DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Nasworthy Master Plan and Implementation Strategy San Angelo, Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lake Nasworthy Master Plan and Implementation Strategy San Angelo, Texas Prepared For: City of San Angelo | November 5, 2013 PARCPeter A. Ravella Consulting, LLC Acknowledgments San Angelo City Council Mayor Alvin New (frmr.) Paul Alexander, District 1 (frmr.) Dwain Morrison, District 2 (frmr.) Johnny Silvas, District 3 Fred Adams, District 4 (frmr.) Kendall Hirschfeld, District 5 (frmr.) Charlotte Farmer, District 6 Mayor Dwain Morrison Rodney Fleming, District 1 Marty Self, District 2 Johnny Silvas, District 3 Don Vardeman, District 4 H.R. Winkie Wardlaw, District 5 Charlotte Farmer, District 6 San Angelo City Staff Daniel Valenzuela - City Manager Rick Weise - Assistant City Manager Michael Dane - Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer AJ Fawver - Interim Director, Development Services Robert Scheeman - Interim Director, Economic Development Shane Kelton - Operations Director Carl White - Director, Parks and Recreation Mike Smith - GIS Manager Al Torres - Building Official Ricky Dickson - Water Utilities Director Lake Nasworthy Institutional Stakeholders San Angelo Regional Airport San Angelo State University - Greg Pecina Executive Director for Business Services Goodfellow Air Force Base Stakeholder Groups Spring Creek Marina The Lake Nasworthy HOA Texas Parks and Wildlife Upper Colorado River Authority Concho Cruises Lakeshore Village Concho Valley Archery Association Lake Nasworthy Master Plan and Implementation Strategy | San Angelo, Texas | November 2013 iii Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 II. Public Participation .................................................................................................................... 3 A. Input and Outreach Process .............................................................................................. 3 B. Stakeholders Involved ....................................................................................................... 3 C. Summary of Stakeholder Input .......................................................................................... 3 III. Assessment of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 7 A. Map of Study Area and Description ................................................................................. 7 B. Natural Structures ............................................................................................................ 7 C. Major Existing Uses/Users ............................................................................................... 7 D. Relation to Prior Studies ................................................................................................... 8 E. Resource Management and Environmental Issues .......................................................... 9 IV. Market Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 11 A. Market Area Demographics ............................................................................................ 11 B. Demand Potential by Sports Participation ...................................................................... 21 C. Demand Potential by Propensity ..................................................................................... 25 D. Tourism ............................................................................................................................ 26 V. Master Plan ............................................................................................................................. 37 A. Lake Nasworthy Area Master Plan ................................................................................. 37 B. Market Potential by Character Zone ............................................................................... 39 C. Integrated Parks/Trails and Connectivity ........................................................................ 46 VI. Implementation Report ............................................................................................................ 53 A. Potential Partnership Structures .................................................................................... 53 B. Funding/Financing Strategy ............................................................................................ 53 C. Catalytic Projects ............................................................................................................ 53 D. Regulatory Environmental Issues ................................................................................... 62 E. Roadways and Utilities ................................................................................................... 64 F. Trails Funding .................................................................................................................. 64 Appendix Market Study Appendix ......................................................................................................................... 67 Lake Nasworthy Master Plan and Implementation Strategy | San Angelo, Texas | November 2013 v Executive Summary ake Nasworthy, a unique recreation destination for In the initial process of studying the lake and as the team visitors and locals alike, is currently widely used yet also engaged the public, these general clusters of activity Lholds potential for further enhancement and investment. emerged as describing the most prevalent activities around It is not only a regional recreational lake; it also touches a the lake. With that information, the consultant team studied several residential neighborhoods. The complexity of Lake the lake based on these five distinct character zones. These Nasworthy’s history and the surrounding ownership include areas provide structure and logic to the Master Plan. various public holdings, ground leases, and private owners, The location of the character zones and their current and which necessitate that the Lake be linked through a common anticipated activity are explained in detail in this plan. vision and strategy. Each character zone includes a unique focus, but together This Master Plan is a comprehensive summary of the work they create the vibrancy that makes Lake Nasworthy an done on behalf of the City of San Angelo to identify issues admired local amenity and regional draw. The popularity of and opportunities for a Lake Nasworthy redevelopment Gun Club Hill Road as a walking and jogging destination is strategy. This initiative was driven by input from a good metaphor for the latent demand for more structured stakeholders to create a market-based plan to promote facilities for activity around the lake. There is more demand context sensitive development and preservation of the lake for a safe walking and jogging destination near the lake than and its surrounding areas. the street can safely accommodate. Proposed expansion The vision and strategy reflected in this plan reflects of activity around the lake is supported by market trends, the intersection of a market study to understand the true increased activity due to the oil and gas industry employees potential of the lake with its surrounding context, as well seeking recreational opportunities, and increased regional and national tourism resulting from marketing by the San as the insight of scores of stakeholders representing public Angelo Convention and Visitors Bureau. institutions, neighborhoods, business owners, recreation advocates, city leaders, and other key opinion leaders. The City Council and San Angelo Planning staff seek an What emerged early in the process is that Lake Nasworthy outcomes-focused strategy. The desired outcome of this represents an amazing quilt of unique physical areas and initiative is to encourage activity and development to ensure multiple organized activities, many of which have already the long term viability of Lake Nasworthy as a recreation claimed regional and national recognition. This fact is destination in west Texas. This outcome can be achieved important as this plan reflects a means to continue the by identifying existing tourism and recreation activities momentum of the lake rather than an effort to impose a and enhancing those offerings, thereby creating economic contrived concept that ignores the authentic character of development opportunities. This report encourages a the lake and its community. comprehensive policy and approach that includes potential “catalytic projects” -- or appropriate development in This Master Plan provides a substantial amount of key locations -- that will provide a necessary influx of technical analysis. That analysis is provided, however, to economic activity. At the same time, the approach calls for establish the capacity for implementing its findings and development that fits the context of what already exists at recommendations. We express those recommendations the lake in order to create sustained investment momentum. within a series of character zones that emerged during the planning process from existing and likely geographically- Lake Nasworthy has great potential to fulfill the vision of based activities. Those character zones include: the city and community as an economic and recreational centerpiece for San Angelo and the surrounding area. The • Action Sports master plan provides the road map to reach that objective; • Harbor Village however, several lake management issues beyond the • Nature/Education
Recommended publications
  • Concho River & Upper Colorado River Basins

    Concho River & Upper Colorado River Basins

    CONCHO RIVER & UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASINS Brush Control Feasibility Study Prepared By The: UPPER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY In Cooperation with TEXAS STATE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION BOARD and TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY December 2000 Cover Photograph: Rocky Creek located in Irion County, Texas following restoration though a comprehensive brush control program. Photo courtesy of United States Natural Resources Conservation Services. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation of this report is the result of action by many state, federal and local entities and of many individuals dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of water resources within the State of Texas. This report is one of several funded by the Legislature of Texas to be implemented by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board during FYE2000. We commend the Texas Legislature for its’ extraordinary insight and boldness in moving ahead with planning that will be critical to water supply provision in future decades. In particular, the efforts of State Representative Robert Junell are especially recognized for his vision in coordinating the initial feasibility study conducted on the North Concho River and his support for studies of additional watershed basins in Texas. The following individuals are recognized as having made substantial contributions to this study and preparation of this report: Arlan Youngblood Ben Wilde Bill Tullos Billy Williams Bob Buckley Bob Jennings Bob Northcutt Brent Murphy C. Wade Clifton C.J. Robinson Carl Schlinke David Wilson Don Davis Eddy Spurgin Edwin Garner Gary Askins Tommy Morrison Woody Anderson Gary Grogan Howard Morrison J.P. Bach James Moore Jessie Whitlow Jimmy Sterling Joe Dean Weatherby Joe Funk John Anderson John Walker Johnny Oswald Keith Collom Kevin Spreen Kevin Wagner Lad Lithicum Lisa Barker Marjorie Mathis Max S.
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
  • New Mexico Three Rivers, New Mexico

    New Mexico Three Rivers, New Mexico

    Rock Art Studies: A Bibliographic Database Page 1 North America_United States_New Mexico_Three Rivers Petroglyph Site (42 Citations) Compiled by Leigh Marymor 02/07/16_Pt. Richmond CA Apostolides, Alex Fire), Rattlesnake Wells, Whiskey Flat, Nevada. Petroglyph National Monument, Abo, Three Rivers, New Mexico. 1975 Hueco Tanks, Texas. Sand Island, Myton, Newspaper Rock, "The Rock Art of Three Rivers" in New Mexico Maila Mammoth, Henry's Fork Creek, Rochester Creek, Magazine, Vol. 53(11):14-17, Santa Fe, New McConkie Ranch, Arches National Park, Dinosaur National Mexico. Monument, The Moab Man, The Bear, Thompson Springs, Black Dragon, Utah. Four Corners. Southwest. United States. North America. Popular guide book. Tourist. Visitor. THREE RIVERS, NEW MEXICO. SOUTHWEST. United Jornada-Mogollon rock art. States. North America. LoC, LMRAA. WELLM. Crimmins, Martin L. Apostolides, Alex 1925 1982 "Petroglyphs of the Jumanos" in El Palacio, Vol. "The Masks of Three Rivers" in Utah Rock Art 19(2-3):44, Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe, Papers Presented @ the First Annual Symposium New Mexico. 1981, Vol. XII:9-12, Utah Rock Art Research Association, Salt Lake City, Utah. SENATOR FALL'S RANCH, CARRIZOZO, THREE RIVERS, NEW MEXICO. SOUTHWEST. United States. THREE RIVERS, CARRIZOZO, NEW MEXICO. North America. JORNADA MOGOLLON ROCK ART. SOUTHWEST. United States. North America. SITE DESCRIPTION - A BRIEF MENTION. DISCUSSION OF MOTIF(S) FOUND AT THE SITE. RANMAB MASK MOTIFS. SETTING: ROCK FEATURE INCORPORATION. Jornada-Mogollon. LMRAA. Crimmins, Martin L. 1926 Barnes, F.A. "Petroglyphs, Pictographs and the Diffusion of 1982 Culture" in Art and Archaeology, Vol. 21(6- Canyon Country. Prehistoric Rock Art Another 3):297-298, The Archaeological Institute of Canyon Country Guide Book, (14):304 pgs, America, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • San Angelo Project History

    San Angelo Project History

    San Angelo Project Jennifer E. Zuniga Bureau of Reclamation 1999 Table of Contents The San Angelo Project.........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................7 Post Construction History ................................................12 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................16 Project Benefits and Use of Project Water ...................................16 Conclusion............................................................17 About the Author .............................................................17 Bibliography ................................................................18 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................18 Government Documents .................................................18 Articles...............................................................18 Books ................................................................18 Index ......................................................................19 1 The San Angelo Project The San Angelo Project is a multipurpose project in the Concho River Basin of west- central Texas. In a region historically known for intermittent droughts and floods, the project provides protection against both weather extremes.
  • Long-Term Trends in Streamflow from Semiarid Rangelands

    Long-Term Trends in Streamflow from Semiarid Rangelands

    Global Change Biology (2008) 14, 1676–1689, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01578.x Long-term trends in streamflow from semiarid rangelands: uncovering drivers of change BRADFORD P. WILCOX*, YUN HUANG* andJOHN W. WALKERw *Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA, wTexas AgriLIFE Research, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA Abstract In the last 100 years or so, desertification, degradation, and woody plant encroachment have altered huge tracts of semiarid rangelands. It is expected that the changes thus brought about significantly affect water balance in these regions; and in fact, at the headwater-catchment and smaller scales, such effects are reasonably well documented. For larger scales, however, there is surprisingly little documentation of hydrological change. In this paper, we evaluate the extent to which streamflow from large rangeland watersheds in central Texas has changed concurrent with the dramatic shifts in vegeta- tion cover (transition from pristine prairie to degraded grassland to woodland/savanna) that have taken place during the last century. Our study focused on the three watersheds that supply the major tributaries of the Concho River – those of the North Concho (3279 km2), the Middle Concho (5398 km2), and the South Concho (1070 km2). Using data from the period of record (1926–2005), we found that annual streamflow for the North Concho decreased by about 70% between 1960 and 2005. Not only did we find no downtrend in precipitation that might explain this reduced flow, we found no corre- sponding change in annual streamflow for the other two watersheds (which have more karst parent material).
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions

    TPWD Strategic Planning Regions

    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
  • Water Rights Detail Table

    Water Rights Detail Table

    Data Dictionary - Water Rights Database Field Name Description WRNo Water Right Number; identifier for water rights. WRType Water Right Type; any of the following: 1 = Application/Permit 2 = Claim 3 = Certified Filing 4 = Returned or Withdrawn 5 = Dismissed/Rejected 6 = Certificate of Adjudication 8 = Temporary Permit 9 = Contract/Contractual Permit/Agreement WRSeq Water Right Sequence Number; numbers the lines of data in each water right. AppNo Indicates the Application number associated with the Permit number (water right number). Use this number to request a Central Records Permit file. WRIssueDate Indicates the date the water right was issued by the TCEQ or predecessors. AmendmentLetter Unique identifier for amendments to water rights. CancelledStatusCode Indicates water right status; any of the following: R = Dismissed/Rejected/Combined T = Totally Cancelled A = Adjudicated P = Partially Cancelled Blank = Current Owner Name Indicates the water right owner name. OwnerTypeCode Indicates type of owner; any of the following: 1 = Individual 7 = Individual Unverified 2 = Organization 8 = Organization Unverified 3 = Et Ux 9 = Estate or Trust Unverified 4 = Et Al 10 = Archive 5 = Estate or Trust 11 = Et Ux Unverified 6 = Et Vir 12 = Et Al Unverified DivAmountValue Indicates the amount of water authorized for diversion per year, in acre-feet. WMCode Indicates the Watermaster Area in which the water right is located, as follows: CR = Concho River ST = South Texas RG = Rio Grande blank = not in a Watermaster Area UseCode Indicates the appropriated use of the water right; any of the following: 1 = Municipal/Domestic 7 = Recreation 2 = Industrial 8 = Other 3 = Irrigation 9 = Recharge 4 = Mining 11 = Domestic & Livestock Only 5 = Hydroelectric 13 = Storage 6 = Navigation Priority Date Indicates the original date of the original use of the water allocated under that water right.
  • Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas

    Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas

    Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas: . An Archaeological and Archival Investigation of a u.s. Army Subpost, and Evidence Supporting Its Use by the Military and "Buffalo Soldiers 11 Maureen Brown, Jose E. Zapata, and Bruce K. Moses with contributions by Anne A. Fox, C. Britt Bousman, I. Waymle Cox, and Cynthia L. Tennis Sponsored by: San Angelo District Texas Department of Transportation Archaeological Survey Report, No. 267 Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio 1998 Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas: An Archaeological and Archival Investigation of a U.S. Army Subpost, and Evidence Supporting Its Use by the Military and "Buffalo Soldiers" Maureen Brown, Jose E. Zapata, and Bruce K. Moses with contributions by Anne A. Fox, C. Britt Bousman, L Waynne Cox, and Cynthia L. Tennis Robert J. Hard and C. Britt Bousman Principal Investigators Texas Antiquities Permit No. 1866 Archaeological Survey Report, No. 267 Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio ©copyright 1998 The following information is provided in accordance with the General Rules of Practice and Procedure, Chapter 41.11 (Investigative Reports), Texas Antiquities Committee: 1. Type of investigation: Archaeological and archival mitigation 2. Project name: Camp Elizabeth 3. County: Sterling 4. Principal investigator: Robert J. Hard and C. Britt Bousman 5. Name and location of sponsoring agency: Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas 78701 6. Texas Antiquities Permit No.: 1866 7. Published by the Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 N. Loop 1604 W., San Antonio, Texas 78249-0658, 1998 A list of publications offered by the Center for Archaeological Research is available.
  • Distributional Surveys of Freshwater Bivalves in Texas: Progress Report for 1997

    Distributional Surveys of Freshwater Bivalves in Texas: Progress Report for 1997

    DISTRIBUTIONAL SURVEYS OF FRESHWATER BIVALVES IN TEXAS: PROGRESS REPORT FOR 1997 by Robert G. Howells MANAGEMENT DATA SERIES No. 147 1998 Texas Parks and Wildlife Depar1ment Inland Fisheries Division 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many biologists and technicians with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's Inland Fisheries Research and Management offices assisted with SW"Veys and collectons of freshwater mussels. Thanks also go to Pam Balcer (Kerrville, Texas) and Sue Martin (San Angelo; Texas) who assised extensively with collection of specimens and Jesse Todd (Dallas, Texas), Dr. Charles Mather (University of Arts and Science, Chickasha, Oklahoma) and J.A.M. Bergmann (Boerne, Texas) who provided specimens and field data. ABSTRACT During 1997, over 1,500 unionid specimens were docwnented from 87 locations (I 06 sample sites) statewide in Texas where specimens were either directly surveyed by the Heart of the Hills Research Station (HOH) staff or were sent to HOH by volunteers. Living specimens or recently-dead shells were found at 59% of the locations, 14% yielded only Jong-dead or subfossil shells, 24% produced no unionids or their remains, and 3% could not be accessed due to private lands or other local site problems which precluded sampling. Jn conjunction with previous field-survey work J 992-1996, unionids appear completely or almost completely extirpated from the Pedernales, Blanco, San Marcos, Llano, Medina, upper Guadalupe, upper Sulphur, areas of the San Jacinto, and much of the San Saba rivers. Sections of other river systems and many tributaries have also experienced major unionid population losses in recent years.
  • Two of Our Own Honored at Statewide Conference

    Two of Our Own Honored at Statewide Conference

    VOL. 17 SPRING, 2019 NO. 1 TRAIL RIDE EVENT SUCCESS By Linda Ashton Another successful trail ride is in the books. Postponed because of weather, the rescheduled Monarch Ride took place April 6-7 and brought in about eighty-five riders from all over Texas. All the camping sites with electricity in North Concho and Bald Eagle Campgrounds were full as were and most of the primitive sites of both campgrounds. Saturday afternoon activities were on schedule with Ranger Bonnie leading a nature hike and Gaylon and Sherry Hall providing wagon rides with their beautiful mules. At four o’clock the auction was ready for shoppers. At six o’clock Dorothy Douthit of Fiddle Fire Catering was ready to feed all the hungry folks a chicken-fried steak dinner with cobbler for dessert. Dorothy then entertained the with fiddle music. Fifty-eight folks, more than ever before, signed up for the Poker Run. Thanks to Gail Metcalf and her crew, the Poker Run ran smoothly and everyone had a great time. Sunday was a beautiful day for a long ride. After delicious breakfast by Fiddle Fire, riders were ready to hit the trails. The long ride led by Larry McMurtry and Linda Ashton along with outriders Shawn and Bull had twenty-four riders. The short and gaited riders lead by Judy Hight and Cindy Middleton, along with outriders Dennis and Houston, had thirty-four riders. Chairpersons Judy Hight and Linda Ashton would like to thank all who helped make this event a success. Registration: Sharon Olson, Sarah Howell, Brownie Roberts.
  • Comparison of Professional Positions and Duties Between State Park Peace Officers and Game Wardens for Texas Parks and Wildlife

    Comparison of Professional Positions and Duties Between State Park Peace Officers and Game Wardens for Texas Parks and Wildlife

    COMPARISON OF PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS AND DUTIES BETWEEN STATE PARK PEACE OFFICERS AND GAME WARDENS FOR TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT by Richard G. Powe, B. B. A. Accounting; B. S. Geog Resource & Enviro Stdies A directed research project submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Geography with a Major in Geog Resource & Enviro Stdies May 2021 Committee Chair Directed Research Advisor: Dr. Andrew Sansom Committee Member: Dr. Jennifer Devine Texas State University Graduate Program in Geography i COPYRIGHT by Richard G. Powe 2021 ii FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Richard G. Powe, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. iii DEDICATION The devotion and sense of appreciation goes out to those people who have assisted during the pursuit of this academic goal and endeavor. Most know who they are, yet the specific person would be the author’s father, Richard E. Powe, who is the first to help in the initial education about nature and how to catch a fish, many years in the past, only to look and find the path found here, and now.
  • United States Geological Survey

    United States Geological Survey

    DEFARTM KUT OF THE 1STEK1OK BULLETIN OK THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 19O S F, GEOGRAPHY, 28 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR GAZETTEEK OF TEXAS BY HENRY G-A-NNETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 CONTENTS Page. Area .................................................................... 11 Topography and drainage..... ............................................ 12 Climate.................................................................. 12 Forests ...............................................................'... 13 Exploration and settlement............................................... 13 Population..............'................................................. 14 Industries ............................................................... 16 Lands and surveys........................................................ 17 Railroads................................................................. 17 The gazetteer............................................................. 18 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PF,ATE I. Map of Texas ................................................ At end. ry (A, Mean annual temperature.......:............................ 12 \B, Mean annual rainfall ........................................ 12 -ryj (A, Magnetic declination ........................................ 12 I B, Wooded areas............................................... 12 Density of population in 1850 ................................ 14 B, Density of population in 1860