DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Rutland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Rutland May 2002 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Boundary Committee for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. 2 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 13 3 SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED 17 4 ANALYSIS AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 19 5 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 29 APPENDICES A Draft Recommendations for Rutland: Detailed Mapping 31 B Code of Practice on Written Consultation 33 A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for Oakham Town is inserted inside the back cover of this report. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to the Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No 3692). The Order also transferred to the Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and their implementation. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Kru Desai Robin Gray Joan Jones Ann M Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England. Our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 5 6 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) began a review of the electoral arrangements for Rutland on 16 October 2001. As a consequence of the transfer of functions referred to earlier, it falls to us the Boundary Committee for England, to complete the work of the LGCE. • This report summarises the submissions received during the first stage of the review, and makes draft recommendations for change. We found that the current arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Rutland: • in 12 of the 16 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the district and eight wards vary by more than 20 per cent from the average; • by 2006 this situation is expected to worsen, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 14 wards and by more than 20 per cent in six wards. Our main draft recommendations for future electoral arrangements (see Tables 1 and 2 and paragraphs 64-65) are that: • Rutland County Council should have 26 councillors, six more than at present; • there should be 16 wards the same as at present; • the boundaries of 15 of the existing wards should be modified, with one ward retaining its existing boundaries. The purpose of these proposals is to ensure that, in future, each Rutland councillor represents approximately the same number of electors, bearing in mind local circumstances. • In 12 of the proposed 16 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the district average. • This improved level of electoral equality is expected to improve further with the number of electors per councillor in all 16 wards expected to vary by no more than 10 per cent from the average for the district in 2006. Recommendations are also made for changes to parish and town council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and the reduction and re-distribution of councillors for the parish of Oakham. This report sets out our draft recommendations on which comments are invited. • We will consult on these proposals for eight weeks from 14 May 2002. We take this consultation very seriously. We may decide to move away from our draft recommendations in the light of comments or suggestions that we receive. It is therefore important that all interested parties let us have their views and evidence, whether or not they agree with our draft recommendations. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 7 • After considering local views, we will decide whether to modify our draft recommendations. We will then submit our final recommendations to the Electoral Commission which, with effect from 1 April 2002, will be responsible for implementing change to local authority electoral arrangements. • The Electoral Commission will decide whether to accept, modify or reject our final recommendations. It will also determine when any changes come into effect. You should express your views by writing directly to us at the address below by 8 July 2002: Team Leader Rutland Review Boundary Committee for England Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW 8 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND Table 1: Draft Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 1 Braunston & Belton 1 The parishes of Ayston, Belton-in-Rutland, Map 2 Braunston-in-Rutland, Brooke, Leighfield, Preston, Ridlington and Wardley 2 Chater 1 The parishes of Gunthorpe, Lyndon, Manton, Map 2 Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Pilton and Wing 3 Cottesmore 2 The parishes of Barrow, Cottesmore, Market Map 2 Overton and Teigh 4 Exton 1 The parishes of Ashwell, Burley, Egleton, Exton, Map 2 Hambleton, Horn and Whitwell 5 Greetham 1 The parishes of Clipsham, Greetham, Pickworth, Map 2 Stretton and Thistleton 6 Ketton 2 The parishes of Barrowden, Ketton, Tinwell and Map 2 Tixover 7 Langham 1 The parish of Langham Map 2 8 Lyddington 1 The parishes of Bisbrooke, Caldecott, Glaston, Map 2 Lyddington, Seaton, Stoke Dry and Thorpe By Water 9 Normanton 2 The parishes of Edith Weston, Empingham, Map 2 Normanton, North Luffenham and South Luffenham 10 Oakham North East 2 part of Oakham parish (the proposed Oakham North Large Map East parish ward) 11 Oakham North West 2 part of Oakham parish (the proposed Oakham North Large Map West parish ward); the parish of Barleythorpe 12 Oakham South 2 part of Oakham parish (the proposed Oakham Large Map East South East parish ward) 13 Oakham South West 2 part of Oakham parish (the proposed Oakham Large Map South West parish ward) 14 Ryhall & Casterton 2 The parishes of Essendine, Great Casterton, Little Map 2 Casterton, Ryhall and Tickencote 15 Uppingham 3 Unchanged – The parishes of Beaumont Chase and Map 2 Uppingham 16 Whissendine 1 The parish of Whissendine Map 2 Notes: 1 The whole district is parished 2 The wards in the above table are illustrated on Map 2 and the Large Map inserted in the back of this report. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 9 Table 2: Draft Recommendations for Rutland Ward name Number Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (2001) electors per from (2006) electors from councillors councillor average per average % councillor % 1 Braunston & Belton 1 985 985 -2 1,028 1,028 -4 2 Chater 1 971 971 -3 1,002 1,002 -6 3 Cottesmore 2 2,033 1,017 1 2,083 1,042 -3 4 Exton 1 1,083 1,083 8 1,113 1,113 4 5 Greetham 1 921 921 -8 969 969 -9 6 Ketton 2 2,073 1,037 3 2,186 1,093 2 7 Langham 1 875 875 -13 1,042 1,042 -3 8 Lyddington 1 1,064 1,064 6 1,081 1,081 1 9 Normanton 2 2,262 1,131 13 2,279 1,140 6 10 Oakham 2 1,886 943 -6 2,048 1,024 -4 North East 11 Oakham 2 2,196 1,098 10 2,243 1,122 5 North West 12 Oakham 2 1,727 864 -14 2,172 1,086 1 South East 13 Oakham 2 2,065 1,033 3 2,094 1,047 -2 South West 14 Ryhall & Casterton 2 2,203 1,102 10 2,289 1,145 7 15 Uppingham 3 2,750 917 -9 3,143 1,048 -2 16 Whissendine 1 972 972 -3 1,055 1,055 -1 Totals 26 26,066 – – 27,827 – – Averages – – 1,003 – – 1,070 – Source: Electorate figures are based on Rutland County Council’s submission. Note: The ‘variance from average’ column shows by how far, in percentage terms, the number of electors per councillor varies from the average for the district. The minus symbol (-) denotes a lower than average number of electors. Figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 10 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 1 INTRODUCTION 1 This report contains the proposals for the electoral arrangements for the district of Rutland, on which we are now consulting. This district being reviewed as part of the programme of periodic electoral reviews (PERs) of all 386 principal local authority areas in England. The programme started in 1996 and is currently expected to finish in 2004. 2 Rutland’s last review was carried out by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, which reported to the Secretary of State in May 1977 (Report no.
Recommended publications
  • The Manors of Allexton, Appleby and Ashby Folville

    The Manors of Allexton, Appleby and Ashby Folville

    The Manors of Allexton, Appleby and Ashby Folville. BY GEORGE FARNHAM, M.A., F.S.A., AND A. HAMILTON THOMPSON, M.A., F.S.A. PREFACE. Since the appearance of Nichols' History of Leicestershire, pub­ lished between 1795 and 1815, the materials for original work upon local history and topography have been considerably extended, and many classes of documents are now available for research which serve at once to supplement and correct the information contained in the older county histories.. While Nichols' famous volumes must always remain the foundation for any future work upon the history of Leicestershire, the student who knows how to make use of them finds that their statements constantly stand in need of verification and that their accuracy is seriously impaired by their author's partial and arbitrary use of his documents. For some time past the present writers have entertained the idea of bringing together the results of their several collections of material illus­ trating the manorial and ecclesiastical annals of the county, and it will be found that the notes which follow in the form of con­ nected narratives endeavour to fill up gaps in the story of the three places concerned and to present in consecutive order information which hitherto has been treated merely in outline or overlooked altogether. For the chief part of the work, tracing the descent of the manors, and for the pedigrees Mr. Farnham is responsible. The notes upon advowsons and the lists of incumbents, which con­ siderably amplify Nichols' imperfect and carelessly compiled lists, are supplied by his collaborator.
  • LAA 2014 Final

    LAA 2014 Final

    Local Aggregates Assessment (Jan – Dec 2015) November 2016 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Data limitations .................................................................................................................. 2 2. Aggregate supply and demand ................................................................................... 3 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 3 Limestone .......................................................................................................................... 4 Rutland sales ..................................................................................................................... 7 Sand and gravel ................................................................................................................. 9 Ironstone .......................................................................................................................... 10 Clay ................................................................................................................................. 10 Recycled and secondary aggregates ............................................................................... 10 3. Future aggregate supply ........................................................................................... 13 Aggregate provision ........................................................................................................
  • Foxhunting and the Landscape Between 1700 and 1900; with Particular Reference to Norfolk and Shropshire

    Foxhunting and the Landscape Between 1700 and 1900; with Particular Reference to Norfolk and Shropshire

    Foxhunting and the landscape between 1700 and 1900; with particular reference to Norfolk and Shropshire Jane Bevan Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History October 2011 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived from it, may be published without acknowledgement Abstract This thesis explores the history of foxhunting from 1700 to 1900. It examines how perceptions of an ideal hunting country, and what constituted an elite quarry, altered in tandem with alterations to the English lowland countryside. The relationship between the landscape and changes bought about by the upheaval of enclosure and agricultural development are discussed, in the context of the evolution in practice and geographical spread of foxhunting, at a national, regional and county-wide level. Several long-held beliefs are challenged. The social history of foxhunting and the increased participation of both ‘polite’ urban neophytes and prosperous tenant farmers during the two centuries is compared with the declining involvement of women. The impact of hunt clubs and the rise of subscription packs in the two study areas is contrasted. The influence of changes in the landscape on foxhunting is considered alongside the reciprocal impact of foxhunters manipulating the physical surroundings to enhance their sport. A detailed study of the history of hunting and its most iconic feature, the covert, in Norfolk and Shropshire highlights the importance of landowners control over the countryside.
  • Richard Westbrook (Dick) Baker's Scrapbook Provides Further

    Richard Westbrook (Dick) Baker's Scrapbook Provides Further

    Langham Local News Articles taken from The Grantham Journal by The Grantham Journal Correspondent for Langham & Barleythorpe Richard Westbrook Baker Pre 1913 Vestry Meeting - Lively Proceedings The usual Easter vestry meeting was held in the church on Friday afternoon. The Vicar of Oakham, Rev. J. Mould, presided. In opening the meeting the Chairman observed that they were assembled for two objects, as specified in the notice, viz., the passing of the last year’s accounts and the appointment of churchwardens for the ensuing year. He therefore called upon the churchwardens to produce their accounts and vouchers. As far as the accounts were concerned, he might say they were the best they had had for some time, the offertory especially being very good. - Mr. Swingler, junr., contended that the previous year’s accounts should be dealt with first of all, as they were disallowed by the vestry at the last meeting. The Chairman ruled that he would have nothing to do with the previous year’s accounts; that meeting was called to settle those of the year just closed, and he would allow nothing else to be done. - Mr. Swingler, senior, said that being so, there need have been no meeting at all. The Vicar still maintained his point, saying that although not passed in vestry, the accounts had been put right. Miss Skeffington remarked that it was quite unnecessary to have a vestry meeting, if the accounts could be put right without. The Chairman called upon Mr. George Stafford to read out the several items, which he proceeded to do.
  • Lincolnshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan

    Lincolnshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan

    LINCOLNSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE LOCAL PLAN CORE STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 4 2. LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................... 7 3. SPATIAL PORTRAIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSETS ............................... 12 4. SPATIAL VISION & STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ........................................... 21 5. PROVIDING FOR MINERALS ......................................................................... 24 6. PROVIDING FOR WASTE ............................................................................... 57 7. DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES................................................... 83 8. RESTORATION .............................................................................................. 111 9. MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................... 119 10. KEY DIAGRAM ............................................................................................... 128 Appendix 1: Relationship between Policies ................................................... 130 Appendix 2: Waste and Mineral Sites in Lincolnshire .................................. 133 Appendix 3: Minerals and Waste Site Mapping by District ......................... 144 Appendix 4: Glossary of Terms........................................................................ 152 TABLES Table 1: Calculation of Sand and Gravel Provision 2014 – 2031 ..........
  • JULY 2021 Volume 34 Number 2 50P Where Sold 1 2 Hello All, Stop Press… SO “Freedom Day” Has Been Postponed

    JULY 2021 Volume 34 Number 2 50P Where Sold 1 2 Hello All, Stop Press… SO “Freedom Day” Has Been Postponed

    ▲ Travellers invade: Page 3 ▲ 100 mile trek bid: Page 11 JULY 2021 Volume 34 Number 2 50p where sold 1 2 Hello all, Stop press… SO “Freedom Day” has been postponed. It would have been nice to have returned MAYHEM IN OAKHAM to normality after months of restrictions, Scores of travellers invaded Oakham on June 19th, but at least we’re slowly returning to a with caravans and well over 1500 people reported routine of sorts. coming from various parts of the country, France, Lots of events are scheduled for the Ireland and Wales to the Rutland showground. summer, and we’ve listed many of them They claimed to have booked the site for an annual inside. Let’s hope they all go ahead. Christian gathering for 30 caravans but as soon as We’re also talking to a leading British the gates opened they all piled in. conductor about choirs in difficulty and Later they looted shops, drove at high speed along we reveal a little-known local link with an the bypass in super cars and terrorised staff at award-winning prep school. Oh, and McDonalds, Co-Op, Aldi and M&S. Cottesmore’s new-look multi-court is set Along the Oakham Canal a swan was killed by a to open soon. lurcher which was believed to belong to a traveller. Finally, congratulations to Tommy and Several shops didn’t open on Mon day morning. Gwen Coggan on reaching their Additional police were drafted in from Leicester. At “Platinum” anniversary. The devoted the time of The Link going to press the event was Cottesmore couple celebrated their 70th still ongoing but should have ended by the end of wedding anniversary on June 30.
  • East Midlands Aggregates Working Party Annual Monitoring Report 2018

    East Midlands Aggregates Working Party Annual Monitoring Report 2018

    East Midlands Aggregates Working Party Annual Monitoring Report 2018 – incorporating data from January – December 2018 For further information on this document and the East Midlands Aggregates Working Party, please contact: Chairman Stephen Pointer Team Manager, Planning Policy Nottinghamshire County Council County Hall, West Bridgford NG2 7QP Tel: 0115 993 9388 Mob: 07766 384458 [email protected] Secretary Helen Conlon Senior Planning Policy Officer Capita Local Public Services Tel: 07568 610925 [email protected] The statistics and statements contained in this report are based on information from a large number of third party sources and are compiled to an appropriate level of accuracy and verification. Readers should use corroborative data before making major decisions based on this information. Published by Capita on behalf of the East Midlands Aggregates Working Party. Executive Summary The East Midlands Aggregate Working Party (AWP) is one of nine similar working parties throughout England and Wales established in the 1970's. The membership of the East Midlands AWP is detailed in Appendix 1. This Annual Monitoring (AM) report provides sales and reserve data for the calendar year 1st January – 31st December 2018. The report provides data for each of Mineral Planning Authorities in the East Midlands, which are as follows: Derbyshire Leicestershire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire 2 East Midlands AWP Annual Monitoring Report 2018 Rutland Derby Leicester Nottingham Peak District National Park, which incorporates areas within Sheffield, Barnsley, Kirklees, Oldham, Cheshire East and Staffordshire It is not a policy-making body, but is charged with data collection to facilitate planning by Mineral Planning Authorities (MPAs), national government agencies and the industry, and to inform the general reader.
  • Visitor Guide (See Advert Page 11)

    Visitor Guide (See Advert Page 11)

    FREE This brochure is the official tourism guide for Rutland and was produced by Leicester Shire Promotions Limited on behalf of Rutland Tourism with support from Rutland County Council. Special thanks to Richard Adams, Roger Rixon, Andy Ward at Creative Link Solutions, The Leicester Mercury, Shakir at iways, RSPB Rutland and the Anglian Water Birdwatching Centre for their photography, and to Philip Dawson for use of the Rutland map. Particular thanks Rutland London go to Chris Hartnoll of CHFI who has provided photography for this guide Visitor Guide (see advert page 11). All information was believed to be correct at the time of going to press. Leicester Shire Promotions cannot accept liability for inaccuracies, omissions or subsequent 07/08 alterations in information supplied. You are advised to check opening times, prices, etc with establishments before your visit. Large print format also available. Please call 0116 225 4000 for details. Produced for by in partnership with Getting to know Rutland Out & About Useful Information Where to Stay © Leicester Shire Promotions Limited 2007 7-9 Every Street, Leicester LE1 6AG www.gorutland.com Getting to Know Rutland 3 History 5 Oakham 9 Uppingham 13 Stamford 15 Rutland Water Out and About 17 Short Break Ideas Rutland. England’s smallest county 23 Gardens and Nature and arguably its finest too. Lying halfway 25 Museums and Stately Homes between London and York, nestling close 27 Historic Buildings and Churches to Leicester, Nottingham, Lincoln and 29 Outdoor Activities Peterborough, Rutland offers visitors 32 Leisure a world of outstanding natural beauty 33 Rutland Map that more than justifies its claim to be 35 Events ‘100 per cent real England’.
  • Local Aggregates Assessment 2018 (Reporting on 2017 Data)

    Local Aggregates Assessment 2018 (Reporting on 2017 Data)

    Local Aggregates Assessment 2018 (Reporting on 2017 data) August 2018 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Data limitations .................................................................................................................. 1 2. Aggregate supply and demand ................................................................................... 2 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 2 Limestone .......................................................................................................................... 3 Rutland sales ..................................................................................................................... 5 Ironstone ............................................................................................................................ 8 Clay ................................................................................................................................... 8 Recycled and secondary aggregates ................................................................................. 8 3. Future aggregate supply ........................................................................................... 11 Aggregate provision ......................................................................................................... 11 Crushed rock ..................................................................................................................
  • Distance Table of Towns and Principal Villages in the County of RUTLAND

    Distance Table of Towns and Principal Villages in the County of RUTLAND

    RUTLANDSHIRE. THlS is an inland county, and the smallest ir. England, being only about eighteen miles in length, fit its greatest breadth not more than sixteen, anrl its circumference fifty-eight; comprising 149 square miles, or 95,3fi0 acres, of which about 43,00i1 are undet· tillage. It is bounded on the north-west and south-west by Leicestershire; on the south and south -eal'lt by Northamptonshire, trom which it is separated by the t·ive:r WeJland; and the county of Lincoln is the boundary on ils east and north-eastern sideli.-This districc, at the time of the Roman invasion, formed a part of the territory of the Coritani: under the Romans it was included in the divhion called Flavia CCBsariensis: at Great Casterton was a Roman station, but antiquaries disagree concerning its 11ame. By the Saxons the district was comprised in the kingdom of Mercia. In Domesday• book Rote/and is mt:ntioned as being composed of the t\o\'o wapentakes of Alstoe and Martiosley; and the res~ of the county, at that periml, was included iu Northamplonshit·e. Rutland is first described as a dis­ tinct county in the fifth year of King John, at thr coronation of whose queen, lsabel, it was, amongst other lands, assigned in parliament for her dower. But few important historical events are connected with this county. In 1470, on the 27th of April, an army uf Lancaste1·ians was defeated by Edward IV, M Horn, witb a loss of thirteen thousand men, wht'n Sir Thomas Wells and Sir Thomas de Launde were taken pl'isoners, and shortly afterwards beheaded : this engagement has been jocularly styled 'the Battle of Lose-coat Field,' from the disper•ed fugitives having ca•t off their coats in order to be le~ encumbered.
  • RUTLAND. [KELLY's Oakham Has No Incorporation, and Is Under the Juris­ Acres; but Under the "Local Government Act, 1894,''' Diction of the County Magistrates

    RUTLAND. [KELLY's Oakham Has No Incorporation, and Is Under the Juris­ Acres; but Under the "Local Government Act, 1894,''' Diction of the County Magistrates

    392 OAKHAM. RUTLAND. [KELLY'S Oakham has no incorporation, and is under the juris­ acres; but under the "Local Government Act, 1894,''' diction of the county magistrates. Courts-Ieet are held the parish of Deanshold with Barleythorpe was divided; annually by the lord of the manor of Lordshold, George the latter is now a separate parish, and! Deanshold and 'Henry Finch esq. M.P. of Burley-on-the-Hill, and trien­ Lordshold f\Jrm the parish of Oakham. The area of nially for the manor of Deanshold with Barleythorpe, of Oakham is 2,047 acres; assessable value, £12,3.t;3. The which the Dean and Chapter of Westminster are lords. popUlation of Oakham Deanshold with Barleythorpe in The chief landowners are the Earl of Gainsborough, 1891 was 1,146 and of Oakham Lordshold 2,396, including the Earl of Ancaster P. C. the Right Hon. Gerard J ames 65 officers and inmates in the workhouse. Noel P.C. the Earl of Lunsdale and George Henry Finch Gunthorpe is a township, 2 miles south; area, 476 esq. M.P. acres; assessable value, £1,328; the population in IB9I The area of Oakham Lordshold was formerly 2,010 was 24. acres; Oakham Deanshold with Barleythorpe, 1,235 Parish Clerk, George Faulks. OFFICIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, LOCAL INSTlTUTIO NS, &c. Post, M. O. &I T. 0., T. M. 0., Express Delivery, Oakham Fire Brigade, Mill street, William Ellicott, capt. ; Parcel Post,. S. B. & Annuitv & Insurance Office, William Munton, sub-capt. &; 10 men High street.--Henry George Huckman, postmaster. Oakham Institute, High street, G. H.
  • The Leicestershire Archjeological and Historical Society 1961-2

    The Leicestershire Archjeological and Historical Society 1961-2

    THE LEICESTERSHIRE ARCHJEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1961-2 President Lieut.-Col. Sir Robert Martin, C.M.G., D.L., T .D., LLD., M.A. (Deceased 13 1une 1961) Colin D. B. Ellis, Esq., C.B.E., M.C., M .A., F.S.A. (Elected 29 September 1961) * Vice-Presidents Kathleen, Duchess of Rutland The Hon. Lady Martin The Right Revd. The Lord Bishop of Leicester, D.D. The High Sheriff of Leicestershire The Right Worshipful The Lord Mayor of Leicester The Very Revd. H. A. Jones,, B.Sc., Dean of Manchester Albert Herbert, Esq., F.R.I.B.A., F.S.A. Victor Po:::hin, Esq., C.B.E., M.A., D.L., J.P. A. Bernard Clarke, Esq. Levi Fox, Esq., M.A., F.S.A. W. G. Hoskins, Esq., M.A., Ph.D. Miss K. M. Kenyon, C.B.E., M.A., D.Lit., F.B.A., F.S.A. * Officers Hon. Secretary: David T-D. Clarke, Esq., M.A., F.M.A. Hon. Treasurer: C. L. Wykes, Esq., F.C.A. Hon. Auditor: Lieut.-Col. G. L. Aspell, T.D., D.L., F.C.A. Hon. Editor : Professor J. Simmons, M .A., F.R.Hist.S., F.R.S.L. Hon. Librarian: G. H. Martin, Esq., M.A., D.Phil., F.R.Hist.S. * Trustees of the Leicestershire Archawlogical and Historical Society J. E. Brownlow, Esq. Colin D. B. Ellis, Esq., C.B.E., M.C., M.A., F.S.A. Albert Herbert, Esq., F .R.I.B.A., F.S.A. J. N. Pickard, Esq., J.P.