The Franco-American Encampment in the Town of Greenburgh, 6 July – 18 August 1781

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Franco-American Encampment in the Town of Greenburgh, 6 July – 18 August 1781 The Franco-American Encampment in the Town of Greenburgh, 6 July – 18 August 1781: A Historical Overview and Resource Inventory Project Historian ROBERT A. SELIG, Ph. D. Sponsoring Organization Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area (Grant #2000-W-37) Town of Greenburgh NY Friends of Odell House Rochambeau Headquarters Grant Administrator Town of Greenburgh Project Director Garrett P. Duquesne Commissioner of Community Development and Conservation Town of Greenburgh 2020 © 2020 Town of Greenburgh, NY. For additions/corrections/suggestions please contact the author at [email protected] For copies of this report please go to either www.greenburghny.com or www.odellrochambeau.org to download a digital copy Removal of artifacts from archaeological and historic sites identified in this survey can be harmful to the historical record of the site and may be illegal. Unauthorized collecting of archaeological artifacts from public land in state or federal ownership is prohibited. For further guidance, contact the New York Department of Historic Resources. 2 Table of Contents 1) Acknowledgments 4 2) Foreword 5 3) Purpose and Recommendations 6 4) Scope of Work 9 5) Methodology 10 6) Inventory of above-ground Resources 11 7) Timeline 34 8) Historical Background a) From 1763 to the Beginning of the Campaign of 1781 43 b) The March to Greenburgh, 18 June to 6 July 1781 47 c) The Raid on Morrisania Manor, 2-3 July 1781 56 d) Arrival in Greenburgh, 6 July 1781 65 Endnotes 71 9) The Franco-American Encampment in Greenburgh, 6 July-18 August 1781 a) The Meeting of the Two Armies 78 b) The Economic Impact of the Alliance and the Encampment 87 c) Relationships between the Forces 93 d) Life in the Neutral Ground 95 e) The Grand Reconnaissance, 21-23 July 1781 98 f) 14 August 1781: The Day that Would Shake the World 108 g) Preparations for the Departure for Virginia 110 Endnotes 115 10) Feeding the Allied Armies in Greenburgh a) French Camp Organization and Layout 124 b) Bread for Rochambeau’s Soldiers 134 c) Meats for Rochambeau’s Soldiers 137 d) American Camp Organization and Layout 140 e) Supplying the Continental Army 145 f) Food for the Animals 147 Endnotes 151 3 11) George Washington's Headquarters in the Appleby House 156 Endnotes 164 12) The comte de Rochambeau’s Headquarters in the Odell House 165 Endnotes 173 13) The Departure of Allied Forces, 18-25 August 1781 174 a) The Commander in Chief and his Guard 178 b) The Rhode Island Regiment 180 c) The American Wagon Train 185 d) The First New York Regiment 188 e) The Second New York Regiment 191 f) The New Jersey Brigade 192 g) The Second Canadian (Congress' Own) Regiment 193 h) The Light Infantry Regiment 196 i) The Second Artillery Regiment 202 j) The Company of Artillery, Laboratory and Artificers 205 k) Continental Army Forces under General William Heath 206 l) Women and Children 210 m) French Forces 213 n) The French Wagon Train 217 o) The British Reaction of the Movements of the Allied Armies 218 p) The Crossing of the Hudson 220 Endnotes 222 14) Conclusion 231 Endnotes 233 15) John Odell Pension Application 234 16) Bibliography 243 Endnotes 263 4 Acknowledgments It gives me great pleasure to express my gratitude to the Hudson River Valley Greenway and to A. Mark Castiglione, who as its Acting Executive Director from 2008 to 2016 provided funding for this study. Thomas Madden served as AICP Commissioner in the Department of Community Development and Conservation of the Town of Greenburgh during the initial phases of grant. Paul Feiner, Town Supervisor, Garrett P. Duquesne, Commissioner of Community Development and Conservation, and Susan Seal, President and Founder of the Friends of the Odell House Rochambeau Headquarters guided the project to its completion. The late Frank Jazzo, Town Historian of the Town of Greenburgh, Robert J. Stackpole, SAR, and Peter Q. Eschweiler accompanied me both figuratively as well as literally during my research of, and to, the Revolutionary War sites in Greenburgh connected with the encampment of the Franco-American armies in the summer of 1781. My thanks also to Sarah Pawliczak, who produced the map overlays, and to Vaneska Pasqua, who assisted in proof- reading the report manuscript. My good friends and fellow researchers Todd W. Braisted, Donald M. Londahl-Smidt and John U. Rees generously shared their knowledge of the War of Independence in their neighborhood. Albert D. McJoynt, Lt.-Col., US Air Force (ret.) created the modern rendition of the map entitled "Logements of the General Staff/Lodgings of Staff Headquarters" reproduced in Howard C. Rice, Jr. and Anne S. K. Brown, The American Campaigns of Rochambeau's Army 1780, 1781, 1782, 1782. 2 vols, (Princeton and Providence, 1972), vol. 2, map 41. I am grateful to the New-York Historical Society for permission reproduce details from the Erskine-DeWitt maps, to the Connecticut Historical Society in Hartford for the use of images from the Jeremiah Wadsworth Papers, to the Gilder Lehrman Collection in New York City, the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University, and the Anne S. K. Brown Military Collection for permission to reproduce images. Robert A. Selig, PhD Holland, MI 49423 6 July 2020 the 239th Anniversary of General George Washington’s and the comte de Rochambeau’s arrival in Greenburgh in 1781 5 Foreword When asked about the people and places they associate with the War of Independence, most Americans will nominate George Washington, John Hancock, John Adams, the marquis de Lafayette, Benjamin Franklin or Baron Steuben for inclusion among the actors critical for victory. The top five or six places or events named almost always include Lexington, Concord, the winter at Valley Forge, the Boston Massacre, and the victory at Yorktown. But responses such as these are not only America-centric and ignore the fact that the war was waged in the four corners of the world. They also ignore such indispensable Frenchmen as the comte de Rochambeau or the comte de Grasse and the encampment of the allied armies in and around the Town of Greenburgh in the summer of 1781, their set-off point for Yorktown and victory. The American War of Independence impacted virtually every town of the nascent United States, was in many ways a civil war that at some point or another forced every American to declare his or her allegiance to either the Crown or to Congress. Confining the war to some half-dozen people, places, and events ignores the contributions of tens of thousands of Americans in and out of uniform whose support made the victory possible though they may have been living hundreds of miles from the battlefields. Before they could force the surrender of Lord Cornwallis on 19 October 1781, the allied armies had to get to Yorktown. This study presents an in-depth look at the people, places, and events at the starting point of the Yorktown Campaign and places them into their proper historical context. The encampment at Greenburgh was the first time the allied armies met. Chosen to become the staging point for the siege of New York City, it turned into the longest encampment of the campaign, and the only time the Franco-American armies encamped in close proximity to each other. For the six weeks that the armies camped there in anticipation of the march on New York it also became one of the most densely populated areas in the United States: its officers with their hundreds of servants, around 11,000 soldiers, wagoners and supply personnel constituted the fourth-largest city behind New York, Philadelphia, and Boston. Most importantly, however, it became the place where the tracks were set for victory at Yorktown and American independence. Upon receiving news in his headquarters at the John Odell House on 14 August 1781 that Joseph Paul, comte de Grasse, was sailing for the Chesapeake rather than New York, Rochambeau immediately informed George Washington in the Joseph Appleby house. Washington did not hesitate one moment to abandon his long- held dream of taking New York City and ordered his forces to Virginia. Nine weeks later, Lord Cornwallis’ second in command General Charles O’Hara surrendered his sword and the last operational British field army to Washington's second-in-command Major General Benjamin Lincoln. American Independence was won, not on the banks of the Hudson, as Washington had hoped, but on the banks of the York River in his home state of Virginia. But the decision to march there had been made in Greenburgh in the State of New York. 6 Purpose and Recommendations The purpose of this historical overview and resource inventory of the Franco-American encampment in the Town of Greenburgh in July and August 1781 is to provide a historical narrative of the campaign of 1781 in Westchester County with a focus on the Town of Greenburgh and to emphasize the importance of the decisions made during the encampment in Greenburgh for the victory at Yorktown and the achievement of American Independence. In order to achieve this goal the narrative includes a detailed analysis of the land and water routes, campsites and related resources traveled, used and occupied by the Continental Army under the command of General George Washington and of French forces under the comte de Rochambeau in and around the Town of Greenburgh in the summer of 1781. This survey as completed is intended to provide the scholarly foundation necessary to further the goals of the Town of Greenburgh of continuing its work with neighboring communities and organizations such as the , the Hudson River Valley Greenway and the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area (HRVNHA) to support and advance regional historical, recreational and preservation programs.
Recommended publications
  • WASHINGTON BRIDGE, Over the Harlem River from West 18Lst Street, Borough of Manhattan, to University Avenue, Borough of the Bronx
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 14, 1982, Designation List 159 LP-1222 WASHINGTON BRIDGE, over the Harlem River from West 18lst Street, Borough of Manhattan, to University Avenue, Borough of the Bronx. Built 1886-89; com­ petition designs by Charles C. Schneider and Wilhelm Hildenbrand modified by Union Bridge Company, William J. McAlpine, Theodore Cooper, and DeLemos & Cordes; chief engineer William R. Hutton; consulting architect Edward H. Kendall. Landmark Site: Manhattan Tax Map Block 2106, Lot 1 in part; Block 2149, Lot 525 in part, consisting of those parts of these ldta upon which the structure and approaches of the bridge rest. The Bronx Tax Map Block 2538, Lot 32 in part; Block 2880, Lots 1 & 250 both in part; Block 2884, Lots 2, 5 & 9 all in part, con­ sisting of those parts of these lots upon which the structure and approaches of the bridge rest. Boundaries: The Washington Bridge Landmark is encompassed by a line running southward parallel with the eastern curb line of Amsterdam Avenue; a line running eastward which is the extension of the southern curb line of West 181st Street to the point where it crosses Undercliff Avenue; a line running northward parallel with the eastern curb line of Undercliff Avenue; a line running westward from Undercliff Avenue which intersects with the extension of the northern curb lin~ of West 181st Street, to_t~~ point of beginning. On November 18, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Washington Bridge and the pro­ posed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No 8.).
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Park and Critical Periods of Development
    Cultural Landscape Report, Treatment, and Management Plan for Branch Brook Park Newark, New Jersey Volume 2: History of the Park and Critical Periods of Development Prepared for: Branch Brook Park Alliance A project of Connection-Newark 744 Broad Street, 31st Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Essex County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Affairs 115 Clifton Avenue Newark, New Jersey 07104 Newark, New Jersey Cultural Landscape Report 7 November 2002 Prepared for: Branch Brook Park Alliance A project of Connection-Newark 744 Broad Street, 31st Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Essex County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Affairs 115 Clifton Avenue Newark, New Jersey 07104 Prepared by: Rhodeside & Harwell, Incorporated Landscape Architecture & Planning 320 King Street, Suite 202 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 “...there is...a pleasure common, constant and universal to all town parks, and it results from the feeling of relief Professional Planning & Engineering Corporation 24 Commerce Street, Suite 1827, 18th Floor experienced by those entering them, on escaping from the Newark, New Jersey 07102-4054 cramped, confined, and controlling circumstances of the streets of the town; in other words, a sense of enlarged Arleyn Levee 51 Stella Road freedom is to all, at all times, the most certain and the Belmont, Massachusetts 02178 most valuable gratification afforded by the park.” Dr. Charles Beveridge Department of History, The American University - Olmsted, Vaux & Co. 4000 Brandywine Street, NW Landscape Architects Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyman Trumbull: Author of the Thirteenth Amendment, Author of the Civil Rights Act, and the First Second Amendment Lawyer
    KOPEL (1117–1192).DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/2/16 4:20 PM Lyman Trumbull: Author of the Thirteenth Amendment, Author of the Civil Rights Act, and the First Second Amendment Lawyer David B. Kopel* This Article provides the first legal biography of lawyer and Senator Lyman Trumbull, one of the most important lawyers and politicians of the nineteenth century. Early in his career, as the leading anti-slavery lawyer in Illinois in the 1830s, he won the cases constricting and then abolishing slavery in that state; six decades later, Trumbull represented imprisoned labor leader Eugene Debs in the Supreme Court, and wrote the Populist Party platform. In between, Trumbull helped found the Republican Party, and served three U.S. Senate terms, chairing the judiciary committee. One of the greatest leaders of America’s “Second Founding,” Trumbull wrote the Thirteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act, and the Freedmen’s Bureau Act. The latter two were expressly intended to protect the Second Amendment rights of former slaves. Another Trumbull law, the Second Confiscation Act, was the first federal statute to providing for arming freedmen. After leaving the Senate, Trumbull continued his fight for arms rights for workingmen, bringing Presser v. Illinois to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886, and Dunne v. Illinois to the Illinois Supreme Court in 1879. His 1894 Populist Party platform was a fiery affirmation of Second Amendment principles. In the decades following the end of President James Madison’s Administration in 1817, no American lawyer or legislator did as much as Trumbull in defense of Second Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam County
    History of Putnam County Bench and Bar Hon. John W. Sweeny, Jr., Hon. James F. Reitz, Sallie Sypher, and Sarah Johnson This history is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Judge James F. Reitz whose tireless efforts and love for Putnam County helped to bring this project to fruition. With appreciation of Justice John W. Sweeny, Jr. Judge James F. Reitz Putnam County Deputy Historian Sallie Sypher Former Putnam County Historian Sarah Johnson for the compilation of this history 1 12-05-2019 TIMELINE 1806 Dutchess County courthouse burns & new one proposed further north; Fishkill steals some of Philipstown; Kent town meeting calls for separation 1807 Separation bill passes NYS Senate but fails in Assembly by one vote 1812 Petition from 5 towns for separation; Republicans lose election to Federalists: Separation bill passed by lame duck Republicans & signed by Gov. Tompkins 1814 New Putnam Courthouse opens 1823 Constitution of 1821 establishes judicial districts & governor now appoints judges, local justices and district attorneys. 1847 Constitution of 1846 makes all supreme and county judges, local justices, and district attorneys elective. 1848 (circa) Decision made not move county seat; portico and Corinthian columns added to courthouse 1860 New jail “annexed” to courthouse 1924 Fire sweeps through downtown Carmel and damages courthouse 1925 Decision made to repair, not replace, the courthouse 1937 Women serve on juries in Putnam County, first in NYS. 1949 Putnam County Bar Association founded 1961 New Judiciary Article
    [Show full text]
  • A History of George Varnum, His Son Samuel Who Came to Ipswich About
    THE VARNUMS OF DRACUTT (IN MASSACHUSETTS) A HISTORY -OF- GEORGE VARNUM, HIS SON SAMUEL WHO CAME TO IPSWICH ABOUT 1635, AND GRANDSONS THOMAS, JOHN AND JOSEPH, WHO SETTLED IN DRACUTT, AND THEIR DESCENDANTS, <.tomptlet> from jfamill] ll)aper.s ant> @ffictal 'Necort>.s, -BY- JOHN MARSHALL VARNUM, OF BOSTON, 19 07. " trr:bosu mbo bo not tnasmn up tbe mimotl!: of tbdt S!nmitats bo not bumbt ta bi nmembtttb bl!: lf)osttrit11:." - EDMUND BURKE, CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE 5 HISTORY OF THE FAMILY, BY SQUIRE PARKER VARNUM, 5 1818 9 GENEALOGY: GEORGE V ARNUM1 13 SAMUEL V ARNUM2 16 THOMAS V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS 23 JOHN V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 43 J°'OSEPH V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 115 SKETCH OF GEORGE V ARNAM1 13 WILL OF' GEORGE VARNAM - 14 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF GEORGE V ARNAM - 15 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM1 16 DEED OF SHATSWELL-VARNUM PuROHASE, 1664 17 TRANSFER OF LAND TO V ARNUMS, 1688-1735 21 SKETCH OF THOMAS VARNUM3 28 w ILL OF THOMAS VARNUM - 29 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM4 30 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF THOMAS V ARNUM4 31 SKETCHES OF THOMAS V ARNUM1 34 DEACON JEREMIAH V ARNUM8 35 MAJOR ATKINSON C. V ARNUM7 36 JOHN V ARNUM3 45 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF JOHN VARNUM 41 iv VARNUM GENEALOGY. SKETCH OF LIEUT. JOHN V ARNUM4 51 JOURNAL OF LIEUT. JOHN VARNUM~ 54-64 vVILL 01' L1EuT. JoHN VARNU111• - 64-66 SKETCHES OF JONAS VARNUM4 67 ABRAHAM V ARNUl\14 68 JAMES VA RNUM4 70 SQUIRE p ARK.ER VARNUM. 74-78 COL, JAMES VARNUM" - 78-82 JONAS VARNUM6 83 CAPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideals of American Life Told in Biographies and Autobiographies Of
    MEN OF MAKK IN CONNECTICUT Men of Mark in Connecticut IDEALS OF AMERICAN LIFE TOLD IN BIOG- RAPHIES AND AUTOBIOGRAPHIES OF EMINENT LIVING AMERICANS EDITED BY COLONEL N. G. OSBORN M EDITOK "NEW HAVEN JOURNAL AND COURIER" VOLUME II WILLIAM R. GOODSPEED HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 1906 Copyright 1904 by B. F. Johnson [uLIBKARYofOONef-JESSj Two Copies nhcui^j. AFK 14 1908 The Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company, Hartford, Conn. MEN OF MARK IN CONNECTICUT Col, N. G. Osborn, Editor-in-Chief ADVISORY BOARD HON. WILLIAM S. CASE . Hartfobd JIIBGE OF SI7FKBI0B COUBT HON. GEORGE S. GODAED Hartford STATE lilBBABIAK HON. FREDERICK J. KINGSBURY, LL.D. Waterbukt MEMBER CORPORATION TALE UNIVEESITr CAPTAIN EDWARD W. MARSH . Bridgeport TREASUEEB PEOPLE'S SAVINGS BANK COL. N. G. OSBORN New Haven editor new haten begisteb HON. HENRY ROBERTS Hartford EX-OOyEBNOR. HON. JONATHAN TRUMBULL Norwich T.TBBARTAN FT7BLIC LIBRARY WILLIAM KNEELAND TOWNSEND TOWNSEND, JUDGE WILLIAM KNEELAND, of the United States Circuit Court, comes of a family that long has held a prominent place in the university town of New Haven, where he was born June 12th, 1848. He is the son of James Mulford and Maria Theresa Townsend. He was fond of his books and of the companionship of good friends as well, and youthful characteristics have remained constant. Gradu- ated from Yale in 1871, in a class that gave not a few eminent men to the professions, he continued his studies in the Yale Law School, along the line which nature seemed to have marked out for him. In 1874 he received the degree of LL.B, and immediately was admitted to the bar in New Haven County, and entered upon the practice of his pro- fession.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3A, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 6
    George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3A, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 6 To THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS Head Quarters, New Windsor, March 1, 1781. Sir: The inclosed memorial of Colo. Hazen was this day put into my hands. Many of the matters mentioned in it are better known to Congress than to myself. The whole are so fully stated, as to speak for themselves, and require only the determination of Congress. The case of the Canadian Officers and Soldiers I know to be peculiarly distressing and truly entitled to redress, if the means are to be obtained. The Regiment, not being appropriated to any State, must soon dwindle into nothing, unless some effectual mode can be devised for recruiting it. Colo. Hazens pretensions to promotion seems to me to have weight, but how far they ought to be admitted, the general principles which Congress mean to adopt for the regulation of this important point will best decide. In justice to Colo. Hazen, I must testify, that he has always appeared to me a sensible, 83 spirited and attentive Officer. I have the honor etc. To THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS Head Quarters, New Windsor, March 1, 1781. Sir: On opening the inclosed, I found it intended for 83. In the writing of Tench Tilghman. The letter was read in Congress on March 23 and referred to Artemas Ward, John Sullivan, and Isaac Motte. your Excellency, though addressed to me. I intend setting out in the morning for Newport to confer with the French General and Admiral upon the operations of the ensuing Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • NJDARM: Collection Guide
    NJDARM: Collection Guide - NEW JERSEY STATE ARCHIVES COLLECTION GUIDE Record Group: Department of Defense Subgroup: Adjutant General's Office (Revolutionary War) Series: Copies of Correspondence, 1777-1782 Accession #: Unknown Series #: SDEA1005 Guide Date: Pre-1989 Volume: 0.5 c.f. [1 box] Contents Item Description 1. "A Citizen" of Essex County to Baron Von Knyphausen, June 27, 1780. 2. Baron D'Arendt to [Alexander] Hamilton, October 29, 1777. 3. Baron D'Arendt to [Alexander] Hamilton, October 26, 1777. 4. Lady Theresa Asgill to Count de Vergennes, [1782]. 5. Lady Theresa Asgill to Count de Vergennes, [1782]. 6. Lady Theresa Asgill to [?] Gordon, [1782]. 7. Joseph Brown to William Irvine, February 29, 1780, [Extract]. 8. Benjamin Ford to [William] Irvine, January 6, 1780. 9. Benjamin Ford to [William] Irvine, January 8, 1780. 10. Benjamin Ford to [William] Irvine, January 14, 1780. 11. George Germain to Henry Clinton, September 2, 1778. 12. [Caleb] Gibb to George Washington, August 20, 1779. 13. Alexander Hamilton to William Irvine, June 11, 1779. 14. Nathaniel Heard to [Asher] Holmes, April 17, 1779. 15. E.C. de Hoenning to [Friedrich von] Steuben, October 25, 1781; return of Hessian prisoners captured at Yorktown, Virginia, [2 copies], [2 items]. 16. Jonathan Holmes to [his father], January 6, 1777; Jonathan Holmes to [his father], January 1, 1777. 17. William Irvine to Ann Irvine, June 24, 1780, [2 copies]. file:///M|/highpoint/webdocs/state/darm/darm2011/guides/guides%20for%20pdf/sdea1005.html[5/16/2011 9:36:33 AM] NJDARM: Collection Guide - 18. W[illiam] Irvine to George Washington, January 1, 1780, [2 copies].
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Hudson Park, 2007
    Natural Area Mapping and Inventory of Henry Hudson Park 2007 Survey Prepared by the Natural Resources Group Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Adrian Benepe, Commissioner Bill Tai, Director January 8, 2008 Henry Hudson Park Natural Area Mapping & Inventory 9.81 acres Introduction City of New York Parks & Recreation (DPR) manages one of the most extensive and varied park systems of any city in the world. These 29,000 acres of city park property occupy about 15 percent of New York City’s total area. In addition to flagship parks such as Central Park and Prospect Park, the city’s parklands include over 11,000 acres of natural areas. Until the 1980’s, the Parks Department was primarily concerned with developed landscapes and recreation facilities rather than natural areas. In the absence of a comprehensive management policy, these areas succumbed to invasive species, pollution and erosion. In 1984, Parks established the Natural Resources Group (NRG) with a mandate to acquire, restore and manage natural areas in New York City. The wetlands, forests, meadows, and shorelines under NRG’s jurisdiction provide valuable habitat for hundreds of species, from rare wildflowers to endangered birds of prey. In addition to the goals mentioned above, NRG serves as a clearinghouse for technical research to aid in the protection and restoration of the city's natural resources. This inventory of Henry Hudson Park was conducted in 2007 as part of NRG’s commitment to improving the natural areas of New York City parks. Henry Hudson Park, named after the famed English explorer, is located in the Bronx, between Palisade Avenue and Independance Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • HHH Collections Management Database V8.0
    HENRY HUDSON PARKWAY HAER NY-334 Extending 11.2 miles from West 72nd Street to Bronx-Westchester NY-334 border New York New York County New York WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD HENRY HUDSON PARKWAY HAER No. NY-334 LOCATION: The Henry Hudson Parkway extends from West 72nd Street in New York City, New York, 11.2 miles north to the beginning of the Saw Mill River Parkway at Westchester County, New York. The parkway runs along the Hudson River and links Manhattan and Bronx counties in New York City to the Hudson River Valley. DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: 1934-37 DESIGNERS: Henry Hudson Parkway Authority under direction of Robert Moses (Emil H. Praeger, Chief Engineer; Clinton F. Loyd, Chief of Architectural Design); New York City Department of Parks (William H. Latham, Park Engineer); New York State Department of Public Works (Joseph J. Darcy, District Engineer); New York Central System (J.W. Pfau, Chief Engineer) PRESENT OWNERS: New York State Department of Transportation; New York City Department of Transportation; New York City Department of Parks and Recreation; Metropolitan Transit Authority; Amtrak; New York Port Authority PRESENT USE: The Henry Hudson Parkway is part of New York Route 9A and is a linear park and multi-modal scenic transportation corridor. Route 9A is restricted to non-commercial vehicles. Commuters use the parkway as a scenic and efficient alternative to the city’s expressways and local streets. Visitors use it as a gateway to Manhattan, while city residents use it to access the Hudson River Valley, located on either side of the Hudson River.
    [Show full text]
  • William Marsh, 'A Rather Shadowy Figure
    William Marsh, ‘a rather shadowy figure,’ crossed boundaries both national and political Vermont holds a unique but little-known place in eighteenth-century American and Canadian history. During the 1770s William Marsh and many others who had migrated from Connecticut and Massachusetts to take up lands granted by New Hampshire Governor Benning Wentworth, faced severe chal- lenges to their land titles because New York also claimed the area between the Connecticut and Hudson rivers, known as “the New Hampshire Grants.” New York’s aggressive pursuit of its claims generated strong political tensions and an- imosity. When the American Revolution began, the settlers on the Grants joined the patriot cause, expecting that a new national regime would counter New York and recognize their titles. During the war the American Continental Congress declined to deal with the New Hampshire settlers’ claims. When the Grants settlers then proposed to become a state separate from New York, the Congress denied them separate status. As a consequence, the New Hampshire grantees declared independence in 1777 and in 1778 constituted themselves as an independent republic named Vermont, which existed until 1791 when it became the 14th state in the Ameri- can Union. Most of the creators of Vermont played out their roles, and their lives ended in obscurity. Americans remember Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys and their military actions early in the Revolution. But Allen was a British captive during the critical years of Vermont’s formation, 1775-1778. A few oth- ers, some of them later Loyalists, laid the foundations for Vermont’s recognition and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 45 | Issue 3 Article 7 1-1994 Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lewis Grossman, Codification and the California Mentality, 45 Hastings L.J. 617 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol45/iss3/7 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Essay Codification and the California Mentality by LEwIS GROSSMAN* Introduction: The Pomeroy Paradox On August 8, 1878, John Norton Pomeroy, the principal instruc- tor at the newly established Hastings College of Law in San Francisco, delivered the school's inaugural address. It was the culminating mo- ment of an exhilarating decade for California's legal profession. Six years earlier, in 1872, California had moved to the forefront of American legal reform by becoming one of the first states in the nation to codify its complete body of laws. The legislature had en- acted the California Code, which included new Civil, Criminal, and Political Codes, as well as a revised Code of Civil Procedure. Com- mittees of prominent attorneys had drafted the Code, basing it largely on the work of the illustrious New York jurist, David Dudley Field.' The centerpiece of the California Code was the Civil Code, which consolidated all of the state's statutory and common-law rules gov- erning private relations (corporations, property, torts, contracts, and domestic matters) into one meticulously arranged volume.2 Only * Associate, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]