Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 77 (1): e093 https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2527 ISSN-L: 0211-1322

Typification of names published by Schultz “Bipontinus” in the Andryala pinnatifida complex (, ), from the Canary Islands

Maria Zita FERREIRA1*, Inés ÁLVAREZ FERNÁNDEZ2 & Miguel MENEZES DE SEQUEIRA3 1,3Grupo de Botânica da Madeira (GBM), Universidade da Madeira, Faculdade de Ciências da Vida, Campus da Penteada, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal. 2Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo, 2, 28014, Madrid, España. 3CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado.

*Correspondence: [email protected] 1http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-2693, 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5982-5424 3http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-465X

Abstract. Schultz “Bipontinus” (1805-1867) described, in the Histoire Resumen. Schultz “Bipontinus” (1805-1867) describió, en la Histoire Naturelle des Îles Canaries published by Webb and Berthelot in 1849, Naturelle des Îles Canaries, publicada por Webb y Berthelot en 1849, several forms of the Andryala pinnatifida complex, endemic to the varias formas del complejo de Andryala pinnatifida, endémico de las Islas Canary Islands, based on material collected by E. Bourgeau and P. Canarias, basadas en material recolectado por E. Bourgeau y P. B. Webb. B. Webb. In order to facilitate a forthcoming taxonomic revision of this Con el fin de facilitar una próxima revisión taxonómica de esta especie, species complex, some of the names established by Schultz “Bipontinus” algunos de los nombres establecidos por Schultz “Bipontinus” se tipifican are here lectotypified based on protologue analysis and the examination aquí tras el análisis de los protólogos y del material original depositado of original material located at P and FI-W herbaria. en los herbarios P y FI-W.

Keywords. Andryala, Canary Islands, Compositae, historic collections, Palabras clave. Andryala, Islas Canarias, Compositae, colecciones Macaronesia, typification. históricas, Macaronesia, tipificación.

How to cite this article: Ferreira M.Z., Álvarez Fernández I. & Menezes De Sequeira M. 2020. Typification of names published by Schultz “Bipontinus” in the Andryala pinnatifida complex (Cichorieae, Asteraceae), from the Canary Islands. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 77: e093. https://doi. org/10.3989/ajbm.2527 Title in Spanish: Tipificación de los nombres publicados por Schultz “Bipontinus” en el complejo Andryala pinnatifida (Cichorieae, Asteraceae) de las Islas Canarias. Associate Editor: Carlos Aedo; received: 31 May 2019; accepted: 2 February 2020; published online: 10 July 2020.

INTRODUCTION Andryala pinnatifida was validly published by Aiton (1789: 129) who recognised two varieties: A. pinnatifida Andryala L. (Asteraceae: Cichorieae) is a small var. α, from Madeira, and A. pinnatifida var. β, from the comprising about 17 species distributed in the Canary Islands. Nonetheless, later authors (e.g. Sprengel Mediterranean region, Southwest Europe, Northwest 1826; De Candolle 1838; Schultz “Bipontinus” 1849) Africa, and Macaronesia (Sell 1976; Talavera 1987; Tohmé limited A. pinnatifida to the Canary Islands. Lowe & Tohmé 2007; Blanca 2011; El Oualidi & al. 2012; (1868: 564) definitively placed A. pinnatifida var. α in Fennane 2014). Outside this area, only a rare endemic A. cheiranthifolia L´Hér. (currently known as A. glandulosa). species, A. levitomentosa (Nyár.) P.D.Sell, is found in The distribution of A. pinnatifida was extended to North Romania (Nyárády 1965; Sell 1976). In Macaronesia, Africa by different authors (e.g., Ball 1878; Maire 1928). several endemic species are currently recognised, including However, recent taxonomic and phylogenetic studies A. glandulosa Lam. and A. crithmifolia Aiton from Madeira, supported the restriction of A. pinnatifida to the Canary as well as A. pinnatifidaAiton and A. perezii M.Z.Ferreira, Islands (Ferreira & al. 2014c, 2015). R.Jardim, Alv.Fern. & M.Seq. from the Canary Islands Andryala pinnatifida is a morphologically highly (Press 1994; Ferreira & al. 2014a, 2014b; Ferreira & al. variable species and over time several infra-specific 2015). These species are relatively recent and their origin entities have been described by different authors (e.g. may be explained by single colonization events and Schultz “Bipontinus” 1849; Christ 1888; Kunkel 1980). subsequent insular speciation (Ferreira & al. 2015). In the publication Histoire naturelle des Îles Canaries,

Copyright: © 2020 CSIC. This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial Lisence (CC BY 4.0). 2 Ferreira & al.

Schultz “Bipontinus” (1849) described A. pinnatifida in (syntypes and isosyntypes), were located at the P and detail, based on plant material collected by E. Bourgeau in FI-W herbaria. the Canary Islands between 1845 and 1846. Additionally, 2. Andryala pinnatifida f. fuerteventurensis Sch.Bip. in Schultz “Bipontinus” (1849) recognised several forms. Webb & Berthel., Hist. Nat. Iles Canaries (Phytogr.) 3(2): Some of these were recently typified by Ferreira & al. 415. 1849. (2014a, 2015), namely A. pinnatifida f. cuneifolia Sch. Bip., A. pinnatifida f. buchiana Sch.Bip., and A. pinnatifida Ind. loc.: “Fuerteventura, el Risco de Valdebron, 19 f. teydensis Sch.Bip. The objective of this study is to typify Febr. 1846; Bourgeau! n. 13. Iconem tab. 135”. the remaining names in order to facilitate a forthcoming TYPE: Spain, Canary Islands. Fuerteventura, en El taxonomic revision of the A. pinnatifida complex. Risco de Valdebron, 19 Feb. 1846, E. Bourgeau 13 Therefore, only a few names will be placed in the taxa (lectotype, designated here, P 02462161!). presently recognised by the authors (A. pinnatifida subsp. pinnatifida and Andryala pinnatifida subsp. cuneifolia). The specimen P 02462161 from the Schultz “Bipontinus” collection was the only one found under MATERIALS AND METHODS A. pinnatifida f. fuerteventurensis, handwritten by Schultz “Bipontinus” himself. Given that the collection locality This study was based on protologue analysis of the and date, as well as the collector number, coincide exactly typified names and the examination of original material with those in the protologue, this specimen is here selected during a visit to the P herbarium. Digital images provided as the lectotype. by the staff from the FI-W herbarium were also studied. Schultz “Bipontinus” (1849) emphasized the TYPIFICATION OF NAMES PUBLISHED BY morphological similarity between Andryala pinnatifida SCHULTZ “BIPONTINUS” f. sprengeliana and A. pinnatifida f. fuerteventurensis and presented a hand drawing to illustrate both these 1. Andryala pinnatifida f. sprengeliana Sch.Bip. in Webb forms. The illustration shows a caption that says & Berthel., Hist. Nat. Iles Canaries (Phytogr.) 3(2): 415. “Andryala pinnatifida Hort. Kew” and it resembles the 1849 ≡ Andryala pinnatifida var. sprengeliana (Sch.Bip.) lectotype of A. pinnatifida Aiton (designated by Ferreira G.Kunkel in Vieraea 8(2): 344. 1980. & al. 2014a). Accordingly, the observation of original material from the Schultz Bipontinus collection showed Ind. loc.: “Canaria, in collibus aridis argillosis that these forms are morphologically very similar to the Valsequillo, 25 Martio 1846: Bourgeau! n. 5 … Canaria, lectotype of A. pinnatifida Aiton. In view of the foregoing, Barranco de la Vierge, 30 Martio 1846: Bourgeau! n. these forms should be included in Andryala pinnatifida 6 … Canaria in humidiusculis et convalliuin umbrosis, subsp. pinnatifida. Martio 1846: Bourgeau! n. 10 … Canaria, Barranco de los Tiles, monte Doramas, 6 Apr. 1846: Bourgeau! n. 8 3. Andryala pinnatifida f. massoniana Sch.Bip. in Webb … Teneriffa, Barranco de Ignoste [Igueste], reg. Pini, & Berthel., Hist. Nat. Iles Canaries (Phytogr.) 3(2): 414. Junio 1846: Bourgeau! n. 2 … Teneriffa ad Sylva? 1849. marginem prope San Diego del Monte 26 Febr. 1845. Ind. loc.: "In rupestribus Teneriffæ vulgaris: Webb!" Bourgeau! sine n …”. TYPE: Spain, Canary Islands (lectotype, designated TYPE: Spain, Canary Islands. Tenerife, Bco. here, P 02462109!). de Igueste, Jun. 1846, E. Bourgeau 2 (lectotype, designated here, P 02462110!). The original description of A. pinnatifida f. massoniana by Schultz “Bipontinus” (1849) matches the one on the In the protologue of A. pinnatifida f. sprengeliana, label of the specimen P 02462109, designated here as the Schultz “Bipontinus” (1849) mentioned several specimens lectotype. Indeed, on the label Schultz “Bipontinus” wrote collected by E. Bourgeau in different localities of “A. pinnatifida DC. A. fol. pinnatifida a. pinnis integris Gran Canaria and Tenerife. According to the label on – genuina 1. involu. glanduloso = forma massoniana”. the herbarium sheet, the specimen P 02462110, under Although the collector, collection locality and date were A. pinnatifida f. sprengeliana, is from the Schultz not mentioned, this specimen most likely corresponds “Bipontinus” herbarium. An additional label shows that the to original material given that it is from the Schultz collection locality, date and collector number match those “Bipontinus” collection, according to the information on in the protologue. Besides, this specimen fits perfectly the herbarium sheet (“Herb. Car. Henr. Schultz, Bipont.”). the original description and is, therefore, designated Likewise, in the protologue no reference to the collection here as lectotype. The remaining specimens listed in the data was made. A plausible collector might be P. B. protologue, with distinct collection dates and localities Webb seeing that Schultz “Bipontinus” highlighted that

Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 77 (1): e093. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2527 Andryala pinnatifida:typification of names by “Bipontinus” 3 this naturalist had seen the specimen. Another possible P 02462113! specimen on the right; isolectotypes, candidate for lectotypification would be a specimen from P 00723588! specimen on the left, FI-W109930 the Schultz “Bipontinus” collection found at P herbarium specimen on the left, FI-W109941 [digital images!]). (P 02462108, on the left). Nonetheless, the only indication The specimens here considered as original material of that it might correspond to A. pinnatifida f. massoniana is A. pinnatifida f. palmensis were collected by Bourgeau, the label that reads “involucrum hispidum” handwritten exactly in the locality and on the date mentioned in the by the author himself. Indeed, Schultz “Bipontinus” protologue (“Caldera de La Palma, 2 Aout. 1845”). The (1849: 414) considered A. pinnatifida f. massoniana and specimen P 02462113 (on the right) is under the name A. pinnatifida f. preauxiana as the typical forms (“Folia Andryala pinnatifida f. palmensis, handwritten by Schultz pinnatifida, pinnis integris. = Forma genuina”) which “Bipontinus”, and was collected by Bourgeau according differ mainly by the hispid glandular hairs on the involucre, to the label “E. Bourgeau, Plantæ Canariensis, nº. 4”. As present on the first and absent on the second. it clearly matches the information in the protologue and 4. Andryala pinnatifida f. preauxiana Sch.Bip. in is the best preserved specimen, it is here selected as the Webb & Berthel., Hist. Nat. Iles Canaries (Phytogr.) lectotype. The specimen P 00723588 (on the left), also 3(2): 415. 1849. under the name A. pinnatifida f. palmensis, was collected Ind. loc.: “α Capitula corymbosa. In rupibus Teneriffæ by Bourgeau, but no collector number was indicated. cum forma Massoniana. β Racemoso-corymbosa parva However, an additional label reads “Andryala coronopifolia longe pedicellata, folia angustiora, caulis gracilior. Link”, a name that figures in the protologue as unpublished Canaria Despréaux!” (“Andryala coronopifolia