31 30

Local Development: Grasses and People Tharu. With the eSlablishmena of t.he izationofthe autochthonous Inhabltanu in Royal Chitwan National Park. . Nllional Park and the prohibition or and prevent illesalencroachmenton the Oldfield, H.A.. 1880 Sketches from EnviroDmenla/ Conservalion 15: 113- iratins in the forest, the nu mber cat­ protected areas. Nepll. 2 Vols. (Reprint 1971) Delhi. or 118. tle declined drutically, In some villases by 80S. The animals starved to death. References Regmi, M.C. 1976. Landownership 10 Mishra. H.R. 1982. Balancing Human The rarmer now hct-a lack of duns and Conway. D. & Shrestha, N.R. 1985. Issues Nepal. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Uni ­ Needs and Conservation on Nepal's of workins animals. Because of pro­ in Population Pressure. Land Seule­ versity of California Press. Royal Chitwan National Park. A mbio 6: blems in collectins firewood - it has to ment, and Development: The Case of 216-257. be stolen - more and more duni is used Nepal. Studies in Comparafive Internlj­ Regmi. M.C. 1978. Thatched Huts and u fuel , The increase in t.he populllion or lional Development 5 (2): 55-82. Stucco Palaces. Peasants and Landlords Mishra. H.R 1990. A Wild World that is wildlife has caused the Tharu to surrer in 19th Cenlury Nepal. New Delhi. no More. Himal Se pt./Oct.: 11 · 15 . loss 0( barvest and of Ilvestoclc for w hich Edds, D.R. 1986. The fuhes or Royal there Is no compensation. The reiular Chitawan National Park. journal 0/ Spillell, j.J. 1967. A Report on the Wild ­ Muller-Boker. Ulrike 19 91a. Elhnobo­ collection of edible and medicinal Natural Hillory Museum () life Surveys in Northern India and tanical Studies amoni the Citawan plants. of materials for makins houses 10 (1-'0: 1-12. Southern Nepal. Ja nuary - June 19 66. Tharus. journal of Ihe Nepal Research and household items,has become nearly journal of Bomb;,y Nalural Hislory Ce nter 9. In Press. lm possible (M uller -Boker, I 99 I a). Gee, E.P. 1959. Report on a Survey of the Society 63 (3): <192 -628. h is the Tharus in particular who Rhinoceros Area of Nepal. Ory~ 5 Muller-Boker, U. 199 1b . Knowledge and bave beensreatly affected by the loss of (March/April): 5 1-85, Stracey. P.D. 1957. On the St atus of the Eva luation of the Environ ment in Tradi­ access to land ntensively used in the Great Indian Rhinoceros (R. unicorni,) tional Societies of Nepal. Mountain past. In the race of their immediate Gu rung. H. 1981. Nepal: Dimensions 0/ in Nepal. journal of Bombay Natural ResearcbandDevelopment II (21: 101 - problems 0( survival, one can under­ Deve/opmenl. Kathmandu. Hillory Society 51: 763-766. 111. stand why tbey close their ears to arsu­ menU supportinsthe preservation of a Gurung. K.K. 1983. Heart of Ihe jungle: biotope and the protection of endan­ The Wildlife ofChinvan, Nepal. London. INTERVIEW iered wildHfc. For the Tharut the fOrtst is not only an important economic Haffner. W. 1979. Nepal Hi maJa ya. ReorientaUon at the Royal Nepal Academy: resource, it is also their form of econ­ Unrersuchungen zum verfika/en Land­ An interview with Vice-Chancellor Pro(. Isvar Banl omy, tbelr way of life and cultural iden­ schaflsaufb