932 238,407 486,118 768,967 1,864,608 6,875,449 3,267,582 5,444,866 2,038,000 9,991,001 3,447,337 8,471,278 2,838,900 MTAs 16,707,581 12,566,566 68,357,140 59,529,073 (
$ $
$ 6,994,789
$ $ $ $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.21 1.28 1.65 1.03 183,754 331,404 471,238 792,943 1,952,502 6,241,719 3,192,696 5,191,363 2,038,000 7,626,708 1,284,537 6,121,865 2,256,080 22,077,703 17,903,447 91,849,427 85,040,543
$ $
$ $ $ $ (117,068) $
$ 1,033,605
- - - RN NR 1.23 1.35 1.70 1.09 217,654 238,473 455,181 765,113 1,879,570 5,343,093 3,401,062 5,041,342 2,038,000 7,701,804 6,213,018 1,176,918 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 17,721,161 13,585,937 64,144,703 56,556,800
$ $ $ 1,580
$ $ $ $
$ 1,033,605
- - - - RN NR 1.34 1.45 1.66 1.15 130,848 187,555 518,667 873,590 2,172,397 4,977,083 3,073,988 6,275,413 2,038,000 8,484,184 1,029,505 6,931,912 17,081,971 12,740,726 56,282,189 62,745,157
$ $ $ 131,670
$ $ $ $
$ 1,033,605
2,176,418
- - - RN NR 1.34 1.44 1.79 1.13 77,197 810,410 884,591 783,710 818,060 803,852625,842 779,521 660,273 843,398 573,731 825,647 631,096 835,450 627,856 820,771 554,187 802,628 624,851 834,809 628,525 606,406 638,671 643,158 634,449 707,768 757,212 625,486 652,830 653,266 573,428 637,917 665,739 625,016 651,321 664,016 660,931 995,833 495,460 847,378 5,043,365 5,307,844 4,629,737 5,106,555 4,976,861 4,686,1432,887,808 5,148,347 3,072,724 5,144,264 2,723,023 5,033,469 2,880,391 5,218,378 2,921,934 5,358,548 2,759,644 5,255,053 3,028,428 3,026,367 2,969,784 3,003,911 3,110,274 3,048,218 1,454,515 1,470,792 1,328,723 1,347,605 1,245,957 1,283,169 1,360,729 1,328,027 1,329,200 1,278,880 1,327,300 1,291,310 7,237,773 7,677,055 6,266,796 6,520,423 6,443,108 6,264,0733,870,263 7,036,782 4,128,155 6,738,931 3,349,950 6,274,130 3,498,080 6,727,150 3,359,931 6,930,122 3,321,926 7,395,140 3,508,719 3,526,371 3,336,173 3,392,630 3,626,732 3,548,129 2,007,783 5,010,239 6,523,410 7,586,566 19,047,216 30,447,010 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total 137,558,049
$ $ - $ $
$ $ $
$ 1,033,605
e N u n e v e R t c a r t n o Other Revenue 14,913,184 Contract Revenue Other Revenue 69,149,525 Farebox Contract Revenue 455,902 Other Grants Other Grants Farebox Other Revenue 3,167,028 Federal Grants 2,049,052 Federal Grants 1,033,605 Federal Grants 30,982,202 Other Grants Federal Grants C Contract Revenue Other Revenue 6,057,501 Farebox Farebox Other Grants Data Item System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Total Revenue System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Total Revenue System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Total Revenue System Effectiveness Riders per Mile Ridership Mileage Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Revenue METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES MTA Sun Metro - El Paso Fort Worth Transit Authority (THE T) - Ft. Worth Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County - Houston VIA Metropolitan Transit - San Antonio
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 37 1.37 79,941,564 44,008,275 258,893,838 188,757,788 188,762,049 1,898,618,899 $ 2 $ 57,052,528 2 $ 2 ,468,383,315 $ 2 281,332 $ 526,803 148,010,881 $ 182,526,787 $ 192,035,305 $ 220,859,076
$ 195,321,189 $ 204,607,105 - FISCAL YEAR 2015 ) $ 230,004,446 MTAs ( $ 180,862,625 $ 185,766,060 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION $ 238,867,347 $ 175,065,597 23,869,51415,711,879 25,882,448 16,687,590 20,591,109 14,449,902 20,743,470 15,660,828 20,222,194 15,475,045 19,738,483 14,522,649 21,670,626 16,023,173 21,687,576 16,063,666 20,113,189 15,645,385 20,861,551 15,999,070 21,534,357 16,379,306 21,979,321 16,139,295 10,609,770 18,587,154 14,881,315 16,070,902 15,585,752 15,047,121 17,924,631 16,770,928 15,526,474 15,487,485 16,411,840 15,858,677 31,251,293 327,034 2,350,308 1,284,537 3,716,494 702,970 8,341,238 4,070,185 13,566,858 6,965,111 5,307,254 2,058,282 Sep-14 Oct-14Sep-14 Nov-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Dec-14 Feb-15 Jan-15 Mar-15 Feb-15 Apr-15 Mar-15 May-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 May-15 Jul-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Total 2015 FY FY 2015 Total 279,206,146 $ 183,261,632 Riders per Mile 1.52 1.55 1.42 1.32 1.31 1.36 1.35 1.35 1.29 1.30 1.31 1.36 Federal GrantsOther Grants Farebox 55,555,691Contract Revenue 17,609,912Other Revenue 12,073,835 4,038,995 13,838,783 177,750,397 3,270,453 143,467,079 12,802,439 142,720,002 3,040,137 23,678,463 203,813,377 3,859,748 24,129,013 150,882,544 138,491,172 31,490,728 2,778,831 176,277,159 16,485,792 2,942,899 148,438,350 19,513,872 146,752,379 3,332,405 16,592,668 171,488,756 150, 3,836,914 13, 2,989,686 7,403,852 3,196,740 3,317,615 Data Item Data Item Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue System Effectiveness METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 MTA Metropolitan Transportation Authorities - Fiscal Year 2015
38 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total ABILENE Ridership 54,857 61,177 47,214 46,810 48,817 42,275 50,148 53,581 49,540 53,518 50,276 52,280 610,493 Mileage 78,755 90,872 76,504 78,378 78,256 66,562 80,157 83,450 77,132 80,512 81,460 80,162 952,200 Revenue Federal Grants$ 150,284 $ 229,638 $ 136,950 $ 202,595 $ 125,684 $ 96,545 $ 117,986 $ 122,011 $ 106,078 $ 138,174 $ 136,371 $ 106,172 $ 1,668,488 State Grants 13,440 21,855 - - - - 260,953 - 16,777 38,551 - 12,805 364,381 Farebox 46,251 37,454 28,911 29,494 32,594 28,824 36,832 28,916 37,774 21,656 44,494 30,859 404,059 Contract Revenue 11,414 29,348 28,575 14,084 9,678 17,316 7,550 5,695 1,616 55,973 4,693 4,670 190,612 Other Revenue 106,873 94,251 63,369 123,987 90,850 107,428 501 3,315 22,194 68,358 111,385 129,800 922,311 Total Revenue $ 328,262 $ 412,546 $ 257,805 $ 370,160 $ 258,806 $ 250,113 $ 423,822 $ 159,937 $ 184,439 $ 322,712 $ 296,943 $ 284,306 $ 3,549,851 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.70 0.67 0.62 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.63 0.64 0.64 0.66 0.62 0.65 0.64
AMARILLO Ridership 31,428 34,181 26,734 29,690 29,712 28,634 32,055 32,986 28,782 31,547 31,511 31,604 368,864 Mileage 80,935 74,702 63,004 71,698 69,044 67,935 75,004 73,158 68,742 71,652 69,296 74,020 859,190 Revenue Federal Grants$ 189,791 $ 216,856 $ 187,670 $ 204,462 $ 171,206 $ 218,237 $ 176,113 $ 196,021 $ 198,300 $ 218,072 $ 234,200 $ 228,121 $ 2,439,049 State Grants - 145,407 150,734 100,539 ------396,680 Farebox 18,071 17,579 18,456 10,854 15,467 14,655 16,785 16,963 15,189 15,238 16,935 17,327 193,519 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 17,550 17,783 18,337 49,215 150,559 177,357 140,849 151,922 147,859 167,821 165,156 161,038 1,365,446 Total Revenue $ 225,412 $ 397,625 $ 375,197 $ 365,070 $ 337,232 $ 410,249 $ 333,747 $ 364,906 $ 361,348 $ 401,131 $ 416,291 $ 406,486 $ 4,394,694 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.39 0.46 0.42 0.41 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.43 0.43
ARLINGTON Ridership 10,012 10,721 8,880 9,843 10,065 7,974 10,057 10,497 10,131 10,412 10,371 10,563 119,526 Mileage 71,335 74,360 61,016 67,893 69,978 55,984 69,706 72,656 69,785 74,177 72,562 73,655 833,107 Revenue Federal Grants$ 43,448 $ 110,624 $ 132,998 $ 106,391 $ 104,967 $ 111,874 $ 129,548 $ 108,652 $ 119,444 $ 96,950 $ 37,735 $ 45,045 $ 1,147,676 State Grants - 56,201 85,892 70,942 11,713 ------224,748
2015 Farebox 16,772 16,693 15,140 17,825 18,012 15,336 18,898 15,759 16,357 17,704 18,064 16,704 203,264 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 188,851 25,088 12,954 10,278 69,202 84,324 106,107 80,409 87,806 81,668 146,032 204,730 1,097,449
Texas Total Revenue $ 249,071 $ 208,606 $ 246,984 $ 205,436 $ 203,894 $ 211,534 $ 254,553 $ 204,820 $ 223,607 $ 196,322 $ 201,831 $ 266,479 $ 2,673,137 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
Transit BEAUMONT Ridership 50,450 57,068 44,851 48,076 47,983 43,619 43,825 43,809 42,601 42,985 45,813 43,926 555,006 Mileage 75,518 81,703 70,638 77,216 78,182 74,322 79,242 78,747 74,483 80,190 81,516 79,559 931,316 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ 136,714 $ - $ - $ - $ 390,344 $ 387,128 $ 403,892 $ 36,844 $ 381,089 $ 422,604 $ 2,158,615
Statistics State Grants ------367,187 - - 367,187 Farebox 43,585 54,479 44,139 48,076 43,870 46,644 37,204 47,875 39,203 41,309 46,226 42,926 535,536 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 505,182 358,499 287,502 340,284 382,214 400,211 51,974 5,178 - - 1,791 752 2,333,587 Total Revenue $ 548,767 $ 412,978 $ 468,355 $ 388,360 $ 426,084 $ 446,855 $ 479,522 $ 440,181 $ 443,095 $ 445,340 $ 429,106 $ 466,282 $ 5,394,925
Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.67 0.70 0.63 0.62 0.61 0.59 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.60
See footnote at the end of Table 39 40 2015 URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total BROWNSVILLE Ridership 139,267 147,120 130,705 145,467 122,647 113,851 116,170 133,177 125,080 123,870 129,619 132,864 1,559,837 Mileage 134,852 141,184 131,796 133,342 133,453 117,675 138,479 138,293 139,161 134,645 135,765 136,774 1,615,419 Transit Revenue Federal Grants$ 351,162 $ - $ - $ 505,485 $ 616,514 $ 265,186 $ 467,117 $ 929,719 $ - $ - $ - $ 111,707 $ 3,246,890 State Grants 479,459 - - 510,483 786,360 202,205 3,971 7,103 966 171,602 141,657 14,570 2,318,376
Statistics Farebox 97,055 94,100 81,011 97,000 82,032 82,225 87,443 86,430 80,112 82,744 92,224 97,609 1,059,985 Contract Revenue 63,625 3,724 18,708 138,728 101,762 9,086 462,946 17,462 18,708 163,355 (17,324) 43,808 1,024,588 Other Revenue 338,866 67,544 60,006 124,817 419,504 130,246 294,794 977,385 103,851 107,249 685,291 2,085,993 5,395,546 Total Revenue $ 1,330,167 $ 165,368 $ 159,725 $ 1,376,513 $ 2,006,172 $ 688,948 $ 1,316,271 $ 2,018,099 $ 203,637 $ 524,950 $ 901,848 $ 2,353,687 $ 13,045,385 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.03 1.04 0.99 1.09 0.92 0.97 0.84 0.96 0.90 0.92 0.95 0.97 0.97 Report COLLEGE STATION - BRYAN Ridership 1,274,668 1,167,033 848,666 493,938 522,587 923,458 665,693 761,460 253,597 152,153 142,849 167,453 7,373,555 Mileage 288,818 297,874 255,534 205,901 190,983 278,073 257,066 277,722 186,604 166,340 169,832 167,792 2,742,539 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 1,016 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 369,738 $ 7,454 $ 691,954 $ 153,829 $ 1,223,991 State Grants 168,476 108,597 126,910 146,037 80,136 220,317 7,399 10,960 90,028 14,482 6,087 108,140 1,087,569 Farebox 26,431 29,458 24,920 22,447 22,180 22,055 28,949 24,573 20,198 23,810 22,533 22,003 289,557 Contract Revenue 100,702 126,486 99,249 108,909 116,743 100,159 95,566 107,323 107,561 85,726 102,754 88,964 1,240,142 Other Revenue 726,951 752,808 755,423 541,581 527,812 570,220 538,793 630,399 481,494 508,555 2,034 3,381 6,039,451 Total Revenue $ 1,022,560 $ 1,018,365 $ 1,006,502 $ 818,974 $ 746,871 $ 912,751 $ 670,707 $ 773,255 $ 1,069,019 $ 640,027 $ 825,362 $ 376,317 $ 9,880,710 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 4.41 3.92 3.32 2.40 2.74 3.32 2.59 2.74 1.36 0.91 0.84 1.00 2.69
CONROE - THE WOODLANDS Ridership 67,380 72,591 56,157 53,308 64,864 60,101 65,673 64,876 56,173 65,679 67,070 66,744 760,616 Mileage 69,956 76,559 60,605 63,792 71,326 67,363 80,743 80,562 61,226 81,040 85,152 77,411 875,735 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 233,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 148,620 $ 168,143 $ 215,329 $ 200,413 $ 174,257 $ 171,637 $ 211,778 $ 1,523,977 State Grants 320,075 - - - - 20,191 15,994 16,136 15,840 17,771 18,168 5,542 429,717 Farebox 357,013 360,207 246,301 359,443 248,119 309,811 339,095 322,993 300,620 348,268 344,337 317,667 3,853,874 Contract Revenue 29,128 31,245 31,663 ------92,036 Other Revenue 223,808 329,304 2,518 - - 20,191 15,994 16,136 15,840 17,771 18,168 - 659,730 Total Revenue $ 930,024 $ 954,556 $ 280,482 $ 359,443 $ 248,119 $ 498,813 $ 539,226 $ 570,594 $ 532,713 $ 558,067 $ 552,310 $ 534,987 $ 6,559,334 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.84 0.91 0.89 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.81 0.79 0.86 0.87
GRAND PRAIRIE Ridership 3,551 3,922 2,927 3,015 3,156 3,080 3,327 3,722 3,396 3,685 3,566 3,521 40,868 Mileage 11,831 13,033 9,302 9,836 10,270 9,671 10,879 12,146 10,870 11,977 11,376 11,439 132,630 Revenue Federal Grants$ 36,110 $ 36,467 $ 29,072 $ 28,295 $ 28,679 $ 28,908 $ 35,835 $ 30,240 $ 33,911 $ 45,916 $ 36,907 $ 34,158 $ 404,498 State Grants 18,055 14,747 12,749 14,148 12,664 12,745 12,499 13,468 16,956 13,452 12,920 12,980 167,383 Farebox 166 259 113 135 155 - 211 153 179 138 338 138 1,985 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 18,055 16,490 13,643 14,148 13,502 13,599 15,208 14,294 16,956 18,205 15,687 15,029 184,816 Total Revenue $ 72,386 $ 67,963 $ 55,577 $ 56,726 $ 55,000 $ 55,252 $ 63,753 $ 58,155 $ 68,002 $ 77,711 $ 65,852 $ 62,305 $ 758,682 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
HARLINGEN Ridership 10,043 10,630 6,881 6,789 7,442 7,901 7,927 8,338 6,288 7,269 7,417 6,347 93,272 Mileage 27,496 29,336 22,053 25,774 25,852 25,942 26,971 26,650 24,901 27,257 28,758 25,607 316,597 Revenue Federal Grants$ 34,614 $ 46,944 $ 50,718 $ 59,940 $ 20,000 $ 42,706 $ 57,490 $ 38,668 $ 41,401 $ 41,242 $ 49,187 $ 81,148 $ 564,058 State Grants 21,544 26,315 26,037 32,713 13,596 25,601 36,082 25,091 26,282 22,530 12,190 6,995 274,976 Farebox 2,144 2,759 3,046 3,515 2,271 2,917 2,164 3,196 3,424 2,523 3,270 6,134 37,363 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 9,178 11,136 10,985 13,263 3,794 10,017 12,284 8,827 9,360 12,290 25,662 59,085 185,881 Total Revenue $ 67,480 $ 87,154 $ 90,786 $ 109,431 $ 39,661 $ 81,241 $ 108,020 $ 75,782 $ 80,467 $ 78,585 $ 90,309 $ 153,362 $ 1,062,278 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.37 0.36 0.31 0.26 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.31 0.25 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.29
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total KILLEEN Ridership 51,785 56,339 50,661 65,356 20,537 49,495 39,167 49,742 48,840 43,991 45,509 48,504 569,926 (COPPERAS COVE & HARKER HEIGHTS) Mileage 102,245 113,069 118,373 151,833 60,752 111,829 98,444 118,531 113,987 99,246 99,705 115,681 1,303,695 Revenue Federal Grants$ 107,199 $ 198,233 $ 180,250 $ 198,304 $ 199,158 $ 223,415 $ 215,713 $ 216,241 $ 229,886 $ 237,310 $ 332,027 $ 390,099 $ 2,727,835 State Grants 74,309 153,260 118,975 130,373 81,798 - - - 385,106 77,930 - - 1,021,751 Farebox 24,389 14,229 30,625 31,260 16,120 15,120 19,012 13,852 22,982 16,067 22,104 18,091 243,851 Contract Revenue 7,349 10,801 9,348 14,785 82,180 151,521 17,042 91,525 146,280 393,626 182,641 277,076 1,384,174 Other Revenue - - 22,722 - - 7,975 142,502 85,011 21,424 24,490 19,454 - 323,578 Total Revenue $ 213,246 $ 376,523 $ 361,920 $ 374,722 $ 379,256 $ 398,031 $ 394,269 $ 406,629 $ 805,678 $ 749,423 $ 556,226 $ 685,266 $ 5,701,189 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.51 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.34 0.44 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.46 0.42 0.44
LAKE JACKSON - ANGLETON Ridership 11,703 13,789 9,709 10,814 10,326 8,988 9,976 9,996 10,018 11,444 11,665 9,641 128,069 Mileage 29,172 31,424 29,195 29,160 28,969 28,065 31,441 29,745 30,432 31,228 30,262 26,898 355,991 Revenue Federal Grants$ 20,193 $ 51,391 $ 35,079 $ 50,342 $ 37,441 $ 51,803 $ 382,639 $ 48,289 $ 43,659 $ 40,866 $ 37,042 $ 66,050 $ 864,794 State Grants 13,300 21,108 13,228 16,535 14,469 10,580 11,248 13,095 13,586 29,625 13,765 45,352 215,891 Farebox 4,724 7,655 5,241 3,532 5,370 6,085 5,075 4,236 5,795 8,129 5,417 3,996 65,255 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 6,177 9,762 15,341 15,902 10,195 23,873 107,665 23,301 17,230 13,973 13,324 33,683 290,426 Total Revenue $ 44,394 $ 89,916 $ 68,889 $ 86,311 $ 67,475 $ 92,341 $ 506,627 $ 88,921 $ 80,270 $ 92,593 $ 69,548 $ 149,081 $ 1,436,366 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.40 0.44 0.33 0.37 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.33 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.36
LAREDO Ridership 280,763 303,606 257,986 271,175 245,710 244,675 256,942 261,770 261,594 257,461 256,645 259,585 3,157,912 Mileage 166,986 172,511 151,280 159,173 163,264 148,641 163,271 165,955 164,219 158,996 159,235 164,123 1,937,654 Revenue Federal Grants$ 609,476 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,694,629 $ 3,304,105 State Grants 15,102 200,000 244,728 179,947 - 9,064 4,846 3,520 138,961 1,390 391,450 35,090 1,224,098 Farebox 315,926 302,961 277,835 285,463 268,076 254,991 265,868 273,556 271,575 257,944 265,754 277,776 3,317,725 2015 Contract Revenue - - 44,728 - 25,849 17,703 26,381 24,733 5,049 - 16,311 140,228 300,982 Other Revenue 61,919 46,727 45,412 377,225 971,617 754,437 828,506 943,922 444,577 828,366 761,883 42,352 6,106,943 Total Revenue $ 1,002,423 $ 549,688 $ 612,703 $ 842,635 $ 1,265,542 $ 1,036,195 $ 1,125,601 $ 1,245,731 $ 860,162 $ 1,087,700 $ 1,435,398 $ 3,190,075 $ 14,253,853 Texas System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.68 1.76 1.71 1.70 1.50 1.65 1.57 1.58 1.59 1.62 1.61 1.58 1.63
LONGVIEW Ridership 23,450 25,140 19,154 20,893 22,441 20,139 23,040 21,877 19,629 21,909 22,364 21,011 261,047 Transit Mileage 28,698 31,499 26,622 28,747 30,333 24,683 30,295 30,590 29,244 30,833 30,625 30,044 352,213 Revenue Federal Grants$ 124,733 $ 50,998 $ 364,769 $ 143,490 $ 63,868 $ 195,245 $ 71,569 $ 67,612 $ 82,329 $ 78,826 $ 153,785 $ 89,485 $ 1,486,709 State Grants 21,758 13,847 40,256 49,401 20,850 23,810 21,647 21,696 24,165 24,864 9,461 0 271,755 Statistics Farebox 19,378 17,919 15,383 17,042 19,203 16,590 16,298 16,349 15,588 16,002 16,474 17,102 203,328 Contract Revenue 3,721 3,859 4,674 3,526 3,526 3,646 5,676 9,688 4,726 48,204 12,107 18,221 121,574 Other Revenue 34,689 27,323 84,062 24,827 25,989 51,290 12,481 37,441 17,536 25,807 44,944 49,319 435,708 Total Revenue $ 204,279 $ 113,946 $ 509,144 $ 238,286 $ 133,436 $ 290,581 $ 127,671 $ 152,786 $ 144,344 $ 193,703 $ 236,771 $ 174,127 $ 2,519,074 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.82 0.80 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.82 0.76 0.72 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.70 0.74 Report
See footnote at the end of Table 41 42 2015 Texas URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Transit
UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total LUBBOCK Ridership 655,097 587,216 397,876 169,959 324,222 439,572 374,184 434,755 148,727 118,678 124,878 90,781 3,865,945
Statistics Mileage 245,511 254,038 205,021 176,697 202,867 217,335 221,675 246,646 167,034 179763 186192 170856 2,473,635 Revenue Federal Grants$ 471,783 $ 223,365 $ 232,897 $ 282,625 $ 207,675 $ 228,406 $ 443,582 $ 223,560 $ 295,378 $ 288,005 $ 305,712 $ 186,548 $ 3,389,536 State Grants - - - - - 13,970 10,393 - 368,412 222,664 - - 615,439 Farebox 123,268 135,456 95,273 65,715 64,245 61,659 68,200 66,073 60,248 81,721 75,349 73,574 970,781
Report Contract Revenue 581,804 589,375 420,757 236,455 331,744 488,299 423,515 505,434 226,687 244,293 221,896 56,591 4,326,850 Other Revenue 241,152 61,806 143,468 284,567 172,083 125,831 171,980 126,894 117,752 137,139 172,679 566,338 2,321,689 Total Revenue $ 1,418,007 $ 1,010,002 $ 892,395 $ 869,362 $ 775,747 $ 918,165 $ 1,117,670 $ 921,961 $ 1,068,477 $ 973,822 $ 775,636 $ 883,051 $ 11,624,295 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 2.67 2.31 1.94 0.96 1.60 2.02 1.69 1.76 0.89 0.66 0.67 0.53 1.56
MCALLEN Ridership 87,399 93,221 77,082 75,617 68,077 70,448 76,199 77,004 73,001 82,704 83,975 96,164 960,891 Mileage 103,589 115,977 90,789 144,227 163,505 155,017 152,421 174,601 149,099 89,841 87,848 95,738 1,522,652 Revenue Federal Grants$ 237,629 $ 73,922 $ 280,810 $ 268,373 $ 103,601 $ 115,739 $ 207,373 $ 897,136 $ 159,766 $ 147,165 $ 197,939 $ 718,219 $ 3,407,672 State Grants 19,785 23,319 27,263 59,454 22,025 39,582 41,006 28,947 102,011 75,308 61,020 24,926 524,646 Farebox 43,060 51,791 44,182 45,661 36,854 36,705 47,231 42,086 45,201 48,590 49,917 57,912 549,190 Contract Revenue 61,555 66,110 59,973 80,090 42,920 66,250 71,220 51,235 57,847 53,061 60,946 82,781 753,988 Other Revenue 197,242 157,560 187,887 146,568 67,951 78,481 129,804 325,632 158,732 99,586 159,001 306,474 2,014,918 Total Revenue $ 559,271 $ 372,702 $ 600,115 $ 600,146 $ 273,351 $ 336,757 $ 496,634 $ 1,345,036 $ 523,557 $ 423,710 $ 528,823 $ 1,190,312 $ 7,250,414 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.84 0.80 0.85 0.52 0.42 0.45 0.50 0.44 0.49 0.92 0.96 1.00 0.63
MCKINNEY Ridership NR - Not Reported 5,011 6,410 7,207 5,920 6,622 12,450 12,201 12,968 14,101 13,470 10,484 106,844 Mileage 8,158 38,146 40,384 76,548 72,780 72,108 90,692 88,816 96,691 91,608 84,181 63,938 824,050 Revenue Federal Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR State Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Farebox NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Contract RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR NR Other RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR NR Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.13 0.16 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.13
MESQUITE Ridership 2,463 3,730 3,121 3,451 3,201 2,862 3,492 3,369 3,492 3,610 3,782 3,701 40,274 Mileage 13,780 38,277 29,233 34,622 29,131 27,656 29,020 33,932 28,284 23,843 26,725 25,927 340,430 Revenue Federal Grants 21,336$ - $ - $ 39,245 $ - $ 39,245 $ 78,491 $ 78,491 $ 39,245 $ 39,245 $ 39,245 $ 39,245 $ 413,788 State Grants 0 - 0000000 - - - 0 Farebox 1,248 0 - 000000000 1,248 Contract Revenue 0 ------0 Other Revenue 31,142 56,231 0 0 54,373 69,395 0 9,550 12,190 12,051 11,114 9,221 265,267 Total Revenue $ 53,726 $ 56,231 $ - $ 39,245 $ 54,373 $ 108,640 $ 78,491 $ 88,041 $ 51,435 $ 51,296 $ 50,359 $ 48,466 $ 680,303 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.18 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total MIDLAND - ODESSA Ridership 34,090 37,110 28,500 31,725 29,696 25,346 29,602 31,630 28,404 32,147 33,206 33,319 374,775 Mileage 55,372 64,599 56,408 59,589 65,438 55,175 77,727 76,472 71,247 75,920 76,705 75,542 810,194 Revenue Federal Grants$ 530,924 $ 739,312 $ 236,397 $ 457,200 $ 214,901 $ 421,480 $ 257,610 $ 165,027 $ 310,773 $ 332,366 $ 223,407 $ 235,959 $ 4,125,356 State Grants 78,810 111,941 63,462 97,895 72,629 39,110 16,421 14,733 - - 25,329 - 520,330 Farebox 28,876 23,784 20,461 14,435 28,174 19,135 32,401 18,964 26,070 27,918 17,491 29,827 287,536 Contract Revenue - - - 12,867 - - 123,204 - - - - - 136,071 Other Revenue 43,522 68,215 54,334 41,697 81,204 135,289 111,883 110,363 150,318 147,166 105,315 117,994 1,167,300 Total Revenue $ 682,132 $ 943,252 $ 374,654 $ 624,094 $ 396,908 $ 615,014 $ 541,519 $ 309,087 $ 487,161 $ 507,450 $ 371,542 $ 383,780 $ 6,236,593 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.62 0.57 0.51 0.53 0.45 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.46
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - NETS* Ridership 3,061 3,365 2,393 2,642 2,794 2,454 2,986 3,375 2,990 3,378 3,679 3,188 36,305 Mileage 24,301 30,321 18,979 23,380 25,023 27,178 25,752 29,605 26,853 27,875 28,093 24,974 312,334 Revenue Federal Grants$ 33,290 $ - $ - $ 27,228 $ 33,501 $ 113,646 $ 34,805 $ 38,335 $ 34,649 $ 37,276 $ 35,864 $ 30,630 $ 419,224 State Grants - 79,034 54,202 7,577 ------140,813 Farebox 4,310 4,875 3,713 3,993 4,215 3,146 4,787 4,575 4,199 4,482 5,120 4,310 51,725 Contract Revenue 51,172 - - 42,022 51,623 43,236 53,223 59,319 53,553 57,648 54,657 46,742 513,195 Other Revenue - 19,759 13,550 1,894 - 21,454 ------56,657 Total Revenue $ 88,772 $ 103,668 $ 71,465 $ 82,714 $ 89,339 $ 181,482 $ 92,815 $ 102,229 $ 92,401 $ 99,406 $ 95,641 $ 81,682 $ 1,181,614 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12
PORT ARTHUR Ridership 12,442 12,906 10,250 10,806 11,216 10,372 9,664 9,433 8,629 9,800 9,895 9,299 124,712 Mileage 30,597 32,520 26,903 29,603 28,531 30,887 29,229 29,129 28,505 30,392 30,622 28,923 355,841 Revenue Federal Grants$ 119,076 $ 78,422 $ 78,701 $ 67,755 $ 87,175 $ 91,675 $ 87,016 $ 78,571 $ 62,545 $ 9,777 $ 123,472 $ 75,303 $ 959,488 State Grants - - 0 0 0 0 - - 166,273 140,086 - - 306,359
2015 Farebox 11,199 13,331 9,704 12,790 9,832 10,206 10,334 10,651 9,528 10,654 10,809 9,968 129,006 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 132,364 75,007 75,629 65,804 84,130 84,031 77,790 74,056 136,730 2,444 83,132 68,267 959,384 Total Revenue $ 262,639 $ 166,760 $ 164,034 $ 146,349 $ 181,137 $ 185,912 $ 175,140 $ 163,278 $ 375,076 $ 162,961 $ 217,413 $ 153,538 $ 2,354,237 Texas System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.39 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.35
SAN ANGELO Ridership 22,495 24,598 19,217 19,028 19,671 18,106 20,527 22,465 20,065 26,218 20,584 23,614 256,588 Transit Mileage 50,588 57,475 48,275 46,529 51,446 47,498 57,975 61,097 51,638 53,121 52,549 55,367 633,558 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 39,455 $ 104,284 $ 92,042 $ 112,654 $ 88,515 $ 118,863 $ 112,392 $ 79,652 $ 85,790 $ 194,735 $ 113,202 $ 1,141,584
Statistics State Grants - 53,910 8,373 815,702 22,089 94,455 88 - - - - - 994,617 Farebox 10,699 15,822 13,191 11,512 12,836 11,964 13,482 13,499 12,549 13,624 14,557 14,260 157,995 Contract Revenue 600 4,374 7,212 2,717 3,386 4,853 10,774 9,986 17,987 100,585 110,393 71,439 344,306 Other Revenue 2,943 366,459 2,021 167,121 3,640 2,590 6,490 4,392 7,079 28,312 6,527 21,061 618,635 Total Revenue $ 14,242 $ 480,020 $ 135,081 $ 1,089,094 $ 154,605 $ 202,377 $ 149,697 $ 140,269 $ 117,267 $ 228,311 $ 326,212 $ 219,962 $ 3,257,137
Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.44 0.43 0.40 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.49 0.39 0.43 0.40
See footnote at the end of Table 43 44 2015 URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total SAN MARCOS Ridership 13,160 14,210 9,933 10,594 5,913 5,745 6,068 6,173 5,466 6,351 6,677 6,402 96,692 Mileage 23,672 25,931 20,115 23,056 21,091 20,792 23,051 23,895 21,941 23,185 23,506 22,203 272,438 Transit Revenue Federal Grants$ 41,826 $ 42,094 $ 46,940 $ 46,940 $ 41,955 $ 59,514 $ 56,182 $ 29,295 $ 62,670 $ 66,806 $ 70,100 $ 75,100 $ 639,422 State Grants 41,826 10,901 33,393 33,395 41,955 59,514 56,182 29,295 35,948 - - - 342,409
Statistics Farebox 2,378 3,943 2,813 6,339 4,136 4,137 4,030 12,539 4,539 4,300 4,100 4,100 57,354 Contract Revenue 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 20,004 Other Revenue (1,667) 60,558 3,212 (17,962) 21,011 29,033 29,033 29,033 55,755 95,840 89,133 94,133 487,112 Total Revenue $ 86,030 $ 119,163 $ 88,025 $ 70,379 $ 110,724 $ 153,865 $ 147,094 $ 101,829 $ 160,579 $ 168,613 $ 165,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,546,301 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.56 0.55 0.49 0.46 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.35 Report SHERMAN Ridership NR - Not Reported 12,826 10,619 8,760 9,826 10,988 14,160 14,631 14,369 14,965 13,477 12,483 137,104 Mileage 60,264 132,290 138,870 137,566 127,190 130,352 170,233 168,326 183,419 175,060 168,550 142,698 1,734,818 Revenue Federal Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR State Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Farebox NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Contract RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR NR Other RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR NR Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08
TEMPLE Ridership 19,027 18,741 17,995 23,650 7,740 17,257 13,482 16,913 16,893 16,534 16,809 18,248 203,289 Mileage 53,843 56,285 59,413 74,636 24,125 55,690 47,399 55,789 56,122 53,238 51,577 55,613 643,730 Revenue Federal Grants$ 56,824 $ 105,657 $ 97,248 $ 91,922 $ 98,636 $ 85,800 $ 68,540 $ 127,462 $ 114,831 $ 143,340 $ 147,754 $ 147,217 $ 1,285,231 State Grants 51,950 105,415 70,108 20,659 3,825 - - - 1,188,946 77,930 - 20,138 1,538,971 Farebox 14,165 7,312 12,711 15,998 5,830 11,110 9,562 5,153 13,437 9,432 10,971 10,587 126,268 Contract Revenue 960 41,598 28,571 95,604 136,454 112,007 9,657 83,383 86,332 267,116 115,192 222,333 1,199,207 Other Revenue - - 21,433 519 - - 134,938 21,121 - - - 7,102 185,113 Total Revenue $ 123,899 $ 259,982 $ 230,071 $ 224,702 $ 244,745 $ 208,917 $ 222,697 $ 237,119 $ 1,403,546 $ 497,818 $ 273,917 $ 407,377 $ 4,334,790 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.32
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total TEXARKANA Ridership 24,622 27,904 23,887 24,578 24,496 21,285 22,976 23,860 22,680 24,366 24,430 24,782 289,866 Mileage 29,738 32,117 28,548 30,927 30,927 28,548 30,927 32,399 31,400 32,773 32,414 32,414 373,132 Revenue Federal Grants $ 110,778 $ 76,911 $ 59,767 $ 62,505 $ 90,103 $ 58,602 $ 65,509 $ 64,231 $ 64,368 $ 40,744 $ 89,474 $ 75,168 $ 858,160 State Grants 49,798 24,792 38,607 23,160 30,000 20,000 22,893 23,000 26,000 28,000 25,000 13,941 325,191 Farebox 11,316 14,122 11,741 12,123 10,417 10,069 11,011 10,167 9,848 13,883 11,818 10,007 136,522 Contract Revenue - - - 15,893 - - - - - 15,893 - - 31,786 Other Revenue 18,683 28,523 22,109 12,697 46,199 14,491 19,434 36,654 27,145 42,526 30,920 29,206 328,587 Total Revenue $ 190,575 $ 144,348 $ 132,224 $ 126,378 $ 176,719 $ 103,162 $ 118,847 $ 134,052 $ 127,361 $ 141,046 $ 157,212 $ 128,322 $ 1,680,246 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.83 0.87 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.72 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.78
TEXAS CITY Ridership 17,130 18,764 14,303 15,521 15,641 14,879 18,320 16,923 15,451 15,868 16,803 15,329 194,932 Mileage 49,630 53,515 44,807 44,070 43,711 43,514 44,838 43,350 43,221 45,544 45,949 45,296 547,445 Revenue Federal Grants $ 296,366 $ 120,943 $ 111,675 $ 199,082 $ 84,500 $ 81,063 $ 112,235 $ 208,744 $ 78,406 $ 200,687 $ 85,898 $ 713,571 $ 2,293,170 State Grants 19,444 26,608 20,764 29,331 22,159 21,329 22,134 19,251 14,064 24,930 20,517 32,385 272,916 Farebox 9,729 12,591 14,608 12,193 11,596 10,989 12,800 14,264 16,368 17,793 10,490 238,721 382,142 Contract Revenue - 15,290 1,064,820 26,322 - 27,804 30,471 - 18,884 264,864 - 500,602 1,949,057 Other Revenue 103,661 54,408 316,496 75,818 36,687 39,789 49,300 77,314 40,335 72,572 37,740 386,813 1,290,933 Total Revenue $ 429,200 $ 229,840 $ 1,528,363 $ 342,746 $ 154,942 $ 180,974 $ 226,940 $ 319,573 $ 168,057 $ 580,846 $ 154,645 $ 1,872,092 $ 6,188,218 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.35 0.36 0.34 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.37 0.34 0.36
TYLER Ridership 18,896 20,106 14,780 15,196 17,118 15,928 16,401 16,795 15,542 16,536 15,831 15,377 198,506 Mileage 45,123 50,520 40,822 44,680 46,200 42,068 47,860 47,026 44,401 49,290 46,458 43,943 548,391 Revenue Federal Grants$ 100,235 $ 162,025 $ 101,444 $ 77,533 $ 78,443 $ 65,761 $ 83,438 $ 114,936 $ 129,846 $ 136,057 $ 95,147 $ 129,072 $ 1,273,937 State Grants - 153,980 72,648 55,293 56,330 39,359 - - - 119,837 - - 497,447 Farebox 15,268 13,080 4,882 16,487 12,088 25,830 10,985 12,932 21,154 13,100 13,466 12,698 171,970 2015 Contract Revenue ------113,017 - - 113,017 Other Revenue 69,336 27,686 7,209 5,592 5,563 11,702 63,768 54,948 70,755 60,028 50,231 60,611 487,429 Total Revenue $ 184,839 $ 356,771 $ 186,183 $ 154,905 $ 152,424 $ 142,652 $ 158,191 $ 182,816 $ 221,755 $ 442,039 $ 158,844 $ 202,381 $ 2,543,800 Texas System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.42 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.37 0.38 0.34 0.36 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36
VICTORIA Ridership 24,271 25,751 19,894 21,972 22,011 20,642 22,061 22,544 23,173 23,594 25,848 24,443 276,204 Transit Mileage 54,721 58,736 48,067 51,530 55,431 50,850 57,262 54,747 53,731 54,844 60,235 56,720 656,874 Revenue Federal Grants $ 54,677 $ 67,534 $ 76,842 $ 92,518 $ 124,369 $ 84,164 $ 64,858 $ 82,258 $ 78,826 $ 367,035 $ 91,705 $ 56,962 $ 1,241,748 State Grants 37,616 49,175 47,689 35,734 30,896 20,035 13,993 15,512 8,109 0 0 0 258,759 Statistics Farebox 14,317 19,939 13,629 14,473 14,732 13,267 13,092 12,951 12,399 13,962 10,793 14,681 168,235 Contract Revenue 11,385 22,016 32,143 28,483 65,311 72,137 53,605 75,871 83,151 126,722 143,402 150,861 865,087 Other Revenue 12,520 11,383 12,941 13,517 53,308 34,626 17,648 27,213 22,832 15,309 8,078 9,625 239,000 Total Revenue $ 130,515 $ 170,047 $ 183,244 $ 184,725 $ 288,616 $ 224,229 $ 163,196 $ 213,805 $ 205,317 $ 523,028 $ 253,978 $ 232,129 $ 2,772,829 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.43 0.40 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.42 Report
See footnote at the end of Table 45 46 2015 URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas UTA Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total WACO Ridership 120,755 129,911 110,417 95,003 101,005 106,305 100,725 93,957 67,213 61,397 63,843 81,724 1,132,255 Mileage 148,803 161,021 139,748 142,502 145,450 137,447 152,053 157,368 147,932 145,727 148,334 146,558 1,772,943 Transit Revenue Federal Grants $ 351,431 $ 333,935 $ 333,935 $ 168,145 $ 306,675 $ 5,282 $ 6,062 $ 64,514 $ 115,954 $ 39,878 $ 230,923 $ 231,357 $ 2,188,091 State Grants ------238,750 177,805 - 416,555
Statistics Farebox 77,592 62,229 62,769 74,276 63,282 60,985 58,602 68,767 69,406 53,926 53,816 53,726 759,376 Contract Revenue 243,699 116,131 107,098 193,394 244,036 428,228 397,665 349,212 306,441 202,274 167,589 93,157 2,848,924 Other Revenue 39,391 40,085 42,986 44,052 27,837 29,333 55,255 61,799 73,898 41,114 49,600 62,103 567,453 Total Revenue $ 712,113 $ 552,380 $ 546,788 $ 479,867 $ 641,830 $ 523,828 $ 517,584 $ 544,292 $ 565,699 $ 575,942 $ 679,733 $ 440,343 $ 6,780,399 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.81 0.81 0.79 0.67 0.69 0.77 0.66 0.60 0.45 0.42 0.43 0.56 0.64 Report WICHITA FALLS Ridership 49,703 52,759 43,477 34,138 35,780 36,766 39,478 40,337 34,688 36,287 36,376 41,127 480,916 Mileage 49,227 53,391 46,108 46,718 47,207 42,669 47,824 50,930 45,386 49,326 50,003 48,556 577,345 Revenue Federal Grants $ 117,019 $ 115,269 $ - $ - $ 189,445 $ - $ 115,889 $ 180,505 $ 178,651 $ 167,102 $ 202,651 $ - $ 1,266,531 State Grants - - - 115,360 - - - 260,141 - - - - 375,501 Farebox 22,484 23,763 22,898 20,068 21,352 20,125 21,579 23,455 26,350 25,688 23,819 24,528 276,109 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 96,066 98,363 47,620 46,398 39,990 36,702 39,767 48,776 52,390 57,689 41,623 45,672 651,056 Total Revenue $ 235,569 $ 237,395 $ 70,518 $ 181,826 $ 250,787 $ 56,827 $ 177,235 $ 512,877 $ 257,391 $ 250,479 $ 268,093 $ 70,200 $ 2,569,197 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.01 0.99 0.94 0.73 0.76 0.86 0.83 0.79 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.85 0.83 GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Urbanized Ridership 3,113,968 3,051,446 2,320,679 1,775,021 1,860,614 2,379,767 2,106,775 2,302,196 1,429,420 1,332,457 1,338,238 1,364,508 24,375,089 Transit Mileage 2,213,514 2,483,285 2,158,412 2,289,623 2,190,715 2,261,529 2,447,636 2,562,333 2,297,690 2,249,443 2,255,485 2,198,431 27,608,096 Agencies - Revenue Fiscal Year 2015 Federal Grants 4,210,204 3,354,811 3,015,160 3,472,417 3,141,150 2,921,431 4,012,950 4,825,367 3,634,611 3,217,184 4,395,960 7,462,378 $ 47,663,623 State Grants 1,444,747 1,400,412 1,256,018 2,544,678 1,323,494 871,867 557,749 501,948 2,638,430 1,706,889 915,369 332,864 15,494,465 Farebox 1,361,814 1,357,790 1,123,696 1,252,149 1,073,058 1,114,580 1,191,930 1,170,927 1,160,292 1,190,605 1,210,686 1,427,231 14,634,758 Contract Revenue 1,168,781 1,062,024 1,959,186 1,015,546 1,216,879 1,543,912 1,790,162 1,392,533 1,136,489 2,194,024 1,176,924 1,799,140 17,455,600 Other Revenue 3,224,454 2,882,758 2,343,169 2,523,809 3,359,214 3,063,915 3,174,748 3,985,285 2,312,038 2,686,329 2,855,904 4,569,782 36,981,405 Total Revenue $ 11,410,000 $ 10,057,795 $ 9,697,229 $ 10,808,599 $ 10,113,795 $ 9,515,705 $ 10,727,539 $ 11,876,060 $ 10,881,860 $ 10,995,031 $ 10,554,843 $ 15,591,395 $ 132,229,851 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.41 1.23 1.08 0.78 0.85 1.05 0.86 0.90 0.62 0.59 0.59 0.62 0.88 *NETS - Contract Revenues is for General Public Service from another 5307 or 5311 transit agency. NR - Not Reported RURAL AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5311)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 47 SUMMARY RURAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS (Section 5311)
The Section 5311 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5311) provides capital, planning, operating, and administrative grants for public transportation projects in rural areas. The rural transit agencies have mandates to report performance as described in the Texas Transportation Code, §456.008 and the Texas Administrative Code (TAC), §31.36 and §31.48.
The funding formula allocates funds based on “needs” and “performance.” Each agency’s “needs” index is comprised of 75 percent population and 25 percent land area. Including land area in the needs calculation recognizes the increased cost of providing transit service to geographically large areas.
The funding formula distributes performance funding based on an average of three indicators:
Local investment per operational expense Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile Vehicle revenue mile per operational expense
Like the urbanized transit agencies, the rural transit agencies are required to report the following indicators:
(i) Service efficiency--Operating expense per vehicle mile.
(ii) Cost effectiveness--Operating expense per unlinked passenger trip.
(iii) Service effectiveness--Unlinked passenger trips per capita and unlinked passenger trips per vehicle mile.
(iv) Safety--Total incidents per 100,000 miles of service and average number of miles between revenue vehicle mechanical system failures that prevent the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip.
In addition to the performance-based indicators required for formula funding and the reporting requirements of the TAC, the rural transit agencies are obligated to report annually to the Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database (FTA NTD) as state recipients. The reporting requirements are described in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The rural transit agencies’ data is collected by TxDOT-PTN and submitted to FTA-NTD each year in January.
In FY 2015, the ridership number for the rural transit agencies is 6.1 million riders, in which ridership decreased nearly seven (7) percent lower than the FY 2014 ridership total of 6.5 million passenger trips. While ridership decreased from FY 2014 to FY 2015, miles travelled decreased slightly during the same time period.
48 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
From FY 2006 to FY 2015, the number of “unlinked passenger trips” increased an average of three (3) percent annually, and increased 30 percent, over the past decade. The number of “vehicle revenue miles” increased an annual average of three (3) percent, and increased 32 percent, during the same period.
Over the past fiscal year, the transit agencies serving Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council (at 33 percent), Rural Economic Assistance League (at 31 percent) and STAR Transit (at 12 percent) has demonstrated the greatest ridership gains among the rural agencies. In contrast, Texoma Area Paratransit System (at 42 percent), Community Services, Inc. (at 28 percent), Ark-Tex Council of Governments (at 23 percent), Rolling Plains Management Corporation (at 23 percent), East Texas Council of Governments (at 22 percent) and Community Action Council of South Texas (at 20 percent) have shown the greatest significant decrease in ridership.
Kleberg County Human Services, in Kingsville, has demonstrated the heaviest trend regarding the increase in vehicle miles travelled in contrast to their ridership activity, with ridership down four (4) percent, and vehicle miles travelled up 56 percent, from FY 2014 to FY 2015.
With the rural transit agencies, ridership is steadily declining due to the growth of urbanized area through the loss of rural territory. The indicated trend of service usage is also affected by local and national economic conditions.
This is the ninth year the web-based PTN-128 reporting system has been used, allowing all involved parties to review and resolve any variances in the data by data category. This on- line reporting process also allows reasonableness and data quality checks that may be performed anytime throughout the year.
As noted in the introduction, new tables and figures are presented in this report to show the detailed break-out of ridership by programs along with passenger boarding by service.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 49
Figure 9 below shows the rural transit agencies' “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” indicator for FY 2006-2015. The graph shows currently shows and unchanging trend, during the past decade.
FIGURE 9: RURAL AREA PROGRAM Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile - FY 2006-2015
0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5311 Grant Program are located at the end of this section.
In June 2014, the rural transit district known as the Bee Community Action Agency ceased operations. As a result of the agency’s de-establishment, McMullen County became part of the Alamo Area Council of Governments, and the remaining counties of Live Oak, Bee, Refugio and Aransas became part of the Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. rural transit agency. This change has been reflected in Texas Transit Statistics report since Fiscal Year 2014.
In June 2015, the rural transit district known as the Community Action Council of South Texas ceased operations. As a result of the agency’s de-establishment, Zapata and Starr counties became part of the Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council, and the remaining counties of Jim Hogg and Duval became part of the Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. rural transit agency. This change will be reflected in future Texas Transit Statistics reports.
Effective August 1, 2015, a new rural transit district became eligible for state and federal formula funds. McLennan County Transit District was activated by local stakeholders, dissolving rural transit service in McLennan County provided by the Heart of Texas Council of Governments. This change will be reflected in future Texas Transit Statistics reports.
50 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Figure 10 Rural Public Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Lipscomb 23 Hartley Moore Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill Transportation Oldham Potter Carson Gray Wheeler Systems Collings- Deaf Smith Randall Armstrong Donley Worth
Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress Hardeman
Bailey Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger Foard Wichita 30 25 Lamar Red Lubbock Clay Montague River Hockley Crosby Dickens Cooke King Knox Grayson Fannin Bowie Cochran 2 Baylor Archer 34 Delta Titus Yoakum Jack Denton Collin 27 Terry Lynn Garza Kent Stonewall Haskell Throck- Young Wise Hopkins Cass
morton Morris Hunt Franklin Camp 32 Rock- 3 wall Rains Marion 24Parker Wood Upshur Gaines Dawson Palo Tarrant Borden Scurry Fisher Jones Pinto Dallas 33 Harrison Stephens Va n Shackelford Zandt Smith Gregg Johnson Kaufman 35 Hood Ellis Andrews Eastland Martin Howard Mitchell Nolan Taylor Callahan Erath 7 Henderson 12 Rusk Panola El Paso 9 6 Comanche Somervell Navarro 18 Hill Cherokee Loving Winkler Ector Midland Anderson Shelby 13 Glasscock Coke Runnels Bosque Nacogdoches Sterling Brown Limestone Coleman Freestone Hudspeth Hamilton Culberson 22 Ward Crane Mills Mc Tom Lennan Houston San Sabine Reeves Upton Reagan Leon Irion Green Concho 19 Coryell Angelina Augustine Mc Falls Culloch Lampasas 10 San Saba Bell Robertson Trinity Madison 4 37 Pecos Menard Polk Tyler Newton Jeff Davis Burnet Milam Walker Jasper Crockett Schleicher Mason Llano Williamson Brazos San Jacinto
Grimes Hardin Sutton Kimble Burleson Travis Blanco Lee Montgomery Terrell Gillespie Orange Washington Waller Liberty Presidio 5 28 Hays Bastrop Jefferson Kerr Austin Brewster Val Verde Edwards Kendall Fayette Harris Caldwell Chambers Real Comal 11 Bandera Colorado 14 Guadalupe Lavaca 8 Fort 15 Uvalde Bexar Gonzales Bend Kinney Medina Wharton Brazoria Galveston 31 Wilson 1 Dewitt 17 Jackson Maverick 16 Zavala Frio Atascosa Karnes Matagorda Victoria Goliad KEY: Calhoun Mc Bee Refugio Dimmit La Salle Mullen Live 1. Alamo Area Council of Governments Oak 26 San Aransas 2. Ark-Tex Council of Governments Jim Patricio 36 Webb Wells 3. Aspermont Small Business Development Center, Inc. Nueces Duval 4. Brazos Transit District 5. Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) Kleberg 6. Central Texas Rural Transit District Zapata Jim 7. Cleburne, City of Hogg Brooks Kenedy 8. Colorado Valley Transit, Inc. 20 Starr 29 9. Community Services, Inc. Hidalgo Willacy SOUTH PADRE 10. Concho Valley Transit District 21 ISLAND Cameron 11. Del Rio, City of 12. East Texas Council of Governments 26. Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. 13. El Paso, County of 27. Senior Center Resources & Public Transit, Inc. 14. Fort Bend, County of 28. South East Texas Regional Planning Commission 15. Galveston County Transit District 29. South Padre Island, City of 16. Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 30. South Plains Community Action Association 17. Gulf Coast Center 31. Southwest Area Regional Transit District 18. Heart of Texas Council of Governments 32. SPAN, Inc. 19. Hill Country Transit District 33. STAR Transit 20. Kleberg County Human Services 34. Texoma Area Paratransit System, Inc. 21. Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council 35. The Transit System, Inc. 22. McLennan County Rural Transit District 36. Webb County Community Action Agency 23. Panhandle Community Services 37. West Texas Opportunities, Inc. 24. Public Transit Services Texas Department of Transportation 25. Rolling Plains Management Corporation June 1, 2015
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 51 FIGURE 11: RURAL AREA PROGRAM EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2006-2015
Rural Area Program (5311) Service Efficiency $3.50 $3.14 $3.17 $3.13 $2.85 $2.84 $2.83 $3.00 $2.67 $2.81 $2.52 $2.50 $2.30 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Rural Area Program (5311) Cost Effectiveness $22.95$23.17 $24.00 $21.62 $22.00 $20.29 $18.93 $19.50 $19.88 $20.00 $18.00 $16.19 $16.00 $13.61 $14.48 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Rural Area Program (5311) Service Effectiveness 0.30 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 11 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
52 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 18: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (5311) PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 33,061,924 30,922,835 -6.47 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 1,705,753 1,616,781 -5.22Expenses $101,347,279 $92,064,119 -9.16 Total Revenue Vehicles 1,853 1,710 -7.72Total Revenue $53,424,848 $44,383,699 -16.92
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 6,512,765 6,057,232 -6.99 Incidents 5 4 NR Actual Vehicle Miles 38,357,450 36,437,323 -5.01 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 1,988,273 1,907,721 -4.05 Failures 3,232 5,503 70.27
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 2014 2015 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle $3.07 $2.98 Unlinked Passenger $15.56 $15.20 Revenue Mile Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $59.41 $56.94 5% 5% Revenue Hour Ratio**
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS *SAFETY INDICATOR 2014 2015 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Incidents/Per 0.20 0.20 0.015 NR Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 3.82 3.75 Revenue Vehicle 9.78 17.80 Vehicle Revenue Hour System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2014 2015 Dead Head Hours 13.80% 15.30% Dead Head Miles 13.80% 15.10%
Notes: (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are performance measures requirements of Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. # Not a performance-based requirement for Transportation Code §456.008. *Safety data includes incidents for fatalities, major and non-major injuries. Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures is combined major & other mechanical system failures. See Table 24 for detailed breakout. ** (see Table 23 for details). NR - Not Reported
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 53 5.31 9.48 7.31 2.41 8.99 30.75 10.37 11.26 11.71 30.67 52.57 19.40 14.60 27.03 29.82 17.92 14.36 37.50 19.76 32.79 16.61 16.12 30.49 63.86 19.43 10.60 25.27 15.13 18.23 24.45 21.01 15.76 26.47 32.35 52.88 37.93 2015 NR N/A 9.87 8.81 5.04 9.96 8.35 6.84 1.95 8.28 35.29 35.67 28.22 60.75 19.98 17.29 34.93 27.21 16.91 12.10 43.79 18.13 30.45 15.26 15.04 44.44 30.20 17.54 13.59 19.18 13.99 19.40 24.45 20.95 17.31 25.52 27.87 51.42 35.03 2014 N/A 1.40 2.28 1.99 4.96 2.70 2.72 2.67 3.60 3.44 3.54 2.11 2.44 3.80 2.69 3.23 3.80 3.87 4.00 3.08 2.85 3.96 2.49 3.60 3.67 3.35 3.26 2.88 3.11 2.64 3.20 3.06 2.67 2.90 3.57 3.40 2.63 2015
NR N/A 4.08 2.55 3.14 2.82 3.52 3.11 3.16 2.97 2.75 3.41 4.83 3.05 2.95 1.59 3.93 5.21 2.44 4.52 1.61 2.91 3.72 3.53 2.59 2.50 2.87 2.36 3.12 2.98 3.41 3.04 2.34 2.84 3.06 4.19 3.61 3.17 2.59 2014 N/A $ 3.92 $ 4.19 41.20 $ $ 36.53 $ 3.17 $ 3.13 $ 22.95 23.17 $ Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (i) Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passenger Trip (ii) AND COST EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 TABLE 19: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SERVICE EFFICIENCY otes: Average for Reporting Districts Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) N (i) TAC Requirement for Service Efficiency. (ii) TAC Requirement for Cost Effectiveness. N/A - Not Applicable Reported - Not NR Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) of Governments Alamo Area Council of Governments (Texarkana)Ark-Tex Council Ctr. Development Aspermont Business Small (Aspermont) Bee Community Action Agency (Beeville) (Bryan) District Transit Brazos (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) Cleburne City of (Cleburne) Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) (Corsicana) Inc. Services, Community Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) Rio) Rio,of (Del City Del East of Governments (Kilgore) Texas Council El Paso County of, (El Paso) Bend) (Fort District Transit Rural County Bend Fort (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) Heart of Governments of Texas (Waco) Council Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) (Amarillo) Services Community Panhandle Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) AssistanceRural Economic League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) Senior Center Transit Resources and Public Inc.(Greenville) South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) Island) Padre (South of Town Island, Padre South South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) Texas) Southwest of Council Community (formerly District Transit Regional Area Southwest (Denton) Inc. SPAN, STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Co. Senior Citizens Service) (Terrell) (Sherman) System/TAPS Paratransit Area Texoma Transit System Inc., Rose) The (Glen Webb Co. Action Agency Community (Laredo) West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa)
54 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 0.17 0.26 0.15 0.14 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.21 0.22 0.27 0.11 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.24 0.93 0.12 0.06 0.17 0.23 0.31 0.29 0.11 0.21 0.37 0.15 0.11 1.50 0.07 0.06 0.38 0.07 0.22 N/A 0.14 0.20 0.09 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.04 0.11 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.10 0.18 0.26 1.03 0.10 0.05 0.17 0.37 0.26 0.31 0.13 0.20 0.34 0.14 1.75 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.38 0.07 0.23 N/A 1.34 1.34 1.40 0.45 1.15 0.42 0.29 0.77 0.75 0.03 0.35 0.65 0.73 0.86 0.60 0.68 1.04 0.16 0.23 0.41 0.89 1.89 0.48 1.49 0.53 1.30 1.44 0.78 0.87 0.42 0.30 6.36 0.58 12.47 10.01 13.39 6.88 194.18
N/A 1.44 1.34 1.25 0.280.59 0.27 0.10 0.11 0.43 0.20 0.30 0.80 1.31 0.37 0.73 0.64 1.08 0.83 0.73 0.66 1.25 0.20 0.25 0.24 1.00 1.97 0.59 1.67 0.64 1.68 2.14 0.82 0.89 0.73 0.31 6.78 0.71 12.99 10.18 13.90 7.75 2014 2015 2014 2015 222.42 N/A Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita (iii) Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile (iii) TABLE 20: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 otes: Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) Average for Reporting Districts N/A - Not Applicable Reported - Not NR N (iii) TAC requirements for Service Effectiveness population. small and ridership large with destination *Tourist Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) of Governments Alamo Area Council Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana)Ark-Tex Council Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. Development Aspermont Business Small (Aspermont) Bee Community Action Agency (Beeville) (Bryan) District Transit Brazos Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) Cleburne City of (Cleburne) Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) Inc. Services, Community Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) Rio,of (Del City Del East of Governments Texas(Kilgore) Council El Paso County of, (El Paso) Bend) (Fort District Transit Rural County Bend Fort (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston (Victoria) Commission Planning Regional Crescent Golden Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) Heart of Governments of Texas (Waco) Council Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) (Amarillo) Services Community Panhandle Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) Rural Economic AssistanceRural Economic League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) Transit Public and Resources Center Senior South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) Comm. Planning Regional Texas East South South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island)* South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) Southwest Area Regional Transit District (formerly Community Council of Southwest Texas) (Uvalde) (Uvalde) Texas) Southwest of Council Community (formerly District Transit Regional Area Southwest SPAN, Inc. (Denton) Inc. SPAN, STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Co. Senior Citizens Service) (Terrell) Service) Citizens Senior Co. Kaufman (formerly Transit STAR Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) System/TAPS Paratransit Area Texoma Transit System Inc., Rose) The (Glen Webb Co. Action Agency Community (Laredo) West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 55 2015 813,759 30,922,835 2014 870,051 33,061,924 Vehicle Revenue Miles Vehicle Revenue 2015 42,547 1,616,781 2014 44,888 1,705,753
DATA - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 DATA - Fiscal Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue 2015 2014 987,951529,882 N/A978,204 840,585 820,908966,765 14,863637,302 9,894950,326 19,285 593,288 N/A 15,645 720,294 986,618 17,353 10,287 387,073 15,990 11,404 168,631 355,192 7,673 398,961 N/A 21,687 17,133 213,827 360,160 171,107 269,120 164,940 266,608 302,330 817,935 833,638 13,267 14,104 257,991 242,505 936,797 947,917 13,597 14,918 259,516 278,940 3,797,8884,824,6799,909,6475,361,6391,087,2441,444,189 3,186,8451,145,1251,662,981 4,557,4851,109,942 7,784,5613,724,042 3,891,6903,234,582 1,123,8375,926,248 1,548,6044,337,8593,192,272 54,627 974,731 1,463,4111,285,916 1,008,1992,894,305 77,755 3,114,701 145,231 3,968,177 69,930 6,348,878 22,782 4,402,6283,217,251 45,814 3,001,8051,811,129 50,729 2,970,272 15,755 23,026 2,861,400 26,598 77,930 66,284 98,325 47,719 62,619 74,231 3,276,094 20,871 58,569 1,986,738 32,603 62,255 930,205 30,769 13,114 23,631 59,726 1,709,006 22,766 2,813,759 58,673 1,725,182 49,774 76,399 343,952 82,202 61,090 485,918 39,103 59,583 335,706 37,193 344,380 901,332 64,847 363,687 1,262,764 1,869,387 2,033,602 2,046,063 1,508,812 1,444,847 74,200 832,363 1,305,812 37,253 348,413 407,819 800,319 995,446 251,809 365,987 1,091,129 327,841 1,992,417 1,241,400 1,605,244 725,260 1,205,647 887,725 808,732 854,508 1,205,495 690,411 1,967,115 1,645,630 45,333 36,807 686,252 528,935 1,406,117 1,967,113 38,457 52,071 596,829 736,060 1,227,559 1,215,621 27,686 32,255 393,377 460,980 1,556,252 1,567,378 30,044 29,580 521,378 489,962 1,221,979 1,315,495 20,426 20,898 358,432 365,372 3,453,728 3,270,336 50,642 46,001 1,137,589 1,069,878 2,740,0191,699,810 2,501,526 1,725,072 57,269 31,426 47,343 31,493 1,170,027 598,451 937,582 594,478 3,953,317 5,148,464 69,296 89,910 1,290,242 1,440,961 4,945,564 4,376,132 89,752 77,726 1,911,079 1,664,153 5,741,539 NR 70,112 64,671 1,370,351 1,304,616 RAM (Section 5311) SOURCE RAM (Section N/A 58,238 N/A 1,984 N/A 41,523 $ 101,347,279 92,064,119 $ $ 2,667,034 2,488,219 $ $ 4,662,180 $ 4,059,810 64,347 55,929 1,187,887 969,085 Total Expense Operating TABLE 21: RURAL AREA PROG TABLE 21: RURAL otes: Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) Totals Average for Reporting Districts # Includes JARC data. See Table 32 and Table 33 for Breakout. for 33 Table and 32 Table See data. JARC Includes # Breakout. for 37 Table and 36 Table See data. (NF) Freedom New Includes # # data. (NF) Freedom New and JARC Includes @ - NotN/A Applicable Reported Not - NR N Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) @ Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) Bee Community Action Agency (Beeville) (Bryan) District Transit Brazos # (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital @ (Coleman) District Transit Rural Texas Central Cleburne City of (Cleburne) Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) # Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) @ El Paso County of, (El Paso) # @ Bend) (Fort District Transit Rural County Bend Fort @ (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) # Coast Center (Galveston) Gulf Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) # Saba) (San District Transit Country Hill Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) # Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) (Waco) District Transit Rural County McLennan Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) # Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) # South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) # South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) @ Southwest Area Regional Transit District (formerly Community Council of Southwest Texas) (Uvalde) # SPAN, Inc. (Denton) STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Co. Senior Citizens Service) (Terrell) West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) # Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose)
56 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 6 27 10 26 20 42 19 72 93 58 62 2015 9 24 10 22 20 10 80 74 58 76 102 2014 19,458 17,926 86,394 67,859 93,121 2015 546,814 352,516 108,801 111,145 234,920 158,725 21,753 18,219 85,415 94,647 69,911 2014 626,330 367,299 140,624 113,161 241,430 158,305 37 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and NF data. and NF JARC @ Includes Breakout. 37 for 171,389 159,401 48 48 2,816 37,733 16,263 15,99161,937 860,922 16 829,119 16 25 32 57,19648,87938,177 37,979 61,213 388,478 39,02762,528 51,021 382,153 N/A86,12987,673 54 2075,149 63,285 63,657 53 1,89414,574 66,597 66,674 64,104 54 98,802 20 65,171 48 10 92,728 17 34 34 14 22 17 34 31 17 32,477 63,981 61,494 16 18 28,273 86,202 92,952 59,672 161,645 212,245 186,164 60 64 231,276138,104 385,505 94,417 345,573 78,633 86 38 85 50 229,857398,674 134,571190,802106,596 573,260 153,493 103,921 39,957600,618 533,063 143,971 122,295 37,687114,367 80 95,172 116 42,574 86247,960 18 46,514 65 200,627 205,697 62 134 272,968 78 164,819 18 269,076198,733 38 160,941 155,639 141,175 52 93,828 70 115,371 25 63 30 78 131 NR 60 128 407,529 805,898 132,858 113,831 132,252 118,131 164,934 165,041 147,294 67 70 5,953,405 6,512,765 6,057,232 1,863 1,710 Census 2010 Census N/A 17,504 N/A 45 N/A Service Area Population (1) Population Area Service Trips Passenger Unlinked Vehicles Revenue Total s (Rio Grandes (Rio City) N/A 99,158 79,143 29 N/A TABLE 21a: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SOURCE DATA (continued) - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 otes: Nonurbanized Systems (Headquarters) Nonurbanized Totals Systems Reporting for Average Service area population changed from original 2010 Census due to increase or decrease in transit service area coverage. service transit decrease in or due to increase 2010 Census original from changed area population Service SF1. - 2010 U.S. Census Source (1) data - See Table (NF) - See Table 32 and Table ridership Breakout.36 and # Includes New Freedom Table# Includes JARC 33 for N/A - Not Applicable, NR - Not Reported - Not - Not Applicable, NR N/A as of August 31, 2015. operation, Agency in area based on service of transit Population N Bee Community Action AgencyBee Community Action (Beeville) # (Victoria) Planning Commission Regional Golden Crescent Center (Galveston) Coast Gulf Aspermont Business Development Small Ctr. (Aspermont) @ (Galveston) District County Transit Galveston # (Amarillo) Community Services Panhandle Wells) (Mineral Services Transit Public Brazos Transit District (Bryan) Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) Governments (San of Area Council Alamo @ Governments of (Texarkana) Council Ark-Tex # (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital @ District Transit (Coleman) Rural Texas Central (Cleburne) Cleburne City of Texa South of Council Community Act. Angelo) (San District Transit Rural Valley Concho (Del Rio) City of Del Rio, East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) @ El Paso County of, (El Paso) # Bend) @ (Fort District Transit Bend County Rural Fort Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) # (Waco) District Transit County Rural McLennan Corp. (Crowell) Management Rolling Plains League, (REAL) (Alice) Inc. Assistance Economic Rural (Greenville) # Inc. Transit Public and Center Resources Senior Comm. (Beaumont) Planning Regional Texas East South # Island) Padre (South City of Island, Padre South (Levelland) @ Assoc. Community Action Plains South # (Uvalde) District Transit Regional Area Southwest SPAN, (Denton) Inc. STAR Transit (formerly Co. Senior Kaufman Citizens Service) (Terrell) # # (Sherman) System/TAPS Paratransit Area Texoma (Glen Rose) The Inc., System Transit (Laredo) Agency Co. Community Action Webb West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 113,378 141,842 159,128 58 67 Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) Inc. Community Services, Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) # Transit Valley Colorado Saba) (San District Country Transit Hill (Kingsville) # Kleberg Services County Human Develop. (McAllen) Valley Council Lower Grande Rio
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 57 58 2015 TABLE 21b: RURAL AREA PROGRAM - PASSENGER BOARDINGS Texas Fiscal Year 2014 to Fiscal Year 2015 Transit
Statistics Passenger Boardings FY2014 FY2015 Differences % Change General Public 3,965,980 3,822,681 -143,299 -4% Medical Transportation Program 446,534 284,841 -161,693 -36% Report Other Contract Service 1,121,442 1,085,722 -35,720 -3% Section 5316 (JARC) 452,706 329,053 -123,653 -27% Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Disabled 264,364 306,894 42,530 16% Department of Aging & Disabilities 125,244 112,254 -12,990 -10% CMAQ 69,292 68,707 -585 -1% Head Start 38,839 32,454 -6,385 -16% Section 5317 New Freedom 25,294 14,384 -10,910 -43% Other State Programs 3,070 242 -2,828 -92% TOTAL 6,512,765 6,057,232 -455,533 -7%
Figure 12: Rural - Percentage of Passenger Boardings Section 5310 by Service, FY 2015 Department of Enhanced Mobility Aging & of Seniors & Disabilities Disabled 2% 5% CMAQ, Head Start, Section 5316 Section 5317 (JARC) (New Freedom) 5% and Other State Other Contract Programs Service 2% 18% Medical General Public Transportation 63% Program 5% 31,324 2015 202,208 168,210 871,164 499,558 609,048 654,984 733,316 583,084 267,097 741,785 1,196,756 1,486,529 1,224,238 2,740,151 2,096,453 1,558,628 44,383,699 1,214,092 NR 98,517 N/A 2014 177,732 120,504 214,470 183,677 250,658 107,926 318,877 198,916 251,746 364,823 787,616 676,388 344,622 235,153 621,762 546,337 579,437 431,437 338,657 153,119 705,470 341,408 562,913 590,380 589,772 444,253 217,490 459,888 1,281,371 2,543,616 1,062,600 646,977 1,060,951 1,017,283 2,158,123 1,245,139 1,671,024 1,558,935 7,912,510 4,455,041 4,325,280 2,673,744 2,828,769 2,612,335 3,845,957 3,244,234 3,180,253 4,828,552 1,891,722 1,656,466 1,633,201 1,539,037 1,356,646 1,505,572 1,960,400 2,632,219 N/A 2,253,157 $ Total Revenue (1) 26,915 2015 202,208 487,842 219,610 694,221 132,507 180,447 283,808 599,821 153,133 533,736 351,050 140,257 791,816 411,822 511,026 575,780 658,618 539,875 142,967 1,020,321 1,187,124 1,171,246 1,430,914 4,244,533 2,565,702 1,669,488 2,517,224 4,536,703 1,598,770 1,462,888 1,201,166 1,045,921 2,570,994 2,037,017 $1,160,738 1,388,839 $ $ $39,259,530 52,775,896 $ $ NR NR N/A
83,343 2014 301,202 173,565 716,542 258,143 593,671 493,864 984,356 318,316 417,191 158,117 866,837 628,543 664,595 268,227 513,237 515,753 509,556 403,187 115,838 2,111,180 1,181,556 1,509,278 7,776,500 4,169,084 1,772,900 3,078,110 2,926,808 1,830,628 1,551,603 1,033,815 1,359,845 1,744,742 2,235,626 2,568,948 NR NR N/A edicated to transit at revenue, other Reporting Manual. $ 1,361,116 $ 47,897,192 $ 2,062,486 $ 1,362,060 $ Local Revenue TABLE 22: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) ANNUAL LOCAL REVENUE - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Years - Fiscal REVENUE LOCAL ANNUAL 5311) (Section PROGRAM AREA 22: RURAL TABLE otes: Totals Average for Reporting Districts Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) Examples include, but are not limited to, passenger fares, special transit fares, purchased transportation fares, park and ride transportation revenue, charter service revenue, freight tariffs, station and vehicle concessions, advertising revenue, funds d their source, taxes, cash contributions, contract revenue, general revenue, and in-kind contributions. N (1) Directly generated funds, as defined in the latest edition of the Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database Not Reported - NR Not Applicable, - N/A Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) Bee Community Action Agency (Beeville) (Bryan) District Transit Brazos (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital (Coleman) District Transit Rural Texas Central Cleburne City of (Cleburne) Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) (Kilgore) Governments of Council East Texas El Paso County of, (El Paso) Bend) (Fort District Transit Rural County Bend Fort (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) Coast Center (Galveston) Gulf Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) Saba) (San District Transit Country Hill Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) (Waco) District Transit Rural County McLennan Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) Southwest Area Regional Transit District (formerly Community Council of Southwest Texas) (Uvalde) SPAN, Inc. (Denton) STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Co. Senior Citizens Service) (Terrell) Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 59 5% 8% 8% 4% 3% 4% 9% 2% 8% 3% 4% 5% 5% 1% 5% 3% 7% 6% 2015 NR 4% 4% 5% 2% 4% 9% 2% 8% 3% 3% 5% 4% 1% 5% 2% 5% 6% 2014 NR N/A Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) Ratio Recovery Farebox 4,409 2015 98,022 87,736 47,564 79,348 18,469 80,387 94,247 35,703 79,204 43,209 59,436 285,363 176,435 210,508 178,317
NR 2014 73,181 46,94312,300 N/A 73,89378,24481,59725,560 1% 159,135 2% 76,149 31,04880,216 N/A 2% 2% 3% 4% 74,698 5% 5% 3% 4% 4% 43,029 78,18171,074 81,015 76,567 7% 5% 7% 5% 76,927 17,675 85,573 42,697 24,583 74,627 41,066 63,271 86,47928,091 82,020 12,601 8% 2% 8% 1% 49,676 61,09420,341 57,696 12,862 2% 2% 2% 2% 310,456 161,746156,196 128,021 108,042 3% 3%101,652 3% 3% 124,130 14% 15% 150,446 767,847 727,010307,990 13% NR 11% 7% NR 177,732 120,504 18% 15% 136,010 145,727 253,445 291,849 5% 7% 1,055,869 942,847 33% 24% NR N/A Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 $ 145,891 $ 142,338 $ 5,313,186 $ 5,124,169 $ 190,671 $ 196,568 Farebox Revenue Farebox TABLE 23: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) FAREBOX REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO RATIO RECOVERY AND FAREBOX REVENUE FAREBOX (Section 5311) PROGRAM AREA 23: RURAL TABLE otes: Totals Districts Reporting for Average Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses. operating total by divided revenue as farebox is defined ratio recovery Farebox (1) from all calculations. is excluded fares so it charge Padrenot Island does **South N/A - Not Applicable NR = Not Reported N Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) Public Center and Senior Resources South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) Assoc. Action Community Plains South Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) (Alice) Inc. (REAL) League, Assistance Economic Rural (Beaumont) Comm. Planning Regional Texas East South Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) (Texarkana) Governments of Council Ark-Tex (Beeville) Agency Action Bee Community (Coleman) District Transit Rural Texas Central (Kilgore) Governments of Council Texas East Saba) Transit District (San Hill Country (Waco) District Transit Rural County McLennan Island) Padre (South of City Island, Padre South Inc. (Denton) SPAN, (Laredo) Agency Action Community Co. Webb Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) Business Development Small Aspermont Transit District (Bryan) Brazos (El Paso) of, County El Paso (Kingsville) Services Human County Kleberg (McAllen) Council Develop. Valley Grande Rio Lower Citizens Senior Kaufman Co. Service) Transit (formerly (Terrell)STAR 134,974 169,157 3% 3% Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) Services Community Panhandle Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) (Crowell) Corp. Plains Management Rolling Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) Transit District (Fort Rural County Bend Fort (Uvalde) Texas) Southwest of Council Community (formerly District Transit Regional Area Southwest Inc., The (Glen Rose) Transit System Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) System/TAPS Paratransit Area Texoma Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital (Cleburne) of City Cleburne Transit (Columbus) Valley Colorado City) Grande (Rio Texas South of Council Act. Community Inc. (Lamesa) West Texas Opportunities, Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) (Mineral Transit Services Public Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) Services, Community Angelo) Transit District (San Rural Valley Concho (Del Rio) of City Del Rio, Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) Commission Planning Crescent Regional Golden Center (Galveston) Coast Gulf Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco)
60 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report - 5 3 4 4 7 1 0 9 8 1 0 4 7 30 30 14 17 36 63 46 1 235 302 188 177 109 516 109 109 1,670 2015 3,841 N/A 02 0 30 32 9 2 01 72 68 00 00 45 0 4 1 33 22 22 11 21 60 11 14 23 16 34 15 34 72 34 19 58 20 56 61 30 160 216 188 358 1,552 2014 3,232 N/A (2) Other Mechanical System Failures 12 2 14 4 2015 N/A
1 1 31 5 2014 N/A NUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 (1) Total Safety Incidents otes: TABLE 24: RURAL AREA PROGRAM INCIDENTS AND REVE Incidents and Revenue Vehicle System Failures Total Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) N (1) Public Transportation Management Systems (PTMS) and the FTA-NTD Safety Reporting are sources used for incidents data. fire. non-arson and injured 1 person include: non-major and injured persons 2 or more include: - major Incidents failures. system other and major both includes data Failures System Vehicle Revenue (2) data. no reported indicates fields Blank Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) Cleburne City of (Cleburne) Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) (Corsicana) Inc. Services, Community Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) Rio) Rio,of (Del City Del East of Governments (Kilgore) Texas Council Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) (San Antonio) of Governments Alamo Area Council Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana)Ark-Tex Council Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. Development Aspermont Business Small (Aspermont) Bee Community Action Agency (Beeville) (Bryan) District Transit Brazos (Austin) (CARTS) System Transportation Rural Area Capital El Paso County of, (El Paso) Bend) (Fort District Transit Rural County Bend Fort Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) District Transit County Galveston Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) Heart of Governments of Texas (Waco) Council Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) Services Community Panhandle SPAN, Inc. (Denton) Inc. SPAN, STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Co. Senior Citizens Service) (Terrell) Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) System/TAPS Paratransit Area Texoma Transit System Inc., Rose) The (Glen Webb Co. Action Agency Community (Laredo) West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) (Alice) (REAL) Inc. League, Assistance Economic Rural Senior Center Transit Resources and Public Inc.(Greenville) South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) Island) Padre (South of City Island, Padre South South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) (Uvalde) Texas) Southwest of Council Community (formerly District Transit Regional Area Southwest
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 61 This page intentionally left blank.
62 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR
RURAL AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5311)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 63 9 1 8 9 6 1 5 0 3 9 1 3 0 7 2 8 1 0.1 0.12 5,897 15,991 73,89 18,46 259,057 174,55 969,085 210,85 103,921 901,332 768,30 398,961 111,145 402,94 196,56 596,77 388,52 846,50 1,247,13 1,151,20 4,172,35 3,183,86 1,341,94 1,366,58 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8 1 3 0 - - 1 9 3 1 6 8 3 8 9 6 6 0.1 0.12 8,11 1,505 7,417 6,55 1,927 1,367 65,89 68,09 36,31 30,77 86,86 35,632 80,70 17,322 72,167 55,082 86,37 137,71 360,49 236,80
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
8 4 5 0 4 - 1 0 2 3 9 5 4 8 0 3 4 1 1 6 0.1 0.12 8,369 1,38 8,96 3,359 1,56 5,66 6,36 2,78 72,75 34,75 74,93 61,75 45,26 83,59 34,967 29,79218,33 133,28 34,02 75,972 222,93 180,89 134,17
12,92
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
6 6 8 1 - 1 9 4 4 4 0 4 5 5 1 6 0 0 0.12 0.1 8,62 1,40 9,035 1,562 6,27 1,463 77,447 73,18 35,36 26,197 36,66 67,26 69,16 97,38 13,66 32,98 18,63 68,35 184,56 404,90 155,057 242,63 33,40
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
9 0 8 8 8 - - 1 3 5 4 0 5 8 4 5 9 1 0 0.1 0.13 8,92 7,472 1,28 4,175 5,60 1,95 70,48 68,37 32,86 24,93 27,132 15,312 34,91 58,172 44,98 29,31 56,19 118,62 284,017 112,80 256,48 118,77
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,835
4 8 1 8 4 - - 1 9 4 6 6 3 6 6 0 9 3 8 1 1 0 8 0.1 0.13 9,10 8,93 1,403 1,242 4,35 5,53 69,91 80,14 34,91 29,32 31,11 61,68 43,79 17,37 51,58 44,50 48,08 72,39 129,29 246,40 100,07 270,59
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
8 6 0 0 6 6 - 1 1 9 8 6 4 6 4 8 5 1 0 1 4 1 0.1 0.12 8,55 9,21 3,519 1,81 4,46 6,477 75,49 78,06 32,28 27,12 68,48 15,16 41,03 36,86 36,03 64,572 119,97 101,99 219,53 461,13 109,61 258,56
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
8 6 - 1 9 5 0 0 5 4 3 4 5 1 4 8 4 4 6 0.12 0.1 7,39 9,339 1,43 2,85 5,28 80,367 65,87 29,357 32,64 18,40 45,187 77,48 97,66 55,14 39,43 53,777 33,39 19,87 266,77 115,27 111,41 247,16
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
1 1 3 8 - 1 1 5 2 6 1 5 1 3 8 3 1 6 4 0.1 0.1 8,66 9,632 1,20 6,953 4,70 86,82 76,92 32,03 10,182 11,61 11,682 34,68 88,72 17,657 67,82 66,24 33,47 64,22 38,95 243,13 106,43 252,057
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
6 8 8 4 - 1 2 2 9 1 3 9 5 5 9 1 6 0 0.1 0.12 9,315 8,97 1,74 6,499 5,69 87,32 78,02 32,67 27,61 15,097 22,97 12,382 54,00 44,52 99,507 43,11 87,57 57,33 174,08 512,457 216,11 251,57
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
5 4 9 - 1 0 2 9 3 9 3 5 6 8 6 3 0.12 0.1 8,815 7,809 3,547 1,115 9,795 2,627 4,357 81,93 66,43 29,35 16,00 30,46 53,737 60,24 11,28 46,35 38,89 370,67 123,40 273,25 142,89 160,14
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
0 6 0 1 - 1 0 4 8 9 1 4 0 9 0 1 1 1 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.12 9,847 8,20 8,047 11,83 99,86 90,73 34,92 19,032 72,20 81,50 32,762 41,632 58,28 21,06 22,08 103,40 205,70 283,177 588,31 176,30 340,24
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
4 6 0 6 0 1 6 5 3 6 6 4 0 5 0 8 6 8 1 1,349 1,622 1,255 1,333 1,253 1,022 1,17 5,897 6,43 3,60 6,753 1,505 10,55 96,01 10,16 85,29 34,12 64,15 89,31 20,81 74,91 15,942 74,797 211,10 409,04 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total 1,97
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ x x x Farebo Federal Grants 66,80 Federal Grants 152,52 State GrantsRiders per Mile 60,59 State Grants 0.1 Riders per Mile 85,54 0.12 0.1 Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants Contract Revenue Other Revenue State GrantsRiders per Mile 40,14 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Data Item Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Alamo Area Council of Governments Ark-Tex Council of Governments Aspermont Small Business Development Center
64 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 5 1 3 9 9 1 3 8 4 6 2 3 8 6 8 3 5 1 1 1 5 5 7 1 4 4 5 9 4 5 0.1 0.10 0.2 0.13 81,01 78,03 37,687 86,394 76,567 108,04 149,51 404,01 234,920 128,02 533,063 210,50 143,971 348,413 291,94 205,777 407,819 153,75 446,06 771,05 200,99 157,00 543,77 537,86 2,416,18 1,869,387 1,229,92 2,046,063 4,087,52 1,444,847 1,664,09 1,692,64 1,618,26 1,431,78 4,683,36 1,665,42 7,784,56 1,614,78 5,059,58 1,200,54 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3 9 3 0 5 5 0 9 8 8
- 1 0 9 8 2 2 2 6 0 2 9 3 4 1 4 8 0 4 6 6 6 0 0.1 0.09 0.18 0.13 2,979 5,503 6,659 4,12 5,23 5,73 20,85 43,93 12,17 27,94 10,56 30,08
35,16 95,86 11,23 86,88 45,59 15,77 92,412 12,48 34,65 37,567 59,477 167,58 113,067 265,98 117,79 147,35 135,28 292,88 214,12 605,34 376,79 608,85 229,177 114,33
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
0 2 0 0 8 4 0 1 1 0
- 1 0 8 3 6 4 0 1 0 4 6 8 4 6 8 0 5 1 8 6 0 8 4 0 0.1 0.07 0.12 0.13 8,697 6,33 3,17 9,69 4,002 6,32 6,81 50,23 54,302 21,91 14,45 44,26 28,55
39,237 38,43 41,30 56,43 98,33 89,247 22,21 11,20 21,66 173,817 165,15 181,06 349,21 120,06 288,69 116,44 415,58 516,97 160,45 209,01 103,07 500,69 106,11
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
3 2 0 4 6 1 0 4 1
- 1 2 0 3 0 8 5 9 0 6 3 6 3 1 1 8 0 1 8 , 0.1 0.07 0.24 0.13 1 7,06 8,22 3,285 9,573 6,00 8,813 8,02 1,669 6,05 21,267 15,112 29,98 42,607 30,197 45,31 30,99
72,90 72,94 33,65 60,70 81,71 61,81 36,74 162,70 475,50 117,65 187,28 481,947 110,22 775,437 142,037 384,28 125,437 268,89
17,57
2,62 $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
1 0 5 6 5 0 6 1 5 5 3 2 4 0 8 2 0 5 8 0 5 6 1 6 8 3 6 1 1 0 63 0.07 0.1 0.20 0.12 8,019 3,185 5,37 4,00 7,22 8,869 9,48 16,46 42,957 19,01 29,192 26,79
39,50 21,34 97,25 86,707 43,99 10,35 89,47 25,53 42,82 23,44 164,707165,667 176,96 311,75 162,79 110,37 168,66 235,62 112,07 107,44 148,34 498,44 608,50 322,90
2,252
77 $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9 3 2 9 5 8 0 5 0 1 - 1 1 9 4 8 6 2 6 1 3 0 0 4 4 1 3 4 1 0 6 0 118,99 0.1 0.18 0.13 3,362 7,137 9,947 7,81 8,97 3,103 6,72 20,23 45,04 13,45 13,46 30,20 39,71
18,58 22,80 49,52 24,13 53,18 64,88 43,207 86,57 26,917 10,74 158,287 142,20 185,55 406,64 181,53 129,31 631,61 551,55 809,03 112,797 101,75
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ 2,292 3 6 3 4 0 6 6 0 8 6 6 1 0 6 3 4 8 4 4 5 9 4 4 4 5 0 0 9 0 8 6 0.1 0.34 0.13 3,22 1,955 7,495 6,545 5,14 5,883 5,64 4,792 20,83 44,21 11,10 29,59 47,05 87,962 162,00 22,82 15,90 67,412 33,46 71,22 91,02 39,98 78,00 10,96 96,86 21,69 40,39 64,59 159,55 174,25 294,34 120,967 122,59 128,78 588,84 702,55 152,37 296,67 411,27 297,42 1,12
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 750 3 2 6 1 5 9 4 4 5 4 1 1 0 3 2 8 1 1 8 4 3 9 3 5 5 6 4 8 4 6 0 0.13 0.1 0.2 9,919 2,83 6,015 5,832 7,05 5,862 2,763 9,78 4,932 18,38 10,08 25,83 28,04 42,87 50,19 32,85 32,63
73,15 20,84 38,75 36,92 79,19 30,972 139,38 155,05 387,29 139,48 331,027 103,75 321,457 481,49 476,40 117,64 104,26
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ 750 1 8 0 6 5 4 1 4 5 6 1 000001 6 9 6 9 2 5 9 0 8 8 6 5 0 8 0 0 0.10 0.24 3,07 5,869 6,302 6,74 5,147 17,62 44,982 17,86 20,68 11,27 29,43 24,00
50,08 58,84 36,30 33,82 97,72 44,05 40,632 31,46 10,522 21,77 56,542 154,15 154,60 282,84 118,137 105,61 160,637 419,10 386,147 130,837 108,64 129,07 128,62 312,28 108,99
8,30
$ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 750 6 9 8 4 4 0 3 6 5 6 0 4 8 4 1 9 0 9 6 3 5 5 0 1 3 8 5 1 5 4 6 6 1 0 0.1 0.25 750 5,66 3,04 6,13 9,17 8,789 5,785 6,41 6,27 17,92 42,36 58,17 17,61 28,11 24,56
96,18 36,27 35,82 51,467 35,02 10,292 93,982 52,62 22,07 10,66 29,74 146,54 159,16 439,21 116,69 189,54 232,42 259,17 113,13 105,34 434,437 753,09 410,57 113,66
7,582
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 750 3 3 8 8 5 8 3 3 0 9 3 1 4 6 9 2 6 1 9 1 1 4 1 6 3 6 6 8 0.10 0.26 2,73 6,85 8,557 5,929 9,257 4,097 7,15 44,74 17,58 38,41 12,492 26,23 17,36 26,27 15,03 65,337 33,837 10,38 10,382 16,387 40,76 66,70 42,66 29,807 33,65 21,677 141,10 295,07 167,39 394,69 621,17 124,19 344,91 124,57 224,22 102,38
$ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3 9 6 0 5 8 0 5 4 0 - 1 1 1 4 6 8 0 2 9 4 6 5 9 0 4 5 9 6 0 6 1 0 0 0 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.1 226 3,47 6,74 21,982 49,14 28,18 51,50 19,00 32,002 43,28
56,67 13,75 48,71 62,00 45,362
73,53 39,24 11,34 12,17 197,187345,88 155,92 145,967 119,70 319,88 870,97 433,43 115,65 202,11 243,447 150,54 100,49 131,00
$ $ 102,707
$ $ $ $ 125,14 $ $ $ $ $ $ $
1 5 6 8 4 8 5 0 1 8 6 1 1 2 8 4 9 6 5 6 3 4 3 5 3 8 3 6 6 0 365 3,31 5,307 8,90 9,59 8,349 6,912 9,012 49,61 19,49 20,06 45,93 21,87 31,07 33,75 85,59 11,327 42,382 12,932 261,947 445,39 155,967 170,52 173,99 129,28 118,72 266,94 333,54 803,36 240,62 132,97 137,93 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total 10,04 7,46
$ $ $ $ $ 58,32 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
x x x x x Contract Revenue 35,99 Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Farebo Other Revenue State Grants 30,84 State Grants 38,60 Federal Grants 96,35 Federal Grants 48,202 Federal Grants 38,03 Federal Grants 131,53 State GrantsRiders per Mile 70,36 State Grants 0.13 0.13Riders per Mile 205,36 0.12State Grants 0.26 0.12 0.25Riders per Mile 49,96 0.1 0.29 0.17 0.27 0.13Riders per Mile 0.29 0.10 0.1 0.28 0.08 0.25Riders per Mile 0.10 0.24 0.16 0.10 0.26 0.2 0.09 0.24 0.1 0.24 0.26 0.26 Data Item Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Revenue Total Revenue Revenue Revenue System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Brazos Transit District Capital Area Rural Transportation (CARTS) Central Texas Rural Transit District Cleburne (City/County Transportation) Colorado Valley Transit
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 65 4 4 3 1 9 5 0 4 9 1 5 1 0 0 1 9 8 6 5 1 3 5 0.1 0.22 74,43 12,60 93,657 51,021 80,387 41,59 67,859 39,027 79,143 78,69 82,02 408,27 120,50 251,809 376,06 365,987 440,07 327,841 360,160 559,397 409,41 309,45 363,51 974,73 507,66 394,88 820,90 292,12 1,385,71 1,463,41 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8 0 0 1 6 1 - 1 4 1 9 3 9 3 4 3 1 3 1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 258 0.1 434 5,319 3,949 4,25 6,74 2,49 3,223 1,53 5,652 34,39 27,32 20,63 28,337
29,92 38,12 31,28 75,49 14,65 88,78 67,50 37,66 15,98
119,52 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3 0 0 1 8 4 1 0 - 1 2 9 9 3 0 5 4 0 4 0 1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 3,65 6,14 5,57 3,91 4,27 6,119 1,76 1,81 20,437 33,60 27,32 11,202 22,79
22,50 74,78 47,83 92,237 22,50 21,88 17,76 11,482 67,58 30,72
129,36 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 5 0 4 6 - 1 0 4 9 0 5 3 3 8 5 0 6 0 NR NR 3 NR NR NR NR NR 0.1 4 222 , 5,783 3,29 3,765 7,29 3,677 4 6,68 5,33 22,45 31,25 27,32 31,082
34,29 12,65 13,05 29,897 27,31 95,38 65,937 38,78 80,84
114,44 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 5 9 0 1 0 6 8 6 - 1 - 0 8 4 1 3 6 3 5 9 6 5 1 5 6 0 6 0.1 0.23 742 7,217 NR - Not Reported 3,12 3,78 4,837 6,88 4,23 5,09 4,922 2,82 31,96 21,51 28,15 27,32 24,48
18,82 27,41 88,58 59,13 98,99 66,49 50,15 31,36 29,10 30,29 102,44
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
3 6 3 3 0 6 1 0 8 - - -
0 1 8 1 6 0 3 6 0 9 9 0 0 1 0.12 0.22 59 4,87 3,52 8,452 9,27 4,11 8,86 6,113 43,06 26,42 30,30 71,24 21,71
14,20 43,77 84,57 23,267 66,512 14,34 37,24 90,38 20,69 29,15 14,48 118,10 $ 56,21
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
9 3 8 - - - - 1 0
9 1 6 6 3 4 4 0 6 0.1 0.22 662 3,565 6,229 4,82 8,482 4,209 9,13 3,46 7,383 39,28 31,247 27,20 89,682 21,362 10,79 48,20 25,80 84,80 29,057 79,46 83,912 33,89 47,957 31,827
100,73 $ $
$ $ $ 70,75 $ $ $ $ $ $
8 4 3 3 6 4 6 0 - - - 1
0 0 4 8 6 8 0 6 1 1 0.22 233 3,16 7,65 3,31 8,969 9,52 3,905 5,42 8,48 9,173 41,19 30,04 30,43 17,262 23,28
86,15 12,887 48,627 48,42 29,022 59,507 25,39 84,47 86,90 41,68 28,19
110,43 $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
3 0 1 6 1 0 - - 3 4 3 3 0 0 3 8 92 0.19 644 7,485 2,89 3,949 6,56 9,773 7,923 5,737 38,43 20,367 25,077 24,24 25,01
31,34 38,287 89,39 63,792 20,507 20,147 54,25 94,70 41,33
130,35 178,027 288,84
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
0 1 8 6 1 - - -
0 130,35 0 4 6 0 3 9 3 3 8 8 3 0 1 446 0.23 7,92 3,03 4,145 6,90 1,273
2,23 6,193 3,282 34,85 20,33 25,332 24,41
37,21 40,55 94,79 44,207 85,72 42,29 11,95 28,76 46,68
117,22 $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
5 8 - - - 1
0 0 1 3 8 0 1 3 8 9 6 8 358 7,09 2,633 3,883 5,40 1,762 1,793
9,27 1,445 34,09 16,812 30,642 23,662
38,66 89,77 61,25 40,637 29,45 39,85 47,402
127,98 $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
4 9 8 3 8 4 0 - - - 0
0 6 3 9 9 4 0 0 0 1 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 712 1,167 9,475 7,22 3,56
9,17 11,32 51,72 24,91 35,34
59,107 38,25 19,687 35,98 93,92 28,322 67,22
210,41 $ $ 11,25
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
0 6 6 0 8 6 - - 1 6 6 8 4 8 6 1 8 4 8 1 27 6,737 6,655 6,765 5,0752,859 5,919 3,33 5,723 4,5735,282 5,329 5,82 5,607 5,54 4,29 6,807 7,872 97,86 11,36 45,54 24,00 30,65 32,297 36,19 10,99 95,362 60,75 126,61 478,48 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 66,73 $ $ $
e 0000000001 u n e v e x x x x R r e h t Other Revenue 673Contract Revenue 73,447 29,21 3,429 2,849 1,435 1,785 3,80 Federal Grants 42,59 Federal Grants 67,71 Federal Grants 50,45 Farebo Riders per Mile 0.09 0.09Riders per Mile 0.09 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.1 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.16 Riders per Mile 0.25 0.22Riders per Mile 0.2 0.28 0.27 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.27 State Grants 26,97 State Grants 38,087 22,022State Grants 24,637 28,42 53,65 State Grants 320,00 Farebo Contract Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue O Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants 22,78 Other Revenue Data Item Revenue Revenue Revenue System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Total Revenue RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Community Action Council of South Texas Community Services Inc. Concho Valley Transit District Del Rio, City of
66 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 6 1 3 9 7 5 2 3 3 0 1 9 6 0 6 9 3 5 2 6 7 5 0 4 , 0.93 4 95,172 463,44 352,516 942,847 122,807 382,153 829,119 887,725 291,84 727,01 999,53 341,81 949,20 159,13 385,18 788,98 1,091,129 1,162,23 1,992,417 1,605,244 3,587,49 1,517,69 1,058,49 1,546,68 1,305,48 3,114,69 3,786,50 6,960,14 4,593,07 8,179,12 1,073,09 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 1 8 8 3 5 0 6 - 1 5 6 3 5 3 4 0 4 3 1 9 6 0 4 3 0 0.92 7,16 90,33 14,48 48,16 32,48 77,59 84,02 81,30 18,63 43,537 11,73 78,172 90,35 53,60 13,977 78,772 25,51 144,94 165,00 313,89 152,67 348,55 154,51 114,257 164,47 283,65 203,06 1,486,52 2,251,96 $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ 6 6 5 8 0 6 6 8 - 8 2 9 9 6 1 2 9 5 3 1 8 5 4 0 8 9 0 0.99 7,32 90,16 14,06 46,42 33,82 81,54 80,92 44,94 13,27 41,93 75,73 80,597 14,052 22,73 78,207 18,39 42,22 11,99 27,727 94,89 11,39 150,45 265,41 150,21 208,20 384,09 475,99 148,02 201,46 139,92 $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9 4 8 3 9 3 - 1 2 0 0 4 2 9 3 5 8 8 5 5 1 3 0 0 8 4 4 1 0.9 76 7,549 5,187 95,82 27,53 32,72 71,287 77,92 28,53 13,62 79,25 57,86 24,34 10,22 99,91 99,05 78,45 157,35 143,48 162,86 103,98 117,93 127,10 530,31 553,64 966,96 213,35 220,75 120,577 812,56 $ $
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 8 8 4 1 1 9 4 - 6 4 3 9 1 9 3 8 1 6 8 8 3 9 4 3 8 0 1.00 6,76 4,97 83,66 31,31 29,13 71,34 71,59 26,88 19,16 94,92 76,557 12,11 80,072 33,48 23,92 43,05 90,21 187,52 128,19 182,19 228,78 314,65 361,887 685,057 477,22 140,11 139,39 159,50 217,25 $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 4 8 1 6 4 1 1 2 1 9 8 9 3 6 4 6 8 6 4 3 5 8 4 8 1 5 6 0.93 8,12 5,10 93,35 36,34 33,60 66,807 71,52 20,03 55,72 86,68 44,01 17,78 15,48 14,58 94,492 31,49 23,12 42,60 222,68 140,88 110,83 101,877 141,89 591,21 245,08 319,92 287,68 129,58 579,72 732,45
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ 4 8 9 5 0 9 8 5 5 4 2 2 0 3 3 1 6 0 4 4 8 0 5 5 9 9 6 1 000000 2 0.92 7,91 6,94 5,143 93,90 35,94 33,95 68,49 74,692 20,14 67,48 59,35 92,12 54,21 22,58 80,74 32,76 74,38 13,61 224,11 145,51 259,21 528,66 319,68 261,15 520,88 106,00 106,83 141,30 356,39 120,53 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 2 0 8 4 8 6 1 1 8 9 9 2 8 1 9 0 0 5 9 8 3 1 6 1 9 0 0.9 4 , 6,562 4 4,833 75,15 30,95 60,55 66,26 31,13 85,84 95,14 12,78 43,74 21,02 41,687 90,97 12,317 73,44 91,27 87,51 22,23 68,32 183,15 132,92 217,037 308,10 175,22 412,747 495,17 138,55 138,44
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 1 0 6 9 4 0 1 8 4 5 9 9 3 6 1 0 4 4 4 0 3 3 0 0 0.88 7,667 5,28 30,65 64,07 72,41 30,847 88,21 58,81 81,727 35,71 97,01 86,61 23,39 39,23 68,812 15,63 85,26 212,04 121,74 222,85 162,45 139,70 471,39 105,337233,30 205,29 217,31 299,06 870,50 545,65
$ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ 2 1 1 4 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 4 3 1 5 5 9 3 8 8 8 4 1 7,315 3,48 1,44 30,877 65,21 71,55 86,312 28,20 22,622 56,70 21,51 82,10 77,90 13,512 75,71 54,57 81,707 24,77 125,53 122,44 240,427 814,687 186,43 646,26 103,03 373,96 304,44 233,36 234,49
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 6 3 6 2 4 4 9 6 2 2 5 4 0 4 3 5 1 8 9 3 6 7,732 4,647 81,717 25,972 61,00 29,37 67,62 22,197 74,95 56,39 74,51 12,47 27,05 90,907 89,40 21,962 54,99 58,60 152,977 180,85 105,31 141,74 433,05 121,80 155,13 111,55 135,06 249,10 275,95 294,14 589,44
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5 8 4 6 0 8 6 5 8 6 1 0 4 9 1 6 1 3 8 9 5 3 3 9 1 5,07 10,187 37,232 37,18 69,02 73,727 16,44 35,17 83,71 27,32 56,79 54,97 67,922 54,30 33,68 64,132 107,75 195,30 142,76 220,10 377,93 311,94 199,32 354,22 106,21 100,50 142,23 779,55 1,015,30
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 5 5 9 2 1 1 9 8 0 3 9 6 1 5 1 9 0 6 8 4 4,859 6,79 10,86 33,36 33,46 72,54 75,08 17,93 35,88 40,25 14,36 24,93 104,72 181,81 123,49 100,10 106,36 100,06 298,83 287,14 369,29 457,00 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 11,93 e 000002 u n e v e x x x x R r e h t State GrantsRiders per Mile 98,40 0.10 0.09Riders per Mile 0.09State Grants 0.18 0.08 0.19Riders per Mile 0.09 899 0.19State Grants 0.27 0.09 0.17 0.26 0.08Riders per Mile 153,85 0.15 0.25 0.09 0.97 0.17 0.22 0.08 0.94 0.16 0.25 0.08 0.90 0.16 0.23 0.08 0.9 0.17 0.23 0.08 0.17 0.24 0.30 0.09 0.23 0.30 0.23 0.22 0.18 0.22 0.24 Farebo Contract Revenue O Farebo Other Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants 60,16 Federal Grants 137,85 Contract Revenue 133,74 State Grants0000006,72562,95 State Federal Grants 164,01 Federal Grants 211,78 Data Item System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness Revenue Total Revenue Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 East Texas Council of Governments El Paso, County of Fort Bend County Rural Transit District Galveston County Rural Transit District
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 67 68 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2015 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Golden Crescent Ridership 14,803 16,135 15,816 13,139 14,188 15,828 16,085 16,089 16,193 15,661 16,416 15,811 186,164 Transit Regional Mileage 100,547 106,720 102,045 93,006 91,339 103,173 101,044 104,103 100,635 100,850 103,831 98,354 1,205,647 Planning Revenue Commission Federal Grants $ 67,62 5 $ 77,522 $ 74,14 9 $ 63,08 0 $ 70,06 3 $ 56,09 1 $ 59,38 6 $ 44,70 1 $ 61,66 4 $ 149,58 4 $ 76,85 4 $ 85,60 6 $ 886,32 5 State Grants 42,340 43,717 47,466 46,600 50,147 37,674 37,526 35,860 53,430 91,779 58,273 42,196 587,008 Statistics Farebox 5,478 5,233 4,278 4,970 4,978 4,879 4,362 5,123 4,660 4,414 4,695 4,626 57,696 Contract Revenue 68,499 88,235 74,866 91,761 82,439 62,347 79,875 77,546 74,984 73,185 75,043 94,119 942,899 Other Revenue 10,523 23,432 25,316 18,374 64,627 57,832 38,644 64,969 113,148 52,438 90,681 95,887 655,871 Total Revenue $ 194,46 5 $ 238,13 9 $ 226,07 5 $ 224,78 5 $ 272,25 4 $ 218,82 3 $ 219,79 3 $ 228,19 9 $ 307,88 6 $ 371,40 0 $ 305,54 6 $ 322,43 4 $ 3,129,79 9 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 Report
Gulf Coast Ridership 1,298 1,667 1,601 1,443 1,541 1,206 1,469 3,030 1,396 1,590 1,629 1,588 19,458 Center Mileage 14,306 15,263 16,384 16,686 15,342 10,255 11,776 12,744 11,966 13,272 13,486 13,460 164,940 Revenue Federal Grants$ 26,291 $ 26,562 $ 23,43 8 $ 9,795 $ 6,59 8 $ 19,08 0 $ 28,21 9 $ 16,54 0 $ - $ 14,23 4 $ 3,010 $ 25,55 5 $ 199,32 2 State Grants 20,527 15,370 14,471 6,667 1,65 0 11,40 8 9,17 0 8,001 11,71 4 33,025 11,80 8 75,94 6 219,757 Farebox 905 1,360 898 - - 1,065 776 431 1,65 8 4,439 385 945 12,862 Contract Revenue - - - 15,552 11,41 0 7,25 4 13,597 15,22 5 5,852 18,57 5 5,23 8 36,31 6 129,019 Other Revenue 2,747 - - 3,729 - - 4,762 - - - - - 11,238 Total Revenue $ 50,47 0 $ 43,292 $ 38,807 $ 35,74 3 $ 19,65 8 $ 38,807 $ 56,52 4 $ 40,197 $ 19,22 4 $ 70,27 3 $ 20,44 1 $ 138,76 2 $ 572,19 8 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.24 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
Heart of Ridership 4,390 4,670 3,933 3,793 3,809 3,654 3,984 4,150 4,126 3,803 2,648 3,554 46,514 Texas Council Mileage 61,293 62,161 49,925 68,881 68,768 65,543 74,861 72,107 73,231 78,792 55,709 77,461 808,732 of Governments Revenue Federal Grants$ 102,851 $ 178,587 $ 72,727 $ 71,77 1 $ 56,58 4 $ 74,60 4 $ 68,35 4 $ 105,32 1 $ 124,73 6 $ 109,33 6 $ 58,54 3 $ 22,13 6 $ 1,045,55 0 State Grants 44,211 70,571 46,899 37,059 28,012 35,919 35,046 35,685 43,044 37,502 62,315 65,753 542,016 Farebox 9,591 11,353 8,850 8,232 5,040 7,576 3,831 7,930 8,194 7,866 9,254 6,530 94,247 Contract Revenue 123,376 128,460 100,248 103,595 67,031 82,089 115,285 90,149 113,109 93,788 89,788 80,206 1,187,124 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 280,02 9 $ 388,97 1 $ 228,72 4 $ 220,657 $ 156,667 $ 200,18 8 $ 222,51 6 $ 239,08 5 $ 289,08 3 $ 248,49 2 $ 219,90 0 $ 174,62 5 $ 2,868,93 7 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06
Hill Country Ridership 12,535 15,762 15,407 17,775 6,287 14,261 11,612 14,400 14,991 10,192 7,076 6,996 147,294 Transit District Mileage 73,076 84,754 79,910 96,087 31,716 69,776 62,009 75,699 77,565 67,264 64,131 72,521 854,508 Revenue Federal Grants$ 52,936 $ 127,54 1 $ 112,057 $ 21,38 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 116,284 $ 133,61 5 $ 142,01 9 $ 162,74 8 $ 868,58 1 State Grants 38,250 97,460 100,796 198,749 94,332 - - - - 75,80 5 - - 605,392 Farebox 7,618 6,803 7,610 6,286 4,883 7,698 8,871 7,168 7,222 4,827 3,033 4,130 76,149 Contract Revenue 1,655 743 1,432 1,256 133,684 212,041 205,889 242,814 95,159 180,461 110,303 207,327 1,392,764 Other Revenue 6,244 6,235 5,650 5,892 5,724 5,615 6,289 5,893 5,400 5,357 6,008 5,817 70,124 Total Revenue $ 106,70 3 $ 238,78 2 $ 227,54 5 $ 233,56 4 $ 238,62 3 $ 225,35 4 $ 221,04 9 $ 255,87 5 $ 224,06 5 $ 400,06 5 $ 261,36 3 $ 380,02 2 $ 3,013,01 0 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.17 1 3 4 6 6 5 5 0 9 8 3 4 3 5 8 1 1 4 3 4 3 7 9 0 8 4 8 9 1 9 5 , , 0.1 0.29 0.23 0.3 0 1,894 4,409 1 93,121 35,70 26,91 31,04 41,523 61,494 78,633 79,34 26,91 58,23 109,52 110,08 298,93 302,330 386,77 345,573 176,43 690,411 329,347 266,608 402,37 462,46 833,94 795,94 246,34 610,21 1,205,495 1,020,32 1,165,20 3,276,09 2,302,36 1,028,83 1,245,39 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 0 0 9 9 0 1 4 1 8 - 1 0 5 0 1 1 9 8 8 9 0 1 8 5 4 8 0 NR 0.1 0.18 0.28 2,34 3,805 5,742 2,503 1,79 6,722 21,497 10,61 37,71 22,992 14,54 25,52 99,45 14,43 52,87 77,967 13,10 13,10 54,52 11,45 46,957 17,71 70,76 14,54 31,44 71,46 129,79 124,40 144,22 136,74 126,94
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 9 4 1 6 5 5 1 3 1 0 0 3 6 9 3 4 6 8 9 1 6 3 3 1 6 50 4 NR 3 0.09 0.15 0.33 4 , 4,039 5,395 2,06 9,83 1,465 7,017 6,03 26,11 14,31 43,55 25,78 99,00 58,30 97,05 12,892 12,892 35,46 58,35 71,82 73,452 18,54 12,56 51,26 46,28 16,23 140,76 177,67 284,557 168,24
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 9 8 9 1 9 8 1 4 8 9 5 3 3 1 5 3 1 4 1 0 NR NR 0.10 0.14 0.40 5,782 4,12 5,43 6,65 6,647 29,67 42,21 27,97 10,797 68,412 55,34 16,73 13,96 49,292 25,96 26,547 37,74 18,802 59,18 59,03 73,23 10,812 13,96 100,05 114,97 139,71 224,70 170,13
$ $ 26,79
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 8 9 9 5 1 8 1 0 3 0 6 1 9 9 6 5 1 201 6 NR NR 0 3 0.12 0.19 0.29 7 0 217 143 , , 3,425 6,323 5,933 9 6,152 17,90 20,44 28,31 86,12 12,59 53,07 15,907 41,31 42,05 28,14 78,70 92,86 68,372 18,537 15,907 27,23 100,45 107,46 366,17 160,92 159,95 159,98 $ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,64 0 0 8 5 1 5 6 9 2 4 3 1 8 4 1 6 0 8 1 03 NR 0.12 0.22 0.29 0.27 175 5,62 7,349 5,603 1,20 8,497 7,54 7,549 7,14 20,75 28,79 95,67 14,097 59,842 25,08 25,052 27,65 14,762 22,79 53,85 39,26 64,48 62,20 37,44 100,70 181,06 299,32 134,44
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 3 4 6 8 8 1 1 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 8 6 0 3 5 3 6 6 NR 88 0.19 0.28 0.28 0.1 2,63 6,38 5,653 9,68 1,763 9,68 6,305 13,697 28,26 87,72 17,04 90,23 19,94 57,66 34,50 33,93 47,847 24,502 12,21 83,70 91,55 55,36 57,85 49,11 22,29 100,25
286,56 165,74
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4 1 0 6 8 0 8 4 1 2 3 0 1 5 4 6 8 6 4 0 6 0 NR 0.28 0.29 0.12 105 6,37 5,283 5,70 2,93 9,055 5,393 20,31 18,177 28,11 99,98 65,10 48,887 45,23 15,58 19,28 21,92 23,48 10,98 10,29 56,747 36,817 56,20 90,72 45,95 30,12 216,65 103,39
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 6 5 5 0 1 6 8 1 - 5 9 5 8 3 5 5 8 8 5 8 6 8 00000000 9 NR 0.29 0.28 0.12 227 4,83 6,92 4,74 5,88 6,552 2,10 18,57 17,54 37,687 59,38 29,50 16,842 65,12 11,02 37,602 54,01 49,68 29,06 83,76 16,41 49,19 17,81 24,78 59,25 100,60 203,417 207,11
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
0 0 8 0 9 4 1 6 4 3 0 8 5 0 6 8 0 4 6 1 0 8 4 NR 0.29 0.3 0.12 204 7,092 4,543 5,40 4,25 8,223 7,90 6,33 17,50 18,58 30,757 17,472 64,86 61,19 90,99 33,86 43,20 19,91 47,13 11,78 52,07 41,88 100,55 102,367 113,37 137,26 321,96 157,907 362,69 172,19
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 5 0 1 6 6 0 1 4 8 0 5 6 1 8 1 8 5 4 0 1 0 NR 0.25 0.29 0.12 143 7,192 4,457 3,147 5,57 3,68 5,825 26,01 17,57 28,82 80,96 14,19 59,29 53,85 28,01 29,60 58,357 73,60 47,58 75,742 44,54 20,80 77,747 100,45 112,81 267,27 302,60 135,21
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 9 3 1 0 9 6 1 8 1 1 4 8 4 9 6 8 9 6 8 9 4 4 60000003 0 NR 7 0.3 0.3 0.13 189 7,215 8,167 8,55 3,429 6,623 5,40 26,01 23,31 32,28 18,73 68,33 29,42 34,79 30,46 34,452 71,017 44,11 74,10 72,62 21,10 102,88 149,19 371,77 154,61
$ $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 0 9 4 6 4 9 8 - 1 1 1 6 3 5 0 6 1 1 4 5 0 4 8 0 0 8 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 18,53 100 7,743 7,23 7,06 7,509 8,543 6,24 2,95 8,69 9,537 3,96 7,09 92,23 14,80 24,21 22,50 31,44 65,742 64,25 13,22 33,88 23,28 56,80 57,26 101,12 153,78 245,50 289,46 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
NR - Not ReportedNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR8831,01 Not - NR $ -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 135,50 e 03 e 000000000000 0 u u n n e e v v e e x x x x x R R r r e e h h t t Federal Grants otatRvneRRRRRRRRRR 0 0 RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR0 RevenueNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR12,36 Contract Other Riders per Mile 0.3 State GrantsRiders per Mile 74,53 State Grants 0.3 Riders per Mile 62,71 0.1 Riders per Mile 0.32 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.3 State Grants 14,08 State Grants Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.05 0.04 0.05 State Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 Federal Grants 26,26 Federal Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 12,36 Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants Farebo Contract Revenue O Farebo Contract Revenue O Farebo Contract Revenue Other Revenue Federal Grants 107,887 Farebo Data Item Revenue Total Revenue System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness System Effectiveness Revenue Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Total Revenue Ridership Mileage Revenue Ridership Mileage RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Kleberg County Human Services Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council McLennan County Rural Transit District Panhandle Community Services Public Transit Services
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 69 70 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2015 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Rolling Plains Ridership 11,639 13,081 10,298 10,050 10,645 8,870 8,690 11,078 10,073 5,277 4,107 4,993 108,801 Transit Management Mileage 53,306 62,184 50,173 49,095 44,309 38,761 37,150 39,608 33,889 45,055 38,936 36,469 528,935 Corporation Revenue Federal Grants$ 8,163 $ 71,847 $ 62,363 $ 51,15 0 $ 49,48 4 $ 63,64 5 $ 50,237 $ 79,492 $ 58,92 5 $ 27,337 $ - $ - $ 522,64 3 State Grants 51,093 39,606 34,065 12,066 21,768 34,368 20,494 139,474 8,395 8,057 10,304 1,512 381,202 Statistics Farebox 3,503 4,079 4,400 4,640 3,848 3,789 3,224 4,161 3,645 3,345 4,705 4,225 47,564 Contract Revenue 47,157 59,904 50,514 26,499 52,137 23,014 25,989 34,145 26,511 33,227 35,604 27,011 441,712 Other Revenue 27,694 20,352 22,162 23,916 21,919 19,933 20,479 23,873 20,687 18,111 16,322 17,061 252,509 Total Revenue $ 137,61 0 $ 195,78 8 $ 173,50 4 $ 118,27 1 $ 149,15 6 $ 144,74 9 $ 120,42 3 $ 281,14 5 $ 118,16 3 $ 90,077 $ 66,93 5 $ 49,80 9 $ 1,645,63 0 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.22 NR NR 0.20 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.28 0.30 0.12 0.11 0.14 0.21 Report
Rural Ridership 25,952 26,074 21,568 24,050 24,710 23,910 22,894 23,767 22,602 17,592 16,150 19,807 269,076 Economic Mileage 65,175 71,369 52,564 59,704 65,937 60,704 74,791 51,582 52,096 58,542 55,834 67,762 736,060 Assistance Revenue League - REAL Federal Grants $ 70,54 3 $ 75,47 4 $ 61,797 $ 68,18 3 $ 65,247 $ 65,34 4 $ 73,05 0 $ 73,15 0 $ 70,69 8 $ 79,55 5 $ 107,92 2 $ 71,33 4 $ 882,297 State Grants 55,290 55,61 3 48,973 55,507 51,18 1 52,292 58,80 1 60,526 55,90 8 68,838 72,171 58,122 693,222 Farebox 6,453 9,812 6,889 5,491 8,496 8,80 0 7,314 8,028 7,02 1 5,868 5,98 1 7,583 87,736 Contract Revenue 24,624 29,72 9 14,962 24,64 1 26,698 22,349 16,74 4 36,505 23,48 6 41,271 82,219 17,857 361,085 Other Revenue 6,668 5,490 3,738 4,06 4 4,165 3,09 8 4,513 3,606 3,809 3,66 0 4,113 3,813 50,737 Total Revenue $ 163,57 8 $ 176,11 8 $ 136,35 9 $ 157,88 6 $ 155,787 $ 151,88 3 $ 160,42 2 $ 181,81 5 $ 160,92 2 $ 199,19 2 $ 272,40 6 $ 158,70 9 $ 2,075,07 7 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.40 0.37 0.41 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.31 0.46 0.43 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.37
Senior Center Ridership 4,120 6,322 4,882 5,506 5,489 4,991 5,214 5,960 5,743 6,605 6,768 5,074 66,674 Resources and Mileage 39,361 41,123 33,942 39,695 40,188 36,707 38,544 37,645 37,926 38,376 39,819 37,654 460,980 Public Transit Revenue Federal Grants$ 38,249 $ 6,570 $ 25,627 $ 34,97 5 $ 30,11 5 $ 29,95 1 $ 44,31 5 $ 36,39 3 $ 31,29 1 $ 28,02 0 $ 22,79 6 $ 12,92 6 $ 341,22 8 State Grants 22,377 12,974 20,036 27,53 5 21,629 17,264 13,44 3 26,581 24,24 9 36,123 27,635 15,49 5 265,341 Farebox 5,42 4 44,730 7,665 4,907 4,325 4,325 4,325 4,325 4,570 4,367 4,345 4,714 98,022 Contract Revenue 19,169 12,38 5 11,863 21,012 15,457 16,483 13,39 8 14,103 12,482 10,947 10,535 6,382 164,216 Other Revenue 83,047 12,742 10,358 11,99 1 27,309 20,896 31,32 3 19,708 16,63 4 17,067 46,323 49,412 346,810 Total Revenue $ 168,26 6 $ 89,40 1 $ 75,54 9 $ 100,42 0 $ 98,83 5 $ 88,91 9 $ 106,80 4 $ 101,11 0 $ 89,22 6 $ 96,52 4 $ 111,63 4 $ 88,92 9 $ 1,215,61 7 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.10 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.14 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
0 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 3 79,204 Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total 5 South East Ridership 5,648 6,176 4,706 4,951 5,083 5,308 5,299 5,208 4,881 5,658 5,815 5,371 64,1045 Texas Regional Mileage 43,702 48,535 37,310 38,100 41,383 29,103 41,270 41,287 38,198 44,933 44,013 42,128 489,9627 Planning Revenue Commission Federal Grants $ 55,42 9 $ 84,38 5 $ 53,85 9 $ 40,83 0 $ 47,832 $ 46,167 $ 44,70 6 $ 51,33 8 $ 67,65 8 $ 26,16 8 $ 26,25 3 $ 19,51 5 $ 564,14 State Grants 52,916 81,259 51,097 40,830 45,252 38,157 28,374 5,935 44,682 7,588 3,255 4,318 403,66 Farebox 7,753 6,467 6,598 6,474 5,823 7,373 6,405 6,099 6,651 7,516 6,129 5,916 Contract Revenue 19,100 23,948 21,008 20,213 19,523 18,849 22,014 18,149 25,608 21,518 20,954 21,841 252,72 Other Revenue 4,775 5,987 2,280 0 0 3,375 28,664 41,731 38,580 57,433 62,663 77,567 323,05 6 $ 139,97 3 $ 202,04 6 $ 134,84 2 $ 108,347 $ 118,43 0 $ 113,92 1 $ 130,16 3 $ 123,25 2 $ 183,17 9 $ 120,22 3 $ 119,25 4 $ 129,157 $ 1,622,78 Total Revenue 3 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 6 South Padre Ridership 40,474 46,096 36,308 40,516 41,423 48,992 58,339 47,672 43,002 46,420 53,514 44,058 546,814 Mileage 30,280 31,885 31,308 32,243 32,032 28,118 30,060 30,003 31,287 28,430 28,951 30,775 365,372 Island, City of 7 Revenue Federal Grants$ 65,789 $ 66,11 5 $ 41,49 0 $ 67,19 9 $ 55,41 3 $ 57,21 3 $ 54,89 6 $ 53,02 0 $ 43,92 4 $ 28,66 8 $ 226,70 5 $ 181,84 4 $ 942,27 State Grants 60,310 41,095 29,261 56,961 45,981 38,556 46,412 43,599 31,543 57,182 52,717 19,566 523,18 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 15,231 1,319 10,764 5,353 9,558 10,382 6,308 7,086 41,155 0 0 0 107,15 Other Revenue 0 11,590 0 0 0 5,472 273 8,588 17,895 4,979 12,117 34,138 95,052 3 Total Revenue $ 141,33 0 $ 120,11 9 $ 81,51 5 $ 129,51 3 $ 110,95 2 $ 111,62 3 $ 107,88 9 $ 112,29 3 $ 134,517 $ 90,82 9 $ 291,53 9 $ 235,54 8 $ 1,667,66 0 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.34 1.45 1.16 1.26 1.29 1.74 1.94 1.59 1.37 1.63 1.85 1.43 1.50 3 6 South Plains Ridership 15,594 15,164 11,605 11,825 12,157 12,534 12,974 14,042 11,925 13,022 12,205 12,592 155,639 Community Mileage 100,317 101,438 75,892 79,201 85,237 78,349 83,913 92,643 83,751 93,067 100,171 95,899 1,069,878 2 Action Association Revenue Federal Grants$ 77,295 $ 13,45 5 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 238,245 $ 213,17 6 $ 202,70 2 $ 283,30 8 $ 227,80 2 $ 1,255,98 State Grants 152,877 220,202 192,816 194,982 41,966 20,217 0 0 0 0 0 68,500 891,56 Farebox 34,031 13,203 4,121 10,245 60,484 17,320 25,863 6,635 6,902 34,880 61,165 10,514 285,36 Contract Revenue 80,114 57,652 35,137 104,619 136,396 123,555 41,496 95,041 39,856 66,456 134,139 286,705 1,201,16 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 344,317 $ 304,51 2 $ 232,07 4 $ 309,84 6 $ 238,84 6 $ 161,09 2 $ 67,35 9 $ 339,92 1 $ 259,93 4 $ 304,03 8 $ 478,61 2 $ 593,52 1 $ 3,634,07 9 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.15 2
Southwest Area Ridership 10,926 10,742 11,189 12,202 12,067 13,761 15,461 15,557 16,641 13,900 13,484 12,795 158,7253 Regional Mileage 75,361 85,954 85,332 73,295 81,021 82,276 78,997 81,999 77,324 77,631 68,120 70,272 937,5828 Transit Revenue 9
2015 District Federal Grants $ 62,15 5 $ 84,81 9 $ 76,40 8 $ 88,872 $ 97,497 $ 78,64 9 $ 84,037 $ 79,07 5 $ 92,71 6 $ 47,94 1 $ 67,27 3 $ 39,207 $ 898,64 State Grants 64,781 46,844 34,342 40,547 46,735 37,186 40,624 62,744 38,450 33,954 127,751 7,534 581,49 Farebox 9,796 10,713 9,269 9,562 13,648 9,949 18,295 22,181 20,073 19,338 21,883 13,610 178,317
Texas Contract Revenue 59,725 87,166 39,096 48,986 40,240 48,905 57,688 81,284 152,078 77,069 152,243 143,753 988,23 Other Revenue 5,323 5,323 5,323 5,323 5,323 5,323 5,323 5,323 2,229 5,323 2,229 5,323 57,68 Total Revenue $ 201,78 0 $ 234,86 5 $ 164,43 8 $ 193,29 0 $ 203,44 3 $ 180,01 2 $ 205,967 $ 250,607 $ 305,54 6 $ 183,62 5 $ 371,37 9 $ 209,427 $ 2,704,37 2 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.17 4 Transit 74,698 SPAN, Inc. Ridership 5,965 6,277 5,076 5,149 5,022 4,542 5,720 6,078 5,312 5,504 5,346 5,180 65,1712 Mileage 52,162 58,647 46,849 46,662 45,140 40,952 51,943 55,910 48,125 51,288 49,333 47,467 594,4786 Revenue Statistics 2 Federal Grants$ 30,729 $ 92,90 0 $ 48,337 $ 56,60 8 $ 55,86 3 $ 57,932 $ 51,992 $ 61,96 5 $ 101,03 9 $ 53,87 3 $ 52,48 8 $ 55,18 6 $ 718,91 0.11 State Grants 64,956 46,62 4 44,821 28,792 24,838 33,20 6 26,707 30,157 11,683 - - - 311,78 Farebox 7,42 6 7,627 5,386 5,813 6,75 0 5,755 6,932 6,831 5,654 5,48 4 5,658 5,382 Contract Revenue 36,339 31,37 5 49,293 35,274 32,602 31,615 41,311 45,95 8 48,340 48,404 50,08 3 44,418 495,01 Other Revenue 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 105,71 3 163,60 Report Total Revenue $ 144,71 3 $ 183,78 9 $ 153,10 0 $ 131,75 0 $ 125,31 6 $ 133,77 1 $ 132,20 5 $ 150,17 4 $ 171,97 9 $ 113,02 4 $ 113,49 2 $ 210,69 9 $ 1,764,01 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 SPAN 71 72 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2015 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total STAR Transit Ridership 12,970 13,344 9,789 15,003 13,994 11,985 13,977 15,251 13,571 12,734 13,120 13,390 159,128
Transit Mileage 124,944 124,980 104,960 109,377 117,086 99,383 129,751 116,382 115,407 131,741 134,186 132,764 1,440,961 Revenue Federal Grants $ 380,80 2 $ 565,36 8 $ 80,45 3 $ 74,82 1 $ 67,12 9 $ 65,57 5 $ 56,79 9 $ 75,41 1 $ 110,867 $ 99,027 $ 186,64 5 $ 197,27 0 $ 1,960,16 7 State Grants 96,603 76,447 83,518 125,701 115,804 94,314 86,459 143,984 111,371 108,961 74,642 30,475 1,148,279
Statistics Farebox 13,094 16,550 12,990 15,115 13,020 13,900 13,573 15,006 14,264 8,911 19,979 12,755 169,157 Contract Revenue 183,792 213,435 183,863 145,816 208,992 236,832 220,878 218,951 198,953 212,609 177,936 222,890 2,424,947 Other Revenue 8,031 7,989 12,730 7,540 18,377 13,497 11,624 9,742 8,992 30,254 8,916 8,355 146,047 Total Revenue $ 682,32 2 $ 879,78 9 $ 373,55 4 $ 368,99 3 $ 423,32 2 $ 424,11 8 $ 389,33 3 $ 463,09 4 $ 444,447 $ 459,76 2 $ 468,11 8 $ 471,74 5 $ 5,848,59 7 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 Report
Texoma Area Ridership NR - Not Reported 6,883 7,523 6,928 6,542 6,919 9,845 9,925 10,753 10,899 9,952 7,659 93,828 Paratransit Mileage 34,078 95,539 102,893 100,129 91,993 96,086 131,328 131,239 144,345 137,096 130,853 109,037 1,304,616 System - TAPS Revenue Federal Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR State Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Farebox NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Contract Revenue NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR Other Revenue NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07
The Transit Ridership 1,654 1,558 1,369 1,574 1,552 1,259 1,387 1,389 1,556 1,494 1,637 1,497 17,926 System, Inc. Mileage 25,776 24,989 22,384 23,943 23,274 18,320 20,647 20,961 24,108 23,398 26,697 24,443 278,940 Revenue Federal Grants $ 29,15 1 $ 27,71 1 $ 33,23 3 $ 25,782 $ 25,87 0 $ 26,542 $ 26,30 9 $ 25,24 9 $ 27,12 3 $ 25,35 3 $ 25,21 9 $ 25,63 8 $ 323,18 0 State Grants 31,642 18,867 25,192 18,140 18,350 39,402 19,466 17,922 20,721 17,084 17,08 8 19,541 263,415 Farebox 4,52 8 3,849 3,533 3,790 3,619 3,633 3,684 3,023 3,495 3,549 3,346 3,160 43,209 Contract Revenue 29,340 28,277 11,492 166,320 23,369 25,05 3 26,639 35,426 16,628 93,953 29,75 8 29,650 515,905 Other Revenue 1,594 1,364 1,678 1,338 1,663 1,438 1,000 8,018 1,112 1,000 1,040 2,725 23,970 Total Revenue $ 96,25 5 $ 80,06 8 $ 75,12 8 $ 215,37 0 $ 72,87 1 $ 96,06 8 $ 77,09 8 $ 89,63 8 $ 69,07 9 $ 140,93 9 $ 76,45 1 $ 80,71 4 $ 1,169,67 9 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Webb County Ridership 8,077 8,607 7,934 8,165 7,627 7,494 7,598 7,274 7,252 7,598 7,375 7,727 92,728 Community Mileage 20,207 19,782 19,710 20,317 19,205 18,834 23,630 20,291 19,208 20,474 20,638 20,209 242,505 Action Agency Revenue Federal Grants$ 28,708 $ 17,41 1 $ 25,14 4 $ 23,79 0 $ 31,96 1 $ 22,59 9 $ 19,28 5 $ 25,342 $ 27,307 $ 32,57 4 $ 14,32 4 $ 21,72 6 $ 290,17 1 State Grants 17,765 9,412 14,210 13,054 17,374 11,842 7,893 12,626 14,663 24,321 59,556 114,805 317,521 Farebox 10,736 11,166 10,086 10,891 8,867 9,248 17,697 8,964 8,610 9,762 9,124 8,979 124,130 Contract Revenue 0 4,159 0 1,550 6,200 0 5,469 1,094 6,838 002,700 28,010 Other Revenue 7,894 7,159 7,891 7,842 10,354 7,847 9,374 8,610 10,029 10,466 8,739 18,752 114,957 Total Revenue $ 65,10 3 $ 49,307 $ 57,33 1 $ 57,127 $ 74,75 6 $ 51,53 6 $ 59,71 8 $ 56,63 6 $ 67,447 $ 77,12 3 $ 91,74 3 $ 166,96 2 $ 874,78 9 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.40 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.32 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.38 0.38 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total West Texas Ridership 10,037 10,777 9,085 8,794 8,675 8,933 10,461 10,591 9,920 9,057 9,277 9,764 115,371 Opportunities Mileage 132,710 150,175 129,471 133,410 128,250 127,323 143,555 150,515 145,317 139,102 145,040 139,285 1,664,153 Revenue Federal Grants $ 120,60 1 $ 234,28 0 $ 322,05 6 $ 262,448 $ 205,24 0 $ 208,467 $ 45,419 $ 128,41 4 $ 156,132 $ 91,735 $ 54,48 9 $ 137,536 $ 1,966,81 7 State Grants 000000179,684 145,748 165,208 181,073 154,652 150,977 977,342 Farebox 4,276 5,337 3,252 5,800 4,268 6,340 3,356 10,890 4,523 4,305 6,247 842 59,436 Contract Revenue 79,898 100,645 90,480 129,750 71,453 72,694 84,260 78,822 80,889 85,819 79,040 66,072 1,019,822 Other Revenue 52,545 68,661 69,289 78,129 72,312 59,581 120,659 105,364 115,534 114,363 116,452 44,306 1,017,195 Total Revenue $ 257,32 0 $ 408,92 3 $ 485,077 $ 476,127 $ 353,27 3 $ 347,082 $ 433,37 8 $ 469,23 8 $ 522,286 $ 477,29 5 $ 410,880 $ 399,733 $ 5,040,61 2 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07
2015 GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015
Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Rural Ridership 534,794 571,274 469,642 489,549 482,495 487,702 536,060 534,911 496,095 494,722 489,311 470,677 6,057,232 Transit Mileage 2,617,301 2,884,176 2,398,756 2,519,969 2,497,724 2,389,828 2,701,420 2,712,384 2,530,943 2,635,725 2,555,444 2,479,165 30,922,835 Transit Districts - Revenue Fiscal Year 2015 Federal Grants$ 3,103,313 $ 3,557,564 $ 2,724,628 $ 2,883,539 $ 2,444,297 $ 2,035,042 $ 2,491,040 $ 2,111,127 $ 3,050,887 $ 3,263,542 $ 3,048,071 $ 4,320,424 $ 35,033,474
Statistics State Grants 2,263,851 2,386,498 2,193,642 2,322,803 1,687,370 1,605,175 1,553,206 1,814,941 1,757,048 1,741,882 1,416,814 1,518,577 22,261,807 Farebox 397,185 511,064 408,423 408,991 475,752 398,968 453,515 430,641 374,683 462,020 362,000 440,927 5,124,169 Contract Revenue 1,880,247 2,956,141 1,701,531 2,629,724 2,135,773 2,381,899 2,688,661 3,505,719 2,423,905 2,910,750 2,529,338 2,754,302 30,497,990 Other Revenue 695,572 502,248 613,578 566,607 997,285 569,281 702,074 660,984 850,058 692,786 709,737 1,201,330 8,761,540 Report Total Revenue $ 8,340,168 $ 9,913,515 $ 7,641,802 $ 8,811,664 $ 7,740,477 $ 6,990,365 $ 7,888,496 $ 8,523,412 $ 8,456,581 $ 9,070,980 $ 8,065,960 $ 10,235,560 $ 101,678,980 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 73 This page intentionally left blank.
74 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(SECTION 5310)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 75 SUMMARY ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310)
The Section 5310 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5310) provides public transportation for the enhanced mobility of seniors and individuals with disabilities throughout the State of Texas. TxDOT administers the FTA Section 5310 program for the small urbanized and rural areas of the state, which provides about one million unlinked passenger trips to seniors and individuals with disabilities annually. This program provides assistance to help local private nonprofit organizations, public transportation agencies and governmental authorities when other public transportation is unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meeting the needs of the senior and disabled population. (Note: changes in the 5310 program due to MAP-21 are reflected in this Report.)
Section 5310 program funds are allocated after state administrative expenses are deducted. The formula does not address performance, however there are separate calculations for small urbanized areas (population 50,000-199,999) and rural areas.
The formula for allocation of the small urbanized area apportionment includes:
(a) 25 percent distributed equally among the small urbanized areas of the state, using TxDOT district boundaries and, (b) 75 percent distributed by the small urbanized areas share of population of seniors and individuals with disabilities, using TxDOT district boundaries.
Please note that since several TxDOT districts do not include any small urbanized areas, these funds are not allocated by those districts’ boundaries for determination of awards.
Section 5310 rural area allocations are calculated in the same manner as the small urbanized area funds. Twenty-five percent is allocated equally among the TxDOT district boundaries, and seventy-five percent is allocated according to the relative share of the rural population of seniors and individuals with disabilities. All TxDOT districts have some rural population within their respective boundaries.
Section 5310 funds for projects serving small urbanized and rural areas are apportioned to the states, which in turn distribute these funds to eligible local applicants. In small urbanized and rural areas, each applicable TxDOT district establishes a local planning and development process in consultation with local stakeholders. This planning process provides local applicants with an opportunity to participate, ensures that projects meet the needs of the district’s residents, and provides for as much coordination of transportation services as possible.
The Federal Transit Administration apportions Section 5310 funds directly to large urbanized areas, in accordance with the changes implemented from MAP-21. In those large urbanized areas, a selected designated recipient administers the program, including a project selection process that is established locally (See Note, Page 67). This change has decreased the number of 5310 agencies reporting to TxDOT. Those requesting further
76 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report information should contact the designated recipient for the applicable large urbanized area. Contact information is provided starting on page 133.
In addition, there is an increased federal emphasis on coordination requirements is that existing rural transit agencies have become the primary recipients of Section 5310 funds in rural areas. As a result, the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies (agencies receiving only Section 5310 funds through TxDOT) is declining.
This is the ninth year the web-based PTN-128 reporting system has been used, allowing all involved parties to review and resolve any variances in the data by data category. This on- line reporting process also allows reasonableness and data quality checks that may be performed anytime throughout the year.
The ongoing reduction in the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies can be attributed to two other factors. First is the Texas Administrative Code rule that (small) urbanized and rural transit agencies are to be the primary recipients for the Section 5310 program in their respective service areas. In FY 2014 and FY 2015, all 38 rural transit agencies, served as primary recipients for the Section 5310 program in their respective areas. The inclusion of these operators with the independent Section 5310 transit agencies results in an annual combined count of Section 5310 transit providers of 67 in FY 2014 and 61 in FY 2015.
The second factor for reducing the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies is the department’s encouraging the use of Purchase of Service (POS) contracts to foster coordination and increase efficiency. With a POS agreement, Section 5310 transportation services are contracted-out to other transportation agencies that may be able to provide the service more cost-effectively.
As in previous reports, the number of mechanical system failures is not reported here due to annual variations in the number of Section 5310 transit agencies which makes it difficult to form any significant conclusions about trends in this program.
In FY 2015, the ridership number for the 5310 agencies is 434,178, in which ridership declined nearly 29 percent, from 611,197 in FY 2014. However, cost per vehicle revenue mile has increased 63% (from $1.62 to $2.64), and cost per rider has increased 90% (from $15.85 to $30.12), due to the 46% increase in operating expenses (from $5,751,209 to $3,744,276) over the past fiscal year.
Ridership has decreased from FY 2006-2015, at an average rate of seven (7) percent each year. Ridership overall has decreased by 70 percent, compared to FY 2006. This decline corresponds to the significant drop in the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies from 150 in FY 2006 to only 61 in FY 2015. In addition, the “vehicle revenue miles” has decreased an average of 6.2 percent per year over the ten-year period, and decreased 62 percent compared to FY 2006.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 77 Figure 13 below indicates a declining trend in “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” from FY 2006 through FY 2015.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5310 Grant Program are located at the end of this section.
The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated New Freedom/Section 5317 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, was added to the 5310 program at the national level.
In a few cases, TxDOT was asked to become the designated recipient in a large urbanized area for a limited time. See “Contact Information for the Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Transportation Program,” on page 133, for details.
78 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 25: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) - PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 3,439,563 2,894,051 -15.86 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 226,580 182,072 -19.64Expenses $5,751,209 $3,744,276 -34.90 Total Revenue Vehicles 224 141 -37.05Total Revenue $9,426,595 $7,907,122 -16.12
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Trips 611,197 434,178 -28.96
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 2014 2015 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle $1.67 $1.29 Unlinked Passenger $9.41 $8.62 Revenue Mile Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $25.38 $20.56 4% 5% Revenue Hour Ratio**
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 0.18 0.15 Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 2.70 2.38 Vehicle Revenue Hour
Notes: "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. *Safety Data and Safety Indicators for FY 2014 and 2015 are excluded from this report. **Due to the Section 5316 agencies not collecting actual vehicle miles and hours, the deadhead ratios are not applicable. ***See Tables 28 and Table 29 for details.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 79 FIGURE 14: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2006-2015
(Section 5310) Service Efficiency $3.00 $2.55 $2.56 $2.64 $2.51 $2.39 $2.50 $2.16 $2.21 $2.01 $2.00 $1.82 $1.62 $1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
(Section 5310) Cost Effectiveness $32.00 $30.12 $28.00 $24.00 $20.00 $16.49 $16.48 $16.24 $15.16 $15.85 $16.00 $14.10 $12.04 $12.50$11.80 $12.00 $8.00 $4.00 $0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
(Section 5310) Service Effectiveness 0.51 0.50 0.44 0.43
0.40 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.22 0.20
0.10
0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 14 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
80 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 26: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310) - Fiscal Year 2014
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock) 1 3 11 5 0 0.00 0.00 0.60 Air Force Village Foundation (San Antonio) 11 10,816 1,477 36,465 179,946 4.93 16.64 0.30 Aliviane NO-AD, Inc. (El Paso) 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) 4 22,501 792 89,072 240,000 2.69 10.67 0.25 American Red Cross-Greater Houston Area Chapter (Houston) 15 23,630 16,057 295,208 1,032,041 3.50 43.68 0.08 Andrews Central Smith County (Tyler)** 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) 5 7,061 3,641 64,676 0 0.00 0.00 0.11 Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) 2 2,233 0 15,538 17,936 1.15 8.03 0.14 Bastrop Co. Emergency Food Pantry & Support Center, Inc (Bastrop) 2 1,216 0 12,348 6,172 0.50 5.08 0.10 Big Bend Community Action Committee, Inc. (Marfa) 13 3,047 4,505 111,705 407,448 3.65 133.72 0.03 Big Bend Regional Medical Center (Alpine) 1 2,878 126 3,851 1,575 0.41 0.55 0.75 Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin) 1 284 47 568 0 0.00 0.00 0.50 Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo) 0 8,386 1,470 9,422 0 0.00 0.00 0.89 Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) 3 3,640 2,782 22,926 36,000 1.57 9.89 0.16 Camp County Services Industries (Pittsburg)** 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Catholic Charities (formerly American Red Cross Chisholm Chapter) (Fort Worth) 15 32,221 22,025 364,418 1,158,259 3.18 35.95 0.09 Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso) 0 12 4 9 0 0.00 0.00 1.33 City of Friendswood (Friendswood) 0 8,120 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) 0 376 80 1,938 0 0.00 0.00 0.19 Coastal Bend Rural Health Partnership (Alice) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 County of Menard (Menard) 1 115 380 12,075 11,994 0.99 104.30 0.01 County of Sterling (Sterling City) 1 188 769 17,775 15,710 0.88 83.56 0.01 Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas) 17 93,164 20,510 110,930 388,297 3.50 4.17 0.84 2015 Dawson County Senior Citizens Center (Lamesa) 2 2,848 401 9,292 24,026 2.59 8.44 0.31 East Texas Support Services, Inc. (Jasper)* 1 145 0 3,179 4,131 1.30 28.49 0.05
Texas Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels) 0 1,479 107 1,056 0 0.00 0.00 1.40 Eden Hill Communities (New Braunfels) 4 69,476 22,320 97,589 201,891 2.07 2.91 0.71 Faith In Action Caregiving (Round Rock) 3 775 0 8,446 25,799 3.05 33.29 0.09 Transit Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell) 1 724 267 10,867 0 0.00 0.00 0.07 Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin (Midland) 2 129 87 2,925 2,886 0.99 22.37 0.04 Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe) 8 23,473 12,316 167,988 614,235 3.66 26.17 0.14 Statistics Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) 1 357 320 10,277 9,186 0.89 25.73 0.03 Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) 6 7,111 2,541 32,734 72,478 2.21 10.19 0.22 Greater Randolph Area Serivices Program (Converse) 4 4,123 1,493 24,303 69,946 2.88 16.96 0.17 Harris County Transportation (Houston) # 0 53,361 0 0 123,261 0.00 2.31 0.00 Report Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) 2 556 342 12,821 38,509 3.00 69.26 0.04 See footnote at the end of Table 81 82 2015 TABLE 26: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Texas (Section 5310) - Fiscal Year 2014 Transit Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Hockley County Senior Citizens (Levelland)* 0 0 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Statistics Houston Kiddie Express (Beaumont)** 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) 0 807 234 5,509 19,461 3.53 24.12 0.15 Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) 0 3,056 1,296 15,496 0 0.00 0.00 0.20
Report Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) 4 3,905 5,135 88,300 31,085 0.35 7.96 0.04 L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) 34 118,102 65,280 1,256,720 0 0.00 0.00 0.09 Lubbock Independent School District Special Education (Lubbock) 0 312 212 6,700 332 0.05 1.06 0.05 Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) 0 806 68 2,591 0 0.00 0.00 0.31 Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) 9 14,313 2,454 35,768 68,189 1.91 4.76 0.40 MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) 5 11,632 2,945 76,221 26,815 0.35 2.31 0.15 Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) 1 1,233 289 4,492 47,370 10.55 38.42 0.27 Mounting Horizons (Houston)** 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) 1 941 941 15,449 40,877 2.65 43.44 0.06 NDMJ, LLC (Tyler)** 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano) 1 6,188 799 6,262 387 0.06 0.06 0.99 Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona) 1 14 4 117 65 0.56 4.64 0.12 Presa Community Service Center (San Antonio) 9 2,625 2,484 31,099 125,904 4.05 47.96 0.08 Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) 1 3,920 284 1,823 8,133 4.46 2.07 2.15 Rio Concho West, Inc. (San Angelo) 1 1,726 163 1,563 5,912 3.78 3.43 1.10 Salvation Army William Booth Garden Apts. (Tyler) 1 31 45 366 810 2.21 26.13 0.08 San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) 0 2,010 1,304 17,439 66,223 3.80 32.95 0.12 San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) 1 121 59 632 427 0.68 3.53 0.19 Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 5 5,964 2,181 68,388 126,201 1.85 21.16 0.09 Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 2 4,384 3,886 23,438 67,654 2.89 15.43 0.19 Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) 5 2,879 2,264 24,995 120,338 4.81 41.80 0.12 Smith County (Tyler) 0 4,032 2,640 60,000 105,539 1.76 26.18 0.07 St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) 1 3,030 2,024 32,524 57,200 1.76 18.88 0.09 St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio) 1 2,303 867 4,790 9,608 2.01 4.17 0.48 Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) 5 13,569 3,703 53,383 10,224 0.19 0.75 0.25 Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) 5 8,924 7,616 18,135 109,359 6.03 12.25 0.49 Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) 1 2,142 960 12,996 9,885 0.76 4.61 0.16 Young County Senior Cub Center (Olney) 1 1,349 263 3,709 2,040 0.55 1.51 0.36 Zapata County (Zapata) 2 6,431 1,307 20,252 9,445 0.47 1.47 0.32 Total for Fiscal Year 2014 224 611,197 226,580 3,439,563$ 5,751,209
Average for 69 Systems 3.25 8,858 3,284 49,849 $ 83,351 $ 1.62 $ 15.85 0.27
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. **No data reported # Purchase of Service (POS) TABLE 27: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310) - Fiscal Year 2015
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock)** ------Air Force Village Foundation, Inc. (San Antonio) - 361 170 1,758 - - - 0.21 Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - 28,541 792 105,676 240,000 2.27 8.41 0.27 American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) 14 24,522 16,774 335,371 1,064,594 3.17 43.41 0.07 Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) 5 5,745 3,759 60,002 53,792 0.90 9.36 0.10 Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) 2 2,285 - 13,104 43,224 3.30 18.92 0.17 Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) 2 603 - 7,432 4,069 0.55 6.75 0.08 Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) 11 1,053 2,147 52,303 384,376 7.35 365.03 0.02 Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin)** ------Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo)** ------Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) - 3,290 2,324 16,530 30,559 1.85 9.29 0.20 Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth)** ------Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso)* 1 ------City of Friendswood (Friendswood)** ------Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - 411 - 12,142 10,228 0.84 24.89 0.03 Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas)** ------Dawson County Senior Citzens Center (Lamesa) - 2,042 288 6,646 17,946 2.70 8.79 0.31 Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels)** ------Eden Hill Communities. (New Braunfels) 6 83,649 22,147 128,645 238,879 1.86 2.86 0.65 Faith in Action Caregiving (Round Rock) - 436 - 9,432 - - - 0.05 Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell)** ------Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) 2 410 222 4,977 1,030 0.21 2.51 0.08 Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe)** ------Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) 1 375 173 11,391 3,987 0.35 10.63 0.03 Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) 5 8,679 2,601 28,401 72,502 2.55 8.35 0.31 2015 Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) 4 4,529 1,341 22,705 73,076 3.22 16.14 0.20 Harris County Transportation (Houston) # - 57,982 - - 302,200 - 5.21 -
Texas Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) - 587 200 11,611 20,508 1.77 34.94 0.05 Hockley County Sr. Cits. Assoc. (Levelland)** ------Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - 452 129 3,139 10,501 3.35 23.23 0.14 Transit Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) - 1,389 760 14,421 - - - 0.10 Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) - 6,037 6,747 119,425 20,250 0.17 3.35 0.05 L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) 51 109,937 81,600 1,319,552 - - - 0.08 Statistics Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock)** ------Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - 1,054 69 3,725 - - - 0.28 Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) 6 10,905 1,840 30,032 53,042 1.77 4.86 0.36 Menard County (Menard County) - 32 126 4,982 3,600 0.72 112.50 0.01 Report MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) - 14,569 3,191 110,571 33,009 0.30 2.27 0.13 See footnote at the end of Table 83 84 2015 TABLE 27: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Texas (Section 5310) - Fiscal Year 2015 Transit Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) - 1,408 301 4,503 47,820 10.62 33.96 0.31 Statistics Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) 2 715 715 13,553 35,849 2.65 50.14 0.05 NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 1 406 195 16,177 29,329 1.81 72.24 0.03 Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano)** ------
Report Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona)** ------Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) - 7,116 7,067 78,629 266,475 3.39 37.45 0.09 Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) 1 2,985 268 1,700 7,488 4.40 2.51 1.76 Rio Concho West (San Angelo) 1 1,193 119 1,285 5,783 4.50 4.85 0.93 Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 2 143 192 1,332 2,918 2.19 20.41 0.11 San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - 1,615 1,362 18,273 49,814 2.73 30.84 0.09 San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) 1 73 46 425 821 1.93 11.25 0.17 Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 5 8,679 2,189 105,099 202,380 1.93 23.32 0.08 Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 2 3,850 3,797 23,468 61,542 2.62 15.98 0.16 Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) 3 2,741 2,294 25,323 118,382 4.67 43.19 0.11 Smith County (Tyler) - 1,661 1,069 20,436 60,596 2.97 36.48 0.08 St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) 2 4,047 2,544 44,328 71,550 1.61 17.68 0.09 St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio)** ------Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) 5 11,318 4,620 55,067 - - - 0.21 Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) 2 5,175 4,480 8,348 67,035 8.03 12.95 0.62 University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) - 1,360 1,341 13,070 - - - 0.10 Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) 1 2,061 960 12,087 13,949 1.15 6.77 0.17 Young County Onley Senior Cub Center (Olney)** ------Zapata County (Zapata) 3 7,757 1,113 16,975 21,173 1.25 2.73 0.46 Total for Fiscal Year 2015 141 434,178 182,072 2,894,051$ 3,744,276
Average for 61 Systems 5.22 9,648 4,552 65,774 $ 98,534 $ 2.64 $ 30.12 0.22
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. **No data reported # Purchase of Service (POS) TABLE 28: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2014
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock) - Air Force Village Foundation (San Antonio) 5,403 5,403 3.00% Aliviane NO-AD, Inc. (El Paso) - Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - American Red Cross-Greater Houston Area Chapter (Houston) 82,029 950,412 1,033,203 7.95% Andrews Central Smith County (Tyler) - Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) 12,247 - Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) - Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) - Big Bend Community Action Committee, Inc. (Marfa) 8,838 389,687 398,525 2.17% Big Bend Regional Medical Center (Alpine) - Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin) 5,601 - Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo) - Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) 3,600 24,000 27,600 10.00% Camp County Services Industries (Pittsburg) - Catholic Charities (formerly American Red Cross Chisholm Chapter) (Fort Worth) 32,375 945,103 977,478 2.80% Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso) - City of Friendswood (Friendswood) - Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - Coastal Bend Rural Health Partnership (Alice) - County of Menard (Menard) 11,994 11,994 - County of Sterling (Sterling City) 15,710 15,710 - Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas) 388,297 388,297 - 2015 Dawson County Senior Citizens Center (Lamesa) 472 472 - East Texas Support Services, Inc. (Jasper)* 100 4,031 4,131 2.42% Texas Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels) - Eden Hill Communities (New Braunfels) 13,104 13,104 6.49%
Transit Faith In Action Caregiving (Round Rock) 5,027 25,149 - Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell) - Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin (Midland) -
Statistics Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe) 40,775 379,151 568,701 6.64% Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) 6,456 6,456 - Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) 1,233,484 1,233,484 - Greater Randolph Area Serivices Program (Converse) 12,511 27,000 102,043 17.89%
Report Harris County Transportation (Houston) # - Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) 37,899 39,036 - See footnote at the end of Table 85 86 2015 TABLE 28: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Texas (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2014 Transit Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) Hockley County Senior Citizens (Levelland) - Statistics Houston Kiddie Express (Beaumont) 144,000 - Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) 2,804 2,804 -
Report Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) - L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) 3,560,483 3,560,483 - Lubbock Independent School District Soecial Education (Lubbock) - Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) 65,381 138,112 - MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) 37,163 56,586 Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) 47,370 47,370 - Mounting Horizons (Houston) - Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) 40,877 40,877 - NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano) 1,149 1,247 2,524 Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona) - Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) 57,513 - Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) 8,133 8,133 - Rio Concho West, Inc. (San Angelo) 5,912 5,912 - Salvation Army William Booth Garden Apts. (Tyler) 513 513 63.33% San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) - Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 29,319 96,882 126,201 23.23% Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 130 56,452 0.19% Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) 1,640 1,640 1.36% Smith County (Tyler) 6,050 23,140 121,746 5.73% St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) 57,200 - St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio) - Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) 10,527 10,527 - Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) 109,359 109,359 - Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) 5,943 5,943 - Young County Senior Cub Center (Olney) - Zapata County (Zapata) 4,066 4,066 43.05% Total for Fiscal Year 2014 244,406 8,431,140 9,426,595 4.24% Notes: The numerous blank spaces are due to some of the Section 5310 agencies not collecting fares or not receiving local revenue. (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses. * Indicates no longer in service. # Purchase of Service (POS) - - - - - FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) - 3,600 32,995 53,042 TOTAL REVENUE ------2,231 ------20,254 8.48% --- - 402 2.24% ------3,995 - -- - 3,600 7,380 7,380 - 3,330 15,199 - 1,000 52,523 - 32,995 41,457 20,313 20,508 - 34,012 83,766 17.41% 10,290 10,290 - 25,634 30,559 16.12% 408,542 410,999 0.64% 950,412 1,064,594 10.73% 3,803,767 3,803,767 - 1,363,338 1,363,338 -
LOCAL REVENUE ------402 2,231 4,925 2,457 FARES 12,725 20,254 114,182 TABLE 29: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2015 Menard County (Menard County) MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock) L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) Hockley County Sr. Cits. Assoc. (Levelland) Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) Harris County Transportation (Houston) # Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe) Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell) Faith in Action Caregiving (Round Rock) Eden Hill Communities. (New Braunfels) Dawson County Senior Citzens Center (Lamesa) Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels) Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas) Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) City of Friendswood (Friendswood) Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso)* Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth) Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo) Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin) Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Air Force Village Foundation, Inc. (San Antonio) Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock) See footnote at the end of Table
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 87 88 2015 TABLE 29: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310) Texas REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2015
Transit Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) - 47,820 47,820 -
Statistics Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) - 35,849 35,849 - NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 671 - 30,000 2.29% Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano) - -- - Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona) - -- - - Report Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) 62,022 269,289 - Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) - 7,488 7,488 - Rio Concho West (San Angelo) - 5,783 5,783 - Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 2,266 - 2,266 77.66% San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - -- - San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) - -- - Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 22,602 164,376 202,380 11.17% Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 165 - 51,467 0.27% Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) - -- - Smith County (Tyler) 2,533 1,830 60,598 4.18% St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) - - 71,550 - St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio) - -- - Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) - 9,371 9,371 - Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) - 67,035 67,035 - University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) - - 64,000 - Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) - -- - Young County Onley Senior Cub Center (Olney) - -- - Zapata County (Zapata) 2,784 - 2,784 13.15% Total for Fiscal Year 2015 188,197 7,107,644 7,907,122 5.00%
Notes: The numerous blank spaces are due to some of the Section 5310 agencies not collecting fares or not receiving local revenue. (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses.
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. # Purchase of Service (POS)
MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(SECTION 5310)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 89 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 90 2015
Texas ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Transit Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total AMARILLO DISTRICT Amarillo Multiservice Center Ridership 1,964 2,456 1,985 2,296 2,330 2,266 2,746 2,933 2,276 2,463 2,476 2,350 28,541 Statistics for the Aging Mileage 7,744 8,392 6,874 8,044 8,232 7,674 8,763 10,738 9,357 9,607 10,448 9,803 105,676 (Amarillo) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Report Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.25 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.27 0.24 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.27
ATLANTA DISTRICT Texarkana Special Ridership 721 644 504 320 360 278 396 378 360 408 420 386 5,175 Education Center, Inc. Mileage 1,303 1,476 980 470 615 441 476 452 535 562 609 429 8,348 (Texarkana) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 7,089 8,437 7,829 4,818 4,846 4,877 4,809 4,782 5,155 4,804 4,851 4,738 67,035 Total Revenue $ 7,089 $ 8,437 $ 7,829 $ 4,818 $ 4,846 $ 4,877 $ 4,809 $ 4,782 $ 5,155 $ 4,804 $ 4,851 $ 4,738 $ 67,035 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.55 0.44 0.51 0.68 0.59 0.63 0.83 0.84 0.67 0.73 0.69 0.90 0.62
AUSTIN DISTRICT Austin Groups for Ridership 550 567 444 421 447 561 550 468 500 479 360 398 5,745 the Elderly (AGE) Mileage 5,451 6,083 4,803 4,894 5,204 4,758 5,311 5,276 5,070 4,326 3,294 5,532 60,002 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 1,029 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 494 $ - $ - $ - $ 51,523 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue - - - - - 1,000 ------1,000 Total Revenue $ - $ 1,029 $ - $ - $ - $ 51,000 $ - $ - $ 494 $ - $ - $ - $ 52,523 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.10 See footnote at the end of Table TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Austin Travis Center Integral Ridership 185 109 112 67 262 127 127 244 197 597 37 221 2,285 Care (Austin) Mileage 640 725 702 752 958 1,035 1,036 1,607 1,007 1,565 2,343 734 13,104 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.29 0.15 0.16 0.09 0.27 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.20 0.38 0.02 0.30 0.17
Bastrop Co Emergency Ridership 70 96 85 36 34 12 40 60 20 45 65 40 603 Food Pantry & Mileage 998 1,120 895 484 1,095 610 520 200 115 450 525 420 7,432 Support Ctr Inc Revenue (Bastrop) Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.08 0.30 0.17 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.08
Bluebonnet Trails Community Ridership 000000000000 0 MHMR (Austin)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 2015 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Texas System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Ridership 8411610287470000000 436
Transit Faith in Action Partners in Caregiving-# Mileage 1,6383,1202,4171,7405170000000 9,432 (Round Rock) Revenue Federal Grants$ 2,256 $ 3,312 $ 2,693 $ 2,659 $ 949 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,869
Statistics State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 564 $828 $673 $665 $600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3,330 Total Revenue $ 2,820 $ 4,140 $ 3,366 $ 3,324 $ 1,549 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,199 Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.09 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.05 See footnote at the end of Table 91 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 92
2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Texas
Hays County Veterans Ridership 46 55 59 68 66 64 75 79 75 0 0 0 587 Administration Mileage 1,173 1,260 928 1,242 1,393 1,341 1,141 1,616 1,517 0 0 0 11,611 Transit (San Marcos) Revenue Federal Grants$ 162 $ - $ 33 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 195 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Statistics Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,799 3,474 3,364 2,808 3,338 3,530 ------20,313 Total Revenue $ 3,961 $ 3,474 $ 3,397 $ 2,808 $ 3,338 $ 3,530 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,508 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.05 NR NR NR 0.05 Report Mary Lee Foundation Ridership 1,392 1,388 655 719 848 804 779 771 899 890 998 762 10,905 (Austin) Mileage 3,624 3,614 1,495 2,499 2,598 2,402 2,538 2,365 2,231 2,048 2,448 2,170 30,032 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 5,180 $ - $ - $ 1,597 $ - $ - $ 2,192 $ - $ - $ 2,616 $ - $ 11,585 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 5,559 682 5,593 5,155 2,817 3,805 4,649 1,428 1,698 2,986 3,360 3,725 41,457 Total Revenue $ 5,559 $ 5,862 $ 5,593 $ 5,155 $ 4,414 $ 3,805 $ 4,649 $ 3,620 $ 1,698 $ 2,986 $ 5,976 $ 3,725 $ 53,042 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.40 0.43 0.41 0.35 0.36
BEAUMONT DISTRICT Senior Citizen Project of Ridership 382 379 319 248 262 324 318 358 249 324 345 342 3,850 Chambers County (Anahuac) Mileage 2,407 1,756 1,676 1,717 2,244 2,615 1,630 2,110 1,280 1,749 2,063 2,221 23,468 Revenue Federal Grants$ 4,706 $ 4,448 $ 4,579 $ 3,805 $ 4,138 $ 4,379 $ 3,844 $ 4,186 $ 3,735 $ 3,903 $ 4,370 $ 5,209 $ 51,302 State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 20050000045250250 165 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 4,726 $ 4,448 $ 4,629 $ 3,805 $ 4,138 $ 4,379 $ 3,844 $ 4,231 $ 3,760 $ 3,903 $ 4,395 $ 5,209 $ 51,467 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.16 0.22 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.17 NR 0.16
CORPUS CHRISTI DISTRICT Coastal Bend Center Ridership 00023000081130195 411 for Independent Living Mileage 00031500001,8693,1357,120 12,142 (Corpus Christi) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000174500001,4632,3486,417 10,290 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ 17 $ 45 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,463 $ 2,348 $ 6,417 $ 10,290 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR 0.67 0.20 NR NR NR NR 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03
DALLAS DISTRICT Dallas County Department Ridership 000000000000 0 of Health & Human Services Mileage 000000000000 0 (Dallas)* Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Plano Community Homes Ridership 000000000000 0 Sponsor (Plano)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Senior Adult Services Ridership 595 595 595 657 657 657 795 795 795 846 846 846 8,679 (Farmers Branch) Mileage 7,522 7,522 7,522 7,996 7,996 7,996 9,739 9,739 9,739 9,776 9,776 9,776 105,099 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,134 $ 5,134 $ 5,134 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,402 State Grants ------0 Farebox 2,856 2,856 2,856 574 574 574 1,926 1,926 1,926 2,178 2,178 2,178 22,602 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 12,813 12,813 12,813 14,764 14,764 14,764 10,759 10,759 10,759 16,456 16,456 16,456 164,376 Total Revenue $ 15,669 $ 15,669 $ 15,669 $ 15,338 $ 15,338 $ 15,338 $ 17,819 $ 17,819 $ 17,819 $ 18,634 $ 18,634 $ 18,634 $ 202,380 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08
Wilmer Senior Center Ridership 191 191 191 133 133 133 151 151 151 212 212 212 2,061 (Wilmer) Mileage 1,211 1,211 1,211 726 726 726 857 857 857 1,235 1,235 1,235 12,087 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
EL PASO DISTRICT Big Bend Community Ridership 95 83 51 71 107 118 71 78 36 131 108 104 1,053 Action Committee, Inc. Mileage 2,514 3,825 806 868 1,670 5,001 7,524 6,701 6,881 6,795 4,043 5,675 52,303 (Marfa) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 11 309 118 124 37 209 178 284 550 324 165 148 2,457 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 35,478 35,261 28,536 29,430 25,705 32,858 34,467 42,536 40,487 41,763 33,686 28,335 408,542 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 410,999 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
Centro de Salud Familiar Ridership 000000000000 0 La Fe, Inc. (El Paso)** Mileage 000000000000 0 2015 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0
Texas Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0
Transit Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Good Samaritan Society Ridership 781 693 843 827 732 505 701 858 640 672 765 662 8,679 Statistics White Acres Mileage 2,891 1,929 2,874 2,965 2,317 1,960 1,908 2,022 1,953 2,518 2,581 2,483 28,401 (El Paso) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Report Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 110,855 108,880 100,101 109,855 106,000 98,860 174,602 112,366 142,364 106,855 85,600 107,000 1,363,338 Total Revenue $ 110,855 $ 108,880 $ 100,101 $ 109,855 $ 106,000 $ 98,860 $ 174,602 $ 112,366 $ 142,364 $ 106,855 $ 85,600 $ 107,000 $ 1,363,338 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.27 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.32 0.26 0.37 0.42 0.33 0.27 0.30 0.27 0.31
93 See footnote at the end of Table TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 94 2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Transit L.U.L.A.C. Project Ridership 8,946 8,765 8,560 8,521 9,072 8,275 9,182 9,831 9,230 10,009 9,856 9,690 109,937 Amistad (El Paso) Mileage 109,380 112,449 109,978 104,278 109,323 102,323 110,862 112,307 104,833 116,794 115,811 111,214 1,319,552 Revenue
Statistics Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 308,962 343,346 295,226 293,663 311,188 284,836 315,543 332,531 313,800 338,692 334,806 331,174 3,803,767
Report Total Revenue $ 308,962 $ 343,346 $ 295,226 $ 293,663 $ 311,188 $ 284,836 $ 315,543 $ 332,531 $ 313,800 $ 338,692 $ 334,806 $ 331,174 $ 3,803,767 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08
Nazareth Hall Nursing Ridership 79 50 62 37 65 86 77 96 71 5 42 45 715 Center (El Paso) Mileage 628 396 614 719 1,800 2,081 2,113 2,137 1,241 92 1,132 600 13,553 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,588 3,009 3,007 2,825 3,530 2,919 2,763 2,664 2,473 2,970 2,263 3,838 35,849 Total Revenue $ 3,588 $ 3,009 $ 3,007 $ 2,825 $ 3,530 $ 2,919 $ 2,763 $ 2,664 $ 2,473 $ 2,970 $ 2,263 $ 3,838 $ 35,849 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.08 0.05
FORT WORTH DISTRICT Catholic Charities fka Ridership 000000000000 0 Tarrant County/American Mileage 000000000000 0 Red Cross (Ft. Worth)* Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
MHMR Tarrant County (Ft. Worth) Ridership 1,071 1,491 1,408 1,597 1,777 804 966 1,148 1,057 1,286 963 1,001 14,569 Mileage 14,599 17,495 16,529 6,961 6,314 5,430 7,293 7,596 6,945 6,268 9,026 6,115 110,571 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 2,637 2,204 1,991 2,126 1,787 2,216 2,517 2,876 3,579 6,032 3,116 1,914 32,995 Total Revenue $ 2,637 $ 2,204 $ 1,991 $ 2,126 $ 1,787 $ 2,216 $ 2,517 $ 2,876 $ 3,579 $ 6,032 $ 3,116 $ 1,914 $ 32,995 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.23 0.28 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.21 0.11 0.16 0.13 See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
HOUSTON DISTRICT American Red Cross HIV/AIDS Ridership 2,114 2,505 1,921 1,884 1,933 2,070 1,815 1,966 1,719 2,216 2,353 2,026 24,522 Gtr Hou Area Chpt Mileage 29,491 32,982 24,045 27,256 26,552 26,890 28,124 27,090 25,276 28,785 33,619 25,261 335,371 (Houston) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 9,611 11,558 7,838 7,639 7,556 9,132 10,078 9,601 9,589 10,197 11,615 9,768 114,182 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 79,201 950,412 Total Revenue $ 88,812 $ 90,759 $ 87,039 $ 86,840 $ 86,757 $ 88,333 $ 89,279 $ 88,802 $ 88,790 $ 89,398 $ 90,816 $ 88,969 $ 1,064,594 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07
City of Friendswood Ridership 000000000000 0 (Friendswood)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Harris County# Ridership 5,934 6,534 5,762 5,697 5,563 5,524 5,533 5,751 5,541 6,143 0 0 57,982 Transportation (Houston) Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 2015 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Texas Total Revenue System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
000000000000 Transit Montgomery County Com. Ridership 0 on Aging dba Mileage 000000000000 0 The Friendship Center Revenue (Conroe) Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Statistics State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table 95 96 2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Transit Seven Acres Jewish Ridership 216 267 194 245 260 194 260 246 208 235 274 142 2,741 Geriatric Center Mileage 2,289 2,246 3,862 1,650 2,764 2,440 1,219 2,757 1,022 1,841 2,170 1,063 25,323 (Houston) Revenue
Statistics Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Report Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.15 0.09 0.08 0.21 0.09 0.20 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11
LAREDO DISTRICT Border Area Nutritional Council Ridership 000000000000 0 (Laredo)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
LUBBOCK DISTRICT Adult Day Activity & Health Ridership 000000000000 0 Center (Lubbock) Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Dawson County Ridership 241 248 172 151 252 214 251 191 169 153 0 0 2,042 Senior Citizens Center Mileage 366 703 515 634 880 508 879 652 622 887 0 0 6,646 (Lamesa) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 42 46 34 38 38 34 44 42 40 44 - - 402 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 42 $ 46 $ 34 $ 38 $ 38 $ 34 $ 44 $ 42 $ 40 $ 44 $ - $ - $ 402 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.66 0.35 0.33 0.24 0.29 0.42 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.17 NR NR 0.31
Farwell Convalescent Center Ridership 000000000000 0 (Farwell)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------2015 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Texas System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Lubbock Independent School Ridership 000000000000 0 Transit District (Lubbock)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Statistics State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table 97 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 98 2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Texas $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Data Item Sep-14 - Oct-14 - -Nov-14 - Dec-14 - Jan-15 - Feb-15 - Mar-15 - Apr-15 - May-15 - Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total ------
Transit Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. Ridership - 56 - 203 - 36 - 28 - 209 - - 102 - 116 - 28 - 110 58 48 60 1,054 (Lubbock) Mileage - 305 - 450 - 103 - 99 - 496 - - 320 - 287 - 107 - 261 931 157 209 3,725 $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - Statistics State Grants - - 0 Farebox - - 0 Contract Revenue - - 0 Other Revenue $ - $ - - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 $ - - $ ------
Report Total Revenue ------System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.18 0.45 0.35 0.28 0.42 0.32 0.40 0.26 0.42 0.06 0.31 0.29 0.28 ------Prairie Acres Nursing Home Ridership $ -$ 000000000000 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 (Friona)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - State Grants - - Farebox - - Contract Revenue - - Other Revenue $ - $ - - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ------Total Revenue $ - $ ------System Effectiveness Riders per Mile - NR - NR - NR - NR - -NR - NR - NR - NR - NR NR NR NR NR ------ODESSA DISTRICT $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Foundation for MHMR/ Ridership 30202284026404040404460 410 Permian Basin Mileage 700 451 485 128 333 446 280 281 280 282 580 731 4,977 (Midland) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - State Grants - - 0 Farebox $ - $ - - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue - - 0 ------Total Revenue $ - $ ------Riders per Mile 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.08 System Effectiveness $ 350 $ 87 $ 332 $ 177 $ 499 $ 234 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,231 PHARR DISTRICT Jim Hogg County Ridership 263 110 98 172 143 117 273 117 96 0 0 0 1,389 (Jim Hogg) Mileage 1,230 1,927 1,321 1,764 1,708 1,171 1,921 1,617 1,762 0 0 0 14,421 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - State Grants - - 0 Farebox 174 236 142 350 87 332 177 499 234 0 0 0 2,231 Contract Revenue - - 0 Other Revenue - - 0 Total Revenue $ 174 $ 236 $ 142 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.21 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.07 0.05 NR NR NR 0.10 See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Starr County Rural Ridership 510 554 510 938 778 1,153 1,224 1,135 798 1,209 1,340 1,169 11,318 Transportation (Starr) Mileage 3,488 3,870 3,221 4,607 4,480 3,964 5,398 5,136 4,178 5,264 5,035 6,426 55,067 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 1,132 376 341 712 594 1,043 567 514 412 1,367 1,175 1,138 9,371 Total Revenue $ 1,132 $ 376 $ 341 $ 712 $ 594 $ 1,043 $ 567 $ 514 $ 412 $ 1,367 $ 1,175 $ 1,138 $ 9,371 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.17 0.29 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.18 0.21
Zapata County Ridership 660 771 367 404 882 794 581 537 641 591 841 688 7,757 (Zapata) Mileage 2,026 1,932 1,000 1,248 1,512 1,193 1,402 1,351 1,185 1,465 1,346 1,315 16,975 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 299 386 173 172 226 205 258 258 201 199 215 192 2,784 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 299 $ 386 $ 173 $ 172 $ 226 $ 205 $ 258 $ 258 $ 201 $ 199 $ 215 $ 192 $ 2,784 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.33 0.40 0.37 0.32 0.58 0.67 0.41 0.40 0.54 0.40 0.62 0.52 0.46
SAN ANGELO DISTRICT Menard County Ridership 11129000000000 32 (Menard County)** Mileage 1,6811,9281,373000000000 4,982 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0
2015 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 1,311 1,253 1,036 ------3,600
Texas Total Revenue $ 1,311 $ 1,253 $ 1,036 $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.01 0.01 0.01 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.01
324 232 260 398 266 230 285 260 240 165 141 184 Transit Rio Concho Manor Ridership 2,985 (San Angelo) Mileage 145 126 128 248 107 100 155 117 121 194 107 152 1,700 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Statistics State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 706 507 724 807 520 491 644 588 588 626 554 733 7,488 Total Revenue $ 706 $ 507 $ 724 $ 807 $ 520 $ 491 $ 644 $ 588 $ 588 $ 626 $ 554 $ 733 $ 7,488 Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 2.23 1.84 2.03 1.60 2.49 2.30 1.84 2.22 1.98 0.85 1.32 1.21 1.76 See footnote at the end of Table 99 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 100 2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Transit Rio Concho West Ridership 90 128 148 105 94 96 114 136 82 58 46 96 1,193 (San Angelo) Mileage 56 95 91 79 71 91 87 416 57 69 73 100 1,285 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Statistics State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 352 409 409 378 414 607 478 578 358 464 755 581 5,783 Total Revenue $ 352 $ 409 $ 409 $ 378 $ 414 $ 607 $ 478 $ 578 $ 358 $ 464 $ 755 $ 581 $ 5,783 Report System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.61 1.35 1.63 1.33 1.32 1.05 1.31 0.33 1.44 0.84 0.63 0.96 0.93
SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT Air Force Village Ridership 45 45 45 38 38 38 38 38 36 0 0 0 361 Foundation, Inc. Mileage 549 456 361 73 73 73 73 73 27 0 0 0 1,758 (San Antonio) Revenue Federal Grants$ 759 $ 667 $ 571 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,995 State Grants ------0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 759 $ 667 $ 571 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ 333 $ - $ -$ - $ 3,995 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 1.33 NR NR NR 0.21
Eden Heights, Inc. Ridership 000000000000 0 (New Braunfels)* Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Eden Home for the Aged, Inc. Ridership 6,478 6,698 6,488 6,672 6,548 6,203 6,734 6,064 8,486 8,306 7,413 7,559 83,649 dba Eden Hill Communities Mileage 10,621 11,297 10,038 9,983 10,424 9,949 12,735 11,486 10,730 11,107 10,881 9,394 128,645 (New Braunfels) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 1,498 1,350 907 1,525 1,167 1,725 1,496 2,735 2,476 1,595 1,790 1,990 20,254 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 1,498 $ 1,350 $ 907 $ 1,525 $ 1,167 $ 1,725 $ 1,496 $ 2,735 $ 2,476 $ 1,595 $ 1,790 $ 1,990 $ 20,254 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.61 0.59 0.65 0.67 0.63 0.62 0.53 0.53 0.79 0.75 0.68 0.80 0.65
Greater Randolph Ridership 286 342 268 268 304 318 340 806 433 374 384 406 4,529 Ser. Prog. Inc. Mileage 1,710 2,097 1,646 1,769 1,945 1,885 1,890 2,027 1,944 2,015 1,888 1,889 22,705 (Universal City) Revenue Federal Grants$ 6,975 $ 2,729 $ 4,158 $ 3,055 $ 3,849 $ 3,587 $ 3,659 $ 3,659 $ 2,243 $ 475 $ 900 $ 1,740 $ 37,029 State Grants ------0 Farebox 795 890 1,080 749 865 1,330 1,233 1,223 1,245 1,178 1,030 1,107 12,725 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,539 1,880 2,681 1,432 2,696 1,642 702 3,309 2,329 4,357 4,389 5,056 34,012 Total Revenue $ 11,309 $ 5,499 $ 7,919 $ 5,236 $ 7,410 $ 6,559 $ 5,594 $ 8,191 $ 5,817 $ 6,010 $ 6,319 $ 7,903 $ 83,766 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.40 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.20
Inman Christian Ridership 53 39 53 48 50 32 58 59 60 0 0 0 452 Center (San Antonio) Mileage 378 250 316 322 389 218 414 453 399 0 0 0 3,139 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.15 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.14
Kirby Senior Center Ridership 523 527 407 512 553 520 525 532 482 548 473 435 6,037 (San Antonio) Mileage 11,436 8,444 9,226 11,888 5,772 5,814 12,193 10,270 10,361 12,628 10,586 10,807 119,425 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.05 NR NR NR 0.05
Morningside Ministries Ridership 64 194 101 196 91 106 137 109 65 132 96 117 1,408 (San Antonio) Mileage 236 555 313 593 202 295 401 514 277 561 283 273 4,503 2015 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Texas Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 47,820
Transit Total Revenue $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 47,820 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.27 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.45 0.36 0.34 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.34 0.43 0.31
Presa Community Ridership 660 683 624 773 779 909 931 921 836 0 0 0 7,116 Statistics Service Ctr. (San Antonio) Mileage 8,241 7,790 8,075 7,478 8,491 10,035 9,874 9,934 8,711 0 0 0 78,629 Revenue Federal Grants$ 24,161 $ 26,132 $ 19,767 $ 20,088 $ 21,343 $ 22,830 $ 24,957 $ 24,935 $ 23,054 $ - $ - $ - $ 207,267 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Report Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 6,107 7,859 5,607 6,165 5,171 8,579 8,161 6,560 7,813 - - - 62,022 Total Revenue $ 30,268 $ 33,991 $ 25,374 $ 26,253 $ 26,514 $ 31,409 $ 33,118 $ 31,495 $ 30,867 $ - $ - $ - $ 269,289 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.10 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.09 See footnote at the end of Table 101 102 2015 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015 Texas Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
Transit San Antonio AIDS Ridership 144 127 104 73 90 94 140 156 182 197 179 129 1,615 Foundation (San Antonio) Mileage 1,304 1,457 1,070 1,205 1,155 1,331 1,322 1,672 1,802 1,990 2,135 1,830 18,273 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Statistics State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0
Report Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.09
San Antonio Ridership 225101626417126 73 Lighthouse (San Antonio) Mileage 6 22 10 54 2 73 66 14 38 85 52 3 425 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.33 0.09 0.50 0.19 0.50 0.08 0.03 0.43 0.11 0.20 0.23 2.00 0.17
St. Gregory the Great Ridership 264 286 180 262 251 306 422 402 362 374 464 474 4,047 Parish (San Antonio) Mileage 2,854 2,679 1,932 2,614 2,564 4,283 4,767 4,367 3,888 4,108 5,158 5,114 44,328 Revenue Federal Grants$ 4,725 $ 4,950 $ 3,825 $ 4,050 $ 4,275 $ 6,525 $ 7,650 $ 6,975 $ 6,300 $ 6,525 $ 7,875 $ 7,875 $ 71,550 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 4,725 $ 4,950 $ 3,825 $ 4,050 $ 4,275 $ 6,525 $ 7,650 $ 6,975 $ 6,300 $ 6,525 $ 7,875 $ 7,875 $ 71,550 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 NR NR 0.09
St. Vincent De Paul Ridership 000000000000 0 Catholic Church Mileage 000000000000 0 (San Antonio)* Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total
TYLER DISTRICT Gateway Community Ridership 31 34 44 21 16 10 34 38 40 14 49 44 375 Partners, Inc. Mileage 998 1,270 861 831 491 285 1,145 1,215 1,340 899 952 1,104 11,391 (Jacksonville) Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 615 7,380 Total Revenue $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ 7,380 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.03
NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) Ridership 000000076748111362 406 Mileage 00000003,2003,2203,2023,2253,330 16,177 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,790 $ 9,696 $ 9,843 $ 29,329 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------210 304 157 671 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 30,000 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Salvation Army William Ridership 16 21 21 8 10 11 6 11 9 11 6 13 143 Booth Apts. (Tyler) Mileage 122 196 117 95 60 110 65 140 104 113 107 103 1,332 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 297 147 192 138 124 196 194 183 186 204 141 264 2266 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 204 $ 141 $ 264 $ 2,266 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.11 0.18 0.08 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.13 0.11
Smith County (Tyler) Ridership 048353823336431781281051,078 1,661 Mileage 0 528 385 399 265 382 985 522 958 1,530 1,201 13,281 20,436 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ 1,818 $ 1,150 $ 1,778 $ 1,396 $ 1,173 $ 3,294 $ 2,610 $ 4,518 $ 4,313 $ 3,043 $ 31,142 $ 56,235 2015 State Grants ------0 Farebox - 72 53 57 35 54 96 50 117 192 158 1,649 2,533 Contract Revenue ------0 Texas Other Revenue - 455 288 445 349 293 ------1,830 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,780 $ 1,520 $ 3,390 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,598 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 Transit
University of Texas Health Center - Ridership 0000160160176168168176184168 1,360 Tyler (Tyler) Mileage 00001,2001,7901,5901,8761,5321,6101,9101,562 13,070
Statistics Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 64,000 State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------0 0 0 -
Report Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 64,000 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR 0.13 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 See footnote at the end of Table 103 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 104 2015
Texas ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Transit
WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT Bowie Senior Citizens Ridership 307 347 275 287 325 266 296 277 204 349 357 0 3,290 Statistics Project, Inc. (Bowie) Mileage 1,511 1,220 1,113 1,275 1,605 1,390 1,501 1,512 1,389 1,780 2,234 0 16,530 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0
Report Farebox 363 489 330 457 524 495 380 460 326 498 603 - 4,925 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,085 2,314 2,366 2,208 1,964 2,339 2,391 2,283 2,137 2,169 2,378 - 25,634 Total Revenue $ 3,448 $ 2,803 $ 2,696 $ 2,665 $ 2,488 $ 2,834 $ 2,771 $ 2,743 $ 2,463 $ 2,667 $ 2,981 $ - $ 30,559 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.20 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.15 0.20 0.16 NR 0.20
Young County Senior Cub Ridership 000000000000 0 Center (Olney) Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015
Data Item Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 FY 2015 Total Enhanced Mobility of Ridership 36,474 38,655 34,124 35,343 36,861 34,546 37,369 38,349 37,719 40,023 32,545 32,170 434,178 Seniors & Individuals with Mileage 245,466 257,344 231,911 222,650 226,558 221,429 250,484 254,522 235,045 247,000 252,168 249,474 2,894,051 Disabilities - Revenue Fiscal Year 2015 Federal Grants$ 43,744 $ 50,265 $ 36,776 $ 35,768 $ 45,880 $ 96,827 $ 56,871 $ 58,024 $ 53,811 $ 33,006 $ 36,500 $ 63,809 $ 611,281 State Grants 000000000000 - Farebox 15,966 18,339 13,773 11,823 11,233 14,286 16,060 17,306 16,915 16,819 18,224 17,453 188,197 Contract Revenue 000000000000 - Other Revenue 591,377 617,788 556,386 562,074 570,129 548,460 646,853 607,575 617,753 614,805 579,538 594,906 7,107,644 Total Revenue $ 651,087 $ 686,392 $ 606,935 $ 609,665 $ 627,242 $ 659,573 $ 719,784 $ 682,905 $ 688,479 $ 664,630 $ 634,262 $ 676,168 $ 7,907,122 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.15 * Indicates data not reported. **No longer an agency # Purchase of Service (POS) JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC)
(SECTION 5316)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 105 SUMMARY JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM (Section 5316)
The Section 5316 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5316) supports public transportation to and from urban and suburban workplaces. The Job Access and Reverse Commute Program, more commonly called JARC, seeks to provide public transportation services to connect welfare recipients and low income persons to places of employment and related support activities. These support activities include training, job preparation, interviews, and daycare.
On August 10, 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was enacted. With this enactment, JARC became a formula program to the states and large urbanized areas. On May 1, 2007, Circular 9050.1 (JARC Program Guidance and Application Instructions) went into effect. This circular issues guidance on the administration of the JARC program under 49 USC 5316, including application instructions.
TxDOT administers JARC to address the unique transportation challenges faced by welfare recipients and low income persons seeking to get and keep jobs. All JARC projects are selected in a competitive process, which is held annually for small urbanized and rural services throughout the state. Since FY 2007, JARC projects have been represented in the annual Texas Transit Statistics Report.
Also, state agencies, local government authorities, public transportation agencies, private nonprofit, and for-profit transportation organizations are eligible to receive the (JARC) Section 5316 funds administered by TxDOT. Eligible expenditures on capital, planning activities, and marketing projects are 80% reimbursable through the JARC Program. The administrative costs and operating expenses are eligible for a federal reimbursement rate of 50 percent for JARC projects.
As noted in the introduction of this report, due to the inclusion of JARC data in other program reports, monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time. The data shown on the following tables summarize JARC’s operational and financial statistics.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5316 Grant Program are located at the end of this section. The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated JARC/Section 5316 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, were added to the 5307 and 5311 programs.
106 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 30: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) Section 5316 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 4,216,417 3,302,917 -21.67 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 214,890 175,047 -18.54 Expenses $11,548,587 $7,073,634 -38.75 Total Revenue Vehicles 90 27 -70.00 Total Revenue $12,362,905 $7,375,982 -40.34
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Trips 2,221,040 1,853,236 -16.56
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 2014 2015
Operating Expense Per Vehicle Operating Expense Per $2.74 $2.14 $5.20 $3.82 Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip
Operating Expense Per Vehicle $53.74 $40.41 Revenue Hour
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 0.53 0.56 Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 10.34 10.59 Vehicle Revenue Hour
Notes: "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. *Safety Data and Safety Indicators for FY 2014 and 2015 are excluded from this report. **Due to the Section 5316 agencies not collecting actual vehicle miles and hours, the deadhead ratios are not applicable. ***See Tables 28 and Table 29 for details.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 107 108 2015 TABLE 31: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) SERVICE EFFICIENCY, COST AND SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Texas - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Transit JARC RECIPIENTS Operating Expense per Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip Vehicle Revenue Hour Vehicle Revenue Mile
Statistics MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin NR NR NR NR 11.87 11.87 0.59 0.59 Corpus Christi $ 1.90 $ 0.80 $ 12.33 5.17 3.09 3.09 0.15 0.15 Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Report El Paso 0.00 NR 0.00 NR 2.13 2.13 0.11 0.11 San Antonio 1.67 1.86 1.19 1.33 28.00 28.00 1.40 1.40 Urbanized Area Abilene $ 1.31 $ 0.52 $ 12.16 $ 4.81 2.15 2.15 0.11 0.11 Brownsville 5.03 15.70 6.59 20.57 15.27 15.27 0.76 0.76 Lubbock NR NR 7.95 0.00 NR NR NR NR McAllen 0.81 1.82 1.89 4.26 8.56 8.56 0.43 0.43 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Midland-Odessa NR NR 68.01 NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo NR NR 6.95 NR NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque NR NR 0.23 22.45 NR NR NR NR Victoria 6.95 2.89 13.34 5.54 10.42 10.42 0.52 0.52 Waco 1.99 2.22 6.38 7.08 6.25 6.25 0.31 0.31 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 1.96 $ 9.37 $ 18.13 $ 86.52 2.17 2.17 0.11 0.11 Capital Area Rural Transportation System NR NR 26.42 NR NR NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 6.21 20.19 27.14 88.26 4.58 4.58 0.23 0.23 Colorado Valley Transit NR NR 6.35 20.00 NR NR NR NR East Texas Council of Governments NR NR 7.90 6.66 NR NR NR NR El Paso County NR NR 6.16 6.33 NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 2.47 2.03 43.00 35.40 1.15 1.15 0.06 0.06 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR NR 1.37 2.99 NR NR NR NR Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 1.54 0.46 3.17 0.95 9.71 9.71 0.49 0.49 Heart of Texas Council of Governments NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR Kleberg County Human Services 0.15 0.48 2.39 7.46 1.30 1.30 0.06 0.06 Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Service NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Padre Island, City of NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 2.69 4.37 14.74 23.92 3.65 3.65 0.18 0.18 Southwest Area Regional Transit District NR NR 0.00 NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living $ 0.67 $ 1.74 $ 8.94 $ 31.41 2.64 NR 0.07 0.06 Houston Kiddie Express 1.33 NR 112.55 NR 2.40 NR 0.01 NR LULAC - Project Amistad 0.00 NR 0.00 NR 1.08 0.65 0.11 0.10 Mounting Horizons NR NR 0.00 NR NR NR NR NR NDMJ, LLC $ 2.40 2.12 29.66 28.39 1.13 1.12 0.08 0.07 Average for Reporting Systems $ 2.17 $ 4.44 $ 15.34 $ 19.50 6.19 6.59 0.30 0.32
Notes: NR = Not Reported TABLE 32: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) OPERATIONAL DATA - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
JARC RECIPIENTS Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Revenue Miles Vehicle Revenue Hours MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin 106,343 106,581 179,189 179,581 8,959 8,979 Corpus Christi 9,685 23,376 62,787 151,528 3,139 7,576 Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR El Paso 44,617 52,500 419,825 493,994 20,991 24,700 San Antonio 1,060,708 1,014,118 757,604 722,336 37,880 36,216 Urbanized Area Abilene 11,683 14,082 108,620 130,924 5,431 6,546 Brownsville 63,947 20,497 83,771 26,854 4,189 1,343 Lubbock 17,668 26,056 NR NR NR NR McAllen 295,397 132,162 690,244 308,817 34,512 15,441 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR Midland-Odessa 7,270 NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo 3,547 3,831 NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-LaMarque 4,540 2,215 NR NR NR NR Victoria 60,725 67,512 116,511 129,543 5,826 6,477 Waco 38,309 36,431 122,524 116,514 6,126 5,826 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments 29,755 1,347 274,851 12,443 13,743 622 Capital Area Rural Transportation System 1,807 NR NR NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 22,254 8,073 97,263 35,283 4,863 1,764 Colorado Valley Transit 47,567 13,211 NR NR NR NR East Texas Council of Governments 27,393 8,003 NR NR NR NR El Paso County 62,986 45,920 NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 10,617 11,350 184,971 197,751 9,249 9,888 Galveston County Rural Transit District 97,136 94,180 NR NR NR NR Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 111,276 96,509 229,297 198,870 11,465 9,944 Heart of Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR NR NR Kleberg County Human Services 14,727 14,254 227,098 219,806 11,355 10,990
2015 Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR Senior Center Resources and Public Transit, Inc. NR NR NR NR NR NR South Padre Island, City of NR NR NR NR NR NR
Texas South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 11,731 11,092 64,266 60,760 3,213 3,038 Southwest Area Regional Transit District 15,457 25,114 NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR
Transit Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living 2,645 1,428 35,574 22,625 1,002 NR Houston Kiddie Express 2,550 NR 215,998 NR 1,062 NR LULAC - Project Amistad 25,671 7,539 231,721 77,370 23,680 11,520 Statistics Mounting Horizons 3,779 NR NR NR NR NR NDMJ, LLC 9,250 15,855 114,303 212,748 8,205 14,177 Total 2,221,040 1,853,236 4,216,417 3,297,746 214,890 175,046
Report Notes: NR = Not Reported *Data included in other program tables as applicable (MTA, Urbanized Area, Rural Transit Districts and 5310) 109 110
2015 TABLE 33: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) FINANCIAL RESOURCES -
Texas Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
Transit JARC RECIPIENTS Total Revenue (1) Operating Expense MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 Austin NR NR NR NR Statistics Corpus Christi $ 119,372 $ 120,825 $ 119,372 $ 120,825 Dallas 883,945 674,102 883,945 674,102 El Paso NR NR NR NR San Antonio 1,262,462 1,346,002 1,262,462 1,346,002 Report Urbanized Area Abilene $ 142,100 $ 67,757 $ 142,100 $ 67,757 Brownsville 421,700 421,700 421,700 421,700 Lubbock 140,418 0 140,418 NR McAllen 557,784 563,534 557,784 563,534 McKinney 532,470 NR 532,470 NR Midland-Odessa 494,449 12,867 494,449 12,867 San Angelo 24,657 NR 24,657 NR Sherman-Denison 784,194 NR 784,194 NR Texas City-La Marque 1,022 49,719 1,022 49,719 Victoria 810,143 373,997 810,143 373,997 Waco 244,275 258,106 244,275 258,106 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 539,563 $ 116,543 $ 539,563 $ 116,543 Capital Area Rural Transportation System 47,743 NR 47,743 NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 604,012 712,513 604,012 712,513 Colorado Valley Transit 302,033 264,250 302,033 264,250 East Texas Council of Governments 216,360 53,328 216,360 53,328 El Paso County 387,848 290,880 387,848 290,880 Fort Bend County 456,503 401,749 456,503 401,749 Galveston County Rural Transit District 193,747 281,810 193,747 281,810 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 353,107 91,229 353,107 91,229 Heart of Texas Council of Governments 32,356 45,175 32,356 45,175 Kleberg County Human Services 35,197 106,324 35,197 106,324 Panhandle Community Services NR 13,807 NR 13,807 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Service 30,373 47,155 30,373 47,155 South Padre Island, City of 18,821 265,268 18,821 265,268 South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 172,867 NR 172,867 NR Southwest Area Regional Transit District NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System 1,154,019 NR 1,154,019 NR Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living $ 34,144 $ 77,184 $ 23,657 $ 44,855 Houston Kiddie Express 174,000 NR 287,000 NR LULAC - Project Amistad 889,378 236,395 NR NR Mounting Horizons NR NR NR NR NDMJ, LLC 301,843 483,763 274,390 450,139 Total $ 12,362,905 $ 7,375,982 $ 11,548,587 $ 7,073,634
Notes: (1) Includes Passenger Fares NR = Not Reported N/A - Not Applicable NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF)
(SECTION 5317)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 111 SUMMARY NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM (Section 5317)
The Section 5317 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5317) helps individuals with disabilities by providing both new public transportation and public transportation alternatives beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), including transportation to and from jobs and employment-support services.
The New Freedom Program is authorized under the provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, (SAFETEA–LU), enacted on August 10, 2005. The New Freedom Program grew out of the New Freedom Initiative introduced by the Administration under Executive Order 13217, “Community-Based Alternatives for Individuals with Disabilities,” on June 18, 2001. The New Freedom Program intent is to fill the gaps between human service and public transportation services previously available and to facilitate the integration of individuals with disabilities into the workforce and the community.
On May 1, 2007, Circular FTA Circular 9045.1 (New Freedom Program Guidance and Application Instructions) went into effect. This circular issues guidance on the administration of the New Freedom program under 49 USC 5317, including application instructions.
TxDOT administers the FTA Section 5317 New Freedom Program as a formula program. All the New Freedom projects are selected from a competitive process held annually for small urbanized and rural services throughout the state.
Also state agencies, local government authorities, public transportation agencies, private nonprofit and for-profit transportation organizations are eligible to receive the Section 5317 (NF) funds administered by TxDOT. The federal funds may be used to reimburse up to 80 percent of eligible capital expenditures and may be used to reimburse up to 90 percent of incremental costs related to compliance with the Clean Air Act or the ADA. Administrative costs associated with the project as well as net operating expenses are eligible for a federal reimbursement rate of 50 percent.
As noted in the introduction of this report, due to the inclusion of New Freedom data into other program reports, monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time. The data shown on the following tables summarize New Freedom’s operational and financial statistics.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5317 Grant Program are located at the end of this section. The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated New Freedom/Section 5317 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, was added to the 5310 program.
112 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 34: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) Section 5317 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) 2014 2015 (14-15) Vehicle Revenue Miles 1,371,844 700,486 -48.94 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 66,869 44,300 -33.75 Expenses $3,879,365 $2,664,191 -31.32 Total Revenue Vehicles 32 18 -43.75 Total Revenue $4,178,532 $2,934,300 -29.78
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2014 2015 (14-15) Unlinked Passenger Trips 95,666 62,796 -34.36
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 2014 2015
Operating Expense Per Vehicle Operating Expense Per $2.83 $3.80 $40.55 $42.43 Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip
Operating Expense Per Vehicle $58.01 $60.14 Revenue Hour
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2014 2015 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 0.07 0.09 Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 1.43 1.42 Vehicle Revenue Hour
Notes: "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. *No data collected at this time. **Fare revenue is not broken out separately, it is included in the total revenue. Due to the Section 5317 agencies not collecting actual vehicle miles and hours, the deadhead ratios are not applicable.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 113 114 2015
Texas TABLE 35: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) SERVICE EFFICIENCY, COST AND SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Transit
NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS Operating Expense per Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Unlinked Passenger Trip per
Statistics Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip Vehicle Revenue Hour Vehicle Revenue Mile MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 Corpus Christi NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Dallas NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR Report Denton County NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR San Antonio $ 1.69 $ 2.35 $ 17.89 $ 23.74 1.89 1.98 0.09 0.10 Urbanized Area Brownsville NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Laredo NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Longview NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Lubbock NR NR $ 12.00 NR NR NR NR NR McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque NR NR 14.96 65.47 NR NR NR NR Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 0.72 $ 0.79 $ 13.28 $ 14.49 1.09 1.09 0.05 NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 4.64 NR 41.71 NR 2.22 NR 0.11 NR East Texas Council of Governments NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR Fort Bend County 2.06 2.56 17.09 21.25 2.41 2.41 0.12 0.12 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR New Freedom Program Agencies Goliad County $ 2.53 NR $ 26.16 NR 1.59 NR 0.10 NR Houston Kiddie Express 1.30 NR $ 73.93 NR 3.19 NR 0.02 NR LULAC - Project Amistad 0.00 NR 0.00 NR 0.78 0.66 0.06 0.05 NDMJ, LLC 2.16 $ 3.22 30.03 34.20 1.38 1.28 0.07 0.09 Average for Reporting Systems $ 1.89 $ 2.23 $ 24.70 $ 31.83 1.82 1.48 0.08 0.09
Notes: NR = Not Reported NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 849 9,254 5,593 18,165 10,440 2015 85 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1,226 1,814 8,031 5,352 18,416 11,218 20,727 2014 Vehicle Revenue Hours* NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 16,976 2015 244,790 141,787 185,081 111,852
NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1,700 29,870 2014 226,310 224,358 399,150 160,612 222,800 107,044 Vehicle Revenue Miles* NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 925 4,780 11,960 13,339 18,333 13,459 2015 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 189 969 4,333 3,916 2,889 14,401 28,674 12,225 15,190 12,880 2014 95,666 62,796 1,371,844 700,486 66,869 44,301 66,869 700,486 1,371,844 95,666 62,796 Unlinked Passenger Trips TABLE 36: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) OPERATIONAL DATA - Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 DATA - Fiscal OPERATIONAL - (NF) PROGRAM FREEDOM TABLE 36: NEW NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS NEW FREEDOM Urbanized Area Districts Transit Rural New Freedom Program Agencies Total MTAs Notes: Reported = Not NR *Data included in other program tables as applicable (MTA, Urbanized Area, Rural Transit Districts and 5310) LULAC - Project Amistad LLC NDMJ, Corpus Christi Christi Corpus Dallas Denton County San Antonio Brownsville Laredo Longview Lubbock McKinney San Angelo Sherman-Denison Marque City-La Texas East Texas Council of Governments Central Texas Rural Transit District Transit Rural Texas Central Ark-Tex Council of Governments Fort Bend County Galveston County Rural Transit District Transit Rural County Galveston Houston Kiddie Express South Plains Community Action Association Texoma Area Paratransit System Paratransit Area Texoma Goliad County
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 115 116 2015 TABLE 37: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) FINANCIAL RESOURCES - Texas Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 Transit NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS Total Revenue (1) Operating Expense MTAs 2014 2015 2014 2015
Statistics Corpus Christi $ 5,044 $ 6,441 $ 5,044 $ 6,441 Dallas 192,575 202,997 192,575 202,997 Denton County NR 8,434 NR 8,434
Report San Antonio 271,727 435,267 271,727 435,267 Urbanized Area Brownsville $ 18,415 $ 453,924 $ 18,415 $ 453,924 Laredo 280,048 201,267 280,048 201,267 Longview 46,069 58,846 46,069 58,846 Lubbock 11,631 369 11,631 369 McKinney 216,667 NR 216,667 NR San Angelo 11,041 90,743 11,041 90,743 Sherman-Denison 165,406 NR 165,406 NR Texas City-LaMarque 64,819 312,953 64,819 312,953 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 162,290 $ 13,403 $ 162,290 $ 13,403 Central Texas Rural Transit District 7,883 70,000 7,883 70,000 East Texas Council of Governments 107,373 NR 107,373 NR Fort Bend County 220,140 285,993 220,140 285,993 Galveston County Rural Transit District 489,969 NR 489,969 NR South Plains Community Action Association NR 67,324 NR 67,324 Texoma Area Paratransit System 382,073 NR 382,073 NR New Freedom Program Agencies Goliad County $ 3,400 NR $ 75,567 NR Houston Kiddie Express 174,000 NR 289,500 NR LULAC - Project Amistad 403,959 $ 227,948 NR NR NDMJ, LLC 944,003 498,391 861,128 $ 456,230 Total $ 4,178,532 $ 2,934,300 $ 3,879,365 $ 2,664,191
Notes: (1) Includes Passenger Fares NR = Not Reported Definitions
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 117 DEFINITIONS FOR THE ANNUAL TEXAS TRANSIT STATISTICS REPORT
Note: Definitions are based on the FTA National Transit Database Reporting Manual and the Texas Administrative Code.
ACTUAL VEHICLE HOURS: The hours that vehicles travel while in revenue service (actual vehicle revenue hours (VRH)) plus deadhead hours. Actual vehicle hours exclude hours for charter service, school bus service, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing.
ACTUAL VEHICLE MILES: The miles that vehicles travel while in revenue service (actual vehicle revenue miles (VRM)) plus deadhead miles. Actual vehicle miles exclude miles for charter services, school bus service, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing.
ALLOCATION: (1) Between FTA and TxDOT an administrative distribution of funds among the states, done for funds that do not have statutory distribution formulas: (2) Between TxDOT and grant recipients a preliminary distribution of grant funds representing the maximum amount to be made available to a subrecipient during the fiscal year, subject to the subrecipient’s completion of and compliance with all application requirements, rules, and regulations applicable to the specific funding program.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 (ARRA): Commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, is an economic stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress in February 2009.
APPORTIONMENT: A term that refers to a statutorily prescribed division or assignment of funds. An apportionment is based on prescribed formulas in the law and consists of dividing authorized obligation authority for a specific program among the states.
AVERAGE MILES BETWEEN REVENUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES: The sum of all revenue vehicle miles divided by the aggregated sum of mechanical system failures.
COMMISSION: The Texas Transportation Commission.
COORDINATED COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (CCTA): A transit authority organized under Chapter 460 of the Texas Transportation Code that follows county boundaries and collects a transit-dedicated sales tax.
DEADHEAD: The operating time (miles and hours) used to move a transit vehicle before revenue service begins and after revenue service ends. When transit vehicles are deadheading, they operate closed-door and are not available to passengers.
DEADHEAD RATIO: The calculation of actual vehicle miles/hours divided by the vehicle revenue miles/hours.
118 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report DEPARTMENT: The Texas Department of Transportation.
EXPENSE, TOTAL OPERATING: The total operating cost incurred by a transit agency through its transit operation. It includes the following ten expense objects: labor, fringe benefits, service, materials & supplies, utilities, causalities/liabilities cost, taxes, purchased transportation, miscellaneous expenses and expense transfers. These expense objects are summed by the following four functions: vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, non- vehicle maintenance and general administration for the total agency expense.
FAREBOX REVENUE: The total passenger fares earned during the report year for directly operated service, regardless of whether they are used during the report year to pay for capital and/or operating expenses. These are fares collected and/or paid for through tickets, passes, tokens, and other fare payment methods.
FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO: The farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses.
FATALITY: A transit-caused death confirmed within 30 days of the transit incident, which occurs when there is a collision, derailment, fire, evacuation, security incident or when a vehicle leaves the roadway.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION: An agency of the United States Department of Transportation.
FUNDS, FEDERAL: Financial assistance from the federal government to assist in paying the capital and operating costs of providing transit services.
FUNDS, LOCAL: Financial assistance from local government (below the state level) to help cover the capital and operating costs of providing transit services.
FUNDS, OTHER: Any miscellaneous funds. Examples are funds dedicated to a local government agency for transportation rather than specifically for transit, advertising revenues, and private donations.
FUNDS, STATE: Financial assistance obtained from the state government to assist in paying the capital and operating costs of providing transit revenue services.
INCIDENT: An event involving a transit vehicle or occurring on transit-related property, involving one or more fatalities, injuries, property damages, or certain crimes.
INJURY: Any physical damage or harm to a person as a result of an incident that requires immediate medical attention away from the scene. (Two or more injuries per incident are reported as Major).
JARC: Job Access and Reverse Commute. A public transportation project relating to the development and maintenance of transportation services designed to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to their employment; or for any income level when transit is to a suburban destination.
MAJOR INCIDENTS: Any event involving the operation of a transit system if, as a result,
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 119 one or more of the following occurs: an individual dies either at the time of the event or within 30 days of the event; two or more individuals suffer bodily damage as a result of the event requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene; a collision, personal casualty, or fire causes property damage in excess of $25,000; and/or a transit vehicle moving passengers in service is evacuated due to a serious life safety hazard that constitutes an imminent threat.
MAJOR MECHANICAL SYSTEM FAILURES: A failure of some element of the revenue vehicle that prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip because actual movement is limited or because of safety concerns.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA): Agencies funded under the formula Section 5307 urbanized area program which also meet the requirements of serving an area with a population over 200,000 people, having a dedicated taxing authority, and organized according to specific state statutes.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO): A public organization that is designated by the governor to provide planning transportation services for an urbanized area of at least 50,000 population.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY (MAP-21): Federal authorizing legislation, replaced SAFETEA-LU. A funding and authorization bill to govern United States federal surface transportation spending. It was passed by Congress on June 29, 2012, and President Barack Obama signed it on July 6. Eliminated/merged some programs administered by FTA. MAP-21 became effective on October 1, 2012.
NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE (NTD): Established by Congress to be the Nation’s primary source for information and statistics on the transit systems of the United States. The NTD reporting system evolved from the transit industry-initiated Project FARE (Uniform Financial Accounting and Reporting Elements).
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM: Financial assistance from §5317 of the Federal Transit Act. This is a formula program to encourage services and facility improvements to address the transportation needs of persons with disabilities that go beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds may be used for associated capital and operating costs
NON-ARSON FIRE: Uncontrolled combustion made evident by flame and/or smoke that requires suppression by equipment or personnel.
NON-MAJOR INCIDENT: Existence of one or more of the following conditions: injuries requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene for one person, property damage equal to or exceeding $7,500 (but less than $25,000), and all non-arson fires not qualifying as Major Incidents.
NONURBANIZED AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5311 nonurbanized area program, providing coverage for areas outside the urbanized areas established by the US Census Bureau.
120 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
OTHER MECHANICAL SYSTEM FAILURES: A failure of some element of the revenue vehicle that because of local policy prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip even though the vehicle is physically able to continue in revenue service.
PASSENGER FARES: The revenue earned from carrying passengers in regularly scheduled and demand response (DR) services. Passenger fares include base fare, zone or distance premiums, express service premiums, extra cost transfers, and quantity purchase discounts applicable to the passenger’s ride and special transit fares.
PLANNING ACTIVITY PROGRAM: Grants awarded under Section 5303 to MPOs or under Section 5304 to TxDOT for transit planning and research activities.
PTN (acronym): Texas Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division.
PURCHASE OF SERVICE: Transportation service provided to a public transit agency or governmental unit from a public or private transportation provider based on a written contract.
REVENUE, OTHER OPERATING: Revenue derived from (1) organizations paying money in lieu of passenger fares, etc.; (2) transit-related services such as station and vehicle concessions and advertising; and (3) non-transit related services, such as rental of vehicles and properties, investment income, and non-park-and-ride parking revenue.
REVENUE, TOTAL OPERATING: The total revenue earned by a transit agency through its transit operations. It includes passenger fares, advertising, financial assistance for transit operations (not capital expenditures) such as federal, state and local government.
RURAL AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5311 nonurbanized area program, providing coverage for eligible areas. See also NONURBANIZED AREA PROGRAM.
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP): The funds allocated to the States to undertake research, training, technical assistance and other support services to meet the needs of transit agencies in nonurbanized areas.
SAFETY INCIDENTS: Any event involving the operation of a transit system if, as a result, one or more of the following occurs: an individual dies either at the time of the event or within 30 days of the event; one or more persons suffer bodily damage as a result of the event requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene; and/or property damage in excess of $25,000.
SALES TAX: (DEDICATED FUNDS): Any funds raised specifically for transit purposes and which are dedicated at their source (e.g., sales taxes) rather than through an allocation from the pool of general funds.
SENIORS & INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5310 program, providing transportation service to seniors and/or
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 121 individuals with disabilities. Agencies may be non-profit, or a local public body if there is not a readily available non-profit agency in the area. Services may be provided by the grantee agency or purchased from another agency (typically from a nonurbanized Section 5311 agency).
STATE FISCAL YEAR (SFY): The state accounting period of 12 months that begins on September 1 of each calendar year and ends on August 31 of the following calendar year.
TRANSIT VEHICLE AND PROPERTY DAMAGES: The dollar amount required to repair or replace all vehicles (transit and non-transit) and all property/ facilities (tracks, signals, and buildings) damaged during an incident to a state equivalent to that which existed prior to the incident: major Incidents (exceed $25,000) and non-major incidents (exceed $7,500 but less than $25,000).
TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: The body of state regulations that are published and have the force of law. Find transit at Title 43 - Transportation, Part 1 – Texas Department of Transportation, Chapter 31 – Public Transportation.
UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIP: A one-way trip carrying a person from a single origin to a single destination. Passengers are counted each time they board a vehicle no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination.
URBANIZED AREA: An area defined by the U. S. Census Bureau that includes: one or more incorporated cities, villages, towns (central place), and the adjacent densely settled surrounding territory (urban fringe) that together have a minimum of 50,000 persons. The urban fringe generally consists of contiguous territory having a density of at least 1,000 persons per square mile. Urbanized areas do not conform to congressional districts or any other political boundaries.
URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5307 urbanized area program. Both metropolitan transit authorities (MTAs) and smaller urbanized area fall in the Section 5307 urbanized area program, but are generally treated separately. In this report, “urbanized areas” fall between 50,000 and 200,000 in population or do not meet the State requirements to be classified as an MTA.
VEHICLE REVENUE HOURS: The hours that vehicles are scheduled to or actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue hours include layover/recovery time; but exclude deadhead, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing, as well as school bus and charter services.
VEHICLE REVENUE MILES: The miles that vehicles are scheduled to or actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue miles include layover/recovery time; but exclude deadhead, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing, as well as school bus and charter services.
VEHICLES, NUMBER OF: The number of revenue vehicles available to meet the annual maximum service requirements. Vehicles available for maximum service include spares, out-of-service vehicles, and vehicles in or awaiting maintenance, but exclude vehicles awaiting sale and emergency contingency vehicles.
122 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report
WELFARE RECIPIENT: An individual who has received assistance under a state or tribal program funded under the Social Security Act, Title IV, Part A, at any time during the previous three year period, or as otherwise defined by 49 USC §5316, the Job Access and Reverse Commute program.
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 123 This page intentionally left blank.
124 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Contact list current as of this publishing.
(Most current contact information is available at www.txdot.gov)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 125 Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs)
AUSTIN CORPUS CHRISTI
Capital Corpus Christi Metropolitan Regional Transportation Authority Transportation Authority Transit Name: Capital Metro Transit Name: The B
Linda Watson Scott Neeley President/CEO President/CEO 2910 East Fifth Street 5658 Bear Lane Austin, TX 78702-4895 Corpus Christi, TX 78405-2933 (512) 389-7504 (361) 289-2712 (512) 369-6235 Fax (361) 289-3005 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.capmetro.org http://www.ccrta.org
DALLAS EL PASO
Dallas Area Rapid Transit City of El Paso Transit Name: DART Transit Name: Sun Metro
Gary Thomas Jay Banasiak President and CEO General Manager P.O. Box 660163 700-A San Francisco Street Dallas, TX 75266-0163 El Paso, TX 79901-1018 (214) 749-3278 (915) 534-5811 (214) 749-3655 Fax (915) 541-6405 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.dart.org http://www.elpasotexas.gov/sunmetro
FORT WORTH HOUSTON
Fort Worth Metropolitan Transportation Authority Transportation Authority of Harris County Transit Name: The T Transit Name: Houston METRO
Dick Ruddell Thomas C. Lambert President Executive Director President and CEO 1600 E. Lancaster P.O. Box 61429 Fort Worth, TX 76102-6720 Houston, TX 77208-1429 (817) 215-8700 (713) 615-6409 (817) 215-8709 Fax (713) 739-9537 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.the-t.com http://www.ridemetro.org
126 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs)
SAN ANTONIO COORDINATED COUNTY VIA Metropolitan TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Transportation Authority
Transit Name: VIA Denton County
Transportation Authority Jeffery C. Arndt Transit Name: DCTA President and CEO
P.O. Box 12489 James Witt San Antonio, TX 78212-2489 President (210) 362-2050 1660 South Stemmons, Ste. 250 (210) 362-2570 Fax Lewisville, TX 75067 [email protected] (972) 221-4600 http://www.viainfo.net (972) 221-4601
[email protected] http://www.dcta.net
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 127 Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
City of Abilene City of Amarillo Transit Name: Citylink Transit Name: Amarillo Transit System
James Oliver Judy Phelps 1189 S Second Street P.O. Box 1971 Abilene TX 79602-1411 Amarillo TX 79105-1971 325-676-6403 806-378-6842 325-676-6407 Fax 806-378-6846 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.abilenetx.com/CityLink http://www.ci.amarillo.tx.us
City of Arlington City of Beaumont Transit Name: HANDITRAN Transit Name: BMT – Beaumont Transit System Bob Johnson P.O. Box 90231 William Munson Arlington TX 76004-0231 550 Milam Street 817-459-5390 Beaumont TX 77701-4405 817-275-2286 Fax 409-835-7895 [email protected] 409-832-3609 Fax http://www.ci.arlington.tx.us/handitran [email protected] http://www.beaumonttransit.com
City of Brownsville Cities of College Station/Bryan Transit Name: BUS – Transit Name: Brazos Transit District – Brownsville Urban System The District
Norma Zamora Stefani Jimenez 755 International Blvd. 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Brownsville TX 78520 Bryan TX 77803-5167 956-541-4881 979-778-0607 956-544-7603 Fax 979-778-3606 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cob.us/bus/index.asp http://www.btd.org
128 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
City of Conroe City of Grand Prairie Transit Name: Conroe Connection Transit Name: The Grand Connection
Shawn Johnson Anthony Flowers P.O. Box 3066 P. O. Box 534045 Conroe TX 77305 Grand Prairie TX 75053-4045 936-522-3526 972-237-8545 936-756-6162 Fax 972-237-8544 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cityofconroe.org/departments/tra http://www.gptx.org/TransportationServices/T nsit ransit.aspx
City of Harlingen Cities of Killeen/ Transit Name: Valley Metro Copperas Cove/Harker Heights Transit Name: Hill Country Transit District – Tom Logan The HOP 510 S. Pleasantview Drive Weslaco TX 78501-4705 Robert Ator 956-969-5761 4515 W. U.S. 190 956-969-8176 Fax Belton TX 76513 [email protected] 254-933-3700 http://www.myharlingen.us 254-933-3724 Fax [email protected] http://www.takethehop.com
Cities of Lake Jackson/Angleton City of Laredo Transit Name: Connect Transit Transit Name: El Metro
James Hollis Claudia San Miguel 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway 1301 Farragut St Texas City TX 77591 3rd Floor West 409-944-4446 Laredo TX 78040 409-948-6824 Fax 956-795-2288 Ext 234 [email protected] 956-795-2258 Fax http://www.gcmhmr.com [email protected] http://www.elmetrotransit.com/
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 129 Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
City of Longview City of Lubbock Transit Name: Longview Transit Transit Name: CITIBUS
Scott Lewis Maurice Pearl P.O. Box 1952 P. O. Box 2000 Longview TX 75605 Lubbock TX 79457 903-753-2287 806-712-2000 903-753-2291 Fax 806-767-2012 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.longviewtransit.com/index.php http://www.citibus.com
City of McAllen City of McKinney Transit Name: McAllen Express Transit Transit Name: Texoma Area Paratransit System (TAPS) Mario Delgado 1501 W. Hwy 83 Suite 100 Tim Patton McAllen TX 78501 6104 Texoma Parkway 956-688-3500 Sherman TX 75090 956-688-3505 Fax 903-868-9182 [email protected] 903-815-7704 Fax http://www.mcallen.net [email protected] http://www.tapsbus.com
City of Mesquite Cities of Midland/Odessa Transit Name: Mesquite Transportation for Transit Name: EZ Rider Elderly and Disabled Alonda Massey Valery Bradley 8007 E Hwy 80 P. O. Box 850137 Odessa TX 79765 Mesquite TX 75185-0137 432-561-8051 972-329-8329 432-561-8056 Fax 972-329-8340 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.ez-rider.org http://www.cityofmesquite.com/mted
130 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
Northeast City of Port Arthur Transportation Service Transit Name: PAT – Port Arthur Transit Transit Name: NETS (North Richland Hills & nine surrounding communities in Tarrant Colleen Russell County) P. O. Box 1089 Port Arthur TX 77641-1089 Courtney Cartwright 409-983-8767 249 W. Thornhill Road 409-983-8609 Fax North Richland Hills TX 76115 [email protected] 817-336-8714 http://www.beaumonttransit.com/Port_Arthur 817-427-6016 Fax _Service.htm [email protected]
City of San Angelo City of San Marcos Transit Name: Concho Valley Transit District - Transit Name: San Marcos Transit-CARTS TRANSA Edna Johnson John Austin Stokes 2010 E. 6th Street (Shipping Address) P.O. Box 60050 Austin TX 78702 San Angelo TX 76906-0050 P.O. Box 6050 (Mailing Address) 325-947-8729 Austin TX 78762-6050 325-947-8286 Fax 512-481-1011 [email protected] 512-478-1110 Fax http://www.cvcog.org/cvcog/trans_rural.html [email protected] http://ridecarts.com
Cities City of Temple of Sherman/Denison/Howe Transit Name: Hill Country Transit District – The HOP Transit Name:
Texoma Area Paratransit System (TAPS) Robert Ator
4515 W. U.S. 190 Tim Patton Belton TX 76513 6104 Texoma Parkway 254-933-3700 Sherman TX 75090 254-933-3724 Fax 903-868-9182 [email protected] 903-815-7704 Fax http://www.takethehop.com [email protected]
http://www.tapsbus.com
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 131 Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
City of Texarkana City of Texas City/La Marque Transit Name: Texarkana Urban Transit Transit Name: Connect Transit District/T-Line James Hollis Owetta Walton-Bost 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway 1402 Texas Blvd. Texas City TX 77591 Texarkana TX 75501-5014 409-944-4446 903-794-0435 409-948-1411 Fax 903-794-0437 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.gulfcoastcenter.org/connect_tran http://www.t-linebus.org sportation.aspx
City of Tyler City of Victoria Transit Name: Tyler Transit System Transit Name: Victoria Transit
Guillermo Garcia Lisa Cortinas 210 E. Oakwood Street 120 S. Main St, Ste 210 Tyler TX 75702 Victoria TX 77904 903-533-8057 361-578-1587 903-531-9418 Fax 361-578-8865 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cityoftyler.org/Departments/TylerT http://www.gcrpc.org/trans_victoria_transit.ht ransit m
City of Waco City of Wichita Falls Transit Name: Waco Transit System Transit Name: Falls Transit
John Hendrickson Dennis Burket 301 S. 8th St., Suite 100 P.O. Box 1431 Waco TX 76701-1417 Wichita Falls, TX 76307-1431 254-750-1900 940-761-7451 254-750-1901 Fax 940-761-7419 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.waco-texas.com http://www.cwftx.net
132 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Urbanized Area Systems (5307)
The Woodlands Township Transit Name: Brazos Transit District
Margie Lucas 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Bryan TX 77803-5167 979-778-4494 979-778-3606 Fax [email protected] http://www.btd.org
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 133 Rural Transit Districts (5311)
Alamo Area Council of Ark-Tex Council of Governments Governments Transit Name: ATCOG-TRAX Transit Name: ART- Alamo Regional Transit Owetta Walton-Bost William Moseley P.O. Box 5307 8700 Tesoro Dr. Suite 700 Texarkana TX 75505-5307 San Antonio TX 78217-6218 903-832-8636 210-362-5303 903-832-2672 Fax 210-225-5937 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.t-linebus.org http://www.aacog.com/index.asp
Aspermont Small Business Bee Community Action Agency Development Center, Inc. Transit Name: Bee Rural Public Transportation
Transit Name: Double Mountain Coach RTD (Note: Bee Community Action Agency’s service
area was merged into the Rural Economic Ricky Ake Assistance League, effective: June 1, 2014) 9660 U.S. 83 South
Aspermont TX 79502 940-989-2239 940-989-3445 Fax [email protected]
Brazos Transit District Capital Area Rural Transit Name: Brazos Transit District Transportation System – The District Transit Name: CARTS
Stefani Jimenez David Marsh 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway 2010 E. 6th Street (Shipping Address) Bryan TX 77803-5167 Austin TX 78702 979-778-0607 P.O. Box 6050 (Mailing Address) 979-778-3606 Fax Austin TX 78762-6050 [email protected] 512-481-1011 http://www.btd.org 512-478-1110 Fax [email protected] http://ridecarts.com
134 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Rural Transit Districts (5311)
Central Texas Rural Transit Cleburne, City of District Transit Name: CLETRANS – Cleburne Transit Name: CARR - City and Rural Rides Transportation System
J. R. Salazar Grady Easdon P.O. Box 712 206 N. Border Coleman, TX 76834-0712 Cleburne, TX 76031 325-625-4491 817-641-1800 325-625-5044 Fax 817-645-6636 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cityandruralrides.com http://www.ci.cleburne.tx.us
Colorado Valley Transit, Inc. Community Action Council of Transit Name: Colorado Valley Transit South Texas Transit Name: Rainbow Lines Vastene Olier P.O. Box 940 (Note: Community Action Council of South Columbus, TX 78934-0940 Texas’ service area was merged into the Rural 979-732-6281 Ext. 16 Economic Assistance League and Lower Rio 979-732-6283 Fax Grande Valley Development Council, effective: [email protected] June 1, 2015) http://www.gotransit.org
Community Services, Inc. Concho Valley Rural Transit Transit Name: Community Transit Service District (CVRTD) Transit Name: Thunderbird Transit Daniel Edwards P.O. Box 612 John Austin Stokes Corsicana, TX 75151-0612 P.O. Box 60050 903-875-3721 San Angelo, TX 76906-0050 903-872-0561 Fax 325-947-8729 [email protected] 325-947-8286 Fax [email protected] http://www.cvcog.org
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 135 Rural Transit Districts (5311)
Del Rio, City of East Texas Council of Transit Name: None Governments Transit Name: East Texas Rural Transit Elsa Reyes 109 W. Broadway John Hedrick Del Rio, TX 78840 3800 Stone Road 830-703-5324 Kilgore, TX 75662 830-774-8697 Fax 903-984-8641 [email protected] 903-983-1440 Fax http://www.cityofdelrio.com [email protected] http://www.etcog.org
El Paso County Fort Bend County Rural Transit Transit Name: El Paso County Rural Transit District Transit Name: None Bob Geyer 800 E. Overland, Ste 208 Paulette Shelton El Paso, TX 79901-2419 12550 Emily Court, Ste 400 915-834-8242 Sugar Land, TX 77478 915-532-4563 Fax 281-243-6701 [email protected] 281-243-6710 Fax http://www.epcounty.com [email protected] http://www.fbctransit.org
Galveston County Rural Transit Golden Crescent Regional District, City of Galveston Planning Commission Transit Name: Island Transit Transit Name: R Transit
Mike Worthy Lisa Cortinas 3115 Market St 120 S. Main St, Suite 210 Galveston TX 77550-1315 Victoria, TX 77903 409-797-3904 361-578-1587 409-797-3901 Fax 361-578-8865 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.islandtransit.net/main.htm http://www.gcrpc.org/gcrpc_transit2013.htm
136 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Rural Transit Districts (5311)
Gulf Coast Center Heart of Texas Council of Transit Name: Connect Transit Governments/Rural Transportation District James Hollis Transit Name: HOTRTD – Heart of Texas Rural 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway Transportation District Texas City, TX 77591
409-944-4446 Ronald “Rep” Pledger 409-948-6824 Fax 1514 S. New Road [email protected] Waco, TX 76711 http://www.gcmhmr.com/connect_transportat 254-292-1895 ion.aspx 254-759-2492 Fax [email protected] http://www.hotcog.org/pages/transportation. aspx
Hill Country Transit District Kleberg County Human Services Transit Name: Transit Name: Paisano Express The HOP Margie Del Bosque Carole Warlick 720 E. Lee 906 S. High St Kingsville, TX 78363-4606 San Saba, TX 76877-0217 361-595-8572 325-372-4677 361-595-1352 Fax 325-372-6110 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.takethehop.com
Lower Rio Grande Valley McLennan County Rural Transit Development Council District Transit Name: Valley Metro Transit Name: McLennan County Rural Transit District Tom Logan 510 S. Pleasantview Dr. John Hendrickson Weslaco, TX 78596 301 S. 8th Street, Suite 100 956-682-3481 Waco, TX 76701 956-631-4670 254-750-1900 [email protected] 254-750-1901 Fax http://www.lrgvdc.org/riotransit.html [email protected] http://www.co.mclennan.tx.us/595/McLenna n-County-Rural-Transit-District
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 137 Rural Transit Districts (5311)
Panhandle Community Services, Public Transit Services Inc. Transit Name: Public Transit Services Transit Name: Panhandle Transit District Reta Brooks Lylene Springer 7611 Highway 180 East (physical) P.O. Box 32150 P.O. Box 1055 (mailing address) Amarillo, TX 79120-2150 Mineral Wells, TX 76068-1055 806-372-2531 Ext 256 940-328-1391 806-372-4351 Fax 940-328-1392 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.publictransitservices.org
Rolling Plains Management Rural Economic Assistance Corporation League, Inc. Transit Name: SHARP Lines Rural Public Transit Name: REAL Transit Transportation Gloria Ramos Lezlie Carroll 301 Lucero Street P.O. Box 490 Alice, TX 78332-5848 Crowell, TX 79227-0490 361-668-3158 1-800-633-0852 361-664-9695 Fax 940-684-1571 [email protected] 940-684-1853 Fax http://realinc.org/transportation.php [email protected] http://www.rollingplains.org
Senior Center Resources and Services Program for Aging Public Transit, Inc Needs, Inc. Transit Name: The Connection Public Transit Transit Name: SPAN, Inc. System Deborah Robertson Danny Allembaugh 1800 Malone 4912 Lee Street Denton, TX 76201-1746 Greenville, TX 75401-5032 940-382-2224 903-454-1444 (ext. 101) 940-383-8433 Fax 903-454-4150 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.span-transit.org http://www.scrpt.org
138 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report Rural Transit Districts (5311)
South East Texas Regional South Padre Island, City of Planning Commission Transit Name: The Wave Transit Name: South East Texas Transit Jesse Arriaga D’Juana Davillier P.O. Box 3410 2210 Eastex Freeway South Padre Island, TX 78597-3410 Beaumont, TX 77703-4929 956-761-3245 409-899-8444 Ext 254 956-761-1659 Fax 409-729-7391 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://myspi.org/ http://www.setrpc.org
South Plains Community Action Southwest Area Regional Transit Association District Transit Name: SPARTAN Transit Name: Southwest Transit
Brian Baker Sarah Hidalgo-Cook Box 610 – 411 Austin Street 713 East Main Street Levelland, TX 79336-0610 Uvalde, TX 78801 806-894-3800 830-278-4155 806-894-2759 Fax 830-486-0364 Fax [email protected] [email protected] https://spartanpublictransit.com/ http://www.paseoswart.org/
STAR Transit Texoma Area Paratransit System Transit Name: STAR Transit (formerly Transit Name: TAPS Public Transit Kaufman Area Rural Transportation) Tim Patton Omega A. Hawkins 6104 Texoma Parkway P.O. Box 703 Sherman TX 75090 Terrell, TX 75160-0703 903-868-9182 972-563-1422 903-815-7704 Fax 972-563-1491 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.tapsbus.com
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 139 Rural Transit Districts (5311)
The Transit System, Inc. Webb County Community Action Transit Name: The Transit System Agency Transit Name: El Aguila Rural Transportation Derinda Long P.O. Box 332 Robert Martinez Glen Rose, TX 76043-0332 4801 Daugherty Avenue 254-897-2964 Laredo, TX 78044-3881 254-897-7922 Fax 956-722-6100 [email protected] 956-726-4524 Fax [email protected] http://www.webbcounty.com/CommunityActio nAgency/ElAguila/default.aspx
West Texas Opportunities, Inc. Transit Name: WTO - ITRAX
Jenny Gibson P.O. Box 1308 Lamesa, TX 79331-1308 806-872-8354 806-872-5816 Fax [email protected] http://www.gowto.org
140 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report CONTACT INFORMATION FOR ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS & INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310)
For the Large Urbanized Areas in Texas (urbanized population 200,000 and above), 49 USC Section 5310 requires a local selection process to name a designated recipient. These designated recipients are then responsible for administration of the Section 5310 program in their respective urbanized areas, including administration of a project selection process. In some cases, the local preference has been for TxDOT to act as the designated recipient for a limited time. If authorized by the commission, TxDOT will provide this service for a specified period.
The following are the current designated recipients for the Section 5310 program in Texas’ large urbanized areas:
Urbanized Area Designated Recipient (Contact Information)
Austin TxDOT (portion of FY 2015 funds only) Capital Area Metropolitan Transportation Authority (balance of FY 2015 funds and subsequent years) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 118)
Brownsville City of Brownsville (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 120)
Conroe-The Woodlands TxDOT (FY 2015 funds only) City of Conroe (FY 2015 funds and subsequent years) 300 West Davis/P.O. Box 3066, Conroe, Texas 77305 Phone (936) 522-3030, www.CityofConroe.org
Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 118)
Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington Three co-designated recipients, based upon coverage: Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Fort Worth Transportation Authority, and North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 118 for DART and The T; for NCTCOG – Michael Morris, Director of Transportation, 616 Six Flags Drive, Arlington, TX 76011, Phone (817) 695-9241, email [email protected], website http://www.nctcog.org/trans)
Denton-Lewisville NCTCOG (See address under Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington)
2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report 141 Urbanized Area Designated Recipient (Contact Information) (continued)
El Paso El Paso MPO - (Michael Medina, Executive Director, 10767 Gateway Blvd. West, Suite 605, El Paso, TX 79935, Phone (915) 591-9735, email [email protected], web http://www.elpasompo.org)
Houston TxDOT (portion of FY 2015 funds only) Houston Metro (FY 2015 funds and subsequent years) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 118)
Killeen Hill Country Transit District (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 121)
Laredo TxDOT (FY 2014 funds only) City of Laredo (FY 2015 funds and subsequent years) (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 121)
Lubbock City of Lubbock/Citibus (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 122)
McAllen Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council (See Nonurbanized Transit Systems listing on page 122)
San Antonio VÍA Metropolitan Transit (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 118)
For small urbanized and rural areas of Texas, TxDOT is the designated recipient. A complete listing of the current transit agencies operating as Section 5310 providers in those areas would be too cumbersome to list in this report. Listed below are two methods to obtain a current listing.
To obtain a list of addresses of these agencies, please contact the Texas Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas, 78701- 2483 or call (512) 374-5230.
Or you can view the current transit agencies by going to TxDOT’s website.
www.txdot.gov
142 2015 Texas Transit Statistics Report