Transportation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Coordinated Human Services TRANSPORTATION PLAN Ogden - Layton Urbanized Area 2017-2021 Prepared by Utah Transit Authority’s Coordinated Mobility Department 699 W 200 S Salt Lake City UT. 84101 (801) 287-5333 Table of Contents Ogden-Layton Urbanized Area . 1 Background . .2 Regional Accomplishments . 4 Future Regional Objectives . 7 Ogden-Layton UZA . 10 Ogden-Layton Demography . 17 Local Accomplishments and Goals . 25 Proposed Projects . 30 Ogden-Layton UZA Plan 2017 // UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY // Table of Contents Ogden-Layton Urbanized Area Ogden-Layton UZA Plan 2017 // UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY // 1 Background The passage of the federal transportation A system this large requires an enormous reauthorization, MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for amount of cooperation across the region . Progress in the 21st Century) in July 2012 UTA works closely with the Wasatch Front incorporated the New Freedom program Regional Council (WFRC) and Mountainland (49 USC§ 5317 under SAFETEA-LU) into the Association of Governments (MAG), the local updated 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors metropolitan planning organizations along and Individuals with Disabilities Program . the Wasatch Front (both of which are fund- The purpose of the 5310 program under ing partners of this project), as well as the MAP-21 is to enhance mobility for seniors seven county governments, 77 communities and persons with disabilities by providing that make up the Wasatch Front, and the funds for programs to serve the special Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) . needs of transit-dependent populations Through their joint Transportation and Land beyond traditional public transportation Use Connection program, WFRC and UTA services and Americans with Disabilities Act specifically provides technical assistance (ADA) complementary paratransit services . and training to support innovative land use Additionally, under MAP-21, funds are now planning among the communities that it allocated directly to the large urbanized serves, especially those communities with areas (UZA) . The Fast Act of 2015 contin- new rail stations who may not be familiar ued funding and principles of Map 21 in with the fundamental principles of transit-ori- the recent federal five year transportation ented development (TOD) . reauthorization . UTA Mission As a result of the MAP-21 changes, the Gov- Strengthen and connect communities ernor of Utah designated UTA as the recipi- enabling individuals to pursue a fuller life ent for FTA 5310 funds in the Ogden-Layton, with greater ease and convenience by Provo-Orem, and Salt Lake City-West Valley leading through partnering, planning, and City large urbanized areas in 2013 . wise investement of physical, economic, UTA was established in 1970 as a local and human resources . district political subdivision of the State of Utah . Oversight of UTA is exercised by a UTA Vision 16-member Board of Trustees, the majority Provide an integrated system of of which are appointed by elected officials innovative, accessible, and efficient public of the constituent members of the transit transportation services that contribute to district . UTA provides public transit services increased access to opportunities and a throughout the Wasatch Front that includes healthy environment for all people of the the three large urbanized areas . Wasatch region . The total service area of UTA is over 1,600 square miles . The entire system serves more Projected population growth puts pressure than 1 .8 million people and represents one on the area’s transportation system to be of the largest geographic service areas of ready to serve more residents, more trips, any transit agency in the United States, pro- more freight and more traffic. UTA and its viding more than 46 million rides in 2015 1. partners agree that transit is one of the best options to address this situation . 1. “2013-2018 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy.” Wasatch Front Economic Development District. April 2013. 2 // Ogden-Layton UZA Plan 2017 // UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY WASATCH FRONT UZAS (LARGE URBANIZED AREAS) THE OGDEN-LAYTON AREA CONSISTS OF PORTIONS OF: Box Elder County - Bear River Association of Governments (BRAG) planning region Davis County - Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) planning region Weber County - WFRC planning region THE SLC-WVC AREA CONSISTS OF: Salt Lake County - WFRC planning region THE PROVO-OREM AREA CONSISTS OF PORTIONS OF: Utah County – Mountainland Association of Governments (MAG) planning region Ogden-Layton UZA Plan 2017 // UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY // 3 Regional Accomplishments The 2013 Wasatch Mobility Plan identified applications were being taken for and in strategies for furthering mobility efforts getting awarded vehicles/funds to partners . along the Wasatch Front . The UTA The Coordinated Mobility Department Coordinated Mobility Department, in engaged the Local Coordinating Councils in conjunction with the UZA Local Coordinating the grant award process to allow for more Councils, have worked together to implement stakeholder input and for transparency . A these strategies . An update of what has planned yearly schedule of the process has been accomplished regionally is provided been established so that grant applicants below . are applying for the current year’s funding . The Coordinated Mobility Department has DESIGNATED RECIPIENT also established internal processes to In 2013, the Governor of Utah designated streamline the acquisition of vehicles and UTA as the recipient for the FTA 5310 funds the disbursement of funds to awardees for a in the Ogden-Layton, Provo-Orem, and Salt quicker grant turn around time . Lake City-West Valley City large urbanized areas . The FTA Section 5310 Program INCREASED ATTENDANCE AT LOCAL provides funding to non-profit social services COORDINATING COUNCILS and public agencies for qualified projects. UTA COORDINATED MOBILITY DEPARTMENT UTA committed to support a Coordinated Mobility Department prior to being awarded designee status . Once UTA was designated as the recipient for 5310 funds, a manager and intern were hired to begin the work of coordinated transportation . With monetary and visionary support from UTA, combined Participation by Human Service with hard work, this department now has Transportation (HST) providers has improved a manager, three full-time employees, one at the UZA Local Coordinating Councils . part-time employee and an intern to support Over the past two years, Ogden-Layton the many mobility projects in process . attendance has increased 200%; Salt The outreach of the Coordinated Mobility Lake-West Valley attendance has increased Department spans a number of communities 275%; and Orem-Provo attendance has along the entire Wasatch Front and Tooele increased 67% . Along with the increased County serving over 300+ partner agencies . attendance, there has also been increased engagement of the partners at the meetings . 5310 GRANT PROCESS The Coordinated Mobility Department has At the time UTA Coordinated Mobility took worked hard to bring value for providers to over the 5310 Grant for the large UZAs, the LCC meetings . Outreach to individual the process was behind in what year providers has taken place so they are better 4 // Ogden-Layton UZA Plan 2017 // UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY aware of what the Council does as well of The process of methodology included: availability of funding . During meetings, • Identifying as many providers as the Providers participate in discussion of possible-which is an ongoing process the Mobility Plan, common challenges they experience with serving their clients, and • Developing an inventory survey possible common/coordinated solutions • Distributing the survey in two rounds over that can benefit all the participants. Council the span of a year attendees also evaluate and rank the 5310 • Revising and refining the survey over Grant funding requests . This engagement time of the attending providers has helped the • Gathering as much information and as partners take ownership of their councils . many responses as possible PASSAGE OF SCR 8 • Providing high level data which can now As the Designated Recipient, under be used on an ongoing basis the 5310 Program, UTA’s Coordinated Mobility Department is required to assess LEAD ON INTELLIGENT available transportation services for those TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PROJECTS of low-income, seniors, and persons with BENEFITTING ALL PROVIDERS disabilities . These assessments include the Two federal veterans’ grants are providing public, private, non-profit, and government funding for the development of a Regional providers, or agencies, of these services Trip Planner as well as a Scheduling and along the Wasatch Front urbanized area . UTA Dispatching software . These software determined that an in depth, comprehensive programs are Open Source and are available inventory would be needed for the 5310 for use, at no charge, for any Human Service Program . Senate Concurrent Resolution 8 Transportation Providers in the State of shows support from the Utah Legislature and Utah . These programs will allow greater Governor of UTA’s efforts in doing a survey to efficiency in vehicle operations which will evaluate the current Human Transportation result in greater transportation service Provider inventory to meet transportation delivery . needs of seniors and those with disabilities . UTAH RIDELINK EXTENSIVE INVENTORY OF HST This website links all human transportation PROVIDERS services into one site . Users simply input Two interns, hired by the Coordinated their future trip details
Recommended publications
  • Wasatch Front South Boundary Path Rating Study

    Wasatch Front South Boundary Path Rating Study

    Wasatch Front South Boundary Path Rating Study This study has been performed to identify Wasatch Front South boundary capacity, transmission constraints and mitigations PacifiCorp 12/18/2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Study Assumption .................................................................................... 6 2.2 Study Criteria ........................................................................................... 7 2.3 List of Resources ....................................................................................... 8 3. Simulation Setup ................................................................................................ 9 4. Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................11 Appendix .................................................................................................................13 1 | P a g e C:\Users\p95594\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\M8XSQ745\Wasatch Front South Boundary Capacity_Dec-2015-final.docx Executive Summary The Wasatch Front South (WFS) boundary is a critical transmission path within PacifiCorp’s transmission footprint located in
  • The Wasatch Fault

    The Wasatch Fault

    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
  • Downtown Salt Lake 4Th Ave

    Downtown Salt Lake 4Th Ave

    l C a p i t o Pioneer t Memorial Museum E a s UTAH STATE 300 North CAPITOL . Memory Grove A St. B St. C St. Council C a n y o n R d Hall 500 West 400 West 300 West 200 West Downtown Salt Lake 4th Ave. 200 North e . Conference . p 3rd Ave. North Temple Center Bridge TRAX City Creek Main St Station to AIRPORT – 6 miles State St Park West Templ 2nd Ave. North Temple TEMPLE SQUARE Brigham Young Museum of Church Historic Park History & Art Tabernacle Joseph Smith Memorial Beehive Building House Family History 1st Ave. First Library Lion Mormon Pioneer Presbyterian LDS Temple House Church Union Pacific Arena Temple Square Memorial Monument Depot TRAX Station South Temple TRAX Station 1 Olympic Legacy South Temple Plaza Utah Cathedral 2 Museum of of the Maurice Contemporary Madeleine THE Abravanel City Center (100 S) Cathedral EnergySolutionVivint Smarts Art TRAX Station GATEWAY HomeAren Arena a Hall Church of Harmons Grocery St. Mark Discovery Simply Salt Lake CITY CREEK CITY CREEK Gift Shop Gateway CENTER CENTER Visitor Information 3 1000 SSoSoututh Center 100 South Clark Planetarium 4 5 SALT PALACE Planetarium CONVENTION TRAX Station CENTER N Capitol Theatre 200 SSouth 200 South Old Greektown Gallivan TRAX Station 6 7 Center Rio Grande Depot Pierpont Ave. Gallivan Plaza Pierpont Ave. TRAX / UTA Free Fare Zone & Utah State 8 TRAX Station Historical Museum KUTV2 Main Street News Studio S 3 00 South 3 00 South LINE . 9 E PIONEER BLU , & 00 West Main St 200 East State St 500 West 4 PARK 300 West to Foothill Cultural District 200 West est Temple
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)

    Light Rail Transit (LRT)

    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
  • Executive Director Reports To: Utah Transit

    Executive Director Reports To: Utah Transit

    Position Description The Organization: Utah Transit Authority (UTA) Position Title: Executive Director Reports to: Utah Transit Authority Board of Directors Location: Salt Lake City, UT Introduction: The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is recruiting an Executive Director to work in partnership with its newly constituted full-time Board of Trustees to develop and implement strategic plans that meet the business goals and objectives of the organization. Under the new governance model, the Executive Director will work directly with the new board to implement the new structure and set the stage for the agency of approximately 2,600 employees. UTA provides service over a 1,400 square mile area, covering seven counties: Box Elder, Davis, Salt Lake, Summit, Tooele, Utah, and Weber. UTA also offers seasonal bus service to Alta, Brighton, Snowbird, and Solitude ski resorts in Big and Little Cottonwood canyons, as well as Snowbasin Resort and Powder Mountain in Weber County and Sundance Resort in Utah County. UTA operates fixed route buses, flex route buses, express buses, ski buses, paratransit service, three light rail lines (TRAX), a streetcar line (the S-Line), and a commuter rail train (FrontRunner) from Ogden through Salt Lake City to Provo. In 2014, Utah Transit Authority was named Outstanding Public Transportation System by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA). Utah Growth and Public Transportation: Currently, Utah’s economy is ranked 6th in the nation. According to Business insider, Utah’s Q1 2018 GDP growth rate was 3.2% which is the second highest in the U.S. Utah is projected to see population growth double by 2050.
  • Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report

    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report

    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report Public Review Draft October 2017 Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison October 2017 Research and Peer Review Research and Peer Review .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Note on TCRP Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 3 Definition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Commuter Rail Elasticity ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Systems ............................................................................................ 4 Fares ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Employer Programs ..................................................................................................................................................
  • Downtown Salt Lake City We’Re Not Your Mall

    Downtown Salt Lake City We’Re Not Your Mall

    DOWNTOWN SALT LAKE CITY WE’RE NOT YOUR MALL. WE’RE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. What if you took the richest elements of an eclectic, growing city and distilled them into one space? At The Gateway, we’re doing exactly that: taking a big city’s vital downtown location and elevating it, by filling it with the things that resonate most with the people who live, work, and play in our neighborhood. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH STATE FOR BUSINESS STATE FOR STATE FOR #1 - WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2016 #1 BUSINESS & CAREERS #1 FUTURE LIVABILITY - FORBES, 2016 - GALLUP WELLBEING 2016 BEST CITIES FOR CITY FOR PROECTED ANNUAL #1 OB CREATION #1 OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES #1 OB GROWTH - GALLUP WELL-BEING 2014 - OUTSIDE MAGAZINE, 2016 - HIS GLOBAL INSIGHTS, 2016 LOWEST CRIME IN NATION FOR STATE FOR ECONOMIC #6 RATE IN U.S. #2 BUSINESS GROWTH #1 OUTLOOK RANKINGS - FBI, 2016 - PEW, 2016 - CNBC, 2016 2017 TOP TEN BEST CITIES FOR MILLENNIALS - WALLETHUB, 2017 2017 DOWNTOWN SALT LAKE CITY TRADE AREA .25 .5 .75 mile radius mile radius mile radius POPULATION 2017 POPULATION 1,578 4,674 8,308 MILLENNIALS 34.32% 31.95% 31.23% (18-34) EDUCATION BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR 36.75% 33.69% 37.85% HIGHER HOUSING & INCOME 2017 TOTAL HOUSING 1,133 2,211 3,947 UNITS AVERAGE VALUE $306,250 $300,947 $281,705 OF HOMES AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD $60,939 60,650 57,728 INCOME WORKFORCE TOTAL EMPLOYEES 5,868 14,561 36,721 SOURCES: ESRI AND NEILSON ART. ENTERTAINMENT. CULTURE. The Gateway is home to several unique entertainment destinations, including Wiseguys Comedy Club, The Depot Venue, Larry H.
  • Avalanche Hazard Investigations, Zoning, and Ordinances, Utah, Part 2

    Avalanche Hazard Investigations, Zoning, and Ordinances, Utah, Part 2

    International Snow Science Workshop Avalanche Hazard Investigations, Zoning, and Ordinances, Utah, Part 2 David A. Scroggin, Jack Johnson Company L. Darlene Batatian, P.G., Mountain Land Development ABSTRACT: The Wasatch Mountains of Utah are known as home to the 2002 Winter Olympics as well as having an abundance of avalanche history and avalanche hazard terrain that threatens ski areas, highways, and backcountry. Avalanche professionals historically have been drawn to and/or produced from this region resulting in an abundance of publications and research. Still, the subject of avalanche zoning continues to be neglected by developers and governmental approval agencies at communities encroaching on the foothills of the Bonneville Shoreline into avalanche terrain not previously developed. The first and only avalanche hazard ordinance adopted by a county (Scroggin/Batatian, ISSW 2004) is now being challenged by developers. While geologists continue to improve natural hazards mapping for earthquakes, landslides, and debris flows, avalanche hazards have not been included. This presentation will present a slide show and computer terrain analysis of recent large avalanches that have dropped over 5000 vertical feet to existing and proposed development areas as well as inspire a discussion on ways to address the problem both physically and politically. Potential solutions and ways to identify how to assist developers and governmental agencies will be presented. KEYWORDS: Avalanche Zoning, Ordinance, Governmental Approvals, Utah, 1. INTRODUCTION Salt Lake County ski areas (Alta, Snowbird, In 2002 the first avalanche zoning guidelines for Brighton, Solitude) and Utah Department of a county in Utah was taken into state ordinance Transportation (UDOT) highways of Big (www.avalanche.org/~issw2004/issw_previous/ Cottonwood Canyon, Little Cottonwood Canyon 2004/proceedings/pdffiles/papers/073.pdf).
  • At Your Service a Bulletin of Community News

    At Your Service a Bulletin of Community News

    At Your Service a bulletin of community news January 2013 volume 20 • number 1 Help for Francom Public Safety Building Stands for Courage and Honor Small Businesses With a dedication ceremony on January 4, Mayor Mike Caldwell and the Ogden Local experts at SCORE’s City Council officially named Ogden’s public safety building the “Francom Public Safety Ogden Chapter provide Building.” free consulting services to Located at 2186 Lincoln, the building houses Ogden City police and fire departments those in our community along with Weber 911 dispatch center. The name on the building will forever be a symbol interested in starting, of courage and honor, and will stand as a public reminder of Officer Jared Daniel Francom’s growing, and evaluating exemplary service to our community. their small business. New Bus Service transports Skiers to Ogden Area Ski Resorts These experts are Ogden City, along with Weber County, is pleased to announce a new agreement with particularly adept in Utah Transit Authority to offer seasonal bus service for skiers to reach both Snowbasin and assisting individuals with Powder Mountain resorts from various pick up sites throughout Ogden. the elements of a business This new transit option for residents and visitors who wish to enjoy the area’s ski resorts plan and securing funding is an opportunity to save on for a small business. gas money, escape winter SCORE is a nonprofit driving conditions, and avoid organization that provides possible congestion in the free business mentoring canyon. services to entrepreneurs Fare is $4.25 each way. throughout the United Service originates from the States.
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
  • Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually

    Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually

    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 annually Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connection, improve public health and enhance quality of life. • Central Corridor improvements: Expansion of the Utah Valley Express (UVX) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line to Salt Lake City; addition of a Davis County to Salt Lake City BRT line; construction of a BRT line in Ogden; and the pursuit of world class transit-oriented developments at the Point of the Mountain during the repurposing of 600 acres of the Utah State Prison after its future relocation. To learn more go to: rideuta.com VISION Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. THE POSITION The Director of Capital Development plays a critical ABOUT UTA role in getting things done at Utah Transit Authority UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from (UTA). This is a senior-level position reporting to the Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Chief Service Development Officer and is responsible Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a for cultivating projects that improve the connectivity, public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided frequency, reliability, and quality of UTA’s transit residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the offerings. This person oversees and manages corridor form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded and facility projects through environmental analysis, its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit grant funding, and design processes, then consults with service, and carpool and vanpool programs.
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah

    Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah

    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension