INFORMATION TO USERS

This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted.

The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction.

1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity.

2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame.

3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.

4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department.

5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed.

UniversiV MicnSilms International

Lacy, Lucile Christine

A SURVEY AND EVALUATION OF MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM IN SELECTED, ACCREDITED BLACK PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN THE UNITED STATES

The Ohio State University Pk

University Microfilms I nternationsiSOO N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106

Copyright 1985 by Lacy, Lucile Christine All Rights Reserved

In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V

1. Glossy photographs or pag es______

2. Colored illustrations, paper or print______

3. Photographs with dark background ______

4. Illustrations are poor copy______

5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ______

6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page ______

7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages

8. Print exceeds margin requirements ______

9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine______

10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print_____

11. Page(s)______lacking when material received, and not available from school or author.

12. Page(s)______seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows.

13. Two pages numbered ______. Text follows.

14. Curling and wrinkled pages ______

15. Other______

University Microfilms International

A SURVEY AND EVALUATION OF MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

IN SELECTED, ACCREDITED BLACK PRIVATE COLLEGES

AND UNIVERSITIES IN THE UNITED STATES

DISSERTATION

Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate

School of The Ohio State University

By

Lucile Christine Lacy, B.A., M.M.E.

The Ohio State University

1985

Reading Committee: Approved by Dr. A. Peter Costanza Dr. John K. Lehr Dr. William T. McDaniel

Adviser School of Mus Copyright by Lucile Christine Lacy 1985 To my mother, Gladys, and father, Ulysses,

parents of principle

who as my first teachers instilled in me the desire

to establish high standards and goals,

with a firm conviction to achieve them,

and who never stopped encouraging me to pursue knowledge

I dedicate this dissertation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The completion of this project would not have reached

fruition without assistance and guidance from many

people. The writer wishes to express her deep and sincere

appreciation to all who helped make this dissertation a

reality.

Appreciation is expressed to a number of persons who

have provided crucial support for this project. My

adviser. Dr. Peter Costanza, my supporting mentor,

deserves much appreciation for his insightful counsel,

patience, encouragement, guidance and scholarly probing.

Gratitude is extended to other members of my reading

committee: Dr. Joan Lehr and Dr. Ted McDaniel, for their

helpful comments given in the refinement and ultimate

completion of this study. My doctoral committee has

contributed in innumerable ways through their countless

suggestions, scholarly standards and openness in allowing

the researcher to explore her interests.

The writing of this dissertation is the culmination of many experiences and many influences. Special appreciation is also extended to Dr. William Moore and Professor Mary

Tolbert who contributed much to the progress of my studies,

i i i They exemplify the epitome of the quest for know!edge,

understanding and synthesis. Your support and

encouragement will forever be remembered.

A debt of gratitude is owed to Oakwood College for

giving the writer a sabbatical leave, and the United Negro

College Fund for awarding me the Lily Endowment Faculty

Development Grant. Without this the research study would

not have been possible. Appreciation is expressed to The

Ohio State University Office of Minority Affairs and the

United Negro College Fund for endorsing the study and

providing initial contacts. My sincere appreciation is extended to Dr. Frank Hale, Jr. and Dr. Turner Battle, III.

Gratitude is expressed to all subjects who participated

in this study and thus made it possible. Thank you for your time, interest, candid opinions and scholarly expertise.

A word of thanks and acknowledgement are due to Dr.

Donald Maiec and his assistants at The Ohio State

University Statistics Laboratory and to those at the

Instructional Research Computer Center who guided and helped to solve complications. The capability and conveniences of these systems minimized the time required to analyze data.

A big thank-you is extended to my friends Michael,

Mongaring, Janet and Linda whose patience, energy and skills in typing and editing the drafts to printed page sustained the completion of this manuscript.

The writer wishes to extend her warmest appreciation to her family. I shall be forever grateful:

To my parents, who since the beginning, had made

this goal attainable.

To my brother, Walter, and sister-in law, Susan,

for their personal encouragement, deep interest,

sense of pride, sacrificial gifts and financial

support.

To the entire Frank Hale Family who stood by me as

the doctoral growing process unfolded, extended

their love and grand hospitalities in innumerable

ways.

To my sister, Irene and brother-in-law, Frank III,

who also prodded, cajoled, stroked and prayed with

me.

To my nephew, Frank Hale IV, who helped me to

laugh during the rough times.

My deepest appreciation is extended to my entire family, members too numerous to mention, but too special to omit--whose love, support andencouragement has given this accomplishment even more meaning. Finally, but not least, the writer expresses thankfulness, and praise to her Lord and Savior, Jesus

Christ who gave me the vision to complete this study and the strength necessary to realize my dream. To this end,

I give all glory and honor to God. VITA

October 16, 1945 .... Born: Huntsville,

1968 ...... B.S., Oakwood College

1971 ...... M.M.E. George Peabody College for Teachers

1971 ...... Executive Secretary, Vice-President of Academic Affairs Oakwood College

1972 - Present ...... Assistant Professor Department of Music Oakwood College

1979-198 0 ...... Graduate Studies in Music Education and Curriculum and Supervision

1980-1981 ...... Visiting Professor Department of Music Alabama A & M University

1982-85 ...... Doctoral Student The Ohio State University

FIELDS OF STUDY

Major Field: Music Education

Cognate: Educational Administration

Studies in Music Education: Dr. A. Peter Costanza Dr. Joan K. Lehr

Studies in Directive Teaching: Dr. Jere Forsythe

Studies in Piano: Dr. Jerry Lowder Dr. Sylvia Zaremba

vi i Studies in General & Elementary Music: Professor Mary Tolbert

Studies in Administration of Music Education: Dr. David Meeker

Studies in Educational Administration: Dr. William Moore TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page DEDICATION...... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... iii

VITA...... vii

LIST OF TABLES...... xiv

LIST OF FIGURES...... XX

CHAPTER

, I. INTRODUCTION...... 1

An Appraisal of HistoricallyBlack Colleges . . . 4 The Uniqueness of the Selected, Accredited Black Colleges and Universities ...... 7 Geographical Location ...... 11 Teaching Faculty ...... 12 Constituency Served ...... 13 Need for the Study ...... 15 Purpose ...... 23 Research Questions ...... 24 Statement of the Problem ...... 25 Assumptions...... 26 Definitions...... 27 Limitations...... 28 Summary ...... 30

II. REVIEW OF RESEARCH AND RELATED LITERATURE .... 31

Evaluation Defined ...... 31 Academic Program Evaluation ...... 33 Models and Purposes for Academic Program Evaluation ...... 35 Using Evaluative Data in Planning ...... 37 Teacher Education Evaluation Practices ...... 42 Teacher Education in Private College and Universities...... 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS ( C o n t.)

CHAPTER

Comparative Review Studies...... 50 Individual Studies...... 52 Studies Concerning Music Teacher Education. . . . 58 Conclusion ...... 66

III. METHODOLOGY...... 69

Design of the Study ...... 69 The Population...... 71 The Program Director's Questionnaire...... 74 The Music Graduate's Questionnaire ...... 76 V a lid a tio n ...... 77 Pivot T esting...... 78 Procedure for Data Collection ...... 79 The Graduates ...... 81 Data Analysis ...... 86 Summary ...... 87

IV. PRESENTATION OF DATA...... 89

Introduction ...... 89 Findings—Part One Survey of the Music Teacher Education Program . 90 Section I ...... 90 Objective I ...... 90 The Institutions ...... 91 Type of Institutions ...... 93 Division of Academic Y ear...... 95 Total Music F aculty ...... 96 Total Teacher Education Faculty ...... 96 Accreditation Organization...... 97 Degrees Offered in Music and Music Teacher Education ...... 99 Section II...... 101 Teacher Education Program Housed ...... 102 Music Teacher Education - Housed ...... 102 Length of Music Teacher Education Program .... 104 Requirements for Admission to the Music Education Program ...... 104 Retention Requirements for Music Teacher Education Students ...... 108 Teacher Education Council ...... Ill Who or What Group is Responsible for Decision Making...... 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS ( C o n t .)

CHAPTER Page

Requirements for Student Teaching...... 1 25 Teaching Certificate — Level /Grade...... 129 Criteria for Admission into the Music Program. . 131 Majors Offered in Music Teacher ...... 133 Student Membership in Professional Organizations 137 Section III...... 137 Music Theory ...... 138 Si ghtsinging...... 142 Dictation ...... 146 Music History ...... 146 Advanced Music History ...... 147 Applied Music ...... 147 Credit Hours Available for Voice, Keyboard and Band ...... 150 Different Courses Available for Voice, Keyboard and Band/Orchestra Instruments ...... 151 Credit Hours Required of Majors to Graduate (Applied Music -- Voice, Keyboard and Band/ Orchestra Instruments) ...... 154 Credit Hours Required of Minors to Graduate (Applied Music -- Voice, Keyboard and Band Instruments) ...... 156 Credit Hours Available for Applied Music — Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 159 Number of Different Courses for Applied Music — Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 160 Credit Hours Required of Majors to Graduate (Applied Music—Organ and Non-Band Instruments) 162 Credit Hours Required of Minors to Graduate (Applied Music—Organ and Non-Band Instruments) 163 Conducting — Beginning and Advanced ...... 165 Music L iteratu re ...... 169 Ensemble - Large and S m all ...... 172 Composition, Counterpoint and Advanced Theory Courses ...... 175 Music Education Methods Courses ...... 179 Student Teaching ...... 185 Recital -- Senior Recital, Junior Recital, Recital Attendance ...... 187 General Music ...... 188 Seminar in Education ...... 192 Advising...... 193 Total Music Hours for Graduation ...... 193 Grand Total Hours for Graduation ...... 195 TABLE OF CONTENTS ( C o n t.)

CHAPTER Page

G rad u ates ...... 196 General Information...... 196 Findings -- Part Two Evaluation by the Music Teacher Education Graduates ...... 196 Objective I I ...... 197 Section I — Factual Information ...... 197 Graduates by Undergraduate Institution ..... 197 The Graduates' Graduate Institution ...... 199 Year of Undergraduate Degree ...... 200 Degrees Earned by Graduates ...... 201 Major Area of Study ...... 203 Teaching Certificate You Now Have ...... 205 Section II -- Employment Status ...... 209 Teaching Experience...... 209 States/Country Taught In ...... 211 Types of System and Number of Years ...... 213 Your Present Position ...... 214 Music Subject Taught ...... 218 Section III — Academic Preparation...... 219 Section IV -- Open-end Questions ...... 230 Objective I I I ...... 231 Greatest Strengths...... 231 Greatest Deficiencies ...... 232 How Realistically ...... 234 Suggested Improvements ...... 236 Important Areas to be Offered ...... 239

V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .... 241

Summary ...... 241 Background of the Problem ...... 241 Statement of the P ro b le m ...... 242 Purpose ...... 243 P ro ced u res ...... 243 P o p u la tio n ...... 244 The Program Directors' Questionnaire ...... 245 The Music Graduates Questionnaire ...... 246 Data Analysis ...... 247 Findings of the Study ...... 248 Conclusions ...... 254 Recommendations for further use of data and for further research ...... 256 TABLE OF CONTENTS C o n t.)

CHAPTER Page

APPENDICES

A. Identification...... 259

B. Letters to P r e s id e n ts ...... 271

C. The Questionnaires .... ; ...... 278

D. Letters to the Music Teacher Education Program Directors ...... 297

E. Letters to Graduates ...... 304

F. Conversion Table of Academic Honors .... 310

SELECTED REFERENCES ...... 314

xiii L IS T OF TABLES

Page

States Requiring Testing for Certification . . 48

Graduates Eligibility for the Study ...... 84

Institutions and the Location ...... 93

Rank Order, Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Institutions and Denomination Status ...... 94

Frequency and Percentage Distribution -- Institutional Membership in Accreditation Organizations ...... 98

Frequency and Percentage of Degrees Offered in Music and Music Teacher Education ...... 100

Frequency and Percentage for Housing Music Teacher Education Programs ...... 103

Frequency and Percentage of Requirements for Admission to the Music Teacher Education Program ...... 105

Frequency and Percentage of Retention Require­ ments for Music Teacher Education Students. . 110

Frequency and Percentage Distribution -- Who or What Group Prepares and Reviews Objectives of Music Teacher Education Program ...... 114

Frequency and Percentages Distribution of Who or What Group Develops Policies and Criteria With Respect to Admissions ...... 116

Frequency and Percentages Distribution — Who or What Group Studies and Evaluates the C urriculum ...... 118 L IS T OF TABLES ( C o n t.) b le Page

13. Frequency and Percentage Distribution — Who or What Group Receives and Acts Upon Recommendations for Changes in Teacher Education Program ...... 120

14. Frequency and Percentages Distribution Who or What Group Reviews Policies Pertaining to Education andCertification ...... 122

15. Frequency and Percentages Distribution -- Who or What Group Maintains a Balance Between Professional and General Education Preparation ...... 124

16. Frequency and Percentage of Student Teaching Requirements ...... 128

17. Rank Order Frequency and Percentage of Teaching Certificates ...... 130

18. Distribution of Frequencies and Percentages Criteria for Admission into Music Program . . 132

19. Frequency and Percentage of Major Areas by L e v e l s ...... 135

20. Frequency Distribution of Major Areas Offered in Music Teacher Education ...... 136

21. Frequency and Percentage Distribution for the Area of Music Theory ...... 139

22. Frequency and Percentage Distribution: Number of Different Courses Offered in Music Theory. 140

23. Frequency and Percentage Distribution: Number of Required Credit Hours of Music Majors in Music Theory ...... 140

24. Frequency and Percentage Distribution: Number of Credit Hours Required in Music Theory of Minors to G ra d u a te ...... 141 LIST OF TABLES (Cont.)

25. Frequency and Percentage Distribution for the Area of Si gh ts in g in g ...... 143

26. Frequency and Percentage Distribution; Number of Different Courses in Sightsinging ...... 144

27. Frequency and Percentage Distribution: Number of Credit Hours Required in Sightsinging of Majors to Graduate ...... 144

28. Frequency and Percentage Distribution: Number of Credit Hours Required in Sightsinging of Minors to Graduate ...... 145

29. Frequency, Percentage and Credit Hours Available in Applied Music — Voice, Keyboard and Band/ Orchestra Instrument ...... 150

30. Frequency Percentage and Number of Different Courses Offered in Applied Music — Voice, Keyboard and Band/Orchestra Instruments . . .153

31. Frequency Percentage and Credit Hours Required of Majors in Applied Music -- Voice, Keyboard and Band/Orchestra Instruments ...... 154

32. Frequency Percentage and Credit Hours Required of Minors in Applied Music: Voice, Keyboard and Band/Orchestra Instruments ...... 157

33. Frequency Percentage and Credit Hours Available in Applied Music -- Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 159

34. Frequency Percentage and Number of Different Courses Offered in Applied Music — Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 161 LIS T OF TABLES

Tabi e Page

35. Frequency Percentage and Credit Hours Required of Majors in Applied Music -- Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 163

36. Frequency Percentage and Credit Hours Required of Minors in Applied Music: Organ and Non-Band Instruments ...... 164

37. Frequency and Percentage of Credit Hours Available in Beginning and Advanced Conducting ...... 166

38. Frequency and Percentage of Courses Offered in Beginning and Advanced Conducting ...... 168

39. Frequency and Percentage of Music Literature O fferings...... 169

40. Frequency, Percentage of Courses and Credit Hours in Large and Small Ensembles ...... 173

41. Frequency, Percentage of Courses and Credit Hours in Composition, Counterpoint and Advanced Theory Courses ...... 176

42. Frequency and Percentage of Courses and Credit Hours in Music Education Courses ...... 179

43. Frequency and Percentage of Courses and Credit Hours in the A rea ...... 185

44. Frequency, Percentage, Different Courses and Credit Hours in the Area of General Music . . 188

45. Frequency and Percentage of Total Music Hours . 194

46. Frequency and Percentage of Grand Total Hours for G raduation ...... 195 L IS T OF TABLES

Tabi e

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Graduates by Institution ...... 198

Frequency Distribution of Graduates and Graduate Institutions ...... 199

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Undergraduates Degrees of Graduates byYear . 201

Frequency and Percentage of Degrees Earned by Graduates ...... 202

Frequency, Percentage Distribution of Graduates Major Area of Study and Grade/Level ...... 204

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Teaching Certificate...... 206

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Grade/Level...... 207

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of States in Which Graduates Received Teaching C ertificate...... 208

Rank Order Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Total Months/Years Graduates Taught. . . . 209

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Years Graduates Taught in PresentPosition ...... 210

Rank Order Frequency by States/Country in Which Graduates Taught ...... 211

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Types of Systems and Number of Years ...... 213

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Graduates' Present Position ...... 215 LIST OF TABLES (C ont.)

-Page

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Approximate Population of Towns ...... 217

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Approximate Enrollment of Schools/Colleges. . 217

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Music Subject Taught ...... 218

Summary of Frequency and Percentage Ratings of Academic Preparation by Courses as Perceived by the Graduates ...... 220

Rank Order Frequency and Percentage of Greatest Strengths in College Preparation asPerceived by the Music Teacher Education Graduates. . . 232

Rank Order Frequency and Percentage of Greatest Deficiencies in College Preparation as Perceived by the Music Teacher Education Graduates ...... 233

Frequency and Percentage of How Realistically Music Courses Anticipated Real Working Situations and Problems Faced in Work .... 235

Rank Order Frequency and Percentage of Suggested Improvements for Their Music Teacher Education Program as Perceived by the G rad u ates ...... 237

Rank Order Frequency and Percentage Suggested Improvement Areas to be Offered as Perceived by the Graduates ...... 240 LIS T OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1. Interlocking Planning and Evaluation ...... 38

2. Skeleton of Program Evaluation ...... 39 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

We live in a multi-cultural/multi-racial ever-changing society. If schools are to be more than simply instru­ ments of majority culture and majority values, American educators must respect ethnic and racial cultures, values, traditions and languages. We need cultural pluralism, not cultural assimilation to achieve less destructive, more humanistic and a more democratic schooling. (Mohl, 1981).

We are in a time of ambiguity, a time of changing, a time of questioning. Today's world is a world of change and innovation, a world in which problems and conflicts abound. Tomorrow's world, while impossible to predict with accuracy, will also be one in which change continues to accelerate both in society and in the nation's schools and higher education. Therefore, teacher education insti­ tutions must develop individuals who can respond effec­ tively to the challenges of change and conflict. It must produce teachers, administrators and other educational personnel who can positively influence as well as adapt to change. 2

Schools must touch the future. Shane and Tabler

(1981), in Educating for a New Millenium, emphasized that we need schools that "create a curriculum that anticipates tommorrow". As teacher educators we must have a similar vision, we must prepare teachers not for today, but for tomorrow. We must prepare teachers for the year in which the June 1986 graduates of our programs can expect to retire if they teach until they attain the age of 62.

The most reliable way to anticipate the future is by understanding the present (Naisbitt, 1982). We should not delude ourselves by saying that the graduates who will teach our children do not make a difference for_ higher education. To a considerable extent, a higher institution will be governed by the quality of its teacher education graduates and the perceptions these graduates have of their alma mater. Graduates' perceptions of their college or university and teacher preparation program make a big difference in whether or not they will recommend to their students that they attend their alma maters.

The quality of education obtained throughout our nations's schools must be so high that decisions to attend other schools are based on factors other than quality of curriculum and instruction. Furthermore, quality school­ ing and quality teacher education are imperative so that all who attend will want to stay the course and upon 3 graduation will have choices for obtaining further education and selecting careers. Our graduates must be committed to the goals of equal educational opportunity.

Preparation for life in this complex, democratic American society is more than training for careers. Schooling must touch the intellect, hand, and spirit.

Educational institutions must at all times

strive to the utmost to fulfill the purposes and needs of society--and simultaneously interpret and re-i nterpret both society's needs and purposes and also its capacity for fulfilling them. (Foster, 1959, p. 3)

Schools are functioning as a part of a dynamic and accelerated society. Educational experiences must be evaluated in connection with the function that is being served by these experiences at the present time. Today's education must be appraised in terms of its potential use for tomorrow.

Music teacher education programs must keep pace with a changing world. Their curricula must meet the exacting requirement of continuous re-examination, re-evaluation and redirection. In no other way will institutions be able to maintain their positions as institutions of worth in a changing society. To attempt to establish a new curriculum blindly without thoughtful analysis of the old would be as unintelligent as retaining the old curricu­ lum. Moreover, to continue merely in the style of "the 4

good old days" would be a form of educational suicide.

Teacher education is a complex enterprise since it must

attempt to prepare undergraduates with widely disparate

abilities, goals and motivation to meet the increasingly

complex and rapidly changing demands for improved

education for the masses of the American society.

An Appraisal of Historically Black Colleges

The struggle for education among Black Americans in

the United States is a valiant story of determination,

sacrifice and survival. Through the years. Black efforts at change have met with both successes and failures.

Black parents and community leaders have been pace-set­

ters, in the forefront, calling for educational improve­ ment. Throughout the 1950s, and 1970s these Black

Americans have agitated for better schools for their children.

Brown (1979), in defense of Black colleges, gave a

detailed analysis of the function of Black colleges:

Black colleges have assumed primary respon­ sibility for educating the disadvantaged and poorly educated members of the Black commun­ ity. Thus, these institutions provde...: (a) educational opportunity for low income and educationally deprived youth; (b) com­ fortable learning environments where class, race and previous educational experiences are not determinants of success ; (c) centers of culture and tradition unique to Blacks in America; (d) centers for the development of and advancement of Black political and eco­ nomic interest; and (e) training centers for Black leadership of the next generation. (p. 8) Tollett (1974) clearly delineates the roles of the

Historically Black Colleges (HBC's)

First, they provide creditable models for aspiring Black youth; secondly, they are educational settings which many Blacks find more congenial to attend than predominantly white institutions; and thirdly, they provide special-group-oriented transitional educational enclaves, in which these students can prepare for and make the necessary transition from under privileged isolation to mainstream, (p. 165)

As stated by the National Advisory Committee on Black

Higher Education and Black Colleges and Universities

(1979), and confirmed by the Equal Educational Opportunity

Commission Report: More Promise Than Progress (1978),

... until the early 1970's most Black students matriculated at the Historically Black Colleges. Until about 1974 almost every Black person with a college education attended an historically Black College, and as recently as 1974 about one-half of all Black students who earned bachelors' degrees earned them at Historically Black Colleges. (p. 78)

Since the founding of Black colleges their worth has been substantiated through quantitative measures such as the number of graduates and through qualitative assessment such as the accomplishments of their graduates.

Quantitatively and qualitatively most of today's Black teachers, musicians, physicians, social workers and other 6

Black professionals who have made dutiful contributions

and/or attained outstanding distinction are graduates of

Black colleges. Distinguished graduates, to name only a

few, include Martin Luther King, Jr., W. E. B. DuBois and

Ralph Bunche.

In the continuing quest for good schools on the part

of Black Americans, Jane Ellen McAllister, a pioneer for

excellence in Teacher Education, has been recognized widely for her significant contributions (See Appendix

A). She is and has been, an exemplar of excellence and

inspiration and a proto-typical role model (Wil1iams-Burns

1982, and Carney, 1982).

In the area of music, the selected, accredited Black

private colleges and universities have graduated many

persons who have made significant contributions to their

profession (See Appendix A, Table 1 and Table 2).

Distinguished graduates, to name only a few, include

William Grant Still, Leontyne Price and Mattiwilda Dobbs.

Black colleges throughout their existence have served as a primary employer of professionally educated Blacks.

The National Advisory Committee on Black Higher Education and Black Colleges and Universities (1979) cited that as

recently as 1972, the majority of Blacks teaching in

institutions of higher education taught in Black

Colleges. Also, with rare exceptions, restrictive hiring 7 practices have meant that Black professors were not employed as professors at predominantly white campuses until the 1940's although from 1940-1946, only about twenty-six Blacks received faculty appointments at northern white institutions. Moreover, few Black teachers found employment in elite public schools. Most of those who attained academic employment were employed in Black

Colleges (Fleming, Gill, Swinton, 1978 and Moore,

Wagstaff, 1974).

In response to the question of what Black higher education has done for the nation at large, foremost it has identified, trained and made productive significant human talent that might otherwise have been lost. No nation is so wealthy in human resources that it can afford to suppress any portion of talent available to it because of artificial restrictions deriving from race, religion, sex, language or culture.

The Uniqueness of the Selected Accredited Black Private

Colleges and Universities

These colleges and universities are unique as a group from several different perspectives. The uniqueness is characterized by the circumstances that led to their organization as predominantly Black private institutions; the financial support, the geographic locations, the

teaching faculty and the constituency they serve.

Unlike most teacher education institutions, the histor­

ically black private teacher education programs did not originate from the conventional two-year normal schools.

Most of these black private colleges and universities were organized by missionaries and church organizations after the Civil War which ended in 1865 and before the Morrill

Act of 1890. Most of these Black private colleges and universities were organized at a time when about five million Blacks had been emancipated throughout the South.

Due to slavery 95 percent of them were illiterate, unequipped for the responsibility of freedom and had no educational alternative. (Ballard, 1973). Pifer (1973) stated that four northern church groups: Baptist,

Methodist, Presbyterians and Congregationalists were initially responsible for the establishment of private higher education institutions for Negroes in the South.

According to a survey by the investigator of current

College Catalogs (See Appendix A, Table 3) most of these colleges and universities also confirm its organization by missionaries and church organizations. Later, in addition to the four northern church groups, the African Methodist

Episcopal Church was joined by the black denominations.

This survey also confirms that approximately thirty-one of 9

these institutions began shortly after the end of the

Civil War, in 1865, yet before the Morrill Act of 1890

(Leavell, 1930; Bullock, 1967). Nearly all of these

institutions were established as preparatory schools,

normal industrial institutes, that later evolved into

four-year colleges and universities (Leavell, 1930).

The first American Colleges were founded by religious

denominations; and their main aim was as Kelly (1940) put

it was to "Propagate the species" (p. 29). Harvard, Yale,

William and Mary and many other colleges were established for the training of men for clergy. However, the church- related colleges for Negroes were foreshadowed by early efforts to give Negroes a higher education. Historically, all of the present-day Black private colleges with few exceptions, were established by some religious denomina­ tion. The primary motivation of these agencies, in the beginning, was the missionary urge to help provide educa­ tional opportunities for the large mass of illiterate, newly-emancipated slaves. Later, more advanced schools and eventually colleges and theological seminaries were established to train teachers and preachers.

According to Dubois' (1902), pioneer study of the

Negro colleges, the first group of colleges established after the Civil War was the "Freedman's Bureau Schools."

Dubois listed under the Freedmen's Bureau these schools: 10

Atlanta University, , Johnson C. Smith,

Talladega College and Hampton Institute. The Methodist colleges for Negroes was noted for founding Clark

University; the Disciples of Christ chartered Jarvis

Christian Institute; the Roman Catholic founded Xavier

University. Moreover, the American Methodist Episcopal

Church, founded by whites, started WilPerforce University,

Livingston College and Bishop College. Thus, Wi1 Perforce,

Livingston, Lane, Shaw, Benedict, Morris Brown and many others were created and supported Py Negro denominations.

They became the proud counterparts of colleges under white denominations. From the efforts of northern whites came institutions such as Fisk, Morehouse, Spelman, Xavier,

Johnson C. Smith, Atlanta University and many others for the newly emancipated slaves.

Church-related colleges for Blacks have played a significant role over the years since their founding.

They basically outdate all public colleges organized exclusively or primarily for Blacks (Patterson, 1960).

The private. Black church-related colleges have played a significant role in Negro life in answering the needs for training leaders at a time when no other opportunity for higher education was available to them.

Historically, Black private colleges have depended upon endowment earnings to bridge the gap between tuition n income and actual operating costs. However, because most

Black colleges generally have very meager endowment, if any, they have had to supplement their income in other ways. Unlike other institutions which might raise their tuition, most Black, private colleges have had a policy of maintaining relatively low tuition rates in order to remain within the ability of their students to pay. Due to this inherent financial weaknesses, and since alumni have not contributed monies on a regular basis in substantial amounts, the colleges have relied on the philanthropy largely of educational funding agencies, corporations, foundations, founding families, churches, and the general public to provide some measure of relief.

Geographical Location

Practically all of these selected colleges are located in states south of the Mason-Dixon Line (See Appendix A,

Figure 1). These selected col leges/uni vesities are located in twelve different states. Five institutions are in Alabama; one is in Arkansas; three are in Florida; seven are in Georgia; two in Lousi ana ; two in Mississippi; six in North Carolina, one in Ohio; four in South Carolina; four in Tennessee ; six in Texas ; and two are in Virginia

(See Appendix A, Table 4). Teaching Faculty

The private, predominantly Black Colleges and Univer­

sities are essentially teaching institutions as opposed to

research institutions. Thompson (1981) said that

. . . teaching is indeed more central and emphasized in Black Colleges than in other American colleges, primarily because such a large proportion of their students require excellent classroom teaching, plus personal counseling and extensive informal instruction and guidance if they are to overcome centu- ries of accumulated academic neglect to which Blacks have been victims. (p. 2)

In addition to the fact that teaching in Black colleges is

a many-faceted, time consuming role, it is also important

to note that the teaching loads of the faculty are, by comparison, usually very heavy(Carnegie Study, 1969).

These Black institutions of higher education traditionally have commited a major part of their resources to teaching and to service. According to Wright (1979)

Most black educators in higher education are located at black colleges and universities where work conditions include heavy teaching loads, little or no released time for reseach, and little emphasis on research as a criterion for promotion in salary or rank. Funding is inadequate for research by blacks on questions relating to the educational needs of blacks, (p. 18) Constituency Served

According to the UNCF Annual Statistical Report (1981)

the student enrollment of these colleges/universities

range from about 200 to 4,000 students. These students

usually come from homes with few books, and tend to have

parents with little academic training. The vast majority of the UNCF students have been well served by the educational services and expenses provided by the UNCF institutions (UNCF, 1981).

During the last decade the proportion of Black students enrolled inthe selected colleges from the southeast has steadily and continually declined.

In the fall of 1981, 65% of all UNCF students were from the Southeast, compared with 67.4% the previous year. The enroll­ ment of students from both the Central and Western regions declined somewhat, from 8.5% to 8.3% and from 7.2% to 7.0% respectively. (UNCF Annual Statistical Report, 1981, p. 4)

Moreover, as the years go by, the students are not necessarily residents of the states where they chose to go to college. According to the United Negro College Fund's

Annual Statistical Report (1981), approximately sixty percent of these students were in-state residents in 1980, whereas in 1981, fifty-seven percent were in-state resi­ dents. About thirty-six percent were from out-of-state. 14

and almost eight percent were foreign students. Also, in

1981, UNCF Colleges and universities' total enrollment was

approximately 50,000 students.

The student enrollment at these institutions of higher

education has also become increasingly international.

In the fall of 1981, the proportion of foreign students was 7.5%, an increase of 1.8% from the year before. Students from over 55 countries attended UNCF Colleges. Over 46% of the foreign students at UNCF Colleges are from African nations. Another 23% are from Caribbean Countries and about 16% are from the Middle East. (UNCF Statistical Report, 1981, p. 4)

These selected Black private institutions primarily

serve a constituency of socio-economically disadvantaged

students. The median family income of students enrolled

in these institutions, according to the UNCF Statistical

Report (1981) is less than $12,000 dollars.

Research endorsed by the National Merit Scholarship

(Holland, 1957) suggested that the quality of students is more important than the quality of institutions in devel­ oping "superior" graduates. Conversely, these institutions challenge Holland's concept and accept the difficult task

of training students who, for the most part, have been academically and culturally disadvantaged in comparison to majority students at white colleges. However, perhaps one of the easiest and surest way for a college to graduate

good students is to enroll good students. Since the 15 achievement of this goal is not an immediate prospect, the

Black institutions, not only must continue and expand remedial work, but also stress excellence in performance.

Unless colleges and universities promote excellence, there is no need for their perpetuation.

In spite of the limitations facing these higher institutions, they have special significance because of their traditional and continuing role in educating minority students to be responsible, productive and creative participants in the American society.

Need For The Study

Because teaching effectiveness depends immensely on the quality of teacher education programs, there is an urgent and vital need for the development of ways to measure the preparedness of teachers in the "real" world of teaching. Thus, data on the preparedness of practicing teachers is a critical element for developing a sound basis for appraising and adapting programs of teacher education.

Nowhere is this need more critical than in our Black colleges and universities. Black colleges and universi­ ties, in a racially conscious society, have served their 16 constituency by providing education in the mainstream of

insti tutions.

Burnley (1981) cited in the United Negro College

Fund's 1981 Annual Statistical Report that:

Public and private historically black colleges (HBC's) compose fewer than 4% of all institutions of higher education in the United States, yet they enroll 20.1 % of all blacks attending college. Of over 3,000 colleges and universities nationwide, 99 are considered historically black. Of these, 41 are public and 58 are private: 84 are four-year institutions. Of the 84 four-year HBC's, 50 are private and 34 are public. Forty-two of the fifty, four-year private HBC's, are members institutions of the UNCF. (p.4)

Throughout their history, most black institutions of higher education have struggled against debilitating circumstances antagonistic communities and legislatures, poverty, poorly prepared students, competition from white colleges, and program duplication with white institutions.

Perhaps the most singular accomplishment of the histori­ cally black colleges is that, according to Durham (1980),

"... 80% of blacks who hold baccalaureate degrees have received them from these institutions." (p.2). In addition, more than 90% of black Ph.D. holders were granted baccalaureate degrees by historically black schools. In politics, law, education, medicine, and the arts, the graduates of American black higher education 17 institutions have contributed to the well-being of our nation. Former President Jimmy Carter (1978) said that:

The historically black colleges of this nation have played and continue to play a unique and important role in providing educational opportunities to many thousands of students. They have done so in the past when there were no avenues open to the overwhelming majority of black students. They do so now by continuing to provide special opportunities for students of all races. The continuing importance of historically black colleges and universities not only to students but also to this nation's social economic and educational life cannot be overestimated, (p.2)

In sum, historically black colleges have fulfilled their purposes well, in general, despite difficult obstacles.

They are committed to the concept of helping to make

America a stronger member of the world community.

The selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities are a part of the 99 historically Black colleges and universities. However these selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities are set apartfrom other historically black institutions for the following reasons:

they have small enrollment with high tuition and minimum government financial support;

they are non-tax supported;

they are private, liberal arts, religious affiliated institutions; and they are essentially teaching institutions as opposed to research institutions.

In regard to the role of black colleges and

universities, the presidents of two United Negro College

Fund member institutions have commented on indicators of

talent. Dr. Benjamin Payton, President of Tuskegee

Institute, stated:

We can't act as if we are Harvard or Dartmouth. We can only rely on test scores as the primary indicators of talent, or as indicators of who is likely to contribute to society. The Tuskegee mission is different - to educate those who need it most. We must address them where they are and turn them out as highly qualified, competitive individuals. (Middleton, 1981, p. 7)

Dr. Steven Wright, a former president of Fisk University and former Vice President of the College Entrance

Examination Board, stated this position:

The survival of black public school teachers just had to be a part of the very reason for being of departments and schools of education in our black colleges and universities. . . . The far greater challenge, it seems to me, is to prepare teachers who can lif t the horizons of inner city black children, who can teach them to see the relationshipbetween success in school and large life opportunity, and who can motivate them to realize their potential and take pride in achieving their potential. (Norfolk State University, 1980, p.70)

As noted. Black Higher Education Institutions are experienced with and are committed to working with the needs and situations of their individual students at a 19 time when many, if not most, other institutions use stan­ dardized test scores as a priority element in screening and evaluating students.

Today, all too often, we encounter talented committed black students who are unable to acquire admission to teacher education programs because of inadequate entrance examination scores. Mercer (1981)cited that "Reliance on

SAT scores as a teacher education admission requirement hurts black teacher production" (p.26). Samuda (1975) commenting on the performance of minority students on the SAT stated:

The significant point to remember, when considering the performance of minority students, is that the average minority score on tests of aptitude and achievement has been demonstrated to fall one standard deviation below the mean of the white students as a whole, (p.122)

Smith (1984) in describing the critical issue of excellence and equity in competency testing cited that:

The use of competency tests to certify teachers has forced both educators and the public to challenge the most cherished premise underlying the philosophy of education in a democractic society: That persons regardless of social economic status, race or creed are guaranteed both excellence and equity in the pursuit of education, (p.6)

Competency testing forces equity and excellence to be dichotomies and demands an elitist shift from equity to excellence in the nation's thinking. One wonders, can a 20 democractic society have excellence in education without equi ty?

Trammer (1980) has described teaching as "the profession Blacks may lose" in noting detrimental effects of competency testing on the professional tool of black teachers (p.69). Scott (1979), Mohr (1980), Wright (1980) and Witty (1983) have identified state-mandated competency testing as a threat to the very survival of black teachers in America.

Consequently, strict application of test scores will result in systematic exclusion of a large number of minorities from opportunities for professional teacher training. It follows, therefore, that unless other valid criteria are used, there will be a declining number of future black teachers. In some states, such as Alabama and Florida, state legislatures would have to amend present laws regardingteacher education admission requirements and grant institutions more freedom to employ alternatives to the current teacher education requirements. Pugach andRaths (1983)stated that teacher education programs should continue their efforts to recruit minority students and provide for remediation of deficits for those students who they believe are well suited to teacher preparation. 21

Despite barriers, continuous efforts must be made to

ensure that the teaching profession reflects the racial

and cultural diversity which has made America great.

Black colleges and universities, therefore, must continue

to train minority teachers. Furthermore, these schools

along with all others, must work to consistently upgrade

and adjust their curricula.

A major concern of teacher education programs is to ensure that graduates will become capable and effective teachers. Therefore, a critical issue in an evaluation system is to determine what factors contribute to the later relative success of failure of teachers.

Course work and course sequence are certainly primary factors, but it is uncertain what effect general music and professional courses have on the actual performance of music teachers, and whether these effects lead to the outcomes which the courses were designed to produce. It is also uncertain whether the selection of courses is based on reliable evidence as to what is necessary to be a successful music teacher or is based mainly on professional tradition of what students should have.

Apparently, except for the course, student teaching, little is known about how each course in the music education curriculum contributes to success in teaching.

Furthermore, Housewright (1970) stated that; Increasing numbers of first-year music teachers are finding that there is an enormous disparity between the preparation for teaching and the practice of it. Many experienced music teachers recall the disillusionment they suffered during the early years of their teaching when they discovered that their real problems had never been analyzed in methods classes. Many teacher education programs in music have been overtaken by obsolescence, (p.l.)

Although official bodies such as the Music Educators

National Conference, The National Association of Schools of Music, and the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education have studied music teacher training programs and have made a varying range of recommendations, gaps still exist in the scholarly research in this area.

Therefore, this study seeks to identify competencies needed in teaching music as perceived and analyzed by selected graduates and to determine how these individuals believe development of important competencies is achieved.

The writer believes that the information resulting from this study will be especially beneficial to:

1. the teacher education divisions of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities as an aid to understanding the effects of their curricula;

2. the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities who administer and distribute financial aid to member institutions; college of education administrators, deans of music education school s/departments, and music teacher educators who plan and teach music education courses and curricula, and who advise music education students;

appropriate state authorities, professional music education associations, and others who recommend and/or plan continuing education for music teachers and who suggest or set standards for music teacher education;

other researchers by providing useable implications to serve as a background for further investigation and research in the area of music education.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to survey and evaluate the music teacher education program of selected, accredit­ ed Black private colleges and universities in the United

States. As a basis to achieve this purpose, this study sought to elicit information from both the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities and from music teacher education graduates of these selected institutions. The information obtained was organized and analyzed in regard to three specific objectives :

to survey specific elements of the music teacher education programs of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities. to delineate the strengths and weakness­ es of music teacher programs and music programs as perceived by graduates.

to accumulate data for developing recommendations to be used in program evaluation as an aid to curriculum revision.

Questions

As a basis for data collection and identifying pertinent information, the writer sought to answer these questions:

1. What are the general and specific characteristics of the music teacher education programs of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and uni versi ties?

2. What are some general characteristics of the employment status of graduates of these selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities music teacher education programs?

3. What competencies do the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities graduates think are needed for their present position?

4. What music teacher education degrees and major concentrations are offered, and by which selected, accredited Black private college(s) and/or universities offering music teacher education program?

5. What are the major areas of the music teacher education curriculum and required hours for graduation at each selected institution offering music teacher education program? 6. To what degree do the graduates of selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities think that their graduating institution prepared them to teach effectively?

7. To what extent do the graduates believe that they had received help from their advi sors?

Statement of the Problem

It was the intent of this study to focus on teacher education curricula in one area - music teacher preparation - and to specifically relate the study to the music teacher education programs of selected, accredited

Black private colleges and universities in the United

States. In our multi-cultural/multi-racial society. Black private colleges and universities have earned a reputation for credibility and have been, and will continue to be, an important factor in the development of qualified Black educators. To this point however, there is a lack of empirical research about the effectiveness of the music teacher education programs of selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities. Assumptions

The following assumptions were made for this study:

1. that success in teaching is partly a result of instruction in certain speci­ fic courses

2. that success in college is related to teaching success because most states require a minimum of a bachelor's degree for certification in teaching

3. that graduates' opinions of the adequacy of their undergraduate preparation is a necessary and important factor in evaluating music teacher education curricula

4. that graduates shared thoughtfully their attitudes concerning strengths and weaknesses of their undergraduate preparation

5. that all graduates names were submitted by the participating institutions and that they respond to the questionnaire honestly and openly regarding their judgments on their teacher preparation programs

6. that graduates of music teacher education programs of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities made expert opinions because they are the resulting product of the program and certified by a state to teach. Definitions

The following terras have been defined for clarity

purposes :

Music Teacher Education : refers to a raajor in rausic

education which certifies the recipient to teach rausic in

schools of a state.

NASM; The National Association of Schools of Music

is the professional rausic accrediting body.

NCATE; The National Council for the Accreditation

Teacher Education is the accrediting organization for the

approval of teacher education programs.

Music-Teaching Competencies: Music-teaching compe­ tencies as used in this study refer to abilities, profi­ ciencies, skills and fields of knowledge and understanding utilized by rausic teachers in fulfilling their responsi­ bilities and assignments.

A Graduate: The terra "a graduate" as employed in this study refers to an individual who has successfully completed an undergraduate course of study in music teacher education at one of the selected, accredited Black private colleges or universities, has been certified by a

State Department of Education, and who has completed at least one year of teaching. 28

MENC; Music Educators National Conference is the

professional organization for music educators.

Major Applied; A major applied refers to a principal instrument of study in one area of music learning in which a student is required or elects to take a specified number of courses and credit hours in partially fulfilling the requirements for the degree.

Private College: A private college in this study refers to a four-year higher education institution of religious affiliation receiving little or no financial aid from the government.

Minor Applied; Minor applied refers to a secondary instrument of study in one area of music learning in which astudent is required or elects to take a specified number of courses and credit hours, fewer than required for a major applied area - implying less intensive concentration than in the major applied.

Accredited; Accredited, as used in this study, refers to those institutions who hold full membership with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.

Li mi tati ons

For the purpose of this study the following limitations were recognized: This study was limited to a survey and evaluation of four-year undergraduate degree offering music teacher education programs in selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities.

This study included only the 1979, 1980, 1981 , 1982 and 1983 selected Black private colleges and universities music teacher education graduates. No inference for other years or other populations was drawn.

This study relied on the individual survey recipients' sense of recall in order to establish a basis for this study.

This study made no attempt to control the effect of social and political factors and the effects of sex, age, and ability of the respondents.

In addition, neither all historically black institu­ tions nor any selected, accredited Black private colleges or universities music programs with only a concentration in music was included. As with all studies using questionnaires, this study was limited to the impact of its population and by the time, thought and candor of the respondents. Summary

Music teacher education programs must anticipate and respond effectively to the needs of our everchanging world. Within this context, historically Black colleges and universities perform an important function by preparing music teachers of backgrounds, cultures, and geographic locations that are not well served by most other higher education institutions.

Because of this important function, these Black colleges and universities require appropriate information on the relevance and effectiveness of their music teacher education programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to survey and evaluate, to the extent the data allowed, the music teacher education programs of selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities.

To provide the primary data for this study, two populations were surveyed: the music education program directors of the selectedinstitutions, and recent graduates of the music teacher education programs of the selected institutions. The surveys of the two populations were based on eight research questions developed by the researcher in relation to the purpose and objectives of this study. CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

The intent of this study is to provide an evaluation of the preparation of undergraduate music teacher educa­ tion majors in selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities. This chapter contains a review of the literature relating to this topic. The literature reviewed is presented in the following sections: (1)

Evaluation Defined, (2) Academic Program Evaluation, (3)

Models and Purposes for Academic Program Evaluation, (4)

Teacher Education Evaluation Practices (5) An Appraisal of Historically Black Colleges, and (6) Related Studies

Concerning Music Teacher Education.

Evaluation Defined

Evaluation has been defined in many ways by many people. Tyler (1950) perceived evaluation as "The process of determining to what extent the educational objectives are actually being realized" (p. 153). Leading evaluators such as Cronback (1963), Stufflebeam et. al., (1971),

Tenbrink (1974), and Alkin (1969) have defined evaluation

31 32 as providing information and using it to form judgments which in turn are to be used in decision making. Others have defined it as the assessment of merit or worth

(Eisner, 1979; House, 1980; Scriven, 1980; Seriven, 1967;

Stuff-1 ebeam, 1974), or as an activity comprised of both description and judgment (Guba and Lincoln, 1981; Stake,

1967).

Evaluation of teacher education programs has been a topic of intense discussion both within and outside the educational setting during the last decade. Several journals have devoted much space to the theoretical aspects of evaluation in teacher education, such as formative and summative evaluation (Scriven, 1967) and goal-free evaluation (Popham, 1972; Wortman, 1975;

Stufflebeam, 1978). The primary emphasis has been on method.

In short, according to the literature surveyed in this review, evaluation can serve four different functions:

(1) formative, for improvement (Guba, 1981); (2) summative, for selection and accountability (Scriven,

1967; and Stufflebeam, 1972); (3) sociopolitical, to motivate and gain public support (Cronbach e t.a l., 1980;

House, 1974; Patton, 1978; Weiss, 1972; Suchman, 1972;

Mathis, 1980); and (4) administrative, to exercise authority (Dornbusch and Scott, 1975). 33

Evaluation concern in recent years has focused on the development of ways to obtain more effective use of eval­ uation data in program decision making. The emphasis is on "use" (Patton, 1978; Mathis, 1980) directly employed in objective, observable ways in program modification, and operation (Cohen, 1977; Patton, 1978 and Mathis, 1980).

Darnall (1963) emphasized that "human opinion will usually determine to what extent scientific, accurate and factual data will be used" (p.87). Clark and McDonald

(1973) stated:

The plain fact of the matter is that curriculum development and evaluation is a continuous process of making human value judgments about what to include and exclude, what to aim for and how to go about it — difficult judgments even when aided by technical and scientific data and process. (p. 408)

The utilization of "opinion" in research has been widely used and is supported by many authorities. Perhaps other types of research fail to obtain critical data ; for example, judgments about a curriculum provided by those who have experienced it -- the graduates.

Academic Program Evaluation

Clark (1983) emphasized that program evaluation is only one part of institutional assessment for strategic planning; nevertheless, it is a key element in the 34 evaluation of Institutional strengths and weaknesses.

Evaluation of teacher education involves the appraisal of the entirety of any system. Gubser (1981) suggested that attention should be given to the evaluation of such factors as admission program and retention, coursework, clinical facilities, field experience and resources, faculty competence and experience, in addition to the assessment of qualities of graduates. Moreover, failure to assess the function or quality of any of these compo­ nents is likely to limit both the success of one's evaluation efforts and restrict the probability of academic success.

Baer (1973), after examining a representative sample of evaluation studies of teacher education programs, con­ cluded that feedback from graduates isbeing used with increased frequency as a major source of information and that nearly all studies recommend that program evaluation utilize information gathered from graduates. Devoss and

Hawk (1983) stated that feedback from graduates is most often used during institutional accreditation. Follow-up evaluations are common in many areas—such as law, medi­ cine, pharmacy, dentistry, engineering and education.

One measure of an undergraduate teacher education program is the perception of its graduates. Burton's

(1977) findings indicated that recommendations of teacher 35

education graduates are the best source of information for

program alterations and for improving teacher programs.

One valid test of an instrumental program lies in its

effectiveness in the actual life situation for which the

instruction is designed. If the instruction provided by

the schools is ineffective in life situations confronting

graduates, the teacher education program may not be

realistic; and it should be redesigned.

Models and Purposes for Academic Program Evaluation

There is considerable diversity in the design and application of academic program reviews. Borich (1980),

Pegues (1981) and Word and Adams (1981) have stated that the most frequently employed method has been the follow-up questionnaire mailed to recent graduates to elicit their opinions about the training they received and the extent to which this training prepared them to meet the immediate demands of their teaching environment. Evidence confirm­ ing the value of alumni surveys is provided by Wise,

Hengstler and Braskamp (1981).

After nine years of evaluation research, Hord et al.

(1982) formulated the following ten essentials for efficient evaluation: 1. Evaluation of teacher education pro­ grams should be viewed as part of the teacher education program and not as a separate, external function assigned to another unit.

2. Evaluation should be systematic rather than random, purposeful rather than casual.

3. Evaluation should be a continuous process rather than one-shot affairs.

4. Data gathering points should be planned to provide information at critical periods during pre-service and in-service teacher development (Entry, Matriculation, Exit, Induction and Follow-up).

5. Data of a longitudinal nature is preferred to cross sectional data.

6. Analyses and reporting of data should be planned in advance and modified with use.

7. Feedback and interpretation of data should be planned in advance and modified with use.

8. Decisions regarding program change should be based on the evaluation data.

9. Implementation of the decision should be monitored and viewed as part of the program evaluation process.

10. The evaluation operational system should be reviewed periodically as to the relevance and usability of the data in decision-making and in relation to stated goals and objectives, (pp.18, 19)

Hord and Adams' (1981) survey of theory and practice in teacher education program evaluation found that from 37

the administrative perspective, the following values were

observed:

the perceptions of the value of teacher education evaluation was primarily from an administrative viewpoint

institutions who responded that they have evaluation programs, valued evaluation practice more highly than institutions who reported no evaluation programs

size of program was not related to the degree administrators valued evaluation practice

faculty and students in smaller institutions were perceived to value evaluation practice higher than their counterparts in larger instititions. (pp. 18,19)

Using Evaluative Data in Planning

Assessment is the activity that links the evaluation and planning processes (Figure 1). Continuity of the planning cycle depends on feedback of information developed through program goals, measures of program processes and outcomes and comparison with previous conditions, or with some other standard. The circular relationship of the evaluation and planning process emphasizes the continuous nature of both activities. Implement

Compare Specify

Figure 1. Interlocking Planning and Evaluation Cycles (Chickering, et. al., 1981, p. 751)

Davis and Doughery (1979), Mortimer and Tierney

(1979), and Shirley and Volkwein (1978) presented examples of ways in which information from program reviews could be used to set program priorities or reallocate resources among departments. Hall, (1982) proposed a comprehensive model for program evaluation that starts its data collec­ tion when students are accepted into a professional educa­ tion program, continues throughout the duration of teacher education program participation, and includes process as 39 well as product measures. The evaluation model should terminate with a three-year follow-up effort in which graduates are selected randomly for mail survey or class­ room observation. Thus, the model implies a seven-year continuum for each student who enters as a freshman. This model is comprised of four parts: (See Figure 2 below) admission, process, product, and follow-up. The single question for each part to be answered is "What is important to know?"

I------f I------1 I------[ I------f (Admission I Process I I Product I iFollow-upl I n M I Figure 2. Skelton of Program Evaluation

(Hall, 1982, p. 71)

The last part of this comprehensive model for teacher evaluation consists of follow-up studies for three years after graduation. The data acquired from the follow-up studies are related to the evaluation data collected during the undergraduate program. Follow-up studies given at the end of the first year of teaching enable graduates to give a view of the immediate outcomes of the teacher education program and their perceptions about their training. Follow-up studies also identify topics for 40 program development and specific weaknesses which can be addressed during in-service education programs.

Smith's (1982) support for evaluation is indicated in his ten possible purposes of an evaluation:

summative assessment

problem solving

implementation planning

responsive redirection

managerial control

program accreditation

program continuation

demand compliance

accountability

research contribution (p. 84)

Stufflebeam (1982) stated that needs assessment is a crucial part of a sound program of evaluation. Evaluation of teacher education needs to be oriented to the needs of the teacher trainees and of the schools and society which they will serve.

People who are associated with any program are potentially the best source of intelligence about the program. Thus, Stake (1977) has argued, we should system­ atically seek out, analyze, and report their judgments and recommendati ons. 41

According to Kilgore's (1981) survey of teacher

education, personnel from relatively small, private

colleges the level of involvement of small colleges in

follow-up evaluation studies of their graduates had been

minimal, although all programs had semi formal and informal

networks working for them. For the small colleges

surveyed, data-gatheri ng processes varied from informal

and random visits to the graduates who were teaching, to

observations of graduates in their classrooms, to

questionnaires for first year teachers and interviews with

graduates who have returned to campus for graduate

classes. Also, the data collected did not appear to be

used systematically for program type decision making,

rather the persons collecting the data may have made some

changes in the part of the programs over which they had

direct control, (e.g. based on informal talks with

graduates, one professor modified a methods course).

Kilgore concluded that data collected were helpful, but

the evaluation design was very loose, unsystematic, and

underfinanced.

No one evaluation plan is appropriate for all purposes or places. In fact, it is rarely possible to transport a

program review system from one institution to another

(Clark, 1983). If evaluation is to fulfill its potential contribution to assuring the quality of teacher education. 42

it needs to be conceived and implemented as an ongoing

program.

Patton, (1978), Cronbach and Associates, (1980),

Gardner, (1982), Rath, (1982), and Erly (1982) gave the

purpose for evaluation as the need to provide information

for accountability. However, Borich (1982) argued that

evaluation of teacher education should be drawn from and

contribute to research in teaching. Beyond satisfying

external requirements, evaluations that are designed to

serve accountability (as well as improvement) have the advantage of helping to develop credibility for teacher education programs. Sandefur (1970), Gardner (1982), Rath

(1982), stated that a purpose of evaluation should be to assess the competence and on-the-job performance of

graduates of a program.

Because our nation's schools need and will increasingly need more effective teachers, more effective preparation programs are also needed. Program evaluation efforts may be to provide the impetus for the development of those effective- preparation programs.

Teacher Education Evaluation Practices

Cooper and Weber (1973) stated

. . . if a teacher education program is to be most effective in achieving its objectives, it must be continously revised on the basis of constructive data supplied by sound evaluation procedures. Those responsible for making decisions must have access to data that permit them to determine which elements of the program warrant maintenance and which warrant change. Without such information, the program cannot improve, and, in fact, deteriorates. (p. 11)

Reiff (1980) cited that one of the major weaknesses of a teacher education program is the lack of or the inade­ quacy of program evaluation. Gubser (1981) stated that one common weakness in teacher education evaluation is the frequent confinement of assessment efforts to evaluation of graduates.

The National Council for the Association of Teacher

Education Standards for Accreditation (1970) explicitly stated that institutions producing teachers must have a systematic evaluation of their teacher education programs to include data gathering while students are in the pre­ service program and after they have entered the teaching profession. Evidence must also be provided of utilization of data for program changes.

Smith, Katz, Rath, Mohanty and Kurachi (1979) and

Irving (1981) both found few published reports describing institutions' program evaluation efforts and consequent application of evaluation data. Pegues' (1981) survey of teacher education follow-up evaluation practice concluded that "there is only moderate (one-half of the respondents) 44 cotntemporary involvement in systematic follow-up evaluative practice by teacher education programs" (p. 189).

Furthermore, Katz, Raths, Mohanty, Kurachi and Irving

(1981) concluded that it was apparent that few institutions of any kind systematically followed up their graduates unless they were required to do so by an external agent.

Finally, Wheeler (1980) stated that in spite of the pressure applied by NCATE on teacher education programs, violation of the standard for follow-up studies was cited as a weakness in 58% of the programs reviewed during 1979.

Adams and Craig (1983) however, conducted a survey of

779 AACTE Member institutions and found that based on reviews of professional educational literature, more teacher education institutions are conducting evaluations of their programs than was expected. This finding was consistent with Smith's (1979) interpretation and data reported by Pegues (1981).

Purpose, scope, and utilization should be the basis for a sound evaluation program. An evaluation system established simply to have one in place for an NCATE visit should not be an important motivator. The NCATE standards are well intended, but the professional teacher education community must give these standards meaning and value, especially in evaluation of our own progress. 45

Teacher Education In Private Colleges and Universities

King, Wimpelberg and Nystrom (1984) stated that our

knowledge of the history of teacher education in private

colleges and universities is limited. A review of the

literature suggests that our knowledge of its current

status is equally limited. Ciampa (1980) and McArdie and

Balch (1982) stated that nowhere is there a clear descrip­

tion of the characteristics of teacher education units in

private settings. Consequently, King, Wimpelberg, and

Nystrom are currently presenting a series of articles in the Journal of Teacher Education discussing teacher educa­ tion in private colleges and universities. Nevertheless, the role and status of the private college and university

in teacher education has not been extensively studied.

Hord (1982) has said that the States evidently believe that educators have failed to exercise proper controls on entry in the teacher education programs, and assumed that educators have failed to establish qualitative standards for exit. Consequently, the State level has assumed the responsibility of evaluation for certification purposes because they believe that educators have failed to assure the public of the quality of their product. Vlaanderen

(1983) listed twenty states that either require or will require by a definite date in the future, applicants for 46

teacher certification to be tested for competency either

in the basic skills, subject matter knowledge, pedagogical

knowledge or some combination of these.

Table 1 lists the twelve states which house the

Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and

Universities thus requiring testing for certification.

Today, of these twelve states, eleven states require or will require by a definite date in the future teacher

education applicants to either take a state-developed test

or the National Teachers' Examination. Of the eleven

states, five states require applicants to take a state developed test, five other states require the National

Teachers' Examination, and one state. South Carolina,

requires either a State test or the National Teachers'

Examination. Consequently, of all twelve states only one state, Ohio, does not, at this time, require competency testing for teacher certification. Kearns (1984) and

Sandeful (1983) reported that the Southern states appear to be the most active in promoting both written and performance-based certification tests for beginning teachers.

Smith (1984) has predicted that if minority scores do not show improvement and if the ruling that applicants must pass all three examinations (reading, writing and math) is not amended, 96% of the black applicants and 84% 47 of the Hispanic applicants might be denied permission to teacher education. Andrews (1983) cited that in 1980 minority teachers constituted approximately 12.5% of the national teaching force. Black teachers represented 8.6% of all teachers K-12; Hispanics 1.8%; and American Asians and American Indians, less than 1%. However, Smith further predicts that

if the currently observable impact of competency testing continues unabated along with normal rates of attrition through retirements and teacher burn- out, minority representation in the national teaching force could be reduced to less than 5% by 1990. (p. 8) TABLE 1

STATES REQUIRING TESTING FOR CERTIFICATION

year YEAR "TEST STATE AUTHORITY ENACTED EFFECTIVE USED

A1abama *SBE 1980 1981 State

Arkansas Legi siature 1979 1983 **NTE

FIori da Legi siature 1978 1980 State

Georgia SBE 1 979 1979 State

Loui si ana Legi siature 1977 1979 NTE

Mi ssi ssi ppi SBE 1977 1977 NTE

North Carolina SBE 1979 1981 State

Ohi 0

South Carolina Legi siature 1979 1982 NTE/State

Tennessee SBE 1980 1981 NTE

Texas SBE/

Legi siature 1980/81 1985 State

Vi rginia Legi siature 1980 1981 NTE

(Adapted from: Vlaanderen, R. B.. Testing for Teacher

Certi fi cati on. Issuegram 7, January 3. , 1983.

(ED 231 814) (p. 2)

*SBE = State Board of Education

**NTE = National Teachers' Examination 49

It appears that the competency testing movement will induce negative reverberations that will reach far beyond the exclusion of minority applicants to teaching.

Minority teachers contribute to the quality of education for all children in our pluralistic society. Moreover, cross-cultural exposure for students of the minority is an essential factor in the development of their healthy social attitudes. Finally, minority teachers as role models are essential both to the minority and majority child's learning environment.

Selection Process - Academic Quality

Conant (1963) voiced a strong opinion that greater selectivity is needed in recruiting intellectually brighter students into the teacher education programs. He further suggests that "we should endeavor to recruit our teachers from the upper third of the graduating high school on a national basis" (p. 81).

Watts (1980) supports a selected criterion by stating that

the reason for establishing admission standards for any professional program is to increase the probability that those who are admitted will successfully complete the program and become effective professionals. (p. 120) 50

Vance and Schlechty (1982), however, propose caution in assuming that more rigid selection standards are needed.

They place a great deal of emphasis on "committment" to teaching as a factor to be considered when determining selection criteria.

In general, the literature reviewed indicated that some sort of a selection process for teacher education programs is supported but the specific selection criteria are not yet agreed upon. As demand for higher quality teaching receives more attention, music teacher education departments are faced with re-evaluating their total programs. This evaluation must include: entry, process, and exit evaluation.

Comparative Review Studies

Bray (1954) sought to inquire of Northwestern

University's music school Bachelor of Music, Bachelor of

Music Education, and Master of Music degree graduates of classes 1934, 1938, 1942, 1946 and 1950 their attitude toward their education at Northwestern in relation to their post-college experiences. The 305 questionnaires provided data which led to the following conclusions:

The graduates of the classes surveyed were satisfied that the education they received was adequate preparation for post-college vocational and avocational activities.

The curriculum had been designed in relation to future vocational and avocational needs and demand.

The education received has a continuing effect for good, vocationally and avocational ly in the lives of the graduates, (p. 1756, Vol. 14)

Moreover, Woodward (1963) evaluated the probable effectiveness of the 1959-60 music teacher education curriculum at the University of Colorado by a comparison of the 1945-55 curriculum of known effectiveness.

Questionnaires were sent to both the graduates and their supervisors of the 1945-1955 and 1959-60 curricula. The findings clearly indicated that in music education, as well as in other content areas, the gap between theory and practice continues to be a source of great concern to most graduates. This concern was graphically pointed out in

Woodward's investigation of music teacher education graduates when he sought to determine the effectiveness of their college preparation in music in their teaching position. He outlines ten areas of music preparation which were rated by the graduates of University of

Kentucky as to their importance in teaching. The results of the ratings were as follows (from most important to least important): Graduate's Rated College Rated

1. Methods (ProfessionalMusic) 1. Music theory 2. Conducting 2. Major applied area 3. Performing ensembles 3. Methods (Professional Music) 4. Minor Piano 4. Minor instruments 5. Psychology of learning 5. Performing ensemble 6. Major applied area 6. Minor piano 7. Minor instruments 7. Minor voice 8. Minor voice 8. Music history 9. Music history 9. Conducting 10. Music Theory 10. Psychology of learning to music (P. 4618, VOL. 23)

From this data it is interesting to note that the college rated music theory as most importance, whereas, graduates rated music theory as least important. Moreover, conducting was rated by the college as number nine but graduate rated its importance as number two.

Individual Studies

Humphrey's (1955) study also confirms a similar desire for practical knowledge and helpful skills from the grad­ uates of the University of Illinois. The design of this follow-up study translated musical competencies into musical behaviors and asked 185 graduates to rate their preparation in the behavior. The collected data provided many noteworthy suggestions such as: the establishment of a functional and

realistic guidance program for music students

the establishment of music curricula upon the

basis of their use and effectiveness in the

lives of the graduates

a de-emphasis of "professional music" since

no work seem to exist therein for the vast

majority of music graduates.

an emphasis on more practical knowledge and

use of keyboard (p. 350, VOL. 16)

Humphrey emphasized that many traditional concepts and methods of doing things plus conventional restrictions

should be abandoned. This alludes to the fact that in a

society undergoing vast changes, an ongoing curriculum

evaluation is essential.

Furthermore, Baird's (1955) follow-up inquiry of

secondary school music teachers prepared at San Jose State

College was designed to determine how well the curriculum

for the applicants for Special Secondary program in music met the needs of their graduates when placed in teaching 54

situations. According to the employed five point scale of

rating importances of listed general education, professional teaching and music teaching, responses indicated that curriculum effectiveness was average in developing needed competencies in all areas. Both graduates and music faculty expressed a need for increased emphasis on performance skills. Also, the music faculty were more critical of curriculum effectiveness than were the graduates.

Additional evaluative studies such as those conducted by Piper (1960). Meurer (1974), Bennett (1975) and Choate

(1976) solicited not only the opinions of graduates, but also of their pri nci pal/supervi sor and or administrator opinions of the adequacy of their music teacher education program. Meurer's questionnaires were sent to all graduates of the elementary teacher education program at Indiana

State University, and data were complied separately for graduates who had taught one year, two years and three years. The 1956 graduates indicated more satisfaction with their preparation and felt more adequately prepared than the 1957 and 1958 graduates. Yet the 1957 graduates indicated more dissatisfaction than the 1956 or the 1958 graduates. However, graduates who had not taught indicated more dissatisfaction with the program than those who had taught. 55

The study of Meurer (1974) was to evaluate music teacher education at Indiana State University through an analysis of its teaching graduates of 1968-1972 who had completed at least one year and the opinions of the grad­ uates employere (principals and music supervisors).

Employers rated the major teaching competencies on a scale ranging from "superior" to "inferior". The great majority of graduates were rated "superior" in all facets of teach­ ing ability. Conversely, among the conclusions of the graduates who were asked to rate 65 music teaching competencies according to importance for teaching and effectiveness of collegiate preparation were;

preparation in music theory is very important for school music teaching, but need to be more strongly oriented toward practical use in school music

knowledge of pre-Baroque music is not as important for teaching music in the schools as 20th century music

music literature courses representing newer course materials such as jazz, ethnic, folk, and youth music are important for school teaching

more effective preparation is needed in functional piano skills for school teaching (p. 5896, VOL. 35)

In short, the importance of competencies for teaching were generally rated higher than the effectiveness of prepara­ tion. There were some areas where importance and effec­ tiveness were identical. Only a few areas were rated 56 significant for teaching purposes but very inadequately treated in any of the programs.

Bennett (1975) evaluated the effectiveness of the undergraduate music education curriculum at North Texas

State University. Graduates who responded to the question­ naire indicated that the undergraduate music education curriculum between 1967 and 1972 was generally adequate in preparing students to teach music in the public schools.

Weaker areas were : administration, supervision, student teaching and professional education while the stronger areas were instrumental and vocal. Among the recommenda­ tions for specific changes in the curriculum were :

secondary instrumental methods courses should be restructured to include more emphasis on marching band techniques, instrumental music program supervision, and administration of a public school instrumental music program

student organizations such as MENC should be encouraged to work more productively in conjunction with the music teacher education curriculum

academic advising program should be expanded to distribute more evenly the duties given to faculty members who believe in that function. (p. 2691 , VOL. 36)

The opinions of the graduates' supervisors revealed a low positive correlation (r=.107) between selected graduates' academic success and their success as teachers in the public schools. Consequently, it was accepted that there 57 was only a slight relationship between students' success in undergraduate training at North Texas and their success as public school music teachers.

Choate (1976) undertook a study to evaluate the undergraduate instrumental curriculum at Louisiana State

University, by an analysis of the opinions of the graduates of the years of 1965-1974 and the principals' and supervi­ sors' evaluations of the graduates who were employed as teachers during the 1974-1975 academic year. The graduates revealed a high rating for the essentiality and importance of music teaching competencies. With few exceptions, essentiality and importance were scored at the highest levels of the rating scale: preparation of competencies such as "conducting", rehearsal, discipline, and musician­ ship were considered to be very effective. Also, graduates employed as teachers were highly regarded by their princi­ pals and supervisors as indicated by the strong majority that receive high ratings on their presonal and profess­ ional qualities.

In summary, the data from these studies varied considerably when opinions were obtained from the predecessors or successors of these specific groups. This emphasizes the need for constant evaluation in music teacher education curricula. 58

The literature review shows that there is an evolving

concern for reform in music teacher education. It was

repeatedly emphasized that graduates from these studies

suggested more relevant courses attuned to the changing,

emerging nature of our American, pluralistic society.

Studies Concerning Music Teacher Education

One of the original goals for establishing Negro

private colleges was to train teachers who would in turn

help to provide educational opportunities for the large mass of illiterate, newly emancipated slaves. (Journal of

Negro Education Summer Yearbook. 1960 and Goines, 1963).

Richardson (1980) and Patton (1940) cited that "Fisk

students and teachers demonstrated considerable interest in music from the time the school opened in 1866. During leisure hours students sang together the songs they had

1 earned as slaves" )p. 25). A Freedmen's Bureau agent in

Nashville, Tennessee, invited George L. White, who had never received musical instructions to teach singing at

Fisk. White proposed to the board of trustees that his singing group perform concerts to further financially compensate Fisk University for the succeeding year. The group began singing spirituals, and the name "Jubilee

Singers" was decided upon by White in memory of the Jewish 59 year of Jubilee (Leviticus 25: 8-17) (Spenc, 1911). The

incalculable singing appeal of the group, the dignity of the name, and the financial contribution it brought to the institution led to the continuing and growing success of the group. The "Jubilee Singers" became famous throughout the United States and Europe.Johnson (1933) stated that

"they (Jubilee Singers) sang their way into the conscious­ ness of two continents and charmed the world with the beauty of Black Music" (p. 39).

Since the beginning of music studies at Fisk University many other selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities now offer degrees in music. Wil1iams-Burns

(1982) and Carney (1942) stated that the real history of

American Negro teacher education on the advanced level began with the pioneer effort of Doctor Jane Ellen

McAllister. Dr. McAllister was a pioneer for excellence in teacher education who servedas Head of the Education department at Fisk University (the first Black woman to fill the position) and was a prominent reason Fisk gained accreditation as "Class A" by the Southern Association of

Colleges and Schools (SACS). (See Appendix A - McAllister)

According to the investigator's survey of literature, studies of music and music teacher education of small institutions of higher education are very few and yet even 60 more limited for small, private. Black 1iberal-arts insti­

tutions. Nevertheless many studies concerning music

teacher education programs of individual colleges are

present throughout the literature. Conversely, less multi­

group studies were found of music teacher education

programs. Consequently, related music teacher education

program studies are discussed in this grouping of selected multi-group studies; and single studies of individual colleges.

Leonhard (1958) advocated that the final criterion for judging the effectiveness of a program of music education is its effect on the music behavior of graduates. It follows that, when possible, the best means of evaluating the program is to ascertain the progress of students toward the objective sought."

Examples of selected multi-group studies include studies done by Terry, Borg, Dunston, Boyce and Clayton concerning music and music teacher education program.

Terry (1959) conducted a study of small (student enrollment up to 2,000) liberal-art colleges, conservatories, teachers' colleges, and universities to discover any differences that might exist between large and small colleges and to determine any advantages that might characterize the small colleges. Consequently, in order to propose a music education curriculum based on the data 61

obtained from this study, results for the study were

produced by two hundred questionnaires, conferences with music educators and supervisors of public school music,

and through inquiry sheets to five hundred high school

seniors. Terry's findings and implications included the

following:

Despite the fact that the basic courses

for developing musicianship received

uniform approval by all institutions,

variation existed in the amount of

credit given in theory, piano and voice

for graduation.

The allotment of credit in areas of

orchestral and band instruments was

lowest in teachers colleges

Each institution endorsed special

requirements (senior recital and

primary secondary instruments) for

music majors.

There was considerable agreement

between and among these institutions

relative to student teaching readiness

essentials such as screening

candidates, scholastic rating; 62

regularity of observation periods and

completion of methods courses.

It was apparent that these institutions

offering a major in music education

agreed as to the requirement of high

school units for entrance; nevertheless

indicated little use of objective tests

or of a screening by a special music

committee, (p. 691, Vol. 20)

Borg (1959) made a study concerned with the basic

requirements, minimum standards, and course offerings and

credit of prospective school teachers. Borg also compared

present-day practices with the "Standards for the

Evaluation of the College Curriculum for the Training of the school Music Teacher" as recommended in the MENC

Source Book No. 2.

Data was obtained from questionnaires answered by music department chairpersons from twenty-four colleges and universities in seven mid-western states based on the

1958-59 school year; catologue study of each institution; personal interviews with department chairpersons, heads of music education, music methods teachers and senior music educationstudents. Borg's findings revealed that 75 percent of department chairpersons agreed that teacher training institutions should conform to minimum standards. 63 basic requirements and offerings outlined by the MENC.

Also, it was the consensus of opinion of music department chairpersons that the distribution of minimum requirements in general education, professional education, and in music met the needs of prospective music teachers in their respective institutions. Yet, administrators in teachers colleges showed an overbalance in general education which did not allow adequate hours for the major subjects.

Great variance, ranging from "nearly none" to "high" was found for standards set by accreditating organizations for minimum music entrance requirements. Yet none of the institutions employed any means of testing musical skills or teaching techniques prior to student teaching or on the completion of the teacher-training program, other than passing grades. Also, a very limited amount of elective credits were allowed for school music majors to meet minimum graduation requirements in a four-year program.

Dunston (1965) made a critical analysis of the music program in the small, liberal arts colleges of North

Carolina as they related to the preparation of the elemen­ tary classroom teachers and the public school music teachers. Conclusions (among many) drawn from data of 890 employed elementary teachers surveyed revealed that;

the curricula and general music program of

the small liberal arts colleges of North Carolina compared favorably with the

requirements of national groups

Music, for the most part, is accepted in

the total elementary education program

of the public schools

there was a need of curriculum

re-evaluation in most small colleges.

(p. 6527, Vol. 26)

Boyce (1973) studied four state-supported colleges/ universities of Utah to make an evaluation of curricula, training effectiveness, applicability, and need for addi­ tional training. The descriptive research techniques of a closed-form questionnaire were utilized to acquire data for the years 1969-71 from graduates faculties concerning common and traditional curricular areas of:

music theory

scoring and arranging

music history

conducting and rehearsal techniques

vocal methods and materials

instrumental methods and materials

group instruction

private instruction - major instrument 65

performance

minor instrument repair (p. 7569A. Vol.

34)

The conclusion from this study indicated present training

effectiveness is generally excellent in all areas of music

education curricula in all four colleges; and even though

the training is excellent and applicable, there remains a

strong desire by both graduates and faculty for additional

training in all areas of curricula, with the exception of

traditional music history.

A more recent study conducted by Claybon (1981) deter­

mined the perceptions of 104 music educators using the

questionnaire method. The purpose of Claybon's study was

to determine the perceptions of music educators at United

Negro College Fund Colleges and Universities concerning

the importance of music teaching competencies and courses

for prospective public school music teachers. Findings of

this study revealed that the UNCF music educators were in

general agreement with the NASM and MENC's one hundred and

eighteen competencies recommendations. The mean score

indicated that the competencies and courses were perceived

as being either "very important" or "moderately

important." However, a small percentage of the music educators perceived some of the competencies as being "not

important." 66

Unlike Claybon's descriptive study, this study seeks to acquire from the music teacher education program directors of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities' information about specific elements of their music teacher education programs; thereby, having obtained these descriptive characteristics of the music teacher education program of their institutions, the investigator further seeks to evaluate, based on the opinions of graduates, the effectiveness of the music teacher education program in preparing them for the jobs they now hold. Consequently, based on the acquired data, recommendations will be offered in program evaluation as an aid to music teacher education curricula revi si on.

This literature review has been provided to present an organized survey of scholarly studies relating to the investigator's research. Specifically, the literature reviewed is concerned with one or both of the following major elements of the current study;

Academic program evaluation from

studies of the broad topic to studies of the more specific topic, i.e. music

teacher education evaluation.

The purpose, development, and impact of

the historically black colleges, and,

more specifically, UNCF member institu-

ti ons.

As a basis for the current study, the literature reviewed indicates an increased recognition of the importance of program evaluation as a means of improving the accountability of our higher education system. In addition, many of these studies reveal an increasing acceptance by faculty and administ!»ators of evolutions involving students and graduates.

Although recent practice suggests that all institutions could benefit from evaluation, this may be especially true for the historically black colleges. Because of their financial difficulty and their critical role in training Black professionals, these selected Black private schools must continuously be open to methods and means to make all of their educational programs as efficient and effective as possible.

The program directors' questionnaire was divided into five main sections developed to elicit information on specific elements of the music teacher 68 education program. The music teacher education graduates' questionnaire was divided into four main sections designed to elicit information on graduates academic credentials and current professional status and on their perceptions and opinions about their formal music teacher preparation.

Data collected from each group of questionnaires were coded for computer statistical analysis for compilation of tables of results and subsequent investigation analysis.

The investigator's analysis along with descriptive statistics are presented in Chapter 4. CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

The purpose of the study was to survey and evaluate the music teacher education programs of selected, accredited Black Private (SABP) Colleges and Universities in the United States. The data obtained were organized to:

analyze specific elements of the music teacher education programs of SABP colleges and universities.

identify relative strengths and weaknesses of music teacher programs and music programs as perceived by their graduates.

provide data for recommendations to be used in program evaluation as an aid to curriculum revision.

Design of the Study

Thischapter describes the design of the study, development of the instruments, population surveyed, procedure for data collection, and procedure for data analysis.

The research design employed for the study was that of an analytic-descriptive survey type. Mouly (1970) cited that ". . . analysis is a form of description, but without

69 70 analysis to provide a deeper insight into the basic nature, the adequate description of phenomena is relatively impossible (p. 279)."

The chief method of data collection used was two different questionnaire forms, one for SABP colleges and universities Music Teacher Education Program Directors and the other for SABP Colleges and Universities Music Teacher

Education Graduates from the years of 1979 through 1983.

The primary format of these instruments was that of a checklist type. Travers (1964) stated the value of the questionnaire survey as:

It can serve to identify characteristics which show a sufficiently wide range of values that individual differences can be reliably assessed, but it also serves to identify those characteristics which have not been developed and to which teaching programs should give special attention. (pp. 300,301)

Other methods of data collection included interviews of graduates and Music Teacher Education Program Directors via telephone and review of college catalogs and curric­ ulum listing for verification of collected data.

Expert opinion was used in gathering data in the survey. According to Simon (1969) "expert opinion is indispensable when the judgment involves human values. . .

The scholars' opinions do not simply stand for some more objective measure of the quality of a graduate school ; their judgments are the measure of values." (p. 275). 71

Thus, the investigator used the music teacher education

graduates of these selected, accredited colleges and uni­

versities as the best judgment of the value or importance

of the competencies and courses presented in the survey.

The Population

Initial contact with the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities was made through the

United Negro College Fund (UNCF). This was made possible with the assistance of the Office of Minority Affairs at the Ohio State University. Support and endorsement of this study was obtained from the Office of Minority

Affairs on July 27, 1984. The Minority Affairs Office contacted the executive staff of the UNCF and a list of forty-three approved and accredited black private colleges and universities in the United States was obtained. The administrative executive staff of the United Negro College

Fund indicated their endorsement and support of the study on August 30, 1984, and wrote a letter to all colleges/ universities presidents introducing and explaining the study.

On the strength of the approval and support of the

United Negro College Fund, the investigator, on September

11 , 1984, sent a letter (see Appendix B) to each of the 72 forty-three colleges/universities presidents {Appendix B,

Table I). This letter explained the purpose of the study, its importance and significance. It also sought their approval to conduct the study at their institution. The investigator asked each president to indicate his consent/approval of this study by checking the appropriate response on the enclosed "Approval Form" (See Appendix B ).

The purpose of the "Approval Form" was threefold:

it identified whether the college offered a music teacher education program.

it sought consent for the study to be conducted at the respective institution.

it obtained the names and addresses of the Music Teacher Education Program Di rectors.

Each president was asked to complete and return the

"Approval Form" in the enclosed pre-addressed, stamped envelope within a stipulated period of time.

By the requested return date of October 2, 1984, twenty-three of the forty-three presidents' "Approval

Forms" had been completed and returned. In an effort to obtain the remaining twenty responses, on October 4, 1984, a follow-up letter (see Appendix B) was mailed; also, on

October 25 long distance telephone calls were made and a second follow-up letter was sent on December 6 (see

Appendix B). By December 11, forty of the forty-three presidents had completed and returned their "Approval

Form." 73

Responses from the forty presidents identified a total of twenty-three music teacher education program. One was ineligible for this study due to a current on-going . internal evaluation study. Two music teacher education program directors did not return the questionnaire. Thus twenty music teacher education program directors partici­ pated in this study.

As a result of the investigator's survey of college catalogs (See Appendix A) which were available for 41 of the 43 institutions, the following was noted:

Two of these selected institutions are graduate institutions.

Two institutions are accredited by the National Association of Schools of Music.

Three other institutions are accredited by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.

Apparently, not one of these institutions was accredited by both the National Association of Schools of

Music and the National Council for the Accreditation of

Teacher Education. This survey confirmed the findings that resulted from the questionnaire as returned by the

Music Teacher Education Program Directors.

These selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities are located in twelve states : Alabama,

Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Lousiana, Mississippi, North

Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and 74

Virginia. According to the United Negro College Fund 1981

Statistical Annual Report, the total enrollment in these institutions was approximately 50,000 students. These colleges and universities primarily serve an economically disadvantaged constituency. The median family income is less that $12,000 (UNCF, 1981).

The population of this study of selected, accredited black private colleges and universities in the United

States consisted of the Music Teacher Education Graduates from these twenty selected institutions. Therefore, for the purpose of this study, a concerted effort has been made to survey the entire population.

The Program Director's Questionnaire

The purpose of the questionnaire sent to the SABP

Colleges and Universities Music Teacher Education Programs

Directors was to generate data concerning specific elements of music teacher education programs at the selected institutions. This questionnaire was developed by the researcher and is divided into five sections:

Section I - Institutional Information Section II - Teacher Education Program Section III - Music Teacher Education Curricul um Section IV - List of Graduates Section V - Respondent Information The purpose of each section was;

Section I sought information about the type of institution, organizational structure, degree offerings, composition of the music teacher education faculty, criteria for admission to the music program, and identification of student chapters of professional organizations.

Section II was designed to survey elements of the teacher education program, specifically: organization, governance and requirements for admission, retention, and student teaching of the teacher education component of which the music teacher education unit is generally a part.

Section III sought specific data on individual courses and areas of the music curriculum including require­ ments for graduation.

Section IV asked for a list of all music teacher education graduates, in the period 1979/80 through 1983/84 and their mailing addresses.

Section V asked for the name and title of the Respondent, provided a space for general comments, if any, and asked whether the respondent would like a copy of the results of the study. As a stimulus to return the form quickly, the questionnaire concludes with a specific date by which it should be returned to the researcher at her specific address.

The length of the questionnaire was of concern to the investigator, however, according to Oppenheim (1966)

much would seem to depend on personal involvement: the more interested people are in the subject of the questionnaire, the more they are likely to fill in and return an even quite lengthy questionnaire, (p. 35).

The questionnaire for the Music Teacher Education

Program Directors, in its final form, asked 52 item

questions and comprised eleven typed pages (See appendix

C). It was thought that the length might be a limiting

factor in securing an inadequate return. However, certain

competencies are indispensable when assessing an entire

four-year undergraduate music teacher education program.

If those areas were to be omitted, the questionnaire would

have been considerably weakened.

The Music Graduate's Questionnaire

The questionnaire for the selected, accredited Black

private colleges and universities music teacher education

graduates was a modification of a questionnaire used by

The Ohio State University music education faculty for its music graduates. This modified questionnaire was

comprised of four parts:

Part I - Factual Information Part II - Employment Status Part III - Academic Preparation Part IV - Open ended questions

The purpose of each section was: Part I sought factual information such as degrees obtained, major area(s) of study, and teaching certificates.

Part II solicited data concerning employment status and teaching experience.

Part III asked the graduates to evaluate how well they thought their graduating institution prepared them in general areas of music education study. The measurement for this part sought to obtain a series of responses each within a six-point scale of excellent to poor, and did not take.

Part IV provided open-end questions designed to elicit information on perceived strengths and weaknesses in the respondents' college preparation for the jobs they now hold.

In its final form this questionnaire asked forty item questions and comprised six typewritten pages (See

Appendix C).

Validation

Before printing the questionnaires, validation procedures were employed. The instruments in draft form, were first submitted to the major professor for a review and recommendations. He made useful comments that improved the quality of the questionnaire. Thereafter, these instruments were submitted to the doctoral committee of professional music education experts for validation of criteria and improvement of format. The researcher asked 78

the experts to review the instrument while giving special attention to the following:

1. whether the number of items could be reduced and still achieve the same results

2. whether the statement of any item could be rearranged

3. whether the wording of items was biased;

4. whether clarity of the statement of items could be improved.

Revisions were made based on comments and suggestions for improvements in the content, wording, and format of the items. Thus, the instruments were revised into validated instruments.

Pilot Testing

The respective questionnaires were pretested on a selected group of eight black music teacher educators who had expertise in all aspects of undergraduate music teacher education. These chosen educators were from institutions believed by the researcher to have some of the similiar characteristics as the twenty selected insti­ tutions for this study. The graduates' questionnaire was pretested on ten black music teacher education graduate students. These chosen graduates completed their 79

undergraduate degrees at predominantly black institutions

believed by the researcher to be similar to the selected

institutions of this study.

The pilot testing subjects were asked to make comments

and suggestions concerning:

* directions

recording procedures

clarity

accuracy

wording

format

As a result of the pilot test, minor adjustments were made in recording procedures and the questionnaire was then submitted to the selected population.

Procedure For Data Collection

Since the Music Teacher Education Program Directors were unknown, it was necessary to wait until each college/university president returned his/her "Approval

Form" before each Music Teacher Educator Program Director could be contacted. Beginning September 20, 1984, as the

"Approval Forms" were received from the various

Presidents, questionnaires were sent to the twenty-three music teacher education program directors. A cover letter

(See Appendix D) explained the purposes and significance 80 of the study, and solicited cooperation from the directors. They were given approximately twenty-one days within which, to complete the questionnaire and return it to the investigator in the provided stamped, self-addressed, envelope.

By October 11th, 1984, only two of the music teacher education program directors had returned their completed questionnaires. In an effort to receive a better response, the academic advisor of the investigator sent a letter on

November 16 (See Appendix D) to each of the music teacher education directors reiterating the value of the study and urging them to complete the questionnaire. On December 7,

1984, the investigator wrote a follow-up letter (See

Appendix D) to the Music Teacher Education Directors. A duplicate questionnaire was sent to them and a period of approximately two weeks was given for the return. As of

December 18th, an additional five completed questionnaires had been received. The investigator made several telephone calls to the music teacher education program directors about the progress of completion and return of the questionnaire. Extensions were made as it became necessary to have the questionnaires returned. A second letter (See Appendix D) was sent on February 4, 1985, announcing that February 18 would be the last day for the return of the questionnaires. Finally on February 11 a 81 brochure (See Appendix D) was sent making a last appeal

for the questionnaires to be returned. By the expiration of the deadline of February 18 a total of twenty out of

the twenty-two questionnaires had been filled out and

returned. This represented ninety-one percent of the selected accredited Black colleges and universities that participated In the study.

The Graduates

Because the graduates of the music teacher education programs were not known, they could not be sent question­ naires until each Music Teacher Education Program Director returned his/her questionnaire. Section IV of their questionnaires requested them to provide the names and addresses of the graduates between the years of 1979 and

1983.

From October 11 , 1984, as the questionnaires from the program directors were received, the graduates of the twenty colleges whose music teacher education program director responded were sent questionnaires.

Between October 11 and December 30, 1984, a total of forty-six graduates' questionnaires were mailed. A cover letter (See Appendix E) accompanied each questionnaire.

The letter explained the purpose of the study. Its 82 perceived utility and the crucial importance of the graduates' participation. The graduates were given approximately fourteen days each within which to complete and return the questionnaires in the provided, stamped, self-addressed envelope. By December 30, 1984, thirty out of the forty-six questionnaires had been filled out and returned. A follow-up letter (See Appendix E) was sent by the investigator requesting the return of the question­ naire. In addition, the investigator's adviser sent a letter (See Appendix D) to the graduates encouraging them to return the questionnaire.

During the month of January, 1985, a list of twenty- nine graduates was received from the music directors.

Twenty-nine questionnaires were mailed with cover letters urging them to return the questionnaires within fourteen days. By the end of the month, only four out of the twenty-nine questionnaires had been filled out and returned. A second follow-up letter was sent on February

1 , 1985 (See Appendix E) to the twenty-five who had not returned their questionnaires. On February 11, 1985, a brochure (Appendix E) was sent to all the graduates who had not returned their questionnaires. The brochure reminded them that February 18 was the deadline for the return of the questionnaires. By February 19 a total of 83 seventy-five questionnaires had been mailed and sixty-eight, or ninety-one percent, were returned.

Although a listing of seventy-five music teacher education graduates' names and addresses were secured, not all were eligible for the study, a breakdown of responses is given in Table 2, showing the total of those who became eligible for the study and listing reasons for the ineligibility of others. GRADUATES ELIGIBILITY FOR THE STUDY

Total number of questionnaires mailed ...... 75 Total number who did not return questionnaires ....-7 Total number completed and r e t u r n e d ......

Total number completed and returned butineligible . . .-26

Reason for ineligibility to participate in the study:

1. Returned — due to incorrect address .. . 19 2. Certified but without teaching experience . 3 3. Have neither teaching experience nor certification ...... 2 4. Double major — working in second major without experience in music ...... 1 5. Returned — not a music m ajo r ...... 1 IF

Total number of graduates eligible for the study . . . . 42 85

As shown in Table 2, a total of seventy-five names with addresses of music graduates was submitted to participate in this study. Of that number, sixty-eight returned and completed questionnaires making 91 percent total response for the study. It is important to note that a large percentage of graduates listed in Section IV of the Music Teacher Education Program Directors questionnaires, were ineligible for this study (26 out 68, or 38 percent). It is also noteworthy that not all of the

68 graduates, (91 percent) who responded, were eligible for the study. This reduced the total eligible population of music teacher education graduates to forty-two, thereby bringing the possible percentage of eligible responses to

62 percent (42 out of 68).

All correspondence and questionnaires were sent by first-class mail since it was desirable to have the letters/questionnaires returned if there was a mistake in the address. Due to first-class mailing and "address correction requested" onall correspondence, many addresses were updated.

Anonymity of responses of individual music graduates was provided by assigning a code to each questionnaire mailed. This code consisted of the institution's initials followed by a number. As each questionnaire was returned, the entry on the master list was checked off. Those 86

graduates not responding within fourteen 14 days of origi­

nal mailing were contacted again.

Data Analysis

Each completed questionnaire was subjected to analysis

after examination for accuracy and completeness.

Ambiguous responses were clarified and missing data were

obtained by contacting the respondents by telephone when

necessary. All items on both questionnaires were renum­

bered for the coding process. All open-ended questions

and comments were categorized into groups and coded.

After the data were coded, it was key punched onto cards

and analyzed by means of the Statistical Analysis System

(SAS) available at the Instruction and Research Computer

Center at the Ohio State University. The SAS computer analyses resulted in the computation of descriptive

statistics, including frequency distribution and percentages. From these, the number of responses to each part of each question determined the tables of the results constructed. As a result of the information collected from the questionnaires and from other background research, the investigator analyzed relationships among and between responses as a means to provide descriptive data leading to specific recommendations pertaining to the programs studied. Summary

This chapter describes the study design, the study populations, the data gathering instruments and procedures, and the data analysis. The study design was a survey type developed to elicit responses pertinent to the research questions of the study.

Because two different populations were surveyed, two different questionnaires were designed. The first population surveyed was the music teacher education program directors of the selected, accredited Black private institutions. The identities and addresses of these directors were obtained from the university and college presidents. Ultimately, twenty music teacher education program directors were surveyed. The second population surveyed was recent graduates of the music teacher education program of the selected colleges. This population was identified through the program directors.

Ultimately, forty-two recent graduates participated in this study.

The program directors' questional re was divided into five main sections developed to elicit information on specific elements of the music teacher education program.

The music teacher education graduates' questionnaire was divided into four main sections designed to elicit

information on graduates academic credentials and current

professional status and on their perceptions and opinions

about their formal music teacher preparations.

Data collected from each group of questionaires were coded for computer statistical analysis for compilation of

tables and results and subsequent investigation analysis.

The investigator's analysis along with descriptive

statistics are presented in Chapter 4. CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION OF DATA

Introduction

The findings of the data for this study have been organized into two parts and are presented in Chapter II and Chapter IV. Part one of this Chapter presents the data as provided by the Music Teacher Education Program

Directors. Part two presents the data as provided by the

Music Teacher Education Graduates of the years 1979-1983.

Both subject populations were from the selected, accred­ ited Black private colleges and universities throughout the United States as described in Chapter III.

Part one presents findings concerning the selected institutions and seeks to describe the music teacher education programs. Part two presents findings of the solicited graduates' opinions as to how well their music teacher education program prepared them for teaching, and their suggestions and comments for improvements in the music teacher education programs at their undergraduate insti tutions. FINDINGS — PART ONE SURVEY OF THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

The findings presented in this part are arranged in three sections, according to the objectives set forth in the research (Chapter 1). Part one, therefore, includes the following sections: (1) institutional information,

(2) teacher education program, and (3) music teacher education curriculum.

The findings have been organized in accordance with the structure of the instrument completed by the Music

Teacher Education Program Directors. The data are provid­ ed in tables and a brief discussion is offered. Comments from the music teacher education program directors were included with the quantitative data. Conclusions and recommendations from these findings are reserved for the last chapter of the study.

Objective I

To Survey Specific elements of the Music Teacher Education Programs of The Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities 91

The questionnaire designed for the Music Teacher

Education Program Directors enabled the researcher to answer Objective I. The first section of the questionnaire (See Appendix C) was designed to collect information concerning the institution.

The Institutions

The Institutions

Twenty institutions (100 percent) of the total population participated in this study. The data revealed, as shown in Table 3, a listing of the selected, accredited

Black private institutions and their locations. TABLE 3

INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR LOCATION (N=20)

NAME OF INSTITUTION LOCATION

Benedict College Columbia, SC Bishop College Dallas, TX Claffin College Orangeburg, SC Clark College Atlanta, GA Fisk University Nashville, TN Hampton University (Institute) Hampton, VA Huston-Ti11otson College Austin, TX Jarvis Christian College Hawkins, TX Lane College Jackson, TN Livingston College Salisbury, NC Miles College Birmingham, AL Morris Brown College Atlanta, GA Oakwood College Huntsville, AL Paine College Augusta, GA Rust College Holly Springs, MS St. Augustine College Raleigh, NC Talladega, AL Texas College Tyler, TX Virginia Union College Richmond, VA Wiley College Marshall, TX 93

As reflected in TABLE 3, these twenty institutions were geographically located in eight southern states.

Geographic distribution is as follows:

Five colleges were located in Texas

Three colleges were located in Georgia

Three colleges were located in Alabama

Two colleges were located in Tennessee

Two colleges were located in Virginia

Two colleges were located in South Carolina

Two colleges were located in North Carolina

One college was located in Mississippi

This geographic range by states showed that Texas had the most colleges with five, (25 percent); and that

Mississippi had the least, one (5 percent).

Type of Institutions

Respondents reported that each of the twenty (100 percent) institutions were four-year, private, liberal arts and coeducational. Nineteen (95 percent) institutions had undergraduate programs. Only one (5 percent) of the twenty institutions offered both an undergraduate and graduate program. All twenty institutions were church affiliated institutions of higher learning. The data revealed that the twenty institutions 94 were affiliated to one of the following churches:

American Missionary Association, Baptist, Christian

Methodist Episcopal, Disciples of Christ Episcopal,

Seventh-day Adventist, United Church of Christ and United

Methodist. (Table 4) reveals a rank order frequency and percentage distributions of institutions and denominations status.

RANK ORDER, FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DENOMINATION STATUS

CUMULATIVE DENOMINATION NO. OF CUMULATIVE PERCENT­ PERCENTAGES STATUS INSTI. FREQUENCY AGES BY DENOMINATION

METHODIST 55 Uni ted Methodist 4 4 20 AME ZION 3 7 15 CME 3 10 15 Episcopal 1 11 5

CHURCH OF CHRIST 25 United Church of Chri st 3 14 15 Disciples of Christ 2 16 10 BAPTIST 15 Bapti St 3 19 15

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST (SDA) 5 SD’A------1 20 5 95

Table 4 shows that the Methodist denomination is the affiliation of eleven(55 percent) of the institutions, and the Church of Christ is the affiliation of five (25 percent). The Baptist denomination is the affiliation of three colleges (15 percent) and the Seventh-Day Adventist denomination is theaffiliation of one institution of higher learning.

Division of Academic Year

The results fromthe questionnaires indicated that nineteen (95 percent) of the institutions operated under the semester system; and only one (5 percent) indicated that its academic year was organized under the quarter system.* The institution operating under the quarter system had the academic year divided into three quarters.

Seventeen institutions (85 percent) reported that their academic year was divided into two semesters. Three institutions (15 percent) reported "sometimes" having summer sessions in addition to the two-semester academic

For clarity purposes specified quarter hours has been converted to semester hours. The formula for this conversion has been determined by the institution. (See Appendix F) Total Music Faculty

The data revealed that the institutions had an average of five full-time music faculty and the number of full­ time music faculty ranged from two to eleven. Only one college reported having eleven full-time faculty. Seven colleges had four full-time faculty members each.

The number of part-time music faculty ranged from zero to seven for the twenty institutions. Eight insti­ tutions (40 percent) reported having no part-time faculty members. Six institutions (30 percent) indicated that they had one part-time faculty member. For all the insti­ tutions the average number of part-time faculty was four.

Total Teacher Education Faculty

Respondents reported having a teacher education faculty ranging from zero to eighteen. Whereas one institution (5 percent) reported eighteen full-time teacher education faculty, four (20 percent) reported having only two full-time teacher education faculty. The remaining fifteen institutions (75 percent) reported less than two full-time teacher education faculty. According to the data, the average number of full-time teacher 97

education faculty for the twenty institutions was six

(6.125) members.

The total number of part-time teacher education

faculty, as reported by the music teacher education

program directors, ranged from zero to three. Fourteen

institutions (70 percent) reported not having any part-

time teacher education faculty at all; three (15 percent) had one part-time faculty; two (10 percent) had two part- time faculty; and one (5 percent) had three part-time faculty.

Accreditation Organization

Reported results of the institution's membership in accrediting organizations are presented in Table 5. All of the colleges and universities are accredited by the

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION -- INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP IN ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATIONS

ACCREDITATION FREQUENCY ORGANIZATION NUMBER PERCENTAGE *NON- **ACCRED. *N0N- **ACcRED. ACCRED. ACCRED.

1 1 SACS 0 1 20 0 1 100

NCATE 16 1 4 80 1 20

NASM 17 1 3 85 1 15

REGIONAL 19 1 1 95 I 5 STATE 6 I 14 30 1 70

*NON-ACCREDITED **ACCREDITED

Of the twenty institutions, only three (15 percent) were accredited by the National Association of Schools of

Music. Seventeen (85 percent) institutions were not accredited by the National Association of Schools of Music

(NASM). The data revealed that two (10 percent) have accredition from both the National Association of Schools of Music and the National Council for the Accreditation of

Teacher Education. Of the twenty institutions, only four

(20 percent) are accredited by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. 99

Seventy percent (14) of the respondents reported that their institutions were accredited by either a State agency or a State Department of Education. Of the remain­ ing, six institutions (35 percent) reported not having state accreditation, two (10 percent) were reported to have applied for either state or regional or national accredi tati on.

Degrees Offered in Music and Music Teacher Educatiôïï

Table 6 presents the frequencies and percentages of degrees offered in music and music teacher education throughout the institutions. TABLE 6

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF DEGREES OFFERED IN MUSIC AND MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION

FREQUENCY DEGREES OFFERED OF In MÜSÏC COLLEGES PERCENTAGE Music Music Music Music Music Music Education Education Education

B.A. B.A. 16 8 80 40

B.S. B.S. 7 8 35 40

B.M. B.M. 1 1 5 5

B.Ed B.Ed 1 3 5 15

B.M.E.' 4 - 20 - 101

In reference to music degrees, sixteen directors (80

percent) reported offering the Bachelor of Arts Degree.

Seven institutions (35 percent) offered the Bachelor of

Science Degree, one (5 percent) offered the Bachelor of

Music Degree, four (20 percent) offered the Bachelor of

Music Education and one (5 percent) offered the Bachelor of Education Degree.

For music teacher education degrees, the data revealed that eight institutions (40 percent) offered the Bachelor of Arts Degree. Eight other institutions (40 percent) offered the Bachelor of Science Degree.Three institu­ tions (15 percent) offered the Bachelor of Music Education

.Degree. Only one institution (5 percent) offered the

Bachelor of Music Degree.

The second section of the questionnaire elicited information about the structure and organization of the music teacher education program. In this section the findings further describe specific elements of the music teacher education program. Teacher Education Program Housed

In response to the question of where the teacher

education was housed, fifteen of the twenty directors (75

percent) reported that the program was housed under the

school or department or division of education. Three (15

percent) responded that their teacher education program was housed under the school or department or division of humanities. In two institutions (10 percent) the program was housed under the school or department or division of music. In one institution (5 percent) the program was housed under the division of Literature and Language Arts.

Music Teacher Education - Housed

Table 7 presents the director's responses about the housing of the music teacher education programs. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE FOR HOUSING MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS

^ T :E .p . FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Music 6 30 Humanities 10 50 Educati on 5 25 Teacher Education 3 15 Fine Arts 2 10 (School of Arts & Letters)

*M.T.E.P. = Music Teacher Education Program.

Ten program directors (50 percent) reported that the music teacher education program was housed under the school or department or division of Humanities; six (30 percent) reported the program was housed under the music department; five program directors (25 percent) indicated the program was housed under education, and three (15 percent) under the Teacher Education Division. In res­ ponse to "other" as listed on the questionnaire, two directors (10 percent) indicated that it was housed under

Fine Arts in the School of Arts and Letters. Length of Music Teacher Education Program

The length of the music teacher education program as reported by thirteen program directors (6.5 percent) was eight semesters. Three directors (15 percent) reported the length as nine semesters ; and of the remaining four institutions (20 percent): one (5 percent) reported six semesters, one (5 percent) eight and a half semester, one

(5 percent) ten semesters, and one (5 percent) eleven semesters.

Requirements for Admission to the Music Education Program

Table 8 indicates the frequency, percentage, and requirements for admission to the music teacher education program. 105

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

REQUIREMENT

A. Music Courses - minimum GPA

GPA of 3.00 1 5 GPA of 2.50 3 15 GPA of 2.20 1 5 GPA of 2.00 8 40

B. Minimum Cumulative GPA

GPA of 3.00 1 5 GPA of 2.50 12 60 GPA of 2.25 2 10 GPA of 2.20 1 5 GPA of 2.00 4 20

C. Required Minimum Test Scores - ACT

Score of 16 3 15 Score of 14 1 5

D. Required Minimum Test Scores - SAT

Score of 800 1 5 Score of 745 1 5 Score of 500 1 5 TABLE 8 (Continued)

REQUIREMENT

E. Interview with:

Chairperson 25 Music Faculty 20 Teacher Education Council Music Teacher Education Faculty 10 Education Department 10 Music Advisor 5

F. Narrative Essay

G. Letters of Recommendations

Completion of Academic Program Foundation of Cô~urses

I. Written Exam

English Proficiency Exam 14 70

J . Vocal Proficiency 17 85

K. Instrumental Proficiency

L. "OTHER"

Application for Admission 4 20 Approval of Teacher Educ. Council 1 5 Certified by Registrar - Completion of Academic Foundation Care 1 TABLE 8 (Continued)

REQUIREMENT

"OTHER" (Continued)

Theory Placement Test 1 5 General Ability to Utilize Classroom Instruments 1 5 State Dept. Preprofessional Ed. Test 1 5 Audition 1 5 Pass English Proficiency Exam 1 5 Student’s Interest With High School Background 1

The most frequently required criterion for admission into

teacher education program revealed that twenty

institutions (100 percent) required a specified minimum

grade point average. Seventeen institutions (85 percent)

required an interview as part of the admission procedure; seventeen program directors (85 percent) reported a required demonstration of vocal proficiency; sixteen (80 percent) reported the required completion of an academic program foundation of courses prior to admission; fourteen reported a required written examination such as the

English proficiency test; thirteen (65 percent) reported a required specified grade point average, ranging from 2.00

to 3.00 for music courses.

Specific minimum scores on the ACT or the SAT were

required. Four program directors (20 percent) required a minimum ACT score of either 14 or 16 (Table 8). Fifteen directors (3 percent) reported a required minimum SAT score of either 500 or 745 or 800. One program director

(5 percent) reported that the State Department of

Education required a preprofessional examination for admission to teacher education, begun in 1984.

Retention Requirements for Music Teacher Education

Students

The findings with regard to retention requirements are given in TABLE 9 a total of eighteen directors (90 percent) indicated a specified minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) for retention in the music teacher education program, ranging from 2.00 to 2.50. The most frequently reported minimum cumulative GPA of 2.00 was required as reported by eight directors (40 percent).

Six program directors (30 percent) indicated a required minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) of

2.50; one (5 percent) required a minimum cumulative GPA of

2.20, and one (5 percent) required 2.35.

A total of sixteen program directors (80 percent) indicated a required minimum cumulative GPA in music courses only, ranging from 2.00 to 2.60. The most frequently reported minimum GPA of 2.60 for music courses 109

was reported by four directors (20 percent). Three

directors (15 percent) reported a GPA of 2.50; and one

director (5 percent) required a minimum GPA of 2.35, 2.25

or 2.20.

The data also revealed that nineteen program directors

(95 percent) reported that the music teacher education

program required, each academic term, a jury appearance

before a faculty committee in a specified music area.

Eighteen directors (90 percent) reported required

attendance at recital - seminars; seventeen (85 percent)

required commendable recommendation from the dean of

student affairs ; and seventeen (85 percent) required

participation with credit in at least one major ensemble

for every quarter/semester of study. Moreover, twelve (60

percent) of the institutions required successful passing

of a specified sequence of courses ; seven (35 percent) required student membership of at least one professional organization.

Comments as "other" pertaining to retention require­ ments for music teacher education included:

passing of pre-professional skills test

senior recital in applied area of performance. no

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES OF RETENTION REQUIREMENTS FOR MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS

REQUIREMENT NUMBER PERCENT Minimum Cumulative GPA JÜ----- GPA of 2.50 8 40 GPA of 2.35 6 30 GPA of 2.20 2 10 GPA of 2.00 2 10

Minimum Cumulative GPA In Music Education GPA of 2.60 5 30 GPA of 2.50 4 20 GPA of 2.35 3 15 GPA of 2.25 1 5 GPA of 2.20 1 5 GPA of 2.00 1 5

C. Commendable Recommendations Dean of Students 3 15

D. Pass Sequence of Tests 12 60

E. Ensemble Participation 17 85

F. Jury Appearance 19 95

G. Attendance at Recital-Seminars 18

H. Student Affiliation With ProfessioniT Organization 7

"OTHER" Pre-professional skills test 35 Senior Recital 35 Teacher Education Council

Responding to the question: does your institution have a teacher education council, thirteen program directors (65 percent) reported having a council. On the other hand, seven directors (35 percent) reported not having a teacher education council at their institution.

In regard to the inquiry of the make-up of the member­ ship of the teacher education council, eleven program directors (55 percent) revealed that the director of the

Teacher Education Program also served as the director of the teacher education council. Eight directors (40 percent) reported ex-officio members, ranging from one to nine, served on theteacher education council. Seven program directors (35 percent) reported that their division and department chairpersons, ranging from four to twenty, held membership in the teacher educaton council.

For all the institutions, the average number of division/ chairpersons serving on a teacher education council was eight.

In twelve institutions (60 percent), the directors reported that faculty members, ranging from one to eight, served as members of the teacher education council. In nine institutions (45 percent), the directors reported that faculty members, ranging from one to eight, served as 112 members of the teacher education council. In nine institutions (45 percent), the directors reported an average of six student representatives serving as members on the teacher education council. Public school repre­ sentatives serving on the teacher education council, reported by ten directors, range from one to twenty. For all the institutions, the average number of public school personnel per institution was five.

Comments included as "Other" pertaining to the make-up of the teacher education council revealed that two (10 percent) of the respondents included the following:

each department had a representative on the

teacher education council

supervisors of student teachers from all areas of

the college were members of the teacher education

counci 1

Teacher education associates are invited as

members of the council.

Who or What Group is Responsible for Decision Making

Respondents were asked about "who" or "what group" is responsible for making decisions concerning the operations of the teacher education curricula. Multiple responses were received. Tables 10-15 provide a distribution of 113

frequencies and percentages of the responses from the

music teacher education program directors with regard to

responsibilities. Percentages have been calculated for

the number of institutions reporting who or what group

performed the different responsibilities.

"Who" has been divided into five categories : (1)

dean, (2) teacher education council (TEC), (3) chairperson,

(4) faculty committee, and (5) Other. "What Group" refers

to any combination of two or more in the "Who" and

"Others" categories. "Others" has been designated, by the respondents, to mean any or one of the following:

State education agency

The entire faculty

Departmental chairperson

Departmental faculty

Academic Policies Committee

School of education and psychology and

chairperson with committee.

There was a variety of responses to the question of

"who" or "what group" prepares and reviews the objectives of the teacher education program. These are shown in

Table 10. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION WHO OR WHAT GROUP PREPARES, AND REVIEWS OBJECTIVES OF MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM N = 20)

COLLEGES f of % of 1

Colleges Col 1eges1 DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS

2 10 1 X ------

5 25 1 --- X ------2 10 1 -- — X -- --

3 15 1 ------X --

2 10 1 -- — -- -- X

1 5 1 X X ------

2 10 1 XX X -- --

1 5 1 X -- XX --

1 5 1 — X X X’ --

1 5 1 X X X X -- 115

Five program directors (25 percent) reported that the teacher education Council (TEC) was responsible, three program directors (15 percent) reported that the faculty was responsible, while two program directors (10 percent) reported that either the dean, chairperson or TEC was responsible. Six program directors (30 percent) reported that either the dean or chairperson or "Others" were responsible. Four program directors (20 percent) indicated that the dean and chairperson; or the dean and

TEC; or the TEC chairperson and faculty; or the dean, chairperson, TEC and faculty were responsible.

Table 11 reveals the responses in reference to "Who" or "What Group" develops policies and criteria with respect to admissions into, retention in and exit from the program. TABLE n

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION OF WHO OR WHAT GROUP DEVELOPS POLICIES AND CRITERIA WITH RESPECT TO ADMISSIONS (N = 20)

COLLEGES

f 1 % DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS 2 1 10 X

5 1 25 X

4 1 20 X

2 1 10 XX

2 1 10 X X

1 1 5 X XX

1 1 5 XX X

1 1 5 X X X

1 I 5 XXX X

1 1 5 X 117

As revealed in Table 11 fiveprogram directors (25 percent) indicated that the TEC was responsible; four (20 percent) reported that the faculty was responsible; two

(10 percent) indicated the dean; whileone (5 percent) indicated "others."

With regard to joint responsibility, two directors (10 percent) reported both the dean and the chairperson and two directors (10 percent) indicated both the TEC and the chairperson made the decision. Four (20 percent) reported: the dean, chairperson and "Others"; or the TEC, chairperson and faculty;or the dean and chairperson; or the dean, TEC, chairperson and faculty developed policies and criteria with respect to admissions.

Table 12 gives the responses to the question about

"who" or "what group" studies and evalutes the effective­ ness of curricula and procedures in relation to needs of the teaching profession. 118

TABLE 12

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION WHO OR WHAT GROUP STUDIES AND EVALUATES THE CURRICULUM (N = 20)

COLLEGES

f 1 % DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS

3 1 15 X

2 1 10 X

5 1 25 X

1 1 5 X

1 1 5 XX

1 1 5 XX

1 1 5 XX

1 1 5 XX

1 1 5 XXX

1 1 5 XXX

3 1 1 5 X X X X 119

Five (25 percent) indicated that the faculty was respon­

sible; three (15 percent) indicated the dean ; two (10

percent) reported the chairperson; and one (5 percent)

indicated "Others." The data also revealed, in regard to

group or joint responsibility, as shown in Table 12, that three (15 percent) indicated the dean, chairperson, TEC and the faculty as the parties that study and evaluate the curriculum. Six program directors (30 percent) reported one of the following: both the dean and chairperson; the chairperson and TEC ; the chairperson and "Others"; the TEC and faculty; the dean, TEC and "Others"; or the chairperson, TEC and the faculty.

Table 13 gives the responses to the question about

"Who" or "What Group" receives and acts upon recommendations for change in the teacher education program. TABLE 13

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION WHO OR WHAT GROUP RECEIVES AND ACTS UPON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES IN TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM (N = 20)

COLLEGES f 1 % DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS

2 1 10 X

2 1 10 X

6 1 30 X

1 1 5 X 1 1 5 X X

1 1 5 XX

1 1 5 X X

1 1 5 X X

1 1 5 X X X

1 1 5 XX X 3 1 15 X X X X 121

As solely responsible, six directors (30 percent) indicated the faculty; two (10 percent) reported the dean ; two (10 percent) indicated the TEC; while one (5 percent) indicated "Others."

With regard to group or joint responsibility, three program directors (15 percent) reported the dean, TEC, chairperson and faculty were responsible. Six program directors (30 percent) reported either the dean and the

TEC; the chairperson, TEC and others ; the chairperson and faculty; the dean, chairperson and "Others"; or the teacher education council, chairperson, and faculty.

Table 14 shows the responses to the question"Who" or

"What Group" reviews all policies pertaining to the education and certification of teachers in the coTlege/university. TABLE 14

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION WHO OR WHAT GROUP REVIEWS POLICIES PERTAINING TO EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION (N = 20)

COLLEGES

f 1 % DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS

4 I 20 X

3 1 15 X

1 1 5 X

1 1 5 X

3 1 15 X

3 1 15 X X

2 1 10 XX

1 1 5 X X X

■ 2 1 10 XXX X 123

Four program directors (20 percent) indicated the dean;

three (15 percent) the TEC; and three (15 percent)

indicated that "Others" were responsible.

Concerning group or joint responsibility, two program

directors (10 percent) reported the chairperson and

faculty; and three (15 percent) reported the dean and TEC were responsible. Four program directors (20 percent)

indicated either the TEC and chairperson; or the dean, chairperson, TEC and the faculty were responsible. One

program director (5 percent) indicated that the dean and chairperson were responsible.

Table 15 shows the responses to the question "Who" or

"What Group" maintains a balance between professional

preparation, general education preparation, and mastery of the subject content field in each curriculum in teacher educati on. TABLE 15

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION WHO OR WHAT GROUP MAINTAINS A BALANCE BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EDUCATION PREPARATION (N = 20)

'Colleges

f 1 % DEAN TEC CHAIRPERSON FACULTY OTHERS 2 1 10 X

5 1 25 X

1 1 5 X

3 1 15 X

2 1 10 X

2 1 10 X X

1 1 5 X X

1 1 5 XX X

1 1 5 X X X

1 1 5 X X X

1 1 5 XXX X 125

Five program directors (25 percent) reported the TEC;

three(15 percent) the faculty; four (20 percent) either

the dean or "Others" and one (5 percent) reported the

chairperson as those solely responsible.

In regard to group or joint responsibility, two

directors (10 percent) indicated the dean and the TEC; and

five (25 percent) indicated one of the following: the TEC

and chairperson ; the dean, TEC and chairperson; the dean,

TEC and "Others"; the dean, chairperson and "Others"; and the dean, TEC, chairperson and faculty.

Requirements for Student Teaching

The data obtained revealed that nineteen (95 percent) of the twenty institutions required a designated number of credit hours for the course, student teaching. In regard to the question how many credit hours could a student take in addition to the credit hours for the course, student teaching, only seven of the twenty program directors (35 percent) responded. These seven directors reported credit hours ranging from zero to seven : two reported three credit hours ; two indicated six credit hours ; two reported zero credit hours ; and one reported seven credit hours as the allowable number of credit hours, in addition to the hours for the course, student teaching. 126

In twelve institutions (60 percent), students Were

required to complete a minimum number of hours of observa­

tion and participation in pre-clinical experience before

student teaching. The number of hours of observaton

ranged from twelve to one hundred and eighty clock hours.

Thirteen Program directors (65 percent) indicated that music teacher education majors had to acquire the approval of the teacher education council to student teach. Seven­ teen directors (85 percent) indicated that majors were to obtain recommendations by either the chairperson of the division, or music faculty and/or area coordinator(s).

Music teacher education majors, as reported by seventeen program directors (85 percent), were also required to satisfactorily complete the general education core requirement prior to student teaching.

With regard to testing, three directors (15 percent) reported a required minimum ACT score of 16; two (10 percent) required a minimum SAT score of 453, as a prere­ quisite for student teaching. Seven directors (35 percent) reported that students were required to either take and/or pass the National Teachers' Examination.

Moreover, fifteen program directors (75 percent) indicated that music teacher education majors were required to pass a comprehensive music examination. Seventeen of the twenty institutions (35 percent) required music teacher 127

education students to maintain a minimum cumulative grade

point average during student teaching.

Pertaining to the inquiry of music teacher education

majors demonstrating proficiencies, sixteen program direc­

tors reported required demonstrated proficiencies in

English; fifteen (75 percent) in Speech; thirteen (65

percent) in math; and thirteen (65 percent) in hearing, j Comments included as "Other" pertaining to demonstrated

proficiencies, as revealed by four program directors (20

percent), required demonstration either in reading

proficiencies or recital attendance. Also, two directors

(10 percent) required demonstration either in passing the

State Department of Education proficiency test or basic

ability to play the piano.

Fifteen of the twenty directors (75 percent) reported

that music teacher education majors were required to

obtain a clearance from the college/university Health

services prior to student teaching. The remaining five

directors (25 percent) indicated that a clearance of

health status was not required.

With regard to student participation in student

professional organizations, nine program directors

indicated required student membership in the local Music

Education National Conference (MENC) Chapter; and eleven

(55 percent) indicated that this was not a requirement. 128

Six directors (30 percent) indicated that student member­

ship in the local National Education Association (NEA)

chapter was a requirement; whereas, fourteen directors

indicated that membership was not required. Table 16

presents these responses.

TABLE 16

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF STUDENT TEACHING REQUIREMENTS

REQUIREMENTS FOR STUDENT TEACHING FREQUENCY PERCENTAG

Complete a designated number of 19 95 credit hours Maintain a required cumulative Gpa 17 85 Complete a general education program 17 86 Complete a minimum number of hours of observation and participation of pre-clinical experience in the public school 12 60 Join the student chapter of the NEA 6 ■ 30 Join the student chapter of the MENC 9 45 Recommendations by the chairperson of division, music faculty and area coordi nators 17 85 Approval by the teacher educ. council 13 65 ACT score of at least l6 3 15 SAT score of at least 453 2 10 Carry a limited number of credit hours other than student teaching 7 35 Take the National Teachers Examination ....■ r 35 Pass the National Teachers Examination 35 Pass a comprehensive music examination 11 55 Clearance from College Health Service 15 75 Demonstrate proficiency in: Engli sh 16 1 80 Math 1 3 1 65 Speech 1 5 1t 7 5 Heari ng 13 1 65 129

Teaching Certificate — Level/Grade

According to the data, twenty program directors reported a total of seven level/grade teaching certifi­ cates for the music teacher education program. Table 17 presents a rank order of frequency and percentage of responses as reported by the twenty music teacher education program directors.

Fifteen program directors (75 percent) reported that the music teacher education program prepared students to teach at pre-school, elementary, and secondary grade/ level. Four program directors (20 percent) indicated that their music teacher education program prepared students to teach at the high school grade/level. One program director (5 percent) indicated the music teacher education program prepared majors to teach at the nursery level through grade nine. RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF TEACHING CERTIFICATES (N=20)

TEACHING CERTIFICATE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE LËVÉL/GrAdE

7 35 "All Levels"

5 25 K - 12

4 20 7-12

1 5 *N - 12

1 5 "Entry/Secondary & Elementary"

1 5 Elementary/Secondary

1 5 *N - 9

*N = Nursery Criteria for Admission into the Music Program

Respondents were asked to indicate the criteria for admission into the music program from six listed requirements. The data obtained revealed that in eighteen colleges/universities (90 percent), the admission criteria into the music program included the following:

Jury audition

Letters of recommendations

Interview

Paper Essay, a written essay

Music Placement test

Required Minimum GPA of 2.2

Table 18 gives the frequency and percentage in regard to the criteria for admission into the music program. DISTRIBUTION OF FREQUENCIES AND PERCENTAGES CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION INTO MUSIC PROGRAM

FREQUENCIES PERCENTAGES NOT 1r wr FOR ADMISSION REQUIRED REQUIRED REQUIRED REQUIRED

Jury (audition) 15 5 75 25 Intervi ew 12 8 60 40 Paper Essay 1 19 5 95 Music Placement Test 11 9 55 45 Theory on Music Placement Test 14 6 70 30 Applled Major Instrument 10 10 50 50 Music History 17 3 85 15 Applied Major Instrument 2 18 10 90 Letters of Recommendation 15 5 75 25 Required GPA (2.2) 7 13 35 65 Other - Open Admission 2 18 10 90

As Table 18 shows, the most frequently required criteria for admission were appearance before a jury and letters of recommendation (re: character, industriousness and scholarship). These were reported by fifteen institutions

(75 percent). While twelve program directors (60 percent) indicated that an interview was required; seven (35 percent) required a minimum grade point average of 2.2; and one director reported that a written essay was required as part of admission criteria for the music program. 133

Fourteen directors indicated that they required students to take a music placement test. To describe the placement test, fourteen directors (70 percent) indicated that music theory was included; ten (50 percent) reported applied major instrument questions; seventeen (75 percent) indicated music history; and two (10 percent) indicated questions concerning the history of the student's applied major instrument.

Another response classified as "other" relating to criteria for admission into the music program was "open admissions" reported by two institutions (10 percent).

Majors'Offered in Music Teacher Education

All twenty colleges offered vocal/choral study as a major area in music teacher education. Nineteen directors

(95 percent) also reported instrumental study as a major in music teacher education.

Seven program directors (35 percent) indicated that general music was offered as a major; two (10 percent) indicated performance as a major area and seven program directors (35 percent) reported one or more of the following major areas:

Music history

Performance 134

Jazz studies

Theory

Church music

Other

Afro-American Music

Music Media

The findings also revealed that in describing the

level/grade for the vocal/choral , instrumental, and

general music areas, six colleges (30 percent) offered

vocal /choral as a major area at the "All Level" and six

(30 percent) offered instrumental as a major area for

Kindergarten through Grade 12 (K-12). Three directors (15

percent) reported that "General Music" was offered at "all

levels."

The vocal/choral and instrumental level/grade (All

Level and K-12) were reported with the two highest frequencies, as shown in Table 19. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF MAJOR AREAS BY LEVELS

All Level f _L_ Vocal/choral 6 30

Instrumental 5 25

K-12 Level f %

Vocal/choral 5 25

Instrumental 6 30

None of the music teacher education program directors indi­ cated that their institution offered a major area in super­ visory nor in "other" areas for music teacher education majors. These responses are shown in Table 20. TABLE 20

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MAJOR AREAS OFFERED IN MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION

E E L 1 G R A E MAJOR COL.EGES 7 -12 ALL .EVEL K 12 N 12 Elem-Sec N 9 AREAS f % f % f % f % f % f % f % Vocal/ Choral 20 100 3 15 6 30 5 25 2 10 3 15 1 5

Instru­ mental 19 95 4 20 5 25 6 30 1 5 3 15 1 5

General 7 35 1 5 3 15 2 10 0 0 1 5 0 0

Super­ visory

Other

Key­ board -

Music History 1 5

Perfor- 2 10

Jazz Studies 1 5

Theory 1 5

Church Music 1 5

Other: Afro America 1 1 5

Music Media 1 5 student Membership in Professional Organizations

In seven institutions (35 percent), the music teacher

education program directors reported active student

participation in student chapters of the Music Education

National Conference (MENC). Six program directors (30

percent) reported having active student chapters of the

National Education Association (NEA). Only two program

directors (10 percent) reported having regional organi zati ons.

SECTION III

Section III of this Chapter further describes the music teacher education program in the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities by reporting the responses to the third section of the Music

Teacher Education Program Directors questionnaire. This section of the questionnaire sought information concerning areas of music teacher education curriculum, course offerings and credit hours available and required for graduation by both majors and minors in the music teacher education program of the twenty institutions in the study, only one operated under the quarter system. Using the 138 conversion table in Appendix F the institution provided the semester quarter equivalents to the quarter hours.

The conversion is based on the formula:

quarter hours ? 1.5 = semester hours

Therefore, throughout the remainder of the study, all quarter hours have been converted to and are reported as semester hours.

Music Theory

Tables 21-24 show the responses of the twenty music teacher education program directors regarding (a) the credit hours available, (b) the different courses available, (c) the number of credit hours required of music education majors, and (d) the number of credit hours required of minors. TABLE 21

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION FOR THE AREA OF MUSIC THEORY N=20

# of CREDIT FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE PERCENT CUMULATIVE HOURS AVAILABLE FREQUENCY PERCENT

03S 1 1 5 5 09S 2 3 10 15 lOS 2 5 10 25 12S 5 10 25 50 14S 1 11 5 55 15S 2 13 10 65 16S 1 14 5 70 18Q=12S* 1 15 5 75 IBS 3 18 15 90 21S 1 19 5 95 24S 1 20 5 100

*18Q f 1.5 = 12 semester hours Q = quarter 1hours S = semester hours 140

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES OFFERED IN MUSIC THEORY (N=20) MUSIC THEORY

NUMBER OF CUMULATIVE DIFFERENT FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE COURSES FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

2 1 1 5 5 3 3 4 15 20 4 10 14 50 70 5 4 18 20 90 6 1 19 5 95 8 1 20 5 100

TABLE 23

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER OF REQUIRED CREDIT HOURS OF MUSIC MAJORS IN MUSIC THEORY (N = 20)

NUMBER OF REQUIRED CREDIT HOURS CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE OF MAJORS FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

OSS 1 1 5 5 06S 2 2 5 10 09S 2 4 10 20 lOS 2 6 10 30 12S 6 12 30 60 14S 1 13 5 65 15S 3 16 15 80 16S 2 18 10 90 IBS 2 20 10 100 TABLE 24

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER_OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED IN MUSIC THEORY OF MINORS TO GRADUATE (N = 11)

NUMBER OF REQUIRED CREDIT HOURS CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE OF MINORS FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

OS 11 11 55 55 6S 3 14 15 70 7S 1 15 5 75 as 1 16 5 80 9S 4 20 20 100

For all the institutions, the total number of credit hours for music theory ranged from three to twenty-four semester hours. The number of music theory courses available ranged from two to eight courses (Table 22). As

Table 23 shows, in five institutions, twelve semester hours was the average requirement for graduation.

Nine program directors (45 percent) reported required credit hours in music theory for minors to graduate. A total of eleven directors (55 percent) reported credit hours required of minors to graduate, which ranged from one to nine. These responses are revealed in Table 24. 142

Comments under "Other" pertaining to the availability of the number of credit hours revealed that fourteen institutions (70 percent) offered music theory as a combined course with sight-singing and dictation. The other six institutions (30 percent) offered music theory as a separate course from sight-singing and dictation.

Sight Singing

Answers to the question about the different courses, number of courses and requirements for graduation were varied with regard to the area of sight singing. Tables

25-28 give the responses. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION FOR THE AREA OF MUSIC SIGHT SINGING (N = 20)

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE AVAILABLE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

OS 14 14 70 70 IS 1 15 5 75 3Q = 2S* 1 16 5 80 4S 2 18 10 90 6S 1 19 5 95 8S 1 20 5 TOO

*3Q f 1.5 = 2S Q = quarter hours S = semester hours FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES IN SIGHT SINGING (N = 20)

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVI COURSES FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT .PERCENT

0 14 14 70 70 1 1 15 5 75 2 2 17 10 85 4 3 20 15 100

TABLE 27

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED IN SIGHT SINGING OF MAJORS TO GRADUATE (N = 20)

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE OF MAJORS FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

OS 14 14 70 70 IS 1 15 5 75 3Q = 2S* 1 16 5 80 4S 2 18 10 90 6S 1 19 5 95 8S 1 20 5 100

*3Q T 1.5 = 2S Q = quarter hours S = semester hours TABLE 28

FREQUENCY AMD PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION: NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED IN SIGHTSINGING OF MINORS TO GRADUATE (N = 20)

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE OF MAJORS FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT

OS 18 18 90 90 3Q = 2S* 1 19 5 95 4S 1 20 5 100

*3Q & 1.5 = 2S Q - quarter hours S = semester hours

Table 25 shows responses to courses and credit hours in

sightsinging. There were only six institutions (30

percent) that offered and required credit hours in

sightsinging. The credit hours ranged from one to eight

as shown in Tables 25 and 27. The number of different courses, as revealed by the sixdirectors, ranged from

zero to four as shown in Table 26.Only two directors (10

percent) indicated either two or four semester hours were

required of minors, as shown in Table 28. In the

remaining fourteen institutions (70 percent) sight singing was either not offered at all as an independent area, offered in conjunction with other music theory courses or integrated throughout the entire music curriculum. Dictation

Almost all (nineteen, 95 percent) of the music teacher

education program directors reported that they neither

required nor offered credit hours in the area of dicta­

tion. Only one institution reported offering one course

in dictation. This course was required of majors to

graduate, but not of music minors. Thus, none of the

colleges required credit hours in dictation for music minors to graduate. "Comments" under this section.

Dictation, indicated that nineteen (95 percent) of the

directors indicated that dictation was taught in either music theory and/or sightsinging courses.

Music History

All twenty music teacher education program directors reported that they not only offered credit hours in music history but they also required credit hours of majors to graduate. As reported by the directors, available credit hours ranged from one to twelve semesters. The number of different courses offered ranged from one to four. The number of required credit hours of minors to graduate ranged from one to six; and the number of required credit hours of majors to graduate ranged from one to twelve. 147

Music history "comments" as reported by seventeen directors (85 percent) revealed that the course contents of music history also included music literature and humanities. Only three program directors of the twenty

(15 percent) reported that music history was offered exclusively as an independent course.

Advanced Music History

Unlike the area music history where all institutions offered credit hours, only four directors (20 percent) reported that they offered semester hours encompassed in one or two different courses of advanced music history.

Responses revealed that all of the four institutions offered six credit hours and also required six credit hours of majors to graduate. On the other hand, no program directors reported requiring credit hours in this area of minors to graduate.

Applied Music

All twenty music teacher education program directors

(100 percent) reported available credit hours and different courses for both voice and piano. However, only 148

fifteen institutions (75 percent) required credit hours in

both piano and voice of minors to graduate.

Sixteen directors (80 percent) indicated that credit

hours were not available for piano keyboard harmony. while four colleges (20 percent) offered different courses and required credit hours in piano keyboard harmony of majors for graduation, only two colleges (10 percent) were

reported to require credit hours in piano keyboard harmony for minors to graduate. Of the two institutions, one required two credit hours and the other institution required four credit hours of minors in piano keyboard harmony. Each of the sixteen directors (80 percent) indicated under the section "Comments" that piano keyboard was integrated into other classes, such as music theory and applied piano classes.

Band instruments woodwind, brass and percussion applied music, were reported as the second highest performance medium area offering both credit hours and different courses. Eleven institutions (55 percent) offered credit hours and different courses in the above areas for majors. Eight institutions (40 percent) required credit hours in these areas, woodwind, brasswind and percussion, for minors to graduate. While nine institutions (45 percent) did not offer credit hours for 149 majors to graduate, twelve (60 percent) did not offer

credit hours for minors to graduate.

Institutions that did not require credit hours in applied music performing medium areas of woodwind, brasswind and percussion did offer and require courses in either "Class woodwind," "Class brasswind," "Class percussion," or "Class Brass/Percussion" and "Class

Percussion/Woodwind," as reported by fifteen directors (75 percent)

Fourteen directors (70 percent) indicated that the music teacher education program not only offered but required credit hours of "Class String." While thirteen directors (65 percent) reported credit hours in class string for majors, only three (15 percent) indicated credit hours in class strings for minors. Two directors

(10 percent) reported that credit hours of class winds and percussion for minors to graduate.

In summation, the data revealed that all twenty institutions (100 percent) offered either applied music lessons or "Class" applied music in these areas : woodwind, brasswind and percussion. Instruments

Results of responses in reference to credit hours available for Voice, Keyboard and Band instruments are

shown In Table 29.

TABLE 29

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT■ HOURS AVAILABLE: IN APPLIED MUSIC — VOICE. KEYBOARD AND BAND/ORCHESTRA INSTRUMENTS

AREA OF NUMBER OF APPLIED NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE AVAILABLE (RANGE)

Voi ce 20 100 2-28 Pi ano 20 100 2-28 Piano-Keyboard Harmony 4 20 2, 3 Woodwinds 11 55 2-28 Brasswi nd 11 55 2-28 Percussi ons 11 55 2-28 Class String 14 70 1/2-14 Class Woodwinds 15 75 1/2-6 Class Brasswind 15 75 1/2-6 Class Percussion 15 75 1/2-6 151

All twenty directors (100 percent) reported the total number of credit hours available in both voice and piano, ranged from two to twenty-eight semester hours. Four directors (20 percent) reported the total number of credit hours available in Applied Music in keyboard harmony was either two or three semester hours. Eleven directors (55 percent) reported that the total number of credit hours available for band instruments ranged from two to twenty-eight semester hours. While the reported total number of credit hours offered in class string ranged from one-half to fourteen semester hours, class woodwind and brasswind ranged from one-half to six hours and percussion ranged from one-half to six credit hours.

Different Courses Available for Voice, Keyboard and

Band/Orchestra Instruments

All twenty program directors reported that the total number of different courses offered in the area of applied music — voice ranged from four to eight courses. It was also reported by the twenty directors that the total number of different courses in applied music -- piano ranged from one to five courses. With regard to applied music in piano keyboard harmony courses, only four 152

directors (20 percent) reported either one or two

different courses in keyboard harmony.

For woodwind, brasswind, percussion, class string and

class woodwind, eleven directors (55 percent) reported offering different courses, ranging from one to eight.

The remaining nine institutions reported not offering courses in the area. Moreover, class percussion, brass percussion class and percussion/woodwind classes were

rported by fourteen directors (70 percent), who offered either one or two different courses throughout these areas. Results of the responses are shown in Table 30. FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES OFFERED IN APPLIED MUSIC — VOICE, KEYBOARD AND BAND/ORCHESTRA INSTRUMENTS

NUMBER OF AREA COURSES APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

Voice 20 100 4-8 Piano 20 100 1-5 Piano-Keyboard Harmony 4 20 1 or 2 Woodwi nds 11 55 1-8 Brasswi nds 11 55 1-8 Percussi on 11 55 1-8 Class String 11 55 1-8 Class Woodwind 11 55 1-8 Class Brasswind 11 55 1-8 Class Percussion 14 70 1 or 2 Brass/Percussion Cl ass 14 70 1 or 2 Percussi on/Wood- Wind Class 14 70 1 or 2 154

Credit Hours Required of Majors to Graduate (Applied

Music — Voice, Keyboard and Band/Orchestra Instruments)

Responses of the program directors in reference to

credit hours required of majors to graduate concerning applied music -- voice, keyboard and band/orchestral

instruments are given in Table 31.

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS IN APPLIED MUSIC — VOICE, KEYBOARD AND BAND/ORCHESTRA INSTRUMENTS

NUMBER OF AREA COURSES APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS (RANGE)

Voice 20 100 2-16 Piano 20 100 6-16 Piano--Keyboard Harmony 4 20 1 or 2 Woodwi nds 11 55 2-12 Brasswi nds 11 55 2-12 Percussion 11 55 2-12 Class Strings 13 65 1/2-4 Class Woodwinds 14 70 1/2-6 Class Brasswinds 14 70 1/2-6 Class Percussion 14 70 1/2-6 Brass/Percussion Cl ass 2 10 1 or 2 Percussion/ Woodwi nd 2 10 1 or 2 155

In the area of applied music -- Voice, the total

number of credit hours requird of music teacher education

majors to graduate ranged from two to sixteen credit

hours. One director each reported the following credit

hours: two, six, seven, nine, ten and fourteen. Five

directors (25 percent) reported twelve credit hours, and

four other directors reported that sixteen credit hours of

Applied Music -- Voice was required of majors to graduate.

A look at the findings of applied music — Piano

revealed that the total number of credit hours required of

music teacher education majors, at the twenty institutions,

ranged from six to sixteen credit hours. Only four

directors (20 percent) reported that majors were required

to complete either one or two credit hour(s) of applied

music -- Piano keyboard harmony for graduation. Also the

total number of cre^'t hours required of majors for "Class

Strings" ranged from one-half to four credit hours.

The total number of credit hours for class woodwind

and class brasswind ranged from one-half to six credit

hours. The total number of credit hours required of

majors in percussion ranged from one-fourth hour to six

credit hours. Eleven directors (55 percent) reported that majors were required to complete from two to twelve credit

hours of woodwinds, brasswi nds and percussion instruments

respectively before graduation. Two directors reported 156 under "Comments" that courses such as Brass/percussion and

Percussion/woodwinds required majors to complete either one or two credit hours for both of these combined courses.

Credit Hours Required of Minors to Graduate (Applied

Music — Voice, Keyboard and Band Instruments)

Table 32 reveals the program directors* responses in reference to credit hours required of minors to graduate in Applied Music, Voice, Keyboard and Band instruments. FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MINORS IN APPLIED MUSIC: VOICE, KEYBOARD AND BAND/ORCHESTRA INSTRUMENTS

NUMBER OF AREA COURSES APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

Voice 15 75 1-8 Piano 15 75 2-8 Piano--Keyboard Harmony 2 10 2 or 4 Woodwind 8 40 2-7 Brasswi nd 8 40 2-7 Percussion 8 40 2-7 Class Strings 3 15 0 Class Woodwinds 2 10 0 Class Percussion 2 10 0 Class Brasswind 2 10 0 Brass/Percussion Class 2 10 0 Percussion/Wood- Wind Class 2 10 0 158

Whereas, fifteen program directors (75 percent)

reported that credit hours were required in either Voice

or Piano for their minors to graduate, the remaining five

directors did not have such a requirement. The number of

credit hours required in the fifteen institutions that had

such a requirement varied.

In the area of Voice, the number of credit hours

ranged from one to eight hours. The credit hour

requirement in Piano for minors to graduate ranged from

two to eight hours. Two directors (10 percent) required

two or four hours of Piano Keyboard harmony respectively

for minors to graduate.

With regard to applied music -- Woodwind, brasswind

and percussion course requirements for minors to graduate

ranged from two to seven hours as reported by eight

directors (40 percent). None of the twenty directors

reported requirements in either class strings, class wood­ winds, class brasswinds, class percussion, brass/percussion

and percussion/woodwind for minors to graduate. Credit Hours Available for Applied Music

— Organ and Non-Band Instruments

The response most frequently reported for the quesion about the total number of credit hours available in applied music - was in the area of piano and voice. The second most commonly reported area was in wind and percussion instruments, and the third most commonly reported area consisted of organ, guitar and strings.

Table 33 reveals the directors' responses in reference to the credit hours available in organ, guitar and strings.

TABLE 33

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT HOURS AVAILABLE IN APPLIED MUSIC — ORGAN AND NON-BAND INSTRUMENTS (N = 22)

NUMBER OF AREA OF CREDIT HOURS APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

Organ 8 40 4-28 Gui tar 7 35 2-28 Stri ngs 7 35 1-28 160

Eight directors (40 percent) reported that their insti­

tutions offered credit hours in organ. The number of

hours ranged from four to twenty-eight credit hours.

Seven directors (35 percent) indicated that their

institutions offered credit hours in guitar that ranged

from two to twenty-eight hours. Seven directors (35 percent) reported that from one to twenty-eight hours were available in strings. Results of the responses are shown in Table 33.

Number of Different Courses for Applied Music

— Organ and Non-Band Instruments

Table 34 shows the responses of the nineteen program directors when asked the number of difference courses in organ and non-band instruments. TABLE 34

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES OFFERED IN APPLIED MUSIC — ORGAN And NON-BAND INSTRUMENTS (N = 19)

NUMBER OF AREA OF COURSES APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

ORGAN 5 25 1-4

GUITAR 7 35 2-8

STRINGS 7 35 4-8 162

The findings revealed that the number of applied music

Organ and non-band instrument courses offered in the twenty institutions varied. Five directors (25 percent) reported that their institutions offered courses in organ. Of these five institutions, three offered two different courses each while the other two institutions offered one and four different courses in organ, respectively. Seven of the directors (35 percent) reported that they offered courses in guitar. The number of courses ranged from two to eight. Seven other institutions (35 percent) reported that they offered different courses in strings, ranging from four to eight courses.

Credit Hours Required of Majors to Graduate

(Applied Music -- Organ and Non-Band Instruments

The responses of the nineteen directors in regard to credit hours required of majors in Applied music, organ and non-band instruments are given in Table 35. TABLE 35

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS IN APPLIED MUSIC — ORGAN AND NON-BAND INSTRUMENTS

NUMBER OF AREA OF CREDIT HOURS APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

ORGAN 9 45 4-16

GUITAR 7 35 1-12

STRINGS 5 25 7-12

Nine program directors (45 percent) reported

requirements of credit hours in organ, ranging from four

to sixteen. Seven institutions (35 percent) reported that

their institutions required credit hours in guitar for their majors to graduate. These ranged from one to twelve credit hours. Five institutions (25 percent) reported having requirements ranging from seven to twelve credit

hours for their majors to graduate. Credit Hours Required of Minors to Graduate

(Applied Music —Organ and Non-Band Instruments

Responses of the program directors when asked the

number of credit hours available of minors in applied music, organ and non-band instruments are given in Table

36.

TABLE 36

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE AND CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MINORS IN APPLIED MUSIC: ORGAN AND NON-BAND INSTRUMENTS

NUMBER OF AREA OF CREDIT HOURS APPLIED NUMBER OF AVAILABLE MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

Organ 6 30 1-8

Guitar 7 35 1-9

Stri ng 5 25 2-7 165

Very few directors (five, 25 percent) reported that

their institutions required credit hours in strings for

their minors to graduate. In six institutions (30

percent) there was a requirement of credit hours in organ

for minors to graduate.

Credit hours in guitar was required in seven

institutions (35 percent) for minors to graduate. The

number of credit hours required of minors to graduate in

organ and guitar in the institutions that required them

ranged from one to eight hours and from one to nine hours,

respectively. The number of credithours required of

strings ranged from two to seven hours of minors to graduate.

Conducting—Beginning and Advanced

Table 37 presents the data concerning the number of credit hours available in beginning and advanced theory.

It also gives the required number of credit hours required of both minors and majors. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF CREDIT HOURS AVAILABLE IN BEGINNING AND ADVANCED CONDUCTING

NUMBER OF AVAILABLE CREDIT HOURS

AREA OF NUMBER OF APPLIED NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

BEGINNING CONDUCTING 20 100 2-6

ADVANCED CONDUCTING 8 40 3/4-5

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MINORS

BEGINNING CONDUCTING 20 100 2-6

ADVANCED CONDUCTING 4 20 2-6

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS

BEGINNING CONDUCTING 20 100 2-6

ADVANCED CONDUCTING 4 20 2-6 167

All of the program directors indicated that their institutions offered courses in the area of beginning conducting, and eight (40 percent) indicated that credit hours were available in the area of advanced conducting.

Of the twenty institutinns offering courses in beginning conducting, seventeen (85 percent) offered only one such course while the remaining three offered two courses. Of the eight directors reporting that their institutions offered advanced conducting courses, one offered two such courses, the others each offered one course.

The beginning conducting requirement for majors ranged from one to three semester hours. Twelve directors (60 percent) indicated that their majors were required to complete two semester hours in beginning conducting. Six other directors indicated that a total of three credit hours were required of majors to graduate. The remaining two institutions required three-quarters of a semester hour and five semester hours of beginning conducting, respectively. Table 38 gives the number of different courses available in beginning and advanced conducting.

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF COURSES OFFERED IN BEGINNING AND ADVANCED CONDUCTING

AREA OF NUMBER OF APPLIED NUMBER OF COURSES MUSIC COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE (RANGE)

Beginning Conducti ng 20 100 1 or 2 courses

Advanced Conducting 8 40 1 or 2 courses

The reported total number of credit hours required of majors in the area of advanced conducting ranged from two to six semester hours. Of the four directors (20 percent) reporting that their institution required courses in advanced conducting for majors to graduate, two institutions (10 percent) had a requirement for two semester hours; two other institutions reported a requirement of four semester hours; and the remaining two institutions required one and six semester hours, respecti vely. 169

As a requirement for minors to graduate, fifteen of the directors (75 percent) reported that their institutions had no requirements of credit hours in beginning conducting for their minors to graduate. The findings show that five of the institutions each reported that minors required two credit hours in beginning conducting to graduate. None of the twenty institutions had a requirement of advanced conducting for minors to graduate.

Music Literature

Course and credit hours offerings in the area of music literature are given in Table 39.

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF MUSIC LITERATURE OFFERINGS

CREDIT HOURS AREA OF COLLEGES NO OF REQUIRED OF MUSIC MAJORS TO LITERATURE FREQUENCY|% COURSES GRADUATE

Piano Literature 1 5 1 2

Vocal-Choral 1 5 1 2 Literature

Vocal Pedagogy 1 5 1 1

Instrumental 1 5 1 1 Pedagogy 170

None of the twenty music teacher education program

directors indicated that one or more of the following

courses was offered or required at their institution:

String Literature

Woodwind Literature

Brass Literature

Percussion Literature

Orchestral Literature

Band Literature

Various directors did report the following: One

program director (5 percent) reported that one course in

Piano Literature was offered for two credit hours and was

required of majors; one program director (5 percent)

reported that one course in Vocal-Choral Literature was offered for two credit hours and was required of majors ;

another director (5 percent) indicated that one course in

Vocal pedagogy was offered for one credit hour and was

required of majors; one director (5 percent) indicated that one course in Instrumental Pedagogy was offered for one credit hour and was required of majors.

Responses included "Other" pertaining to areas of music literature, as reported by the respondents are as

fol 1ows: 171

Introduction to Music Literature

* Piano Pedagogy

Vocal Piano Pedagogy

Three directors (15 percent) revealed that one course

called Introduction to music literature (one credit hour) was both offered and required of majors; two directors (10

percent) revealed that one course, vocal 1 piano pedeagogy was offered for one credit hour but was not required of majors; only one director (5 percent) indicated that three

different courses of Piano Pedagogy was offered and

required of majors for a total of three credit hours.

Responses included as "Comments" pertaining to the area of music literature, as reported by sixteen directors

(80 percent), indicated that even though separate courses in music literature were not offered, the contents of many courses were "somewhat integrated throughout the curriculum." Also, sixteen directors (80 percent) revealed that music history and music literature were integrated and offered as one course called music history. Interestingly, not one of the twenty directors reported a single creidt hour in the area of music literature was required of minors to graduate. Ensemble — Large and Small

Table 40 reveals the responses of the directors when asked to describe the large and small offerings and required hours for majors and minors. 173

TABLE 40

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE OF COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN LARGE AND SMALL ENSEMBLES

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS OFFERED

AREA OF APPLIED NUMBER OF MUSIC NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES

Large Enserable 18 90 1-8 hours

Smal 1 Ensemble 8 40 2-8 hours

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES

Large Ensemble 19 95 1-8 courses

Smal 1 Ensemble 9 45 1-8 courses

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS

Large Ensemble 14 70 2-8 hours

Smal 1 Ensemble 4 20 4-8 hours

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MINORS

Large Ensemble 10 50 1-8 hours

Smal 1 Ensemble 4 20 1-8 hours - -174

Nearly all of the program directors (eighteen, 90

percent) indicated that credit hours were available in

their institutions in the area of large ensemble.

However, only eight directors (40 percent) indicated that

credit hours were available in the area of small

ensemble. The number of credit hours available in the

area of large ensemble ranged from one to eight credit

hours ; and the number of credit hours available in the area of small ensemble ranged from two to eight credit hours.

In regard to large ensemble, the number of different courses offered as reported by nineteen (95 percent) of the directorsranged from one to eight courses. Eleven directors (55 percent) reported that no courses were offered in small ensemble at their institutions and nine directors (45 percent) reported offering different couses ranging from one to eight in the area of small ensemble at their institutions.

The reported total number of credit hours required of majors in the are of large ensemble, as reported by fourteen directors (70 percent), ranged from two to eight semester hours. The remaining six directors (30 percent) reported that no credit hours were required of majors in the area of large ensemble. 175

In reference to credit hours required of majors in the

area of small ensemble, only four directors (20 percent)

indicated that their institutions required a range of four

to eight semester hours for graduation. Sixteen directors

(80 percent) reported that credit hours in small ensemble were not required at their institutions of majors.

In reference to the number of credit hours required of minors to graduate, ten directors (50 percent) reported no credit hours in large ensemble were required of minors.

Ten other directors (50 percent) reported a range of one to eight credit hours in large ensemble required of minors. Only four directors (20 percent) reported

required credit hours in small ensemble for minors. These credit hours ranged from one to eight hours. Responses of the results are shown in Table 40. Responses included as

"comments" pertaining to the area of ensemble revealed that eight directors (40 percent) reported that student participation in ensemble was required of majors, however, students had the option to take it without credit.

Composition. Counterpoint and Advanced Theory Courses

Responses pertaining to composition, counterpoint and advanced theory courses given by the music teacher education program directors are shown in Table 41. 176

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE OF COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN COMPOSITION, COUNTERPOINT AND ADVANCED THEORY COURSES

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS OFFERED

AREA OF NUMBER OF MUSIC NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES

Advanced Theory 14 70 1 1/2-10 hours

Counterpoint 12 60 1-3 hours

Composi tion 35 3/4 - 6 hours

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES

Advanced Theory 13 65 2-4 courses

Counterpoi nt 12 60 1 course

Composi tion 5 25 1 or 2 courses NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS

Advanced Theory 12 60 1/2-10 hours

Counterpoi nt 11 55 1 or 2 hours

Composi ti on 3 15 2 or 3 hours 177

In reference to the number of credit hours available,

fourteen directors (70 percent) revealed that credit hours

ranged from one and a half semester hour to ten semester

hours of Advanced Theory Courses. The remaining six directors (30 percent) reported that their institutions did not offer -- credit hours in the area of Advanced

Music Theory courses.

In the area of counterpoint, twelve directors indicated that their institution offered credit hours ranging from one to three hours. The other eight directors indicated that no credit hours were available at their institutions in the area of counterpoint.

Responses in the area of composition, as indicated by seven directors (35 percent), showed a range of three-quarters of a semester hour to six semester hours.

However, thirteen directors (65 percent) reported that at their institutions no credit hours were available in the area of composition.

With regard to the number of different courses, seven directors (35 percent) indicated that no courses were offered at their institutions in the area of advanced theory, and thirteen directors (65 percent) indicated that a range of two to four courses were offered in advanced theory. 178

In the area of counterpoint, twelve directors (60

percent) indicated that one course was offered, and eight

directors (40 percent) indicated that no courses were

offered at their institutions. In the area of compos­

ition, fifteen directors (75 percent) reported that no courses were offered, and five directors (25 percent) indicated that their institutions offered either one or two courses in composition.

In regard to credit hours required of majors in advanced theory, twelve directors (60 percent) required credit hours ranging from one-half of a semester hour to ten semester hours. The remaining eight directors reported that their institutions did not offer credit hours in advanced theory.

In the area of counterpoint, eleven directors (55 percent) reported that either one or two credit hours were requiredof majors to graduate, and nine (45 percent) reported that no credit hours were required. In the area of composition, only three directors (15 percent) required either two or three credit hours, and seventeen directors indicated no required credit hours of majors.

None of the twenty directors indicated that their music teacher education programs required credit hours of minors in composition, counterpoint, and advanced theory for graduation. MUSIC EDUCATION METHODS COURSES

Table 42 gives the program directors responses to the

number of credit hours for music education courses that

were both available and required by majors.

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN MUSIC EDUCATION COURSES

NUMBER OF CREDITHOURS OFFERED

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES

Elem. School Musi c 85 1-6 hours

Sec. School Musi c 80 1-6 hours

Pre-Student Teachi ng 3 hours

Intro, to Music Teachi ng 1-3 hours

Elementary General Music (Vocal-Choral) 2 or 3 hours

Secondary Gen. (Vocal-Choral ) Elementary Instrumental Music 10 3 hours

Jr. High/Middle (Vocal-Choral ) 10 2 or 3 hours (TABLE 41 c o n t . )

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES

Jr. High/Middle (Instrumental) 10 2 hours

Secondary Instrumental 10 2 or 3 hours Elem. Curriculum & Instruction 5 3 hours

Sec. Curriculum & Instruction 3 hours

Sec. Supervision & Admi n. 3 hours

Elem. General Educati on 3 hours

General Music (K-12) 0 hours

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES

Elem. School Musi c 17

Sec. School Music 16 80 1 course

Pre-Student 1 20 1 course

Intro, to Music Teachi ng 4 1 course

Elem. Gen. Music (Vocal-Choral) 3 15 1 course

Sec. General (Vocal-Choral) 3 15 1 course (TABLE 42 c o n t . )

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES

Elem. Instr. Music 10 1 course

Jr. High/Middle (Vocal-Choral ) 10 1 course

Jr. High/Middle (Instrumental) 10 1 course

Sec. Instr. 10 1 course

Elem. Currie. & Instruction 5 1 course

Sec. Currie. & Instructi on 5 1 course

Sec. Super­ vision & Adm. 1 course

Elem. General Education 1 course

General Music (K-12) ) 0 0 course

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED BY MAJORS

Elem. School Musi c 16 1-6 hours

Sec. School Musi c 16 1-6 hours

Pre-Student Teaching 5 25 1 hour

Intro, to Music Teaching 5 25 1-3 hours (TABLE 42 cont.)

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE CREDIT HOURS/ COURSES

Elem. Gen. Music (Vocal-Choral) 20 1-3 hours

Sec. General (Vocal-Choral) 20 1 or 2 hours

Elem. Instr. Music 15 1-3 hours

Jr. High/Middle (Vocal-Choral) 15 1-3 hours

Jr. High/Middle (Instrumental 10 1 or 2 hours

Sec. Instr. 15 1-3 hours

Elem. Currie. & Instruction 5 3 hours

Sec. Currie & Instruction 5 3 hours

Sec. Supervision & Adm. 5 3 hours

Elem. General Education 5 3 hours

General Music (K-12) 0 0 hours 183

Comments categorized as "Other" In reference to music education methods courses, reported by the twenty directors, revealed that the two most frequently offered music teacher education courses were "Elementary School

Music" and "Secondary School Music." Seventeen directors

(85 percent) revealed that only one methods course.

Elementary School Music, was offered. This course was offered to credit hours ranging from one to six hours and was required of majors. Sixteen program directors (80 percent) reported that one course. Secondary School Music was offered and required of majors. The number of credit hours ranged from one to six credit hours.

Other less frequently offered music teacher education courses were reported by the music teacher education directors. Four directors (20 percent) indicated that courses entitled, "Introduction to Music Teaching" and

"Pre-Student Teachings" were offered and required of music teacher education students. The credit hours for these courses ranged from one to three semester hours each.

Three directors (15 percent) reported offering two courses: "Elementary General Music" (Vocal-Choral) and

"Secondary General Music" (Vocal-Choral ). While

Elementary General Music was offered for two credit hours.

Secondary General Music — Vocal Choral was offered for 184

either two or three credit hours. Both courses were

required of majors.

Two directors (10 percent) indicated that one course each of the following was offered: "Elementary

Instrumental Music" and "Secondary Instrumental Music."

Both directors indicated that three credit hours were required for each of the two courses and were required of majors.

Two other directors (10 percent) reported three other courses: "Junior High/Middle Vocal-Choral ", "Junior

High/Middle Instrumental" and "Secondary Instrumental" were offered at their institutions. These institutions required these courses for either two or three credit hours for graduation.

Additional comments included as "Other" pertaining to music teacher education methods course offerings, as revealed by four program directors (20 percent) included the following:

Elementary Curriculum and Instruction (5 percent)

Secondary Curriculum and Instruction (5 percent)

Secondary Supervision and Administration

(5 percent)

Elementary General Education (5 percent)

Each course was offered for three credit hours and was required of majors. 185

None of the twenty program directors indicated that

"General Music" (K-12) was offered at their institution.

All of the methods courses were offered for credit hours

varying from one to three hours, except for the courses.

Elementary and Secondary School music.

Both Elementary School Music and Secondary School

Music courses were offered for either five or six credit hours. None of the twenty music teacher education program directors indicated that courses or credit hours in the area of music education methods were required of minors.

Student Teaching

Table 43 reports the respones of directors pertaining to the area of student teaching.

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN THE AREA OF STUDENT TEACHING

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS OFFERED

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS COURSES/CREDIT HOURS _____ Elem. Gen. Instru. 2 10 5 or 6 hours

Sec. Gen. Choral 3 15 5 or 6 hours

Elem. Instru. 3 15 5 or 6 hours

Sec. Instru. 3 15 5 or 6 hours 186

TABLE 43 (c o n t.)

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES/CREDIT ______HOURS______

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES Elem. Gen. 1 or 2 courseC s)

Sec. Gen. Choral 15 1 or 2 course(s)

Elem. Instru. 15 1 or 2 courseC s)

Sec. Instru. 15 1 or 2 course(s)

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS Elem. Gen. Instru. 2 10 5 or 6 hours

Sec. Gen. Choral 15 5 or 6 hours

Elem. Instru. 15 5 or 6 hours

Sec. Instru. 15 5 or 6 hours

Seventeen music teacher education program directors

(85 percent) reported that they offered one general course in student teaching that included the combined level of elementary and secondary instead of different courses according to designated areas and levels in music. One general course in student teaching was offered for six credit hours and was required of music teacher education majors but not, of music teacher education minors. 187

Only three directors (15 percent) indicated different

courses at different levels in the area of student

teaching. According to the three directors (15 percent),

four courses in the area of student teaching were offered :

Elementary General Instrumental

Elementary General Choral

Secondary General Choral

Secondary General Instrumental

No more than two courses were offered in each of the above

areas. These courses were offered for either five or six credit hours and were required of majors.

Recital -- Senior Recital. Junior Recital. Recital Attendance

Eighteen directors (90 percent) required senior recital of majors but did not offer creidt hours for the course toward graduation. Two directors (10 percent) reported that senior recital was required of majors, but it was not offered as a course. Majors were to fulfill this requirement by completing the last academic quarter/semester of applied music major instrument study.

Two directors (10 percent) indicated that a junior recital was required of majors to graduate. The remaining eighteen directors (90 percent) did not require credit hours in the area of junior recital. None of the twenty 188

directors reported credit hours or different courses as a

requirement of minors. All twenty program directors

reported that Recital Attendance was required of majors;

however, academic credit for graduation was not avail­

able. No program director reported offering a course in

Recital Attendance. Also, one of the twenty program

directors reported that Recital Attendance was required of

mi nors.

General Music

Table 44 gives the frequency and percentage of courses

and credit hours that are offered and required in the area

of general music.

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE, DIFFERENT COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN THE AREA OF GENERAL MUSIC

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS AVAILABLE

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES/CREDIT HOURS (RANGE)

Music For Early Childhood 11 55 3 hours

Music Appreciation 8 40 2-4 hours 189

TABLE 44 (c o n t.)

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE, DIFFERENT COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN THE AREA OF GENERAL MUSIC

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS AVAILABLE

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES/CREDIT HOURS (RANGE)

Afro-American Music 5 25 1-6 hours

Music & Worship 3 15 1 or 3 hours

Opera Workshop 2 10 1 or 2 hours

Jazz 2 10 3 hours

Vocal Diction 1 5 3 hours

Black Music 1 5 3 hours

Hymnol ogy 1 5 3 hours

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT COURSES

Music For Early Childhood 11 55 1 course

Musi c Appreciati on 8 40 1 course

Afro-American Musi c 5 25 1

Music & Worship 3 15 1 (TABLE 44 c o n t.)

FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE, DIFFERENT COURSES AND CREDIT HOURS IN THE AREA OF GENERAL MUSIC

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS AVAILABLE

AREA OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MUSIC INSTITUTIONS PERCENTAGE COURSES/CREDIT HOURS (RANGE)

Opera Workshop 2 10 1 course

Jazz 2 10 3 courses

Vocal Diction 1 5 1 course

Black Music 1 5 4 courses

Hymnology 1 5 1 course

NUMBER OF CREDIT HOURS REQUIRED OF MAJORS

Music For Early ChiIdhood 0 0 0 hours

Music Appreciation 8 40 2-4 hours

Afro-American Music 5 25 2 or 3 hours

Music & Worship 1 5 1 hour

Opera Workshop 0 0 0 hour

Jazz 0 0 0 hour

Vocal Diction 0 0 0 hour

Black Music 0 0 0 hour

Hymnology 0 0 0 hour 191

More program directors (eleven, 55 percent) reported

offering the course. Music for Early Childhood, for three

credit hours, than any other course listed under General

Music. Music Appreciation as reported by eight directors

(40 percent), offered either two or four credit hours.

Afro-American Music, as reported by five directors (25

percent), offered either one or six credit hours.

Other reported courses included Music and Worship,

reported by three directors (15 percent) for either one or

three credit hours ; Opera Workshop, reported by two pro­ gram directors (10 percent), available for either one or two credit hours ; two directors (10 percent) revealed that

Jazz courses, reported by two directors for three credit hours. In addition, three directors (15 percent) reported three courses:

Vocal Diction (5 percent)

Black Music (5 percent)

Hymnology (5 percent)

Each of these courses were available for three credit hours each. As reported by the directors in reference to the number of different courses offered in these areas, more courses were offered in the area of Black music

(four) and Jazz (three) than in any ofthe other areas.

Only one course was offered in each of the following: 192

Music and Worship, Afro-American Music, Opera Workshop,

Vocal Diction and Music Appreciation. Two courses such as

recreational music, history and development were not offered.

Of all the courses listed under the area. General

Music, fourteen program directors (70 percent) reported a total of three courses required of majors. One director

(5 percent) required one credit hour for the course Music and Worship ; five directors (25 percent) required either two or three credit hours for the course Afro-American

Music ; and eight directors (40 percent) required either two or four credit hours of majors for music appreciation.

Of the twenty program directors, four (20 percent) required only one course, music appreciation, of minors.

In these four institutions, music appreciation was offered for either two or three credit hours.

Seminar in Education

According to the twenty program directors, none of their institutions offered courses under the area of

Seminar in Education for credit. Courses listed in the questionnaire under the area of Seminar in Education were:

Study Skills

Upward Bound and Special Skills 193

Test Taking Skills & Strategies

Developing Teaching Competencies

National Teacher Workshop

Advising

Fifteen program directors (75 percent) reported that

music teacher education students were advised by both the

teacher education faculty and music faculty. Five direc­

tors (25 percent) reported that their students were either

advised by a teacher education faculty member or by a music faculty member; however, not by both.

Total Music Hours for Graduation

Table 45 shows the frequency and percentage of the total required music hours, as reported by the twenty music teacher education program directors. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL MUSIC HOURS (N = 20)

Total Music Frequency Cummulati ve Hours Inst. Frequency Percent %

43S 1 1 5 5 45S 2 3 10 15 49S 2 5 10 25 50S 1 6 5 30 52S 1 7 5 35 57S 2 9 10 45 58S 2 11 10 55 59Q* 1 12 5 60 59S 1 13 5 65 60S 1 14 5 70 613 3 17 15 85 623 1 18 5 90 633 1 19 5 95 683 1 20 5 100

S = Semester hours Q = Quarter hours *59Q = 39.3 Semester hours

An examination of the data revealed that the range of total music hours for graduation was from forty-three to sixty-eight semester hours. More institutions, three (15 percent) required a total of sixty one credit hours. The computed mean of total music hours for the colleges was fifty-two music hours. None of the program directors indicated neither upper division nor lower division music hours for graduation. Grand Total Hours for Graduation

Table 46 reveals the frequency and percentage of grand total hours required of music teacher education majors for graduation, as reported by the twenty program directors.

TABLE 46

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES OF GRAND TOTAL HOURS FOR GRADUATION (N = 20)

GRAND TOTAL FREQUENCY CUMM. % CUMM HOURS FOR OF FREQUENCY % GRADUATION INSTI.

120S 2 2 10 10 121S 1 3 5 15 124S 2 5 10 25 125S 1 6 5 30 128S* 2 8 10 40 131S 3 11 15 55 143S 1 12 5 60 144S 1 13 5 65 147S 1 14 5 70 127 1 15 5 75 129 1 16 5 80 130 1 17 5 85 133 1 18 5 90 134 1 19 5 95 136 1 20 5 100 C AIT1Û e ^ a V* h v«e

The grand total hours for graduation ranged from one hundred and twenty (120) to one hundred and forty-seven

(147) semester credit hours. The computed arithmetic mean for the grand total hours for graduation was one hundred and twenty-four (124) semester hours. Graduates

Section IV of the questionnaire was used for identi­

fication and location of the 1979-80 through 1983-84 music

teacher education graduates of the selected institutions.

It held no specific value to the analyses of the data,

other than proper identification, classification and cate­

gorization of the response instrument.

General Information

Section V of the questionnaire was . used for

identification of the respondent's status only. It held no specific value to the analyses of the data, other than proper classification and categorization of the response instrument.

FINDINGS — PART TWO EVALUATION BY THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION ------ïïR^DiraTTs------

Part two presents the data as provided by the music

Teacher Education Graduates of the years 1979 through

1983. The findings presented were from the graduates' opinions as to how well their music teacher education program prepared them for their teaching; and their suggestions or comments for improvements in the music 197

teacher education programs at their undergraduate

institutions. The findings for this portion of the study are presented in four sections according to the objective

set forth in the research (Chapter I).

OBJECTIVE II

To identify relative strengths and weaknesses of music teacher education programs and music programs as perceived by their graduates.

The responses from questionnaires designed for the

Music Teacher Education Graduates enabled the researcher to answer Objective II. The findings have been organized in accordance with the structure of the instrument completed by the Music Teacher Education Graduates. The first section of the questionnaire (See Appendix C) was designed to collect factual information concerning the graduates.

SECTION I — FACTUAL INFORMATION

Graduates by Undergraduate Institution

Only ten of the twenty institutions provided names and addresses (total of 42) of Music Teacher Education

Graduates to participate as subjects for this study. 198

Table 47 shows a frequency and percentage distribution of graduates by institutions--the population for this portion of the study.

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF GRADUATES BY INSTITUTION

NUMBER OF percentages OF GRADUATES TOTAL SURVEYED

2 5 5 12 2 5 11 26 2 5 4 10 7 17 4 10 4 10 1 2 TOTAL T? TM*

* All percent amounts in this section have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

The data, as shown in Table 47, presents the number of graduates participating in this study, per institution, ranging from one to eleven. One institution had eleven graduates (26 percent)* to participate in this study; another institution had seven graduates (17 percent); and one other institution had five graduates (12 percent) to participate. These three institutions had a total of twenty-three graduates (55 percent of the total surveyed) ranging from five to eleven graduates, while the seven 199

other institutions had a total of nineteen graduates (45

percent), ranging from one to four graduates per

institution.

The Graduates' Graduate Institution

Table 48 provides the response of the graduates to the questions at what institution did you obtain your advanced degree?

TABLE 48

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF GRADUATE'S GRADUATE INSTITUTIONS (N = 11)

GRADUATE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE INSTITUTION

1 9 East Texas State University 1 9 George Peabody College 1 9 Tennessee State University 2 18 University of Illinois 1 9 Alabama A & M University 1 9 University of Alabama in Birmingham 3 27 The Ohio State University 1 9 Morgan State University TOTALS TT IM 200

Thirty-one graduates (74 percent) indicated that they

had not received an advanced degree beyond their

baccalaureate. Eleven graduates (26 percent) reported

that they had acquired either masters or doctoral

degrees. These eleven participants had attended a total

of eight different graduate institutions, although three

(27 percent) had obtained their advanced degrees from the

same institution and two others (18 percent) had obtained

their degrees from another institution. Thus, the

remaining six (55 percent) had received their degrees from

six respectively different graduate institutions.

Year of Undergraduate Degree

Table 49 gives the response of the forty-two graduates

indicating the year in which their undergraduate degrees were received. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF UNDERGRADUATES DEGREES OF GRADUATES BY YEAR (N = 42)

YEAR FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

1979 8 19 1980 9 21 1981 6 14 1982 10 24 1983 9 21

The fewest number of graduates received baccalaureate

(six, 14 percent) in 1981, and the most degrees (ten, 24 percent) were conferred in 1982. The number of degrees awarded per year, for the graduates, ranged from six to ten during the years of 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983.

Degrees Earned by Graduates

The responses of the graduates pertaining to degrees earned are given in Table 50. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF DEGREES EARNED BY GRADUATES (N=44)

DEGREES CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE EARNED FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE

BACCALAUREATE

B.S. Ed 2 2 4.762 4.762 B.A. 13 15 30.952 35.714 B.S. 27 32 64.286 100.000

MASTERS (N = 11) M.S. 1 1 9.091 9.091 M. Ed 2 3 18.182 27.273 M.M 2 5 18.182 45.455 M.A. 6 11 54.545 100.000

DOCTORATE (N = 1)

D.M.A. 1 1 100.000 100.000

All forty-two respondents (100 percent) indicated that they had received their undergraduate degree. Two of the forty-two earned two baccaleaureate degrees each. More bachelor of science degrees

(twenty-seven, 64 percent) were conferred than either bachelor of Arts degrees (thirteen, 31 percent) or bachelor of science in education degrees (two, five percent).

In addition, eleven graduates (26 percent) reported having received their masters degrees. Of the eleven. 203

more graduates had master of arts degrees (six, 55

percent) than either master of music degrees (two, 18

percent), master of education degrees (two, 18 percent),

or master of science degrees (one, 9 percent). Only one

of the forty-two graduates (2 percent) had received a

doctorate, which was a doctor of musical arts degree.

Although thirty-one of the forty-two graduates (74

percent) had not received their masters or doctorate

degrees, five of the thirty-one graduates (16 percent)

reported, under the section of "Other," that they were

currently working toward the masters degree. Only one of

the thirty-one (2 percent) was working towards a doctorate

of music arts degree. Therefore, of the thirty-one

graduates without master or doctorate degrees, six (18

percent) are currently working toward receiving advanced

degrees.

Hence, the data revealed that twenty-five graduates

(60 percent) had neither received nor were currently working toward advanced degrees.

Major Area of Study

Table 51 summarizes the graduates' responses in reference to their major area of study and grade/level. FREQUENCY, PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF GRADUATES MAJOR AREA OF STUDY AND GRADE/LEVEL

AREA OF CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE LEVEL/ STUDY FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE GRADE

Vocal 15 15 36 36 All Level/ K-12 1 16 2 38 7-12 2 18 5 43 K-8 3 21 7 50 6-8 (Middle)

Instrumental and Keyboard 13 34 31 81 7-12 3 37 7 88 All Level/ K-12

General 5 42 12 100 All Level• 205

Of the forty-two graduates, twenty-one (50 percent) reported Vocal, sixteen (38 percent) indicated instrumental and keyboard, and five (12 percent) indicated general music as their major area of study. The twenty-one gradu­ ates (50 percent) whose major area was vocal, reported an overall grade level preparation of all level/K-12. Table

51 presents a breakdown of responses.

Of the sixteen graduates (38 percent) whose major area was instrumental/keyboard, thirteen (81 percent) indicated preparation at the 7-12 grade level and three graduates

(19 percent) indicated the K-12 level. In the area of general music, all five graduates (12 percent) indicated their level/grade preparation as all level.

Graduates reported that courses had been available to them in areas such as music history, music theory, perfor­ mance, jazz studies and church music; however, none of the graduates indicated that any of these was their major area of concentration as music teacher education majors.

Teaching Certificate You Now Have

Table 52 reports the frequency and percentage of types of teaching certificates. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TEACHING CERTIFICATE

TEACHING FREQUENCY OF CERTIFICATE GRADUATES PERCENTAGE

Regular/professional 35 83 Provi si onal/temporary 5 12 Denomi nati onal 2 5 TOTAL TÏÏÏÏ

The forty-two graduates reported a total of three different levels/grades for teaching : All level/K-12, 7-12 and K-8. Table 53 reported the frequency, percentage distribution of grade/level for the forty-two graduates. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION OF GRADE/LEVEL

FREQUENCY LEVEL/GRADE PERCENTAGE

33 All Level/K-12 79 6 7-12 14 3 K-8 7 TOTAL TDÏÏ

There were three basic types of teaching certificates

listed by the forty-two graduates. The three types were:

(1) regular/professional, (2) provi sional/temporary, and

(3) denominational (Seventh-Day Adventists). Thirty-five

graduates (83 percent) reported that they received the

regular/professional certificate, five (12 percent)

reported the provi sional/temporary certificate and two (5 percent) reported the denominational certificate.

The forty-two music teacher education graduates were certified in nine different states as shown in Table 54. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE-DISTRIBUTION OF STATES IN WHICH GRADUATES RECEIVED TEACHING CERTIFICATE

STATE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

South Carolina 8 19 Vi rgi ni a 8 19 Georgia 7 17 Texas 4 10 Maryland 4 10 A1abama 4 10 Tennessee 2 5 New York 2 5 North Carolina 3 7 TOTAL 77 TM

Eight graduates (19 percent) were certified in South Caro­ lina; eight in Virginia (19 percent); seven graduates (17 percent) in Georgia; four graduates (10 percent) in Texas; four graduates (10 percent) in Maryland; four (10 percent) in Alabama; two (5 percent) in Tennessee; two (5 percent) in New York; and three (1 percent) were certified in North

Caroli na. SECTION II -- EMPLOYMENT STATUS

Teaching Experience

In reference to employment status, graduates were asked to report their total number of years of teaching.

Details of responses are given in Tables 55 and 56.

TABLE 55

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGES DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL MONTHS/YEARS GRADUATES TAUGHT

TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHS/ FREQUENCY YEARS OF TEACHING (GRADUATES) PERCENTAGE

3 years 12 29 2 years 11 26 1 year 7 12 4 years 5 17 5 years 2 5 18 months 2 5 6 months 2 5 30 months 1 2 TOTAL *TDÏÏ

*A11 percent amounts in this section have been rounded to the nearest whole numbers, when necessary. FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF YEARS GRADUATES TAUGHT IN PRESENT POSITION

NUMBER OF YEARS IN PRESENT POSITION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

2 years - 15 35.714 1 year 12 28.571 3 years 8 19.048 4 years 3 7.143 5 years 1 2.381 6 months 2 4.762 18 months 1 2.381

Thirty-five graduates (83 percent) reported a total number of years ranging from one to four years; in addition,

three graduates who reported their experience by months

indicated they had taught either one and one-half year or

two and one-half years. Thus, the total percentage of

graduates who have taught within the one to four year

range is almost 93 percent. Two graduates (5 percent)

reported five year's experience the remaining two

graduates (5 percent) reported six months experience.

When asked the total number of years in present

teaching position, the same report was given.

Thirty-eight graduates (93 percent) reported a total

number of years ranging from one to four years; two

graduates (5 percent) reported five years, and the

remaining two graduates reported six months. States/Country Taught In

The forty-two music teacher education graduates

reported that they taught in twelve different states.

Table 57 shows the responses.

TABLE 57

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY BY STATES/COUNTRY IN WHICH GRADUATES TAUGHT

STATE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

South Carolina 8 19.048 Vi rgi ni a 6 14.286 Georgia 6 14.286 Texas 4 9.524 Tennessee 3 7.143 New York 3 7.143 North Carolina 3 7.143 Ohio 3 7.143 Maryland 3 7.143 Kentucky 1 2.381 Alabama 1 2.381 Oregon 1 2.381 212

The breakdown for each of the twelve states is as

follows: South Carolina (eight, 19 percent); Virginia

(six, 14 percent); Georgia (six, 14 percent); Texas (four,

9.5 percent); Tennessee, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Maryland (three graduates each, six percent each);

Kentucky, Alabama and Oregon (one graduates each, two percent each).

All of the music teacher education graduates had taught only in the United States. However, six graduates

(14 percent) indicated under "Comments" that they had served as missionaries in Japan, Middle East, Caribbean, and African countries during their college years. Types of System and Number of Years

Table 58 contains the graduates' responses in regards to the type of school system and the number of years taught.

TABLE 58

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TYPES OF SYSTEMS AND NUMBER OF YEARS

TYPES OF FREQUENCY NUMBER SYSTEM OF GRADUATES OF YEARS

URBAN PRIVATE 9.524 3 2- 1/2 7.143 3 3 7.143 TU 23.810

RURAL PRIVATE

SUBURBAN PRIVATE 1 2.381 1/2 4.762 7 7 m

URBAN PUBLIC 8 1 19.048 5 2 11 .905 1 1- 1/2 2.381 1 5 2.381 1? 35.715

PUBLIC 4 1 9.524

SUBURBAN PUBLIC 6 1 14.286 1 4 2.381 16.667 214

More graduates (ten, 24 percent) taught in Urban private systems than in rural private systems (three,

7 percen t), and more graduates (fifte e n , 36 percent) taught in urban public systems than in rural public system

(four, 10 percent) or in suburuban public (seven, 17 percent). Of these six classes of systems, the most graduates (fifteen, 35.7 percent) taught in Urban Public systems.

The number of years graduates taught in Urban Public and Suburban Public systems ranged from one to five years. While graduates that taught in urban private systems indicated a range from one to three years, graduates who taught in suburban private systems had taught for either one-half or one year. Graduates that taught in rural private and rural public had taught for only one year.

Your Present Position

Table 59 gives the graduates area of their present teaching position. 215

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF GRADUATES' PRESENT POSITION

PRESENT POSITION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Education/General Music Teacher 1 2 Private Voice Teacher 13 31 Private Keyboard Teacher 6 14 Piano Teacher (4) Organ Teacher (2) Private Band/Orchestra Teacher 4 10 Trumpet (3) Flute (1) Private Teacher of Composition 1 2 Teacher in Public Elementary 6 14 Teacher in Public Jr. High/Middle School 5 12 Teacher in Public Secondary School 4 10 Teacher in College 2 5 216

The majority of music teacher education graduates

(twenty-seven, 64 percent) were teachers of voice in level

grade K-12. Ten graduates (24 percent) are either junior

high/middle school vocal teachers (and five, 12 percent)

are high school vocal teachers. Twelve graduates (28

percent) indicated that they were presently employed as a

private teacher of vocal music. Eight graduates (19.0

percent) indicated that they were teachers of instrumental music. Of these e ig h t, two (5 percent) were private elementary instrum ental teach ers, two (5 percent) were ju n io r high/m iddle school teach ers, and four (10 percent) were teachers of general music. Finally, two graduates were college teachers and only one was a private teacher of composition.

Tables 60 and 61 summarize the graduates' responses in reference to the population of towns and schools in which they taught. TABLE 60

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF APPROXIMATE POPULATION OF TOWNS

POPULATION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Less than 1,000 1,000 - 10,000 21 50 10,000 - 19,499 19,500 - 49,999 5 12 50,000 - 199,999 3 7 200,000 - 1,000,000 7 17 1,000,000 - 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 6 14 TOTAL 1ÏÏÏÏ

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF APPROXIMATE ENROLLMENT OF SCHOOLS/COLLEGES (N = 42)

POPULATION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

150 - 499 14 33 500 - 999 17 40 1,000 - 2,200 8 19 2,201 - 4,999 5,000 - 8,999 1 2 9,000 - 10,000 2 5 TOTAL *TM

*A11 percent amounts in this section have been rounded to the nearest whole number, when necessary. 218

The forty-two graduates indicates that they taught in towns and cities of a wide range of populations (1,000 to almost 10 million). Graduates also indicated that the approximate enrollment of the school or college where they worked ranged from one hundred and f if ty to nine thousand five hundred students.

Music Subject Taught

Table 62 shows the area music graduates taught for both "now" and the " p a s t."

TABLE 62

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF MUSIC SUBJECT TAUGHT (N = 42)

MUSIC FREQUENCY SUBJECT NOW 1 PAST PERCENTAGE

1 Elementary Vocal (Private) 12 I l 2 28.571 Elementary Instrumental 2 1 2 4.762 J r . High/Middle - Vocal 10 1 10 23.810 Jr. High/Middle 1 -Instrumental 2 1 2 4.762 High School - Vocal 5 1 5 11 .905 High School 1 - Instrumental 4 1 4 9.524 General Music 4 1 4 9.524 Teacher of Composition 1 (Private) 1 1 1 2.381 Teacher in College 1 - General Music 2 1 2 4.762 219

All of the graduates indicated that their current teaching area is the same as their prior teaching area.

Twenty-six graduates (64 percent) reported that they taught vocal music, K-12; eig h t graduates (14 percent) taught instrumental music. Four graduates (10 percent) taught general music; and one graduate taught

Composition. Two graduates (5 percent) indicated that they taught general music and music education courses at the college level.

SECTION III — ACADEMIC PREPARATION

In Section III of the questionnaire for graduates, respondents were asked to in d icate which courses they had taken at their undergraduate institution and were asked to rate each course on a five-point scale. Table 63 gives the ratings of academic preparation by courses as perceived by the graduates. SUMMARY OF FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE RATINGS OF ACADEMIC PREPARATION BY COURSES AS PERCEIVED BY THE GRADUATES

COURSE WHO TOOK LESS THAN VERY COURSE POOR ADEQUATE ADEQUATE GOOD EXCELLENT

f % f % f % f % f %

Fundamentals of Music 31 74 3 10 5 23 31 Music Theory 42 100 2 5 3 7 3 7 16 18 43 Sight Singing 37 88 3 10 3 10 13 31 11 7 17 Dictation 35 83 5 14 3 9 13 37 12 2 6 Basic Music Hi story 42 100 2 5 3 7 9 21 17 40 11 26 Advanced Music Hi story 29 69 1 4 5 17 3 10 7 24 13 45

MAJOR APPLIED MUSIC Piano 37 88 1 3 2 5 11 30 13 35 10 27 Organ 10 24 - - 2 20 2 20 2 20 4 40 Voice 35 83 3 9 7 20 7 20 18 51 Strings 22 52 2 9 3 14 4 18 6 27 7 32 Woodwi nds 23 55 1 4 5 22 11 48 6 26 Brass 25 60 1 4 5 20 11 44 8 32 Percussion 23 55 1 4 1 4 4 17 11 48 6 26 Guitar 16 38 1 6 2 13 3 19 7 44 3 19 TABLE 63 (Continued)

TOTAL WHO TOOK COURSE ADEQUATE EXCELLENT

f % f % f % f % f % MINOR APPLIED MUSIC Piano Keyboard Harmony 26 62 2 8 8 31 11 42 5 19 Voice 25 60 3 12 3 12 9 36 10 40 Strings 15 36 1 7 1 7 2 13 8 53 3 20 Woodwi nds 18 42 2 11 6 33 7 39 3 17 Brass 18 43 3 17 4 22 7 39 4 22 Percussion 17 40 3 18 3 18 8 47 3 18 Guitar 11 26 1 9 2 18 5 45 3 28

Beginning Conducting 42 100 1 2 5 12 6 14 15 36 15 36 Advanced Conducting 26 62 1 4 4 15 3 12 8 31 10 38 , Large Ensemble 36 86 1 3 1 3 6 17 12 33 16 44 Small Ensemble 32 76 2 6 1 3 3 9 14 44 12 38

GENERAL MUSIC Music & Worship 17 40 1 6 . -- 5 29 6 35 5 29 Afro-American Music 19 45 1 5 2 11 8 42 7 37 1 5 TABLE 63 (Continued)

TOTAL WHO TOOK LESS THAN VERY COURSE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE GQOD

f % f % f % f % f % f %

Qpera Workshop 11 26 2 18 2 18 2 18 5 45 Vocal Diction 20 48 1 5 2 10 3 15 7 35 7 35 Music Appreciation 21 50 --- - 6 29 2 29 9 43 MUSIC LITERATURE Piano Literature 18 43 1 6 633 633 5 28 Vocal-Choral Literature 19 45 1 5 3 16 4 21 6 32 5 26 String Literature 9 2 1 11 5 56 1 11 2 22 Woodwind Li terature 10 24 1 10 1 10 6 60 2 20 __ Brass Literature 10 24 1 10 1 10 3 30 2 20 3 30 Percussion Literature 9 21 1 11 1 11 7 78 Vocal Pedagogy 14 33 2 14 4 29 5 36 3 21 Instrumental Pedagogy 15 36 2 13 -- 4 27 5 33 4 27

Counterpoint 37 88 10 27 1 . 3 11 30 13 35 2 5 Composition 29 69 6 21 2 7 7 24 12 41 2 7 Advanced Theory 29 69 1 4 2 7 10 34 14 48 2 7 TABLE 63 (Continued)

RATING TOTAL WHO TOOK LESS THAN VERY COURSE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE GOQD

f % f % f % f %■ f % f %

MUSIC EDUCATION METHODS Intro, to Music Teaching 35 83 2 6 3 9 18 51 12 34 El ementary General 28 67 1 4 1 4 3 11 12 43 11 40 El ementary Instrumental 17 40 1 5.5 __ 1 5.5 12 71 3 18 Junior High/ Middle School Instrumental 17 40 14 82 3 18 Junior High/ Middle School Vocal 16 38 2 12.5 12 75 2 12. Secondary Vocal - Choral 21 50 ___ 2 10 16 76 3 14 Secondary Instrumental 17 40 _ 2 12 10 59 5 29 General Music 31 71 7 23 14 33 9 30 Pre-Student Teaching 32 77 __ 1 3 3 9 9 28 19 59 TABLE 63 (Continued)

RATING TOTAL WHO TOOK LESS THAN VERY COURSE POOR ADEQUATE ADEQUATE GOOD

f % f % f % f %

STUDENT TEACHING Elementary General Instrumental 14 33 1 7 8 57 5 36 Secondary General Choral 22 53 ---- 4 18 11 50 7 32

RECITAL Junior Recital 13 31 1 7, 4 31 7 54 1 7. Senior Recital 40 95 -- 2 5 3 7.5 23 58 12 30 ADVISING Education Advisor 42 100 6 14 5 12 6 14 13 31 12 29 Music Advisor 42 100 6 14 5 12 3 7 8 19 21 50 Recital Attendance 23 55 1 4 2 9 8 19 9 39 3 13

SEMINAR IN EDUCATION Study Skills 17 40 1 6 7 41 7 41 2 12 Nat'1 Teacher Workshop 13 31 1 8 __ 3 23 7 54 2 15 Upward Bound Special Services TABLE 63 (Continued)

RATING TOTAL WHO TOOK LESS THAN VERY COURSE POOR ADEQUATE ADEQUATE GOOD EXCELLENT

f % f %

Test-Taking Skills Strategies Developing Teaching Competencies 14 9 64 Accompanying Laboratory 1 12.5 12.5 6 76 226

Comments categorized as "other" in reference to music theory, from the twenty program d ire c to rs revealed th at students were advised to take or not to take the course.

Fundamentals of Music, before taking the required course in Music Theory. Thirty-one (74 percent) of the forty-two graduates indicated they took Fundamentals of Music; only eleven (26 percent) did not take such a course. Of the thirty-one graduates who did take the course, ninety percent (28 of 31) of the graduates rated th e ir

Fundamentals of Music course as "very good" or

"exellent." All forty-two graduates indicated that they took Music Theory. Ratings of the Music Theory course revealed th at eighty-one percent (34 of 42) rated th is course as "very good" or "ex cellen t," while only twelve percent (5 of 42) rated i t "below adequate."

Forty-three percent (18 of 37) of the graduates rated

Sight Singing as "very good" or "excellent," while only fourteen percent (6 of 37) rated i t "below adequate."

Forty percent (14 of 35) of the graduates rated Dictation as "very good" or "excellent," while only twenty-three percent (8 of 35) rated i t "below adequate."

In the area of music history, graduates rated advanced music history higher than basic music h isto ry . Whereas all graduates took basic music history, only 69 percent

(29) of the forty-tw o graduates took Advanced Music 227

History. While twelve percent of the graduates rated

Basic Music History "below adequate," twenty-one percent rated Advanced Music History "below adequate."

Of all the courses offered in the area of major applied music, the graduates indicated that they took piano and voice more than any other course. It was in te re s tin g to note th a t brass (76 p ercen t), woodwinds and percussion (74 percent) courses received the highest

"above adequate" ratings of all courses in this area.

Voice received the highest "above adequate" rating (71 percent) followed by piano (62 percent). Courses that received the lowest "below adequate" rating in the area of major applied music were strin g s (23 p ercen t), organ (20 percent) and g u ita r (19 percent).

In the area of minor applied music, more graduates took piano (62 percent) and voice (60 percent) than any of the orchestral instruments or guitar. The three highest rated "above adequate" courses were voice (76 percent), percussion (65 percent) and piano (62 p ercen t). Courses in this area that received the lowest "below adequate" ratin g were percussion (18 p ercen t), brass (17 percent) and s trin g s (13 p ercent).

While all forty-tw o graduates took the course beginning conducting, only twenty-six (62 percent) of the forty-two graduates took the course advanced conducting.

Seventy-one percent (30 of 42) of the graduates rated 228

beginning conducting as "very good" or "ex cellen t," and

fourteen percent (6 of 42) rated it "below adequate."

Sixty-two percent (18 of 26) of the graduates rated

advanced conducting as "very good" or "excellent," while, only nineteen percent (5 of 26) rated i t "below adequate."

More graduates took large ensemble (36 or 86 percent) than small ensemble (32 or 76 percent). Eighty-one percent of the graduates rated small ensemble, as "very good" or "excellent" while seventy-eight percent of the graduates rated large ensemble as "very good" or

"excellent." Whereas six percent rated large ensemble

"below adequate," nine percent rated small ensemble "below ad eq u ate."

In the area of general music, the three most frequently taken courses were music appreciation (50 percent), vocal dictio n (48 percent) and Afro-American music (45 percent). The three courses were also rated by the graduates with the highest "above adequate" ratings; music appreciation (72 p ercent), vocal diction (70 percent) and music worship (65 percent). The three courses that received the lowest "below adequate" ratings were: opera workshop (18 percent), Afro-American music

(16 percent) and vocal dictio n (15 percent).

Table 63 shows th a t vocal-choral l it e r a t u r e (45 percent) and piano l it e r a t u r e (43 percent) were the two 229 most frequently taken courses by graduates in the area of music literature. Graduates rated percussion literature

(78 percent) with the highest "above adequate" rating.

Piano literature received the second highest "above adequate" rating (61 percent) followed by instrumental pedagogy (57 percent).

Courses in the area of music education methods received one of the highest "above adequate" ratings of all the areas under “academic preparation." Each methods course was rated "above average" with a rating of seventy-seven percent or above.

An analysis of course ratings under the area of student teaching revealed this area to have received the highest "above adequate" rating of all courses under

"academic preparation." The graduates "above adequate" ratings of student teaching courses ranged from eighty-two to ninety-three percent. Only one course in the area of student teaching was rated "below adequate."

While ninety-five percent of the graduates indicated that they took a course in senior recital ; only thirty-one percent indicated that they took a course in the area of junior recital. Eighty-three percent of the graduates who took senior recital rated it "above adquate." The graduates who took junior recital gave it a rating ("below adequate") below the rating for the senior recital. 230

All forty-two graduates indicated that they had an

advisor in education as well as an advisor in music.

While sixty-nine percent of the graduates rated their

music advisor as "above adequate," sixty percent rated

t h e ir education advisor as "above adequate." Both music

and education advisors received the "below adequate"

ratings from twenty-six percent of the graduates.

In the area of Seminar in Education most graduates

indicated they took these three courses: study skills,

developing teaching competencies and test-taking skills.

The two courses that received the highest "above adequate"

ratin g from most graduates were developing teaching competencies (79 percent) and accompanying laboratory (75 p e rc e n t).

SECTION IV - OPEN-END QUESTIONS

Sections I, II and III of the Music Teacher Education

Graduates' Questionnaire sought objective responses of formal ratings; however. Section IV containing open-ended questions sought more subjective responses. The responses to Section IV enabled the researcher to answer Objectives

II and I II . OBJECTIVE II

To identify relative strengths and weaknesses of music teacher education programs and music programs as perceived by their graduates.

OBJECTIVE III

To provide data for recommendations to be used in program evaluation as an aid to curriculum revision.

The findings have been organized in accordance with the structure of the instrument. Five questions were asked regarding the strengths and weaknesses of their college music teacher preparation and recommendations for program evaluation and curricula revision.

Greatest Strengths

Regarding the question, "What were the greatest strengths of your college preparation for the job you now hold (or your most recent teaching position)?, the forty-two graduates provided a variety of responses.

Table 64 shows a rank order frequency and percentage of strengths, from high to low, as reported by the graduates. TABLE 64

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF GREATEST STRENGTHS IN COLLEGE PREPARATION AS PERCEIVED BY THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATES (N = 42)

GREATEST STRENGTHS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Music Theory Courses 11 26 Applied Music - Primary Medium 10 24 Student Teaching 9 21 Individualized Instruction 7 17 Human Relations 7 17 Education Methods Courses 6 14 Music A ppreciation Course 6 14 Commitment of Faculty 4 10 Psychology Courses 3 7 Academic Advising - Double Major 3 7 Ensemble P a rtic ip a tio n 3 7 Problem Solving 1 2 Good Study and Research S k ills 1 2 Pre-Student Teaching Experi ences 1 2 Faculty Support and Encouragement 1 2

Greatest Deficiencies

When asked, "What were the greatest deficiencies in your college preparation for the job you now hold?", the forty-two graduates again gave a variety of responses. 233

Table 65 gives a rank order frequency and percentage of d eficien cies from high to low, as reported by the graduates.

TABLE 65

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF GREATEST DEFICIENCIES IN COLLEGE PREPARATION AS PERCEIVED BY THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATES (N = 42)

GREATEST DEFICIENCIES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Lacking Skills in Applied Secondary Medium 16 38 Lacking Hands-on P ractical Meaningful Experience (Methods o u t-of-date) 15 36 Schools Lacking Proper Equipment/ Instruments and Facilities Due to Lack of Money 12 29 Lack of In stru ctio n in Music for Exceptional Child 11 27 Lacking Listening S k ills and Literature for Elementary Students (Appreciation, Music History) 27 Failed to Apply Self 12 Lack of Pre-Student Teaching Experience Test and Measurement, Evaluative Skills Career Placement Sightsinging Teaching/Learning Process Behavior Modification; Motivation How Realistically

Table 66 briefly presents the explanations of the graduates' responses to the question, "How realistically did the music courses you took in college anticipate real working situ a tio n s and problems you have faced in your work?" TABLE 66

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF HOW REALISTICALLY MUSIC COURSES ANTICIPATED REAL WORKING SITUATIONS AND PROBLEMS FACED IN WORK (N = 42)

EXPLANATION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

VERY REALISTICALLY

Teacher-Student Relationship & Human Relations 35 83 Methodology 34 81 Develop Good Musicianship (Theory, Primary Medium) 31 74 Advising-Double Major-Music Education & Elementary Education 29 69 Sightsinging & Ear Training 18 40 Student Teaching 12 29

NOT REALISTICALLY

Lacking Meaningful Practical Experience (Methodology) 10 24 Hands-on Meaningful Experience 7 17 Failed to Keep Up with the Times (out-of-date) 7 17 Lacked Conducting Experiences 14 Lacked Keyboard/Choral Experi ences 14 Identifying & Solving D iscipline Problems 4 10 M otivation and the Learning Process 5 Counseling Skills 1 2

ADEQUATELY/FAIRLY PREPARED

Overall All Classes & Experience Were Adequate 1 2 236

Seven graduates responded "not realistically."

Thirty-four of the forty-two graduates (81 percent)

responded, "very r e a l is t ic a l ly ; " and one graduate (two

percent) responded, "adequately."

Suggested Improvements

In reference to the question, "How do you think your graduating institution should improve its program in such areas as: music courses, experience, preparation for teaching and so on?", the forty-tw o graduates responded as shown in Table 67. This Table provides a rank order of frequency and percentage of suggested improvements for th e ir Music Teacher Education Program as perceived by the

Graduates. TABLE 67

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE OF SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THEIR MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM AS PERCEIVED BY THE GRADUATES (N = 42)

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENT FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Provide more performance opportunities for applied music students ; A compre­ hensive approach to the study of applied music (Both vocal & instrumental students study both voice & instruments) 15 36

Provide more p rac tic a l and varied experiences in con­ ducting, o rch e stra tio n and choral keyboard experience for actual real teaching situations 11 26

The music curriculum should include more m eaningful, v aried, broad and p ractical listening experiences and skills development 11 26

Identify and address current issues - thus aiding students in passing the National Teacher Examination 8 19

Provide more pre-stu d en t teaching experiences; extend student teaching from one term to a longer period and provide more p r a c t ic a l , intense varied experiences, also more meaning­ ful feedback and evaluation 7 17 TABLE 67 (C o n tin u e d )

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

B etter F a c ilitie s - gain more monies for improvement and over­ all maintenance of equipment and instruments 6 14

More student participation in curriculum planning, develop­ ment and evaluation; more representation from the i n s t it u t io n 's community; better school/community relationships 5 12

More varied and broad music teacher education approaches and methods; a broader, meaningful and relevant literature repertoire appro­ p riate for both public and private schoolchildren 5 12

Provide and require more Music History and Music L iteratu re courses 4 10

Music faculty should develop closer ties with prominent music educators, musicians, professional schools of higher learning; provide more opportunities to aid talented graduates 4 10

Provide more Workshops and seminars addressing current problems and issues 3 7

Provide more rela te d a rts experiences 1 2 239

TABLE 67 (Continued)

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Restudy the music theory curriculum; provide for a variety of different learning styles 1 2

Important Areas to Be Offered

Thirty-nine (93 percent) of the forty-two graduates

responded to the question, "What music areas do you think would have been important but were not offered?" Twenty- one important areas were suggested by the graduates. Table

68 provides a rank order frequency and percentage of the twenty-one suggested important areas to be offered as perceived by the graduates. TABLE 68

RANK ORDER FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE OFFERED AS PERCEIVED BY THE GRADUATES (N = 40)

IMPORTANT AREAS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Music for the Handicapped 13 33 Music L iteratu re as Separate Courses 12 31 A Course Dealing with Politics and Music Education 11 29 Church Music as a Major 9 23 Adequate Follow-up of Graduates 8 21 More Methods and L iteratu re Classes 8 21 Invite Guest Clinicians in Music Education 5 13 Sight Singing and Ear Training as Separate Courses 5 13 Pedagogy 4 10 How to Build a New Program from Ground Up 4 10 Career Placement 3 8 Laser Music, Electronic Music, and 20th Century Music 3 8 Related Arts Courses 2 5 Marching Band 2 5 Composition Course 1 3 Instrument Repair and Tuning 1 3 Music Industry/B usiness 1 3 Computer L iterary - Music 1 3 Afro-American Music 1 3 Arrangi ng 1 3 American Music 1 3 CHAPTER V

SUMMARY. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

This chapter presents a summary of the research problem, objectives, procedures, and findings.

Conclusions based on the research and the findings and recommendations for further study are also presented in this chapter.

Background of the Problem

A major concern of teacher educations programs is to ensure th at graduates w ill become capable and e ffe c tiv e teachers. Therefore, a critical issue in an evaluation system is to determine what factors contribute to the later relative success or failure of teachers.

Course work and course sequence are c e rta in ly primary factors, but it is uncertain what effect general music and professional courses have on the actual performance of music teachers, and whether these effects lead to the outcomes which the courses were designed to produce. It is also uncertain whether the selection of courses is

241 242

based on reliable evidence as to what is necessary to be a

successful music teacher or is based mainly on professional

tradition of what students should have. Apparently,

except for the course, student teaching, little is known

about how each course in the music education curriculum

contributes to success in teaching.

Because teaching effectiveness depends immensely on

the quality of teacher education programs, there is an

urgent and vital need for the development of ways to measure the preparedness of teachers in the "real" world

of teaching. Thus, data on the preparedness of practicing

teachers in a critical element for developing a sound

basis for appraising and adapting programs of teacher education.

Nowhere is th is need more c ri t ic a l than in our Black colleges and universities. Black colleges and universi­ ties, in a racially-conscious society, have served their constituency by providing education in the mainstream of i nstituti ons.

Statement of the Problem

It was the intent of this study to focus on teacher education curricula in one area - music teacher prepara­ tion - and to specifically relate the study to the music - 243 teacher education programs of selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities in the United States.

In our multi-cultural/multi-racial society. Black private colleges and universities have earned a reputation for c re d ib ility and have been, and will continue to be, and important factor in the development of qualified Black educators. To this point, however, there is a lack of empirical research about the effectiveness of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities music teacher education programs.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to survey and evaluate the music teacher education program of selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities in the

United States.

The research design used in this study was an analytic-descriptive survey. The chief method of data collection used was two different questionnaire forms, one for SABP colleges and u n iv e rs itie s Music Teacher Education

Program D irectors and the other for SABP Colleges and 244

Universities Music Teacher Education Graduates front the years of 1979 through 1983. The primary format of these

instruments was that of a checklist type. Other methods of data collection included interviews of graduates and

Music Teacher Education Program Directors via telephone and review of college catalogs and curriculum listing for verification of collected data.

Population

Responses from the forty-three college presidents identified a total of twenty-three music teacher education programs. One of the twenty-three music teacher education programs was ineligible for this study due to a current on-going internal evaluation study. Two music teacher education program directors did not return the question­ naire. Thus, twenty music teacher education program directors participated in this study.

From the survey of the twenty program directors, a list of seventy-five graduates was gathered. Because of ineli­ gibility criteria and non-response, this list of seventy- five graduates was eventually pared to forty-two graduates who became the population of the music education participants of this study. The Program Director's Questionnaire

The purpose of the questionnaire sent to the SABP Colleges

and Universities Music Teacher Education Program Directors was to generate data concerning specific elements of music

teacher education programs at the selected institutions.

This questionnaire was developed by the researcher and is

divided into five sections:

Section I - Institutional Information

Section II - Teacher Education Program

Section III - Music Teacher Education

Curriculum

Section IV - List of Graduates

Section V - Respondent Information

The purpose of each section was :

Section I sought information about the type of institution, organizational structure, degree offerings, composi­ tion of the music teacher education faculty, criteria for admission to the music program, and identification of student chapters of professional organizations.

Section II was designed to survey elements of the teacher education program, specifically: organization, governance and requirements for admission, retention, and student teaching of the teacher education component of which the music teacher education unit is generally a part.

Section III sought specific data on individualcourses and areas of the music curriculum including requirements for graduation.

Section IV asked for a list of graduates, in the period of 1979/80 through 1983/84 and their mailing address. It also requested each graduate's major concentration.

Section V asked for the name and title of the respondent, provided a space for general comments, if any, and asked whether the respondent would like a copy of the results of the study. As a stimulus to return the form quickly, the questionnaire concludes with a specific date by which it should be returned to the researcher at her specific address.

The questionnaire for the Music Teacher Education

Program Directors, in its final form, asked fifty-two item questions and comprised eleven typewritten pages.

The Music Graduates Questionnaire

The questionnaire for the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities music teacher education graduates was a modification of a questionnaire used by

The Ohio State University music education faculty for its music graduates. This modified questionnaire was comprised of four parts:

Part I - Factual Information Part II - Employment Status Part III - Academic Preparation Part IV - Open Ended Questions 247

The purposes of each section was:

Part I sought factual information such as degrees obtained, major area(s) of study, and teaching certificates.

Part II solicited data concerning employment status and teaching experience.

Part III asked the graduates to eval­ uate how well they thought their graduating institution prepared them in general areas of music education study. The measurement for this part sought to obtain a series of responses each within a six-point scale of excellent to poor, and did not take.

Part IV provided open-ended questions designed to elicit information on perceived strengths and weakenesses in the respondents' college preparation for the jobs they now hold.

In its final form this questionnaire asked forty item questions and comprised six typewritten pages.

DATA ANALYSIS

Each completed questionnaire form was subjected to analysis after examination for accuracy and completeness.

Ambiguous responses were clarified and missing data were obtained by contacting the respondents by telephone when necessary. All questions on both questionnaires were renumbered for the coding process. All open-ended ques­ tions and comments were categorized into groups and coded. After the data were coded, it was keypunched onto 248

cards and analyzed by means of the Statistical Analysis

System (SAS) available at the Instruction and Research

Computer Center at the Ohio State University. The SAS

computer analyses resulted in the computation of descrip­

tive statistics, including frequency distribution and

percentages. From these, the number of responses to each part of each question determined the tables of the results constructed. As a result of the information collected

from the questionnaires and from other background research, the investigator analyzed relationships among and between responses as a means to provide descriptive data leading to specific recommendations pertaining to the programs studied.

Findings of the Study

The findings of this study were relevant to the research questions developed to organize the research planning and data gathering. The research questions are listed below.

1. What are the general and specific characteristics of the music teacher education programs of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and uni versi ties?

2. What are some general categorizable characteristics of the employment status of graduates of these selected, accredited Black music private colleges and universities music teacher educa­ tion programs?

3. What music teacher education degrees and major areas are offered, and by which selected, accredited Black private college(s) and/or universities offering music teacher education program?

4. What are the major areas of the music teacher education curriculum and required hours for graduation at each selected institution offering music teacher education program?

5. To what extent do the graduates believe that they had received help from their advisors?

6. To what degree do the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities graduates think that their graduating institution prepared them to teach effectively?

7. What competencies do the selected, accredited black private colleges and universities graduates think are needed for their present position?

The research questions were generated on the basis of the three objectives of this study. The three objectives were:

to survey specific elements of the music teacher education programs of the selected, accredited Black private colleges and universities.

to delineate the strengths and weaknesses of music teacher programs and music programs as perceived by graduates.

to accumulate data for developing recommendations to be used in program evaluation as an aid to curriculum revision. 250

All data gathered and analyzed are presented in detail

in Chapter Four. Findings relative to objective one

reveal a number of characteristics about the institutions

involved in this survey. These characteristics include

geographic location, size, affiliation, faculty informa­

tion, teacher education program information, music educa­

tion program information, admission and retention require­ ments, number of credit hours offered in specific music

and music education courses.

Generally, the twenty institutions that participated

in this study were small, private, church affiliated

institutions located in eight southern states.

Nearly all of the twenty institutions have open door admissions policy for general college entrance; however,

practically all of these colleges had specified admission

requirements for entrance into both the teacher education and music teacher education programs. Such requirements included: interviews, commendable recommendations, test scores, successful completion of core foundations of academic courses, a required GPA (in many cases higher than the general college admissions required GPA), music jury auditions and demonstrated proficiencies in: hearing, speech, and communication skills, also medical/ health clearance, diagnosis testing, and written application into the teacher education program. 251

In reference to who makes the decisions concerning the music teacher education curricula, it appears that most decisions were made by a single person/group rather than by two or more groups or single combinations.

There was a wide range of music and music education courses among the various schools, although course range within individual schools was much more limited.

According to the twenty directors in regard to course offerings, the following tendencies prevailed:

Only one course was offered in the area of student teaching.

Basically only one methods course was offered at the elementary level and only one course at the secondary level.

Nearly all of the colleges combined music theory, sightsinging, and ear training as one course.

Music history and music literature were most often combined into one course.

More course offerings and major areas of applied music medium were available in voice and piano rather than in band instruments. Seldomly were courses available in the area of strings. This was also the case in reference to available credit hours for the above mentioned areas.

More course offerings and credit hours were both available and required in the areas of basic music core courses than in courses such as: - advanced conducting - advanced music history - advanced theory courses - composition and counterpoint Ensemble participation was required in nearly all institutions; however, academic credit was optional.

Most colleges required jury examination for each academic term yet although credit may or may not have been available.

Nearly all twenty colleges required recital - seminar attendance without offering academic credit toward graduation.

Findings in relation to objective two came from the responses of the forty-two music education graduates surveyed and indicate the opinions of the graduates as to the strengths and weaknesses of a number of aspects of their music teacher training. Generally, in terms of ratings of their specific music education courses, a majority of the respondents rated their individual courses as adequate or better in almost all cases. In fact, a majority of the courses were rated at least very good by more than half of the respondents.

Findings related to objective three were derived from a study and analysis of all the data collected in the responses from the twenty music education directors and from the forty-two music teacher education graduates.

Especially useful in this regard are the graduates' comments in response to the open-ended questions on the final part of their questionnaire. Five open-ended ques­ tions were asked about the strengths and weaknesses of the individual graduates' formal education preparation for 253

their teaching jobs ; how realistically did the individual programs anticipate real working situations and problems; and what improvements would the graduates suggest for their music teacher education program.

Fifteen strengths were noted by the various graduates. The most frequently mentioned strengths were music theory courses, applied music primary medium and student teaching, with over twenty percent mentioning each of these.

Eleven weaknesses were noted. The two most frequently mentioned (by over 35 percent each) were the lack of training in skills in an applied secondary medium and a lack of practical experiences.

Six different program aspects were noted by the grad­ uates as very realistically anticipating actual teaching situations. Eight different programs aspects were noted as not realistically anticipating actual teaching situations. A much higher frequency noted "very realistically" compared to "not realistically", over the range of program aspects.

Thirteen improvement suggestions were offered by the graduates. The most frequently mentioned (by 36 percent) concerned the need to improve in the area of applied music. The four most frequently suggested improvements, reported by the graduates, were : 1) more performance opportunities (36 percent)

2) more practical and varied experiences in conducting and vocal-choral/keyboard experiences (26 percent)

3) More meaningful, varied, broad and practical listening experiences and skill development (26 percent)

4) Better identification and addressing current issues thus aiding students in passing the National Teachers' Examination (19 percent).

Finally, twenty-one different areas of training were noted as important for music teaching training. The most frequently noted were music for the handicapped (33 percent) and music literature as a separate course (31 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

The data generated and findings of this study are the basis for the following conclusions.

1. The responses by the twenty music education

directors provide a wealth of information

about the music education program of small

Black private colleges of the southern United

States. 255

The twenty small Black private institutions that participated in this study train music teacher education students who graduate to teach in a wide variety of school environ­ ments .

Most of the twenty participating institu­ tions are limited in their music education programs by financial constraints. As a result, music education faculties are small, and curriculum offerings are lacking in various areas of study.

Music teacher education graduates of the participating institutions have generally positive perceptions of their undergraduate training, but identify specific weaknesses and areas where improvement is needed.

In relation to graduates' ratings of specific courses, the data are inconclusive in some instances because only a small percentage of the forty-two respondents took some of the individual courses.

Some of the SABP colleges and universities need to update their record of current addresses of their graduates in order to facilitate further evaluations. 256

Even though the selected, accredited Black

private colleges and universities have a

creditable reputation for guiding students

through careers, due to recent certification

and testing rquirements, graduates are having

difficulty in meeting test score requirements.

RECOMMENDATION FOR FURTHER USE OF THE DATA AND FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Music education directors, music education

curriculum committees, and related faculty and

administrators from the twenty participant

schools as well as from similar schools should

study the data of this investigation as a source

of survey data, as a source of comparison of

individual programs, and as a source of

evaluative feedback from graduates.

With this study as a basis of identification of

weaknesses and suggested improvements, further

information should be solicited by other

researchers to better specify graduates' percep­

tions so they may be related to specific changes

in curriculum and teaching methodology.

Studies should be conducted of similar purpose

and design but of different types of 257 institutions. This would permit a broader population with which to compare the data of this study.

Greater effort should be made by appropriate college officials in developing systematic means of soliciting, on a regular basis, evaluative program information from music education grad­ uates currently teaching. This evaluative data should in turn be used to monitor programs and make changes when necessary and feasible.

A special interest support group of SABP colleges and universities music teacher education program directors, faculty and administrators should be established to address the current issues and needs of Black teachers and Black higher education institutions in the United States.

Legislative support should focus with special interest on the development and/or improvement of all aspects of Black teacher education training programs.

National teacher certification requirements should reflect the curriculum provided in training institutions. Furthermore, criteria must be designed to develop a multi-culturally/ multi-racial, diverse, talented body of teachers. 258

8. Attention and funds should be allocated at

initial planning for continuous ongoing

review/evaluation and possible reorganization of

curricular and intra-i nstitutional communication

and support system for the music teacher

education directors, programs and institutions. APPENDIX A: IDENTIFICATION

Jane Ellen McAllister

Table 1. Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities Graduates Who Became Musical Performers

Table 2. Distinguished Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities Graduates

Table 3. Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities Catalogs

Table 4. Selected, Accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities by State

Figure 1. Geographic Outline of Selected Accredited Black Private Institutions JANE ELLEN MCALLISTER: PIONEER FOR EXCELLENCE

IN TEACHER EDUCATION

Jane Ellen McAllister, according to Wi11iams-Burns

(1982) graduated from Talladega College [one of the SABP

colleges] in 1919 with a bachelor of arts degree. In June

1921, she became a member of the first class to be awarded

the master's degree by the University of Michigan. In

1928, McAllister completed requirements for the doctorate degree at Columbia University's Teachers College; however, because of lack of funds her dissertation, "The Training of Negro teachers in Louisiana", was not published until

1929.

Dr. McAllister's career was spent in the historically

Black colleges. Wil1iams-Burns (1982) further stated that

Dr. McAllister became professor of education at Fisk

University [one of the SABP Universities] in September,

1928 after having completed the doctoral program. In

September, 1929, she became head of the Department of

Education at Fisk University, the first Black woman to fill this position. Also, in 1930, Fisk became the first

Black college to be accredited as "class A" by the

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) of which McAllister was an important reason for the 261

accreditation. Moreover, in 1937, at the joint request of

the Louisiana Negro Normal and Industrial Institute (Now

Grambling State Department of Education. She accepted the

invitation to direct and revise the teacher training

program at Grambling.

Obviously, Jane Ellen McAllister's impact on teacher

education has been substantial. Though her career was

spent in Historically Black Colleges and Universities, she

effected changes far beyond those campuses. As an

academician, she overcame obstacles that were racial, and

sometimes, sexist. Not aggressive in seeking personal

honors. Dr. McAllister has not been recognized widely.

She is and has been an exemplar of excellence and inspira­

tion and a prototypical role model. Dr. McAllister's

contributions are significant in the history of the

continuing quest for good schools on the part of Black

Americans.

William-Burns, Winona, Jane Ellen McAllister; Pioneer for Excellence in Teacher Education, Journal of Negro Education, 1982, 51, (3), 342-357. TABLE 1

SABPC&U GRADUATES WHO BECAME MUSICAL PERFORMERS

UNDERGRADUATE NAME AREA INSTITUTION DEGREE/YEAR

Dobbs, Concert/opera singer Spellman College B.A., 1946 Mattiwilda

*D[orothy] Opera/concert singer Xavier University Antioinette Hayes, Concert singer Fisk University [1905-c 1910] Roland

Matthews, Concert singer Fisk University B.A. 1926 Edward

Robinson, Opera/concert singer Bennett College B.S. n.d. Faye

Wyatt, Concert accompanist Xavier University B.A. 1947 Kelley

ADAPTED FROM: Southern, Eileen, Biographical Dictionary of Afro-American and African Musicians. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982 TABLE 2

DISTINGUISHED SABPC&U MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

DEGREE NAME______AREA/SPECIALTY INSTITUTION______YEAR

Blanton, Carol College Prof./ Spelman College B.A. 1933 Concert Pianist

Boyer Horace College Professor Bethune-Cookman B.A. 1957 College

Brown, John H. Composer/Col lege Fisk University B.A. 1923 Professor

Campbell, Lucie E. Gospel Songwriter/ Rust College B.A. n.d. Educator

Clark, Edgar R. Music Educator Clark College B.A. 1935

*Dawson, William L. Composer/College Tuskegee 1914-1923 Professor Institute

Debose, Tourgee College Prof./ Fisk University B.A. 1913 Concert Pianist

Fuller, Oscar A. College Music Bishop College B.Mus.1924 Professor

Hall, Frederick A. .College Professor ; Mprehouse College B.A. 1921

Harris, Carol G., Jr. College Professor Philander Smith B.A. 1956 College

James, Willis L. College Music Morehouse College B.A. 1923 Educator

John, Altona Trent College Music Atlanta University B.A. n.d. Educator

*Jones, Mildred B. Educator Fisk University n.d. TABLE 2

DISTINGUISHED SABPC&U MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

DEGREE NAME AREA/SPECIALTY INSTITUTION YEAR

Kennedy, Ann G. College Professor Fisk University B.A. 1941

Kennedy, Matthew W. College Music Fisk University B.A. 1946 Educator

Lawson, Warner Choral Conductor/ Fisk University B.A. 1926 Professor

McLin, Lena J. Educator/Choral Spelman College B.A. 1951 Conductor

Moore, Undine S. Composer Fisk University B.A., B.Mus. n.d.

Pittman, Evelyn L. Music Educator/ Spelman College B.A. 1933 Composer

*Pittman, Portia Music Educator Tuskegee Institute

Roach, Hildred College Prof./ Fisk University B.A. 1957 Pianist

Standifer, James University Professor Fisk University B.A. 1957

Tibbs, Roy W. College Professor Fisk University B.Mus,.1931

Tills, Frederick C. Composer/College Wiley College B.A. 1949 Professor

Van Buren, Catherine Singer/Col lege Fisk University B.A. 1931 Professor

*Watts, Nellie Impresario/Pulib Atlanta University n.d. Sch. Teach.

Whalum, Wendell P. College Music Morehouse College B.A. 1952 Educator TABLE 2

DISTINGUISHED SABPC&U MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

DEGREE NAME AREA/SPECIALTY INSTITUTION YEAR

♦Whitman Sisters, The Vaudeville Troupe Morris Brown Company

♦Work, Frederick J. Folklorist/Music Fisk University Educator

Work, John W. II Composer/College Fisk University B.A. 1895 Professor

Work, John W. Ill Composer/Col lege Fisk University B.A. 1923 Professor

' UNCF ATTENDEE — Receive music training only.

ADAPTED FROM: Southern, Eileen, Biographical Dictionary of Afro-Ameri­ can and African Musicians. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982. TABLE 3

SABP COLLEGE CATALOGS

NAME OF CATALOG

Barber-Scotia College General Information Catalog 1979-1981 Benedict College Catalogue ...... 1981-1984 Bennett College Opening New Doors in Women's E d u catio n ...... 1981 Bethune-Cookman College C a t a l o g ...... 1983-1985 Bishop College Catalogue ...... 1 982-1 984 Claflin College C a t a l o g ...... 1981-1982 General C atalog...... 1 982-1 984 Fisk University B u lle tin ...... 1981 Florida Memorial College Catalogue ...... 1981-1983 Huston-Ti 11 otson College B u l l e t i n ...... 1981-1983 Interdenominational Theological Center Catalog . .1982-1983 Jarvis Christian College Catalog...... 1982-1 983 Johnson C. Smith University C a t a l o g ...... 1981-1983 Knoxville College C a t a l o g...... 1976-1978 Lane College General Information Bulletin . . . .1971-1972 LeMoyne-Owen College Catalog ...... 1980-1982 Livingston College C atalog...... 1980-1 982 Miles College B u lle tin ...... 1982-1984 Morris College C atalog...... 1 982-1 983 Oakwood College B u lle tin ...... 1982-1 984 Paine College C a t a l o g ...... 1 983-1 985 Paul Quinn College B u l l e t i n ...... 1981 -1983 Philander Smith College C a t a l o g ...... 1 982-1 984 Rust College General C atalog ...... 1981-1983 Saint Augustine's College Bulletin ...... 1982 Saint Paul's College Bulletin ...... 1981-1983 TABLE 3 CONTINUED

Shaw University B u lletin ...... 1981-1 983 Spelman College B u lle tin ...... 1981-1983 Talladega College C a t a lo g ...... 1983-1 985 Tougaloo College C atalog ...... 1982-1984 Tuskegee Institute General Information Catalog . .1976-1978 Virginia Union University C a t a lo g ...... 1982-1 984 Voorhees College C atalog...... 1981-1983 Wiley College General C a t a l o g ...... 1982-1 984

The Ohio State University Office of Minority Affairs SELECTED ACCREDITED BLACK PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

YEAR FOUNDED

ALABAMA MILES COLLEGE - BIRMINGHAM 1905 OAKWOOD COLLEGE - HUNTSVILLE 1896 STILLMAN COLLEGE - TUSCALOOSA 1876 TALLADEGA COLLEGE - TALLEDEGA 1867 TUSKEGEE INSTITUTE - TUSKEGEE INSTITUTE 1881

ARKANSAS FITTlander smith college LITTLE ROCK

FLORIDA BETHUNE-COOKMAN COLLEGE - DAYTONA BEACH 1904 EDWARD WATERS COLLEGE - JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA MEMORIAL COLLEGE - MIAMI 1892

GEORGIA ATLANTA UNIVERSITY - ATLANTA 1865 CLARK COLLEGE - ATLANTA 1869 INTERDENOMINATIONAL THEOLOGICAL CENTER - ATLANTA 1958 MOREHOUSE COLLEGE - ATLANTA 1867 MORRIS BROWN COLLEGE - ATLANTA 1881 PAINE COLLEGE - AUGUSTA 1882 SPELMAN COLLEGE - ATLANTA 1881

LOUISIANA DILLARD UNIVERSITY - 1869 XAVIER UNIVERSITY - NEW ORLEANS 1915

MISSISSIPPI RUST COLLEGE - HOLLY SPRINGS 1866 TOUGALOO COLLEGE - TOUGALOO 1869 TABLE 4 CONTINUED

YEAR FOUNDED

NORTH CAROLINA BARBER-SCOTIA COLLEGE - CONCORD 1867 BENNETT COLLEGE - GREENSBORO 1873 JOHNSON C. SMITH UNIVERSITY - CHARLOTTE 1867 LIVINGSTON COLLEGE - SLAISBURY 1879 ST. AUGUSTINE'S COLLEGE - RALEIGH 1867 SHAW UNIVERSITY - RALEIGH 1865

OHIO ' WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY - WILBERFORCE

SOUTH CAROLINA BENEDICT COLLEGE - COLUMBIA 1879 CLAFLIN COLLEGE - ORANGEBURG 1869 MORRIS COLLEGE - SUMPTER 1908 VOORHEES COLLEGE - DENMARK 1897

TENNESSEE FISK UNIVERSITY - NASHVILLE 1866 KNOXVILLE COLLEGE - KNOXVILLE 1875 LANE COLLEGE - JACKSON 1882 LEMOYNE-OWEN COLLEGE - MEMPHIS 1870

TEXAS BISHOP COLLEGE - DALLAS 1881 HUSTON-TILLOTSON COLLEGE - AUSTIN 1876 JARVIS CHRISTIAN COLLEGE -HAWKINS 1912 PAUL QUINN COLLEGE - WACO 1872 TEXAS COLLEGE - TYLER 1894 WILEY COLLEGE - MARSHALL 1873

VIRGINIA RAMPTON INSTITUTE - HAMPTON ST. PAUL'S COLLEGE - LAWRENCEVILLE 1888 VIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY - RICHMOND 1865

UNCF, FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW. NEW YORK: UNCF, 1981 SSI#

•Number o< Institutions

Figure 1. Geogrephlc Outline o1 SABP Institutions APPENDIX B: LETTERS TO PRESIDENTS

Cover Letter to Presidents

Approval Form Accompanying Cover Letter

First Follow-up Letter to Presidents

Second Follow-up Letter to Presidents

Table 1. Letters sent to Presidents of SABP Institutions Dear President (Name)

This is a follow-up in reference to Dr. Turner Battle's memorandum of August 28 in regards to a study of the Music Teacher Education Program at your institution. As noted in the proposal sent to you by Dr. Battle, the intent of this analytic-descriptive study is to survey and evaluate, based on the opinions of the music graduates, the music teacher education programs of selected, accredited black private colleges and universities in the United States. All reponses will be treated in such a manner that anonymity will be protected.

Enclosed is a form for you to indicate your approval for this study to be conducted at your institution. The completed form should be mailed to me by Tuesday, September 18 in the enclosed self-addressed envelope.

Please allow me to express in advance my deep appreciation for your support and endorsement given to this study to assist me in completing requirements for the doctoral degree at The Ohio State University.

Sincerely yours.

Lucile Lacy

LL: jw Enclosure APPROVAL FORM

INSTRUCTION: PLEASE CHECK OR GIVE APPROPRIATE RESPONSES.

I APPROVE OF THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED AT OUR INSTITUTION.

NO, I DO NOT AGREE FOR THIS STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED AT " OUR INSTITUTION.

WE DO NOT OFFER AN UNDERGRADUATE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.

C I'N STITm ’ON) "(PRESIDENT)

(DATE) "(SIGNATURE)

NAME & ADDRESS OF THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM DIRECTOR:

(ZIP CODE) Dear President ______: (Name)

On the 30th of October, I telephoned your office concerning your approval to conduct an analytic- descriptive research study of your music teacher education program. As stated in my letters to you of September 14 and October 2, this study is endorsed by the United Negro College Fund Executive Board and by the Office of Minority Affairs at The Ohio State University (see Dr. Turner Battle's memorandum of August 28).

As of today I have not received your "Approval Form" so that (Name of College) can be a part of this valuable study at selected accredited, black private colleges/ universities. It is of utmost importance that all members of the selected sample participate in this study.

Be confident that all responses of the questionnaires will be treated in such a manner that anonymity will be protected.

If you have questions (or reasons for non-participa­ tion), feel free to write or call me collect. Also, if the "Approval Form" and the stamped, pre-addressed envelope did not reach you, I am enclosing another "Approval Form" and a pre-addressed envelope for your convenience. If I do not hear from you by November 27, I will probably telephone you again. If there are no questions or problems, I will look forward to receiving your "Approval Form" VERY SOON!

I am trying very hard to complete this research project in the most complete and accurate manner possible. Your efforts will help make this possible. With gratitude and all best wishes, I am

Sincerely,

Lucile Lacy Doctoral Candidate The Ohio State University Dear President (Name)

On the 30th of October, I telephoned your office concerning your approval to conduct an analytic-descrip­ tive research study of your music teacher education program. As of this date, I have not received your "Approval Form." To me, it is of utmost importance that al1 members of the selected and small sample participate in this study.

Be confident that all responses in the questionnaires will be treated in such a manner that anonymity will be protected.

If you have any questions (or reasons for non-parti­ cipation), feel free to write or call me collect. Also, if the "Approval Form" did not reach you, I am enclosing another "Approval Form" and a pre-addressed envelope for your convenience. If I do not hear from you by Monday, December 10, I will probably telephone you again. If there are no questions or problems, I will look forward to receiving your "Approval Form" VERY SOON!11

I am trying very hard to complete this research project in the most complete and accurate manner possible. I do hope to receive all data SOON so that I can complete the writing of my dissertation and return to my teaching position at my Alma Mater, Oakwood College. Your efforts will help make this possible. With gratitude and all best wishes, I am

Sincerely yours.

Lucile Lacy Doctoral Candidate The Ohio State University

Enelosures SABP COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (N=43)

Name of Institutions

Atlanta University Barber Scotia College Benedict College Bennett College Bethune-Cookman College Bishop College Claflin College Clark College Dillard University Fisk University Florida Memorial College Hampton University (Institute) Huston-Tillotson College Interdenominational Theological Center Jarvis Christian College Johnson C. Smith University Knoxville College Lane College Lemoyne-Owen College Livingston College Miles College Morehouse College Morris College Morris Brown College Oakwood College Pain College Paul Quinn College Philander Smith College 277

TABLE 1 CONTINUED

Rust College St. Augustine's College St. Paul's College Shaw University Spelraan College Stillman College Talladega College Texas College Tougaloo College Tuskegee Institute Virginia Union University Voorhees College Wilberforce University Wiley College Xavier University APPENDIX C; THE QUESTIONNAIRES

Questionnai re for the Music Teacher Education Program Director

Questi onnai re

for the Music Teacher Education Graduate (Code Number)

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SELECTED ACCREDITED BLACK PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES' MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM DIRECTORS

SECTION I - INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION

INSTRUCTION: Please check, circle or give appropriate response.

1. NAME OF INSTITUTION ______

2. TYPE OF INSTITUTION: (circle as many as apply) 4 year, 2 year. Private, Independent, Liberal Arts, Graduate, Undergraduate, Co-ed, Male, Female, Church Affiliated ______, (specify) Other (If your institution offers graduate programs only, please go to Section V).

3. DIVISION OF ACADEMIC YEAR: Number of quarters ______Number of semesters ______

4. TOTAL MUSIC FACULTY Full-time Music Faculty Part-time Music Faculty

TOTAL TEACHER EDUCATION FACULTY Full-time Teacher Education Faculty Part-time Teacher Education Faculty

ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATIONS: (check all that apply) NASM State ...... (specify) NCATE Regional ______(specify) SACS Applicant (specify)

7. DEGREES OFFERED IN MUSIC: (circle all that apply) B.A., B.S., B.M., B.M.E., O t h e r ______(specify)

8. DEGREE OFFERED IN MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION: ______SECTION I I - TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

INSTRUCTION: Please check or give appropriate response.

1. TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM IS HOUSED UNDER THE SCHOOL OR DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION OF: Education Music Physical Education Other ______

2. MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM IS HOUSED UNDER THE SCHOOL OR DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION OF: Music Education Teacher Education Humanities Other ______

3. LENGTH OF MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

(specify number of quarters or semesters)

REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE MUSIC EDUCATION PROGRAM Required GPA: Required Test Scores : Music courses ______ACT SCORE (specify) (specify) All Courses ______SAT SCORE (speci fy) (speci fy ) Other ______Other ______

(Check as many as apply)

Interview with (specify) Completion of narrative essay Letters of Recommendation Completion of designated courses Written exam (such as English proficiency) Vocal proficiency Instrumental proficiency Other ______5. RETENTION REQUIREMENTS FOR MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS Required: Cumulative GPA of ______. Cumulative GPA of in Music Education. Other ______(such as English courses) (specify)

(Check as many as apply)

Commendable recommendation from dean of student affairs Successfully pass required sequence of tests Participation, with credit, in at least one major ensemble for every quarter/semester of study A successful jury appearance before a faculty committee in a designated music area at the end of each quarter/semester of study Required attendance at recital-seminars Student affiliation with at least one professional organization Other ______

6. DOES YOU INSTITUTION HAVE A TEACHER EDUCATION COUNCIL? Yes No If no, go to 6B.

6A. The director of Teacher Education Programs is chairperson of Teacher Education Council Yes No Number of Ex-officio members ______Number of division and department chairpersons ______Number of faculty members Number of student representatives ______Number of public school personnel ______Other ______

6B. Of the following, who or what group is responsible

1. dean, 2. teacher education council, 3. chairperson 4. faculty committee 5. other 282

(Fill in the appropriate number(s)--as many as apply)

Prepares and reviews objectives of the program Develops policies and criteria with respect to admissions to, retention in and exit from the program Studies and evaluates the effectiveness of curricula and procedures in relation to needs of the teaching profession Receives and acts upon recommendations for changes in the teacher education program Reviews all policies pertaining to the education and certification of teachers in the University Maintains a balance between professional preparation, general education preparation, and mastery of the subject content field in each curriculum in teacher education Other ______

7. REQUIREMENTS FOR STUDENT TEACHING (check as many as apply) Complete a designated number of credit hours Maintain a required cumulative GPA Complete a general education program Complete a minimum number of hours ( ______) (specify) of observation and participation of pre-clinical experience in the public school Join the student chapter of the NEA Join the student chapter of the MENC Recommendations by the chairperson of the division, music faculty and area coordinators Approval by the teacher education council ACT score of at least (specify) SAT score of at least (specify) Carry no more than ______credit hours (speci fy) other than student teaching Take the National Teachers Examination Pass the National Teachers Examination Pass a comprehensive music examination Clearance from College Health Service 283

Demonstrate proficiency in: YES English Math _____ Speech Hearing _____ Other ______

TEACHING CERTIFICATE Level/grade _____

CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION INTO MUSIC PROGRAM: (check as many as apply) Jury (audition) _____ Letters of recommendation Interview _____ Required GPA _____ Paper (essay) (specify) Music Placement Test: theory _ applied major instrument history _ applied major instrument Other ______, (specify)

MAJORS OFFERED IN MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION: (check any that apply) Vocal/Choral Level/grade ______Instrumental Level/grade . General Level/grade ______Supervisory Level/grade ïïtïïFr ______:______Music History Music Theory Performance _____ Church Music Jazz Studies Other ______

STUDENT CHAPTER OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION: MENC Local Association (specify) NEA State Association (speci fy) Regional Association ______(specify) COMMENTS (IF ANY) ______

(If your institution offers neither a music teacher education program nor a music education major with a concentration for teacher education certificate, go to Section V). SECTION III - MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM

INSTRUCTION: Give the appropriate response.

(Please attach an up-to-date copy of your program's music teacher education curriculum whi£ji_lisj^_____ required and elected courses). II II II AREAS OF MUSIC CURRICULUM

Music Theory (comments)

Sight Singing (comments) _

Dictation . . (comments)

Basic Music History

Advanced Music History (All courses after 1st Sequence) ...... (comments) ______

Applied Piano (keyboard harmony) J O 2 O U Ô

AREAS OF MUSIC CURRICULUM

Recital Attendance (comments) ______

General Music .... Music and Worship . Afro-American Music Opera Workshop . . Vocal Diction . . . Music Appreciation

(comments) ______

Seminar in Education Study Skills ...... Upward Bound and Special Services Test Taking Skills and Strategies Developing Teaching Competencies National Teacher Workshop .... Other ______(comments)

ADVISING; (Specify the number of music education students each group advised)

Teacher Education Faculty ____ Music Faculty ____

Total Music Hours Required for Graduation Upper division ____ Lower division

Grand Total Hours Required for Graduation AREAS OF MUSIC CURRICULUM ) u a) I C

Strings h Woodwinds . li Brass Percussion (comments )_

Beginning Conducting (comment s) ______

Advanced Conducting (comments) ______

Large Ensembles (comments) ___

Small Ensembles (comments) ___

Music Literature Piano Literature . . . . Vocal/Choral Literature String Literature . . . Woodwind Literature . . Brass Literature . . . . Percussion Literature Vocal Pedagogy . . . . Instrumental Pedagogy Orchestral Pedagogy . . Band Literature .... Other ...... (comments) ______

1- AREAS OF MUSIC CURRICULUM

Composition . {comments) ÎUÎ Us

Counterpoint (comments)

Advanced Theory courses (comments) ______

Music Education Methods Courses Intro, to Music Teaching .... Elem. Gen. Music Vocal/Choral Elem. Instrumental Music .... Jr. High/Middle Sch. Vocal/Choral Jr. High/Middle Sch. Instrumental Sec. Gen. Music Vocal/Choral . . Secondary Instrumental ...... Gen. Music K-12 ...... Pre-Student Teaching ...... Lab. or Field Experiences . . .

(comments)

Student Teaching ...... Elem. Gen. Instrumental . . . Sec. Gen./Choral Instrumental Elementary Instrumental . . . Secbndcury Instrumental . . . (comments) ______

Junior Recital (comments) ___

Senior Recital (comments) ___ SECTION IV - GRADUATES

List your music teacher education graduates during the years from 1979-80 through 1983-84 according to the follov/ing format.

NAMES MAILING ADDRESS 1 . ______SECTION V - GENERAL INFORMATION

INSTRUCTION: Please give appropriate response.

SUBMITTED BY ______TITLE OR POSITION_

ADDRESS ______

TELEPHONE

(Area Code)

Would you like a final report of this study sent to you?

Yes

. No

COMMENTS (IF ANY)

THANK YOU for your assistance in completing this questi onnai re. Please return it by ______,______(day) (date ) to :

Lucile C. Lacy The Ohio State University Box 632 Jones Graduate Tower 101 Curl Drive Columbus, Ohio 43210 290

(Code Number)

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SELECTED ACCREDITED

BLACK PRIVATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES'

UNDERGRADUATE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION

GRADUATES OF 1979-1983

PART I - FACTUAL INFORMATION

INSTRUCTION; Please circle or check or give appropriate response

1. YEAR UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE RECEIVED: 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983.

2. DEGREES EARNED: (circle as many as apply) 3.A., B.S., B.M.E., B.F.A., other ______; M.A., M.M., (specify) Ed.S., Ed. D., D.MA., Ph.D., other (speci fy )

NAME OF: Undergraduate institution Graduate institution (Masters) Graduate institution (Doctorate)

MAJOR AREA OF STUDY: (check as many as apply) Music Education Vocal Level/grade ______Instrumental Level/grade ______General Level/grade Other ______Level/grade (specify)

Music History ___ Performance Church music Music Theory ___ Jazz Studies Other ______(speci fy)

TEACHING CERTIFICATE YOU NOW HAVE: Type Level Subject Field Received in State of ______PART I I - EMPLOYMENT STATUS

1. TEACHING EXPERIENCE:______Total number of years teaching Number of years in present teaching position 2. STATES/COUNTRY TAUGHT IN AND NUMBER OF YEARS: State ______Year______State ______Year______Country ___ ;______Year______(except USA)

3. TYPES OF SYSTEM AND NUMBER OF YEARS: Urban private _____ Urban public Rural private Rural public Suburban private _____ Suburban public

4. YOUR PRESENT POSITION: Not employed in any area of education Private teacher of voice Private teacher of keyboard instrument: (check) Piano _____ Organ, Other (speci fy Private teacher of band or orchestral instrument.

(Name of instrument) Private teacher of music theory (check) Composition _____ Arranging, Other (speci fy) Teacher in public elementary school Teacher in public junior high/middle school Teacher in public secondary school Teacher in college Approximate Population of Town Approximate Enrollment of School ~

MUSIC SUBJECT TAUGHT: (If now, write the word "NOW"; if at any time in the past, write the word "PAST"). Elementary vocal _____ Elementary instrumental Junior high/Middle _____ Junior high/Middle school vocal school instrumental High school vocal _____ High school instrumental General music Other (explain) ______PART I I I - ACADEMIC PREPARATION

INSTRUCTION: Evaluate how well you think your graduating institution prepared in these general areas by circling the best descriptor:

Did Not Less Than Very Take Poor Adequate Adequate Good Excellent

Fundamentals of Music X X X X X X Music Theory X X X X X X (Conments) ______

Sight Singing (Comments)

Dictation (Comments)

Basic Music History (1st yr.) (Comments) ______

Advanced Music History (All courses after 1st sequence) (Comments) ______

Major Applied Music "Pi ano XX XXXX Organ XXX XXX Voice X XXXXX Strings XX XX . X X Woodwi nds XX XXXX Brass X X XX XX Percussion XX XXXX Guitar X XX XXX (Comments )_ Did Not Less Than Very Take Poor Adequate Adequate Good E xcellen t

Minor Applied Music (private or class) Piano Keyboard harmony X XXX XX Voice XX XXXX Strings XX XXXX Woodwinds XXXXX X Brass XX XX XX Percussion XX XXXX Guitar X XXXXX (Comments)

Begi nni ng Conducti ng XXXX XX (Comments)

Advanced Conducting XXXXXX (Comments)

Secondary Instrumental XXX X XX General Music K-12 X XX XXX Pre-Student Teachi ng XXX X XX Lab or Field Experience Other X XX X XX (Comments)

Student Teaching Elementary General Instru. X X X X X X Secondary General/ Choral X X X X X X Elementary Instru. X X X X X X Secondary Instru. X X X X X X (Comments)______Did Not Less Than Very Take Poor Adequate Adequate Good E xcellen t

Junior Recital (Comments)_____

Senior Recital (Comments)_____

Advising Education Advisor X X School of Music Advisor X X (Comments)______

Recital Attendance (Comments)______

Seminary in Education Study Skills X X X X X X National Teacher Workshop X X X X X X Upward Bound & Special Services X X X X X X Test Taking Skills and Strategies X X X X X X Developing Teaching Competencies X X X X X X Accompanying Lab. X X X X X X Other X X X X X X (Comments )______

Large Ensembles XX X XX X (Comments)

Small Ensembles XXX XXX (Comments) 295

Did Not Less Than Very Take Poor Adequate Adequate Good E xcellen t

General Music and Worship X X X X X X Afro-American Music X X X X X X Opera Workshop X X X X X X Vocal Diction X X X X X X Music Appreciation X X X X X X Other X X X X X X (Comments )______

Music Literature Piano Literature X X X Vocal/Choral Liter. X X X String Literature X X X Woodwind Literature X X X Brass Literature X X X Vocal Pedagogy X X X Instrumental Pedagogy X X X (Comments)______

Counterpoi nt XXXXXX (Comments)

Composition XX XXXX (Comments)

Advanced Theory Courses X XXXX X (Comments)

Music Education Methods Courses Intro, to Music Teachi ng X Elementary General X Elementary Instru. X Junior high/Middle Sch. School Vocal X Junior high/Middle School Instrumental X Secondary Vocal/ Choral X PART IV - OPEN - END QUESTIONS

INSTRUCTION: Please consider carefully your answers to these questions:

1. What were the greatest strengths of your college preparation for the job you now hold (or your most recent teaching position)?

2. What were the greatest deficiencies in your college preparation for the job you now hold?

3. How realistically did the music courses you took in college anticipate real working situations and problems you have faced in your v/ork? (Explain)

4. How do you think your graduating institution should improve its program in such areas as: music courses, experience, preparation for teaching and so on?

5. What music areas do you think would have been important, but were not offered?

GENERAL COMMENTS (IF ANY): Use back if necessary.

THANK YOU for your assistance in completing this questionnaire. Please return it by ______, ______1984, in the (day) (date) enclosed, self addressed stamped envelope. APPENDIX D: LETTERS TO THE MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM DIRECTORS

Cover Letter to the Music Teacher Education Program Di rectors

Advisor's Letter to the Music Teacher Education Program Directors and Graduates

First Follow-up Letter to the Music Teacher Education Program Directors

Second Follow-up Letter to the Music Teacher Education Program Directors

Brochure to the Music Teacher Education Program Directors 298

Dear ______: (Name of program director) I am a faculty member of the Music Department at Oakwood College currently on leave and pursuing the Ph.D. degree in music education at The Ohio State University. Presently, I am conducting an analytic-descriptive study to survey and evaluate the Music Teacher Education Programs of selected accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities in the United States.

On the basis of the already expressed endorsement given by Dr. Turner Battle III of the United Negro College Fund, and the support and approval given by your College/ University President, I am now requesting your assistance.

Enclosed is a questionnaire prepared for Music Teacher Education Program Directors of selected, accredited Black Private Colleges and Universities to be completed and returned to me in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope. Please provide the appropriate responses as indicated in the instructions for filling out this questionnaire. Be confident that al1 responses on these questionnaires will be treated in such a manner that anonymity will be protected. It is my sincere hope that you will give this questionnaire top priority by complet­ ing it immediately since the questionnaire for the Music Teacher Education Graduates is solely dependent upon your helpful response of this questionnaire. Your completed questionnaire should be mailed to me by

As you are aware, very little systematic study has been done of music teacher education programs black private colleges,and universities in the United States. My advisor. Dr. Peter Constanze, and the Vice-Provost of Minority Affairs, Dr. Frank Hale at The Ohio State University believe that this will be a landmark study to add some knowledge about the music teacher education programs and graduates in this unique group of black private colleges and universities in the United States.

Please allow me to express in advance my deep appreciation for your support in this study. With highest personal and professional regards, I am

Sincerely yours.

Lucile Lacy School o( M uiic

Cciiioti'- R(j;i'! Coiuri.rjus Ohio Phone 614 4?2-657l

November 14, 1984

Dear

Recently, Lucile Lacy, a Ph.D. candidate in Music Education at The Ohio State University, requested your participation in her dissertation project. As noted in her letter, this research is supported and endorsed by the United Negro College Fund Executive Committee and by the Office of Minority Affairs at The Ohio State University. As of this date, Lucile has not received your response.

As her adviser and chairman of her dissertation committee, I am convinced that this research will make a significant contribution both to the literature and to the profession and I request your participation in this research project.

Sincerely yours.

A. Peter Costanza Chairman, Music Education

APC/se (Name of Program Director)

Sometime ago, I sent you a questionnaire concerning a dissertation study of music teacher education program at selected accredited, black private colleges and universi­ ties. In my cover letter I described the study and requested your participation. As of today I have not received your questionnaire.

I realize that you are a very busy person, I am also aware, however, that you are a very important person -- vital to music teacher education and vital to the success of this study. In the interest of scholarly research it is imperative that all members of the select sample participate in this study.

Please 111 I am asking that you take the time to complets the questionnaire. (Note: You are not committed to any long-term participation in an on-going study).

Maybe the questionnaire did not reach you; therefore, I am enclosing another copy of the questionnaire and a self-addressed envelope for your convenience. I would greatly appreciate your completing and returning this questionnaire “immediately" (Within one week) as the longer you might put it off the less likely you will be to complete it at all. (I know from personal experience.) If I do not hear from you, I will probably call you to check upon the status of your participation. Please feel free to call me (collect) if you have any questions or problems. Also, please know that all aspects of your participation in this study will be kept in strict confidence. Finally, please accept my heartfelt thanks for your time and cooperation.

Again, many thanks and I look forward to receiving your questionnaire VERY SOONIi! With gratitude and all best wishes, I am

Sincerely yours.

Lucile Lacy Dear ______: (Marne of Program Director)

Again, I am writing to encourage your participation in an effort to improve music teacher education program at your college and to the whole of Music Teacher Education. Out of the entire sample needed to complete this research study your Music Teacher Education graduates' addresses are still needed. I cannot overstate the importance of your participation.

I realize that you are a very busy person, and I am also aware, however, that you are a very important person -- vital to the success of this study. Your prompt help in assisting me in ascertaining your 1979-1983 Music Teacher Education Graduates will be most appreciative.

I am anxious to receive this list so that I can proceed to the next stage of storing all the data in the computer and completing the statistical analysis. May I receive this material by Monday, February 18, 1985?

Please feel free to call me (collect), if you have any questions, to expedite time in receiving this requested data. Research of this type is only possible with help from people like yourself.

Finally, please accept my heartfelt thanks for your time and cooperation. With gratitude and all best wishes, I am

Sincerely yours.

Lucile Lacy F i e r i L I N C F

MUSIC

TEACHER

EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION

Mil» Lucile C. Lacy K [ n r n B r R

nrr.iiAüY

L a

A itui ■ iin ii/ri « ( yuuA iimt ru n rfiunyr «iny TliVn.qt.

TO RETURN THE OUESTIOMIIAIRE APPENDIX E: LETTERS TO GRADUATES

Cover Letter to Graduates

First Follow-up Letter to Graduates

Second Follow-up Letter to Graduates

Brochure to Graduates (Name o f G ra d u a te )

You can make a valuable contribution to your Alma Mater and to the future of Music Teacher Education Programs at Black Private Colleges and Universities in the United States by completing the enclosed questionnaire. This research study has been endorsed by The United Negro College Fund, the Minority Affairs Office at The Ohio State University as well as the President of your Alma Mater. The Music Chairperson of your Alma Mater has recommended you to participate in this study. We believe that this landmark research study will add some knowledge about the music teacher education programs and graudates in this unique group of Black private higher education institutions.

Data obtained from graduates' ratings of the prepara­ tion received from their undergraduate music teacher education programs and their teaching experiences since graduation will provide statistically valuable information that can be used to analyze the degree programs. This will provide a basis to draw some conclusions about the strengths and weaknesses of the program and to formulate plans for future development. Please be confident that no individual response or individual institution will be identified in this research.

I am requesting that you complete the enclosed questionnaire and mail it to me in the enclosed pre­ addressed stamped envelope by Your promptness will be deeply appreciated.

Best Wishes for a successful teaching year; and thank you in advance for you time and cooperation in this study.

Sincerely,

Lucile Lacy

Enelosures (Name o f G ra d u a te )

A short time ago I sent you a questionnaire concerning the evaluation of music teacher education program at your Alma Mater. In order for this research to be successful, your opinions of your experiences are needed.

This questionnaire is one aspect of my doctoral dissertation ; however, the completion and return of this instrument could possible have far-reaching effects for future teacher education students in music.

I realize that you are very person but your participa­ tion is vital to the success of this study. In the interest of scholarly research it is imperative that all participants in this study respond. Research of this type is only possible with help from people like yourself. I firmly believe that graduates are the best source for gaining information about the music teacher education program because you are the ones who has gone through the program.

Please 111 I am asking th a t you take the time to complete the questionnaire. (Note; You are not committed to any long-term p a rtic ip a tio n in an on-going study.)

Perhaps the questionnaire did not reach you; therefore, I am enclosing another copy of the question­ naire and a self-addressed envelope for your convenience, I would greatly appreciate your completing and returning this questionnaire immediately (within one week).

Please feel free to call me (collect) if you have any questions or problems. Also, remember that all aspects of your participation in this study will be kept in strict confidence. Finally, accept my heartfelt thanks for your time and cooperation.

I can not thank you enough for your time and coopera­ tion. I am trying very hard to complete this research project in the most complete and accurate manner possi­ ble. Your efforts will help make this possible. I look forward to receiving your questionnaire VERY SOONll

Most appreciative,

Lucile Lacy Dear ______; (Name of Graduate]

Again, I am writing to encourage your participation in an effort to improve music teacher education program at your Alma Mater and to the whole of Music Teacher Educa­ tion. As a black music educator currently employed at an accredited, black private college, I am particularly interested in the educational status, learning conditions and professional opportunities — especially for blacks in the area of Music Teacher Education.

Out of the entire sample needed to complete this study your questionnaire is one that is still needed. I cannot overstate the importance of your participation. I am hoping to attain a perfect return rate — thus leading to increased validity and reliability for this study. You can help to make this possible.

PLEASE 1 ! 1 take the time to complete the question­ naire previously sent to you concerning the evaluation of music teacher education program. Feel free to give your candid response and remember that all aspects of your participation in this study will be kept in strict confi dence.

If for some reason the questionnaire did not reach you, to expedite time, call me collect at (614) 421-1725 for another copy.

I am anxious to receive your completed questionnaire so that I can proceed to the next stage of storing all the data in the computer and completing the statistical analysis. Therefore please, help me by completing the questionnaire NOW, today, and return it to me without further delay. T must bring this phase of the study to a close by Monday, February 18, 1985.

Research of this type is only possible with help from people like yourself, so let us make our colleges the BEST. I look forward to receiving your questionnaire VERY IÜÏÏITI!: ------

Again, thank you so much for sharing a corner of professional terrain with me.

Appreciatively yours,

Lucile Lacy fieri L t H c r

MUSIC

TEACHER

EDUCATION T E A C H E R e d u c a t i o n

Th« Ohio Sfêf# University

Coluabut* Ohio 43210 R r n r fl B r R

Shatr i/aiiH idra6 and ftp n irn A ifui >iinu/r« o( yuut tta CB t rfuinye «iny fkxmg*.

TO RETURN THE OUESTIOHIIAIRE APPENDIX F

Conversion Table of Academic Hours 311

CONVERSION TABLE SEMESTER HOURS TO QUARTER CREDITS

1 1.5 26 39.0

2 3.0 27 40.5

3 4.5 28 42.0

4 6.0 29 43.5

5 7.5 30 45.0

6 9.0 31 46.5

7 10.5 32 48.0

8 12.0 33 49.5

9 13.5 34 51 .0

10 15.0 35 52.5

11 16.5 36 54.0

12 18.0 37 55.5

13 19.5 38 57.0

14 21 .0 39 58.5

15 22.5 40 60.0

16 24.0 41 61 .5

17 25.5 42 63.0

18 27.0 43 64.5

19 28.5 44 66.0

20 30.0 45 67.5

21 31 .5 46 69.0

22 33.0 47 70.5

23 34.5 48 72.0 312

CONVERSION TABLE SEMESTER HOURS TO QUARTER CREDITS

49 73.5 72 108.0

50 75.0 73 109.5

51 76.5 74 111.0

52 78.0 75 112.5

53 79.5 76 114.0

54 81 .0 77 115.5

55 82.5 78 117.0

56 84.0 79 118.5

57 85.5 80 120.0

58 87.0 81 121 .5

59 88.5 82 123.0

60 90.0 83 124.5

61 91.5 84 126.0

62 93.0 85 127.5

63 94.5 86 129.0

64 96.0 87 130.5

65 97.5 88 132.0

66 99.0 89 133.5

67 100.5 90 135.0

68 102.0 91 136.5

69 103.5 92 138.0

70 105.0 93 139.5

71 106.5 94 141 .0 313

CONVERSION TABLE SEMESTER HOURS TO QUARTER CREDITS

ester Quarter 95 142.5

96 144.0

97 145.5

98 147.0

99 148.5

100 150.0 SELECTED REFERENCES

Adams, R. D., & Craig, J. R. A status report of teacher education program evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education. 1983, 34, (2), 33-36:

Alkins, M. M. Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment. 1969, 2-7.

Andrews, T. E. Teacher education reports. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, 1983. In Pritchy G. Smith. The critical issue of excellence and equity in competency testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 1984, 35, (2), 6-9.

Baer, G. T. An evaluation of the Northern Illinois University Undergraduate elementary education program based on the opinions of a selected group of its graduateTT Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Illinois University, 1973.

Baird, F. J. A follow-up inquiry of secondary school music teachers prepared at San Jose State College {Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1955). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1956, 24, 1-832A. University Microfilm No. 15-341, 2887

Ballard, A. B. The education of black folks. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.

Bennett, R. W. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the undergraduate music education curriculum at North Texas State University.' Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Texas State University, 1975.

Borg, R. L. An analysis of music teacher education programs in a select group of mid-western universities and colleges (Doctoral dissertation. State University of Iowa, 1959) Dissertation Abstract International. 1959, 20, 1917-2988A. (University Microfilms No. 59-57077 2151 )

Borich, G. Implication for developing teacher competencies from process-product research. Journal of Teacher Education. 1980, 30, (1), 77-86. Boyce, H. W. A graduate oriented evaluation of the music education curricula of four state college - universities systems in Utah (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 1973) Dissertation Abstracts International. 1973, 34, 7385-7926A. (University Microfilms NO. 74-13,~2’G3)

Bray, M. A comparative of the educational, vocational and avocational experiences of the graduates of the school of musicT Unpubli shed doctoral di ssertation, Northwestern University, 1954.

Brown, L. In defense of black colleges; a response to Kenneth B. Clark, ISEP Monitor. Ill, 1979, 3, 8.

Bullock, H. A. A history of negro education in the south. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.

Bullock, H. A. A history of negro education in the south: from 1619 to the presentl New York : Praeger Publishers, 1970.

Burton, H. B. Teacher education graduates and their perceptions of programs. Journal of Social Studies Research. 1977, 1_, (1), 20%!?:

Burnley, M., & Kirschner A. H. UNCF statistical report of the member institutions. New York: UNCF, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 213 314)

By-Laws of the United Negro College Fund, Inc. Albany, N. V.: Author, 1944.

Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, In Dunham, E. A. Colleges of the forgotten Americans. New York: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1969.

Carney, M. Doctoral dissertations and projects relating to the education of negroes. Advanced School Digest. New York: Teachers College Columbia University, 1942.

Carter, 0. Issues directive on Black colleges, ISEP Monitor, (December, 1978), 2.

Certificate of incorporation of United Negro College Fund, Inc. pamphlet, Albany N. Y.: UNCP, 1944.

Chickering, A., & Associates. The modern American college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981. 316

Choate, J. F. Jr. An analysis of the undergraduate curriculum and the subsequent professional involvement of selected instrumental music education graduates of Louisiana State University (Doctoral dissertation. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 37, 3231-3961 A. (University Microfilm No. 76-28, 7?4)

Ciampa, B. J . The master's degree in education: a survey of smaller public and private institutions. Journal of Teacher Education. 1980, (3), 47-49.

Clark, D., & McDonald, J. Critical value questions and the analysis of objective and curriculum. Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.

Clark K. B. Higher education for Negroes : challenges and prospects. Journal of Negro Education. 1967, 36. 196-203. —

Clark, M. J. Academic program evaluation. New Directions For Institutional Research. 1983, 27-27.

Claybon, S. E. C. An investigation of music teacher preparation in selected United Negro Fund Colleges and Universities (Doctoral dissertation. North Texas State University, 1981). Dissertation Abstract Internati onal, 1982 (University Microfilm No.)

Conant, J. B. The education of American teachers. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1963.

Cohen, L. H. Factors affecting the utilization of mental health evaluation research findings. Professional Psycholoqy. 1977, (4), 526-534.

Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R. Dornbusch, S. M. Hess, R. D. Hornik, R. C. Phillips, D. C. Walker, D. E. & Weiner, S. Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.

Cronbach, L. J. Course improvement thought evaluation. Teachers College Record, 1963. £4, 672-683.

Darnall, J. The evaluation of the bachelor of music education curriculum at Murray State College, through an analysis of the opinions of its teaching graduates? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1963. Davis, C. K. & Dougherty, E. A. Guidelines for program discontinuance. Educational Record, Winter, 1979. 68-77.

Devoss, G. & Hawk, D. Follow-up models in teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983, 5, (2), 163-171.

Dornbusch, S. M. & Scott, W. R. Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Franci sco: Jossey-Bass,

Dunston, P. F. A critical analysis of the music programs in the small liberal arts colleges of North Carolina as they relate to the preparation of elementary classroom teachers and public school music teachers (Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut, 1965) Dissertation Abstracts International. 1965, 26, 6267-6939A. (University Microfilms No. 66-841)

Durham, Joseph T. Enhancement or elimination -- which for Black institutions of higher education in the eighties? Annapolis: Maryland State Board of Education, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 194 023)

Eisner, E. W. The educational imagination. New York: Macmi11 an, 1979.

Erly, M. C. A practitioner's perceptions regarding problems in assessing the effectiveness of teacher education programs. A working paper of the Symposium of the Evaluation of Teacher Education, University of Texas, Austin, 1982.

Equal Educational Opportunity: More Promise than Progress. Washington, D. C.: Ü. S. Office of Education, 1978.

Fleming, J. E. & Gill, G. R. The case for affirmative action for Blacks in higher education. Washington, b . c . : Howard University Press, l 9 7 8 .

Foster, L. H. Annual report of the president. Bulletin of Tuskegee Institute, Oct., 1959, 5^ (3). 318

Gardner, W. E. NCATE: Accreditation: problems, issues, and needed research. In Shirly M. Hord, (ed) et.al.. Toward usable strategies for teacher education program evaluation. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Education, 1982. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 229 370)

Glass, G. V. The growth of evaluation methodology (Research Paper No. È7). Boulder: Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado, 1969. (Mimeo)

Goldhammer, K. Teacher education: reality, hops and promise. Journal of Teacher Education. 1981. 32, 25-29. —

Goins, Music and music education in predominantly Negro colleges and universities offering a four-year program of music study termination in a degree. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, 1963.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.

Gubser, L. What not to do in evaluating teacher education programs. In Shirley M. Hord (ed.) Adams, R. D. (ed.) Teacher Education Program Evaluation 1981: Theory and PracticeT Papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Feb. 17-20, 1981. Washington, D. C.: National Inst, of Education 1981 (ERIC Document ED 204 329)

Hall, G. E. Induction : the missing link. Journal of Teacher Education. 1982, 21- 53-55.

Holland, J. L. Undergraduate origins of American scientists. Science. 1957. (Sept. 6), 436.

Hord, S. M. & Ronald, D. (eds) Teacher education program evaluation 1981 : Theory and Practice. Austin, Texas: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproducation Service No. ED 204 329)

Hord, S. M. et.al. Toward useable strategies for teacher education program evaluation. Austin, Texas: Texas University, 1982. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 229 370) . 319

House, E. R. The politics of educational innovation. Berkeley, talifornia: McCutchas, 1974.

House, E. R. Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, Calif. : Sage,'1980.

Housewright, W. L. Charge to the commission. Music Educators Journal. 1970, £7. 35.

Humphreys, A. W. A follow-up study of the graduates of the school of the university of Illinois (Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, 1955). Dissertation Abstract International, 1956, 16^, 1 - 83ZA. (University Microfilms NO. 15 - 227, 350)

Johnson C. Smith University Catalog. Charlotte, North Carolina: Johnson C. Smith Univeristy Press, 1981-83.

Johnson, W. J. Jubilee Day, an address given on Oct. 7, 1933 James Weldon Johnson's collection, Fisk University Library. Harper's weekly 20 (22 January, 1876). In Vernon Loggins, The Negro author: his development in America (New York, 1931.)

Journal of Negro Education Summer Yearbook. The Negro private and church-related college. Journal of Negro Education 1960, (3), 211-216.

Katz, L., Raths, J. Mohanty, C. Kurachi A. & Irving, J. Follow-up studies: are they worth the trouble? Journal of Teacher Education. 1981, 3^, (2), 18-22.

Kearns, J. M. State competency testing for teacher certification. Journal of Teacher Education. 1984, M , (2), 58-61.

Kilgore, A. Small college needs in follow-up evaluation studies. In Shirly M. Hord & e t.a l. (eds) Teacher Education program evaluation. 1981: Theory and Practice. Papers presented at the annual meeting at the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Feb. 17-20, 1981 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 204 329)

King, J. A. Wimpelberg R. K. Nystrom, N. J. Teacher education in private colleges and universities: past and present. Journal of Teacher Education, 1984, 35, (2), 27-30. — Leave!1, U. W. Philanthropy in Negro education. Nashville: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1930.

Leonhard, C. & House, R. Foundations and Principles of Music Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1958.

Mathis, W. Evaluating: the policy implications. Phi Delta Kappa CEDR Quarterly, 1980, U, (2), 3-6, 22.

Mercer, W. A. Future black teachers hurt by SAT score requirement. Capital City Outlook. Tallahasse, Florida, 1.

Meurer. E. K. An evaluation of music teacher education at Indiana State University, 1969-1972 (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, 1974, 35, 5581-6280A. (University Microfilms No. 75-55677 895)

Middleton, L. Booker T. Washington Tuskegee 100. Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 1981, 7.

Mohl, Raymond A. Cultural assimilation versus cultural pluralism. The Educational Forum, 1981. 65 330.

Mohr, P. Research agenda for teacher education : Black perspective. In E. P. Witty (ed.) Proceedings of the National Invitational Conference on Problems, Issues, TTans, and Strategies Related to the preparation and survival of Black Public School Teachers, 19807 Norfolk, Virginia: Norfolk State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. not yet assigned; Clearinghouse on Teacher Education No. SP 019 478)

Mortimer, K. P. Tierney, M. L . The three "Rs" of the Eighties: Reduction, Reallocation, and Retrenchment. AAHE/ERIC/ Higher Education Research Report No. 4. Washington, D. C. : American Association for higher Education, 1979.

Mouly, George J. The Science of Educational Research. (2nd ed.). New York : D. Van Nostrand Company, 1970.

McArdle, P. E. & Balch P. M. Summary of survey. Unpublished manuscript, February, 19871

Naisbitt, J. Megatrends: ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books, 1982. 321

National Advisory Committee on Black Higher Education and Black colleges and universities, Black Colleges and universities. An essential component of a diverse system of higher educationT Washington, D. C. : O’. S. Office of Education, September, 1979.

Norfolk State University School of Education, Proceedings : National conference on problems, issues, plans and strategies related to preparation and survival of bTack public school teachers, June, 1980. 26-27.

Oppenheim, A. N. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. New York; Basic Books, Inc. 1966.

Patterson, F. D. Southern viewpoint: Would it not be wise for some negro schools to make joint appeal to public for funds, Pittsburgh Courier. 1943, (January 30), n.p.

Patton, M. Q. Utilization focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1978.

Pegues, W. W. An assessment of teacher evaluation follow-up evaluation in the United States: A descriptive analysi Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Uni versi ty of Tulsa, 1981.

Piper, E. An evaluation of the undergraduate elementary teacher education program at the University of Oregon, based on the opinions of graduates (Doctoral disserta­ tion, University of Oregon, 1960). Di ssertati on Abstracts International. 1961, 21, 1677-2838A. (University Microfilm no. 60-54UT, 2209)

Popham, W. J. An evaluation guidebook. Los Angeles : The Institutional objective exchange, 1972.

Pugach, M. C. & Raths, J. D. Testing teachers : analysis and recommendations. Journal of Teacher Education, 1983, U, (1 ), 37-43.

Roth, R. A. Requirements of a data base for effective program utilization. A working paper of the symposium on the evaluation of teacher education. University of Texas, Austin, 1982.

Reiff, J. C. Program evaluation based on faculty/student responses. College Student Journal, 1980, 1_4, (3), Richardson, J. M. A history of Fisk University. 1865-T946. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press, 1980.

Sandefur, J. T. An Illustrated model for the evaluation of teacher education graduates. Washington, D. C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1970.

Sandefur, J. T. Competency assessment of teachers: 1980-83. (ED number not yet assigned; clearinghouse No. SP 023 584)

Scott, H. J. Minimum competency testing: the newest obstruction to the education of blacks and disadvantaged Americans. Princeton, New Jersey: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement and Evaluation and Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduc­ tion Service No. 178 618)

Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (ed.) AERA Monograph series on curriculum evaluation. No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.

Shane, H. G. Tabler, M. B. Educating for a new millenium. Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa. 1981.

Shirley, R. C. & Volkwein, J. F. Establishing academic program priorities. Journal of Higher Education, 1978, 49, (5), 472-48F:

Simon, Ju lian L. Basic research methods in social science : the a r t of empirical in v e s tig a tio n ? New York: Basic Books, In c ., 1969.

Smith, Nick L. Introductory guidelines for designing evaluations of teacher education programs, 1982. In Shirly M. Hord, et al: Toward useable strategies for teacher education program evaluation. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 229 370)

Smith, N. L. The limitations of ERIC in reviewing evaluation literature. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979, 1, (1), 68-73.

Sommer, R. No, not research. I said evaluation! APA Monitor, 1977, 8, (4), 1-11 . Spence, A. K. Jubilee Singers, Fisk University News. October, 1911, Tennessee: University Press. 1911.

Stake, R. E. Evaluating educational programmes: The need and the response. Washington, D. C.: OECD Publications Center, 1977.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. Foley, W. J. Gephart, W. J. Guba, E. G. Mammon, R. L. Merriman, H. 0., & Provus, M. M. Educational Evaluation and Decision - Making. Itasca, Ï11inois : Peacock, 1971.

Stufflebeam, D. L. Explorations in the evaluation of teacher education, 1982. In Shirly M. Hord et. al. Toward Useable strategies for teacher education program evaluation. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 229 370)

Stufflebeam D. L. The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability SRIG Quarterly, 1972. 5, 3-6. ------

Stufflebeam, D. L. Meta - Evaluation (occasional paper no. 3) Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, December, 1974.

Stufflebeam, D. L. Meta - evaluation: An overview. Evaluation and Health professions, 1978, 1^, 17-43.

Tenbrink, Terry D. Evaluation: A practical guide for teachers. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. 1974.

Terry, A. M. A proposed music education curriculum for the small college based on a survey of curriculums in selected college (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1959). Dissertation Abstract International, 1959, 20, 1-112A University Microfilms No. 59-2433, 691) ~

Thompson, D. C. The role of Black colleges in conducting critical research, TIP SHEET, 1981, 1 (5), 1-5.

Toi 1ett, K. S. Black institutions of higher learning: inadvertent victims or necessary sacrifices. The Black Law Journal, 1974, 165-166.

Travers, R. M. W. An introduction to Educational Research. New York : Macmillan Company, 1964. Trammer, M. D. The teaching profession black may lose. Black Enterprise, 1980, Feb., 69-72.

Tyler, R. VI. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1950.

United Negro College Fund, Inc., Facts, author, n.d.

United Negro College Fund. Facts you should know. New York: UNCF, 1981.

United Negro College Fund. The biography of an idea. u n p u b l i s h e d m a n u s c r i p t . New York : UNCF headquarters, 8, 1944.

United Negro College Fund. UNCF statistical report of the member institution. New York: author, 1981.

Vance, V. S. & Schlechty, P.C. The distribution of academic ability in teaching force: policy implication. Phi Delta Kappan, September. 1982. 64. (1), 22-27. —

VIaanderen, R. B. Testing for teacher certification. Issuegram 7. Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States, 1983. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 231 814)

Watts, D. Admissions standards for teachers preparatory programs: time for a change. Phi Delta Kappan. October, 1980, 120-122.

Webster, D. S. Methods of assessing quality: advantages and disadvantages. Change, 1981, 1_3, (7), 20-24.

Weiss, C. H. Evaluating research: Methods for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-hal1, 1972.

Wheeler, C. W. NCATE: Does it matter? Institute for Research on Teaching Research Series No. 92. East Lansing: College of Education, Michigan State University, 1980.

Wi11iams-Burns, W. Jane Ellen McAllister: Pioneer for Excellence in Teacher Education. Journal of Negro Education. 1982, (3), 342-357. Wise, S. L. Hengstler, D. D. Braskamp, L. A. Alumni ratings as an indicator of departmental quality. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1981, 23, 71-77.

Witty, E. P. Prospects for black teachers : preparation, certification, employment. Washington; D. C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 213 659)

Wolters, R. The new Negro on campus: black college rebellions of the 1920'T7 Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.

Woodward, C. D. An investigation of music education at the University of Colorado including a follow-up of graduates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universi ty of Colorado, 1963.

Wortman, P. M. Evaluation research: A psychological perspective. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 562-575.

Wright, M. D. The survival of black public school teachers: A challenge for black colleges and universities. In E. P. Witty (ed.) Proceedings of the national invitational conference on problems, issues, plans, and strategies related to tne preparation and survival of black public school teachers. Norfolk, Virginia: Norfolk State University. (EftlC Document Reproduction Service No. not yet assigned: Clearinghouse on Teacher Education NO. SP 019 418)