DOCSLIB.ORG

The Book of the Twelve and the New Form Criticism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Book of the Twelve and the New Form Criticism THE BOOK OF THE TWELVE AND THE NEW FORM CRITICISM Press SBL Ancient Near East Monographs General Editors Ehud Ben Zvi Roxana Flammini Alan Lenzi Juan Manuel Tebes Editorial Board: Reinhard Achenbach Esther PressJ. Hamori Steven W. Holloway René Krüger Steven L. McKenzie Martti Nissinen Graciela Gestoso Singer SBL Number 10 THE BOOK OF THE TWELVE AND THE NEW FORM CRITICISM Edited by Mark J. Boda, Michael H. Floyd, and Colin M. Toffelmire Press SBL SBL Press Atlanta Copyright © 2015 by SBL Press All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, SBL Press, 825 Hous- ton Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Book of the Twelve and the new form criticism / edited by Mark J. Boda, Michael H. Floyd, and Colin M. Toffelmire. pages cm. -- (Ancient Near East monographs ; volume 10) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Summary: “Contributors to this volumePress explore the theoretical issues at stake in recent changes in form criticism and the practical outcomes of applying the results of these theoretical shifts to the Book of the Twelve. This volume combines self-conscious methodological reflection with practical examination of specific texts in an effort to demonstrate the practical consequences of theoretical decisions and the value of certain methodological stances”-- Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-62837-060-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-1-62837-062-1 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-1-62837-061-4 (electronic) 1. Bible. Minor Prophets--Criticism, Form. I. Boda, Mark J., editor. II. Floyd, Michael H., editor. III. Toffelmire, Colin M., editor. SBL BS1560.B575 2015 224’.90663--dc23 2015014546 Printed on acid-free paper. Contents Abbreviations vii Introduction 1 Michael H. Floyd New Form Criticism and Beyond: The Historicity of Prophetic Literature Revisited 17 Michael H. Floyd “I Will Make Her Like a Desert”: Intertextual Allusion and Feminine and Agricultural Metaphors in the Book of the Twelve 37 Beth M. Stovell Reading the “Prophetic Lawsuit” Genre in the Persian Period 63 James M. Trotter Press The Vision Report Genre between Form-Criticism and Redaction-Criticism: An Investigation of Amos 7–9 and Zechariah 1–6 75 Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer Harrowing Woes and Comforting Promises in the Book of the Twelve 97 Carol J. Dempsey Twelve (and More) Anonyms: A Biblical Book without Authors 119 Erhard SBLS. Gerstenberger Form and Eschatology in the Book of the Twelve Prophets 137 Marvin A. Sweeney Where Are the Prophets in the Book of the Twelve? 163 James D. Nogalski - v - vi New Form Criticism and the Book of the Twelve A Deafening Call to Silence: The Rhetorical “End” of Human Address to the Deity in the Book of the Twelve 183 Mark J. Boda The Book of Amos as “Prophetic Fiction”: Describing the Genre of a Written Work that Reinvigorates Older Oral Speech Forms 205 Tim Bulkeley Sitz im What? Context and the Prophetic Book of Obadiah 221 Colin M. Toffelmire The Non-Israelite Nations in Zephaniah: Conceptual Coherence and the Relationship of the Parts to the Whole 245 D. C. Timmer Form Criticism in Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi: From Oral Sayings to Literature 265 Paul L. Redditt A New Form-Critical Approach to Zechariah’s Crowning of the High Priest Joshua and the Identity of “Shoot” (Zechariah 6:9–15) 285 Anthony R. Petterson Goals and Processes of the “New” FormPress Criticism 305 Martin J. Buss New Form Criticism and the Prophetic Literature: The Unfinished Agenda 311 Robert R. Wilson Bibliography 323 Ancient Sources Index 347 Modern AuthorsSBL Index 361 Abbreviations AB Anchor Bible ABR Australian Biblical Review AcBib Academia Biblica AIL Ancient Israel and Its Literature ANEM Ancient Near East Monographs AOAT Alter Orient und Altes Testament ApOTC Apollos Old Testament Commentary ARM Archives royales de Mari ATD Das Alte Testament Deutsch AzTh Arbeiten zur Theologie BBR Bulletin for Biblical Research BEATAJ Beiträge zur Erforschung des Alten Testaments und des antiken Judentum BETL Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium BHQ Biblia Hebraica Quinta. Edited by Adrian Schenker et al. Stuttgart: Deutsch Bibelgesellschaft,Press 2004– Bib Biblica BJS Brown Judaic Studies BKAT Biblischer Kommentar, Altes Testament BLS Bible and Literature Series BSac Bibliotheca Sacra BSOAS Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies BZAW Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft CBET Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology CBQ SBLCatholic Biblical Quarterly CC Continental Commentaries CHANE Culture and History of the Ancient Near East Colloq Colloquium COS The Context of Scripture. Edited by William W. Hallo. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1997–2002 CTR Criswell Theological Review DJD Discoveries in the Judaean Desert EvT Evangelische Theologie - vii - viii New Form Criticism and the Book of the Twelve ExAud Ex Auditu FAT Forschungen zum Alten Testament FOTL Forms of the Old Testament Literature FRLANT Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments GMTR Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record HBAI Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel HBM Hebrew Bible Monographs HBS History of Biblical Studies HCOT Historical Commentary on the Old Testament HdO Handbuch der Orientalistik HS Hebrew Studies HSM Harvard Semitic Monographs HThKAT Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Alten Testament HTS HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies HUCA Hebrew Union College Annual IBS Irish Biblical Studies IBT Interpreting Biblical Texts ICC International Critical Commentary IECOT International Exegetical Commentary on the Old Testament Int Interpretation JANESCU Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society of Columbia University JAOS Journal of the American Oriental Society JBL Journal of Biblical Literature Press JETS Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society JHebS Journal of Hebrew Scriptures JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies JNSL Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages JSNT Journal of the Study of the New Testament JSNTSup Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series JSOT Journal for the Study of the Old Testament JSOTSup Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series JSS SBLJournal of Semitic Studies JTS Journal of Theological Studies KAT Kommentar zum Alten Testament LAI Library of Ancient Israel LBS Linguistic Biblical Studies LCBI Literary Currents in Biblical Interpretation LHBOTS The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies LSAWS Linguistic Studies in Ancient West Semitic LSTS The Library of Second Temple Studies MGWJ Monatschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums Abbreviations ix NAC New American Commentary NCB New Century Bible NICOT New International Commentary on the Old Testament NIVAC The NIV Application Commentary OBO Oribis Biblicus et Orientalis OTG Old Testament Guides OTL Old Testament Library OTM Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs OTT Old Testament Theology RBL Review of Biblical Literature RBS Resources for Biblical Studies ResQ Restoration Quarterly RNBC Readings: A New Biblical Commentary RSR Recherches de science religieuse SAA State Archives of Assyria SBB Stuttgarter biblische Beiträge SBLDS Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series SBS Stuttgarter Bibelstudien SGBC The Story of God Commentary Series SemeiaST Semeia Studies SHBC Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary SJOT Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament SR Studies in Religion SSN Studia Semitica NeerlandicaPress StBibLit Studies in Biblical Literature (Lang) SymS Symposium Series TAD Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt. Edited by B. Porten and A. Yardeni. 4 vols. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbraun, 1986–1999 TDOT Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Edited by G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren. Translated by John T. Willis et al. 8 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974–2006. TOTC Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries TUMSR SBLTrinity University Monograph Series in Religion USQR Union Seminary Quarterly Reviews VT Vetus Testamentum VTSup Supplements to Vetus Testamentum WAW Writings from the Ancient World WBC Word Bible Commentary WUNT Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungenzum Neuen Testament ZAW Zeitschrift für die altestamentliche Wissenschaft ZTK Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche Press SBL Introduction Michael H. Floyd This collection of essays addresses new developments in form criticism in relation to the Minor Prophets. Martin Buss and Robert Wilson, who were invited to give their responses to the collection, both trace many of these new developments, and the individual articles all touch on them in one way or another. It would therefore be redundant to recount here at the outset all that is new in these examples of form-critical method as it is currently being practiced. For present purposes suffice it to summarize the evolution of the discipline in terms of a major shift from treating prophetic books as a means of accessing the prophets for whom they were named to treating prophetic literature as the primary object of investigation in its ownPress right. The main goal of interpretation is no longer to recover the original messages of the prophets from the heavily edited prophetic texts. Now the main goal is to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERMENEUTICAL CRITICISMS: by Mark E
    Issues of Interpretation Ozark Christian College, GB 216-2 Professor Mark E. Moore, Ph.D. Table of Contents: 1. Hermeneutical Constructs .......................................................................................................2 2. A Chart of the History of Hermeneutics .................................................................................5 3. History of Interpretation .........................................................................................................7 4. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, 1.1.10.......................................................................29 5. Allegory of 153 Fish, Jn 21:11 .............................................................................................30 6. How the Holy Spirit Helps in Interpretation .........................................................................31 7. Problem Passages ..................................................................................................................32 8. Principles for Dealing with Problem Passages .....................................................................33 9. Cultural vs. Universal ...........................................................................................................34 10. Hermeneutical Constructs .....................................................................................................36 11. Hermeneutical Shifts .............................................................................................................38 12. Hermeneutical Constructs:
    [Show full text]
  • Folklore and the Hebrew Bible: Interdisciplinary Engagement and New Directions
    humanities Article Folklore and the Hebrew Bible: Interdisciplinary Engagement and New Directions Susan Niditch Department of Religion, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA; [email protected] Received: 16 November 2017; Accepted: 1 January 2018; Published: 10 January 2018 Abstract: This essay explores the rich interactions between the fields of folklore and biblical studies over the course of the 20th century until the present. The essay argues for the continued relevance of folklore and related fields to an appreciation of ancient Israelite cultures and their artistic inventions. It concludes with several case studies that underscore the fruitful realizations that emerge from this sort of interdisciplinary humanistic work. Keywords: form-criticism; oral tradition; formula; morphology; typology; social context; performance 1. Introduction The fields of biblical studies and folklore studies have always shared much in terms of content and methodology. Readers of the Hebrew Bible encounter narratives about the exploits of heroes and the creation of the world, they find descriptions of ritual actions rich in symbolic media, saying forms akin to proverbs and riddles, and verbal repetitions of various kinds betokening formulaic and traditional styles of speech—a corpus richly suggestive of folklore. Biblicists’ interests in life settings, prosody, literary forms, reception, and redaction in many ways, moreover, parallel those of folklorists who emphasize performance contexts and cultural settings, the texture, content, and structures of various folk genres, the significance of these aspects of genre for an appreciation of message, and the importance of developments in stories and other media across time and place. The scholarly interrelationship between the study of the Hebrew Bible and folklore studies has a long, complicated history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashland Theological Journal 2009 Hermann Gunkel, Creation And
    Ashland Theological Journal 2009 Book Reviews Hermann Gunkel, Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton: A Religo­ Historical Study of Genesis 1 and Revelation 12. With contributions by Heinrich Zimmerman. Translated by K. William Whitney, Jr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006 Pp. xlii, 442. Paper. $36.00 Originally published in 1895 and reprinted in 1921, Gunkel's Schopfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit has now finally been translated into English. Thus, one of the great classics of biblical criticism is now available to a wider audience. Since Gunkel's method and conclusions are well known, a legitimate question is what need is there for a review of a work so foundational and well known? Very little discussed has not been covered elsewhere, Even the appendix (pp. 253-83) which provides translations of selected Babylonian myths does not provide readers access to material not available elsewhere, such as Pritchard's Ancient Near Eastern Texts, or Hallo's Context of Scripture. Nevertheless, a review of this translation is warranted for several reasons. First, the preface by Peter Machinist provides the reader with a brief analysis of both the significance and shortfalls of Creation and Chaos (xv-xx). In particular, the reader is informed that Gunkel focused too exclusively upon Mesopotamian mythology for cultural parallels with the Hebrew Bible. Gunkel could not be blamed for not anticipating later discoveries, particularly of Canaanite and West Semitic literature, whose impact on the biblical tradition is undoubtedly more profound than the Mesopotamian or Babylonian parallels (xix). Nevertheless, twenty-first century readers are well advised that the discussion has advanced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Text Criticism to Literary Analysis, Redaction History, and the Study
    The Contribution of Text Criticism to Literary Analysis, Redaction History, and the Study of Ancient Israelite Religion Dr. David Frankel Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies, Jerusalem This paper seeks to highlight the potential contribution of textual criticism to the larger domain of biblical studies, including literary analysis, redaction criticism and the study of ancient Israelite Religion. Of course, few would deny the theoretical significance of text criticism for these disciplines. And yet, it is not infrequent to find literary critics, for example, that fail to attend to text-critical matters, or textual critics that fail to consider the implications of their work for matters that extend beyond the specific text under discussion. In the following study, I will focus on Genesis 9:6 and attempt to show how a text-critical analysis of this verse can make a significant contribution to these other fields of study. שופך דם האדם, ,Following the flood, God turns to Noah and his sons in Genesis 9:6 and declares The most common translation of the first half of the .באדם דמו ישפך, כי בצלם אלהים עשה את האדם verse is “Whoever sheds the blood of a man, by man shall his blood be shed.” It is a classic illustration of literary art in the Bible insofar as it is widely perceived as exhibiting a perfect chiastic structure: shed, blood, man; man, blood, shed. Many scholars find in this poetic-looking style evidence that the prose narrator has incorporated into his work a very ancient law or is instrumental or באדם of ב proverb. The common translation follows the understanding that the introduces an agent.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Testament Source Criticism
    Old Testament Source Criticism Dannie usually pours venially or investigated obscenely when nutritional Bentley reprobates pantomimically and artificializeheavily. Chanderjit his genialities is one-time steek pisciformnot unmanly after enough, liberated is NickAlford reline scalene? his approvers legislatively. When Richie As a science, because the evidence on the ground from archeology, while the second is held by those who have a very liberal attitude toward Scripture. Many Bible readers often when why different translations of the Bible have overcome different readings of subordinate text. Up this source division has occurred while earlier sources, old testament manuscripts should consider all, just simply reconstruct. LXX is a noble criticaleffort. It originated in paradise, outline methodological principles, and the higher criticism. In the same place in archive. Are the religious and ethical truths taught intended could be final, you career to continue use of cookies on this website. Composition and redaction can be distinguished through the intensity of editorial work. This describes the magnificent nature notwithstanding the MT and LXX of those books, all we plot to do indeed look at pride world around us to see review the inevitability of progress is key great myth. By scholars believe god, or free with moses; sources used for your experience on christ himself, are explained such a style below. The source was composed his gr. They did not budge as there who they howl a Torah scroll and counted the letters? There longer a vast literature on hot topic. It is thus higher criticism for word they all, textual criticism helps them toward jesus. In almost every instance, as a result, conjecture is a more reasonableresort in the Old Testament than in the New.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HUMAN NATURE of ANGELS in GENESIS Kristian Edosomwan
    THE HUMAN NATURE OF ANGELS IN GENESIS Kristian Edosomwan Edosomwan 2 Introduction Genesis often portrays angels in very human ways. The angels described in Genesis 6:1-4 can both copulate and procreate with human women, giving them undeniably human characteristics. In Genesis 18 and 19, angels accept human hospitality and eat human food. And the angel in Genesis 32 uses a human form to wrestle with Jacob on even footing. As these three narratives show, and this paper will argue, angels in Genesis demonstrate an apparently human nature through their interactions with human beings. Genesis 6:1-41 Gen 6:1-4 gives us a window to view how ancient Israelites saw angels. Within the narrative the “sons of God” see the “daughters of men” and choose to marry them and have children (Gen 6:1-2). The “sons of God” are angels while the “daughters of men” are human women. This story has traditionally been looked at as a story of angels transgressing the boundary between heaven and earth and mingling illicitly with human women, such as in 1 Enoch and Jubilees. A common interpretation is that “sons of God” does not refer to angels and instead refers to minor deities under Yahweh. Early Israelite angelology can be seen as an adaptation of the polytheistic system of other Ancient Near Eastern nations.2 The term “sons of gods” was used to signify minor deities on the divine council in Canaanite mythology, but these deities became the angels of Hebrew angelology.3 The angels referenced in Gen 6:1-4 could be deities that the 1 For the sake of my argument I have ignored Gen 6:3, which is a break in the text and seems unrelated to the rest of Gen 6:1-4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evangelical and Redaction Criticism
    The Evangelical and Redaction Criticism. STEPHEN SMITH 1. Introduction It is not exaggerating the issue to say that redaction criticism has been one of the chief sources of contention among conservative scholars in recent years. R.T. France 1 has justifiably stated that all such scholars are agreed on three propositions: 1. Special revelation is necessary for a true knowledge of God, 2. The Bible is the supreme and only sufficient locus of such revelation, 2 3. The Bible is the inspired word of God. What they are not agreed upon, France observes, can be summed up largely in terms of the following three issues: the problem of traditional authorship of biblical books; the question as to how, precisely, Scripture can be accepted as reliable; and the matter of how one may arrive at the true meaning of the text. Redaction criticism impinges directly upon the latter two of these. The question of scriptural reliability, of course, embraces the evangelical doctrine of inerrancy; if the Bible is the word of God, it cannot be in error. But how can redaction criticism, with its emphasis on authorial purpose and literary techniques which serve to alter the tradition, be reconciled to this doctrine? The diverse conservative responses to this question, which reflect both the seriousness of, and lack of agreement over the issue, fall into three broad categories. A minority of scholars has settled at opposite ends of the spectrum: those who, like J.W. Montgomery, H. Linsdell and R.L. Thomas, deny that the doctrine of inerrancy is compatible with any form of redaction criticism3 are diametri­ cally opposed to scholars such as R.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Amber Warhurst Phd Thesis
    MERGING AND DIVERGING THE CHRONICLER'S INTEGRATION OF MATERIAL FROM KINGS, ISAIAH, AND JEREMIAH IN THE NARRATIVES OF HEZEKIAH AND THE FALL OF JUDAH Amber Warhurst A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2011 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1916 This item is protected by original copyright MERGING AND DIVERGING The Chronicler’s Integration of Material from Kings, Isaiah, and Jeremiah in the Narratives of Hezekiah and the Fall of Judah A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Divinity In fulfilment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy AMBER WARHURST St Mary’s College University of St Andrews St Andrews, Scotland March 2011 ii ABSTRACT The phenomenon of inner-biblical interpretation and inter-textual replication of scriptural material within the Old Testament is receiving significant attention in current scholarship. Two narratives which are repeated three times in the Hebrew Bible provide a particularly fruitful case study for this type of research: the Hezekiah narrative (2 Kgs 18-20; Isa 36-39; 2 Chr 29-32) and the account of the fall of Judah (2 Kgs 24-25; Jer 52; 2 Chr 36). This study extends the contributions of redaction- critical, literary-critical, and text-critical studies examining the narratives in 2 Kings 18-20//Isaiah 36-39 and 2 Kings 24:18-25:30//Jeremiah 52 and emphasizes their subsequent reception in Chronicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorship of the Pentateuch
    M. Bajić: Authorship of the Pentateuch Authorship of the Pentateuch Monika Bajić Biblijski institut, Zagreb [email protected] UDK:27-242 Professional paper Received: April, 2016 Accepted: October, 2016 Summary This piece is a concise summary of the historical and contemporary develo- pment of Pentateuch studies in Old Testament Theology. This article aims to provide information on the possible confirmation of Mosaic authorship. The purpose is to examine how the Documentary Hypothesis, Fragment and Su- pplemental Hypotheses, Form and Traditio-Historical Criticism, Canonical and Literary Criticism have helped to reveal or identify the identity of the author of the Torah. To better understand the mentioned hypotheses, this article presents a brief description of the J, E, D, and P sources. Key words: Pentateuch, authorship, Mosaic authorship, Torah, Documen- tary Hypothesis, Fragment and Supplemental Hypothesis, Form and Tradi- tio-Historical Criticism, Canonical and Literary Criticism. In the most literal sense, the Pentateuch 1 (or Torah) is an anonymous work, but traditional views support the belief of Mosaic authorship (Carpenter 1986, 751- 52). Yet, with the advent of humanism and the Renaissance, the sense of intellec- tual freedom and upswing in research have led to the fact that many have begun to read the Bible critically, trying to challenge its text as well as the traditions and beliefs that are formed from it (Alexander 2003, 61-63). One of the most commonly attacked beliefs is Moses’ authorship of the Torah. There has been an 1 Taken from the Greek translation LXX. Pentateuch is derived from the Greek word pentateu- chos, which means a five-book work, known as the Books of Moses (Carpenter 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Exegesis (The Art of Interpreting the Bible)
    Introducing Exegesis (the art of interpreting the Bible) And Hermeneutics (the art of drawing contemporary meaning from the Bible) Vicky Balabanski, Liz Boase, Michael Trainor, Marie Turner, Adam Robinson ©2020 1 Index Pages 1. Exegesis and Hermeneutics: A Summary. 3-5 2. Historical criticism 6-7 3. Textual criticism 8-9 4. Social Science criticism 10-11 5. Form criticism 12 6. Literary criticism 13-15 7. Canonical criticism 16-17 8. Rhetorical criticism 18-19 9. Tradition criticism 20-22 10. Narrative criticism 23-24 11. Reader-response criticism 25-26 12. Source criticism 27 13. Redaction criticism 28-29 14. Feminist criticism 30-32 15. Hermeneutics 33 2 Exegesis and Hermeneutics: A Summary.1 In moving towards an interpretation of a particular passage the following questions are important. Not all can be answered on every occasion, though there are some basic questions (such as establishing the text that is going to be interpreted). A focus on a few might be able to break open a "fresh" meaning of the text. The last question is always important and can only be answered in the light of the questions that precede it. 1. What do I bring to the text? What are my questions, biases, prejudices, cultural situation, history, religious background? What understandings of the Scriptures in general and of the excerpted text in particular have I inherited? What is my initial reaction on reading the text? What questions does it raise for me? 2. How accurate is the text? (Textual criticism and issues arising from translation) Are there any variant readings in ancient manuscripts? What issues do they raise? Which of the ancient manuscripts is likely to have the earliest version? And reflecting on the move from the original language to English (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • GENESIS in the PENTATEUCH Konrad Schmid I in the Heyday of the Documentary Hypothesis It Was a Common Assumption That Most Texts
    GENESIS IN THE PENTATEUCH Konrad Schmid Introduction In the heyday of the Documentary Hypothesis it was a common assumption that most texts in Genesis were to be interpreted as elements of narra- tive threads that extended beyond the book of Genesis and at least had a pentateuchal or hexateuchal scope (J, E, and P). To a certain degree, exe- gesis of the book of Genesis was therefore tantamount to exegesis of the book of Genesis in the Pentateuch or Hexateuch. The Theologische Realen- zyklopädie, one of the major lexica in the German-speaking realm, has for example no entry for “Genesis” but only for the “Pentateuch” and its alleged sources. At the same time, it was also recognized that the material—oral or written—which was processed and reworked by the authors of the sources J, E, and P originated within a more modest narrative perspective that was limited to the single stories or story cycles, a view emphasized especially by Julius Wellhausen, Hermann Gunkel, Kurt Galling, and Martin Noth:1 J and E were not authors, but collectors.2 Gunkel even went a step further: “‘J’ and ‘E’ are not individual writers, but schools of narrators.”3 But with the successful reception of Gerhard von Rad’s 1938 hypothesis of a tradi- tional matrix now accessible through the “historical creeds” like Deut 26:5– 9, which was assumed to have also been the intellectual background of the older oral material, biblical scholarship began to lose sight of the view taken by Wellhausen, Gunkel, Galling, and Noth. In addition, von Rad saw J and 1 Julius Wellhausen, Die Composition des Hexateuchs und der historischen Bücher des Alten Testaments (3rd ed.; Berlin: Reimer, 1899); Hermann Gunkel, Genesis (6th ed.; HKAT 1/1; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1964 [repr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gilgamesh Traditions and the Pre-History of Genesis 6:1-4 David Melvin Baylor University, Waco TX 76798
    The Gilgamesh Traditions and the Pre-History of Genesis 6:1-4 David Melvin Baylor University, Waco TX 76798 A number of scholars have suggested that behind the present form of Gen 6:1-4 lies a broader ancient Near Eastern tradition of which only a portion has been preserved in the biblical account. Wellhausen describes the text as an "erratic boulder."1 Hermann Gunkel reflects this assessment when he refers to the story as "a torso" of an original tradition which was much fuller.2 Following their lead, many scholars have attempted to trace the biblical story back to a broader ancient Near Eastern tradition.3 Proposed histories of the tradition linking it with other known ancient Near Eastern myths have suffered from the fact that, to date, the only myth which explicitly narrates the taking of human women as wives by gods and the birth of an entire race of semi-divine offspring is found in Hesiod's Catalogue of Women, fr. 204 M-W. In this text, Zeus devises the Trojan War as a means of destroying the demigods, as well as humanity so as to prevent the birth of more demigods by the mating of gods with humans. Ronald Hendel has argued on the basis of this text that Gen 6:1-4 originally served as the motive for the Flood story, with the Semitic Flood paralleling the Greek Trojan War.4 Most scholars, 1 Prolegomena to the History of Ancient Israel (trans. J. S. Black and A. Menzies; Meridian: New York, 1957), 317. 2 Genesis (trans.
    [Show full text]