DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Talk About Abortion: a Guide to Rights-Based Messaging 1 Stigma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Talk About Abortion: a Guide to Rights-Based Messaging 1 Stigma on reality,to decide, counteractchallenge, diversity,clear, stigma, attitudes, focus appropriate,right avoid ontochallenge, sensitive, decide,reality, judgement, involve,clear, counteractdiversity, story-attitudes,to focus decide, on attitudes, stigma, honest, accurate, clear, focus rights-based, individual, right inclusive, references, factual, effective, telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, How to talk about abortion: a guide to rights-based messaging appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based,How individual, to right talk diversity, appropriate, , involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract 1 avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, rightabout to decide, diversity, abortion: appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteracta guide stigma, to avoid rights-based judgement, rights-based, messaging individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, individual, rightright to decide, to decide, diversity, diversity, appropriate, appropriate, involve, involve, inclusive, inclusive, references,references, factual, factual, effective, effective, challenge, challenge, attitudes,attitudes, sensitive, sensitive, story-telling, story-telling, experiences, experiences, normalize,normalize, honest, honest, accurate, accurate, clear, clear, focus focus on reality, on reality, counteractcounteract stigma, stigma, avoid avoid judgement, judgement, rights-based, rights-based, individual, individual, right right to decide, to decide, diversity, diversity, appropriate, appropriate, involve, inclusive, inclusive, references, references, factual, factual, effective, effective, challenge, challenge, attitudes, attitudes, sensitive, sensitive, story-telling, story- telling, experiences,experiences, honest, normalize, accurate, honest, clear, accurate, focus clear, on reality, focus on counteract reality, counteract stigma, stigma, avoid avoidjudgement, judgement, rights-based,rights-based, individual, individual, right to decide, right to diversity, decide, diversity, appropriate, appropriate, involve, , involve, inclusive, inclusive, references, references, factual, factual, effective, challenge,effective, challenge, attitudes, attitudes, sensitive, sensitive, story-telling, story-telling, experiences, experiences, normalize, honest, honest, accurate, accurate, clear, focus clear, focuson on reality, reality, counteract counteract stigma, stigma, avoid avoid judgement, judgement, rights-based, rights-based, individual, individual, right to right decide, to decide, diversity, diversity,appropriate, appropriate, involve, involve, inclusive, inclusive, references, references, factual, factual, effective, effective, challenge, challenge, attitudes, attitudes, sensitive, sensitive, story- story-telling,telling, experiences, experiences, decide,normalize, diversity, honest, accurate,appropriate, clear, involve, focus on inclusive, reality, counteract references, stigma, factual, avoid effective,judgement, challenge, rights-based, attitudes, individual, sensitive, right story-telling, to decide, diversity, experiences, appropriate, normalize, involve, honest, honest, accurate, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, clear, focusdiversity, on reality, appropriate, counteract involve, stigma, inclusive, avoid references, judgement, factual, rights-based, effective, challenge, individual, attitudes, right sensitive, to decide, diversity,story-telling, appropriate, experiences, involve, inclusive, normalize, references, honest, accurate, factual, clear, effective, focus challenge,on reality, counteract attitudes, sensitive,stigma, story-telling,avoid judgement, experiences, rights-based, honest, accurate, individual, clear, right focus to decide, on reality, diversity, counteract appropriate, stigma, involve, avoid inclusive, judgement, rights-based,references, individual, factual, effective, right to challenge, decide, diversity, attitudes, appropriate, sensitive, story-telling, involve, inclusive, experiences, references, normalize, factual, effective,honest, challenge, accurate, clear, attitudes, focus on sensitive,reality, counteract story-telling, stigma, avoidexperiences, judgement, normalize, rights-based, honest, individual, accurate, clear,right focus to decide, on reality, diversity, counteract appropriate, stigma, involve, avoid inclusive,judgement, references, rights-based, factual, individual, effective, challenge, right to decide, diversity,attitudes, appropriate, sensitive, story-telling, involve, inclusive, experiences, references, honest, factual, accurate, effective, clear, focus challenge, on reality, attitudes, counteract sensitive, story-telling,stigma, avoid experiences,judgement, rights-based, normalize, individual, normalize, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights- based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights- based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, , involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story- telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights- based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights- based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual, effective, challenge, attitudes, sensitive, story-telling, experiences, normalize, honest, accurate, clear, focus on reality, counteract stigma, avoid judgement, rights-based, individual, right to decide, diversity, appropriate, involve, inclusive, references, factual,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and Future Development Efforts in Sub- Saharan Africa
    Anthós Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 1 4-2010 Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub- Saharan Africa Katherine Clare Alexander Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anthos Part of the Political History Commons, Public Policy Commons, Women's Health Commons, and the Women's History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Alexander, Katherine Clare (2010) "Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub-Saharan Africa," Anthós: Vol. 2: Iss. 1, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15760/anthos.2010.1 This open access Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team. Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub-Saharan Africa By: Katherine Clare Alexander In the low-income countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the performance of pyramidal reproductive health and family planning services with public outreach initiatives has not met the expectations or the needs of the communities they serve. Insufficient case management, limited management capacity and referral and communication failures are challenges faced on the delivery level, while on the policy level these health clinics face insufficient coordination among organizations and weak links between programs (Schneider, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Abortion Abortions Provided Before 13 Weeks Are Quite Surgical Abortion Is One of the Safest Types of Unusual
    cant advances in medical technology and greater access to high-quality services.3 Gener- ally, the earlier the abortion, the less compli- cated and safer it is. Serious complications arising from aspiration Safety of Abortion abortions provided before 13 weeks are quite Surgical abortion is one of the safest types of unusual. About 88% of the women who ob- medical procedures. Complications from hav- tain abortions are less than 13 weeks preg- ing a first-trimester aspiration abortion are nant.4 Of these women, 97% report no com- considerably less frequent and less serious than plications; 2.5% have minor complications those associated with giving birth. Early that can be handled at the medical office or medical abortion (using medications to end a abortion facility; and less than 0.5% have more 1 pregnancy) has a similar safety profile. serious complications that require some addi- Illegal Abortion is Unsafe Abortion tional surgical procedure and/or hospitaliza- tion.5 Abortion has not always been so safe. Between the 1880s and 1973, abortion was illegal in all Early medical abortions are limited to the first or most U.S. states, and many women died or 9 weeks of pregnancy. Medical abortions have had serious medical problems as a result. an excellent safety profile, with serious com- 6 Women often made desperate and dangerous plications occurring in less than 0.5% of cases. attempts to induce their own abortions or re- Over the last five years, six women in North sorted to untrained practitioners who per- America have died as a result of toxic shock formed abortions with primitive instruments secondary to a rare bacterial infection of the or in unsanitary conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Organizations and Advocacy STRATEGIES and FINANCES
    NONPROFIT ADVOCACY AND THE POLICY PROCESS A SEMINAR SERIES VOLUME 2 Exploring Organizations and Advocacy STRATEGIES AND FINANCES ISSUE 1 Edited by Elizabeth J. Reid and Maria D. Montilla The Urban Institute NONPROFIT ADVOCACY AND THE POLICY PROCESS A SEMINAR SERIES VOLUME 2 Exploring Organizations and Advocacy STRATEGIES AND FINANCES ISSUE 1 Edited by Elizabeth J. Reid and Maria D. Montilla The Urban Institute Acknowledgments We wish to thank the seminar cohosts, Evelyn Brody and Frances Hill, the authors, and the seminar participants who contributed valuable insights to the seminars and to the volume. CNP staff, especially Pho Palmer, provided valuable assistance to the project. Nonprofit Advocacy and the Policy Process: A Seminar Series Advisory Panel Members Audrey Alvarado Debra Minkoff National Council for Yale University Nonprofit Associations Department of Sociology Elizabeth T. Boris John Pomeranz Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy Alliance for Justice The Urban Institute Elizabeth J. Reid Evelyn Brody Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy Chicago-Kent College The Urban Institute Illinois Institute of Technology School of Law Peter Shiras Independent Sector Rosemary E. Fei Silk, Adler & Colvin C. Eugene Steuerle The Urban Institute Frances Hill University of Miami School of Law Leslie Lenkowsky Indiana University Center on Philanthropy Copyright © August 2001. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in- cluding photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written per- mission from the Urban Institute. The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of pub- lic consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • A CASE for LEGAL ABORTION WATCH the Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina
    HUMAN RIGHTS A CASE FOR LEGAL ABORTION WATCH The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Copyright © 2020 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2020 ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 8 To the President of Argentina: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLOBAL GAG RULE the Unintended Consequences of US Abortion Policy Abroad by Emily Ausubel
    THE GLOBAL GAG RULE The Unintended Consequences of US Abortion Policy Abroad By Emily Ausubel Emily Ausubel is a frst-year Master in Public Policy candidate at the Harvard Kennedy School concentrating in International and Global Afairs. Before coming to HKS, Emily worked at global health organizations in the US and Uganda. Emily is passionate about advancing women’s health and preventing sexual and gender- based violence. pproximately 55 million abortions take A HISTORY OF US FOREIGN POLICY A place each year globally.1 In the United TOWARD ABORTION States, abortion is a deeply contentious In 1973, Congress passed the Helms issue, occupying a rift between religious and Amendment to the US Foreign Assistance Act, non-religious—and, often by proxy, conser- which prohibited direct US federal funding of vative and liberal—Americans. In the 1970s, abortion services outside of the United States. the US government started passing legisla- Under this policy, such organizations could tion to remove US funding from abortion-re- use other funds for abortion services through lated services, both domestically and globally. separate accounts.2 However, many pro-life While some policies have likely succeeded in Americans argued that even funding these eliminating direct US funding of abortions organizations to provide other services was abroad, there is mounting evidence that they comparable to funding abortion (sometimes also have widespread negative effects on the referred to as the “fungibility argument”).3 In lives of some of the most vulnerable
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 ABORTION WORLDWIDE Abortions have been available in all cultures since ancient times (1, 2). Nowadays, an estimated 43.8 million abortions are carried out worldwide each year. About one in five pregnancies ends in an abortion (3). Each year, approximately 21.6 million women worldwide still undergo an unsafe abortion, resulting in an estimated 47000 deaths, largely among the most vulnerable women, such as poor, unmarried and young women in particular. Apart from the deaths caused by unsafe abortions, another 5 million women per year have to deal with temporary or permanent disabilities and are accompanied by huge financial and social costs to themselves, their families and the health care systems (4, 5). Goal 5 of the Millennium Development Goals is to reduce the maternal mortality ratio in 25 years by 75% and to achieve universal access to reproductive health care by 2015 (6). Unsafe abortion is one of the main causes of maternal mortality and could be prevented. Complications from unsafe abortion accounted for an estimated 13% of all maternal deaths worldwide (7). The definition of unsafe abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) is: a procedure for terminating a pregnancy that is performed by an individual lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both. Recently, the WHO added the following: “The persons, skills, and medical standards considered safe in the provision of abortion are different for medical and surgical abortion, and also depend on the duration of pregnancy. What is considered “safe” should be interpreted in line with the current WHO technical and policy guidance” (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Abortion: an Update
    Foreword The continued demand for abortion services refl ects the unmet need for avoiding unwanted pregnancies. Unsafe abortions have always been a hazard to the lives of women. The fact that safe abortions save lives has been proven time and again across all cultures and countries. The provision of safe abortion services therefore assumes an importance which extends beyond simply doing the MTP. Despite the availability of medication abortion since 2002 there is a felt need to disseminate the optimal uses of this safe and eff ective technology. Most providers fail to use this technology because of fears which are not necessarily grounded in facts. It is 1 hoped that publications like these as this will dispel such fears. FOGSI remains committed to making abortions safer and this commitment is refl ected in the support of the offi ce bearers and past chairperson of the MTP committee in making this publication a reality. Many thanks to Dr. C.N. Purandare, Dr. Sanjay Gupte, Dr. Shirish Patwardhan, Dr. P.K. Shah, Dr. Nozer Sherier, Dr. Hrishikesh Pai. We are grateful to Cipla for supporting this initiative. Dr. Kiran Kurtkoti Dr. Jaydeep Tank Chairperson-MTP Committee, FOGSI Immediate Past Chairperson MTP Committee 2 Medical Abortion: An Update Introduction Evolution of Medical Abortion Unsafe abortion is still a major health problem in the world. Of Inducing abortion by administering drugs is not a new the 6.4 million abortions performed in India in 2002 and 2003, concept. Historic documents list an incredibly large number of 56% or 3.6 million were unsafe (Abortion Assessment Project drugs, tablets, decoctions and other substances like papaya , 3 I, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Northern Ireland's Abortion Laws on Women's Abortion Decision-Making and Experiences
    Downloaded from http://srh.bmj.com on January 16, 2019 - Published by group.bmj.com Research The impact of Northern Ireland’s abortion laws on women’s abortion decision-making and experiences Abigail R A Aiken,1,2 Elisa Padron,3 Kathleen Broussard,2,4 Dana Johnson1 1LBJ School of Public Affairs, ABSTRACT University of Texas at Austin, Key messages Background In Northern Ireland, abortion is Austin, Texas, USA 2 Population Research Center, illegal except in very limited circumstances to ► Women in Northern Ireland still University of Texas at Austin, preserve a woman’s life or to prevent permanent experience multiple barriers to travelling Austin, Texas, USA or long-term injury to her physical or mental 3College of Natural Sciences, to access abortion care even though University of Texas at Austin, health. Abortions conducted outside the law are abortions are now provided free in Great Austin, Texas, USA a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. Britain. 4Department of Sociology, We assessed the impacts of Northern Ireland’s ► Self-managed medication abortion using University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA abortion laws on women's decision-making and online telemedicine may be preferred experiences in accessing abortion. over travel due its convenience and Correspondence to Methods Between April 2017 and February safety, but the experience is dominated Dr Abigail R A Aiken, LBJ School 2018 we interviewed 30 women living in by fear and isolation due to the risk of of Public Affairs, University Northern Ireland who had sought abortion prosecution. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713, USA; araa2@ utexas.
    [Show full text]
  • B1 Self Managed Abortion
    B1- Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 1 I. Title: Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 2 3 II. Author Identification 4 • Monique Baumont, Center for Reproductive Rights, 199 Water St, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 5 10038, [email protected], Member #10432693, Sexual and Reproductive Health 6 Section 7 • Bonnie K Epstein, unaffiliated, 4403 Riverview Ave, Englewood, NJ 07631, 8 [email protected]. Member #9855820, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section. 9 • Caitlin Phelps, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 409 12th Street, SW 10 Washington, DC 20024-2188, [email protected], Member #9847505, Sexual and Reproductive 11 Health Section 12 • Silpa Srinivasulu, Reproductive Health Access Project, P.O. Box 21191, New York, NY 10025, 13 [email protected], Member #10338166, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 14 15 III. Co-Sponsorship: Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 16 17 IV. Collaborating Units: N/A 18 19 V. Endorsement: International Health Section 20 21 VI. Summary 22 Access to abortion care is essential to the health, well-being, and bodily autonomy of pregnant 23 people and their families. While the right to abortion is constitutionally protected in the U.S., restrictive 24 state and federal legislation and regulations have eroded this right. These policies have exacerbated 25 structural inequities to undermine and impede access to care, disproportionately affecting Black, 26 Indigenous, and people of color, those with lower incomes, immigrants, and people in rural areas. Due to 27 logistical and financial barriers to accessing abortion care, and some people’s personal preferences and 28 experiences of stigma and structural racism with respect to the medical system, there has been 29 considerable growth in demand for self-managed abortion in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsafe Abortion in Brazil: a Systematic Review of the Scientific Production, 2008-2018 Aborto Inseguro No Brasil
    REVISÃO REVIEW Aborto inseguro no Brasil: revisão sistemática da produção científica, 2008-2018 Unsafe abortion in Brazil: a systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 Aborto inseguro en Brasil: revisión sistemática de la producción científica, 2008-2018 Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues 1 Sandra Costa Fonseca 2 Maria do Carmo Leal 3 Estela M. L. Aquino 4 Greice M. S. Menezes 4 doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00190418 Resumo Correspondência R. M. S. M. Domingues Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação O objetivo deste estudo é atualizar o conhecimento sobre o aborto inseguro Oswaldo Cruz. no país. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática com busca e seleção de estudos Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21040-360, Brasil. via MEDLINE e LILACS, sem restrição de idiomas, no período 2008 a 2018, [email protected] com avaliação da qualidade dos artigos por meio dos instrumentos elaborados 1 pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs. Foram avaliados 50 artigos. A prevalência de Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. aborto induzido no Brasil foi estimada por método direto em 15% no ano de 2 Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 2010 e 13% no ano de 2016. Prevalências mais elevadas foram observadas Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. em populações socialmente mais vulneráveis. A razão de aborto induzido por 3 Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação 1.000 mulheres em idade fértil reduziu no período 1995-2013, sendo de 16 por Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 4 Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1.000 em 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment
    “#Repealthe8th”: Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment SINÉAD KENNEDY*1 Abstract Abortion is illegal in almost all circumstances in Ireland, permitted only where there is a risk to the life of the woman due to the eighth amend- ment to the Irish Constitution. While abortion is banned, women living in Ireland do access abortion; they do so legally by travelling abroad, and illegally within Ireland by accessing the abortion pill online. This access is highly mediated by race, class and migration status. This article will consider the politics of Ireland’s abortion ban through the prism of public debates around abortion, reflecting on the discursive devices employed to both chal- lenge and uphold the status quo on abortion. This conclusion will focus on different dimensions of the “Repeal” movement; a movement that pro- pelled Ireland to finally face up to the reality of abortion and change it laws through removing the eighth amendment from the constitution. Keywords: Abortion; Migration; Repeal; Movement; Ireland On Friday 25th May 2018 the Irish electorate voted by two to one majority to remove Article 40.3.3, the prohibition on abortion, from the Irish Con- stitution. While opinion polls had suggested that those who campaigned to remove the ban on abortion would win, it was predicted to be a close result; no one predicted the sheer scale of the victory and the support from every section of society, young and old, urban and rural. In the immediate aftermath of the referendum the result was heralded as nothing short of revolutionary by journalists and activists alike who understood it to be part of a major gender and generational shift in Irish political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Policy Landscape-India2
    First Second Post-Abortion Trimester Trimester Care Specialists (ob gyns) WHO Non-specialists (general physicians) Medical abortion ** *** (using mifepristone (Up to 9 weeks) & misoprostol combination) Surgical abortion HOW (vacuum aspiration) Surgical abortion (dilatation & evacuation) All public-sector Secondary and tertiary public- Where facilities and All public and approved private sector facilities private sector facilities/ and approved facilities clinics**** private facilities *Qualiication and training criteria apply. **The Drug Controller General of India limits the use of MA drugs upto nine weeks. However, the national CAC guidelines10 include drug protocol for second trimester abortions in accordance with WHO Guidelines 2014, for reference. *** Misoprostol only. **** MA upto seven weeks can also be prescribed from an outpatient clinic with an established referral access to MTP-approved facility. REFERENCES 1 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Aairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. Rev. 1 https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ 2 Census of India 2011 http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.html 3 Sample Registration System 201416 http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/ SRS_Bulletins/MMR%20Bulletin-201416.pdf 4 National Family Health Survey 4 (201516) http://rchiips.org/nhs/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf 5 Maternal Mortality Ratio: India, EAG & Assam, Southern States and Other States https://www.niti.gov.in/content/maternal-mortality-ratio-mmr-100000-live-births ABORTION 6 National Family Health Survey 1 (199293) http://rchiips.org/nhs/india1.shtml 7 Sample Registration Survey. Maternal Mortality in India: 19972003. Trends, Causes and Risk Factors. Registrar General. India http://www.cghr.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/RGICGHRMaternal-Mortality-in- India-1997%E2%80%932003.pdf POLICY LANDSCAPE 8 Banerjee et al.
    [Show full text]