DOCSLIB.ORG

The Omnipresence of Brahman-God in Indian and Western Thought

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Omnipresence of Brahman-God in Indian and Western Thought GOPAL STAVIG RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY The Omnipresence of Brahman-God in Indian and Western Thought GOPAL STAVIG paceless, timeless, and unchanging causation. All time is in us, we are not in Nirguna Brahma is omnipresent as the time. As the Soul [âtman] is not in time and Sfoundational ground of existence. space, all time and space are within the Soul. Remove Nirguna Brahma and all existence The Soul is therefore omnipresent.’3 ‘This immediately ceases to be. From the non- glass is limited; it is not omnipresent, dualistic standpoint, Shankara described because the surrounding matter forces it to Brahman as all-pervading, omnipresent take that form, does not allow it to expand. It (Sarvagata, Vibhu), boundless without an is conditioned by everything around it and is end, and not confined to a single locality. It therefore, limited. But that which is beyond is the seer of sight, the thinker of thought law, where there is nothing to act upon It, and the knower of knowledge. This is how can It be limited? It must be confirmed by the religious scriptures that tell omnipresent.’4 One infinite omnipresent us, ‘He is omnipresent like space and Brahman-God transcends the law of eternal’ and ‘This one is eternal, causality and is not limited by any omnipresent, steady and unchanging’ constraining external forces. He is not (Bhagavad Gità 2:24). In view of the fact restricted by space, time, and causality or by that Brahman is infinite, there is nothing name and form, and is thus, infinite and outside of It. Brahman is the substratum of omnipresent. space, the ground of existence. All things Concerning Saguna Brahma (Personal are rooted in Brahman while It is rooted in- God) the Divine attribute of omnipresence is Itself. Finite things are contingent having the property of being present in every only a dependent and participating location in heaven and in the universe existence, which they receive from concurrently at the same time, yet being Brahman, the omnipresent substrative cause contained in none. Qualified non-dualists of the universe.1 hold that Brahman-God is everywhere so Vivekananda indicates that Nirguna that we and the laws of nature are a fragment Brahman is ‘omnipresent, because He has no of Brahman-God. Vivekananda explains form. That which has no form or shape that omnipresence this way, ‘The whole universe which is not limited by space or time, cannot comprising all nature, and an infinite live in a certain place. How can it? It is number of souls, is, as it were, the infinite everywhere, omnipresent, equally present body of God. He is interpenetrating the through all of us.’2 ‘Form is confined to time whole of it.’5 ‘The whole world is a body, and space and is bound by the law of and behind that is the universal mind, and 6 Bulletin of the Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture October 2017 THE OMNIPRESENCE OF BRAHMAN-GOD IN INDIAN AND WESTERN THOUGHT behind that is the universal Soul. Just as this There is not a particle, not an atom in the body is a portion of the universal body, so universe where He is not.’9 ‘He is near and this mind is a portion of the universal mind, He is far. He is inside everything. He is and the soul of man a portion of the outside everything, interpenetrating universal Soul.’6 ‘The Personal God is only everything.’ ‘Therefore there is a the sum total of all, and yet It is an metaphysical necessity ... one Soul which individual by Itself, just as you are the covers and interpenetrates all the infinite individual body of which each cell is an number of souls in the world, in and through individual part itself.’7 This is omnipresence which they live, in and through which they in the total and most unlimited sense since sympathize, and love, and work for one the universe is the infinite body of God. another. And this universal Soul is A more moderate form is the doctrine of Paramàtman, the Lord God of the universe.’ Panentheism (all-in-God) according to ‘This highest Energy-Love-Beauty is a which the universe is contained within person, an individual, the Infinite Mother of Brahman-God, and that It is within all things this universe—the God of gods—the Lord of (Theoenpanism (God-in-all)).8 This lords, omnipresent yet separate from the coinherence is possible because It is universe—the Soul of souls, yet separate omnipresent. Referring to Brahman-God as from every soul.’10 ‘It,’ means that It combines He, She, and Swami Abhedananda emphasized, ‘If non-personal aspects. Maximum external we say that matter exists separate from and omnipresence indicates that all things reside outside of God, we have made Him limited within Brahman-God. Maximum internal by matter, we have made Him finite and (immanent) omnipresence means that perishable . if He is infinite and one, our Brahman-God resides in all things. An bodies and everything in the universe from infinite Brahman-God without limits is the minutest atom to the largest planetary omnipresent: being external and internal system, from the lowest animalcule to the (immanent) pervading the phenomenal highest Being, exist in and through that world, and existing beyond its limits Infinite Existence. The whole universe is (transcendent). It pervades all objects in God and God is in it; it is inseparable outside of us including space, which makes from God. I am in Him and He is in me . It external to us, just as another person’s this infinite Being pervades the universe and mind pervades their body, yet is external to interpenetrates every particle of matter, us. giving existence to everything.’ ‘Our body is As Swami Vivekananda states, ‘The a part of God’s body, our mind is a part of God of the Qualified non-dualists is also a the Divine or Universal Mind, our will is a Personal God, the repository of an infinite part of the Universal or Cosmic Will.’11 God number of blessed qualities, only He is is the ‘Supreme Lord of the universe, who interpenetrating everything in the universe. dwells in all beings and who is the life and He is immanent in everything and soul of all animate and inanimate objects of everywhere; and when the scriptures say that the world.... He is the one stupendous whole God is everything, it means that God is of which the manifested phenomena are but interpenetrating everything, not that God has parts. The gross material universe is His become the wall, but that God is in the wall. physical body. He sees through all eyes, Bulletin of the Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture October 2017 7 GOPAL STAVIG hears through all ears, eats through all omnipresence of Brahman-God is a source mouths, feels through all hearts, thinks of strength and comfort and conviction for through all minds, and reasons through all us.15 intellects.’12 ‘God is not merely the Ruler of Brahman-God, not being a physical the universe standing outside of nature, but object, is not contained in any location. He dwells in nature. He is immanent and Augustine (354-430), the Bishop of Hippo resident in nature. He is not only, therefore, in North Africa who also lived in Rome, extra-cosmic, but also intra-cosmic. He is made the point that God ‘knows how to be the internal Ruler of the universe. His wholly everywhere without being confined creation is constantly manifesting His to any place.’ God is wholly present powers. The physical body of this Being is wherever He is. Moreover, God is not the gross material universe. His mind is contained in or confined by any of the places the sum total of all the individual minds, at which He exists. ‘Although in speaking of and, therefore, it can be said that there is one Him we say that God is everywhere present, ocean of mind or mental force which we must resist carnal ideas and withdraw our pervades the universe, and that is neither mind from our bodily senses, and not yours, nor mine, but belongs to God.’13 imagine that God is distributed through all In the west Stephen Charnock (1628- things by a sort of extension of size, as earth 80), the British Puritan Presbyterian or water or air or light are distributed.’16 clergyman, put it, ‘God preserves all, and The Lutheran theologian Abraham therefore is in all. He works in Calov (1612-86) mentioned that God everything, everything lives and works in ‘comprehends all places, not as one who is Him; therefore He is present with all, or contained and circumscribed, but as the One rather if things live, they are in God, who who contains all things, according to a gives them life. If things live, God is in presence which is illocal and not local. This them, and gives them life; if things move, is what the scholars meant when they said: God is in and gives them motion; if things God is everywhere and God is nowhere— have any being, God is in and gives them everywhere inasmuch as His presence being; if God withdraws Himself, they comprehends all things, nowhere inasmuch presently lose their being.’14 as He is enclosed in nothing. It is not The idea of omnipresence or immanence possible for Him not to be present emphasizes the nearness of Brahman-God. everywhere.’17 Meditators are told to think of themselves as The American Baptist Augustus Strong being bathed in the bliss of Brahman-God. (1836-1921) noted that, ‘God’s nature is Since Brahman-God is omnipresent, It is without extension; is subject to no within us and that constitutes the immanent limitations of space; and contains in Itself divinity at the root and ground of our being.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emotional Doubt and Divine Hiddenness
    Eruditio Ardescens The Journal of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Volume 1 Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 (Spring 2014) Article 1 5-2014 Emotional Doubt and Divine Hiddenness A. Chadwick Thornhill Liberty University Baptist Theological Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts Part of the Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Thornhill, A. Chadwick (2014) "Emotional Doubt and Divine Hiddenness," Eruditio Ardescens: Vol. 1 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts/vol1/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eruditio Ardescens by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Emotional Doubt and Divine Hiddenness A. Chadwick Thornhill* Emotionally motivated doubts concerning one’s religious faith can generate severe pain and anxiety in the life of a believer. These doubts may generate both emotional and physical problems that also significantly affect their health. Os Guinness in speaking of this type of doubt asserts, “no one is hurt more than the doubter. Afraid to believe what they want to believe, they fail to believe what they need to believe, and they alone are the losers.” 1 While recent Christian scholarship has begun to be more attentive to this issue as it pertains to addressing the emotional doubts of the church community, much more work needs to be done concerning this prevalent issue. One issue in particular which may motivate emotional doubt and permit it to fester is that of divine hiddenness, or the silence of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Monotheism: a Signal of Transcendence Challenging
    Liberty University Original Monotheism: A Signal of Transcendence Challenging Naturalism and New Ageism A Thesis Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Divinity in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Ministry Department of Christian Leadership and Church Ministries by Daniel R. Cote Lynchburg, Virginia April 5, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Daniel R. Cote All Rights Reserved ii Liberty University School of Divinity Thesis Project Approval Sheet Dr. T. Michael Christ Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity Dr. Phil Gifford Adjunct Faculty School of Divinity iii THE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY THESIS PROJECT ABSTRACT Daniel R. Cote Liberty University School of Divinity, 2020 Mentor: Dr. T. Michael Christ Where once in America, belief in Christian theism was shared by a large majority of the population, over the last 70 years belief in Christian theism has significantly eroded. From 1948 to 2018, the percent of Americans identifying as Catholic or Christians dropped from 91 percent to 67 percent, with virtually all the drop coming from protestant denominations.1 Naturalism and new ageism increasingly provide alternative means for understanding existential reality without the moral imperatives and the belief in the divine associated with Christian theism. The ironic aspect of the shifting of worldviews underway in western culture is that it continues with little regard for strong evidence for the truth of Christian theism emerging from historical, cultural, and scientific research. One reality long overlooked in this regard is the research of Wilhelm Schmidt and others, which indicates that the earliest religion of humanity is monotheism. Original monotheism is a strong indicator of the existence of a transcendent God who revealed Himself as portrayed in Genesis 1-11, thus affirming the truth of essential elements of Christian theism and the falsity of naturalism and new ageism.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT on Science and Atheism: Whether Atheistic Belief Is
    ABSTRACT On Science and Atheism: Whether Atheistic Belief is Scientifically Motivated Charles L. Jester Director: Gerald Cleaver, Ph.D. The intent of this paper is to explore the motivation behind the rejection of theistic religious faiths by modern atheist scientists, and whether it is justified to claim that this rejection is scientifically motivated. First, a brief background of the development of the contemporary schism between faith and science is given, noting in particular changes in belief amongst the scientific community. Next, an exposition on the motivations for scientists’ convictions concerning God is laid out, followed by an address to the question of whether atheistic scientists reject all properties of God, or only certain of them. Based on analyses of personal statements, statistical data on beliefs, and developments in twentieth-century physics and mathematics, it is concluded that modern scientists who reject theism are not overwhelmingly motivated by science, and that they in fact do not reject all ideas of God. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Gerald B. Cleaver, Department of Physics APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Andrew Wisely, Director DATE: ___________________________ ON SCIENCE AND ATHEISM: WHETHER ATHEISTIC BELIEF IS SCIENTIFICALLY MOTIVATED A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Charles L. Jester Waco, Texas
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Divine Attributes of Monotheistic Religions in Ziggy Zezsyazeoviennazabrizkie’S All the Fish in the Sky Novel
    THE REPRESENTATION OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES OF MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS IN ZIGGY ZEZSYAZEOVIENNAZABRIZKIE’S ALL THE FISH IN THE SKY NOVEL A Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Strata One Degree FENA BASAFIANA 11140260000008 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2018 ABSTARCT Fena Basafiana, The Representation of Divine Attributes of Monotheistic Religions in Ziggy Zezsyazeoviennazabrizkie’s All the Fish in the Sky Novel. Thesis, Jakarta: English Letters Department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah, 2018. This Research aims to know the representation of divine attributes of monotheistic religions through HE as the unusual main character in Ziggy Zezsyazeoviennazabrizkie‟s All the Fish in the Sky novel using the concept of representation by Stuart Hall and the concept of monotheism by Ibn Arabi. This research also reveals the ideology of divine attributes of monotheistic religions through the identity of HE. The writer uses qualitative descriptive analysis method to reveal the findings. All data are collected from the narratives and dialogues of the novel. The writer finds that HE represents five divine attributes of monotheistic religions: superior, creator, helper, omnipresence and listener. Those divine attributes are represented through actions and characteristics of HE. By representing those divine attributes of monotheistic religions in HE is present as a male. A male is defined as the subject of the patriarchal system who holds authorization in the world. This research shows that this novel does not identify HE as a God but HE possesses divine attributes of monotheistic religions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of African Traditional Religion in Interreligious Encounters in Sierra Leone Since the Advent of Islam and Christianity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Unisa Institutional Repository THE PLACE OF AFRICAN TRADITIONAL RELIGION IN INTERRELIGIOUS ENCOUNTERS IN SIERRA LEONE SINCE THE ADVENT OF ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY by PRINCE SORIE CONTEH submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY In the subject RELIGIOUS STUDIES at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA PROMOTER: PROF G J A LUBBE APRIL 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNED DECLARATION ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x SUMMARY xi KEY WORDS AND PHRASES xv CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Objectives 3 1.2 Methodological Approach 4 1.2.1 Field work 6 1.3 Past and Present Academic Context 9 1.4 Literature Review 10 1.5 Socio-History of Sierra Leone 20 1.6 Outline 21 CHAPTER 2 Fundamental Tenets and Practices of Sierra Leone Indigenous Religion (SLIR) and Culture 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 Meeting our Subjects 26 2.2.1 The Mende 26 2.2.2 The Temne 27 2.2.3 The Limba 28 2.2.4 The Kono 29 2.2.5 The Krio 30 2.2.6 Common Cultural Straits 31 ii 2.3 Sources of SLIR 34 2.3.1 Oral Tradition 34 2.3.2 Forms of Art 35 2.4 Components of SLIR 37 2.3.1 The Supreme Being 37 2.3.1.1 Names of God 38 2.3.1.2 God Lives Above 41 2.3.1.3 God’s Intrinsic Attributes 43 2.3.1.3.1 Omnipotence 43 2.3.1.3.2 Omnipresence 45 2.3.1.3.3 Omniscience 45 2.3.1.3.4 All-seeing God 46 2.3.1.4 Activities of God 46 2.3.1.4.1 Creator 46 2.3.1.4.2 God as Ruler 48 2.3.1.5 The Worship of God 49 2.3.2 Lesser Gods/Deities 50 2.3.3 Angels 52 2.3.4 Ancestral Spirits 53 2.3.4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Knowledge of the Holy – God's Omnipresence
    Chapter 14 Knowledge of the Holy – God’s Omnipresence 1 CHAPTER 14 God's Omnipresence 1 Our Father, we know that Thou art present with us, but our knowledge is but a figure and shadow of truth and has 2 little of the spiritual savor and inward sweetness such knowledge should afford. This is for us a great loss and the 3 cause of much weakness of heart. Help us to make at once such amendment of life as is necessary before we can 4 experience the true meaning of the words “In thy presence is fulness of joy.” Amen. 5 The word present, of course, means here, close to, next to, and the prefix omni gives it universality. God is 6 everywhere here, close to everything, next to everyone. 7 Few other truths are taught in the Scriptures with as great clarity as the doctrine of the divine omnipresence. Those 8 passages supporting this truth are so plain that it would take considerable effort to misunderstand them. They declare 9 that God is immanent1 in His creation, that there is no place in heaven or earth or hell where men may hide from His 10 presence. They teach that God is at once far off and near, and that in Him men move and live and have their being. 11 And what is equally convincing is that they everywhere compel us to assume that God is omnipresent to account for 12 other facts they tell us about Him. 13 For instance, the Scriptures teach that God is infinite. This means that His being knows no limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Inman Divine Immensity and Omnipresence JMA Jtedit Final
    Divine Immensity and Omnipresence Ross D. Inman “Immensus Pater, immensus Filius, immensus Spiritus Sanctus” —Athanasian Creed The divine attributes of immensity and omnipresence have been integral to classical Christian confession regarding the nature of the triune God. Divine immensity and omnipresence are affirmed in doctrinal standards such as the Athanasian Creed (circa 500), the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Basel (1431-49), the Second Helvetic Confession (1566), the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647), the Second London Baptist Confession (1689), and the First Vatican Council (1869-70). In the first section of this chapter, I offer a brief historical overview of divine immensity and divine omnipresence in the Christian tradition. I then offer a brief taxonomy of contemporary models of divine omnipresence in the philosophical and theological landscape. In the second, more constructive section I aim to gesture toward the retrieval of several classical insights regarding immensity and omnipresence that remain unexplored in contemporary analytic work. 1. Divine Immensity and Omnipresence: Historical Landscape In the Christian theological tradition, divine immensity and omnipresence have largely been understood to be distinct yet intimately related divine attributes. Divine immensity has been closely associated with divine infinity, where divine infinity has traditionally been understood in negative terms as God’s being without limitation of any kind, whether in essence, power, knowledge, wisdom, goodness, etc. (Eph. 3:20; Is. 40:12, 15, 17). In positive terms, God is understood to be qualitatively infinite in that the divine nature is intrinsically full and complete in the eternal, divine processions of paternity, filiation, and spiration. It is precisely because of the absolute fullness and plenitude of the triune God ad intra (Ps.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology and Atheism in the Soviet Union Religion and Society 28
    Ideology and Atheism in the Soviet Union Religion and Society 28 GENERAL EDITORS Leo Laeyendecker, University of Leiden Jacques Waardenburg, University of Lausanne MOUTON DE GRUYTER • BERLIN • NEW YORK 1989 Ideology and Atheism in the Soviet Union by William van den Bercken MOUTON DE GRUYTER • BERLIN • NEW YORK 1989 Mouton de Gruyter (formerly Mouton, The Hague) in a Division of Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin. The vignet on the cover this book represents the symbol of the Agathos Daimon, the snake of the Good Spirit, known from Greek astrological and magical texts. As its Town God, the Agathos Daimon was believed to protect Alexandria, which was famous world-wide for its library with precious manuscripts and books. Translated from the Dutch by H.Th.Wake Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bercken, William Peter van den, 1946- Ideology and atheism in the Soviet Union. (Religion and society ; 28) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Atheism- Soviet Union. 2. Ideology. I. Title. II. Series: Religion and society (Hague, Netherlands); 28. BL2747.3.B47 1988 211'.8'0947 88-28526 ISBN 0-89925-384-9 (alk. paper) Deutsche Bibliothek Cataloging in Publication Data Bercken, William van den: Ideology and atheism in the Soviet Union / William van den Bercken. [Transi, by H.Th.Wake]. - Berlin ; New York : Amsterdam : Mouton de Gruyter, 1988 (Religion and society ; 28) ISBN 3-11-011406-2 NE: GT © Printed on acid free paper. © Copyright 1988 by Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. All rights reserved, including those of translation into foreign languages.No part of this book maybe reproduced in any form - by photoprint, microfilm or any other means - nor transmitted nor translated into a machine language without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • When Consumption Embraces Faith
    When Consumption Embraces Faith: How Religious Beliefs and Practices Influence Consumption by Vivian Yue Qin Business Administration Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: _____________________________ Gavan J. Fitzsimons, Co-Chair _____________________________ Richard Staelin, Co-Chair _____________________________ Bryan Bollinger _____________________________ Aaron C. Kay Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the reQuirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 ABSTRACT When Consumption Embraces Faith: How Religious Beliefs and Practices Influence Consumption by Vivian Yue Qin Business Administration Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: _____________________________ Gavan J. Fitzsimons, Co-Chair _____________________________ Richard Staelin, Co-Chair _____________________________ Bryan Bollinger _____________________________ Aaron C. Kay An abstract of the dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the reQuirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright by Vivian Yue Qin 2016 Abstract Marketers have long looked for observables that could eXplain differences in consumer behavior. Initial attempts have centered on demographic factors, such as age, gender, and race. Although such variables are able to provide some useful information for segmentation (Bass, Tigert, and Longdale 1968), more recent studies have shown that variables that tap into consumers’ social classes and personal values have more predictive accuracy and also provide deeper insights into consumer behavior. I argue that one demographic construct, religion, merits further consideration as a factor that has a profound impact on consumer behavior. In this dissertation, I focus on two types of religious guidance that may influence consumer behaviors: religious teachings (being content with one’s belongings), and religious problem-solving styles (reliance on God).
    [Show full text]
  • The Essence of God (Grace Fellowship – Revised 10/21/2011) Lesson 1 the Essence of God
    Basic Doctrine – God 1 (L1) – The Essence of God (Grace Fellowship – revised 10/21/2011) Lesson 1 The Essence of God I. Definition of Essence When we speak of the essence of God we are talking about His substance, about what the basic or essential nature of God is. Essence is opposed to things that are merely thoughts, or a force or power. When we say there is a God, we do not just mean that there is the idea of an infinite Spirit in our minds; but that such a Being really exists entirely independent of our idea of Him. Normally, when we talk about God’s essence we describe it in terms of spirituality, self- existence, infinity, and eternity. A. Spirituality Jesus said that God is Spirit (John 4:24) This means that: 1) God is immaterial. Jesus said, “a spirit does not have flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39). None of the properties of matter can be applied to God. He does not have a body or physical parts, He is not tangible, He does not have bulk or form. 2) God is invisible. John 1:18 - “No one has seen God at any time” Colossians 1:15 - “He [Christ] is the image of the invisible God” I Timothy 6:16 - [God] “whom no man has seen or can see.” How then are we to respond to passages that say that men have seen God? (Genesis 32:30; Exodus 3:6, 24:9-10; Numbers 12:6-8; Deuteronomy 34:10; Isaiah 6:1) Possible answers: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Omnipresence of God
    6 the Omnipresence of God Message introduction As embodied beings, we are limited by space and time. When confronted with com- peting demands on our time, we often excuse ourselves by stating that we can’t be in two places at once. God, however, can be in two places at once. In fact, He is everywhere at once. In this lesson, Dr. Lawson unfolds the biblical teaching of God’s omnipresence, demonstrating that there is no place in heaven or hell, nor the entire universe, where God is not present in the fullness of His being. Scripture readingS Psalm 139:7–10; Jeremiah 23:23–25 teaching obJectiveS 1. To explore the significance of God’s unbounded presence 2. To correct misunderstandings about the nature of God’s omnipresence 3. To demonstrate how an understanding of God’s omnipresence can comfort Christians experiencing hardships QuotationS If God be infinite, he is omnipresent. Suppose him infinite, and then suppose there is any- thing besides himself, and his presence with that thing, wherever it be, doth necessarily follow; for if he be so bounded as to be in his essence distant from anything, he is not infinite. —John Owen Does the Lord turn Himself unto our prayer only after long delay? Is not He omnipres- ent? Is not every whispered and stammering prayer known to Him, before there is yet a word in the tongue? —Abraham kuyper 22 6—the omnipresence of god 23 lecture outline I. Everywhere Present A. The doctrine of divine omnipresence teaches that God is at the same time present in every part of the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Theology Faculty Research and Publications Theology, Department of 1-1-2016 God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. God's Immanence: Liturgical Implications? College Theology Society Annual Convention 2016. © 2016 published by Thomas Hughson. Used with permission. 1 God’s Immanence: Liturgical Implications? A Question The 2016 Call for Papers in Systematic Theology asked, "In what way does the efficacy of the sacraments promote belief in the doctrine of God?" Inquiring in the reverse direction, "how does belief in the doctrine of God promote the efficacy of the sacraments?" will be the aim here. Belief is the act, doctrine on God the content; sacraments and liturgy will be interchangeable. Is the latter question methodologically legitimate? There is, after all, “the ancient saying: lex orandi, lex credendi …The law of prayer is the law of faith: the Church believes as she prays.”1 Should not the priority of liturgy to doctrine organize reflection? And yet the Church not only believes as she prays but also prays as she believes. So “When the Church celebrates the sacraments, she confesses the faith received from the apostles.”2 Sacraments confess and so contain “the faith received from the apostles.” Does not a mutual rather than unilateral dynamic underlie the ancient saying?3 The priority of Christ, Scripture, and apostolic tradition made beliefs normative in the origin, however inchoate, of exterior, effective, sacramental signs and meanings through which Christ and the Spirit acted within people. Seven ecumenical councils from 325 C.E.
    [Show full text]