Dinesh Raj Pant the Institution of Slavery in Nepal and Its Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Dinesh Raj Pant The Institution of Slavery in Nepal and its Analysis Based on the Dharmasastras 1. A Survey of Sources 1.1. The history of Nepal that can be written based on documents begins 1500 years ago under the Licchavi kings. About two hundred inscriptions of the Licchavi period have been found. Of them, one deals with the institution of slavery. There is a temple of Anantalingesvara on a hill located south of Suryavinayaka in Bhaktapur and north of the town of Lubhu. The inscription was set up by Narendradeva (ca. 643-680),1 a famous king of the Licchavi period. The site, nowadays famous under the name of the iaiva deity Anantalingesvara, belonged to Hamsagrhadranga during the Licchavi period. There was a temple dedicated to the Vaisnava deity Lokapalasvamin, and Narendradeva, in administering the affairs of the temple, assigned ten male and twenty female temple slaves2 to it.3 Since many letters have worn away in the passage on this stone inscription where the slaves are described, it is not possible to understand everything that was written, but it is clear that provisions were made for the slaves to receive grain and sums of money.4 This is the only clear mention of the institution of slavery during Licchavi times to have come to light. Something now will be said, however, about a further sign of its existence found in another inscription. There is an inscription near the Buddhist caitya of Chabel, located somewhat east of Pasupatinatha Temple. In this inscription, the date of which has not been ascertained, it is stated, in connection with the subject of controlling one's sense organs, dasavat tani sandharyai ('bringing them under control like slaves'), and this is an indirect indication that the institution of slavery existed. 1.2. Following this discussion of the practice of slavery in the Licchavi period, we come to two documents from the second half of the 11th century. These two legal documents, 1 This paper furnishes for kings their reign, and for other persons their lifetime. 2 With regard to how devabhrtyanam and dasinam (D. Vajracharya 1973:486) have been described in this inscription, it appears at first as if only devadasa ('male temple slave') and dasi ('female slave') are described, but not female slaves of God. However, 'female slave' is used here for female slaves of God, being described along with devadasa in a religious context. D. Vajracharya has written 'female slaves of God' in some places and 'female slaves' in others (ibid,-.487, 488) in translating this inscription. 3 D. Vajracharya 1973:486. 1 Ibid. 5 D. Vajracharya 1973:1. 136 Dinesh Raj Pant dating to 1051 and 1061, are located in the Rudravarnamahavihara (Okubahal) in Patan. The document of 1051 records the case of someone who pledged himself to bondage for five years in exchange for having received both cash and kind,6 and the document of 1061 stipulates a three-year period of service under the same conditions.7 As these are private documents, the name of the king is not on them; nevertheless, the first document dates to the reign of Baladeva (ca. 1049-1060), and the second one to either Baladeva or Pradyumnakamadeva (ca. 1063-1066). 1.3. We come to the troubled times that followed upon the Licchavi period. From the reign of Anandadeva (II.), there is a legal document, dated 1313, which says ioxit pdtra-s from Gabahal in Patan freed two persons.8 Now although the paramount kings residing in Bhaktapur was recognized as such, in Patan the traditional rule was one of patra-s, and since it was they who issued it, there is no mention of any king. As sense cannot be made of all the sentences, the exact situation is not clear; still, when things are put into context, it is seen that what is being referred to is manumission. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact, furthermore, that the word mukatapatra (muktipatra = 'writ of emancipation') is written on the back side. 1.4. The evidence continues after a gap of more than three centuries. King Siddhinarasimha Malla (1619-1661) of the kingdom of Lalitpur (Patan) was the one who built the famous Krsna Temple at the darbar square of his capital. In an inscription set up there in 1637 when the temple was dedicated, along with the various gifts Siddhinarasimha gave during a kotihoma he performed for forty days, mention is made of a gift of male and female slaves.' From this it is clear that, in making gifts of slaves in this manner, he was gaining merit. 1.5. On the northern side of Talejuchok, Bhaktapur's royal palace, a total of twelve gilt copperplate inscriptions have been affixed in a row to the main beam supporting the rafters. The fourth of them from the left is of relevance to the institution of slavery. It was placed there by Siddhinarasimha Malta's grandson, the Patan king Yoganarendra Malla (1684-1705). Witnessed by the Bhaktapur king Bhupatlndra Malla (1696-1722), Patan's cautdra ('chief minister') and the royal priest of Patan, it tells of Yoganarendra founding a guthi for the Taleju of Bhaktapur. The inscription calls upon slaves and wicked persons not to damage the gilt copperplate, threatening them with Taleju's baleful look if they do, while promising them her look of blessing if they preserve it.10 Srirajapatni Jayalaksmidevi also numbers among those who acted as witnesses. This Jayalaksmi was one of Yoganarendra Malla's concubines. It may be supposed that she had a hand in comparing slaves to wicked persons as a warning to anyone who might offer competition to her, it being the tradition in the society of the time that concubines who had entered the court as slaves might become queens if they pleased the king. 6 B. Kolver 1986:436. 7 Ibid.-Ay?. 8 For this document and the problems of its interpretation, see M. Pant 1990:8. ' Parajuli, Y. Vajracharya and R. Vajracharya 1954:21. 10 levari et al. 1962:29-30. The Institution of Slavery in Nepal 137 1.6. Now for the great incision in Nepalese history, the conquest of the Kathmandu Valley by the Gorkha King Prthvinarayana ¿aha (1743-1775). From his reign onwards, documents relating to slavery become more plentiful. 1.6.1. From Prthvinarayana ¿aha himself, there are four documents, all issued to one ¿rikrsna Pathaka, the king ordering him to give male and female slaves to several different people.11 Three documents concern the traditional giving of slaves as gifts, as though they were gifts of property. A fourth document, however, is of particular interest, and I propose to discuss it in some detail. It was issued in 1766 and shows the king commanding ¿rikrsna Pathaka 'to seize the wife and children of the enemy and give them to Bhlmasena KarkI in exchange for a male buffalo that was confiscated from him and brought to the king.'12 From this document we learn that the value of a mixed pair of slaves was no greater than a single animal. A next group of relevant documents was issued by Prthvinarayana Paha's son Pratapasimha ¿aha (1775-1777) when he was the crown prince. They were also addressed to ¿rikrsna Pathaka, and two of them again concern the giving of a mixed pair of slaves to someone.13 In one document Pratapasimha ¿aha orders ¿rikrsna Pathaka to 'send two couples of slaves if possible and, if not, one, because of some urgent works over here.'14 In 1767 a savdl ( i.e. a 'question,' 'request,' 'desire' etc. — the word is from Arabic) was carried out under the name of ¿rikrsna Pathaka. The term is in common use in Nepali and is used, among other things, in the sense of an affidavit obtained as part of the legal process to expedite court cases. This particular affidavit lists a number of tasks entrusted to ¿rikrsna Pathaka, among them matters concerning male and female slaves.15 The king's name is not on the document, but it comes from Prthvinarayana ¿aha's reign. We do not know much about ¿rikrsna Pathaka, but from other documents it is clear that during the period of the conquest of the Kathmandu Valley, he was involved as a chief officer in the job of exercising authority over newly conquered territory and conquering other new territory. — Interestingly enough, all the documents encountered up to now which command the transfer of slaves are addressed to this single ¿rikrsna Pathaka. 1.6.2. Some light is also shed on the institution of slavery as it existed during the period, by a document written by Prthvinarayana ¿aha in 1771 A. D. to the umard of Agin- chok, Laksmlkanta Upadhyaya. It stipulates that if the owner of a male slave who had committed an act of theft was unable to locate him, then he would become government property, and adds that it was not proper for anyone to appropriate a slave to himself in exchange for an unfinished plough, there being no custom from former times to do 11 D. Pant 1982:54, 56; id. 1985:30. 12 D. Pant 1985:30. 13 D. Pant 1982a:64, id. 1983:2-3. 14 D. Pant 1988:104. 15 D. Pant 1985:31. 138 Dinesh Raj Pant so. Again it is seen that the custom of regarding a slave as the equivalent of an inanimate object still existed at the time.16 1.6.3. In the treasury of the Pasupatinatha temple, there is a copperplate dated 1773 that concerns a donation, made by a Bhirkot Brahmin, of two Newar women as temple female slaves.17 If hitherto we have encountered only examples of rulers being involved in the institution of slavery, we now have proof, from this copperplate, that ordinary citizens were also involved in it.