ANALYTICAL INDEX

NARCOTICS -Continued 1 3.2. Obtained by Search and Seizure An officer was properly permitted to testify that a dog trained to detect heroin went to defendant's safe deposit box several times and tried to bite the han- dle, although the officer had no search warrant when he took the dog to the safe deposit area. S. v. Rogers, 475. Q 4.2. Sufficiency of Evidence; Defense of Entrapment Evidence did not disclose entrapment as a matter of law in a prosecution for possession and sale of marijuana. S. v. Dancy, 208.

NEGLIGENCE Q 6.1. Application of Doctrine of Plaintiff's evidence supported the application of the doctrine of res ipsa lo- quitur where it tended to show that a toll bar at the entrance to a hospital parking lot rose and then fell immediately, injuring plaintiff. McPherson v. Hospital, 164. 1 29.1. Sufficiency of Evidence of ; Particular Cases Trial erred in entering summary judgment for defendant in an action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff when she fell through an unguarded open- ing in the floor of her home created when defendant's employees removed a furnace grille from the floor. Taylor v. Air Conditioning Corp., 194. Q 30.1. Particular Cases Where Nonsuit Is Proper Where defendant guarantors obtained fire insurance on certain equipment, the equipment was subsequently sold at a foreclosure sale, and the purchase was financed by plaintiff and guaranteed by defendants, defendants failed to offer evidence sufficient to show that plaintiff breached its duty in failing to inform them that the insurance policy provided coverage only when the owner of the equipment was the named insured of the policy. Bank v. Morgan, 63. 1 53.7. Duty Owed by Person in Control of Elevator Plaintiffs who were injured when an elevator in defendant's home fell were in- vitees and not licensees as determined by the trial court. Briles v. Briles, 575. Q 57.10. Cases Involving Other Injuries Where Evidence Is Sufficient In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when a cinder block wall in defendant's basement collapsed on him, evidence presented a question for the jury to decide whether defendant's failure to brace the wall and warn plaintiff of the danger constituted actionable negligence. Ryder v. Benfield, 278.

PARENT AND CHILD Q 1. Termination of Relationship The appointment of counsel to represent an indigent respondent in a pro- ceeding to terminate respondent's parental rights is not constitutionally required. In re Lassiter, 525. 1 4.1. Right of Parent to Maintain Action for of Chid One parent may not recover from the other parent for alienating the affections of their child. Edwards v. Edwards, 296.