DOCSLIB.ORG

Probe Told of Zuma's 'Hidden Hand' at Eskom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Probe Told of Zuma's 'Hidden Hand' at Eskom Legalbrief | your legal news hub Thursday 30 September 2021 Probe told of Zuma’s ‘hidden hand’ at Eskom For the first time, President Jacob Zuma has been placed at the scene that opened the door to the wholesale looting of Eskom, writes Legalbrief. And, in a day of high drama at Parliament’s state capture inquiry, Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown was yesterday exposed as being associated with the Guptas and being at the centre of machinations at Eskom that led to the suspension and ultimate departure of three key executives (see report below). Zuma was directly linked to Eskom’s capture by former Eskom chair Zola Tsotsi yesterday (Wednesday). Zuma, Brown and their Gupta associates were the ‘hidden hand’ that Tsotsi said was orchestrating affairs at the utility, according to a BusinessLIVE report. This is the first direct link of Zuma to allegations of state capture, according to the report which says the closest he has come to being linked with such allegations was through his son Duduzane and the Guptas. But yesterday, Tsotsi told MPs in the state-capture hearings that Zuma, in cahoots with then SAA chair Dudu Myeni, had played a direct role in dislodging senior executives from Eskom, opening the way for the appointment of Brian Molefe as CEO and Anoj Singh as chief financial officer. Both have been implicated in concluding deals with Gupta-owned companies. The report says Tsotsi, who was chair of Eskom between June 2011 and March 2015, also told the inquiry of approaches made to him by Tony Gupta regarding the affairs of Eskom and the association between Brown and the Guptas. Never has the case for a judicial inquiry into state capture by a judge who is not appointed by Zuma been so compelling as it is after yesterday’s explosive parliamentary hearings into events at Eskom, Business Day notes in an editorial. It says Tsotsi, who at one stage was happy to do Zuma’s bidding – he suspended four Eskom executives in 2015 at his behest – has spilled the beans on his former political bosses. Not only did Tsotsi say it was Zuma who urged him to make the suspensions but that the meeting at which this occurred was convened by Zuma’s close friend, Myeni, at the President’s Durban residence. Tsotsi also said Brown was directly involved in the collusion. Business Day notes that while the parliamentary inquiry is doing an excellent job of exposing, once again, the extent of the penetration of private and corrupt interests into the heart of the state and its key commercial institutions, it will be difficult for it to move much beyond the various versions of events that are put to it. Tsotsi revealed an alleged plot to remove Eskom executives and replace them with those amenable to the President and his clique, suggesting that Zuma was behind the suspension of four senior Eskom executives in March 2015 – which ended in his (Tsotsi’s) own resignation about 10 days later, according to a City Press report. It says the former Eskom director painted a picture of a coordinated attempt to control Eskom. This attempt involved Zuma, Brown, Myeni and the Gupta brothers and started shortly after Brown took office in 2014. Tsotsi told the inquiry that he had sought to cultivate a working relationship with Brown following her appointment in May 2014, but did not succeed. Brown had called him to a meeting a day or two before the February 2015 State of the Nation address. Tsotsi claimed that after a brief exchange about their working relationship, Brown warned him to ‘go and do what you have to do, I will go and do what I have to. There is no reason for you and me to talk about anything’. Tsotsi told spellbound MPs that the very same afternoon he was approached by Tony Gupta, who requested to meet with him. At the meeting, Gupta told him: ‘Chairman, you are not helping us with anything. We are the ones who put you in the position you are in. We are the ones who can take you out.’ The report says Tsotsi notes: ‘It was at this time that I felt that some sinister clouds were gathering because the coincidence of the two events was not lost on me.’ Tsotsi has levelled damning accusations against Brown, Tony Gupta and their close associate Salim Essa. ‘There is a clear association between Minister Brown and the Gupta family,’ Tsotsi is quoted in a Fin24 report as saying. He told the inquiry that Brown invited him to her house after a new Eskom board had been appointed in December 2014. ‘Tony Gupta and Salim Essa were present,’ he said. The matter was about the allocation of board members to different subcommittees. ‘Salim Essa would draw up his idea of board allocations up and send it to the minister,’ he said. Asked by DA MP Natasha Mazzone if Brown was taking instruction from Essa, he said: ‘I would not say she took instructions from them, but it seemed to me that I was not able to complete this exercise without the involvement of Mr Essa. I got a list and I changed the list on the basis of what I thought it should be. I sent it to the minister to get her concurrence. She changed it back to what it was when she originally sent it. My hands were tied.’ Brown denied the claims, saying: ‘I have never consulted with anyone on my executive functions. Not Tony Gupta or Salim Essa or anyone else. Why would I hand over my functions to anyone else?’ A TimesLIVE report notes Brown however admitted that Eskom officials had on more than one occasion misled her‚ and manipulated her into lying to Parliament for which she faces sanctions by the Public Protector and Parliament's ethics committee. The report says Brown has painted state-owned companies as a ‘battleground’ for ANC factional battles‚ opposition parties and the media. Brown‚ who has raised concerns about Parliament’s inquiry into state capture‚ said she had appeared before the committee despite legal advice not to do so. A BusinessLIVE report says she effectively accused Tsotsi of lying in claiming that she had told then Eskom director Ben Ngubane that the financial director Tsholofelo Molefe should also be suspended along with the three already agreed upon by the board. This suspension took place. Dealing with board appointments Brown said she had never changed the shortlist of candidates proposed by her department and that the Cabinet appointed board members. Brown denied that she received a phone call from Zuma in 2015, instructing her to suspend three Eskom executives, contradicting the explosive evidence of the former board chair. ‘I said no, Advocate (Ntuthuzelo) Vanara,’ Brown replied wearily when the evidence leader in the parliamentary inquiry into Eskom questioned her about the alleged instruction, said to have emanated from a meeting including Zuma and Myeni. ‘In fact, I don’t know the conversation. Why don’t you ask the president?’ According to a report on The Citizen site, Brown said Essa and Tony Gupta had never been to her home, adding: ‘At this point it is my word against theirs.’ Parliament's inquiry into state capture will invite the Gupta brothers‚ Salim Essa‚ Eric Wood‚ Duduzane Zuma and Dudu Myeni to appear before it. A TimesLIVE report notes that following weeks of evidence in which the Gupta brothers‚ Essa‚ Duduzane Zuma and Wood have regularly been named‚ ACDP MP Steve Swart proposed that they be subpoenaed to attend. EFF MP Floyd Shivambu said given testimony by the former Eskom board chair in which Myeni is cited as having set up a meeting with the President and Tsotsi to discuss board suspensions‚ she should be called too. After five hours of testimony to Parliament, former Eskom CEO Brian Molefe on Tuesday admitted having phone contact with the Gupta family and knowing of the power utility's deal with Trillian, but maintained that he had no direct knowledge of corruption. A report on the IoL site says Molefe claimed that he had been removed from the business side of operations in order to focus on ending load-shedding during his 15 months at the helm of Eskom, and flippantly told MPs to raise questions about specific contracts and payments with suspended chief financial officer Anoj Singh. Molefe initially denied knowledge of Eskom’s agreement with Trillian Capital Holdings, which lacked National Treasury approval but nonetheless saw the company earn some R600m as a subsidiary of global consultancy firm McKinsey. He accused DA MP Natasha Mazzone of ambushing him by asking about Trillian, which had been the subject of extensive testimony before the inquiry..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Guptas, the Public Protector's Report and Capital Accumulation In
    The Guptas, the Public Protector’s Report and Capital Accumulation in South Africa Ashwin Desai Goolam Vahed Abstract The relationship between South African President Jacob Zuma and his family, and the Guptas, possibly the richest family of Indian origin at present in South Africa, has made persistent national and increasingly international headlines in the media over the past few years. The Gupta family, who arrived in South Africa from India just prior to the country’s first non-racial democratic elec- tions in 1994, are accused of colluding with Zuma in the removal and appoint- ment of government ministers, as well as the directors of State-Owned Enter- prises (SOEs) in order to secure lucrative state contracts. This article examines the allegedly corrupt relationship between the Zumas and the Guptas to probe key issues in post-apartheid South African society: corruption, state capture, inequality, class formation, Black Economic Empowerment, and White Mono- poly Capital. It argues that corruption has negative consequences such as creat- ing despondency amongst the populace leading to capital flight and creating the possibilities for state capture as well as further deepening inequality. Keywords: Apartheid, Gupta, Zuma, Black Economic Empowerment, White Monopoly Capital, Social Cohesion The lexicon of South African English has been constantly transformed by the inclusion of words from the Afrikaans language, and phrases from the Indian sub- continent, as well as by some words and phrases from local African languages. When this potpourri of ‘English’ is spoken at a rapid pace, even an English Alternation 24,1 (2017) 26 - 49 26 Electronic ISSN: 2519-5476; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2017/v24n1a3 The Guptas, the Public Protector’s Report and Capital Accumulation speaking foreigner could easily get lost as sentences are trespassed with local inflections (Mesthrie 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Take 286 Starts at 14:05
    UNREVISED HANSARD NATIONAL ASSEMBLY THURSDAY, 29 NOVEMBER 2018 Page: 1 THURSDAY, 29 NOVEMBER 2018 ____ PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ____ The House met at 14:02. The House Chairperson Ms M G Boroto took the Chair and requested members to observe a moment of silence for prayer or meditation. DEBATE ON 16 DAYS OF ACTIVISM OF NO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN: #HEARMETOO – A WOMAN OF FORTITUDE The MINISTER OF SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT: Hon Chairperson, hon Members of Parliament, representatives of Civil Society and Women’s Movements, ladies and gentlemen, I stand here before you to talk about one of the most and highly emotive issues in South Africa and the world. This scourge knows no colour, knows no religion, knows no race, knows no class and knows no political UNREVISED HANSARD NATIONAL ASSEMBLY THURSDAY, 29 NOVEMBER 2018 Page: 2 affiliations. It ravages communities and families across class and the colour line. It is a societal challenge which requires a societal responses. IsiZulu: Ngicela nje ukuthi namhlanje ngingahlushwa uma ngikhuluma ngento ebuhlungu kakhulu kubantu baseNingizimu Afrika. Ngikhuluma ngento engakhethi ukuthi ungubani, unjani, unemali engakanani nokuthi ungubani emphakathini. English: Let us just for a moment put ourselves in the shoes of those who suffer in the hands of abusers. Let us even if it is for a minute feel their pain and trauma. As we do that, let us call upon for those who believe on our almighty and those who believe on ancestors to get into the hearts and minds of these heartless abusers so that they can understand and feel the suffering and the pain that they caused to their victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Outa Heads of Arguments
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 15996/17 In the matter between: ORGANISATION UNDOING TAX ABUSE First Plaintiff SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS PILOTS ASSOCIATION Second Plaintiff and DUDUZILE CYNTHIA MYENI First Defendant SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS SOC LTD Second Defendant AIR CHEFS SOC LTD Third Defendant MINISTER OF FINANCE Fourth Defendant PLAINTIFFS’ HEADS OF ARGUMENT: CLOSING ADDRESS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................... 7 Delinquency ............................................................................................................ 7 Directors’ duties .................................................................................................... 12 The SAA governance framework .......................................................................... 22 OVERVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE............................................................................. 26 The plaintiffs’ evidence ......................................................................................... 26 Ms Myeni’s evidence ............................................................................................ 28 THE EMIRATES DEAL ............................................................................................ 32 Overview ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HSF V Eskom (Founding Affidavit)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO In the matter between: THE HELEN SUZMAN FOUNDATION First Applicant! MAGDALENA FRANCISZKA WIERZYCKA Second Applicant and ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED First Respondent THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Second Respondent AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Third Respondent ATUL KUMAR GUPTA Fourth Respondent RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Fifth Respondent DUDUZANE ZUMA Sixth Respondent TEGETA EXPLORATION AND RESOURCES (PTY) Seventh Respondent LTD MINISTER OF MINERAL RESOURCES Eighth Respondent MINISTER OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES Ninth Respondent MINISTER OF FINANCE Tenth Respondent MINISTER OF WATER AND SANITATION Eleventh Respondent NATIONAL TREASURY Twelfth Respondent DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES Thirteenth Respondent DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES 2 25 DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION Fifteenth Respondent BRIAN MOLEFE Sixteenth Respondent MARK PAMENSKY Seventeenth Respondent ANOJ SINGH Eighteenth Respondent SALIM AZIZ ESSA Nineteenth Respondent NAZEEM HOWA Twentieth Respondent RONICA RAGAVAN Twenty First Respondent THE PERSONS LISTED IN ANNEX "FA1 " Twenty Second to Seventy Third Respondents FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, FRANCIS ANTONIE do hereby make oath and say: 1. I am an adult male of full legal capacity and a director of the Helen Suzman Foundation ("HSF"), the first applicant, holding office as such at 2 Sherborne Road, Parktown, Johannesburg. 2. I am duly authorised to depose to this affidavit on behalf of the applicants. 3. Save as appears from the context, the facts in this affidavit are within my own personal knowledge and are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, both true and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • State Capture and the Political Manipulation of Criminal Justice Agencies a Joint Submission to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry Into Allegations of State Capture
    State capture and the political manipulation of criminal justice agencies A joint submission to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture CORRUPTION WATCH AND THE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES APRIL 2019 State capture and the political manipulation of criminal justice agencies A joint submission by Corruption Watch and the Institute for Security Studies to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture April 2019 Contents Executive summary ..........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................3 Structure and purpose of this submission .....................................................................................................3 Impact of manipulation of criminal justice agencies .......................................................................................4 Recent positive developments .......................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................4 Fixing the legacy of the manipulation of criminal justice agencies..............................................................4 Addressing risk factors for future manipulation
    [Show full text]
  • Scc Day 383 Transcript Dd 2021-04-27
    COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO STATE CAPTURE HELD AT CITY OF JOHANNESBURG OLD COUNCIL CHAMBER 158 CIVIC BOULEVARD, BRAAMFONTEIN 27 APRIL 2021 DAY 383 22 Woodlands Drive Irene Woods, Centurion TEL: 012 941 0587 FAX: 086 742 7088 MOBILE: 066 513 1757 [email protected] CERTIFICATE OF VERACITY I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, in as far as it is audible, the aforegoing is a VERBATIM transcription from the soundtrack of proceedings, as was ordered to be transcribed by Gauteng Transcribers and which had been recorded by the client COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO STATE CAPTURE HELD AT CITY OF JOHANNESBURG OLD COUNCIL CHAMBER 158 CIVIC BOULEVARD, BRAAMFONTEIN DATE OF HEARING: 27 APRIL 2021 TRANSCRIBERS: B KLINE; Y KLIEM; V FAASEN; D STANIFORTH Page 2 of 138 27 APRIL 2021 – DAY 383 PROCEEDINGS RESUME ON 27 APRIL 2021 CHAIRPERSON: Good morning Mr Seleka, good morning everybody. ADV SELEKA SC: Morning Chairperson. CHAIRPERSON: Good morning Mr Zwane. MR ZWANE: Chairperson good morning. CHAIRPERSON: Good morning on Freedom Day. MR ZWANE: Thank you Chair. CHAIRPERSON: Good morning to your attorney. Thank 10 you. ADV SELEKA SC: Thank you Chair. CHAIRPERSON: I must start by thanking everybody who has agreed to work on a public holiday for sacrificing enjoying Freedom Day and coming to work. Mr Seleka and your team, the investigators, the staff, the technicians, Mr Zwane thank you for your cooperation you probably would have been at some function today to join others who are celebrating freedom and thank you to your attorney again for the cooperation that you have given the commission to 20 enable the commission to sit today.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Politcsweb-Going-Off-The-Rails
    http://www.politicsweb.co.za/documents/going-off-the-rails--irr Going off the rails - IRR John Kane-Berman - IRR | 02 November 2016 John Kane-Berman on the slide towards the lawless South African state GOING OFF THE RAILS: THE SLIDE TOWARDS THE LAWLESS SOUTH AFRICAN STATE SETTING THE SCENE South Africa is widely recognised as a lawless country. It is also a country run by a government which has itself become increasingly lawless. This is so despite all the commitments to legality set out in the Constitution. Not only is the post–apartheid South Africa founded upon the principle of legality, but courts whose independence is guaranteed are vested with the power to ensure that these principles are upheld. Prosecuting authorities are enjoined to exercise their functions “without fear, favour, or prejudice”. The same duty is laid upon other institutions established by the Constitution, among them the public protector and the auditor general. Everyone is endowed with the right to “equal protection and benefit of the law”. We are all also entitled to “administrative action that is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair”. Unlike the old South Africa – no doubt because of it – the new Rechtsstaat was one where the rule of law would be supreme, power would be limited, and the courts would have the final say. This edifice, and these ideals, are under threat. Lawlessness on the part of the state and those who run it is on the increase. The culprits run from the president down to clerks of the court, from directors general to immigration officials, from municipal managers to prison warders, from police generals to police constables, from cabinet ministers to petty bureaucrats.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors
    Stefan Jung / Volker Kessler / Louise Kretzschmar / Elke Meier (eds.): Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors © 2019, V&R unipress GmbH, Göttingen ISBN Print: 9783847109150 – ISBN E-Book: 9783847009153 Stefan Jung / Volker Kessler / Louise Kretzschmar / Elke Meier (eds.): Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors Management–Ethik –Organisation Band 6 Herausgegeben vomEvangelische Bank Institut für Ethisches Management © 2019, V&R unipress GmbH, Göttingen ISBN Print: 9783847109150 – ISBN E-Book: 9783847009153 Stefan Jung / Volker Kessler / Louise Kretzschmar / Elke Meier (eds.): Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors Stefan Jung /Volker Kessler / Louise Kretzschmar /ElkeMeier (eds.) Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors With 5figures V&Runipress © 2019, V&R unipress GmbH, Göttingen ISBN Print: 9783847109150 – ISBN E-Book: 9783847009153 Stefan Jung / Volker Kessler / Louise Kretzschmar / Elke Meier (eds.): Metaphors for Leading – Leading by Metaphors This volume was edited by Gesellschaft fþr Bildung und Forschung in Europa (GBFE), Wycliff Germany, and YMCA University of Applied Sciences. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet þber http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. 2019, V&R unipress GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Breite 6, D-37079 Gçttingen Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschþtzt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich
    [Show full text]
  • Namibian Influence, Impacts on Education, and State Capture
    THE EFFECTS OF COLONIZATION AND APARTHEID ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA: NAMIBIAN INFLUENCE, IMPACTS ON EDUCATION, AND STATE CAPTURE by Austin Michael Hutchinson A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Austin Hutchinson All Rights Reserved Abstract When discussing South Africa, apartheid is the most common topic that people remember. The legacies and institutional framework that apartheid established are still prevalent in the current state of development in South Africa. This work examines three prominent issues hindering the development of the South African nation. Understanding the narrative history of colonization and apartheid allows for a more comprehensive view on the current development of South Africa. Using colonial records, court rulings, journals, news articles among various other sources across the topics mentioned, a narrative is created that explains the current problems facing South Africa and Namibia. Namibia endured colonial rule from three different oppressors but was initially claimed by Germany and named German South West Africa. Although Namibia and South Africa were merged under one rule for nearly a century beginning in 1915, each nation had divergent paths to independence. Namibia eventually gained its independence in 1990, a few years prior to South Africa, which gained its own independence from apartheid rule in 1994. As a result of colonization and apartheid in South Africa, certain ideals which hindered the progression of the South African people remained, including inequities in the education system. Furthermore, some of the pervasive systems established under the apartheid regime led to failures in the accountability mechanisms which resulted in institutional weakness and state capture in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Myeni Laundered R3m to Zuma Foundation, Says Scared Mr X
    18 February 2020 Zondo Commission – Myeni laundered R3m to Zuma foundation, says scared Mr X Had it not been for the probe into his business affairs by the state capture commission late last year, the safety of the family of KwaZulu-Natal businessman “Mr X”, who has testified in-camera, would not be a cause for concern. For the period that he has testified on Monday and Tuesday, they have been forced to flee their home and take refuge with neighbours, unsure of what might happen to them, he said. It was on this note that the proceedings of Tuesday ended, as Mr X concluded his evidence. He added that he hoped that beyond his testimony on an alleged money laundering scheme that benefited the Jacob Zuma Foundation, the community that he lives in in Richards Bay will not judge him as a sell- out, but understand that he was compelled to tell the truth. Just over R3-million was channelled through his company Isibonelo Construction, allegedly on the instruction of foundation chairperson Dudu Myeni, between 2015 and 2016. Dodgy payments These payments, said evidence leader Advocate Kate Hofmeyr, were made in October and December 2015 and again in February 2016, into Isibonelo's business account. The total was just over R3-million. The payments, appearing on his bank statements as being from a company named Premier Attraction 1016, were made in two R1-million tranches, and a third tranche of R1.1-million. Premier Attraction 1016 is owned by Myeni’s son Thalente, who testified on Monday, prior to Mr X, and claimed to not remember what his company paid Isibonelo for, but said it could have been for work done for Premier Attraction, as it has business dealings in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal of the Promise: How South Africa Is Being Stolen
    BETRAYAL OF THE PROMISE: HOW SOUTH AFRICA IS BEING STOLEN May 2017 State Capacity Research Project Convenor: Mark Swilling Authors Professor Haroon Bhorat (Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town), Dr. Mbongiseni Buthelezi (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Professor Ivor Chipkin (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Sikhulekile Duma (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Lumkile Mondi (Department of Economics, University of the Witwatersrand), Dr. Camaren Peter (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Professor Mzukisi Qobo (member of South African research Chair programme on African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg), Professor Mark Swilling (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Hannah Friedenstein (independent journalist - pseudonym) Preface The State Capacity Research Project is an interdisciplinary, inter- that the individual confidential testimonies they were receiving from university research partnership that aims to contribute to the Church members matched and confirmed the arguments developed public debate about ‘state capture’ in South Africa. This issue has by the SCRP using largely publicly available information. This dominated public debate about the future of democratic governance triangulation of different bodies of evidence is of great significance. in South Africa ever since then Public Protector Thuli Madonsela published her report entitled State of Capture in late 2016.1 The The State Capacity Research Project is an academic research report officially documented the way in which President Zuma and partnership between leading researchers from four Universities senior government officials have colluded with a shadow network of and their respective research teams: Prof. Haroon Bhorat from the corrupt brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 November 2020 Zondo Commission – Zondo to Myeni: Ball Is in Your
    5 November 2020 Zondo commission – Zondo to Myeni: ball is in your court, report corruption you know of While former SAA chairperson Dudu Myeni may feel aggrieved that the commission of inquiry into state capture is selective in its pursuit of cases within its mandate, it is up to her to report any corruption that she knows of before the commission’s terms end. Myeni was encouraged by chairperson Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo to send any information on corruption that she may have for it to be investigated. Her second day of testimony started off on the same note as her first – with her invoking a right of silence on questions relating to allegations made against her so far, for fear of self-incrimination – but she took some time during the morning session to outline the shortcomings of the commission, as well as its intentions. This was after Zondo cautioned HER on the implications of her silent stance on the commission’s final findings on her in future. “As you exercise your rights as they apply to the proceedings of the commission, I just want you to appreciate that in the end, the commission would make its report, make its findings based only on the evidence that it has,” said Zondo. Myeni replied: “I appreciate what the chairperson has clarified. My apprehension was that I come before this commission trusting your leadership, trusting your position, trusting the journey you’ve traversed to the level that you are in the country. So I came before this commission knowing clearly that I am a culprit, I am a criminal.
    [Show full text]