Genode As Desktop OS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genode As Desktop OS Genode as Desktop OS Norman Feske <[email protected]> Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS2 Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS3 Universal Truths Assurance Scalability Accountability Utilization Security Ease of use Genode as Desktop OS4 TCB of an application on Linux: Kernel + loaded kernel modules Daemons X Server + window manager Desktop environment All running processes of the user → User credentials are exposed to millions of lines of code Problem: Complexity Today’s commodity OSes Exceedingly complex trusted computing base (TCB) Genode as Desktop OS5 → User credentials are exposed to millions of lines of code Problem: Complexity Today’s commodity OSes Exceedingly complex trusted computing base (TCB) TCB of an application on Linux: Kernel + loaded kernel modules Daemons X Server + window manager Desktop environment All running processes of the user Genode as Desktop OS5 Problem: Complexity Today’s commodity OSes Exceedingly complex trusted computing base (TCB) TCB of an application on Linux: Kernel + loaded kernel modules Daemons X Server + window manager Desktop environment All running processes of the user → User credentials are exposed to millions of lines of code Genode as Desktop OS5 Huge attack surface for directed attacks Zero-day exploits Problem: Complexity (II) Implications: High likelihood for bugs (need for frequent security updates) Genode as Desktop OS6 Zero-day exploits Problem: Complexity (II) Implications: High likelihood for bugs (need for frequent security updates) Huge attack surface for directed attacks Genode as Desktop OS6 Problem: Complexity (II) Implications: High likelihood for bugs (need for frequent security updates) Huge attack surface for directed attacks Zero-day exploits Genode as Desktop OS6 Universal Truths Assurance Scalability Accountability Utilization Security Ease of use Genode as Desktop OS7 → Largely indeterministic behavior → Need for complex heuristics, schedulers Problem: Resource management Pretension of unlimited resources Lack of accounting Genode as Desktop OS8 → Need for complex heuristics, schedulers Problem: Resource management Pretension of unlimited resources Lack of accounting → Largely indeterministic behavior Genode as Desktop OS8 Problem: Resource management Pretension of unlimited resources Lack of accounting → Largely indeterministic behavior → Need for complex heuristics, schedulers Genode as Desktop OS8 Problem: Resource management Pretension of unlimited resources Lack of accounting → Largely indeterministic behavior → Need for complex heuristics, schedulers Genode as Desktop OS8 Universal Truths Assurance Scalability Accountability Utilization Security Ease of use Genode as Desktop OS9 ...but how to compose those? Key technologies Microkernels Componentization, kernelization Capability-based security Virtualization Genode as Desktop OS 10 Key technologies Microkernels Componentization, kernelization Capability-based security Virtualization ...but how to compose those? Genode as Desktop OS 10 Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS 11 Idea → Application-specific TCB Genode as Desktop OS 12 Combined with virtualization Genode as Desktop OS 13 Each component lives in a virtual environment A component that possesses a capability can I Use it (invoke) I Delegate it to acquainted components Object capabilities Delegation of authority between components Genode as Desktop OS 14 A component that possesses a capability can I Use it (invoke) I Delegate it to acquainted components Object capabilities Delegation of authority between components Each component lives in a virtual environment Genode as Desktop OS 14 I Delegate it to acquainted components Object capabilities Delegation of authority between components Each component lives in a virtual environment A component that possesses a capability can I Use it (invoke) Genode as Desktop OS 14 Object capabilities Delegation of authority between components Each component lives in a virtual environment A component that possesses a capability can I Use it (invoke) I Delegate it to acquainted components Genode as Desktop OS 14 Recursive system structure Genode as Desktop OS 15 Resource management Explicit assignment of physical resources to components Genode as Desktop OS 16 Resource management (II) Resources can be attached to sessions Genode as Desktop OS 17 Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS 18 Components Genode as Desktop OS 19 Components Genode as Desktop OS 20 Components Genode as Desktop OS 21 Components Genode as Desktop OS 22 Components Genode as Desktop OS 23 Components Genode as Desktop OS 24 Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS 25 Faithful virtualization (traditional) root mode non-root mode authorized to change the kernel VM process highly complex access control? /dev/vboxdrv Guest OS kernel highly complex vboxdrv.ko VMMR0 / Hypervisor Genode as Desktop OS 26 VirtualBox as Genode subsystem Unmodified Guest OS Kernel virtual virtual virtual CPU RAM device Resource Device VMM Multiplexer Driver Init Core User Mode NOVA Hypervisor Privileged Mode Genode as Desktop OS 27 OS-level virtualization Genode as Desktop OS 28 OS-level virtualization Genode as Desktop OS 28 OS-level virtualization (example) Editor Noux Backdrop FS-ROM RAM FS Runtime config file file ROM system system Init Genode as Desktop OS 29 Report ROM Decorator Layouter Report ROM input Report ROM Report ROM ROM <window-layout> <hover > <window-list> <hover > <window-layout> ... ... ... ... ... </window-layout> </hover > </window-list> </hover > </window-layout> Nitpicker Window manager Nitpicker App Nitpicker Init Multi-component applications Genode as Desktop OS 30 Report ROM Decorator Layouter Report ROM input Report ROM Report ROM ROM <window-layout> <hover > <window-list> <hover > <window-layout> ... ... ... ... ... </window-layout> </hover > </window-list> </hover > </window-layout> Nitpicker Window manager Nitpicker App Nitpicker Init Multi-component applications Genode as Desktop OS 30 “Turmvilla” scenario timer acpi drv acpi report rom VirtualBox Noux platform drv ahci drv part blk log file terminal log rump fs wifi drv ps2 drv usb drv fb drv rtc drv Nitpicker Window trace subject reporter CLI monitor input merger GUI Manager report rom nitpicker wm report rom wm layouter decorator vbox pointer shared fs config fs config rom rom cli nit fb Init cli terminal Genode as Desktop OS 31 Rich applications Testnit Nitpicker Virtual Launchpad GUI Framebuffer Arora Web Browser TCP/IP Init Nitpicker Loader Menu GUI Init Genode as Desktop OS 32 Outline 1. Why another operating system? 2. Architectural principles 3. Framework for building operating systems 4. Desktop scenarios 5. Present and future Genode as Desktop OS 33 Disclaimer Currently used by only a few enthusiasts No package management Limited hardware support Not yet palatable for uninitiated end users Genode as Desktop OS 34 Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Genode as Desktop OS 35 Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Genode as Desktop OS 35 RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms Genode as Desktop OS 35 USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V Genode as Desktop OS 35 Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Genode as Desktop OS 35 Collaborating with Qubes? Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Genode as Desktop OS 35 Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Genode as Desktop OS 35 Ambitions Eating our own dog food (tool chain, email, IRC...) Capability-based desktop environment Muen and seL4 as base platforms RISC-V USB Armory Nix package manager Collaborating with Qubes? Genode as Desktop OS 35 The Book “Genode Foundations” GENODE Operating System Framework Foundations Norman Feske http://genode.org/documentation/genode-foundations-15-05.pdf Genode as Desktop OS 36 Thank you Genode OS Framework http://genode.org Genode Labs GmbH http://www.genode-labs.com Source code at GitHub http://github.com/genodelabs/genode Genode as Desktop OS 37.
Recommended publications
  • The Design of the EMPS Multiprocessor Executive for Distributed Computing
    The design of the EMPS multiprocessor executive for distributed computing Citation for published version (APA): van Dijk, G. J. W. (1993). The design of the EMPS multiprocessor executive for distributed computing. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR393185 DOI: 10.6100/IR393185 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1993 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Amigaos 3.2 FAQ 47.1 (09.04.2021) English
    $VER: AmigaOS 3.2 FAQ 47.1 (09.04.2021) English Please note: This file contains a list of frequently asked questions along with answers, sorted by topics. Before trying to contact support, please read through this FAQ to determine whether or not it answers your question(s). Whilst this FAQ is focused on AmigaOS 3.2, it contains information regarding previous AmigaOS versions. Index of topics covered in this FAQ: 1. Installation 1.1 * What are the minimum hardware requirements for AmigaOS 3.2? 1.2 * Why won't AmigaOS 3.2 boot with 512 KB of RAM? 1.3 * Ok, I get it; 512 KB is not enough anymore, but can I get my way with less than 2 MB of RAM? 1.4 * How can I verify whether I correctly installed AmigaOS 3.2? 1.5 * Do you have any tips that can help me with 3.2 using my current hardware and software combination? 1.6 * The Help subsystem fails, it seems it is not available anymore. What happened? 1.7 * What are GlowIcons? Should I choose to install them? 1.8 * How can I verify the integrity of my AmigaOS 3.2 CD-ROM? 1.9 * My Greek/Russian/Polish/Turkish fonts are not being properly displayed. How can I fix this? 1.10 * When I boot from my AmigaOS 3.2 CD-ROM, I am being welcomed to the "AmigaOS Preinstallation Environment". What does this mean? 1.11 * What is the optimal ADF images/floppy disk ordering for a full AmigaOS 3.2 installation? 1.12 * LoadModule fails for some unknown reason when trying to update my ROM modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Morpho-Syntactic Interactions Between V and C in Romance1
    Dialectologia. Special issue, V (2015), 293-319. ISSN: 2013-2247 Received 7 August 2015. Accepted 26 September 2015. MORPHO-SYNTACTIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN V AND C IN ROMANCE1 Ángel J. GALLEGO Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [email protected] Abstract This paper discusses a series of morpho-syntactic (a)symmetries that emerge in the vP and CP levels of different Romance languages. The (a)symmetries considered indicate a P or D oriented nature for specific functional heads placed in the vP and CP domains, an idea that has been at the forefront of micro-parametric studies ever since the 80s (cf. Kayne 1984, 2000; Uriagereka 1995). The consequences of this investigation for the status of parameter theory are further considered (cf. Chomsky 1981; Baker 2001; Biberauer 2008; Kayne 2000; Picallo 2014) and the study of the lexicon, arguably the main locus of linguistic variation (cf. Halle & Marantz 1993; Hale & Keyser 1993; Starke 2014; Uriagereka 2008). Keywords complementizers, lexicon, micro-parameters, Romance languages, variation, verbs INTERACCIONES MORFOSINTÁCTICAS ENTRE V Y C EN ROMANCE Resumen Este trabajo discute una serie de (a)simetrías morfosintácticas que aparecen en los niveles del Sv y el SC de diferentes lenguas románicas. Dichas (a)simetrías indican que núcleos funcionales pertenecientes a los dominios Sv y SC despliegan una naturaleza similar a P o a D, una idea que ha 1 A previous version of this paper was presented at the V Westmost Europe Dialect Syntax (Wedisyn) Meeting, held at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (24-25 April 2014), whose audience I thank for questions and suggestions. Special thanks go to Roberta D’Alessandro, Carlota de Benito, Inés Fernández-Ordóñez, and Álvaro Octavio de Toledo for comments and (on-going) discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors to This Issue
    Contributors to this Issue Stuart I. Feldman received an A.B. from Princeton in Astrophysi- cal Sciences in 1968 and a Ph.D. from MIT in Applied Mathemat- ics in 1973. He was a member of technical staf from 1973-1983 in the Computing Science Research center at Bell Laboratories. He has been at Bellcore in Morristown, New Jersey since 1984; he is now division manager of Computer Systems Research. He is Vice Chair of ACM SIGPLAN and a member of the Technical Policy Board of the Numerical Algorithms Group. Feldman is best known for having written several important UNIX utilities, includ- ing the MAKE program for maintaining computer programs and the first portable Fortran 77 compiler (F77). His main technical interests are programming languages and compilers, software confrguration management, software development environments, and program debugging. He has worked in many computing areas, including aþbraic manipulation (the portable Altran sys- tem), operating systems (the venerable Multics system), and sili- con compilation. W. Morven Gentleman is a Principal Research Oftcer in the Com- puting Technology Section of the National Research Council of Canada, the main research laboratory of the Canadian govern- ment. He has a B.Sc. (Hon. Mathematical Physics) from McGill University (1963) and a Ph.D. (Mathematics) from princeton University (1966). His experience includes 15 years in the Com- puter Science Department at the University of Waterloo, ûve years at Bell Laboratories, and time at the National Physical Laboratories in England. His interests include software engi- neering, embedded systems, computer architecture, numerical analysis, and symbolic algebraic computation. He has had a long term involvement with program portability, going back to the Altran symbolic algebra system, the Bell Laboratories Library One, and earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • QUICK START GUIDE 4G Lite Product Series Table of Contents
    QUICK START GUIDE 4G Lite Product Series Table of Contents STEP ONE: OVERVIEW 1 to 4 STEP TWO: WIRING 5 to 11 STEP THREE: COMMUNICATION 12 to 15 STEP FOUR: ACP OR SDAC 16 to 17 STEP FIVE: SOFTWARE 18 to 21 STEP SIX: ENROLLMENT 22 to 24 STEP SEVEN: TIME & ATTENDANCE OPERATION 25 to 29 ACP OR SDAC (4G V-Station Lite) STEP FOUR: QUICK START GUIDE II Product Packaging Checklist 4G CR-PASS, 4G V-FLEX LITE AND 4G SECURECONTROL 4G V-STATION LITE QTY ITEM QTY ITEM 1 4G CR-Pass Device or 4G V-Flex Lite or 4G V-Station Lite 1 4G SecureControl Device 1 Installation CD 1 Terminal Block, 1x12po, 3.5mm, RA 1 Installation Guide (on Installation CD) 1 Terminal Block, 1x14po, 3.5mm, RA 1 Operator’s Manual (on Installation CD) 1 Quick Start Guide (Hard-copy and on Installation CD) 1 Quick Start Guide (Hard-copy and on Installation CD) 4 Dry Wall Anchor, Nylon, #4-8, 1” Length 1 SST Wall Mount Plate 4 Self-Tapping Screw, Philip Pan Head, SST, #6, 1” Length 1 4G MicroUSB Device Cable 1 Logo Sticker 1 4G MicroUSB PC Cable 1 Clamp-on Ferrite Core (WLAN Only) 1 Clamp-on Ferrite Core 1 Antenna, Omni Plug Connector (WLAN Only) 1 Machine Screw, Pin-in-Hex Security, Pan Head, SST, 6-32, 1/4” Length 1 Security Key, Pin-in-Hex, 2.5” Length NOTE: Electronic documentation is provided in Adobe® 1 Security Screw Retainer, Stainless Steel Acrobat® format (PDF). Adobe® Acrobat® Reader is available 2 Self-Tapping Screw, Philip Pan Head, SST, #6, 1” Length on the Installation CD or at http://www.adobe.com OVERVIEW 2 Dry Wall Anchor, Nylon, #4-8, 1” Length 2 Machine Screw,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CS307 Operating Systems Introduction Fan Wu Department of Computer Science and Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Spring 2020 Operating Systems Operating Systems 2 Operating Systems UNIX-family: BSD(Berkeley Software Distribution), System-V, GNU/Linux, MINIX, Nachos, OS X, iOS BSD-family: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD System-V-family: AIX, HP-UX, IRIX, Solaris Linux-family: Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE, Linux Mint, Google's Android, WebOS, Meego MS-DOS, Microsoft Windows, Windows Mobile, Win-CE, WP8 AmigaOS Symbian, MeeGo Google Chrome OS OS/2 XrossMediaBar(XMB) for PS3, Orbis OS for PS4 Input Output System for Wii Tiny-OS, LynxOS, QNX, VxWorks Operating Systems 3 Four Components of a Computer System People, machines, other computers Application programs define the ways in which theSystem system programs resources are arecomputer used to software solve the computingdesigned to problems operate theof thecomputer users hardware and toControls provide and a platformcoordinates for runninguse of hardware application among programsvarious applications and users provides basic computing resources Operating Systems 4 Computer System Structure Hardware – provides basic computing resources CPU, memory, I/O devices Operating system – Controls and coordinates use of hardware among various applications and users System programs – are computer software designed to operate the computer hardware and to provide a platform for running application programs BIOS and device drivers Application programs – define the ways in
    [Show full text]
  • Microkernel Construction Introduction
    Microkernel Construction Introduction Nils Asmussen 04/09/2020 1 / 32 Normal Organization Thursday, 4th DS, 2 SWS Slides: www.tudos.org ! Studies ! Lectures ! MKC Subscribe to our mailing list: www.tudos.org/mailman/listinfo/mkc2020 In winter term: Microkernel-based operating systems (MOS) Various labs 2 / 32 Organization due to COVID-19 Slides and video recordings of lectures will be published Questions can be asked on the mailing list Subscribe to the mailing list! Practical exercises are planed for the end of the semester Depending on how COVID-19 continues, exercises are in person or we use some video-conferencing tool 3 / 32 Goals 1 Provide deeper understanding of OS mechanisms 2 Look at the implementation details of microkernels 3 Make you become enthusiastic microkernel hackers 4 Propaganda for OS research done at TU Dresden and Barkhausen Institut 4 / 32 Outline Organization Monolithic vs. Microkernel Kernel design comparison Examples for microkernel-based systems Vision vs. Reality Challenges Overview About L4/NOVA 5 / 32 Monolithic Kernel System Design u s Application Application Application e r k Kernel e r File Network n e Systems Stacks l m Memory Process o Drivers Management Management d e Hardware 6 / 32 Monolithic Kernel OS (Propaganda) System components run in privileged mode No protection between system components Faulty driver can crash the whole system Malicious app could exploit bug in faulty driver More than 2=3 of today's OS code are drivers No need for good system design Direct access to data structures Undocumented
    [Show full text]
  • Porting the QEMU Virtualization Software to MINIX 3
    Porting the QEMU virtualization software to MINIX 3 Master's thesis in Computer Science Erik van der Kouwe Student number 1397273 [email protected] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Faculty of Sciences Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Supervised by dr. Andrew S. Tanenbaum Second reader: dr. Herbert Bos 12 August 2009 Abstract The MINIX 3 operating system aims to make computers more reliable and more secure by keeping privileged code small and simple. Unfortunately, at the moment only few major programs have been ported to MINIX. In particular, no virtualization software is available. By isolating software environments from each other, virtualization aids in software development and provides an additional way to achieve reliability and security. It is unclear whether virtualization software can run efficiently within the constraints of MINIX' microkernel design. To determine whether MINIX is capable of running virtualization software, I have ported QEMU to it. QEMU provides full system virtualization, aiming in particular at portability and speed. I find that QEMU can be ported to MINIX, but that this requires a number of changes to be made to both programs. Allowing QEMU to run mainly involves adding standardized POSIX functions that were previously missing in MINIX. These additions do not conflict with MINIX' design principles and their availability makes porting other software easier. A list of recommendations is provided that could further simplify porting software to MINIX. Besides just porting QEMU, I also investigate what performance bottlenecks it experiences on MINIX. Several areas are found where MINIX does not perform as well as Linux. The causes for these differences are investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Microkernels Mitigate Microarchitectural Attacks?⋆
    Can Microkernels Mitigate Microarchitectural Attacks?? Gunnar Grimsdal1, Patrik Lundgren2, Christian Vestlund3, Felipe Boeira1, and Mikael Asplund1[0000−0003−1916−3398] 1 Department of Computer and Information Science, Link¨oping University, Sweden ffelipe.boeira,[email protected] 2 Westermo Network Technologies [email protected] 3 Sectra AB, Link¨oping,Sweden Abstract. Microarchitectural attacks such as Meltdown and Spectre have attracted much attention recently. In this paper we study how effec- tive these attacks are on the Genode microkernel framework using three different kernels, Okl4, Nova, and Linux. We try to answer the question whether the strict process separation provided by Genode combined with security-oriented kernels such as Okl4 and Nova can mitigate microar- chitectural attacks. We evaluate the attack effectiveness by measuring the throughput of data transfer that violates the security properties of the system. Our results show that the underlying side-channel attack Flush+Reload used in both Meltdown and Spectre, is effective on all in- vestigated platforms. We were also able to achieve high throughput using the Spectre attack, but we were not able to show any effective Meltdown attack on Okl4 or Nova. Keywords: Genode, Meltdown, Spectre, Flush+Reload, Okl4, Nova 1 Introduction It used to be the case that general-purpose operating systems were mostly found in desktop computers and servers. However, as IoT devices are becoming in- creasingly more sophisticated, they tend more and more to require a powerful operating system such as Linux, since otherwise all basic services must be im- plemented and maintained by the device developers. At the same time, security has become a prime concern both in IoT and in the cloud domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Software Workshop 2007 ( FSW-07)
    Flight Software Workshop 2007 ( FSW-07) Current and Future Flight Operating Systems Alan Cudmore Flight Software Branch NASAIGSFC November 2007 Page I Outline Types of Real Time Operating Systems - Classic Real Time Operating Systems - Hybrid Real Time Operating Systems - Process Model Real Time Operating Systems - Partitioned Real Time Operating Systems Is the Classic RTOS Showing it's Age? Process Model RTOS for Flight Systems Challenges of Migrating to a Process Model RTOS Which RTOS Solution is Best? Conclusion November 2007 Page 2 GSFC Satellites with COTS Real (waiting for launch) (launched 8/92) (launched 12/98) (launched 3/98) (launched 2/99) (12/04) XTE (launched 12/95) TRMM (launched 11/97) JWST lSlM (201 1) Icesat GLAS f01/03) MAP (launched 06/01) LRO HST 386 4llH -%Y ST-5 (5/06) November 2007 Page 3 Classic Real Time OS What is a "Classic" RTOS? - Developed for easy COTS development on common 16 and 32 bit CPUs. - Designed for systems with single address space, and low resources - Literally Dozens of choices with a wide array of features. November 2007 Page 4 Classic RTOS - VRTX Ready Systems VRTX Size: Small - 8KB RTOS Kernel Provides: Very basic RTOS services Used on: - Small Explorer Missions Used from 1992 to 1999 8086 and 80386 Processors - Medium Explorer Missions XTE (1995) TRMM (1997) 80386 Processors - Hubble Space Telescope 80386 Processors Advantages: - Small, fast - Uses 80386 memory protection -- A feature we have missed since we stopped using it! Current use: - Only being maintained, not used for new development
    [Show full text]
  • Operating System Support for Run-Time Security with a Trusted Execution Environment
    Operating System Support for Run-Time Security with a Trusted Execution Environment - Usage Control and Trusted Storage for Linux-based Systems - by Javier Gonz´alez Ph.D Thesis IT University of Copenhagen Advisor: Philippe Bonnet Submitted: January 31, 2015 Last Revision: May 30, 2015 ITU DS-nummer: D-2015-107 ISSN: 1602-3536 ISBN: 978-87-7949-302-5 1 Contents Preface8 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Context....................................... 10 1.2 Problem....................................... 12 1.3 Approach...................................... 14 1.4 Contribution.................................... 15 1.5 Thesis Structure.................................. 16 I State of the Art 18 2 Trusted Execution Environments 20 2.1 Smart Cards.................................... 21 2.1.1 Secure Element............................... 23 2.2 Trusted Platform Module (TPM)......................... 23 2.3 Intel Security Extensions.............................. 26 2.3.1 Intel TXT.................................. 26 2.3.2 Intel SGX.................................. 27 2.4 ARM TrustZone.................................. 29 2.5 Other Techniques.................................. 32 2.5.1 Hardware Replication........................... 32 2.5.2 Hardware Virtualization.......................... 33 2.5.3 Only Software............................... 33 2.6 Discussion...................................... 33 3 Run-Time Security 36 3.1 Access and Usage Control............................. 36 3.2 Data Protection................................... 39 3.3 Reference
    [Show full text]
  • The Distributed V Kernel and Its Performance for Diskless Workstations
    July 1983 Report No. STAN-B-83-973 Also twtdered C’SL 246 The Distributed V Kernel and Its Performance for Diskless Workstations bY David R. Cheriton and Wily Zwaenepoel Department of Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 . The Distributed V Kernel and its Performance for Diskless Workstations David R. Cheriton and Willy Zwaenepoel Computer Systems Laboratory Departments of Computer’ Science and Electrical Engineering Stanford University Abstract Ethernet [7]. Network interprocess communication is predominantly used for remote file access since most SUN The distributed V kernel is a message-oriented kernel that workstations at Stanford are configured without a local disk provides uniform local and network interprocess communication. This paper reports our experience with the implementation and It is primarily being used in an environment of diskless use of the V kernel. Of particular interest are the controversial workstations connected by a high-speed local network to a set of aspects of our approach, namely: file servers. We describe a performance evaluation of the kernel, 1. The use of diskless workstations with all secondary storage with particular emphasis on the cost of network file access. Our provided by backend file servers. results show that over a local network: 2. The use of a general purpose network interprocess 1. Diskless workstations can access remote files with minimal communication facility (as opposed to special-purpose file performance penalty. access protocols) and, in particular, the use of a Thoth-like 2. The V message facility can be used to access remote files at inter-process communication mechanism. comparable cost to any well-tuned specialized file access The more conventional approach is to configure workstations protocol.
    [Show full text]