<<

Value-added Conversion of Waste Cooking Oil, Post-consumer PET and Soybean Meal into Biodiesel and Products

THESIS

Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University

By

Yu Dang

Graduate Program in Food, Agricultural & Biological

The Ohio State University

2016

Master's Examination Committee:

Dr. Scott A. Shearer, Advisor

Dr. Katrina Cornish, Co-Advisor

Dr. Jianjun Guan

Dr. Rudolph G. Buchheit

Copyrighted by

Yu Dang

2016

Abstract

Biodiesel is an environmentally friendly alternative to petroleum diesel. It is

biodegradable, nontoxic and has lower greenhouse gas emission profiles compared to

petroleum diesel. Polyurethane (PU) products such as PU foams and PU are

widely used in many aspects of our life. Traditionally, the PU is heavily

petroleum dependent because both the feedstocks - isocyanates and polyols - are

products. Bio-based PU products became a very promising research field

due to concerns about the environment and the depletion of petroleum resources.

Waste cooking oil (WCO), which is abundantly available and about 2 or 3 times

cheaper than virgin , is considered a good source for production of biodiesel.

Also, post-consumer PET bottles contribute a large volume fraction in the solid waste

stream and their non-biodegradability has caused concern. In this study, a sustainable

process of value-added utilization of wastes, specifically WCO and post-consumer PET

bottles for the production of biodiesel and PU foams, respectively, was developed. WCO

collected from campus cafeteria was firstly converted into biodiesel, which can be used

as vehicle fuel. Then crude glycerol (CG), a byproduct of the above biodiesel process,

was incorporated into the glycolysis process of post-consumer PET bottles collected from campus to produce polyols. Thirdly, PU foams were synthesized through the reaction of the above produced polyols with isocyanate in the presence of catalysts and other additives. The characterization of the produced biodiesel demonstrated that its properties ii meet the specification of the biodiesel standard. The effect of CG loading on the properties of polyols and PU foams were investigated. With the increase of CG loading from 0% -15%, the hydroxyl value increased from 478 mg KOH/g to 592 mg KOH/g.

This is most likely due to the high hydroxyl value of glycerol (1829 mg KOH/g). The PU foams produced showed density of 46.03-47.66 kg/m3 and compressive strength of 235.9

to 299.9 kPa, which are comparable to some petroleum-based analogs. A mass balance

and a cost analysis for the conversion of WCO and waste PET into biodiesel and PU

foams indicate potential economic viability of the developed process.

Soybean meal (SM) is the residue after the extraction of oil from

soybeans. With its high protein content, SM has the potential to become one of the

feedstocks for PU production. In this study, a novel way was developed to produce UV- curable PU acrylate coatings from SM. High oleic SM was hydrolyzed by dilute acid to amino acid oligomers, then a hydroxyl-terminated PU oligomer was synthesized through a non-isocyanate pathway: i) amination of the amino acid oligomers with ethylene diamine to produce amino-terminated compound; ii) amidation of the amino-terminated compound was reacted with ethylene carbonate. Functionalization of hydroxyl- terminated PU oligomers was achieved by esterification and acrylation reactions to produce PU acrylate oligomers. PU acrylate oligomers were then formulated with multifunctional monomer and photo initiator to form a PU under UV light. The

PU oligomer after esterification showed a hydroxyl value of 223 mg KOH/g and around 6.1 Pa·s at 10.9 1/s shear rate. The UV-cured coating showed higher tensile strength (approximately 18.2 MPa) and modulus (approximately 450.1 MPa), and

iii

lower elongation at break (approximately 4.5%) compared to other PU acrylate coatings

reported in literature, which might due to hydrogen bonding between amino acid and

urethane bond and enhanced cross-linking density with the incorporation of oleic acid in

esterification reaction.

In summary, the value-added conversion of WCO, post-consumer PET bottles and

SM into Biodiesel and PU products (i.e. PU foams and coatings) have been successfully

developed in this study. All the parameters of biodiesel produced from WCO meet the

requirements in the ASTM D6751 standard. The PU foams showed good compressive strength and insulation properties and have potential application as construction materials. The PU coatings also showed promising mechanical properties and good thermal stability.

iv

This document is dedicated to my family.

v

Acknowledgments

I would like to say thank my advisor, Dr. Scott Shearer, and my co-advisor Dr.

Katrina Cornish for their support, encouragement and guidance to me. I also would like to thank Dr. Rudolph Buchheit and Dr. Jianjun Guan for their time and effort as my committee members. Furthermore, I want to thank Mrs. Candy McBride and Mrs. Peggy

Christman for their administrative support, Mrs. Mary Wicks for proofreading and providing useful suggestions to my and proposals, and Mr. Michael Klingman for his technical support on my research.

My appreciation also goes to Dr. Fuqing Xu, Dr. Feng Wang, Dr. Xumeng Ge,

Dr. Chun Chang, Ms. Juliana Vasco Correa, Mrs. Danping Jiang, Mrs. Xiaoying Zhao,

Mr. Lu Zhang Mr. Johnathon Sheets and many more for their help and friendship. I would give my special thanks to Dr. Xiaolan Luo who gave me lots of advice and help on my research, Dr. Mark Soucek and Dr. Zhouying He from The University of Akron for their help and support on my project. I also want to thank Ms. Kathryn Lawson and Mr.

Josh Borgemenke for their support on the courses I took in Columbus. Lastly, I would like to thank my family, my boyfriend Kyle Smith and my beloved friends Wenna Chen,

Fang Qiu, Rao Fu and Yuli Fan for their constant encouragement and understanding to me through the two years of my graduate study and for always believe in me and support my choices.

vi

Vita

1991...... Born, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

2014...... B.S. Materials and Engineering,

Sichuan University, China

2014 to present ...... Graduate Teaching Associate, Department

of Food, Agricultural and Biological

Engineering, The Ohio State University

Publications

1. Shi, Y., Huang, G., Liu, Y., Qu, Y., Zhang, D., Dang, Y. Synthesis and thermal properties of novel room temperature vulcanized (RTV) rubber containing POSS units in polysioxane main chains. Journal of Polymer Research (2013) 20:245, DOI:

10.1007/s10965-013-0245-y

2. Dang, Y., Luo, X., Wang, F., Li, Y. Value-Added Conversion of Waste Cooking

Oil and Post-consumer PET Bottles into Biodiesel and Polyurethane Foams. Waste

Management (2016) 52:360-6, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.054

vii

Fields of Study

Major Field: Food, Agricultural & Biological Engineering

viii

Table of Contents

Abstract ...... ii

Acknowledgments...... vi

Vita ...... vii

Table of Contents ...... ix

List of Tables ...... xiii

List of Figures ...... xiv

Chapter 1: Introduction ...... 1

1.1 Background ...... 1

1.2 Research hypothesis ...... 4

1.3 Research objectives ...... 4

Chapter 2: Literature review ...... 6

2.1 Introduction ...... 6

2.2 Polyols and PUs from CG ...... 7

2.2.1 Polyols and PUs from direct conversion of CG ...... 7

2.2.2 Polyols and PUs from CG based liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass ...... 10

ix

2.3 Polyols and PUs from glycolyzation of PET ...... 12

2.4 polyols and PUs from protein based feedstocks ...... 15

2.4.1 Introduction of different types of protein feedstocks ...... 15

2.4.2. Polyols from protein feedstocks ...... 17

2.4.3 PUs of protein feedstocks ...... 19

Chapter 3 Value-Added Conversion of Waste Cooking Oil and Post-consumer PET

Bottles into Biodiesel and Polyurethane Foams ...... 22

3.1 Introduction ...... 22

3.2 Experimental ...... 24

3.2.1 Materials ...... 24

3.2.2 Characterization of WCO ...... 25

3.2.3 Production of biodiesel from WCO ...... 26

3.2.4 Characterization of biodiesel and CG from biodiesel production ...... 26

3.2.5 Synthesis of polyols ...... 27

3.2.6 Characterization of polyols ...... 27

3.2.7 Synthesis of PU foams ...... 28

3.2.8 Characterization of PU foams ...... 28

3.3 Results and Discussion ...... 29

3.3.1 Properties of biodiesel and CG from WCO ...... 29

x

3.3.2 Properties of polyols...... 30

3.3.3 Performance of PU foams ...... 32

3.3.4 Structural characterization...... 35

3.3.5 Mass balance and cost analyses of the process from WCO and waste PET to

biodiesel and PU foams ...... 36

3.4 Conclusion ...... 39

Chapter 4 Value-added Conversion of soybean meal into UV-curable polyurethane acrylate coatings...... 40

4.1 Introduction ...... 41

4.2 Materials and methods ...... 41

4.2.1 Materials ...... 41

4.2.2 Measurements...... 42

4.2.3 Synthesis of glutamic acid based hydroxyl terminated PU oligomer ...... 43

4.2.4 Synthesis of SM based polyol ...... 43

4.2.5 Preparation of UV cured PU coating...... 48

4.3 Results and discussion ...... 48

4.3.1 Model compound glutamic acid based polyol...... 48

4.3.2 SM-based polyol ...... 50

4.3.3 Properties of the coating film ...... 51

xi

4.3.3.1 Mechanical properties ...... 51

4.3.3.2 Thermal properties ...... 52

4.4 Conclusions ...... 54

Chapter 5 Conclusions and Suggestions for Future Research ...... 55

5.1 Conclusions ...... 55

5.2 Suggestions for Future Research ...... 56

References ...... 57

xii

List of Tables

Table 1 PU foam production formula ...... 28

Table 2 Properties of biodiesel sample compared to ASTM D6751 standard ...... 30

Table 3 Properties of polyols from PET and CG ...... 32

Table 4 Foaming characteristics of PU foams ...... 33

Table 5 Breakdown of biodiesel production costs in dollars per liter ...... 37

Table 6 Breakdown of PU foam production costs in dollars per kilogram ...... 37

Table 7 Amine, acid and hydroxyl value of Glu and SM derived oligomers ...... 50

Table 8 Mechanical properties of SM-based PU acrylate coating ...... 52

Table 9 Thermal properties of SM-based PU acrylate coating ...... 53

xiii

List of Figures

Figure 1 Reactions involved in the thermochemical conversion of CG for the production of polyols (Li et al., 2015) ...... 9

Figure 2 Modification of protein with PEG and cyanuric chloride for the production of polyol (Li et al., 2015) ...... 18

Figure 3 Modification of protein with ethylene diamine and ethylene carbonate for the production of polyol (Li et al., 2015) ...... 19

Figure 4 The process diagram for value-added conversion of WCO and post-consumer

PET bottles into biodiesel and PU foams ...... 24

Figure 5 Mass balance analysis for the production of biodiesel and PU foams from WCO and post-consumer PET bottles ...... 24

Figure 6 Compressive strength, density, and thermal conductivity of PU foams...... 34

Figure 7 FT-IR spectra of PET, DEG, CG, Pol-9, and PUF-9 ...... 36

Figure 8 Process diagram for the conversion of SM into UV-cured PU acrylate coating 41

Figure 9 Synthesis route of hydroxyl-terminated PU oligomer ...... 46

Figure 10 Synthesis route of PUOFA and PUAO ...... 47

Figure 11 FT-IR spectra of (A) Glu-ED-EC, (B) Glu-ED, and (C) Glu ...... 48

Figure 12 Viscosity as a function of shear rate of SM-PUOFA and SM-ED-EC...... 51

Figure 13 TGA and DTA curves of UV-cured PU acrylate coating...... 53 xiv

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Background

Biodiesel is a promising alternative to fossil fuels. The production of biodiesel involves a

transesterification reaction of renewable feedstocks, such as vegetable oils and animal fat,

with . It is biodegradable and nontoxic, and has lower greenhouse gas emissions

than petroleum diesel, so is environmentally beneficial (Ma and Hanna, 1999). The

limitations to extensive commercialization of biodiesel are high cost and

competition for vegetable oil with food consumption. Waste cooking oil (WCO), which is

abundantly available and about 2.5-3.0 times cheaper than virgin vegetable oils

(Demirbas, 2009), can considerably reduce biodiesel production cost. It is estimated that

an average of 10 kilograms of total waste grease per person are produced annually in the

U.S. (Wiltsee, 1998).

Crude glycerol (CG) is a major byproduct generated during biodiesel production.

Basically, the production of every 10 kg of biodiesel yields approximately 1 kg of CG

(Kongjao et al., 2010). Depending on the feedstock, the process and the post-treatment methods used, CG contains various impurities such as free fatty acids (FFAs), alcohols, water, salts, and soap and has a low value (approximately $0.11/kg) (Johnson and Taconi,

2007). The refining of CG to pure glycerol is an important value-added processing step

because glycerol is a versatile platform chemical in the industries of foods and beverages, 1

pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, textiles, etc. However, refining processes are costly

(approximately $0.44/kg (Werpy et al., 2004)), especially for small- and medium-sized biodiesel plants (Pachauri and He, 2006). CG has become a potential financial and environmental liability for biodiesel producers (Johnson and Taconi, 2007). Many studies have been conducted to develop both chemical and biological processes for value-added

conversion of CG (Johnson and Taconi, 2007; Pachauri and He, 2006; Pagliaro et al.,

2007; Yang et al., 2012). Examples of products derived from CG include: 1,3-

propanediol (Mu et al., 2006; Oh et al., 2008), citric acid (Rywińska and Rymowicz,

2010), hydrogen (Sabourin-Provost and Hallenbeck, 2009), poly(hydroxyalkanoates)

(Mothes et al., 2007), succinic acid (Scholten et al., 2009), polyols, and polyurethane

(PU) foams (Hu et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2013).

Poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a semi-crystalline material widely used in the manufacture of fibers, films and materials-mainly bottles.

Although waste PET materials do not create a direct hazard to the environment, its

substantial fraction by volume in the waste stream and its high resistance to atmospheric

and biological agents has led to concerns over its environmental pollution (Paszun and

Spychaj, 1997; Sinha et al., 2010). Recycling and reprocessing PET can serve as a way to

reduce solid waste and also contribute to the conservation of raw petrochemical products

and energy. Chemical recycling is one of the most attractive techniques of recycling PET

waste as it can depolymerize PET to generate feedstocks for the production of highly

valuable (Sinha et al., 2010). Chemical recycling of PET can be divided by the

type of chemical agents used: hydrolysis of PET is carried out in alkaline solution or

2

concentrated acid (Paszun and Spychaj, 1997); glycolysis of PET is carried out in

glycols, most frequently ethylene glycol (Baliga and Wong, 1989),

(Pardal and Tersac, 2006), propylene glycol(Vaidya and Nadkarni, 1987) or dipropylene

glycol (Vaidya and Nadkarni, 1988); methanolysis of PET is carried out in methanol

(Kishimoto et al., 1999; Yang et al., 2002).

Soybeans are widely grown as an industrial crop cultivated for oil and protein. Soybeans

account for 55% global oilseed production and 90% U.S. oilseed production (Cromwell,

2011). In the U.S., about 70% of soybean oil goes to human consumption; about 22%

goes to the production of biodiesel, and the remainder to other uses, including the

production of coatings, inks, lubricants, soy polyols and other industrial products.

Soybean meal (SM) is the soy protein residue after oil extraction, for each ton of crude

soybean oil, about 4.5 tons of SM is produced (Watchararuji et al., 2008). SM has long been considered an excellent supplemental protein source in diets for livestock and poultry because of its high content (44% to 49%) of digestible protein. Recently, soy-

based , , films and coatings are being considered in agricultural

equipment, marine infrastructure, automobiles and civil engineering (Kumar et al., 2002).

However, the low mechanical properties and weak water resistance of soy protein has

hindered expansion of its industrial use. Nowadays, most SM is used as animal feed

(96.49%), and only a small portion (3.29%)is refined to flour, concentrates or isolates

suitable for human consumption, and an even smaller amount (0.22%) of SM is used

industrial applications, such as fibers, adhesives, and coatings (United Soybean

Board, 2015).

3

PUs are versatile polymeric materials and can be used in many aspects of modern life.

Due to the large variety of their isocyanate and polyol feedstocks, PUs can be easily

tailored for wide applications, such as foams, coatings, adhesives, constructional

materials, fibers, paddings, , and synthetic skins. Traditionally, the PU

industry is heavily petroleum dependent because isocyanates and polyols are both

petrochemical products. With the growing awareness of the need to find alternatives to

petroleum resources, the demand for green or bio-based PUs is increasing. Different

renewable feedstocks have been studied for the production of bio-based polyols and PU,

including vegetable oils and their derivatives, lignocellulosic biomass, and protein based

feedstocks (Li et al., 2015).

In this study, we developed a sustainable process for value-added conversion of WCO and post-consumer PET bottles into biodiesel and PU foams, and a process for the production of UV-cured PU acrylate coatings from SM, respectively. The properties of the produced biodiesel, polyols, PU foams and PU acrylate coatings were evaluated. The effects of CG loading on properties of polyols and the resulting PU foam also were investigated. A mass balance and a cost analysis for the conversion of WCO and waste

PET to biodiesel and PU foams are discussed.

1.2 Research hypothesis

The central hypothesis of this study is that CG, post-consumer PET materials and SM can

be can be effectively utilized for the production of polyols and PU products with

commercially-acceptable properties and production costs.

1.3 Research objectives

4

1) Produce biodiesel and PU foams from WCO and post-consumer PET bottles, investigate the effect of CG loading on the properties of polyols and PU foams, conduct mass balance and cost analysis of the whole process. (Chapter 3)

2) Prepare UV-cured PU acrylate coatings from SM and evaluate their mechanical properties and thermal properties. (Chapter 4)

5

Chapter 2: Literature review

2.1 Introduction

Polyol generally refers to compounds that contain two or more reactive hydroxyl

groups in one molecule. Polyols used in polyurethane (PU) manufacture are divided into

two groups based on their structure. The first group is monomeric polyols with low

molecular weight (Mw), such as: propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol,

diethylene glycol, 1, 4 butanediol, triethanolamine, glycerol, and others. These polyols

are often used as chain extenders and crosslinkers in PU production. The second group is

polymeric polyols, i.e. polyols that are low Mw polymers with terminal hydroxyl groups.

Most common polymeric polyols used in the PU industry are polyether and polyester polyols (Ionescu, 2005). By controlling the functionality of the initiator and the degree of polymerization, a wide range of polyols are commercially available for various types of

PU applications. Generally, polyols with high functionality (3.0-8.0), low molecular weight (150-1000 g/mol), and high hydroxyl value (250-1000 mg KOH/g) are used for

the production of rigid foams and high performance coatings, while polyols with low

functionality (2.0-3.0), higher molecular weight (1000-6500 g/mol), and low hydroxyl

value are used for the production of flexible foams and elastomers (Fink, 2005; Szycher,

1999).

6

Currently, the PU industry is heavily depended on petroleum derivatives, because

most commercial polyols and isocyanates are petrochemical products. Recently, concern

over the depletion of petroleum has led to the development of bio-based polyols and PUs from renewable sources. Three major sources for producing bio-based polyols include: vegetable oils and their derivatives, lignocellulosic biomass and protein-based feedstocks

(Li et al., 2015).

Vegetable oils, such as palm oil, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, and sunflower seed oil, and their derivatives have been widely used for the production of polyols and PUs. The pathways for the production of polyols from vegetable oils are: (1) epoxidation and oxirane ring-opening, (2) hydroformylation and hydrogenation, (3) ozonolysis, (4) thiol- ene coupling, and (5) transesterification/ amidation (Li et al., 2015). The polyols and PUs prepared from vegetable oils have comparable properties to petroleum-based analogs.

However, polyols and PUs made from vegetable oils and their derivatives still face challenges including technical barriers and high cost. It is also worth noting that the production of polyols and PUs from vegetable oils will compete with food supplies and biodiesel production.

Value-added conversion of biodiesel industry byproducts such as crude glycerol

(CG) and soybean meal (SM) into biobased polyols and PU products has the potential to improve the economics of biodiesel production as well as the sustainability of the polyol and PU industry.

2.2 Polyols and PUs from CG

2.2.1 Polyols and PUs from direct conversion of CG

7

Direct utilization of CG to produce bio-based polyols and PU foams has been reported. Hoong et al. (Hoong et al., 2011) produced polyglycerol from CG. The preferred CG composition from biodiesel industry was: 60 to 90% glycerol, 10 to 25% methanol and 10 to 15% soap. The process steps included (a) thermal dehydration reaction of CG to polyglycerol at 270ºC for 3 to 5 hours, soap in CG could act as a catalyst in this step, (b) acidification of the crude product with phosphoric acid at 50-

90ºC, (c) centrifugation to separate the fatty acid and salt from the product. However, the properties of the polyglycerol produced through this process, such as hydroxyl values, were not tested, and the feasibility of using polyglycerol for the production of PU materials was not investigated. Thermochemical conversion of CG for polyols was also reported (Hu et al., 2015; Li et al., 2014; Luo et al., 2013). The reactions involved in the thermochemical conversion are mainly (1) acidification of soap using sulfuric acid, (2) esterification of glycerol and fatty acids, (3) transesterification of glycerol and fatty acid methyl (FAME) (Figure 1) (Li et al., 2015). The reaction parameters, such as sulfuric acid loading, reaction temperature and reaction time, were investigated by Luo et al. (Luo et al., 2013). It was discovered that the preferred reaction conditions for the CG used in the study (composition: 22.9% glycerol, 10.9% methanol, 18.2% water, 26.2% soap, 21.3% FAMEs, 1.0% FFAs, and 1.2% glycerides) were 200ºC, 90 min and 3% sulfuric acid loading. Hu et al. (Hu et al., 2015) also investigated the effect of soap content in CG on polyol production. Their study showed that at higher soap levels,

FAMEs were converted more rapidly than at low levels due to the intensified emulsifying and/or catalytic effects of soap. However, it is worth noting that high residual soap

8

content in the polyols is unfavorable for PU production. Therefore, after balancing these

two contradictory effects of soap, they concluded that the preferred soap content was

6.6%, and the polyol produced at 190ºC and 120 min had low FFA (< 1%) and FAME

(ca. 2.5%) contents.

Figure 1 Reactions involved in the thermochemical conversion of CG for the production of polyols (Li et al., 2015)

Polyols produced from CG have been used to make PU foams and waterborne PU coatings. PU foams using polyol produced from CG (acid value 5.02 ± 0.03mg KOH/g, hydroxyl value 481± 10 mg KOH/g) and polymeric methylene-4,4’-diphenyl

9

diisocyanate (pMDI) (Luo et al., 2013) had a compressive strength of 184.5 kPa and a

density of 43.0 kg/m3, both of which are comparable to petroleum based and vegetable oil

based analogs (Li et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2013). Waterborne PU coatings derived from

CG-based polyols had higher glass transition temperatures (Tg) (66-81 ºC) than coatings from soybean oil-based polyol due to higher functionality (fn: 4.7) and higher hydroxyl

number (378 mg KOH/g) of the CG-based polyols. The waterborne PU coatings from

CG-based polyol also had similar thermal degradation properties as vegetable-oil based

PU coatings, excellent properties and low flexibility (Hu et al., 2015).

2.2.2 Polyols and PUs from CG based liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass

Lignocellulosic biomass refers to the dry matter in plants, and is the world’s most

abundant renewable biomass feedstock. The main structural units in lignocellulosic

biomass are carbohydrate polymers (30-35% , 15-35% hemicellulose), and

aromatic polymers (20-35% ), all of which are highly functionalized materials rich

in hydroxyl groups, making them promising candidate for bio-based polyol production.

Currently, polyols from lignocellulosic biomass are mainly produced by two

technologies: (1) oxypropylation and (2) liquefaction. The oxypropylation of

lignocellulosic biomass is a polymerization process that grafts oligo (propylene oxide) or

propylene oxide onto macromolecular structures of lignocellulosic biomass. The reaction

often requires KOH as catalyst and is often carried out under high pressure (650-1820

kPa) and high temperature (100-200 ºC) (Evtiouguina et al., 2000; Li et al., 2015). The

polyols produced from oxypropylation process is a mixture containing oxypropylated

10

biomass, poly propylene oxide, and some unreacted or partially oxypropylated biomass,

and usually can be directly used in the production of PU materials (Aniceto et al., 2012).

Liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass is the degradation and decomposition processes of biomass into smaller molecules by polyhydric alcohols via solvolytic reactions. The liquefaction process is often conducted at elevated temperatures (150-250

ºC) under atmospheric pressure, and can be either acid- or base-catalyzed. Polyols produced via liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass are a mixture of different compounds rich in hydroxyl groups and can be used directly in the preparation of PU foams (Yan et al., 2008), adhesives (Juhaida et al., 2010; Lee and Lin, 2008) and films

(Kurimoto et al., 2001).

A variety of lignocellulosic biomasses such as wood, wheat straw, corn bran and cornstalks have been studied for production of polyols by either oxypropylation or liquefaction.

Currently, almost all liquefaction are expensive petroleum-derived polyhydric alcohols, such as glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerol and ethylene carbonate. Typically, 5-6.25 g /g biomass is needed to obtain high-quality polyols.

Because of its potential to reduce the high cost of solvent and increase the sustainability of the biomass liquefaction process, CG from the biodiesel industry has also been studied as an alternative biomass liquefaction solvent for polyol production. The effects of reaction temperature, reaction time, sulfuric acid loading and biomass loading on the liquefaction process of soybean straw have been evaluated (Hu et al., 2012). With an increase in reaction temperature from 120 to 240 ºC, the biomass conversion rate

11

increased from 15% to 50%, the viscosity of the polyol increased from 36 to higher than

100 Pa·s, the polyol hydroxyl and acid value decreased from approximately 635 to 533

mg KOH/g and from 23 to 2.7 mg KOH/g, respectively. Increasing reaction time from 45

to 360 min increased the biomass conversion ratio from 46% to 75%. The optimal

loading of sulfuric acid as catalyst was between 3% and 5%, and optimal biomass loading

was between 10% and 15%. This study showed that liquefaction temperature, reaction

time, and acid loading had significant effects on the density of the PU foams (p <0.05),

while liquefaction temperature, reaction time and biomass loading had significant effects

on the compressive strength of the PU foams (p <0.05). Despite the slightly lower

biomass liquefaction efficiency, the polyols and PU foams produced exhibited properties

comparable to those prepared from conventional petroleum solvent based liquefaction

processes (Hu et al., 2012). A two-step sequential CG-based liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass (corn stover) also was developed (Hu and Li, 2014). The first step, acid-catalyzed liquefaction, was highly effective in liquefying biomass, which helped enhance biomass conversion rate; the second step, base-catalyzed liquefaction, featured extensive condensation reactions, increased the molecular weight of the produced polyol and decreased its acid number. The PU foams produced using polyol from the two-step liquefaction process showed higher compressive strength than those of

PU foams produced from only acid- or base-catalyzed biomass liquefaction process, and are excellent thermal insulation materials due to their low thermal conductivity (Hu and

Li, 2014).

2.3 Polyols and PUs from glycolyzation of PET

12

PET is semi-crystalline thermoplastic polyester that has been widely used in the

manufacture of apparel fibers, disposable soft-drink bottles, and photographic films (Mir

et al., 2012). This has caused environmental concerns due to large number of post-

consumer PET products, especially bottles and . Although PET products are

non-toxic and do not create a direct hazard to the environment, they have high resistance

to atmospheric and biological agents, and have a high volume fraction in solid waste

streams. Chemical recycling of PET materials have many advantages over land filling of

such non-biodegradable material: (1) consumption of waste materials by converting them

into new useful materials, (2) conversion of a non-biodegradable polymer into a

biodegradable one (Mir et al., 2012). Among many PET chemolysis processes, such as hydrolysis (Paszun and Spychaj, 1997), alcoholysis (Kishimoto et al., 1999; Yang et al.,

2002), glycolysis (Baliga and Wong, 1989; Pardal and Tersac, 2006; Vaidya and

Nadkarni, 1987), aminolysis (Shukla and Harad, 2006), and ammonolysis (Blackmon et

al., 1990), glycolysis using various glycols is most popular. During the glycolysis

reaction, PET polymer is depolymerized by glycols, which break the linkages and

replace them with hydroxyl groups in the presence of trans-esterification catalysts

(mainly metal acetates). The effects of reaction conditions, such as type of glycol used, glycolysis time, glycolysis temperature, catalyst concentration, and glycol concentration on the glycolysis process of PET, have been studied (Chen et al., 2001; Pardal and

Tersac, 2006). Glycolysis of PET by diethylene glycol (DEG), dipropylene glycol (DPG) and glycerol (Gly) was studied at 220 ºC without catalyst and at 190 ºC with titanium

(IV) n-butoxide by Pardal and Tersac (Pardal and Tersac, 2006). It was found that the

13

order of reactivity for uncatalyzed glycolysis at 220 ºC is: DEG Gly DPG, while the

order of reactivity for catalyzed reactions is DEG > DPG Gly.≫ DEG showed≫ the best

reactivity in both reaction conditions and allows low molecular≫ mass oligomers to be

obtained quickly. A 23 factorial experiment studied the main, two-factor interaction and three-factor interaction effect of glycolysis temperature, glycolysis time, and the amount of catalyst (cobalt acetate) on the glycolysis of recycled postconsumer soft-drink PET bottles. The sequence of main effects on the glycolysis conversion of PET was found to be: catalysis concentration > glycolysis temperature > glycolysis time (Chen et al., 2001).

Luo and Li (Luo and Li, 2014) reported for the first time the utilization of CG in the

recycling process of waste PET to produce polyols. In their study, post-consumer PET

was first glycolyzed by DEG, the obtained PET oligomer was then further reacted with

pretreated CG at different weight ratios. They concluded that increasing weight ratio of

CG to PET and DEG, lead to polyols with decreased molecular weights and ,

and increased hydroxyl numbers. Polyols prepared using CG as the sole glycolysis agent

showed slightly higher acid values than those of polyols prepared from DEG and CG

(Luo and Li, 2014). Chaudhary et al (Chaudhary et al., 2013) reported micro-wave assisted glycolysis of PET for preparation of polyester polyols, and they discovered that the reaction time required for glycolysis using microwave (about 30 min) is significantly shorter than conventional thermal glycolytic processes (8-9 h for the same level of depolymerization).

The polyols produced from recycled PET have been used to produce PU foams and coatings. Vitkauskiene et al. (Vitkauskiene et al., 2011) synthesized polyurethane-

14

polyisocyanurate (PU-PIR) foams from a series of aromatic polyester polyols from

glycolysis of PET waste using DEG. In their study, glycerol, adipic acid, polypropylene glycol and hexanediol also were tested as functional additives in the glycolysis process.

PU-PIR foams based on PET-waste-derived polyols had high isocyanurate yield (67%-

90%), high closed cell content (more than 94%), and excellent mechanical properties exceeding those of typical PU-PIR foams. They also discovered that the incorporation of glycerol as a functional additive decreased isocyanurate yield, core density, and tensile strength but increased elongation at break, while the incorporation of adipic acid acted vice versa (Vitkauskiene et al., 2011). Kathalewar et al. (Kathalewar et al., 2013) glycolyzed post-consumer PET using neopentyl glycol and prepared PU coatings from the glycolyzed oligomers. The coatings showed excellent gloss and chemical resistance,

good hardness and thermal stability, but poor impact resistance due to the brittle nature of

the films (Kathalewar et al., 2013).

2.4 polyols and PUs from protein based feedstocks

2.4.1 Introduction of different types of protein feedstocks

Proteins are large macromolecules (polypeptides) formed by linking many α- amino acids via amide bonds (peptide bonds). The presence of many functional groups, such as amino (-NH2) groups, carboxyl (-COOH) groups, hydroxyl (-OH) groups and disulfide (-S-S-) groups (Schulz and Schirmer, 1979), makes protein a promising material

for the production of bio-based polymeric materials. Feedstocks that contain high protein

content are also abundant in nature, including soybean protein products, such as soy

flour, defatted SM, soy protein concentrates, and soy protein isolates (Kumar et al.,

15

2002a). Each of the soybean protein products have different protein content and are used to produce different protein products in the . Soy flour has a protein content ranging from 40-60% (Kumar et al., 2002a) and is used as a source material for soymilk, tofu and other specialty foods (Singh et al., 2008). SM has a protein content ranging from

10-90%, and is often used as animal feed (United Soybean Board, 2015). Soy protein concentrates contain about 60-70% protein (Kumar et al., 2002a), and are used in bakery products, baby foods, cereals and milk replaces (Singh et al., 2008). Soy protein isolates have the highest protein content (80-90%) (Kumar et al., 2002a) and are often used as poultry and meat protein replacements (Singh et al., 2008). Corn is another high volume protein source, with products such as corn gluten meal, corn gluten feed, distillers dried grains (DDG), and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Corn gluten meal has the highest protein content (65%), corn gluten feed has about 23% protein content, and

DDGS has about 27% protein content. Zein, a functional prolamine protein, can be produced from corn gluten meal and has been used in the production of plastics, coatings, inks, chewing gum, and fibers (Anderson and Lamsa, 2011). A third source, wheat gluten, generally contains about 75-85% protein and has been successfully utilized for the production of bio-based plastics (Domenek et al., 2004). Fourthly, algal biomass, which can be classified into macroalgal and microalgal biomass, following the extraction of oil for the production of biodiesel, has a protein content of about 48%. In order to improve the economics of algae oil based biodiesel, value-added conversion of algae biomass residue including the production of methane through anaerobic digestion has been developed (Chisti, 2007).

16

2.4.2. Polyols from protein feedstocks

Two methods are mainly used for the production of polyols from protein feedstocks: (1) modification of proteins into polyols, (2) liquefaction of proteins. The modification of proteins have been achieved via the addition reaction with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-aldehyde, or the substitution reaction with cyanuric chloride-modified PEG

(Figure 2) (Li et al., 2015). Oxypropylation of hydrolysate of SM mixed with sucrose based polyol has been reported to produce polyols (Narayan et al., 2014). The derived polyol obtained from oxypropylation had a hydroxyl value of 442 mg KOH/g, an amine value of 102 mg KOH/g and a water content lower that 0.2% (Narayan et al., 2014).

Algal protein-based polyols have been produced through reactions of algal hydrolysate with ethylene diamine and ethylene carbonate (Figure 3) (Kumar et al., 2014a). The polyols obtained showed a hydroxyl value of 422 mg KOH/g, an acid value of 3 mg

KOH/g, and an amine value of 26 mg KOH/g (Kumar et al., 2014a).

17

Figure 2 Modification of protein with PEG and cyanuric chloride for the production of

polyol (Li et al., 2015)

18

Figure 3 Modification of protein with ethylene diamine and ethylene carbonate for the

production of polyol (Li et al., 2015)

Liquefaction also has been shown to be effective in generating protein-based feedstocks for polyol production. Liquefaction of DDG under atmospheric pressure in ethylene carbonate with sulfuric acid as catalyst was most successful using a liquefaction solvent/DDG ratio of 4, liquefaction temperature of 160 ºC, liquefaction time of 2 h, and sulfuric acid loading of 3 wt% (Yu et al., 2008).

2.4.3 PUs of protein feedstocks

PU foams, coatings/films, and composites/plastics have been successfully prepared based on protein feedstocks. Both algae polyol and SM polyol were used in

19

combination with other polyols to prepare PU foams. The most noticeable property of

foams formulated with algae-based polyol and SM based polyol was the self-catalytic

property due to the presence of tertiary amine groups in their protein structures. This was

confirmed by shorter cream time, time, rise time, and tack-free time compared to

reference foam samples from commercial polyols. Both algae- and SM-based foams

showed similar physical properties to reference foams (Kumar et al., 2014b; Narayan et

al., 2014).

Soy protein has significant potential for the production of coatings and films due

to its good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and processability (Song et al., 2011).

However, poor water resistance and brittleness of soy protein-based films has limited

their use in industrial applications. Various modification methods have been studied

including denaturation and cleavage of proteins, crosslinking, enzyme modification, plasticization, and blending with other polymers (Kumar et al., 2002b; Tong et al., 2015).

Among these methods, blending is the most popular and useful one (Li et al., 2015). Liu et al. (Liu et al., 2008) have successfully prepared blended films from hydrophobic castor oil-based PU and p-phenylene diamine soy protein (PDSP), and the blended films combined good mechanical properties with optical transmittance. It was discovered that

PDSP exhibited good miscibility with PU with its content varying from 10 to 80 wt%, and PDSP and PU had strong hydrogen bond and chemical cross-linking interactions.

With the increase of PU content, the blend films showed increased elongation at break, thermal stability, and water resistance and decreased tensile strength and Young’s modulus (Liu et al., 2008). Waterborne PU (WPU) was used to modify soy protein isolate

20

(SPI) to improve the flexibility and water resistance of the soy protein films (Tian et al.,

2010). The blended films exhibited good compatibility due to strong hydrogen bonding interactions between the SPI and WPU. Not only did the blended film have improved flexibility and water resistance, the incorporation of WPU also enhanced the mechanical properties of the blend films in water, leading to the applications suited to wet conditions

(Tian et al., 2010).

PU composites/plastics are the materials that combine PU and other constituent materials with different physical or chemical properties. PU composites/plastics containing protein feedstocks have been reported in which a series of protein composites from 30 to 50 wt% PU prepolymer (PUP) with soy dreg (SD), soy whole flour (SWF), and soy protein isolate (SPI) were compression-molded at 120 ºC(Chen et al., 2003). The results in this study indicated that the protein component in the soy products plays an important role in the enhancement of adhesivity, processability and biodegradability of the composites. It is also possible to obtain different materials, from to , by changing the type of soy protein product and the content of PUP (Chen et al., 2003).

Zein-based PUs were synthesized by chemical modification of zein protein with

isocyanates (phenyl isocyanate (PI) and n-hexyl isocyanate (HI)) and diisocyanates

(isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) and methylenediphenyl 4,4’-diisocyanate (MDI)) (Sessa et al., 2013). Moisture uptake decreased with isocyanate and diisocyanate modifications, indicating improved waster resistance of zein-based PU polymers compared to pure zein polymers. The authors suggested potential applications of zein-based PUs in , floor coating, and ink (Sessa et al., 2013).

21

Chapter 3 Value-Added Conversion of Waste Cooking Oil and Post-consumer PET Bottles into Biodiesel and Polyurethane Foams

Value-added utilization of waste cooking oil (WCO) and post-consumer PET bottles for the production of biodiesel and polyurethane (PU) foams was developed.

WCO collected from campus cafeteria was firstly converted into biodiesel, and then crude glycerol (CG), a byproduct of the above biodiesel process, was incorporated into the glycolysis process of post-consumer PET bottles to produce polyols. PU foams were synthesized from the above produced polyols. The characterization of the produced biodiesel demonstrated that its properties meet the specification of biodiesel standard.

The effect of CG loading on the properties of polyols and PU foams were investigated.

All the polyols showed satisfactory properties for the production of rigid PU foams which had performance comparable to those of some petroleum-based analogs. A mass balance and a cost analysis for the conversion of WCO and post-consumer PET into biodiesel and

PU foams were also discussed. This study demonstrated the potential of WCO and PET waste for the production of value-added products.

3.1 Introduction

Biodiesel (fatty acid ester) produced by transesterification of renewable feedstocks such as vegetable oils and animal fats with alcohol, has been widely

22

considered as an alternative to petroleum diesel. However, the commercialization of

biodiesel is mainly limited by its high manufacturing cost (Camobreco et al., 1998;

Meher et al., 2006). WCO, as a cheaper alternative than virgin vegetable oil, can largely

reduce the biodiesel production cost. The production of biodiesel from WCO is mainly

performed under the catalysis of alkalis, acids, or enzymes, with alkaline catalysts such as

NaOH, KOH, and NaOCH3 being most commonly used due to their higher reaction rate

than acid and enzymatic catalysts. CG is a byproduct of the biodiesel production process.

It has the potential to be converted into value-added products through biological or

chemical reactions. Chemical recycling of PET can depolymerize PET to generate feedstocks for the production of highly valuable polymers (Sinha et al., 2010). In this chapter, value-added conversion of WCO and post-consumer PET bottles into biodiesel

and PU foams was successfully developed (Figure 4). The biodiesel production from

WCO and the glycolyzation of post-consumer PET were integrated by CG. The properties of the produced value-added products, i.e. biodiesel, polyols, and PU foams, were characterized to examine the feasibility of designed process. The effects of CG loading polyols and PU foams were investigated. Mass balance and a preliminary cost analysis for this process were discussed.

23

Figure 4 The process diagram for value-added conversion of WCO and post-consumer PET bottles into biodiesel and PU foams

Figure 5 Mass balance analysis for the production of biodiesel and PU foams from WCO and post-consumer PET bottles

3.2 Experimental

3.2.1 Materials

WCO and post-consumer PET water bottles were collected from the cafeteria in

Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute (Wooster, OH) and from the recycle center at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (Wooster, OH). After the

24

removal of polyethylene caps and polypropylene , the collected PET bottles were

washed, dried, and cut into small pieces (5 × 30 mm) using a HSM Shredstar BS10CS

shredder (Downingtown, PA). DEG, glycerol, and 0.1 mol/L and 10.0 mol/L NaOH

solution were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Ethanol and

Tetrahydrofuran (THF) as high performance chromatography (HPLC) grade were

purchased from Pharmco-AAPER (Shelbyville, KY). Titanium isopropoxide,

HYDRANAL-Composite 5, HYDRANAL-Water Standard 10.0 and HYDRANAL-

Methanol Rapid for Karl Fischer titration; glycerin, monoolein, diolein, triolein,

butanetriol, tricaprin and N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) for the quantitative analysis of total monoglycerides and free/total glycerol in biodiesel, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Standard polystyrene samples were purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA). Polycat 5, polycat 8, and Dabco

DC5357 used in foaming process were obtained from Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

(Allentown, PA). Polymeric methylene-4,4´-diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI) was obtained from Bayer Material Science (Pittsburgh, PA). Chemicals were reagent grade, except those specifically mentioned.

3.2.2 Characterization of WCO

To determine whether any pretreatment was needed, the water and FFA contents of WCO were determined prior to transesterification for biodiesel production. The water content was measured by Mettler Toledo volumetric Karl Fisher compact titrator V20

(Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH) was 0.1%. The FFA content was 0.53%, measured in accordance with AOCS Ca 5a-40.

25

3.2.3 Production of biodiesel from WCO

Due to the low water and FFA contents, the transesterification of WCO was

carried out in a one-step alkali-catalyzed process for the production of biodiesel. 1,500 g

WCO, 300 mL methanol, and 9.15 g KOH (7.5 g for catalyst and 1.65 g for neutralizing the FFA) were charged into a 2.5-L glass reactor equipped with a magnetic stirring bar

(Banani et al., 2014). The mixture was stirred for 2h at 37 °C, and then settled overnight.

The crude biodiesel located in the upper layer was washed three times with deionized water to remove residues of catalysts and glycerol, and dried by rotary evaporation to yield biodiesel. The CG in the bottom layer also was collected for subsequent applications to produce polyols from PET waste. The residual methanol in the glycerol was removed by evaporation. Other common impurities of CG such as water, soap an salts (Yang et al., 2012) might still exist.

3.2.4 Characterization of biodiesel and CG from biodiesel production

The density of biodiesel samples were determined by measuring their masses in fixed volume. Dynamic viscosity was measured by a Brookfield DV-II+Pro Viscometer

(Brookfield, Middleboro, MA) at 40°C and converted to kinematic viscosity by dividing the dynamic viscosity by the fluid mass density. Water contents of biodiesel and CG were determined using a volumetric Karl Fisher compact titrator V20 (Mettler Toledo,

Columbus, OH). The glycerol and methanol contents in CG were determined using a

Shimazu LC-20 AB HPLC system (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) equipped with a RID-10A refractive index detector and a Phenomenex RFQ- Fast Fruit H+ (8%) column. The

mobile phase was 0.005 N H2SO4 aqueous solution, which ran at 60°C with a flow rate of

26

0.6 mL/min. The monoglyceride and free/total glycerol contents in the biodiesel were measured according to ASTM D6584-13 by gas chromatography (GC) using a Shimadzu

GC-2010 plus GC system (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). The results were compared to requirements for biodiesel listed in ASTM

D6751-15a.

3.2.5 Synthesis of polyols

Polyols were prepared by PET glycolysis in the presence of DEG and CG as a trifunctional additive. Glycolysis was carried out at 230°C for 4 h in a 500 mL three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, condenser, thermometer, and nitrogen inlet. Titanium isopropoxide (0.5 wt.% of PET) was added as a catalyst (Luo and Li, 2014). The molar ratio of PET to DEG was kept constant at 1:2 to investigate the effect of CG loading on the properties of polyols. The CG loading varied from 0% to 5%,

9% and 15% based on the total weight of PET, DEG or CG.

3.2.6 Characterization of polyols

Both hydroxyl and acid numbers of polyols were determined following ASTM

D4272-05D and ASTM D4662-08. The viscosities of polyols were determined in accordance with ASTM D4878-08 using a Brookfield DV-II+Pro Viscometer

(Brookfield, Middleboro, MA) at 25°C. The average molecular weights and molecular weight distributions of polyols were determined by gel permeation chromatography

(GPC) analysis in THF at 35°C with an elution rate of 1.0 mL/min using a Shimadzu LC-

20 AB GPC system (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD) equipped with a RID-10A refractive index detector, a SPD-M20A prominence photodiode array detector, and a Waters

27

styragel HR1 column (7.8 × 300 mm). Polystyrene standard samples were used to

calibrate the GPC column.

3.2.7 Synthesis of PU foams

PU foams from the above obtained polyols were prepared according to our

previous study (Hu et al., 2012). Polyols, catalysts, a , and a blowing reagent

(water) were mixed by rapid stirring using a hand mixer for 10-15 s in a 250 mL plastic

cup to achieve homogeneous mixing. Pre-weighed pMDI with an isocyanate index of 110 was then quickly added and vigorously mixed for 5 s. The mixture was poured into a square wood (11cm × 11cm × 11cm) with aluminum foil lining and left to rise at room temperature. The cream time, rising time, and tack free time were recorded according to ASTM D7487-13. PU foams were allowed to cure at room temperature for

24 h before the thermal conductivity test, and for 1 week before density and compressive strength tests. The formula used for the PU foam preparation is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 PU foam production formula

Ingredients Parts by weight

PET-based polyols 100 Catalyst-Polycat 5 1.26 Catalyst-Polycat 8 0.84 Surfactant-DABCO DC5357 2.5 Blowing agent-Water 3 Equivalent weight for pMDI isocyanate index of 110

3.2.8 Characterization of PU foams 28

The thermal conductivity of PU foams was measured by a Lasercomp FOX 314 heat flow meter (Lasercomp, Saugus, MA) according to ASTM C518. The compressive strength parallels to the foam rise direction were measured following ASTM D1621-10 using Instron 3366 (Instron, Norwood, MA). The PU foam density was measured following ASTM D1622M-14. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy for PET,

CG, DEG, polyols and PU foams were obtained from PerkinElmer Spectrum 2 IR spectrometers (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA).

3.3 Results and Discussion

3.3.1 Properties of biodiesel and CG from WCO

As shown in Table 2, all measured parameters, including viscosity, water content, monoglyceride, and free and total glycerol of biodiesel produced from WCO, meet the requirements in ASTM D6751 standard. Compared to parameters reported for biodiesel produced from different sources of feedstock, such as beef tallow (free glycerol: 0.01%, total glycerol 0.33%, and monoglycerides: 0.13%) (da Cunha et al., 2009) and WCO with high content of FFA (free glycerol: 0.08% and total glycerol: 0.21%) (Meng et al., 2008), the biodiesel produced in this study had lower contents of free/total glycerol and monoglycerides. This indicates that complete transesterification between WCO and methanol occurred in the study. The post-treatment of crude biodiesel (separation and water washing) produced high-quality biodiesel.

29

Table 2 Properties of biodiesel sample compared to ASTM D6751 standard Kinematic Viscosity Water content Monoglycerides Free glycerol Total glycerol (mm2/s, 40°C) (% in volume) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) ASTM D6751 1.9-6.0 <0.050 <0.40 <0.02 <0.240 Biodiesel 5.5 0.049 0.06 BDLa 0.206 Note: a Below detection level (0.0001%)

The produced CG after evaporation of methanol contains 84.46% glycerol, 2.64%

water, and 4.03 % residual methanol. Compared to the CG collected from a WCO

biodiesel plant (glycerol content 27.31-30.25%, water content 5.10-8.20%) (Kongjao et

al., 2010), CG collected in this study had a much higher glycerol content and lower water

content. This difference could be attributed to the different feedstocks and the processes

used for biodiesel production. Moreover, the CG has significantly different composition

from the one previously used for the production of PET-based polyols (Luo and Li, 2014)

and may produce polyols and PU foams with different properties.

3.3.2 Properties of polyols

Polyols were synthesized by the glycolysis of PET with DEG in the presence of

different loadings of CG (0%, 5%, 9%, and 15%). The acid values of all polyols were

below 0.6 mg KOH/g (Table 3), which fell within the maximum acidity (around 2 mg

KOH/g) acceptable for polyester polyols (Ionescu, 2005). With CG content increasing

from 0 to 15%, the hydroxyl number of the derived polyols increased by 23.8%. This is

most likely due to the high hydroxyl number of glycerol (1829 mg KOH/g). Similar

results have also been observed for the PET-based polyols produced previously (Luo and

Li, 2014). In that study, as CG contains 22.9% of glycerol, the actual glycerol contents in

the reaction mixture were 6.87% and 11.45% at CG loadings of 30% and 50%,

30

respectively. Compared to polyols produced in the previous study with similar glycerol

content, the polyols in this study had higher hydroxyl numbers (Table 3), and were more

favorable for the production of rigid PU foams. The difference in hydroxyl number between the polyols obtained in the previous study and this study was mainly caused by the impurities in CG. The high contents of impurities such as fatty acid esters, soap and fatty acids in CG used for the production of PET-based polyols in the previous study participated in reactions and consumed hydroxyl groups, resulting in low hydroxyl numbers (Luo and Li, 2014). It was also observed that the dynamic viscosity and the molecular weight of polyols increased from 819.4 to 1511.5 cP and from 738 to 806 (Mn), respectively, as the CG loading increased from 0 to 15% (Table 3). This is possibly caused by the participation of glycerol in glycolysis of PET. Glycerol has been widely used as a crosslinker in polymeric material production, and could compete with DEG in the depolymerization of PET for the formation of cross-linking structures, resulting in increased molecular weights of the glycolyzed PET polyols. Furthermore, the glycolyzed

PET with increased cross-linking structures can cause more entanglement, resulting in

increased viscosity. Due to the high purity of CG, polyols yields above than 92% were

obtained under all conditions. Polyols in this study showed lower viscosity, higher

molecular weight and yield, and increased hydroxyl number compared to polyol

produced previously (Luo and Li, 2014). It concluded that the composition of CG has a

significant impact on polyol properties, which could affect PU foam performance.

31

Table 3 Properties of polyols from PET and CG

a Polyols CG Glycerol Acid # OH # Viscosity Yield Mn Mw Mw/Mn loadingb contentc (mg (mg (cP, 25°C) (wt%) (Da) (Da) (wt%) (wt%) KOH/g) KOH/g) Pol-0 0 0 0.28±0.01 477.9±7.6 819.4±6.0 97.4 738 980 1.33 Pol-5 5 4.22 0.34±0.03 526.3±5.1 1022.0±4.0 96.6 754 989 1.31 Pol-9 9 7.60 0.40±0.05 548.9±15.1 1104.5±18.5 96.3 791 1044 1.31 Pol-15 15 12.69 0.52±0.03 591.5±9.8 1511.5±9.5 92.9 806 1035 1.29 Pol-Ad 30 6.87 0.18±0.05 282.6±1.6 4994±21 68.2 763 1132 1.48 Pol-Bd 50 11.45 0.22±0.01 374.6±4.2 1810±3 68.2 671 931 1.39 Note: a For all polyols, the PET to DEG molar ratio was kept at 1:2;

b CG loading=mass(CG)/mass(CG+PET+DEG);

c Glycerol content=mass(glycerol)/mass(CG+PET+DEG);

d Polyols produced in previous study(Luo and Li, 2014).

3.3.3 Performance of PU foams

PU foams (PUF-x) were produced by the polymerization of the above prepared

PET-based polyols (Pol-x) and polymeric methylene-4,4’-diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI)

using polycat 5 and polycat 8 as catalysts, Dabco DC5357 as a surfactant, and water as a

blowing agent. As shown in Table 4, the cream time, rise time and tack free time of PU

foams increased as CG loading increased in the preparation of PET-based polyols. In

general, the cream time and rise time are related to the expansion rate, while the tack free

time is used for the characterization of gelation rate (Hu et al., 2002). As a result, the PU

foams showed slower expansion rate and gelation rate with the increase of CG loading.

This was most likely related to the increase of secondary hydroxyl groups from glycerol

and the increased viscosity of the polyols. Water content in CG might also affect the

foaming characteristics of PU foams. According to Chen et al. (Chen et al., n.d.), the

cream time, rise time and tack free time of the PU foam increase with the increase of 32 water used in the formulation. As the CG loading increasing from 0 to 15%, the water content in CG as an impurity also increased, thus resulting in increased water in polyols even the formulation remained the same for four foams with different CG loadings.

Moreover, with an increase of hydroxyl number of polyols, the required amount of pMDI increased under the same isocyanate index, and thus slightly longer time might be needed for well-mixing.

Table 4 Foaming characteristics of PU foams

PU Cream Rise time Tack free foams time (s) (s) time (s) PUF-0 8-10 14-16 13-15 PUF-5 10-12 19-21 18-20 PUF-9 16-18 23-25 20-22 PUF-15 16-18 24-25 24-25

33

350 60 Compressive strength 330 Density

)

55 1 310 -

Thermal conductivity ·K 1 -

290 m ·

50 ) 3 270

250 45

230 Density (kg/m 40 210 Compressive strength (kPa) 190 35 Thermal conductivity (mW 170

150 30 PUF-0 PUF-5 PUF-9 PUF-15

Figure 6 Compressive strength, density, and thermal conductivity of PU foams

The compressive strength, density and thermal conductivity of the PU foams made from PET-based polyols are shown in Figure 6. CG loading had little impact on the density of the foams but significantly influenced their compressive strength and thermal conductivity.

All the foams produced showed similar densities ranging from 46.03 to 47.66 kg/m3. With increasing CG loading from 0 to 15%, the compressive strength increased from 235.9 to 299.9 kPa. This could be explained by the increased cross-linking structures of polyols and the resulting PU foams due to the trifunctional characteristics of glycerol. Compared to PU foams made from polyols from PET and other CG sample

(Luo and Li, 2014), PU foams in this study showed much higher compressive strengths

34

due to the higher hydroxyl number of polyols. Moreover, the presence of very low

content fatty acid chains from impurities of CG also contributed to the improvement of

compressive strength perhaps because the dangling fatty acid chains in PU structures

could generate plasticizing effect. It further indicated that the composition of CG influences properties of PU foams. In addition, the compressive strength of PU foams were superior over that (compressive strength of 220 kPa) of a commercial analog for construction applications (Demharter, 1998). Thermal conductivity of PU foams decreased from 38.7 to 33.3 mW·m-1·k-1 with the increase of CG loading from 0 to 9%,

after which it increased to 40.8 mW·m-1·k-1 at CG loading of 15% (Figure 6). Most of the

PU foams showed thermal conductivities comparable to those of conventional rigid PU

foams (38 mW·m-1·k-1) (Kacperski and Spychaj, 1999) and commercial EPS foams (37

mW·m-1·k-1) (Zarr and Pintar, 2012). PU foams with 9% of CG loading had the best insulation properties.

3.3.4 Structural characterization

The FT-IR spectra of PET, DEG, CG, a representative polyol (pol-9), and the resulting foam are presented in Figure 7. In the spectra of DEG and CG, characteristic hydroxyl stretching at 3200-3400 cm-1 was observed, along with absorption bands related

to C–H of alkyl groups at 2850-3000 cm-1. Small peaks at 1570cm-1 and 1740 cm-1 in the spectrum of CG indicate the presence of some amount of impurities: the small band at around 1570 cm-1 represents the COO- of soap, while the small band at 1740cm-1 is

evidence of C=O of fatty acids and their esters (Kongjao et al., 2010). An absorption

band at 1714 cm-1 due to ester stretching is present in the spectrum of polyol as a result of

35

glycolysis of PET (Chaudhary et al., 2013). This peak is also present in the spectrum of

PET. The absorption bands of polyol at 3200-3400 cm-1 and 2850-3000 cm-1 are similar

to the absorption band in the spectra of DEG and CG, representing hydroxyl groups and

C–H of alkyl groups in the polyol. The spectrum of the PU foam showed the presence of

several characteristic urethane bands: –N–H stretching at 3304cm-1, C=O stretching at

1707cm-1, C–O stretching at 1217cm-1, and C-N stretching of group at

1595cm-1, and N-H bending at 1511cm-1 (Čuk et al., 2015; Mishra et al., 2009).

1714 PET

3200-3400 2850-3000 DEG

CG 1740 1570 Pol-9 Transmittance (%) Transmittance

PUF-9 1595 3304 1707 1511 1217 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm-1)

Figure 7 FT-IR spectra of PET, DEG, CG, Pol-9, and PUF-9

3.3.5 Mass balance and cost analyses of the process from WCO and waste PET to biodiesel and PU foams

36

Table 5 Breakdown of biodiesel production costs in dollars per liter

Costs for 50 L of Biodiesela($) WCOb 9.38 Methanol 2.16 Potassium hydroxide 0.28 Electricity 0.17 Water 0.02 Total 12.00 Unit cost ($/L) 0.24 bWCO price: approximately $200/ton(Zhang et al., 2003)

Table 6 Breakdown of PU foam production costs in dollars per kilogram

Costs for 50kg of PU foamsa ($) Recycled PET flakes* 2.92 CG (from biodiesel process) 0.28 DEG 4.80 TPP 0.14 Electricity 10.65 Nitrogen gas 0.74 Water 0.01 pMDI 49.49 Polycat 5 1.11 Polycat 8 0.43 DABCO DC 5357 2.72 Total 73.29 Polyol unit cost ($/kg) 1.17 Foam Unit cost($/kg) 1.47 *Recycled PET flakes market price: approximately $0.40/kg

a Unless specified, chemical prices are from http://www.icis.com,

http://www.alibaba.com, http://www.zauba.com.

During biodiesel production, the cost of raw materials, especially vegetable oil, is the biggest contributing factor for the overall operating cost. Hass et al. (Haas et al.,

2006) designed a model to calculate the annual operating costs for a 3.87 ×107 L/year biodiesel production facility. In their analysis, biodiesel production cost is around

$567/ton, in which soybean oil itself constitutes 90.2%. WCO is usually sold at $200/ton

(Zhang et al., 2003), which is much cheaper than the price of virgin canola oil ($500/ton) 37

(Zhang et al., 2003) and virgin soybean oil ($520/ton) (Haas et al., 2006). Together with other fats such as beef tallows, waste greases have the potential of producing 3.5 billion liters of biodiesel per year (Nelson et al., 1994). Based on the mass balance analysis shown in Figure 5, the estimated cost for biodiesel produced from WCO is around

$0.24/L (Table 5), which is about half the price of biodiesel produced under similar process using virgin vegetable oil as a feedstock [30].

The market price for PU foam production is about $2.2-4.4/kg, which is significantly dependent on the cost of polyol. Table 6 shows the estimated cost for the production of polyols and PU foams from PET and CG with a loading of 15%. The production cost of polyol is $1.17/kg, less than half of the average price of petrochemical-based polyol ($2.69/kg) (Nikje and Garmarudi, 2010). Besides the cost for pMDI, the main contributing factors for the overall production cost of PU foam are the cost of DEG and electricity, and the production cost of PU foam can be as low as

$1.48/kg. During the cost analysis, 50L biodiesel and 50kg PU foams were chosen to represent the scale of typical lab size production. The mass balance and preliminary cost analyses for biodiesel and PU foams production indicate a very competitive production cost advantage of the presented process in the comparison with biodiesel from virgin vegetable oil and polyols and PU foams from petroleum. Incorporating biodiesel byproduct into PET recycling for PU foams production appears a promising application.

Furthermore, the comprehensive utilization of waste into value-added products can improve the sustainability of the PU foams industry and help enhance competitiveness of biodiesel as a sustainable energy source against petroleum diesel.

38

3.4 Conclusion

A sustainable process for value-added conversion of WCO and post-consumer

PET bottles into biodiesel and PU foams was developed successfully. CG, a byproduct of the biodiesel production from WCO, can be effectively used as a functional additive during the glycolysis of post-consumer PET bottles with DEG for the production of polyols with properties suitable for rigid PU foam applications. CG composition affects the properties of polyols and PU foams. With the increase of CG loading from 0 to 15%, polyols showed increased hydroxyl numbers, viscosities, and molecular weights, and the resulting PU foams presented increased compressive strength while at similar densities.

Best insulation properties were was obtained from PET-based polyol prepared with 9%

CG. The PU foams also showed physical performance comparable to those of some of petroleum-based analogs. A preliminarily mass balance and cost analyses indicated the potential of economic viability of this process. Overall, this sustainable process effectively combined biodiesel production from WCO with recycling of post-consumer

PET bottles for PU foam production, and is promising for converting them into value- added products for industrial uses.

39

Chapter 4 Value-added Conversion of soybean meal into UV-curable polyurethane acrylate coatings

In this study, a novel way has been developed to produce UV-curable polyurethane (PU)

acrylate coatings from soybean meal (SM). High oleic SM was hydrolyzed by dilute acid

to amino acid oligomers, then a hydroxyl-terminated PU oligomer was synthesized

through a non-isocyanate method: i) amination of the amino acid oligomers with ethylene

diamine to produce amino-terminated compound; ii) amidation of the amino-terminated compound was achieved with ethylene carbonate. Functionalization of hydroxyl- terminated PU oligomers was achieved by esterification and acrylation reactions to produce PU acrylate oligomers. PU acrylate oligomers were then formulated with multifunctional monomer and photo initiator to form a PU coating under UV light. Pure glutamic acid (Glu) was used as a model compound to verify the feasibility of the process. The hydroxyl number, acid number and chemical structures of both PU acrylate oligomers derived from Glu and SM were determined. The thermal and mechanical properties, such as tensile strength, modulus, glass transition temperature and degradation temperature, of UV-cured PU acrylate coatings from SM were characterized. The diagram for this process is shown in Figure 8.

40

Figure 8 Process diagram for the conversion of SM into UV-cured PU acrylate coating

4.1 Introduction

SM is the soy protein residue after oil extraction, and has long been considered a promising feedstock for the production of bio-based polymer materials due to its high protein content.

UV radiation curing has been widely used in the production of PU coatings. The main advantages of using UV radiation are: very high polymerization rates, low energy

input compared with traditional thermal cured coatings, and no or low volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) (Decker and Decker, 2002; Decker, 1998, 1996). A UV-curable PU

coating formulation is mainly composed of a PU oligomer, a multifunctional monomer

that acts as a reactive diluent to adjust formulation viscosity, and a photoinitiator.

4.2 Materials and methods

4.2.1 Materials

High oleic SM was provided by Cargill Inc. (Sidney, OH). After receiving the

SM, its protein content was determined to be 51.06% by the Kjeldahl method. Glutamic

acid, sodium hydroxide solution, oleic acid, hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA), isophorone

diisocyanate (IPDI), phenolphthalein, imidazole and methyl ethyl ketone were obtained 41

from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Ethylene diamine, ethylene carbonate,

hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), 1-hydroxy-cyclohexyl-phenylketone (Irgacure 184), bromophenol blue, and phthalic anhydride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,

MO). Pyridine, ethanol and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Pharmco-AAPER

(Shelbyville, KY). Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) was obtained from Pfaltz & Bauer, Inc.,

(Waterbury, CT).

4.2.2 Measurements

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analyses were performed on a

PerkinElmer spectrum Two IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, MA), and all samples were

scanned from 4000 to 400 cm-1 with a resolution of 4 cm-1.Thermal properties of UV-

cured PU acrylate coatings were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

(TA Instruments Q20, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE). Each measurement was

performed in three cycles at a rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. The samples

were first heated from 40 to 200 °C to eliminate the thermal history, then cooled to −50

°C and held for 3 min, and heated again to 200 °C. The glass transition temperature (Tg)

was determined based on the third cycle. Thermal degradation behaviors of UV-cured PU

acrylate coatings were evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), which was

performed under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 20 °C/min from 50 to 700 °C

using a TA Instruments Q50 thermogravimetric analyzer. Both DSC and TGA data

analyses were conducted using a TA Universal Analysis 2000. Pencil hardness of the

coatings cured on iron plates was determined in accordance with ASTM D3363-05.

42

Tensile strength, modulus and elongation at break of the films were measured using an

Instron 3366 tensiometer (Instron, Norwood, MA) at room temperature.

4.2.3 Synthesis of glutamic acid based hydroxyl terminated PU oligomer

Glutamic acid (Glu) was chosen as a model amino acid because it commonly has the highest abundance among amino acids in soybean (Berk, 1992). The synthesis from

Glu to amino terminated compound and hydroxyl terminated compound is illustrated in

Figure 9. Glu (14.71g, 0.1mol) , excess ED (36.06g, 0.6mol) and DBTDL (0.51g, 1wt%) were added to a 250-ml round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, a three-way adapter, a condenser, a vacuum adapter, a receiving flask and a thermometer . The system was raised to 105°C and reacted for 6 hours to yield amino-terminated compound (Glu-

ED). Unreacted ED was distilled out at the end of the reaction for reuse.

Glu-ED obtained from the previous step was first dissolved in ethanol. Since unreacted Glu is insoluble in ethanol, it was simple to separate Glu-ED with unreacted

Glu by centrifuge followed with filtration. The Glu-ED thus obtained (24.52g, amine value equals to 465.5 mg KOH/g) was reacted with EC (17.91g, 0.203mol) with ethanol as solvent in a 250-ml three-neck flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, a condenser and a thermometer. The ratio of the total amine value equivalents to the total carbonate equivalents was kept close to 1. The reaction was carried out at 70°C for 2 hours to produce hydroxyl-terminated PU oligomer (Glu-ED-EC).

4.2.4 Synthesis of SM based polyol

100g SM (51.06% protein) and 300 ml 60% (v/v) aqueous ethanol solution was added to a round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer. After constant stirring for

43

1 hour under room temperature, the slurry was filtered under vacuum and the wet SM was dried in 40ºC oven overnight. 80.32g SM without soluble carbohydrates was obtained.

The hydrolysis of SM was carried out in a 500-ml three neck flask, equipped with a magnetic stirrer, a condenser, a thermometer and a N2 inlet, under atmosphere pressure

with constant stirring. About 50g ethanol extracted SM and 200 ml 2N HCl was added to

the flask and heated to 100ºC in an oil bath with constant stirring. The temperature was

held constant for 24 hours of reaction time. After reaction, the solution was cooled to

room temperature and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted

and neutralized using 10M NaOH to a pH 6 and then the solvent was evaporated using a

rotary evaporator at 50-70ºC.

SM-ED, SM-ED-EC were synthesized using the same procedure as the syntheses

of Glu-ED and Glu-ED-EC. SM-ED-EC (10 g, hydroxyl value=478.6 mg KOH/g,

contains 0.085mol hydroxyl groups) and oleic acid (11.99g, 0.043mol) (the molar ratio of

hydroxyl groups to carboxyl groups is 2:1) were added to a three-necked flask equipped

with a magnetic stirrer, condenser and thermometer. The temperature was held constant

at 130ºC under vacuum for 20 hours of reaction time (Figure 10).

In order to react with 10g SM-PUOFA (hydroxyl number = 222.5mg KOH/g,

contains 0.04mol hydroxyl groups), IPDI-HEA derivative was first synthesized. 8.30

IPDI (0.04mol) and 0.22 ml DBTDL were placed in a three-necked flask equipped with magnetic stirrer, a dropping funnel with a drying , a thermometer and a nitrogen inlet. The flask was placed to a previously heated oil bath. The reaction mixture was

44 stirred at 35 ºC while 4.17 ml 2-HEA (0.04mol) was dripped into the flask. After the dripping was finished, the reaction mixture was stirred until the absorption peak of OH group (3500 cm-1) in FT-IR had disappeared. After that, 10g SM-PUOFA was dissolved in 20ml methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and added to the flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at 75 ºC until the absorption peak of NCO groups (2267cm-1) in FT-IR had disappeared. The solvent was then evaporated (Figure 10).

45

O NH O O NH 2 O O O O 2 O H H O carbonate) (ethylenediamine) NH2 NH2 (ethylene O N N O HO OH N N HO N N OH Amination H H Amidation H H NH2 NH2 O HN O O O urethane bond

OH 46 Glutamic acid

Amino-terminated compound (Represent amino acid oligiomers) Hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane oligomer

Figure 9 Synthesis route of hydroxyl-terminated PU oligomer

46

O O O O O O H H H H O N N O ROOH O N N O HO N N OH (fatty acids) R O N N O R H H H H O HN O o O HN O 150 C, vacuum O O O O

OH OH

Hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane oligomer Polyurethane oligomer-grafted fatty acid

NCO NCO DBTDL O DBTDL + O o OH o 75 C 35 C O N O NCO O H O IPDI 2-HEMA IPDI derivative 47

O O O O H H O N N O R O N N O R H H O HN O O O O

O N O H O N O H O Polyurethane acrylate oligiomer

Figure 10 Synthesis route of PUOFA and PUAO

47

4.2.5 Preparation of UV cured PU coating

PUAO was first mixed with 20% hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA) and 4% Igracure

184, and then the mixture was coated on an iron plate by an applicator with a 6 mils

(152.4 μm) gap, and cured under UV light for 10 passes on a 5m/min conveyor.

4.3 Results and discussion

4.3.1 Model compound glutamic acid based polyol

(A)

1679

(B)

1255 1647 1548

(C)

1501 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000

Figure 11 FT-IR spectra of (A) Glu-ED-EC, (B) Glu-ED, and (C) Glu

Figure 11 shows the FT-IR spectra of Glu-ED-EC, Glu-ED and Glu. The main changes between Glu and Glu-ED were the appearance of new peaks at 1647cm-1 and

1255cm-1, corresponding to C=O deformation and C-O deformation of the amide groups;

the peak corresponding to N-H of the primary amine at 1501cm-1 was shifted to 1548cm-1 and is attributed to the transformation of amine into amide. The acid value of Glu-ED 48

(Table 7) indicates that most of the carboxylic groups were protected and converted to

amides. However, when comparing the experimental amine value to the theoretical value

(731.7 mg KOH/g), there is a 36.4% difference, which is 17% larger than data from

similar experiments (Kumar et al., 2014a). This might due to the chemical structure of

Glu. With carboxylic groups on both ends of the glutamic acid, when one side of

carboxylic group has reacted with ED, the steric hindrance for the carboxylic group on

the other side of Glu becomes larger; thus it becomes more difficult to ensure that both carboxylic groups on Glu have reacted with ED.

The formation of urethane groups in Glu-ED-EC was confirmed by the appearance of a peak corresponding to carbonyl stretching of the urethane groups at

1679cm-1. On the spectrum of Glu-ED-EC two small peaks at 1773 and 1805cm-1

corresponding to C=O stretching in EC can be observed, which indicate a small amount

of unreacted EC in Glu-ED-EC(Nyquist and Setyineri, 1991). The amine, acid and

hydroxyl values of Glu-ED-EC are shown in table 7. From the amine value we calculated

that the conversion rate of amines to hydroxyl terminated urethanes is around 83%, which

is 10% smaller than previously reported (Kumar et al., 2014b). This difference can also

be explained by larger steric hindrance of the amine groups in the middle of Glu-ED

chain.

49

Table 7 Amine, acid and hydroxyl value of Glu and SM derived oligomers

Amine value (mg Acid value (mg KOH/g) Hydroxyl value (mg KOH/g) KOH/g) Glu- Glu-ED 465.5±19.3 59.8±3.2 - Glu-ED-EC 79.4±0.29 37.3±1.5 402.6±15.2 SM- SM-ED 533.4±9.4 24.8±0.4 - SM-ED-EC 98.2±1.2 22.6±1.6 478.6±9.6 SM-PUOFA - 1.5±0.5 222.5±10.9

4.3.2 SM-based polyol

The amine value, acid value and hydroxyl value of SM-ED, SM-ED-EC and SM-

PUOFA are summarized in Table 7. The SM-based polyol and its intermediate showed similar values to the model Glu compound, which indicates that the amino acids from hydrolyzed SM went through the same as the model compound.

50

60 SM-PUOFA SM-ED-EC 50

40

30

Viscosity (Pa·s) 20

10

0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Shear rate (1/s)

Figure 12 Viscosity as a function of shear rate of SM-PUOFA and SM-ED-EC

As shown in Figure 12, after the esterification of SM-ED-EC with oleic acid, the resultant SM-PUOFA showed decreased viscosity (at shear rate 10.9 1/s) from 41.2 Pa·s to 6.1 Pa·s at 25ºC. The decrease in viscosity is evidence that oleic acid has successfully reacted with SM-ED-EC and that the incorporation of oleic acid with long aliphatic chain gave the SM-ED-EC oligomer chain more flexibility. Furthermore, the decrease in viscosity will also be beneficial to the control of acrylation reaction following the preparation of UV-curable PU coating. Both oligomers showed decreased viscosity with increasing shear rate, demonstrating the shear thinning effect of non-Newtonian fluids.

4.3.3 Properties of the coating film

4.3.3.1 Mechanical properties

51

Mechanical properties of the SM-based PU acrylate coating are reported in Table

8. Compared to PU acrylate coatings reported by Gite et al. and Kim et al.(Gite et al.,

2010; Kim et al., 1996), the coating prepared in this study showed higher tensile strength and modulus and lower elongation at break. Pencil hardness test also shows that the coating film has the highest level of hardness. The results indicated that the coating prepared in this study exhibited rigid and brittle mechanical properties. This may due to possible hydrogen bonds between the N-H of the amide group and the C=O of another amide, urethane carbonyl or the ether (Lu and Larock, 2008) and enhanced cross- linking density due to the additional double bonds in oleic acid.

Table 8 Mechanical properties of SM-based PU acrylate coating

Tensile strength Modulus (MPa) Elongation at Pencil (MPa) break (%) hardness SM-based PU acrylate 18.2±3.6 450.1±17.3 4.5±0.7 9H coating PUA-1a 2.12 1.60 81 - PUA-2a 2.00 1.65 82 - PUA-3 - 43.4 70 - Note: a PU acrylate coatings prepared by Gite et al. (Gite et al., 2010)

b PU acrylate coating prepared by Kim et al. (Kim et al., 1996)

4.3.3.2 Thermal properties

52

Figure 13 TGA and DTA curves of UV-cured PU acrylate coating

Table 9 Thermal properties of SM-based PU acrylate coating TGA DSC ) T5 (ºC) T50 (ºC) Total weight Tg (ºC loss (%) SM-based PU 203.2 350.2 93.6 84.4 acrylate coating

Figure 13 shows the TGA and DTA curves of PU acrylate coating, it can be seen that the coating showed a two-stage decomposition process. The first stage of weight loss happened between 200-310 ºC is related to the decomposition of urethane groups existed in PUAO from the reaction between SM-ED and ethylene carbonate and the reaction between hydroxyl group in PUAO with isocyanate group in IPDI (Duquesne et al., 2001;

Tamami et al., 2004). The second stage of weight loss between 310-500 ºC reflects the decomposition of urethane-acrylate terminal groups (Dzunuzovic et al., 2005; Gao et al.,

53

2011) and also the scission of oleic acid chains in the PU acrylate coating (Li et al., 2014;

Lu and Larock, 2008).

The decomposition temperatures at 5% and 50% weight loss and the glass

transition temperature (Tg) based on DSC measurements are summarized in Table 3. The

initial weight loss before 5% was mainly caused by the removal of uncured components

with low molecular weight. The glass transition temperature is higher than many PU

acrylate coatings reported (Xu and Shi, 2005; Xu et al., 2012), the Tg agrees well with the

coating’s rigid and brittle mechanical properties discussed previously.

4.4 Conclusions

UV-curable PU acrylate coatings derived from SM were successfully prepared through a series of reactions, including amination, amidation, esterification and acrylation. The feasibility of the process and the chemical structure of the oligomers was studied using glutamic acid as the model compound. The oligomers prepared from SM

showed similar amine, acid and hydroxyl values as the oligomers prepared from model

compound. Compared with other PU acrylate coatings reported in literature, the UV-

cured PU acrylate coating prepared in this study showed higher Tg, tensile strength and

modulus, and lower elongation at break.

The high protein content in SM makes it a potential feedstock for amino acid based polymers. The value-added conversion of soybean oil byproduct has the potential to lower the price of biodiesel produced from soybean oil, and also lower the cost for producing PU coatings. The developing of polymer from bio-based feedstocks also helps reduce reliance on petrochemical feedstocks.

54

Chapter 5 Conclusions and Suggestions for Future Research

5.1 Conclusions

In the studies, value-added conversion of waste cooking oil (WCO), post- consumer PET bottles into biodiesel and polyurethane (PU) foams and value-added conversion of soybean meal (SM) into PU coatings have been successfully developed and evaluated.

The first study demonstrated that WCO is suitable feedstock for the production of biodiesel and that crude glycerol (CG) can be effectively used as a functional additive during the glycolysis of post-consumer PET bottles with DEG for the production of polyols suited to rigid PU foam applications. Increasing CG loading from 0 to 15%, increased polyol hydroxyl numbers, viscosities, and molecular weights, and the resulting

PU foams had increased compressive strength while having similar densities. Best insulation was obtained from PET-based polyol prepared with 9% CG. A preliminarily mass balance and cost analyses indicated the probable economic viability of this process.

The second study demonstrated that SM can be converted into polyol for the production of UV-cured PU acrylate coatings. The feasibility of the process and the chemical structure of the oligomers was studied using glutamic acid as the model compound. The oligomers prepared from SM showed similar amine, acid and hydroxyl values to the oligomers prepared from the Glu model compound. The UV-cured PU acrylate coating 55

prepared in this study showed good mechanical properties and thermal stability, with

higher Tg, tensile strength and modulus, and lower elongation at break than PU acrylate

coatings reported in literature.

5.2 Suggestions for Future Research

The preliminary cost analysis in chapter 3 included the market cost of

transportation and collection of WCO and recycled PET. However, the labor cost, facility

cost, and transportation cost for making biodiesel and PU foams are not included. A more

comprehensive techno-economic analysis or life cycle analysis is needed to better

analyze the feasibility of this process. What’s more, the varying composition of crude

glycerol could be a major barrier to the commercialization of this process. Future

research should focus on how to standardize or control the compositions of crude

glycerol to produce PU foams with stable qualities.

The produced PU acrylate coatings exhibit brittle, plastic-like properties, and

future research should focus on further modification of the product process to produce

PU coatings with improved elongation at break. Research should also be conducted on

the adhesion and water resistance properties of the coating, and to explore other SM-

based PU products such as PU elastomers or plastics.

Lastly, we should investigate other processes for value-added conversion waste

materials into useful PU products. The value-added conversion of waste polymer

materials and biodiesel byproducts can enhance the cost-effectiveness of the biodiesel

and polymer industry, and also reduce the environmental impact of polymer materials.

56

References

Anderson, T.J., Lamsa, B.P., 2011. Zein extraction from corn, corn products, and coproducts and modifications for various applications: A review. Cereal Chem. 88, 159–173. doi:10.1094/CCHEM-06-10-0091

Aniceto, J.P.S., Portugal, I., Silva, C.M., 2012. Biomass-based polyols through oxypropylation reaction. ChemSusChem 5, 1358–1368. doi:10.1002/cssc.201200032

Baliga, S., Wong, W.T., 1989. Depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) recycled from post-consumer soft-drink bottles. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 27, 2071–2082. doi:10.1002/pola.1989.080270625

Banani, R., Ayadi, M., Snoussi, Y., Bezzarga, M., 2014. Biodiesel production from unrefined and refined olive pomace oil : Comparative study. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 6, 906–915.

Berk, Z., 1992. Technology of production of edible flours and protein products from soybeans., FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No.97. Haifa, Israel.

Blackmon, K.P., Fox, D.W., Shafer, S.J., 1990. Process for Converting PET Scrap to Diamine Monimers.

Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Sheehan, J., Shapouri, H., Graboski, M., 1998. Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus. Final report NREL/SR–580–24089. doi:10.2172/658310

Chaudhary, S., Surekha, P., Kumar, D., Rajagopal, C., Roy, P.K., 2013. Microwave assisted glycolysis of poly(ethylene terepthalate) for preparation of polyester polyols. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 129, 2779–2788. doi:10.1002/app.38970

Chen, C.-H., Chen, C.-Y., Lo, Y.-W., Mao, C.-F., Liao, W.-T., 2001. Studies of glycolysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) recycled from postconsumer soft-drink bottles. II. Factorial experimental design. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 80, 956–962. doi:10.1002/app.1176

57

Chen, T., Mi, Y., Du, H., Gao, Z., n.d. Mechanical properties and dimensional stability of water-blown PU foams with various water levels.

Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Du, L., 2003. Structure and Properties of Composites Compression- Molded from Polyurethane Prepolymer and Various Soy Products. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 6786–6794. doi:10.1021/ie0301381

Chisti, Y., 2007. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 25, 294–306. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001

Čuk, N., Fabjan, E., Grželj, P., Kunaver, M., 2015. Water-blown polyurethane/polyisocyanurate foams made from recycled polyethylene terephthalate and liquefied wood-based polyester polyol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 41522. doi:10.1002/app.41522 da Cunha, M.E., Krause, L.C., Moraes, M.S.A., Faccini, C.S., Jacques, R.A., Almeida, S.R., Rodrigues, M.R.A., Caramão, E.B., 2009. Beef tallow biodiesel produced in a pilot scale. Fuel Process. Technol. 90, 570–575. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.01.001

Decker, C., 1998. The use of UV irradiation in polymerization. Polym. Int. 45, 133–141. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199802)45:2<133::AID-PI969>3.0.CO;2-F

Decker, C., 1996. Photoinitiated croslinking polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 21, 593– 650.

Decker, C., Decker, C., 2002. Kinetic Study and New Applications of UV Radiation Curing. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 23, 1067–1093. doi:10.1002/marc.200290014

Demharter, A., 1998. Polyurethane rigid foam, a proven thermal insulating material for applications between +130°C and −196°C. Cryogenics (Guildf). 38, 113–117. doi:10.1016/S0011-2275(97)00120-3

Domenek, S., Feuilloley, P., Gratraud, J., Morel, M.-H., Guilbert, S., 2004. Biodegradability of wheat gluten based bioplastics. Chemosphere 54, 551–559. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00760-4

Duquesne, S., Le Bras, M., Bourbigot, S., Delobel, R., Camino, G., Eling, B., Lindsay, C., Roels, T., 2001. Thermal degradation of polyurethane and polyurethane/expandable graphite coatings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 74, 493–499. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00177-X

Dzunuzovic, E., Tasic, S., Bozic, B., Babic, D., Dunjic, B., 2005. UV-curable hyperbranched urethane acrylate oligomers containing soybean fatty acids. Prog. Org. Coatings 52, 136–143. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.10.003 58

Evtiouguina, M., Margarida Barros, A., Cruz-Pinto, J.J., Pascoal Neto, C., Belgacem, N., Pavier, C., Gandini, A., 2000. The oxypropylation of cork residues: preliminary results, Bioresource Technology. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00158-3

Fink, J.K., 2005. Reactive Polymers Fundamentals and Applications - A Concise Guide to Industrial Polymers, William Andrew Publishing/Plastics Design Library. William Andrew Publishing/Plastics Design Library.

Gao, Q., Li, H., Zeng, X., 2011. Preparation and characterization of UV-curable hyperbranched polyurethane acrylate. J. Coatings Technol. Res. 8, 61–66. doi:10.1007/s11998-010-9285-y

Gite, V. V., Mahulikar, P.P., Hundiwale, D.G., 2010. Preparation and properties of polyurethane coatings based on acrylic polyols and trimer of isophorone diisocyanate. Prog. Org. Coatings 68, 307–312. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.03.008

Haas, M.J., McAloon, A.J., Yee, W.C., Foglia, T. a., 2006. A process model to estimate biodiesel production costs. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 671–678. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.039

Hoong, S.S., Bakar, Z.A., Siti, N., Din, M.N.M., Idris, Z., Yeong, S.K., Hassan, H.A., Ahmad, S., 2011. Process of Producing Polyglycerol from Crude Glycerol. doi:10.1016/j.(73)

Hu, S., Li, Y., 2014. Two-step sequential liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass by crude glycerol for the production of polyols and polyurethane foams. Bioresour. Technol. 161, 410–415. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.072

Hu, S., Luo, X., Li, Y., 2015. Production of polyols and waterborne polyurethane dispersions from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 1–8. doi:10.1002/app.41425

Hu, S., Wan, C., Li, Y., 2012. Production and characterization of biopolyols and polyurethane foams from crude glycerol based liquefaction of soybean straw. Bioresour. Technol. 103, 227–33. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.125

Hu, Y.H., Gao, Y., De Wang, N., Hu, C.P., Zu, S., Vanoverloop, L., Randall, D., 2002. Rigid polyurethane foam prepared from a rape seed oil based polyol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 84, 591–597. doi:10.1002/app.10311

Ionescu, M., 2005. Chemistry and Technology of Polyols for , Smithers Rapra Technology. Smithers Rapra Technology.

59

Juhaida, M.F., Paridah, M.T., Mohd. Hilmi, M., Sarani, Z., Jalaluddin, H., Mohamad Zaki, A.R., 2010. Liquefaction of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) core for wood laminating adhesive. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 1355–1360. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.048

Kacperski, M., Spychaj, T., 1999. Rigid polyurethane foams with poly(ethylene terephthalate)/triethanolamine recycling products. Polym. Adv. Technol. 10, 620– 624. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1581(199910)10:10<620::AID-PAT929>3.3.CO;2-D

Kathalewar, M., Dhopatkar, N., Pacharane, B., Sabnis, A., Raut, P., Bhave, V., 2013. Chemical recycling of PET using neopentyl glycol: Reaction kinetics and preparation of polyurethane coatings. Prog. Org. Coatings 76, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.08.023

Kim, B.K., Lee, K.H., Kim, H.D., 1996. Preparation and Properties of UV-Curable Polyurethane Acrylates. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 60, 799–805.

Kishimoto, Y., Kajihara, T., Kato, S., 1999. Study on the alcoholysis of aromatic polyesters and related esters using a high-pressure calorimeter. Polym. Bull. 42, 295–300. doi:10.1007/s002890050466

Kongjao, S., Damronglerd, S., Hunsom, M., 2010. Purification of crude glycerol derived from waste used-oil methyl ester plant. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 27, 944–949. doi:10.1007/s11814-010-0148-0

Kumar, R., Choudhary, V., Mishra, S., Varma, I.K., Mattiason, B., 2002a. Adhesives and Plastics Based on Soy Protein Products. Ind. Crops Prod. 16, 155–172. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00007-9

Kumar, R., Choudhary, V., Mishra, S., Varma, I.K., Mattiason, B., 2002b. Adhesives and Plastics Based on Soy Protein Products. Ind. Crops Prod. 16, 155–172.

Kumar, S., Hablot, E., Moscoso, J.L.G., Obeid, W., Hatcher, P.G., DuQuette, B.M., Graiver, D., Narayan, R., Balan, V., 2014a. Polyurethanes preparation using proteins obtained from microalgae. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 7824–7833. doi:10.1007/s10853-014- 8493-8

Kumar, S., Hablot, E., Moscoso, J.L.G., Obeid, W., Hatcher, P.G., DuQuette, B.M., Graiver, D., Narayan, R., Balan, V., 2014b. Polyurethanes preparation using proteins obtained from microalgae. J. Mater. Sci. 7824–7833. doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8493- 8

Kurimoto, Y., Koizumi, A., Doi, S., Tamura, Y., Ono, H., 2001. Wood species effects on the characteristics of liquefied wood and the properties of polyurethane films 60

prepared from the liquefied wood. Biomass and Bioenergy 21, 381–390. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00041-1

Lee, W.-J., Lin, M.-S., 2008. Preparation and application of polyurethane adhesives made from polyhydric alcohol liquefied Taiwan acacia and China fir. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 109, 23–31. doi:10.1002/app.28007

Li, C., Luo, X., Li, T., Tong, X., Li, Y., 2014. Polyurethane foams based on crude glycerol-derived biopolyols: One-pot preparation of biopolyols with branched fatty acid ester chains and its effects on foam formation and properties. Polym. (United Kingdom) 55, 6529–6538. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.043

Li, Y., Luo, X., Hu, S., 2015. Bio-based Polyols and Polyurethanes. Springer International Publishing.

Liu, D., Tian, H., Zhang, L., Chang, P.R., 2008. Structure and Properties of Blend Films Prepared from Castor Oil-Based Polyurethane / Soy Protein Derivative. Society 9330–9336.

Lu, Y., Larock, R.C., 2008. Soybean-oil-based waterborne polyurethane dispersions: Effects of polyol functionality and hard segment content on properties. Biomacromolecules 9, 3332–3340. doi:10.1021/bm801030g

Luo, X., Hu, S., Zhang, X., Li, Y., 2013. Thermochemical conversion of crude glycerol to biopolyols for the production of polyurethane foams. Bioresour. Technol. 139, 323–9. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.011

Luo, X., Li, Y., 2014. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyols and Polyurethane Foams from PET Waste and Crude Glycerol. J. Polym. Environ. 22, 318–328. doi:10.1007/s10924-014-0649-8

Meher, L.C., Vidya Sagar, D., Naik, S.N., 2006. Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification - A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10, 248– 268. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.002

Meng, X., Chen, G., Wang, Y., 2008. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via alkali catalyst and its engine test. Fuel Process. Technol. 89, 851–857. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.02.006

Mir, G., Sadeghi, M., Sayaf, M., 2012. From PET Waste to Novel Polyurethanes. Mishra, A.K., Jena, K.K., Raju, K.V.S.N., 2009. Synthesis and characterization of hyperbranched polyester-urethane-urea/K10-clay hybrid coatings. Prog. Org. Coatings 64, 47–56. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.07.012

61

Narayan, R., Hablot, E., Graiver, D., Sendijarevic, V., 2014. Soy meal-based polyols for rigid polyurethane foams. PU Mag. 11, 1–4.

Nelson, R.G., Howell, S. a, Weber, J.A., 1994. Potential feedstock supply and costs for biodiesel production, in: The Sixth National Bioenergy Conference, Reno/Sparks, Nevada.

Nikje, M.M.A., Garmarudi, A.B., 2010. Regeneration of Polyol by Pentaerythritol- assisted Glycolysis of Flexible Polyurethane Foam Wastes. Iran. Polym. J. 19, 287– 295.

Nyquist, R.A., Setyineri, S.E., 1991. Infrared Study of Ethylene Carbonate in Various Solvents and Solvent Systems 45.

Pardal, F., Tersac, G., 2006. Comparative reactivity of glycols in PET glycolysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 91, 2567–2578. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.05.016

Paszun, D., Spychaj, T., 1997. Chemical Recycling of Poly (ethylene terephthalate). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 1373–1383. doi:10.1021/ie960563c

Schulz, G.E., Schirmer, R.H., 1979. Principles of protein structure. Springer, New York.

Sessa, D.J., Cheng, H.N., Kim, S., Selling, G.W., Biswas, A., 2013. Zein-based polymers formed by modifications with isocyanates. Ind. Crops Prod. 43, 106–113. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.034

Shukla, S.R., Harad, A.M., 2006. Aminolysis of polyethylene terephthalate waste. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 91, 1850–1854. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.005

Singh, P., Kumar, R., Sabapathy, S.N., Bawa, a. S., 2008. Functional and edible uses of soy protein products. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 7, 14–28. doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00025.x

Sinha, V., Patel, M.R., Patel, J. V., 2010. Pet waste management by chemical recycling: A review. J. Polym. Environ. 18, 8–25. doi:10.1007/s10924-008-0106-7

Song, F., Tang, D.L., Wang, X.L., Wang, Y.Z., 2011. Biodegradable soy protein isolate- based materials: A review. Biomacromolecules 12, 3369–3380. doi:10.1021/bm200904x

Szycher, M., 1999. Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes.

Tamami, B., Sohn, S., Wilkes, G.L., 2004. Incorporation of carbon dioxide into soybean oil and subsequent preparation and studies of nonisocyanate polyurethane networks. 62

J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 92, 883–891. doi:10.1002/app.20049

Tian, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Quan, C., Zhang, X., 2010. Improved flexibility and water resistance of soy protein containing waterborne polyurethane. Ind. Crops Prod. 32, 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.02.009

Tong, X., Luo, X., Li, Y., 2015. Development of blend films from soy meal protein and crude glycerol-based waterborne polyurethane. Ind. Crops Prod. 67, 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.063

United Soybean Board, 2015. 2015 Soy Products Guide.

Vaidya, U.R., Nadkarni, V.M., 1987. Unsaturated polyesters from PET waste: Kinetics of polycondensation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 34, 235–245. doi:10.1002/app.1987.070340120

Vitkauskiene, I., Makuska, R., Stirna, U., Cabulis, U., 2011. Synthesis and physical- mechanical properties of polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams based on PET-waste- derived modified polyols. J. Cell. Plast. 47, 467–482. doi:10.1177/0021955X11409494

Xu, G., Shi, W., 2005. Synthesis and characterization of hyperbranched polyurethane acrylates used as UV curable oligomers for coatings. Prog. Org. Coatings 52, 110– 117. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.10.001

Xu, H., Qiu, F., Wang, Y., Wu, W., Yang, D., Guo, Q., 2012. UV-curable waterborne polyurethane-acrylate: preparation, characterization and properties. Prog. Org. Coatings 73, 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.08.019

Yan, Y., Pang, H., Yang, X., Zhang, R., Liao, B., 2008. Preparation and characterization of water-blown polyurethane foams from liquefied cornstalk polyol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 110, 1099–1111. doi:10.1002/app.28692

Yang, Y., Lu, Y., Xiang, H., Xu, Y., Li, Y., 2002. Study on methanolytic depolymerization of PET with supercritical methanol for chemical recycling. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 75, 185–191. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00217-8

Yu, F., Le, Z., Chen, P., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Ruan, R., 2008. Atmospheric pressure liquefaction of dried distillers grains (DDG) and making polyurethane foams from liquefied DDG. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 148, 235–243. doi:10.1007/s12010- 007-8040-z

Zarr, R.R., Pintar, A.L., 2012. NIST Special Publication 260-175 Standard Reference Materials : SRM 1453 , Expanded Polystyrene Board , for Thermal Conductivity 63

from 281 K. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 260-175. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.260-175

Zhang, Y., Dubé, M.., McLean, D.., Kates, M., 2003. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 90, 229–240. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00150-0

64