Title of Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tesis. Síndromes De Polinización En
Dr. Luis Giménez Benavides, Profesor Contratado Doctor del Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, CERTIFICA Que los trabajos de investigación desarrollados en la memoria de tesis doctoral, “Síndromes de polinización en Silene. Evolución de las interacciones polinizador-depredador con Hadena” son aptos para ser presentados por el Ldo. Samuel Prieto Benítez ante el tribunal que en su día se consigne, para aspirar al Grado de Doctor en el Programa de Doctorado de Conservación de Recursos Naturales por la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid. V°B° Director de Tesis Dr. Luis Giménez Benavides TESIS DOCTORAL Síndromes de polinización en Silene. Evolución de las interacciones polinizador- depredador con Hadena. Samuel Prieto Benítez Dirigida por: Luis Giménez Benavides Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Mayo 2015 A mi familia y a Sofía, gracias por el apoyo y el cariño que me dais. ÍNDICE RESUMEN Antecedentes 11 Objetivos 19 Metodología 20 Conclusiones 25 Referencias 27 Lista de manuscritos 33 CAPÍTULOS/CHAPTERS Capítulo 1/Chapter 1 35 Revisión y actualización del estado de conocimiento de las relaciones polinización- depredación entre Caryophyllaceae y Hadena (Noctuidae). Capítulo 2/Chapter 2 65 Diel Variation in Flower Scent Reveals Poor Consistency of Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination Syndromes in Sileneae. Capítulo 3/Chapter 3 113 Floral scent evolution in Silene: a multivariate phylogenetic analysis. Capítulo 4/Chapter 4 145 Flower circadian rhythm restricts/constraints pollination generalization and prevents the escape from a pollinator-seed predating specialist in Silene. Capítulo 5/Chapter 5 173 Spatio-temporal variation in the interaction outcome between a nursery pollinator and its host plant when other other pollinators, fruit predators and nectar robbers are present. -
Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (Site of Special Scientific Interest Source Pathway Receptor Analysis for Drought Permit Options)
Our Dry Weather Plan South East Water’s 2021 draft drought plan Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis for drought permit options) March 2021 South East Water Rocfort Road Snodland Kent ME6 5AH Drought Plan | March 2021 Contents 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.1 Halling No. 8 - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.2 Balcombe- site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 5 1.1.3 Tangier / Chasewood - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 6 1.1.4 Southlands / Oaklands - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 8 1.1.5 Hackenden - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 10 1.2 Surface water - Site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 11 1.2.1 RIVER OUSE Drought Plan - SSSI Source Pathway Receptor Analysis 2020 11 1.2.2 RIVER CUCKMERE - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 14 Annex – Assessment of the hydrological links between the River Cuckmere and the West Dean Brooks. 19 2 Drought Plan | March 2021 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis In support of the assessment of potential effects associated with the drought permit it has been assumed that: • All appropriate infrastructure is in place at the source • Pump testing will have been undertaken and used to confirm the extent of any surface water drawdown and inform the need to re- scope this assessment with respect to potential groundwater effects • Abstracted water meets all quality criteria associated with both Environment Agency consenting requirements and requirements for potable supply • All abstracted water is transferred to supply via existing pipe works 1.1.1 Halling No. -
A Floristic Survey of Fair Isle
Edinburgh Research Explorer A floristic survey of Fair Isle Citation for published version: Quinteros Peñafiel, CV, Riddiford, N & Twyford, A 2017, 'A floristic survey of Fair Isle', New Journal of Botany, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: New Journal of Botany General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 New Journal of Botany Journal of the Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland ISSN: 2042-3489 (Print) 2042-3497 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ynjb20 A floristic survey of Fair Isle C. V. Quinteros Peñafiel, N. J. Riddiford & A. D. Twyford To cite this article: C. V. Quinteros Peñafiel, N. J. Riddiford & A. D. Twyford (2017) A floristic survey of Fair Isle, New Journal of Botany, 7:2-3, 101-111, DOI: 10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 © 2017 The Author(s). -
Eastbourne Downland Estate Whole Estate Plan 2020-2045
EASTBOURNE DOWNLAND ESTATE WHOLE ESTATE PLAN 2020-2045 The Vision for the Eastbourne Downland Estate over the next 25 years Conserve the iconic downland landscape and cultural heritage of the Estate, so that these special qualities can be enjoyed, understood and valued by the public, with access for all, contributing to Eastbourne’s sense of community, wellbeing and belonging and instil a strong sense of public stewardship that encourages visitors and people from all backgrounds to actively care for the Estate and invest in it. Maintain and enhance the ‘natural capital’ of the Estate, so that high-quality, well-managed habitats are resilient and adaptable to climate change, pests or disease; support wildlife networks throughout the landscape; and continue to deliver the widest range of ecosystem services into the future. Ensure that these ecosystem services are enjoyed, valued and understood by the public, with all Eastbourne residents feeling they are beneficiaries of the Estate – not just those who are able to visit regularly. Ensure that our farmers are supported and valued as stewards of our land, its soils and its wildlife, with sustainable and profitable businesses that can continue to flourish and innovate. Protect the Estate for future generations, ensuring that it is self-sustaining and financially resilient, built on diversified income streams, promoting innovation, craftsmanship, rural creative industries, and high-quality visitor experiences, supporting tourism and local communities. 1 prepared an endorsed WEP (Strategic Policy -
A Floristic Survey of Fair Isle
Edinburgh Research Explorer A floristic survey of Fair Isle Citation for published version: Quinteros Peñafiel, CV, Riddiford, N & Twyford, A 2017, 'A floristic survey of Fair Isle', New Journal of Botany, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/20423489.2017.1393191 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: New Journal of Botany General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 1 A floristic survey of Fair Isle 2 Camila V. Quinteros Peñafiel 3 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR 4 [email protected] 5 Nick J. Riddiford 6 Schoolton, Fair Isle, Shetland, ZE2 9JU 7 [email protected] 8 Alex D. Twyford 9 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, 10 Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL 11 [email protected] 12 A floristic survey of Fair Isle 13 14 Fair Isle is a small isolated island located off the northern tip of Great Britain. -
Download the South-East IAP Report Here
Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining. -
SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT) Submission Version
SEAFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2017-2030 Seaford Town Council SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT) Submission Version May 2019 Seaford Neighbourhood Plan Sustainability Appraisal February 2019 Contents NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 1.INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 11 WHAT IS A SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (INCLUDING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT)? ................................................................................................................................................ 13 WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT? .................................................................................... 14 HOW TO COMMENT ON THE SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL ............................................................. 15 STRUCTURE OF THE SA ............................................................................................................. 15 COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PLANS AND PROGRAMMES REGULATIONS . 16 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT...................................................................................... 16 2. SEAFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN .................................................................................... 18 NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING AREA ........................................................................................... 18 NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN VISION -
Seaford Head Nature Reserve Management Plan 2018 - 2028
Seaford Head Nature Reserve Management Plan 2018 - 2028 Sarah Quantrill and Steve Tillman 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 4 1.1: Executive Summary & Vision Statement .................................................... 4 2: POLICY STATEMENT ...................................................................................... 5 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 6 3.1: General Information .................................................................................... 6 3.1.2: Tenure ................................................................................................. 7 3.1.3: Management/organisational infrastructure ........................................... 7 3.1.4: Site infrastructure ................................................................................. 8 3.1.5: Map coverage ...................................................................................... 9 3.1.6: Photographic coverage ........................................................................ 9 3.2: Zones ....................................................................................................... 10 3.3: Environmental information ........................................................................ 10 3.3.1: Physical ............................................................................................. 10 3.3.1.1: vulnerability and climate change .................................................... -
Biodiversity Strategy 2021 - 2025
Lewes District Council Biodiversity Strategy 2021 - 2025 Document name: Biodiversity Strategy Document type: Strategy Authority(ies) covered: LDC Responsible (Executive Lead): Andy Frost, Customer First Resolution Team Senior Specialist Advisor (Green Consultancy) Jane Goodall, Strategy Lead QE Accountable (Operational Lead): Andy Frost, Customer First Resolution Team Senior Specialist Advisor (Green Consultancy) Version (e.g. first draft, final Final report): Approved by: Cllrs Julie Carr and Matthew Bird Date of publication: 10 June 2021 Revision due: Date 2023 Final Equality and Fairness Seanne Sweeney Analysis (EaFA) report approved by: Date final EaFA report approved: 6 May 2021 Contents Page Contents 4 Executive Summary 5 Purpose of the strategy 5 What is biodiversity? 5 Natural assets 6 Why do we need a Biodiversity Strategy? 7 Policy and legislative context 7 The Focal Areas 8 Collaboration through partnership working 9 Preserve and enhance existing valuable habitats 10 Creating more and joining up existing biodiversity habitats 12 The importance of trees and tree planting 12 Implement biodiversity net gains within development 13 Promoting biodiversity and understanding throughout our councils 14 Nature based solutions and ecosystem services 15 Pesticide Policy and Pollinator Strategy 16 What our councils will do 18 Appendix 1 – Our Partners 3 Biodiversity strategy Executive Summary With the natural world facing threats to an unprecedented degree, Lewes District Council is scaling up efforts to defend local biodiversity, reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality. For more detail on the council’s approach to these issues, visit our climate change webpage. Healthy and resilient societies depend on giving nature the space it needs. -
Appraisal of Possible Environmental Impacts of Proposals for England
www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal Appraisal of possible environmental impacts of proposals for England Coast Path between Shoreham by Sea and Eastbourne Pier Natural England’s Report to the Secretary of State Contents and arrangement of this report This report records the conclusions of Natural England’s appraisal of any potential for environmental impacts from our proposals to establish the England Coast Path in the light of the requirements of the legislation affecting Natura 2000 sites, SSSIs, NNRs, protected species and Marine Conservation Zones. The report is arranged in the following sections: 1. Summary A summary of our conclusions, including key mitigation measures built into our proposals. 2. Scope In this part of the document we define the geographic extent for the appraisal and the features that are included. 3. Baseline conditions and In this part of the document we identify which features might be sensitive ecological sensitivities to changes in access, and rule out from further consideration those that are not. 4. Potential for interaction In this part of the document we identify places where sensitive features are present and whether there could, or will not, be an interaction with proposed changes in access. 5. Assessment of impact- In this part of the document we look in more detail at sections of coast risk and incorporated where there could be an interaction between the access proposal and mitigation measures sensitive features. We discuss possible risks to sensitive features and explain how these have shaped the design of our proposals and/or led to the inclusion of specific mitigation measures. -
East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste And
East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste and Minerals Sites Plan - Schedule of Suitable Industrial Estates 1 Introduction 3 2 Site Profiles 9 Gossary 116 I/A Alder Close Hawthorn Rd Industrial Estate, Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 11 I/B Avis Way / New Road Industrial Estates, Newhaven 13 I/C Beeching Road Industrial Estate, Bexhill 15 I/D Bellbrook Industrial Estate, Uckfield 17 I/E Brampton Road Industrial Estate, Willingdon Drove, Eastbourne 19 I/F Brett Drive Industrial Estate, Bexhill 21 I/G Bulverhythe Depot, Bulverhythe, St-Leonards-on-Sea 23 I/H Castleham Industrial Estate, St Leonards-on-Sea 25 I/I Centenary Industrial Estate, Brighton 27 I/J Chaucer Industrial Estate, Polegate 29 I/K Churchfields Industrial Estate, St Leonards-on-Sea 31 I/L Cradle Hill Industrial Estate, Cradle Hill Rd, Seaford 34 I/M Diplocks Way, Hailsham 36 I/N Dittons Business Park, Dittons Road, Polegate 38 I/O English Close Industrial Area, Brighton 40 I/P Farningham Road, Crowborough 42 I/Q Finmere Road Industrial Estate, nr. Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 45 I/R Hammonds Drive Industrial Estate, Lottbridge Drove, Eastbourne 47 I/S Heathfield Industrial Estate (Ghyll Road Site), Heathfield 49 I/T Highfields Industrial Estate, Willingdon Drove, Eastbourne 51 I/U Hollingbury Industrial Estate, Brighton 53 I/V Home Farm Industrial Estate, Brighton 55 I/W Hove Technology Park, St Joseph's Close, Hove 57 I/X Hyde Business Park, Bevendean, Brighton 59 I/Y Ivyhouse Lane Industrial Estates, Hastings 61 I/Z Mile Oak Depot (Polegate Depot), Polegate 63 I/AA Millbrook Business Park, Crowborough 65 I/AB More House Farm, Wivelsfield 67 I/AC Moulsecoomb Fairways Industrial Estate, Brighton 69 I/AD Newhaven Industrial Estate Plots 4 to 9, Beach Road / Beach Close / Railway Road, Newhaven 72 I/AE Newtown Road Industrial Estate, Brighton 74 I/AF Oakwood Business Park, Golden Cross, Nr. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of Silene Sect. Melandrium and Allied Taxa
! "#! $ %&'(%)($ *++%,-,./,0 *+)%12.,.--0.1-,,. ! 3 4 3 3!!35.,6626 !" # $%&%&&'&'()&* * * + ,- . , / ",%&&',+ / *, " - 0 1 * $ 2 -," , 3)',4& , ,'5!6' 6774657 63, -* *8 0 1 " 9 * : * , * 8 ," . ; * : * , * * 0 1,- * * ,- " ,- ; : * . , < . ** * =>? . 6 +/ ,- ; , " * , ! , $ 8* " ,@ * * ,* ! * , - . * **, "# $= $ = =-"=- " "/" /+"%/+%/+%=> =? <-= @ %&' ( ) *+,-./# A" 8/ %&&' <== 37 63% 4 <='5!6' 6774657 63 ( ((( 6 &&!&30 (BB ,:,B C D ( ((( 6 &&!&31 Cover illustrations: Barry Breckling, Sara Gold, Kjell Lännerholm, Anja Rautenberg and Wiebke Rautenberg. List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Rautenberg, A., Filatov, D., Svennblad, B., Heidari, N., Oxel- man, B. (2008) Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8:299 II Rautenberg, A., Hathaway, L., Oxelman, B., Prentice, H. C. Phylogenetic relationships of Silene section Elisanthe (Caryo- phyllaceae) as inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA se- quences. Manuscript. III Rautenberg, A., Hathaway, L., Prentice, H. C., Oxelman, B. Phylogenetic relationships