DALLAS COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 900 Jackson Street, (Founders Square) 6th Floor, Suite 680 Dallas, Texas * 75202 DANIEL R. GARZA Purchasing Director

August 1, 2017

ADDENDUM # 3

BID NO. # 2017-054-6678

CONTRACT FOR MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NO. 10217B DENTON DRIVE FROM 470 SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LANE TO 850 NORTH OF ROYAL LANE

WHEREAS, Supplemental Agreement has been added to the bid specifications.

Whereas, Special Specifications has been added to the bid specification

Whereas, Ballast Wall Details has been added to the bid specification

Whereas, PAGE 27 IS HEREBY REPLACED WITH PAGE 27A

Whereas, Page 28 is hereby replaced with page 28A

Whereas, Page 31 is hereby replaced with page 31A

Whereas, Page 32 is hereby replaced with page 32A

Whereas, Page 33 is hereby replaced with page 33A

Except as provided herein / above, all other specification requirements of the original solicitation referenced shall remain unchanged in and full force and effect. This addendum should be signed and returned with your Solicitation package on or before Thursday, August 17, 2017 @ 2:00 p.m. CST.

This addendum is hereby acknowledged, understood and considered in our Solicitation.

Printed Name:

Signature of Authorized Representative:

Title:

Company: 1

QCI) m0 m

0> ‘

Agreement Enclosed

Assistant Charles

cc:

0623

Memorandum

Jan Analeslie

Ramon Mildred Clifford

Jeniffer Michael Gayle Bonnie

Michael Gavino

R/

August

Mr.

Agreement: City Supplemental

adopted 90—2408,

9

M.

Hart,

is

Robert

No.

City

Miguez,

Pepper,

Secretary

Bierfeld

Meeder,

Sotelo,

one

Cox,

Marcotte,

Coker, 10,

V.

Varley,

June

1

Muncy, City

adopted

Attorney

fully

for

Keheley,

Sloan

Director,

Planning

Director,

Director,

Agreement

26,

Manager

lie

Department

Director Director,

your

City

City

Only

executed

Director,

July

1990)

Reason

official

Assistant

Attorney

Controller

You

Department

and

25,

Department

Property

of (w/one No. (u/one

(w/one

(w/one

(u/one

And

Streets

of

original

I

Planning

1990;

Are

Dallas

Development 1

Transportation

Here City

City

executed original

executed

executed to

executed

Is

To

Management

and DART (u/one

of

Serve

records.

of

Water

City/DART

of

Manager

(w/one

lie

Transportation

Sanitation

Public

Board

the

Cthe

copy) contract)

copy) original

copy)

copy)

(City

Utilities

Of

original

subject

DiiLu

(w/one Resolution

(w/one

Works

CITYOF

Master

Council

contract)

executed

executed

DALLAS

contract)

Supplemental

Resolution

Interlocal

90—0108,

copy)

copy) THE COUNTY

SUPPLEMENTAL home by Interlocal pursuant 900036, and the a various connection DART facilities. of 1.1

in (DART),

procedural

City

mutual part

STATE

development

DART

This

rule The

The

and

OF

Purpose

Council

a is

by

light

parties to

purpose

Transportation the

OF DALLAS

municipal Supplemental

regional

interest:

Agreement made

with

the

Article

TEXAS

AGREEMENT

City

framework

rail

City

by Resolution

of

facilities

hereto

of

as

and

transportation

the

transit

) )

corporation,

1118y, this

outside

(“Agreement’t),

it

(1)

PLANNING

NO.1

Agreement between

DART PURPOSE and

agree

System relates

Supplemental

the

No.

as

a

owned,

corridors

TO

Transportation

its

cooperative

scheduled

to amended, ARTICLE

CITY/DART

the 90-0810

AND

within AND

—1—

to

city

No.

and the

authority

operated

City

DEFINITIONS

DEVELOPMENT

the

dated

1

Dallas

following

within

limits),

Agreement I

the

to

and

Texas

planning

completion

of

MASTER

working

that

February

Dallas

DART Dallas

System

or

Area

created

the

Revised

maintained

focusing

certain

regarding

INTERLOCAL

Board

No.

and

City

Rapid

relationship

city

and

(City),

dates

28,

and

development 1

Civil

of

Resolution

its

is

limits

Master

Transit

1990,

on

existing

Dallas, for

the

to

in

a

associated

seven

AGREEMENT:

Statutes.

Texas

establish

whole

the

approved

planning

(or

between

of

areas

as

No.

in

or planning adopted

incorporated systems stations,

of traffic Agreement: facilities

the In 1.2.2 1.2

1.2.1

(1) (4)

(2)

(3)

this

addition

joint

following

transit commitment ef transportation reciprocal establishment

Definition forts

February mitigation

Supplemental

(rail

and

development; transit

Grade designated guideway accessory drive, Complex, residential, of

facilities

and

to

by

location

to Article

system

and

terms

other

the

reference

to grants

facilitate

Semaration

28,

or

centers, high

of

measures;

expeditious

terms of

Station and

and and

uses. are

access

Agreement

Terms 1990,

fixed

in lll8y,

in

of

principles

occupancy

of

recreational,

a

(5)

other

defined its the

addition

transit

defined

public

in

rights.

and maintenance

planning the

facilities;

or - easement

associated

V.A.T.S.,

DART

City

and

The

planning

Terminal

attached

protection

review

includes:

—2—

as

or

vehicle

facilities

and

Service

physical to in (7)

Council

used

private

and

the

transit

at

off—premise

procedures

institutional

of

which

shops,

facilities;

issues; —

a

hereto

development

Master

in

(3)

lanes)

DART

Any

Plan

crossing

Resolution

of

separation

this

street,

and

station

may

uses,

right—of-way;

development

park

and

pursuant

as

,

Interlocal

fixed

relating

Supplemental

include

including

signs.

Exhibit

City

transit

by

and

and

thoroughfare,

area

of

No.

means of

guideway

work ride

a

to

industrial

commercial,

a

90-0810, planning;

The

to regional

so

A;

Agreement,

Section

support

DART

guideways,

(6)

of

program

land

content

(2)

a

use,

the

and 14 1.2.8

1.2.7

1.2.6 1.2.5 1.2.4 1.2.3

planning Station connections vehicular manufactured difference easements, City Station Station business, enables Section Median/Shared clearances Off—Premise system. within Grade amenities service thoroughfare. or operation easement located.” facilities, is

alley,

“a

determines

sign Level

the

Areas patrons

or Interface - 216.002

process.

by

within

circulation Structures, person, of thoroughfare

median

product and displaying

in for

Sjqi Street and a

(including

or a

Right-of—Way elevation

DART -

passage

DART sub-surface

The of parking, to sold should

the -

organization, or Planning

An The

Crossings not enter

fixed

fixed land

boundaries

on surface

—3—

platforms,

advertising

“off—premise facilities,’

Texas of principally right-of-way, be

streets,

sufficient

the

guideway

and outside landscaping

guideway

rail

considered

and -

(R..0.W.)

premises

R.0.W. —

Local

The leave

The

or

aerial

activity, of

sidewalks,

concourses,

the

planning

street at

copy

intermodal

to crossing

Government or

sign”

the

the located

Operation

of

drive

the

on

and

station

in

allow

roadway

walkways)

a

that

station

light

which

its

vehicles.

public

same

as passenger

event,

for

or

or

pedestrian

of adequate

defined

pertains

station

pedestrian

transfer

rail

sites

lane(s) elevation. access

Code, the primarily

direct

any -

site,

street

and

The

place,

sign

transit

street

that

which

in

area

which

to

or

is

a and

the Section subsequent 3.2 the

in 3.1 dates maintenance vicinity efforts Cliff 2.3 2.4 rail funds; 2.2 2.1 1.2.9

the DART The For DART DART DART lines DART Technical Definition for light Service 1OA to appropriate the Financial between the commits Transportation. and commits Traffic published commits referred integration DART

amendments achieve will of rail facility purpose various the DART’s Plan” COMNITMENTS and be of Simpson line MAJOR to City that

that Impact Plan the the to Malor Policy and department of is along locate

thereto enabling will light of in above commit the the first defined this CHANGES and amended Stuart Study stations “Traffic Chanq Review design the not South REGARDING summarized the rail ARTICLE Supplemental as operational ARTICLE to

(hereinafter —4— be legislation, South — well directors as IN Road by rail transit undertake Those Oak dependent with and Impact THE all the III Oak as and assembly Cliff LIGHT II construction major SERVICE on private procedures City the corridors Cliff Ledbetter Study lines Agreement, Exhibit and

called all and RAIL Article scheduled upon

of changes plant staff West Guidelines” sector Dallas reasonable light in PLAN FACILITIES receipt A, the and “Major as Road; of and Oak 1118y, from attached rail identified “Major materials completion development. specified the Starter Department major Cliff of the Changes”). best South line as and Changes federal City hereto. System; light in Oak in in the and f DART will review proposed Major Changes and any other Service Plan amendments within the City limits. 3.3 City Council Review and Approval Consistent with State legislation, the City Council shall have the right to review and approve the addition of new fixed guideway routes. As used in this Supplemental Agreement, “the addition of a new fixed guideway route” means (1) the creation of a fixed guideway route by connecting a point currently designated on the Service Plan to a point not designated on the current DART Service Plan, (2) the shifting of a route from the route specified in the Service Plan to a new location which is more than 300 feet measured horizontally from the existing Service Plan route or less than 300 feet if the shifting moves the guideway to a street right—of—way, or (3) the creation of a fixed guideway route beginning and terminating at points not designated in the current DART Service Plan. For purposes of measurement, the Service Plan route shall be considered as filling the boundaries of any right-of-way shown as occupied (either exclusively or shared) by the DART System in the Service Plan, For example, if a railroad corridor is designated as the route in the Service Plan, the 300 foot horizontal measurement shall be measured from the nearest boundary of the railroad right-of way. Nothing in this Section 3.3 shall be construed to limit in any manner the right and obligation of the City Council to approve the addition of a fixed guideway route as required by changes in state law before same may be added to the DART Service Plan. ARTICLE IV

FIXED FACILITY SITE SELECTION AND SUBSEQUENT CITY APPROVALS

4.1 DART Responsibiljy

DART has the responsibility for selecting sites for all its facilities. The selection of sites and designation of vehicular and pedestrian entrance locations for DART’s fixed facilities within the City limits will be performed by DART with input by and in coordination with the City as required. 4.2 Alternative Development and Evaluation For each DART fixed facility to be located within the City limits, DART, in consultation with the City, will identify feasible alternative sites. For each of the alternatives, the City at its discretion will provide to DART an analysis and/or review of the impacts on existing land use and possible future land use. The City may also analyze and/or review development and traffic impacts for each alternative. After the alternatives have been narrowed down to two or three sites, and entrance locations have been proposed, the City will

provide to DART a more detailed analysis of the impacts on existing and potential land use and development. DART will then prepare and submit a traffic impact study for the preferred alternative for City review consistent with City policies and ordinances.

4.3 DART Public Involvement In the alternatives development and evaluation process, DART will conduct its established public involvement process, which consists of open meetings, briefings, public hearings and workshops with neighborhood residents, property owners, business persons and other interested groups. The number and type of public involvement

—6— 4.6 permits, State activities. accommodate review for timely preferred documentation DART 4.5 a for committees requested for development meetings 4.4 City coordination DART’s information facilities, preferred City each each DART Zoning agrees Following City DART Briefings staff enabling by manner adopted actions approval DART fixed and will the Review site by and or will the to alternative. on and impacts. the other is City. as and fixed commissions, City comply legislation plan submit tentative facility policies traffic, DART may participate necessary or such City of information staff public authorizations to facility, vary This eminent facility, with becomes supplemental concerning the prior land and will DART depending submission with information all or City or procedures in domain use, required available as DART selection to brief the —7— applicable thoroughfare this other for may the the City and required will information upon authority, review appropriate public may then alternatives DART City projected activities by Council for and submit of the be provisions potential be Board’s activities, along a selecting involvement plan by accompanied is complexity available preferred necessary City at as in zoning City or with amendments will an a under a final potential ordinance joint minimum whole, ongoing of Council fixed changes such and conform alternative for process of by the consideration selection for development to the a review. other as City’s the or and adequate request provide to or to issue. other where of Development Code and its zoning ordinances, as amended, as they pertain to the implementation of the DART Service Plan. In accordance with Section 14 of Article 1118y, V.A.T.s., final location of any DART Station or Terminal Complex shall require City Council approval as to conformance with the Dallas Development Code. 4.7 Joint Public Hearings and Exoedited Processes Joint public hearings sponsored by the DART Board and the City council will be held whenever possible. The City commits to expedite its processes where possible and both agencies agree to attempt to combine City and DART processes where overlap occurs or efficiencies can be achieved.

ARTICLE V

STATION AREA PLANNING 5.1 City Responsibility The City shall be responsible for preparing a station area plan after a station site is approved, when the need for a station area plan is determined to be appropriate by the City. Such station area planning will be performed by the City with the participation of

DART. A project team will be formed to ensure coordination between station area planning by the City and station planning by DART and to facilitate DART’s input into the station area planning process. DART will provide essential input and make recommendations about all DART related City planning efforts. The station area plans will establish land use, development guidelines, traffic plans, arid implementation proposals for each station area. The plans will also be guides against which future zoning applications will be evaluated. The plans may also be used as the basis to determine prcper zoning.

—8— 5.2 General Requirements Each station area plan will be based on an approved station site and pedestrian access points. At the beginning of the planning process, the City will indicate its information needs to DART so that DART can assist in expediting the planning process by providing essential information. 5.3 Station Area Plan Development Process The plan development process will include the following: (1) a public involvement process; (2) establishment of study area boundaries; (3) collection of data regarding existing conditions in the station area; (4) analysis of existing conditions; (5) development of goals and objectives for the station area (6) assessment of potential impacts of possible future development alternatives or guidelines; (7) formulation of recommendations; (8) public review of recommendations; (9) development of final plan recommendations; (10) public hearings; and (11) adoption of the final plan by the City at its discretion. 5.4 CBD Stations

As part of the station area planning process for CBD stations, consideration will be given to providing convenient connections to the grade—separated pedestrian walkway system at station locations. 5.5 City Public Involvement The City will conduct a public involvement process, which may include briefings and workshops involving neighborhood residents, property owners and business persons in the plan development and evaluation process. Notification of meetings will be made cOnsistefl with existing City ordinances and will include persons who participated in DART’s fixed facility site selection process. DART staff may participate in this public involvement process in order to provide DART information related to plan development. 5.6 Public Agency Briefings City staff will brief the DART Board or an appropriate Board Committee, as requested by DART, on the draft station area plan. ARTICLE VI

CITY-OWNED LAND OR FACILITIES 6.1 Ownership of Joint Use Facilities If there is occasion for City and DART joint use of facilities,

either the City or DART may acquire and own the facilities. A separate or supplemental agreement between DART and the City will be drafted and executed to address, among other things, all costs and revenues associated with the acquisition, construction, operation and maintenance of the respective facility and lands associated with the facility. 6.2 Cost of Transfer

In the event that DART requests the City to acquire real property for sole use by DART, all City expenses, including but not limited to, acquisition and relocation costs, surveys, title expenses, staff costs (including attorneys), consultants, appraisals, and costs and judgments in connection with judicial proceedings, including attorneys fees and awards, incurred in the process of acquiring the real property, shall be paid by DART.

—10— development

7.1 and

street joint

joint property

expenses, established not among after and acquiring

6.3 including

the

costs limited

Joint DART, o o o o o o In By

Air,

development

development

other

site

or

City

mutual the

for

alley

development

City cost the station staff land attorneys and impact zoning

Surface however,

selection

Development

expenses

event things: to,

for

shall

sole

real judgments

Council and ownership

agreement,

right-of-way,

each acquisition costs

on

requirements

activities

agreements use

that

interface

MUTUAL

negotiate and benefit

property,

will

public

fees

and

by proposed

project

by

(including

Subsurface the approval

Proposals

the

in

proceeds the be

and

GRANTS

DART

City sharing, connection

facilities

planning solely

and DART

ARTICLE

with

are City, the awards, shall

where

or DART/City

—11—

and

requests relocation

requirements,

OF

distribution undertaken attorneys>, on Board.

parties Rights on

all be City responsible

CROSSING

City

other

if

VII

a incurred

with paid

DART applicable case

project

joint

A

DART

involvement on

City-owned other

by costs, project

judicial

expenses,

by

City in

RIGHTS

consultants,

to

the development

in

of if

City-owned for case

teams

than

acquire

the

any,

the Right-of-Way

surveys,

City.

team

negotiating

proceedings,

basis.

process

property,

the

is joint

may

including

for

may

appropriate

real

City.

project, appraisals,

be

a

public

title

joint consider

of

its

DART

but

Where In accordance with Article lll8y, as amended, and subject to the provisions of the Master Interlocal Agreement between the parties dated February 28, 1990, DART shall have the non—exclusive right to use air, surface or subsurface areas of City public street and alley rights-of—way for the construction and operation of DART fixed guideway facilities as reflected in the approved Service Plan at no charge to DART by the City (other than reimbursement by DART of City expenses incurred in accommodating DART facilities), following design review and approval by the appropriate City departments. However, such right of use by DART shall be subordinate to the City’s rights and uses of its public street and alley rights—of-way for its own public purposes and facilities. 7.2 Air, Surface and Subsurface Rights on DART Transit Right-of-Way The City shall have the non-exclusive right to use air, surface and subsurface areas of DART right-of—way for City streets and City- owned or operated utilities at no charge to the City (other than reimbursement by the City of DART expenses incurred in accommodating City facilities), following design, review and approval by appropriate DART officials. However, such right of use by the City shall be subordinate to DART’s rights and uses of its transit rights- of-way for DART’s own public purposes and facilities. 7.3 Crossing Procedure, Utility Relocation and Maintenance Requirements At such time as either party (the “Requesting Party”) desires to use the other’s (the “Reviewing Party”) right—of-way for its own public purposes and facilities, the Requesting Party shall submit its proposal, including plan and profile sheets, to the designated official of the Reviewing Party. Each proposal shall contain

—12— relocation 7.4

at the as

utilized, and construction

and rights-of—way Reviewing time require of-way with

the Requesting sufficient operating, facilities. designing, reasonable location Party

a

indemnitees

contractor’s the

the

Reviewing

Reasonable

In

later

In

and

In relocation The

shall

shall

circumstances the

Reviewing

payment

contract the

Requesting of in

the

Party’s

date

shall

removing, time. Party information

installing,

event

event such provide the

All be contract.

contract

is Party’s

of

Exercise to

and done

of

Requesting

be

required manner

to

construction may is

the the

Party,

the operations

Upon

accommodate

and

accomplished

performance be

for

comments Party begin

in replacing,

where

Requesting

contractor

construction

rights-of—way,

shall done damage

constructing, and concurrence

more

In so a

Of

their

good

liability

shall

all work.

as detail Party’s

Rights

one

by

provide

than

and

to

work to to

—13—

the officers

a

and instances

party

bonds

bear the and

at minimize Party’s and

contractor the

facilities.

$25,000, to

Reviewing

work workmanlike

proposed and of

no maintaining

Requesting

insurance

as that

Reviewing as determine the reconstructing,

has totalling

the

maintenance cost

additional well and

on

where

facilities entire

both

superior Reviewing

interference

the

the

employees, to of use.

as

Party’s

policies. the manner Requesting the Reviewing the Party a Party’s the cost all

100% its

contractor The

within

Reviewing Requesting Requesting named

rights, extent

must

costs

Party,

facilities

within of

repairing, and

facilities, Reviewing

and

with and

shall

the

be

Party’s expense

insureds

Party the associated

at and

others’

that the

the relocated a

is

be

such

Party.

Party

Party rights-

within

shall

named parY

such of on shall act reasonably when the exercise of those rights could adversely impact the operation of facilities previously approved or existing. 7.5 RAILTRAN

With the exception of the provisions in Article V concerning station area planning within the City of Dallas, this Supplemental Agreement excludes from its provisions the City’s RAILTRAN properties and facilities, including track and right-of-way, both inside and outside of the Dallas city limits. A separate long-term agreement permitting the use of RAILTRAN properties and facilities by DART will be reviewed by the RAILTRAN Policy Committee prior to joint approval by the City Councils of Dallas and Fort Worth, and the DART Board. ARTICLE VIII RIGHT-OF-WAY PROTECTION

The City Council may adopt, by City ordinance, the DART Service Plan’s description and mapping of the fixed guideway transit system within the Dallas City limits. 8.1 Setback Requirements For the benefit and protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City, setback requirements for the placements of structures on real property that abut or adjoin DART fixed guideway alignments may be adopted by the City. The setback requirements shall be jointly prepared by DART and City staff. Final authority for establishment of setbacks rests with the City. 8.2 Provision of Information

DART will provide any surveys and mapping needed to implement this article. 8.3 Review of New License Requests and Adjacent Development

—14— affected DART amendment, to

DART

has adjacent modify, to the subordinate purchase implementation responsibility coordinate normal comments Plan, 8.4 DART established

licenses, and from zoning

determine

Section

and/or use

in

mass

shall

Amendment, The The

the staff.

(1)

including

variances

application

the

or of

and

to

of within City

City. City

transit

abandonments,

modification

deliver When

will public

with terminate

vicinity 10

the to property

in

the the

DART

will

will and

of the

to Article

the public Modification enter

The ten surface, DART

actions

impact within

this

will right-of-way facility

11 initiate

to

City’s exercise process provide

planning,

City

of

(10)

of

license to

is

the

into

Section

right-of-way.

complete

stations IV,

or on protect Chapter an necessary building

which

working will

subsurface

City use

private with termination

reaches any area established to or

all

agreements and

design

review as DART for

—15—

are a are action

for

XIV owners or along areas legal its

Termination days permits, report jointly

a

for

a as other necessary a copies licenses,

public

of and review

temporary and DART’s

level

The of DART

rights DART’s

for identified follows:

whose

the by

of

air

issued

indicating

determined receipt

engineering

fixed

policies City plats,

said of

said

purpose,

City and

sufficient fixed

comments

rights.

property held

use, all

of

and

for

provide by private purchase. ordinance,

facilities

licenses

Charter License

guideway

of

requests

in zoning

to

the

by

the

it

and the

which

the by DART’s

identify

as

of In

City it is

City

is

for

the use the

procedures

licenses

part which

to Agreements the changes,

DART’s

a information required,

abutting

the and as corridors

proposed

DART to for

pursuant

City

amend, Service City

event

of

the

will

permit

City

private

sole

the with

and

and

or

for undertake with regard thereto. Such actions could include temporary or permanent termination, modification or amendment of such licenses. (2> Following city approval of DART’s plans regarding temporary or permanent termination, modification or amendment of licenses, the City will take those actions requested by DART; provided, however, that DART shall by prior agreement pay the City’s expenses or losses incurred in undertaking the actions. (3) In the event of litigation arising out of the adoption of an ordinance or resolution, or the cancellation or termination of an existing license by the City Council requested by DART pursuant to this section, DART agrees to defend both the City and DART, and DART shall be solely responsible for payment of all expenses, damages, attorneys fees, settlements and judgments related thereto; provided, however, that DART shall not be responsible for or indemnify the City for errors by the City or its staff in carrying out the request for DART. The City and DART agree to cooperate with one another in the defense of any such lawsuits, and no lawsuit shall be settled by the City without prior approval from DART where DART funds are liable

for any portions of the settlement. V

(4) DART agrees to indemnify and reimburse the City for any relocation costs required to be paid by the City to any licensee under the terms of or in connection with any license agreement being terminated, amended or modified.

(5) DART shall give the City sufficient advance notice in writing prior to the first required action of the City under any applicable license agreement.

(6) In the event that the City and DART are concurrently conducting projects on the same street location or vicinity, and any

—16— The following be staff Plan, right-of—way street 9.1 privileges, of not In construction between costs actions relocation City’s a license result closed the no process Evaluation be o o o o All (7) will from event and relocations City incurred staff DART of agreement proposed automobile length safety; traffic primary of or The judgments the be the costs, for or and shall both relocated, or by and and subjected provisions City benefits City, evaluating facility), but DART either and the projections; direct criteria: projects, grade the the requires and and for delay; dissipation resulting TRAFFIC and City and City defense median party or DART to level upon DART’s costs. are of each on these the thorough including be DART amendment, this to MITIGATION any not unless a ARTICLE operations —17— street obligated party’s from of crossing project. case-by—case recommend The of shall conditions person Article intended litigation such vehicle evaluation otherwise responsibility those crossings, IX responsibility modification not protected MEASURES or to litigation are (or whether to be in entity pay queues; shall basis, arising joint confer solely obligated the agreed by any street the the or include approved not or costs prior shall or for any for out grade to for street appropriate shared a termination closures, the to party the rights, in of that to be any the pay separated. Service writing. payment such benefit decided should use court hereto. would the of as of a o light rail transit delay; o changes in levels of service; o impact on area—wide signal system; o cost—effectiveness; and o mitigation measures Any modification to a City right-of-way requires City approval. In those places where a grade separation already exists, DART must continue the grade separation. 9.2 Technically Warranted Traffic Mitigation Measures Traffic mitigation measures are determined to be technically warranted when the results of the above evaluation indicate that street modifications are required in order to operate the DART rail

system and provide level of service D or better for existing or projected cross—street traffic. However, in no event shall the projected level of service drop more than one level. Such traffic mitigation measures include but are not limited to grade separations, grade level street crossings, street closures, right-of—way acquisitions, street construction, reconstruction or relocations, or modifications in median operations. In developing and implementing

its Service Plan, DART shall be responsible for funding all technically warranted traffic mitigation measures. DART agrees to design, construct and maintain all grade level street crossings and signalization to the best available standards, with minimum disruption to cross-traffic. In those circumstances where additional street or railroad right-of-way is required to implement the mitigation measures, City Council, consistent with normal procedures, will either (a> approve the new street alignment and grant to DART authority for eminent

—18— consultant selected recommendations recommendation contrary

analysis cost.

shall described recommends

accompanied will

Fiscal spent. 9.3 least domain available to staff, owners consider or

implement in

Section

approve,

(b)

In

Technically Evaluation

program

In

proceed

one

Year

within DART hold proceedings

the

the

and to described

public

grade

material

in to

shall

that

9.4,

event DART by

will

deny event 1991 a

compensated

this

construct sufficient

with

public

200

from a

on

a results

separation,

that comments

be

staff Warranted

staff to grade

or

Article City grade

DART

feet

the

in mitigation

implementation

necessary

the

a

cover modify

hearing

it

qualified this

matter

recommendations, staff recommendation. grade

of separate

finds,

basis

separation

following funds is

by

on

IX the the

Article

Grade

unable

that

the

and

the

will

finds separations

to

following

of measures

cost properties for

in for

—19—

parties. will

the independent new alignment.

implement

whether

Separations

its

be DART/City of the

at reasons

that

IX of

is

crossing. street

presented the

a replenish Financial

warrant

technically detailed designing

grade notification agreed

Where

the

the

recommendation, that

the required

The

the

other

alignment

parties concurrent consultant results

grade level

would

the upon new

a

findings

To these to

technical Plan

than

and

grade

warranted,

street

the

DART ensure

in

by

street

separation

will beginning be constructing to

of

prior this those

funds

DART DART

separation,

property

staff mutually the impacted

of

at analysis alignment;

obtain funds

crossing event,

the

described to

once and technical Board,

DART’s

DART

voting

in

is

are City

to

a

at

DART

to technically warranted. 9.4 City—Required Grade Separations In the event that the City (1) prefers that a particular crossing be grade separated where other reasonable and effective traffic mitigation measures are feasible, and (2) directs DART to build such a grade separation outside the CBD that is not recommended by DART, the City of Dallas or others shall be responsible for the net additional cost of that grade separation. 9.5 Provisions for Future Grade Separations Following completion of a particular grade crossing, should the construction of a grade—separated crossing, in the future, become necessary at that location in the judgement of the appropriate City and DART staff based on the technical considerations in Section 9.1, DART will proceed with such construction, and the funding responsibilities will be determined at the time of such construction. DART will undertake all reasonable efforts to ensure its initial crossing designs will permit and accommodate future construction of such grade separations. 9.6 Future Agreements For any mitigation measures, including but not limited to median or shared City/DART right—of-way operation, grade level street crossing, protection devices or grade separation structure, agreements that set forth the responsibilities of DART and the City may be developed by the appropriate City and DART staffs for implementation as appropriate.

ARTICLE X

SHIFTS IN VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS

Any shift in vertical alignment proposed by DART which is more

—20— than 15 feet measured vertically from the existing alignment in the DART Service Plan, and which is necessitated by considerations other than traffic, shall be evaluated to determine what mitigation measures, if any, are appropriate based on a process similar to that described in subsection 9.1. This evaluation shall include consideration of the following primary criteria: o noise o safety o drainage/floodplain o structural requirements o geometric requirements o access to adjacent properties o aesthetics/visual intrusion o cost—effectiveness o other considerations unique to the proposed vertical realignment ARTICLE XI

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE

Both DART and the City will adhere to all present and future legislation and regulations enacted by the federal government, the State of Texas, and the City with respect to the environment, and special districts and sites adopted by City ordinance, such as the West End Historic District, the Arts District, and individually designated historic sites. In addition, adopted policies of the City related to land uses, historic preservation and the environment will be observed and complied with. Environmental concerns shall include, but not be limited to, physical environmental elements such as floodplains, drainage, soils, slopes, and vegetation as well as other

—21-- elements as they relate to health and safety, e.g. air, water, and noise pollution. The City supports the incorporation by DART of mitigation measures in the construction and operation of its System Plan, designed to assure that a high level of urban and natural environmental quality is maintained. ARTICLE XII OFF-PREMISE SIGNS

DART agrees to comply with all City ordinances governing signs, including requirements for the removal of non—conforming detached off-premise signs at the end of those amortization periods duly established by the City in accordance with Chapter 216 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended. DART shall not renew any detached off—premise sign leases that expire, except on a month-by-month basis, and will undertake reasonable efforts to obtain removal of those sign structures on or before the date rail operation commences in those corridors or locations. Subsequent to the date of this Supplemental Agreement, unless otherwise waived by the City Council

on a case—by—case basis, DART will not erect new off-premise signs on

DART property in Dallas outside of station or transfer center sites, and will prohibit off—premise signs in any lease granted by DART on

DART property. The City agrees that advertising signs in all DART light rail stations and transfer centers shall be wholly exempt from the City’s sign ordinance unless those signs are designed to inform or attract the attention of persons outside the building site on which they are located. ARTICLE XIII

DART AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES

DART and the city recognize that DART may enter into similar

contractual

Supplemental

Master

full

such

In

forbearances,

amendment

to

discretion,

governmental

clause,

service

establish

interlocal

this

reflect

force All

interlocal

Interlocal

regard,

condition,

Plan.

other

shall

the and

the

agreement.

agreements

this

Agreement

entity

if

process

effect,

terms,

more

Whenever

agreement

DART

also

any,

Supplemental

Agreement

or

favorable

than

agrees

include

provisions,

which

provision

No.

and

with

for

any

contained

upon

SINGLE

1 said

review

between

other

to

accompany

shall

such

ARTICLE

—23—

the

provision;

Agreement

provide

request.

Master

more

obligations,

AGREEMENT

and

interlocal

governmental

conditions,

be

herein,

the

XIV

favorable

construed

implementation

said

Interlocal

the

City

shall

provided,

more

City

then

agreement

and

and

responsibilities

be

entities

to

together

with

favorable

at

DART

amended

Agreement

obligations

another

however,

the

of

a

shall

includes

copy

City’s

the

in

as

and

provision.

order

a

DART and

remain

of

that

modified

single

of

any

or

any

this

to

the

the in (I) 1< C-) I-. C: • rtj rt rt 0 NO 0 N N U) t’N U) 0 x C: rt N U) :3 0 C)3 C,) 0 (D rt 0 :3 / H N CDrx :3 Z’-3 rt 00 CD rt 0 U) 0 I— 0 rt 0 C-) H U) 0 C: C: rt CD rt :3 U) :3. U) 0 0 CD CD :3 H H rt 0 Ui 0 rt :3 cj z 0 0 0 a, 0 0 C-4 H C 0 H a, 0 w b3 rq L< HH rt H CD ‘0 0 ‘0 C)) 0 C-’ rt C: CD H N C: C--’ ‘1 C: U) Lfl C: CD U) C,) :3 H 0 rt 0 0 H ‘0 ‘0 0 (U

:3 __ EXHIBIT A 90 - 0 WHEREAS,on October 11, 1989, City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-3272, which approved the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) System Plan subject to certain conditions being met; and

WHEREAS,one of those conditions was that an Interlocal Agreement be entered into between the City and DART; and

WHEREAS,a Master Interlocal Agreement has been negotiated which incorporates the intent of the provisions of City Council Resolution 89-3272, establishes a basis for a cooperative working relationship between the two agencies, and addresses, among other matters, methods of compensation for reimbursement of services; and

WHEREAS,DARThas committed in the attached letters from Marvin H. Lane, Jr., DARTBoard Chairman, and Charles S. Anderson, DART Executive Director, that the South Oak Cliff and West Oak Cliff light rail transit lines will be the first operational lines in the Starter System, with the South Oak Cliff light rail transit line being constructed regardless of the receipt of federal funds, and additionally that the rail assembly plant and major maintenance facility will be built along the South Oak Cliff line in the vicinity between Ledbetter and Simpson Stuart Road; and

WHEREAS,the above commitments and all other routes currently listed in DART’s Financial Plan Light Rail Transit and Construction Schedule (see Attachments II and III) shall be incorporated in a subsequent Planning and Development interlocal agreement between DARTand the City; and

WHEREAS,on February 14, 1990, the Dallas City Council passed a resolution endorsing the South Oak Cliff rail line as the first operating segment of the DARTrail system; Now, Therefore,

BE IT RESOLVEDBY THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF DALLAS:

SECTION 1. That the City Manager be and is hereby authorized to execute the Master Interlocal Agreement with DART, setting out general provisions and interagency relationships regarding the approved DARTSystem Plan and Service Plan, following approval as to form by the City Attorney. SECTION 2. That the provisions of this Resolution and the Master interlocal Agreement shall control if in conflict with the provisions of City Council Resolution 89-3272.

SECTION 3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Dallas, and it is accordingly so resolved. APPROVEDBY CiTYCOUNCIL

FEB 28 19O

A c “0 —— 0vC0___—————— — — - . / ‘j’ — * CItj Sc3fy

DART

Chairman,

Marvin

Best

Please

tranSIt

Design

October

transit

revenue Avenue

System.

transit

you

Per

Dear

Dallas,

City Co

The

1500 card

-

nds.

ebruary

un

Board

that your

regards,

Honcrable

ol

Jerry:

Marilla

of

of

M.

iran

call

and

and

More

line

1996. line

ervice

lines

TX

Dallas

Directors

Specifically,

2i474&.327a

&i

the c-anci

request

Lane,

28,

o

construction

the

75201

PcoH

me

will

irportantly,

fror

South

Directors

Toxo

Ar

Street

1990

will

Jerry

at

i-’est

Jr.

Avenue

in

Popd

75222

of

995-03213

riot

Illinois

on

January

be

Oak

OaM

earlier

Bartos

Trar

April

be

the

the

cliff

of

Cliff

dependent

a

firt

the

Ave.nue

South

1995.

if

12,

resolution

this

and

line

you

South

1988,

operational

Oak

We-st rorriing

to The

have

upon

to

Oak

Led.better

Cliff

confirms

South

Westoreland

OaM

aDproved

any

the

Cliff

I

cuff

line

am

cuestions.

receipt

Oak

lines

pleased

this

light

will

by

ClIff

to

light

in

the

will

Illinois

commItment.

of

be

raIl

the

light

rail to

DIRT

federal

open

be

Starter

advise

in rail North Stemmons Stemmons North South Stemmons Northeast South Southeast Corridor North West. North South

Oak

Central Oak Central

Oak Central Central Oak

COD

(Hall

(Ledbetter

Cliff

(Denton (Northwest (COD

Cliff

Cliff Dallas/Pleasant

Cliff

(Mockingbird

to

Street to

(Arapaho (Park FINANCIAL

(West

(East

Park

(to

(Illinois

(COD

Dr. Northwest

•to

Westrnoreiand)

Hwy

Lane side Lane) side

to

to

to

Simpson

to

to

O’Connor)

Buckner)

to PLAN

Illinois)

of of to

Grove N.

to Piano

Highway) Valley

SCHEDULE

Arapaho)

US US

Garland

Ledbetter) LIGHT

Stuart)

75) 75,

Pkwy)

View)

RAIL

T.C.)

TRANSIT

Start

2000

2004 2000 1990 2006 2006 1997 1990 1990

1996 2006

Oct

July Jan

2000

2000 2004 2004 2007

2009 2008

2009

900810

‘95

‘96

‘95 j’JuoIu

DaUa Aroa Papid Transit U)i PaciliC Avenue o,nT Dallas, Texas 75202 / 2141748-3278

February 27, 1990

The Honorable Al Lipscornb Councilman City of Dallas 1500 Manila St. Room 5-E North Dallas, TX 75201 Dear Al: I appreciated our conversation last Friday afternoon regard ing the proposed Intenlocal Agreement between the City of Dallas and DART. As promised, I want to assure you of sev eral important issues about which you remain concerned: 1. The South Oak Cliff and West Oak Cliff light rail tran sit lines will be the first operational lines in the Starter System. Specifically, the South Oak Cliff line to Illinois Avenue and the West Oak Cliff line to Westmoreland will be in revenue service in January 1995. The South Oak Cliff light rail transit line from Illi nois Avenue to Ledbetter will be open October 1996. See attached schedule for other components of the 66 mile light rail transit system. 2. Design and construction of the South Oak Cliff light rail transit line will not be dependent upon the receipt of federal funds. More importantly, a resolution :approved by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1988, confirms this commitment. 3. The Rail Assembly Plant and Major Maintenance Facility will be built along the South Oak Cliff line in the vi cinity between Ledbetter and Simpson Stuart Road. More importantly, a resolution approved by the Board of Di rectors on May 10, 1988, confirms this commitment. I believe the above commitments address your concerns. If they do not, or if you have additional questions, please call me. We truly need your support now to approve the Interlocal 900810 The Honorable Al Lipscomb Page 2 -

Agreement o that we can move ahead aggressively with the de sign and construction of the Starter System and commence to provide rail service and the creation of jobs for the South Oak Cliff area. Per

CharThs S. Anderson Executive Director

• End. CSA: dh

c: DART Board of Directors Dallas City Council Richard Knight, Jr. Jan Hart —C1iff Kehe]ey Db.RT

TO: SUBJECT: Attached

a Charles

CSA:dh light Executive

Councilman

P.S.

sent

part

the

rail

ji

DtIas Da1io. 214174&3278

S.

same

Pacific is

Director

Anderson transit.

Wells’

LeCounci1

Jan Are-a

Construction Texas

the

information

Avenue

Pap4d

752fl

Hart

construction

office

Trznsi1

Resolution

You

Schedule

has

may

to

made

Barbara

want

•schedule

on

this

to

the

Bankston.

consider

request

Interlocal

for

February

the

this

also,

66

Agreement.

miles

to

27,

and

become

900810

we 1990

of

have Corridor West South North

North South Northeast North

Southeast

Stemmons Stemmons South

Stemmons North

Oak

Oak

Central Oak Central

Central

Oak

Central

COD

(Hall

(Ledbetter

Cliff

(COD (Northwest

(Denton Cliff

Cliff

Dallas/Pleasant (Hockingbird

Cliff

to

FINANCIAL

(East

(West Street (Park

to

(Arapaho Park (to

(COD

(Illinois

Northwest

Dr.

Westmoreland)

to

Lane) side side

Lane

Hwy

to

to

to

Simpson

to

PLAN

to Illinois)

Buckner)

to

O’Connor)

of of

to

N. to

Grove

SCHEOULE

Plano

Highway)

Valley

US US

Arapaho)

LIGHT

Garland Ledbetter)

Stuart)

75, 75)

Pkwy)

View)

RAIL

T.C.)

TRANSIT

Start

1990

1990

1990

1996 2000 1997

2000 2004

2006 2006

2006

pjpjte

Jan

Oct July

2000 2000

2004

2004 2007

2008 2009

2009

900810

‘95

‘96

‘95 *M

Agreement WHEREAS,

development

WHEREAS, maintenance WHEREAS, of Plan, the

Therefore, be SECTION referenced light Transportation BE Supplemental including SECTION passage and setting

and

negotiated activities

IT

HEAD

cooperative

it

development

incorporates

RESOLVED

rail

OF

is

out 2.

1. in

D€PAMTi4ENT

the

Supplemental

on

with

commitments accordingly

accordance in

That

transit

general

of

Master

That

facility,

February

Agreement

City

between to

a

BY

System,

DART

working

this

public

address

the

THE

issues

Council

the

Interlocal

provisions

lines,

(Resolution

Resolution

City

Agreement

with

the CITY

so

regarding

conditions

28,

and

following

No.

transportation

relationships

specific

resolved.

City

associated

Resolution

Manager

CITY

the

the COUNCIL

1990, the

1

APPROVED

Agreement

JUL

and

croA

provisions

and

City No.

location

to

shall light

No.

construction

COUNCIL approval

of

City

issues

SicreWy

25

interagency be

the

DART;

OF

1

approval

o addresses

No.

take

and

90-0810)

1990

THE with

rail between

FINACE

system; Master

states

Council

BY

of

necessary

and 90-0810

of

is

CITY

as

effect

transit

the

the

the

hereby

to

of

of

that

DART relationships

Interlocal

Planning

and

OF

rail

approved

which

form

the

Charter

dated

the

immediately

implementation

DALLAS:

supplemental

for

and

authorized

construction

System

South

by

assembly

accepts

February

the

COUNCIL

and

the

the

of

Agreement

a

expeditious

Plan,

Development

and

the

City

City Master

regarding

fromand

)

plant

the

cji

CHAMBER

to

agreements

City

West

28,

July

regarding

and

Attorney.

of

MANAGER

schedule,

execute

DART

1990;

with

Interlocal

of

Oak

and

describes

the

after

11,

planning

9

conduct

issues,

Dallas,

System

major

Cliff

0 DART,

1990 will

Now,

this

DART

the

its

2

as

4

0

8 !)flr) 1

RESOLUTION RESOLUT ‘I D&i Arec Papd Transit of the

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT BOARD (Executive Committee) Supplemental Interlocal Agreement With the City of Dallas on Planning and Development

WHEREAS, on June 27, 1989, the Board approved the Transit system Plan; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 1989, the Board adopted the Work Program for Implementing the Starter System as the first step in advancing the Transit System Plan; and WHEREAS, authorization to commence procurement actions to allow initiation of the Work Program within any of DART’s member jurisdictions was predicated upon a member jurisdiction approving the Transit System Plan and indicating its intent to enter into an Iriterlocal Agreement with DART to allow implementation of the Plan within that jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 1989, the Dallas city Council approved the Transit system Plan subject to certain conditions governing the construction and operation of a CBD Transitway Mall and a future CBD subway, with such conditions to be included in an Interlocal Agreement between DART and the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Board of Directors that the Executive Director or his designee is authorized to enter into a Supplemental Interlocal Agreement with the city of Dallas covering planning and development issues.

Don Raines Marvin H. Lane, J secretary Chairman

A06-515A.Doc 06/26/1990/dls ø’0 0 ,JI c,u1 til

‘3, C!) 00 QO 0

CI) 0

0 rt t’1 CD Cf)

C4

(t

U,

D

OFFICIAL January

95-0223

Addendum

The

Councilmember Motion the Councilmember it After Motion

Councilmember After declared

OFFICE

is -- --

resolution

following

brought

discussion

further

Association George Doug

II,

seconded

seconded

the

OF

ACTION

addition

1995

back

motion

Ralston,

THE

to

discussion individuals

Reynolds,

Wells

Box

the Hicks

Councilmember

by

by to

CITY

9: city the

unanimously

Deputy OF

Councilmember

moved

2417

moved

withdrew

city

THE

council

A

SECRETARY Agreement construction, permit DART Mayor of repealing

by including

addressed

2911

Fabens

the

council to

Mayor

DART resolution

to

DALLAS

approve

revenue

the

postpone

transportation

Turtle

Bartlett his

Wells

property

adopted.

the

Rd.,

the

continued Pro

buses

the for

second

No.

Hicks.

requirement

previous

the

action. withdrew Tern received

representing city in

Creek

authorizing

CITY

called

consideration

(Mayor

1

resolution.

accordance

and

to

to council

Mayes.

maintenance

the

COUNCIL

committee

Blvd., the

the

conditions

from

their

his

Bartlett

motion

that

CityIDART

vote regarding

Ralston

a

motion

these

representing

DART

relocation

of Second

with

on

to

for

and

of the

signs of

postpone.

Councilmember

to

Outdoor

existing,

review

dedicate applicable

resolution the Resolution

Councilmember

postpone.

Master

Amendment

to

resolution:

if

the

Dallas

CITY

and

Advertising

legal

required

between

repair

Interlocal

for

recommendation

94-2038 City

OF

off-premises Outdoor

60

of Box’s

DALLAS,

to

Box)

25

days,

ordinances,

by streets

Agreement and

Co.

Supplemental

in

motion,

transit

Advertising

and

the

50

damaged

signs

percent TEXAS

regard,

to

before

refer

line

and then

on

to ______

COUNCIL CHAMBER 95f).) January 11, 1995

WHEREAS, on February 28, 1990, the City Council by Resolution No. 90-08 10 approved a Master Interlocal Agreement with Dallas Area Rapid Transit (“DART”), which accepted the DART System Plan, incorporated the conditions of approval of the System Plan, and described the cooperative working relationships between the City and DART regarding the development of a public transportation system: and

WHEREAS, the Master Interlocal Agreement states that supplemental agreements will be negotiated to address specific interagency issues; and

WHEREAS, on July 25, 1990, the City Council by Resolution No. 90-2408 approved Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to City/DART Master Interlocal Agreement: Planning and Development (“Supplemental Agreement No. 1”), which addressed planning and development of the DART transportation system, including scheduled completion dates, planning and location of transit facilities and fixed guideway systems, station area planning, joint development, protection of right-of-way, traffic mitigation measures, and off-premise signs; and

WI-IEREAS,on August 1, 1994, pursuant to Resolution 94-2037, passed by the City Council on May 25, 1994, the City and DART executed an Amendment to Supplemental Agreement No. 1, concerning the substitution of the electronic shop facility for the rail assembly plant/major maintenance facility in the vicinity of South Lancaster Road and LBJ Freeway, and the establishment of the bus turnout criteria for Lancater Road; and

WHEREAS, Article XII of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 requires DART to undertake reasonable efforts to obtain removal of off-premise signs on DART property in a rail corridor before rail operation commences in those corridors, and prohibits DART from erecting new off- premise signs in those locations without City Council approval; and

WHEREAS, these signs provide leaserevenues to DART, tax revenues to the City and DART, and opportunities to promote area businesses; and

WHEREAS, on May 25, 1994, the City Council by Resolution No. 94-2038 recognized the need to continue the positive economic impact on the City arising from revenues and jobs generated by these signs, directed City staff and the City Plan Commission to perform analyses, evaluate alternatives, and prepare recommendations to amend the City’s sign regulations to allow the relocation of existing legal off-premise signs on DART property as a result of the construction of light rail transit lines, and authorized the City Manager to sign a second

amendment to Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to allow the continued maintenance of these signs on DART property and their relocation during the construction of light rail transit lines if: (a) the relocated signs are erected along the same segment from which they are removed, (b) DART dedicates between 25 and 50 percent of the revenue received from these signs to the repair of streets damaged by DART buses, and (c) the other municipalities that are members of DART are also provided the opportunity to share revenue generated from the off-:remlse signs on DART Property within their municipal limits: and

APPROVED — — APPROVED APPROVED — — —4EADQF DEPART ME. TECTOR OF F NANCE MANFOER COUNCIL CHAMBER950223

\VHEREAS on June 22, 1994, the City Council by Ordinance No. 22113 amended the City’s sign regulations to allow the relocation of nonconforming signs within railroad right-of- way if: (1) the construction of a light rail transit line requires the removal of the sign, (2) the sign is relocated as close as possible to its original location, (3) the same sign supports are used at the new location, (4) no new sign supports that are more than five feet above grade secure the sign, and (5) the degree of nonconformity of the sign is not increased at its new location; and

\VHEREAS, it is now recommended that the conditions under which the City Manager was authorized to sign the second amendment to Supplemental Agreement No. i should be revised, and that conditions (b) and (c) be withdrawn; Now, Therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALL4S:

SECTION 1. That the City Manager, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney, is hereby authorized to execute a Second Amendment to Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to City/DART Master Interlocal Agreement: Planning and Development, amending Article XII to permit:

(a) the continued maintenance of existing, legal off-premise signs on DART property in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, as amended; and

(b) the ielocation of existing, legal off-premise signs on DART property, in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, as amended, within the same project area from which they were removed, if their removal was required by the construction of a light rail transit line.

SECTION 2. That nothing contained in this resolution shall be deemed to impair, release, or waive any rights or claims the City may have with regard to damages caused by DART to City streets or rights-of-way.

SECTION 3. That Section 1 of Resolution No. 94-2038, adopted on May 25, 1994, containing the previous conditions under which the City Manager was authorized to si the second amendment to Supplemental Agreement No. 1. is hereby repealed.

SECTION 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage in accordance with the provisions of the PRROEOi€ity of Dallas, and it is accordingly so resolved, CITYCOUNCIL

JAN 11 1995

CitySecretary

APPROVED _____—.———— APPROVED APPROVED ___— MANAC,ER — OF F NANCE ‘EA.) OF DECiOP THE

revenues COIJNTY erecting reasonable Lancaster corridor Lancaster protection transportation construction Commissioj City transit to continued amend recognized. facility (“Supp. AREA signs Supplemental the Resolution segment authorized of buses,

CITY/DART

the

City

and STATE

on

SECOND

WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS,

and

facilities

revenue

RAPID

the

for

new

before

frorri

DART,

No, Council

DART

-undj,bsgenerated

OF Road Road;

maintenance of

(C)

City’s the

No. efforts

the

the

TO

OF of

right-of-way,

off-premise to

DALLAS

which

the system, 1”)

TRANSIT, Agreement .City iie,d

light

rail

eorm

rail 900108;

received

TEXAS

and and

CITY/DART

MASTER

proèrty and and AMENDMENT

on

sini’egulations

other

to

pursuant

assembly

operation

on

on

Manager

these

Supp. rail on

LBJ

fixed

to

they opportunities

Article

May

obtain

including

August

July

continue

df

May municipalities

analyses,

transit

and

PLANNING

signs

from

Freeway,

are

these signs

as (“DART”),

traffic

guideway

) 25, ) )

No. No.

INTERLOCAL

25.

removal

a

to

25,

removed,

plant/major to

commences

XII

in

MASTER

these lines by

result 1994,

1,

signs 1

1,

provide

1990.

sign

City

the

mitigation

those

scheduled

evaluate

1994, 1994,

TO

addressed

tO these

to concerning

of

and

if:

positive

systems,

signs promote

a

the

of of

allow on executed

AND

SUPPLEMENTAL

Council

that

the

locations

Supp.

(a)

second

(b) the

pursuant

the

the off-premise

DART lease

signs,

City’

INTERLOCAL

maintenance

in

the alternatives,

CITY

are

to DART

1 measures,

establishment

AGREEMENT:

completion

DEVELOPMENT

the

City construction

those planning

economic

relocated area

the

station

No. members revenues

and

SUPPLEMENTAL

amendment

the

relocation

directed Resolution

without

property

OF

to

Council

repair

dedicates

businesses;

corridors,

DART

substitution

Resolution

1

signs DALLAS,

area

and

requires and

and

impact

facility

signs

dates,

City

of

to

of

and

City

of

off-premise

of

planning,

of AGREEMENT: AGREEMENT

by

on executed

DART

DART, prepare

to development

streets

Planning

No.

between

light the

Council

and

are

existing

their

Supp.

Resolution DART

planning

and

staff

on

No. in

(“City”)

of

bus

DART

erected

prohibits

90-2408

AGREEMENT rail the

the

are

relocation

damaged recommendations

the

tax

94-2037,

joint

and

No. turnout

an

approval;

25

and signs;

property

City

legal vicinity

also

transit

revenues

electronic

and

Amendment

along

and

the

and

1

to of

development,

Development

No.

provided

arising DART

NO.

to

and

off-premise

and

location

the

criteria

50

undertake

during

by

City’

passed lines,

DALLAS

allow

5O223

of

the

94-2039

and

in

percent

1

DART DART

DART

to

South

NO.

a

same

from from

shop

Plan

and

rail

the the the

the

for

by

of

to to

1 THEREFORE, respectively, requirements (3) opportunity policy Development railroad Development, Resolution authorized of removal will periods Agreement adopted Agreement the within are property. outside Agreement, Government and are transfer which

the

more

the

designed

the City’s

not

sign

they

The DART WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, their WHEREAS,

of 1.

same

of

duly

following

centers

erect

a

right-of-way of

than

both

sign

station

The

is

are

sign

parties the

municipal

Nos.

unless

the

to

established

No No.

not ARTICLE

or sign

for

to

with

and

Code,

five as

agrees

located. the policy

share

sign,

shall

City

allow

inform

regulations previously

City

increased

the

94-2037

or

1.

is

supports

DART 1

feet City

otherwise

conditions

hereto

the

on on

on

substituted

transfer

(2)

be agrees removal

to revenue

to

as

which

limits;

to

the

if:

Manager

above

January June

October

City DART

Council

wholly

or

the

by XII

City/DART City/DART

comply

amended.

(1) erection

Resolution

agree

and

attract at

the are amended,

sign

that

is

and

and

center

22,

waived of

to

its grade

of

(b) generated

the OFF-PREMISE within

may

exempt

City

used

95-0233,

therefore:

Supp.

11,

25,

and

allow new

non-conforming

DART is

1994,

advertising to

to

and

with “ARTICLE

the

of

construction

relocated

sites,

continue secure

1995, the

in

1994,

by sign the

at

new

location;

(c) concerning

Subsequent that

attention

No.

No. Master Master

accordance

from

all the

the

the

the

following

desire

DART from

withdrawn;

and

off-premise dated

of

the

the

the in city

1,

2

City

City

new relocation

940299

the

to

the

as

signs

will Resolution

as

City the

XII sign,

and

Second

to

maintain

SIGNS

Interlocal

Interlocal

ordinances

close

of

Board

Council of May

City’s Council

location,

previously City;

off-premise

signs

amend

off-premise

prohibit

persons with regarding

to

in Council a

and ,

and

light

as

signs

25,

dated

and all

the

in of

sign

at

(5) Amendment Chapter

possible

existing.

on

Supp. by No.

accordance DART

(4)

the nonconforming

1994

off-premises

date

rail

Agreement:

Agreement:

outside on

the

governing

ordinance

a

amended,

by

Ordinance

October

signs

case-by-case

changes

no

940299

end

signs

DART

degree

Resolution

transit

No.

and

216

of

new

to

legal

light

of

in

the

its

1

this

on

January

of

those

the

with

25, property

sign to

to unless the

of

is

line

off-premise

to

original

rail

signs,

building

the 22113

DART

signs

reflect

rail

hereby

nonconformity Planning

Planning

Supplemental

Supplemental

O223

Supplemental

DART

1994;

City

basis,

signs supports No.

amortization

Texas stations

requires

corridor.

those

on

11.

including

in

amended

location,

property

95-0223

the

Council

deleted

site

DART

DART

NOW,

Dallas

within

Board

Local

1995,

signs signs

sign

and

and

and

that

the

on ‘O yROGER By: APPROVED B DALLAS the Amendment line.” on as Supplemental all and were may Office Printed President/Executive a applicable DART Master single confirmed also removed, Executed 2. of relocate Name: AREA property SNOBLE contractual Interlocal DART to AS Except City Agreement Supplemental if in TO this3Dthday RAPID Roland existing, their General ordinances, all in FORM: as Agreement, Director respects agreement. accordance removal specifically TRANSIT Castaneda No. legal Counsel of Agreement as 1, March, and off-premise was Supp. amended, as with otherwise set remains required 1995. No. forth all No. By: applicable 3 within signs 1, 1, in in supplemented, as by JOHN By: SAM APPROVED CITY Supp. section full previously on the Printed the Assistant Assistant DART force A. OF No. construction same City L. LINDSAY, 1 WARE, DALLAS Prir’ted Name: of 1, ordinances, and project property, City City AS as amended, this shall

/ previously effect, TO Name: Manager Attorney Second City be area of anis FORM: City in

950223 construed Manager a is and as from accordance light Attorney Everhart Amendment hereby amended, amended, this which rail together Second ratified ansit with they and and to OFFICIAL

94-2496

Item The A regulating (The would legal

June22, commission, when Councilmember Assigned Motion had Later Motion motion place

cco6fl.. During

OFFICE

public --

voted

following

93:

w,t, non-premise

city

in

the

vote

require

Michael

discussion,

concerning

seconded

seconded

the

1994

hearing

OF

item

ORDINANCE

plan with

private

taken) Public

ACTION

meeting

THE

and

the

individuals

on

the

commission

Toby,

Box

pass was

the

by signs

removal Hearing

by signs

CITY

Councilmember

majority

the

Councilmember

Councilmember

agenda

OF

called

Councilmember

the

moved

3700

amendment

near

in

NO.22113.

SECRETARY

THE

ordinance.

addressed the -

of

DEVELOPMENT

on E.

a

to

recommended

for

the

proposed

DART

to

DALLAS

Randol

consider

the

the

signs,

close

motion.

Wells to

August

Wells

the

Rail

Haistead.

the

Luna Mill

light and

the

an

city

CITY

withdrew

Dallas

right-of-way.)

moved

amendment

an approval public Rd.,

10,

rail

and

council

ordinance

CODE

COUNCIL

1994,

transit

Arlington,

Development

unanimously

to

hearing,

his

reconsider

regarding

of

city

AMENDMENT

line

motion

to

an

implementing

the council

to

represent

amendment

accept

be

Dallas

adoted.

Code.

to

the

the

relocated

reconsider,

meeting

amendment:

previous

the

Development

Patrick

Councilmember

the

recommendation

to

(Hicks

when

for the

proposal.

vote

Media

but

CITY

reconsideration.

Dallas

the

absent;

on

asked

Code

OF construction

Group Councilmember

Development

Wells

the

DALLAS.

McDaniel

to

of

city

allow

the

stated

manager

of

city

existing

TEXAS

the

that

absent

Box’s

Code

plan

line

he

to APPROVED

WHEREAS,

which

WHEREAS, City approved ______the WHEREAS, activities Cliff will Agreement WHEREAS, issues, WHEREAS, maintenance corridor new and undertake WHEREAS, positive Section these No. Attorney, BE maintenance

a. DART

b.

IT

System

be

DART,

and

1

off-premise

light

signs;

RESOLVED

to accepted

the removed;

DART street streets from

property

including

negotiated

1.

economic

before

DART

between

City/DART

OEPAP4E%

a

relocated

is efforts

rail

Plan,

and

No. Master

off-premise

Now,

the

these

it the on

damage

That facility,

hereby

Article

of

dedicates

damaged

has

regarding

rail

the transit

opportunities

February

daring

Master

signs City 1

existing

and

to commitments

the

BY

Therefore, to

signs

the

impact

on

become

Interlocal

DART

operation

signs

obtain

authorized address

and

being

THE

City

Master XII Council described

July

in

City

the lines,

signs

Interlocal

no

provide

by

those

the

legal

are

the

CITY on

APPROVED

and

28,

of

System

in removal

25,

necessary construction

less

DART Manager,

specific

light

erected in Interlocal

the accordance

development

to Agreement

that the

commences

1990,

by

DART;

locations;

1990,

off-premise

regarding

CdUNCIL

DART’s

the

than

to promote ______

lease

City

D

Resolution

Agreement location rail

Plan,

RECTD

buses,

sign

supplemental

of

cooperative

the

issues

which along

25% to

and

arising off-premise transit

revenues following

Agreement

of

incorporated right-of-way

revise an

and

City with

area

FINANCE

with

construction

with

there

OF

light

and

of

the

necessary

of

signs

amendment

addressed

construction

a

No.

from

previously THE

businesses; Council states

the

av

same

Article

public Dallas

up

rail

determination

to

and working

approval

and

signs 90-2408

CITY rail agreement

DART,

to

25,

that revenues

transit

segment

that

prohibits

within

for

the

50%

transportation

Area

relocation

XII

by

of

plarming

assembly

1994

on would

OF

to

the

agreed

relationships

supplemental

conditions

and

APPROVED

the

schedule;

COUNCIL

tax

lines in

approved

Resolution

of

as

DART

Supplement

DALLAS:

Rapid

the

expeditious

and

order

from

South

the

to revenues

DART

of

requires

allow

if: City ______

upon

and

jobs

form

of

plant

property

responsibility

revenue

CHAMBER

Transit

which

to

and

sytem;

these and

of

to ‘,

Supplemental

the

from

criteria;

development

generated

MA.AGEP

continue No.

between

by

the

approval

agreements

to

Agreement and

conduct

West

DART

continued

they

signs

the

(DART), the

repair

received

erecting

in

90-0810

and

9’2O3S

major

and

a

were

City

Oak

City

rail

the

the

for by

on

of of

to

of

sup

..30055 APPROVED

c. Section

The Section regulations to agenda amendments, recommendations Section caused property is passage release,

accordingly -EAC

amendments

perform

opportunity

property the

by C’

of

2. 3.

4.

in

or

as

DART

the

other

accordance

waive

so

That

That That a

Council

so if

as

result

within

appropriate

any,

municipalities

to

resolved.

to

the

necessary nothing any

as this

City

to

allow

to

are

City

of

with

meeting

share

rights

Resolution

their

what streets

the

made,

the

APPROVED

contained

staff

the

municipal

to

revenue

or

relocation construction amendments,

or

analyses,

on

provisions

implement

and

claims that

staff

______

rights-of-way. OIflCtQ*

June

shall

the

are

in

is

generated

22,

limits.

the 9

of

this take

City

directed

members

of

1994.

evaluate existing

this of

if

City

Resolution

the

Plan

effect

any,

light

resolution

may

from Charter

to

Commission

should

legal of

immediately

rail

enforce

have

alternatives,

DART

off-premise

:HYCO1JNCIL

shall

off-premise

of

transit

aflRO

be

shall

COUNCIL

.ir?ROVED

with

the

MAY.

Cit,

the

made

are

be

VEt

City

also

Secreaiy

be

25

existing lines.

deemed

regard

from

also

CHAMBBR

to signs .y included

of

signs

hereby

19%

and

the

BY

provided

Dallas,

and

to

Until

ordinance.

on

City’s

to

on

damages

directed

after

prepare

impair, 9&2039

on

DART

DART

and

such

sign

the the

its

it

1uP4Nu* An

CODE,”

signs nonconforming Dallas

providing removed date.

CHAPTER Signs,”

Code, “SEC. effect article,

comply following It

maintained modified

is

ordinance

a

and

at

BE SECTION

as City

(a) 51A-7.702.

(b)

defense

are of

with of

the to

If a

amended,

IT

exptio& Division

the

references

51A,

[in

construct illegal

Code, saving

and

ORDAINED the

time

amending Signs

All

aceordance

Dallas

sign

that

provisions “PART

to

signs

the

1.

signs

51A-7.700,

as

clause;

prosecution

erected

REMOVAL

is

do

within

sign a

City

That

amended;

amended

to

that

light

II

not

CHAPTER

if

ORDINANCE

BY

OF

the

a

was

Code,

with

of

providing

Section

conform

a

without

permit were

THE

rail

THE

this

defunct

railroad “Non-Conformance,”

erected.

OF the

transit

under

to

as

CITY removing

article

legally

DALLAS

was

CERTAIN

read

procedure&

51A,

a

51A-7.702, amended,

to

a

permit,

NO.

Municipal

the COUNCIL right-of-way

this

severability

line;

required

so It as

“PART

erected

shall

provisions ______

that follows:

DEVELOPMENT

redundant subsection

providing

22113

either NON-CONFORMING

by

&peciñed

be

a

“Removal

II

for

OF

permit

Board

pursuant

amending

OF

unlawful

of

clause; prior

to

its

THE

of

Article

a THE

be

exemptions

erection

if

this

penalty

may

to on in

the

CITY

relocated

6-22-94 Section of

or

to

to and DALLAS

article

Sign

Section

VII,

CODE,”

be

maintain after sign

Certain

a

OF

according

not

providing

issued.

valid

“Sign

Control;

SIGNS. must

the has DALLAS: 51A-.7O6,

to

to

when

51A-7.702 DEVELOPMENT

of

permit

amortization

exceed

Regulations,” Nonconforming

adoption any

been the

be

an to

allowing

it

removed illegal

Dallas

the

942496

or must effective

made

$2,000;

with

of

of legally

law

sign.

City

the

this

be the

of

of to a or

in Greation

dates. ten4ed

la’.. from 7.3O6-maemain

made before than

does pole, repair location, increase Tegally sign. of modified

with

relocated

any

the

60 the

not metal,

and a (c)

January ifi (d) non-conforming (e)

erected

of

above

non-conforming

percent

the unless

for

in

include

requirements

within

the

amortization

accordance

only 2-)-- and (1)

structure

-‘1)

No

The

Reserved A fl

L1 L1 L4.

CBD

pursuant conformity

1,

that

nonconforming

that

person

wood

of se—lon---a€

building

1990.

maintenance

in

A The

All

the the the the

the Freeway

no

right-of-way

p4ac

sign

of

detached

sign non-conforming

are

[All conformity

new

sign: with same sign of

construction may

cost to the

periods

sign

is

provisions

official

a

Division

each as

signs

compensation non-conforming brought

the

is

sign val-id

repair

bies44e4hs

of

Loop

sign

to

where

relocated

or

sign erecting

procedures

the

an 22113 if: non-pcemieo

were

shall

-in

sueports

permit

changes

dates

sucoorts

Sign-Dietr-ict

a

51A-7.1000 example

fact

into

of

the

non-conforming

the

located

signs

notify

set

a

for of as conformity

or

provisions

West a

effect

light

continues

its

by

that 1egally of

close new

the are

sign. specified

for

in

of

non-conformity.

words

within

the

rail

sign

End removal

writing used

of which]

a are is

sign

of

as

For

“type”

maintained exempt

transit such

Municipal

with

of

this

more

possible Histor4c

to

or

made

at

a

sign

in

of

purposes

Subsection

the

useful

be

other the

railroad

or

Section repair this

article of the

line

if

than required

from

mcdifi-caticn

owner

new

sign

the non-conform[ng----by

chapter.

same

Sign to

content

Board life

and

requires

shall

the fvp

cost its of

must

location:

51A-7.706]. and

right-of-way

determinations

or

c)

that

this

original Dstrict

by

type

above

feet

person

of on

the

be

on

and

b No

state

section, do

the

of

repair

to Sign

the at

term

above

person

removed those

not ae-exernpt

conformity location:

that

removal enlarge

the or

in

face

942436

conform

may

is

Control

“repair”

federal

control

mono-

signs

same

giad more

were

were

may

of the

be

or

Of

of

a conviction,

and CODE, are passage APPROVED SAM Dallas,

Passed By__ DCA-13 61

3/1

Assistant

governed

except

A.

SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION

and

LINDSAY, of

and

JUN

the

is

as

City it

AS

L1

punishable

publication

by

is

amended Dallas

TO

accordingly

Attorney

Section

3. 4. 5.

2.

City

the

FORM:

That

That That

City

That

Attorney

degree

by

by in

1-4

CHAPTER

this the

Code,

accordance

this

a

a

so

of

terms

ordinance fine

person

of

ordained. CHAPTER

ordinance.

as

nonconformity

not

amended,

and

51A,

22113

to

violating

with

provisions

shall

exceed

“PART

1

3

the

of

take

shall

the

provisions

a $2,000.

of

II

effect

Dallas provision of

OF the

remain

this

THE

sign

immediately

ordinance

City

of in

is

DALLAS

full

of

the

Code,

not

this

force

Charter

increased

are

as

from

ordinance,

DEVELOPMENT

and

amended.

severable

of

and

effect,

the

at

after 94246

its

City

upon

save

new

and

its

of HONORABLE

DC Development like the BACKGROUND: Manager signs ISSUE: There DART On the s which conforming removal within way reconstructed proximity materials, DART Council, conformity conforming of supplemental of-way ejyIQv STAFF Development CPC non-conformity, the 1

y

stern.

to

the

934-13

May billboards

rights-of-way

same

to

be

the

in

are

continue

to

are

non-conforming

to

the removed

right-of-way RECOMMENDATION:

RECOMMENDATION:

the

25,

Interlocal

QLcrtn,,

staff for

relocate

location

be

to

to

58

on

adjacent Whether

DART with

signs

rights.

1994,

residentially rail dismantled

the make

Code

Code

non-conforming

do

the using

is

MAYOR agreement

to

or during

current

not

rights-of-way proposing

to

construction

it certain

within

receive

right-of-way, same the

to

in regulating

Agreement

DART

nQJ,,,

Development

be

acquired

wish their to DEVELOPMENT

Article

allow to

any

to

City

dismantled

construction

AND single

signs

location, and

amend

standards.

the

be

signs the

zoned to

way has

original

to

Dallas

Council

an

give

DART reconstructed VII

dismantled income CITY

from

private

would signs the

numerous

family

increase

requires during amendment of

without

prbperty. depending

Article

up

Approval

“Sign

or

the

Area

Code

Interlocal

and

materials.

railroad

COUNCIL

right-of-way

adopted

within

their

of

Approval

as produced

not

Article

signs

zoned

CODE

LRT the the

reconstructed

Rapid the losing

near

Regulations”

that

amendment

billboards

VII

be

leases.

This

and LET

construction

to of using

on in the

existing

to companies

system

a

extended

XII

property.

AMENDMENT an

all

as

allow Agreement,

“Sign

the

Transit

their Resolution by the

Article

of

proposal DART

system.

reconstructed,

amendment

so

possible

signs

of

the

DART,

these

DART

an

alignment

long

WEDNESDAY,

and

Supplemental

signs

non-conforming

amount

would

Regulations”

original

unless

ACM.

recommendations

amendment does to

right-of-way,

VII,

by

within

in

signs.

other as of

At

Relocation would

Rail

on move

to

within

which

requiring

DaliaE

the

allowing

doing

the

in

Teodoro not eliminate the

they

the

to

of

materials right-of

of

advertising

the

conjunction private

Light

insure

non-conformity. request

other

Section

allow

using the

directed original

so

the

are

Agreement DART

JUNE

of

The

to

will

or at

rights.

rails

J.

that signs

Rail

DART

brought

hand,

way.

that

the

adversing

those these

the

Benavides least

temporary

of

51A-7.702, the

on

owners

not

to

location,

the right-of-

the 22,

signs

and they

Transit

or the

Dallas

with

in Dallas

would

create

right- allow

same

23

non non

1994 near

City 94249€

City

into

No.

the the life

be

in

of of

a

93 CPC

ACTION:

Motion

Motion

Speakers:

No.

No.

(June

Development right-of Maker: It Result: Second:

Rail Dallas Result: Maker: It Second:

2: 1:

was

was

None

right-of

16,

moved

Development

Absent: moved

Absent: There

There

way,

1994)

Ayes: Failed: Thomas Craycroft Richmond Nays: Ayes: Mago

Nays: Carried:

way,

contrary

to

is Code

is

to

recommend

6

one

one

recommend 9 to

7. 6-

4- as 9- 1

1-

to

regulating

7

vacancy.

vacancy.

per

Code

Tupper, Rasansky, Garcia Mago, Clark, Tupper, Rasansky, Richmond,

Garcia Chaney

4

to

staff

staff

2Da

regulating

denial

Scott,

Chaney,

recommendation.

recommendation.

Barger Craycroft, approval

private

Thomas,

of

Richmond,

Vinson,

Mago,

an

private

of signs

amendment

Barger,

an

Wadkins,

Clark,

Vinson,

signs Thomas, in

amendment

Wadldns

the

in

to

Wahiquist,

DART

942496 Wahiquist,

Craycroft,

the

the

Scott,

Dallas

DART to

Rail

the A

PPR

OV

ED

Council

and WHEREAS,

Rapid WHEREAS, desire Lancaster electronics Agreement: WHEREAS, Now,

BE is SECTION construction Master Lancaster criteria passage SECTION is

/f4Ea0

accordingly

authorized

IT

RESOLVED

Therefore,

Transit

to

for

O

adopted,

in

Interlocal

Road:

OtPART.4EN

1.

2. Road

shop

amend

Lancaster

accordance

by

by

That

That

Planning

the

by

to

so

Board

Resolution

Resolution

and

and

and

execute

resolved. City

among

DART

upon

BY

this

“Supplemental

CITY

to

Agreement:

Road.

1-20

THE

adopted,

of

with /44Z

incorporate

APPROVED resolution

approval

and

other

of Dallas

an

City

and

CITY

No,

No. A

COUNCIL

PPROVEO’_

the

an

amendment

SecretarY Development” 25

to

94-0928, 940068,

things,

ft/PECOP

prqvisions

COUNCIL among

electronic

(“City”)

as incorporate

1994

shall

BY Planning

bus

to Agreement

approved form the

turnout

approved

other

take

O

and

to

flNANC&

of

OF bus

shop

by

Supplemental

effect

the

the and to Dallas

THE

things,

criteria turnout

the

on

Charter No.

include

on facility

previously

CITY

City

Development

immediately

March

March

Area

1 the

for

criteria

Attorney,

OF

to

of

in

COUNCtL

Lancaster

the

Rapid bus

A

22,

Agreement

PP 2,

the

DALLAS:

May

the

the

approved

1994,

1994,

construction

turnout for

City

1l1994

Master

from

Transit

vicinity

CHAMBER

the

Lancaster

to

the

Road:

C’V the

of

City

include

and No.

Dallas

bus

Dallas

criteria

Dallas

(“DART”)

Interlocal

GEP

of

Manager

9

1 after

turnout

Road; of

South to

and

4

Area

City

for

the

the

an

2 its

it

0

3

7 does standards presently SEC. oth legalized page time, the a shall conrming ordinances; Iiablly, be. prosecutions incuned this shall penalties presently

SEC. the to this defense removed to sign shall if conrm Munkripai made

794

1990.

5111-7.701

a

conforming

a or

provisions

permit

law

article valid

It

ordinance

It

has

all

(a) be (b) after be

81A-7.701. not ordinances be

51A-7.702.

Division

is

Is

and

privately

in

discharged a penalty

the

unlawful

to prior

of been

further or conform

unless or permit to illegal All

Signs

pending

non-conforming

the

under

effect

was

Board

so

or

prosecution

this

modified

or forfeitures amortization

declared

the

signs

and

adoption

to

that

non-conforming of

made or

51

an

required

erected that

or ordinance

or sign

the

such the

at

the

of owned

A-7.700.

this provisions

to

on

non-conforming

to suits

illegal

that

a may

PURPOSE

legally

forfeiture, REMOVAL NON-CONFOR1G

the the

or

time

maintain

permit

no intent

if to terms

all

shall article Sign

purpose

sign

useful affected

may were

city

of

time

comply

proceed.

for

without

signs offense provisions

under

for

this

sign

this

periods

maintained

Non-Conformance. sign

Control be

and of complies

of

and

such be

may

its

the

legally

or

of

ordinance life

Dallas. article,

any either

OF

shall this deemed

if

OF of sign, instituted,

erection

this

if with by

be

declared this

sign a

its

it

determinations

be

committed,

it

offenses, this

DIVISION.

permit,

illegal

(Ord.

ordinance

such CERTAIN did

were

removed.

legally sign

Part

before

of

either

amendments,

subsection erected

Issued.

as

civil

the

article

was are with

Any

division

and

this

not

the

to

was

passage, according

U

provisions

19455)

under

sign. illegal

or

and

set

either SIGNS. erected.

purpose

conform

sign have

all

that of

existed ordinance

January

exist

case

liabilities,

criminal,

pursuant

must

adopted

the

and

current

and

causes

that,

by

By

which

do

It

Dellas

if been

signs

prior

were

prior

as

may

Delis

is

the but

the

not the

no no all

be

as

to in

of

to of

It a

1,

a

City

Dev

sign a conformity the example the section, repair the sign other not right-of-way the railroad Line possible is new than

cases, 20927; SEC. following respect

Code

non-conforming

not

owner

cost same

prnent

include

requires

non-conforming

if (c) as

(d) (0 Ce) location;

(a) five

(b)

content

5IF-7.7O3.

increased

the shall

22113)

take

to

to

mono-pole, of

right-of-way of

to

feet

No A

Reserved.

The

(1)

(3) (4) (2) (5) location,

The

or

the

cost

The

special

with Code

the

a

erecting

its

be

if

nonconforming the

person

the

person

maintenance

types above

on

fact

building

the

the the no the original

provisions

board to

board

of

this

at

following

removal

the

enlarge

degree new same

repair

construction

of

its

sign

sign unless

of

variances

BOARD

chapter,

In

a

grade

metal,

face

its

new may

may sign sign.

of

of

new

control

location;

othciai

sign

sign

non-conformity.

adjustment

is

adjustment is

where or

of

of of

of

location.

and

that

acons

repair

be

secure

sign more or

OF

and For nonconformity

increase

relocated

this the

supports supports

a

sign

No

of

changes and sign.

the relocated shall

.AD]uS’rMEN’r.

of

sign

sign;

of

article.

any

wood

the

than

person

a

term purposes and

located a the

the

(Ord.

exceptlons

notify

non-conforming

non-conforming

may, light may

the is

effect

are

that

sign;

60

same

authorize

as are

repair’

brought

of

structure

Nos,

may

within

used

percent

waive rail

in

of

81A-7.703

in

are

words

close

within

each

and

of

specific the

type

of

writing

transit

repair 19455;

at

more

does such

sign with

into that

this

any

388 the

the

an

as

or

of of at

a WHEREAS, Transit Agreement WHEREAS,

WHEREAS, regarding Agreement a WHEREAS, called separation; WHEREAS,

grade

Now, BE Section and approved supplemented. Warranted Section the requirement

determination Section

become order allocation Supplemental

APQVED

part

IT

City

be

______

Therefore,

‘Supplemental

separation

RESOLVED

(DART)

to

of

consistent

disagree HEAD

2.

1. the

be 3.

Supplemental

warranted, by

of which

with and,

on

on Grade

OF

the

on That

consistent for

approved on That the That

$1.5

DEPARTMENT

System

October Agreement to February

July evaluation provisions

DART,

provisions DART September

provided on

retrofit DART

DART DART

with million BY Separations”)

technically Agreement

25,

and

THE Plan

DART

with 11,

the Board

setting

28,

Agreement

is

an

1990,

is is

and

No.

of for

by

hereby

1989,

is of subject CITY

provisions

1990, existing hereby Section hereby

DART’s

9, System

an

the Supplemental

on

1. requested

require

warranted out

Resolution

APPROVED

No,

independent 1997,

COUNCIL of Resolution

September

Master

Resolution

requested,

to

general requested

requested

1”); 9.5 Supplemental at-grade No.

Grade Plan

certain

that

of

DART

and,

(“Provisions

CT’f

Interlocal

1: the

to grade

and

all

97-0176

CONTROLLER OF ______Separation Agreements, provisions

89-3272

conditions;

9,

Planning 90-0810 existing remove

consultant crossing as

funding

to

Service

to

THE Board

1997,

separations.

called

make

revisit

Agreement.

Agreement

CITY

authorized for

approved

Master

and

authorized

the considerations

for Plan;

approved and

and for

Policy

the

and,

Future

in

the

with

OF

which

modify

the

in

DART

City Development

interagency

and,

Grade

Section Interlocal

DALLAS:

are

grade

situation

No. the

APPRO,D

Grade

the

an

the grade

that

a

not

benchmark

Dallas

1,

equal

Separation

COUNCIL (viaster policy

separation Master

be 9.3 the 981429

to Separations”)

policy

Agreement,

that 1998 separation

relationships

negotiable,

same

maintain (“Technically

Area

(hereinafter

voice

on

DART

Interlocal

lnterlocal CHAMBER

to

cr

funding

Rapid

as

grade

reflect being Policy

in

MA’AGER

and the

has

the

the

as

of

in Section Grade for has

Section Future to separations DART Separations”) Section Separation incremental inflation

of Section

should separation Section accordingly in

Distribution:

be non-warranted

benefit the

accordance

consistent

Separations”)

Grade

provides

be

4. Grade

at

5.

7. 6.

8.

reevaluated of the

policy Policy as

That That

That cost so That

That the

Separations”) of

Public City Budget City

time

for

resolved.

Separation

Supplemental

with with

same

the grade of

this DART

Attorney DART

Controller

DART

non-warranted applies

DART

to

of

Works

of non-warranted

and

the

the resolution construction

same reflect

subsequent amount Supplemental

separations.

Management

is

>U3’APpRoVED is

and is

requested

is

provisions

hereby to

hereby

of

hereby Policy,

hereby

Transportation,

level

that

all

Agreement Supplemental

of

shall

rail

grade DART

requested

of the

to

Services

requested grade of

which requested

amendment

requested

the

corridors

take Agreement

all of

DART funding

separations, funding

Transit

non-warranted

the

Sandra

No.

effect separations

states,

Agreement to

Charter

1, contribution

to

to in

delete

to

System

Williams, for as

immediately in

of

No.

amend

the

amend

change

Section

will “The

Section

non-warranted,

in

1,

DART

of the

will

be

separation. order

Plan OCMC, in

No.

retrofit

the Section

Section aflowed last

order

be 4

of

paragraph

CITY

9.4

above. from updates’. 1, Transit

J for

City

$1.5 sentence accordingly

Room

in APPROVED

(“City

to Acting

porticn such

MAY

9.4 order

and other 9.5

of ensure

million COUNCiL

101

COUNCIL

System

retrofitted

981429 City Required (“City

Dallas 2 after funding (Provisions

13

to member in

of

of

Secretary

adjusted paragraph ensure

1998 that BY

toward

its the

the

Required

CHAMBER 13

Plan

and

passage amount

Dallas

Grade Grade

grade

cities 1998

grade

that

it and the

for

for

3 is STATE COUNTY

executed (hereinafter

Development

for Supplement

Supplement

Amendment,

from

the

(Non-Warranted)

Future

the

revised

the

rail

WHEREAS,

OF WHEREAS,

WHEREAS,

WHEREAS,

WHEREAS, WHEREAS,

City

City THIRD “9.4 and 1. such Grade separation, the and separations amount Resolution 2. Supplemental

of “9.5 9.1, become appropriate provisions

OF

assembly

TEXAS

called a DART

No.

No. City effective

and

construction (1)

particular is (hereinafter DALLAS

a

DART

Provisions TO

Separations,

grade

ARTICLE hereinafter City

ARTICLE

1 prefers of 1

DART

AMENDMENT or

necessary

“City”), (the Grade (the

CITY/DART Grade

funding

except

970176, concerning plant/major

on

others City Required City on on

pursuant

on Supplement

separation traffic

will

“First “Second Agreement

grade

July that September agree

August

March

Separations,

called for

and Separation and

and called that of IX,

proceed PLANNING

LX,

as is shall

mitigation

a

as in Amendment”), Future 25, § § §

crossing,

DART a DART

hereby particular to

it

(Non-Warranted)

TRAFFIC DALLAS to DART

TRAFFIC amended

grade the Amendment”) “Supplement

City maintenance

contributes outside 30, the

1,

“Amended 1990,

be

DART’s

No. MASTER

No.

9,

future 1994,

(Retrofitted) with following TO

Policy; responsible 1995

staff desire required, amended

separations is

1997, agrees

1

should measures

1,

the

crossing hereby

to the

SUPPLEMENTAL by

AREA

design

as

MITIGATION pursuant

AND the

MITIGATION

City/DART at City

CITY

Grade to

CBD relating to Resolution DART

Now, Supplement

facility;

amended No.

that

that

the further INTERLOCAL amendments City

relating

other

to

amended

non-warranted

and

are RAPID

Grade

be Grade DEVELOPMENT

contained it for and read 1”);

construction

that

OF

location, Therefore,

Separation

to will

approved and

grade

feasible, to member

and

DART

the

amend

the and

construction is DALLAS, as

to

a Master

by

980149.”

contribute Separations,

Separations.

DART

substitution

not TRANSIT No.

to

follows: off-premises

net technical

REMEDIES,

separated

REMEDIES,

the

to read in

based recommended

Amended

executed

and cities 1”;

additional

a

Amended

Amended

Interlocal

First of

Policy

AGREEMENT

grade

grade

executed

AGREEMENT: as

and

a (2)

a

toward

considerations grade-separated follows:

for on

Texas

(hereinafter where Amendment of

of

directs

separation

Following

In

separation signs;

as

non-warranted the

Supplement a the

the

Section Supplement Agreement:

Supplement Section cost

the

Second

set

the

a

municipal judgment

electronic other

by

gtade-separated

DART

First

and

event

Out cost

of

DART,

called 9.4

policy completion reasonable that 9.5

NO.

in and in the Amendment Amendment

of

that No. crossing to

City-Required Section Planning No.

Erji2nhir DART design No.

shop

grade of corporation

grade build same

the

then “DART’),

1

that

1 the

the

1:

1; to

Second facility

and

varied reflect

and

to

to Third No. otherwise

MADELEINE APPROVED City

BY______

DALLAS

By:

I

Attorney

is

crossing, contribute DART Amendment separation retrofitted pursuant 970176, prohibit where 3.

Executed

Assistant hereby

President/Executive ROGER

supplemented,

AREA

AS necessary

beginning

Except

B. DART

ratified as

and

to

TO at crossings this

City SNOBLE

JOHNSON

RAPID grade amended

DART’s

least _____

to the

FORM:

as

Attorfley

from

Sbmitte

Amended

and

or

funding

shall the

specifically

separation design

TRANSIT

justified,

elsewhere

confirmed

contributing by

day same

Director

Grade

be

Resolution to

responsibilities

of construed

on

City

Supplement amount

as

Separation

the

crossings set in

agreed in

the

more

forth project,

all

of

980149.

together

City

respects

funding

upon

funding in

No.

of as Policy of

CITY TEODORO City

Sections , BY______

except APPROVED

By:

1999.

each Dallas

with

as This it

1

and for

Printed Manager Office

a allows and

than

OF

as single party

the

Section design

that

remains

and

1 DALLAS

set

the

the

City.”

and

of Assistant

J. Name:

will within DART

contractual for

AS out

DART BENAVIDES minimum Master

and

2

shall

in

TO be hereof, non-warranted

in

construction

full

other

determined

agrees DART City not FORM: General

Interlocal

force

described

agreement. be

Amended member

Manager

construed

that

Resolution

and

Counsel

of

prior

it Agreement

effect

grade cities,

above

these

will Supplement

to

to

and

this

as SPECIAL SPECIFICATIONS SPECIAL SPECIFICATION

ITEM DC-752

TREE REMOVAL (DELIVER TO DART)

1. Description

This item shall govern for the preparation, removal and delivery of trees to Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) storage yard as indicated in the plans.

A. Related Documents 1. Drawings and General Provisions of Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification sections, apply to work of this section.

B. Submittals 1. Qualifications: Statement of arborist qualifications including not less than five years experience in tree transplantation in the State of Texas. 2. Tree Removal/Delivery Plan: indicating anticipated: a. Anticipated time of tree removal and delivery. b. Utility coordination efforts: c. Tree preparation/removal methods and equipment. d. Tree transportation/delivery details

C. Quality Assurance 1. Contractor’s Field Supervision: The Contractor shall maintain an experienced full time supervisor on project site when tree removal operations are in progress.

2. Equipment

1. Tree removal operations shall be conducted with any equipment and by the means suitable for the intended task. 2. Pruning Tools: Use only sharp, clean tools, sterilized prior to use. 3. Removal tools: Size of Tree Spade, if used, is to be large enough to encompass fibrous feeder roots, consistent with standard nursery sizes for trees being relocated. 4. Flatbed trucks to be used for transporting trees shall have sufficient equipment and be large enough to transport trees safely.

3. Execution

A. Preparation 1. Verify with Engineer which trees are to be removed. 2. Prune tree branches and roots per recommendations of arborist. 3. Assure that surrounding soil is at a moisture level as directed by the arborist. 4. Coordinate with Dallas Water Utilities to protect existing water main. 5. Coordinate with DART regarding delivery location and time.

B. Tree Removal 1. Use tree spade machinery in good condition with a minimum tolerance (max 2”) between cutting blades or use other mechanical equipment or manual methods. 2. Upon tree removal immediately protect root ball by completely wrapping with burlap per standard nursery practice. Root ball size should be a minimum of 10-inches in diameter per 1- inch tree caliper or as directed by the arborist. 3. Do not allow cracking of root ball or excessive loss of soil.

C. Tree Delivery 1. When tree has been prepared for transportation, place tree on flatbed truck by lifting by the root ball. 2. Assure tree is safely secured to the vehicle and foliage is wrapped or covered to prevent wind damage while in transport. 3. Deliver tree(s) to the DART facility previously determined and unload trees at the location designated by DART personnel. 4. DART is to assume responsibility of tree maintenance at time of delivery.

4. Measurement Tree Removal (Deliver to DART) will be measured per each tree removed and delivered to DART. 5. Payment The work as prescribed by this item will be paid for at the unit price bid, per each for “Tree Removal (Deliver to DART)” which price shall be full compensation for preparation, removal, and delivery of trees to an agreed upon DART facility as indicated in the plans or as directed by the Engineer, for furnishing all materials, labor, tools, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. FOR BID PROPOSAL NO. 2017-054-6678 SOLICITATION FOR DENTON DRIVE ‐ MCIP PROJECT # 10217B Total Working Days: 450 DAYS FROM 470' SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LN. TO 850' NORTH OF ROYAL LN. IN THE CIITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DISTRICT NO. 4 BASE BID TOTAL UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS EXTENSION PRICE

SCHEDULE 1 ‐ PAVING & DRAINAGE ITEMS

DOLLARS 100‐2002 PREPARING ROW STA 71.9 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2001 REMOVING CONC (PAV) SY 6,002 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2009 REMOVE CONC (RIPRAP) SY 286 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2011 REMOVING CONC (MEDIAN) SY 74 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2015 REMOVING CONC (SIDEWALKS) SY 1,176 CENTS PER UNIT

27A of551 DOLLARS 104‐2017 REMOVE CONC (DRIVEWAYS) SY 2,953 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2022 REMOVING CONC (CURB AND GUTTER) LF 1,089 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 104‐2044 REMOVING CONC (FLUME) SY 13 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 105‐2045 REMOVING STAB BASE & ASPH PAV (2" ‐ 8") SY 22,526 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 110‐2001 EXCAVATION (ROADWAY) CY 20,637 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 110‐2002 EXCAVATION (CHANNEL) CY 132 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 132‐2002 EMBANKMENT (FINAL) (DENS CONT) (TY D) CY 2,507 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 160‐2003 FURNISHING AND PLACING TOPSOIL (4") SY 8,000 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 162‐2002 BLOCK SODDING SY 8,000 CENTS PER UNIT

170‐2001 IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS 1 DOLLARS

AND ZERO CENTS FOR BID PROPOSAL NO. 2017-054-6678 SOLICITATION FOR DENTON DRIVE ‐ MCIP PROJECT # 10217B Total Working Days: 450 DAYS FROM 470' SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LN. TO 850' NORTH OF ROYAL LN. IN THE CIITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DISTRICT NO. 4 BASE BID TOTAL UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS EXTENSION PRICE

DOLLARS 260‐2002 LIME (HYDRATED LIME (SLURRY) ) TON 684 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 260‐2027 LIME TRT (EXST MATL) (8") SY 32,309 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 340‐2XXX ASPH CONC (TY ‐ B) (BASE) (6") TON 595 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 340‐2XXX ASPH CONC (TY D) (2") TON 198 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 360‐2011 CONC PVMT (JOINTED ‐ CPCD) (10") SY 27,885 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 360‐2012 CONC PVMT (JOINTED ‐ CPCD) (11") SY 3,232 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 28A of551 360‐2013 CONC PVMT (JOINTED ‐ CPCD) (10") (CLASS HES) SY 1,100 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 402‐2001 TRENCH EXCAVATION PROTECTION LF 5,769 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 420‐2008 CL C CONC (WINGWALLS) CY 43 CENTS PER UNIT DOLLARS 420‐2242 CL A CONC (CHANNEL LINING) CY 66 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 423‐2012 RETAINING WALL (CAST‐IN‐PLACE) SF 2,213 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 450‐2179 RAIL (SPECIAL RAIL 1) LF 2,769 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 462‐2001 CONC BOX CULV (3 FT X 2 FT) LF 822 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 462‐2003 CONC BOX CULV (4 FT X 2 FT) LF 160 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 462‐2004 CONC BOX CULV (4 FT X 3 FT) LF 416 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 462‐2007 CONC BOX CULV (5 FT X 3 FT) LF 407 CENTS PER UNIT FOR BID PROPOSAL NO. 2017-054-6678 SOLICITATION FOR DENTON DRIVE ‐ MCIP PROJECT # 10217B Total Working Days: 450 DAYS FROM 470' SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LN. TO 850' NORTH OF ROYAL LN. IN THE CIITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DISTRICT NO. 4 BASE BID TOTAL UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS EXTENSION PRICE

DOLLARS 496‐2295 REMOVE STR (MASONARY WALL) LF 28 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 500‐2001 MOBILIZATION LS 1 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 502‐2001 BARRICADES, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC HANDLING MO 23 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 502‐2019 PORTABLE LIGHTED MESSAGE BOARDS (2) MO 17 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 504‐7000 FIELD OFFICE MO 23 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2003 ROCK FILTER DAMS (INSTALL) (TY 3) LF 60 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 31A of551 506‐2009 ROCK FILTER DAMS (REMOVE) LF 60 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2016 CONSTRUCTION EXITS (INSTALL) (TY 1) SY 640 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2019 CONSTRUCTION EXITS (REMOVE) SY 640 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2037 TEMP SEDMT CONT FENCE (INSTALL) LF 8,750 CENTS PER UNIT

506‐2038 TEMP SDMT CONT FENCE (CURB INLET PROTECTION) EA 31 DOLLARS

CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2038 TEMP SDMT CONT FENCE (DROP INLET PROTECTION) EA 15 CENTS PER UNIT

506‐2048 BIODEG EROSN CONT LOGS (INSTL) (12") LF 620 DOLLARS CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2056 BIODEG EROSN CONT LOGS (REMOVE) LF 620 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 506‐2057 TEMP SEDMT CONT FENCE (REMOVE) LF 8,750 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 508‐2002 CONSTRUCTING DETOURS SY 3,136 CENTS PER UNIT FOR BID PROPOSAL NO. 2017-054-6678 SOLICITATION FOR DENTON DRIVE ‐ MCIP PROJECT # 10217B Total Working Days: 450 DAYS FROM 470' SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LN. TO 850' NORTH OF ROYAL LN. IN THE CIITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DISTRICT NO. 4 BASE BID TOTAL UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS EXTENSION PRICE

DOLLARS 512‐2001 TEMPORARY PORT CONC TRAF BARRIER LF 90 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 529‐2006 CONC CURB (MONO) (TY II) LF 11,419 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 530‐2010 DRIVEWAYS (CONC) SY 2,694 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 530‐2011 DRIVEWAYS (ACP) SY 172 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2005 CURB RAMPS (TY 1) EA 10 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2006 CURB RAMPS (TY 2) EA 2 CENTS PER UNIT 32A of551 DOLLARS 531‐2015 CONC SIDEWALKS (4") SY 733 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2040 CURB RAMPS (TY 5) EA 8 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2041 CURB RAMPS (TY 10) EA 10 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2094 CONC SIDEWALKS (SPECIAL) (PATTERNED)(4") SY 7,780 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 531‐2095 CONC BICYCLE TRACK (SPECIAL) (6") SY 4,462 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 536‐2002 CONC MEDIAN SY 68 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 536‐2006 CONC MEDIAN (MONO NOSE) SY 14 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS LF 152 542‐2001 REMOVE METAL BEAM GUARD FENCE CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 644‐9991 RELOCATE SMALL ROAD SIGN SUPPORT & ASSEMB EA 30 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 644‐9992 INSTALL SMALL ROAD SIGN SUPPORT & ASSEMBLY EA 21 CENTS PER UNIT FOR BID PROPOSAL NO. 2017-054-6678 SOLICITATION FOR DENTON DRIVE ‐ MCIP PROJECT # 10217B Total Working Days: 450 DAYS FROM 470' SOUTH OF WALNUT HILL LN. TO 850' NORTH OF ROYAL LN. IN THE CIITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DISTRICT NO. 4 BASE BID TOTAL UNIT ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS EXTENSION PRICE

DOLLARS 644‐9993 SIGN (DECORATIVE) (REMOVE) EA 1 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2003 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 4" (BRKN) (100MIL) LF 80 CENTS PER UNIT

666‐2012 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 4" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 270 DOLLARS CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2024 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 6" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 4,225 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2036 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 8" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 244 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2042 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 12" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 735 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 33A of551 666‐2045 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 18" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 651 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2048 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) 24" (SLD) (100MIL) LF 279 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2054 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) (ARROW) (100MIL) EA 40 CENTS PER UNIT

DOLLARS 666‐2057 REFL PAV MRK TY I (W) (BIKE ARW) (100MIL) EA 46 CENTS PER UNIT