Reading Skills: Present Perfect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Reading skills: Present perfect Beginners level Julio Antonio Rodríguez Lara Read the text carefully and then answer the questions. London has had an underground train system since the 19th century. The London Underground started in 1863, when engineers and workers built the Metropolitan Railway. This railway line went from Paddington Station to Farringdon Street Station. It was a very short line. Eight more lines have opened since then. The world’s first electric railway opened in 1890. This line went from the city centre to South London. The most modern line is the Jubilee Line. It opened in 1977. Since the London underground began many other cities, like New York and Moscow, have built their own systems. Since when has London had an underground train system? a) 18 century b) 20 century c) 19 century d) never Where is the Metropolitan Railway? a) London b) Paris c) Moscow d) Mexico What is the most modern underground line? a) Victoria Line c) East London Line b) Circle Line d) Jubilee Line According to the text, which other cities have built their own underground system? a) Paris & Mexico c) Roma & Sidney b) New York & Moscow d) Rio de Janeiro & Tokyo The objective in this activity is to help the students to develop their reading skills and introduce them in the usage of the present perfect tense. Reading skills: Present perfect Beginners level Julio Antonio Rodríguez Lara Read the text carefully and then answer the questions. London has had an underground train system since the 19th century. The London Underground started in 1863, when engineers and workers built the Metropolitan Railway. This railway line went from Paddington Station to Farringdon Street Station. It was a very short line. Eight more lines have opened since then. The world’s first electric railway opened in 1890. This line went from the city centre to South London. The most modern line is the Jubilee Line. It opened in 1977. Since the London underground began many other cities, like New York and Moscow, have built their own systems. Since when has London had an underground train system? a) 18 century b) 20 century c) 19 century d) never Where is the Metropolitan Railway? a) London b) Paris c) Moscow d) Mexico What is the most modern underground line? a) Victoria Line c) East London Line b) Circle Line d) Jubilee Line According to the text, which other cities have built their own underground system? a) Paris & Mexico c) Roma & Sidney b) New York & Moscow d) Rio de Janeiro & Tokyo The objective in this activity is to help the students to develop their reading skills and introduce them in the usage of the present perfect tense. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Rail Accident Report
Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
[Show full text]
The Operator's Story Appendix
Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
[Show full text]
Investigation Into Reliability of the Jubilee Line
Investigation into Reliability: London Underground Jubilee Line An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science By Jack Arnis Agolli Marianna Bailey Errando Berwin Jayapurna Yiannis Kaparos Date: 26 April 2017 Report Submitted to: Malcolm Dobell CPC Project Services Professors Rosenstock and Hall-Phillips Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract Metro systems are often faced with reliability issues; specifically pertaining to safety, accessibility, train punctuality, and stopping accuracy. The project goal was to assess the reliability of the London Underground’s Jubilee Line and the systems implemented during the Jubilee Line extension. The team achieved this by interviewing train drivers and Transport for London employees, surveying passengers, validating the stopping accuracy of the trains, measuring dwell times, observing accessibility and passenger behavior on platforms with Platform Edge Doors, and overall train performance patterns. ii Acknowledgements We would currently like to thank everyone who helped us complete this project. Specifically we would like to thank our sponsor Malcolm Dobell for his encouragement, expert advice, and enthusiasm throughout the course of the project. We would also like to thank our contacts at CPC Project Services, Gareth Davies and Mehmet Narin, for their constant support, advice, and resources provided during the project.
[Show full text]
Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
[Show full text]
The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
[Show full text]
Standard-Tube-Map.Pdf
Tube map 123456789 Special fares apply Special fares Check before you travel 978868 7 57Cheshunt Epping apply § Custom House for ExCeL Chesham Watford Junction 9 Station closed until late December 2017. Chalfont & Enfield Town Theydon Bois Latimer Theobalds Grove --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Watford High Street Bush Hill Debden Shenfield § Watford Hounslow West Amersham Cockfosters Park Turkey Street High Barnet Loughton 6 Step-free access for manual wheelchairs only. A Chorleywood Bushey A --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Southbury Chingford Buckhurst Hill § Lancaster Gate Rickmansworth Brentwood Carpenders Park Woodside Park Southgate 5 Station closed until August 2017. Edmonton Green Moor Park Roding Grange Valley --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hatch End Mill Hill East West Finchley Arnos Grove Hill Northwood Silver Street Highams Park § Victoria 4 Harold Wood Chigwell West Ruislip Headstone Lane Edgware Bounds Green Step-free access is via the Cardinal Place White Hart Lane Northwood Hills Stanmore Hainault Gidea Park Finchley Central Woodford entrance. Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Wood Green Pinner Wealdstone Burnt Oak Bruce Grove Ruislip Manor Harringay Wood Street Fairlop Romford --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Canons Park Green South Woodford East Finchley Uxbridge Ickenham North Harrow Colindale Turnpike Lane Lanes
[Show full text]
Family History Research at London Transport Museum
Family history research at London Transport Museum Introduction This factsheet is for family historians researching ancestors who have connections with public transport in London. Many thousands of people have been employed across the different modes of transport over the years, but unfortunately relatively few records survive because there is no business or statutory requirement to keep them beyond a few years. The guide to sources below is designed to help you identify surviving records that may be related to your research. It tells you where they are located and how you can access them. Questions at the end of this factsheet may also help you get started on your family history journey. Museum Library London Transport Museum Library, Albany House, 98 Petty France, London SW1H 9EA You may want to visit the Library as part of your research. Information about our collection and how to contact us or arrange a visit is on our Library page on the Museum website. Where to start To find relevant staff records, you first need to identify which company your ancestor might have worked for and the years when they may have been employed there. The London Passenger Transport Board (also known as London Transport) was formed in 1933. Before then, public transport in London was run by many different companies operating the buses, trams and underground railway lines. You might know your ancestor’s job from a certificate or photograph. If you know where they lived in London, you could use that as a starting point to identify their employer. Be aware though that in the past people often walked long distances to go to work.
[Show full text]
Retro Underground: the Seventies to the Noughties – 3
RETRO UNDERGROUND: THE SEVENTIES TO THE NOUGHTIES – 3. OTHER EVENTS by Tony Morgan My earliest memories of the Underground are during the Second World War travelling from Kingsbury on the Bakerloo Line into London and sometimes on to Kent on the Southern Railway to visit relations. In 1968, after ten years of driving to North Acton, I started commuting in to Great Portland Street. While I was there the second section of the Victoria Line opened as far as Warren Street. One lunchtime I decided to have a quick trip on it. The 1967 Stock train came in to reverse back. The Train Operator was standing in the cab with his back to the direction of travel as the ATO stopped the train. Maybe this was being done to build confidence in the new control system. Travelling home one day from Great Portland Street I saw the latest LT Magazine on display in the ticket office. I then started buying it on a regular basis. The front cover of that first edition had a photograph of the C69 Stock about to be introduced on the Circle Line on it. From that magazine I found out about ‘The Last Drop’ event at Neasden Depot, on Sunday 6 June 1971 advertised, which celebrated the end of use of steam locomotives for engineers’ operations. There I joined the Society because of their Sales Stand. This was my first organised event. At this event all three remaining locomotives were in steam. L94 hauled a rake of engineers’ vehicles from the City and pulled into one of two Klondyke Sidings in Neasden depot.
[Show full text]
Design of Farringdon Elizabeth Line Station
Structural engineering for the Elizabeth line Farringdon station thestructuralengineer.org Design of Farringdon Elizabeth line station Ghanshyam Kumar David Sharples NOTATION BEng, MTech, MEng, CEng, MIStructE BSc (Hons), CEng, MICE AOD above ordnance datum TfL Engineering (formerly Structural Technical Director, AECOM, London, UK BIM Building Information Associate, AECOM, London, UK) Modelling CAD computer-aided design Synopsis ETH East Ticket Hall Farringdon is one of eight new underground stations being built in central London LU London Underground for the Elizabeth line and will be one of the key interchange stations on the new mATD meters above tunnel datum (AOD +100m) line. Upon completion, over 140 trains per hour will pass through the Farringdon OSD oversite development interchange, making it one of Britain’s busiest stations. With Thameslink, SCL sprayed concrete lining Elizabeth line and London Underground services, it will be a key link in bringing SH-W1 circular shaft (West passengers from outer London to the business hubs in the City and Canary Wharf. Ticket Hall) SH-W2 rectangular shaft (West The station will also provide direct rail links to three of London’s ﬁ ve airports. Ticket Hall) Farringdon Elizabeth line station comprises two platform tunnels, each 245m SH-W3 escalator shaft (West long, between new ticket halls over 300m apart. Each ticket hall has been Ticket Hall) SH-E3 trapezoidal shaft (East designed to accommodate future oversite developments. Ticket Hall) This paper discusses the structural engineering challenges encountered during TBM tunnel boring machine design and construction of the two ticket halls on constrained sites surrounded by WTH West Ticket Hall existing transport infrastructure, utilities and historic buildings.
[Show full text]
The London Underground: Driving London to New Possibilities
The London Underground: Driving London to New Possibilities Aram Soultanian London HUA 2900 Dr. David Spanagel & Esther Boucher-Yip 6/20/18 1 Soultanian The London Underground, or better known as the “Tube,” is known as a across the world, but its fascinating construction, history, and successes are often untold. Every day, over three million passengers ride on the London Underground, amounting to 1.37 billion passenger rides annually. Although it is known as the London Underground, only 45% of its railway network is actually underground as many of the outer city lines run above ground. Built, even before electricity, in 1863, the London Underground was the world’s first underground railway and now ranks as the fourth largest underground metro system in the world. The Underground originally began as a six kilometer-long track and consisted of only six stations. Most of the tunnels were built and financed by the Metropolitan Railway Company within the first 50 years of construction. Today, the London Underground has expanded to 11 rail lines, 270 stations across 402 kilometers of rail. Utilizing unique architecture and technology, none of the structures of the original stations between Farringdon and Paddington still stand today. However, the construction of these tracks and stations not only gave rise to engineering marvels that saved the lives of millions of Londoners during the World Wars, but it also facilitated London’s manufacturing, economy, technology, and social ties in Victorian England, the effects of which reverberated through London and across England. In this paper, I will argue that the presence of the London Underground system precipitated London’s rise as a prosperous metropolitan city and financial epicenter.
[Show full text]
Case Study: Looking After Customers
Case Study: Looking after customers Focus on the customer Recommendations for future projects to improve the delivery of infrastructure projects to maintain a focus on customers Throughout the Thameslink Programme the top priority was to look after customers through: • maintaining train service capacity wherever possible • understanding the touch points prior to, during and after journeys • identifying the best journey options • providing an excellent communications campaign covering each stage of the programme • highlighting the benefits achieved – ‘This is why… ‘ • providing ticket acceptance on alternative routes and types of transport • recruiting additional staff to assist during the major engineering works • encouraging volunteers from the Train Operating Companies (TOCs), Network Rail and Department for Transport to assist. Maintaining train service capacity where possible For each of the stages of the programme which required changes in train services both during engineering works and post the network changes, the TOCs and Network Rail focused on passenger numbers and journeys with emphasis on the peak hours of travel to develop timetables providing required capacity. Major timetable changes, for example the Charing Cross run-throughs, where trains to Charing Cross did not stop at London Bridge station between January 2015 and August 2016 and the Cannon Street run-throughs, where trains to Cannon Street did not stop at London Bridge station between 29 August 2016 to January 2018 were fully consulted along with the May 2018 timetable changes. A marketing campaign ‘Times are changing’ was run; https://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/travel-information/live-travel-information/may-timetable This covers details of the Southeastern May 2018 Timetable Consultation Response.
[Show full text]
Impact of the Night Tube on London's
TfL 90993 – Impact of the Night Tube on London’s Night-Time Economy Report Prepared by Volterra Partners for TfL and London First September 2014 Economic impact of the Night Tube Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2 The need for the scheme ............................................................................................................... 9 3 Business Case of the Night Tube ............................................................................................... 18 4 The Wider Case for the Night Tube .......................................................................................... 21 5 Retaining London’s attractiveness .............................................................................................. 28 Appendix 1 – London’s Night-Time Transport Network ................................................................... 33 Appendix 2 – Transport Impact of the Night Tube ............................................................................. 40 Appendix 3 – Supporting Material for Wider Case .............................................................................. 44 1 Economic impact of the Night Tube Executive Summary Key conclusions The new Night Tube service will open up London’s night-time economy to a whole
[Show full text]