DOCSLIB.ORG

Government, Law and Policy Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Government, Law and Policy Journal NYSBA SUMMER 2012 | VOL. 14 | NO. 1 Government, Law and Policy Journal A Publication of the New York State Bar Association Committee on Attorneys in Public Service, produced in cooperation with the Government Law Center at Albany Law School FFirearms,irearms, PPublicublic SSafetyafety aandnd tthehe LLawaw • The Sullivan Law at 100 • Advocate’s View of New York Gun Laws • Regulating Guns in New York • Microstamping Guns • Does the Second Amendment Apply in New York? • Gun Law, Policy, and Politics • Federal Shield Law • Q&A on Firearms Availability, Carrying, and Misuse • Gun Control Movement Reinvigorated • Fort Hood and Its Aftermath • Social Movement and Gun Violence Prevention NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION From the NYSBA Book Store > Legal Careers in New York State Government Tenth Edition • How to Find a Job in State Government AUTHORS Professor Patricia E. Salkin • Employment Opportunities with New York State Govern- Director, Government Law Center, ment Albany Law School, Albany, NY • Employment Opportunities with the New York State Court Daniel Gross, Esq. System Government Law Center, Albany Law School, Albany, NY • Employment Opportunities with Municipal Government D’vora Koelling Government Law Center, Everything you need to know about a career in public service Albany Law School, Albany, NY is conveniently compiled into this one directory. Revised in 2012, this informative handbook includes samples and infor- mation about civil servant announcements and application PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES forms, graduate internship programs, graduate and post- 2012 | 360 pages | softbound graduate fellowship programs, clerkships, and the New York PN: 41292 ethics laws and regulations. NYSBA Members $40 Non-members $60 Order multiple titles to take advantage of our low fl at rate shipping charge of $5.95 per order, regardless of the number of items shipped. $5.95 shipping and handling offer applies to orders shipped within the continental U.S. Shipping and handling charges for orders shipped outside the continental U.S. will be based on destination and added to your total. Get the Information Edge 1.800.582.2452 www.nysba.org/pubs Mention Code: PUB1415N SUMMER 2012 | VOL. 14 | NO. 1 Government, Law and Policy Journal Contents Board of Editors 2 Message from the Chair J. Stephen Casscles Peter S. Loomis Lisa F. Grumet 3 Editor’s Foreword James F. Horan Rose Mary K. Bailly Barbara F. Smith 4 Guest Editor’s Foreword Patricia K. Wood Daniel L. Feldman Staff Liaison I. Legislation Albany Law School 6 The Sullivan Law at 100: A Century of “Proper Cause” Handgun Licensing Editorial Board in New York State Rose Mary K. Bailly David D. Jensen Editor-in-Chief 16 New York Gun Laws: An Advocate’s View Patricia E. Salkin Jackie Hilly Director, 27 Regulating Guns in New York: Existing State Laws and How Government Law Center They Could Be Strengthened Vincent M. Bonventre Laura Cutilletta and Juliet Leftwich Founding Editor-in-Chief 36 Microstamping: A Cost-Effective Tool in the Fight Against Crime Student Editors Senator José Peralta Daniel Levin 44 Microstamping Guns: A Tool to Help Solve Gun Crimes in New York Executive Editor Assemblywoman Michelle Schimel Alaina Bergerstock II. Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation Oriana Carravetta Stefan Eilts 51 “A Crime to Possess a Firearm”: Does the Second Amendment Jennifer Jack Apply in New York? Stephen P. Halbrook Kevin Rautenstrauch Stephanie Sciandra 57 Gun Law, Policy, and Politics Adam Staier Robert J. Spitzer Catherine Van Auken III. Litigation Senior Editors 65 Not Quite Bulletproof—Gun Litigation Continues Against Corrupt Gun Sellers Editorial Offi ce Despite an Unprecedented Federal Shield Law GLP Journal Daniel R. Vice, Jonathan E. Lowy, and Robyn Long Government Law Center Albany Law School IV. Empirical and Statistical Research 80 New Scotland Avenue 77 Q&A on Firearms Availability, Carrying, and Misuse Albany, NY 12208 Philip J. Cook 518.445.2329 Send Address Changes to: V. Politics Records Department 82 A Stalled Farewell to Arms—Reinvigorating the Gun Control Movement New York State Bar Assoc. Richard Aborn and Marlene Koury One Elk Street 90 Ford Hood and Its Aftermath: An Archetype of Guns and Gun Albany, New York 12207 Violence in America 518.463.3200 Tom Diaz [email protected] VI. Social Action 98 Building a Social Movement Around Gun Violence Prevention Dan Gross and Allison Dickin The Government, Law and Policy Journal welcomes submissions and suggestions on subjects of interest to attorneys employed or otherwise engaged in public service. Views expressed in articles or letters published are the authors’ only and are not to be attributed to the editors, the Government Law Center, or the Association unless expressly so stated. Authors are responsible for the correctness of all citations and quota- tions. Contact the editor-in-chief for submission guidelines. Material accepted for publication becomes the property of the Association. Copyright © 2012 by the New York State Bar Association. ISSN 1530-3942 (print) ISSN 1933-8414 (online). The Journal is published twice a year. Message from the Chair By Peter S. Loomis It does not seem pos- of Delegates in 2009, stands as the Committee’s single sible that it has been three unique achievement of which I will always remain most years since my appointment proud. as Chair of the Commit- tee on Attorneys in Public Now for the frustrations and disappointments, I have Service by then NYSBA previously written about the challenge of attracting more President Michael Getnick, public sector attorneys to bar membership and then ac- and that this is my last tively involving them in bar activities. Our committee, of Message to our readers of course, is dedicated to attorneys in public service, and it the Government, Law and is clear to me that there are still many impediments fac- Policy Journal. The time has ing these attorneys, both external and internal. Public fl own by quickly and my sector attorneys must pay their own yearly membership term will end at the end fees, and there is currently no program which would offer of May. I recall that when public sector attorneys reduced dues across the board and I fi rst assumed this position, I refl ected that I was suc- thereby make membership more attractive. It has been ceeding then-Chair Patty Salkin of Albany Law School’s argued that public sector attorneys, in some cases, earn Government Law Center, an extraordinary leader of this more than those in private practice, so perhaps a reduced Committee who no sane person would want to follow. I membership fee should simply be income based. I am continue to salute Patty’s ongoing work for this Commit- convinced that the current cost of membership stands as a tee and this Association. Indeed, it has been a challenging major reason why the Association does not attract a high- three years for me, with successes of which I am very er percentage of lawyers working in public service. A sec- proud, frustrations and disappointments that I continue ond and most unfortunate reason, having nothing what- to ponder and which require thought and consideration soever to do with money, is that some offi ces employing by this Committee’s future leadership if it is to remain public sector attorneys are simply not at all supportive of viable and vibrant. their staff being active in bar activities. Rather than taking pride in such activities by their staff, some offi ces see bar As to our successes, there can be no question but work as detracting from the time these lawyers devote that this publication continues to be one of our com- to their jobs. I have personally experienced frustrating mittee’s crowning achievements. With each issue, the situations during my tenure when attorneys on this com- Journal continues to impress, and we are indebted to our mittee stated that not only did they not receive support partner in this endeavor, the Government Law Center from their employers, but that they actually felt at risk if at Albany Law School, our editor, Rose Mary Bailly, our they were more active and took on additional committee guest editors over the years, and the students at Albany responsibilities. Volunteer work on one’s own time for self Law School. This publication is a true collaborative effort. improvement and to benefi t one’s profession should never Without the ongoing work and dedication of many indi- be viewed in a negative context. viduals it simply could not exist. While a majority of our committee’s members have I am also extraordinarily proud of the Annual Meet- been active and vital to our work, it is also frustrating that ing programs we have presented over the last three years, many have not. In any organization, motivating members and of our Awards for Excellence in Public Service and to become involved is a continuing challenge for leader- our Citations for Special Achievement in Public Service, ship. Given the initial diffi culty of fi rst attracting the pub- which were fi rst presented under my tenure. We have lic sector member, however, the challenge becomes even mounted programs that have zeroed in on relevant issues greater. The Committee on Attorneys in Public Service is to New Yorkers, and have appropriately honored those now in its 12th year of existence, and perhaps it is time whose public service contributions have been truly exem- for a fundamental review and analysis of the Committee’s plary. These events exemplify what this Committee is all work and mission, an examination aimed at discover- about. ing ways to still accomplish our important core func- tions—publication of the Journal, presenting the Annual As a former Chief Administrative Law Judge prior Meeting program and our Awards and Citations—but yet to my retirement, I will admit to some bias, but promul- signifi cantly broaden our appeal to attorneys who are not gation during my tenure of our Model Code of Judicial yet bar members.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issue Background Over the Past Several Years, Gun Violence
    Gun Violence Prevention Background NFTY Mechina 2015 Issue Background Over the past several years, gun violence prevention has once again been at the forefront of North American political discourse, spurred in large part by the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Navy Yard shooting in Washington, D.C., and the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, among others. The costs of gun violence in the United States are staggering: Consider these numbers: 8: Each day, eight young Americans under age 19 die from gun violence. 12: The rate of gun deaths among America’s children is 12 times higher than those of the 25 other wealthiest nations combined. 30,000: Over 30,000 Americans die each year from gun violence. $100 Billion: The estimated medical and social cost of gun violence in America, every single year. Nearly 80% of this cost is borne by taxpayers. The vast majority of Americans, even gun owners, support common sense gun safety measures. According to the National Opinion Research Center, 75% of gun owners support mandatory registration of handguns, as does 85% of the general public. 66% of gun owners and 80% of the general public favor mandatory background checks in private handgun sales, such as gun shows. However, some Americans believe that such gun control measures are unnecessary, ineffective, and contrary to the wording and spirit of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states, “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) argue that law-abiding citizens, like hunters and sportsmen, will suffer the most under restrictive gun control laws, while criminals will always be able to access guns no matter what restrictions or gun control measures are enacted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blinding Rapture of Mobilization Vs. the Deep
    THE BLINDING RAPTURE OF MOBILIZATION VS. THE DEEP STATE1 By Moshe ben Asher, PhD & KhulDa bat Sarah For the millions who marched on the day after the Trump inauguration, doing so would surely have built their morale and clarified their political thinking, as evidenced by the fact that many of them have continued to resist and challenge the Trump administration’s worst initiatives. But did it do more than that? Ideally, the effect of such mobilizations would be to chasten Trump, to prompt him to restrain his worst inclinations. Or, if not that, then perhaps in a more roundabout fashion they could influence the Republican majority in Congress who, feeling pressure, would disassociate themselves from Trump, causing him to restrain his more outrageous behavior.2 But this does not appear to have happened. Why is that? Given our careers as professional community organizers, we have serious doubts about the staying power and the ultimate outcomes of mobilizations not built on long-term organizational development and seasoned leadership, which are the basis for waging extended campaigns. In their absence, even mass mobilizations can be forgotten in a matter of days. It’s no accident that few of us remember the massive anti-war demonstrations that preceded the U.S. invasion of Iraq. They did not prevent the war.3 It’s not that there’s anything wrong with marching. Every experienced community organizer has witnessed and appreciated the euphoria that accompanies such mobilizations, even those with turnouts in the hundreds (let alone in the millions). When citizens who have previously experienced themselves as powerless find themselves surrounded by others who share their resentment and their hopes and dreams, it’s no surprise they feel joyful.4 This reaction fits the definition of rapture: “a feeling of intense pleasure or joy,”5 which have positive benefits for organizing.
    [Show full text]
  • National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc. As Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioners ______
    No. 20-843 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____________ NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ROBERT NASH, BRANDON KOCH, PETITIONERS v. KEVIN P. BRUEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE POLICE, RICHARD J. MCNALLY JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUSTICE OF THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND LICENSING OFFICER FOR RENSSELAER COUNTY, RESPONDENTS _____________ ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _____________ BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION INC. AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONERS _____________ LAWRENCE G. KEANE JONATHAN F. MITCHELL National Shooting Counsel of Record Sports Foundation Inc. Mitchell Law PLLC 400 North Capitol Street 111 Congress Avenue Suite 475 Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20001 Austin, Texas 78701 (202) 220-1340 (512) 686-3940 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae QUESTION PRESENTED The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” U.S. Const. amend. II; see also McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010) (incorporating the Second Amendment against the States). The State of New York prohibits indi- viduals from carrying pistols or revolvers outside the home unless they obtain a license, and it prevents these licenses from being granted unless the applicant demon- strates “proper cause for [its] issuance.” N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f). The statute does not define “proper cause,” but the courts of New York interpret this phrase to re- quire an applicant to “demonstrate a special need for self- protection distinguishable from that of the general com- munity or of persons engaged in the same profession.” Klenosky v.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny County Sportsmen's League Legislative Committee Report
    Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League Legislative Committee Report August 2008 Issue 166 ALLEGHENY COUNTY SPORTSMEN LEAGUE ON THE INTERNET http://www.acslpa.org Contacts : Legislative Committee Chairman , Kim Stolfer (412.221.3346) - [email protected] Legislative Committee Vice-Chairman, Mike Christeson - [email protected] Registration of Guns Brings PA Mayors Association Convention TERROR to Suburbia Gun Control Takes Center Stage Report On MD State Police Gestapo "Investigation" th On July 18 the Allegheny County Sportsmen's (Source--Bruce Jackson-VCDL) League legislative committee chairman and Firearms I just wanted your organization to know what Our (Maryland) Owners against Crime chairman, Kim Stolfer, made a State Police are up too. The incident below happened to me, a presentation to the annual gathering of the Pennsylvania legal gun owner in La Plata, Maryland two nights ago (August 4, mayor's held in Gettysburg Pennsylvania. The crux of 2008 at 12:30 PM). Next time, they won't get in without a warrant. You live and you learn. this meeting was initially to discuss Representative My Wife and I were unfairly besieged late last night by the David Levdansky's controversial legislation that would Maryland State Police. Enclosed is my summation for your have made it a crime to not report a lost or stolen gun. review. We were offered the opportunity to present the opposing Last night at 12:30 pm a MD State Police "Armed Response viewpoint. Team" showed up at our door. I was dead asleep, my Wife was Once representative Levdansky discovered that we laying some ceramic tile on our basement floor when our driveway alert went off several times.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Background Checks” & Burdening Access to Human Rights Written By: Matthew Larosiere, Joseph Greenlee, and Adam Kraut
    2 FIREARMS POLICY COALITION FIREARMS POLICY COALITION 3 “Universal Background Checks” & Burdening Access to Human Rights written by: matthew larosiere, joseph greenlee, and adam kraut Executive Summary transfers to prohibited persons; law-abiding people already follow those laws, while criminals already “ niversal background checks” require that a violate them. Ubackground check be conducted anytime a fire- Nor do universal background checks address the arm is transferred between two private parties.1 Fed- problem of mass-shootings—which constitute an eral law already requires anyone who purchases a exceedingly small percentage of gun violence and a firearm from a licensed dealer to undergo a back- mere fraction of homicides to begin with. Nearly ground check.2 Universal background checks extend every mass-shooter in recent history would have—or that requirement to purely private and intrastate did—pass a background check, and a few that back- transactions. ground checks should have prevented passed the Background checks are relatively recent gun con- check anyway, because the system failed. trols. There is no colonial or founding era basis for That universal background checks would have lit- such laws, aside from discriminatory restrictions on tle effect on crime is especially problematic when persons who were not considered citizens. Rather considering the burden they place on law-abiding than require government permission to own fire- individuals. Background checks make it more diffi- arms, the historical practice in America was for the cult and more expensive to acquire a firearm for government to require firearm ownership. Only in self-defense, to lend a firearm to a family member or the twentieth century did some states start requiring friend in danger, to train with firearms at the gun all purchasers to demonstrate good moral character, range, and to share a firearm when hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Gun Trafficking
    Patterns of gun trafficking: An exploratory study of the illicit markets in Mexico and the United States A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Security Science David Pérez Esparza Department of Security and Crime Science Faculty of Engineering Sciences University College London (UCL) September, 2018 1 Declaration I, David Pérez Esparza confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis aims to explain why, against the background of a fairly global crime drop, violence and crime increased in Mexico in the mid-2000s. Since most classical hypotheses from criminological research are unable to account satisfactorily for these trends, this study tests the explanatory power of a situational hypothesis as the main independent variable (i.e. the role of opportunity). In particular, this involves testing whether the rise in violence can be explained by an increase in the availability of illegal weapons in Mexico resulting from policy changes and rises in gun production in the bordering U.S. To conduct this study, the thesis develops and implements an ad hoc analytic strategy (composed of six steps) that helps to examine each gun market (i.e. pistols, revolvers, rifles, and shotguns) both in the supply (U.S.) and in the illegal demand for firearms (Mexico). Following this market approach, the study finds that patterns of gun production in the U.S. temporally and spatially coincide with the patterns of gun confiscation (and violent crime) in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Members of the Campaign Against
    February 5, 2021 Dear Members of the Florida Legislature: We are members of the Campaign Against Assault Weapons in support of F​lorida Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, LWV of Florida, The Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus, and Ban Assault Weapons Now efforts t​o pass SB 370 & HB 653 to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines in Florida. Too many Americans have been senselessly gunned down in public spaces in towns and cities in Florida. With easy access to military-style semi-automatic assault weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines, too many individuals have turned our schools, malls, concerts, movie theaters, stores, restaurants, nightclubs, food festivals, streets, workplaces, and places of worship into war zones filled with terror, devastation, and terrible loss. Military-style semi-automatic assault weapons are designed to efficiently kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time available. ● On July 20, 2012, a 24-year-old white male killed 12 people and injured 70 others (58 from gunfire) with assault weapons and high capacity magazines inside a Century 16 movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. ● On December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old white male killed 26 children and educators with an AR-15 and high capacity magazines in less than five minutes at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. ● On December 2, 2015, a homegrown extremist couple killed 14 people and 22 others with assault weapons and high capacity magazines in an attack at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California. ● On June 12, 2016, a 29-year-old security guard, killed 49 people and injured 53 others with an assault weapon and high capacity magazines in an attack targeting LGBTQI community inside the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Party of Erie County V. Cuomo, 970 F.3D 106 (2Nd Cir
    No. ______ ______________________________________________________________________________ In The Supreme Court of the United States ______________________________________________________ Libertarian Party of Erie County, Michael Kuzma, Richard Cooper, Ginny Rober, Philip M. Mayor, Michael Rebmann, Edward L. Garrett, David Mongielo, John Murtari, William Cuthbert, Petitioners, v. Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Letitia James, individually and as Attorney General of the State of New York, Joseph A. D'Amico, individually and as Superintendent of the New York State Police, et al. Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ______________________________________________________ PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ______________________________________________________ James Ostrowski Counsel of Record Buffalo, New York 14216 MICHAEL KUZMA (716) 435-8918 1893 Clinton St. [email protected] Buffalo, New York 14206 (716) 822-7645 michaelkuzmaesq @gmail.com Counsel for Petitioners i QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW This case presents one big issue that necessarily requires the resolution of a number of critical subsidiary issues. 1. Should the State of New York, in all of its three branches of government, working in unison, be allowed to continue to blatantly violate the right to bear arms as recognized by this Court in the landmark decisions of District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), through its arbitrary, complex and onerous pistol permit process which forces citizens to seek the permission of neighbors, police officers and licensing officials to exercise a fundamental right and which vests in licensing officials virtually unlimited discretion to deny, suspend or revoke handgun permits while ignoring due process, and which forces citizens to endure a lengthy, expensive and complex permit application process? Resolving this question requires the resolution of the following additional questions: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Katieatherton.Pdf (512.3Kb)
    WOMEN'S STUDIES CELEBRATION Women's History Month 2005 NOMINATION: Papers and projects done in completion of course work for Spring, Summer and Fall 2004 eligible for nomination. Students do not need to be enrolled Fall 2004 or Spring 2005 to be eligible. (Students are encouraged to identify works they would like nominated and approach their professor to initiate the process.) Instructor: Patti See Dept: ASC and WMNS Course Number and Name: WMNS 210: Culture of the Third Wave Semester completed: Summer, 2004 Title of Nominated Work: "Where are the Damsels in Distress? Guns and Women" CATEGORY: Sampson: Undergraduate Research Paper See - Undergraduate Project Olson Graduate - Kessler Turell Belter STUDENT INFORMATION: Name Katie Atherton Email athertkl Yearmajor: Senior 1 CHEMISTRY Local Address: 425 NIAGARA ST I EAU CLAIRE WI 54703 Local Phone: 262 I 617-3 146 **WHY DO YOU, THE INSTRUCTOR, RECOMMEND THIS AS AN EXEMPLARY STUDENT PAPEIUPROJECT? (Attach a separate sheet.) As the nominating instructor, please notify the student and ask them to turn in the paper, or attach to your nomination form. ................................................................................................................................................................. Awards are sponsored by the UW-Eau Claire Foundation, Helen X. Sampson Fund, and by private individuals. Research involving human subjects must conform to the guidelines given by the Institutional Research Board. Contact Research Services, 836-3405, with questions. Submission deadline is February 11,2005. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire 105 Garfield Avenue P.O. Box 4004 Eau Claire, WI 54702-4004 February 10, 2005 0 P To: Women's History Month Awards Committee qp From: Patti See RE: Nomination of Katie Atherton's Undergraduate Research paper \~b 'u 'u I am pleased to nominate Katie Atherton's paper "Where are the Damsels in Distress? Guns and Women" in which she explores issues and stereotypes surrounding women's firearm use.
    [Show full text]
  • GUN POLITICS and NARRATIVE SHIFT Gun Violence in America Claims 38,000 Lives Every Year—An Average of 100 Per Day—And the Proliferation of Fire- Arms Is Astronomical
    2 CASE STUDY 5 GUN POLITICS AND NARRATIVE SHIFT Gun violence in America claims 38,000 lives every year—an average of 100 per day—and the proliferation of fire- arms is astronomical. It is estimated that there are 393 million guns in circulation in the United States.1 Americans are twenty-five times more likely to be killed in a gun homicide than people in other high-income countries. For decades, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has successfully obstructed the passage of laws restricting gun ownership in any way. So successful have its efforts been that for years the NRA has been dubbed by the media as “the most powerful lobby in America,” a mantle the organization has worn with pride. Its “scorecard,” in which the NRA grades politicians from A to F depending on their responses to a candidate questionnaire, alongside the millions of dollars it spends on federal and state election campaigns, have, until recently, effectively muzzled lawmakers. This is in spite of the fact that a majority of Americans favor stricter gun laws.2 One resulting dominant narrative has been that any politician who crosses the NRA will lose their bid for election or reelection. The power of this narrative was on display in 2013 after the Sandy Hook tragedy in which twenty young children and six adults were murdered in their elementary school. Public support for a federal law to require universal back- ground checks for all gun sales stood at 90 percent, but a modest bipartisan bill to that effect introduced by Sena- tors Manchin (D-WV) and Toomey (R-PA) failed to pass after the NRA announced its opposition and sent an e-mail to all senators warning them the organization would “score” their vote; a vote in favor of the bill would negatively affect their NRA rating and lead to retaliation in their next election from an influential and united segment of their constituency: NRA members and supporters.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Whatever Happened to the 'Missing Movement'? Gun Control
    Kristin A. Goss Whatever happened to the ‘missing movement’? 7 Whatever happened to the ‘missing movement’? Gun control politics over two decades of change Kristin A. Goss Introduction In April 1999, a catastrophe befell the leafy suburbs of Denver. Two heavily armed teenagers went to their high school and killed 12 fellow students and a teacher while injuring two dozen others. The shooting at Columbine High School followed a string of similar mass shootings in schools and other presumptively safe spaces. The Columbine shooting horrified the nation and felt like a tipping point in American gun politics. The response was immediate and far-reaching. Families got involved. Parents of Columbine victims found their voices as advocates, and after a shooting four months later at a Jewish community center in California, mothers in particular had had enough. Taking advantage of the first generation of Internet tools, such as listservs and websites, moms mobilized hundreds of thousands of people to march on Washington and in scores of cities and towns across the country. Unfolding on Mother’s Day 2000, the Million Mom March combined images of playful maternalism and fearless womanhood to demand policy change. Wealthy donors got involved. Everyday people sent small contributions to gun control groups, but big money flowed, as well. A tech billionaire supplied millions of dollars to create a new, pragmatic gun control group (Americans for Gun Safety) that sought to break the political logjam on firearms policy. The President got involved. Bill Clinton flew to Colorado to console the families and the community. After returning to Washington, he continued advocating privately and publicly for stricter gun laws over the following year, the last of his final term.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Gun Control War of the Twentieth Centuryâ•Fland Its
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 39 Number 5 Symposium - Gun Control and the Second Amendment: Development and Controversies in the Article 10 Wake of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago March 2016 The Great Gun Control War of the Twentieth Century—and its Lessons for Gun Laws Today David B. Kopel Denver University, Sturm College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Second Amendment Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation David B. Kopel, The Great Gun Control War of the Twentieth Century—and its Lessons for Gun Laws Today, 39 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1527 (2012). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol39/iss5/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KOPEL_CHRISTENSEN (DO NOT DELETE) 2/6/2013 10:47 PM THE GREAT GUN CONTROL WAR OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY—AND ITS LESSONS FOR GUN LAWS TODAY David B. Kopel* Introduction ........................................................................................... 1528 I. From the Roaring Twenties to the Calm Fifties ......................... 1529 A. The 1920s .............................................................................. 1529 B. The New Deal and World War II ...................................... 1532 C. The 1950s .............................................................................. 1535 II. Things Fall Apart .......................................................................... 1537 A. 1966 ....................................................................................... 1539 B. 1967 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]