Context-Driven Exploration of Complex Chemical Reaction Networks
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Chemical Engineering Perspective on the Origins of Life
Processes 2015, 3, 309-338; doi:10.3390/pr3020309 processesOPEN ACCESS ISSN 2227-9717 www.mdpi.com/journal/processes Article A Chemical Engineering Perspective on the Origins of Life Martha A. Grover *, Christine Y. He, Ming-Chien Hsieh and Sheng-Sheng Yu School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, GA 30032, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (C.Y.H.); [email protected] (M.-C.H.); [email protected] (S.-S.Y.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-404-894-2878 or +1-404-894-2866. Academic Editor: Michael Henson Received: 29 January 2015 / Accepted: 19 April 2015 / Published: 5 May 2015 Abstract: Atoms and molecules assemble into materials, with the material structure determining the properties and ultimate function. Human-made materials and systems have achieved great complexity, such as the integrated circuit and the modern airplane. However, they still do not rival the adaptivity and robustness of biological systems. Understanding the reaction and assembly of molecules on the early Earth is a scientific grand challenge, and also can elucidate the design principles underlying biological materials and systems. This research requires understanding of chemical reactions, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, optimization, and control. Thus, the discipline of chemical engineering can play a central role in advancing the field. In this paper, an overview of research in the origins field is given, with particular emphasis on the origin of biopolymers and the role of chemical engineering phenomena. A case study is presented to highlight the importance of the environment and its coupling to the chemistry. -
Prebiotic Chemistry: Geochemical Context and Reaction Screening
Life 2013, 3, 331-345; doi:10.3390/life3020331 OPEN ACCESS life ISSN 2075-1729 www.mdpi.com/journal/life Article Prebiotic Chemistry: Geochemical Context and Reaction Screening Henderson James Cleaves II Earth Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] Received: 12 April 2013; in revised form: 17 April 2013 / Accepted: 18 April 2013 / Published: 29 April 2013 Abstract: The origin of life on Earth is widely believed to have required the reactions of organic compounds and their self- and/or environmental organization. What those compounds were remains open to debate, as do the environment in and process or processes by which they became organized. Prebiotic chemistry is the systematic organized study of these phenomena. It is difficult to study poorly defined phenomena, and research has focused on producing compounds and structures familiar to contemporary biochemistry, which may or may not have been crucial for the origin of life. Given our ignorance, it may be instructive to explore the extreme regions of known and future investigations of prebiotic chemistry, where reactions fail, that will relate them to or exclude them from plausible environments where they could occur. Come critical parameters which most deserve investigation are discussed. Keywords: chemical evolution; prebiotic organic reactions-prebiotic reactions in the aqueous phase; prebiotic reactions in the solid state; energy sources on the primitive Earth; mineral catalysis 1. Introduction Prebiotic chemistry is the study of how organic compounds formed and self-organized for the origin of life on Earth and elsewhere [1]. -
Formose Reaction Controlled by a Copolymer of N,N-Dimethylacrylamide and 4-Vinylphenylboronic Acid
polymers Article Formose Reaction Controlled by a Copolymer of N,N-Dimethylacrylamide and 4-Vinylphenylboronic Acid Tomohiro Michitaka, Toru Imai and Akihito Hashidzume * ID Department of Macromolecular Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043, Japan; [email protected] (T.M.); [email protected] (T.I.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-6-6850-8174 Received: 8 October 2017; Accepted: 24 October 2017; Published: 25 October 2017 Abstract: The formose reaction is an oligomerization of formaldehyde under basic conditions, which produces a complicated mixture of monosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Selective formation of useful monosaccharides by the formose reaction has been an important challenge. In this study, we have investigated the formose reaction controlled by N,N-dimethylacrylamide/4-vinylphenylboronic acid copolymer (pDMA/VBA) and phenylboronic acid (PBA) because boronic acid compounds form esters with polyols, e.g., monosaccharides and sugar alcohols. We obtained time–conversion data in the presence of these boronic acid compounds, and characterized the products by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy and NMR measurements. pDMA/VBA and PBA decelerated the formose reaction because of the formation of boronic acid esters with products. It is noteworthy that the formose reaction in the presence of pDMA/VBA and PBA formed favorably six- and seven-carbon branched monosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Keywords: formose reaction; boronic acid compounds; N,N-dimethylacrylamide/4-vinylphenyl boronic acid copolymer; phenylboronic acid; monosaccharides; sugar alcohols 1. Introduction Carbohydrates are ubiquitous in our life and very important biological materials [1,2]. Carbohydrates can be divided into three categories based on their molecular weight; (1) low molecular weight saccharides, e.g., monosaccharides and disaccharides, (2) oligosaccharides, and (3) polysaccharides. -
Inferring Chemical Reaction Patterns Using Rule Composition in Graph Grammars Jakob L Andersen1,4, Christoph Flamm2*, Daniel Merkle1* and Peter F Stadler2,3,4,5,6,7
Andersen et al. Journal of Systems Chemistry 2013, 4:4 http://www.jsystchem.com/content/4/1/4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Inferring chemical reaction patterns using rule composition in graph grammars Jakob L Andersen1,4, Christoph Flamm2*, Daniel Merkle1* and Peter F Stadler2,3,4,5,6,7 Abstract Background: Modeling molecules as undirected graphs and chemical reactions as graph rewriting operations is a natural and convenient approach to modeling chemistry. Graph grammar rules are most naturally employed to model elementary reactions like merging, splitting, and isomerisation of molecules. It is often convenient, in particular in the analysis of larger systems, to summarize several subsequent reactions into a single composite chemical reaction. Results: We introduce a generic approach for composing graph grammar rules to define a chemically useful rule compositions. We iteratively apply these rule compositions to elementary transformations in order to automatically infer complex transformation patterns. As an application we automatically derive the overall reaction pattern of the Formose cycle, namely two carbonyl groups that can react with a bound glycolaldehyde to a second glycolaldehyde. Rule composition also can be used to study polymerization reactions as well as more complicated iterative reaction schemes. Terpenes and the polyketides, for instance, form two naturally occurring classes of compounds of utmost pharmaceutical interest that can be understood as “generalized polymers” consisting of five-carbon (isoprene) and two-carbon units, respectively. Conclusion: The framework of graph transformations provides a valuable set of tools to generate and investigate large networks of chemical networks. Within this formalism, rule composition is a canonical technique to obtain coarse-grained representations that reflect, in a natural way, “effective” reactions that are obtained by lumping together specific combinations of elementary reactions. -
Often an Acidic Proton)
314 Arrow Pushing practice/Beauchamp 1 Electrophile = electron loving = any general electron pair acceptor = Lewis acid, (often an acidic proton) Nucleophile = nucleus/positive loving = any general electron pair donor = Lewis base, (often donated to an acidic proton) Problems - In the following reactions each step has been written without the formal charge or lone pairs of electrons and curved arrows. Assume each atom follows the normal octet rule, except hydrogen (duet rule). Supply the lone pairs, formal charge and the curved arrows to show how the electrons move for each step of the reaction mechanism. Identify any obvious nucleophiles and electrophiles in each of the steps of the reactions below (on the left side of each reaction arrow). A separate answer file will be created, as I get to it. Let me know when you find errors. RX reactions Examples of important patterns to know from our starting points (plus a few extras). methyl and primary secondary tertiary special H3C X very good very poor SN2 patterns SN2,E2,SN1,E1 X X X X X vinyl allylic X X X X X X X benzylic X phenyl X X There are many X variations. X 1o neopentyl 1. SN2 and SN2 a b I Br Br N C I I C I N 2. SN2 and E2 a b H Br H O HC C H I HC C Br OH I 3. SN2 and SN2 a Na b Na Na Br S HC C Br Br O O S Na Br R R Z:\classes\315\315 Handouts\arrow pushing mechs, probs.doc 314 Arrow Pushing practice/Beauchamp 2 4. -
Arrow Pushing: Mechanisms
Arrow Pushing: Mechanisms A few rules to follow: X H H 1) Arrows show the movement of ELECTRONS! HO HO They go from site of high electron density, usually a lone pair or alkene, to sites of low electron density, Correct OTs Incorrect OTs usually a cation, hydrogen, or unfilled orbital. H H H H 2) Balance the equation. Be sure to conserve mass and charge. If you start with an over charge of +1, +1 Incorrect 0 you need to end with an overall charge of +1. +1 Correct +1 Br Br CN Br CN Br H H 3) Draw out all intermediates. Include hydrogens, lone CN NC pairs, and charges. Be sure there are no carbons with X Incorrect H 5 bonds or other chemical errors in the intermediates. Correct 5 bonds to C OH Cl Cl HCl 4) The mechanism should give the observed product. + Do not forget about stereochemistry and regiochemistry. This mechanism HAS to go via a SN1 Let's try an example: HO cat. TsOH Given this reaction scheme we can determine that this will be an elimination type mechanism, specifically E1. CH HO CH3 2 The reaction scheme may not show all by products! CH CH3 cat. TsOH 3 + H2O Let's draw all hydrogens and balance the equation. H The lone pair on oxygen would be a site of high electron HO CH3 O CH3 O H O density and an acidic hydrogen (TsOH) is a site of low OH + OH CH3 H S CH3 S electron density. Note: TsOH is catalytic so it needs to O O O O be regenerated in our mechanism! H Now that we have made a charged species we want to CH H O CH3 3 find a way to stabalize or neutralize the charge. -
Property Relationships Acid-Base Chemistry W
109, Structure & Properties, Acid-Base CHEM 109, Lecture 1 Structure – Property Relationships Acid-Base Chemistry McMurry & Begley (M&B) Chapter 1.1-1.2 (posted on CHEM 109 website) CONCEPT MAP: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE & PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS WHAT DO WE KNOW WELL & WHAT COULD WE KNOW BETTER? The intention of this exercise is to figure out your current knowledge of the relationship between chemical structures and properties. Perhaps more importantly, we want to identify misconceptions or gaps in knowledge. Learning that you don’t understand something as well as you thought is actually a good thing! This will be based on your knowledge and, eventually, that of your peers. No outside resources such as cell phones, notebooks, textbooks, etc. are necessary. Before Class: Cut out each term on page E1-3 to create a set of cards. Begin to categorize and relate the fundamental general chemistry terms to each other by moving the term cards around. Brainstorm your current understanding of each term on a separate sheet of paper. Draw structures and/or figures to exemplify the term where appropriate (this is appropriate for most terms). Create a concept map (example on next page) with these terms – use the cards, write the terms by hand, or use a digital format such as ThinkSpace or Mindmeister. Add terms and links as necessary to complete your map. There are many, many ways to organize and describe these terms. Do what make sense to you! I can’t stop you from looking up terms on your own, but I’d recommend avoiding this as much as possible. -
CH4103 Organic and Biological Chemistry LCM Lecture 5
CH4103 Organic and Biological Chemistry LCM Lecture 5 Dr Louis C. Morrill School of Chemistry, Cardiff University Main Building, Rm 1.47B [email protected] Autumn Semester For further information see Learning Central: CH4103/Learning Materials/LCM 1 Lecture 5 Preparation To best prepare yourself for the contents of this lecture, please refresh • Atomic and molecular orbitals (Unit 1, Lecture 2) • Molecular shape and hybridisation (Unit 1, Lecture 2) • Sigma and pi bonds (Unit 1, Lecture 2) • Electronegativity and bond polarisation (Unit 1, Lecture 3) • Stereochemistry (Unit 1, Lecture 4-7) • Reactive intermediates – carbocations (Unit 1, Lecture 8) • Acids and bases – pKa (Unit 1, Lecture 9) • Reaction thermodynamics (Unit 2, Lecture 1) and kinetics (Unit 2, Lecture 2) • Curly arrow pushing mechanisms (Unit 2, Lecture 3) and SN2 (Unit 2, Lecture 4) For further information see Learning Central: CH4103/Learning Materials/LCM 2 Lecture 5: Introduction to Substitution Reaction – SN1 Key learning objectives: • Know the difference between the possible mechanisms for nucleophilic substitution at saturated carbon – SN2 and SN1 • The rate law for a SN1 reaction • The free energy diagram for a SN1 reaction • The curly arrow pushing mechanism, molecular orbital analysis, intermediate and stereochemical outcome of a SN1 reaction • The factors that favour a SN1 mechanism including the nature of the substrate, nucleophile, solvent and leaving group • Synthetic Analysis – How to favour one substitution mechanism over the other? For further information -
Complex Chemical Reaction Networks from Heuristics-Aided Quantum Chemistry
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Harvard University - DASH Complex Chemical Reaction Networks from Heuristics-Aided Quantum Chemistry The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Rappoport, Dmitrij, Cooper J. Galvin, Dmitry Zubarev, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. 2014. “Complex Chemical Reaction Networks from Heuristics-Aided Quantum Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10 (3) (March 11): 897–907. Published Version doi:10.1021/ct401004r Accessed February 19, 2015 5:14:37 PM EST Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12697373 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP (Article begins on next page) Complex Chemical Reaction Networks from Heuristics-Aided Quantum Chemistry Dmitrij Rappoport,∗,† Cooper J Galvin,‡ Dmitry Yu. Zubarev,† and Alán Aspuru-Guzik∗,† Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, and Pomona College, 333 North College Way, Claremont, CA 91711, USA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract While structures and reactivities of many small molecules can be computed efficiently and accurately using quantum chemical methods, heuristic approaches remain essential for mod- eling complex structures and large-scale chemical systems. Here we present heuristics-aided quantum chemical methodology applicable to complex chemical reaction networks such as those arising in metabolism and prebiotic chemistry. -
The Power of Crowding for the Origins of Life
Orig Life Evol Biosph (2014) 44:307–311 DOI 10.1007/s11084-014-9382-5 ORIGIN OF LIFE The Power of Crowding for the Origins of Life Helen Greenwood Hansma Received: 2 October 2014 /Accepted: 2 October 2014 / Published online: 14 January 2015 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Abstract Molecular crowding increases the likelihood that life as we know it would emerge. In confined spaces, diffusion distances are shorter, and chemical reactions produce fewer and more regular products. Crowding will occur in the spaces between Muscovite mica sheets, which has many advantages as a site for life’s origins. Keywords Muscovite mica . Molecular crowding . Origin of life . Mechanochemistry. Abiogenesis . Chemical confinement effects . Chirality. Protocells Cells are crowded. Protein molecules in cells are typically so close to each other that there is room for only one protein molecule between them (Phillips, Kondev et al. 2008). This is nothing like a dilute ‘prebiotic soup.’ Therefore, by analogy with living cells, the origins of life were probably also crowded. Molecular Confinement Effects Many chemical reactions are limited by the time needed for reactants to diffuse to each other. Shorter distances speed up these reactions. Molecular complementarity is another principle of life in which pairs or groups of molecules form specific interactions (Root-Bernstein 2012). Current examples are: enzymes & substrates & cofactors; nucleic acid base pairs; antigens & antibodies; nucleic acid - protein interactions. Molecular complementarity is likely to have been involved at life’s origins and also benefits from crowding. Mineral surfaces are a likely place for life’s origins and for formation of polymeric molecules (Orgel 1998). -
4 Carbohydrates
Basic classes of biomolecules • Aminoacids • Lipids • Carbohydrates (sugars) • Nucleobases • Nucleosides (sugar+nucleobase) Nucleotides - components Phosphates and the prebiotic synthesis of oligonucleotides Activated ribonucleotides in the potentially prebiotic assembly of RNA. Potential P–O bond forming polymerization chemistry is indicated by the curved arrows. Phosphorylation reagents DAP M. A. Pasek, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7918-7920 A. Eschenmoser, et al. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1999, 29, 333-354 Phosphorylation reagents DAP M. A. Pasek, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7918-7920 A. Eschenmoser, et al. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1999, 29, 333-354 Phosphorylation of sugars A. Eschenmoser, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2281-2285 Phosphorylation of sugars A. Eschenmoser, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2281-2285 Nucleosides - nucleobases + sugars Carbohydrates Formose reaction Alexander Butlerov (1828-1886) St. Petersburg, Kazan, Russia The reaction begins with two formaldehyde molecules condensing to make glycolaldehyde 1 which further reacts in an aldol reaction with another equivalent of formaldehyde to make glyceraldehyde 2. An aldose-ketose isomerization of 2 forms dihydroxyacetone 3 which can Ronald Breslow (1931-) react with 1 to form ribulose 4, and through another isomerization ribose 5. Molecule 3 also Columbia University, USA can react with formaldehyde to produce tetrulose 6 and then aldoltetrose 7. Molecule 7 can split into 2 in a retro-aldol reaction. Formaldehyde condensation Aldol -
2014 Purple Book Answers Week 4.Pdf
Chem S-20ab Purple Book Solutions Week 4 - Page 1 of 38 Aromaticity 1. Given the following structures, circle any that are aromatic. Explain why the other species are not aromatic. 4n electrons not a continuous antiaromatic cyclic system. NH not a continuous 4n electrons cyclic system. antiaromatic 2. In the following molecule, which nitrogen atom is more basic (i.e. more willing to accept a proton)? Why? The other one has its lone pair as part of CH3 the 6 electron aromatic system. Protonating that lone pair would destroy the aromaticity, N which would be bad: H CH3 this one is more basic N N not a continuous cyclic system. N 3. When the following molecule is oxidized, the expected ketone is not formed, but phenol is formed instead. Describe what is going on here, and explain this unusual behavior. OH O OH CrO3 oxidation phenol Tautomerizes in order to achieve aromaticity. Chem S-20ab Purple Book Solutions Week 4 - Page 2 of 38 Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Mechanisms 1. Provide a curved-arrow mechanism for the following transformation. Show resonance structures for the cationic intermediate which make it clear why the substitution goes where it does. O O Cl HN CH3 HN CH3 AlCl3 catalyst Cl AlCl3 Cl AlCl3 O O O O HN CH3 HN CH3 HN CH3 HN CH3 H H H want to put + charge next to :Solvent electron-donating nitrogen 2. Provide a curved-arrow mechanism for the following transformation. H+ + O: H2SO4 catalyst H OH :Sol :Solvent OH2 H OH H+ OH OH Chem S-20ab Purple Book Solutions Week 4 - Page 3 of 38 Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Direction 1.