HF 2 : Correspondence with Leicestershire County Council
2a Letter HF to LCC; 4.4.11
2b email LCC to HF; 14.4.11
2c Letter HF to LCC; 14.4.11
2d email LCC to HF; 4.5.11
2e Letter HF to LCC; 13.5.11
2f email LCC to HF; 17.5.11
2g email HF to LCC; 23.5.11
2h email HF to LCC; 13.6.11
2i email HF to LCC; 27.6.11
2j email LCC to HF; 11.7.11
2k email LCC to HF; 20.7.11
2l email HF to LCC; 13.9.11
2m email LCC to HF; 13.9.11
2n email HF to LCC; 25.11.11
2o email LCC to HF; 30.11.11
2p email HF to LCC; 30.11.11
2q email LCC to HF; 30.11.11
2r email HF to LCC; 2.12.11
2s email HF to LCC; 5.12.11
2t email HF to LCC; 8.12.11
2u emails LCC to HF; 14.12.11 2a
FFIIEELLDDIINNGG CCOONNSSUULLTTAANNTTSS EDUCATION CONSULTANCY Principal : Howard Fielding, MA, MEd.
Judith Turner Leicestershire County Council (by email) 4.4.11
Dear Judith
Development at Stephenson Way, Coalville
I am an education consultant engaged by Jelson Homes to advise and assist them with education contributions in relation to this site. I have copies of various correspondence with you, and would at this stage seek some further information and clarification, as follows.
1. Could you please specify exactly what you are requesting at the primary school phase, both in land area and cost. 2. In place of the information on local primary schools, could I please have the current numbers on roll in the various year groups, the future anticipated numbers on roll, and the school capacities. 3. In relation to the above, what housing developments you are taking into account in the area, whether the impact is included in your forecasts, and what S.106 contributions have been agreed or are being sought. 4. Could I please have similar information for the High School phase, and an explanation as to why only just over £300K was requested in September last year, but over £1.1m is being requested now. 5. Could I please have a copy of the latest policy document you use for developer contributions.
I trust that this information will be readily to hand and will not cause too many difficulties.
I have worked on developments with the County before on several occasions and can already advise my clients that I would not seek to challenge your pupil yield figures, and your calculation of the DfE multipliers, modified slightly to include IT costs.
I look forward to hearing from you, but please get in touch if I can clarify any of the above.
Yours sincerely,
HOWARD FIELDING 2b
14.4.11
Dear Howard,
I am writing in response to your email of 4 th April addressed to Judith Turner.
I will deal with each of the points in turn.
1. We are requesting a site for a minimum of a 315 place school. (Ideally a 420 pl site would be preferred as this would provide space to build a school to serve the whole community) The proposed development will yield 341 primary age pupils. From an organisation perspective a 315 or 420 pl school is the optimum size we would provide. However there are a number of surplus places at primary schools within a 2mile radius and are making a claim for 169 places. We therefore are requesting the land to build a 315 pl school and the building of initially a new school to provide the 169 places required. The school will be extended as further development proceeds on this site. In order to create a sustainable community which I understand is a key element of this application a school to serve the whole community will ultimately be required.
2. I attach forecast information for the 11 primary schools included in the calculation.
The net capacity figure is included on the top right hand corner of each form.
3. The following attachments detail the housing developments taken into account, the impact is included in the forecast. S.106 agreements have only been sought and agreed in respect of the planning applications 05/1283/REM, 07/1529/ful, 06/00066,ful, 04/00730/ful.
4. I attach the high and upper school forecasts. When the calculation was done in September there were a number of surplus places at Newbridge School and this reduced the total high school claim to 18 places. The forecast pupils on roll figures have since been revised and the pupil roll at Newbridge has increased so there are no longer any surplus places. The High school claim is now for 64 places.
5. The latest policy document for developer contributions was approved by County Council cabinet on the 21/11/2006 and County Council on 6/12/2006, full details of both documents can be found on the Council website.
Yours sincerely,
Julie Muddimer
2c
FFIIEELLDDIINNGG CCOONNSSUULLTTAANNTTSS EDUCATION CONSULTANCY Principal : Howard Fielding, MA, MEd.
Julie Muddimer Leicestershire County Council (by email) 14.4.11
Dear Julie
Development at Stephenson Way, Coalville
Thank you for your prompt and detailed response. As we might have expected, this produces some further questions of clarification, as follows:
1. The schools data include two capacity figures, an ‘Approved net Capacity’ and a ‘Max Capacity’. Could you explain the difference, please? I note, for example, that Broom Leys Primary has consistently housed more pupils than its NC figure, but within the MC figure. 2. You tell me of four of the local sites which have S.106 agreements. Without breach of commercial detail, could you let me know how many pupils at each phase each agreement provides for, and whether any action has been taken to increase schools’ capacities as yet. For the other sites, can I assume that you are intending to seek S.106 agreements but have not yet done so; if not, why are they exempt? 3. On the school by school schedule, where there is an impact of new housing, this seems to be slightly above your primary 24/100 ratio, although only by one or two pupils. 4. The housing included in the forecasts is much less than the overall list. I assume that the difference is that much of the primary phase impact does not fall within the five year period of the pupil forecasts. 5. In looking at your current request for ‘my’ site, you see a net need for 169 pupils but want to build 1.5FE or 2FE. Should not my site be providing space for 1FE, and future developments meet their impact? 6. Are you expecting to charge the DfE multiplier for 169 pupils, or some other cost?
I look forward to hearing from, but please get in touch if I can clarify any of the above.
Yours sincerely,
HOWARD FIELDING 2d
4.5.11
Dear Howard,
I can respond to your further questions as follows:-
Using the DFE formula we calculate a minimum and maximum capacity for each school, the schools then sets its admission number within this range. The admission numbers times the numbers of year groups in a school gives you a approved net capacity which could be lower than the maximum capacity figure.
The 4 sites for which we have a signed S106 relate to two schools, we have undertaken a variety of work and the 106 monies have been used to contribute towards the erection of a Sports Hall at Newbridge High school, and a playground extension and new modular building at Belvoirdale. In the case of the other sites we have not been able to justify a 106 claim for a number of reasons relating to capacity, pupil forecast, number of dwellings proposed, surplus places in neighbouring schools all of these factors are constantly changing.
When calculating pupil places we always round up to the nearest whole pupil, which would explain why the on occasions we may be above the primary 24/100 ratio.
The housing gain figures included in the pupil forecasts assume the following yield rates year one – 9%, year two – 34%, year three – 60%, year four – 86% and year five – 100%. Therefore as some of the developments shown have been under construction for some time some of the pupil yield will be included in the current pupils on roll figures and not shown within the housing gain figures.
If you take into account the current surplus places in primary schools within a 2 mile walking radius then the 106 claim is for 169 pupils. However having met recently with the Chief Executive and the leader of NWLDC and the planning officers they are keen to see the development of sustainable communities and the school is a key part of that provision. By building 1420 homes your development will yield 340 pupils. If we only build a school for 169 pupils then inevitably a large proportion of children from the development will need to travel outside the development to access a primary school. To assist school organisation we would build, 1FE 1.5FE or 2FE schools, in this instance a site for a 315 pl (1.5FE) school would be the required option.
The DFE multiplier assumes extension to an existing school where the majority of the infrastructure is in place. We would require the Developer to fund or build as a minimum a 169 place school or whatever is required at the time the 106 is agreed. There are a number of other developments seeking planning permission at the moment, these developments serve by and large the same primary and secondary schools, should these developments secure outline permission before your application then in accordance with the LA procedure for dealing with 106’s we will count the housing gains from these developments and effectively the majority of the current surplus places will be removed. Obviously this will also apply if your application secures approval first.
Regards
Julie Muddimer
2e
FFIIEELLDDIINNGG CCOONNSSUULLTTAANNTTSS EDUCATION CONSULTANCY Principal : Howard Fielding, MA, MEd.
Julie Muddimer Leicestershire County Council (by email) 13.5.11
Dear Julie
Development at Stephenson Way, Coalville
Thank you for your further response.
I have still a couple of points to raise, and then I will need to report to my clients to see how they wish to proceed.
Firstly, on school capacities, you respond that a selection is made by each school to set a capacity which is at or below the maximum capacity, and that admission numbers are set to reflect the selected capacity. However, from the point of view of assessing what actual physical capacity exists, it seems to me that we should be looking at the maximum capacity figure in each case, as it would seem obvious that if there were demand from existing housing – ignoring for this purpose any housing development – which led to a school being oversubscribed to its selected capacity, but below the maximum capacity, the County would not seek to provide more buildings, but would require the school to move to its maximum capacity or to whatever figure below that which would accommodate the pupils.
My interpretation of planning legislation is that a developer should not be requested to make a contribution in these circumstances, if there is surplus capacity within the maximum figures. If the implications of this are examined, my calculation is that there are 383 surplus places available within the primary phase, within maximum capacities, and taking the latest year of forecasts including the impact of new housing. With a forecast yield of 341 pupils from the development, there would appear to be no need for additional accommodation, much less for a new school.
I fully accept, of course, that this would imply that all pupils from the development would be dispersed to existing schools, and that this would not necessarily be the most sustainable option for that reason. But currently you are asking my clients to provide sufficient land for a 1.5FE school, and finance for lust over half of that school. Compared with a zero contribution, and bearing in mind that the development is quite central to most of the primary schools, my clients may take a view that they are being asked for an unreasonable contribution. But that will be their decision.
My second point relates to your closing paragraph, where you say that developments will be dealt with in the order in which they come forward, and that surplus places will be ‘allocated’ on a first come, first served basis. My understanding of the process required by Circular 5/05 is that where there are a number of developments known to be coming forward but at differing stages of the planning process, the implications of the developments as a whole should be taken into account, and places planned accordingly. The cost implications, both in land and building costs, should then be shared pro rata between developments.
My third point relates to the High school phase and is just a repeat of the maximum capacity figure mentioned above. It appears that – again, taking the latest forecast year and the forecasts including new housing – the two high schools have 188 surplus places compared with their maximum capacities, and the demand from the development is for 142 places.
It will be obvious that on the basis of the above assessment of the position, I cannot advise my clients that contributions of land and several millions of pounds seem to be a fair and reasonable request, but I am sure you will have some comments to make back to me.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
HOWARD FIELDING 2f
Date: 17 May 2011 16:51
Dear Howard,
The DFE guidance and advise to School allows them to set an AN within the min and max range, they do not have to set an AN at the max of the range. The AN is set by the Governing Body in consultation with the LA following the guidelines issued by the DFE. A school does not have to set an AN at the maximum of its capacity if this is not in the best interests of the educational organisation of the school. This is further emphasised by the legal requirement to keep KS1 class sizes at or below 30. Section 106 calculations are therefore based on the AN for each school not the maximum capacity. This process applies equally to Primary and Secondary schools.
Section 106 planning obligations including educational requirements to be used to mitigate the impacts of a proposed development are assessed in accordance with the County Council's adopted policy guidance and the basis for calculating those requirements (using the DFE guidance and cost multipliers) has stood up to examination in several recent planning appeal inquiries in the County.
With regards to your second point, this is an issue for NWLDC as the Planning Authority, I can make no further comment.
Yours sincerely,
Julie Muddimer
2g
23.5.11
Dear Julie
Thanks for your response. The point I was making about setting the AN within the minimum and maximum range is that it is therefore technically possible to set the AN at the maximum of the range. It may not be the way the school wants to manage pupil numbers, but simply that it is technically, and therefore legally possible, to set the AN at the maximum of the range.
If you have electronic versions of the recent appeals you refer to, I’d be pleased to have them.
Can I please confirm exactly what the County is requesting? My understanding is that it would be a site large enough for 1.5FE. My understanding is that this would be 1.432 ha (midpoint of DfE guidelines for total site size). In addition, you request cash funding for 169 pupils. Is this at the multiplier, or some other figure?
Thanks
Howard
2h
Date: 13 June 2011 11:29
Julie
Are you in a position to reply to my email of 23 May?
Thanks
Howard
2i
Date: 27 June 2011 17:35
Dear Julie
Are you in a position to reply to my emails of 23rd May and 13th June, please?
Regards,
Howard
2j
Date: 11 July 2011 14:44
Howard,
Can you please forward me a copy of the email/letter you are awaiting a response on and I will endeavour to get back to you ASAP.
Julie
2k
Date: 20 July 2011 13:14
Dear Howard,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
With regard to the setting of school Admission Numbers(AN), I feel I fully explained the process in my email of 17th May and the reasons why schools need the flexibility to set an AN within the given range, I am therefore not able to make any further comment on this issue.
I attach a copy of our response to the Planning notification, which explains we require a site for a 315 place school (between 1.3ha and 1.5ha) and the funding to provide the first 169 places, which represents the deficit of places at this point in time, (however as explained in the response there are a number of other pending applications at the moment which will impact on the overall deficit of pupil places in the area) The cost multiplier used in the calculations assume you are extending an existing school by providing additional places and all the other required infrastructure is in place. As we are looking at a new school this is clearly not the case, we would require the Developer to build the first 169 places to a specification provided by the County Council or provide the funding required to enable the County Council to do so.
Julie Muddimer
2l
Date: 13 September 2011 16:29
Julie
Thanks for the attachment. You say the DfE multiplier is not appropriate for a new school, but you don’t give your cost for a new school? It is this figure which I was asking for, so that I can advise whether it seems reasonable.
Your DfE cost multiplier looks as if it derives from the DfE overall primary multiplier of £12,257 per pupil, adjusted for your regional factor (93%) with £700 added, which I expect is for IT. Is this correct?
You will know that the DfE splits the multiplier into extension and new build. On the basis above the new build figure would be £13,043 adjusted for the regional factor and with £700 added. This comes to £12,830.
Regards
Howard
2m
Date: 13 September 2011 16:07
Howard,
I attach the information for Coalville All Saints Primary.
As I explained in my email of 4th May and the formal response to NWLDC of 3rd Feb, we are seeking the site for a 315 place school and the building of the first phase to accommodate 169 pupils. The cost multiplier which is £12,099 assumes extension to an existing school where the infrastructure is in place and you are simply providing additional classrooms, this is not appropriate where the building of a new school is required.
Regards
Julie Muddimer
2n
Date: 25 November 2011 11:0
Dear Julie
I tried calling you today (Friday, 25th) to discuss this, but I understand that you only work certain days.
Let me update you.
As you probably know, this development is now at appeal, with the Inquiry scheduled for February. Proofs of evidence have to be submitted by late December.
My instruction from my clients at present is this: They have received the LCC statement of case which sets out the request for a 341 place primary school and a secondary phase (High School only) contribution of £232K, based on a shortfall of 13 places to be provided at Castle Rock. They have seen reports from me about both the primary and secondary phases, and about how LCC sets capacity figures. They are prepared, if we can agree, to accept the provision of the primary school, but not to make the secondary contribution. If we cannot agree, I am to write a proof of evidence and to challenge LCC’s position at the Inquiry.
This puts considerable urgency on the process.
To my mind, the matter is very simple. The LCC statement of case gives the capacity of Castle Rock as 600 places. You have provided me with the data on the school, future forecast numbers etc. This document shows the maximum capacity at the school to be 667 places. So all that has to happen is that the admission number is amended to, say, 210 from 200, adding up to 30 additional pupils and still within the maximum capacity, and the matter is resolved, with no further debate on the primary phase. I cannot imagine LCC would wish to go through the whole of an inquiry process on such a straightforward and comparatively minor aspect.
I don’t know if you personally have the power to negotiate/agree such issues, or who I should deal with who does have such power. No doubt you can let me know.
However, I would be very grateful if we could resolve the matter urgently. If you could perhaps give me a call on Monday 28th., that would be very helpful.
Regards
Howard
2o
Date: 30 November 2011 09:27
Dear Howard,
Apologies for not getting back to you sooner.
Section 106 funding is required to increase the capacity of the Castle Rock High school to cope with pupils from the Development and we must therefore pursue our claim for a secondary contribution.
Regards
Julie
2p
Date: 30 November 2011 10:55
Dear Julie
I’m sorry you are taking this attitude to what was a very reasonable proposal to resolve the education issues. I just do not see how your position is tenable, and that you would want to have it tested at the Inquiry. Castle Rock – by your own evidence to me – has a maximum capacity of 667 places. Its admission capacity for the moment has been set at 600. This means that there is scope to admit 67 more pupils by adjusting the admission number before more accommodation is needed. Please tell me where I am getting this wrong, if you think that I am.
If I am not, then it needs to be understood that a fair and reasonable offer has been made prior to the Inquiry, and that this is liable to be reflected in any decision on costs. You, unless the position changes, are committing me to work on a proof of evidence and to be present at the Inquiry, at substantial costs to my clients. If the Inquiry finds that all that work, and costs, were unnecessary, then it is likely that they will fall on the County Council. Please also understand that this correspondence will be included in my evidence as proof that my clients and I have attempted to resolve the matter without wasting the Inquiry’s time. Can you please confirm that you personally have the authority to make this decision on behalf of the County Council, and that you personally are putting the County’s funds at risk in the element of potential costs.
If you need to refer such decisions to another officer, would you please let me know who that is, and that they know that they are taking that responsibility. I see that you have copied the correspondence to John Prendergast and Andrew Tyrer, as I am doing. I have some idea of Andrew’s position, but none of John’s, and would just like to know who has the executive powers for these decisions.
If you still wish to proceed to the Inquiry, could you please let me have updated schools data to reflect numbers on roll for the current academic year, as the ones which you sent previously reflected the last academic year. To be clear, could I have the information in the same format as before, to include net and maximum capacities, and to include numbers on roll and future forecasts. Could I have it for all the schools in Coalville, to include all the primary schools within a two mile radius of the development, not just those three within a two mile walking distance.
Could you please confirm the geographical point, or points, which you are using as the basis for the walking distance calculations, and supply the numbers of pupils who are attending the three nominated primary schools whose home addresses are nearer to one of the six more distant schools which have surplus capacity.
I am sorry to have to respond in this tone, and to impose significant additional work on us both. I would hope that you might reflect on this and resolve the matter. But if not, please respond to all the above points so that I can pursue my role effectively and present a full picture to the Inquiry.
And as you know, the timescales are very pressing.
Regards
Howard
2q
Date: 30 November 2011 15:52
Dear Howard,
I note the contents made in your email.
Julie Muddimer
2r
Date: 02 December 2011 10:02
Dear Julie
Our planning consultant has forwarded the following to me, and asked me to pass it on. I hope for a detailed and full response to my previous email early next week.
“The Inspector, at Tuesday's PIM, said that he would expect all parties to present robust and justified evidence to demonstrate the requirement for the contribution sought (i.e. that it is CIL / Circular compliant) and that if they don't, he will not recommend to the SoS that the contribution is necessary. He also said that he expected the parties to work together in order to agree what they can before the Inquiry, and that if one party fails to do that, he would consider applications for an award of costs.
The County Council's solicitor and s106 officer are both aware of this (as they attended the meeting), so they should have advised their colleagues that there is a need to co-operate on all s106 related matters. “
Regards
Howard
2s
Date: 05 December 2011 20:40
Dear Julie
In the absence of any positive response to my proposal to agree education contributions prior to the Inquiry, I have now had to begin work on my proof of evidence.
Following researches into the County’s procedures, especially in relation to the margin of capacity between ‘Approved Net Capacity’ and ‘Maximum Capacity’, could you please confirm to me that in relation to the schools listed below, whose admission numbers have been increased, no additional buildings have been provided, or are planned to be provided, in relation to the increased admission number:
Broom Leys Primary Holy Cross Primary Warren Hills Primary Newbridge High
Can you also explain why at Hugglescote Primary there are numbers on roll in excess of approved net capacity in four of the seven year groups, and a total NOR in excess of the net capacity? Have additional buildings been provided at this school?
Surely it is obvious that the contribution at Castle Rock High is not at all necessary. Do we have to waste the Inquiry’s time?
Regards
Howard
2t
Dear Julie
Thanks for your holding response. I obviously don’t know whether your intentions are simply to supply me with various data to illuminate my proof, or whether it is hoped to come to an agreement in advance of putting evidence before the Inquiry. In order to be helpful, my timescales are as follows. I intend to finalise my proof in draft and have it with Counsel by the end of tomorrow, Friday 9th. Any revisions will be completed by Thursday 15th. at which point it will go to binding and into evidence.
So if we need to have any discussions, or if your factual updatings are to be included in my proof and not added subsequently or as part of a rebuttal – assuming you are intending submitting evidence – I need to deal with that on Tuesday or Wednesday next week, especially if I have to consult with clients/colleagues at my end.
Also in a spirit of trying to be helpful and reach a sensible conclusion, let me let you know what our current position is:
1) There is no question of our acceptance of the LCC position about school capacity figures. In our view school capacities between the ‘selected’ capacity and the ‘maximum’ capacity can be utilised as no additional buildings are required. There is evidence that this is LCC practice anyway.
2) I’m happy to see up to date pupil numbers/forecasts and so on as these will impact on the margins of surplus provided by the capacity figures. To a certain extent you have included these in your statement of case anyway.
3) So far as a primary school goes, my suggestion is that the idea of building a school for 341 pupils does not make sense. In various parts of our correspondence you have described LCC’s preferred policy of having 1FE, 1.5FE or 2FE schools, and not some rather unmanageable figure in between. I agree with this and am suggesting that the development has a school for 1.5FE – 315 pupils. That will meet the needs of 93% of the forecast pupils, leaving just 26 to go to neighbouring schools within walking distance – and which have capacity within their maximum. So we have a sensible school size in accordance with your best practice, and which also meets sustainable walking to school by all pupils. If you want it to be larger, to accommodate any future development, then LCC can pay for any supplementary land/buildings and recoup from future development – as allowed for in Circular 5/05.
4) The current intention is for the developers to build the school. I would hope that setting an agreed specification would not be too taxing, provided that we live within DfE guidelines for the overall size of site and buildings included in BB 99. We may have to put a cash alternative, as you have in your statement of case, into any S.106/unilateral. 5) So far as the secondary phase goes, the need for a contribution is eliminated. I’m not sure, in any case, that the physical changes proposed in the statement of case whereby you would use the contribution to make one classroom from two would meet the Circular 5/05 tests of adding necessary additional accommodation. However, that’s a point of minor detail.
If we can reach an agreement along these lines, very good. Otherwise I look forward to your answers to my various points and will incorporate them in my evidence as far as I am able to within the above time constraints.
Regards
Howard 2u (i)
Dear Howard, With ref. to you email of 30th November to Julie Muddimer. Julie is dealing with a number of Planning Inquiries and I have therefore been asked to take over her role with regard to this application. I attach a detailed forecast for all of the schools included in the original calculation. The point for measuring the distance is taken from the Easting 412000 and Northing 234000 as detailed in the planning application. We are not able to provide data with regard to numbers of pupils, their home address and distance from respective schools, however I am able to give information for each school on the in and out catchemnt make up of the school population. Yours sincerely,
Sue Owen Strategic Officer Admissions and Pupil Place Planning School Admissions and Pupil Services Children and Young People's Services Leicestershire County Council
2u (ii) [response to 2s]
In response to your query the info is as follows:-
Coalville Newbridge, the NC has increased from 530 to 590 following the erection of a new Sports Hall.
Whitwick Holy Cross, is an Aided school and as such operates it's own Admissions Policy.
Warren Hills, the NC has fluctuated at this school over the last 8 years for a variety of reasons, including the establishment of a Sure Start centre on site and the removal of mobile classroom units. The NC was increased to support the best organisational model for the school and to set an AN appropriate to the KS1 class size requirement. It is still well within the maximum capacity.
Broom Leys, is one of the largest primary schools in Leicestershire and the NC has been increased to support the schools method of organisation and to ensure the best outcomes for pupils, it is still well within the maximum range.
Hugglescote Primary, I am still researching this and will provide more information next week
County Council Services Adult Social Care & Health
1. Name of service Adult Social Care & Health
2. Category of service County Council provider
3. Current Guidance Circular 05/2005 on the issue Government’s White Paper “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say”
4. Type of facilities Community facilities for adults which may include day and / for which provision or residential services. Care Services for adults of all ages may be needed including those with learning and / or physical disabilities. Multi- agency, integrated community facilities e.g. Health and Social Care Centre, Community Centre, extended school. (as promoted in the Government’s White Paper “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say”).
5. Type of development which might trigger need i. Residential Any residential development is likely to have an impact on the County’s Adult Social Care provision. Some developments may have a more acute impact. Developments likely to house a high concentration of older people, people with learning disabilities or people with physical disabilities will have a greater demand on services. These developments will be assessed on a case by case basis.
ii. Other
6. Form in which Cash or land, as appropriate. payments should be made
7. Contributions to Further details of the methodology for calculating capital costs or contributions and formulae are under review and will be revenue costs subject to review in the near future.
8. Threshold for size Any development may trigger a need for contributions. of development for which contributions are appropriate
9 Contact person Chris Williams Head of Finance Adult Social Care, County Hall, Glenfield, Leicester, LE3 8RA. Tel 0116 265 6946. email: [email protected]
10 Last updated October 2007
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 21 County Council Services Civic Amenity - Waste Management
1. Name of service Civic Amenity - Waste Management
Category of Service 2. County Council - Waste Disposal Authority Provider
3. Current Guidance Circular 05/2005 Environmental Protection Act (1990)
PPS10 Planning for Sustainable Waste Management –PPS10 sets out the Government’s policy to be taken into account by waste planning authorities and forms part of the Waste Management Plan for the UK
Leicestershire Leicester Rutland Waste Local Plan
Leicestershire Municipal Waste Management Strategy 2006
4. Type of Facilities for Civic Amenity (CA) site construction costs for extensions or alterations which provision may be to existing infrastructure or the same at sites of new facilities. needed Currently contributions for other types of facilities are not claimed for but this will not preclude claims for them in the future.
5. Type of development which might trigger need
a) Residential Where a new development increases the number of residential households in an area there will be increased patronage/use of the local CA site/s. This can lead to a lack of capacity at the local CA site.
b) Other Contributions will not normally be sought for other types of development for example commercial industrial leisure/recreational and student halls of residence.
The CA site facilities are provided for resident households to take their own household waste. Other types of users are normally not eligible or are highly unlikely to use the CA facilities so contributions are not sought at present.
The contribution rate for all CA sites is currently reviewed on an annual basis. The rate requested per CA site varies and currently the highest amount is £87.26 per additional dwelling unit.
7. Form in which payments Financial contribution for capital costs. Where the contributions are should be made relatively small amounts, then payment of the contribution/s are normally required in full prior to the commencement of the development. The amount of the contribution will be index-linked normally to the BCIS index as applied to other County Council claims.
Contributions to Capital 8. Capital costs only. costs or Revenue Costs
22 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire
9. Threshold for size Contributions will be sought where: of development for which contributions (i) the number of additional dwellings amount to 6 or more are appropriate (ii) the total contribution sum would amount to £200 or more.
Each additional dwelling unit is claimed at the same rate and the total number of additional dwelling units claimed for is net of any demolitions.
Contributions may be sought from smaller sized developments if they form part of an overall development in an area.
10. Geographical areas Contributions are determined by assessing which CA site(s) where there is no the residents of a new developments are likely to use. If the spare capacity nearest CA site is one of the following then we currently claim for a contribution: - Barwell, Coalville, Kibworth, Loughborough, Lount, Market Harborough, Melton Mowbray, Oadby and Sileby.
Where it is deemed that two CA sites are equally likely to be used by residents then contributions are sought at a reduced rate of 50% for each site.
Notwithstanding a residential development application will be assessed on its impacts/merits in terms of waste management issues and this may result in a request not in line with the above, for example claims may be made for a contribution
11. Contact Person Nigel Shilton Waste Projects Officer Department of Highways, Transportation and Waste Management Leicestershire County Council County Hall Glenfield Leicestershire LE3 8RJ Tel: 0116 2656833 Fax: 0116 2658128
13. Last Update October 2007
Review Date The rate requested per CA site varies currently the highest amount required is £87.26 per additional dwelling.
14. Retention of The contribution will be retained for 5 years from the date of contribution payment.
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 23 County Council Services Ecology/Geology/Environment/Geomorphology
1. Name of service Ecology/ Geology/ Environment /Geomorphology
Category of service 2. County, District and Environmental Consultancy provider
3. Current Guidance on the Circular 05/2005 issue East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy PPS9 Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation PPS9 sets out planning policies on protection of biodiversity and geological conservation through the planning system. UK Biodiversity Action Plan The Development Plan for the area Local Biodiversity Action Plan Regional Biodiversity Strategy
4. Type of facilities for Mitigation exercises, habitat restoration/ habitat creation, landscaping, which provision may be site management, and site interpretation, where possible using natural needed species, commonly occurring in the vicinity and of local stock. (Green and Environmental Infrastructure).
5. Type of development 1. Residential and 2. Other Development : which might trigger need -All likely impacts on ecologically or geologically sensitive locations will need to be assessed individually, on both residential and other development sites; i. Residential no thresholds apply. ii. Other The extent of the ecological or geological interest will need to be located and defined by prior assessment. -Costs will need to be individually assessed for each project/development.
6. Form in which payments Financial contribution, control of land or other forms of payment, as should be made appropriate; Provision and compensating wildlife sites. (See English Nature’s Guidelines for further detail on compensating wildlife sites).
7. Contributions to capital For all projects involving habitat creation and landscaping, costs or revenue costs contributions are required to capital costs of implementation and to maintenance costs, which may be long term (up to 3 years) and in the form of a commuted payment.
8. Threshold for size of No thresholds apply if sensitive site affected. development for which contributions are appropriate
9.. Geographic areas National Nature Reserves, Special Areas of Conservation, Sites of Special where there is no spare Scientific Interest, Local Wildlife Sites/Local Sites, Local Nature Reserves. capacity
10 Contact person Leicestershire Environmental Resources Centre, Holly Hayes Birstall, Leicester LE4 4DG Tel 0116-267-0008 e-mail: [email protected]
11 Last updated September 2007
24 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire County Council Services Children & Young People’s Service (Education)
1. Name of service Children & Young People’s Service (Education)
2. Category of service County Council/Agents provider 3. Current Guidance on Circular 05/2005 the issue The Development Plan for the area. 4. Type of facilities for Sites for new schools, construction costs of new schools, which provision may contributions towards additional classrooms and facilities/ be needed. other building provision of existing schools (including additional grass/artificial turf sports pitches and nature areas)
5. Type of development A contribution will be required for existing schools, towards the which might trigger cost of additional primary and secondary school places, where need. there is a need. Contributions will be calculated on the basis of a minimum of 24 primary places and 20 secondary places per 100 i Residential houses. For flats/apartments the current figures are 4.3 primary pupils and 3.2 secondary pupils per 100 units. Information about local pupil yields will be taken into account in setting the precise requirements. The costs per pupil place based on DCSF cost multipliers, are £10,422 for primary, £15,713 for 11-16 year old pupils and £16,839 for 16+ students based on 2006/07 figures. On a ‘per house built’ basis this equates to £2,501.28 per house for primary, £1,571.30 per house for 11 – 14 High Schools, and £1,608.46 per house for 14 – 18 upper schools. On a ‘per flat built’ basis this equates to £448.15 per flat for primary, £251.41 per flat for 11-14 High schools, and £257.41 per flat for 14-18 upper schools. These cost multipliers are updated on April 1st each year. Where circumstances arise when a new school is required then a developer would be expected to make a developer contribution in the form of a suitable site or piece of land for a new school and the construction costs of the school building/s and/or facilities, including professional fees, furniture and equipment and/or works in kind to the County Council’s specifications. The construction costs in these instances will exceed the costs per pupil place quoted above and will vary according to the conditions & configuration of each individual site. For guidance the latest 210 place Leicestershire Primary School was completed at a build cost of £3.1 million, in March 2006, exclusive of land costs, fees and equipment.
ii. Other The value of contributions will be based upon either DCSF cost multipliers current at the time of the signing of the formal agreement or the appropriate cost multipliers plus an index linked update (as defined earlier), whichever is the greater. Proposals to redevelop an existing school site by a developer would normally trigger need for a replacement school.
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 25 County Council Services Children & Young People’s Service (Education) Cont...
6. Form in which Land where required and either the costs of construction of payments should be buildings or work in kind to the County Council’s specification, made. as detailed by the Director of Property. 7. Contributions to Capital only, normally. capital costs or revenue costs. 8. Threshold for size of 10 dwellings (or less in the case of ‘pooled’ contributions). development for which contributions are appropriate. 9. Geographic areas Since school capacity varies from term to term, consultation where there is no with the Education Department is essential to establish spare capacity. whether or not there is spare capacity in a given school. 10. Contact person Bob Dutton, Service Manager, Room 700, County Hall, Glenfield, Leicester LE3 8RF. Tel: 0116 265 6336.
Chris Page, Learning Environment Team, Room 700, County Hall, Glenfield, Leicester LE3 8RF. Tel: 0116 265 6375.
11. Last updated Sept 2007
26 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire County Council Services Highways and Transportation
1. Name of service Highways and Transportation
2. Category of County Council service provider (Note: The Highways Agency is responsible for Motorways and other Trunk Roads.
3. Current Guidance Circular 05/2005 on the issue PPS13 The Development Plan Highways, Transportation and Development www.leics.gov.uk/htd (“HTD”)
4. Type of facilities Pedestrian and cycle facilities, public transport enhancement for which (bus and rail, capital and revenue), Travel Plans, park and ride provision may be facilities, road improvements, traffic management, car parking, needed traffic regulation orders, and associated landscape work including planting and hard surfacing. 5. Type of Any type of development which leads to a material increase development in traffic on the network, or is detrimental to road safety, or which might has inadequate access (including walking, cycling and public trigger need transport), or has inadequate parking provision, or creates an on-street parking problem or affects a public right of way. See “HTD”.
Requirements will depend on the particular circumstances relating to the development and may include, for example, highway implications such as parental car parking at schools and traffic management. The submission of a Transport Assessment helps in assessing requirements. 6. Form in which The required infrastructure will generally be provided by the payments should developer, but some matters may be covered by a financial be made contribution.
7. Contributions to Generally capital but some revenue, for example bus capital costs or subsidy and particular maintenance liabilities. Maintenance revenue costs contributions usually take the form of a commuted sum.
Liability included for compensation arising from development highway works.
8. Threshold for size No minimum level as need for contribution will depend on local of development circumstances. See “HTD”. for which contributions are appropriate
9. Geographic areas Not hitherto a consideration for highways/ transport where there is no contributions. Potentially for future consideration but additional spare capacity to any site-specific requirements.
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 27 County Council Services Highways and Transportation Cont...
10 Contact person Allan Headley, Tel 0116-265-7187 (Charnwood, Melton, NW Leics.) Ian Dutton, Tel 0116-265-7185 (Blaby, Hinckley and Bosworth, Harborough, Oadby and Wigston). John Glover, Tel 0116-265-7195 (General Liaison).
11 Last updated 2006
28 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire County Council Services Library Services
1. Name of service Library Services
Category of service 2. County Council provider
Circular 05/2005
Current Guidance Review of the Libraries and Information Service Network Service 3. on the issue Delivery Policy and Strategy
The Development Plan for the area and the Community Strategy
Type of facilities 4. for which provision Access to library and information materials and equipment. may be needed
5. Type of development which might trigger need
i. Residential Any new residential development has potential for increasing the service delivery. ii. Other A large commercial/employment development could lead to an increase in the use of local library services
6. Form in which Cash in the majority of cases, however, for some large scale payments should developments shared use of new/converted buildings may be more be made appropriate.
7. Contributions to A contribution will be required for the enhancement of existing static capital costs or library buildings and mobile provided services. Calculations are based on the average number of residents per type of dwelling, revenue costs the current provision of library materials per resident, the current average price of library materials and the numbers that use the service. These factors are converted into a formula for a cost per type of dwelling. Current costs are 1 bedroomed houses @ £26.44 per house 2 bedroomed houses @ £52.87 per house 3/4/5 bedroomed houses @ £61.68 per house 1 bedroomed apartments @ £26.44 per apartment 2 bedroomed apartments @ £52.87 per apartment 3/4/5 bedroomed apartments @ £61.68 per apartment
These costs are reviewed annually in June and adjusted to reflect the CIPFA submitted costs of providing Library Services
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 29 County Council Services Library Services Cont...
8. Threshold for size Any new development has potential for increasing the service of development for delivery but the de-minimus development below which contributions which contributions are not required is 3 dwellings. are appropriate
9. Geographic areas A flat rate (formula based) contribution is used in all cases where there is no spare capacity
10. Contact person Paul Love, Community Service Department, 4th Floor, County Hall, Glenfield, Leicester LE3 8SS. Tel 0116 265 7376
11. Last updated July 2006
30 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire County Council Services Museums, Heritage Interpretation and Cultural Development Cultural Planning
1. Name of service Museums, Heritage Interpretation and Cultural Development Cultural Planning
2. Category of service County Council provider 3. Current Guidance Circular 05/2005 on the issue The Development Plan for the area
Draft Museums Interpretation Strategy 2007-2017 Environment & Heritage Service Plan 2007-2010 4. Type of facilities Local museum / site interpretation / Open Museum community for which provision showcase / Arts / Cultural planning to encourage more aesthetic may be needed environment (e.g. public art,) / Community Nature areas.
Community learning room (for museum activities with local community and school groups); physical access improvements to museum premises; intellectual access to collections and related information including information about local heritage and cultural amenities (via ICT and other interpretation methods) which adds to local quality of life.
5. Type of development which might trigger need
i. Residential Any development associated with a site or issue of cultural or heritage significance. (The precise triggering mechanism may need to be developed through experience between the Developer Contributions Coordinator and Environment & Heritage in Community Services Department)
Any residential increase in population near a museum (say half an hour’s drive time) triggers greater need for museum facilities especially but not only developments associated with a site or issue of cultural or heritage significance.
ii. Other 6. Form in which Financial contribution; land or sites, where appropriate payments should be made 7. Contributions to As appropriate capital costs or revenue costs 8. Threshold for size See above note on type of development which may trigger of development for need. which contributions are appropriate
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 31 County Council Services Museums, Heritage Interpretation and Cultural Development Cultural Planning
9.. Geographic areas Not applicable where there is no spare capacity
10 Contact person Yolanda Courtney Environment & Heritage in Community Services Department, County Hall, Tel 0116-265-6642 E-mail: [email protected]
11 Last updated Sept 2007
32 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire County Council Services Recreation, Community Facillities and Amenity Land
1 Name Of Service Recreation, Community Facilities and Amenity Land 2 Category of service County Council District and Parish Councils and Voluntary provider Groups 3 Current Guidance on Circular 05/2005 the issue PPS17 Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation National Playing Fields Association Standards Sport England Facilities Planning Model Leicestershire Leicester City and Rutland Playing Fields Strategy National Forest Strategy County Sports Partnership Business Plan (under review) BSEN 1176/1177 (Children Playgrounds)
4 Type of facilities for which New or extended community halls, public open space including provision may be needed. amenity land, water facilities and pathways for use by the public play facilities for children (including equipment) sports pitches (grass or artificial) indoor or outdoor sports facilities allotment gardens. Local nature reserves, land of biodiversity/wildlife potential (Green and Environmental Infrastructure)
Type of development 5 a) Provision should relate to specific local need (or contributions which might trigger towards projects of regional significance). need b) Even small developments of 10 to 15 units may trigger need i. Residential for extra or new children’s play space or equipment. c) Larger developments may need provision of additional land on the basis of 2.4 hectares per 1000 people (pro rata).
Developments over 1000 people are likely to generate need for new community halls or expansion / improvement of existing facilities.
d) Developments over 20,000 people will generate the need for major indoor / outdoors sports facilities to be agreed with the local planning authority.
a) Specialist residential or day care institutions may be required to provide their own recreation facilities or contribute to public facilities as appropriate. ii. Other b) Large industrial / commercial developments may generate excess demand on existing leisure facilities. Consideration should be given to the need for access to leisure provision before / after work (by for example commuters) as well as lunchtime leisure requirements by employees including land of nature conservation value.
Where new industrial or commercial development occurs it may impede or discourage opportunities for physical activity. In some cases where it can be shown that there is a detrimental impact on such opportunities, then contributions might be sought towards accessible alternative recreational and leisure facilities.
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 33 County Council Services Recreation, Community Facillities and Amenity Land Cont...
6 Forms in which Provision of land (especially for children’s play and amenity open payment must be made space); creation of equipped playgrounds and sports pitches; financial contributions to LEA/ schools for shared use facilities; financial contributions to local authorities to enhance other facilities; dedicated public rights of way; financial contributions for dedicated revenue programmes that deal with health inequalities, community safety and social inclusion issues etc
7 Contributions to capital Capital contributions towards initial development costs with costs or revenue costs possible commuted sum to deal with long term maintenance.
Residential • A contribution of between £750 and £1100 per dwelling unit. (determined on the basis of each planning application) should be sought for capital costs from residential developments. Time limited funds may also be sought for dedicated revenue programmes.
• Contributions should be sought from a) minor developments where appropriate and b) where an area experiences for example accumulative developments which result in a significant increase in population and related leisure/recreational demands.
Contributions arising from non residential development may be Other sought on the basis of the scale and type of development and the availability of existing recreational facilities and demand for additional facilities. 8 Threshold for size of Normally 10 houses, though specialist institutions may generate development for which exceptional demand (especially for children’s play or recreational contributions are sport) appropriate The thresholds for contributions to the district services may be as low as a single unit. 9 Geographic areas Capacity issues are dependent on the nature of the where there is no spare development and the basis of the planning application. capacity 10 Contact person David Stock, Facilities Officer Leicestershire & Rutland Sport Netball Centre Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire. LE11 3TU 11 Last updated October 2007
34 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire Other Services - Not provided by Leicestershire County Council Health Care
1. Name of service Health Care 2. Category of Service Other Services Provider 3. Current Guidance Circular 05/05 Health Care Business Plans Public Health Strategies Development plans for the area 4. Type of Facilities Sites of New Facilities for which provision Construction Costs for additional Facilities / extensions or may be needed alterations.
5. Type of development which might trigger need
a) Residential Where a development increases the population of an area and where there is extra demand on the local health care provision. The contribution will be based on the Health Formula which considers the following areas which impact on Health Care Services
Population Capacity Public Health needs assessment Deprivation GP list sizes Population distribution, (Age, Culture)
b) Other Expansion of any area that will impact on the demand for Health Care the same or similar formula will apply, for example:
Expansion of Universities
Expansion or contraction of major employer
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 35 Other Services - Not provided by Leicestershire County Council Health Care Cont...
6. Health Care Property Type Number Value Formula A 1-2 Bed £583
B 3-4 Bed £1,167
C 5+ Bed £1,750
D Students £219
Deprivation Ward/Area Value 0 to 40 + Factor Calculation factor 0.8 to 1.4
MIPS (Current) 395
7. Form in which Capital Monies payments should Land or buildings be made
8. Contributions to Capital costs to contribute to the expansion of Health Care Capital costs or provision either are a payment for a specific area or into a Revenue Costs pooled contribution for that area where there is a progressive expansion.
The level of contribution will be in accordance with the Health Care Formula and linked to the MIPS Health Care inflation index. 9. Threshold for size The standard threshold is 10 units, but this will be reduced to of development 5 or less if an area is being developed in small sites. for which contributions are appropriate 10. Geographical areas The PCT’s will divide their area into specific zones that will where there is no include a number of Council wards, e.g. using the Public spare capacity Health neighbourhoods system. The capacity in each zone will be calculated and the level of short fall or not will form the basis of a case of need for any request for a contribution 11. Contact Person Mr Ian Derbyshire Head of Estates & Facilities Charnwood & North-West Leicestershire PCT Woodgate, Loughborough, LE11 2TZ
Tel: 01509 568664 / 567797
36 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire 12. PCT Contacts and Each individual PCT will provide its own developer arrangements Contribution needs assessment and supporting documentation in line with this guidance and in conjunction with there local planning department 13. Last Update 2006
Review Date 2008 14. Retention of The contribution will be retained for 5 years where it is for a contribution specific project and 7 years where it is included in a Pooled fund for an area. 15. Contribution The Contributions will be made as follows: Trigger Points 1st - 50% of Payment - When 40% of site complete or 12 months from commencement of development, whichever is the sooner
2nd - 50% of Payment - When 95% of site complete or 24 months from commencement, which ever is the sooner
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 37 Other Services - Not provided by Leicestershire County Council Leicestershire Constabulary
1. Name of service Leicestershire Constabulary
2. Category of service Other Service provider 3. Current Guidance PPS 1 sets out the Governments vision for planning and the on the issue key policies and principles which should underpin the planning system. It states that design policies should encourage developments which ‘Create safe environments where crime and disorder or fear of crime does not undermine quality of life or community cohesion’.
PPS 3 requires that in Designing for Quality, Local Planning Authorities should develop plans and policies which ‘promote designs and layouts that are inclusive, safe, take into account of public health, crime prevention and community safety, ensure adequate surveillance ….’.
The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 adds impetus to the need to work in partnership to improve the quality of life by requiring all authorities, including planning authorities, to consider crime and disorder whilst exercising all their duties.
Leicestershire Constabulary are preparing additional guidance on Developer Contributions. This will be incorporated into the Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire in a subsequent review of the document. 4. Type of facilities Sites for police stations, erection costs of new police stations for which provision and contribution towards additional office/other building may be needed provision at existing police stations or other community buildings. 5. Type of development which might trigger need
i. Residential A contribution will be required towards the cost of additional policing if there is a need arising from the development. Where
a new police station is required, the developer would be
expected to provide a site and the erection costs.
Proposals to redevelop an existing police station site by a developer would normally trigger need for a replacement police station. Otherwise, each application to be considered on an individual basis.
ii. Other Leicestershire Constabulary provides a free Architectural Liaison Service to which in the first instance development proposals should be submitted.
38 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire 6. Form in which Land where required and either the costs of construction of payments should buildings or work in kind to the Constabulary’s specification. be made Other contributions may be appropriate, and these will be assessed on an individual site by site basis 7. Contributions to Capital only, normally. capital costs or revenue costs 8. Threshold for size The impact upon police service provision should be assessed in of development for respect of each new development but normally with residential which contributions development a minimum threshold of 10 units be applied are appropriate 9.. Geographic areas where there is no spare capacity 10. Contact person Sue Davison, Property Services Department
Stewart Bradshaw, Community Safety Bureau
Leicestershire Constabulary, Police Headquarters, St Johns, Enderby, Leicester LE9 2BX. TEL: 0116 222 2222 11. Last updated 2006
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 39 Other Services - Not provided by Leicestershire County Council Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service
1. Name of service Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service
2. Category of service Other Services provider
3. Current Guidance Circular 05/2005. on the issue The Fire Service is required to secure water from either potable or open water services to effectively fight fires under normal circumstances. The Code of Practice between all Fire Authorities and all Water Companies states:
Securing water for fire fighting purposes on new sites,
All new development should be considered at the planning stage with a view to securing water meeting fire-fighting needs. Both the fire service and water companies as consultees, should require provision of water for fire-fighting by developers/owners of new developments, or redevelopments when the needs are increased.
4. Type of facilities Hydrants and appropriate water mains with adequate pressure to for which provision supply them. Possible alternative sources of water for fire fighting may be needed include balancing lakes and underground tanks.
5. Type of Both residential and commercial development can trigger need. development which Storage and manufacturing uses raise particular needs. In the might trigger need case of potable water services, the cost of provision includes both hydrants and the supply to them through suitable water mains. i. Residential Adequate mains pressure to fight fires is a further consideration. ii. Other The Code recognises that water distribution systems are subject to external factors beyond the control of water companies that affect flow, such as peak demand and leaks. Alternative sources to the mains for fire-fighting water supply include balancing lakes and underground tanks. Where these are appropriate their provision will need to be negotiated between developers and local planning authorities in each case.
6. Form in which Land where required and either the costs of construction of payments should buildings or work in kind to the Chief Fire Officer’s specification be made
40 | Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire
7. Contributions to capital costs or revenue costs
8. Threshold for size Any form of development might compromise fire-fighting ability. of development for which contributions are appropriate
9.. Geographic areas Water for fire fighting is most often a problem in areas of greenfield where there is no development. spare capacity
10. Contact person Ian Cartwright Head of Community Risk Management Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service, Headquarters Anstey Frith Leicester Road Glenfield Leicester LE3 8HD Tel 0116-287-2241
11. Last updated October 2007
Statement of Requirements for Developer Contributions in Leicestershire | 41 Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013 Primary Schools in the Coalville and Ashby Area
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on Behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery office. © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Leicestershire County Council. 3636 100019271. Published 2010. 444 333222444 COALVILLE AND ASHBY 555333 BB555
BBB BBB BBB
555 555 555 000 000 000 2121 000 000 000 666 1515 666 1515 666 1515
777 777 777 888 11 888 11 888 55 555 55 555 3030 55 555 3030 BBB BBB BBB 222 AA555111222 3434 AA 22 99 3131 77 AshbyAshby dede lala ZouchZouch 3333 77 1717 2929 AAA 2929 WhitwickWhitwick 555 2020 111 88 111
66 CoalvilleCoalville 2424 3232 1212 222 444 1010 1111 AAA 1111 2626 3737 3535 2323 1818
A A A A A A A A A
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2525 4 4 4 2525 4 4 4 4 4 4 MeashamMeasham 1919 1414
BBB BBB 1616 BBB 1616 444 444 444 1111 111 111 1 111 44 11 44 666 666 IbstockIbstockIbstock 666 IbstockIbstockIbstock MM444 33 333 444222 999333 555 444999 888 555444 555 BBB555 555 BBB 2828 BBB 2727 2222 AAA 2222 AAA444 444444 444777
BagworthBagworth
1313 1313 BBB BBB555 555888 888555 Infant Schools 1 Blackfordby St Margaret’s Church of England 14 Ellistown Community Primary (Aided) Primary School School 2 Moira Infant School 15 Griffydam Primary School 3 St Denys Church of England Infant School 16 Heather Primary School Ibstock 17 Holy Cross Catholic Primary School, Whitwick, Junior Schools Leicestershire 28 Snarestone Church of England Primary School 4 Ibstock Junior School & Special Unit 18 Hugglescote Community Primary School 29 Swannington Church of England Primary Primary Schools 19 Measham Church of England Primary School School 5 Albert Village Community Primary School 20 New Swannington Primary School 30 Thringstone Primary School 6 All Saints Church of England Primary School 21 Newbold Church of England Primary School 31 Viscount Beaumont’s Church of England Coalville 22 Newton Burgoland Primary School Primary School 7 Ashby Hill Top Primary School 23 Oakthorpe Primary School 32 Warren Hills Community Primary School 8 Ashby Willesley Primary School 24 Packington Church of England Primary School 33 Whitwick St John The Baptist Church of 9 Ashby-de-la-Zouch Church of England 25 Saint Charles’s Catholic Primary School, England Primary School Primary School Measham, Leicestershire 34 Woodcote Primary School 10 Belvoirdale Community Primary School 26 Saint Clare’s Catholic Primary School, 35 Woodstone Community Primary School 11 Broom Leys School Coalville, Leicestershire 36 Worthington School 12 Donisthorpe Primary School 27 Sir John Moore Church of England Primary Special Schools 13 Dove Bank Primary School School 37 Forest Way School
30
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions Junior 20514. Ibstock -DfE School 3047 -DfE Denys ChurchSchool, Ibstock England3. St. Infant of 2. Moira Primary School - DfE 2007 5. Albert Village Community Primary School - DfE 2006 -DfE School Village Primary Community 5. Albert 3013 -DfE School Primary Church England (Aided) 1. Margaret’s of Blackfordby, St. Headteacher 4+ 11 to years 217880 01283 Village, Road,Occupation Swadlincote, Albert DE11 Derbys 8HA Susan SavageMrs 117 to years 260481 01530 LE67Melbourne Road, Leics 6NP Ibstock, Parkes Jo Mrs 4+ 7years to 01530 260004 LE67 Leics 6NL Ibstock, Close, Laud JaneMrs Sharp 4+ 11 to years 217450 01283 Moira, Swadlincote, Lane, Blackfordby DE12 Derbys 6EX AllenaMrs Bird 4+ 8years to 217702 01283 Main Blackfordby, Street, Swadlincote,Off DE11 Derbys 8AB Miss Susan Vernon address Postal
Telephone number 8.55am – 3.30pm (KS2) –3.30pm 8.55am (KS1) -3.25pm 8.55am 8.45am –3.20pm 8.55am –3.15pm 8.55am –3.10pm 8.45am –3.00pm Fax number Phasing in from Sept 2011 Sept Year 3 in from with Phasing address Email Website address Community Voluntary Controlled Community Voluntary Aided Community Community Age range Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary Opening times www.albertvillage.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 216132 01283 www.ibstockjuniorschool.org.uk [email protected] [email protected] 264292 01530 www.stdenysschool.com [email protected] 01530 263406 www.moirainfantschool.org.uk [email protected] 217450 01283 www.blackfordby.leics.sch.uk [email protected] - See page 40 for the admission policy of this school. this of policy admission the for 40 page See Partially Accessible - - - Pathway School School type Disabled access
Admission no. Admission Autumn 2012 Autumn 60 60 25 15 30 31
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013
6. All Saints Church of England Primary School, Coalville - DfE 3022
Ms Deborah May 01530 813675
Ashby Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 3LB [email protected] [email protected] 01530 832608
4+ to 11 years 9.00am – 3.15pm Voluntary Controlled - 27 COALVILLE AND ASHBY 7. Ashby Hill Top Primary School - DfE 2321
Mrs Di Mullan 01530 414283
Beaumont Avenue, Ashby De La Zouch, Leics LE65 2NF [email protected]
01530 415736 www.ashbyhilltop.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.55am – 3.25pm Community 39
8. Ashby Willesley Primary School - DfE 2167
Mrs Carolyn Beaton 01530 560412
Packington Nook Lane, Ashby De La Zouch, Leics LE65 2QG [email protected]
01530 413654 www.ashbywillesley.org.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.55am – 3.15pm Community Pathway School 50
9. Ashby De La Zouch Church of England Primary School - DfE 3212
Mrs Liz Powell 01530 411720
Burton Road, Ashby De La Zouch, Leics LE65 2LL [email protected]
01530 412243 www.ashbyce.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.20pm Voluntary Controlled 45
10. Belvoirdale Community Primary School - DfE 2020
Mrs Nicola Lenton 01530 815593
Scotlands Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 3RD [email protected]
01530 832595 www.belvoirdale.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.15pm Community Partially Accessible 45
32
Apply for a school place online: Unless otherwise stated all admissions are subject www.leics.gov.uk/admissions to the Local Authority’s admissions policy
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions 15. Griffydam Primary School - DfE 2028 -DfE School Primary 15. Griffydam 14. 2023 -DfE EllistownSchool Primary Community 13.Dove 2334 -DfE BankSchool Primary 2082 -DfE School 12. Primary Donisthorpe 2360 11. -DfE School Leys Broom Headteacher 4+ 11 to years 01530 222281 Top LE67 Leics 8HU Road, Griffydam, DianaMrs Payne 4+ 11 to years 260301 01530 Whitehill Road, Ellistown, LE67 Coalville, Leics 1EN James Margaret Mrs 4+ 11 to years 01530 262371 Road, Nailstone, Nuneaton, WarksBagworth CV13 0QJ Owen Mr Robert 4+ 11 to years 270371 01530 Road,Ashby Swadlincote, Donisthorpe, DE12 Derbys 7QF Ms Sylvie Newman 4+ 11 to years 01530 832234 Road, Leys LE67 Coalville,Broom Leics 4DB Prior Mr Robert address Postal Telephone number 8.50am –3.15pm 8.45am –3.15pm 8.55am –3.10pm 8.50am –3.10pm (KS2) –3.25pm 8.50am –3.15pm8.50am (KS1) Fax number address Email Website address Community Community Community Community Community Age range
Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary Opening times www.griffydam.leics.sch.uk [email protected] [email protected] 01530 222281 - [email protected] 01530 262828 www.dovebank.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 01530 262371 www.donisthorpe.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 27207401530 www.broom-leys.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 814105 01530 Pathway School Partially Accessible Partially Accessible Pathway School School type Disabled access Admission no. Admission Autumn 2012 Autumn 15 30 15 25 83 33
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013
16. Heather Primary School - DfE 2043
Ms Lou Harrison 01530 260257
Main Street, Heather, Coalville, Leics LE67 2QP [email protected]
01530 260257 www.heather.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.55am – 3.15pm Community - 15 COALVILLE AND ASHBY 17. Holy Cross Catholic Primary School, Whitwick, Leicestershire - DfE 3340 See page 41 for the admission policy of this school.
Ms Anne Noon 01530 832799
Parsonwood Hill, Whitwick, Leics LE67 5AT [email protected]
01530 832799 www.holycrosswhitwick.org.uk
9.00am – 3.15pm (Yrs 4+ -2) 4+ to 11 years Voluntary Aided Partially Accessible 30 9.00am – 3.20pm (Yrs 3-6)
18. Hugglescote Community Primary School - DfE 2024
Mrs Ann Husband 01530 817108
[email protected] Ashburton Road, Hugglescote, Coalville, Leics LE67 2HA [email protected]
01530 832721 www.hugglescote.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.15pm Community Partially Accessible 60
19. Measham Church of England Primary School - DfE 3060
Mr Derek Mullan 01530 272245
Bosworth Road, Measham, Swadlincote, Derbys DE12 7LG [email protected]
01530 271019 www.meashamschool.org
4+ to 11 years 8.45am – 3.15pm Voluntary Controlled Partially Accessible 30
20. New Swannington Primary School - DfE 2026
Mrs Rachel Rees-Jones 01530 832656
Church Lane, Whitwick, Leics LE67 5DQ [email protected]
01530 832656 www.newswanningtonprimary.org.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.55am – 3.15pm Community Pathway School 29
34
Apply for a school place online: Unless otherwise stated all admissions are subject www.leics.gov.uk/admissions to the Local Authority’s admissions policy
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions 3068 -DfE ChurchSchool 24. England Primary of Packington 2083 -DfE School Primary 23. Oakthorpe 2097 -DfE School Primary Burgoland 22. Newton 3066 21. -DfE NewboldChurchSchool England Primary of 25. Saint Charles’ Catholic Primary School, Measham, Leicestershire - DfE 3338 25. - DfE Saint Charles’ School, Measham, Catholic Primary Leicestershire Headteacher 01530 270572 01530 Road, Measham, Swadlincote,Bosworth DE12 Derbys 7LQ Smith Frances Mrs 4+ 11 to years 4+ 11 to years 412425 01530 LE65 Zouch, 1WL Leics Mill La De Ashby Packington, Street, Price Carol Mrs 4+ 11 to years 270383 01530 Swadlincote, Oakthorpe, DE12 Derbys Street, School 7RE Ms Donna Moulds 4+ 11 to years 270320 01530 Burgoland, LE67 Leics Newton 2SL Lane, School Sue WardMrs 4+ 11 to yrs 01530 222318 LE67 Coalville, Leics 8PF Coleorton, Newbold Lane, School JulieMrs Cooper address Postal
Telephone number 8.55am –3.30pm 8.55am –3.15pm 8.45am –3.00pm 8.45am –3.20pm 8.50am –3.15pm Fax number address Email Website address Voluntary Aided Voluntary Controlled Community Community Voluntary Controlled Age range Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary Opening times See page 41 for the admission policy of this school. this of policy 41 page See admission the for www.st-charles.leics.sch.uk [email protected] [email protected] 270572 01530 www.packington.leics.sch.uk [email protected] [email protected] 412425 01530 www.oakthorpeprimary.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] 27492501530 www.newburland.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 270320 01530 www.newbold-cecp.leics.sch.uk [email protected] - - Pathway School Pathway School Partially Accessible Pathway School School type Disabled access Admission no. Admission Autumn 2012 Autumn 17 15 15 12 10 35
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013
26. Saint Clare’s Catholic Primary School, Coalville, Leicestershire - DfE 3348 See page 41 for the admission policy of this school.
Mrs Jane Monaghan 01530 815746
Convent Drive, Coalville, Leics LE67 3SF [email protected]
01530 837747 -
4+ to 11 years 8.55am – 3.15pm Voluntary Aided Partially Accessible 30 COALVILLE AND ASHBY 27. Sir John Moore Church of England Primary School - DfE 3300 See page 39 for the admission policy of this school.
Mrs Judith Boston 01530 515108
Top Street, Appleby Magna, Swadlincote, Derbys DE12 7AH [email protected]
01530 270330 www.sirjohnmoore.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 9.00am – 3.30pm Voluntary Aided Partially Accessible 20
28. Snarestone C of E Primary School - DfE 3316 See page 39 for the admission policy of this school.
Mr David Maksymiw 01530 270598
[email protected] Main Street, Snarestone, Swadlincote, Derbys DE12 7DB [email protected]
01530 270598 -
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.20pm Voluntary Aided - 12
29. Swannington Church of England Primary School - DfE 3089
Ms Michele King 01530 832655
Main Street, Swannington, Coalville, Leics LE67 8QJ [email protected]
01530 832655 www.swann.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.05pm Voluntary Controlled - 15
30. Thringstone Primary School - DfE 2164
Mrs Ella Roberts 01530 224913
Hensons Lane, Thringstone, Coalville, Leics LE67 8LJ [email protected]
01530 222489 www.thringstone.leics.sch.uk
8.50am – 3.15pm (KS1) 4+ to 11 years Community Partially Accessible 30 8.50am – 3.20pm (KS2)
36
Apply for a school place online: Unless otherwise stated all admissions are subject www.leics.gov.uk/admissions to the Local Authority’s admissions policy
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions 34. Woodcote Primary School - DfE 2373 -DfE School Primary Woodcote 34. 32. Warren 2177 Hills -DfE School Primary Community 35. Woodstone Community Primary School - DfE 2025 -DfE School Primary 35. Woodstone Community 3101 -DfE ChurchSchool England StJohn Primary of The Baptist 33. Whitwick, 31. Viscount Beaumont’s 3305 -DfE ChurchSchool England Primary of Headteacher 4+ 11 to years 519473 01530 Ravenstone, Lane, LE67 Coalville,Heather Leics 2AH Mr Patrick Mullins 4+ 11 to years 417007 01530 LE65 Zouch, 1JX Leics La Willowbrook De Ashby Close, Mr Ian Watson 4+ 11 to years 832116 01530 Hill,Parsonwood LE67 Leics 5AT Whitwick, ChristineMrs Killip 4+ 11 to years 01530 834030 Drive, LE67 Coalville,Stamford Leics 4TA Mr David Lloyd 4+ 11 to years 412480 01530 LE67 Coalville, Leics 8FD Road,Ashby Coleorton, Lewis Ms Carolyn address Postal Telephone number 8.55am –3.15pm 8.55am –3.15pm 8.40am –3.00pm 8.40am –3.15pm (KS2) –3.05pm 8.40am (KS1) –3.00pm 8.40am Fax number address Email Website address Voluntary Controlled Community Community Community Voluntary Aided Age range
Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary
See page 40 for the admission policy of this school. this of policy admission the for 40 page See Opening times www.woodstoneprimary.co.uk [email protected] [email protected] 837714 01530 www.woodcoteprimary.com [email protected] 412712 01530 www.whitwickce.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 810526 01530 www.warrenhills.leics.sch.uk (Headteacher) [email protected] [email protected] 830177 01530 www.viscountbeaumonts.leics.sch.uk [email protected] 01530 416805 Pathway School Partially Accessible Pathway School - Pathway School School type Disabled access Admission no. Admission Autumn 2012 Autumn 50 30 30 30 16 37
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013
36. Worthington School - DfE 2104
Miss Amanda New 01530 222319
[email protected] Main Street, Worthington, Ashby De La Zouch, Leics LE65 1RQ [email protected]
01530 222319 www.worthington.leics.sch.uk
4+ to 11 years 8.50am – 3.20pm Community - 10 COALVILLE AND ASHBY
Special School Admissions to this school are subject to the child’s Statement of Special Educational Needs.
37. Forest Way School - DfE 7008 Area School for Pupils with Complex, Moderate, Severe and Profound Learning Difficulties
Mrs Lynn Slinger 01530 814069
Warren Hills Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 4UU [email protected]
01530 831899 -
3 to 18 years 9.00am – 3.20pm Community Special - 174
Special Units in Mainstream Schools Units which cater largely for Moderate Learning Difficulties are provided at the following schools. Admissions to these units are subject to the child’s Statement of Special Educational Needs.
3. St. Denys Church of England Infant School, Ibstock - DfE 3047
Mrs Jane Sharp 01530 263406
Laud Close, Ibstock, Leics LE67 6NL [email protected]
01530 260004 www.stdenysschool.com
5 to 7 years 8.55am – 3.15pm Voluntary Controlled - -
4. Ibstock Junior School - DfE 2051
Mrs Jo Parkes 01530 264292
[email protected] Melbourne Road, Ibstock, Leics LE67 6NP [email protected]
01530 260481 www.ibstockjuniorschool.leics.sch.uk
7 to 11 years 8.45am – 3.20pm Community Partially Accessible -
38
Apply for a school place online: Unless otherwise stated all admissions are subject www.leics.gov.uk/admissions to the Local Authority’s admissions policy
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions 3. 2. 1. Snarestone CofEPrimary School full for the school contact Please guidance and definitions. system. apublic entrance front meets highwayhome property’s to the school’s main designated gate, using mapping acomputerised will to the school is closest awarded be the place. Measurement distance of is in astraight line the point from that the atieTie to Breaker: operate breaker children for Should who fulfil necessary itsame be the criteria, the child residence whose 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Sir JohnMooreChurchofEnglandPrimary School,ApplebyMagna (VA, Trust, Foundation) School admissionpoliciesforownschools 18. Hugglescote Community Primary School - DfE 2024 -DfE School Primary Community 18. Hugglescote Headteacher different addresses during the addresses weekshoulddifferent living be within the parish the of time. 50% at for least Children permanent whose parental home is in the parish Children Snarestone. of who live at parents with different admissions. Two this for criterion will places but should reserved they be taken not be they will back toof the general pool revert the school. evidence relevant In from such professionals is the required cases application. to support Children with documented acute medical or social who, needs in the view would a place thefrom of Governors, at benefit Primary Snarestone school. to attend apreference Children who express (LA) in Authority the of the Local care the of time. 50% for area during ChildrenDeed. the who addresses weekshould live at different living parents be with different in the catchment Children living parents of in the Chilcote, parishes of Measham, Swepstone and as defined Snarestone in the historic Trust is appropriate and thethat difficulties the child would if theyrequiredexperience were anotherschool. to attend their from letter or GP Social Worker. should Parents aware be that out clearly to set they why need in the school question the school. It is thatwith essential provide thedocumentation parents Governors their to support application including a Children with documented acute medical or social who, needs in the view the would of a governors, placefrom at benefit religious tradition. their or religious Applicants from will priest support of leader. aletter need Children who are practising parents of other of faiths, members and its of this desire them to attend because school Churches Together their from in Aletter minister Leicestershire. should accompany this application. Children are regular parents whose another of worshippers Anglican Church or Christian denomination as defined by minister should accompany this application. Children who are regular parents of in worshippers the Anglican churches the of Appleby their Group. from Aletter siblingsadopted or fostered and who will attending be on the the date school admission. of Children who already parents of have or daughter ason attending the school, including step-siblings, half-siblings and during the addresses weekshould at different living parents be with different in the catchment the of time. 50% for area Children living parents of in the Appleby Children parishes of Magna, who Applebyand live Stretton-en-le-Fields. Parva Children in Authority. the of the Local care 7 to 117 to years 832721 01530 LE67 Coalville, Leics 2HA Road, Hugglescote, Ashburton Husband Ann Mrs address Postal Telephone number 8.55am –3.15pm Fax number address Email Website address Community Age range Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary Opening times www.hugglescote.leics.sch.uk [email protected] [email protected] 817108 01530 Partially Accessible School type Disabled access Admission no. Admission Autumn 2012 Autumn - 39
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Primary Education 2012-2013
4. Children with siblings* who are already attending the school at the time of the requested admission. 5. Children of parents who are regular worshippers in the Anglican churches of the Appleby Group. A letter of support from their minister should accompany this application. 6. Children of parents who are regular worshippers in other Anglican churches (or Christian denomination as defined by Churches Together in Leicestershire). A letter of support from their minister should accompany this application. 7. Children of parents who are practising members of other faiths and desire their child(ren) to attend this school because of its religious tradition. A letter of support from their religious leader should accompany this application. *Siblings are defined as brothers, sisters, half-brothers and sisters, foster children, children of partners living together or legally adopted children regarded as brothers or sisters.
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Should it be necessary to operate a tie-breaker for children who fulfil the same criteria, the child whose residence is closest to the school, as measured in a straight line from the main entrance of the school to the front door of the child’s residence, will be awarded the place. In the event of an appeal, where distance is the issue in question, the Diocesan Board of Education surveyors will be asked to measure the distance. A child who is subject to a Statement of Special Educational Needs in which Snarestone is the ‘named’ school shall be entitled to a place in the relevant year group. This may reduce the number of places available for offer in any year. Please contact school for full guidance and definitions.
St. Margaret’s Church of England (Aided) Primary School, Blackfordby 1. Children who are designated as “Children in Care” by the Local Authority [Leicestershire County Council] pursuant to Section 31, 3c of the Children Act 1989 or children accommodated by a local authority pursuant to Section 20 of the Children Act 1989. 2. Siblings (that is brothers or sisters, stepchildren, legally adopted children and foster children regarded as brothers or sisters, and children of partners living together) living at the same address as children currently within the school, on the date that they start school. 3. Children whose parents live and / or worship in the parish of Christ the Redeemer. Applications from those who worship within the parish churches should be supported by a minister’s letter. 4. Children whose parents are regular worshippers in other Anglican churches beyond the parish boundary. Applications should be supported by a minister’s letter. 5. Children whose parents are regular worshippers in other Christian denominations or regular worshippers of another faith. Again, applications should be supported by a letter from the minister or other faith leader. Tie-Breaker: Should it be necessary to operate a tie-breaker, then those who qualify for a place within the one particular criterion above will be chosen according to ‘Measurement of distance in a direct line from home to school using a computerised system’. Please contact school for full guidance and definitions.
Viscount Beaumont’s Church of England Primary School, Coleorton 1. Children who are looked after in public care. 2. Children of parents who live in the parishes of Coleorton and Peggs Green. 3. Children of parents who worship (application to be supported by a letter from your church minister) in the parishes of Coleorton and Peggs Green. 4. Children who have siblings in school, that is brothers, sisters, half brothers, half sisters or who have children living at the same address who share a parent in the school on the date of admission. 5. Children of parents who are regular worshippers (application to be supported by a letter from your church minister) in Christian churches as defined by Churches Together in Leicestershire and who request a place on denominational grounds. In the event of over-subscription, places will be allocated to children who live closest to the school as drawn in a straight line. Measurement of distance is direct line from home to school using a computerised system. In the event of any dispute over distance that results in an appeal, the Diocesan Board of Education will have the distances measured professionally. Please contact school for full guidance and definitions.
40
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions 40
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions Please contact school for full for school contact Please guidance and definitions. the use same definition school each of TheSchool governors Leicestershire’.Authority.‘Starting by Local in theas used See /Carers Note 5–Parents the use same definition school each of TheSchool governors Leicestershire’.Authority.‘Starting by Local in theas used See Note 4–Place Residence of the use same definition school each of TheSchool governors Leicestershire’.Authority.‘Starting by Local in theas used See Note 3–Definition and of brothers sisters (siblings) 3. 2. 1. Note 2–DefinitionCatholicof he / she is admitted to school. application his for /her admission is made and canconfirm, Authority whowill the Local still at the time after be looked when A child byin authority alocal with accordance who 22 the is of after Children’s looked Section 1989 Act (b) at the time Note 1–Definitionof Child in PublicCare after) (Looked allocated by drawing lots. admissions number. If however, admission would result in the legal limit 30 of children being exceeded, then the place will be if thereis no other way separating of the applications then will the governors admit the additional child above the planned a place (eg children who live or have at the same address the same distance measurement). In this exceptional situation, it may the applications possible to not decide fewbe cases, In between avery pupils those of who are the final qualifiers for public highway to the school’s main designated gate, front using mapping acomputerised system). (measurement distance of is in astraight line entrance front (including the point from that the home property’s a flats) meets Tie Breaker: remains If any the of categories will oversubscribed, preference given be to children living the school nearest 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. VerificationMass if Form this issued.been has 1-3,In categories (after sibling priority priority) will given be to children have /carers completed and parents whose returneda time admission. of atthe the school proposed in priority all willFirst categories given be to siblings (see note 3) that is, children who will attending have or sisters brothers admitting children above the published admissions number tothat schools are already full. authority,local especially vulnerable, a place the most at asuitable as quickly are offered school as possible. This includes Authorities areLocal required to have Fairin Protocols orderto make sure Access that unplaced children who live in the home number available. places of details further for In School Leicestershire’ about special ‘Starting provision. See needs Children who have Special of astatement Educational which Needs will names the school admitted. be This will the reduce Saint Charles’CatholicPrimary School,Measham Saint Clare’sCatholicPrimary School,Coalville Holy CrossCatholicPrimary School,Whitwick the Catholic church to keep appropriate (parishes are requested records). A child who, with his or her family, is preparation enrolled of leading course in arecognised to baptism into or reception A child baptised in another Christian denomination into who received hasfull been communion with the Catholic Church Bishop Rome. of (Pope Advice available Benedict XVI) Education Diocesan Service. from A child baptised in the Catholic Church (Roman are rites) in members rite whose or Eastern full communion with the childrenOther and whom for no Supplementary those Form received. has been Children who are other baptised of churches or dedicated members which belong to ‘ChurchesTogether in England’. childrenOther who are in (see authority alocal note of the 1). care Catholic (see note 2) children living parish(es). outside these Catholic (see note 2) children living in the parish(es) by the school. served Catholic children who are 1and in (see authority 2). alocal notes of the care Your Guideto2012-2013 Education Primary www.leics.gov.uk/admissions Apply foraschool placeonline: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions Apply foraschoolplaceonline: 41
COALVILLE AND ASHBY Your Guide to Secondary Education 2012-2013 Secondary Schools in the Coalville and Ashby Area
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on Behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery office. © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Leicestershire County Council. 222444 555333222 COALVILLE AND ASHBY 100019271. Published 2010. BB555
BBB BBB BBB
555 555 555 000 000 000 000 000 000 666 666 666
777 777 777 888 888 888 555 555 555 BBB BBB 222 BBB 555111222 AA555
33 55 AshbyAshby dede lala ZouchZouch WhitwickWhitwick
AA555 AA555111111 66 11
CoalvilleCoalville
77 222 77 444 44 AAA
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
A A A A A A MeashamMeasham A A A
BBB BBB 444 444 IbstockIbstockIbstock 111 22 IbstockIbstockIbstock 111 22 111 22 111 111 MM 666 MM444 666 333 444222 333 555 999 888 444 555888 555 555 BBB BBB
AAA 444 444 444
BagworthBagworth BB BB555888 888555 High Schools 1 Castle Rock High School (11-14) 2 Ibstock Community College (11-14) 3 Ivanhoe College Ashby de la Zouch (11-14) 4 Newbridge High School (11-14) Upper Schools 5 Ashby School (14-19) 6 King Edward VII Community College (14-19) Special Schools 7 Forest Way School
30
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions Your Guide to Secondary Education 2012-2013
1. Castle Rock High School - DfE 4035
Mrs Julia Patrick 01530 830485 [email protected] Meadow Lane, Coalville, Leics LE67 4BR [email protected] 01530 834368 www.castlerock.leics.sch.uk
11 to 14 8.40 am – Community Partially Sports 200 165 years 3.10 pm Accessible
2. Ibstock Community College - DfE 4012
Mr David King 01530 265831
Central Avenue, Ibstock, Leics LE67 6NE [email protected] COALVILLE AND ASHBY COALVILLE 01530 260705 www.ibstockcollege.leics.sch.uk
11 to 14 8.35 am – Community Technology - 235 191 years 3.15 pm
3. Ivanhoe College, Ashby De La Zouch* - DfE 4028
Mrs Anne-Marie Blewitt 01530 412146
North Street, Ashby De La Zouch, Leics LE65 1HX [email protected]
01530 412756 www.ivanhoecollege.leics.sch.uk
11 to 14 8.40 am – Community Pathway Technology 304 292 years 3.20 pm School
4. Newbridge High School - DfE 4007
Mrs Pat Young 01530 276440
Forest Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 3SJ [email protected]
01530 831561 www.newbridgehs.leics.sch.uk
8.45 am – 3.15 pm 11 to 14 Partially Mon-Thurs, Community Sports 180 168 years Accessible 8.45 am – 2.45 pm Fri
5. Ashby School** - DfE 4508
Mr Eddie Green 01530 560665 [email protected] Nottingham Road, Ashby de la Zouch, Leics LE65 1DT [email protected] 01530 413748 www.ashbyschool.org.uk
14 to 19 8.45 am – Voluntary Pathway Languages & 540 540 years 3.05 pm Controlled School Technology
*+5 for Ashby Boarding House **+81 External 6th Form Admission Number 31
Postal Telephone Email Website Opening Disabled School Admission no. No. of requests Headteacher Fax number Age range School type address number address address times access Specialism Autumn 2012 agreed by June 2011 Your Guide to Secondary Education 2012-2013
6. King Edward Vii Science And Sport College - DfE 4001
Mr Noel Melvin 01530 832268
Warren Hills Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 4UW [email protected]
01530 834925 www.kinged.org.uk
14 to 19 8.55 am – Community Science & 420 335 years 3.10 pm Sports COALVILLE AND ASHBY Special Schools Admissions to this school are subject to the child’s Statement of Special Educational Needs.
7. Forest Way School - DfE 7008
Mrs Lynn Slinger 01530 814069
Warren Hills Road, Coalville, Leics LE67 4UU [email protected]
01530 831899 -
3 to 18 8.50 am – Community 174 years 3.20 pm Special
APPLY ONLINE IT’S EASY & SECURE! Closing Date: 31st October 2011 www.leics.gov.uk/admissions
32
Apply for a school place online: Unless otherwise stated all admissions are subject www.leics.gov.uk/admissions to the Local Authority’s admissions policy
Apply for a school place online: www.leics.gov.uk/admissions JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
School:All Saints Church of England Primary Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards School Coalville Age Range:4-11 Status: Voluntary Controlled Approved Net Capacity: 189 Max Capacity: 210 DfE : 3022 Approved Admission Number: 27
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
240 220 200 l 180 Actual NOR 160 Capacity 140 No Housing Incl. Housing 120 Numbers on on on on on on Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Roll Roll Roll Roll Roll 100 80 60 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing All Saints Church of England Primary School Coalville Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 14 24 16 23 14 24 21 136 53 28.0 2012 19 13 24 16 22 15 23 132 57 30.2 2013 25 18 13 25 15 24 15 135 54 28.6 2014 19 24 18 13 24 17 23 138 51 27.0 2015 28 18 24 18 12 27 17 144 45 23.8 2016 24 27 18 25 17 13 26 150 39 20.6
3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing All Saints Church of England Primary School Coalville Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 14 24 16 23 14 24 21 136 53 28.0 2012 19 13 24 16 22 15 23 132 57 30.2 2013 26 19 14 26 16 25 16 142 47 24.9 2014 21 26 20 15 26 19 25 152 37 19.6 2015 31 21 27 21 15 30 20 165 24 12. 7 2016 28 31 22 29 21 17 30 178 11 5.8
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & Births History Feeder Known Births January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total 19 2007 17 19 22 26 17 24 25 150 16 2008 25 17 20 25 24 24 26 161 29 2009 17 22 15 19 23 23 22 141 13 2010 25 17 23 15 20 22 23 145 2011 14 24 16 23 14 24 21 136
5. Births Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 4+ Limited Not limited Manual From To Births for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 24 2012 22 22 -3 2012 2013 272 2013 252 252 - 2013 2014 21 2014 19 19 - 2014 2015 31 2015 27 28 - 2015 2016 26 2016 24 24 - ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Total 10+ Intake for the given year Revised 4 yr ave children 2011 2012 19 79.2 91.5
6. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Pre-calculated Births to R Percentage % Percentages Chosen Latest year: 107.7 Average for last 4 years: 105.2 Weighted Average for last 4 years: 104.5104.5 Own estimate 91.5 Y
7. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 4 to 5 Age 5 to 6 Age 6 to 7 Age 7 to 8 Age 8 to 9 Age 9 to 10 groups Chosen Latest year 96.0 94.1 100.0 93.3 120.0 95.5 4 yyearear averaaveragege 95.2 98.7 102.5 95.3 110.7 98.9 4 year Weighted Average 96.2 96.9 100.6 96.0 112.4 97.3 Own estimate 95.2 98.7 102.5 96.0 110.7 97.3 Y
8. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 104 No of Flats to be Occupied 6 Estimated Housingg Gains after 5 Years 26
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
School:Broom Leys School Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards
Age Range:4-11 Status: Community Approved Net Capacity: 585 Max Capacity: 651 DfE : 2360 Approved Admission Number: 83
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
660
640
620 l Actual NOR 600 Capacity 580 No Housing 560 Incl. Housing
Numbers on on on on on on Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Roll Roll Roll Roll Roll 540
520
500 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing Broom Leys School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 86 84 85 93 83 81 83 595 -10 2012 81 87 82 86 89 81 81 587 -2 2013 87 82 85 83 82 87 81 587 -2 2014 86 88 80 86 79 80 87 586 -1 2015 73 87 86 81 82 77 80 566 19 3.2 2016 82 74 85 87 78 80 77 563 22 3.8
3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing Broom Leys School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 86 84 85 93 83 81 83 595 -10 2012 81 87 82 86 89 81 81 587 -2 2013 87 82 85 83 82 87 81 587 -2 2014 86 88 80 86 79 80 87 586 -1 2015 73 87 86 81 82 77 80 566 19 323.2 2016 82 74 85 87 78 80 77 563 22 3.8
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & Births History Feeder Known Births January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total 96 2007 87 89 88 84 83 90 73 594 105 2008 93 88 89 89 81 86 91 617 113 2009 84 93 89 89 86 80 84 605 109 2010 86 88 90 88 85 85 82 604 2011 86 84 85 93 83 81 83 595
5. Births Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 4+ Limited Not limited Manual From To Births for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 93 2012 82 82 -1 2012 2013 99 2013 83 878 - 2013 2014 98 2014 83 86 - 2014 2015 83 2015 73 73 - 2015 2016 93 2016 82 82 - ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Total 10+ Intake for the given year Revised 4 yr ave children 2011 2012 81 87.1 80.2
6. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Pre-calculated Births to R Percentage % Percentages Chosen Latest year: 78.9 Average for last 4 years: 82.5 Weighted Average for last 4 years: 80.280.2 Own estimate 87.9 Y
7. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 4 to 5 Age 5 to 6 Age 6 to 7 Age 7 to 8 Age 8 to 9 Age 9 to 10 groups Chosen Latest year 97.7 96.6 103.3 94.3 95.3 97.6 4 yyearear averaaveragege 100.9 98.6 100.8 95.7 99.1 99.7 4 year Weighted Average 100.2 97.7 101.5 95.2 97.5 99.2 Own estimate 100.9 97.7 100.8 95.7 97.5 99.7 Y
8. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 0 No of Flats to be Occupied 0 Estimated Housingg Gains after 5 Years 0
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
School:New Swannington Primary School Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards
Age Range:4-11 Status: Community Approved Net Capacity: 203 Max Capacity: 207 DfE : 2026 Approved Admission Number: 29
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
260
240 l 220 Actual NOR Capacity 200 No Housing Incl. Housing 180 Numbers on on on on on on Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Roll Roll Roll Roll Roll
160
140 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing New Swannington Primary School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 31 28 27 29 27 33 27 202 1 0.5 2012 25 31 29 27 29 27 35 203 0 2013 31 25 32 29 27 29 29 202 1 0.5 2014 28 31 26 32 29 27 31 204 -1 2015 35 28 32 26 32 29 29 211 -8 2016 31 35 29 32 26 32 31 216 -13
3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing New Swannington Primary School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 31 28 27 29 27 33 27 202 1 0.5 2012 25 31 29 27 29 27 35 203 0 2013 31 25 32 29 27 29 29 202 1 0.5 2014 28 31 26 32 29 27 31 204 -1 2015 35 28 32 26 32 29 29 211 -8 2016 31 35 29 32 26 32 31 216 -13
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & Births History Feeder Known Births January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total 31 2007 25 29 29 28 27 25 30 193 23 2008 29 25 29 25 28 29 28 193 26 2009 24 28 26 31 24 26 29 188 29 2010 28 24 29 27 33 23 26 190 2011 31 28 27 29 27 33 27 202
5. Births Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 4+ Limited Not limited Manual From To Births for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 27 2012 28 28 -3 2012 2013 30 2013 29 31 - 2013 2014 27 2014 28 28 - 2014 2015 34 2015 29 35 - 2015 2016 30 2016 29 31 - ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Total 10+ Intake for the given year Revised 4 yr ave children 2011 2012 23 85.2 101.0
6. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Pre-calculated Births to R Percentage % Percentages Chosen Latest year: 106.9 Average for last 4 years: 102.8 Y Weighted Average for last 4 years: 105.4105.4 Own estimate
7. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 4 to 5 Age 5 to 6 Age 6 to 7 Age 7 to 8 Age 8 to 9 Age 9 to 10 groups Chosen Latest year 100.0 112.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 117.4 4 yyearear averaaveragege 99.1 104.7 99.1 100.9 99.1 106.8 4 year Weighted Average 99.5 107.8 100.6 101.0 98.6 109.9 Own estimate 99.5 104.7 99.1 100.9 99.1 106.8 Y
8. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 0 No of Flats to be Occupied 0 Estimated Housingg Gains after 5 Years 0
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
School:Whitwick St John The Baptist Church Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards of England Primary School Age Range:4-11 Status: Voluntary Controlled Approved Net Capacity: 350 Max Capacity: 386 DfE : 3101 Approved Admission Number: 50
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
400 380 360
l 340 Actual NOR 320 Capacity 300 No Housing 280 Incl. Housing 260 Numbers on on on on on on Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Roll Roll Roll Roll Roll 240 220 200 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing Whitwick St John The Baptist Church of England Primary School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 51 49 42 48 46 38 39 313 37 10.6 2012 50 52 51 45 50 45 38 331 19 5.4 2013 50 51 54 55 47 49 46 352 -2 2014 44 51 53 58 58 46 50 360 -10 2015 45 45 53 57 61 57 47 365 -15 2016 50 46 47 57 60 60 58 378 -28
3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing Whitwick St John The Baptist Church of England Primary School Surplus January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total places % 2011 51 49 42 48 46 38 39 313 37 10.6 2012 50 52 51 45 50 45 38 331 19 5.4 2013 50 51 54 55 47 49 46 352 -2 2014 44 51 53 58 58 46 50 360 -10 2015 46 46 54 58 62 58 48 372 -22 2016 51 47 48 58 61 61 59 385 -35
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & Births History Feeder Known Births January 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ Total 53 2007 38 30 29 37 48 42 35 259 36 2008 43 41 34 34 39 44 42 277 34 2009 45 45 41 36 35 37 44 283 45 2010 48 42 47 44 38 38 38 295 2011 51 49 42 48 46 38 39 313
5. Births Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 4+ Limited Not limited Manual From To Births for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 64 2012 50 62 CAP 2012 2013 55 2013 500 533 CAP 2013 2014 45 2014 44 44 - 2014 2015 46 2015 45 45 - 2015 2016 53 2016 50 52 CAP ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Total 10+ Intake for the given year Revised 4 yr ave children 2011 2012 50 78.1 108.4
6. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Pre-calculated Births to R Percentage % Percentages Chosen Latest year: 113.3 Average for last 4 years: 111.3 Weighted Average for last 4 years: 118.8118.8 Own estimate 97.2 Y
7. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 4 to 5 Age 5 to 6 Age 6 to 7 Age 7 to 8 Age 8 to 9 Age 9 to 10 groups Chosen Latest year 102.1 100.0 102.1 104.5 100.0 102.6 4 yyearear averaaveragege 101.7 103.8 107.3 104.6 98.1 101.2 Y 4 year Weighted Average 100.9 102.4 105.5 104.6 100.6 102.0 Own estimate
8. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 15 No of Flats to be Occupied 0 Estimated Housingg Gains after 5 Years 5
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Primary School Forecast 13/12/2011 ! s E llunlaa d Roll ! = 6 s HggEe'g T cz 63 o o s o s D F E tn 6 , .tt o I I F b TI' o a o (,t tr D T a ln I ct o =U { llr o vt R t n o =D o Io il I vt .l' Io {o = o $ o $ T o 6 JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 10 YEARS
School:Coalville Castle Rock High School Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards
Age Range:11-14 Status: Community Approved Net Capacity: 600 Max Capacity: 633 DfE : 4035 Approved Admission Number: 200
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
840
740 l 640 Incl. Housing No Housing 540 Capacity Actual NOR 440 Numbers on Numbers on Numbers on Numbers on Roll Roll Roll Roll Numbers on Roll
340
240 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing Coalville Castle Rock Highg School Surplusp January 11+ 12+ 13+ Total places % 2011 150 184 172 506 94 15.7 2012 165 150 187 502 98 16.3 2013 171 165 152 488 112 18.7 2014 167 170 168 505 95 15.8 2015 189 166 173 528 72 12.0 2016 163 188 169 520 80 13.3 2017 178 163 191 532 68 11.3 2018 182 177 166 525 75 12.5 2019 176 181 180 537 63 10.5 2020 177 175 184 536 64 10.7 2021 171 176 178 525 75 12.5
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing Coalville Castle Rock High School Surplus January 11+ 12+ 13+ TOTAL places % 2011 150 184 172 506 94 15.7 2012 165 150 187 502 98 16.3 2013 171 165 152 488 112 18.7 2014 167 170 168 505 95 15.8 2015 190 167 174 531 69 11.5 2016 164 189 170 523 77 12.8 2017 179 164 192 535 65 10.8 2018 183 178 167 528 72 12.0 2019 177 182 181 540 60 10.0 2020 178 176 185 539 61 10.2 2021 172 177 179 528 72 12.0
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & 10+ Feeder History Linked 10+ January 11+ 12+ 13+ Total 166 2007 158 161 176 495 175 2008 152 163 171 486 180 2009 175 150 162 487 164 2010 183 169 152 504 2011 150 184 172 506
5. Primary School Number on Roll for Current Academic Year January 2011 NOR from linked Primary/Infant/Junior schools School DCSF No. 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ NEW SWANNINGTON PRIMARY SCHOOL 2026 28 31 26 31 28 27 29 27 33 27 COALVILLE WARREN HILLS PRIMARY SCHOOL 2177 23 19 30 24 27 18 30 20 28 28
COALVILLE BROOM LEYS SCHOOL 2360 86 87 78 86 84 85 93 83 81 83 WHITWICK ST JOHN THE BAPTIST PRIM.SCHOOL 3101 44 50 53 51 49 42 48 46 38 39
Total 181 187 187 192 188 172 200 176 180 177
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 3 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 6. 10+ Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 11+ Limited Not limited Manual From To 10+ for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 177 2012 168 168 -3 2012 2013 180 2013 171 171 - 2013 2014 176 2014 167 167 - 2014 2015 200 2015 189 189 - 2015 2016 172 2016 163 163 - 2016 2017 188 2017 178 178 - 2017 2018 192 2018 182 182 - 2018 2019 187 2019 177 177 -1 2019 2020 187 2020 177 177 - 2020 2021 181 2021 171 171 - ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Revised 4 yr Total 11+ Intake for the given year children ave 2011 2012 165 93. 2 96. 7
7. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Percentage Pre-calculated Yr6 to Yr7 Percentages % Chosen Latest year: 91.5 Average for last 4 years: 96.4 OtitOwn estimate 94.794 7 Y
8. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 11 to 12 Age 12 to 13 groups Chosen Latest year 100.5 101.8 4 yearyg average 99.7 101.9 Own estimate 99.7 101.6 Y
9. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 15 No of Flats to be Occupied 0 Estimated Housing Gains after 5 Years 2
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 4 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 o e@@{oor}(,o r c) c si;ateFg ?frg z$ t- AA=:e'nE.g=R,g=*o J R 'n a = = =€ E€=EEgo=r E EI l -ol, -* o x z d o o (D .{i U' 3 *ot N e o o o rn F rn t', rrr F, ln rt rn 33 l\rN I z (o to (rr 9) 90 5 $$Hs$$$ o N tC)
=ocn $AdJ *d$3r:B ilA or c t- (Dz I (,l Pt { (tt CO s sE$$$iE o5 (D Hr' g ozt- im $*FBFr$ Hs A n
t IHEeHH$€ s E {H a MD $*:*$i*s ild g; 9. Exceeding the Admission Number (AN)
9.1 At the time of main admission/transfer decisions, if there are more requests for in-catchment children than the admission number (AN), the AN may be exceeded to accommodate the catchment area children. 9.2 In normal circumstances, the AN will not be exceeded in any one year group by the admission of out-of-catchment pupils. If there are more out-of-catchment requests than places available within AN, places will be allocated up to AN according to the priority criteria, with any outstanding requests normally refused. 9.3 Parents whose requests are refused have a right to appeal to an Independent Appeal Committee whose decisions can override local policy. (NB: In the case of parents whose children have Statements of Special Educational Needs, the appeal is to the Special Educational Needs Tribunal.) 9.4 It may be that in exceptional circumstances a school requests admitting out-of- catchment pupils above AN or the Local Authority asks a school to exceed its AN. These situations should be viewed as exceptional and not as precedents for subsequent years or for other schools. Exceptional circumstances might be: (a)the admission of children who would have siblings in the school; (b)if admission assists the Local Authority in fulfilling its responsibilities for the overall provision of places, within the context of efficient use of resources; (c)Children in public care; (d)“Hard to Place” children whose cases fall within the Fair Access protocol. 9.5 If an exceptional request to exceed AN is made, either to the Local Authority or to a school, any decision to approve this must be made in conjunction with interested parties. (a) Parents' requests must still be referred to the Admissions Section. (b)A request from a school to exceed AN must be made to the Admissions Section; a request from the Admissions Section to a school to exceed AN must be made to the Headteacher. (c)The Admissions Section makes the final decision, taking account of the views of interested parties and the Local Authority's position. 9.6 At transfer phases schools may apply to exceed the Admission Number on a ‘one off occasion’, by 26 pupils through application to LA, i.e. at First Time Admissions and at all other transfer stages only. Applications must be received by schools by specified dates as outlined in the guidance notes (available from Admissions Section). Part of the assessment process will be for the LA to be satisfied that neighbouring schools will not negatively be impacted. The LA decision outcomes may be:
• To accept the application • To refuse the application (i.e. the impact to a neighbouring school is too great) • To partially accept the increase (i.e. to agree a smaller number)
There will be no appeal process to challenge the LA’s decision by a school or the governing body. Schools will be informed of the LA decision well in advance of the national offer date(s) to allow for planning and organising. If a school exceeds its AN by 26 children in any three year period the LA must then determine a higher AN at the next available opportunity.
East Sussex County Council Children’s Services Authority
Advice on Admission Numbers
What is the admission number?
Legislation requires each school to have an admission number. It is the minimum number of children a school is expected to admit. It can be the maximum where class size law is relevant. It is often referred to as the PAN – planned/published admission number.
Can it be exceeded?
Yes, in certain circumstances, for example where there are not enough places in an area to accommodate the children coming forward for admission. The In-Year Fair Access Protocol (see elsewhere on czone) placing the most vulnerable pupils, which was drawn up with schools, indicates the PANs will be exceeded to admit such pupils. However, the School Admissions Code issued by the Secretary of State, makes clear that if it is intended to significantly exceed the PAN there must be ‘exceptional’ reasons for doing so and it should be referred to the Admissions Forum. The Admissions Forum was established under legislation to discuss amongst other things the effectiveness of local admission arrangements.
Who decides to exceed the PAN?
This is a matter for the admissions authority. In the case of community and voluntary controlled schools the decision rests with the Children’s Services Authority (CSA), whilst for aided schools it is a matter for the governing body.
What about infant class size law?
Legislation states that no infant child should be taught in a class of more than 30 children and PANs have been fixed to reflect this. However the legislation permits exceptions to be made to the general requirement of the law. This is where a place cannot be found within a reasonable distance of the child’s home, the child has a statement, an appeal panel decision, an error by the admissions authority or the child is attending the school because there is a specialist unit available.
How is the PAN decided?
The PAN must reflect the capacity of the school. The Secretary of State has devised a formula for assessing the size of a school which takes into account all the teaching accommodation. This produces a capacity range which is divided by the number of year groups. The PAN is selected from the range. The idea of this is so the PAN which is agreed reflects a sensible organisation for a school. For example, a primary school with seven teaching bases might fall in the range of 28 to 34 and a PAN of 30 will be selected. In the case of a secondary school a PAN might be 216 reflecting 8 tutor groups of 27 children where the range is 198 to 219. As said above the PAN is determined by the admissions authority and it is for that authority to decide on the PAN from the range.
Can the PAN be outside of the capacity range?
Updated July 2007
[email protected] Tel: 01273 481000 - 1 -
The PAN can be greater than the range if the admissions authority believes that appropriate. It cannot be below the bottom of the range unless formal notices are published in the press and at the school explaining the reasons for the lower PAN. If there are objections to the proposal to set a lower PAN the matter is settled by the Schools Adjudicator. The Adjudicator has been appointed by the Secretary of State and one of his tasks is to settle disputes over admissions issues such as the PAN. What is the process for setting the PAN?
PANs are set by the admissions authority who must consult on the proposed number. The CSA must each year consult all schools and neighbouring Local Authorities (LAs) on the proposed PAN for each school for which it is the admissions authority. Schools which are their own admission authority (aided/foundation schools) must consult the CSA, all schools in their relevant area and the neighbouring LA if there is one within 3.2 kilometres of the school (primary) or 8 kilometres for secondary.
What is the timetable for consultation?
This is set in legislation and in the School Admissions Code. Admission authorities must have received comments on their proposals by 1 March and determined the arrangements by 15 April (some 16/17 months ahead of the time when the children join the school).
Why is the PAN so important?
Because it is used as the point at which an admission application can be refused. It is used by admissions authorities to demonstrate to independent school admissions appeal panels that the school/year group is full. In effect, it determines ‘prejudice to efficient education or the efficient use of resources’ which are the only grounds for refusing parents preferences.
What is a Standard Number?
Standard numbers is an old term which was derived in the 1988 Education Act. This Act introduced the concept of admission numbers. It was dropped in the 2002 Education Act and the term should not be used.
How does the PAN relate to other year groups?
The legislation is quite clear that PANs only apply to the intake group. There has to be good reason for not applying the PAN to other groups. One such reason used by the CSA is that the school has had to organise differently because its financial position does not enable the PAN to be reached. For example a two form entry primary school (60 places) attracting only 45 applications might put together the two year groups (90 children) to form 3 parallel mixed age classes of 30 children. Similarly a secondary school with an intake of 216 (8 tutor groups) might only have 162 children and therefore organise the year group into six tutor groups.
So does that mean the intake group could be restricted below the PAN for organisational reasons?
No, once the PAN has been agreed it is published in the annual admissions book. Parents are aware that the school has that many places to be offered up. Legislation states that ‘prejudice’ cannot be proven unless the PAN has been reached.
What about the overall capacity of the school?
Updated July 2007
[email protected] Tel: 01273 481000 - 2 - It has no reference to admission intakes. Whilst the capacity calculation produces a figure, the only thing which matters about determining admissions is the PAN. The fact that the capacity of a school has been reached does not permit applications to be refused if the PAN has not been reached.
Why does the admissions book show the estimated roll of the school?
This is required by legislation. It is only given so parents can see the rough size of the school. It is not used for any other purpose.
Any other issues? Staff in the school admissions team are always pleased to offer advice or explanations about PANs.
Updated July 2007
[email protected] Tel: 01273 481000 - 3 -
DETERMINED REDUCTIONS/INCREASES IN PUBLISHED ADMISSION NUMBERS FOR SEPTEMBER 2011
Admission numbers are part of a school’s admission arrangements. Admission regulations require that admission authorities set an admission number for the relevant year group, which is subject to consultation, based on the physical capacity of the school. Admission numbers must refer in each case to children to be admitted to the school for the first time.
Admission authorities may fix an admission number for a relevant age group that is lower than the capacity assessment. If they do so, they must publish this information for parents at the same time as they notify the bodies they are required to consult about the determination of their admission arrangements, who may object to the admission number. They can also set a higher admission number than that indicated by the capacity assessment.
This paper seeks comments on a number of proposals for reductions/increases in Published Admission Numbers (PAN) at various primary and secondary schools in Cheshire West and Chester Authority for September 2011-2012.
Comments on the proposed arrangements must be referred to the admission authority for the school before the closing date of 1 March 2009. Admission authorities will need to consider the responses before determining the admission arrangements, which must be 15 April 2009.
Proposed Changes for 2011–2012
Part 1 - Reductions/increases proposed by, or supported by governing bodies which would bring Published Admission Numbers more in line with their school’s net capacity are listed below. Proposals that the Local Authority recommends for approval are listed below.
Table A
PROPOSED REDUCTIONS IN PUBLISHED ADMISSION NUMBERS - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
School Current Proposed Current Proposed Net Net Published Published Capacity Capacity Admission Admission Number Number 2011 (1) Elton Primary 245 210 35 30 (2) Winnington Park Community Primary 245 210 35 30
1 Rationale
(1) Can be accommodated within Net Capacity range and will enable compliance with infant class sizes regulations.
(2) Can be accommodated within Net Capacity range and will enable compliance with infant class sizes regulations.
Table B
PROPOSED INCREASES IN PUBLISHED ADMISSION NUMBERS – RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
School Current Proposed Current Proposed Net Net Published Published Capacity Capacity Admission Admission Number Number 2011 (3) Delamere CE Primary 70 84 10 12 (4) Duddon St Peter’s CE 105 119 15 17 Primary (5) Little Leigh Primary 161 168 23 24 (6) Saighton CE Primary 105 115 15 16 (7) Upton Westlea Primary 119 140 17 20 (8) Neston High 1624 1720 255 270
Rationale
(3) School’s Net Capacity can sustain increase in PAN. Also assists LA by providing capacity in an area where this is needed.
(4) School’s Net Capacity again will support – a small increase whose impact on neighbouring schools would be minimal.
(5) School’s Net Capacity again will support – an increase of just 1 place whose impact on neighbouring schools would be minimal.
(6) School’s Net Capacity can sustain increase in PAN. Also assist LA by providing capacity in an area where this is needed.
(7) School’s Net Capacity can sustain increase in PAN. Additional numbers have been admitted over PAN in recent years through the appeals process.
(8) The school has been seeking an increase in its PAN for some years as it is a ‘popular and successful’ school. The school has also had additional accommodation completed and taken into use leading to an increase in its Net Capacity. The DCSF School Admissions Code indicates that ‘popular and successful’ schools should be allowed to expand.
Part 2 - Proposals by governing bodies to increase the published admission number for their school which the Local Authority recommends are not supported are listed below. This recommendation is made as either the proposed change is not in line with the net capacity of the school, or the
2 Authority has concerns about the long term implications for the school and the duty to comply with infant class size legislation, or the impact on other schools within the locality.
Table C
PROPOSED REDUCTIONS IN PUBLISHED ADMISSION NUMBERS - NOT RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
School Current Proposed Current Proposed Net Net Published Published Capacity Capacity Admission Admission Number Number 2011 (9) Greenfields Primary 210 189 30 27 (10) Rossmore Primary 175 161 25 23 (11) Sutton Green Primary 280 210 40 30
Rationale
(9) Intake for 2009 was 30 – indications are that demand for places will be similar in the foreseeable future. School’s Net Capacity supports current PAN of 30.
(10) Current PAN of 25 is supported by school’s overall Net Capacity. Reception Admissions in recent years have been below PAN.
(11) Reduction to 30 cannot be achieved given school’s current overall Net Capacity.
Table D
PROPOSED INCREASES IN PUBLISHED ADMISSION NUMBERS - NOT RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
School Current Proposed Current Proposed Net Net Published Published Capacity Capacity Admission Admission Number Number 2010 (12) Clutton CE Primary 56 56 8 10 (13) Kingsley Community 189 203 27 29 Primary (14) Utkinton St Paul’s CE 56 56 8 9 Primary (15) Whitegate CE Primary 119 119 17 18
3 Rationale
(12) School’s current Net Capacity will not sustain proposed increased PAN.
(13) No indication that increased PAN required in light of Reception year numbers in recent years.
(14) School’s current Net Capacity will not sustain proposed increased PAN.
(15) School’s current Net Capacity will not sustain proposed increased PAN.
Objections to Determined Admission Arrangements
Any objections to determined arrangements must be referred to the Office of the Schools Adjudicator, which must be before 31 July 2010.
The School Adjudicator can consider objections from parents, admission authorities, local authorities and the admission forum. Governing bodies of community and voluntary controlled schools can also object to the admission arrangements of other schools within the relevant area, although they may not object to the admission arrangements for other community and voluntary controlled schools whose admission arrangements have been determined by the local authority.
Full details of this process are available at www.schoolsadjudicator.gov.uk
4
APPENDIX TWO
List of School Admission Numbers for community and voluntary controlled schools
PRIMARY SCHOOL ADMISSION NUMBER (AN) FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 and 2011
DCSF AN AN DCSF AN AN SCHOOL SCHOOL No 2010 2011 No 2010 2011 2000 AB KETTLEBY COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 8 8 3305 COLEORTON VISCOUNT BEAUMONTS PRIM.SCHOOL 15 15 2006 ALBERT VILLAGE COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 15/18 25 2090 CONGERSTONE PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 20 2001 ANSTEY THE LATIMER SCHOOL 40 40 2029 COSBY PRIMARY SCHOOL 40 40 2318 ANSTEY WOOLDEN HILL COMMUNITY PR. SCHOOL 30 30 3024 COSSINGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3300 APPLEBY MAGNA C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 20 2003 COUNTESTHORPE GREENFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 80 80 3000 ARNESBY CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 8 8 3027 CROFT CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 15 2187 ASFORDBY CAPTAINS CLOSE PRIMARY SCHOOL 27 27 3028 CROXTON KERRIAL C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 10 10 2004 ASFORDBY HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 20 2032 DESFORD COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 38 38 2321 ASHBY HILL TOP PRIMARY SCHOOL 40 40 3029 DISEWORTH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 3212 ASHBY-DE-LA-ZOUCH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 45 2082 DONISTHORPE PRIMARY SCHOOL 20, 29 20, 29 2167 ASHBY-DE-LA-ZOUCH WILLESLEY PRIM. SCHOOL 50 50 2034 DUNTON BASSETT PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2373 ASHBY-DE-LA-ZOUCH WOODCOTE PRIM. SCHOOL 25 25 3335 EARL SHILTON ST PETER'S RC PRIM SCHOOL 30 30 3006 BARKBY THE POCHIN SCHOOL 20 20 3213 EARL SHILTON TOWNLANDS PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3007 BARLESTONE C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 29 29 3030 EARL SHILTON WEAVER'S CLOSE PRIM. SCHOOL 34 30 3008 BARROW HALL ORCHARD C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 60 60 2168 EAST GOSCOTE BROOMFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 38 38 3009 BARWELL CHURCH OF ENGLAND JUNIOR SCHOOL 72 67 2023 ELLISTOWN COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2049 BARWELL INFANT SCHOOL 60 60 2141 ENDERBY DANEMILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 75 75 2180 BARWELL NEWLANDS COMMUNITY PRIM. SCHOOL 42 42 3034 FLECKNEY C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3010 BELTON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2036 FOXTON PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3011 BILLESDON PAROCHIAL PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3035 FRISBY CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 17 17 2367 BIRSTALL HIGHCLIFFE PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2037 GADDESBY PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2368 BIRSTALL RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY PRIM.SCHOOL 82 60 3325 GILMORTON CHANDLER C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3302 BITTESWELL ST MARYS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 15 15 2322 GLEN PARVA GLEN HILLS PRIMARY SCHOOL 70 70 3012 BLABY STOKES C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2349 GLENFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 45 2115 BLABY THISTLY MEADOW PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2345 GLENFIELD THE HALL SCHOOL 60 60 3013 BLACKFORDBY ST MARGARETS C OF E PR. SCH. 20 15 3059 GREAT BOWDEN C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3014 BOTTESFORD C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2018 GREAT DALBY SCHOOL 20 20 2181 BRAUNSTONE KINGSWAY PRIMARY SCHOOL 42 42 3037 GREAT GLEN ST CUTHBERTS PRIMARY SCHOOL 40 30 2133 BRAUNSTONE MILLFIELD COMMUNITY SCHOOL 50 50 2028 GRIFFYDAM PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2375 BRAUNSTONE RAVENHURST PRIMARY SCHOOL 81 80 2123 GROBY ELIZABETH WOODVILLE PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3016 BREEDON ST HARDULPHS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 15 15 2376 GROBY LADY JANE GREY PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2016 BRINGHURST PRIMARY SCHOOL 23 19 2042 GROBY MARTINSHAW PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2383 BROUGHTON ASTLEY HALLBROOK PRIM. SCHOOL 38 38 3107 HALLATON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCH. 14 14 2330 BROUGHTON ASTLEY OLD MILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3039 HARBY CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 14 15 3017 BROUGHTON ASTLEY ORCHARD C OF E PRIMARY 30 30 3106 HATHERN CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 15 2017 BUCKMINSTER PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2043 HEATHER PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3018 BURBAGE CHURCH OF ENGLAND INFANT SCHOOL 90 90 2056 HEMINGTON PRIMARY SCHOOL 11 11 2142 BURBAGE JUNIOR SCHOOL 94 94 3041 HIGHAM ON THE HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 11 11 2183 BURBAGE SKETCHLEY HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2162 HINCKLEY BATTLING BROOK PRIMARY SCHOOL 79 80 2019 BURTON-ON-THE-WOLDS PRIMARY SCHOOL 17 17 2044 HINCKLEY HOLLIERS WALK PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2178 CASTLE DONINGTON ORCHARD PRIMARY SCHOOL 39 39 2351 HINCKLEY RICHMOND PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3021 CASTLE DONINGTON ST EDWARDS PRIM. SCHOOL 30 30 3042 HINCKLEY ST. MARY'S PRIMARY SCHOOL 44 45 3332 CHURCH LANGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3336 HINCKLEY ST.PETER'S RC PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3052 CLAYBROOKE PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2046 HINCKLEY WESTFIELD INFANT SCHOOL 90 90 3022 COALVILLE ALL SAINTS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 27 27 2045 HINCKLEY WESTFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL 80 80 2020 COALVILLE BELVOIRDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 45 3043 HOSE CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 11 11 2360 COALVILLE BROOM LEYS SCHOOL 81 81 3044 HOUGHTON ON THE HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3348 COALVILLE ST CLARES CATHOLIC PRIM SCHOOL 30 30 2024 HUGGLESCOTE COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2177 COALVILLE WARREN HILLS PRIMARY SCHOOL 28 30 2173 HUNCOTE COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 20 PRIMARY SCHOOL ADMISSION NUMBER (AN) FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 and 2011
DCSF AN AN DCSF AN AN SCHOOL SCHOOL No 2010 2011 No 2010 2011 3046 HUSBANDS BOSWORTH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 2380 NARBOROUGH THE PASTURES PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 45 2051 IBSTOCK JUNIOR SCHOOL & SPECIAL UNIT 59 60 2026 NEW SWANNINGTON PRIMARY SCHOOL 29 29 3047 IBSTOCK ST DENYS C OF E INFANT SCHOOL 60 60 3066 NEWBOLD CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 10 10 2053 KEGWORTH PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2078 NEWBOLD VERDON PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3048 KIBWORTH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2097 NEWTON BURGOLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 3307 KILBY ST MARYS C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 2079 NEWTOWN LINFORD PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 2055 KIRBY MUXLOE PRIMARY SCHOOL 51 51 3310 NORTH KILWORTH ST ANDREWS PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2146 LEIC FOREST EAST STAFFORD LEYS PRIMARY 84 84 2333 OADBY BROCKS HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 2068 LITTLE BOWDEN SCHOOL 52 52 2189 OADBY BROOKSIDE SCHOOL 50 50 3053 LONG CLAWSON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2338 OADBY LANGMOOR PRIMARY SCHOOL 27 27 3054 LONG WHATTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 13 13 2357 OADBY LAUNDE PRIMARY SCHOOL 90 90 2165 BOOTH WOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2384 OADBY WOODLAND GRANGE PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3434 C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2083 OAKTHORPE PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2374 COBDEN PRIMARY SCHOOL 50 50 3067 OLD DALBY C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 21 21 2331 HOLYWELL PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3068 PACKINGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2194 MOUNTFIELDS LODGE SCHOOL 73 73 3069 QUENIBOROUGH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 27 30 2169 OUTWOODS EDGE PRIM.SCHOOL 52 52 3070 QUORN ST BARTHOLOMEWS C OF E PRIM.SCHOOL 55 60 2062 RENDELL PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 45 2085 RATBY PRIMARY SCHOOL 41 41 2192 ROBERT BAKEWELL PRIM.SCHOOL 34 34 3312 REARSBY ST MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS 15 15 3341 SACRED HEART RC PRIM SCHOOL 30 30 3072 REDMILE CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 11 11 2350 SHELTHORPE PRIMARY SCHOOL 50 45 3074 ROTHLEY CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 53 3433 ST.MARYS RC PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3314 SAPCOTE ALL SAINTS C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 25 25 2382 STONEBOW PRIMARY SCHOOL 45 48 3077 SCALFORD C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 11 11 2120 THORPE ACRE INFANT SCHOOL 50 45 2088 SEAGRAVE VILLAGE PRIMARY SCHOOL 13 13 2116 THORPE ACRE JUNIOR SCHOOL 45 45 3078 SHARNFORD C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 9 9 3056 LUBENHAM ALL SAINTS PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3080 SHEEPY MAGNA C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 14 15 2166 LUTTERWORTH JOHN WYCLIFFE PRIMARY SCHOOL 40 40 2092 SHEPSHED NEWCROFT PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3209 LUTTERWORTH SHERRIER PRIMARY SCHOOL 59 59 2137 SHEPSHED OXLEY PRIMARY SCHOOL 35 35 3334 MARKET BOSWORTH ST PETERS C OF E PRI SCH 40 40 3339 SHEPSHED ST WINEFRIDES RC PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3058 MARKET HARBOROUGH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3082 SHEPSHED ST. BOTOLPHS PRIMARY SCHOOL 36 36 2176 MARKET HARBOROUGH FARNDON FIELDS PRIMARY 30 30 2319 SILEBY HIGHGATE COMMUNITY PRIM. SCHOOL 30 38 2002 MARKET HARBOROUGH MEADOWDALE PRIM SCH 45 52 2326 SILEBY REDLANDS COMMUNITY PRIM.SCHOOL 30 30 2179 MARKET HARBOROUGH RIDGEWAY PRIMARY 45 45 3316 SNARESTONE C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 12 3347 MARKET HARBOROUGH ST JOSEPHS RC PRIM SCH 30 30 2094 SOMERBY PRIMARY SCHOOL 7 7 2069 MARKFIELD MERCENFELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 54 54 3085 SOUTH KILWORTH C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 10 10 3060 MEASHAM CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2158 SOUTH WIGSTON FAIRFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3338 MEASHAM ST CHARLES CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCH 17 17 2355 SOUTH WIGSTON PARKLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 75 75 2072 MELTON MOWBRAY BROWNLOW SCHOOL 89 89 2070 STANTON UNDER BARDON COM. PRIMARY SCHOOL 13 13 2191 MELTON MOWBRAY SHERARD PRIMARY SCHOOL 57 45 2096 STATHERN PRIMARY SCHOOL 17 17 3342 MELTON MOWBRAY ST FRANCIS RC PRIM SCHOOL 39 39 3319 STOKE GOLDING ST MARGARETS PRIM. SCHOOL 30 30 3062 MELTON MOWBRAY ST MARYS PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3087 STONEY STANTON MANORFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 50 50 2185 MELTON MOWBRAY SWALLOWDALE PRI SCH & CC 50 52 3089 SWANNINGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2073 MELTON MOWBRAY THE GROVE PRIMARY SCHOOL 42 42 3329 SWINFORD C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2007 MOIRA INFANT SCHOOL 30 30 3090 SWITHLAND ST LEONARDS C OF E PRIM.SCHOOL 14 14 3211 MOUNTSORREL CHRIST CHURCH & ST PETERS 58 58 3432 SYSTON ST PETER AND ST PAUL PRIM. SCHOOL 60 60 3065 MOWSLEY ST NICHOLAS C OF E PRIMARY SCH. 8 7 2161 SYSTON THE MERTON PRIMARY SCHOOL 51 51 2334 NAILSTONE DOVE BANK PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 2009 THORNTON COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 18 20 2076 NARBOROUGH GREYSTOKE PRIMARY SCHOOL 50 50 2164 THRINGSTONE PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2358 NARBOROUGH RED HILL FIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 40 40 3093 THRUSSINGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 9 9
PRIMARY SCHOOL ADMISSION NUMBER (AN) FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 and 2011
DCSF AN AN SCHOOL No 2010 2011 3330 THURCASTON RICHARD HILL C OF E PR.SCHOOL 30 30
3320 THURLASTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 17 17
3345 THURMASTON BISHOP ELLIS CATHOLIC PRIMARY 50 50 3094 THURMASTON CHURCH HILL C OF E JR. SCHOOL 90 90 2110 THURMASTON CHURCH HILL INFANT SCHOOL 90 90 2157 THURMASTON EASTFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL 35 35 2149 THURNBY FERNVALE PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 3095 THURNBY ST LUKES C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 35 35 3097 TUGBY CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3098 ULLESTHORPE C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3100 WALTHAM-ON-THE-WOLDS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 14 14
2170 WHETSTONE BADGERBROOK PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60
3321 WHETSTONE ST PETERS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 40 40 3340 WHITWICK HOLY CROSS RC PRIMARY SCHOOL 29 30 3101 WHITWICK ST JOHN THE BAPTIST PRIM.SCHOOL 50 50 3331 WIGSTON ALL SAINTS PRIMARY SCHOOL & C.C. 50 50 2138 WIGSTON GLENMERE COMM. PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2369 WIGSTON LITTLE HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3343 WIGSTON ST JOHN FISHER CATHOLIC PRIM SCH 30 30 2190 WIGSTON THE MEADOW COMM. PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60
2193 WIGSTON THYTHORN FIELD COM. PRIM. SCHOOL 30 30
2354 WIGSTON WATER LEYS PRIMARY SCHOOL 60 60 3102 WITHERLEY C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 12 15 3103 WOODHOUSE EAVES ST PAULS PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2025 WOODSTONE COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 30 30 2104 WORTHINGTON SCHOOL 10 10 3104 WYMESWOLD C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 15 15 3333 WYMONDHAM ST PETERS PRIMARY SCHOOL 8 8
SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSIONS FOR SEPTEMBER 2010 and 2011
DCSF AN AN DCSF AN AN School School No 2010 2011 No 2010 2011 4032 Anstey Martin High 216 216 4601 De Lisle Catholic 220 220 4508 Ashby Grammar 540 540 4030 The Garendon High 270 270 4028 Ashby Ivanhoe High 290 295 4014 Limehurst High 172 172 4000 Barrow Humphrey Perkins High 310 331 4268 Woodbrook Vale High 180 180 4039 Birstall Longslade College 415 415 4503 Lutterworth College 628 628 4029 Birstall Stonehill High 257 257 4015 Lutterworth High 250 250 4036 Bottesford Belvoir High 135 135 4016 Market Bosworth High 224 224 4038 Braunstone Winstanley High 200 200 4003 Market Harborough Robert Smyth 440 440 4057 Broughton Astley Thomas Estley 251 267 4017 Market Harborough Welland Park 243 250 4026 Burbage Hastings High 200 200 4018 Markfield South Charnwood High 162/7 162/7 4031 Castle Donington Community Coll 158 158 4044 Melton John Ferneley High 160 160 4035 Coalville Castle Rock High 200 200 5400 Melton Long Field School 160 160 4001 Coalville King Edward VII 472 472 4041 Oadby Gartree High 180/16 180/16 4007 Coalville Newbridge High 176 176 4043 Oadby Manor High 232 232 4050 Countesthorpe Community College 382 382 4045 Oadby The Beauchamp College 502 502 4054 Countesthorpe Leysland High 224 224 4505 Quorn Rawlins Community College 468 468 Desford Bosworth Community 4048 College 473 473 4034 Shepshed High School 137 137 4011 Earl Shilton Heathfield High 220 220 4056 Shepshed Hind Leys College 234 234 4059 Earl Shilton William Bradford 280 280 5402 South Wigston High 210 210 4506 Enderby Brockington College 300 300 4602 Stoke Golding St. Martin's High 113 116 4051 Groby Brookvale High 220 221 4049 Syston Wreake Valley College 146/231 147/232 4052 Groby Community College 310 310 4022 Thurmaston Roundhill College 240 243 4501 Hinckley John Cleveland College 600 620 5403 Wigston Abington High 166 169 4010 Hinckley Mount Grace High 215 215 5401 Wigston Bushloe High 175 175 4053 Hinckley Redmoor High 161 161 4033 Wigston Guthlaxton College 540 540 4012 Ibstock Community College 238 238 4055 Kibworth High 250 250 4002 Burleigh College 489 489
JANUARY ACTUALS FOR LAST 5 YEARS AND ESTIMATES FOR NEXT 10 YEARS
School:Coalville Newbridge High School Date of forecast: 13/12/2011 Forecast from January: 2012 onwards
Age Range:11-14 Status: Community Approved Net Capacity: 590 Max Capacity: 656 DfE : 4007 Approved Admission Number: 196
1. Pupils Numbers Graph
January Actual/Forecast
840
740 l 640 Incl. Housing No Housing 540 Capacity Actual NOR 440 Numbers on Numbers on Numbers on Numbers on Roll Roll Roll Roll Numbers on Roll
340
240 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Year
2. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years without the effects of new housing Coalville Newbridgegg High School Surplusp January 11+ 12+ 13+ Total places % 2011 178 162 167 507 83 14.1 2012 168 177 162 507 83 14.1 2013 165 167 176 508 82 13.9 2014 165 164 166 495 95 16.1 2015 170 164 164 498 92 15.6 2016 158 169 164 491 99 16.8 2017 169 157 168 494 96 16.3 2018 163 168 157 488 102 17.3 2019 150 162 167 479 111 18.8 2020 167 149 162 478 112 19.0 2021 161 166 149 476 114 19.3
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 1 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 3. Actual and forecast NOR for next five years with potential effect of new housing Coalville Newbridge High School Surplus January 11+ 12+ 13+ TOTAL places % 2011 178 162 167 507 83 14.1 2012 169 178 163 510 80 13.6 2013 168 170 179 517 73 12.4 2014 170 169 171 510 80 13.6 2015 177 171 171 519 71 12.0 2016 166 177 172 515 75 12.7 2017 177 165 176 518 72 12.2 2018 171 176 165 512 78 13.2 2019 158 170 175 503 87 14.7 2020 175 157 170 502 88 14.9 2021 169 174 157 500 90 15.3
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 2 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 Supporting Data
4. Number on Roll & 10+ Feeder History Linked 10+ January 11+ 12+ 13+ Total 168 2007 178 151 179 508 171 2008 169 175 157 501 178 2009 163 168 171 502 157 2010 167 168 170 505 2011 178 162 167 507
5. Primary School Number on Roll for Current Academic Year January 2011 NOR from linked Primary/Infant/Junior schools School DCSF No. 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 8+ 9+ 10+ COALVILLE BELVOIRDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL 2020 56 46 34 44 42 39 39 37 39 47 HUGGLESCOTE COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL 2024 53 52 57 62 61 63 62 70 52 63
THRINGSTONE PRIMARY SCHOOL 2164 19 26 27 21 26 17 18 25 28 14 COALVILLE ALL SAINTS C OF E PRIM. SCHOOL 3022 21 27 26 14 24 16 23 14 24 21 SWANNINGTON C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL 3089 15310 4 11 16 7 10 8
Total 150 156 147 151 157 146 158 153 153 153
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 3 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011 6. 10+ Data for Intakes for Academic Year Estimated 11+ Limited Not limited Manual From To 10+ for January to PAN to PAN Adjustment 2011 2012 153 2012 165 165 3 2012 2013 153 2013 165 165 - 2013 2014 153 2014 165 165 - 2014 2015 158 2015 170 170 - 2015 2016 146 2016 158 158 - 2016 2017 157 2017 169 169 - 2017 2018 151 2018 163 163 - 2018 2019 147 2019 159 159 -9 2019 2020 156 2020 168 168 -1 2020 2021 150 2021 162 162 -1 ADMISSIONS TEAM INFORMATION % known Revised 4 yr Total 11+ Intake for the given year children ave 2011 2012 168 109. 8 102. 6
7. Percentage Used to Predict Intakes Percentage Pre-calculated Yr6 to Yr7 Percentages % Chosen Latest year: 113.4 Average for last 4 years: 100.4 OtitOwn estimate 107.9107 9 Y
8. Percentage Used to Predict Transfer Between Non Intake Groups Transfer rates between existing age Percentage Age 11 to 12 Age 12 to 13 groups Chosen Latest year 97.0 98.8 4 yearyg average 99.4 99.7 Y Own estimate
9. Housing Gains No of Houses to be Occupied 180 No of Flats to be Occupied 48 Estimated Housing Gains after 5 Years 23
Research and Insight Team, Community Planning 4 Secondary School Forecast 13/12/2011