DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Report Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Report 65 Guise Street, Hamilton Date: June 2, 2016 Prepared for: The City of Hamilton Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited (MHBC) 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive Kitchener ON, N2V 3X9 T: 519 576 3650 F: 519 576 0121 Our File 0727AR Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 65 Guise Street, Hamilton Ontario June 2016 Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Policy Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The Planning Act .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) .................................................................................................. 3 2.3 City of Hamilton Policies ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Approach and Methodology .................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Description of Study Area .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Physiographic context .............................................................................................................. 10 5.0 Historical Overview ....................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Hamilton Settlement ...................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Development of the Study area ............................................................................................... 12 5.3 Historical themes ....................................................................................................................... 25 6.0 Description of Built Features ........................................................................................................ 26 7.0 Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................... 30 7.1 Evaluation Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 30 7.2 Evaluation of subject properties .............................................................................................. 31 8.0 Summary of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest ........................................................................ 37 9.0 Description of proposed development ....................................................................................... 38 10.0 Impacts of proposed development ............................................................................................. 39 11.0 Assessment of Development Alternatives .................................................................................. 40 12.0 Mitigation measures ..................................................................................................................... 42 13.0 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................................ 43 14.0 Sources Consulted ......................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix A – City of Hamilton Evaluation Criteria ......................................................................................... 1 Appendix B – Draft Plan of Subdivision.......................................................................................................... 1 Appendix C – Qualifications .......................................................................................................................... 1 1 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 65 Guise Street, Hamilton Ontario June 2016 1.0 Introduction In February 2016 the City of Hamilton retained MHBC to prepare a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the proposed plan of subdivision of 65 Guise Street, located in the City of Hamilton. The lands are part of Piers 5-8, formerly owned by the Hamilton Port Authority and conveyed to the City of Hamilton in 2000. The City of Hamilton intends to subdivide the lands for commercial and residential development. In 2013, a Heritage Impact Assessment for the area was prepared as part of the Environmental Assessment for the proposed sewage pumping facilities for Piers 5-8. The Heritage Impact Assessment focused on assessing potential impacts of the locations of the proposed facilities as well as cultural heritage resources within a 100 metre radius. The impacts of the proposed sewage pumping facilities were confined to the installation locations and there was no loss or removal of cultural heritage resources as a result of those works. This report assesses the potential impacts of the proposed plan of subdivision of the subject lands, which includes an assumption of demolition of the existing structures on site. Several of the structures on the subject lands were identified in the 2013 Heritage Impact Assessment to have potential cultural heritage value or interest, including: 659 Catharine Street North, Boat Maintenance Building (BHR No. 20); 17 Discovery Drive, Marine Police Garage (BHR No. 21); 1 Guise Street, Hamilton Port Authority (BHR No. 22); 595 Bay Street North, Royal Hamilton Yacht Club- Junior Sailing (BHR 23); 595 Catharine Street North, Navy League/Sea Corp Cadets (BHR No. 24); 1 Guise Street, Hamilton Port Authority Varnish Shed (BHR No. 25); City of Hamilton Heritage Staff have also requested that the HIA assess a stone retaining wall for potential cultural heritage value and identify impacts as appropriate. The subject site is also adjacent to properties listed on the City of Hamilton’s Inventory of Buildings of Architectural and/or Historical Interest and identified through the CHIA, including: 2, 4, 6, & 8 Brock Street; 28-30 Guise Street; 605 James Street North; and, 555 Bay Street North, Royal Hamilton Yacht Club – Junior Sailing. 2 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 65 Guise Street, Hamilton Ontario June 2016 City of Hamilton Heritage Planning Staff have limited the scope of this assessment to assessing only the potential impacts of the proposed plan of subdivision on the properties located within the subject site. As the proposed plan of subdivision will not result in the loss or removal of heritage attributes on adjacent properties, indirect impacts of future development on adjacent properties will be dealt with in later stages through urban design and site plan approval. 2.0 Policy Framework 2.1 The Planning Act The Planning Act makes a number of provisions respecting cultural heritage either directly in Section 2 of the Act or Section 3 respecting policy statements and provincial plans. In Section 2 The Planning Act outlines 18 spheres of provincial interest, that must be considered by appropriate authorities in the planning process. One of the intentions of The Planning Act is to “encourage the co-operation and co-ordination among the various interests. Regarding Cultural Heritage, Subsection 2(d) of the Act provides that: The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Municipal Board, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, ... (d) the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest; 2.2 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) In support of the provincial interest identified in Subsection 2 (d) of the Planning Act, and as provided for in Section 3, the Province has refined policy guidance for land use planning and development matters in the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS). The PPS is “intended to be read in its entirety and the relevant policy areas are to be applied in each situation”. This provides a weighting and balancing of issues within the planning process. When addressing cultural heritage planning, the PPS provides for the following: 2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Significant: e) in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest for the important 3 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 65 Guise Street, Hamilton Ontario June 2016 contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, an event, or a people. Built heritage resource: means a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property’s cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Aboriginal community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or included on local, provincial and/or federal registers. Cultural heritage landscape: means a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hamilton's Heritage Volume 5
    HAMILTON’S HERITAGE 5 0 0 2 e n u Volume 5 J Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Hamilton Planning and Development Department Development and Real Estate Division Community Planning and Design Section Whitehern (McQuesten House) HAMILTON’S HERITAGE Hamilton 5 0 0 2 e n u Volume 5 J Old Town Hall Reasons for Designation under Part IV Ancaster of the Ontario Heritage Act Joseph Clark House Glanbrook Webster’s Falls Bridge Flamborough Spera House Stoney Creek The Armoury Dundas Contents Introduction 1 Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the 7 Ontario Heritage Act Former Town of Ancaster 8 Former Town of Dundas 21 Former Town of Flamborough 54 Former Township of Glanbrook 75 Former City of Hamilton (1975 – 2000) 76 Former City of Stoney Creek 155 The City of Hamilton (2001 – present) 172 Contact: Joseph Muller Cultural Heritage Planner Community Planning and Design Section 905-546-2424 ext. 1214 [email protected] Prepared By: David Cuming Natalie Korobaylo Fadi Masoud Joseph Muller June 2004 Hamilton’s Heritage Volume 5: Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 1 INTRODUCTION This Volume is a companion document to Volume 1: List of Designated Properties and Heritage Conservation Easements under the Ontario Heritage Act, first issued in August 2002 by the City of Hamilton. Volume 1 comprised a simple listing of heritage properties that had been designated by municipal by-law under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act since 1975. Volume 1 noted that Part IV designating by-laws are accompanied by “Reasons for Designation” that are registered on title.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan
    Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan A cooperative resource management plan developed by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Royal Botanical Gardens April 7, 2010 Correct citation for this publication: Bowlby, J.N. , K. McCormack, and M.G. Heaton. 2010. Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Royal Botanical Gardens. Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan Executive Summary Introduction The Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan (HHWFMP) provides information about the characteristics of the watershed, the state of fisheries resources, and guidance for the management of fisheries resources in the watershed. The need for the HHWFMP developed directly from successes of the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to restore water quality and fish habitat in Hamilton Harbour and its watershed. Hamilton Harbour is a large embayment at the western tip of Lake Ontario. The main tributaries of Hamilton Harbour include Spencer Creek, Grindstone Creek, and Red Hill Creek. The Hamilton Harbour watershed, which includes the contributing streams and creeks, covers an area of approximately 500 km2. It encompasses some of the regions most scenic and diverse landscapes: the Niagara Escarpment is a prominent physical feature, and Cootes Paradise is one of the largest and most significant coastal wetlands of Lake Ontario. Water quality in Hamilton Harbour and Cootes Paradise is the most important factor that currently limits the successful restoration of sustainable, self–reproducing native fish community. In 1987, Hamilton Harbour was officially designated as an Area of Concern (AOC) by the International Joint Commission, pursuant to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Port Authority
    THERE’S LOTS HAPPENING IN THE NORTH END! Tell us about your upcoming events, advertise your business or give us your feedback in our Letters to The Editor column. We’re looking for more people to help us put your Newspaper together. What do you like to do? Report on events or interview people? Maybe help with proof reading? Email [email protected] JANUARY 2019 | VOLUME 1 | [email protected] | WWW.NORTHENDBREEZES.COM | @NORTHENDBREEZES | FACEBOOK.COM/NORTHENDBREEZES would not be out of place in any HAMILTON PORT luxury liner. The exterior of the building is faced with limestone AUTHORITY: panelling and large steel mounted windows that gather light and re- flect the sky in a way that suggests THE BUILDING THAT a watery environment. THINKS IT’S A SHIP In 2012, to mark the 100th an- niversary of the founding of the Harbour trust, the Port Authority, SUBMITTED BY ROBYN GILLAM which replaced the Trust in 2000, There’s no proof that the Hamilton Harbour Com- renewed the building. While pre- missioners wanted a land-based ship for their new serving unique materials used in headquarters when they purchased the site at 601 the original construction, like the Burlington in 1951, but there are plenty of clues. steel doors, some features were upgraded. The outdoor railings While Hamilton architects, Murton and Evans, were replaced with titanium and a did not provide any concept or “vision” for their new commemorative plaque was five-storey office building, they offered a design added to those on the facade of the in the Art Moderne style, rather oldfashioned by building.
    [Show full text]
  • Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project
    Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Comprehensive Study Report Prepared for: Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Transport Canada Hamilton Port Authority Prepared by: The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group AECOM October 30, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group Members: Roger Santiago, Environment Canada Erin Hartman, Environment Canada Rupert Joyner, Environment Canada Sue-Jin An, Environment Canada Matt Graham, Environment Canada Cheriene Vieira, Ontario Ministry of Environment Ron Hewitt, Public Works and Government Services Canada Bill Fitzgerald, Hamilton Port Authority The Technical Task Group gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following parties in the preparation and completion of this document: Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Transport Canada, Hamilton Port Authority, Health Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ontario Ministry of Environment, Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Agency, D.C. Damman and Associates, City of Hamilton, U.S. Steel Canada, National Water Research Institute, AECOM, ARCADIS, Acres & Associated Environmental Limited, Headwater Environmental Services Corporation, Project Advisory Group, Project Implementation Team, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Office, Hamilton Conservation Authority, Royal Botanical Gardens and Halton Region Conservation Authority. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HL 0002 18 Articling Brochure Outside
    The Hamilton Bar is recognized not only for its excellence but its true sense of camaraderie. Our Bar has long encouraged articling students and lawyers to participate in the numerous seminars, professional and social activities sponsored by the Hamilton Law Association, the Hamilton Lawyers’ Club, the Hamilton Criminal Lawyers’ Association and the Hamilton Medical/Legal Society. These organizations help make Hamilton a unique place to practise law. The Hamilton Law Association is proud and honoured to house the Anthony Pepe Memorial Law Library, located in our offices in the John Sopinka Court House. Full time staff provide support to help you learn your way around the library. As a reference facility the library offers a comprehensive collection of case reports, digests, statutes, texts, CPD publications and law journals. Resources in electronic format are Explore & increasingly replacing or supplementing the print resources. Computers with internet connection and access to a host of the most popular legal reference Consider software are available to all members. Hamilton With a population of over 500,000, Hamilton is a vibrant Hamilton is comprised of diverse cultures spread community conveniently located less than an hour from throughout pleasant neighbourhoods and vibrant Articling is a crucial part of a lawyer’s training and metropolitan Toronto and the Niagara wine region. communities from Stoney Creek in the east to choosing a law firm is a very important decision for a Hamilton is the 5th largest city in Ontario and offers a Ancaster, Dundas and Waterdown in the west. new graduate. Choosing where to article and practise unique blend of urban and rural amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cootes Paradise Sanctuary Died Arriving by Ship in the 1840S and Those Who Died in the Cholera Epidemic in the 1860S
    s il a r t t n o rfr ate W d n a uce Br e h t to s Link ara Escarpment World Biosphere Reserve Biosphere World Escarpment ara g Part of the Nia the of Part Trail Destinations 1. Burial Grounds Located on Burlington Heights along York Blvd., the area provides the best views in the region. A memorial marks this site’s historic connections — the War of 1812, immigrants who Cootes Paradise Sanctuary died arriving by ship in the 1840s and those who died in the cholera epidemic in the 1860s. Established in 1927 for its signifi cance as an migratory bird stopover, it’s RBG’s largest and most diverse sanctuary at over 2. Westdale Ravine 600 hectares. The area features a 320-hectare river-mouth marsh, Located on the south shore of Cootes Paradise, this deeply glacial plateaus, 16 creeks and 25 kilometres of shoreline. incised sand-plain ravine features a spring-fed creek, exposed Royal Botanical Gardens glacial beach rocks and some of the tallest trees on the MAJOR ACCESS POINTS property. It is a forest-birding hotspot. Mission To be a living museum which serves local, regional and Princess Point 3. Native Trees Walk global communities while developing and promoting public Princess Point is a natural gathering place and trail hub. It Starting at the Nature Centre, these trails travel through a understanding of the relationship between the plant world, includes a canoe launch to the marsh, access to six kilometres of labeled native tree collection — a perfect way to learn how to humanity and the rest of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardiner Expressway Interchanges at Kipling Ave. and Islington Ave
    The City of Toronto holds public consultations as one way to engage residents in the life of their city. Toronto thrives on your great ideas and actions. We invite you to get involved. Gardiner Expressway Interchanges at Kipling Ave. and Islington Ave. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Notice of Public Open House #2 Public Consultation We invite you to attend a Public Open House to learn more about the work completed to date, the study recommendations and the next steps in this process. Details as follows: Date: Thursday April 23, 2009 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Location: Royal Canadian Legion Hall, 110 Jutland Rd. (near Islington Ave. and The Queensway) Background The City of Toronto is conducting a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study to examine safety and operational improvements for the F.G. Gardiner Expressway (Gardiner) at Kipling Ave. and Islington Ave. This Study is being done in accordance with the planning and design process for ‘Schedule C’ projects as outlined in the Municipal Engineers Association Municipal Class Environment Assessment process, which is approved under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. At the first Public Open House held in June 2008, City staff provided information on the existing challenges and opportunities, projected future conditions, and presented alternative solutions for improvements to the Gardiner. A second Open House is now being held to present the results of the evaluation of the options; introduce the recommended improvements; and, identify the next steps of the study. Staff will be available to answer your questions and concerns. We would like to hear from you: Public consultation is an important part of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • 327 – 333 QUEEN STREET WEST TORONTO URBAN RETAIL OFFERING | 2 327 – 333 Queen Street West Toronto
    CBRE Limited 1 | 327 – 333 QUEEN STREET WEST TORONTO URBAN RETAIL OFFERING | 2 327 – 333 Queen Street West Toronto TABLE OF CONTENTS CBRE Limited 3 | 01 The Offering 02 Property Overview 03 Market Overview 04 Tenancy Summary 05 Financial Overview 06 The City of Toronto 07 Offering Process | 4 327 – 333 Queen Street West Toronto THE OFFERING CBRE Limited 5 | CBRE Limited (“CBRE”) is pleased to offer for sale a signature retail opportunity, situated in the heart of Queen West - Canada’s most exciting and dynamic fashion retail strip. This offering, which is located at 327-333 Queen Street West, Toronto (the “Property” or the “Site”) presents a ~15,700 sq. ft., newly completed (2013), \ The Property boasts approximately 56 feet of prime frontage that is strategically positioned on the south side of Queen Street West, east of Spadina Avenue at the southern terminus of Beverly Street. Size In-Place Rent WALT Expiry American Eagle 5,266 $93.64 8.0 Jan-25 Yyoga 10,495 $31.00 6.8 Oct-23 TOTAL 15,761 $51.93 7.2 - | 6 327 – 333 Queen Street West Toronto 2% RETAIL VACANCY $110-$140 ASKING RETAIL RENTS POPULATION ~305,000 3KM RADIUS 53 ACTIVE DTW CONDO PROJECTS CBRE Limited 7 | INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS IDEALLY SITUATED IN THE HEART OF QUEEN WEST – TORONTO’S MOST EXCITING RETAIL NEIGHBOURHOOD Queen West represents the heart of urban lifestyle within Toronto, offering a diverse mix of ]S" retailers call Queen West home, including brands such as Zara and H&M, not to mention \ FULLY LEASED WITH RENTAL RATE UPSIDE POTENTIAL #\ $$\%'* space along Queen West, contract rents for the Property are currently considered to be below- market.
    [Show full text]
  • 373 King Street West
    373 KING STREET WEST TROPHY URBAN RETAIL & OFFICE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage | 145 King Street West | Suite 1100 | Toronto, ON M5H 1J8 PROPERTY DETAILS RETAIL UNITS OFFICE UNITS Starbucks: 1,477 sq.ft. Unit 203: 3,439 sq.ft. Fit Factory: 6,895 sq.ft. IgnitionOne: 2,732 sq.ft. Dental Clinic: 1,503 sq.ft. Total: 6,171 sq.ft. Total Retail: 9,875 sq.ft. NOI (approximate): $388,310 Total Size: 16,046 sq.ft. *60 FEET OF FRONTAGE* *RETAIL 100% LEASED* *TORONTO’S MOST COVETED RETAIL & OFFICE NODE* *VALUE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES* CBRE Limited (“CBRE”), on behalf of Lifetime Developments (the “Vendor”) is pleased to offer for sale 16,046 sq.ft. of space at the base of the M5V condos (the “Property”) located at 373 King Street West. The Property occupies a premier position in Toronto’s urban core located in one of Canada’s most in demand retail and office nodes and most enviable demographic growth markets. The retail component of the asset (consisting of the ground and second floor) is 100% leased and there is imminent upside on rental income when these leases expire. 373 offers a coveted combi- nation of premium asset quality in core urban locations with value enhancement opportunities. 373 KING STREET WEST OFFICE STARBUCKS FIT FACTORY DENTISTRY 373 KING STREET WEST N N N GROW IO T T H A THE LOCATION L U 2011-2016 373 King Street West occupies a highly P O coveted area in Toronto’s downtown core. P Downtown Toronto, particularly King West, 30.8% is among the most active leasing markets LD IN O CO EH in Canada, experiencing unprecedented S M rental rate growth and demand from office U E GARDINER EXPRESSWAY and retail tenants as the area is home to 373 KING O STREET W H a young, affluent and highly educated BATHURST STREET .
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Web Maps
    p 18 5 119 2525 407407 118118 eergerrgrg LakeLLakaakeakkeke 22 1 116116 QEWQEW 1 13 11 403 OAKVILLEO 7 Niagara20 PalermoPalerP erermrmomoo 4 to Hamilton Harbour 12 e LowvilleLoL wvw llelee 113 9 111 8 17 aarlislearlarlisarrlislerlisi lel 181 1 3 BronteBronBBrBroronroronteoonnntetee CreekC CreeCrCrerreeekekk 131 5 HamBur656 109109 Loop (see overview map 1-17) FlamboroFlamboFlamlamam oro 5 107107 BronteBronte CentCCenCentretre 0 5 10 105105 WaterdownWateerdowndowwnn 102102 82/10082/100 101101 BURLINGTON e 7 3 99 7878 111 MuséeMuMususséée J. BrantBrBraranant MuseumMuMususseum ssonon’son’s 1397 1 eersrss 403 AldAldershotAldersA ersershrs LieuxLLieie historique national Butler’s Barracks/Fort George/ eorgorge/e/ FourFo 7474 12 vvillevilviilleili l HAMILTON Festival Shaw FestivaFestivalall CreeCreekCr k 144 8989 Niagara-on-the-Lake s141 2 4 2 9 FortFoFFororoortrrtt NiNiaN iiaa ll ConfederationCoCononfeededer on ST. 87 7 i 11. NiagaraNiN L. Ale y 2 x H a 7 k YounYoungou g n StoneyStonneyey CrCr 1a 15d P e d 11 3 r P 83 CATHARINES 18F g 1818 k e y 6611 y. 9 Grimsby VirgilVirgill 15 e a R l 10 3 86 l 8 CNC Beach 1010 a FruitlandFruitlanduiuitiitlandlandnndd 7171 r JosJoseJJoossee 7 68 83 a V 7 64 Port Dalhousieusiesieie 87 6 6 6 6 16 WinonaWinoWWiiniinonnona9nana 686 7 55 100 6 VVinemountinemountin mo ntt QEWQEW 57 55 5151 449 4747 4646 6 HamiltonHaHamiltonillttoon20 9 44 244 E.E W.W Grimsby 8 81 VinelandVinelandinildnenelae d Queenstonn n CNCN JoJJordanrdandStaann StaStSta.a. 121 St.SSt. DavidsDa MountM ununtntt ElfridaE ridadaa 7 StationSta6ion 5 2 Niagara81 al al Grassieassssieie 73 BeamsvilleB ammssvsvvill LincolnLi c 265 34 406 al 38 405405 LeLewL w HopeHoH Hamiltone 5 LHNLLHHNHNQN QuQueQuee WoodburnWoodbuooodbuurn 18 JordanJoJ rdanda 89 37 34 8 Canal C C Cana C C C C Ca C C C C C C C C Canal C C C C C C C C 20 FultonF to VinelandVinelandnelandl d 81 Canal Profile 65 56 12 Ball’sBallBalBaBaallllll’s 70 29 CP CampdenCCamCam d 73 24 ThoroldThoThThoh rooldd NiagaraNiagaNNiaNiagagaraararara L.L NiapencoNiaNi Profilecoo TwentyTw FallsFFalls 32 enty 14 .
    [Show full text]
  • Dofasco Trail
    forest. Also along the trail you will observe the Sinclair Sugar Bush, and 87-Acres Battlefield House Museum and Park Erland Lee (Museum) Home 2000 Trail Park's quarry pond, home to a wide variety of wildlife and a habitat for several Battlefield House was built in 1796. It gives visitors the chance to experience Built in 1808, it was home to the Lee Family for six generations. Erland Lee species of migratory waterfowl. what life was like in the 1830's. This pioneer homestead is where the Gage and his wife Janet were instrumental in founding the Women's Institute. The Dofasco 2000 Trail is an 11.5 kilometre multi-use trail on Hamilton's East family was held as the Battle of Stoney Creek took place around their home. They invited Adelaide Hoodless to come speak in Stoney Creek in 1897, Mountain. The trail links the Devil's Punch Bowl Conservation Area, 87-Acres The one hundred foot high Battlefield Monument is dedicated to one which helped to lay the Institute's foundations. The house is the best Park, the Bruce Trail and Battlefield House Museum and Park. It passes Trail Highlights: hundred years of peace between the United States and Canada since the War example of gothic revival in Ontario. It is located at 552 Ridge Road, just east through the beautiful rural countryside of Stoney Creek, with a boardwalk of 1812. From the main Bruce Trail, follow the side trail marked in blue for of the on-road section of the Dofasco 2000 Trail. section through the Vinemount South Swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. -- IN THE MATIER OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER 0.18 AND 126 JOHN STREET CITY OF TORONTO, PROVINCE OF ONTARIO NOTICE OF PASSING OF BY-LAW-. To: Dover Corporation (Canada) Limited Ontario Heritage Foundation 1551 Caterpillar Road 10 Adelaide Street East Mississauga, Ontario Toronto, Ontario L4X 2Z6 MSC 1J3 Festival Hall Developments Limited Borden & Elliot 347 Bay Street Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West Suite 301 ,, Suite 4100 Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario M5H2R7 M5H3Y4 Attn: Attn: Solicitor for Dover Corporation (Canada) Limited Take notice that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Toronto has passed By-law No. 1997-0667 to designate 126 John Street as being of architectural value or interest. • • Dated at Toronto this 19th day of December, 1997. • • • Sydney K. Baxter City Clerk • • • • • !- • No. 1997-0667. A BY-LAW To designate the property at 126 John Street as being of architectural value or interest. (Passed December 8, 1997.) WHEREAS by Clause 9 of Executive Committee Report No. 25, adopted by Council at its meeting held on December 8, 1997, authority was granted, at the request of the representative of the owner, to designate the property at 126 John Street as being of architectural value or interest; AND WHEREAS the 01ztario Heritage Act authorizes the Council of a municipality to enact by-laws to designate real property, including all the buildings and structures thereon, to be of historical or architectural value or interest; -.
    [Show full text]