DOCSLIB.ORG

The Riemannian Connection • If We Are to Use Geodesics and Covariant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Riemannian Connection • If We Are to Use Geodesics and Covariant The Riemannian Connection • If we are to use geodesics and covariant derivatives as tools for studying Rie- mannian geometry, it is evident that we need a way to single out a particular connection on a Riemannian manifold that reflects the properties of the metric. • We are going to show that on each Riemannian manifold there is a natural connection that is particularly suited to computations in Riemannian geometry. • Guided by an example of an embedded submfd of Rn, we describe two properties that determine a unique connection on any Riemannian manifold. (1) The first property, compatibility with the metric, is easy to motivate and understand. (2) The second, symmetry, is a bit more mysterious. • Since we get most of our intuition about Riemannian manifolds from studying submanifolds of Rn with the induced metric, let us start by examining that case. • As a guiding principle, consider the idea: A geodesic in a submfd of Rn should be “as straight as possible”, which we take to mean that its acceleration vector field should have zero tangential projection onto TM. • To express this in the language of connections, let M ⊂ Rn be an embedded submanifold. Any vector field on M can be extended to a smooth vector field on Rn. (Why?) • Begin with a trivial example on Rn. Definition. Define the Euclidean connection by j j DX (Y ∂j )=(XY )∂j . — In other words, DX Y is just the vector field whose components are the ordinary directional derivatives of the components of Y in the direction X. — It is easy to check that this satisfies the required properties for a connection, and that its Christoffel symbols in standard coordinates are all zero. • Define a map D> :Γ(TM) × Γ(TM) → Γ(TM) by setting > > DX Y = π (DX Y ), where X and Y are extended arbitrarily to Rn, D is the Euclidean connection n n on R , and for any point p ∈ M, π : TpR → TpM is the orthogonal projection. • As the next lemma shows, this turns out to be a connection on M, called the tangential connection. Typeset by AMS-TEX 1 2 Lemma 1. The operator D> is well-defined, and is a connection on M. > Proof. (1) Claim: DX Y is well-defined. > (i) DX Y is clearly independent of the choice of vector fields extending X, since the value of DX Y at a point p ∈ M depends only on X. (ii) The value of DX Y at p depends only on the values of Y along a curve whose initial tangent vector is Xp; taking the curve to lie entirely in M shows that > DX Y depends only on the original vector field Y ∈ Γ(TM). (2) Smoothness follows easily by expressing DX Y in terms of an adapted orthonor- mal frame. > ∞ (3) It is obvious from the definition that DX Y is linear over C (M)inX and over R in Y . (4) To check the product rule, let f ∈ C∞(M) be extended arbitrarily to Rn. Evaluating along M, we obtain > > DX (fY)=π (DX (fY)) > > =(Xf)π Y + fπ (DX Y ) > =(Xf)Y + fDX Y. • A theorem of John Nash says that any Riemannian metric on any manifold can be realized as the induced metric of some embedding in a Euclidean space. — Thus, in a certain sense, one would lose no generality by studying only submfds of Rn with their induced metrics, for which the tangential connection would suffice. • However, when one is trying to understand intrinsic properties of a Riemannian manifolds, an embedding introduces a great deal of extraneous information, and in some cases actually makes it harder to discern which geometric properties depend only on the metric. • Our task in this chapter is to distinguish some important properties of the tan- gential connection that make sense for connections on an abstract Riemannian manifold, and to use them to single out a unique connection in the abstract case. • The Euclidean connection on Rn has one very nice property w.r.t. the Euclidean metric: it satisfies the product rule DZ hX, Y i = hDX Y,Zi + hY,DX Zi, as we can verify easily by computing in terms of the standard basis. — It is now immediate that the tangential connection has the same property,ifwe now interpret all the vector fields as being tangent to M and interpret the inner product as being taken w.r.t. the induced metric on M. Definition. Let g be a Riemannian (or pseudo-Riemannian) metric on a manifold M. A connection D is said to be compatible with g if it satisfies the following product rule for all vector fields X, Y , and Z. DZ hX, Y i = hDX Y,Zi + hY,DX Zi. 3 Lemma 3. The following conditions are equivalent for a onnection D on a Rie- mannian manifold: (1) D is compatible with g. (2) Dg ≡ 0. (3) If V , W are vector fields along any curve γ, d hV,Wi = hD V,Wi + hV,D W i. dt t t (4) If V , W are parallel vector fields along a curve γ, then hV,Wi is constant. → ∀ (5) Parallel translation Pt0t1 : Tγ(t0)M Tγ(t1)M is an isometry t0, t1. • It turns out that requring a connection to be compatible with the metric is not enough to determine a unique connection, so we turn to another key property of the tangential connection. This involves the torsion tensor of the connection. 2 Definition. The torsion tensor of the connection is the 1-tensor field τ : Γ(TM) × Γ(TM) → Γ(TM) defined by τ(X, Y )=DX Y − DY X − [X, Y ]. • A linear connection ∇ is said to be torsion-free or symmetric if its torsion vanishes identically; i.e., if DX Y − DY X ≡ [X, Y ]. Lemma 4. The tangential connection on an embedded submfd M ⊂ Rn is sym- metric. Theorem 5 (Fundamental Lemma of Riemannian Geometry). Let (M,g) be a Riemannian (or pseudo-Riemannian) manifold. There exists a unique linear connection D on M that is compatible with g and symmetric. • This connection is called the Riemannian connection or the Levi-Civita connection of g. Proof. We prove uniqueness first, by deriving a formula for D. Let D be such a connection, and let X, Y , Z ∈ Γ(TM) be arbitrary vector fields. Write the compatibility equation three times with X, Y , Z cyclically permuted: XhY,Zi = hDX Y,Zi + hY,DX Zi, Y hZ, Xi = hDY Z, Xi + hZ, DY Xi, ZhX, Y i = hDZ X, Y i + hX, DZ Y i. Using the symmetry condition on the last term in each line, this is rewritten as 4 XhY,Zi = hDX Y,Zi + hY,DZ Xi + hY,[X, Z]i, Y hZ, Xi = hDY Z, Xi + hZ, DX Y i + hZ, [Y,X]i, ZhX, Y i = hDZ X, Y i + hX, DY Zi + hX, [Z, Y ]i. — Adding the first two of these equations and subtracting the third, we obtain XhY,Zi+Y hZ, Xi−ZhX, Y i =2hDX Y,Zi+hY,∇Z Xi+hZ, [Y,X]i−hX, [Z, Y ]i. Hence 1 (1) hD Y,Zi = (XhY,Zi+Y hZ, Xi−ZhX, Y i) X 2 −hY,[X, Z]i−hZ, [Y,X]i + hX, [Z, Y ]i). — Now suppose D1 and D2 are two connections that are symmetric and compatible with g, Since the right-hand side of (1) does not depend on the connection, it follows that 1 2 hDX Y − DX Y,Zi =0, ∀X,Y,Z. 1 2 1 2 This can only happen if DX Y = DX Y for all X and Y , and so D = D . • Existence: We use (1) or rather a coordinate version of it. — It suffices to prove that such a connection exists in each coordinate chart, for then uniqueness ensures that the connection constructed in different charts agree where they overlap. — Let (U, (xi)) be any local coordinate chart. Applying (1) to the coordinate vector fields, whose Lie brackets are zero, we obtain 1 (2) hD ∂ ,∂ i = (∂ h∂ ,∂ i + ∂ h∂ ,∂ i−∂ h∂ ,∂ i. ∂i j ` 2 i j ` j ` i ` i j Recall the definition of the metric coefficients and the Christoffel symbols: m gij = h∂i,∂j i,D∂i ∂j =Γij ∂m. Inserting these into (2) yields 1 (3) Γmg = (∂ g + ∂ g − ∂ g ). ij m` 2 i j` j `i ` ij ik `k k Multiplying both sides by the inverse matrix g and noting that gm`g = δm, we obtain 1 (4) Γk = gk`(∂ g + ∂ g − ∂ g ). ij 2 i j` j `i ` ij — This formula certainly defines a connection in each chart. k k — It is evident from the formula that Γij =Γij , so the connection is symmetric. — Thus only compatibility with the metric needs to be checked. By Lemma 3, it suffices to claim: Dg =0. – In terms of a coordinate frame, the components of Dg are ` ` gij;k = ∂kgij − Γkig`j − Γkjgi`, Using (3) twice, we conclude 1 1 Γ` g +Γ` g = (∂ g + ∂ g − ∂ g )+ (∂ g + ∂ g − ∂ g )=∂ g , ki ij kj i` 2 k ij i kj j ki 2 k ji j ki i kj k ij which shows that gij;k =0. 5 • A bonus of this proof is that it gives us an explicit formula (4) for computing the Christoffel symbols of the Riemannian connection in any coordinate chart. • On any Riemannian mfd, we will always use the Riemannian connection from now on without further comment. Definition. Geodesics with respect to the Riemannian connection are called Rie- mannian geodesics, or simply geodesics.. Definition. If γ is a curve in a Riemannian mfd, the speed of γ at any time t is the length of its velocity vector |γ0(t)|.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Chern Connections and Chern Curvatures1
    1 2. Chern connections and Chern curvatures1 Let V be a complex vector space with dimC V = n. A hermitian metric h on V is h : V £ V ¡¡! C such that h(av; bu) = abh(v; u) h(a1v1 + a2v2; u) = a1h(v1; u) + a2h(v2; u) h(v; u) = h(u; v) h(u; u) > 0; u 6= 0 where v; v1; v2; u 2 V and a; b; a1; a2 2 C. If we ¯x a basis feig of V , and set hij = h(ei; ej) then ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ h = hijei ­ ej 2 V ­ V ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ where ei 2 V is the dual of ei and ei 2 V is the conjugate dual of ei, i.e. X ¤ ei ( ajej) = ai It is obvious that (hij) is a hermitian positive matrix. De¯nition 0.1. A complex vector bundle E is said to be hermitian if there is a positive de¯nite hermitian tensor h on E. r Let ' : EjU ¡¡! U £ C be a trivilization and e = (e1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ; er) be the corresponding frame. The r hermitian metric h is represented by a positive hermitian matrix (hij) 2 ¡(­; EndC ) such that hei(x); ej(x)i = hij(x); x 2 U Then hermitian metric on the chart (U; ') could be written as X ¤ ¤ h = hijei ­ ej For example, there are two charts (U; ') and (V; Ã). We set g = à ± '¡1 :(U \ V ) £ Cr ¡¡! (U \ V ) £ Cr and g is represented by matrix (gij). On U \ V , we have X X X ¡1 ¡1 ¡1 ¡1 ¡1 ei(x) = ' (x; "i) = à ± à ± ' (x; "i) = à (x; gij"j) = gijà (x; "j) = gije~j(x) j j For the metric X ~ hij = hei(x); ej(x)i = hgike~k(x); gjle~l(x)i = gikhklgjl k;l that is h = g ¢ h~ ¢ g¤ 12008.04.30 If there are some errors, please contact to: [email protected] 2 Example 0.2 (Fubini-Study metric on holomorphic tangent bundle T 1;0Pn).
    [Show full text]
  • A Geodesic Connection in Fréchet Geometry
    A geodesic connection in Fr´echet Geometry Ali Suri Abstract. In this paper first we propose a formula to lift a connection on M to its higher order tangent bundles T rM, r 2 N. More precisely, for a given connection r on T rM, r 2 N [ f0g, we construct the connection rc on T r+1M. Setting rci = rci−1 c, we show that rc1 = lim rci exists − and it is a connection on the Fr´echet manifold T 1M = lim T iM and the − geodesics with respect to rc1 exist. In the next step, we will consider a Riemannian manifold (M; g) with its Levi-Civita connection r. Under suitable conditions this procedure i gives a sequence of Riemannian manifolds f(T M, gi)gi2N equipped with ci c1 a sequence of Riemannian connections fr gi2N. Then we show that r produces the curves which are the (local) length minimizer of T 1M. M.S.C. 2010: 58A05, 58B20. Key words: Complete lift; spray; geodesic; Fr´echet manifolds; Banach manifold; connection. 1 Introduction In the first section we remind the bijective correspondence between linear connections and homogeneous sprays. Then using the results of [6] for complete lift of sprays, we propose a formula to lift a connection on M to its higher order tangent bundles T rM, r 2 N. More precisely, for a given connection r on T rM, r 2 N [ f0g, we construct its associated spray S and then we lift it to a homogeneous spray Sc on T r+1M [6]. Then, using the bijective correspondence between connections and sprays, we derive the connection rc on T r+1M from Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 396. Covariant Derivative, Parallel Transport, and General Relativity
    Math 396. Covariant derivative, parallel transport, and General Relativity 1. Motivation Let M be a smooth manifold with corners, and let (E, ∇) be a C∞ vector bundle with connection over M. Let γ : I → M be a smooth map from a nontrivial interval to M (a “path” in M); keep in mind that γ may not be injective and that its velocity may be zero at a rather arbitrary closed subset of I (so we cannot necessarily extend the standard coordinate on I near each t0 ∈ I to part of a local coordinate system on M near γ(t0)). In pseudo-Riemannian geometry E = TM and ∇ is a specific connection arising from the metric tensor (the Levi-Civita connection; see §4). A very fundamental concept is that of a (smooth) section along γ for a vector bundle on M. Before we give the official definition, we consider an example. Example 1.1. To each t0 ∈ I there is associated a velocity vector 0 ∗ γ (t0) = dγ(t0)(∂t|t0 ) ∈ Tγ(t0)(M) = (γ (TM))(t0). Hence, we get a set-theoretic section of the pullback bundle γ∗(TM) → I by assigning to each time 0 t0 the velocity vector γ (t0) at that time. This is not just a set-theoretic section, but a smooth section. Indeed, this problem is local, so pick t0 ∈ I and an open U ⊆ M containing γ(J) for an open ∞ neighborhood J ⊆ I around t0, with J and U so small that U admits a C coordinate system {x1, . , xn}. Let γi = xi ◦ γ|J ; these are smooth functions on J since γ is a smooth map from I into M.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Levi-Civita Connection and Its Curva- Ture
    Department of Mathematics Geometry of Manifolds, 18.966 Spring 2005 Lecture Notes 1 The Levi-Civita Connection and its curva- ture In this lecture we introduce the most important connection. This is the Levi-Civita connection in the tangent bundle of a Riemannian manifold. 1.1 The Einstein summation convention and the Ricci Calculus When dealing with tensors on a manifold it is convient to use the following conventions. When we choose a local frame for the tangent bundle we write e1, . en for this basis. We always index bases of the tangent bundle with indices down. We write then a typical tangent vector n X i X = X ei. i=1 Einstein’s convention says that when we see indices both up and down we assume that we are summing over them so he would write i X = X ei while a one form would be written as i θ = aie where ei is the dual co-frame field. For example when we have coordinates x1, x2, . , xn then we get a basis for the tangent bundle ∂/∂x1, . , ∂/∂xn 1 More generally a typical tensor would be written as i l j k T = T jk ei ⊗ e ⊗ e ⊗ el Note that in general unless the tensor has some extra symmetries the order of the indices matters. The lower indices indicate that under a change of j frame fi = Ci ej a lower index changes the same way and is called covariant while an upper index changes by the inverse matrix. For example the dual i coframe field to the fi, called f is given by i i j f = D je i j i j i where D j is the inverse matrix to C i (so that D jC k = δk.) The compo- nents of the tensor T above in the fi basis are thus i l i0 l0 i j0 k0 l T jk = T j0k0 D i0 C jC kD l0 Notice that of course summing over a repeated upper and lower index results in a quantity that is independent of any choices.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Introducing Riemannian Geometry
    3. Introducing Riemannian Geometry We have yet to meet the star of the show. There is one object that we can place on a manifold whose importance dwarfs all others, at least when it comes to understanding gravity. This is the metric. The existence of a metric brings a whole host of new concepts to the table which, collectively, are called Riemannian geometry.Infact,strictlyspeakingwewillneeda slightly di↵erent kind of metric for our study of gravity, one which, like the Minkowski metric, has some strange minus signs. This is referred to as Lorentzian Geometry and a slightly better name for this section would be “Introducing Riemannian and Lorentzian Geometry”. However, for our immediate purposes the di↵erences are minor. The novelties of Lorentzian geometry will become more pronounced later in the course when we explore some of the physical consequences such as horizons. 3.1 The Metric In Section 1, we informally introduced the metric as a way to measure distances between points. It does, indeed, provide this service but it is not its initial purpose. Instead, the metric is an inner product on each vector space Tp(M). Definition:Ametric g is a (0, 2) tensor field that is: Symmetric: g(X, Y )=g(Y,X). • Non-Degenerate: If, for any p M, g(X, Y ) =0forallY T (M)thenX =0. • 2 p 2 p p With a choice of coordinates, we can write the metric as g = g (x) dxµ dx⌫ µ⌫ ⌦ The object g is often written as a line element ds2 and this expression is abbreviated as 2 µ ⌫ ds = gµ⌫(x) dx dx This is the form that we saw previously in (1.4).
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS a CONNECTION, and WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. the Search for a Good Directional Derivative 3 3. F
    WHAT IS A CONNECTION, AND WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? TIMOTHY E. GOLDBERG Abstract. In the study of differentiable manifolds, there are several different objects that go by the name of \connection". I will describe some of these objects, and show how they are related to each other. The motivation for many notions of a connection is the search for a sufficiently nice directional derivative, and this will be my starting point as well. The story will by necessity include many supporting characters from differential geometry, all of whom will receive a brief but hopefully sufficient introduction. I apologize for my ungrammatical title. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The search for a good directional derivative 3 3. Fiber bundles and Ehresmann connections 7 4. A quick word about curvature 10 5. Principal bundles and principal bundle connections 11 6. Associated bundles 14 7. Vector bundles and Koszul connections 15 8. The tangent bundle 18 References 19 Date: 26 March 2008. 1 1. Introduction In the study of differentiable manifolds, there are several different objects that go by the name of \connection", and this has been confusing me for some time now. One solution to this dilemma was to promise myself that I would some day present a talk about connections in the Olivetti Club at Cornell University. That day has come, and this document contains my notes for this talk. In the interests of brevity, I do not include too many technical details, and instead refer the reader to some lovely references. My main references were [2], [4], and [5].
    [Show full text]
  • GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS of CURVATURE Contents 1. Notation and Summation Conventions 1 2. Affine Connections 1 3. Parallel Tran
    GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS OF CURVATURE ZHENGQU WAN Abstract. This is an expository paper on geometric meaning of various kinds of curvature on a Riemann manifold. Contents 1. Notation and Summation Conventions 1 2. Affine Connections 1 3. Parallel Transport 3 4. Geodesics and the Exponential Map 4 5. Riemannian Curvature Tensor 5 6. Taylor Expansion of the Metric in Normal Coordinates and the Geometric Interpretation of Ricci and Scalar Curvature 9 Acknowledgments 13 References 13 1. Notation and Summation Conventions We assume knowledge of the basic theory of smooth manifolds, vector fields and tensors. We will assume all manifolds are smooth, i.e. C1, second countable and Hausdorff. All functions, curves and vector fields will also be smooth unless otherwise stated. Einstein summation convention will be adopted in this paper. In some cases, the index types on either side of an equation will not match and @ so a summation will be needed. The tangent vector field @xi induced by local i coordinates (x ) will be denoted as @i. 2. Affine Connections Riemann curvature is a measure of the noncommutativity of parallel transporta- tion of tangent vectors. To define parallel transport, we need the notion of affine connections. Definition 2.1. Let M be an n-dimensional manifold. An affine connection, or connection, is a map r : X(M) × X(M) ! X(M), where X(M) denotes the space of smooth vector fields, such that for vector fields V1;V2; V; W1;W2 2 X(M) and function f : M! R, (1) r(fV1 + V2;W ) = fr(V1;W ) + r(V2;W ), (2) r(V; aW1 + W2) = ar(V; W1) + r(V; W2), for all a 2 R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riemann Curvature Tensor
    The Riemann Curvature Tensor Jennifer Cox May 6, 2019 Project Advisor: Dr. Jonathan Walters Abstract A tensor is a mathematical object that has applications in areas including physics, psychology, and artificial intelligence. The Riemann curvature tensor is a tool used to describe the curvature of n-dimensional spaces such as Riemannian manifolds in the field of differential geometry. The Riemann tensor plays an important role in the theories of general relativity and gravity as well as the curvature of spacetime. This paper will provide an overview of tensors and tensor operations. In particular, properties of the Riemann tensor will be examined. Calculations of the Riemann tensor for several two and three dimensional surfaces such as that of the sphere and torus will be demonstrated. The relationship between the Riemann tensor for the 2-sphere and 3-sphere will be studied, and it will be shown that these tensors satisfy the general equation of the Riemann tensor for an n-dimensional sphere. The connection between the Gaussian curvature and the Riemann curvature tensor will also be shown using Gauss's Theorem Egregium. Keywords: tensor, tensors, Riemann tensor, Riemann curvature tensor, curvature 1 Introduction Coordinate systems are the basis of analytic geometry and are necessary to solve geomet- ric problems using algebraic methods. The introduction of coordinate systems allowed for the blending of algebraic and geometric methods that eventually led to the development of calculus. Reliance on coordinate systems, however, can result in a loss of geometric insight and an unnecessary increase in the complexity of relevant expressions. Tensor calculus is an effective framework that will avoid the cons of relying on coordinate systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Bundles and Connections
    VECTOR BUNDLES AND CONNECTIONS WERNER BALLMANN The exposition of vector bundles and connections below is taken from my lecture notes on differential geometry at the University of Bonn. I included more material than I usually cover in my lectures. On the other hand, I completely deleted the discussion of “concrete examples”, so that a pinch of salt has to be added by the customer. Standard references for vector bundles and connections are [GHV] and [KN], where the interested reader finds a rather comprehensive discussion of the subject. I would like to thank Andreas Balser for pointing out some misprints. The exposition is still in a preliminary state. Suggestions are very welcome. Contents 1. Vector Bundles 2 1.1. Sections 4 1.2. Frames 5 1.3. Constructions 7 1.4. Pull Back 9 1.5. The Fundamental Lemma on Morphisms 10 2. Connections 12 2.1. Local Data 13 2.2. Induced Connections 15 2.3. Pull Back 16 3. Curvature 18 3.1. Parallel Translation and Curvature 21 4. Miscellanea 26 4.1. Metrics 26 4.2. Cocycles and Bundles 27 References 28 Date: December 1999. Last corrections March 2002. 1 2 WERNERBALLMANN 1. Vector Bundles A bundle is a triple (π,E,M), where π : E → M is a map. In other words, a bundle is nothing else but a map. The term bundle is used −1 when the emphasis is on the preimages Ep := π (p) of the points p ∈ M; we call Ep the fiber of π over p and p the base point of Ep.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Natural Constructions on Vector Bundles
    96 CHAPTER 4. NATURAL CONSTRUCTIONS 4.1 Direct sums, tensor products and bun- dles of linear maps Suppose πE : E ! M and πF : F ! M are two vector bundles of rank m and ` respectively, and assume they are either both real (F = R) or both Chapter 4 complex (F = C). In this section we address the following question: given connections on E and F , what natural connections are induced on the other bundles that can be constructed out of E and F ? We answer this by defining parallel transport in the most natural way for each construction Natural Constructions on and observing the consequences. Vector Bundles Direct sums To start with, the direct sum E ⊕ F ! M inherits a natural connection such that the parallel transport of (v; w) 2 E ⊕ F along a path γ(t) 2 M takes the form Contents t t t Pγ (v; w) = (Pγ(v); Pγ(w)): 4.1 Sums, products, linear maps . 96 We leave it as an easy exercise to the reader to verify that the covariant 4.2 Tangent bundles . 100 derivative is then rX (v; w) = (rX v; rX w) 4.2.1 Torsion and symmetric connections . 100 for v 2 Γ(E), w 2 Γ(F ) and X 2 T M. 4.2.2 Geodesics . 103 If E and F have extra structure, this structure is inherited by E ⊕ F . For example, bundle metrics on E and F define a natural bundle metric 4.3 Riemannian manifolds . 105 on E ⊕ F : this has the property that if (e1; : : : ; em) and (f1; : : : ; f`) are orthogonal frames on E and F respectively, then (e1; : : : ; em; f1; : : : ; f`) 4.3.1 The Levi-Civita connection .
    [Show full text]
  • Cartan Connection and Curvature Forms
    CARTAN CONNECTION AND CURVATURE FORMS Syafiq Johar syafi[email protected] Contents 1 Connections and Riemannian Curvature 1 1.1 Affine Connection . .1 1.2 Levi-Civita Connection and Riemannian Curvature . .2 1.3 Riemannian Curvature . .3 2 Covariant External Derivative 4 2.1 Connection Form . .4 2.2 Curvature Form . .5 2.3 Explicit Formula for E = TM ..................................5 2.4 Levi-Civita Connection and Riemannian Curvature Revisited . .6 3 An Application: Uniformisation Theorem via PDEs 6 1 Connections and Riemannian Curvature Cartan formula is a way of generalising the Riemannian curvature for a Riemannian manifold (M; g) of dimension n to a differentiable manifold. We start by defining the Riemannian manifold and curvatures. We begin by defining the usual notion of connection and the Levi-Civita connection. 1.1 Affine Connection Definition 1.1 (Affine connection). Let M be a differentiable manifold and E a vector bundle over M. A connection or covariant derivative at a point p 2 M is a map D : Γ(E) ! Γ(T ∗M ⊗ E) with the 1 properties for any V; W 2 TpM; σ; τ 2 Γ(E) and f 2 C (M), we have that DV σ 2 Ep with the following properties: 1. D is tensorial over TpM i.e. DfV +W σ = fDV σ + DW σ: 2. D is R-linear in Γ(E) i.e. DV (σ + τ) = DV σ + DV τ: 3. D satisfies the Leibniz rule over Γ(E) i.e. if f 2 C1(M), we have DV (fσ) = df(V ) · σ + fDV σ: Note that we did not require any condition of the metric g on the manifold, nor the bundle metric on E in the abstract definition of a connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12. Tensors
    Lecture 12. Tensors In this lecture we define tensors on a manifold, and the associated bundles, and operations on tensors. 12.1 Basic definitions We have already seen several examples of the idea we are about to introduce, namely linear (or multilinear) operators acting on vectors on M. For example, the metric is a bilinear operator which takes two vectors to give a real number, i.e. gx : TxM × TxM → R for each x is defined by u, v → gx(u, v). The difference between two connections ∇(1) and ∇(2) is a bilinear op- erator which takes two vectors and gives a vector, i.e. a bilinear operator Sx : TxM × TxM → TxM for each x ∈ M. Similarly, the torsion of a connec- tion has this form. Definition 12.1.1 A covector ω at x ∈ M is a linear map from TxM to R. The set of covectors at x forms an n-dimensional vector space, which we ∗ denote Tx M.Atensor of type (k, l)atx is a multilinear map which takes k vectors and l covectors and gives a real number × × × ∗ × × ∗ → R Tx : .TxM .../0 TxM1 .Tx M .../0 Tx M1 . k times l times Note that a covector is just a tensor of type (1, 0), and a vector is a tensor of type (0, 1), since a vector v acts linearly on a covector ω by v(ω):=ω(v). Multilinearity means that i1 ik j1 jl T c vi1 ,..., c vik , aj1 ω ,..., ajl ω i i j j 1 k 1 l . i1 ik j1 jl = c ...c aj1 ...ajl T (vi1 ,...,vik ,ω ,...,ω ) i1,...,ik,j1,...,jl 110 Lecture 12.
    [Show full text]