DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Preparers List of Preparers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Preparers List of Preparers table of contents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment - List of Preparers List of Preparers The following is a list of contributors to this draft environmental impact statement. Numerous other people have also contributed in many ways to this document. Their help is greatly appreciated. Interdisciplinary Team Suraj Ahuja – Air Resources Specialist Dr. Ahuja is currently a Province Air Quality Specialist for the Forest Service supporting air program for the eight northern national forests in California. He has worked for the Forest Service for twenty years in the Southwest and Pacific Southwest Region in various positions. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of California at Davis. He also has Air Quality Certification from University of California (Extension) Davis. He has written various technical documents and papers for Forest-wide and Region-wide use. David Arrasmith - Planner Graduated UC Davis - 1981 B.S. Agricultural Economics & Management Socio-Economic Planner - Eldorado National Forest 1980 - 1987 Economist/Analyst - Tongass Land Management Planning Team - 1987-1989 Assistant Team Leader - Tongass Land Management Team 1989 - 1991 Socio-Economic Planner - Northern Spotted Owl EIS Team 1991-1992 Planning Staff Officer - Tongass National Forest - 1992-1999 Administrative Officer - Tongass National Forest - 1999 - 2000 Planner - Sierra Nevada Framework - 2000-2001 John Babin – GIS Coordinator/Analyst John holds a Bachelor of Science in Forest Resource Management from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He did graduate work in Forest Business Management at the University of Oregon. John most recently served as GIS Analyst on the interdisciplinary team for the Herger- Feinstein Quincy Library Group EIS. He has been the GIS Coordinator on the Tahoe National Forest for the last 8 years. John has worked for the Forest Service for 19 years in positions in land management planning, forest inventory, and silviculture. Berni Bahro – Fire/Fuels Specialist Berni received his A.S. in Forestry from the University of New Hampshire’s Thompson School of Applied Science in 1979. He graduated in 1989 with a B.S. in Science Education from Oregon State University. In 1993 he graduated from Technical Fire Management, an advanced study program in Wildland Fire Science that is accredited through Colorado State University. Berni has been working for the U.S. Forest Service for twenty-one years, with the last twenty years in wildland fire suppression. He has worked in three regions, on three National Forests and at a Forest Service Experiment Station. He also participated in the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project as an Associate Contributor and co-authored two publications. Berni is currently the District Fire and Fuels Specialist on the Placerville Ranger District, Eldorado National Forest. Klaus Barber – Analysis Core Team Coordinator Education: BS in Forest Management from University of California, Berkeley and an MBA from University of Southern California. Experience: Klaus has 34-years with the Forest Service as District Timber Management Officer, Timber Planner, Forest Land Use Planner, Regional Biometrican, and presently Regional Operational Research and Management Science specialist. He has worked on special projects, such Redwood Park Expansion, Gang-of -Four Spotted-Fisheries Analysis, FEMAT, and Cal Owl. He is the co-developer of CIA, ELMO, and RELM computer models. FEIS Volume 1, List of Preparers Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Tim Biddinger – Hydrologist Tim obtained a B.S. in Forestry from UC Berkley in 1973. He has worked for the Forest Service for 23 years as a timber sale planner, silviculturist, sale administrator and hydrologist. He is currently the west zone hydrologist for the Tahoe National Forest. Steve Bishop – Regional Range Program Manager Steve has a BS degree in Range Management from Humboldt State University. He has been with the Forest Service 26 years. He started his career as a Range Conservationist (3 years), District Resource Officer, with range mgmt. responsibilities (7 years), District Ranger on two different Districts, each with strong range programs (12 years), Regional Range Program Manager (4 years). He is an active member of the Society of Range Management. Kris Boatner – Wildlife Biologist Kris Boatner is currently the District Wildlife Biologist and Biological Resources Officer for the Amador Ranger District of the Eldorado National Forest. She holds a B.S. degree in Wildlife and Fisheries Biology from the University of California at Davis, and has worked as a wildlife and natural resources biologist for the Forest Service for 10 years. John S. Bradford – Assistant Interdisciplinary Team Leader and NEPA Specialist John has a BS degree in Forestry and Business Management from the University of Nevada, Reno. Zone NEPA Specialist/Planner, Tahoe National Forest (1996-1998), Acting Forest Silviculturist, Tahoe National Forest (1995-1996), Wild & Scenic River Planner, Tahoe National Forest (1994), NEPA Specialist, Tahoe National Forest (1993), Supervisory Forester/Planner, Plumas National Forest (1991-1992), District Silviculturist, Coconino National Forest (1989-1991), Assistant Resource Officer, Angeles National Forest (1986-1989), District Culturist, Modoc National Forest (1980-1986), District Culturist, Shasta-Trinity National Forest (1978-1980). John is a Certified Silviculturist in Regions 3 and 5. Lisa Bryant – Forest Soil Scientist Lisa has worked as a soil scientist for the last 12 years. She is currently the Forest Soil Scientist on the Inyo National Forest and has also worked in Sacramento for US Bureau of Reclamation (1992- 1995), the Tahoe National Forest (1989-1992), and for the Plumas National Forest (1988). She has a MS Soil Science from University of California, Davis and a BA in General Agriculture from Washington State University. Annie Buma – Forester Annie is co-owner of the ACT 2 enterprise team. ACT 2 wrote responses to public comments. Annie has been employed by the Forest Service since 1973. Prior to becoming co-owner of the ACT2 Enterprise Unit, Annie spent eight years as Planning Forester Staff for the Happy Camp Ranger District, one of five Districts within the Klamath National Forest. Her responsibilities included planning and coordination of environmental analysis, supervision of seven resource management specialists, and budgeting ($150,000-600,000 program). Other responsibilities included Endangered Species Act compliance and management of the Wildlife Program on the District. Steven D. Clauson – Interdisciplinary Team Leader BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley 4 years as Engineer, Plumas National Forest 4 years District Resource Officer, San Bernardino National Forest 12 years, District Ranger, Cleveland and Shasta Trinity National Forests 4 Years, Forest planner, Plumas, Cleveland, and Shasta-Trinity National Forests 4 years, Regional Forester assistant, Northwest Forest Plan coordination 1.5 years, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Sierra Nevada Framework project FEIS Volume 1, List of Preparers Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment - List of Preparers Joanna Clines – Botanist Joanna has Bachelor of Arts degree in biology from California State University, Fresno. She earned a Master of Arts degree in plant ecology from CSU Fresno, and completed a thesis on the reproductive ecology of the rare shrub Carpenteria californica. Prior to joining the Forest Service as a seasonal botanist in 1988, Joanna gained experience in wildlife and fisheries biology working for California Department of Fish and Game and Kings River Conservation District, and in botany with the California Energy Commission. Joanna has worked as the Forest Botanist for the Sierra National Forest for 10 years. Other duties on the Sierra National Forest include coordination of the noxious weed program and the research natural area program. Kent Connaughton – Project Manager Bachelor of Arts degree in biological sciences from Stanford University; Master of Forestry degree from Oregon State University; PhD in forest economics from the University of California, Berkeley. Previously, Supervisor of the Lassen National Forest, Susanville, California (1996-1998); Assistant Director for Economic Assistance in the U.S. Office of Forestry and Economic Assistance, Portland, Oregon (1994-1996); Research Scientist and Research Team Leader, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon (1978-1994). Yvonne Cougoulat – Wildlife Biologist Yvonne Cougoulat is a Wildlife Biologist for the Kings River/Pineridge Ranger District of the Sierra National Forest. Yvonne has a B.S. in Conservation Biology from University of Nevada, Reno and has been with the Forest Service for 12 years. Michael D. Dunn – Minerals and Geology Education: Master of Science (w/honors) Geology, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington, 1981; Bachelor of Science (w/honors) Geology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 1976; Assoc. of Science (w/high honors) Conservation of Natural Resources, Delta Community College, University City, Michigan, 1974. Positions held: 2/1996 - present, Mining Geologist/Mineral Examiner, Region 5, Minerals Management, Eldorado National Forest, Placerville, CA. 10/1988 - 2/1996, Physical Scientist, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Western Field Operations Center, Spokane, Washington. 1/1993 - 4/1993, Program Manager (Temporary Detail), U.S. Bureau of Mines, Headquarters, Washington D.C., 3/1979 - 10/1988, Geologist/Physical Scientist, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Western Field Operations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804
    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment E Part 2
    Response to Correspondence from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Regarding the ArtCenter Master Plan Note that the emails (Attachment A) dated after April 25, 2018, were provided to the City after the end of the CEQA comment period, and, therefore, the emails and the responses below are not included in the EIR, and no response is required under CEQA. However, for sake of complete analysis and consideration of all comments submitted, the City responds herein and this document is made part of the project staff report. Response to Correspondence This correspondence with the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy occurred in the context of the preparation of the EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The formal comment letter from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy included in this correspondence was responded to as Letter No. 6 in Section III, Response to Comments, of the April 2018 Final EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The primary correspondence herein is comprised of emails between John Howell and Mickey Long discussing whether there is a wildlife corridor within the Hillside Campus, as well as emails between John Howell and CDFW regarding whether there is a wildlife corridor and whether CDFW will provide a comment letter regarding the ArtCenter Project for the Planning Commission hearing on May 9, 2018. Note that CDFW submitted a comment letter on May 9, 2018, after completion of the Draft EIR and Final EIR. The City has also provided a separate response to this late comment letter. This correspondence centers around the potential for the Hillside Campus to contribute to a wildlife corridor. The CDFW was contacted during preparation of the Final EIR to obtain specific mapping information to provide a more comprehensive description of the potential for wildlife movement within the Hillside Campus within the Final EIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Stewardship Proposal, Tahoe National Forest, Bear River
    Land Stewardship Proposal for the Lake Spaulding, Bear River, & Fordyce Lake Planning Units of the Yuba Bear Watershed by the USDA Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest PART 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION Contact Information: Primary Contact: Fran Herbst Lands Program Manager 631 Coyote Street Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 478-6852 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 Secondary Contact: Heather Newell (New Secondary Contact) Yuba River Ranger District Assistant Public Service Officer 15924 Highway 49 Camptonville, CA 95922 (530) 288-0727 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 Executive Director: Tom Quinn Forest Supervisor 631 Coyote Street Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 478-6200 [email protected] Fax (530) 478-6109 1 2. Executive Summary The Tahoe National Forest (TNF) is managed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) which is a federal agency in the Department of Agriculture. National Forest System (NFS) lands are generally managed with similar goals and objectives as the Beneficial Public Values (BPVs) identified for Stewardship lands. Some of the laws requiring the protection of these values include the National Forest Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Archaeological Resources Protection Act. The Forest Service was established in 1905. The Forest Service manages 193 million acres of public lands, known collectively as the National Forest System. Currently, a critical emphasis of the USFS is to retain and restore ecological resilience of the NFS lands to achieve sustainable ecosystems that provide a broad range of services to humans and other organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Eldorado National Forest
    Welcome to the Eldorado National Forest The Eldorado National Forest is part of an overall community which contributes to the quality of life. Everyone who shares in its benefits, shares in its welfare. Contact Information Eldorado National Forest Supervisor’s Office Ramiro Villalvazo, Forest Supervisor 100 Forni Road Placerville, CA 95667 Phone: 530) 622-5061 (530) 642-5122 (TTY) Internet Site: www.fs.fed.us/r5/eldorado Amador Ranger District 26820 Silver Drive Pioneer, CA 95666 Phone: (209) 295-4251 (209) 295-5996 (TTY) Georgetown Ranger District The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in 7600 Wentworth Springs Road all its programs and activities on the Georgetown, CA 95634 basis of race, color, national origin, Phone: (530) 333-4312 age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, Pacific Ranger District parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, 7887 Highway 50 political beliefs, reprisal, or because Pollock Pines, Ca 95726 all or part of an individual’s income Phone: (530) 644-2349 is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with Placerville Ranger District disabilities who require alternative 4260 Eight Mile Road means for communication of Camino, CA 95709 program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact Phone: (530) 644-2324 USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) (530) 647-5314 (TTY) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences
    United States Department of Giant Sequoia Agriculture Forest Service National Monument Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement August 2010 Volume 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Chapter 4 includes the environmental effects analysis. It is organized by resource area, in the same manner as Chapter 3. Effects are displayed for separate resource areas in terms of the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects associated with the six alternatives considered in detail. Effects can be neutral, beneficial, or adverse. This chapter also discusses the unavoidable adverse effects, the relationship between short-term uses and long-term productivity, and any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources. Environmental consequences form the scientific and analytical basis for comparison of the alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Camp and Oak Knoll 2018 120318
    KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST RANGER DISTRICT SPECIFIC CUTTING CONDITIONS For woodcutting in Happy Camp, Oak Knoll, Salmon River, and Scott River listen to the West Zone KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST OFFICES PERSONAL USE FIREWOOD CONDITIONS danger rating. For the Goosenest, listen to the East Zone. In addition to the Forest-Wide Personal Use Firewood Conditions, the following applies to woodcut- Ranger District and Supervisors Office hours are 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM. United States Department of Agriculture This map, together with the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM), and fuelwood tags are ting on specific Districts of the Klamath National Forest. Woodcutters shall have an USDA, Forest Service approved spark arrester on the chainsaw and fire Forest Service a part of your woodcutting permit and must be in your possession while cutting, HAPPY CAMP extinguisher or a serviceable shovel not less than 46 inches in length within 25 feet of woodcutting area. Forest Supervisor's Office Happy Camp Ranger District gathering, and transporting your wood. 1711 South Main St. 63822 Highway 96 A. Within areas designated for General Firewood Cutting: Check woodcutting site for any smoldering fire and extinguish before leaving. Yreka, CA 96097 Happy Camp, CA 96039 In order to get the most out of your woodcutting trip, it is important that you review 1. Standing dead hardwoods and conifers may be cut. and become familiar with the terms of your Permit prior to cutting. If you have ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS: (530) 842-6131 (530) 493-2243 2. Standing live hardwoods may be cut. (TDD) (530) 841-4573 (TDD) (530) 493-1777 questions about any terms or conditions, please contact the District you plan to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • September 29, 2014 Land Management Plan Revision USDA
    September 29, 2014 Land Management Plan Revision USDA Forest Service Ecosystem Planning Staff 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 Submitted via Region 5 website Re: Comments on Notice of Intent and Detailed Proposed Action for the Forest Plan Revisions on the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests To the Forest Plan Revision Team: These comments are provided on behalf of Sierra Forest Legacy and the above conservation organizations. We have reviewed the Notice of Intent (NOI), detailed Proposed Action (PA), and supporting materials posted on the Region 5 planning website and offer the following comments on these documents. We have submitted numerous comment letters since the forest plan revision process was initiated for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra national forests. Specifically, we submitted comment letters on the forest assessments for each national forest (Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2013a, Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2013b, Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2013c), comments on two need for change documents (Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2014a, Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2014b) and comments on detailed desired conditions (Sierra Forest Legacy et al. 2014c). We incorporate these comments by reference and attach the letters to these scoping comments. We have included these letters in our scoping comments because significant issues that we raised in these comments have not yet been addressed in the NOI, or the detailed PA creates significant conflict with resource areas on which we commented. Organization of Comments The following comments address first the content of the NOI, including the purpose and need for action, issues not addressed in the scoping notice, and regulatory compliance of the PA as written.
    [Show full text]
  • Inyo National Forest Visitor Guide
    >>> >>> Inyo National Forest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Visitor Guide >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> $1.00 Suggested Donation FRED RICHTER Inspiring Destinations © Inyo National Forest Facts “Inyo” is a Paiute xtending 165 miles Bound ary Peak, South Si er ra, lakes and 1,100 miles of streams Indian word meaning along the California/ White Mountain, and Owens River that provide habitat for golden, ENevada border between Headwaters wildernesses. Devils brook, brown and rainbow trout. “Dwelling Place of Los Angeles and Reno, the Inyo Postpile Nation al Mon ument, Mam moth Mountain Ski Area National Forest, established May ad min is tered by the National Park becomes a sum mer destination for the Great Spirit.” 25, 1907, in cludes over two million Ser vice, is also located within the mountain bike en thu si asts as they acres of pris tine lakes, fragile Inyo Na tion al For est in the Reds ride the chal leng ing Ka mi ka ze Contents Trail from the top of the 11,053-foot mead ows, wind ing streams, rugged Mead ow area west of Mam moth Wildlife 2 Sierra Ne va da peaks and arid Great Lakes. In addition, the Inyo is home high Mam moth Moun tain or one of Basin moun tains. El e va tions range to the tallest peak in the low er 48 the many other trails that transect Wildflowers 3 from 3,900 to 14,494 feet, pro vid­ states, Mt. Whitney (14,494 feet) the front coun try of the forest. Wilderness 4-5 ing diverse habitats that sup port and is adjacent to the lowest point Sixty-five trailheads provide Regional Map - North 6 vegetation patterns ranging from in North America at Badwater in ac cess to over 1,200 miles of trail Mono Lake 7 semiarid deserts to high al pine Death Val ley Nation al Park (282 in the 1.2 million acres of wil der- meadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Giant Sequoia Forest Service Sequoia National Monument National Forest August 2012 Record of Decision The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Responsible Official: Randy Moore Regional Forester Pacific Southwest Region Recommending Official: Kevin B. Elliott Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest California Counties Include: Fresno, Tulare, Kern This document presents the decision regarding the the basis for the Giant Sequoia National Monument selection of a management plan for the Giant Sequoia Management Plan (Monument Plan), which will be National Monument (Monument) that will amend the followed for the next 10 to 15 years. The long-term 1988 Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource environmental consequences contained in the Final Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the portion of the Environmental Impact Statement are considered in national forest that is in the Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Sierra Nevada Gooseberry in Relation to Blister Rust Control
    4C z icology of the Sierra Nevada Gooseber n Relation to Mister Rust Control By Clarence R. Quick, Forest Ecologist, Forest Service Circular No. 937 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CONTENTS Page Page Introduction 3 Effects of various forest dis- Plant ecology in the Sierra turbances 21 Nevada 5 Fire 21 Climatology 5 Logging 22 Sierran montane forest 6 Grazing 23 Forest ecology 7 Hand eradication 23 Autecologv of the Sierra Nevada Chemical eradication 25 gooseberry 7 Application of ecology to control Morphology 8 work 25 Diseases 8 Timing of eradication 25 Seeds and distribution 9 Estimation of gooseberry Seedling 11 occurrence potential 26 Seedling survival and growth. _ 13 Timber management 27 Fruit production 17 Decline of populations 18 Summary 28 Gooseberries and the fauna 19 Literature cited 29 Washington, D. C. March 1954 INTRODUCTION Ecological studies of the genus Ribes have been in progress in northern California for more than 20 years. A thorough under- standing of the ecology of native ribes in general, and of the Sierra Nevada gooseberry (Ribes roezli Regel) in particular, is necessary in connection with the control of the white pine blister rust in California. This disease of five-needled pines, caused by the fungus Cronartium ribicola Fischer growing on ribes as its alternate host, threatens to destroy sugar pine (Pinus lamberliana Dougi.) on about a million and a half acres of forest land that supports sufficient sugar pine to make rust control economical. Some of the conclusions from these studies are based on extensive field observations. For the most part, however, they are related directly to analyses of field data collected from several series of plots in California from 1936 to 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • California SNO-PARK Sites
    California SNO-PARK Sites 1. YUBA PASS 12. SPICER 16. EASTWOOD Located on the south side of Highway 49 at Yuba Located on the south side of Highway 4 at Spicer Located on the east side of Highway 168 Pass. Contact: Tahoe National Forest, Sierraville Road. Contact: Stanislaus National Forest, at Huntington Lake Road. Contact: Sierra Ranger District - (530) 994-3401. Calaveras Ranger District - (209) 795-1381. National Forest, High Sierra Ranger District - GPS: 39°37’1.20”N, 120°29’23.10”W GPS: 38°25’44.44”N, 120°4’38.01”W (559) 855-5355. GPS: 37°15’21.04”N, 119°9’39.10”W 2. DONNER SUMMIT 13. HIGHWAY 108 Located on the south side of I-80 at the Castle Peak Located at the winter closure gate on Highway 108, 17. HUNTINGTON LAKE exit beyond Boreal Inn. Contact: Tahoe National east of Strawberry. Contact: Stanislaus National Located on the west side of Huntington Lake Forest, Truckee Ranger District - (530) 587-3558. Forest, Summit Ranger District - (209) 965-3434. Road, three miles from Eastwood SNO-PARK. GPS: 39°20’23.54”N, 120°20’38.25”W GPS: 38°16’1.47”N, 119°59’30.31”W Contact: Sierra National Forest, High Sierra Ranger No snowmobiling District - (559) 855-5355. GPS: 37°15’5.30”N, 119°10’27.23”W 3. BLACKWOOD CANYON 14. TAMARACK Located on the west side of Highway 89, three miles Located on the south side of Highway 168, east south of Tahoe City. Contact: Lake Tahoe Basin of Shaver Lake.
    [Show full text]