DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Challenges of the Healthy Workplace Bill – an Interpretive Policy Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations CAHSS Theses and Dissertations 2019 Understanding Challenges of the Healthy Workplace Bill – An Interpretive Policy Analysis Cynthia Contreras Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Share Feedback About This Item This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Understanding Challenges of the Healthy Workplace Bill – An Interpretive Policy Analysis by Cynthia Contreras A Dissertation Presented to the College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences of Nova Southeastern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Nova Southeastern University 2019 Copyright © by Cynthia Contreras November 2019 Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences This dissertation was submitted by Cynthia Contreras under the direction of the chair of the dissertation committee listed below. It was submitted to the College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences and approved in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conflict Analysis and Resolution at Nova Southeastern University. Dedication To my Godparents, Joseph and Miriam Torres, thank you for helping me achieve my dream to come to the United States to live and to come to college. I was able to graduate with my Bachelors, my Masters, and now my Ph.D. thanks to your generosity, selfless guidance and love. To my parents, Juan Francisco Contreras and Elsa Marina Solares; my sister, Gabby Contreras de Gomez, and her family, thank you for your support in all of my educational and American adventures; thank you for always supporting my decisions and encouraging me to do what I love. To my grandmothers Paula de María Aguirre Aguilar and Refugio Grijalva Vazquez, thank you for being the “resilient women” role models in my life. I miss you every day and I carry you in my heart always. To my best friends, Nicte’ Torres, Ana Maria Schwindt and Liz Phrampus. Thank you for your unconditional support always and for encouraging me to finish what I started. You know my story and how difficult my life journey has been. Thank you for not giving up on me. Acknowledgments I would like to thank God and the Virgin Mary for their never-ending blessings and mercy on me throughout my life. I have always been a private person when it comes to faith but I know that I have been never been alone in times of darkness and they have always been guiding me towards the light. I am grateful for all of the faculty and staff at Nova Southeastern University (NSU), especially my dissertation chair, Dr. Neil Katz, for his guidance. He has been instrumental in me getting my topic and ideas approved. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Urszula Strawinska-Zanko and Dr. Judith McKay, for their feedback and support on my topic. I am very grateful to the respondents to my survey for this study, I truly appreciate them taking their time to participate, as well as the expert in the field of Workplace Bullying. Meeting this expert was one of the highlights of my life and I cannot wait to meet this person again in the future. My time at NSU has been memorable and I will never forget my classmates, especially Dr. Sue Walton-Robertson, who became one of my closest friends in this program. I still keep in touch with many of my classmates that have already have graduated and I feel grateful for their advice and feedback as I entered this last step. I feel lucky to have meet so many amazing people in the past 7 years; the stories of my peers and faculty are embedded in my heart always. I am also grateful to the faculty and staff, past and present, of the University of Central Florida who supported my Ph.D. goals, especially Dr. Thomas Bryer, Dr. Mary Ann Feldheim, Dr. Naim Kapucu, Dr. Genaro Lopez, Dr. Wilfredo Lopez-Ojeda, Dr. Mohtashem Samsam, Dr. Raheleh Ahangari, Ms. Jacqueline Waleski, Ms. Margaret Blankenship and Mr. Gregory Weigel. I am grateful for my family, my chosen family, my SEED friends and safe space, friends in the U.S., Guatemala and around the world; especially my generation of cousins, who have been a close part of my life and have always supported my life goals. Finally, I would like to note that I had many experiences with bullying in school, with family and in the workplace. However, the experiences I’ve had are the reason why I’m inspired to work for the voiceless, the marginalized, the abused, the oppressed and the abandoned; for those who feel as if they do not belong anywhere. Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................ vi Abstract .......................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ................................................................................ 1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Goal of the Proposed Research ................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Literature Review ........................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 Defining Workplace Bullying ..................................................................................... 7 Workplace Bullying as Defined in the Healthy Workplace Bill............................... 11 The Healthy Workplace Bill Explained .................................................................... 13 International Anti-Workplace Bullying Laws .......................................................... 16 Importance of Addressing Workplace Bullying and its Interpretations ................... 20 Social Conflict Theories Related to Workplace Bullying ......................................... 20 Chapter 3: Research Method .......................................................................................... 30 Mixed Methodology Research Towards an Interpretive Policy Analysis ................ 30 Research Problem Summary and Research Question .......................................... 32 Research Sub-Questions ...................................................................................... 33 Research Design................................................................................................... 33 Research Design – Qualitative ............................................................................. 34 Research Design – Quantitative ........................................................................... 40 Interpretive Policy Analysis Steps ............................................................................ 43 i Ethical Aspects of this Research Study .................................................................... 46 Chapter 4: Results .......................................................................................................... 49 Analysis, Results and Findings ................................................................................. 49 Qualitative Analysis and Results ......................................................................... 49 Quantitative Analysis and Findings ..................................................................... 81 Results Comparing Responses Between Employees and Managers.................... 94 Mixed Methodology Triangulation .................................................................... 115 Interpretive Policy Analysis Steps, Results and Findings from this Study ............. 124 Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Recommendations ...................................... 130 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 130 Review of the Theoretical Framework .............................................................. 130 Review of the Interpretive Policy Analysis ....................................................... 136 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 140 Contribution to Conflict Analysis and Resolution Field ........................................ 144 Recommendations ................................................................................................... 146 Final Reflection ....................................................................................................... 146 References .................................................................................................................... 148 Appendix A: Workplace Bullying Definitions ............................................................ 157 Appendix B: Workplace Bullying Definitions Used in Bills ...................................... 165 Appendix C: Characteristics/Behaviors that Define Workplace Bullying .................
Recommended publications
  • Workplace Bullying: a Communication Perspective Barbara Daniel

    Workplace Bullying: a Communication Perspective Barbara Daniel

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Workplace Bullying: A Communication Perspective Barbara Daniel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION WORKPLACE BULLYING: A COMMUNICATION PERSPECTIVE By BARBARA DANIEL A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Communication in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Summer Semester, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Barbara Daniel All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Barbara Daniel defended on April 14, 2004. ______________________________ Dr. Stephen McDowell Professor Directing Dissertation _____________________________ Dr. Mary E. Guy Outside Committee Member _____________________________ Dr. Marilyn Young Committee Member _____________________________ Dr. Felecia Jordan-Jackson Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Stephen McDowell, Chair, Department of Communication ________________________________________________ Dr. John Mayo, Dean, College of Communication The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii To my grand-children, Tye, Makayla, Kamari, and Amaya. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Stephen McDowell, you helped me tremendously over the past year, guiding me with patience and encouragement without which I may not have completed this work. You have been a wonderful mentor. Thank you for reading all those drafts and editing my work so willingly. Dr. Marilyn Young, you have always been an inspiration and a role model, from the first class I had with you on historical methods to your comments and suggestions over the past year. Dr. Felecia Jordan-Jackson, thanks for all your very, very helpful suggestions over the past few years and for always having an open door for me throughout this process.
  • Constructing, Programming, and Branding Celebrity on Reality Television

    Constructing, Programming, and Branding Celebrity on Reality Television

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Producing Reality Stardom: Constructing, Programming, and Branding Celebrity on Reality Television A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Television by Lindsay Nicole Giggey 2017 © Copyright by Lindsay Nicole Giggey 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Producing Reality Stardom: Constructing, Programming, and Branding Celebrity on Reality Television by Lindsay Nicole Giggey Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Television University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor John T. Caldwell, Chair The popular preoccupation with celebrity in American culture in the past decade has been bolstered by a corresponding increase in the amount of reality programming across cable and broadcast networks that centers either on established celebrities or on celebrities in the making. This dissertation examines the questions: How is celebrity constructed, scheduled, and branded by networks, production companies, and individual participants, and how do the constructions and mechanisms of celebrity in reality programming change over time and because of time? I focus on the vocational and cultural work entailed in celebrity, the temporality of its production, and the notion of branding celebrity in reality television. Dissertation chapters will each focus on the kinds of work that characterize reality television production cultures at the network, production company, and individual level, with specific attention paid to programming focused ii on celebrity making and/or remaking. Celebrity is a cultural construct that tends to hide the complex labor processes that make it possible. This dissertation unpacks how celebrity status is the product of a great deal of seldom recognized work and calls attention to the hidden infrastructures that support the production, maintenance, and promotion of celebrity on reality television.
  • Power Dynamics and Sexual Harassment Reporting in US State Legislative Bodies Halley Norman Macalester College, Hnorman@Macalester.Edu

    Power Dynamics and Sexual Harassment Reporting in US State Legislative Bodies Halley Norman Macalester College, [email protected]

    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Political Science Honors Projects Political Science Department Spring 5-2019 Why We Hear About It, and Why We Don't: Power Dynamics and Sexual Harassment Reporting in US State Legislative Bodies Halley Norman Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors Part of the American Politics Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Other Political Science Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Norman, Halley, "Why We Hear About It, and Why We Don't: Power Dynamics and Sexual Harassment Reporting in US State Legislative Bodies" (2019). Political Science Honors Projects. 82. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/82 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why We Hear About It, and Why We Don’t: Power Dynamics and Sexual Harassment Reporting in US State Legislative Bodies Halley Norman Advisor: Prof. Julie Dolan Political Science May 1, 2019 Table of Contents Abstract….………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………… 2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 3 Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Cultural Context Chapter
  • Workplace Bullying in Japan

    Workplace Bullying in Japan

    Workplace Bullying in Japan Shino Naito The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training 1. Introduction Workplace bullying has been exposed much more as a social problem in recent years in Japan. It shall be explained in detail later, but if we look at a breakdown of labour counseling at prefectural Labour Bureaux, 6,627 (5.8%) of these cases were bullying and harassment in FY2002, but in FY2012 it had rapidly increased to 51,670 cases (17.0%), becoming the most common consultation for the first time.1 And in courts and labour tribunals, cases related to workplace bullying are on the rise. Psychological injuries including suicide due to workplace bullying, which are determined as industrial accidents, are also increasing. In response to this situation, the Government has started taking countermeasures. In July 2011, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) set up the Round-table Conference regarding Workplace Bullying and Harassment (hereinafter Round-table Conference ), which then launched the Working Group for the Round-table Conference regarding Workplace Bullying and Harassment (hereinafter Working Group ). After repeated discussions, as commissioned by the Round-table Conference, the Working Group released a report on 30th January, 2012. In response, the Round-table Conference published its Recommendations for Prevention and Resolution of Workplace Power Harassment 2 on 15th March. In this paper, I shall look at the general situation with regard to workplace bullying in Japan, specifically the current situation, the consequences and impacts (for companies, victims, colleagues), the background and reasons for the occurrence, the national policies, the intervention and prevention on the part of companies and trade unions, and the role and functioning of voluntary organizations.
  • School Managers' Perceptions of the Occurrence of Upward Bullying In

    School Managers' Perceptions of the Occurrence of Upward Bullying In

    SCHOOL MANAGERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF UPWARD BULLYING IN PUBLIC AND INDEPENDENT GAUTENG SECONDARY SCHOOLS – IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL MANAGEMENT by CIDALIA MARIA DOS SANTOS OLIVIER MINOR–DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MAGISTER EDUCATIONIS in EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP in the FACULTY OF EDUCATION at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR : Prof BR Grobler May 2012 DEDICATION This mini-dissertation is dedicated to my husband, Rynardt Gideon Olivier, for all his support, encouragement and all the moral support that he gave me in studying for and working towards this degree. 2 | P a g e ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My children, Jason, Lauren and Micaela. My mother, Maria Amelia Jordao. My sister, Dr Anabela Nascimento and her husband José Nascimento. My supervisor, Professor BR. Grobler for all of his guidance, patience and uncanny ability to recognise my eternal optimism whilst attempting to dodge all the bullets by suggesting that sentences would be more appropriate. 3 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AIMS OF STUDY AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 1.1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 11 1.3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 13 1.4 RESEARCH STRATEGY AND METHOD 13 1.4.1 Research design 13 1.4.2 Research method 14 1.4.3 Data collection and analysis 15 1.4.4 Demarcation of research 16 1.5 CONCEPT CLARIFICATION 16 1.6 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 16 1.7 BENEFITS OF THE RESEARCH 17 1.8 CONCLUSION 18 CHAPTER TWO - A LITERATURE STUDY TO ELUCIDATE THE COMPONENTS
  • The Measurement and Impact of Workplace Cyberbullying Samuel Farley Institute of Work Psychology Sheffield University Managemen

    The Measurement and Impact of Workplace Cyberbullying Samuel Farley Institute of Work Psychology Sheffield University Managemen

    The Measurement and Impact of Workplace Cyberbullying Samuel Farley Institute of Work Psychology Sheffield University Management School University of Sheffield Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Carolyn Axtell, Christine Sprigg and Iain Coyne for the constant support they have given me over the past three years. They have answered my daily email bombardments with saint-like patience and have been enormously generous with their encouragement. I must also acknowledge staff within Sheffield University Management School for the time and advice they have given me, and I owe huge thanks to the Management School for funding this Ph.D. The past few years would not have been the same without my office mates Liam Goucher, Rob Marchand and Peter Crellin. The enduring memories from this Ph.D will centre around life in B03, including the coffee breaks, Sainsbury’s trips and most of all the arguments. I am especially grateful to Liam and Debs for letting me stay over so often, even though you were quite rude about my washing-up skills. I would also like to thank my fellow Ph.D. students at the doctoral centre for all the good times. If we ever go to the Lake District again I promise to take you on a regular walk and not a nine hour hike. There are numerous friends and family members who have helped me along this journey. Most importantly I would like to thank my Mum and Dad who have supported me through countless years of university (in return I’ll not to make you read this) and both Robbie and Josh for being around on Sky Sports Super Sundays.
  • Understanding Civility/Incivility

    Understanding Civility/Incivility

    Confidential Impartial Informal Independent UNDERSTANDING CIVILITY/INCIVILITY “Civility’s defining characteristic is its ties to city and society. The word derives from the latin civitas, which means “city,” especially in the sense of civic community. Civitas is the same word from which civilization comes. The age-old assumption behind civility is that life in the city has a civilizing effect…Although we can describe civil as courteous, polite, and well mannered, etymology reminds us that they are also supposed to be good citizens and good neighbors.” “Choosing Civility” by P.M. Forni A civil environment produces: 1. Collaborations 2. Ideas – innovation & creativity 3. Customer satisfaction 4. Retention 5. Supportive learning environment 6. Community of trust and inclusion Source: Adapted from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/diversity/workplace/civility The Price of Incivility: ! 48% intentionally decreased their work effort. ! 47% intentionally decreased the time spent at work. ! 38% intentionally decreased the quality of their work. ! 80% lost work time worrying about the incident. ! 63% lost work time avoiding the offender. ! 66% said that their performance declined. ! 78% said that their commitment to the organization declined. ! 12% said that they left their job because of the uncivil treatment. ! 25% admitted to taking their frustration out on customers Source: “The Price of Incivility”, Harvard Business Review, January 2013 Issue. Authors: Christine Porath and Christine Pearson. 1 Bullying is an example of one type of incivility. Bullying
  • Workplace Moral Harassment (*1) Found in Legal Cases in Japan

    Workplace Moral Harassment (*1) Found in Legal Cases in Japan

    Workplace Moral Harassment (*1) Found in Legal Cases in Japan This report describes the present legal situation of workplace bullying and harassment in Japan by presenting the courses of important court cases. (A) Harassment court precedents regarding workmen’s compensation in Japan 1. The system of workmen’s compensation approval in Japan This section reports the realities of moral harassment by introducing cases where company employees had developed work-related depression and committed suicide. The examples shown in this paper are about administrative lawsuits for workmen’s compensation approval, and not cases in which perpetrator companies or employers were punished for their moral harassment responsibilities. To begin, I would like to explain the system of workmen’s compensation approval. When a worker (or bereaved family) insists that (s)he has developed a mental disease such as depression due to work-related causes, the sufferer can claim workmen’s compensation to a Labour Standards Supervision Office with jurisdiction over the workplace of the victim. Then the relevant Labour Standards Supervision Office judges whether the claimed case should be approved as a workmen’s compensation based on a notice called “Judgment guidance for on and off-the-job mental illness caused by mental distress” (message No. 544, Sept. 14, 1999). The following is a brief description about the “Judgment Guidance”. 1. Having been strongly distressed through work before onset of mental illness 2. Psychological distress can be identified solely caused by a specific work 3. Other specific factors (such as previous history of depression) cannot be identified in the person who is affected The mental illness is deemed to be caused by work (and acceptable as workmen’s compensation), only when these three criteria are satisfied.
  • Employment Law Outlook Winter 2012

    Employment Law Outlook Winter 2012

    Employment Law Outlook Winter 2012 Can’t YOU HEAR THAT WHISTLE BLOW? EXTENDING BENEFITS TO FORMER EMPLOYEES - A LESSON LEARNED Samuel J. Webster Cher E. Wynkoop and Corina V. San-Marina Recently, employee whistleblowing has taken on a new and enhanced life. Statutes growing out of the 9/11 terrorist attacks It is common in severance or retirement situations to promise and the economic meltdown have led to an alphabet soup of extended group health or life insurance benefits to separating federal and state whistleblower legislation. Common examples or retiring executives. In fully insured health plans (and plans of whistleblowing statutes include OSHA (workplace safety), utilizing a stop-loss carrier), employers must consult their insurers SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley securities violations), the Title VII’s anti- before committing to such a promise. In a recent court case, retaliation provisions (employment discrimination), and the anti- Bekaert Corporation learned a difficult lesson. retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. In Bekaert Corp. v. Standard Security Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., the While many of these statutes have the laudatory purposes of court agreed with the stop-loss insurance carrier’s decision to protecting the public from corporate cover-ups and conspiracies deny coverage under its policy to a former employee whose and protecting employees from retaliation, typically whistleblower coverage: (1) was based on a Separation Agreement with the claims arise from employees who have some ax to grind with the employer that was never disclosed to the insurer, and (2) was employer – performance issue, personality clash, general dislike not included in the terms of the health plan sponsored by the of the work, “unfair” treatment.
  • Mobbing: Psychological Terror in the Workplace

    Mobbing: Psychological Terror in the Workplace

    “HENRI COANDA” “GENERAL M.R. STEFANIK” AIR FORCE ACADEMY ARMED FORCES ACADEMY ROMANIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE of SCIENTIFIC PAPER AFASES 2014 Brasov, 22-24 May 2014 MOBBING: PSYCHOLOGICAL TERROR IN THE WORKPLACE Viorel CONSTANTINESCU Association of Applied Psychology in the field of Private Security Abstract: Mobbing is a less known phenomenon in Romania, but its effects are real and worrisome. It is a form of psychological abuse in the workplace, carried out by either colleagues or superiors through repeated aggressive acts. This kind of psychological pressure frequently leads to affecting the well-being of the victim either by loss of self-esteem, feelings of victimization, depression, psychosomatic disorders, insomnia, self-destructive behavior (alcoholism), a drop in work efficiency, acute stress and post- traumatic stress. In organizations where mobbing takes place, there is an obvious decrease in productivity. In order to prevent this type of behavior, there needs to be an accurate understanding of the act of mobbing in all contexts. (organizational, professional, individual) Keywords: psychological harassment, emotional abuse, intimidation, mobbing, psychological pressure 1. INTRODUCTION become a long-term victim of a series of abuses, wrongdoings and humiliation meant to Heinz Leymann was the first psychologist to force him to leave his current job. This put forward the idea of mobbing in specialized psychological pressure should not only make literature. He borrowed the term « mobbing » him lose his position, but in most cases will from animal psychology expert Konrad also affect his health. Lorenz, who had observed and studied “Mobbing” is a type of systematic behaviors of isolation/exclusion among psychological harassment in the workplace animals, more explicitly the attacks of a group that happens every time an employee is being of smaller animals against a bigger one.
  • A Researcher Speaks to Ombudsmen About Workplace Bullying LORALE IGH KEASHLY

    A Researcher Speaks to Ombudsmen About Workplace Bullying LORALE IGH KEASHLY

    Journal of the International Ombudsman Association Keashly Some Things You Need to Know but may have been Afraid to Ask: A Researcher Speaks to Ombudsmen about Workplace Bullying LORALE IGH KEASHLY ABSTRACT In the early 1990’s, I became interested in understand- ing persistent and enduring hostility at work. That Workplace bullying is repeated and prolonged hostile interest was spurred by a colleague’s experience at mistreatment of one or more people at work. It has the hands of her director. He yelled and screamed tremendous potential to escalate, drawing in others at her (and others), accusing her of not completing beyond the initial actor-target relationship. Its effects assignments, which she actually had. He lied about can be devastating and widespread individually, her and other subordinates. He would deliberately organizationally and beyond. It is fundamentally a avoid when staff needed his input and then berate systemic phenomenon grounded in the organization’s them for not consulting with him. At other times, he culture. In this article, I identify from my perspective was thoughtful, apologetic, and even constructive. My as a researcher and professional in this area current colleague felt like she was walking on eggshells, never thinking and research findings that may be useful for sure how he would be. Her coworkers had similar ombudsmen in their deliberations and investigations experiences and the group developed ways of coping as well as in their intervention and management of and handling it. For example, his secretary would these hostile behaviors and relationships. warn staff when it was not a good idea to speak with him.
  • Pacers' Toolkit Tackles the Wicked Problems of Bullying in Healthcare

    Pacers' Toolkit Tackles the Wicked Problems of Bullying in Healthcare

    ENABLING SOLUTIONS: PACERS’ TOOLKIT TACKLES THE WICKED PROBLEMS OF BULLYING IN HEALTHCARE Program Developed by the PACERS A Seven Member National Project Team from the 2012 Cohort of the: RWJF Executive Nurse Fellows Program Program Funded by the: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation RWJF ENF Action Learning Team • Rita K. Adeniran, RN, DrNP, CMAC, NEA-BC FAAN President/CEO Innovative and Inclusive Global Solutions Drexel Hill, PA • Beth Bolick, RN, DNP, PPCNP-BC, CPNP-AC, FAAN Professor Rush University Medical Center College of Nursing, Chicago, IL • Ric Cuming, RN, MSN, EdD, NEA-BC, CNOR VP/Chief Nurse Executive Einstein Healthcare Network: Philadelphia, PA • Cole Edmonson, RN, DNP, FACHE, NEA-BC VP/Chief Nursing Officer Texas Health Resources: Presbyterian Dallas • Bernadette Khan, RN, MSN, NEA-BC Vice President Patient Care Services/Chief Nursing Officer New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital • Linda B. Lawson, RN, DNP, NEA-BC Administrative Director for Health Care Transformation Sierra Providence Health Network - El Paso, TX • Debra White, RN, MSN, MBA, ACNS-BC, NEA-BC VP/Chief Nursing Officer Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO • Listed alphabetically, not by weight of contribution This presentation may be used in full or part with attribution. The recommended citation is: Adeniran, R., Bolick, B., Cuming, R., Edmonson, C., Khan, B., Lawson, L., & Wilson, D. (2016). Culture of civility and respect: A healthcare leader’s role. www.stopbullyingtoolkit.org TODAY’S PRESENTER Dr. Rita K. Adeniran President and CEO Innovative