IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

WRIT PETITION NO.9190/2011 (GM-WAKF)

Between:

Sri Syed Abdul Khadar, S/o Syed Dastagir, Aged about 69 years, R/o Daulat Ka Makhan, J.C.Road, Tumkur. …. Petitioner.

(By Sri M.R.Rajagopal & Sri H.N.Basavaraju, Advs.)

And:

1 State of Karnataka, By its Secretary, Dept. of Wakfs in State, , – 560 001.

2 The Addl. Chief Executive Officer, Karnataka State Board of Wakfs, No.6, , Bangalore – 52.

2

3 The Asst. Secretary, Karnataka State Board of Wakfs, Tumkur.

4 Sri Rafiullah Khan, S/o Ziaulla Khan, Aged about 45 years, President, Management of Doulath Ka Makan, J.C.Road, Tumkur City, Tumkur.

5 Sri Abtab Ahmed, S/o Shafi Ahmed, Major, Vice President.

6 Sri Mehaboob Pasha, S/o Syed Akbar Pasha, Major, Secretary.

7 Sri Mansoor Ahmed, S/o Moshaq Ahmed, Major, Treasurer.

8 Sri Ansar Pasha (Kalusa), S/o Khalender Sab, Major, Joint Secretary.

9 Sri Akramullah Khan, S/o Rasheed Khan, Major, Member.

10 Sri Wasim Sultan, S/o Sultan Mohamood, Major, Member.

3

11 Sri Mohd. Ghouse @ Naveed, S/o Abdul Azeez, Major, Member.

12 Sri Pashida (Santhepet), S/o late Badida, Major, Member.

13 Sri Liquat Da, Major, Membe.r

14 Sri Afroz Khan (Yarub), S/o Basha Sha, Major, Member.

15 Sri Mohd. Ahmed (Advocate), Major, Member.

16 Sri Afzal Ahmed, S/o Siraj Ahmed, Major, Member.

17 Sri Ghouse Pasha, S/o Shaik Mohammed, Major, Member.

4

18 Sri Akbar, Major, Member.

R4 to R18 are all office bearers Of Managerment of Doulath Ka Makan, J.C.Road, Tumkur Dist. …. Respondents.

(By Smt. B.P.Rupa, HCGP for R1 Sri P.S.Malipatil, Adv. for R2 Service of notice held sufficient in respect of R5 to R9, R11 to R17 is held sufficient; R3, R4, R10 and R18 served)

---

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of , praying to quash the proceedings of the 2 nd respondent dated 22.3.2010, etc.

This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court passed the following:

ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that having regard to the subsequent development, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition does not survive for consideration.

5

2. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infrucutous. No costs.

Sd/- JUDGE.

BMM/-