Structured Finance & Securitisation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structured Finance & Securitisation Structured Finance & Securitisation in France Report generated on 24 March 2020 The information contained in this report is indicative only. Law Business Research is not responsible for any actions (or lack thereof) taken as a result of relying on or in any way using information contained in this report and in no event shall be liable for any damages resulting from reliance on or use of this information. © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research Structured Finance & Securitisation Table of contents GENERAL FRAMEWORK Legislation Applicable transactions Market climate REGULATION Regulatory authorities Licensing and authorisation requirements Sanctions Public disclosure requirements ELIGIBILITY Originators Receivables Investors Custodians/servicers Public-sector involvement TRANSACTIONAL ISSUES SPV forms SPV formation process Governing law Asset acquisition and transfer Registration Obligor notifcation Credit rating agencies Directors’ and ofcers’ duties Risk exposure SECURITY Types Perfection Enforcement Commingling risk © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research 1/17 Structured Finance & Securitisation TAXATION Originators Issuers Investors BANKRUPTCY Bankruptcy remoteness True sale Consolidation of assets and liabilities UPDATES AND TRENDS Key developments of the past year LAW STATED DATE Correct on © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research 2/17 Structured Finance & Securitisation Contributors France Olivier Hubert [email protected] De Pardieu Brocas Maffei © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research 3/17 Structured Finance & Securitisation GENERAL FRAMEWORK Legislation What legislation governs securitisation in your jurisdiction? Has your jurisdiction enacted a specifc securitisation law? Securitisation in France is mainly regulated by specifc legislation relating to the regulated funds specialising in securitisation activities, namely, fnancing entities (OF). Such legislation has been codifed in the French Monetary and Financial Code (MFC). EU Regulation 2017/2402 providing a general framework for securitisation also applies since it is of direct application in France. French banking monopoly rules are also of great relevance since an exemption from banking monopoly rules is generally necessary to conduct securitisation activities in France. This is because securitisation activities typically involve the acquisition or granting of receivables (either loans or commercial receivables), which are also typically considered as being a banking activity by French banking authorities and case law. Securitisation legislation has been deeply renovated by a 2017 ordinance of the French government, which entered into force on 3 January 2018 and replaced the old 1988 law. The purpose of this 2017 ordinance is to create a broad category of OF that regroups the old mutual securitisation funds (FCT) and other types of regulated funds now authorised to provide fnancing either by granting loans or by purchasing receivables. This 2017 ordinance also recaptures the provisions of the 1988 legislation establishing a robust legal framework for the transfer of receivables through a true sale process. The purpose of the 2017 legislation is to allow non-bank private investors to invest in any type of receivables (including debt, loans, commercial receivables or distressed debt) through a fnancing entity that can be structured either as a traditional securitisation entity (OT) or a specialised fnancing entity (OFS). This French legal framework aims at providing all OF, in other words, both OT and OFS, with a strong and clear legal regime that eliminates uncertainty regarding the true sale transfer of the receivables and reduces the seller’s or originator’s risk; both the OT or OFS can be created either as a corporation or as an organised and legally transparent co-ownership and are allowed to acquire receivables or to extend loans. In addition, an OFS is also allowed to hold other types of assets and qualify as an alternative investment fund (AIF), regulated by the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) (AIFM), which may qualify as a long-term European investment (ELTIF). The tax regime of an FCT will generally remain the same; the tax regime of an OFS will shortly be clarifed by the French tax authorities. Applicable transactions Does your jurisdiction defne which types of transactions constitute securitisations? The MFC does not specifcally defne which transactions qualify as a securitisation transaction; however, it broadly defnes the purpose of securitisation entities as being entities exposed to risks, including insurance risks, by acquiring receivables, granting loans, guarantees and security interest, underwriting risks through participation in credits, concluding forward fnancial instruments or contracts transferring insurance risks, and such securitisation entity fnances or covers those risks by issuing securities (shares or debt instruments) or forward fnancial instruments or borrowing money or through other resources (L214 of the MFC). © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research 4/17 Structured Finance & Securitisation Market climate How large is the market for securitisations in your jurisdiction? The French securitisation market has followed the same trends as the European market. Since 2010, it has progressively re-established itself. According to a survey published by the association for fnancial markets in Europe, in 2017, France ranked second in Europe (after the UK) for the new issues of securitised receivables, which amounted to €36.9 billion in 2017, compared with €235 billion for the whole European Union. For investors, securitisation offers interesting investment opportunities with yields that are on average higher compared with those offered by corporate bonds, in particular on the lower tranches of collateralised loan obligation. Residential mortgage loans and auto loans represent a signifcant part of the total amount of securitised assets. Securitisation is of major importance to banks as a refnancing tool and for easing compliance with ratios imposed on banking institutions by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. In France, securitisation activity is fuelled by three main participants, including arranging banks, investors and legal counsel, developing the required high level of expertise. REGULATION Regulatory authorities Which body has responsibility for the regulation of securitisation? The main market institution responsible for regulating securitisation is the Financial Markets Authority (AMF). The AMF General Regulation (RGAMF) contains a number of detailed rules applied to creating securitisation entities and their management by a licensed fund management company. French securitisation entities are regulated entities that are not directly supervised by the French market authorities. However, their management companies and custodians are supervised entities. The management company is overseen by the AMF and the custodian is generally supervised by the French Prudential Supervisory Authority. Additionally, the law provides that instructions given by the management company will be performed by the custodian to the extent that only such decisions comply with the constitutive documents and regulations of the securitisation entity, and with the provisions of French law. The accounts of the securitisation entity are audited on a yearly basis. If the relevant securitisation entity’s management strategy includes active asset management or entry into credit derivatives’ transactions as a protection seller, the management company will need to be licensed for this purpose and will have to set up appropriate organisational and risk-control procedures. Licensing and authorisation requirements Must originators, servicers or issuers be licensed? No licence is required from originators for securitising receivables. An originator may be any type of commercial company, including any seller of goods, vehicles or commodities, any service provider or any banking or fnancial institution. Securitisation entities themselves need not obtain a specifc licence for issuing securities. However, specifc requirements apply to public offers of securities (including the publication of a prospectus approved by the AMF), but this does not in itself involve requiring a specifc licence for the issuer. © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research 5/17 Structured Finance & Securitisation The servicing of the securitised receivables may be handled by the originator or by any entity that was in charge of the servicing before the transfer. The servicing may also be delegated by the management company to any other entity appointed for such a purpose. No specifc licence is required for servicing activities performed for a securitisation entity; these third-party servicers are exempted from complying with the decree relating to amicable recovery activities in France. Certain covered bonds’ companies issuing bonds such as the sociétés de crédit foncier must be licensed as a credit institution, but they are generally not considered to be securitisation entities. French authorities consider the purchase of non-matured receivables on a regular basis to be a banking activity requiring a banking licence; however, this requirement does not apply to French OF and French securitisation entities, which beneft from a specifc exemption from the banking monopoly rules. Foreign securitisation vehicles may also beneft from an exemption from the banking monopoly rules if their activities are conducted in a similar
Recommended publications
  • Structured Finance & Securitisation
    GETTING THROUGH THE DEAL Structured Finance & Securitisation Structured Finance & Securitisation Finance Structured Contributing editor Patrick D Dolan 2017 2017 © Law Business Research 2017 Structured Finance & Securitisation 2017 Contributing editor Patrick D Dolan Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Publisher Law The information provided in this publication is Gideon Roberton general and may not apply in a specific situation. [email protected] Business Legal advice should always be sought before taking Research any legal action based on the information provided. Subscriptions This information is not intended to create, nor does Sophie Pallier Published by receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. [email protected] Law Business Research Ltd The publishers and authors accept no responsibility 87 Lancaster Road for any acts or omissions contained herein. The Senior business development managers London, W11 1QQ, UK information provided was verified between Alan Lee Tel: +44 20 3708 4199 February and March 2017. Be advised that this is a [email protected] Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 developing area. Adam Sargent © Law Business Research Ltd 2017 [email protected] No photocopying without a CLA licence. Printed and distributed by First published 2015 Encompass Print Solutions Dan White Third edition Tel: 0844 2480 112 [email protected] ISSN 2058-5594 © Law Business Research 2017 CONTENTS Global overview 5 Japan 31 Patrick D Dolan Motohiro Yanagawa, Takashi
    [Show full text]
  • GE Commercial Finance Meeting
    Mike Neal GE Commercial Finance Overview Organized for faster growth and lower cost 90’s 2002 Today GE Commercial Consumer Commercial Infrastructure Industrial NBCU Healthcare MID -MARKET FINANCING Vendor Financial Finance Finance Commercial Commercial Services Commercial Dave Calhoun John Rice Bob Wright Equipment European Finance Bill Castell Structured Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Financing Equipment Finance Joe Hogan Finance Finance Sr. Vice President3 Dave Nissen Mike Neal Card Services Finance Group Healthcare Sr. Vice President Vice Chairman Global Finance Real – Aircraft Engines – Cons. & Ind’l. – Network – Diagnostic Consumer Estate – Energy – Plastics – Film Imaging – Oil & Gas – Silicones/Quartz – Stations – Biosciences Finance – Rail – Security – Ent. Cable – Clinical Sys. – Water – Sensing – TVPD – Info. Tech. –Europe –Capital Solutions Financial Equity GE Consumer – Energy Fin. – Fanuc – Sports/Olympics – Services Assurance Svcs. – Inspect Tech. – Parks – Aviation Fin. – Equip. Svcs. –Asia –Real Estate CONSUMER SPECIALIZED FINANCING 2002 Svcs. (GECAS) SPECIALIZED SERVICES GE Capital SPECIALTY INSURANCE –Americas –Corp. Fin. Svcs. SPECIALIZED SERVICES SPECIALTY INSURANCE Finance Employers Capital Reinsurance –Australia –Healthcare Markets Reinsurance Corporation Re-org Fin. Svcs. Global Process Mortgage –Insurance Solutions InsuranceInsurance GE Insurance Technology Rail Financial Services Services Guaranty Aviation Insurance Penske Truck Services Mod Space Leasing Fleet Trailer European Equipment
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Finance & Restructuring
    Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-1 Structured Finance & Restructuring Prof. Ian Giddy New York University Structured Finance z Corporate financial restructuring z Asset-backed securitization z Synthetic and whole business securitization z Credit-linked structured finance z Structured financing techniques Debt-linked Equity-linked z Leveraged finance Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 2 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-2 Structured Finance Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 3 Assignments z Individual 30% z Team 30% z Caselets 20% z Final 40% Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 4 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-3 Investor economics SPONSORING COMPANY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Rates Ratings Risk SALE OR Liquidity ASSIGNMENT SPECIAL PURPOSE Spread analysis VEHICLE ISSUES ACCOUNTS ASSET-BACKED RECEIVABLE CERTIFICATES Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 5 Bowie Rights: Where’s the Money? Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 6 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-4 Credit-Linked Notes BANK Credit Default Swap SPV Credit Guarantee Deposits Credit- REFERENCE Linked POOL OF LOANS Fee Notes (like spread on bond) T-bonds (ABS) Copyright ©2004 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 7 Structure of the US MBS Market MortgageMortgage Loan Loan BankBank (mortgage (mortgage originator) originator) makes makes a a whole whole loan loan Ancillary:Ancillary: brokers, brokers, servicers, servicers, insurers insurers MortgageMortgage Pass-Through Pass-Through FNMAFNMA or or GMAC GMAC (conduit) (conduit)
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Structured Finance Markets
    THE ROLE OF CREDIT RATING AGENCIES IN STRUCTURED FINANCE MARKETS FINAL REPORT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS MAY 2008 BACKGROUND TO THE TASK FORCE WORK In 2003, the Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions formed a task force of its members’ principal representatives to study issues related to the activities of credit rating agencies (CRAs). This Chairmen’s Task Force on Credit Rating Agencies (frequently referred to as the CRA Task Force) issued a report in September 2003 describing the role CRAs play in the global capital market and issues that CRAs currently face that may have an impact on the quality of the credit ratings they publish.1 At the same time that the Technical Committee published this report, it also published a set of principles that regulators, CRAs and other market participants might follow as a way to better guard the integrity of the rating process and help ensure that investors are provided with ratings that are timely and of high quality.2 The IOSCO CRA Principles are high-level and meant to be used by CRAs of all types and sizes, using all types of methodologies, and operating under a wide variety of legal and market environments. Shortly after the release of the IOSCO CRA Principles, several CRAs advised IOSCO’s Technical Committee that it would be helpful to them and other market participants, if the Technical Committee were to describe in more detail how the IOSCO CRA Principles might be applied in practice. Subsequently, the CRA Task Force drafted the Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies (IOSCO CRA Code of Conduct)3 designed to serve as a model upon which CRAs could base their own codes of conduct as a way of implementing the IOSCO CRA Principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Securitisation 2020
    Securitisation 2020 A practical cross-border insight to securitisation work 13th Edition Featuring contributions from: Allen & Overy LLP Macfarlanes LLP Roschier Advokatbyrå AB Brodies LLP Maples Group Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP Cuatrecasas Mayer Brown Shearman & Sterling LLP Freshfields Bruckhaus McMillan LLP Sidley Austin LLP Deringer LLP Nishimura & Asahi VdA GSK Stockmann Oon & Bazul LLP Walder Wyss Ltd. King & Wood Mallesons Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Europe) Waselius & Wist Loyens & Loeff Luxembourg S.à r.l. LLP ISBN 978-1-83918-046-0 ISSN 1745-7661 Published by 59 Tanner Street London SE1 3PL United Kingdom Securitisation 2020 +44 207 367 0720 [email protected] th www.iclg.com 13 Edition Group Publisher Rory Smith Editor Jane Simmons Senior Editor Contributing Editor: Sam Friend Rupert Wall Head of Production Suzie Levy Sidley Austin LLP Chief Media Officer Fraser Allan CEO Jason Byles Printed by Stephens & George Print Group Cover image www.istockphoto.com ©2020 Global Legal Group Limited. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction by any means, Strategic Partners digital or analogue, in whole or in part, is strictly forbidden. PEFC Certified Disclaimer This product is from sustainably managed forests and controlled sources This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehen- PEFC/16-33-254 www.pefc.org sive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Finance: Equity
    Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-1 Structured Finance: Equity Prof. Ian Giddy New York University Structured Finance l Asset-backed securitization l Corporate financial restructuring l Structured financing techniques Copyright ©2002 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 2 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-2 When Debt and Equity are Not Enough Assets Liabilities Debt Contractual int. & principal Value Contractual int. & principal Value NoNo upside upside ofof futurefuture SeniorSenior claimsclaims Control via restrictions cashcash flowsflows Control via restrictions Equity ResidualResidual payments payments UpsideUpside and and downside downside ResidualResidual claims claims VotingVoting controlcontrol rightsrights Copyright ©2002 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 3 When Debt and Equity are Not Enough Alternatives Assets Liabilities n Collateralized Debt n Asset-securitized Contractual int. & principal n Project financing Value Contractual int. & principal Value NoNo upside upside ofof futurefuture SeniorSenior claimsclaims Control via restrictions cashcash flowsflows Control via restrictions n Preferred Equity n Warrants n Convertible ResidualResidual payments payments UpsideUpside and and downside downside ResidualResidual claims claims VotingVoting controlcontrol rightsrights Copyright ©2002 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 4 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-3 Case Studies l Ban Pu Convertible Bond; l Keppel T&T Convertible; l Singapore Warrant Bonds; l Lyons; l Endesa Copyright ©2002 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 5 A Day in the Life of the Eurobond Market l Examine the deals uWhich were structured financing? uWhy were each done in that particular form? uWhat determines the pricing? l Can you break the hybrids into their component parts? Copyright ©2002 Ian H. Giddy Structured Finance 6 Ian H. Giddy/NYU Structured Finance-4 A Day in the Life..
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Finance Bulletin Legal Insights and Trends in the Structured Finance Markets NOTES from the EDITORS JAMES J
    Spring 2020 Structured Finance Bulletin Legal Insights and Trends in the Structured Finance Markets NOTES FROM THE EDITORS JAMES J. ANTONOPOULOS CHRISTOPHER J. BRADY MICHAEL P. GAFFNEY In this Spring 2020 edition of our Structured Finance Bulletin, we highlight key trends to watch in 2020 in the fintech, banking and regulatory spaces and in the mortgage and residential and consumer asset-backed securitization spaces. We also take a deep dive into capital relief trades and structuring considerations in synthetic securitizations and discuss the latest in LIBOR replacement, transition preparedness, and the impact of LIBOR replacement on consumer loans. We also look at recent Volcker Rule revisions, developments in the EU securitisation regulation, and initiatives to market and promote green finance. Finally, we describe a recent case that delivered a surprising ruling regarding collateral descriptions in UCC financing statements. Please visit Mayer Brown’s new structured finance blog, Retained Interest, designed to provide clients updates and analysis on legal and regulatory developments impacting the structured finance industry. Our lawyers provide insights related to developments and innovations in the structured finance industry and concise and timely briefings on current issues affecting financial asset transactions. retainedinterest.com Additionally, the Consumer Financial Services Review blog provides insights from an industry-leading group of lawyers within Mayer Brown’s global Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement practice. For more than 20 years, the Consumer Financial Services group has been recognized for its thought leadership and for providing high-caliber regulatory counseling, enforcement defense and transactional advice to a broad range of consumer financial services providers, including mortgage and auto lenders, consumer finance companies, payment companies, credit card issuers and investment banks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treatment of Structured Finance Under the Investment Company Act
    Chapter 1 The Treatment of Structured Finance under the Investment Company Act I. Introduction and Summary of Recommendations Structured finance is a financing technique in which financial assets, in many cases illiquid, are pooled and converted into capital market instruments.' In a typical structured financing, a sponsor transfers a pool of assets to a limited purpose entity, which in turn issues non-redeemable debt obligations or equity securities with debt-like characteristics ("fixed income securities"). Payment on the securities depends primarily on the cash flows generated by the assets in the underlying pool. Typically, the securities are rated in one of the two highest categories by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization ("rating agency"). Issuers that have more assets or that expect to receive more income than needed to make full payment on the fixed income securities also may sell interests in the residual cash flow. Structured finance differs from conventional financing techniques in that it involves the pooling of financial assets, which are then removed from the sponsor's balance sheet. The risks inherent in holding the financial assets are shifted away from the sponsor to investors that believe they are in a better position to accept these risks? As a result, the sponsor may be able to manage its balance sheet better, while gaining access to alternative funding sources. 'Although "structured finance" is the term most commonly used to describe this financing technique, the terms "structured securitized credit," "asset-backed arrangement," "asset-backed financing," and "asset securitization" also are used. We use these terms interchangeably throughout this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7 – Structured Finance (CDO, CLO, MBS, ABL, ABS)
    Investment Banking Prof. Droussiotis Lecture 7 – Structured Finance (CDO, CLO, MBS, ABL, ABS) There are several main types of structured finance instruments. Asset-backed securities (ABS) are bonds or notes based on pools of assets, or collateralized by the cash flows from a specified pool of underlying assets. Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are asset-backed securities the cash flows of which are backed by the principal and interest payments of a set of mortgage loans. o Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities, (RMBS) deal with Residential homes, usually single family. o Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) are for Commercial Real Estate such as malls or office complexes. o Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) are securitizations of mortgage-backed securities. Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) consolidate a group of fixed income assets such as high-yield debt or asset-backed securities into a pool, which is then divided into various tranches. o Collateralized bond obligations (CBOs) are CDOs backed primarily by corporate bonds. o Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are CDOs backed primarily by leveraged bank loans. o Commercial real estate collateralized debt obligations (CRE CDOs) are CDOs backed primarily by commercial real estate loans and bonds. Collateral Analysis Collateral is assets provided to secure an obligation. Traditionally, banks might require corporate borrowers to commit company assets as security for loans. Today, this practice is called secured lending or asset-based lending. Collateral can take many forms: property, inventory, equipment, receivables, oil reserves, etc. 45 Investment Banking Prof. Droussiotis Advance Debt Rates (ABL BV of Capacity Facility) Assets based on ($ mm) Collateral Cash 100% 50.00 50.00 A/R 85% 200.00 170.00 Inventory 50% 150.00 75.00 Fixed 50% Assets 300.00 150.00 Investments 50% 100.00 50.00 Total 800.00 495.00 A more recent development is collateralization arrangements used to secure repo, securities lending and derivatives transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Mix, Low-Volume Lean Manufacturing Implementation and Lot Size Optimization at an Aerospace OEM
    High-Mix, Low-Volume Lean Manufacturing Implementation and Lot Size Optimization at an Aerospace OEM by Jonathan M. Rheaume Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University (1995) Bachelor of Science in Chemical Physics, Tufts University (1995) Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Sloan School of Management in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Master of Science in Management In Conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2003 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author______________________________________________________________ Department of Mechanical Engineering Sloan School of Management May 2003 Certified by____________________________________________________________________ Deborah Nightingale, Thesis Supervisor Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Certified by____________________________________________________________________ Donald Rosenfield, Thesis Supervisor Senior Lecturer of Management Certified by____________________________________________________________________ Timothy Gutowski, Thesis Reader Professor of Mechanical Engineering Accepted by____________________________________________________________________ Margaret Andrews, Executive Director of Masters Program Sloan School of Management Accepted by____________________________________________________________________ Ain Sonin,
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ratings in Structured Finance: Issues and Implications
    Committee on the Global Financial System The role of ratings in structured finance: issues and implications Report submitted by a Working Group established by the Committee on the Global Financial System January 2005 Copies of publications are available from: Bank for International Settlements Press & Communications CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +41 61 280 9100 and +41 61 280 8100 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2005. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited. ISBN 92-9131-676-8 (print) ISBN 92-9197-676-8 (online) Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................4 2. Structured finance markets: structure and development ...............................................................4 2.1 Key characteristics of structured finance.............................................................................4 2.2 Market participants and their roles.......................................................................................5 2.3 Market size...........................................................................................................................7 2.4 Basic structured finance economics ....................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 7: Specialised Lending- Structured Finance and Project
    Credit Skills Academy Credit Skills Academy Executive Briefing Unit 7: Specialised Lending- Structured Finance and Project Finance keith Checkley & Associates 1 Credit Skills Academy Originated and Devised by Keith Checkley & Associates London; UK Senior authors: Keith Checkley FCIB, FCIBS, Chartered Banker and Keith Dickinson FCIB The authors have taken all reasonable measures to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this topic and cannot accept responsibility or liability for errors or omissions from any information given or for any consequences arising. © Keith Checkley & Associates, November 2013 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing. keith Checkley & Associates 2 Credit Skills Academy Table of contents 1 Structured Finance Principles ............................................................................ 5 2 Project Finance Checklist ................................................................................ 11 2.1 Risks Inherent in Project Finance ..................................................................... 11 2.2 Common Causes for Project Failures .............................................................. 11 2.3 Successful Project Financing Checklist ........................................................... 11 2.4 Credit Analysis from the Viewpoint of a Term Lender ..................................
    [Show full text]