r • 07 r r

FINAL

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN PRISTINE SITE READING, EPA 07-5V56.0

October 24, 1984

I

L EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

223791 CONTENTS

Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2 COMMUNITY RELATIONS BACKGROUND 2-1 Site Description 2-1 History of Community Relations Activities 2 2-1 Interested Parties and Key Concerns 2-7 Community Relations Objectives 2-9 3 COMMUNITY RELATIONS WORK PLAN 3-1 Community Relations Techniques 3-1 and Tasks Staffing Allocation v 3-5 Budget 3-6 Schedule 3-7 4 MAILING LIST 4-1

Tables Page

1 Site Chronology 2-5 2 Community Relations Schedule 3-2

Figures Page 1 Location Map 2-2 2 Vicinity Map 2-3 3 Sjte Map 2-4

GLT122/2 t • c

Section 1 INTRODUCTION r This Community Relations Plan for the Pristine site will serve as a guide for conducting community relations activities in the community during the period of the Remedial Investigation/ i Feasibility Study (RI/FS). The Superfund program encourages active dialogue between communities affected by the releases of hazardous substances and the agencies responsible for remedial actions. To promote the exchange of information, U.S. EPA requires that a Community Relations Plan be pre- pared for each Remedial Action Site. Community relations activities recommended in this plan have substantially r evolved from meetings and conversations with agency person- nel, local officials, and citizens. The Community Relations Plan for the Pristine site has four major sections: 1. Introduction 2. Community Relations Background 3. Community Relations Work Plan 4. Mailing List The Community Relations Background (Section 2) provides a site description, a history of community relations activities, and a discussion of interested parties and their concerns. Information for the Background section was provided by U.S. EPA Region V staff, the Ohio EPA, the Reading Fire Chief, Reading Safety Service Director, and several residents of Uhrig's Trailer Park. It was used to design community relations objectives for the Pristine site. The Community Relations Work Plan (Section 3) describes the techniques that will be used and designates specific tasks to be accomplished during the RI/FS. Because the schedule for the RI/FS has not been established, community relations tasks correspond with technical milestones rather than specific dates. This section includes a schedule, staff allocations, and a budget. Section 4 is a mailing list of residents near the site, public officials, agency personnel, and persons who were interviewed during the preparation of this plan. The Office of Public Affairs, U.S. EPA Region V, is responsible for implementing the Community Relations Plan. GLT122/3

1-1 Section 2 COMMUNITY RELATIONS BACKGROUND

SITE DESCRIPTION

The Pristine, Inc., site (Figures 1-3) occupies approximately 5 acres in the City of Reading, Hamilton County, Ohio, the fifth largest city in the county with a population of 12,819 in 1980. It is part of the greater area. A chain link fence limits site access from the north, east, and south. A guarded bridge over Mill Creek provides access to the site from the west. The general public is not permitted to cross the bridge. Two industrial uses are located to the west and to the south of the Pristine site. Cincinnati Drum Service has a 13-acre facility to the west, where drums are recycled, reclaimed, and stored. The Long family owns the Cincinnati Drum Service as well as being shareholders in Pristine, Inc. Oh property to the south is the Carstab Corporation, formerly Cincinnati Milicron. Liquid waste from Carstab, which produces synthetic stabilizers and plasticizers, was allegedly disposed of on its property in pits and in steel and fiber drums. These properties are possible sources of soil and water contamination, To the east of the Pristine site is a railroad track and Uhrig's Trailer Park. To the north is Mill Creek and the City of Reading water supply field. One of its wells is within 100 feet of the fence surrounding Pristine. A city water main crosses the site (as shown in Figure 3) then extends to the south, parallel to the access road. Local officials indicate that the water main must be replaced every 2 to 3 years because of corrosion. Remaining on the Pristine site are several bulk storage tanks, several pj.ts, and an inactive incinerator near the center of the site. Pristine, Inc., reinstalled a run-off collection system along the west side of the site to prevent contaminated water from reaching Mill Creek. The water from the pond is intended to be pumped through a sand pit and carbon filter before being released to Mill Creek. HISTORY OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES Pristine, Inc<>, began operation as a liquid disposal firm in November 1974 (see Table 1, Site Chronology). Prior to this, a sulfuric acid manufacturing plant occupied the site. The site is owned by Orin and Jane Long, and Pauline Long, who also owns the adjacent Cincinnati Drum Service facility.

2-1 1.000

500 MILES

FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP PRIST'.VJE SITE CITY OF READING WELL FIELD

600

L 300 L SCALE IN FEET

FIGURE 2 VICINITY MAP PRISTINE SITE MUNICIPAL WELL

ACCESS ROAD

RUNOFF COLLECTION PIT BURIED RUNOFF COLLECTION TILE

APPROXIMATE LOCATI OF CITY WATER MAIN

UNDERGROUND TANK TANK SEVERAL SMALL TANKS

BURIED SOYBEAN OIL COLLECTION TANK TILE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION L a OF BURIED WASTE r*

NOT-TO-SCALE

FIGURE 3 SITEMAP PRISTINE SITE ' \ Table 1 SITE CHRONOLOGY 1974 Pristine, Inc. began operations as a. liquid disposal firm. 1977-1979 Ohio EPA logged numerous violations of Ohio's air pollution regulations. Late 1970's Numerous complaints were registered with various enforcement agencies, principally the Reading Fire Department, regarding odors and fumes from the Pristine incinerator. The Reading Fire Chief frequently followed up on complaints to ensure that safe practices were being used. April 1979 An Ohio EPA inspection showed an estimated 10,000 drums of waste material onsite, 13 bulk storage tanks, and extensive soil con- tamination. 1980 The Reading Fire Department issued a municipal order to suspend operations. The order was disregarded.

June 1980 The Ohio Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit requesting Pristine to comply with the terms and conditions of its permit to operate an air contaminate source. In the same month, a partial consent decree was filed limiting the receipt of waste and incineration. January 1981 11 monitoring wells were installed on pro- perties belonging to Pristine, Inc., Cincinnati Drum Services, and Carstab Corp. February Pristine hired Ny-Trex, Inc. to help reduce the amount of hazardous materials onsite, in an attempt to comply with the consent decree. June 1981 In June, and again in July 1981, the court found Pristine, Inc. in contempt of court for noncompliance set forth in the consent decree of a year earlier.

September 1981 Operations at the site finally ceased, as a result of OEPA's lawsuit. April 1984 A consent order issued by U.S. EPA resulted in the surface cleanup of remaining drums and tank wastes, and removal of visibly contaminated soils.

GLT122/8 A liquid injection incinerator, a biological digester, and e neutralization pit were used on the site as disposal facilities. Between 1977 and 1979, the Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control, logged numerous violations of Ohio's air pollution regulations. The incinerator has been described as "an archaic apparatus" equipped with a corroded scrubber system that leaked where operated, nor did the incinerator have a device for monitoring combustion efficiency.

During the late 1970's, the Reading Fire Department received numerous complaints from an industrial plant, Thiokol/Carstab, and Unrig's Trailer Park regarding odors and fumes from the incinerator on the Pristine site. On occasion, employees of Thiokol/Carstab were taken to the hospital allegedly as a result of being overcome by the fumes. Thiokol/Carstab was forced to close down several times until Pristine was ordered to stop using the incinerator. On April 4, 1979, the facility was inspected by Ohio EPA. An estimated 10,000 drums of waste material were scattered throughout the yard area. There were about 13 tanks, both above and below ground, and extensive soil contamination. The contaminants that were stored on the site included DDT, PCB's, flammable solvents, paint sludges, acids, and cyanide sludges. The conditions of the tanks and drums ranged from poor (leaking and rusting) to good. The tank just south of the incinerator stack was once used to store soybean oil contaminated with PCB's. The Reading Fire Chief issued a municipal order to cease operation of the incinerator in 1980. The order was disre- garded and operations continued until 1981, when the courts ordered Pristine, Inc. to stop incinerating and accepting waste. On June 11, 1980, the Ohio Attorney General's Office, repre- senting Ohio EPA, filed a complaint in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas requesting compliance of Pristine, Inc., with the terms and conditions of its permit to operate an air contaminant source. This permit had required Pristine, Inc., to reduce and maintain onsite waste at 2,000 drum equiva- lents by March 4, 1980, and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations for water pollution control.

In conjunction with the complaint, a partial consent decree was filed. This decree limited incineration and receipt of waste, except to the extent that these activities were in full compliance with provisions of the decree.

In January 1981, the U.S. EPA directed its Contractor to install 11 monitoring wells on property belonging to Pristine, Inc., Cincinnati Drum Services, and Carstab Corporation.

2-6 The purpose of their monitoring was to assess groundwater contamination in the vicinity of these properties. In February 1981, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported that Jack Salter, general manager of Pristine, Inc., testified in court that governmental harassment had prevented the firm from reducing the amount of hazardous material at the site. As of February 1981, there were still 3,700 barrels onsite. In the same month, Pristine hired Ny-Trex, Inc. to assist in the inventory reduction at the site. In June, and again in July 1981, the Court found Pristine, Inc., in contempt of court for noncompliance with several deadlines set forth in the June 11, 1980 decree. In both June and July, the deadlines for compliance were extended. Operation of the site finally ceased in September 1981, as a result of OEPA's lawsuit. Ny-Trex, Inc. had removed most of the drums. A consent order issued by U.S. EPA in April 1984 resulted in further surface cleanup. All remaining drums were removed, the tanks were cleaned, the runoff collection system was reinstalled, and visible contaminated soil was removed from three areas. Contaminated soil still remains onsite? the extent of contamination is not known. Citizen activity at Pristine has been confined to the site owner, residential trailer park, Thiokol/Carstab, and the Reading Fire Department. The nearby industry and the residents of the trailer park complained verbally and in writing to the fire department regarding smoke and odors resulting from incineration of waste at Pristine. At this point, no local citizen group has been formed and there has been little citizen activity at the site since it was closed. INTERESTED PARTIES AND KEY CONCERNS During the preparation of this plan, personal interviews were conducted with key participants in the Pristine site. Those interviewed included U.S. EPA, Ohio EPA, the City of Reading Fire Chief, Reading Safety Service Director, and several residents of Uhrig's Trailer Park. They were asked about community issues and concerns and what methods could best be used to help keep all concerned informed of upcoming RI/FS activities. Their responses were used in preparing the following sections. LOCAL RESIDENTS •s. All local residents rely on area groundwater sources for their domestic water supply. The residential area nearest the site is Uhrig's Trailer Park about 150 yards away. Res- idents were forced to evacuate on one occasion when the Pristine incinerator operated improperly. According to

2-7 several residents of the park, there were many times when they couldn't go outside because of the odor. Although odor problems ended with the closure of Pristine, there is still concern over the water supply. Test wells have been placed at several points on and off the site. CITY OF READING The Reading Municipal Well Field is directly north of the site approximately 100 yards. The city regularly checks its water supply and has detected low levels of organic contami- nants. The Ohio EPA Division of Public Water Supply recom- mended in August 1984, that the city treat its water for the contaminants, or find an alternate source of water. All runoff from the Pristine site used to either discharge into a collection pit or flow directly into a drainage ditch that is tributary to Mill Creek. A runoff collection system has been installed and is now operational. Local citizens and officials are concerned over the water quality of Mill Creek as a result of the hazardous waste discharges. They are uncertain as to its present condition and who will be responsible for continued monitoring. LOCAL INDUSTRY Thiokol/Carstab is a specialty chemical company located near Pristine. On occasion, the fumes from the Pristine incinerator forced closing portions of the plant and several times Thiokol/Carstab workers were taken to the hospital allegedly because of the fumes. Thiokol/Carstab made formal complaints to the Reading Fire Department regarding the operation of Pristine. READING FIRE DEPARTMENT On the local level, the Reading Fire Department has demon- strated the greatest amount of interest in the site. Residents and Thiokol/Carstab contacted the fire department when fumes and odor from the Pristine incinerator began to cause problems. The fire chief was especially concerned about the potential fire hazard from the stored material. The fire department actively pursued the site owners and operators because of fire code violations. The fire chief, Robert Hollmeyer, remains interested in the site and monitors onsite activities. OHIO EPA ^ Ohio EPA has been involved with Pristine since the mid-1970"s. It participated in the law suit to close the site and has worked with local officials regarding the problem. Ohio EPA remains available to meet with local residents and officials

2-8 concerning the site. To date there have been no public meetings with local residents and officials concerning Pristine. SUMMARY Local concern about the Pristine site is low at the present time. Residents, local officials, and agency personnel believe that the odor problem is, for the most part, resolved. Public concern subsided significantly after the site closure and surface cleanup. Continued well monitoring will be necessary, as will further tests of soil and surface water, to determine whether offsite contamination has occurred. COMMUNITY RELATIONS OBJECTIVES AND TECHNIQUES o Provide Chief Robert Hollmeyer and Safety Service Director Dennis Albrinck with timely information about the scope, progress, and findings of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. o Inform Mr. Tracy, the caretaker at Uhrig's Trailer Park, and the residents on the mailing list of plans, problems, and progress during upcoming studies. o Provide timely and accurate information to the Cincinnati Enquirer and other local media. o Coordinate the release of all public information with the Ohio EPA. o Respond to all inquiries about this project in a timely manner. o Encourage involvement of any environmental, citizen, or other groups that may become interested in the site. o Provide a central information source to respond to project questions using Chief Hollmeyer and Safety Service Director Albrinck as much as possible. o Provide residents and officials with a nontechnical interpretation of the study findings. o Provide all interested parties an opportunity to L review the RI/FS and comment on the remedial action alternatives. A 3-week public comment period will be ^provided with a 2-week notice before the beginning of the comment period.

GLT122/4

2-9 Section 3 COMMUNITY RELATIONS WORK PLAN

COMMUNITY RELATIONS TECHNIQUES AND TASKS The techniques and tasks described in this section are de- signed to meet the objectives outlined in the previous sec- tion. Community Relations tasks for the Pristine site are based on the following project milestones. Table 2 summa- rizes the relationship of project milestones and community relations activities. PROJECT MILESTONES o Beginning of remedial investigation - o Site investigation and analysis o Final remedial investigation and report o Feasibility study - identification and evaluation of alternatives o Final feasibility study report o Record of decision TECHNIQUES AND TASKS 1. Mailing List A mailing list of citizens and elected officials inter- ested in the study was developed and is attached to this plan. This list will be updated throughout the study. 2. Briefing of Agencies and Officials • Local agencies, officials and citizens will be briefed at the beginning of the RI/FS to summarize the activities to date, the current status, and planned study activities, Briefings will be provided throughout the RI/FS as appro- priate. Briefings can be in the form of fact sheets, L telephone calls, or meetings. Appropriate state and federal officials will also be identified and contacted at the beginning of the study L to determine their concerns and information needs. o Task A. Brief citizens and officials at the I outset of the Remedial Investigation. I I 3-1 Table 2 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SCHEDULE PRISTINE SITE July 198A

Project Milestones Site Identification Beginning Investigation Final RI and Evaluation FS Record of of RI and Analysis Report of Alternatives Report Decision Tasks Month 1 Months 2-9 Month 10 Months 11-13 Month U Month 16

1. Mailing List

2. Briefing Officials A B C D E F

3. Central Contact i». Information Repository

5. News Releases A B C D

6. Public Meetings A B C

7. Public Comment Period

8. Responsiveness Summary A

9. Revision of CRP B

GLT122/6 i o Task B. Update citizens and officials dur_ the course of the RI on study progress. o Task C. Inform citizens and officials abov study r results at the end of the RI. o Task D. Update citizens and officials on the r development and evaluation of site cleanup alter- natives. o Task E. Inform citizens and officials about the final recommended plan. o Task F. Report to local citizens and officials on the Record of Decision. _ 3. Central Public Information Contact A central information contact within the lead agency, U.S. EPA, will be identified to respond to public inquiries and concerns. A local information contact, either Chief Hollmeyer or Safety Service Director Albrinck, will be used whenever possible. The telephone number(s) for public inquiries and comments will be included in news releases or fact sheets. 4. Information Repository The Reading City Hall at Pike and Market Streets will be used as the local repository for technical reports, fact sheets, and other written material. 5. News Releases The media are the most effective means of providing in- formation to the general public for this site. News releases will be issued at appropriate times throughout the RI/FS, including: • o Task A. Month 1. This release will provide gen- eral background about the Superfund program and will describe the purpose activities and schedule of the RI/FS. It will also announce the first public information meeting and will identify infor- i. mation contacts, and the location of the information repository. i o Ta§*k B. Month 10. Announce findings of RI. o Task C. Month 13. A news release^will be issued 2 weeks before the public comment period to explain L the procedure for making comments, and the public meeting(s). I I. 3-3 o Task D. Month 14. A news release will announce the completion of the feasibility study and the recommended alternative. Other news releases or advisories will be issued as ap- propriate throughout the RI/FS process. Activities that could require news releases include onsite activities, test results, or enforcement actions. The U.S. EPA Office of Public Affairs in Chicago will serve as central media contact. News releases should be coordinated with appropriate technical and public relations personnel. 6. Public Meetings The need for public meetings will be evaluated through- out the study. Although little public interest is now evident, activities at the site or findings of the remedial investigation/feasibility study could raise concerns and questions that might best be addressed at meetings. Meetings could be appropriate: 1) at the outset of the remedial investigation if site work is likely to generate concern among residents, 2) at completion of the remedial investigation if groundwater contamination is found, and 3) at the end of the feasibility study to review alternatives and receive public comment. o Task A. Month 1. Meeting to discuss the pur- pose, activities and schedule of the RI/FS. o Task B. Month 10. Conduct a meeting to discuss the results of the RI and to describe the alter- natives to be considered in the FS. Citizen input will be considered at the meeting. o Task C. Month 13. Meeting to discuss the recom- mendation of the feasibility study, and to receive public comment on the recommendations. 7. Public Comment Period A 3-week public comment period will be provided after release of the feasibility study. The comment period will be announced through mailed notices and a press L release issued 2 weeks before the comment period be- gins. Technical reports and summaries will be made availabla at the Reading City Hall. A public meeting(s) I may be appropriate to review the study findings and receive public comment. i

3-4 I. 1 8. Responsiveness Summary A responsiveness summary should be prepared after the f public comment period to summarize the comments re- I ceived and indicate how the remedial action recommenda- tion reflects these comments. It should be prepared in r a format suitable for public distribution, if appro- j priate. 9. Revision of Community Relations Plan ' Community concerns and information needs will be moni- tored throughout the RI/FS. The Community Relations j" Plan will be reviewed quarterly and revised as necessary. I It will also be revised after the Record of Decision to specify activities to be conducted during Phase II design ( and construction, if appropriate. o Task A. Quarterly review of community relations "- plan. ' o Task B. Revise CRP following Record of Decision. j STAFFING ALLOCATION 1. Mailing List U.S. EPA Work Hours Cost Community Relations Specialist 4 $90.00 2. Briefing of Agencies and Officials U.S. EPA _ Community Relations Specialist 16 340.00 Onscene Coordinator 8 120.00 Contractor Support i Community Relations Specialist 66 3,300.00 3. Central Information Contact

I U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 8 170.00 I. Onscene Coordinator 8 120.00 4. Information Repository I U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 4 90.00 I 3-5 I 5. News Releases U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 24 510.00 6. Public Meetings U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 20 $420.00 Onscene Coordinator 10 150.00 Contractor Support Community Relations Specialist 24 1,440.00 Graphics 3 200.00 Clerical 8 200.00 7. Public Comment Period U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 16 340.00 Onscene Coordinator 8 120.00 » 8. Responsiveness Summary U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 24 $510.00 Onscene Coordinator 8 120.00 Contractor Support Community Relations Specialist 16 960.00 Clerical 8 200.00 9. Revision of Community Relations Plan I U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 8 170.00 L Contractor Support Community Relations Specialist 8 480.00 L BUDGET SUMMARY U.S. EPA Community Relations Specialist 2,640.00 - Onscene Coordinator 630.00

3-6 L Contractor Support Community Relations Specialist 6,180. Graphics, Clerical 600. ,

Expenses Travel (2 trips - 4 days) Air fare ($200/trip) $600.00 Auto ($50/day) 200.00 Per Diem ($100) 400.00 Reprographics 1,000.00 Postage 400.00 TOTAL - " $12,650.00

SCHEDULE A draft schedule is attached (Table 2). A final schedule will be prepared after the work plan for the RI/FS has been approved. GLT122/5

3-7 Section 4 MAILING LIST f PERSONS INTERVIEWED Mr. James Thacker r 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Ms. Patricia Duff 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Ohio Public Interest Campaign 1216 East McMillan Room 305 Cincinnati, OH 45206 Mr. Tracy, Caretaker Uhrig's Trailers Park 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Mr. James Kirby 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Mr. Walter Adams 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Mr. Oscar Ford 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Ms. Rose Green 9499 Reading Road Reading, Oh 45215 Mrs. Garr*ett Gamble 9499 Reading Road Reading, OH 45215 Mr. Clifford McKinney 9499 Reading Road i Reading, OH 45215 L FEDERAL, STAT£, LOCAL AGENCY STAFF Ms. Mary Tyson Regional Site Project Officer U.S. EPA Region V I 230 South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60604 I 312/886-6941 4-1 I f. Chief Robert Hollmeyer Reading Fire Department Pike and Market Streets Reading, OH 45215 513/733-5537 Mr. Dennis Albrinck Safety Service Director City of Reading Pike and Market Streets Reading, OH 45215 513/733-3725 Rodger Field Regional Counsel U.S. EPA Region V 230 South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60604 Margaret McCue Community Relations Coordinator U.S. EPA Region V 230 South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60604 Roger Hannahs Ohio EPA Box 1049 Columbus, OH 43216 Pat Madigan OEPA Public Interest Center Box 1049 Columbus, OH 43216 Don Marshal Ohio EPA SW District 7 East 4€h Dayton, OH 45402 FEDERAL OFFICIALS Senator 1 503 Hart Building Washington, D.C. 20510

4Ck L Senator 363 Russell Building I Washington, D.C. 20510 I I 4-2 Representative Tom Luken 2342 Rayburn Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Representative Willis Gradison 2311 Rayburn Building Washington, D.C. 20515 STATE OFFICIALS Senator Bill Bowen State Senate Columbus, OH 43215 Senator Stanley Aronoff State Senate Columbus, OH 43215 Senator Richard Finan State Senate Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Tom Pottengep Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Terry Tranter Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Helen Rankin Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative John O'Brien Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Dale VanVyven Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Jerry Luebbery Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Lou Blessing Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215 Representative Bill Mallory Ohio House of Representatives Columbus, OH 43215

4-3 f • I

MEDIA Newspapers r Cincinnati Post 800 Broadway \ Cincinnati, OH 45202 Enquirer 617 Vine Street \ Cincinnati, OH 45202 Valley Courier 218 West Benson Cincinnati, OH 45215 Radio WCIN-AM 1480 kHz 106 Glenwood Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45217 WCKY-AM 1530 kHz 501 Carew Tower Cincinnati, OH 45202 WEBN-FM 102.7 MHz 2724 Erie Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45208 WKRC-AM 550 kHz 1906 Highland Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45219 WKFQ-FM 101.9 MHz 1906 Highland Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45219 WLW-AM 70(J kHz 3 E. Fourth Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 WUBE-FM 105.1 MHZ 225 E. Sixth Street Cincinnati, OH 45201 WWEZ-FM 92.5 MHz 501 Carew Tower i Cincinnati, OH 45202 WYYS-FM 94.9 MHz i 1132 West Keeper Road Cincinnati, OH 45240

4-4 r- Television WBTI Channel 64 5177 Fishwick Drive r Cincinnati, OH 45216 WCET Channel 48 1223 Central Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45214 WCPO-TV Channel 9 500 Central Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45202 WKRC-TV Channel 12 1906 Highland Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45219 WLWT Channel 5 140 West Ninth Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 WXIX-TV Channel 19 10490 Taconic Terrace Cincinnati, OH 45215 GLT122/7

I I I 4-5 I