Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass

Menorah Review VCU University Archives

1987 Menorah Review (No. 11, Fall, 1987)

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/menorah Part of the History of Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons

© The Author(s)

Recommended Citation https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/menorah/11

This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the VCU University Archives at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Menorah Review by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MENOAAfi

REVIEW• THE JUDAIC STUDIES PROGRAM OF VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY • NUMBER 11 • FALL 1987

Church's historic attitude of con­ Jewish-Christian relations are WHY IT'S FUNDAMENTAL tempt toward the Jewish people; Vat­ never an academic exercise. ican II rose to this historic challenge. They are, on the contrary, part A Dictionaryof tM Jewish­ A relationship that had endured for of the very fabric of our religious Christilm Dill1ogue 1,900 years began to undergo a met­ commitments and our respective Edited by Leon I

crime of crucifixion? Nothing but the one hand, the approach of Evan­ dozen years a pronounced right wing the perversity of habit. gelists and Fundamentalists to Juda­ thrust manifested itself in the emer­ Jesus died the victim of Roman ism parallels that of the Roman Cath­ gence of a new Fundamentalist block authority, sentenced by Pilate, olic Church during the centuries among the Orthodox, which is re­ crucified by Roman soldiers. preceeding Vatican II. That is, the flected in the controversy about Nothing, not even the coopera­ historic Fundamentalist approach to "who is a Jew." He described the tion of the Jewish authorities, , in many respects, follows Jewish Fundamentalists in Israel as can extenuate the significance of the philosophy of the teaching of "nondemocratic, noncommitted to this historical fact, whose cer­ contempt. From that perspective, Ju­ pluralism, and concerned only with tainty is beyond question. daism is regarded as the first stage of their own religious interest." Pro­ Such are the conclusions of an God's plan, a way of preparing the phetically, he pointed out, "the at­ investigation conducted on a world for Jesus. Therefore, according mosphere of religious extremism is purely historical level-conclu­ to that school of thought, Judaism fueled and fuels a corresponding sec­ sions which are limited but es­ does not have a mission to witness ular extremism, which is just as sential. All the rest is the product God. The attitude of historic Funda­ destructive." of Christian catechism-whose mentalism, in general, toward Juda­ Concern about Jewish Fundamen­ orientation we know-which, ism is that of friendship and curios­ talism is not limited to religious aca­ because of its orientation, was ity, but also a desire for fi nal demicians. Barely a month after Ro­ too often exploited to foster and acceptance of Jesus. sen spoke, Leila Seigel, president of support the worst prejudices. What complicates the relationship the International Council of Jewish with for some Jews Women, addressing the European In his chapter on "The Crime of is the special relationship between conference of the organization, said, Deicide," he concludes "What has the Fundamentalist movement and "We are disturbed by the progress of not been done in the last 1,900 years Israel and its Jewish population. Fun­ religious fundamentalism, whatever in an effort to conjure away Pilate!" damentalists have avowed their total its o