19546 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2002 / Notices
or 18 gauge, in diameter. Extruded Customs to liquidate, without regard to notification of return/destruction of rubber thread is currently classifiable antidumping duties, all entries for any APO materials or conversion to judicial under subheading 4007.00.00 of the importer for whom the assessment rate protective order is hereby requested. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 Failure to comply with the regulations United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS percent), pursuant to 19 CFR and the terms of an APO is a subheadings are provided for 351.106(c)(2). sanctionable violation. We are issuing convenience and customs purposes. The For Rubberflex’s EP sales, we divided and publishing this determination and written description of the scope of this the total dumping margins by the notice in accordance with sections review is dispositive. entered quantity for each importer. We 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. will direct Customs to assess these per- Dated: April 16, 2002. Period of Review unit amounts on all entries by these The period of review (POR) is October importers. Bernard T. Carreau, 1, 1999, through September 30, 2000. Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Cash Deposit Requirements Administration. Changes Since the Preliminary Results The following deposit requirements [FR Doc. 02–9807 Filed 4–19–02; 8:45 am] Based on our findings at verification will be effective upon publication of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S and the identification of certain clerical this notice of final results of errors, we have made certain changes in administrative review for all shipments the margin calculations. These changes of extruded rubber thread from Malaysia DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE are discussed in the May 6, 2002, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, calculation memoranda to the file for consumption on or after the date of International Trade Administration entitled ‘‘Calculations Performed for publication, as provided by section Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd. in the Final 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit [A–570–848] Results of the Antidumping Duty rates for the reviewed firms will be the Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the Administrative Review on Extruded rates shown above, except if the rate is People’s Republic of China; Notice of Rubber Thread from Malaysia,’’ less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de Final Results of Antidumping Duty ‘‘Calculations Performed for Heveafil minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR Administrative Review, and Final Sdn. Bhd., Filmax Sdn. Bhd., and 351.106, the cash deposit rate will be Partial Rescission of Antidumping Heveafil USA, Inc. in the Final Results zero; (2) for previously reviewed or Duty Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty investigated companies not listed above, Administrative Review on Extruded the cash deposit rate will continue to be AGENCY: Import Administration, Rubber Thread from Malaysia,’’ and the company-specific rate published for International Trade Administration, ‘‘Calculations Performed for Rubberflex the most recent period; (3) if the U.S. Department of Commerce. Sdn. Bhd in the Final Results of the exporter is not a firm covered in this SUMMARY: On October 12, 2001, the Antidumping Duty Administrative review, a prior review, or the original Department of Commerce (the Review on Extruded Rubber Thread less-than-fair-value (LTFV) Department) published the preliminary from Malaysia.’’ investigation, but the manufacturer is, results of its administrative review of the cash deposit rate will be the rate Final Results of Review the antidumping duty order on established for the most recent period freshwater crawfish tail meat from the We determine that the following for the manufacturer of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). See weighted-average margins exist for the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the period October 1, 1999, through rate for all other manufacturers or People’s Republic of China: Notice of September 30, 2000: exporters will continue to be 15.16 Preliminary Results of Antidumping percent. This rate is the ‘‘All Others’’ Duty Administrative Review and Percentage Manufacturer/Exporter Margin rate from the LTFV investigation. Preliminary Partial Rescission of These deposit requirements shall Antidumping Duty Administrative Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd. ... 18.52 remain in effect until publication of the Review, 66 FR 52100 (October 12, 2001). Heveafil Sdn. Bhd./ final results of the next administrative The administrative review covers the Filmax Sdn. Bhd...... 0.20 review. period September 1, 1999, through Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd...... 0.00 This notice serves as a final reminder August 31, 2000. to importers of their responsibility Based on our analysis of the The Department shall determine, and under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a comments received, we have made Customs shall assess, antidumping certificate regarding the reimbursement changes to the margin calculations. duties on all appropriate entries. In of antidumping duties prior to Therefore, the final results differ from accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b), we liquidation of the relevant entries the preliminary results. The final have calculated importer- specific during this review period. Failure to weighted–average dumping margins for assessment rates. For Filati and comply with this requirement could the reviewed firms are listed below in Heveafil, we divided the total dumping result in the Secretary’s presumption the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of margins for the reviewed sales by their that reimbursement of antidumping Review.’’ total entered value for each importer. In duties occurred and the subsequent addition, for Rubberflex’s constructed assessment of doubled antidumping EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 2002. export price sales, we divided the total duties. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: dumping margins for these sales by their This notice also serves as the only Doug Campau or Maureen Flannery; total entered value for the affiliated reminder to parties subject to Office of Antidumping/Countervailing importer. We will direct Customs to administrative protective order (APO) of Duty Enforcement VII, Import assess the resulting percentage margins their responsibility concerning the Administration, International Trade against the entered values for the subject disposition of proprietary information Administration, U.S. Department of merchandise on each of that importer’s disclosed under APO in accordance Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution entries. However, we will instruct with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230;
VerDate 11
telephone (202) 482–1395 or (202) 482– On December 4, 2001, we received live crawfish and other whole crawfish, 3020, respectively. rebuttal briefs from Lakebest, et al; whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ningbo Nanlian and Louisiana Packing Also excluded are saltwater crawfish of Company; and petitioners. any type, and parts thereof. Freshwater Applicable Statute During the week of February 25, 2002, crawfish tail meat is currently Unless otherwise indicated, all the Department sent a team to Spain to classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff citations to the statute are references to discuss with government and industry Schedule of the United States (HTS) the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the officials the study of the Spanish under item numbers 1605.40.10.10, Act). In addition, unless otherwise freshwater crawfish industry printed by 1605.40.10.90, 0306.19.00.10 and indicated, all citations to the the Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de 0306.29.00.00. The HTS subheadings Department’s regulations are to the Agricultura y Pesca (Government of are provided for convenience and provisions codified at 19 CFR part 351 Andalucia, Department of Agriculture Customs purposes only. The written (2000). and Fisheries) (the Spanish Study). description of the scope of this order is On March 12, 2002, the Department dispositive. Background released its reports regarding these On October 12, 2001, the Department meetings to all interested parties. We Analysis of Comments Received published, in the Federal Register, the received comments from parties on All issues raised in the case and preliminary results of the antidumping March 19, 2002, and rebuttals on March rebuttal briefs by parties to this duty administrative review on 21, 2002. administrative review are addressed in freshwater crawfish tail meat from the Both petitioner and certain the Issues and Decision Memorandum PRC. See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat respondents submitted untimely new from Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy from the People’s Republic of China: factual information in their surrogate Assistant Secretary for Import Notice of Preliminary Results of value submissions, in comments on the Administration, Group III, to Faryar Antidumping Duty Administrative Department’s Spain trip reports, or in Shirzad, Assistant Secretary for Import Review and Preliminary Partial their briefs. We rejected this new factual Administration: Issues and Decision Rescission of Antidumping Duty information pursuant to 19 CFR Memorandum for the Final Results of Administrative Review, 66 FR 52100 351.301(b)(2) and (c)(3) and requested the Antidumping Duty Administrative (October 12, 2001). Since the that the parties refile their comments on Review and Final Partial Rescission of publication of the preliminary results, the Department’s Spain trip reports, Antidumping Duty Administrative the following events have occurred. On surrogate value submissions, and briefs, Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail October 29, 2001, Ningbo Nanlian which they did on March 21, 2002, Meat from the People’s Republic of Frozen Foods Company, Ltd. (Ningbo April 1, 2002, and April 2, 2002, China: September 1, 1999 through Nanlian) and Louisiana Packing respectively. On March 21, 2002, April August 31, 2000, dated April 10, 2002 Company submitted a study on the 1, 2002, and April 5, 2002, objections (Decision Memo), which is hereby Spanish crawfish industry published by were filed by either petitioner or the adopted by this notice. the Government of Andalucia, Spain. respondent party concerning the A list of the issues which parties have On November 1, 2001, Ningbo Nanlian Department’s return of the untimely raised and to which we have responded, and Louisiana Packing Company, Fujian new factual information. We addressed all of which are in the Decision Memo, Pelagic Fishery Group Co. (Fujian the comments concerning the is attached to this notice as an Pelagic), Qingdao Zhengri Seafood Department’s decision to reject these appendix. Parties can find a complete Company, Ltd. (Qingdao Zhengri), submissions in two separate memos to discussion of all issues raised in this Yangzhou Lakebest Co. Ltd. (Lakebest), the file: ‘‘Memorandum to the File review and the corresponding Qingdao Rirong Foodstuff Co., Ltd. Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from The recommendations in this public (Qingdao Rirong), Yancheng Haiteng People’s Republic of China: Rejection of memorandum which is on file in the Aquatic Products & Foods Co., Ltd. New Factual Information Submitted By Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the (Haiteng), and Suquian Foreign Trade Petitioner’’and ‘‘Memorandum to the main Commerce Building. In addition, a Co., Ltd. (Suquian FTC), submitted File Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from complete version of the Decision Memo timely information on surrogate values. The People’s Republic of China: can be accessed directly on the Web at The Crawfish Processors Alliance, the Rejection of New Factual Information http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy petitioners, as well as the Louisiana Submitted By Ningbo Nanlian’’ (dated and electronic version of the Decision Department of Agriculture & Forestry April 10, 2002). Memo are identical in content. and Bob Odom, Commissioner, also On March 22, 2002, the Department Changes Since the Preliminary Results submitted timely information on conducted a public hearing on the proposed surrogate values on November issues presented by interested parties in Based on our analysis of comments 1, 2001. On November 27, 2001, we their case and rebuttal briefs. received, we have made certain changes received timely case briefs from the The Department has now completed in the margin calculations. We have also following respondents: Lakebest, this review in accordance with section corrected certain clerical errors from our Qingdao Rirong, Haiteng, and Suqian 751 of the Act. preliminary results. Finally, for packing FTC (collectively, Lakebest et al); Fujian materials, we are using updated Indian Pelagic, Huaiyin 30, Yancheng Foreign Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order import statistics for the period April Trade, Ltd. (YFT), and Yancheng Yaou The product covered by the 2000 through January 2001. See the (collectively Fujian Pelagic et al); antidumping duty order is freshwater April 10, 2002 memorandum entitled Ningbo Nanlian and Louisiana Packing crawfish tail meat, in all its forms ‘‘Packing Material Surrogates Used for Company; and Huaiyin Foreign Trade (whether washed or with fat on, the Final Results of the 1999–2000 Corporation (5) (Huaiyin 5), renamed whether purged or unpurged), grades, Administrative Review of Freshwater Jiangsu Hilong International Trading and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s Company Ltd., subsequent to the POR chilled; and regardless of how it is Republic of China.’’ For a discussion of (Jiangsu Hilong). We also received packed, preserved, or prepared. the issues and changes made for each comments from petitioners. Excluded from the scope of the order are company, refer to the Decision Memo.
VerDate 11
Partial Rescission of Administrative Seatrade International, aka Seatrade above, the Department is treating these Review Enter.; Shanghai Guangxum Trading; two companies as a single entity for In our preliminary results, we Toyo Warehouse, aka TKK Toyo; these final results. concluded that YFT did not have any Weishan Jinmuan Foodstuff; Y & Z In the preliminary results, the sales to the United States during the International, aka Y & Z International Department erroneously stated that it period of review, and thus was not Trading; Yancheng Baolong was preliminarily rescinding the review entitled to a review under section 751(a) Biochemical Products, Co., Ltd.; of Fujian Pelagic. To clarify, the of the Act. For a further discussion of Yancheng Haibao Foods; Mr. Yang Yi Department has conducted an this issue, see the relevant sections of Xiang; Yangzhou Foreign Trading; administrative review of Fujian Pelagic the Decision Memo; see also Yiaxian No. 2 Freezing Factory; for this POR. Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman Yundong Aquatic Products Processing Determination to Apply Facts Available Factory; Yundong Waterstuff Processing through Maureen Flannery from Elfi The Department received no Blum: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat Plant; Zegao Daxin Foodstuff Freezing Plant; Zegao Foodstuff Freezing Plant; comments on its preliminary from the People’s Republic of China determination to apply facts available to (PRC); Yancheng Foreign Trade, Ltd. Zhenfeng Foodstuff Co.; Zhenfeng Group Food Co.; Ocean Harvest and Shantou SEZ Yangfeng Marine Products (YFT), formerly Yancheng Foreign Co. (Yangfeng Marine). Therefore, we Trade Corporation (YFTC): Intent to Nantong Delu; Anhui Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs; Fujian Hualong Aquatic have not altered our decision to apply Rescind Administrative Review facts available to Yangfeng Marine for (September 24, 2001). After reviewing Trade Development Co. Lianjian Seafood Processing Plant; Huaiyin these final results of review. the comments received with respect to Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides Foreign Trade Corporation (1); Huaiyin YFT, we have concluded that our that if any interested party: (A) Foreign Trade Corporation (3); Mr. preliminary determination was withholds information that has been Edward Lee; Lianyungang Haiwang appropriate because YFT had no sales to requested by the Department; (B) fails to the United States during the POR. Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.; Mr. Lin provide such information in a timely Therefore, we are rescinding the Zhong Nan; Mr. Ma Guo Zhong; Pacific manner or in the form or manner administrative review of YFT. Coast Fisheries Corp.; Shanghai requested; (C) significantly impedes an Furthermore, we did not receive any Zhongjian International Trading; antidumping investigation; or (D) comments regarding our preliminary Suyang Shuangyu Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; provides such information but the decision to rescind the review with Mr. Wei Wei, aka Philip Wei; Mr. Wei information cannot be verified, as respect to Anhui Chaohu Daxin Meat Zhang, aka Zhang Wei; Weishan Hongfa provided in section 782(i) of the Act, the Poultry Co, Ltd.; Anhui Provincial Lake Foodstuff Co., Ltd., aka Weishan Department shall, subject to section Aquatic Co.; Baoluu Waterstuff Co., Fongfa Lake Foodstuff; Yancheng Fubao 782(d) of the Act, use the facts Ltd.; Baoying Freezing Plant; Baoying Aquatic Food Co., Ltd.; and Mr. Yang Yi otherwise available in reaching the County Freezing Plant; Beijing Farenco; Xiang. Therefore, we are rescinding the applicable determination under this Ever Concord; Feidong Freezing Plant; review with respect to these companies. title. Fubao Aquatic Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; In the preliminary results, the Yangfeng Marine failed to respond to Fujian Hualong Aquatic Trade Department determined that Qingdao sections C and D of the Department’s Development Co. Lianjian Seafood Zhengri and Yancheng Seafood should questionnaire. As a result, we were Processing Plant; Fujian Hualong be treated as a single entity for purposes unable to obtain the information Aquatic Trade Development; Funing of this administrative review. Qingdao necessary to conduct a review. County Frozen Food; Guangzhou Xinye Zhengri and Yancheng Seafood’s Therefore, in accordance with section Plastic Products; Hengji Trading Co., consolidated supplemental response 776(a)(2)(A) of the Act, we are applying Ltd.; Hexing Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Hongze states that Yancheng Seafood negotiates facts available to Yangfeng Marine. See, County Laoshan Danxian Freezing the price with U.S. customers on behalf e.g., Silicon Metal from the People’s Factory; Hongze Lake Green Food Co., of Qingdao Zhengri, and that Qingdao Republic of China: Preliminary Results Ltd.; Hongze County Aquatic Freezing Zhengri receives payment for such sales. of Antidumping Duty Administrative Factory; Hua Yin; Huai Yin; Huaiyin The sales for which Qingdao Zhengri Review, 63 FR 37850 (July 14, 1998); County Freezing Factory; Huaiyin produced the merchandise account for a and Silicon Metal From the People’s Foreign Economic Relations and Trade significant portion of Qingdao Zhengri/ Republic of China; Final Results of Committee; Huaiyin Foreign Trade Yancheng Seafood’s reported U.S. sales. Antidumping Duty Administrative Corp. Shunda Branch; Huaiyin Foreign We also note that in their response to Review, 63 FR 37850 (July 14, 1998). Trade Corporation; Huaiyin Foreign the Department’s questionnaire, the Because Yangfeng Marine failed to Trading; Huaiyin Luky Trade Corp.; total volume and value of sales for both provide section C and D questionnaire Huaiyin Shunda Economic and Qingdao Zhengri and Yancheng Seafood responses on the record, section 782(d) Technology Trading Co.; JAS were consolidated in Yancheng does not apply. Further, absent these Forwarding; Jiangsu Zhenfeng Group Seafood’s section A response. See sections, the Department cannot Foodstuff; Jiangsu Zhenfeng Group; Yancheng Seafood’s January 22, 2001, calculate export price or normal value, Jiangsu Lukang Foodstuffs; Jin Hu response to section A of the and thus any remaining information Foreign Trading; Jinghu Aquatic Department’s questionnaire. cannot form the basis for this Foodstuff Processing Plant; Jinpeng Furthermore, the companies submitted a determination under section 782(e). Agriculture and By–Product consolidated response to sections C and Therefore, in accordance with section Development Co.; Laoshan Brother D of the Department’s questionnaire, 776(a)(2), we are applying facts Freezing Plant; Liaoning Limeng and to the Department’s supplemental available to Yangfeng Marine. Exports & Imports; Neptune questionnaire for sections A, C, and D. As noted above, we have determined International; Panwin Logistics; Qidong See Yancheng Seafood and Qingdao that Qingdao Zhengri and Yancheng Baoluu Aquatic Food Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Zhengri’s July 23, 2001, response to the Seafood should be treated as a single Shun Hang Forwarding; Qingshan Department’s supplemental entity. Since Qingdao Zhengri did not Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Rich Shipping; questionnaire. For the reasons cited allow verification of its portion of the
VerDate 11
consolidated response, the Department Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Seafood a We received documentation from the considers the whole of the consolidated letter indicating that it would not be U.S. Customs service regarding entries response to be unverifiable. Therefore, possible for the Department to verify of crawfish tail meat made during the in accordance with section 776(a)(2)(D) only parts of the companies’ POR. On January 11, 2002, we sent of the Act, we are applying facts consolidated response. The letter letters to Huaiyin 5 and Huaiyin 30, available to Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng pointed out that if a company objects to stating that entry documentation Seafood. For a discussion of why we are verification, the Department will not indicated entries of merchandise continuing to apply facts available to conduct verification and may disregard exported by them during the POR that Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng Yaou any or all information submitted by the had not been reported by them to the Seafood (Yancheng Seafood), see the company in favor of the use of the facts Department, or that had been reported Decision Memo at Comment 18. available. Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng differently than shown on the Customs Section 776(b) of the Act provides Seafood never responded to the documentation. These respondents that the Department may apply adverse Department’s letter, and made no indicated that certain entries of crawfish facts available to a respondent when subsequent efforts to contact or arrange tail meat during the POR purported to that respondent fails to cooperate to the verification with the Department. have been exported by respondents best of its ability. As noted above, in the Therefore, we determine that these were not, in fact, exported by them. See instant administrative review, Yangfeng entities did not cooperate by acting to letter to the Department from Huaiyin 5, Marine and Qingdao Zhengri/Yancheng the best of their ability in complying dated January 18, 2002; letter to the Seafood failed to provide complete and/ with the Department’s requests for Department from Huaiyin 5, dated or verifiable responses. With respect to information. January 25, 2002; letter to the Yangfeng Marine, this company failed to We are treating all the above Department from Ningbo Nanlian, dated provide full section C and D companies, together with all other PRC January 25, 2002 (in support of Huaiyin questionnaire responses. These companies that have not established 5); and letter to the Department from responses are necessary for the that they are entitled to separate rates, Huaiyin 30, dated January 16, 2002. The Department to calculate an accurate as a single enterprise subject to details of these letters and the identity margin. Without section C and D government control. Furthermore, we of the importer(s), which Huaiyin 5 and information, the record is devoid of have determined the rate to be applied Huaiyin 30 deny they ever exported to, information concerning U.S. sales and to this single enterprise is a PRC–wide are proprietary; however, based on the factors of production. At no time did rate based on adverse facts available, in information certified by Ningbo Yangfeng Marine indicate to the accordance with section 776(b) of the Nanlian, Huaiyin 5, and Huaiyin 30, we Department that it was having Act. Section 776(b) of the Act states that conclude that these are entries of subject difficulties complying with the adverse facts available may include merchandise from an exporter that does Department’s requests for information, information derived from the petition, not have a separate rate, and will nor did it seek assistance from the the final determination, a previous instruct the Customs Service to Department. Therefore, we conclude administrative review, or other liquidate these entries at the PRC–wide that Yangfeng Marine has failed to information placed on the record. As rate. cooperate in this review. adverse facts available, we are using the Final Results of Review With respect to Qingdao Zhengri/ rate of 223.01 percent for Huaiyin 30, Yancheng Seafood, after the Department the highest calculated rate in this We determine that the following received a letter from Qingdao Zhengri segment of the proceeding, which is also weighted–average margins exist for the indicating that it would not submit to the highest rate from any segment of the period September 1, 1999 through verification, the Department issued proceeding. August 31, 2000:
Manufacturer/Exporter Time Period Margin (percent)
Ningbo Nanlian/ Huaiyin5 (a.k.a. Jiangsu Hilong International Trading Company, Ltd.) ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 62.51 percent Yancheng Haiteng ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 65.81 percent Huaiyin 30 ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 223.01 percent Fujian Pelagic ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 174.04 percent Yangzhou Lakebest ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 41.93 percent Suqian FTC ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 41.41 percent Qingdao Rirong ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 9.76 percent Nantong Shengfa ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 45.40 percent PRC–Wide Rate ...... 9/1/99–8/31/00 223.01 percent
Assessment of Antidumping Duties divided the total dumping margins Cash Deposit Requirements (calculated as the difference between Upon completion of this normal value and export price or The following deposit requirements administrative review, the Department constructed export price) for each will be effective upon publication of shall determine, and the U.S. Customs exporter/importer by the total quantity these final results for this administrative Service shall assess, antidumping duties of subject merchandise sold by that review for all shipments of freshwater on all appropriate entries. The exporter to that importer during the crawfish tail meat from the PRC entered, Department will issue appraisement POR. Upon the completion of this or withdrawn from warehouse, for instructions directly to the U.S. Customs review, we will direct Customs to consumption on or after the date of Service. For assessment purposes, multiply the resulting quantity–based publication, as provided by section where possible, we calculated importer– rates by the weight in kilograms of each 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For exporters specific assessment rates for freshwater entry of the subject merchandise on an with separate rates listed above, we will crawfish tail meat from the PRC. We importer–specific basis for the POR. establish a per kilogram cash deposit
VerDate 11
rate which will be equivalent to the Comment 4: Whether Crawfish Capture DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE company–specific cash deposit in Spain Is Performed with Unbaited established in this review except that, Nets International Trade Administration for firms whose weighted–average Comment 5: Whether Spanish Crawfish [A–588–846] margins are less than 0.5 percent and Prices Are Aberrational therefore de minimis, the Department Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality shall require no deposit of estimated Comment 6: Similarity of Spanish GDP Steel Products from Japan: Extension antidumping duties; (2) for previously– to That of China of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of reviewed PRC and non–PRC exporters Comment 7: The Spain Trip Versus the Antidumping Administrative Review with separate rates, the cash deposit rate Australia and Mexico Trips will be the company–specific rate AGENCY: Import Administration, established for the most recent period; Comment 8: Use of Mexican Data as a International Trade Administration, (3) for all other PRC exporters, the cash Surrogate Value for Whole, Live Department of Commerce. Crawfish deposit rate will be the PRC–wide rate, ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time 223.01 percent; and (4) for all other Comment 9: Comparability of Limit for Preliminary Results of non–PRC exporters of the subject Economies Administrative Review. merchandise, the cash deposit rate will Comment 10: Suggested Wet–Dry be the rate applicable to the PRC Weight Conversion Factor for Crawfish EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 2002. supplier of that exporter. These deposit Scrap, Based on Information from an FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: requirements shall remain in effect until Indian Chitosan Producer Doug Campau or Maureen Flannery, publication of the final results of the AD/CVD Enforcement, Import next administrative review. Comment 11: The Appropriate Factor Administration, International Trade This notice serves as a final reminder for Use in Calculating a Wet–Dry Administration, U.S. Department of to importers of their responsibility Conversion Factor Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a Comment 12: Suggested Wet–Dry Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20230; certificate regarding the reimbursement Weight Conversion Ratio of 50 Percent telephone: (202) 482–1395 or (202) 482– of antidumping duties prior to for Crawfish Scrap 3020, respectively. liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to Comment 13: Incorporation of a Wet– The Applicable Statute Dry Weight Conversion Factor for Scrap comply with this requirement could Unless otherwise indicated, all result in the Secretary’s presumption for Yangzhou Lakebest (Lakebest) citations to the statute are references to that reimbursement of antidumping Comment 14: Suqian’s Wet–Dry the provisions effective January 1, 1995, duties occurred and subsequent Conversion the effective date of the amendments assessment of double antidumping Comment 15: Suqian’s and Yancheng made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) duties. Haiteng’s Coal Freight Expense by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. This notice also serves as a reminder In addition, unless otherwise indicated, to parties subject to administrative Comment 16: Rescission of Review for all citations to the Department’s protective order (APO) of their Yancheng Foreign Trade, Ltd. (YFT) regulations are to the current responsibility concerning the Comment 17: The Department’s Refusal regulations, codified at 19 CFR part 351 disposition of proprietary information to Review Certain Sales of Huaiyin (2001). disclosed under APO in accordance Foreign Trade Corporation (30) (Huaiyin SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The with section 351.305(a)(3) of the 30) Department published in the Federal Department’s regulations. Timely Register an antidumping duty order on written notification of the return/ Comment 18: Whether the Department certain hot-rolled, flat-rolled, carbon- destruction of APO materials or Improperly Determined that Fujian quality steel products (hot-rolled steel) conversion to judicial protective order is Pelagic and Pacific Coast are not from Japan on June 29, 1999 (64 FR hereby requested. Failure to comply Affiliated Parties 34778). We published a notice of with the regulations and the terms of an Comment 19: Whether the Department initiation of this antidumping duty APO is a sanctionable violation. Improperly Applied Facts Available to administrative review on hot-rolled This administrative review and notice Yancheng Yaou are in accordance with sections steel on July 23, 2001 (66 FR 38252). 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Comment 20: Single Rate for Huaiyin 5 The period of review (POR) is June 1, and Ningbo Nanlian 2000 through May 31, 2001. On Dated: April 10, 2002. September 4, 2001, Kawasaki - the sole Faryar Shirzad, Comment 21: Yancheng Haiteng’s Indirect Selling Expenses Ratio respondent in this administrative Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. review - informed the Department that Comment 22: Yancheng Haiteng’s APPENDIX it had not made any shipments of Marine Insurance Factor subject merchandise during the POR. List of Issues Comment 23: Certain Domestic Parties’ Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Comment 1: Use of Australia Bureau of Status as Interested Parties Act, the Department shall make a preliminary determination in an Agriculture and Resource Economics Application of the Continued Dumping administrative review of an (ABARE) Statistics or Mulataga and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (Byrd antidumping duty order within 245 Information to Value Live Crawfish Amendment) Comment 2: Whether the Spanish Study days after the last day of the anniversary is a Reliable Source of Live Crawfish [FR Doc. 02–9802 Filed 4–19–02; 8:45 am] month of the date of publication of the Prices and Represents the Best Available BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S order. The Act further provides, Information however, that the Department may Comment 3: Size and Weight of Live extend the 245–day period to 365 days Spanish Crawfish if it determines that it is not practicable
VerDate 11