tolerable, and all recipients developed anti- bodies that blocked the virus from entering cells (P. Kremsner et al. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/ghjkvj; 2020). But the levels of those ‘neutralizing’ antibodies were rela- tively low — on a par with the amounts found in people who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infections, but well below those seen in recipi- ents of the and –BioNTech vac- cines, which are both given at higher doses.

Modified RNA Others think that the problem might lie in the mRNA sequence. All three mRNA vac- cines encode a form of the coronavirus spike protein, which helps virus particles to pen- etrate human cells. But the Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines use modified RNA, incorporating an mRNA nucleotide called pseudouridine — which is similar to uridine but contains a natural modification — in place

YVES HERMAN/REUTERS/ALAMY of uridine itself. This is thought to circumvent A trial volunteer receives a dose of CureVac’s vaccine. the body’s inflammatory reactions to foreign mRNA. CureVac’s vaccine uses normal uridine and relies on altering the sequence of RNA let- ters in a way that does not affect the protein COVID VACCINE FLOP it codes for, but helps the vaccine to evade immune detection. SPOTLIGHTS MRNA Proponents of modified mRNA have long argued that the chemical adjustment is inte- DESIGN CHALLENGES gral to the success of the vaccine technology. Drew Weissman, an immunologist at the Scientists are searching for explanations for University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, describes it as the “best platform for antibody CureVac’s disappointing final-stage trial results. and neutralization levels”. In light of the new CureVac data, many scientists who spoke to By Elie Dolgin Technology in Atlanta who has worked with Nature agree. CureVac and many other mRNA-focused “Modified mRNA has won this game,” says wo vaccines made using messenger companies. Rein Verbeke, an mRNA-vaccine researcher at RNA (mRNA) have proved spectacularly Ghent University in Belgium. successful at warding off COVID-19, Variant problem There are other possible explanations for but a third mRNA-based candidate has CureVac executives put the poor results down CureVac’s tolerability problems, so for some flopped in a final-stage trial, according to the high number of coronavirus variants scientists it remains too early to draw conclu- Tto an initial report. Researchers are now asking circulating in the ten countries across Europe sions. “The jury is still out on which of these why — and some think that the type of mRNA and Latin America where the company is run- is a better technology,” says Jeffrey Ulmer, a chemistry used might be to blame. Any insight ning its trial. Of 124 COVID-19 cases for which former pharmaceutical executive who now could help to guide the future design of mRNA scientists obtained a genetic sequence, only consults on vaccine research issues. He pre- vaccines against COVID-19 or other diseases. one was caused by the original version of dicts that modified and unmodified mRNA will The company behind the beleaguered SARS-CoV-2. be useful in different contexts. trial, CureVac, based in Tübingen, Germany, But other mRNA vaccines have fared much CureVac hopes that its vaccine — or at least announced preliminary data on 16 June from better in the face of variants, which has led trial its unmodified mRNA technology — might yet a 40,000-person trial. The results showed that investigators and other scientists to suggest deliver. It is continuing its trial and expects a the two-dose vaccine was just 47% effective at that the problem is with the vaccine itself. final analysis in the next few weeks. The com- preventing disease. “My best take is that the dose is the culprit,” pany, in collaboration with London-based CureVac’s mRNA vaccine was expected to be says Peter Kremsner, an infectious-disease GlaxoSmithKline, has a second-generation cheaper and to last longer in refrigerated stor- specialist at Tübingen University Hospital who COVID-19 vaccine in the works that, like its age than the mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer– is leading CureVac’s clinical studies. predecessor, uses unmodified mRNA. How- BioNTech and Moderna. Many had hoped that In phase I testing, Kremsner and his col- ever, this one has been fine-tuned so that it it could help to expand the reach of mRNA- leagues evaluated doses ranging from 2 to elicits higher levels of neutralizing antibod- based vaccines in lower-income countries, and 20 micrograms of mRNA per injection. At the ies, according to data from rat and monkey European countries were expecting to order higher doses, the vaccine caused too many studies. “Our optimization has never stopped,” hundreds of millions of doses. side effects, with trial participants frequently says CureVac’s chief technology officer Mari- “I’m definitely surprised — and also dis- complaining of problems such as severe head- ola Fotin-Mleczek. “It’s too early to say unmod- appointed,” says Philip Santangelo, a bio- aches, fatigue, chills and injection-site pain. ified, natural messenger RNA is not an option.” medical engineer at the Georgia Institute of At 12 micrograms, the vaccine proved more Human trials are due to launch later this year.

Nature | Vol 594 | 24 June 2021 | 483 ©2021 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All rights reserved.