20/09/2018

Management of Hyperacusis in Children Veronica Kennedy and Rosa Crunkhorn BACCH 10th September 2018

Case 1

» 3 year old » Dislikes hand driers, hoovers, motorbikes » Covers ears with hands – Flinches, panics » Otherwise well, normal development

1 20/09/2018

Case 2

» 8 year old girl » Multiple difficulties: – Babies crying – Dog barking – Birthday parties / family gatherings » Foetal valproate syndrome

Outcomes

» Know what hyperacusis is

» How common hyperacusis is

» Understanding of management of hyperacusis

2 20/09/2018

Definitions » Hyperacusis – disturbed loudness function (Phillips &Carr 1998) – Range of different descriptions may describe different sensations • Likely different underlying mechanisms and aetiologies » – fear of sound, anticipatory » – dislike for selected sounds

Prevalence

Defeating • 6% child population oversensitive to noise

Coelho, Sanchez, Tyler 2007 • 506 school children (5‐12yrs) • 42% bothered by sounds • 3.2% had hyperacusis–of whom 50% • 9% phonophobia

3 20/09/2018

Prevalence ALSPAC (Hall et al 2016) • 7097 11 year old children • 3.7% children reported hyperacusis. • more likely: • Male>females • where higher maternal education • where readmission to hospital in first four weeks

Bolton Case Review » Retrospective study – All children with troublesome sensitivity to sounds 2008‐2013 – Review of notes • Age, gender • Clinical presentation • levels • Associated medical conditions

4 20/09/2018

Age when first reported (n=61)

20 19 (31%)

15(24.5%) Male:Female 1.65:1. 15

10

6 5 5 4 Number children of 3 3 2 1 1 11

0 1y 2y 3y 4y 5y 6y 7y 8y 9y 10y 11y 15y

Age at presentation (y=years)

Which sounds are troublesome? Sounds Number of children (in order of frequency) (%) Vacuum cleaner 28(45%) Noisy crowd/children shouting 22(36%) Music related sounds 17(28%) Hair/hand dryer 13(21%) Siren/alarms 9(15%) Traffic/vehicle noise 7 Ringing noise/door bells 5 Washing machine 5 Clapping 4 Drilling noise 4 Dog barking 3

5 20/09/2018

How many sounds are troublesome? 35% 33% 31% 30%

25% 24%

20%

15%

10%

Number of children (%) 7%

5% 3% 2%

0% 123457 Number of troublesome sounds reported

Reported Behavioural Responses

• Cover ears 62% • Cry, scream, , panic 38% • General dislike 13% • Pain (Ears/head hurt) 9% • Runaway/hide 4% • Teeth grinding 2%

6 20/09/2018

Some examples • Covers ears before he shouts • Hates parties, family had to whisper happy birthday song • Avoids going to school dinner hall as noisy • Dreads school bell ringing • Family had to keep stopping to let noisy vehicles pass while walking

Assoc medical conditions in relation to age 12 A C B 10 F 8

6

(n=61) B A F 4 C D D Number of children 2 E E 0 < 5 yrs ≥ 5yrs A: Active middle ear problem 11 4 B: Neurodevelopmental 410 condition C: Both of the above 11 3 D: Past history glue ear 23 E: Sensorineural 01 F: None of the above 84

7 20/09/2018

Neurodevelopmental Conditions Number of children (28/61) Autistic spectrum disorder 8 (13%) Cerebral Palsy 3 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2 Down’s syndrome 2 Hydrocephalus 2 Epilepsy 2 Sensory processing problems 2 Dyspraxia 1 Klinefelter’s syndrome 1 Microcephaly,severe learning difficulties 1 1 Leigh’s syndrome 1 Microdeletion 15q13.3 1 Possible Syndrome (facial dysmorphism, 1 developmental delay, congenital heart defect)

Results Summary • Hearing loss present in about one‐third • problems/history in nearly half of them (OME: 11, Hx OME: 8) • Tinnitus reported in 13% of children • Neurodevelopmental/significant behavioural problems in more than half ‐ 55% (ASD 18%) • Overlap seen in 22% patients between OME and neurodevelopmental/behavioural problem

8 20/09/2018

Assessment • History • Sounds / sensations • Circumstance/setting • Impact / reactions • Support by others • Successful or unsuccessful strategies • Developmental and otological history

Date: m aft evening SOUND SENSITIVITY DIARY or er Child’s Name:______ni no Address:______ng______on ______

Example:

Sound or Situation: Dog barking in the park

Severity of child’s response 1 2 3 4 5 no sli m ve Maximum distress gh od ry distress t er di di at str str e es es di se s str d es s

Comments Started crying. Had to leave the park. Stopped crying only once inside the car.

Your response in this Picked him up/cuddled him. Felt very anxious. Also situation wanted to leave the park, hurried off to the car park immediately.

9 20/09/2018

Common Findings

• Control

• Unpredictability

• Spectrum: Hyperacusis – Phobic response

• Safety behaviours

Assessment

• Full audiological assessment (where possible) • Hearing thresholds and middle ear status • Age appropriate techniques should be used in an suitable paediatric setting. • Allow plenty of time and reassurance • (No ULLs)

10 20/09/2018

Management

Tailored Management • Likely mechanism • Depends on impact of hyperacusis Level 1 Cover

Level 2 Paddy make it stop Level 3 Avoid • Age/Developmental stage of child • Cognitive ability

11 20/09/2018

Possible mechanisms

‘Kennedy Classification’

1. Immature but normally developing 2. Temporary auditory deprivation 3. Disorder within the auditory system 4. Disorder of sensory processing

1. Immature but normally developing auditory system

• As most children with hypersensitivity in the pre‐ school group, ?hypothesise that with progressive maturation of the auditory system, the ability to process the troublesome sounds improve.

12 20/09/2018

Normally development of auditory system

• Progressive maturation of the auditory system, • myelination of the thalamic fibres of the thalamocortical auditory system 1‐4 yr old with further axonal myelination up to 10 years Moore (2002) • contributes to improvements in auditory sensitivity thresholds • maturation of intensity discrimination through at least 10 years of age Fior & Bolzonello (1982)

• Development of sensory gating between 7– 13 years (Davies, Chang, & Gavin, 2009) • Sensory gating is the process that inhibits ‘distracting’ or non‐ relevant auditory information. An inability to inhibit an influx or distracting information can cause difficulty in processing a sensory stimulus

• With maturation of the frontal cortex, decrease in susceptibility to interference from irrelevant environmental stimuli (Marshall, Bar‐Haim & Fox 2004).

13 20/09/2018

Emotions, flight or fight…

• Non‐classical auditory pathways Moller & Rollins (2001) : the limbic system and the amygdala • Respond to somatosensory as well as auditory stimuli • fight or flight response to aversive sounds • involvement of these pathways diminishes with increasing age

2. Temporary auditory deprivation • 1/3 in our study had history of hearing loss at some point mostly secondary to OME.

• Post grommets ‐ 47% (Nigam, 1994) • Temporary effect on the central auditory gain system and threshold of the middle ear reflex (Formby et al. (2003). Munro (2014)). • at an early age can impair sound intolerance by reducing GABA inhibition in inferior colliculus Sun Wei 2011 – Rat study

14 20/09/2018

3. Permanent Auditory disorder • For some, the disorder in the auditory system may be permanent rather than temporary. • Individuals with William’s syndrome frequently have some degree of hypersensitivity to sounds. • Possible causes a. Hyperactive auditory efferent system b. Lack of acoustic reflexes c. Also high incidence of OME in William’s syndrome ?auditory deprivation may be an additional factor here.(Klien 1990, Gothelf et al 2006).

4. Disorder of sensory processing

• Sensory over responsitivity (SOR) reported in children with developmental and learning disorders. • defined as a child’s exaggerated, intense, and/or frequent behavioural response to sensory stimulation. (Carter 2011).

15 20/09/2018

Sensory difficulties • Ben‐Sasson & Carter, 2009 prevalence of Sensory over responsitivity at levels interfering with routine activities in 5‐16% in school children

• Adamson et al 2006: 70% of children with ASD showed abnormal sensory reactivity with highest difficulty in auditory filtering. Sensory modulation difficulties in children with ASD independent of age.

• Sensory modulation difficulties have also been reported in children with other developmental disorders eg ADHD, Fragile X syndrome

Neurodevelopmental issues

• Hyperacusis may be the most visible part of a wider difficulty with integrating sensory information in the environment. • Children with ASD are often much less able to recognise and describe their emotional reactions

16 20/09/2018

Hyperacusis and ASD • contrary behaviours of hypersensitivity and unawareness to sound in ASD may be due to difficulties in attention control Funabikki et al 2012 • children with autistic spectrum disorder had ineffective inhibitory control of sensory processing. Orekhova et al • Dunn (2007) Difficulty regulating sensory information ‐ hyper‐sensitivity to sensory stimuli leading to sensory‐avoidance ie shying away or intensely reacting to loud sounds, bright lights, being held etc •

Anxiety in ASD

• Anxiety has the same physical correlates to anger. • Anger is easier to tolerate for most children and the behavioural correlates of anger also come with the added bonus of allowing the child to escape from the anxiety stimulus therefore reinforcing the anxiety, anger and behaviour

17 20/09/2018

Anxiety can exacerbate hyperacusis and vice versa The child with ASD often increased experiences an increased level increased auditory anxiety of emotional arousal. gain This is because the social environment contains threats increased for these children that neuro vigilance to sound typical children are oblivious to.

So how can we help?

18 20/09/2018

Don’t even think about it….

Management • Possible different approaches • Level 1 : • Explanation • Reassurance • Level 2 • Simple strategies • Calming strategies eg relaxation May need different • Level 3 approaches at the same time across these levels • Address safety behaviours • Sound therapy Modify a/c age, ability • Systematic desensitisation May need different skills

19 20/09/2018

Explanation • Age and ability dependant • Engage with child to explore sound • Validation • Why does it have to be loud? • How long does it last? • Instead of dwelling on the distress, explore the enjoyable aspect of the sound eg the colourful lights of the fireworks, dessert! • Be competitive

Reassurance

• Where the child becomes distressed by a sound, it may be helpful to gently move him/her away from the sound (if possible) and comfort them. (Better to act on early signs before responses entrenched)

• • Don’t force a child to stay in a situation that is obviously causing them distress

• Children may feel less anxious if they can leave the situation, or know they can, even for a short time, should the noise become distressing to them.

20 20/09/2018

Avoid labelling • Avoid negative labels or blaming re sound sources • ‘the dog is going to be good and not bark’ • ’naughty dog is barking’

• (Note how others caring for the child react – mixed messages)

Simple strategies • Acknowledgment • Diversion/direction • ‘Control’ • Identify/address safety behaviours • Aim for planned rather than reactionary behaviour, ‘permissions’ • Preparation/Setting the scene

21 20/09/2018

Relaxation

• Relaxation techniques • Finger cued breathing • Imagining favourite place • Sensory grounding techniques

• Mood/emotion regulation exercises

• Websites: Cosmic kids, Relax kids

22 20/09/2018

Managing control issues • Often the sounds that children find distressing are those over which they have no control. • The child's reaction to the sound will often get better if she/he can exercise some control over the noise eh ‘helping’ with the vacuuming. • For some children, it may be helpful to increase their interest, or get them involved, in the noisy activity that bothers them. It can be helpful to engage the child’s attention in the enjoyable part of the activity.

Safety Behaviours • Overt or covert behaviours which allow the user to escape the experience of anxiety and therefore prevent habituation. • Safety behaviours prevent the user from learning that the feared catastrophe does not happen (the avoidance of catastrophe is attributed to the safety behaviour). • Habituation will not occur if the child, or carer, is using covert safety behaviours

23 20/09/2018

Diversion/Direction • For some children, it may be helpful to increase their interest, or get them involved, in the noisy activity that bothers them. • engage the child’s attention in the enjoyable part of the activity. • sitting towards the front of school assembly/play where their interest may be maintained longer • giving them a fun but noisy task to do within the noisy activity eg keeping beat with a drum or tambourine.

Sound therapy • Aim is to improve the tolerance to problematic sounds by reducing the sensitivity of the ear. • Increase background sounds • The use of sound generators can help improve a child’s of control over a situation, such as school, where the option of moving away from the sound source is usually not possible • lack of evidence to support this • Can be helpful in children with ASD

24 20/09/2018

Systematic desensitisation • Repeated gentle exposure to the problem noise while the child is playing may help to reduce the child's anxiety and help him/her to get used to the sound. • It can also help to prepare the child before going into noisy situations as sudden or unexpected noises e.g. fireworks can be distressing.

• But must be something that child is on board with and can see benefit

Systematic desensitisation • Step 1: Identify hierarchy of troublesome or feared sounds • Step two: Learn relaxation and coping strategies • Age/ability • Relax kids website

25 20/09/2018

Systematic desensitisation • Step three: graded, step by step exposure to the sound or feared stimuli. (Bouchard, Mendlowitz, Coles and Franklin (2004). Important to • make treatment fun and playful, need a strong rapport with the child, • ensure that the child is motivated to undertake this challenging work, and rewarded for progress made • Know your limits professionally

Conclusion • Hypersensitivity to sounds can be distressing for children and their families • Many children/parents can be helped with explanation and strategies • Helpful strategies – need to know • Awareness of possible pathogeneses • Developmental and otological history • Prospective studies in children looking at pathogeneses and management needed

26 20/09/2018

JLA

The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership, a non-profit making initiative, specialise in bringing patients and clinicians together to identify and prioritise uncertainties, or 'unanswered questions'

• 2018: Top Ten hyperacusis research uncertainties • Managing a child with hyperacusis • Managing hyperacusis in a child with autism

Further information

• Hyperacusis in children: A clinical profile. Myne S, Kennedy V. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;107:80‐85.

• Increased Sound Sensitivity in Children. Veronica Kennedy, Claire Benton, and Rosie Kentish. Chapter 13 in Hyperacusis and Disorders of Sound Intolerance Clinical and Research Perspectives Ed: Marc Fagelson, David M. Baguley 2018 ISBN13: 978‐1‐94488‐328‐7

27 20/09/2018

Thank you for listening

References • Moore, D. R. (2002). Auditory development and the role of experience. Br. Med. Bull. 63(1),171–181. • Fior, R., & Bolzonello, P. (1988). An investigation on the maturation of hearing abilities in children. Ear and Hearing, 8(6), 347–349. • Marshall, P. J., Bar‐Haim, Y., & Fox, N. A. (2004). The development of P50 suppression in the auditory event‐related potential. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 51(2), 135–141. • Davies, P. L., Chang, W., & Gavin, W. J. (2009). Maturation of sensory gating performance in children with and without sensory processing disorders Int. J. Psychophysiol., 72(2), 187–197. Nigam A, Samuel PR. Hyperacusis and Williams syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108(6):494‐496. • Sun, W., Manohar, S., Jayaram, A., Kumaraguru, A., Fu, Q., Li, J., & Allman, B. (2011). Early age conductive hearing loss causes audiogenic seizure and hyperacusis behaviour. Hearing Research, 282(1–2), 178–183. Klein AJ, Armstrong BL, Greer MK, Brown FR 3rd. Hyperacusis and in individuals with Williams syndrome. J Speech Hear Disord 1990;55(2):339‐344. • Gothelf, D., Farber, N., Raveh, E., Apter, A., & Attias, J. (2006). Hyperacusis in Williams syndrome: Characteristics and associated neuroaudiologic abnormalities. , 66(3), 390–395. • Carter, A. S., Ben‐Sasson, A., & Briggs‐Gowan, M. J. (2011). Sensory over‐responsivity, psychopathology, and family impairment in school‐aged children. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. ., 50(12), 1210–1219. • Ben‐Sasson A, Carter AS, Briggs‐Gowan MJ. Sensory over‐responsivity in elementary school: prevalence and social‐emotional correlates. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009;37(5):705‐716. • Adamson A, O'Hare A, Graham C. Impairments in Sensory Modulation in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Br J Occup Ther 2006;69(8):357‐364. • Bouchard, S., Mendlowitz, S. L., Coles, M.E., & Franklin, M. (2004). Considerations in the use of exposure with children. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 11, 56–65.

28