Differential Expression of Stress and Immune Response Pathway
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Published OnlineFirst April 30, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0623 Molecular Cancer Chromatin, Gene, and RNA Regulation Research Differential Expression of Stress and Immune Response Pathway Transcripts and miRNAs in Normal Human Endothelial Cells Subjected to Fractionated or Single-Dose Radiation Sanjeewani T. Palayoor1, Molykutty John-Aryankalayil1, Adeola Y. Makinde1, Michael T. Falduto2, Scott R. Magnuson2, and C. Norman Coleman1 Abstract Although modern radiotherapy technologies can precisely deliver higher doses of radiation to tumors, thus, reducing overall radiation exposure to normal tissues, moderate dose, and normal tissue toxicity still remains a significant limitation. The present study profiled the global effects on transcript and miR expression in human coronary artery endothelial cells using single-dose irradiation (SD, 10 Gy) or multifractionated irradiation (MF, 2Gy 5) regimens. Longitudinal time points were collected after an SD or final dose of MF irradiation for analysis using Agilent Human Gene Expression and miRNA microarray platforms. Compared with SD, the exposure to MF resulted in robust transcript and miR expression changes in terms of the number and magnitude. For data analysis, statistically significant mRNAs (2-fold) and miRs (1.5-fold) were processed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to uncover miRs associated with target transcripts from several cellular pathways after irradiation. Interestingly, MF radiation induced a cohort of mRNAs and miRs that coordinate the induction of immune response pathway under tight regulation. In addition, mRNAs and miRs associated with DNA replication, recombination and repair, apoptosis, cardiovascular events, and angiogenesis were revealed. Implications: Radiation-induced alterations in stress and immune response genes in endothelial cells contribute to changes in normal tissue and tumor microenvironment, and affect the outcome of radiotherapy. MolCancerRes;12(7);1002–15. Ó2014 AACR. Introduction to tumor focusing on areas deemed at highest risk (3–5). The Radiation oncology remains a mainstay of cancer therapy newer technology can reduce high doses to normal tissues as both curative and palliative therapy used alone or as a but can increase the amount of tissue receiving daily dose (6). component of combined modality therapy. Routinely, in The incidental radiation exposure of normal tissues is a topic clinical practice, radiation therapy is administered as mul- of concern in radiotherapy (7). tiple fractions of 2 to 2.5 Gy per day for 5 days per week for 1 Recent work from our laboratory showed that prostate to 7 weeks to allow repair, repopulation, and recovery of the carcinoma cells that survive multifractionated (MF) radia- tion exposure have a different genomic signature compared collateral damage to the normal tissue (1, 2). Individualized – radiation therapy with development of modern techniques with the cells exposed to single-dose radiation (SD; refs. 8 10). Exposure to 10 Gy radiation delivered as fractionated such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-   guided radiation therapy can deliver more controlled single irradiation (1 Gy 10 or 2 Gy 5) resulted in more robust or fewer fractions of high-dose radiation (hypofractionation) differential gene expression changes in PC3 and DU145 cells, whereas in LNCaP cells, 10 Gy radiation delivered as a single dose was more effective (9, 10). These studies also Authors' Affiliations: 1Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer revealed that the mRNA expression profiles following frac- Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; and 2GenUs fl Biosystems, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois tionated irradiation were in uenced by p53 status. In LNCaP cells, harboring wild-type p53 DNA replication/ Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Research Online (http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/). recombination/repair and cell cycle were the top gene ontology categories affected by radiation, whereas in p53- Corresponding Author: Sanjeewani T. Palayoor, National Cancer Insti- tute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building # 10, Room B3B406, Bethesda, MD mutated PC3 cells, genes from IFN, immune, and stress 20892. Phone: 301-496-1401; Fax: 301-480-1434; E-mail: response categories were altered significantly. miRNAs play [email protected] an important role in regulation of gene expression at the doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0623 posttranscriptional level by base pairing with the comple- 0 Ó2014 American Association for Cancer Research. mentary sequences within 3 -untranslated regions of target 1002 Mol Cancer Res; 12(7) July 2014 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst April 30, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0623 mRNA and miRNA Profiles of Irradiated Endothelial Cells mRNAs, resulting in translational repression or mRNA SD and 6 and 24 hours after the final dose of fractionated degradation (11). As observed for the mRNA expression irradiation. Separate controls were maintained for SD and profiles, in the prostate carcinoma cells, treatment with MF radiation protocols. fractionated irradiation significantly altered more miRNAs as compared with the cells exposed to SD radiation (12). RNA isolation Although normal tissue exposure remains a major con- Cells were pelleted at 6 and 24 hours after an SD and 6 fi cern in radiation therapy, few studies have investigated the and24hoursafterthe nal dose of MF irradiation and molecular effects of various radiation treatment regimens stored in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA including small in normal cells. The purpose of the present study was to RNAs was isolated using phenol/chloroform extraction fi investigate global gene and miRNA alterations in normal followed by puri cation over spin columns (Ambion Cat. cells exposed to radiation protocols simulating hypofrac- No. AM9738). The concentration and purity of total tionated and conventionally fractionated radiation regi- RNA were measured by spectrophotometry at OD260/ mens typically used for radiotherapy in clinic. For this 280, and the quality of the total RNA sample was assessed study, we treated normal human coronary artery endo- using an Agilent Bioanalyzer with the RNA6000 Nano thelial cells (HCAEC) with 10 Gy radiation delivered as a Lab Chip (Agilent Technologies). SDradiationoras5fractionsof2Gyradiation(MF).The mRNA microarray analysis differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs were iden- The mRNA microarray analysis was performed using tified by microarray analysis at 6 and 24 hours after an SD Agilent Technologies Human Gene Expression 4  44 K and 6 and 24 hours after the final dose of fractionated V2 microarrays (product number G4845A, design irradiation. These data showed that in HCAEC more ID 026652) designed to target 27,958 Entrez Gene RNAs. mRNAs and miRNAs were differentially expressed by exposure to MF compared with SD, and the magnitude miRNA microarray analysis of changes was higher in MF-irradiated cells. Gene ontol- The miRNA microarray analysis was performed using ogy classification showed that in addition to cell cycle, Agilent Technologies Human miRNA 8  15 K V2 micro- genes regulating DNA replication, DNA damage stimu- arrays (product number G4470B, design ID 019118) with lus, and DNA repair, and genes related to immune probes for 723 human and 76 human viral miRNAs sourced response were significantly altered following exposure to from Sanger miRBase (release 10.1). MF. Using ingenuity target filter program, we identified The mRNA and miRNA microarray data were analyzed miRNAs associated with the target genes from different using Gene Spring Software (Agilent Technologies) as cellular pathways that were differentially expressed in described previously (12). To ensure that mRNAs and response to SD and MF. The present study suggests that miRNAs were reliably measured, ANOVA was used to endothelial cells may play an important role in the out- compare the means of each condition (n ¼ 3). For mRNA come of radiotherapy in the clinical settings. analysis, cutoff ratios of gene expression greater than 2.0 and less than 0.5 and a P value of <0.05 relative to the respective Materials and Methods control group were selected. For miRNA analysis, cutoff Cells ratios greater than 1.5 and less than 0.66 with a P value of Cryopreserved HCAEC and the media were purchased <0.05 relative to the respective control were selected. from Lonza Walkersville Inc. Cells were thawed and main- The mRNA and miRNA microarray data discussed in this tained in EBM-2 basal medium supplemented with FBS and publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression growth factors (EGM-2 MV BulletKit CC-3202) according Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series Accession to the supplier's instructions. Cells from passages P1 to P3 No. GSE57059 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/ were used. acc.cgi?acc¼GSE57059), and Accession No. GSE56824 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi? Radiation acc¼GSE56824), respectively. Cells were irradiated in a PANTAK high-frequency X-ray generator (Precision X-ray Inc.), operated at 300 kV and Real-time RT-PCR 10 mA. The dose rate was 1.6 Gy per minute. Cells were Separate experiments were set up to extract RNA at 6 and plated into T75 cm2 flasks (1–1.5  106 for SD radiation 24 hours after an SD and 6 and 24 hours after the final dose and 0.6–0.8  106 for fractionated radiation). After 24 of fractionated irradiation for real-time RT-PCR analysis. hours, cells were exposed to a total of 10 Gy radiation RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy mini Kit (Cat. No administered either as a SD radiation or as MF radiation 74104; Qiagen) as described previously (12). Purified RNA of 2 Gy  5. These nonisoeffective doses were selected to was reverse transcribed to cDNA and RT-PCR was carried simulate clinical hypofractionated and conventionally frac- out as described previously (13). Alterations in selected tionated radiotherapy regimens. For the MF protocol, cells differentially expressed genes were confirmed using Taq- were exposed to 2 Gy radiation twice a day, at 6-hour Man Custom Express Plate (Part # 4391524; Applied interval.