DOCSLIB.ORG

“Photograph”: a Study of British Miniatures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Photograph”: a Study of British Miniatures The 16th Century “Photograph”: A Study of British Miniatures Devin Kibbe Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts Rosanne Denhard and David Langston, Faculty Mentors Contemporary portraiture is heavily reliant on the photograph to produce mementoes and to document likeness. Starting in the 16th century, British portraiture achieved the same purposes through miniatures: small-scale paintings that can be worn around the neck, pinned to clothing, or stowed away secretly. My research during recent travel to England has opened a world of understanding both the technique and unique materials that were mastered to create a new and brilliant style. With sincere study of Queen Elizabeth I‟s favorite portrayer Nicholas Hilliard‟s prominent method I have produced my own miniatures in tribute to this purposeful art. [1] The 16th Century “Photograph”: A Study of British Miniatures During Britain‟s medieval and Renaissance periods the masters of painting were the Dutch, Italian, and other foreign artists; “At this time period English painters were rarely as accomplished as their foreign counterparts, not only because of less intensive training, but also because of a lack of institutional patronage to encourage talent” (Cooper 38). For centuries, Britain‟s art was shaped by foreign influence, leaving Britain without a distinctly British artistic history—that is until the late sixteenth century when the British miniature painting moved the concept of British paintings from products to the status of an art form. Queen Elizabeth‟s favorite portrayer, Nicholas Hilliard (1547-1619) is regarded as the first native artist of importance to the history of Britain‟s paintings. Likewise, the miniature movement greatly influenced the purpose and function of portraits in general, making portraiture more accessible and productive than full- length, life size portraits that had previously dominated the market. From the early influence of the British miniature painting, portraiture has advanced and become widely available and desirable in contemporary life; “It was not until the advent of photography that any other portrait art was to be so intimately bound up with people‟s lives” (Coombs back cover). During the sixteenth century, portraiture served primarily functional purposes, which parallel in many ways the same as contemporary photography. First and foremost portraits recorded the likeness of the sitter with great detail. These portraits were then used to memorialize important events and rites of passage such as a death, successes in careers, and marriages. Further, being easily obtainable, portraits were often traded between families and individuals during marriage negations to inform the prospective spouse about physical features when meeting in person was not possible. Through the portraits, individuals were able to assess the [2] character and social conditions of the sitter because of their clothes and other external factors, but also through their facial expressions. Lastly, portraits were also used as propaganda, when “Ownership of [monarchs‟] portraits showed loyalty to the crown” (Cooper 8-9). Though portraits were highly functional and a vital part of the society‟s functionality in the sixteenth century, they were not commissioned merely for artistic connotations. The portrait was not “inspired” but rather, “The Englishman‟s innate interest in character…and the enhanced sense of his individual importance that he had derived from the Renaissance gave an especial significance to portraiture” (Rothenstein 22). Tarnya Cooper explains further the society surrounding portraiture, “Portraits were considered curious and endearing mementoes, but in a culture that was largely attuned to the value of materials, rather than the value of skill, painted pictures did not generally command high prices” (Searching for Shakespeare 38). Portraiture had more to do with wealth and status—based on how expensive the portrayer hired was, how regally the sitter was represented—rather than the truly artistic character of a painting. Portrait sitters were also primarily nobles and it was not until the late 1560s that merchants, lawyers, and other professionals commissioned the painting of their likeness. The first miniature paintings were also attributed to wealthy patrons in the early 1500s. The word miniature is directly in correlation with its origin: „miniature‟ derives from the Latin word “miniare”, literally to color with red lead, referring to the red lettering used in coloring manuscripts since the 1400s. During the early 1500s, hand-illustrated books including miniature paintings of biblical scenes in private books of worship became desirable objects for the wealthy. Outside of Britain, “portrait miniatures first appeared in the 1520s, in the French and English courts…The earliest examples were painted by two Netherlandish miniaturists, Jean Clouet [3] working in France and Lucas Horenbout in England” (“The Origin of the Portrait Miniature”). The miniature painting elaborated on the functionality of traditional portraiture, in fact, [m]iniatures formed another category of portraiture; these small scale images tended to have a more personal function. They were popular with courtiers and were often set into elaborate jeweled cases with covers. Miniatures could be worn around the neck, pinned to clothing, or secretly concealed on the body as a way of honouring the memory of a loved one. (Cooper, Tarnya, Fraser 13) Still, the field was dominated by foreign counterparts including the Bavarian artist Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) who had a great influence in Britain, and on the first notable British artist, Nicholas Hilliard. Miniaturist Nicholas Hilliard pioneered the miniature painting movement both in technique and style, eventually becoming a royal portrayer, working closely with Queen Elizabeth I and James I. Hilliard is one of the highest regarded portrayers in British history because of his unique style, skill, and influence. According to Tarnya Cooper, “at this period English painters were rarely as accomplished as their foreign counterparts, not only because of less intensive training, but also because of a lack of institutional patronage to encourage talent and specialization, for example from the church of local government” Hilliard was attuned to painting like his foreign artistic counterparts, not simply as an artificer but as an artist (Searching for Shakespeare 38). Born to a goldsmith, Richard Hilliard, Nicholas later became an expert craftsman as a goldsmith in The Goldsmiths‟ Company in 1569, from which “the experienced craftsman dominates” in his paintings (Salamon 109). Part of what distinguishes Hilliard is his [4] unique development in the technique including a delicate process to represent the many jewels and gems that he worked with as a goldsmith. For pearls Hilliard paints with real silver; rubies were simulated by applying resin with a hot needle atop of silver paint which reflects the light. Hilliard‟s miniatures are greatly influenced by his trade including, his “use of burnished metal, his love of decorative flourish and clear precise line all come from his training as a goldsmith” (Coombs 29). Yet more than his techniques, Hilliard developed a distinct style of portrait miniatures, producing a recognizable personality within all of his work. Rothenstein explains Hilliard‟s insight into character, claiming, “No English portraits of the age are equal either in accomplishment or grasp of character to those of the miniaturist Nicholas Hilliard…He had at his command a line at once severe and gracious and penetrating yet sympathetic insight to character” (25). Beyond his innate sense of character and understanding, Hilliard‟s understanding of painting was largely influenced by the French. In 1577, Hilliard traveled to France for two years, studying the art of painting portrait miniatures, or limning. His time in France solidified a concept for him that would help reshape painting in Britain: that the miniature painter should be regarded as an artist, not just an artificer. Of the first portraits that exemplified this idea was Hilliard‟s self portrait in 1577. The Victoria and Albert Museum explains, “In England painters such as Hilliard were treated as mere tradespeople. But this confident self-portrait was painted during Hilliard‟s two years in France, where painters had a higher social status”. Simply, that Hilliard Nicholas Hilliard 1547-1619, Self-portrait Aged 30, Dated 1577, Victoria and Albert Museum, Museum no. P.155-1910 [5] painted the artist as the subject signifies the artist‟s importance in society, and in a tradition that portrayed the prominent and wealthy of society. Yet looking at the portrait gives one a definitive understanding of this idea, represented by his elaborate lace collar and steady, direct eye contact. During his time in France, Hilliard further attested to the importance of the artist by writing his Treatise Concerning the Arte of Limning. The Treatise served a primary purpose, “to teache the arte of limning…as also to shewe who are fittest to be practisers thereof, for whom only let it suffice that I intend my whole discourse” (15). The Treatise can be divided into two sections, first theoretical and second directional. Theoretically, or conceptually, Hilliard approaches the idea of limning from many angles. He asserts that gentlemen should be painters since, “It is a kind of gentill painting, …sweet and cleanly to usse” (16). Hilliard is devout in insisting “a good painter hath tender sences, quite
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dnh-001-CONTENTS & FLANNEL RS NOW USE 2 1 BAJ V, 1 Contents
    dnh-123-130 13 BAJ XVI, 3 Review essays Tittler.e$S_baj gs 12/05/2016 18:32 Page 123 The BRITISH ART Journal Volume XVII, No. 1 failure to produce it altogether, which leads her repeatedly to REVIEW ESSAY make extravagantly questionable claims. In addition, some of her contentions come down to overly enthusiastic interpretation of style and technique for which her The ‘Feminine Dynamic’ in Tudor Art: A reassessment connoisseurial expertise appears insufficient. Of the tendency to read too much into her sources there are several glaring examples. For one, she notes that Robert Tittler During the Tudor period, seven men held the position of sergeant painter and of those seven, evidence shows that five of them had I wives who were either artists who continued the family business Susan E James’s The Feminine Dynamic in English Art, 1485– or entrepreneurs who … took over the control of his workshop.10 1603 (2009) offered the most comprehensive work to date on Leaving aside James’s failure here and throughout the book to English women painters, patrons, and consumers of art in the distinguish between ‘artists’ and ‘craftsmen’, the subsequent 1 period 1485–1603. As several reviewers of the book pointed discussion amounts to somewhat less than meets the eye. We out, a work on this subject promised to fill numerous gaps in read that John Browne’s widow Anne Gulliver inherited his what we know about the role of women in producing, workshop and continued to work in her husband’s patronizing, and generally supporting artistic production in that occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean
    British Art Studies September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean Miniature Paintings in Context Edited by Catharine MacLeod and Alexander Marr British Art Studies Issue 17, published 30 September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean Miniature Paintings in Context Edited by Catharine MacLeod and Alexander Marr Cover image: Left portrait: Isaac Oliver, Ludovick Stuart, 2nd Duke of Lennox, later Duke of Richmond, ca. 1605, watercolour on vellum, laid onto table-book leaf, 5.7 x 4.4 cm. Collection of National Portrait Gallery, London (NPG 3063); Right portrait: Isaac Oliver, Ludovick Stuart, 2nd Duke of Lennox, later Duke of Richmond, ca. 1603, watercolour on vellum, laid on card, 4.9 x 4 cm. Collection of Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (FM 3869). Digital image courtesy of National Portrait Gallery, London (All rights reserved); Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (All rights reserved). PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/advisory-board Produced in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean Miniature Paintings in Context Edited by Catharine Macleod and Alexa
    British Art Studies September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean Miniature Paintings in Context Edited by Catharine MacLeod and Alexander Marr British Art Studies Issue 17, published 30 September 2020 Elizabethan and Jacobean Miniature Paintings in Context Edited by Catharine MacLeod and Alexander Marr Cover image: Left portrait: Isaac Oliver, Ludovick Stuart, 2nd Duke of Lennox, later Duke of Richmond, ca. 1605, watercolour on vellum, laid onto table-book leaf, 5.7 x 4.4 cm. Collection of National Portrait Gallery, London (NPG 3063); Right portrait: Isaac Oliver, Ludovick Stuart, 2nd Duke of Lennox, later Duke of Richmond, ca. 1603, watercolour on vellum, laid on card, 4.9 x 4 cm. Collection of Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (FM 3869). Digital image courtesy of National Portrait Gallery, London (All rights reserved); Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (All rights reserved). PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/advisory-board Produced in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Name Field: Early Modern Europe Courses Taken for Ion C
    Student Name Field: Early Modern Europe Courses Taken for Concentration Credit Fall 2005 Freshman Seminar 39u – Henri Zerner Focused on the development of Printmaking, Art and print culture and art with the Communication advent of the printing press in the fifteenth century, and subsequent printing techniques that developed, such as woodblock, engraving, etc. Looked at original artwork and prints and studied how the medium was used to communicate ideas and styles of art Spring 2006 History of Art and Henri Zerner A survey of western art Architecture 10 – The Western historical trends from the early Tradition Renaissance to the present, focusing on particular artists or movements representative of art historical periods but by no means encompassing the entire history. Spring 2006 English 146 – Sex and Lynne Festa A study of evolving concepts of Sensibility in the Enlightenment literary personas in the English Enlightenment from Eliza Haywood’s Philidore and Placentia (1727) to Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility (1811). We looked at changing gender roles in print material and literature, as well as developing concepts of the human body and 20th century analyses of these trends, focusing particularly on Foucault’s A History of Sexuality. Fall 2006 History of Art and Frank A look into trends of art and Architecture 152 – The Italian Fehrenbach inventions specific to the Renaissance Italian Renaissance, looking at the origins of these trends in Medieval Italian Art (from the ninth century at the earliest ) and following them through late sixteenth century mannerism. Focused particularly on the invention of single‐point perspective, oil painting, sculptural trends and portraiture.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619) Henry Percy, 9Th Earl of Northumberland, C
    Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619), Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-5 Fig. 1. Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619) Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-1595, miniature on parchment, 25.7 x 17.3 cm (slightly small than A4), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. 1. Introduction, Patronage, Dates, Description, Related Works 2. Melancholia, Panofsky, Dürer, Four Humours 3. Impresa, Archimedes, Galileo, „Tanti‟ 4. Secret Knowledge, School of Night, Square 5. Conclusion This article can be downloaded from http://www.shafe.co.uk/art/Northumberland.pdf 1 of 8 pages 1. Introduction Patronage This is arguably the most cryptic Tudor cabinet miniature. It is likely that is was commissioned by Henry Percy the Ninth Earl of Northumberland (1564-1632), a well known Elizabethan intellectual and cultural figure. He was known as the ‗Wizard Earl‘ because of his scientific and alchemical experiments and his large library. In 1594 Henry Percy married Dorothy Devereux sister of Robert Devereux, Second Earl of Essex. His southern estates were Petworth and Syon House, the latter he acquired through his marriage to Dorothy Devereux. He was a non-Catholic but argued for Catholic toleration and tried to negotiate with James VI of Scotland to reduce Catholic persecution when he became king of England. This did not happen and Henry‘s second cousin and agent Thomas Percy became one of the five conspirators in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. As a result Henry Percy suspected of complicity and spent the next 17 years in the Tower of London and was financially ruined by a fine of £30,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Masters' Thesis Abstract and Table of Contents
    Céline Cachaud Masters’ Thesis (2017) École Pratique des Hautes Études (Paris) Pr. Sabine Frommel (dir.) Nicholas Hilliard’s trip to France (1576-1579) and its consequences on his work A holistic approach This thesis is the result of more than two years of research. It is a two-parts research with a study of 167 pages and a comprehensive catalogue of Nicholas Hilliard’s work, the first in French, of 273 numbers. The study is currently only available in French. The study Nicholas Hilliard’s trip to France has regularly been boiled down to a no-consequence phase of his career by most of the specialists and scholars. However, sources and preserved works of art tell us another story : this period was indeed prolific and meaningful for the rest of his life. Although very few works of art are kept, circa twenty compared with the more than 200 authentic and attributed pieces, they are proofs of the plurality of his artistic production and the signs of the apex of his career thanks to the protection of the Valois court and most notably, thanks to the patronage of the French king’s brother, the duke of Alençon. Main issue Through the renewed analysis of the available and discovered archival and iconographical sources, this thesis had for main issue to discuss the consequences of Hilliard’s stay in France and the importance of it. To a lesser extent, it also questions Hilliard’s part in the renewal of portrait miniatures production in France in the late sixteenth century. ABSTRACT AND CONTENTS !1 Method : Our intentional holistic approach aimed at analyzing Hilliard’s trip to Paris in a global way, questioning on both Hilliard’s artistic career and human path into French society.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Exhibition of Miniatures Catalogue
    EIGHTH ANNUAL EXHIBITION OF MINIATURES CATALOGUE THE PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS MDCCCCIX THE PENNSYL VANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS FOUNDED 1805 THE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY OF MINIATURE PAINTERS CATALOGUE OF THE EIGHTH ANNUAL EXHIBITION OF MINIATURES, NOVEMBER 8 TO DECEMBER 19, 1909 PHILADELPHIA MCMIX MANAGEMENT OF THE PENNSYL VANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS PRESIDENT, JOHN FREDERICK LEWIS. VICE· PRESIDENT I CLEMENT B. NEWBOLD. HONORARY VICE-PRESIDENTS, JOH N H. CONVERSE, E. BURGESS WARREN. DIRECTORS, THEOPHILUS P. CHANDLER, ALFRED C . HARRISON, HERBERT M. HOWE, M.D., CLARENCE C. ZANTZINGER, GEORGE H. McFADDEN, GEORGE D. WIDENER, CLEMENT B. NEWBOLD, T. DE 'WITT CUYLER, EDWARD T. STOTESBURY, ARTHUR H. LEA, THEODORE N. ELY, CHARLEMAGNE TOWER, FRANK H. CAVEN. TREASURER, ~ GEORGE H. McFADDEN. SECRETARY AND MANAGER, JOHN E. D. TRASK. ASSISTANT TO SECRETARY AND TREASURER, HARRY P. RHOADS. CURATOR OF SCHOOLS, CHARLES F. RAMSEY. SOLICITOR, JOHN G, JOHNSON. COMMITTEE ON EXHIBITIONS, CLEMENT B. NEWBOLD, CHAIRMAN, GEORGE H. McFADDEN, ALFRED C. HARRISON, EDWARD T. STOTESBURY, THEODORE N. ELY, CHARLEMAGNE TOWER. 2 @ff(cers ant> members of tl)e lDennsog{\?anta Soctet\? of miniature lDainters PRESIDENT EMILY DRAYTON TAYLOR VICE· PRESIDENT LUDWIG E. FABER SECRETARY A. MARGARETTA ARCHA~IBAULT TREASURER SARAH YOCUM McFADDEN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ELLEN WETHERALD AHRENS AMY OTIS REBECCA PEALE PATTERSON MEMBERS ELLEN WETHERALD AHRENS REBECCA BURD PEALE PATTERSON A. MARGARETTA ARCHAMBAULT EVELYN PURDIE ALICE BECKINGTON EDNA F. HUESTIS SIMPSON ELLA SHEPARD BUSH Lucy MAY STANTON SALLY CROSS MARIA JUDSON STREAN HERMAN DEIGENDESCH MARY H. TANNAHILL EULABEE DIX EMILY DRAYTON TAYLOR LUDWIG E. FABER HELEN M. TURNER JEAN WILLIAMS LUCAS MABEL R.
    [Show full text]
  • WARTS and ALL the Portrait Miniatures of Samuel Cooper (1609-1672)
    PRESS RELEASE October 2013 WARTS AND ALL The Portrait Miniatures of Samuel Cooper (1609-1672) A major loan exhibition dedicated to the first internationally celebrated British artist, Samuel Cooper, will go display at the Philip Mould gallery from 13 November – 7 December 2013 (Preview Tuesday, 12 November). Known to his contemporaries as ‘the prince of limners’ or ‘Vandyck in little’. Lenders to the exhibition include Royal Collection Trust, The Duke of Buccleuch, Castle Howard, Burghley House, The Ashmolean Museum, the Victoria and Albert Museum and the National Portrait Gallery. The exhibition takes its name from the Duke of Buccleuch’s iconic unfinished portrait of Oliver Cromwell, which, for the first time, will be hung alongside Sir Peter Lely’s identical portrait of Cromwell [on loan from Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery]. The death mask of Oliver Cromwell will also be loaned from Warwick Castle to allow visitors to compare his features to Cooper’s ad vivum sketch and subsequent portraits. As the exhibition will conclusively show, it is to Cooper that Oliver Cromwell is believed to have made clear his desire to be painted ‘warts and all’. This ambitious exhibition has been curated by Emma Rutherford, portrait miniature specialist to Philip Mould & Co, who has succeeded in securing loans from across the country to make this an outstanding show and give visitors a rare opportunity to glimpse these significant portraits together. Most have not been seen together since leaving Cooper’s studio in the 17th Century. The curator, Emma Rutherford, says “visitors to the exhibition will be able to visually follow Cooper’s career in the same way that we are able to read Pepys diary.
    [Show full text]
  • Anecdotes of Painting in England : with Some Account of the Principal
    C ' 1 2. J? Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/paintingineng02walp ^-©HINTESS <0>F AEHJKTID 'oat/ /y ' L o :j : ANECDOTES OF PAINTING IN ENGLAND; WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF THE PRINCIPAL ARTISTS; AND INCIDENTAL NOTES ON OTHER ARTS; COLLECTED BY THE LATE MR. GEORGE VERTUE; DIGESTED AND PUBLISHED FROM HIS ORIGINAL MSS. BY THE HONOURABLE HORACE WALPOLE; WITH CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONS BY THE REV. JAMES DALLAWAY. LONDON PRINTED AT THE SHAKSPEARE PRESS, BY W. NICOL, FOR JOHN MAJOR, FLEET-STREET. MDCCCXXVI. LIST OF PLATES TO VOL. II. The Countess of Arundel, from the Original Painting at Worksop Manor, facing the title page. Paul Vansomer, . to face page 5 Cornelius Jansen, . .9 Daniel Mytens, . .15 Peter Oliver, . 25 The Earl of Arundel, . .144 Sir Peter Paul Rubens, . 161 Abraham Diepenbeck, . 1S7 Sir Anthony Vandyck, . 188 Cornelius Polenburg, . 238 John Torrentius, . .241 George Jameson, his Wife and Son, . 243 William Dobson, . 251 Gerard Honthorst, . 258 Nicholas Laniere, . 270 John Petitot, . 301 Inigo Jones, .... 330 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD. Arms of Rubens, Vandyck & Jones to follow the title. Henry Gyles and John Rowell, . 39 Nicholas Stone, Senior and Junior, . 55 Henry Stone, .... 65 View of Wollaton, Nottinghamshire, . 91 Abraham Vanderdort, . 101 Sir B. Gerbier, . .114 George Geldorp, . 233 Henry Steenwyck, . 240 John Van Belcamp, . 265 Horatio Gentileschi, . 267 Francis Wouters, . 273 ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD continued. Adrian Hanneman, . 279 Sir Toby Matthews, . , .286 Francis Cleyn, . 291 Edward Pierce, Father and Son, . 314 Hubert Le Soeur, . 316 View of Whitehall, . .361 General Lambert, R. Walker and E. Mascall, 368 CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Bulletin of Nationalmuseum Stockholm Volume 26:1
    The Danish Golden Age – an Acquisitions Project That Became an Exhibition Magnus Olausson Director of Collections Art Bulletin of Nationalmuseum Stockholm Volume 26:1 Art Bulletin of Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, © Copyright Musei di Strada Nuova, Genova Martin van Meytens’s Portrait of Johann is published with generous support from the (Fig. 4, p. 17) Michael von Grosser: The Business of Nobility Friends of the Nationalmuseum. © National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. Open © Österreichisches Staatsarchiv 2020 (Fig. 2, Access image download (Fig. 5, p. 17) p. 92) Nationalmuseum collaborates with Svenska Henri Toutin’s Portrait of Anne of Austria. A © Robert Wellington, Canberra (Fig. 5, p. 95) Dagbladet, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, New Acquisition from the Infancy of Enamel © Wien Museum, Vienna, Peter Kainz (Fig. 7, Grand Hôtel Stockholm, The Wineagency and the Portraiture p. 97) Friends of the Nationalmuseum. © Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam/Public Domain (Fig. 2, p. 20) Graphic Design Cover Illustration © Christies, 2018 (Fig. 3, p. 20) BIGG Daniel Seghers (1590–1661) and Erasmus © The Royal Armoury, Helena Bonnevier/ Quellinus the Younger (1607–1678), Flower CC-BY-SA (Fig. 5, p. 21) Layout Garland with the Standing Virgin and Child, c. Four 18th-Century French Draughtsmen Agneta Bervokk 1645–50. Oil on copper, 85.5 x 61.5 cm. Purchase: © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Wiros Fund. Nationalmuseum, NM 7505. NY/Public Domain (Fig. 7, p. 35) Translation and Language Editing François-André Vincent and Johan Tobias Clare Barnes and Martin Naylor Publisher Sergel. On a New Acquisition – Alcibiades Being Susanna Pettersson, Director General. Taught by Socrates, 1777 Publishing © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Ludvig Florén, Magnus Olausson, and Martin Editors NY/Public Domain (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secrets of Tudor Art We Must Try to Put Ourselves Back Into the Minds of the Tudor Courtier
    • The Tudors loved secrets, puzzles and word play and a lot of time and effort has gone into trying to understand what it all meant. • In order to decode the secrets of Tudor art we must try to put ourselves back into the minds of the Tudor courtier. • There were concepts that are alien or unknown to us today on which the interpretation hinges. • Some of the most important are the divine right of kings, magnificence, chivalry and melancholia. • I will start with one of the most puzzling – melancholia. Notes 1. Melancholy 2. The Accession Day Tilt 3. The Impressa 4. Symbolic meaning in Tudor art 5. Nicholas Hilliard, Young Man Amongst Roses. 6. Isaac Oliver, A Man Against a Background of Flames. 7. Nicholas Hilliard, Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland 8. Ditchley Portrait, reject the Renaissance conventions of space and time 9. Armada Portrait 10. The Origins and Functions of the Portrait Miniature • See shafe.uk ‘Tudor: The Origins and Functions of the Portrait Miniature’ • Holbein, Mrs Jane Small • Simon Bening • Lucas Horenbout • Nicolas Hilliard, ‘Young Man Among Roses’, the Art of Limning • Isaac Oliver, Hilliard’s pupil and Limner to Queen Anne of Denmark 1604, Lord Herbert of Cherbury. • Levina Teerlinc 1 Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619), Portrait of Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, c. 1594-1595, miniature on parchment, 25.7 x 17.3 cm (slightly small than A4), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Secret Knowledge • In order to explain what I mean by ‘secret knowledge’ I have selected one Elizabethan miniature and will spend some time analysing its many levels of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • From Allegory to Domesticity and Informality, Elizabeth I and Elizabeth II
    The Image of the Queen; From Allegory to Domesticity and Informality, Elizabeth I and Elizabeth II. By Mihail Vlasiu [Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Glasgow] Christie’s Education London Master’s Programme September 2000 © Mihail Vlasiu ProQuest Number: 13818866 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13818866 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 GLASGOW 1 u n iv er sity .LIBRARY: \1S3lS Abstract This thesis focuses on issues of continuity and change in the evolution royal portraiture and examines the similarities and differences in portraying Elizabeth I in the 16th and 17th centuries and Elizabeth II in the 20th century. The thesis goes beyond the similarity of the shared name of the two monarchs; it shows the major changes not only in the way of portraying a queen but also in the way in which the public has changed its perception of the monarch and of the monarchy. Elizabeth I aimed to unite a nation by focusing the eye upon herself, while Elizabeth II triumphed through humanity and informality.
    [Show full text]