DOCSLIB.ORG

Copies After the Ghent Altarpiece for Spain: Four Case Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copies After the Ghent Altarpiece for Spain: Four Case Studies Chapter 4 Copies after the Ghent Altarpiece for Spain: Four Case Studies Leslie Blacksberg Few can doubt the visual power of the Altarpiece of the Holy Lamb by Hubert and Jan van Eyck (Fig. 4.6), completed in 1432 for Joos Vijd and Elisabeth Borluut, wealthy, wool industrialists of Ghent.1 Nearly 600 years after its cre- ation, the altarpiece continues to mesmerize. The rich colors of its oil paint and its veracity of form makes the polyptych timeless. To have seen the Ghent Altarpiece in the fifteenth century would be to experience a work of art un- like any other. The four artists of my case studies may in fact have had that experience. The works that they produced were all made for Spain or acquired for it, and they are: the Virgin of the Councilors by Lluis Dalmau (Barcelona, Museo Nacional d’Art de Catalunya, fig. 4.2); the Fountain of Life by a follower of Jan van Eyck (Madrid, The Prado, fig. 4.3); Christ and the Singing Angels by Hans Memling (Antwerp, Royal Museum of Fine Arts, fig. 4.4); and the Dëesis by Jan Gossart (Madrid, The Prado, fig. 4.5).2 All of these paintings are what I call partial copies, since they borrow only selected motifs, and their intentions are radically different from full-scale copies.3 I will examine how the copy re- sponds to its model while considering larger themes such as the fame of the Altarpiece of the Holy Lamb, the desire of the patrons to include elements from the Ghent Altarpiece in their commission, and the function of partial copying 1 This research was first presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Netherlandic Studies, in Ann Arbor, MI on 3 June 2016. I would like to dedicate this paper to Diane G. Scillia for her generous spirit and thoughtful comments. I would also like to thank Amy Golahny for making the connections that allowed my paper to be published. I am further grateful to Dr. Abbey Poffenberger, chair of the department of Languages, Cultures, and Humanities at Eastern Kentucky University for the support in the purchase of photographs. 2 For Eyckian copies and derivations see also the paper by Larry Silver in this volume. 3 Jozef Duverger proposes that there were two categories of copying of the Altarpiece of the Holy Lamb: partial copies in which selected motifs were borrowed to be used for other com- positions and complete replicas. In order to preserve the uniqueness of the orginal, Duverger argues that the church authorities tried to limit the latter, see Jozef Duverger, “Kopieën van het ‘Lams-Gods’-retabel van Hubrecht en Jan van Eyck.” Bulletin Koninklijke Musea voor Schone Kunsten Brussel, no. 3, 1954, pp. 51–68, 62–3 and 55. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi:10.1163/9789004379596_006 166 Blacksberg Figure 4.1 Hubert and Jan van Eyck, Altarpiece of the Holy Lamb. 1432, interior view, Saint Bavo’s Cathedral, Ghent Erich Lessing / Art Resource, New York itself. In conclusion, I will evaluate the four case studies in relation to the great- er phenomenon of copying in fifteenth-century Flanders. 1 The Case Studies Lluis Dalmau, the court painter of Alfonso V from Aragon, has the possible distinction of being the only artist in our group to have been in Jan van Eyck’s Bruges studio when Jan was alive. In 1431, Dalmau was awarded the sizeable amount of 100 gold guilders by his royal patron to travel to Bruges to train, most likely to learn the art of oil painting in Jan’s workshop.4 In Bruges, Dalmau may have had contact with Jan’s workshop or even Jan himself. Back in Spain, Dalmau was commissioned in 1443 by the city councilors of Barcelona to 4 Susan F. Jones, “Jan van Eyck and Spain.” Boletin del Museo del Prado, vol. 32, no. 50, 2014, pp. 30–49, 32; and Stephan Kemperdick, “The History of the Ghent Altarpiece.” The Ghent Altarpiece by the Brothers Van Eyck: History and Appraisal, edited by Stephan Kemperdick and Johannes Röẞler, Michael Imhof, 2014, pp. 8–69, 29. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 2012 Newsletter
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 29, No. 2 November 2012 Jan and/or Hubert van Eyck, The Three Marys at the Tomb, c. 1425-1435. Oil on panel. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam. In the exhibition “De weg naar Van Eyck,” Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, October 13, 2012 – February 10, 2013. HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904 Telephone: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President - Stephanie Dickey (2009–2013) Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Vice-President - Amy Golahny (2009–2013) Lycoming College Williamsport, PA 17701 Treasurer - Rebecca Brienen University of Miami Art & Art History Department PO Box 248106 Coral Gables FL 33124-2618 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Contents Board Members President's Message .............................................................. 1 Paul Crenshaw (2012-2016) HNA News ............................................................................1 Wayne Franits (2009-2013) Personalia ............................................................................... 2 Martha Hollander (2012-2016) Exhibitions ............................................................................ 3 Henry Luttikhuizen (2009 and 2010-2014)
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Ïhe Clrthusisds of 'Genadeda!' Near Bruges Unlike All Rctigious
    'Genadeda!' Cïartcrhouses in the low Countries had also rcccived substantial ducal supporr-r 5. Ïhe ClrthusisDs of near Bruges Notable mcmbers of Ée oÍdcr, Dionysius of Louvain (l4f/z-71), and Jacob R.uebs, pncr of the Grthusians at Ghent, wcre both cormcillors of Philip the Unlike all rctigious instiUrtions in Bruges discussed thus far, the Good. Carthusian Monastery'Genadcdal'was sinntcd ouSidc the city walls, in tbe Many chartcrhouses devclopcd as important ccntcrs of manuscript production. rcrrirory siuratcd bctwecn thc parish church of the community of Sint-Ihtis and The Carthusian nrlc rcquired tlrat the monks live thcir days of thc Brugcs-Damme canal (Pl. 94).tt It was foundcd in l3lt undcr the auspiccs manual labor in soliary conrcmplation.r Copyrng manuscrips offered ample opporurnity and witl thc financiat suppoÍt of Jan van Kockclac, a pricst arached to thc parish to follow this rule faithfirlly. of oru. Lady. Thc firS sronc of thc monastcry buildings was laid by Count Genadedal, likc many othcr Carthusian monastcries, had a rcmarkable Robcrt III of Betbrrne (ruIcd 1305-22), one of the grcat bcnefactors of the collcction of manuscripts, most of which wcrc unforurnatcly losrt Onc of the promincnt foundation.* The Bnrgcs city rnagisranrc also belpcd the new foundation, for most bibliophilcs was Dom Ouo Amclisz van Mocrdrccht, prior of the which thc gcneral chaper of the order c:rprcsscdits gntiude. monastcry between 1433 and 1438. Bcfore he was appoinrcd ge rhis position, he The prcmiscs of the Carthusian monastcry consisted of frfucn seParatc headedthe monastcry Nieuwlicht at UnechL In l423,the ycar of his novitiae, he cells cach wittr its own linle gardcn, ccntc,rcdround ao inner courtyand, a modcst had some books copied and illuminaed for the library at Urechrlt Som" monks church with one aislc only, and stables and storage facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Netherlandish Underdrawing Craze and the End of a Connoisseurship Era
    Genius disrobed: The Early Netherlandish underdrawing craze and the end of a connoisseurship era Noa Turel In the 1970s, connoisseurship experienced a surprising revival in the study of Early Netherlandish painting. Overshadowed for decades by iconographic studies, traditional inquiries into attribution and quality received a boost from an unexpected source: the Ph.D. research of the Dutch physicist J. R. J. van Asperen de Boer.1 His contribution, summarized in the 1969 article 'Reflectography of Paintings Using an Infrared Vidicon Television System', was the development of a new method for capturing infrared images, which more effectively penetrated paint layers to expose the underdrawing.2 The system he designed, followed by a succession of improved analogue and later digital ones, led to what is nowadays almost unfettered access to the underdrawings of many paintings. Part of a constellation of established and emerging practices of the so-called 'technical investigation' of art, infrared reflectography (IRR) stood out in its rapid dissemination and impact; art historians, especially those charged with the custodianship of important collections of Early Netherlandish easel paintings, were quick to adopt it.3 The access to the underdrawings that IRR afforded was particularly welcome because it seems to somewhat offset the remarkable paucity of extant Netherlandish drawings from the first half of the fifteenth century. The IRR technique propelled rapidly and enhanced a flurry of connoisseurship-oriented scholarship on these Early Netherlandish panels, which, as the earliest extant realistic oil pictures of the Renaissance, are at the basis of Western canon of modern painting. This resulted in an impressive body of new literature in which the evidence of IRR played a significant role.4 In this article I explore the surprising 1 Johan R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghent Altarpiece”
    “The Ghent Altarpiece” or “The Adoration of the Mystical Lamb” By Jan van Eyck 1432 This celebrated masterpiece—which also holds the dubious distinction of being the world’s most stolen artwork—is a remarkable testament to the virtuosity of the Flemish painter Jan van Eyck. Not only does the “Ghent Altarpiece” astound through its use of vibrant color and texture, the painting is also the first of its kind in which an artist pays deliberate attention to detail, drawn directly from nature. Through this display of detail, the painting gave birth to a “new realism” in northern renaissance art. In this regard, then, the “Ghent Altarpiece” is one of humanity’s great artworks, with a significance to art and world heritage that ranks it as one of the most important works of art in the entire world. The altarpiece consists of 24 framed panels and can be viewed from two sides—a front view, as pictured here, and a back view. In the upper panels we see the Virgin Mary, Christ and John the Baptist. Below, are angels singing, and playing music. Further below, are panels that comprise the adoration of the lamb with the faithful streaming forward toward the scene in separate side panels. The Upper Panels (Center): While the identities of the Virgin Mary and John the Baptist are unmistakable, there is debate over the identity of the central figure. Most commonly understood to be Christ, art historians through the years have noticed several elements in this central figure’s portrayal that indicate that van Eyck may have intended this figure to represent a melding of God and Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • On Making a Film of the MYSTIC LAMB by Jan Van Eyck
    ARAS Connections Issue 4, 2012 Figure 1 The Mystic Lamb (1432), Jan van Eyck. Closed Wings. On Making a film of THE MYSTIC LAMB by Jan van Eyck Jules Cashford Accompanying sample clip of the Annunciation panel, closed wings middle register from DVD is available free on YouTube here. Full Length DVDs are also available. Details at the end of this article. The images in this paper are strictly for educational use and are protected by United States copyright laws. Unauthorized use will result in criminal and civil penalties. 1 ARAS Connections Issue 4, 2012 Figure 2 The Mystic Lamb (1432), Jan van Eyck. Open Wings. The Mystic Lamb by Jan van Eyck (1390–1441) The Mystic Lamb (1432), or the Ghent Altarpiece, in St. Bavo’s Cathedral in Ghent, is one of the most magnificent paintings of the Early Northern Renais- sance. It is an immense triptych, 5 meters long and 3 meters wide, and was origi- nally opened only on feast days, when many people and painters would make a pilgrimage to be present at the sacred ritual. They could see – when the wings were closed – the annunciation of the Angel Gabriel to the Virgin Mary, which The images in this paper are strictly for educational use and are protected by United States copyright laws. Unauthorized use will result in criminal and civil penalties. 2 ARAS Connections Issue 4, 2012 they knew as the Mystery of the Incarnation. But when the wings were opened they would witness and themselves participate in the revelation of the new order: the Lamb of God, the story of Christendom, and the redemption of the World.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Van Eyck's Annunciation
    Jan van Eyck’s Annunciation John Oliver Hand National Gallery of Art The Annunciation by Jan van Eyck is one of the treasures of the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Art, and its creator, a founder of the early Netherlandish school of painting, must be numbered among the greatest artists of all time. This exhibition celebrates the return of the Annunciation to public view after an absence of more than two years, during which rime it was painstakingly cleaned and restored (fig. 1). As a result of this treatment, the brilliance of Van Eyck's accomplishment can now be more fully understood and admired. “As Best I Can": The Artist's Career Jan van Eyck's exact date and place of birth are unknown. It is generally thought that he and his brother Hubert came from Maaseik, a town north of Maastrict, and that Jan was probably born no later than about 1390. To judge from the surviving documents, Jan van Eyck's career was spent as a court artist. He is first recorded in 1422 working for John of Bavaria, count of Holland, in The Hague. After the count's death Van Eyck moved to Bruges, and he was appointed painter and varlet de chambre to Philip the Good, duke of Burgundy, on 19 May 1425. Until the end of 1429 the artist resided at the court in Lille, but he was entrusted by Philip with several secret missions. Van Eyck may have been sent to Spain in 1427 to negotiate a marriage between Philip and Isabella of Aragon, and he was in Lisbon in 1428 and 1429 where a marriage was successfully contracted between the duke of Burgundy and Isabella of Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY NETHERLANDISH PAINTING Part One
    EARLY NETHERLANDISH PAINTING part one Early Netherlandish painting is the work of artists, sometimes known as the Flemish Primitives, active in the Burgundian and Habsburg Netherlands during the 15th- and 16th-century Northern Renaissance, especially in the flourishing cities of Bruges, Ghent, Mechelen, Leuven, Tounai and Brussels, all in present-day Belgium. The period begins approximately with Robert Campin and Jan van Eyck in the 1420s and lasts at least until the death of Gerard David in 1523, although many scholars extend it to the start of the Dutch Revolt in 1566 or 1568. Early Netherlandish painting coincides with the Early and High Italian Renaissance but the early period (until about 1500) is seen as an independent artistic evolution, separate from the Renaissance humanism that characterised developments in Italy; although beginning in the 1490s as increasing numbers of Netherlandish and other Northern painters traveled to Italy, Renaissance ideals and painting styles were incorporated into northern painting. As a result, Early Netherlandish painters are often categorised as belonging to both the Northern Renaissance and the Late or International Gothic. Robert Campin (c. 1375 – 1444), now usually identified with the Master of Flémalle (earlier the Master of the Merode Triptych), was the first great master of Flemish and Early Netherlandish painting. Campin's identity and the attribution of the paintings in both the "Campin" and "Master of Flémalle" groupings have been a matter of controversy for decades. Campin was highly successful during his lifetime, and thus his activities are relatively well documented, but he did not sign or date his works, and none can be confidently connected with him.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was Jan Van Eyck Here? the Subject, Sitters, and Significance of the Arnolfini Marriage Portrait
    Venezia Arti [online] ISSN 2385-2720 Vol. 26 – Dicembre 2017 [print] ISSN 0394-4298 Why Was Jan van Eyck here? The Subject, Sitters, and Significance of The Arnolfini Marriage Portrait Benjamin Binstock (Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York City, USA) Abstract Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Marriage Portrait of 1434 still poses fundamental questions. An overlooked account explained the groom’s left hand holding his bride’s right hand as a secular, legal morganatic marriage with a bride of lower social rank and wealth. That would explain Van Eyck’s presence as witness in the mirror and through his inscription, and corresponds to the recent identification of the bride and groom as Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his previously unknown first wife Helene of unknown last name. Van Eyck’s scene can be called the first modern painting, as the earliest autonomous, illusionistic representation of secular reality, provided with the earliest artist’s signature of the modern type, framing his scene as perceived and represented by a particular individual. That is why Jan van Eyck was here. Summary 1 What is being disguised: religious symbolism or secular art? – 2 A morganatic, left-handed marriage. – 3 The sitters: Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his first wife Helene? – 4 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait as the first modern painting. – 5 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait within his oeuvre and tradition. – 6 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait and art historical method. Keywords Jan van Eyck. Signature. Arnolfini. Morganatic Marriage. Modern painting. For Marek Wieczorek What is the hardest of all? What you think is the easiest.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Eyck Year in Ghent.Pdf
    2020: Van Eyck Year in Ghent Travel Passports Baggage Please ensure your 10-year British Passport is not As with most trains, passengers are responsible for out of date and is valid for a full six months beyond carrying baggage onto and off the train. Baggage the duration of your visit. EU, Andorra, can be stored on overhead shelves or at the Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino or Switzerland entrance to the carriages. Trollies are available at St valid national identification cards are also Pancras and Lille, but bags do need to be carried on acceptable for travel to Belgium. to the platform. Porters are sometimes but not always available at St Pancras. Visas Travel Editions recommends a luggage delivery British and EU passport holders are not required to service called thebaggageman, where your suitcase have a visa. can be picked up from your home before departure and delivered straight to your hotel; therefore For all other passport holders please check the visa removing the worry about carrying your cases onto requirements with the appropriate embassy. and off the trains. Belgian embassy: 17 Grosvenor Crescent, London For further information: SW1X 7EE. Tel: (0)20 7470 3700. http://www.thebaggageman.com [email protected] For visa information: Tel: 0871 376 0023, or visit www.vfs-be-uk.com Labels Open Mon-Fri 0900-1200. Please use the luggage labels provided. It is useful to have your home address located inside your suitcase should the label go astray. Tickets You will be issued with return train tickets. Transfers Please take care not to lose your tickets and please On arrival in Brussels transfer to a local train to check that the details on your tickets are accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Further Source for the Ghent Altarpiece? the Revelations Of
    GRANTLEY MCDONALd A Further Source for the Ghent Altarpiece? TheRevelations of Bridget of Sweden The fact that so many of the iconographical details of the Ghent Altarpiece are derived from the Apocalypse of John makes it easy to overlook the fact that others are not. Whoever was responsible for the iconographical program of the altarpiece clearly drew on several subsidiary sources besides the bible. In this paper it is suggested that one of these subsidiary sources was the Revelations of Bridget of Sweden. Reminiscences of Bridget’s visions may be found not merely in the iconography of the altarpiece, but also in its inscriptions. The iconographical program of the Ghent Altarpiece, with its almost overwhelming richness of detail, has long been the subject of vigorous discussion and diverging conclu- sions.1 Fortunately, the inscriptions on the painting provide some points of reference.2 They assist the viewer not merely to understand the individual details of the work, but also — by constantly pointing the eye to other locations within the painting and by emphasising the dialectic between its elements — to make connexions between the parts and thus to ‘read’ the narrative of the entire composition. Being verbal, the inscriptions also link the imagery of the painting to texts, particularly to the rich tradition of biblical commentary and devotional literature with which the clergy and the more literate laity were intimately familiar. Some of these inscriptions have been identified as deriving more or less faithfully from authorities such as Augustine, and such associations have clarified the iconography to a certain extent. But there is still much that remains unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Images. Light in the Mirror Van Eyck Policy Plan, 2017–2020
    Living Images. Light in the Mirror Van Eyck Policy Plan, 2017–2020 1. Introduction Alive to the future This strategic plan for 2017–2020, Living Images. Light in the Mirror, has been compiled under more promising conditions than those that prevailed four years ago. (1) Reintegration of Dutch post academic-level art institutions into the main cultural infrastructure (culturele basisinfrastructuur) has given them the security they need to stay internationally recognized sites of talent development. (2) Uncertainty about its survival chances has not held the Van Eyck back from devoting its wholehearted efforts to developing a new strategy. The institute is proud of what it has achieved and of the resilience that it has proved able to muster in realizing its ambitions, despite the cutbacks. Our confidence in the chosen course was boosted by the recommendations of the Council for Culture (Raad voor Cultuur), Agenda Cultuur 2017–2020 en verder (“Agenda for Culture, 2017-2020 and Beyond”), and by the Minister of Culture's Letter to Parliament setting out principles for cultural policy, Ruimte voor Cultuur (“Space for Culture”). The core concepts defined in these documents, such as quality, social value, profiling, internationalization, education, participation and the importance of the urban region, were already integral to the Van Eyck Policy Plan of 2013. The Van Eyck aims to continue innovating along these paths towards a more secure position. This is consistent with Ruimte voor Cultuur, in which the minister urges cultural institutions to make realistic plans that take into account the employment conditions of their staff. (3) Salto Mortale: Salto Vitale In mid 2011, the then State Secretary for Culture announced budget cuts in the 2013–2016 planning period.
    [Show full text]