DOCSLIB.ORG

Weekly Update May 3, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weekly Update May 3, 2013 WWEEEEKKLLYY UUPPDDAATTEE WSTA would like to recognize our 2013 GOLD and SILVER Annual Partners: GOLD – Finley Engineering Company, Inc. SILVER - Interstate Telcom Consulting, Inc., Kiesling Associates LLP, Metaswitch Networks, and National Information Solutions Cooperative, Inc. (NISC) Thank you National Information Solutions Cooperative and HickoryTech for your sponsorship of WSTA electronic publications! Associate members, click here to join them! Weekly Update May 3, 2013 Legislative and Political UW System reserves projected to grow another $150 million Money in reserve funds at the University of Wisconsin System is projected to grow by another $150 million by the end of June, according to UW figures. Lawmakers lambasted UW officials after learning a week and a half ago the UW System had more than $1 billion in reserve as of June 2012, of which $648 million was unrestricted. The total reserve will climb to nearly $1.2 billion by the end of this June, when the fiscal year ends, UW officials told lawmakers Wednesday. The figures university officials gave to legislators did not say how much of that money would be restricted. The total increase over the year would be $150 million, or 14%. "It continues to show that the UW System has plenty of resources," said Rep. Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield). "Let's just put a pause on tuition, and let's put a pause on more (taxpayer money)." UW System spokesman David Giroux cautioned that the figure was "a very high-level, very preliminary projection" and that it wasn't possible to know whether the cash balance would grow or shrink by the time the fiscal year ends in June. Kooyenga is part of the Assembly's "CPA caucus" that asked questions earlier this year that led to a review by the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau and Legislative Audit Bureau that uncovered the reserve. He also sits on the budget-writing Joint Finance Committee, which will decide in the coming weeks how much money to put toward the UW System. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are united in freezing tuition after students faced 5.5% annual increases in recent years. Letter from Rep. Petryk: Joint Finance Committee work continues The second Executive Session of the powerful Joint Finance Committee took place on Tuesday, April 30th. It was another successful day of debate and votes on various budget provisions contained within the Governor’s budget bill, Assembly Bill 40. The Committee remains focused on controlling government spending with the goal of not raising taxes on Wisconsin’s taxpayers, altering the way our state government is run through reviewing the Wisconsin tax code and our education system, and reinvesting in our state’s future through programs for our most vulnerable citizens while creating a business-friendly climate for better job creation. Regulatory and Industry Tom Wheeler to be nominated for FCC head President Barack Obama will nominate venture capitalist Tom Wheeler to head the Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday, a White House official told POLITICO. Pending confirmation, the agency’s soon-to-be senior Democrat, Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, will serve as its acting leader, the official added. Wheeler, 67, is a longtime Obama loyalist. During Obama’s first presidential campaign, Wheeler and his wife, Carol, spent six weeks in Iowa, where they worked the phones and knocked on doors for the candidate. Wheeler also raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Obama’s two presidential campaigns. He told C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb, “The six weeks that I spent in Iowa are going to rank right up there as the best six weeks of my life.” The White House official said of the nomination: “Tom Wheeler is an experienced leader in the communications technology field who shares the president’s commitment to protecting consumers, promoting innovation, enhancing competition and encouraging investment.” FCC Chairman Nominee Wheeler in His Own Words Former telecom trade association chief and current venture capitalist Tom Wheeler, nominated yesterday to replace Julius Genachowski as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, has been hailed for his industry expertise. In a blog that he has written regularly since joining Core Capital Partners several years ago, Wheeler offers a few hints at where he might stand on important telecom policy issues. I scanned through these and pulled out a few excerpts to share with readers. CenturyLink's Beal to carriers: Transform or perish CenturyLink CTO Matt Beal delivered a blunt challenge to his fellow telco service providers at GENBAND's Perspectives13 conference in Orlando. They can transform the way they do business to the point that Alexander Graham Bell would be unable to recognize it, or perish at the hands of those inside or outside the industry who will. "Our customers are voting with their feet, and they're going to go to that company that provides this transformative experience," Beal said during an afternoon keynote. The transformative experience, he emphasized, means recognizing that humans are "a visual species" who want more from their carriers than a voice connection; all services must surround broadband and be convergent and able to be changed at a consumer's whim. Broadband and Internet Can a Buffalo Help Sell DSL Service? Frontier has a new marketing campaign, centered around a “6 feet tall, 8 feet long and 2,000 pound” Buffalo named Frank. The tier 2 telco with extensive rural markets says the campaign will begin immediately and will include broadcast, print, digital and social media, billboards, truck wraps, and more. Frank’s first mission is to push Frontier’s $19.95 DSL service. Frontier launched this promotion back in February. The deal requires customers to also subscribe to Frontier home phone service. It offers a three-year price lock, with no termination or contract required. Frank also appears to be pushing FiOS Internet from Frontier, suggesting that this promotion also includes FTTH service, which Frontier acquired from Verizon back in 2010. Regardless of access method, the $19.95 deal is for 6 Mbps broadband. Facebook Dominance Threatened By New Social Services Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) dominance may be under threat as it has lost millions of users every month in its biggest markets, according to Independent data. The latest social networks like Instagram and Path are the new destination for those who are wishing to have new and fresh experience, reports Guardian. Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB), which enjoys the status of biggest social networking site of the world, lost 6 million users in the United States last month, a decline of 4 percent according to an analyst at SocialBakers. This number goes up to 9 million if we consider the past six months. In UK, Facebook lost 2 million monthly users in the last six months. The attraction of Facebook is fading in countries like Canada, Spain, France, Germany and Japan. The bad news for Facebook is that these are the markets where Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) has expanded most in terms of users. Cellular and Wireless Is the mobile industry failing theft victims? It's a horrible thought for consumers who can't live without their their pricey, feature-laden mobile phones: What can they do when that piece of hardware is stolen? Unfortunately for the victims, not a lot. It's a pressing issue for more and more people, given that mobile-phone theft has reached epidemic proportions. As theft rise across the country, the crime has become the equivalent of the rash of car break-ins during the 1980s. But while the auto industry helped deter that trend with improved antitheft technology, mobile-phone carriers and handset makers aren't responding to the rising crime wave in a similar fashion, according to The New York Times. The reason may be financial. Some lawmakers are charging that mobile-phone companies actually have a vested interest in the status quo, given that a stolen phone means the victim will be forced to buy another expensive iPhone from Apple or Google Android device such as Samsung's Galaxy S4. Half of companies will require BYOD by 2017 About half of the world’s companies will enact BYOD (bring your own device) programs by 2017 and will no longer provide computing devices to employees, a new Gartner report predicts. Ultimately, only 15 percent of companies will never move to a BYOD model, while 40 percent will offer a choice between BYOD and employer-provided devices, according to the report by Gartner analyst David Willis, which was announced Wednesday. While mobile computing helps make on-the-go workers more productive, the average cost of more than $600 per employee per year for company-provided devices has been difficult for many to shoulder, Willis wrote. This along with other factors, such as increased employee satisfaction, has helped drive the BYOD movement, he added. So far, BYOD adoption is most common in companies with between $500 million and $5 billion in revenue, but there are significant differences according to geography, said Gartner. The U.S. adoption rate is double that of Europe, but the highest rate is in India, China, and Brazil, according to the report. IPTV and Video TDS Telecom's IPTV, hosted services drive Q1 revenues to $217 million TDS Telecom, the wireline subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, reported that first-quarter 2013 results rose to $217 million as it expanded its TDS TV service to more residential customers and new sales of its managedIP products to business customers. Inside TDS Telecom, the ILEC segment grew 2 percent $141.5 million, while the CLEC division declined 3 percent to $42.6 million. Meanwhile, TDS' Hosted and Managed Solutions (HMS) unit, which offers a host of cloud, managed services and data center services to businesses, rose to $35.6 million.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APRIL 17, 2015 Chairman Tom Wheeler Federal Communications
    APRIL 17, 2015 Chairman Tom Wheeler Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Applications of Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable Inc. for Consent to Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, MB Docket No. 14-57 Dear Chairman Wheeler: It has been more than a year since Comcast announced its intention to acquire Time Warner Cable to form a cable TV and ISP behemoth. The combined company would, among other things: control over half of the high-speed residential broadband connections in the United States; dominate pay-TV across the nation; combine even stronger distribution muscle with NBC-Universal’s “must-have” video programming; and control critical advertising and set-top- box inputs. Opposition to this merger began the day the deal was announced and has grown to historic proportions. Over 700,000 Americans have called on you to reject the proposed merger, far more people than have opposed any other merger in the history of the Commission. Diverse industry and public interest group stakeholders (several of which are represented by the signatories below) have filed extensive documents in strong opposition to the merger. 1 The message is clear: the Commission should reject this merger because it would result in too much power in the hands of one company. You have staked your chairmanship on the importance of fostering competition to protect consumers and spur innovation, investment, lower prices and diversity. We agree. And the only way to protect that competitive future now is to reject the Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger outright — no conditions, no side deals — no merger, period.
    [Show full text]
  • The FCC's Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers Online
    The FCC’s Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers Online Hon. Maureen K. Ohlhausen* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A FRAMEWORK FOR THINKING ABOUT REGULATION: COMPARING THE FCC AND THE FTC .................................................................. 205 A. The Regulator’s Knowledge Problem....................................... 206 B. The FCC’s Prescriptive, Ex Ante Regulatory Approach .......... 208 C. The FTC’s Flexible, Ex Post Enforcement-Based Approach ... 212 II. NET NEUTRALITY AND THE FCC: A CASE STUDY IN REGULATORY DIFFICULTY ..................................................................................... 214 A. What is Net Neutrality? ............................................................ 215 1. Proponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 215 2. Opponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 216 B. The FCC’s History of Broadband Regulation: The Road to Reclassification ........................................................................ 218 1. Broadband as a Title I information service ....................... 218 2. The Verizon Decision ........................................................ 220 3. The Aftermath of Verizon ................................................. 221 Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission. I would like to thank Neil Chilson for his contributions to this essay. The views expressed here are solely my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any other individual Commissioner. Portions of this essay were adapted from a keynote
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission
    S. HRG. 114–175 OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 18, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 98–498 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:32 Feb 08, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\98498.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN THUNE, South Dakota, Chairman ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi BILL NELSON, Florida, Ranking ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARIA CANTWELL, Washington MARCO RUBIO, Florida CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota TED CRUZ, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut DEB FISCHER, Nebraska BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii JERRY MORAN, Kansas EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska CORY BOOKER, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin TOM UDALL, New Mexico DEAN HELLER, Nevada JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia CORY GARDNER, Colorado GARY PETERS, Michigan STEVE DAINES, Montana DAVID SCHWIETERT, Staff Director NICK ROSSI, Deputy Staff Director REBECCA SEIDEL, General Counsel JASON VAN BEEK, Deputy General Counsel KIM LIPSKY, Democratic Staff Director CHRIS DAY, Democratic Deputy Staff Director CLINT ODOM, Democratic General Counsel and Policy Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:32 Feb 08, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\98498.TXT JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on March 18, 2015 ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The High Cost of Doing Nothing on Net Neutrality Introduction
    ISSUE BRIEF: Q4 2019 UPDATE THE HIGH COST OF DOING NOTHING ON NET NEUTRALITY INTRODUCTION Business Forward has organized hundreds of briefings across the country on technology and innovation, collecting recommendations from local business leaders on a range of issues, from how to protect IP to helping small businesses use the internet to find new markets. Few issues are as important – or contentious – as net neutrality. This issue brief explains why net neutrality matters and offers a path to achieving it. The term “net neutrality” was coined in 2003, capturing the belief that the best way to ensure an open and vital internet is to prevent network operators from interfering with traffic to favor data from some sites or applications over others. Without net neutrality, network operators could censor viewpoints, stifle startups by charging exorbitant tolls, or undermine competition by favoring their own web offerings over their competitors’ offerings. With net neutrality, companies operating at the “edge” of the network are more likely to invest in distance learning, telemedicine, media streaming, and other new, data-intensive businesses. FOUR DIFFERENT FCC CHAIRS, SERVING TWO PRESIDENTS, SUPPORTED NET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES, POLICIES OR RULES – BUT THEY LACKED CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THEM. The FCC began working on ways to promote net neutrality in 2004. Four different FCC chairs (Michael Powell, Kevin Martin, Julius Genachowski, and Tom Wheeler) serving two presidents (George W. Bush, Barack Obama) issued net neutrality principles, policies or rules. But federal courts or subsequent FCC orders struck down these efforts. Martin’s “policy statement” was found to be unenforceable because it wasn’t a formal regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Commission Must Fight for Internet Freedom by Roger
    Public Service Commission Must Fight for Internet Freedom by Roger Koopman When, in the spirit of bipartisanship, Congress and the Clinton Administration deregulated the Internet in 1994, the results were predictable. Fueled by freedom and entrepreneurship, the United States became the international Internet leader, attracting a steady stream of investment capital and creating the most robust, innovative and competitive broadband market in the world. All of that is about to change though, because the Federal Communications Commission knuckled under to a president whose vision for America is conformity, not liberty -- a place where free thought and free expression must first approved by the federal government. They call it “Net Neutrality,” which, like the camel’s nose under the tent, appears harmless enough. But what’s the real agenda here? Net Neutrality is a solution in search of a problem, based on the unsubstantiated fear that unless the government steps in and places its homogenizing thumb on the Internet, service providers (ISPs) will somehow create unequal access for transmission of broadband data. Thus, we must be protected from such bureaucratic boogeymen as “throttling,” “fast lanes,” and “blocking.” But guess what? Free market competition (which the FCC stands ready to ruin) has already exorcized those ghosts and goblins. Our nation has 17 large broadband providers and over 3,000 smaller ones. There is no monopoly and there is no problem. There is only the insatiable appetites of Obama Administration extremists, who wish to place every human activity under the expert supervision of the government elite. The biggest target of the professional controllers and planners is the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • The FCC Is Involved in a Never Ending Fight to Ensure Net Neutrality As a Law Volume 1 (2) 2015
    The FCC is Involved in a Never Ending Fight to Ensure Net Neutrality as a Law Volume 1 (2) 2015 Fast Lanes without Slow Lanes: The FCC is Involved in a Never Ending Fight to Ensure Net Neutrality as a Law Matthew C. Quattrochi* 1. Introduction The overall purpose of this work is to discuss the current state of net neutrality. Given Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”) Chairman Tom Wheeler’s most recent proposal to pass net neutrality into law, net neutrality is ripe for discussion.1 The court ruling striking down the infrastructure of the Open Internet Order in Verizon v. F.C.C., and the devaluation of Title I regulatory authority exhibited in the decision made in Comcast Corp. v. F.C.C. bring about an appropriate point to stop and reflect concerning the options the FCC has to instill net neutrality regulation.2 Part II of this work will be dedicated to explaining net neutrality and addressing the overall question of whether net neutrality needs to be enacted into law. Part III will be dedicated to discussing Verizon v. F.C.C. and Comcast Corp. v. F.C.C. as well as other applicable case law concerning net neutrality violations. Part IV will address FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s most recent net neutrality proposal, now law. Part V will consider the authoritative options that the FCC has in regulating net neutrality violations. * Matthew C. Quattrochi is a 3rd Year law student at Barry Law School in Orlando Florida. He is an Orlando Chapter Attorney Liaison and the member of American Constitution Society.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Cafeteria Podcast How We Connect: Network Revolutions from Gutenberg to Google February 22, 2019
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Brookings Cafeteria Podcast How we connect: Network revolutions from Gutenberg to Google February 22, 2019 CONTRIBUTORS FRED DEWS Host Managing Editor for New Digital Products BILL FINAN Host Director, Brookings Institution Press TOM WHEELER Visiting Fellow, Governance Studies, Center for Technology Innovation JOSEPH PARILLA Fellow - Metropolitan Policy Program (MUSIC) DEWS: Welcome to the Brookings Cafeteria. The Podcast about ideas and the experts who have them. I’m Fred Dews. How we connect defines who we are says former SCC Chair Tom Wheeler, the guest on today’s episode. He is author of a new book published by the Brookings Institution Press titled, From Gutenberg to Google: The History of our Future. In which he brings to life the great network revolutions of our past to help us understand and deal with what is to come. You’ll hear my colleague, Bill Finan’s interview with him in just a moment. Also, on today’s episode, Metropolitan Policy Program Fellow, Joseph Parilla, shares his thoughts on Amazon’s decision to discontinue plans to open a new headquarters in New York City and what this means for economic development incentives. You can follow the Brookings Podcast network on Twitter @policypodcasts to get the latest information about all our shows, including Dollar and Cents, the Brookings’ trade Podcast, Intersections, and 5 on 45. Find them on our website, on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you like to get Podcasts. And now, on with the interview. Here’s Bill Finan, Director of the Brookings’ Institution Press. FINAN: Fred, thanks, and Tom, hello.
    [Show full text]
  • US Supreme Court Leaves Legal Precedent Supporting Net Neutrality
    US Supreme Court leaves legal precedent supporting net neutrality November 6, 2018 As the OCC has reported on our website on several occasions over the last few years, net neutrality has had its ups and downs. The greatest up was on February 26, 2015, when Consumer Counsel Elin Swanson Katz, State Broadband Policy Coordinator William Vallee, Senator Beth Bye, and Comptroller Kevin Lembo were invited by FCC Chair Tom Wheeler and his Special Counsel Gigi Sohn to attend an historic vote to ensure “net neutrality” to protect consumers with a level playing field, ordering that no consumer must pay more or charge more to gain faster speed at the expense of other users. Consumer Counsel and Other State Official Attend Historic FCC Hearing on Net Neutrality Consumer Counsel and Senator Beth Bye talking with Apple co- founder Steve Wozniak (“The Woz”) at the Historic FCC Hearing on Net Neutrality. Photo: Vallee We also reported on the low point last December 2017 when the Pai FCC overturned the 2015 Order by repealing (in effect, June 2018) the consumer protections granted by the Wheeler FCC’s net neutrality rules. On Monday. November 5, 2018, the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) declined to hear a Trump administration and telecom industry federal appeal of the 2016 U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling in favor of the 2015 Wheeler FCC Order in favor of net neutrality. By so doing, SCOTUS essentially makes no “decision on the merits,” but the ramifications of not taking up the industry appeal (opposing net neutrality) of the D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 March 7, 2016 Tom Wheeler Chairman Federal Communications
    March 7, 2016 Tom Wheeler Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Broadband Privacy Rulemaking Dear Chairman Wheeler: On March 1, 2016, five large trade associations for broadband Internet service providers (“ISPs”) proposed a framework for the Federal Communication Commission’s (“FCC”) forthcoming rulemaking on broadband privacy.1 While it is encouraging that ISPs now appear willing to engage on this issue and to recognize the importance of FCC data security and data breach regulations, the proposed framework fails to provide consumers with the robust protections needed in light of ongoing ISP information collection practices. We therefore submit this letter reviewing the collection practices of ISPs across multiple platforms (including their video offerings), and urging the FCC to adopt rules that will provide meaningful protections for broadband consumers. ISPs currently play a leading role in the complex ecosystem of online behavioral advertising and related forms of data-driven, targeted marketing. These companies are showing an increased interest in monetizing the data they collect about their customers, and they are leveraging their position as gatekeepers to the Internet to harness this data in powerful and invasive ways. Verizon, for example, has in place powerful data-driven tracking and targeting infrastructure for multiple platforms and devices, including mobile phones. Verizon’s acquisition of both AOL and Millennial Media in 2015, as well as its advertising partnership with Microsoft, provide the company with extraordinary capabilities for data gathering, analysis, and monetization of subscriber information.2 1 Letter of American Cable Association, Competitive Carrier Association, CTIA, NCTA and USTelecom to Tom Wheeler, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • March 22, 2016 Chairman Tom Wheeler Federal Communications
    Officers March 22, 2016 Chair Judith L. Lichtman National Partnership for Chairman Tom Wheeler Women & Families Vice Chairs Federal Communications Commission Jacqueline Pata National Congress of American Indians 445 Twelfth Street, SW Thomas A. Saenz Mexican American Legal Washington, DC 20554 Defense and Educational Fund Hilary Shelton NAACP Re: MB Docket No. 14-50 Secretary Jo Ann Jenkins AARP Treasurer Dear Chairman Wheeler: Lee A. Saunders American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more Board of Directors than 200 national advocacy organizations, we are writing to highlight the importance of Helena Berger media ownership diversity in the broadcast industry, and the role that the upcoming American Association of People with Disabilities broadcast incentive auction can play in enhancing or eroding the ability of women and Cornell William Brooks NAACP people of color to fully participate in the nation’s marketplace of ideas. Kristin Clarke Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Broadcast media ownership diversity has been one of the most important priorities for The Lily Eskelsen García National Education Association Leadership Conference and its members. However, this issue has not received the analysis Marcia D. Greenberger National Women's Law Center and consideration that it deserves from the Federal Communications Commission, and that Chad Griffin Human Rights Campaign failure is all the more evident as we look down the road toward the likely outcome of the Linda D. Hallman AAUW broadcast incentive auction. Even as the FCC has taken much needed steps to improve Mary Kay Henry carrier access to spectrum, it has struggled and largely failed to take meaningful steps to Service Employees International Union Sherrilyn Ifill improve broadcast ownership diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Competition with China Starts with Competition at Home
    DIGITAL COMPETITION WITH CHINA STARTS WITH COMPETITION AT HOME TOM WHEELER APRIL 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY data advantage: New smartphone-based apps, created in place of the digital integration that China previously The United States and China are engaged in a lacked, produce a richer collection of data. This bulk technology-based conflict to determine 21st-century and richness of Chinese data creates an inherent digital international economic leadership. China’s approach is advantage when compared to the United States. to identify and support the research and development efforts of a handful of “national champion” companies. If the United States will never out-bulk China in the quantity The dominant tech companies of the U.S. are de facto and quality of data, it must out-innovate China. Here, the embracing this Chinese policy in their effort to maintain United States has an advantage, should it choose to take domestic marketplace control. Rather than embracing it. The centralized control of the Chinese digital economy a China-like consecration of a select few companies, is an anti-entrepreneurial force. In contrast, innovation is America’s digital competition with China should begin the hallmark of a free and open market. with meaningful competition at home and the all- American reality that competition drives innovation. But the domestic market must, indeed, be free, open, and competitive. America’s dominant tech companies have seized upon the competition with China as a rationale for why their Currently, the American digital marketplace is not behavior should not be subject to regulatory oversight competitive. A handful of companies command the that would, among other things, promote competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Comcast Expanding X1 Device Lineup with IP-Only Client, Next-Gen Gateway
    Comcast Expanding X1 Device Lineup With IP-Only Client, Next-Gen Gateway By: Jeff Baumgartner The evolution of Comcast’s X1 video platform continues to take shape as the operator begins to introduce a small IP-only client device and moves forward with the development of a next-generation gateway device that can anchor the service. Comcast confirmed last week that it has begun to roll out the Xi3, an all-IP HD video client for the X1 platform, in select markets around the country. A Comcast official said the MSO is deploying the new Pace-made device slowly in a number of unidentified markets, and added that Comcast expects the device to become “widely available across our footprint in Q1 or Q2 of next year.” The X1 platform is currently being anchored by the XG1, a hybrid (MPEG/IP) HDDVR that Comcast is sourcing from Arris and Pace. The new Xi3 model will serve as a multi-room companion to XG1 and work with Comcast’s new Cloud DVR product. Postings on the DSL Reports message board also turned up evidence that Cisco Systems is among the suppliers working on a new version of an X1 gateway called the XG2. A Comcast official confirmed that the image is a rendering of a future iteration of the XG1 gateway, but declined to detail the technical specs or when Comcast expected to make it available. A person familiar with the initiative said that iteration is a headed gateway that won’t feature internal DVR storage, meaning it will likely work with Comcast’s Cloud DVR or support attached storage.
    [Show full text]