DOCSLIB.ORG

King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet August 7, 2012 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet For more information call 206-296-VOTE (8683) or visit www.kingcounty.gov/elections 2 A letter from the Director Dear King County Voter: The August primary and November general election represent the grand fi nale of our four year election cycle in this Presidential election year. In keeping with the drama and intensity of Presidential year elections, this election cycle, national headlines have focused on stories about what some consider to be safeguards and others deem barriers to voter registration and voting. Registered voter purges, requirements to provide government issued photo identifi cation, redistricting with the appearance of isolating minority communities, and screening requirements for voter registration are examples of programs creating controversy. Naturally, advocacy groups have lined up on both sides of these actions. Department of Justice law suits and Supreme Court rulings have reined in some states to address any semblance of voter discrimination. A prominent issue related to these actions is citizenship, and the fear that non-citizens are taking part in our political process. Citizen concerns about voting rights and voter fraud have increased. Recently, King County’s Election Department has received inquiries about the efforts we take to research the validity of citizenship for voter registration in our county, offering the opportunity to clarify myths about voter fraud. I’ve seen immigrant citizens avoid their legal right to vote due to fears brought with them from their former place of citizenship. Reports and proof of non-citizens illegally invading the ballot box are extremely rare. Voter registration in Washington requires signing the required oath attesting that you meet the legal qualifi cations. You are attesting to the fact that you are a citizen of the U.S. and at least 18. You are also declaring you are not under the authority of Department of Corrections and have not been disqualifi ed from voting due to a court order. Registering to vote and voting without meeting these qualifi cations constitutes a violation of the law and is subject to prosecution. A registered voter or the prosecuting attorney has the right to challenge a voter’s registration status. Having served as an elections offi cial in this state for over 16 years, I have witnessed very few voter challenges, and very rarely seen any challenges confi rmed as voter fraud. Successful challenges for fraud across the country also remain remarkably rare. Still, those states seeking to impose voting restrictions cite voter fraud as the reason. In Washington, every citizen age 18 or older meeting the legal requirements to vote are encouraged to register and vote. King County Elections does not conduct background checks on voters or question qualifi cations unless a challenge has been fi led. Be aware of registration and voting deadlines and do not miss your opportunity to vote in our historic Presidential year elections. Best Regards, Voter registration deadlines • July 9 – Deadline to register by mail or online, or to transfer or update voter registration. Sherril Huff • July 30 – Deadline to register in-person for people who are not currently registered in Washington. Contents 3 quently ask General information Dear King County Voter: Fre ed qu A letter from the Director 2 est Reading the pamphlet 3 The August primary and November general election represent the grand fi nale of our io n Top 2 Primary 4 four year election cycle in this Presidential election year. s Contact information 4 In keeping with the drama and intensity of Presidential year elections, this election Reading the local Register to vote 5 cycle, national headlines have focused on stories about what some consider to be Returning your ballot 6 safeguards and others deem barriers to voter registration and voting. Registered voter purges, voters’ pamphlet Accessible voting 7 requirements to provide government issued photo identifi cation, redistricting with the appearance of Duties of offices in this election 8 isolating minority communities, and screening requirements for voter registration are examples of programs Countywide measures creating controversy. Naturally, advocacy groups have lined up on both sides of these actions. Department Why are there measures and candidates in the local King County Proposition No. 1 10 of Justice law suits and Supreme Court rulings have reined in some states to address any semblance of voters’ pamphlet that are not on my ballot? Federal offices voter discrimination. A prominent issue related to these actions is citizenship, and the fear that non-citizens Don’t worry, your ballot is correct. are taking part in our political process. US Senator 11 The measures and races on your ballot refl ect the Congressional District No. 7 17 Citizen concerns about voting rights and voter fraud have increased. Recently, King County’s Election districts in which you are registered to vote. The local Congressional District No. 9 21 voters’ pamphlet may cover multiple districts and Department has received inquiries about the efforts we take to research the validity of citizenship for voter State offices include measures and races outside of your districts. registration in our county, offering the opportunity to clarify myths about voter fraud. Governor 25 I’ve seen immigrant citizens avoid their legal right to vote due to fears brought with them from their former What is an explanatory statement? Lieutenant Governor 30 Secretary of State 33 place of citizenship. Reports and proof of non-citizens illegally invading the ballot box are extremely rare. An explanatory statement is prepared by each district’s attorney stating the effect of the ballot measure if Treasurer 37 Voter registration in Washington requires signing the required oath attesting that you meet the legal passed into law. Auditor 38 qualifi cations. You are attesting to the fact that you are a citizen of the U.S. and at least 18. You are also Attorney General 40 declaring you are not under the authority of Department of Corrections and have not been disqualifi ed from How are committees in favor of or in opposition to Commissioner of Public Lands 42 voting due to a court order. Registering to vote and voting without meeting these qualifi cations constitutes a measure formed? Superintendent of Public Instruction 44 a violation of the law and is subject to prosecution. A registered voter or the prosecuting attorney has the Districts choosing to participate in a local voters’ right to challenge a voter’s registration status. Having served as an elections offi cial in this state for over Insurance Commissioner 47 pamphlet are responsible for appointing committee Legislative District No. 11 49 16 years, I have witnessed very few voter challenges, and very rarely seen any challenges confi rmed as members who agree to write statements. voter fraud. Legislative District No. 30 54 The statements are a way to persuade voters to vote Legislative District No. 33 59 Successful challenges for fraud across the country also remain remarkably rare. Still, those states seeking for or against a measure. King County Elections is Legislative District No. 34 61 to impose voting restrictions cite voter fraud as the reason. not responsible for the content or accuracy of the Legislative District No. 36 63 statements. In Washington, every citizen age 18 or older meeting the legal requirements to vote are encouraged to Legislative District No. 37 69 register and vote. King County Elections does not conduct background checks on voters or question What is the order of candidates in the local voters’ Legislative District No. 43 71 qualifi cations unless a challenge has been fi led. pamphlet? Legislative District No. 46 73 Candidates in the local voters’ pamphlet appear in the Judicial offices Be aware of registration and voting deadlines and do not miss your opportunity to vote in our historic State Supreme Court 78 Presidential year elections. order they will appear on the ballot. Court of Appeals 83 Candidates are given word limits based upon the Best Regards, Superior Court 84 number of registered voters within each district. Voter registration deadlines Local measures • July 9 – Deadline to register by mail or online, or City of Renton 91 to transfer or update voter registration. City of Seattle 92 Sherril Huff South King Fire & Rescue 96 • July 30 – Deadline to register in-person for people who are not currently registered in Helpful tools Washington. Candidate index 99 Ballot measure contact information 99 About the Top 2 Primary Washington uses a “Top 2” system for its primary election. A Top 2 primary allows voters to vote for any candidate running in each race. The two candidates who receive the Contact information most votes in the primary election advance to the general election. A candidate must also Phone: receive at least 1% of the votes cast in that 206-296-VOTE (8683) race to advance to the general election. 1-800-325-6165 The Top 2 primary applies to partisan offi ces. TTY Relay: 711 It does not apply to elections for Precinct Committee Offi cers. While there are some Email: slight variations, elections for nonpartisan offi ce, such as city council or judge, are [email protected] conducted in a similar manner to the Top 2 primary. Generally, the two candidates in a Online: nonpartisan race who receive the most votes www.kingcounty.gov/elections in the primary advance to the general election. You may wonder why some offi ces don’t Mail or in-person: appear on the primary ballot. When only 919 SW Grady Way one or two candidates fi le for a nonpartisan offi ce, there is no primary and the candidates Renton, WA 98057 automatically advance to the general election. For partisan offi ces and some judicial offi ces, Voter Registration Annex* there is still a primary even if only one or two King County Administration candidates fi le.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Editorial: Recommended for State Supreme Court, Position 8: Gonzalez
    https://www.yakimaherald.com/opinion/editorial-recommended-for-state-supreme-court-position-gonzalez/article_6d3d28a2-d3ef-11e8-8168-430c158b9238.html Editorial: Recommended for state Supreme Court, Position 8: Gonzalez By The Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board Oct 22, 2018 Updated Oct 22, 2018 Buy Now Even if he wasn’t widely viewed in the legal community as a fair and contemplative jurist, even if he hadn’t been anointed by 11 bar associations with the highest rating of “exceptionally well qualified,” even if hadn’t worked collaboratively with his fellow justices and extensively on community outreach, Steven Gonzalez would be our overwhelming choice to be reelected to the Washington State Supreme Court, Position 8. The reason: His challenger, Bellevue attorney Nathan Choi, lacks any judicial experience and seemingly a modicum of ethical grounding, as well as failing to display a nuanced grasp of state law during an hour-long meeting with the Herald-Republic editorial board. Choi, simply, is not a worthy candidate. When he unsuccessfully ran in 2017 for appellate judge, he was found to have failed to abide by state campaign disclosure rules. He also was admonished by the King County Bar Association for falsely describing himself as a judge in campaign ads. He was sued by the state Attorney General for not following Public Disclosure Commission laws for reporting campaign expenses and contributions. In May, after Choi failed to respond to the AG’s office, a Thurston County judge granted an order of default against him. Any of those actions alone would raise serious doubts about a candidate’s fitness for office.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Supreme Court Alters Sentencing Structure for Accomplices
    Washington Supreme Court alters sentencing structure for accomplices By Adam Lynn The News Tribune February 5, 2015 A divided Washington State Supreme Court has overturned the exceptional sentence of a Pierce County man in a decision that some believe will change fundamentally the way criminal accomplices are sentenced in Washington. In a 5-4 opinion released Thursday, the state’s high court ruled that convicted identity thief Larry Hayes should have received a standard-range sentence after being convicted of a host of felonies in 2009. Instead, he got a 15-year term under a provision that allows prosecutors to seek extra punishment for egregious offenders. The majority ordered the case back to Pierce County for re-sentencing. At issue is how people charged as accomplices should be treated under the law at sentencing. For years, Washington law has prescribed that accomplices and principle actors in a crime be exposed to the same culpability, a concept Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist on Thursday called “in for a penny, in for a pound.” In an opinion written by Justice Charles Johnson and signed by Justices Charles Wiggins, Susan Owens, Mary Fairhurst and Sheryl Gordon McCloud, the majority ruled that should not always be the case, especially where sentencing is concerned. Until Thursday, when a prosecutor sought an exceptional sentence for a criminal defendant, he or she had to prove to a jury that certain aggravating factors made the crime worse than usual. The requirement applied to principle actors and accomplices alike. Thursday’s majority opinion said the blanket application to accomplices is improper.
    [Show full text]
  • Officials Officials
    5.2021 - made changes after we printed on 3/9 (K6183) - Artboard DOESN’T reflect the copy *Change Asotin County Republican Party: Alice White’s email ASOTIN-ANATONE 509-243-1100 CITY OF ASOTIN 509-243-4411 MEGAN PIERCE, AREA 1, Vice President 2023 SCHOOL DISTRICT #420 121 Cleveland Street, PO Box 517 [email protected] DALE BONFIELD, SUPERINTENDENT Asotin, WA 99402 RUSS DAVIS, AREA 5 2021 314 2nd Street, PO Box 489 [email protected] Asotin, WA 99402 Council Members JIM NELLY, AREA 4 2021 www.aasd.wednet.edu POSITION 1: DAVID WEAKLAND [email protected] 2021 [email protected] MILES SIDENER, AREA 2 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS [email protected] POSITION 2: LORI LOSETH, Mayor Pro Tem [email protected] WASHINGTON/ Public meeting at 6 PM 4th Monday. High School Library, [email protected] 215 2nd Street, Asotin, WA 99402 POSITION 3: STEVE COUDREY OTHER INFORMATION ASOTIN COUNTY [email protected] Asotin County Democratic Party Elected for 4 year terms serving without compensation. POSITION 4: MERVIN SCHNEIDER PEGGY GARY, Chairperson [email protected] PO Box 510, Clarkston, WA 99403 PAULA ELSCAMP, District 1, Vice Chair POSITION 5: TIM OTTMAR [email protected] DIRECTORY CHAD ENGLE, District 2 [email protected] ROBERT UHRICH, District 3 POSITION 6: DWAYNE PARIS, Mayor Asotin County Republican Party 509-751-9210 OF TODD CLOVIS, District 4 [email protected] ALICE WHITE ELECTED WARREN BENNER, District 5, Chairperson PO Box 82, Clarkston, WA 99403 CITY OF CLARKSTON 509-758-5541 [email protected] PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT (PUD) 509-758-1010 829 5th Street OFFICIALS TIM SIMPSON, GENERAL MANAGER Clarkston, WA 99403 Lewis Clark Valley 509-758-7712 AND OTHER INFORMATION 1500 Scenic Way, PO Box 650 Chamber of Commerce Clarkston, WA 99403 CITY COUNCIL KRISTIN KEMAK, President/CEO Compiled by www.asotinpud.org Elected nonpartisan in Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio 21 Steering Committee Prepared by the Technology Alliance October 2004
    BIOImplementing Washington 21 State’s Initiative in 21st Century Health A Report to Governor Gary Locke and the Citizens of Washington State from the Bio 21 Steering Committee Prepared by the Technology Alliance October 2004 Implementing Washington State’s Initiative in 21st Century Health A Report to Governor Gary Locke and the Citizens of Washington State from the Bio 21 Steering Committee Prepared by the Technology Alliance October 2004 The Technology Alliance 1301 Fifth Avenue Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98101 www.technology-alliance.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 II. INTRODUCTION 9 III. BACKGROUND 13 IV. CASE STATEMENT 15 V. BIO 21: THE PLAN 19 BIO 21’S VISION 19 BIO 21’S MISSION 19 STRATEGIES AND PROGRAM ELEMENTS 19 A. Establishment, Organization and Operation of the Bio 21 Strategic Trust Fund 20 B. Priorities of the Bio 21 Strategic Trust Fund 21 C. Three Strategies for Bio 21 Investments 23 D. Bio 21 Funding Categories 28 E. Source of Funds and Timeline 30 F. Measures of Success 32 VI. CALL TO ACTION 35 APPENDICES Appendix A: Economic Impacts Analysis A-1 Appendix B: Report of the Diagnostics and Therapeutics Subcommittee B-1 Appendix C: Report of the Patient Outcomes Subcommittee C-1 Appendix D: Report of the Seed Funding Strategy Subcommittee D-1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many individuals from across the state, representing various organizations, institutions, government and the community, came together to work on Phase II of the Bio 21 effort. The Technology Alliance, as coordinator of this project, would like to extend its gratitude to those who devoted their time and expertise to development of the Bio 21 program for Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • We2.0 Washington Education Association Volume 50, Number 3 – Summer 2012
    we2.0 Washington Education Association Volume 50, Number 3 – Summer 2012 2012 ELECTION A vote for our future “His first opportunity to get involved in politics started as a parent in the Selah School District to fight for education. … If you compare Jay Inslee to the other candidate who is running, he understands people. He understands fighting for and allowing us to preserve our collective bargaining rights. … Who’s going to be able to protect our bargaining rights and be able to allow us to fight for kids?” Kendell Millbauer Middle school social studies teacher Richland Summer 2012 1 am an optimist. I think I inherited my glass- Our compensation, up for discussion next half-full tendencies alongside the educator legislative session, is a good illustration of the geneI that runs in my family. And I have to say, it’s linkage between funding and policy. Back in 2009, come in handy lately. I’ve been working in public the Quality Education Council set the road map education for 42 years, and I’ve never experienced a for education policy and funding in motion. It From year quite like this — the pace has accelerated, the was reaffirmed by the Legislature in 2010, and the demands are high, the issues relentless. McCleary decision cites these steps as legislative intent regarding funding. Mary I know you feel it too. As I’ve been out visiting with councils Meaning money and reforms and members this fall, everyone ‘We care so much are linked, and how those play has been talking about Chicago, forward relies on the people we “Won’t Back Down,” the about this election elect.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Expenditures and Electioneering Communications
    2008 Election Financing Fact Book Compiled by Washington State Public Disclosure Commission Olympia, Washington Suemary Trobaugh, Editor The Public Disclosure Commission’s office is located at: 711 Capitol Way, Room (206) Olympia WA 98504 (360) 753-1111 - Fax: (360) 753-1112 www.pdc.wa.gov FOREWORD The 2008 Election Financing Fact Book is the sixteenth in a series of comparable biennial reports produced since 1978 by the Washington Sate Public Disclosure Commission, pursuant to the Commission’s authority in RCW 42.17.370(3) to publish reports and statistics concerning campaign finance so that the information may be fully disclosed to the public. This Fact Book also depicts the political finance activity of the ninth regular legislative election held following the implementation of Initiative 134. Material in this book is based on campaign finance reports filed by candidates and political committees disclosing activity through January 12, 2009. For the most part, these reports have not been audited by PDC staff. Every effort has been made to assure that the data as well as the summary charts and graphs accurately reflect the filed information. The total expenditures by legislative candidates, who reported spending money, are summarized as follows: In 1994, 316 candidates spent $10,516,508 In 1996, 313 candidates spent $13,064,270 In 1998, 267 candidates spent $12,994,043 In 2000, 303 candidates spent $16,257,511 In 2002, 258 candidates spent $15,847,338 In 2004, 257 candidates spent $18,904,376 In 2006, 216 candidates spent $18,850,341 In 2008, 244 candidates spent $21,306,132 From 2004 to 2008 the average expenditure by major party general election legislative candidates with opposition increased approximately 4% from $97,124 to $100,915*.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
    August 7, 2012 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet For more information call 206-296-VOTE (8683) or visit www.kingcounty.gov/elections 2 A letter from the Director Dear King County Voter: The August primary and November general election represent the grand fi nale of our four year election cycle in this Presidential election year. In keeping with the drama and intensity of Presidential year elections, this election cycle, national headlines have focused on stories about what some consider to be safeguards and others deem barriers to voter registration and voting. Registered voter purges, requirements to provide government issued photo identifi cation, redistricting with the appearance of isolating minority communities, and screening requirements for voter registration are examples of programs creating controversy. Naturally, advocacy groups have lined up on both sides of these actions. Department of Justice law suits and Supreme Court rulings have reined in some states to address any semblance of voter discrimination. A prominent issue related to these actions is citizenship, and the fear that non-citizens are taking part in our political process. Citizen concerns about voting rights and voter fraud have increased. Recently, King County’s Election Department has received inquiries about the efforts we take to research the validity of citizenship for voter registration in our county, offering the opportunity to clarify myths about voter fraud. I’ve seen immigrant citizens avoid their legal right to vote due to fears brought with them from their former place of citizenship. Reports and proof of non-citizens illegally invading the ballot box are extremely rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Wcs Oct 2010
    Organized 1885 Official Organ of the Sailors' Union of the Pacific Volume LXXIII No. 10 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Friday, October 22, 2010 House Speaker Pelosi Congressman Cummings supports the Jones Act champions U.S. merchant marine on Capitol Hill by Tony Munoz, Editor-In-Chief, The Maritime Executive he U.S. Merchant Marine cargoes accounted for 49.6% of all cargo has been an integral carried by U.S.-flag operators. In 2007, T factor in building a secure and cargo preference provided U.S. opera- wealthy nation since its birth. But, it has tors $919.4 million for military cargo, fallen on hard times since the 1970s due $319.8 million for agricultural cargo, and to weak government policies. In fact, $113.4 million for civilian agency cargo today’s maritime policies and funding and cargo gained from the Export and are pathetic at best as the U.S. govern- Import Bank. ment continues to dump billions upon But, DOE has continually assumed the billions into broken highway systems that cargo preference laws do not apply to are constantly in need of maintenance loans it provides under Title XVII of the while the maritime industry gets next to Energy Act of 2005. Specifically, Title nothing in support. However, the mer- XVII of the Energy Policy Act gives the chant marine has a real champion in Rep- agency the ability to guarantee 80% of resentative Elijah Cummings (D-Mary- the cost of the development of renew- land), who grilled Maritime Adminis- able energy systems, including offshore trator David Masuda at a hearing on Sep- wind and ocean energy, advanced fossil tember 29, challenging his knowledge energy technologies, hydrogen fuel cell and leadership of the industry’s most vi- technologies, carbon capture and seques- tal link to the administration.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 Legislative Scorecard
    2011-2012 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD 2011-2012 Legislative Scorecard | 1 DEAR SCORECARD READER Welcome to the 2011-2012 Washington Conservation Voters Scorecard, your trusted guide to environmental politics in Washington. The Scorecard tells the story of the Legislature’s record over the past two years, holding individual members accountable for their environmental votes. Unfortunately we can’t record the votes that didn’t happen. The past two years have largely been defensive, and we have had to work tirelessly to prevent rollbacks on our most basic environmental protections. WCV helped stop over 75 bad bills from receiving floor votes in 2012. The credit, however, goes to you: citizen activists who have demonstrated their strength in amaz- ing ways over the past two years, providing effective grassroots pressure at critical moments. We recognize that state budget shortfalls have placed pressure on environ- mental and natural resource programs, but the lack of progress on issues like Puget Sound restoration and climate change can also be attributed to a troubling lack of bipartisan strength on our issues. If we are ever to succeed on tackling some of our State’s hardest-to-solve problems, it will be because of a commitment to problem-solving on both sides of the political aisle. WCV is committed to ensuring that our shared environmental values are turned into legislative priorities. As a bipartisan organization, we will continue to build strong environmental leaders in both parties, working together to cre- ate a strong economy and healthy environment for our state. Together with Washington Environmental Council, our legislative partner, we will continue to collaborate with the 25 organizations in the Environmental Priorities Coalition to deliver achievements on the issues you care about.
    [Show full text]
  • 1993 Telephone Directory & Committee Assignments
    1993 Telephone Directory & Committee Assignments Fifty- Third Washington State Legislature Telephone Directory and Committee Assignments of the Washington State Legislature Fifty·Third Legislature 1993 Regular Session Joel Pritchard, Brian Ebersole, Ueutenant Governor, Speaker of the House President of the Senate R. Lorraine Wojahn, Ron Meyers, President Pro Tempore, Speaker Pro Tempore, Senate House AI Williants, Alan Thompson, Vice President ChiefOerk, Pro Tempore, House Senate Marty Brown, Dennis Karras, Secretary of the Senate Deputy Chief Oerk/ Director, OPR House Brad Hendrickson, Marilyn G. Showalter, Deputy Secretary, House Counsel/ Senate Deputy Chief Clerk, House Richard C. Fisher, Karen Parkhurst, Sergeant at Arms, Assistant Chief Clerk, Senate House Washington State Senate Leadership and Committee Assignments Senate Caucus Officers 1993 Democratic Caucus Majority Leader . Marcus S. Gaspard Caucus Chair . .................. Sid Snyder Majority Floor Leader ................. Jim )esernig Majority Whip . ............ Harriet A. Spanel Caucus Vice Chair .............. Margarita Prentice Majority Assistant Floor Leader .... Betti L. Sheldon Majority Assistant Whip. ... Valoria H. Loveland Republican Caucus Republican Leader .... Caucus Chair ........ Ann Anderson Republican Floor Leader ............ Irv Newhouse Republican Whip ........................ Bob Oke Republican Deputy Leader . Emilio Cantu Caucus Vice Chair. .............. Linda A. Smith Republican Assistant Floor Leader. Gary A. Nelson Republican Assistant Whip .... 1993
    [Show full text]
  • Telephone Directory & Committee
    2009 Telephone Directory & Committee Assignments 61st Washington State Legislature Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of Women’s Suffrage in Washington Image credits to: •Whatcom Museum image #1993.66.1 •Washington State Historical Society Recycled/ Recyclable Telephone Directory and Committee Assignments of the Washington State Legislature Sixty–First Legislature 2009 Regular Session Washington State Senate Brad Owen . President of the Senate Rosa Franklin . President Pro Tempore Paull Shin . .Vice President Pro Tempore Tom Hoemann . Secretary of the Senate Brad Hendrickson . Deputy Secretary of the Senate Jim Ruble . Sergeant at Arms Washington State House of Representatives Frank Chopp . Speaker Jeff Morris . Speaker Pro Tempore Barbara Baker . Chief Clerk Bernard Dean . Deputy Chief Clerk 61st Washington State Legislature Members by District District 1 District 14 Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe, D Sen. Curtis King, R Rep. Al O'Brien, D Rep. Norm Johnson, R Rep. Mark Ericks, D Rep. Charles R. Ross, R District 2 District 15 Sen. Randi Becker, R Sen. Jim Honeyford, R Rep. Jim McCune, R Rep. Bruce Chandler, R Rep. Tom Campbell, R TBD District 3 District 16 Sen. Lisa Brown, D Sen. Mike Hewitt, R Rep. Alex Wood, D Rep. Maureen Walsh, R Rep. Timm Ormsby, D Rep. Laura Grant-Herriot, D District 4 District 17 Sen. Bob McCaslin, R Sen. Don Benton, R Rep. Larry Crouse, R Rep. Tim Probst, D Rep. Matt Shea, R Rep. Deb Wallace, D District 5 District 18 Sen. Cheryl Pflug, R Sen. Joseph Zarelli, R Rep. Jay Rodne, R Rep. Jaime Herrera, R Rep. Glenn Anderson, R Rep. Ed Orcutt, R District 6 District 19 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • The 11Th District Journal
    WASHINGTON STATE—11TH DISTRICT DEMOCRATS THE 11TH DISTRICT JOURNAL AUGUST 2004 — VOLUME 2, ISSUE 8 Official Call 11th Legislative District Democrats Endorsement Meeting Wednesday August 18, 2004—6:00 pm (please note day and time change) Renton Carpenters Hall 231 Burnett Avenue North Light supper will be served and timeline for the event is included on page 3 11th Legislative District Democrats State Representative—Position 2 Candidate Forum Featuring Bob Hasegawa, Rosemary Quesenberry, Ed Prince, and Marvin Rosete Wednesday August 11, 2004 7:00 pm — 9:00 pm Renton Carpenters Hall 231 Burnett Avenue North Sponsored by the 11th LD Democrats Open to the Public Candidates File for Public Office July 26-30, 2004 marked a flurry of candidates filing for office at King County Records and Elections in Seattle and with the Secretary of State Offices in Olympia for statewide positions. Membership Chair George Summers hand-carried the 58 PCO applications, now listed at the web- site of the Elections office at, http://www.metrokc.gov/elections/contests/ contests.aspx. Filing for 11th LD—State Senator and State Representa- tives from the 11th Legislative District were: Senator Margarita Prentice-D, Jennifer Christensen-L, Bill Roenicke-R. Representative—Position 1: Zack Hudgins-D, Elizabeth Harris-R. Includes guest speakers, steak Representative—Position 2: Ed Prince-D, Marvin Rosete-D, Rosemary barbeque, silent auction Quesenberry-D, Bob Hasegawa-D, John Potter-R, Ruth Gibb-R. and raffle (Bold lettering indicates incumbents) AUGUST 2004 — VOLUME 2, ISSUE 8 PAGE 2 KCDCC Summer Picnic 11TH LD DEMOCRATS-ENDORSED August 14th Senator Margarita Prentice: Please join candidates and elected officials at our annual Summer pic- 419 John A.
    [Show full text]