Women in Higher Education, 1994. REPORT NO ISSN-1060-8303 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 164P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women in Higher Education, 1994. REPORT NO ISSN-1060-8303 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 164P DOCUMENT RESUME ED 378 926 HE 028 100 AUTHOR Wenninger, Mary Dee, Ed. TITLE Women in Higher Education, 1994. REPORT NO ISSN-1060-8303 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 164p. AVAILABLE FROMWomen in Higher Education, 1934 Monroe St., Madison, WI 53711-2027 (yearly subscription, $79). PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Women in Higher Education; v3 n1-12 1994 EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Administration; College Faculty; Court Litigation; *Females; Feminism; *Higher Education; Newsletters; Presidents; Sex Bias; Sex Discrimination; Sexual Abuse; Sexual Harassment; State Legislation; Women Administrators; Women Faculty; Womens Athletics; Womens Studies IDENTIFIERS California State University; tiniversity of California ABSTRACT This document consists of the 12 monthly issues of a newsletter on women students, teachers, and administrators in higher education, issued in 1994. Each issue includes feature articles, news on higher education, profiles of significant peoplein the field, and job announcements. The issues' main article topics are: (1) campuses's changing definition of family and employee benefits, mentoring, and listening skills;(2) interim positions and defining sexual harassment;(3) gender pay gap for administrators, and cultures of decision making;(4) getting into administration and department chair positions, and women trustees;(5) campus safety and women presidents;(6) sex bias in athletics, resolving problems, professional support networks, and current research;(7) opening the Monterey Bay campus in the California State University system, tenure litigation, and grooming for campus leadership;(8) the "stained glass ceiling" limiting women's advancement at Catholic schools, single sex schools, and survival strategies for women administrators; (9) organizational models for gender equity on campus, handling hostile male students, and confronting conflict; (10)a California law requiring University of California to reveal the cost of sex bias suits, negotiation skills, and women in science and other male fields; (11) relations between women's centers and women's studies; sexual harassment, academic freedom, and due process, as well as negotiating for a higher salary; and (12) value differences and gender issues, getting and keeping a top student affairs post, and math anxiety. (JB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** CA CN 00 WOMEN BEST COPY AVAILABLE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ()eke of Educe trona! Research end Irnprosmonf "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY CI This document has been reproduced as received from the person or colonization onconahng it O Mawr changes save been made to improve Mary Dee Wenninger reproduction quality Points Of new or oprniOns slated in ttme dOCtt men) do not necessarily represent officral OE RI positron or policy TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 2 WOMENJANUARY 1994 Volume 3, No. 1 Campuses Expand Definition of "What Is a Family?" Academe has walkeda fine line between preserv- ing tradition and embracing social change, and the What's HOT and What's NOT movement toward providing employee benefits for in Higher Education for 1994 domestic partners is no different. In 1992, Stanford, the University of Iowa and NOT HOT Albert Einstein College of Medicine became the first schools to offer health benefits to domestic partners. Managers Leaders Now many leading private and public schools are Stars Team players adopting similar policies, such as MIT, Harvard, Autocracy Consensus Columbia, Princeton, University of Chicago, Univer- End justifies means Valuing the process sity of Vermont and University of California-Berkeley. Techy bells & whistlesProductivity boosters Coverage Varies Paper address book Electronic device At least 30 schools now offer some benefits to Gender bias Helping them "get it" nonmarried partners. Most limit benefits to sick or Sexual harassment Helping them "get it" bereavement leave, tuition reduction and access to Time: by semester Time: whatever works campus housing, recreation and health services. New products Better services Schools usually cover only same-sex partners, TQM CQI/Quality Improvement reasoning that gays and lesbians legally lack the Productivity numbersProductivity results option of marriage to qualify for spousal benefits. Diversity quotas Multi-culturalism Eligibility requi:ements also vary. To receive Lifers Sequential careers domestic partner states, couples usually must docu- Being chic Being real ment financial interdependence and common resi- dence for at least six months, by showing a lease or Suggestions from WIIIE readers, Center for Teaching and mortgage and other records. Learning at Cal State Long Beach and others. Children of domestic partners also may be eligible for health benefits. A new City University of New rudimentary means for empowering and sustaining York (CUNY) report recommends covering children same-sex relationships" as are available to married when both partner and child are dependents. couples. Why Extend Benefits? CUNY also sees practical advantages: "Everyone Colleges cite a variety of reasons to cover domestic gains, for communities are more productive as they partners, including social and political pressures, become more inclusive." ethical a- d humanitarian considerations. Costs Overestimated Stanford saw the issue as ore of competition. It felt Employer anticipations of cost increases in the offering comprehensive benefits would help them hire overall benefits plan, because more people are cov- and retain the best employees: "Within five or ten ered, and because of an increase in AIDS claims, were years, such coverage will be standard for many unfounded. employers, including universities.". At Stanford, only 28 employees out of 10,000 Iowa viewed partner benefits as "a humane and signed up, which the CUNY report says is typical for equitable response to community members who live in colleges. stable long-term relationships." Many partners already have health coverage. CUNY was already in a city with nondiscrimina- Other gay employees do not seek partner benefits tion policies concerning sexual orientation and prefer- because they aren't ready to disclose their relation- ence, and a large gay and lesbian community. CUNY ships. leaders felt political and moral pressure to make Pregnancy, Not AIDS, Costs Employers "practice comply witl. policy" and provide "such The actual cost of enrolling a domestic partner has proven to be less than for a married spouse, Institution type: Four-year 58%, two-year 42% according to the New York Times (June 13, 1993): Institution size: More than 5,000 students 51%. "The single most expensive medical cost is preg- fewer 49% nancy-related...[and] domestic partners are statisti- Career paths: Many are late or interrupted. cally less likely to get pregnant." Age: 20s= 8%; 30s=26%; 40s=52%; 50s=12%; And AIDS claims cost no more than any other 60s=2%. serious illness, according to Harvard's 1993 domestic Philosophies: Range from awakening awareness of partnerships report. the need for special support for women and women's Public Reactions Mixed ways of accomplishing goals on campus, to those But even with practical concerns allayed, some who would describe themselves as strong feminists. oppose the expanded campus policies on principle. The majority are in the middle. Ohio State University President E. Gordon Gee Criteria for Selecting Proposals had approved a housing department recommenda- 1. Results are expected to have practical implica- tion to allow gay couples to live in a campus apart- tions for helping women to succeed on campus: ment complex. But the ensuing controversy led by career, personal, spiritual, helping others. Ohio politicians dissuaded OSU leaders from estab- 2. Subject matter is of interest to WINE readers. lishing the new policy. 3. Survey design is likely to produce practical The University of Vermont, conversely, faced results that can be generalized to a larger group. public public pressure to include gay couples in its 4. Any creative design or application aspects? health benefits policy. When President Thomas Procedure to Apply Salmon denied the request, saying the University's Summarize your proposal on no more than three definition of spouses was consistent with state law, pages, including what you want to learn,. how you the state Labor Relations Board ruled that the school will measure your results, what the results will mean was discriminating. to women on campus, estimated timelines and other Most campuses actually have experienced relevant info. Small words work best. smooth policy changes, with little public debate. Be sure to include your name, title, department, But when it does occur, debate should be wel- school, address and phone number. Call WIHE at comed as a necessary part of the process, says the (608) 251-3232 if you have questions. Proposals are CUNY Study Group on Domestic Partnerships, due on April 1, 1994. Researchers submitting selected convened by Chancellor Ann Reynolds. proposals will be notified by May 1, 1994. Its October 1993 report emphasizes "the impor- Although applicants need not be subscribers, tance of communication in dissolving the categories regular readers are advantaged by knowing WINE that often divide us." subscriber's
Recommended publications
  • The University Application Process
    Post-18 Pathways The University Application Process Post-18 Pathways The University Application Process 1. Introduction 2. Why study at university? 2.1 The pros and cons 2.2 The university experience 2.3 Is one university better than another? 2.4 Useful comparison websites 2.5 Decisions, decisions 2.6 How do I get information to make my decisions? 3. The university application process 3.1 University application process overview 3.2 What happens after you apply? 3.3 Further services offered in APPLY 3.4 Your four key choices 3.4.1 Choosing your subject 3.4.2 Choosing your type of course 3.4.3 Choosing which type of institution to apply to 2 3.4.3.1 Types of universities 3.4.3.2 Russell Group universities 3.4.4 Choosing which institution / location to apply to 3.5 Entrance requirements 3.6 Prospectuses, visits and open days 4. Your university application 4.1 Your personal statement 4.2 Specialist applications 4.2.1 Oxford 4.2.1.1 Oxford admissions tests and additional application materials 4.2.2 Cambridge 4.2.2.1 Cambridge admissions tests and additional application materials 4.2.3 The case for making an Oxbridge application 4.2.3.1 Breaking some stereotypes 4.2.4 Medical applications 4.2.4.1 Types of medical course 4.2.4.2 BMAT 4.2.4.3 UKCAT 4.2.5 Applications for art and design 4.3 Interviews 4.3.1 General interview advice 4.3.2 Preparing for interview 4.3.3 Before the interview 4.3.4 On the day 4.3.5 A note about Oxbridge interviews 4.4 Taking a gap year 5.
    [Show full text]
  • JAHF 2001 Annual Report
    The John A.Hartford Foundation 2001 Annual Report THE JOHN A T F O A R R D . HARTFORD FOUNDATION 200 H F . O A U N N 1 H D ANNUAL REPORT O A J T I E O H N T . 1 9 2 9 John A. and George L. Hartford, founding fathers of the John A. Hartford Foundation “It is necessary to carve from the whole vast spectrum of human needs one small band that the heart and mind together tell you is the area in which you can make your best contribution.” This has been the guiding philosophy of the Hartford Foundation since its establishment in 1929. With funds from the bequests of its founders, John A. Hartford and his brother George L. Hartford, both former chief executives of the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, the Hartford Foundation seeks to make its best contribution by supporting efforts to improve health care for older Americans. Statement of Purpose Founded in 1929, the John A. Hartford Foundation is a committed champion of health care training, research and service system innovations that will ensure the well-being and vitality of older adults. Its overall goal is to increase the nation’s capacity to provide effective, affordable care to its rapidly increasing older population. Today, the Foundation is America’s leading philanthropy with a sustained interest in aging and health. R T F O R Through its grantmaking, the John AA. D Hartford Foundation seeksH specifically to: Enhance and expand the training of F doctors, nurses, social. workers and other health professionals who care for elders, and O Promote innovationsA in the integration and delivery of services for all older people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Schedule
    884653.indd4653.indd 1 3-1177-0088 4 4:03:30:03:30 P PMM Letter from the Chairs Dear Friends, Welcome to Imagining a More Civil Society: The Summit on the University and the Jewish Community. One year ago a steering committee convened at Hillel’s Kraft Center for Jewish Student Life at Columbia University to begin planning this unique event. We set out not just to catalogue the many positive trends in civil discourse and civic engagement on campus, but to imagine what could be. With the generous support of the Einhorn Family Charitable Trust, this remarkable group of people – leaders of the academy and the Jewish community – developed a program that enables participants to refl ect on who we are and the ideas of others, to discuss and learn from others in an effort to share and integrate our truths, and to act to create greater opportunities for others. As we imagine a more civil society, we will focus deeply on discourse itself and also on activi- ties that foster safe dialogue and productive contributions to society. We will delve into the challenges of creating community, often raising questions without defi nitive solutions. We will demonstrate what we hope to lead on campus: respectful, authentic conversations in which we hold multiple truths simultaneously, listening carefully while articulating our own thoughts and opening ourselves to letting go and learning anew. We will bring back to campus fresh ideas on discourse and civic engagement. We would like to take this opportunity to thank Hillel International Board of Governors Chairman Edgar M.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Postgraduate Study
    8210-0617 University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK T: +44 (0)1483 681 681 F: +44 (0)1483 300 803 E: [email protected] surrey.ac.uk GUIDE TO POSTGRADUATE STUDY 2018 Connect and explore The information in this brochure is intended as an indicative guide to the educational and other services provided by the University. The University endeavours to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up-to-date at the time of going to press (October 2017). However, it may be necessary for the University to make changes to some of the information presented in it. To make an informed decision about whether you wish to study at the University, we advise you to consult the University’s website: surrey.ac.uk for up-to-date information. Greetings from the University of Surrey – one of the top 10 universities in the UK with a rising global reputation. Thank you for considering Surrey as the next destination on your journey to an exciting new chapter in your life. A life-changing experience A masters from Surrey will unlock your potential to achieve your academic and career ambitions. It will equip you with the knowledge, skills and confidence for professional and personal success, making a positive change to the world. Located in historic and beautiful Guildford, and close to London, our campus offers a safe, friendly and vibrant environment with excellent facilities for postgraduate study. There is an exciting range of postgraduate options, accredited by industry. As the world faces ever more complex challenges, postgraduate study at Surrey enables you to gain skills to provide solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 3 September 14, 1993
    INSIDE • Of Record: President/Provost and Special JIO Report on DP Case, pp. 2-3 • Senate Chair; SEC Actions 9/8/93, p 4 • Deaths, p. 5 • Convocation, pp. 6-8 • Survey on Mail of Hazardous Matter, p. 9 • Belgian Exchange; Diabetes Grants, p. 10 • TIAA CREF Counseling; HUP Studies, p. 11 • CrimeStats, pp. 10-12 • Update, p. 12 Pullout: Safety Report for 1993, pp. I-IV Tuesday, September 14, 1993 Published by the University of Pennsylvania Volume 40 Number 3 Following ‘Water Buffalo’ Case, A Faculty Board of Inquiry As promised at the end of the spring, we have asked Special JIO Report on DP Confiscation Case a faculty Board of Inquiry, composed of Professor On page 2 and 3 is the verbatim report of Special Judicial Inquiry Officer Howard Jacob Abel (chair), Professor Anna Marie Chirico, Arnold, preceded by a statement from Interim President Claire Fagin and Interim Provost and Professor Rosalyn Watts to examine how the Marvin Lazerson concerning the April 15 confiscation ofThe Daily Pennsylvanian. judicial process operated in the recent case involving Professor Arnold concluded that the student action violated Penn’s policy on an allegation of racial harassment. We have asked confiscation of publications, but he recommended that no further action be taken the Board to consult with the individuals involved, against the students who participated. to review the procedures, and in its report to us, to President Fagin and Provost Lazerson accepted the recommendation. But they warned present its findings as to how the procedures were or that confiscating publications “will not be tolerated,” and violators “will be subject to were not applied.
    [Show full text]
  • OS001 Annreportcomps
    THE HISTORY OF OASIS OASIS provides opportunities for mature adults to challenge their minds, improve their health, connect with others, build skills and serve the community. OASIS ENRICHING LIVES | The History of OASIS 2 Introduction: Making Aging a Creative Process 6 Chapter One: From Dreams to Reality 12 Chapter Two: Building an Organization 18 Chapter Three: Challenging Minds 26 Chapter Four: Serving the Community 36 Chapter Five: Improving Health 44 Chapter Six: Forging Ahead INTRODUCTION | Making Aging a Creative Process Marylen Mann clearly remembers the day three decades ago when Father Lucius Cervantes, St. Louis commissioner of aging, took her and her friend Margie Wolcott May on a tour of the city’s senior centers. By then Mann had already established a reputation as an innovator in curriculum development at the University of Missouri-St. Louis and a federally-funded educational laboratory known as CEMREL. Though her work up to that At the end of the day, point had been mostly with schools and cultural institutions Mann told Cervantes, throughout the St. Louis area, Cervantes thought Mann might have some ideas for program improvements for older adults. “We can do better for older adults.” Mann spent a day in church basements visiting with older adults as they made crafts, played bingo and sat idly around the rooms. Although the centers were meeting important basic needs, Mann saw a world of potential going to waste. Why should the people in these centers, who had raised families and held productive jobs, have such limited opportunities as they aged? At the end of the day, Mann told Cervantes, “We can do better for older adults.” Mann spent many more days in senior centers, talking with older adults and center directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Applications to Oxbridge
    Introduction and Applications to Oxbridge Sophie Parry, Schools Liaison Officer, Newnham College Cambridge [email protected] Introduction to University What is the Russell Group? What can you study at university? Does every university Why might you choose to go offer the same things? to university? In small groups, can you answer one (or more) of these questions? What types of universities are there? Do you have to be from a certain background or type of school to go to a top university? A world of choice! How many Universities do you think there are in the UK? 130 How many of those do you think are in England? 108 What makes a ‘Top’ university? #1 The Russell Group University of Birmingham University of Manchester University of Bristol Newcastle University University of Cambridge University of Nottingham Cardiff University University of Oxford Durham University Queen Mary (University of University of Edinburgh London) University of Exeter Queen's University Belfast University of Glasgow University of Sheffield Imperial College London University of Southampton King's College London University College London University of Leeds University of Warwick University of Liverpool University of York LSE (London School of Economics) What makes a ‘Top’ University? #2 Quality of Teaching Student Satisfaction Class Sizes Ability of Staff Student Support Financial Facilities Available Personal Social Life and Societies Opportunities Available Why Oxford or Cambridge? • Broad range of courses • World-class teaching – lectures, seminars/classes, practicals • Small-group teaching – tutorials/supervisions • Excellent facilities and resources • Academic, pastoral and financial support • Wide range of extra-curricular options • Excellent graduate opportunities, irrespective of degree discipline What kinds of university are there? CAMPUS Campus University e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying to University Guide 2020-21
    Applying to University Guide 2020-21 (Updated 22 January 2021) 1 Contents Where do you start? UCAS basics .................................................................................... 3 Key Dates ............................................................................................................................. 2 How to choose a University subject ...................................................................................... 4 UCAS Grades and UCAS Tarriff Points ................................................................................ 6 Contextual Offers .................................................................................................................. 7 Types of Courses ................................................................................................................. 9 Where to study – Choosing a University .............................................................................11 * Oxford and Cambridge (or ‘Oxbridge’) and Russell Group Universities .......................111 Course Choices – how many? .............................................................................................12 Applying for Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and other NHS Healthcare courses ...................12 Applying for Law courses.....................................................................................................12 Applying for Acting,Theatre, Music and Dance courses ......................................................15 Applying for Art & Design, Photography and other
    [Show full text]
  • Educating for Professional Life
    UOW5_22.6.17_Layout 1 22/06/2017 17:22 Page PRE1 Twenty-five Years of the University of Westminster Educating for Professional Life The History of the University of Westminster Part Five UOW5_22.6.17_Layout 1 22/06/2017 17:22 Page PRE2 © University of Westminster 2017 Published 2017 by University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2HW. All rights reserved. No part of this pUblication may be reprodUced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, withoUt prior written permission of the copyright holder for which application shoUld be addressed in the first instance to the pUblishers. No liability shall be attached to the aUthor, the copyright holder or the pUblishers for loss or damage of any natUre sUffered as a resUlt of reliance on the reprodUction of any contents of this pUblication or any errors or omissions in its contents. ISBN 978-0-9576124-9-5 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. Designed by Peter Dolton. Design, editorial and production in association with Wayment Print & Publishing Solutions Ltd, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK. Printed and bound in the UK by Gomer Press Ltd, Ceredigion, Wales. UOW5_22.6.17_Layout 1 05/07/2017 10:49 Page PRE3 iii Contents Chancellor’s Foreword v Acknowledgements vi Abbreviations vii Institutional name changes ix List of illustrations x 1 Introduction 1 Map showing the University of Westminster’s sites in 1992 8 2 The Polytechnic and the UK HE System pre-1992
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI TIMES the State Historical Society of Missouri and Western Historical Manuscript Collection
    May 2008/ Vol. 4, No. 1 MISSOURI TIMES The State Historical Society of Missouri and Western Historical Manuscript Collection “Conflict and Compromise” Challenge 1898 Society Members, Guests Members of the 1898 Society and their guests, of Missouri’s historical resources, and whose the regional coordinators and judges for National volunteer activities encourage and support the History Day in Missouri, gathered at the Society study of history by young people throughout recently to view a new art acquisition and preview the state. The Society is grateful for the gifts of all Thomas Hart Benton in the 1930s. The group patrons. enjoyed hors d’oeuvres and wine, lingering long Named for the founding year of The State Page 2 after the exhibition overview by art curator Joan Historical Society of Missouri, the 1898 Society Stack. honors supporters who have made provisions The Benton show, which dramatically illustrates for the Society through estate planning or the “Conflict and Compromise” 2008 History Day endowment gifts. 1898 Society membership is theme, inspired lively conversations. Red Tailed Hawk, an original double elephant folio print open to patrons, members, and friends. All 1898 by John James Audubon unveiled by University Society members receive invitations to special of Missouri Professor Emerita Susan Flader, also events; periodic reports on collections, services, illustrates the conflict theme and underscores the and publications; recognition in honor rolls; and close ties between culture and environment. a color print of George Caleb Bingham’s Watching This event brought together an interesting the Cargo. For more information, contact Carole blend of people whose gifts and plans for the Sue DeLaite, development officer, at delaitec@ future support the preservation and accessibility umsystem.edu or (573) 882-7083.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 16 December 21, 1993
    INSIDE Trustees: Proceedings of the Meeting • to Elect a President, pp. 2-3 • Deaths of Mr. Eckman, Dr. Witthoft, p. 3 • Speaking Out: More on SAS Closings, p. 6 • Thomas Cook Currency Unit Moves, p. 7 • CrimeStats, p. 7 • PennInfo Kiosks, p. 7 • Make It a Break, not a Break-in, p. 8 Centerspread: January at Penn Tuesday, December 21, 1993 Published by the University of Pennsylvania Volume 40 Number 16 ‘A Virtual Pied Piper. .’ is President K.C.G. In a moving letter written May 17, 1993, the late Dr. Eliot Stellar had called Penn alumna Judith Rodin “the ideal candidate photo/ for the presidency of Penn, for she is a scholar with great natural leadership abilities....She is a virtual Pied Piper.” Farther along he added, “In my 51 years at Harvard, Brown, Hopkins and Penn Almanac I have never seen a better fit than between Dr. Rodin and Penn.” Reading from that letter as he placed her name in nomination for the presidency, Paul F. Miller, Jr., said that after interviewing the nominee, he had concluded that Eliot Stellar “understates her qualities. She is simply spectacular.” Four trustees seconded Mr. Miller’s nomination, and Penn’s new president—effective July 1—was elected unanimously by hand count of 37 trustees present and a poll of five who participated by conference call. After a standing ovation, Dr. Rodin delivered a short acceptance speech—with the ringing refrain, Penn will lead the way—which brought trustees and observers to their feet again for even more prolonged applause. Dr. Rodin then literally led the way through Blanche Levy Park and up Locust Walk to the Annenberg Center for a gala luncheon.
    [Show full text]
  • Upfront Spring 07.FINAL.Rev 4/23/07 11:48 AM Page C1 April 2007
    upFRONT spring 07.FINAL.rev 4/23/07 11:48 AM Page C1 april 2007 INSIDE Kelly Delaney, Nu ’03 – Fighting Hunger in Africa Searching for a Breakthrough – Latest Autism Research care to change Governor Rendell Launches Rx for PA TM at School of Nursing THE WORLD. upFRONT spring 07.FINAL.rev 4/23/07 11:48 AM Page C2 Caitlin Phillips, Nu ’07, GNu ’09, taught students about HIV/AIDS as a Peace Corps community health volunteer in a Madagascar village. At the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, students, alumni, faculty, and staff “Care to change the world” through participation in local, national, and global educational, healthcare, research and outreach programs. From our West Philadelphia neighborhood to remote villages on the other side of the world, Penn Nurses are making a difference. penn nursing around the world The important work of the School of Nursing community was highlighted in the inaugural Global Photo Exhibition, held during our first Global Reflection Week celebration, March 26-28. Photographs from around the world taken by our students, faculty, and staff during their international journeys were exhibited on the screen in the School lobby. The exhibition illustrated the many ways Penn Nurses are making an impact. Associate Professor of Nurse Midwifery William F. McCool, C ’76, PhD, CNM, RN, photographed this oceanfront dwelling along the Arabian Sea in Mumbai, India. board of overseers The Honorable Marjorie O. Rendell, Chair Mrs. Ellen R. Kapito Editor Henry P. Baer, Esquire Mr. Dean Kehler Heather Redfern Mr. Mark Baiada Mrs. Norma P. Killebrew Contributing Editor The Honorable Phyllis W.
    [Show full text]