36 - 46 (1394 ) 5 ( 1)      <

 ; A)  ( Lepidium draba L.) c  b  5'Q=  $ <) C5 C   1+  ( Aceria drabae (Nal.) : Eriophydae )  $R 

2$   ) 1 P" ( " N *N 2() _2f N 1C'9  ,= . + )3 ) 3 ? , : )  ,1= )  ,C 1 . + )19 )19  , : )  ,1= )2 4  `aI  D7 ,C 2 [email protected] :*l' ,1'+ * 139 2/08 /19 : D + P+ 4 139 4/01 /19 :Z+mG P+ 4  ( Lepidium draba L. ) 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 = .139 4 .$  .0 P" . z () . } N. NC'9  .36 -46 :(1) 5 .     3 .   "N  ( Aceria drabae (Nal.) Acari: Eriophydae )  * C   , J 

;( 5r

Aceria drabae (Nal.)  * C   , J   ( Lepidium draba L. ) 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 = c   .1  3 1390 *  9  O -      9 _ b "N   + >  ( Acari: Eriophydae) 4 40 )c 8+  . 5 +  + 1  _ b 2(  \…4  +  +  )? C <  4 1"  >  )"   uG .11    1C   ? C  * C   ,O? "N  +  ,O? 4 20  TO 4 20 <  <  )M NM )V J4 1 < + G  .11 ,O? ) * C   (   > 4 :+   ƒ- @   , J   1>   > 4  5 y >   * C      A    [+  .1 D\   C ,1 m  -  +>  > 1 5   4 

-  ) ( p≤0/01 )  ; 5 +  +  > CR+   * C  -(  \…4 .= +mh4 5  A%  ^ t , > C  > CR+ @>    * C  4 7  .1 1>   '+ "  5 m  - 1I 98 @>  Š7   * C  -(  X .D  , 1 > _7 8+ m  - @>  Š7  )5 +  + Archive.T% 9 > , C ) ;of X 8- )  ASID   ) '+ V4 :(   ;Q

www.SID.ir 37 ... 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 =

Eric et al., ) D :   M +  ? rN + (1  2(  , J   D " t'  .( 2004 7  >  c  I  > @O L  =+ >  > _7 rN     5+WO  *  c  b> C @>  T> > ,1  3  > Za4 Ti  .1 '> > C?  @ '+  )>  > _7 &N D++1 , .D  +mG  A >G >  > _7    *Q -< 7    T4  D'      >  > _7 *   1 O4  > +A>  5+ T D  Bacher and Schwab, ) 1 + @+A ,1 *   >  t ? ) =*  2I   O )1 +  ~   .( 2000 1 O4  > +A>     t4  14  9? + *  t   > < 7 @+AC T 9  > ;  =+ .( Seyed Sharifi et al., 2007 ) 1  c *Q  =     A  54 )>  > _7 '+  t ?      2Q  @>  Z s1>  i > C :+  1 D?  <+14 * - (   21 O4 < 1I 15 4 12 >  > _7 + )8+  .( Mc Clay and Balciunas , 2005 )  1> V   .( Zimdahl , 1992 ) D  ,1 ? 9% Eric et al., 2004 ; ) 2 " "Q4  [+   %4   >  -  )2 ? *   , J   + -   *   > < 7  >  @ G (Louda et al., 2005 8+   > @=J7 ) 7  >  c   >  > _7 > < 7 ?   7-3)     ^  \…4 :y >  > _7  8 +  *1   > Za4 LC 8+  1   1 "N  ( %  > C @>  Š7  + -   > @=J7  , J   >  7 > C   A   ?  1+  tN ,1    =-7 9  >  > _7 D M  =+   A   ? .1 +  €"Q4 ) 7 i D'+  > CO? @+A -%    •D  < 7  8-+  N   C T -4  > 2! >  > _7 D "  )1 O4  > +A>  N Q :+  z  > mC \ 8 1  '+ *  8  8   ) + -   8+ G G    D' *   > < 7  > mO . D  s1> i > C V4 @>   1  C  s1> i  > %  C3 '% )Q4 N   2( ,R+  5+WO  Mc Kenney et al., ) D    *   A   '+  uG )s1> > C :+  9? N * - (  >  c  D++1    > D O ; 8 y-> .( 2007  > 1 1  }M  +  = +mh4   -X ,  1      s1>   A  *1  7  > ?  s1> i > C :+  +mh4 2I V4  + +G   G  h4 Š7     3   M  C  2I  A   ? + G  +AC  i ,1 =   1;  7 > C  >  > _7  +  '  > C1 y G < O  .( Louda et al., 2005 ) -< 7  ; X - C1  2 h4 8+  D   > CR+     2( @+AC 1+? A  >  > _7 ,1 *  (5+WO  ) '+  >  =+WO+A  ) ( Archive  > ‰) =+WO - M of %  SID :  )8+  A .D  \F 8 ;4 )1   A  , C ~ + -   >    C    @+C ) +mi   > @=J7 ,1  .( Paterson et al., 2009 ) D      A     ( =+WO )    8+A:+ %  > => 1+?      @ G *   > < 7  8+  Asadi et al., ) D  , @+A )>  > _7 *  -%      uG  O (  )1  5- @+AC .( 2008 ) N Q D'+  > mC \  D  + > < 7 ; X -      <  5+WO  *  Morin ) 1>  @>   > _7   M  7 - % Smith et al., ) D  2 ? D ;-% T c4  A  (< ' G ) ,"O  4 2 " "Q4  [+  .( et al., 2009 4  '+ *   > < 7  , J   .( 2010 Acari: ) 1 +  _ b  > C   , @>   >  > _7 1  ? A  1 +…4 '+ *   > < 7 7   ( Eriophyidae @>  < O  3    ( Lym and Zollinger , 1995 ) Briese and Cullen , 2001 ; Cullen and ) D  ,  9? D ;-% ) 7 > C  >  > _7 D M 4

www.SID.ir (1) 5     3 ( 139 4)  =->  + i 38

&? &m%  M  ,1 D M   , C 8+ ) 1 '> Briese , 2001 ; Gerson et al., 2003 ; Smith et al.,  ,  +  v=4  1 D7  >  8+ .( 2010 Mojab and Mahmoodi, ) D  , <+14 +mi    -( < O  )8+  )1 +         ?  .( 2008 1   C% Š7  +  + _ b  > 1     , C 8+ J  \…4  %4  )t 44 8+1 Briese and Cullen, ) 1  s1>  > C  v=4  !  ? *  )D'+ { Q  7 21 O4 2001 ; Lindquist et al., 1996 ; Rosen and Huffaker ,  > @=J7     D  ? + < M .1   c  .( 1983 + % 4 )1 ,1 ,    5 *   + -    > _7 7  > C C 30000 1( ,1 ?  > Ž 4    D "    3  +  t ? 8+   C 300  8+   1 ,1 Cripps et al., 2006 a Za4 M 5+  uG O )( ) D  Z 'C  1    3+   2Q 1 O4   > _7 5+ 7  5 T> > ) ? *   Lepid ium ) 5 .( Montazeri , 2004 ) 1  9% @b + ! *   > Z 1 ) N   l'   l'  O 1L >  > _7  =+ ( draba L. Cripps et al., 2006 a; Cripps et al., ) D  ,1  M  Aksakal et al., ) D  ^ t ,  ( [- ) *   , J   1   c  )8+   .( 2006 b 2010 ; Cripps et al., 2006 a; Cripps et al., 2006 b; 7  14  5      C%  5+WO   < O  ,  ( Mojab and Mahmoodi , 2008  [+  . 1  `N   8+  t   =>  >  c   N Q D'+    M +  t ?  {4 b> C 196  D  ,  >  ,1 `N  l'  > _7 7  )Y4  7 .( Tălmaciu et al., 2008 )  % 5 -  5 O  , C 5+ .( Fumanal et al., 2004 ) D  Psylliodes wrasei Leon ardi 5  4 ?  >m )1 1 O4 m 4800 4 1200  14 b> C  =+ (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) Jacobs, ) 1  xJ(    % + 4 *  +>  > 1 † Š7   , 5  b4  >  *-;X  > _7 8+ LC ) (2007 C 8+ .   9 <  > C 8+ 1 * (  - {+ ->  O )1>  r %4  + M  5+WO  *  ,"O  < 7 5+ 7  , )€ -7  > + .1 +  ; 4  1  ?   Tălmaciu et al., ) D  ,1 ; 5 > , C  21   5 ,1A  , 'C )Db )m  -   +mh4 < O1 Cripps et al. (2006 a) .( 2008   ?  8 + )1 +  Z 'C > 4 praetiosa -%  Tetranychidae ,  > .(Aksakal et al., 2010 ; Fumanal et al., 2004 )   > 1  T. urticae  Tetranychus atlanticus ) 8+ ,4 D'+ 1I 76  @   3?  )8+  A -   9? ) , C .1  ; 5 '+ *   > < 7 7  v=4   C%  ? *   D " )( 2010 Aceria ))  * C    Cripps et al. (2006 a) ‚ ? m 1 O4  € -7  > A+ { 4 + Archive of SIDFumanal et al., 2004  ( drabae Nal (Acari: Eriophyidae 8+  '+   O .( )  1> Ceutorynchus turbatus (Coleoptera:Curculionidae) O ), O 1L > _7 8+ LC   %4 T9 5 5+WO  *   \F  7 7   "N   "N   |   A    ? @G Fumanal et al. (2004 ) X  A  .1 ; Cripps )  C  2I m €+X  ,1-7X  ):+ Ceuthorrhynchus MX  * C ) X  .( et al., 2006 a; Cripps et al., 2006 b pleurostigm a(Coleoptera:Curculionidae)) = ?   D ‰  T " ' X  > _7 8+ D " Ceutorhynchus assimilis *  < 7 7   ( 1 O4  € -7  > A+ { 4 + < v 1 O4  .1 , ; 5 > , C t  '+   +  c ; 4 )8+  A . ‚ 4 m 5  > Ž 4   D "   %4  8+   > 1  (2 GO?) t ?C  r4 + 4  =>  ) + -   > @= J7    D' 2+AC 2  4 ,1-7X   5  +

www.SID.ir 39 ... 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 =

 9? t'  > < 7 8 ;4  C D   m Cripps et al., ) > , C 8+ *   t  *  O - (  > A  .DC M   DM *   => 3 = c   8+ )( 2006 a , :   , J   +  D   T " ' X  '+     8+A:+ % Z 5+ 7  5 '+ -   ?) ”  )2 7 ) A->  ? C 4 ƒ ? +>  &? {+    *I     O  2( .1 D\ A  9?  +mh4    (   3  (X   9 O -   3?   .11 19: 1I 76 * 4  > G A%  +   ? C )€ "Q4 8+  > s1> :+  .1 <(   O   2( +  *-;X    9?  +  5 > , C  {4 b> C  > M  )| ( 4 mO )D   9? 1 . ? 5+WO  *   < 7 8+ 9 8 ;4 c ,1 ?C  > G .1 C M c DQ4 ,1    o   .11 O 4 1  Z  , :+ ?  * "   uG > , C ; X - 8  +  3 '%  i?  @ G < 7   3 > C :+ )s1> > , C  A     2 7aX 8  +  Y   )5  ? C A   ,1 ,1>  9?  '+ *  )5 u% _ b   > C (  D'+) WO  b   +  c  1 5  uG  > < 7  > , C 8+  > , : '+ % {+ . 11 *  (u ^  CABI A) X ) O -    ?  {4   -   $R  24   6 _P CB .1  3   9 , C  {4 2( ,R+  + G1 ? C  uG  > C 8+ ; X  > , :+ ->  3 '% 9? 1 ,  +  )s1> , C 7  5 > 1390 *  O -     9  [+  € J4  2 7aX  , J   uƒ .DC  3 - M {+  "N  )c 8+  .DC  3 ) +QI  9   ,1? D    > ,?  > ,1>   2 J  D'  (1  'G D ;!) CG4  ? C '+ *  A   > < 7 1 D+O   <  :+1=+     60 +"4 I   @+AC ? 3   DC  3 )s1> , C   ,1 ,1= 4 " "Q4 7A   i   ) > ( Aceria drabae (Nal.) Acari: Eriophydae )  * C  ‹ 9  8+  .11 @+AC        '+ *  A b  { 4  A  ) ; X -  - 8+     8+   D'b D+O 7  DC M (CABI) u ^ D + s1> > _7  > C+  +  '+ V4 5 5+WO  *   ,1 ? C  > < 7 8   ; X - )D  8=-  3?   O .1  . Harris, ) 1     \…4 u% 5+ _ b  > C ,  9 <+  ) * C   A   8 ;4 c  5 u%  > C +  > C -> mO )( 1991   @+AC ^ t , 4  7 i  7 C -< 7 ? C   (L. latifolium  Lepidium draba )     22 NM     18 V J4  + > 1C Archive .1 C of M +QI SID  >  s1> )*   > ) > C "   uG .( 1 *1%) 11    =4 , 1 <( ->  ( + G1) 2( ? C 8 'b .1  3 9?   * C   >  > , : '+   , C 1   + ) +  > yi 8 'b < =4  >1C  @ G  > )+ <  , C  > @b -> .1  3 _ b   8  )m < + G    8  M € M   ( + G1) 2( ? C   , T D  )D >   D  ? + < M .1 C .1  > >  -C D; X  ,O? €X     ,O?  > 1  c  , C  +  t ?     > .11 +   _+‰  TM  , J   >   ? +  4    1%  

www.SID.ir (1) 5     3 ( 139 4)  =->  + i 40

< =4 (  X )8   %  4 , uƒ t ?  >   ) > D >  uG  , .11 - yi 8 'b  , t ? A    DM  > C ->  "N  ,1 , * "   >   ), C  1;  >    > C { 4 ,1 1 O4 m  - '+ "  9?  uG .( Eric et al., 2004 ) 11 ,O? )D; X  ,O? .1 8 ;4 D; X  TO > C  1C  ,1 V J4 ) ,O?  @ G    + * "   > 4 "    R 2R ;   $R  24   -1 $ (@ A  m 1   1 < + G  uG  M NM  .C ' ! ; 2 5  ) +> 1 4  )M NM )4 V J4  2 ) 2 .1 D\   C ,1 m  -  +> 1 Lepidium draba L. 5 U   Mstat -C A   , J   @+ ?  > , Raphanus sativus L. y4 .1  3 t-student ? Sisymbrium officinalis L. P4   Descurania sophia L. 7   t* s'2 Conringia orientalis L. Zi? H Lepidium sativum L. >  '*#  ) Rapistrum rugosum L. - ) > |  ) >A    -G  >  -  >  Brassica napus L. A - , :+ ->  > , sX ) >     (  Y4 Euclidium syriacum L. 53C  2( ->  ,1  3 5 > , C  > Capsella bursa -pastoris L. @  '  )11 +  uƒ  ?C ?  {4 ( + G1) $ 42 C   $R  'B '  .D  ,1 ,? 2 , - *1%  ? [+   5'Q=  ? C 5   ,( C 19  @  )V-3 *   5  * C  +?   + c  ‚ 4  5  ,   C 18   ,1  ;) Y  100 , 'C    )5 > , C .1  ; X X     9  (  10 ×10    ;(  B R (C'() O" 6'P T,  1; .1  C c  ) ,1 ,O? 5 > , C $ 7 6'PVh k'4R ?2?r c   D =+ D'  4 20 ) > 4 1 A &' 10 1( V J4  C 6 4 4) '=+ 1 ( 5   ,1 ? C ( + G1) 2( 8+4 T9 - , -  @+AC Y   5+ 1( I   (   Aceri a draba (Nal.) Acari: )  * C  <  <  (+ ) <  4 20 8 y-> .11 mC MX  * C X   ( Eriophydae   ? C  * C   ,O? 4 ,  TO 4 , Ceutorhynchus pleurostigma [Marsham] ;NM  > 1C  ?  uG  11    1C '  * C  .1 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Archive   of 5+ I  SIDxJ(   <"   ,1 @+AC 8    9   1  ƒ  * (   > %   8+1 .11     4 X  %  > 4 8  +mh4 - '+  > D   ; 4 * (   > M @+AC 8  ;NM  % 4 40 V-3  )t 44 +mh4 .1    3+ * C )5 M   7 )  + 1>  @>  +  A    m 1 O4 D+ 9  4 , A    + * "  4  20  .11 }b ) Tălmaciu and ) 1   C% m 1 O4  <  X  ,O?  - 4 7  :+ 4 ,  1>  7  .( Huma , 2009 )  + * "   > 4 "   uG .11 mC , -  8+4 t  @+AC )1  A    G  C -> 4 ,  8   % 4 , <  1>   > 4  C  "  4  '+ *  < 7 8+4\F  11  ƒ- @   , J     + * "  TO  =+ )1    "N +>  &? {+ 

www.SID.ir 41 ... 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 =

. =  C) C) b . m:  c  ,2B ~/P ]2 ;(  B R O" 6'P T, -2 $ (@ 2R 2 c  ~/P ]2 ;(  B R 1+ Aceria drabae (Nal.) (Acari: Eriophyidae) m    -   ,1= 4 " "Q4 7A Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) †  M  >   - i   Carpocoris mediterraneus (Tamanini.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  >   Carpocoris purpureipennis (DeGeer.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  >   Ceutorhynchus pleurostigma (Marsham.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) +  † )M  i   Dolycoris baccarum (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  i   Epicometis hirta (Poda.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) m    - i   Eurydema ornate (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  i   Eurydema ventralis (Kolenati.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  i   -   ,1= 4 " "Q4 7A Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae ) †  M 4 " "Q4 7A Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae ) †  M  i   - >   Oxythyrea cinctella (Schaum.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) m    -   ,1= 4 " "Q4 7A Thrips tabaci (Lindeman.) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) †  M )m )  

 +mh4 c  5  * C   A   ? [+  8+1 .D  > , C '+ *  <( 8+4 T9 >  > C  > C _ b  > C    A+-b4  '+  ) '+ *  < 7 @+AC  )t 44 .D  ,1 ,  3 *1%  ^ t ,  1  +  t ?  > , C \F *  + 4 8+  D  ? + < M  O . %4 > C :+ S2   $R  24   CB s'2 -3 $ (@       5 \F *  + 4 1+  < 7 ! ; 2   R 2R 10   4' .P '[>P .1   1 s1> i > C :+  N ):+ .C • ( 2 *1%) ,1 ,1>  _ b  > < 7 8   8+  4' .P '[>P ) 2 + Archive+ 5 )MX of  * C X  SID   * C  C  ,R+    - - y4 C1  L  Œ> -> ? C1  L   * C  - - P4   > C :+   &? {+  <-Q4 D  M  , - - Zi? H {+   '   >  &?  ' 4 - - >  - - - *   t  5+WO  < 7 7  ) + - - A .1  C c  5 - - 53C  c  $R  24   CB s'2 - - @  ' 

www.SID.ir (1) 5     3 ( 139 4)  =->  + i 42

1I 7  25 @>  A  Asadi et al . (2011 ) .(&   _ b  > ,1>   >  ) >1+  [+   b4 bC  -(  \…4 DQ4  b4 4 V J4 t , > C  5+ ” >  )5  * C   ZAC +QI  ; X {+  t 44  ,= +mh4 (5 > , C) s1> C A%  ^  \…4   A  Djamankulova et al. (2008 ) .1 8+1 .( 3 *1%) 1 - T> A+-b4 9?   , C  ( Aulacidea acroptilonica )  * C  -( 8+ { 4 +  t ?  3+  +mh4  %4  )t 44  '+ "  M V J4  1 ZAC b4 > 1  t ?  = +mh4  s1> > , C     * C  -(  \…4 .D + @>  1I 21 1>   ?   C M > C  > C :+  ,1 ^ 2 <=  5 +> 1 5  4  c  > , C ,  > C  ->   A  .D  *  < 7 8+  1   c  )1 ,1 @+AC 5 +> 1 5  4    * C  -( \ :+  ? 1 D? * - (  ,  A  54 '+  -( {+   X  ) ( p≤0/01 )  ; Cripps et  >  .1 % s1> i > C   t 44  5 +> 1 5  4   * C -1   * C  8+  D  ,  al. (2006 a)  t 44 ) 1>   '+ "    C 1/06  2/03 A  ? .1   +mh4 5  >m  >  > <=) D + @>  1I 71  62 (C 3/61  5/37  7 ? ) * C  8+  A  1Q    < 7  \…4   A  Fumanal et al. (2004 ) .( 2 ; 5 > , C 5+WO  *   t  5  Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykulls 5+WO  .1 5 + 1 '+ < 7 8+ -(  1  <=  5 M NM  V J4   * C  -(  \…4 Asadi et  Djamankulova et al. (2008 ) . @>   M V J4   * C  -(  \…4 .D  ,1 ^ 1 b4 + 1 ,4 D'+ @>  A  al. (2011 )  * C  -(  X  ) ( p≤0/01 )  ; 5  bC    * C  -(  \…4 DQ4 t 44   '+ "  > , C 8+ V J4 1I 47 @>  Š7  1>   > 4  '+ "  1I 61  25 t 44  * C  -(  \…4 .(_O - 1 <=) 1 TO  > 4  . 1 ZAC -  )( 4 *1%)  ( p≤0/01 )  ; 5 M NM   3 <=  5 m  -   * C  -(  \…4 NM 1I 41 @>  Š7   * C  -(  X .D  ,1 , - 1 <=) 1 TO 4  '+ "  > , C 8+ M

35 (g) 5 (b= )

30 4

25 Archive 3 of SID 20 f€€) €€+f f€€) ;€€ R]€€AP ;€€ ) )

15 2 €€ €€  €€ €€ ( €€ 2€€) €€ ( 10 1 5

0 0

; =B P T=) P ; =B P T=) P

.c # f) +f (g) ]AP (b=)   $R   "  VWP   2 -1 75 .1 '>  ; 2 J4  1I [G * - ( rN  2 J   ƒ->    > 8 : 

www.SID.ir 43 ... 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 =

7 4 5

6

5

4 ' (2 ' C

) 3 R ( 2

1

0

; =B P T=) P

.c '  (2 c P C   $R  c'Q=  $ 7 V -2 75 .1    ; 2 J4  1I [G * - ( rN  2 J   ƒ->    > 8 : 

1000

800

600 [€€ (_P [€€ )

400 ;€€ R  (_P  R ;€€ (

200

0

; =B P T=) P

.c  ; R [     $R  c'Q=  $ 7  VWP   2 -3 75 .1 '>  ; 2 J4  1I [G * - ( rN  2 J   ƒ->    > 8 :   J  \…4   * C Archive }b X  . 1 ZAC - ;of 5 > , SID C m  -   * C  -(  \…4 NM @>  -%  5 > C +  > CR+  * C  -( {+   X  ) ( p≤0/01 )  - CR+ @>  Š7  +> 1   M V J4 )4  '+ "    4  m 19 /05 )5 m  - )8+  A .D  ,1 A  ? m  -  +  > D + @>  1I 98 (4  m 811 /35 ) 1>  - 1 1 @>    * C   1   c  8 L  \…4   A  Fumanal et al. (2004 ) .( 3 <=) + 4 @>  Š7  [+14  14  +>  >  Ceutorhynchus assimilis 5+WO  *  < 7  ):+   . > , C 8+  +  > 1 < 7 8+ -(  1  5 T% 9 C )5  m 1 < =4  >  Š7  ,1 @+AC  > , C 8+ m C1G     ,1  14  Djamankulova et al . (2008 ) .1 > , C 8+ +  1   c  8 L )D+ 9  . 1+1% €X   -(  \…4   A  Asadi et al. (2011 )   > 1 1  J  \…4   * C   , J  @>  8+ b4

www.SID.ir (1) 5     3 ( 139 4)  =->  + i 44

t   C 14   ,  A  54 ) 9% ‚ " 8+  ,O? €X   14  5  +  +>   * C  8+ -( .1  5  =+WO  *   ) ? @G   C%  *  T% 9 C @>  5 > , C +  > CR+  J  \…4   * C  5 +WO  < 7  , J  4  )8+    T% 9 > _7 8+ m  -  +  > CR+ .   I4 5 *    A  54  7 7    * C   1   c  )t 44 8+1 .D *   \…4   A  Cripps et al. (2006 a) )  8 ->  3    +>  > 1 1 @>  < O +  5+  5 +  +  > CR+  A. drabae -( T "7  ):+     +  > 1 1 @>   54  8+  3?  )1   5 4 G "N -  D+ 9  )5  m 1 < =4  > m  > , C 8+ *  Š7  14 C 8+ 5+WO  *   t   7  8+ 4  )     *I      A.  , J  A   Smith et al. (2010 ) . 1> > > _7 '+ *    * C  ,"O  4  *   t    54   7  drabae  3?  * ( 8+  .  ,9 > |   >A   5 .1 1 …4 5 T% 9 C 21 , 4  5 <  *  Š7    , J   R < 2  Y %  >   4    9 G mO ) 1 1>b -  * C      8+ [+   X  ) * C   A        > @+ ?  3 t ? C >  3+ 1  s1> > , C  +mh4 < O  " J4 2I  5 *   '+ Z   ?  @+ ?   > C :+  +  . , J  =  =  7  > Z :+ :+  ""Q :+ € "Q4 [+   %4    A 

y

Aksakal, O., Sunar, S., Kaya, Y. and Agar, G., Caesar , A.J., Caesar , T. and Maathuis , M.H., 2010 . 2010 . Genetic diversity within and among Pathogenicity, characterization and Lepidium draba populations from eastern comparative virulence of Rhizoctonia spp . Anatolia based on RAPD analysis. from insect -galled roots of Lepidium draba Biochemical Genetics . 48 , 603 –611 . in Europe. Biological Co ntrol . 52 , 140 –144 . Asadi, G.A., Ghorbani, R. and Khorramdel, S., Cripps, M.G., Hinz, H.L., Mckenney, J.L., Harmon, 2011 . Evaluation of biological control of B.L., Merickel, F.W. and Schwarzlaender, Russian knapweed ( Acroptilon repens L.) by M., 2006 a. Comparative survey of the applying flower -eater ( Ace ria phytophagous faunas associated acroptiloni Shevchenko & Kacalev) (Acari: with Lepidium draba in Europe and the Eriophyidae ). Agroecology . 3(2), 208 -218 . Western United States, and th e potential for Asadi, G.A., Ghorbani, R., Rashed Mohassel, M.H. biological weed control. Bioscience and Sadeghi , H., 2008 . Introducing herbivor Technology . 16 (10 ), 1007 -1030 . for biological control of Canada Cripps, M.G., Schwarzländer, M., McKenney, J.L., Archivend of SID thistle ( Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop .). In 2 Hinz, H.L. and Price, W.J., 2006b. Iranian Congress of Weed Sciences , 29 th- Biogeographical comparison of the 30 th January, Mashhad, Iran. pp. 224 -228 . arthropod herbivore communities associated Bacher, S. and Schwab, F., 2000 . Effect of with Lepidiu m draba in its native, expanded herbivore density, timing of attack and plant and introduced ranges. Journal of community on performance of creeping Biogeography. 33 , 2107 –2119 . thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Cullen, J.M. and Briese, D.T., 2001 . Host plant (Asteraceae ). Biocontrol Technology . 10 , susceptibility to Eriophyid used for 343 -352 . weed biological control. In: Halliday, R.B., Briese , D.T. and Cullen , J.M., 2001 . The use and Walter, D.E., Proctor, H.C., Norton, R.A. usefulness of mites in biological control of and Colloff, M.J., (Eds.), Acarology. CSIRO weeds. In: Halliday, R.B., Walter, D.E., Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 342 – Proctor, H.C., Norton, R.A. and Colloff, 348 . M.J., (Eds.), Acar ology. CSIRO Publishing, Djamankulova, G., Kham raev, A. and Schaffner, Melbourne , Australia , pp . 453 –463 . U., 2008 . Impact of two shoot -galling

www.SID.ir 45 ... 5 > _7 =+WO  *  3 =

biological control candidates on Russian Mojab , M. and Mahmoodi , S., 2008 . Allelopathic knapweed ( Acroptilon repens ). Biological effects of shoot and root water extracts of Control. 46 , 101 –106 . hoary cress ( Cardaria draba) on Eric, M.C., Janet, K.C., Piper, L.O. and Alfred, germination characteristic and seedling F.C., 2004 . Biological Control of Invasiv e growth of sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.). Plants in the United States, Oregon State Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 1(4), University P ress , Morgantown, West 65 -78. Virginia. Montazeri, M., 2004 . Weed Science Findings: With Fumanal , B., Blanchet , A. and Sobhian , R., 2000 . a Special Perspect ive on Biological Control. Ceuthorrhynchus pleurostigma Marsh. Agriculture Research and Education (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a candidate for Organization. Iran. biological control of Cardaria draba (L.) Morin, L., Reid, A.M., Sims -Chilton, N.M., (Brassicaceae) in the USA and confusions in Buckley, Y.M., Dhileepan, K., Hastwell, its identity. In 6th International Symposium G.T., Nordblom, T.L. and Raghu, S., 2009 . on Biological Control of Weeds , 6th-8th Review of approaches to evaluate the September, Dijon, France. pp. 453 –458 . effectiveness of weed biological control Fumanal, B., Martin, J.F., Sobhian, R., Blanchet, A. agents. Biological Control. 51 , 1–15. and Bon, M.C., 2004 . Host range of Nowjavan, M. 2001 . Principles of Weed Control, Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Coleoptera: Oroomieh University Publication, Curculionidae), a candidate for biological Oroomieh, Iran. control of Lepidium draba (Brassicaceae ) in Paterson, I. D., Downie, D.A. and Hill, M .P., 2009 . the USA. Biological Control. 30 , 598 –607 . Using molecular methods to determine the Gerson, U., Smiley, R.L. and Ochoa, R., 2003 . origin of weed populations of Pereskia acul Mites (Acari) for Pest Contr ol, Blackwell South Africa and its relevance to biological Science Ltd., Iowa State Press, USA. control. Biological Control. 48 , 84 –91 . Harris , S., 1991 . Classical biocontrol of weeds : its Rosen, D. and Huffaker, C.B., 1983 . An overview definition, selection of effective agents and of desired attributes of ef fective biological administrative -political problems. Canadian control agents, with particular emphasis on Entomologist. 123 , 827 -849 . mites. In: Hoy, M.A., Cunningham, G.L. Jacobs , J., 2007 . Ecology and Man agement of and Knutson, L. (Eds.), Biological Control Whitetop [ Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.], of Pests by Mites. University of California, USDA. Montana, United States Department Agricultural Experiment Station, Special of Agriculture, Natural Resources Publication , USA . pp . 2–11. Conservation Service, Invasive Species Seyed Sharifi, R., Farzaneh, S. and Seyed Sharifi, Technical Note 12 . R., 2007 . Comparison of chemical control Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. and Bruin, J., 1996 . and allelopathic effect of weeds in chickpea Eriophyid Mites: Their Biology, Natural under rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Enemies and Control, Elsevier Science Biology . 20 (4), 334 -343 . (In Persian with Publication, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. English abstract). Louda, S.M., Rand, T.A., Arnett, A.E., Mc Clay, Smith, L., de Lillo , E. and Amrine , J.W., 2010 . A.S., Shea, K. and Mc EEachern, A.K., Effectiveness of eriophyid mites for 2005 . Evaluation of ecological risk to biological control of weedy plants and populations of a threatened plant from an challenges for future research. Experimental invasive biocontrol insect. Ecological and Applied Acarology . 51 , 115 –149 . Applications. 15 , 234 -249 . Tălmaciu , N. and Huma , R., 2009 . Observations Lym , R.G. and ZollingerArchive, R., 1995 . Perennial and ofregarding SID the s preading and controle the Biennial Thistle Control, North Dakota State invasive weeds from anatural pasture. University Press, Fargo, North Dakota. Research Journal of Agricultural Science. Mc Clay , A.S. and Balciunas , J.K., 2005 . The role 41 (1), 314 -319 . of pre -release efficacy assessment in Tălmaciu, N., Tălmaciu, M. and Humă, R., 2008 . selecting classical biological control agents Observations regarding the main biological for weeds -applying the Anna Karenina control agents of the invasive weeds from a principle. Biological Control. 35 , 197 –207 . natural pasture . Lucrări Ştiinţifice . 51 , 316 – Mc Kenney, J.L., Cripps, M.G., Price, W.J ., Hinz, 321 . H.L. and Schwarzlander, M., 2007 . No Zimdahl , R.L., 1992 . Weed impact on wheat , maize difference in competitive ability between and other temperate crops . In Proceeding 1st invasive North American and native International Weed Control Congress , 17 th- European Lepidium draba populations. Plant 21 th February , Melborn , Australia . pp . 118 – Ecology . 193 , 293 –303 . 122 .

www.SID.ir (1) 5     3 ( 139 4)  =->  + i 46

Evaluation of biological control of hoary cress ( Lepidium draba L.) by applying gall mite ( Aceria drabae (Nal.) (Acari: Eriophyidae ) in Shirvan region

Elham Oghazian, 1 Ghorbanali Asadi, 2,* Hamid Hatami 1 and Surur Khorramdel 2 1Department of Agricultural Engeeniring, Faculty of Agriculture, Azad University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran. 2Departmert of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

*Corresponding auth or : [email protected]

Abstract In order to find an approach for controlling hoary cress using gall mite ( Aceria draba (Nal.) (Acari: Eriophyidae), various studies were conducted in three regions of Shirvan, northern Khorasan Province (Iran) during spring 2011 . Preliminary studies that included collecting , identifying and screening bio -control agents for hoary cress were carried out . For this purpose , 40 plants (20 infected and 20 healthy ) were transplanted to the pots. After establishment, the control plants were sprayed with an acaricide and others infested with the gall mite at three stages. At the end of the growing se ason, plant height, stem diameter, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight and seed number of the hoary cress were measured, accordingly. The host -range results showed that the mite did not feed from any of the plants except for hoary cress. The effect of gal l mite on the vegetative and reproductive characteristics of hoary cress was significant (p ≤0.01 ) and could reduce the seed number of hoary cress by 98% compared with the control . This mite was able to reduce the vegetative and reproductive organs and seed number of hoary cress.

Keywords: Natural enemy, Biodiversity, Host -range, Invasive weed .

Archive of SID

www.SID.ir