White Knight Review Chess E-Magazine March/April - 2012 Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White Knight Review Chess E-Magazine March/April - 2012 Table of Contents Chess E-Magazine Interactive E-Magazine Volume 3 • Issue 2 March/April 2012 Chess Gambits C Seraphim Press Commander in Chess-Presidents Who Played Chess White Knight Review Chess E-Magazine March/April - 2012 Table of Contents Editorial~ “My Move” 4 contents Feature~ Understanding the Chess Rating System 5 ARTICLE~ Bill Wall’s Top 20 Chess Books 9 INTERACTIVE CONTENT Biography~ The Remarkable Reshevsky 10 Portrait of a Prodigy Feature~ Chess Puzzles 16 Article~ Chess Clubs and Organizations 17 Feature~ Themed Chess Pieces 22 In Retrospect~ Spassky Vs. Lorinci 24 Annotated Game ARTICLE~ News Around the World 25 BOOK REVIEW~ Grandmaster Versus Amateur 26 edited by Jacob Aagaard and John Shaw Feature~Death and Chess Players 27 COMMENTARY~ “Ask Bill” 31 White Knight Review March/April 2012 White Knight Review March/April 2012 My Move Editorial - Jerry Wall [email protected] This publication has been somewhat of an experiment. When we started this e-magazine over a year ago we had no idea whether it would have any interest or not. It would be hard to gauge any success White Knight apart from offering a free subscription and gathering an email list and seeing if that Review would grow to any great length. I must say I was pleasantly Chess E-Magazine surprised to see how much that email list has grown in a year. Checking stats on our website has also helped to Executive Editor/Writer By Bill measure hits and visits and again we were delighted to see a slow but steady growth each month. Bill Wall [email protected] Wall Printing this magazine at this time would certainly be cost prohibited but by making it an e-magazine we could offer it as a free download costing us only the labor and Feature website cost. The surge of electronic devises such as Publisher /Editor/ Creative iPhones, iPads, tablet PC’s and e-book readers have also Director Gerald Wall Chess rating systems have been by the Correspondence Chess system to classify players. helped to make this a viable media for today’s market. Also used for pairing purposes in League of America (CCLA). The the advantages of adding interactivity to the magazine [email protected] chess tournaments as well as CCLA was founded in 1909. In In 1948, the Ingo rating system such as hyperlinks in the Table of Contents, page scrolling, estimating playing strength. 1940, it was using a point sys- was created. It was designed email links and even video inserts are helping to drive this A tournament director wants tem designed by Kenneth Wil- by Anton Hoesslinger (1875- digital format. to avoid pairing the strongest liams. 1959) and named after his home Production/ Marketing town, Ingolstadt in Bavaria. It Still unfortunately, the time and effort that Bill and I put Steve Wall players against each other in the early rounds of was used by the West Ger- into this pub have not been offset by the support of [email protected] man Chess Federation from advertising as we had hoped. We want to continue to try to a tournament. Rat- ings are also used for The introduction of chess rating systems 1948 until 1992. It was then offer this as a free publication and continue to put out what tournament section- replaced by the Elo system, I think is one of the best Chess pubs out there. So we are For Subscription ing and prize eligibili- may have done more to popularize tour- named after its creator Dr. asking you to help by either advertising or donating what [email protected] ty. Sections or Class- nament chess than any other single factor. Arpad Elo (1903-1992), a ever you can to help us out. Thanks for all your support. es in tournaments are Hungarian-born American popular and many physics teacher and chess Jerry Wall For Advertising Rates players play other players with master. This was a system Editor [email protected] close to the same rating. In 1942, Chess Review magazine where a player’s new rating was began using the Harkness rating the average rating of his com- The introduction of chess rating system, designed by Kenneth petition minus one point for systems may have done more Harkness (1896-1972). The rat- each percentage point above 50 to popularize tournament chess ings were first used for cor- obtained in the tournament. than any other single factor. respondence chess players. At © Copyright 2012 the time, there were only three In 1949, Kenneth Harkness sub- All Rights Reserved. In 1928, the first work to give classes: Class A – above 1050; mitted his rating system to the Unauthorized reproduction, serious attention to modeling Class B – 950 to 1050, and Class United States Chess Federation in any manner is prohibited chess ability was a paper by C – below 950. (USCF) for use as a numerical Let us know what you think of the magazine. Perhaps you have Ernest Zermelo. He addressed rating system. When a chess some suggestions for future articles or have other comments. without expressed permission from the Author or Editor. the problem of estimating the In 1946, a rating system was player completes a tournament, Let us know and drop me a line at: [email protected] strengths of chess players in proposed in the USSR by Andrey the average rating of his compe- chess tournaments. Khachatoruv (1917- ) and was tition is first calculated. Then, if Click here to Donate via Paypal www.offthewallchess.com published in Shakmaty v SSSR a player scores 50%, he receives In 1939, the first modern numeri- in 1946. The USSR Chess Fed- the average competition rating cal chess rating system was used eration used a non-numerical as his performance rating. If he 4 5 Continue White Knight Review March/April 2012 White Knight Review March/April 2012 scores more than 50%, his new In 1954, the first British Grading to every player a numerical rat- method (Bradley-Terry). It top rating is his competition rating List was published, which listed ing based on performances in peak Edo ratings were: Steinitz plus 10 points for each percent- 49 players. competitive chess. Elo assumed (2803), Morphy (2796), Lasker age point above 50. If he scores that the chess player’s strength (2752), Kolisch (2710), Tarrasch less than 50%, his new rating is In 1955, Irving J. Good (1916- distribution was a normal distri- (2699), Zukertort (2678), von der his competition rating minus 10 2009) developed a system to bution (bell curve). Lasa (2676), Anderssen (2673), points for each percentage point rank chess players and pub- Neumann (2671), and maroczy below 50. lished “On the Marking of Chess The USCF has rating categories. (2665). Players” in the Mathematical A senior master is rated 2400 ings, the FIDE rating was round- the mid-1980s, these features In January 1950, the USCF an- Gazette. and up. A national master is rat- ed out to the nearest multiple were eliminated from the rating In 2005, the Chessmetrics rating nounce that a national rating ed between 2200 and 2399. An of 5. FIDE also only computed system. system was created by statisti- system was being planned to In 1958, the British Chess Fed- expert (or candidate master) is ratings for players over 2000. A cian Jeff Sonas. It is based on cover local and national events. eration (now the English Chess rated from 2000 to 2199. Every player only acquires a rating if In the late 1980s, the concept of computer analysis of chess Federation or ECF) started using 200 point range below expert is it is calculated to be over 2000. a rating floor was established games that uses a weighted In July 1950, the USCF adopted a rating system devised by Rich- a class. For On average, initial FIDE ratings in the USCF system. This pre- average of past performance the Harkness system and invent- ard W.B. example, overestimate players’ abilities vented a player’s rating from and is intended to be more ac- ed by Kenneth Harkness. It was Clarke a rating of because players only receive rat- decreasing below the 100-point curate than the Elo system. The used by the USCF from 1950 to (1910- The flaw with the old Harkness 1900-1999 ings if their initial performances multiple 200 points less than score considers a player’s win 1960. The first published rating 1975). A sytem was that a player could lose is Class are strong. Thus, the FIDE rating one’s highest rating. More percentage against other play- list appeared in the November players every game in a tournament and A. A rat- pool gets inflated over time. recently, the rating floor has ers weighted by the ratings of 20, 1950 issue of Chess Life mag- rating or ing of 1600 been re-implemented so that the other players and the time azine, which rated 2,306 USCF grade is still gain rating points. to 1799 is In 1978, Elo published The Rating the system now uses a 100 point elapsed since the match. members from chess events calculated Class B, A of Chessplayers Past & Present. margin. Rating floors were to from 1921 to July 31, 1950. The by taking rating of A second edition appeared in discourage players from pur- highest rated players on the first the opponent’s grade and add- 1400 to 1599 is Class C, etc. 1986. posely losing games to artifi- USCF rating list were Reuben ing 50 points for a win, subtract- cially lower their ratings so that For one-year peaks, the Fine (2817), Samuel Reshevsky ing 50 points for a loss, and The average rating for established In the 1990s, the USCF rating they could play in lower-rated top rated players were: (2770), A.
Recommended publications
  • Annex 42 Commission for Women in Chess Batumi, Georgia 29Th
    Annex 42 Commission for Women in Chess Batumi, Georgia 29th September 2018, 11.00-13.00 Chairpersons: Susan Polgar (USA), M. Fierro (ECU) Present: N. Cinar (TUR), P. Ambarukwi (INA), D. Chen (TPE), A. Sorokina (BLR), S. Johnson (TTO), U. Umudova (AZE), A. Dimitrijevic (BIH), K. Blackman (BCF), D. Murray (BCF), C. Zhu (QAT), P. Truong (CAM), M. Naugana (MAW), K. Howie (SCO), C. Meyer (USA), R. Haring (USA), U. E. Gronn (NOR), S. Bayat (IRI), S. Rohde (USA), M. Khamboo (NEP), Dr. G. Font (HUN), Dr. N. Short (ENG), A. Karlovych (UKR) MATTERS DISCUSSED At the beginning of the meeting, we addressed the items discussed in the official WOM report submitted to FIDE. The Chairperson (Ms. Polgar) especially praised FIDE for the Women’s World Blitz and Rapid Championships in Saudi Arabia which had a substantially increased prize fund, though it was only one third of the prize in the Open section. The total prize fund in the Women’s championships were $250,000 for each event. Beatriz Marinello reported on her project “Smart Girl” on behalf of the Social Action commission, which included projects in Uganda, Chile, France and the US. This projects seeks to increase participation by girls in chess in those countries. Martha Fierro elaborated on the project about chess in women prisons in Genoa, Italy, which involved the training of refugees in Italy who in turn, train women prisoners. Sophia Rohde from the United States shared some of the work their federation is in doing to promote chess for girls in the USA. They subsequently presented a video showing various interviews with young girls in chess, highlighting the benefits and challenges that they experience in chess.
    [Show full text]
  • FM ALISA MELEKHINA Is Currently Balancing Her Law and Chess Careers. Inside, She Interviews Three Other Lifelong Chess Players Wrestling with a Similar Dilemma
    NAKAMURA WINS GIBRALTAR / SO FINISHES SECOND AT TATA STEEL APRIL 2015 Career Crossroads FM ALISA MELEKHINA is currently balancing her law and chess careers. Inside, she interviews three other lifelong chess players wrestling with a similar dilemma. IFC_Layout 1 3/11/2015 6:02 PM Page 1 OIFC_pg1_Layout 1 3/11/2015 7:11 PM Page 1 World’s biggest open tournament! 43rd annual WORLD OPEN Hyatt Regency Crystal City, near D.C. 9rounds,June30-July5,July1-5,2-5or3-5 $210,000 Guaranteed Prizes! Master class prizes raised by $10,000 GM & IM norms possible, mixed doubles prizes, GM lectures & analysis! VISIT OUR NATION’S CAPITAL SPECIAL FEATURES! 4) Provisional (under 26 games) prize The World Open completes a three 1) Schedule options. 5-day is most limits in U2000 & below. year run in the Washington area before popular, 4-day and 3-day save time & 5) Unrated not allowed in U1200 returning to Philadelphia in 2016. money.New,leisurely6-dayhas three1- though U1800;$1000 limit in U2000. $99 rooms, valet parking $6 (if full, round days. Open plays 5-day only. 6) Mixed Doubles: $3000-1500-700- about $7-15 nearby), free airport shuttle. 2) GM & IM norms possible in Open. 500-300 for male/female teams. Fr e e s hutt l e to DC Metro, minutes NOTECHANGE:Mas ters can now play for 7) International 6/26-30: FIDE norms from Washington’s historic attractions! both norms & large class prizes! possible, warm up for main event. Als o 8sections:Open,U2200,U2000, 3) Prize limit $2000 if post-event manyside events.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 U.S. Tournament.Our.Beginnings
    Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis Presents the 2009 U.S. Championship Saint Louis, Missouri May 7-17, 2009 History of U.S. Championship “pride and soul of chess,” Paul It has also been a truly national Morphy, was only the fourth true championship. For many years No series of tournaments or chess tournament ever held in the the title tournament was identi- matches enjoys the same rich, world. fied with New York. But it has turbulent history as that of the also been held in towns as small United States Chess Championship. In its first century and a half plus, as South Fallsburg, New York, It is in many ways unique – and, up the United States Championship Mentor, Ohio, and Greenville, to recently, unappreciated. has provided all kinds of entertain- Pennsylvania. ment. It has introduced new In Europe and elsewhere, the idea heroes exactly one hundred years Fans have witnessed of choosing a national champion apart in Paul Morphy (1857) and championship play in Boston, and came slowly. The first Russian Bobby Fischer (1957) and honored Las Vegas, Baltimore and Los championship tournament, for remarkable veterans such as Angeles, Lexington, Kentucky, example, was held in 1889. The Sammy Reshevsky in his late 60s. and El Paso, Texas. The title has Germans did not get around to There have been stunning upsets been decided in sites as varied naming a champion until 1879. (Arnold Denker in 1944 and John as the Sazerac Coffee House in The first official Hungarian champi- Grefe in 1973) and marvelous 1845 to the Cincinnati Literary onship occurred in 1906, and the achievements (Fischer’s winning Club, the Automobile Club of first Dutch, three years later.
    [Show full text]
  • White Knight Review Chess E-Magazine January/February - 2012 Table of Contents
    Chess E-Magazine Interactive E-Magazine Volume 3 • Issue 1 January/February 2012 Chess Gambits Chess Gambits The Immortal Game Canada and Chess Anderssen- Vs. -Kieseritzky Bill Wall’s Top 10 Chess software programs C Seraphim Press White Knight Review Chess E-Magazine January/February - 2012 Table of Contents Editorial~ “My Move” 4 contents Feature~ Chess and Canada 5 Article~ Bill Wall’s Top 10 Software Programs 9 INTERACTIVE CONTENT ________________ Feature~ The Incomparable Kasparov 10 • Click on title in Table of Contents Article~ Chess Variants 17 to move directly to Unorthodox Chess Variations page. • Click on “White Feature~ Proof Games 21 Knight Review” on the top of each page to return to ARTICLE~ The Immortal Game 22 Table of Contents. Anderssen Vrs. Kieseritzky • Click on red type to continue to next page ARTICLE~ News Around the World 24 • Click on ads to go to their websites BOOK REVIEW~ Kasparov on Kasparov Pt. 1 25 • Click on email to Pt.One, 1973-1985 open up email program Feature~ Chess Gambits 26 • Click up URLs to go to websites. ANNOTATED GAME~ Bareev Vs. Kasparov 30 COMMENTARY~ “Ask Bill” 31 White Knight Review January/February 2012 White Knight Review January/February 2012 Feature My Move Editorial - Jerry Wall [email protected] Well it has been over a year now since we started this publication. It is not easy putting together a 32 page magazine on chess White Knight every couple of months but it certainly has been rewarding (maybe not so Review much financially but then that really never was Chess E-Magazine the goal).
    [Show full text]
  • Chess for Dummies‰
    01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page iii Chess FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by James Eade 01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page ii 01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page i Chess FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION 01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page ii 01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page iii Chess FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by James Eade 01_584049 ffirs.qxd 7/29/05 9:19 PM Page iv Chess For Dummies®, 2nd Edition Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2005 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permit- ted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317-572-3447, fax 317-572-4355, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley Publishing logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Round 8 -10.08.14
    Bulletin Round 8 -10.08.14 Trading blows Perhaps the man of the day - Paco Vallejo claimed the scalp of none other than Vladimir Kramnik Photo: Georgios Souleidis / chess24 Chess Olympiad Tromsø 2014 – Bulletin Round 8– 10.08.14 Vassily Ivanchuk came to the board ready for a fight Photo: Georgios Souleidis / chess24 Round 8 interim report: Only the missing Today we finally saw no surprises in terms of zero tolerance forfeits, but a mystery about attendance remains. As mentioned in previous reports, one member of the Libyan Open team is paired though never here, and this arrangement now also applies to the Burundi Open team - their second board has now been excluded from the event, along with the Burundi Women's team, for repeated non- appearance. By GM Jonathan Tisdall The organizers have promised a statement at advantage against the hottest man in the today's official evening press conference about Olympiad, Bulgaria's Valentin Iotov. the Burundians - who are not just not being paired, but actually missing. To sum up - it Two dull draws were recorded on the top half of appears that everyone who is here arrived at the the China-Azerbaijan match, and the remaining board on time today. games looked better for the white players, so an evenly balanced and tense match. The Azeris lead The attention-grabbing match in the Open the event on match points, the only team with section turned out to be second seeds Ukraine 13/14, while China, Czech Republic, Bulgaria and floating up to meet 18th ranked Bulgaria. The Romania are chasing with 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Experiment YOUR NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTION: OVERCOME CHESS HOARDING!
    Bold Experiment YOUR NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTION: OVERCOME CHESS HOARDING! Maurice JANUARY 2015 & Ashley Amy Lee’s Bold Experiment FineLine Technologies JN Index 80% 1.5 BWR PU JANUARY A USCF Publication $5.95 01 GM Wesley So and a friendly spectator hold up his winner’s check. 7 25274 64631 9 IFC_Layout 1 12/10/2014 11:28 AM Page 1 SLCC_Layout 1 12/10/2014 11:50 AM Page 1 The Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis is preparing for another fantastic year! 2015 U.S. Championship 2015 U.S. Women’s Championship 2015 U.S. Junior Closed $10K Saint Louis Open GM/IM Title Norm Invitational 2015 Sinquefi eld Cup $10K Thanksgiving Open www.saintlouischessclub.org 4657 Maryland Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63108 | (314) 361–CHESS (2437) | [email protected] NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY: The CCSCSL admits students of any race, color, nationality, or ethnic origin. THE UNEXPECTED COLLISION OF CHESS AND HIP HOP CULTURE 2&72%(5r$35,/2015 4652 Maryland Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63108 (314) 367-WCHF (9243) | worldchesshof.org Photo © Patrick Lanham Financial assistance for this project With support from the has been provided by the Missouri Regional Arts Commission Arts Council, a state agency. CL_01-2014_masthead_JP_r1_chess life 12/10/2014 10:30 AM Page 2 Chess Life EDITORIAL STAFF Chess Life Editor and Daniel Lucas [email protected] Director of Publications Chess Life Online Editor Jennifer Shahade [email protected] Chess Life for Kids Editor Glenn Petersen [email protected] Senior Art Director Frankie Butler [email protected] Editorial Assistant/Copy Editor Alan Kantor [email protected] Editorial Assistant Jo Anne Fatherly [email protected] Editorial Assistant Jennifer Pearson [email protected] Technical Editor Ron Burnett TLA/Advertising Joan DuBois [email protected] USCF STAFF Executive Director Jean Hoffman ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulebook Changes Since the 6Th Edition Rulebook Changes
    Rulebook changes since the 6th edition Rulebook Changes Compiled by Dave Kuhns and Tim Just (2016) Since the publication of the 6th edition of the US Chess rulebook, changes have been made in US Chess policy or in the wording of the rules. Below is a collection of those changes. Any additions or corrections can be sent to US Chess. US Chess Policy Changes Please note that policy changes are different than rules changes and often occur more than once per year. Check the US Chess web page for the most current changes. Scholastic Policy Change: When taking entries for all National Scholastic Chess tournaments with ‘under’ and/or unrated sections, US Chess will require players to disclose at the time they enter the tournament whether they have one or more ratings in other over the board rating system(s). US Chess shall seriously consider, in consultation with the Scholastic Council and the Ratings Committee, using this rating information to determine section and prize eligibility in accordance with US Chess rules 28D and 28E. This policy will take effect immediately and will be in effect for all future US Chess national scholastic tournaments that have ‘under’ and/or unrated sections (new, 2014). Rationale: There are areas of the country in which many scholastic tournaments are being held that are not submitted to US Chess to be rated. As a result, some players come to the national scholastic tournaments with ratings that do not reflect their current playing strength. In order to ensure fair competition, we need to be able to use all available information about these players’ true playing strength.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Year in Review
    The Gambit Nebraska State Chess Archives Nebraska State Chess 2016 The Year in Review. XABCDEFGHY 8Q+-+-mK-mk( 7+-+-+-+-' 6L+-sn-+-+& 5+-+-+-sN-% 4-+-+-+-+$ 3+-+-+n+-# 2-+-+-+-+" 1+-+-+-+-! xabcdefghy White to play & mate in 2 moves. (Composed by Bob Woodworth) Hint: After White’s keymove & depending on Black’s reply, find all of the ‘long-distance’ checkmates. Gambit Editor- Kent Nelson The Gambit serves as the official publication of the Nebraska State Chess Association and is published by the Lincoln Chess Foundation. Send all games, articles, and editorial materials to: Kent Nelson 4014 “N” St Lincoln, NE 68510 [email protected] NSCA Officers President John Hartmann Treasurer Lucy Ruf Historical Archivist Bob Woodworth Secretary Gnanasekar Arputhaswamy Webmaster Kent Smotherman Regional VPs NSCA Committee Members Vice President-Lincoln- John Linscott Vice President-Omaha- Michael Gooch Vice President (Western) Letter from NSCA President John Hartmann January 2017 Hello friends! Our beloved game finds itself at something of a crossroads here in Nebraska. On the one hand, there is much to look forward to. We have a full calendar of scholastic events coming up this spring and a slew of promising juniors to steal our rating points. We have more and better adult players playing rated chess. If you’re reading this, we probably (finally) have a functional website. And after a precarious few weeks, the Spence Chess Club here in Omaha seems to have found a new home. And yet, there is also cause for concern. It’s not clear that we will be able to have tournaments at UNO in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • YEARBOOK the Information in This Yearbook Is Substantially Correct and Current As of December 31, 2020
    OUR HERITAGE 2020 US CHESS YEARBOOK The information in this yearbook is substantially correct and current as of December 31, 2020. For further information check the US Chess website www.uschess.org. To notify US Chess of corrections or updates, please e-mail [email protected]. U.S. CHAMPIONS 2002 Larry Christiansen • 2003 Alexander Shabalov • 2005 Hakaru WESTERN OPEN BECAME THE U.S. OPEN Nakamura • 2006 Alexander Onischuk • 2007 Alexander Shabalov • 1845-57 Charles Stanley • 1857-71 Paul Morphy • 1871-90 George H. 1939 Reuben Fine • 1940 Reuben Fine • 1941 Reuben Fine • 1942 2008 Yury Shulman • 2009 Hikaru Nakamura • 2010 Gata Kamsky • Mackenzie • 1890-91 Jackson Showalter • 1891-94 Samuel Lipchutz • Herman Steiner, Dan Yanofsky • 1943 I.A. Horowitz • 1944 Samuel 2011 Gata Kamsky • 2012 Hikaru Nakamura • 2013 Gata Kamsky • 2014 1894 Jackson Showalter • 1894-95 Albert Hodges • 1895-97 Jackson Reshevsky • 1945 Anthony Santasiere • 1946 Herman Steiner • 1947 Gata Kamsky • 2015 Hikaru Nakamura • 2016 Fabiano Caruana • 2017 Showalter • 1897-06 Harry Nelson Pillsbury • 1906-09 Jackson Isaac Kashdan • 1948 Weaver W. Adams • 1949 Albert Sandrin Jr. • 1950 Wesley So • 2018 Samuel Shankland • 2019 Hikaru Nakamura Showalter • 1909-36 Frank J. Marshall • 1936 Samuel Reshevsky • Arthur Bisguier • 1951 Larry Evans • 1952 Larry Evans • 1953 Donald 1938 Samuel Reshevsky • 1940 Samuel Reshevsky • 1942 Samuel 2020 Wesley So Byrne • 1954 Larry Evans, Arturo Pomar • 1955 Nicolas Rossolimo • Reshevsky • 1944 Arnold Denker • 1946 Samuel Reshevsky • 1948 ONLINE: COVID-19 • OCTOBER 2020 1956 Arthur Bisguier, James Sherwin • 1957 • Robert Fischer, Arthur Herman Steiner • 1951 Larry Evans • 1952 Larry Evans • 1954 Arthur Bisguier • 1958 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Roads to Emancipation: Lincoln, the Law, and the Proclamation Dr
    Copyright © 2013 by the National Trust for Historic Preservation i Table of Contents Letter from Erin Carlson Mast, Executive Director, President Lincoln’s Cottage Letter from Martin R. Castro, Chairman of The United States Commission on Civil Rights About President Lincoln’s Cottage, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, and The United States Commission on Civil Rights Author Biographies Acknowledgements 1. A Good Sleep or a Bad Nightmare: Tossing and Turning Over the Memory of Emancipation Dr. David Blight……….…………………………………………………………….….1 2. Abraham Lincoln: Reluctant Emancipator? Dr. Michael Burlingame……………………………………………………………….…9 3. The Lessons of Emancipation in the Fight Against Modern Slavery Ambassador Luis CdeBaca………………………………….…………………………...15 4. Views of Emancipation through the Eyes of the Enslaved Dr. Spencer Crew…………………………………………….………………………..19 5. Lincoln’s “Paramount Object” Dr. Joseph R. Fornieri……………………….…………………..……………………..25 6. Four Roads to Emancipation: Lincoln, the Law, and the Proclamation Dr. Allen Carl Guelzo……………..……………………………….…………………..31 7. Emancipation and its Complex Legacy as the Work of Many Hands Dr. Chandra Manning…………………………………………………..……………...41 8. The Emancipation Proclamation at 150 Dr. Edna Greene Medford………………………………….……….…….……………48 9. Lincoln, Emancipation, and the New Birth of Freedom: On Remaining a Constitutional People Dr. Lucas E. Morel…………………………….…………………….……….………..53 10. Emancipation Moments Dr. Matthew Pinsker………………….……………………………….………….……59 11. “Knock[ing] the Bottom Out of Slavery” and Desegregation:
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Playerratings'
    Package ‘PlayerRatings’ March 1, 2020 Version 1.1-0 Date 2020-02-28 Title Dynamic Updating Methods for Player Ratings Estimation Author Alec Stephenson and Jeff Sonas. Maintainer Alec Stephenson <[email protected]> Depends R (>= 3.5.0) Description Implements schemes for estimating player or team skill based on dynamic updating. Implemented methods include Elo, Glicko, Glicko-2 and Stephenson. Contains pdf documentation of a reproducible analysis using approximately two million chess matches. Also contains an Elo based method for multi-player games where the result is a placing or a score. This includes zero-sum games such as poker and mahjong. LazyData yes License GPL-3 NeedsCompilation yes Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2020-03-01 15:50:06 UTC R topics documented: aflodds . .2 elo..............................................3 elom.............................................5 fide .............................................7 glicko . .9 glicko2 . 11 hist.rating . 13 kfide............................................. 14 kgames . 15 krating . 16 kriichi . 17 1 2 aflodds metrics . 17 plot.rating . 19 predict.rating . 20 riichi . 22 steph . 23 Index 26 aflodds Australian Football Game Results and Odds Description The aflodds data frame has 675 rows and 9 variables. It shows the results and betting odds for 675 Australian football games played by 18 teams from 26th March 2009 until 24th June 2012. Usage aflodds Format This data frame contains the following columns: Date A date object showing the date of the game. Week The number of weeks since 25th March 2009. HomeTeam The home team name. AwayTeam The away team name. HomeScore The home team score. AwayScore The home team score. Score A numeric vector giving the value one, zero or one half for a home win, an away win or a draw respectively.
    [Show full text]