The Lure and Pitfalls of Mirvs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Lure and Pitfalls of Mirvs THE LURE & PITFALLS OF MIRVs From the First to the Second Nuclear Age Edited by Michael Krepon, Travis Wheeler and Shane Mason THE LURE & PITFALLS OF MIRVs From the First to the Second Nuclear Age Edited by Michael Krepon, Travis Wheeler and Shane Mason May 2016 © Copyright 2016 Stimson Center. All rights reserved. Visit www.stimson.org for more information. Cover photo: David James Paquin via Wikimedia Commons The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs CONTENTS Preface................................................................ 7 Executive Summary .................................................... 8 Key Terms and Acronyms . 10 Introduction.......................................................... 13 Michael Krepon and Travis Wheeler The Geopolitical Origins of US Hard-Target-Kill Counterforce Capabilities and MIRVs.................................... 19 Brendan Rittenhouse Green and Austin Long The Impact of MIRVs and Counterforce Targeting on the US-Soviet Strategic Relationship .................................. 55 Alexey Arbatov and Vladimir Dvorkin China’s Belated Embrace of MIRVs ...................................... 95 Jeffrey G. Lewis India’s Slow and Unstoppable Move to MIRV ............................ 119 Rajesh Basrur and Jaganath Sankaran Pakistan, MIRVs, and Counterforce Targeting ........................... 149 Feroz H. Khan and Mansoor Ahmed Summing Up and Looking Ahead ...................................... 177 Michael Krepon 5 PREFACE I am pleased to present the latest publication of the Stimson Center’s South Asia program, The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs: From the First to the Second Nuclear Age. This monograph begins with expert analyses of the internal and external factors that led the United States and the Soviet Union to affix multiple warheads atop their longest-range missiles. Then three essays assess whether and how China, India, and Pakistan might embrace multiple independently targetable re-entry ve- hicles (MIRVs). As with previous Stimson publications, we expect that The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs will be read carefully by government officials, serving and retired military officers, senior and rising strategic analysts, and students interest- ed in how the second nuclear age will play out in India, Pakistan, and China. For more than 25 years, the Stimson Center has generated policy-relevant scholar- ship on nuclear deterrence and crisis management in South Asia. In recent years, Stimson’s South Asia program has gone from strength to strength, including a web- site, South Asian Voices [http://www.southasianvoices.org], dedicated to providing a forum for rising strategic analysts in India and Pakistan. In 2016, we will launch a new Stimson initiative — an open online course on “Nuclear South Asia.” This free course benefits from the input of more than 70 notable strategic analysts, scholars, and diplomats from India, Pakistan, and the United States. It will become the go-to course on South Asia’s nuclear history, Indian and Pakistani nuclear doctrines, de- terrence and crisis stability, as well as the subcontinent’s alternative nuclear futures. The Stimson Center is deeply indebted for programming on nuclear issues in South Asia from the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The ed- itors also wish to thank: Stimson’s communications team, led by Jim Baird and Miles Abadilla; Stimson’s administrative team, especially Oksana Bellas, Lacie Rawlings, Nakia Bell, and Will Brown; Julia Thompson, a former research associ- ate in the South Asia Program; Akriti Vasudeva, a visiting fellow in the South Asia Program; Stimson interns Joseph Kendall, Mariah Hays, and Poorvie Patel; copy editor Jenny Moore; and graphic designer Lita Ledesma. Sincerely, Brian Finlay President and CEO, Stimson Center 7 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the second nuclear age, no less than the first, there are no realistic prospects for banning multiple-warhead missiles. China has started to deploy such missiles, and India and Pakistan are likely to cross this threshold as well. The motivations behind these steps will determine how extensively nuclear arsenals will grow and how pernicious the effects of stockpile growth will become. Success in dampening the negative repercussions of multiple-warhead missiles will rest on two foundations. The first is improved bilateral relations among the contestants. One of the responsibilities of states that possess nuclear weapons is to pursue nuclear risk reduction measures (NRRMs) with other nuclear-armed states, especially those with which they have previously fought wars. By this yard- stick, China, India, and Pakistan can be found wanting. A willingness to improve bilateral relations is measurable in many ways. It is af- firmed by: the absence of firing across and aggressive patrolling nearby unset- tled borders; the avoidance of violent acts emanating from one country’s soil that can lead to intense crises; failing that, the successful judicial prosecution of high- er-ups; engagement in meaningful strategic dialogue that produces NRRMs; and preventing increased trade or improved relations from being held hostage to issues that are not ripe for settlement. Here again, all three states can be found wanting. The second foundation for dampening the negative consequences of multiple-war- head missiles in Asia is to resist a progression from countervalue to counterforce targeting strategies of nuclear deterrence. This metric, as with the willingness to improve bilateral relations, is measurable in several ways, including: the reten- tion of no first use (NFU) doctrines by China and India; proceeding slowly with limited numbers of multiple-warhead missiles; and being more transparent about strategic modernization plans and programs. China will set the tone for this competition. India will likely indulge in tech- nological advances as well. And Pakistan, the country least equipped to engage in an accelerated competition, is most susceptible to this dynamic as it seeks to keep pace with India. Unlike the first nuclear age, it is possible to dampen the extent of warhead increases due to multiple-warhead missiles. But even modest increments in multiple-warhead missiles — resulting in perhaps 200 warheads among the competitors over the next 10-15 years — will ratchet up the triangu- lar, interactive nuclear competition in Asia. If the growth of warhead totals and missile accuracy presages moves by Beijing and New Delhi toward warfighting strategies of deterrence, then the second nuclear age 8 The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY will become far more dangerous, and prospects for reducing the salience of nuclear weapons on international affairs will be undermined. If decisionmakers in China, India, and Pakistan wish to avoid repeating the missteps of the United States and the Soviet Union during the first nuclear age, they will limit the extent to which mul- tiple warheads are placed atop missiles, they will proceed at a slow pace, and, most important, they will reject the lure and pitfalls of counterforce targeting strategies. 9 Key Terms & Acronyms KEY TERMS & ACRONYMS ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile ALCM Air-Launched Cruise Missile ASAT Anti-Satellite BMD Ballistic Missile Defense CEP Circular Error Probable CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty C3 Command, Control, and Communications DAE Department of Atomic Energy (India) DRDO Defence Research and Development Organisation (India) HTK Hard-Target Kill ICBM Intercontinental Ballistic Missile INF Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces IRBM Intermediate-range Ballistic Missile ISPR Inter-Services Public Relations (Pakistan) ISR Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance LACM Land-Attack Cruise Missile LNO Limited Nuclear Options MAD Mutual Assured Destruction MIRV Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Vehicle MaRV Maneuverable Re-entry Vehicle MRV Multiple Re-entry Vehicle NCA National Command Authority (Pakistan) NESCOM National Engineering and Scientific Commission (Pakistan) NFU No First Use NPT Non-Proliferation Treaty NSA National Security Advisor NSG Nuclear Suppliers Group OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense (United States) PBV Post-Boost Vehicle PLA People’s Liberation Army (China) 10 The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs KEY TERMS & ACRONYMS PMO Prime Minister’s Office (India) PSA Principal Scientific Advisor (India) RV Re-entry Vehicle SAC Strategic Air Command (United States) SALT Strategic Arms Limitation Talks SFC Strategic Forces Command (India) SIOP Single Integrated Operational Plan (United States) SLBM Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile SNF Strategic Nuclear Forces SP Special Projects (United States) SPD Strategic Plans Division (Pakistan) SPS Strategic Program Staff (India) SRF Strategic Rocket Forces (Soviet Union) SSBN Ballistic Missile Submarine START Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty SUPARCO Space and Upper Atmospheric Research Commission (Pakistan) USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 11 The Lure and Pitfalls of MIRVs INTRODUCTION Michael Krepon and Travis Wheeler The dawn of the first nuclear age came as a great shock. The assumption of waging wars by “ironmongery,” with the outcome determined over time by remorseless acts of cumulative punishment, was immediately upended. With stunning effect, the “absolute” weapon was unveiled. The Bomb could be used as a war-winning weapon or, paradoxically, it could be too powerful to be used in war.1 Other shocking technological advances followed the “atomic” bomb in quick
Recommended publications
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2018: Armaments, Disarmament and International
    world nuclear forces 273 VII. Pakistani nuclear forces shannon n. kile and hans m. kristensen Pakistan continues to prioritize the development and deployment of new nuclear weapons and delivery systems as part of its ‘full spectrum deterrence posture’ vis-à-vis India. It is estimated that Pakistan possessed 140–50 war- heads as of January 2018 (see table 6.8). Pakistan’s nuclear weapon arsenal is likely to expand significantly over the next decade, although estimates of the increase in warhead numbers vary considerably.1 Pakistan is believed to be gradually increasing its military fissile material holdings, which include both plutonium and highly enriched uranium (HEU) (see section X). Pakistan’s plutonium production complex is located at Khushab in the province of Punjab. It consists of four operational heavy water nuclear reactors and a heavy water production plant.2 Pakistan appears to be increasing its capacity to reprocess spent nuclear fuel—that is, to chemically separate plutonium from irradiated reactor fuel. A small reprocessing plant has been expanded at the New Laboratories facility of the Pakistan Institute of Science and Technology (PINSTECH) near Rawal- pindi. A larger reprocessing plant has been constructed at the Chashma Nuclear Power Complex in Punjab and may already be operational.3 Uranium enrichment takes place at the gas centrifuge plant in the Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) complex at Kahuta in Punjab and at a smaller plant located at Gadwal, also in Punjab. A new uranium enrichment centri- fuge plant may be under construction in the KRL complex at Kahuta.4 Pakistan’s capacity to produce HEU for nuclear weapons is constrained by its limited indigenous supply of natural uranium.5 Aircraft The Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) Mirage III and Mirage V combat aircraft are the most likely aircraft to have been given a nuclear delivery role.
    [Show full text]
  • DRDO Successfully Tests Armour-Piercing Nag Missiles At
    Tue, 09 July 2019 DRDO successfully tests armour-piercing Nag Missiles at Pokhran range The Defence Acquisition Council in 2018 had approved the procurement of DRDO designed and developed NAG Missile System (NAMIS) at a cost of Rs 524 crore New Delhi: Moving closer toward the induction of the Nag anti-tank guided missiles into the Army, Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) on Sunday carried out three successful test firings of the missiles in the Pokhran firing ranges. "The missiles were test-fired during both day and night on Sunday during the trials. All three tests were successful," DRDO officials said. Government sources said the missile is in the final stages of being inducted into the Army which will use it by mounting them on modified armoured vehicles. The Defence Acquisition Council in 2018 had approved the procurement of DRDO-designed- and-developed NAG Missile System (NAMIS) at a cost of Rs 524 crore. The system includes a third-generation Anti-Tank Guided Missile, the NAG, along with the Missile Carrier Vehicle (NAMICA). The NAG missile is a third-generation anti-tank guided missile, which has top attack capabilities that can effectively engage and destroy all known enemy tanks during both day and night operations. The successful induction of NAG missile into the Army is expected to give a quantum boost to the Army's capability against enemy armour. NAG was one of the first five strategic missiles planned to be developed under the Integrated Missile Development Programme initiated in the 1980s. The other missiles developed under the project include Agni, Prithvi and Akash, and all three have been successfully developed and inducted into the armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Claude Van Johnson
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! JEAN-CLAUDE VAN JOHNSON PILOT EPISODE: ‘THE ONE WITH THE BULGARIAN DRUG CARTEL” Written by Dave Callaham October 31, 2014 Scott Free Television UP ON: AN EXTREME CLOSE-UP OF JEAN-CLAUDE VAN DAMME’S FACE. He has a BLACK EYE but is otherwise impassive. Stoic. JCVD (V.O.) My name is Jean-Claude Van Damme. But you already know that, because I am extremely famous. I have starred in dozens of hit movies that have grossed over a billion dollars worldwide. Perhaps you remember my first starring role, in ‘Bloodsport.’ ‘Bloodsport’ is on television all of the time. Or maybe you have seen ‘TimeCop,’ which is like ‘Looper,’ but like a million times better. In ‘Double Impact’ I played twins. So if you have seen ‘Double Impact,’ I am even more famous to you. (beat) But this is not makeup on my eye. PULL BACK TO REVEAL: JCVD is standing in a DANK, DARK HALLWAY... JCVD (V.O.) This is not a movie set. ... where a steel pipe wielding THUG is racing toward him in SUPER SLO-MO. Bad intentions all over his face. JCVD (V.O.) And that man... is not an actor. As the Thug nears... JCVD (V.O.) I know what he is going to do before he does. He is going to swing at my head. Right on cue, the Thug rears back, starts his slo-mo swing. JCVD (V.O.) He must not know who I am. Because if he knew who I am, he would know: my head is a Hard Target. That is the name of one of my hit films.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Message in DRDO Chief's Exit?
    Page 1 of 9 Newspaper Clips January 20, 2015 Page 2 of 9 IIT Delhi’s Startup Showcase Competition Invites Startups to Pitch for INR 10L in Funding http://www.iamwire.com/2015/01/iit-delhis-start-up-showcase-competition-invites-application-inr-2m-cash- prizes/108443 Enterpreneurship Development Cell (EDC), IIT Delhi is inviting applications for Start-up Showcase Competition event, in association with Foradian Technologies and LetsVenture. The competiton will be held at IIT Delhi with an aim to provide a platform for the Indian Start-up Ecosystem to showcase their budding ventures to the mentors and investors from India and abroad. It is a three-stage competition which offers prizes worth over INR 15 lakhs to the winners along with a trip to the Silicon Valley. The winner would get INR 10 Lakhs, where as the first and second runner up will receive INR 500,000 and INR 300,000 respectively. The startups can submit their applications till January 25, 2015 after which around 40-45 start-ups would be selected for the second round. The selection into the third round would depend on the basis of the commitment of all the members of the startup regarding their idea. After getting selected into the third round, the startups would be assigned a mentor from some of the VC firms eg. Sequoia, Helion etc. and would be provided structured mentoring. The final stage of the Start-up Showcase Competition will be conclude on March 7, 2015. Being entrepreneurship enthusiasts ourselves, we firmly believe that a startup cannot be judged in one day, and hence the competition is more of a process rather than a single event, spanning a period of three months, with each team monitored by a group of mentors beyond the first stage, hence ensuring a productive three months for each of the participating teams, EDC, IIT Delhi mentioned on its website.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock Entertainment Dealer Guide NOVEMBER 2019
    DEALER GUIDE NOVEMBER 2019 JERRY LEWIS COLLECTION DEAN MARTIN COLLECTION JOHN WAYNE COLLECTION WESTERN 10 PACK COLLECTION CLASSIC ROMANCE COLLECTORS SET COVER TITLE: JERRY LEWIS COLLECTION DEALER GUIDE CONTENTS 03 JERRY LEWIS COLLECTION 04 DEAN MARTIN COLLECTION 05 JOHN WAYNE COLLECTION 06 WESTERN 10 PACK COLLECTION 07 CLASSIC ROMANCE COLLECTORS SET 08 AIR CRASH INVESTIGATION SEASON 1-18 COLLECTION 09 JEAN-CLAUDE VAN DAMME COLLECTION 10 LOVE BOAT SEASON 1 - 4 COLLECTION 11 THE GOLDBERGS SEASON 1 - 5 COLLECTION 12 RELIC HUNTER COLLECTION HD 13 MUTANT X COLLECTION HD 14 THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES 1 - 5 COLLECTION 15 A TASTE OF CHRISTMAS / SNOWMANCE 16 ANGELS IN THE SNOW / BACK TO CHRISTMAS 17 MAGGIE'S CHRISTMAS MIRACLE / MR CHRISTMAS 18 MY CHRISTMAS LOVE / LOVE STRIKES TWICE 19 ON THE TWELFTH DAY OF CHRISTMAS / MY SANTA 20 A STAR-CROSSED CHRISTMAS / CHRISTMAS MAIL CATPLBD02PS_FRT WWW.SHOCK.COM.AU JERRY LEWIS COLLECTION RELEASE DATE 06.11.19 ARTWORK TBC SPECS LABEL: SHOCK RATING: PG DISCS: 20 DISCS RUN TIME: 1925 MINS SOUND: MONO JERRY LEWIS COLLECTION REGION: 4 ENJOY TWENTY CLASSICS FROM THE MAN DUBBED ‘HOLLYWOOD’S KING OF GENRE: COMEDY / CLASSIC COMEDY’, THE LEGENDARY JERRY LEWIS! ASPECT RATIO: WIDE SCREEN LANGUAGE: ENGLISH The great comedy legend Jerry Lewis left behind an unparalleled career filled with outrageous characters, SUBTITLES: NONE impeccable comedic timing and outright lunacy. This 20-DVD box set is a delight for anyone afflicted with a susceptibility to the fractured antics of Jerry Lewis. SALES & MARKETING KEY SELLING POINTS • Jerry Lewis is one of the best known comedians and actors of his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Threat of Nuclear Winter Seth D
    Confronting the Threat of Nuclear Winter Seth D. Baum Global Catastrophic Risk Institute http://sethbaum.com * http://gcrinstitute.org Futures 72: 69-79. This version 14 October 2015. Abstract Large-scale nuclear war sends large quantities of smoke into the stratosphere, causing severe global environmental effects including surface temperature declines and increased ultraviolet radiation. The temperature decline and the full set of environmental effects are known as nuclear winter. This paper surveys the range of actions that can confront the threat of nuclear winter, both now and in the future. Nuclear winter can be confronted by reducing the probability of nuclear war, reducing the environmental severity of nuclear winter, increasing humanity’s resilience to nuclear winter, and through indirect interventions that enhance these other interventions. While some people may be able to help more than others, many people—perhaps everyone across the world—can make a difference. Likewise, the different opportunities available to different people suggests personalized evaluations of nuclear winter, and of catastrophic threats more generally, instead of a one-size-fits-all approach. Keywords: catastrophic threats, global catastrophic risk, nuclear war, nuclear winter, risk reduction 1. Introduction The explosion of nuclear weapons causes enormous fireballs, burning everything in the vicinity. Most of the ensuing smoke rises past the clouds, into the stratosphere, where it spreads around the world and remains for a time on the order of ten to twenty years. A large enough nuclear war would send up so much smoke that the global environment would be fundamentally altered. Surface temperatures and precipitation would decline, while ultraviolet radiation increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons
    Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Paul K. Kerr Analyst in Nonproliferation Mary Beth Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation August 1, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34248 Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Summary Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal probably consists of approximately 110-130 nuclear warheads, although it could have more. Islamabad is producing fissile material, adding to related production facilities, and deploying additional nuclear weapons and new types of delivery vehicles. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking military action against Pakistan, but Islamabad’s expansion of its nuclear arsenal, development of new types of nuclear weapons, and adoption of a doctrine called “full spectrum deterrence” have led some observers to express concern about an increased risk of nuclear conflict between Pakistan and India, which also continues to expand its nuclear arsenal. Pakistan has in recent years taken a number of steps to increase international confidence in the security of its nuclear arsenal. Moreover, Pakistani and U.S. officials argue that, since the 2004 revelations about a procurement network run by former Pakistani nuclear official A.Q. Khan, Islamabad has taken a number of steps to improve its nuclear security and to prevent further proliferation of nuclear-related technologies and materials. A number of important initiatives, such as strengthened export control laws, improved personnel security, and international nuclear security cooperation programs, have improved Pakistan’s nuclear security. However, instability in Pakistan has called the extent and durability of these reforms into question. Some observers fear radical takeover of the Pakistani government or diversion of material or technology by personnel within Pakistan’s nuclear complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterrence and Extended Deterrence: Key Terms and Definitions
    Deterrence and Extended Deterrence Key Terms and Definitions Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. Read Ahead Material for PPNT Presentation, UCSD/IGCC, San Diego 23 July 2010 Deterrence Prevention of action by fear of negative consequences A state of mind in one’s adversary, brought about by a credible threat of unacceptable counteraction Credibility = capability + will Purpose: convince a party not to take some action by threatening the destruction of something he considers to be of great value, or by denying him achieving his objectives The opposite of compellence (getting another party to do something they do not want to do) Deterrence by punishment A doctrine used to deter an adversary by threatening the destruction of something he values, such as population centers, key cultural sites, the leadership, or military forces. Deterrence by denial The strategic doctrine used to deter an adversary by denying him the ability to achieve his objectives; this may include a combination of counterforce targeting and active and passive defenses Mutual assured destruction The ability of both sides to guarantee the destruction of the adversary even after suffering from a nuclear first strike. Secure second strike The forces, planning, and basing to ensure that enough offensive striking power remains after a devastating nuclear first strike to still guarantee the destruction of the adversary’s society. Techniques for ensuring a secure second strike may include hardening, dispersal, camouflage, placing forces on alert, or increasing the number of delivery systems. Societal vulnerability The perceived requirement to ensure that both sides’ populations were vulnerable to strategic attack in order to ensure stability between two adversaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 11/03/11 110311 Pisp.Doc Physics in the Interest of Society 1
    1 _11/03/11_ 110311 PISp.doc Physics in the Interest of Society Physics in the Interest of Society Richard L. Garwin IBM Fellow Emeritus IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 www.fas.org/RLG/ www.garwin.us [email protected] Inaugural Lecture of the Series Physics in the Interest of Society Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 3, 2011 2 _11/03/11_ 110311 PISp.doc Physics in the Interest of Society In preparing for this lecture I was pleased to reflect on outstanding role models over the decades. But I felt like the centipede that had no difficulty in walking until it began to think which leg to put first. Some of these things are easier to do than they are to describe, much less to analyze. Moreover, a lecture in 2011 is totally different from one of 1990, for instance, because of the instant availability of the Web where you can check or supplement anything I say. It really comes down to the comment of one of Elizabeth Taylor later spouses-to-be, when asked whether he was looking forward to his wedding, and replied, “I know what to do, but can I make it interesting?” I’ll just say first that I think almost all Physics is in the interest of society, but I take the term here to mean advising and consulting, rather than university, national lab, or contractor research. I received my B.S. in physics from what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland in 1947 and went to Chicago with my new wife for graduate study in Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I. Rabi Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered Tue Apr
    I. I. Rabi Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1992 Revised 2010 March Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998009 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm89076467 Prepared by Joseph Sullivan with the assistance of Kathleen A. Kelly and John R. Monagle Collection Summary Title: I. I. Rabi Papers Span Dates: 1899-1989 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1968) ID No.: MSS76467 Creator: Rabi, I. I. (Isador Isaac), 1898- Extent: 41,500 items ; 105 cartons plus 1 oversize plus 4 classified ; 42 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and educator. The collection documents Rabi's research in physics, particularly in the fields of radar and nuclear energy, leading to the development of lasers, atomic clocks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to his 1944 Nobel Prize in physics; his work as a consultant to the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and as an advisor on science policy to the United States government, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during and after World War II; and his studies, research, and professorships in physics chiefly at Columbia University and also at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein.
    [Show full text]
  • OSP11: Nuclear Weapons Policy 1967-1998
    OPERATIONAL SELECTION POLICY OSP11 NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY 1967-1998 Revised November 2005 1 Authority 1.1 The National Archives' Acquisition Policy announced the Archive's intention of developing Operational Selection Policies across government. These would apply the collection themes described in the overall policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. 1.2 Operational Selection Policies are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. This policy may therefore be reviewed and revised in the light of comments from users of the records or from archive professionals, the experience of departments in using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information. There is no formal cycle of review, but comments would be welcomed at any time. The extent of any review or revision exercise will be determined according to the nature of the comments received. If you have any comments upon this policy, please e-mail records- [email protected] or write to: Acquisition and Disposition Policy Manager Records Management Department The National Archives Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU 1.3 Operational Selection Policies do not provide guidance on access to selected records. 2 Scope 2.1 This policy relates to all public records on British nuclear weapons policy and development. The departments and agencies concerned are the Prime Minister’s Office, the Cabinet Office, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Security Policy Department, Defence Department, Atomic Energy and Disarmament Department, and Arms Control and Disarmament Department), HM Treasury (Defence and Material Department), the Department of Trade and Industry (Atomic Energy, and Export Control and Non-Proliferation Directorate), the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) and the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA).
    [Show full text]
  • Application Requête
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS filed in the Registry of the Court on 24 April 2014 OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO CESSATION OF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE AND TO NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT (MARSHALL ISLANDS v. UNITED KINGDOM) COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE REQUÊTE INTRODUCTIVE D’INSTANCE enregistrée au Greffe de la Cour le 24 avril 2014 OBLIGATIONS RELATIVES À DES NÉGOCIATIONS CONCERNANT LA CESSATION DE LA COURSE AUX ARMES NUCLÉAIRES ET LE DÉSARMEMENT NUCLÉAIRE (ÎLES MARSHALL c. ROYAUME-UNI) 6 R-ILE_UK_2.indd 1 12/10/15 11:49 2 2014 General List No. 160 I. LETTER FROM THE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND CO-AGENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Majuro, 6 April 2014. I have the honour to submit herewith nine Applications to the Court. In six of these Applications the Marshall Islands is requesting the Respondent State to con- sent to the Court’s jurisdiction for the purposes of this particular case. All of the Applications are delivered to you on Thursday, 24 April 2014, by our Co-Agent, Mr. Phon van den Biesen. Attached to this letter are nine letters in which I make it known to the Court that Mr. van den Biesen has been duly appointed as Co-Agent for each of these cases. Each of the nine Applications is submitted to the Court in two original copies. In addition, 30 paper copies of each Application are provided to the Court as well as one USB device containing digital copies of each Application.
    [Show full text]