Gatekeeping by Central and Local Party Actors: Theory and Evidence from a Field Study of New Brunswick Nominations, 2017-2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gatekeeping by Central and Local Party Actors: Theory and Evidence from a Field Study of New Brunswick Nominations, 2017-2018 Gatekeeping by Central and Local Party Actors: Theory and Evidence from a Field Study of New Brunswick Nominations, 2017-2018 Quinn M. Albaugh∗ First Draft: January 27, 2021 This Draft: February 2, 2021 Abstract Under what circumstances do central and local party actors engage in gatekeeping to influence the outcomes of local nomination races? In this paper, I develop a theory of gatekeeping in Canadian parties. I present evidence for this theory with a field study of New Brunswick provincial nominations (2017-2018), including participant-observation of 25 nominating conventions; 93 interviews with party insiders, nomination candidates, and other individuals with knowledge of the nominations process; and an original dataset of nominations for the 2018 New Brunswick election. The theory and results call into question the conventional wisdom that riding associations are the decisive actors in selecting local candidates in Canadian political parties. The extent of central party gatekeeping suggests a need to re-evaluate Carty's claims about a \stratarchical bargain" within Canadian political parties and, ultimately, challenges the notion that Canadian party nominations are minimally democratic. ∗University of Toronto and Max Planck Institute for Religious and Ethnic Diversity. Please direct correspon- dence to [email protected]. I gratefully acknowledge support from a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Award, along with grants from the Princeton Canadian Studies and the Mamdouha S. Bobst Centre for Peace and Justice. I would like to thank Chris Achen, Jeyhun Alizade, Elizabeth Baisley, Paul Frymer, Dara Strolovitch, and seminar participants at Princeton University for comments on previous versions of this research. 1 Since the first large-scale studies of candidate selection in Canada in the early 1990s, the guid- ing assumption of scholarship on candidate selection in Canadian political parties is that riding associations select candidates (Carty, 1991; Carty and Erickson, 1991; Erickson and Carty, 1991). This assumption underpins arguments that diversifying riding association executives should im- prove the representation of women and racialized minority groups (Cheng and Tavits, 2011; Cross and Pruysers, 2019; Medeiros, Forest, and Erl, 2019; Tolley, 2019; Tremblay and Pelletier, 2001). At the same time, scholars have documented several formal and informal means through which central party organizations { party leaders, their staff, and formal party organizations { increased power over candidate selection, including refusing to sign candidates' nomination papers (Court- ney, 1978, 2015; Erickson and Carty, 1991), formal appointment powers for party leaders (Koop and Bittner, 2011), vetting or \green-light" processes that allow party committees to keep candi- dates off the ballot (Pruysers et al., 2017), and manipulating the rules or logistics of nominating conventions (Pruysers et al., 2017). However, we still know relatively little about why central and local party actors engage in gatekeeping { exerting influence over the choice of candidate during candidate selection to favour or disfavour particular candidates { over candidate selec- tion in particular nomination races in particular ridings. Gatekeeping is critical to understanding which actors have influence over the nominations process, why Canadian parties nominate the candidates they do, and, ultimately, which individuals actually hold elected office. In this article, I argue that central party organizations exert much more influence over local candidate nominations than past work has acknowledged. They typically do so through informal gatekeeping practices, such as controlling the logistics of nominating conventions, rather than through formal powers of appointments and the leader's veto. However, they are less effective in exerting control over nominations when riding associations are strong, particularly in relatively safe seats with retiring incumbents. I support this argument with a multi-method field study of candidate nominations in New Brunswick's political parties across all ridings in advance of the 2018 provincial election. A field study allows for the gathering of in-depth qualitative evidence on particular nomination races. This type of qualitative evidence is rare in scholarship on candidate selection, since it is costly to obtain. However, it is invaluable for identifying mechanisms and ensuring that particular cases are correctly coded (George and Bennett, 2005). Although a study of federal nominations would speak most directly to past work on candidate selection in Canada, it is not generally feasible to gather in-depth data across a large number of ridings given their geographic size. For this reason, field studies of riding-level politics in Canada, such as Scarrow (1964), Sayers (1999), Koop (2011), Koop, Bastedo, and Blidook (2018), tend to rely on a small number of ridings. New Brunswick is small enough to allow for the collection of qualitative and quantitative data across all ridings. New Brunswick serves as a microcosm of party politics in Canada. New Brunswick is the only province whose party system has traditionally shared similar linguistic and religious pressures as the federal party system. Its provincial and federal parties tend to overlap substantially in terms of personnel (Koop, 2011). As a result, while these findings draw on provincial nominations, they 2 do so in the province most likely to generalize to federal politics and most able to speak to past work on candidate selection at the federal level. I review the conventional wisdom that local party organizations control candidate selection in Canada, along with increasing evidence that central party organizations have more power than previously ackonwledged. I outline a theory of gatekeekping by central and local party actors that explains many past findings on candidate selection. I sketch out a series of observable implications of this theory, for which guide the evidence presented in the paper. I lay out the research design, materials, and data collected. I present a series of qualitative and quantitative evidence that supports the theory. First, I present interview and participant-observation evidence that there is a \norm of interference" that limits the power. Second, I recount interview and participant- observation evidence that party actors nonetheless have \preferred candidates" that they support through the nominations process despite the norm of non-interference. Third, I demonstrate with interview evidnece that party actors have a range of different activities, which form a \gatekeeping repertoire," through which they can influence the nominations process. Fourth, I use quantitative data on uncontested and contested nominations to show that, in line with the theory, contested nominations overwhelmingly emerge in competitive and safe non-incumbent ridings, particularly those in which central and local party actors have recruited different nomination candidates. Finally, I show that gatekeeping helps explain when disagreement between central and local actors over the choice of candidate does not lead to a contested nomination using a close study of \near-contested" nominations { cases in which multiple candidates expressed an interest in running at the same time but the party acclaimed one candidate at the nominating convention. This paper makes three main contributions. First, it brings new evidence to bear on de- bates over the influence of central and local party actors, including elite interviews, participant- observation and quantitative data across all ridings. This combination of materials suggest that central party actors, including party leaders' offices and formal party organizations, are often able to influence the selection of local candidates behind the scenes to shape the overall candidate slate. This observation stands in stark contrast with the implicit assumption in past work that riding-level variables alone explain the nomination of women and members of racialized minority groups (Cheng and Tavits, 2011; Cross and Pruysers, 2019; Medeiros, Forest, and Erl, 2019; Tolley, 2019; Tremblay and Pelletier, 2001). Second, it suggests a need to re-evaluate the extent to Carty's \franchise bargain" (Carty, 2002, 2004) and the concept of intra-party democracy (Cross and Katz, 2013; Cross et al., 2016) actually hold within contemporary Canadian parties. Although party actors often recognize the power of norms that bar party actors from \interfering" in candidate nominations and that support the right of local party members to choose candidates, party actors often circumvent these norms to exert influence over the candidate nominations pro- cess. As a result, the evidence for gatekeeping casts doubt on the ideas that riding associations autonomously choose candidates or that Canadian political parties are fully internally democratic. Third, the theory has testable implications for future work in federal and provincial politics, along with work on candidate selection in comparable countries such as the United Kingdom. 3 Who Controls Nominations in Canada? On paper, Canadian political parties have traditionally used the most open candidate selection processes outside of American primary elections (Cross et al., 2016; Hazan and Rahat, 2010). In most federal and provincial political parties, the formal rules governing who is eligible to vote are even more permissive than general elections, save for membership dues. Individuals ages 14-17 and permanent
Recommended publications
  • Provincial Solidarities: a History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour
    provincial solidarities Working Canadians: Books from the cclh Series editors: Alvin Finkel and Greg Kealey The Canadian Committee on Labour History is Canada’s organization of historians and other scholars interested in the study of the lives and struggles of working people throughout Canada’s past. Since 1976, the cclh has published Labour / Le Travail, Canada’s pre-eminent scholarly journal of labour studies. It also publishes books, now in conjunction with AU Press, that focus on the history of Canada’s working people and their organizations. The emphasis in this series is on materials that are accessible to labour audiences as well as university audiences rather than simply on scholarly studies in the labour area. This includes documentary collections, oral histories, autobiographies, biographies, and provincial and local labour movement histories with a popular bent. series titles Champagne and Meatballs: Adventures of a Canadian Communist Bert Whyte, edited and with an introduction by Larry Hannant Working People in Alberta: A History Alvin Finkel, with contributions by Jason Foster, Winston Gereluk, Jennifer Kelly and Dan Cui, James Muir, Joan Schiebelbein, Jim Selby, and Eric Strikwerda Union Power: Solidarity and Struggle in Niagara Carmela Patrias and Larry Savage The Wages of Relief: Cities and the Unemployed in Prairie Canada, 1929–39 Eric Strikwerda Provincial Solidarities: A History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour / Solidarités provinciales: Histoire de la Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Nouveau-Brunswick David Frank A History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour david fra nk canadian committee on labour history Copyright © 2013 David Frank Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, ab t5j 3s8 isbn 978-1-927356-23-4 (print) 978-1-927356-24-1 (pdf) 978-1-927356-25-8 (epub) A volume in Working Canadians: Books from the cclh issn 1925-1831 (print) 1925-184x (digital) Cover and interior design by Natalie Olsen, Kisscut Design.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Fixing What Ain’t Broke The New Norm of Fixed-Date Elections in Canada GRIFFYN G. CHEZENKO, Memorial University of Newfoundland Abstract. Since 2001, legislation implementing fixed dates for general elections has been passed by the federal government, and most provincial and territorial governments. The notion that general election dates are now fixed, however, is flawed. In my submission to Changing Political Landscapes, I will explore the fledgling norm of fixed date elections in Canada and examine the aspects of the legislation which call into doubt the fixedness of these elections. With a review of the literature on the subject, I begin by inquiring into the emergence of this foreign phenomenon into Canadian electoral politics and the justification for its extensive adoption. Comparing the legislation across jurisdictions, I analyze the basic construct of fixed date election legislation in Canada, survey similarities and differences, and discover how fixed dates for elections are ultimately avoidable. As a result, I find that election dates are not truly fixed in Canadian jurisdictions where fixed date election legislation has been enacted. Introduction Since the dawn of the 21st century, fixed dates for general elections in Canada have become a widely adopted norm. Bernard Lord, the former New Brunswick premier, once opined that folks “like to know when the elections are going to be” (as cited in Desserud, 2007: 204). This is a familiar concept to Canadian voters because we are inundated with information about what goes on with our southern neighbours. It is rather comforting, as Premier Lord knows, knowing when an election will be, and that there is nothing those rascally politicians can do about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    JOURNALS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK From the 24th day of October to the 17th day of November, 2017 From the 5th day of December to the 21st day of December, 2017 From the 30th day of January to the 9th day of February, 2018 From the 13th day of March to the 16th day of March, 2018 Being the Fourth Session of the Fifty-Eighth Legislative Assembly Fredericton, N.B. 2017-2018 MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Fourth Session of the Fifty-Eighth Legislative Assembly Speaker: the Honourable Christopher Collins Constituency Member Residence Albert Brian Keirstead Lower Coverdale Bathurst East-Nepisiguit-Saint Isidore Hon. Denis Landry Trudel Bathurst West-Beresford Hon. Brian Kenny Beresford Campbellton-Dalhousie* Vacant Caraquet Hédard Albert Saint-Simon Carleton Stewart Fairgrieve Hartland Carleton-Victoria Hon. Andrew Harvey Florenceville-Bristol Carleton-York Carl Urquhart Upper Kingsclear Dieppe Hon. Roger Melanson Dieppe Edmundston-Madawaska Centre** 0DGHODLQH'XEp (GPXQGVWRQ Fredericton-Grand Lake Pam Lynch Fredericton Fredericton North Hon. Stephen Horsman Fredericton Fredericton South David Coon Fredericton Fredericton West-Hanwell Brian Macdonald Fredericton Fredericton-York Kirk MacDonald Stanley Fundy-The Isles-Saint John West Hon. Rick Doucet St. George Gagetown-Petitcodiac Ross Wetmore Gagetown Hampton Gary Crossman Hampton Kent North Bertrand LeBlanc Rogersville Kent South Hon. Benoît Bourque Bouctouche Kings Centre William (Bill) Oliver Keirsteadville Madawaska Les Lacs-Edmundston Hon. Francine Landry Edmundston Memramcook-Tantramar Bernard LeBlanc Memramcook Miramichi Hon. Bill Fraser Miramichi Miramichi Bay-Neguac Hon. Lisa Harris Miramichi Moncton Centre Hon. Christopher Collins Moncton Moncton East Monique A. LeBlanc Moncton Moncton Northwest Ernie Steeves Upper Coverdale Moncton South Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick PC Government Under Pressure from Provincial Liberals: Liberal Party Enjoys 11 Point Lead in Decided Vote, Time for a Change Sentiment at 56%
    New Brunswick PC Government under pressure from Provincial Liberals: Liberal Party enjoys 11 point lead in decided vote, time for a change sentiment at 56% Toronto – June 28, 2005 – Liberals are leading the Progressive Conservatives by 11 points among New Brunswick decided voters (46% Liberals – 35% PC – 17% NDP). Voters appear to be choosing the Liberal Party because they feel it is time for a change. Voters say they are not choosing the Progressive Conservative party because of the party’s policies (particularly healthcare) and its leader. The majority of people in New Brunswick want a change, saying that it is time to give a new person and party a chance (56%). Fifty-two per cent of the public also support a provincial election this fall to either confirm Lord’s government or elect a new one. Despite the mood for a change, PC Premier Bernard Lord enjoys a 6 point lead as Best Premier. Looking at leadership favourables, outgoing NDP leader Elizabeth Weir has the strongest favourable rating at 57%. Lord edges out Graham by 6 points in favourables, the same margin as on best Premier. However, Lord also leads in unfavourables with 38%, 21 points higher than Liberal leader Graham. A second finding that conflicts with the desire of change is the mood of the province. People in New Brunswick feel positively on the direction the province is heading. However, when it comes to issues of concern, health care, jobs and education are the most important to them personally. New Brunswick clearly appears poised for a close provincial election whenever it comes.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review 2018-2019
    YEAR IN REVIEW 2018-2019 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT MY FINAL YEAR AS PRESIDENT OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK PHARMACISTS’ ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN BUSY AND PRODUCTIVE. The NBPA Board of Directors has moved forward with four than just talk. We can no longer rely on the ‘old way’ of caring for strategic directions: engage and enlarge our membership; facilitate patients. Patients need to demand solutions not just for their own transformation of the profession; demonstrate the value of health but for the benefit of the health care system. pharmacy services; and, adapt NBPA governance. I’m pleased to have members volunteering time and energy working toward these This year concludes my term as NBPA President. I consider myself goals with NBPA committees. fortunate to have been given the chance to serve in this capacity. I have had many opportunities to represent New Brunswick We welcomed 500 pharmacists and pharmacy professionals from pharmacists, but this role has also given me the chance to learn across Canada to Fredericton in June 2018 as the NBPA co-hosted from new experiences, and I’m grateful for that. the Canadian Pharmacists Conference. During that event, we released details about a New Brunswick study that clearly showed Our current Board members are passionate advocates for the patients benefit when pharmacists manage uncomplicated urinary pharmacy profession. I tip my hat to our Executive Director Paul tract infections (UTIs). The peer-reviewed study showed that Blanchard, who keeps me and the Board well informed of current pharmacists provided timely access to care (a full day sooner) and and future pharmacy issues both locally and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick
    New Brunswick Name Constituency Riding Contact Gilles LePage Restigouche West [email protected] Daniel Guitard Restigouche-Chaleur [email protected] René Legacy Bathurst West-Beresford [email protected] Lisa Harris Miramichi Bay-Neguac [email protected] Michelle Conroy Miramichi [email protected] Jake Stewart Southwest Miramichi-Bay du Vin [email protected] Greg Turner Moncton South [email protected] Hon. Mike Holland Albert [email protected] Hon. Tammy Scott-Wallace Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins [email protected] Hon. Gary Crossman Hampton [email protected] Hon. Hugh J. A. Rothesay [email protected] Hon. Trevor A. Holder Portland-Simonds [email protected] Hon. Arlene Dunn Saint John Harbour [email protected] Hon. Dorothy Shephard Saint John Lancaster [email protected] Hon. Bill Oliver Kings Centre [email protected] Kathy Bockus Saint Croix [email protected] Kris Austin Fredericton-Grand Lake [email protected] Jeff Carr New Maryland-Sunbury [email protected] Hon. Jill Green Fredericton North [email protected] Ryan P. Cullins Fredericton-York [email protected] Hon. Dominic Cardy Fredericton West-Hanwell [email protected] Gilles LePage Restigouche West [email protected] Michelle Conroy Miramichi [email protected] Greg Turner Moncton South [email protected] Kathy Bockus Saint Croix [email protected] René Legacy Bathurst West-Beresford [email protected] Lisa Harris Miramichi Bay-Neguac [email protected] Ryan P. Cullins Fredericton-York [email protected] Richard Ames Carleton-York [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • If We Could All Be Peter Lougheed” Provincial Premiers and Their Legacies, 1967-2007 1
    “If we could all be Peter Lougheed” Provincial premiers and their legacies, 1967-2007 1 J.P. Lewis Carleton University [email protected] Paper for Presentation at The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Concordia University, Montreal June 2010 Introduction For a variety of reasons, the careers of Canadian provincial premiers have escaped explicit academic attention. Premiers are found frequently in Canadian political science literature, but more for direct roles and actions – in questions of the constitution, federalism, public policy and electoral and legislative studies – instead of longitudinal study and analysis. This fits a pattern of neglect in the field; some academics have lamented the lack of direct attention to provincial politics and history (Brownsey and Howlett 2001). The aggregate imprints of premiers are relatively ignored outside of regional and provincial treatments. No pan- Canadian assessment of premiers exists, and probably for good reason. The theoretical and methodological concerns with asking general research questions about premiers are plenty; leadership theory and historical approaches provide some foundations but any approach is going to confront conceptual challenges. This is where this study is found – in a void of precedents but a plethora of qualitative data. 2 Regardless of methodological challenges, some historians, political scientists and members of the media have not shied away from ranking and assessing national leaders. Some of the more popular treatments (from the popular culture version to the more academic approach) include Ferguson’s Bastards and Boneheads , Granatstein and Hillmer’s Prime Ministers: Ranking Canada’s Leaders , and Bliss’s Right Honourable Men . Bliss (xiv), the esteemed historian, is skeptical of such endeavours, “While this is Canadian history from Parliament Hill, I am not a Hegelian and I do not believe that political leaders, least of all prime ministers of Canada, are personifications of the world spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact List
    CONSULTING PROVINCE CONTACT PHONE/FAX/E-MAIL LOGO BRITISH COLUMBIA Encorp Pacific (Canada) Phone: (604) 473-2400 Neil Hastie Fax: (604) 473-2411 Executive Director E-mail: [email protected] 206 – 2250 Boundary Rd. Burnaby, BC V5M 3Z3 www.return-it.ca BRITISH COLUMBIA Canadian Electrical Stewardship Phone: (710) 410-5070 Association E-mail: [email protected] or Julie Robertson [email protected] Member Inquiries 1321 Blanshard St. , Suite 301 www.cesarecycling.ca Victoria, BC V8W 0B6 BRITISH COLUMBIA Product Care Association Phone: (604) 592-2972 Mark Kurschner Toll Free: 1-888-252-4621 President E-mail: [email protected] or 105 West 3rd Ave. [email protected] Vancouver, BC www.productcare.org V5Y 1E6 The Product Care Association is contracted to manage the MARR www.marrbc.ca stewardship plan in BC. ALBERTA Alberta Recycling Management Phone: (780) 990-1111 Authority Toll Free: 1-888-999-8762 Doug Wright, CEO Fax: (780) 990-1122 1310 Scotia Tower 1 Toll Free Fax: 1-866-990-1122 10060 Jasper Ave. E-mail: [email protected] www.albertarecycling.ca Edmonton, AB T5J 3R8 SASKATCHEWAN SARCAN Recycling Phone: (306) 933-0616 Kevin Acton Fax: (306) 653-3932 Director of Operations E-mail: [email protected] 111 Cardinal Crescent www.sarcan.ca Saskatoon, SK S7L 6H5 SASKATCHEWAN SWEEP/EPRA Saskatchewan Phone: (306) 781-9337 Carl Flis E-mail: [email protected] Executive Director 2366 Ave C North Saskatoon, SK www.sweepit.ca S7L 5X5 MANITOBA Electronic Products Recycling Toll Free : 1-888-527-9382 Association E-mail: [email protected] Dennis Neufeld Program Director 210 – 1600 Kenaston Blvd www.recyclemyelectroni Suite 315 cs.ca/mb Winnipeg, MB R3P 0Y4 57 CONSULTING PROVINCE CONTACT PHONE/FAX/E-MAIL LOGO ONTARIO Ontario Electronic Stewardship Phone: (416) 380-4545 Jonathan Spencer Executive Director Fax: (416) 380-4154 885 Don Mills Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimaging a Better, Stronger New Brunswick: How Might We Help?
    A letter to the Premier, the Honourable Blaine Higgs: Reimaging a Better, Stronger New Brunswick: How might we help? Office of the Premier Chancery Place 6th Floor P. O. Box 6000 Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1 Canada Re: Reimaging a Better, Stronger New Brunswick – How might we help? Dear Premier Higgs, Let us begin by first offering our sincere thanks for your strong leadership throughout the current Covid-19 crisis that we are collectively faced with as Canadians. We are grateful and inspired by the commitment and collaboration shown across governments and throughout our communities. Everyone is doing their part and going above and beyond to ensure that New Brunswick comes through this in a way that strengthens us as people and a province. There have been many articles, theories and roadmaps for recovery from Covid-19 and, at times, it is overwhelming. There is no playbook to draw from and the task ahead daunting. Over the past four weeks, a number of leaders representing businesses, not-for-profit and the immigration sector have been meeting weekly to share information, support each other and think about: How can we collaborate to best contribute in a meaningful way that is helpful to government? Through our learning and discovery as a group, we looked at the way forward as having three phases: 1. Response – The government and communities’ response has been nothing short of amazing! We are so encouraged and grateful for the leadership and rapid response that has led New Brunswick’s risk level to be minimal. This has set us up to deal with the crisis effectively and to minimize the impact on New Brunswickers.
    [Show full text]
  • At the ICD's Fourth Premiers Series Event, New Brunswick Premier
    ICD EVENTS TIMOTHY PORTER PHOTOS: STEPHEN MacGILLIVRAY Reworking government At the ICD’s fourth Premiers Series event, New Brunswick Premier BLAINE HIGGS sat down with CEO RAHUL BHARDWAJ and members of the Maritime chapter to discuss the value of well-trained directors, the push to diversify the province’s economy and the importance of removing politics from government decision-making MAY/JUNE 2019 19 ICD EVENTS New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs from issuing motor vehicle licences to people of the province. His stated mission appealed to members of the ICD to use organizing the annual draw for moose- boils down to changing the way New their “unique perspectives” and insights hunting licences. Brunswickers relate to and interact with to help his Progressive Conservative-led “It is through well-trained directors their government. Or as he puts it, “We minority government make the province who understand the importance of good need to change the way New Brunswickers stronger. governance and the role of directors that think about their government. Speaking to the Institute of our agencies will be stronger – and strong “Instead of always turning Corporate Directors’ Maritime chapter Crown agencies are critical to a strong to government to fix things, New in Fredericton on May 8, he noted that New Brunswick,” he said. Brunswickers need to stand up for this many in the room were board members Higgs said organizations such as province and ask: ‘How can I contribute? or senior staff of Crown agencies and the ICD can offer wise counsel to his How can I be part of the solution?’ ” Crown corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Candidates
    Your VOTE Counts 2014 New Brunswick General Election List of Candidates www.electionsnb.ca Campbellton 2 Notice of Grant of Poll 3 Bathurst 6 (Elections Act, R.S.(N.B.) 1973, c.E-3, ss.57(2), and 129(5)(b)) 1 7 49 4 8 48 5 Tracadie-Sheila Edmundston Advance Polls Ordinary Polls 47 9 Miramichi Saturday, September 13 Monday, September 22 Grand Falls Grand-Sault 10 Moncton-Dieppe Riverview Monday, September 15 46 18 21 12 11 Polls will be open from 10 am until 8 pm. 19 14 20 22 13 17 45 42 Please remember to bring your Voter Information 23 24 Woodstock 15 Card with you, so that we can serve you faster. 38 14 25 16 Fredericton 44 43 24 42 41 37 26 Saint John 39 40 38 43 28 27 34 36 34 39 37 29 35 30 31 Special Ballots 27 32 35 33 Special ballots, which are available at all returning offices, provide electors with additional voting options throughout the election period. Special voting officers can, by appointment, bring a ballot to those electors in hospitals, treatment centers, or at home and unable to access the various voting opportunities because of illness or incapacity. Using a special ballot, a qualified elector may vote at any returning office in the province for a candidate in the electoral district where the elector is qualified to vote. This option is available throughout the entire election period, except Sundays. The offices are open 6 days a week (Mon–Fri 9 am–7 pm, Sat 10 am–5 pm).
    [Show full text]
  • Anglophone South S C H O O L D I S T R I C T District Education Council
    Anglophone South S C H O O L D I S T R I C T District Education Council 490 Woodward Avenue Saint John, New Brunswick March 16, 2021 E2K 5N3 Minister Dominic Cardy Department of Education & Early Childhood Place 2000, 250 King Street Fredericton, NB E3B 9M9 Dear Minister Cardy: During the ASD-S District Education Council meeting of March 10, 2021, a motion was made and passed by Council to advocate in the strongest terms possible for the return of high school students to daily in person classes. We are writing to request immediate attention towards two acute concerns we have for high school students in ASD-S: 1) the state of their education and 2) their mental wellbeing. We know that you share these concerns and appreciate the public support shown by both you and the media this past week. We respect the incredibly difficult mandate involved in handling the pandemic, as well as the need to balance the many facets of public health that have been impacted; however, we are disappointed that the prioritization of youth in the vaccination plan has recently been rescinded. We would like to strongly reinforce the current public attention to our high school students - particularly those in grade 12 - that have been acutely impacted at a seminal point in their lives. As advocates for our education system, and first and foremost our children, we ask that you continue to advocate for all Public Health measures possible to return high school students back to class every day. The ASD-S District Education Council has solicited feedback from students, parents, teachers and staff, and the near- unanimous feedback has been that the single most important thing we can do to help these students' education and mental wellbeing is to get them back to school five days per week.
    [Show full text]