Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting
29th June 2013 & LOCATION
SOMALIA Agenda Standing items 1. Introductions 2. Review and agreement of previous minutes 3. Review/follow-up actions from previous meeting 4. Access constraints 5. Presentation of district level information by response objective, activity and planned versus actual 6. Review of gaps per district and Response Discussion 7. AOB SOMALIA
Access Constraints & Implications on Operations
To be completed for every meeting
SOMALIA Review of FSC Responses for Lower Juba (May 2013)
SOMALIA Cluster Members Responses by Response Priority
Region Improved Livelihood Safety Net Access Investment Responses Lower Juba 22,860 86,472 30,000
SOMALIA District Level Response i) Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets
Region District Improved Safety Net Access Responses Lower Juba Afmadow 4,860 0 Badhadhe 0 Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 18,000 30,000
SOMALIA District Level Response Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets Activity Breakdown
Assisted Assisted Assisted with Region District Goods with Cash with Food Vouchers Lower Afmadow 4,860 0 0 0 Juba Badhadhe 0 0 0 0 Jamaame 0 0 0 0 Kismayo 0 0 18,000 0
SOMALIA District Level Response Livelihood Investment
Livelihood Region District investment Lower Juba Afmadow 18,144 Badhadhe 27,714 Jamaame 9,384 Kismayo 31,230
SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown
Asset Seed Animal Region District Training Construction Distribution Treatment
Lower Afmadow 180 6000 0 11964 Juba Badhadhe 1140 3960 0 22614
Jamaame 5400 0 0 3984
Kismayo 6756 0 0 24474
SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Improved Access and Safety Net Afmadow Responses
Legend L . J U B A Jamame Region Capital District Boundary
KISMAAYO Region Boundary Kismayo May Improved Access and Safety Net Percentage 0 to 10 percent
Badhadhe 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent
SOMALIA Gap Analysis:
Afmadow Livelihood
U Investment Assets
L . J U B A Responses
U Legend Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary May Livelihood Assets
U KISMAAYO Percentage Kismayo 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent U Badhadhe May Livelihood Assets GAP Gap magnitude U < 20.000 U 20.000 to 100.000 U > 100.000
SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Livelihood Afmadow Investment Inputs’ Responses U Legend L . J U B A Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary May Livelihood inputs KISMAAYO Kismayo Pecentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent Badhadhe May Livelihood input GAP Gap Magnitude U 0 to 20,000 U 20,000 to 100,000 U >100,000
SOMALIA Any Other Business
SOMALIA