Energy / China 12 September 2012
China Oilfield Services Target price: HK$15.00 → HK$15.00 Up/downside: +14.7% 2883 HK | CHOLY US Share price (11 Sep): HK$13.08
Sailing in safer waters
• We see a 2013E PER of 8.7x, coupled with solid industry dynamics, as compelling; upgrade to Buy • Fundamentals for oil and gas exploration globally and offshore China look attractive
• Expansion into deepwater areas and China's new and intense focus on domestic unconventional gas represent growth areas for COSL
How do we justify our view?
We see COSL remaining the consensus, due to our higher dominant supplier of oil services for utilisation rates and day rates. offshore China; hence its growth aspects appear favourable. In our Forecast revisions (%)
view, its low-cost operating base, Year to 31 Dec 12E 13E 14E Adrian Loh unique geographic advantage (being Revenue change 0.6 0.5 (0.5) (65) 6499 6548 Net-profit change 2.8 5.9 4.6 [email protected] based in China, it is exposed to the EPS change 2.8 5.9 4.6 offshore China area which we Source: Daiwa forecasts Benjamin Lim believe is underdeveloped), and (65) 6321 3086 Share price performance [email protected] highly experienced operating team should ensure market dominance 16 (HK$) (%)130 for the foreseeable future. What's new 14 120 We believe that: 1) COSL’s share price What we recommend 12 110 underperformance since the 1H12 We upgrade our rating on COSL to 10 100 Buy (1) from Outperform (2) and 8 90 results announcement, despite Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 reiterate our PER/PBR-based six- China Oilfield Services stronger guidance, is unwarranted, (LHS) month target price of HK$15.00. We and 2) its 2013E PER of 8.7x does not reflect the volume growth coming view the stock’s 2013E PER of 8.7x 12-month range 8.80-13.88 from key client CNOOC (883 HK, as undemanding, and even the 10x Market cap (US$bn) 7.58 HK$14.34, Buy [1]). To reflect this 2013E PER implied by our target Average daily turnover (US$m) 9.12 volume growth, we are raising our price is still at a 13% discount to Shares outstanding (m) 4,495 2012-14 EPS forecasts, which assume COSL’s Asian oil services peers. Also, Major shareholder CNOOC Group (54.7%) higher utilisation and day rates with our EV/EBITDA valuation upside from deepwater exploration methodology (using global Financial summary (Rmb) offshore China. comparables) shows that COSL is Year to 31 Dec 12E 13E 14E Revenue (m) 21,136 23,232 24,737 trading at a 20% discount to its Operating profit (m) 6,050 6,784 7,170 What's the impact global peers. We prefer COSL to Net profit (m) 4,828 5,505 5,898 COSL has strong earnings CNOOC in the near term, given the latter’s share-price overhang as a Core EPS 1.074 1.225 1.312 fundamentals, in our view, reflected in EPS change (%) 19.5 14.0 7.1 result of the Nexen deal approvals. our forecasts for a net profit CAGR of Daiwa vs Cons. EPS (%) 3.3 5.9 4.6 13% over 2011-14 (10% previously) The risks we see for COSL include PER (x) 9.9 8.7 8.1 and a stable EBIT margin at about 21- lower oil and gas prices and key Dividend yield (%) 2.0 2.3 2.5 23% over the period. In addition, we customer risk in the form of CNOOC. DPS 0.215 0.245 0.263 now forecast its free cash flow yield to PBR (x) 1.2 1.1 1.0 rise to over 10% (8% before) by 2014. How we differ EV/EBITDA (x) 6.9 5.9 5.2 Our new 2013-14 EPS forecasts are ROE (%) 14.3 13.3 12.8 5-6% above those of the Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg, Daiwa forecasts
Important disclosures, including any required research certifications, are provided on the last two pages of this report. Energy / China 2883 HK | CHOLY US 12 September 2012
Table of contents
Sailing in safer waters ...... 6 Investment thesis ...... 6 Solid fundamentals ...... 6 Business growth plans ...... 9 Financial overview ...... 10 1H12 results: solid outlook ...... 10 Valuation ...... 12 Upgrading to Buy ...... 12 Risks ...... 15 Company background ...... 16 Introduction ...... 16 Drilling ...... 17 Well Services ...... 17 Marine Support and Transportation ...... 17 Geophysical ...... 18
- 2 - Energy / China 2883 HK | CHOLY US 12 September 2012
How do we justify our view?