Ending the Deadlock: Towards a New Vision of Peace in Eastern DRC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ending the Deadlock: Towards a New Vision of Peace in Eastern DRC a ENDING THE DEADLOCK: Towards a new vision of peace in eastern DRC September 2012 Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert is a 26-year-old independent peacebuilding organisation. We work with people who are directly affected by violent conflict to improve their prospects of peace. And we seek to influence the policies and ways of working of governments, international organisations like the UN and multinational companies, to reduce conflict risk and increase the prospects of peace. We work in Africa, several parts of Asia, the South Caucasus, the Middle East and Latin America, and have recently started work in the UK. Our policy work focuses on several key themes that influence prospects for peace and security – the economy, climate change, gender, the role of international institutions, the impact of development aid, and the effect of good and bad governance. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding NGOs with more than 159 staff based in London and 14 field offices. To learn more about how and where we work, visit www.international-alert.org. © International Alert 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. ink, www.d-r-ink.com Front cover image: © Gwenn Dubourthoumieu ENDING THE DEADLOCK: Towards a new vision of peace in eastern DRC 2 International Alert Foreword Over the past decade of violence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a series of peace agreements backed by international interventions has given hope to ordinary people that their suffering might be coming to an end. So far, their hopes have been dashed. The international community has invested billions of dollars in trying to stabilise and build peace, but they know their efforts are not bearing enough fruit. The United Nations has deployed a major peacekeeping mission in the area for a decade. However, there has been no peace to keep. Armed groups continue to control large areas of the Kivu provinces and Ituri district in Orientale province, creating insecurity and preying on the population, with women and girls continuing to suffer disproportionately. The economy fails to develop and young people have no work. Roads and other infrastructure remain dilapidated, and millions of people lack access to the most basic public services. Some 1.8 million people are displaced in the Kivus and Orientale, and hundreds of thousands have fled to neighbouring countries. The inventory of suffering goes on. It is clear that new ideas are needed to find a way out for the people of eastern DRC. International Alert has been working with Congolese partners to build peace for over a decade. This report is based on our consultations and interactions with civil society, politicians, business people and international agencies. It is also based on our 25 years of experience in peacebuilding in other parts of Africa and elsewhere. There is no quick or easy solution. We do not claim to know all the answers, and experience of peacebuilding the world over suggests that not all the answers are currently knowable. What is needed is not a new blueprint but a new approach – a way of thinking, working, monitoring, assessing and, as necessary, adjusting. It is our contention that a major reason why Congolese and international efforts have so far failed to bring peace is that they have wrongly diagnosed the issues and accordingly are addressing the problems in the wrong way. Alert’s approach means being willing to question some of the assumptions which have underpinned peacebuilding efforts so far, especially the approaches to stabilisation. It means taking a strategic, longer-term, more patient and incremental approach. It means addressing the political issues that divide people and put them into potentially warring camps. It means bringing people together – everybody who has a stake – in a broad dialogue aimed at figuring out local, provincial, national and regional strategies for peace. It means accepting that the Congolese state will take many years to build, and that support provided to Kinshasa needs to be matched by an equivalent level of support to local peace and reconstruction efforts. Above all, it means two things: working with Congolese people to identify and strengthen their existing mechanisms for conflict resolution and development, and thus helping the Congolese to take part in shaping their future; and staying the course. Peace in DRC is possible, but it will need a sustained effort and clear thinking. With this report, International Alert marks a new stage in our own contribution to this work. Dan Smith Secretary General International Alert Ending the deadlock: Towards a new vision of peace in eastern DRC 3 Acknowledgements The lead authors of this report were Alexis Bouvy, independent consultant, and Maria Lange, country manager, International Alert DRC. Valuable inputs to the research design and drafting process were provided by various International Alert colleagues in London and DRC. These included individuals who have made an integral contribution to Alert’s programming in DRC in the recent past – Annie Bukaraba, Judy El-Bushra, Aurélien Tobie and Bill Yates. It also included others who are still actively involved in Alert’s programming in Africa and will be carrying forward the report’s recommendations in their work – Jessie Banfield, Bertin Bisimwa Kabomboro, Massimo Fusato, Ndeye Sow, Phil Vernon and Zahed Yousuf. Members of staff and Alert’s partners in both Goma and Bukavu provided invaluable logistical support to the research process; colleagues in London were instrumental in bringing the report to publication. Consultation workshops in Bukavu, Goma and Bunia were designed and moderated by Sarah Hughes, independent consultant. These workshops were facilitated by, respectively, Raphael Wakenge, Jean-Pierre Lindiro Kabirigi and Rodolphe Mbale Myango. The report benefited further from the expert guidance of external reviewers Chris Huggins and Hélène Morvan. Alert would like to thank, in particular, all the many officials and representatives of civil society organisations, provincial and national authorities, as well as international NGOs, UN and multi- and bilateral donor agencies, who either participated in consultation workshops or agreed to be interviewed for this report. We are grateful to them for sharing their perceptions and ideas with the report’s authors and greatly contributing to the overall analysis. Alert’s work in DRC over the past decade, on which this report draws, has been supported by a number of donors. They include the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), United States Agency for International Development (USAID), European Union (EU), UK Department for International Development (DFID), Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, UN Women and World Bank. We would like to thank all of our donors and in particular to acknowledge the support given to International Alert by DFID through our Programme Partnership Agreement, which we have used in part to finance the preparation of this report. 4 International Alert Contents Acronyms 5 Executive summary 6 Introduction: Why a “new vision of peace”? 12 1. Current state of the crisis in eastern DRC 14 1.1 Structural factors of instability 14 The patrimonial and predatory Congolese state 15 Geographic, political and land structures in eastern DRC: The underlying 17 structural causes of inter-community tensions Congolese wars: Local tensions and regional dynamics 22 1.2 War without end? Recent developments in the conflict in eastern DRC (2008–2012) 26 Security developments: The persistence of armed groups 26 Political developments: Backsliding democratisation 29 2. Stabilising eastern DRC: A limited response 31 2.1 International partners losing momentum 31 2.2 International and national stabilisation strategies: STAREC and ISSSS 33 Weaknesses of the stabilisation plan 36 2.3 Understanding and breaking the link between the mining sector and conflict 38 2.4 Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration, return of refugees 40 and land mediation Reintegrating former combatants 40 Return and reintegration of refugees 41 Land mediation 42 2.5 Civil society: A vector for change? 43 Weaknesses of civil society 43 Alternative solutions put forward by civil society 44 3. Ending the deadlock: Towards a new vision of peace 47 3.1 Recommendations 49 Ending the deadlock: Towards a new vision of peace in eastern DRC 5 Acronyms ADEPAE Action for Development and Internal Peace (Action pour le développement et la paix endogènes) AFDL Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of the Congo (Alliance des forces démocratiques pour la libération du Congo) APC Action for Peace and Harmony (Action pour la paix et la concorde) CLPC Permanent local conciliation committees (Comités locaux permanents de conciliation) CNDP National Congress for the Defence of the People (Congrès national pour la défense du peuple) DDR Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EU European Union FARDC Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo) FDLR Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (Forces démocratiques pour la libération du Rwanda) IDPs Internally displaced persons ISSSS International Security and Stabilization Support Strategy M23 Movement of 23rd March
Recommended publications
  • Press Release /3
    PRESS KIT November 2019 2020 Martin Ennals Award – Press Kit 1 CONTENTS Press release /3 Finalists /4-6 Huda Al-Sarari (Yemen) /4 Norma Ledezma (Mexico) /5 Sizani Ngubane (South Africa) /6 Martin Ennals Award – FAQs /7-8 Practical information and contacts /9 2020 Martin Ennals Award – Press Kit 2 1. PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until Tuesday 26 November 2019 at 8 am CET Three exceptional women nominated for the 2020 Martin Ennals Award Geneva, Monday, 25 November 2019 - three exceptional women are the finalists for the 2020 Martin Ennals Award, a demonstration of the leading position now occupied by women in the defence of human rights. In Yemen, Huda Al-Sarari has exposed and challenged the existence of secret prisons and many cases of torture. In Mexico, Norma Ledezma is fighting against femicides and disappearances. In South Africa, Sizani Ngubane is fighting for access for women to education and to land. The 2020 Martin Ennals Award for Human Rights Defenders will be presented to one of them on 19 February during a ceremony hosted by the City of Geneva which, as part of its commitment to human rights, has for many years supported the Award. Three women nominated: a first Each year, the Martin Ennals Award rewards human rights defenders from around the world who distinguish themselves by their strong commitment to promoting human rights - often at the risk of their own lives. In 2020, for the first time the Jury nominated three women who defend the fundamental rights of their communities in sensitive contexts. ‘The Martin Ennals Foundation is proud to recognise the courageous work of three women.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Due Diligence in Conflict- Affected Settings Guidance for Extractives Industries
    Human rights due diligence in conflict- affected settings Guidance for extractives industries About International Alert International Alert works with people directly affected by conflict to build lasting peace. Together, we believe peace is within our power. We focus on solving the root causes of conflict, bringing together people from across divides. From the grassroots to policy level, we come together to build everyday peace. Peace is just as much about communities living together, side by side, and resolving their differences without resorting to violence as it is about people signing a treaty or laying down their arms. That is why we believe that we all have a role to play in building a more peaceful future. www.international-alert.org © International Alert 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout: D.R. ink Images: © Steve McCurry/Magnum Photos (cover); © SWORD Images/International Alert (p.5); © Reynold Sumayku/Alamy Stock Photo (p.9); © Joerg Boethling/Alamy Stock Photo (p.16); © Barry Iverson/Alamy Stock Photo (p.30); © Xinhua/Alamy Stock Photo (p.47); © Aubrey Wade/International Alert (p.66); © Joerg Boethling/Alamy Stock Photo (p.70) Human rights due diligence in conflict-affected settings Guidance for extractives industries Yadaira Orsini and Roper Cleland 2018 2 | International Alert Human rights due diligence in conflict-affected
    [Show full text]
  • Israel-Palestine Through the Lens of Game Theory
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Economics Department Working Paper Series Economics 2021 Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory Amal Ahmad Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/econ_workingpaper Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Ahmad, Amal, "Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory" (2021). Economics Department Working Paper Series. 301. https://doi.org/10.7275/21792057 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Department Working Paper Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Land for peace? Israel-Palestine through the lens of game theory Amal Ahmad∗ February 2021 Abstract Why have Israel and the Palestinians failed to implement a \land for peace" solution, along the lines of the Oslo Accords? This paper studies the applica- tion of game theory to this question. I show that existing models of the conflict largely rely on unrealistic assumptions about what the main actors are trying to achieve. Specifically, they assume that Israel is strategically interested in withdrawing from the occupied territories pending resolvable security concerns but that it is obstructed from doing so by violent Palestinians with other objec- tives. I use historical analysis along with bargaining theory to shed doubt on this assumption, and to argue that the persistence of conflict has been aligned with, not contrary to, the interests of the militarily powerful party, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Collusion Constrained Equilibrium
    Theoretical Economics 13 (2018), 307–340 1555-7561/20180307 Collusion constrained equilibrium Rohan Dutta Department of Economics, McGill University David K. Levine Department of Economics, European University Institute and Department of Economics, Washington University in Saint Louis Salvatore Modica Department of Economics, Università di Palermo We study collusion within groups in noncooperative games. The primitives are the preferences of the players, their assignment to nonoverlapping groups, and the goals of the groups. Our notion of collusion is that a group coordinates the play of its members among different incentive compatible plans to best achieve its goals. Unfortunately, equilibria that meet this requirement need not exist. We instead introduce the weaker notion of collusion constrained equilibrium. This al- lows groups to put positive probability on alternatives that are suboptimal for the group in certain razor’s edge cases where the set of incentive compatible plans changes discontinuously. These collusion constrained equilibria exist and are a subset of the correlated equilibria of the underlying game. We examine four per- turbations of the underlying game. In each case,we show that equilibria in which groups choose the best alternative exist and that limits of these equilibria lead to collusion constrained equilibria. We also show that for a sufficiently broad class of perturbations, every collusion constrained equilibrium arises as such a limit. We give an application to a voter participation game that shows how collusion constraints may be socially costly. Keywords. Collusion, organization, group. JEL classification. C72, D70. 1. Introduction As the literature on collective action (for example, Olson 1965) emphasizes, groups often behave collusively while the preferences of individual group members limit the possi- Rohan Dutta: [email protected] David K.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS on the MARGINS in TUNISIA Vulnerable Young People in Douar Hicher and Ettadhamen
    POLITICS ON THE MARGINS IN TUNISIA Vulnerable young people in Douar Hicher and Ettadhamen Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert helps people find peaceful solutions to conflict. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding organisations, with 30 years of experience laying the foundations for peace. We work with local people around the world to help them build peace, and we advise governments, organisations and companies on how to support peace. We focus on issues that influence peace, including governance, economics, gender relations, social development, climate change, and the role of businesses and international organisations in high-risk places. www.international-alert.org © International Alert 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Translation: Maisie Greenwood Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: © Callum Francis Hugh/International Alert POLITICS ON THE MARGINS IN TUNISIA Vulnerable young people in Douar Hicher and Ettadhamen Olfa Lamloum March 2016 2 International Alert Acknowledgements This report was originally published in French in the book Les jeunes de Douar Hicher et d’Ettadhamen: Une enquête sociologique (The young people of Douar Hicher and Ettadhamen: A sociological survey) under the title ‘La politique à la marge de l’Etat et des institutions’ (Politics on the margins of the state and institutions) (Chapter 5), published by International Alert and Arabesque in March 2015. International Alert would like to thank the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office for funding this work, as well as the governorates of Ariana and Manouba, the Ministry of Social Affairs, the Centre for Defence and Social Integration, and the municipalities of Douar Hicher and Ettadhamen for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Winning Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Or Mr
    Chapter 1 On some winning strategies for the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma or Mr. Nice Guy and the Cosa Nostra Wolfgang Slany Wolfgang Kienreich Technical University Know-Center Graz, Austria Graz, Austria [email protected] [email protected] We submitted two kinds of strategies to the iterated prisoner’s dilemma (IPD) competitions organized by Graham Kendall, Paul Darwen and Xin Yao in 2004 and 20051. Our strategies performed exceedingly well in both years. One type is an intelligent and optimistic enhanced version of the well known TitForTat strategy which we named OmegaTitForTat. It recognizes common behaviour patterns and detects and recovers from repairable mutual defect deadlock situations, otherwise behaving much like TitForTat. OmegaTitForTat was placed as the first or second individual strategy in both competitions in the leagues in which it took part. The second type consists of a set of strategies working together as a team. The call for participation of the competitions explicitly stated that cooperative strategies would be allowed to participate. This allowed a form of implicit communication which is not in keeping with the original IPD idea, but represents a natural extension to the study of cooperative behaviour in reality as it is aimed at through the study of the simple, yet 1 See http://www.prisoners-dilemma.com/ for more details. 1 2 Book Title insightful, iterated prisoner’s dilemma model. Indeed, one’s behaviour towards another person in reality is very often influenced by one’s relation to the other person. In particular, we submitted three sets of strategies that work together as groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Order and Containment in Concurrent System Design Copyright Fall 2000
    Order and Containment in Concurrent System Design Copyright Fall 2000 by John Sidney Davis II 1 Abstract Order and Containment in Concurrent System Design by John Sidney Davis II Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering-Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California at Berkeley Professor Edward A. Lee, Chair This dissertation considers the dif®culty of modeling and designing complex, concurrent systems. The term concurrent is used here to mean a system consisting of a network of commu- nicating components. The term complex is used here to mean a system consisting of components with different models of computation such that the communication between different components has different semantics according to the respective interacting models of computation. Modeling and designing a concurrent system requires a clear understanding of the types of relationships that exist between the components found within a concurrent system. Two partic- ularly important types of relationships found in concurrent systems are the order relation and the containment relation. The order relation represents the relative timing of component actions within a concurrent system. The containment relation facilitates human understanding of a system by ab- stracting a system's components into layers of visibility. The consequence of improper management of the order and containment relationships in a complex, concurrent system is deadlock. Deadlock is an undesirable halting of a system's execution and is the most challenging type of concurrent system error to debug. The contents of this disserta- tion show that no methodology is currently available that can concisely, accurately and graphically 2 model both the order and containment relations found in complex, concurrent systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Coopetition: Is Transparency a Fallacy Or a Mandatory Condition? a Case Study of a Coopetition Project with an Opportunistic Partner
    XXVIe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique Managing coopetition: Is transparency a fallacy or a mandatory condition? A case study of a coopetition project with an opportunistic partner Sea Matilda Bez Université de Montpellier (MOMA) et Université Paris-Dauphine (PSL) [email protected] Frédéric Le Roy Université de Montpellier (MOMA) et Montpellier Business School [email protected] Stéphanie Dameron Université Paris-Dauphine (PSL) [email protected] Abstract : We investigate why and how knowledge transparency between competitors are needed for radical innovation. Previous scholars considered that coopetition (i.e. collaboration between competing firms) could not be a suitable strategy. Knowledge transparency invites opportunism. Thus, even for a radical innovation purpose, being highly transparent with a competitor is a fallacy. Our research goes beyond this specific approach of coopetition and reveals that firms can preserve transparency even if the partners behave opportunistically. We develop counter-intuitive propositions based on a conceptual discussion followed by insight from an extreme case study of a pharmaceutical company opening its innovation project to a competitor who behaves opportunistically (i.e. the Plavix). Our study mainly highlights that firms need to fight against the intuitive reaction of reducing transparency when the partner behaves opportunistically. Reducing the transparency inevitably leads to “shooting itself in the foot” because the reduction of transparency of one partner leads to the destruction of any possibility to create a radical innovation. Moreover, our research represents interesting guidelines for top managers by : (1) confirming that coopetition strategies are relevant in addressing the challenges of radical innovation, and (2) highlighting a specific organization design to manage transparency in a coopetitive project.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Transformation Work CONTENTS
    Code of Conduct Conflict transformation work CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION WORK 3 A. Principles 4 B. Commentary 5 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION WORK 7 A. Basic Position 8 B. Principles for the Incorporation of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law 8 C. Guidelines on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law 9 IMPARTIALITY IN CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION WORK 11 A. Basic Position 12 B. Guidelines on Impartiality 12 WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP 14 A. Basic Position 15 B. Principles of Partnership 15 C. Guidelines for Working in Partnership 17 APPENDIX ONE: FURTHER DISCUSSION 19 1. Human Rights and Conflict Transformation Work 20 2. Impartiality in Conflict Transformation Work 22 APPENDIX TWO: Lessons Learned in Conflict Transformation Work 25 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 1. Guiding Principles for Conflict Transformation Work 30 2. Human Rights and Conflict Transformation Work 31 3. Impartiality in Conflict Transformation Work 31 4. Working in Partnership 32 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Code of Conduct is the result of extensive consultations with IA’s trustees, staff, partners, donors and other interested individuals. It has been a collaborative effort for which thanks are due to a great many people. In particular, IA would like to extend its appreciation to those outside the organisation who have devoted so much of their valuable time to improving and developing this document. The long list of contributors and members of the Code of Conduct Advisory Group include: Patricia Feeney, Mukesh Kapila, Judith Large, Agnes Callamard, Jan Ruyssenaars, Anne van Leeuwen, Andy Carl, Leah Levin, Gunnar Sorbo, Malcolm Blakeney and Norbert Ropers.
    [Show full text]
  • International Alert International Alert
    International Alert International Alert (IA) is a non-governmental organisation based in the UK. IA has a multi- national team of 60 staff including volunteers and interns.The creation of the organisation was a response to the rise in violent conflict within countries and the subsequent abuse of individual and collective human rights in conflict situations. It aims to address the root causes of violence and contribute to the just and peaceful transformation of violent internal conflict.Today there is an ever more pressing need for conflict resolution and peace building efforts. IA was among the first organisations to work specifically on women, peace and conflict. In 1995 IA initiated a programme focusing on women and peace-building in the Great Lakes region of Africa, mainly in Burundi and Rwanda. It has since launched the international Women Building Peace Campaign which undertakes policy research and advocacy focusing on women, peace, security issues within the international community. Swiss Peace Foundation The Bern-based Swiss Peace Foundation (SPF) is an action oriented peace research institute active both nationally and internationally. Since it’s founding in 1988, it has developed into an internationally renowned institute for peace and conflict research and is part of a national and international network.The Swiss Peace Foundation deals with the prevention and management of armed conflicts. In view of the current widespread wars and violent conflicts in the world, the Foundation focuses on the establishment and further development
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding, the World Bank and the United Nations Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal
    Peacebuilding, the World Bank and the United Nations Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal SUmmary of reSearch and emergiNg recommendations Sara Batmanglich and Monica Stephen August 2011 Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert international alert is a 25-year old independent peacebuilding organisation that works with people directly affected by violent conflict to improve their prospects of peace. alert also works to influence the policies and ways of working of governments, international organisations such as the United Nations (UN) and multinational companies that operate in fragile and conflict-affected environments, to reduce conflict risk and increase the prospects of peace. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding non-governmental organisations Peacebuilding, the World Bank (Ngos), with more than 155 staff based in London and 15 field offices. and the United Nations About the International Institutions Programme this programme focuses on how international institutions such as the UN, the Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal World Bank, the european Union (eU) and the african Union can strengthen their support for peacebuilding. Drawing on alert’s network of country programmes SUmmary of reSearch and emergiNg recommendations and expertise in peacebuilding, aid and governance, the programme brings together perspectives from ongoing field and headquarters-based research, analysis and dialogue processes to produce insights on international engagement and good practice. the programme seeks to facilitate reflection on institutional effectiveness and support institutional change processes. to learn more, visit: http://www.international-alert.org/institutions Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many people in Burundi, Liberia, Nepal, New york and Washington, Dc who contributed their experiences to the substance of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do We Build Peace During a Pandemic? Lessons for Peacebuilding and Health Sector Organisations Executive Summary in Unprecedented and Protracted Crisis Settings
    BACKGROUND PAPER: June 2021 How do we build peace during a pandemic? Lessons for peacebuilding and health sector organisations Executive summary in unprecedented and protracted crisis settings. Insights were shared into the limitations of digital engagement over the long-term, with experiences in Somalia identifying the The repercussions of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) need for continued advocacy around technological access have reverberated across the global peace and security for marginalised communities. The urgency of alternative landscape, creating and heightening risk factors for conflict avenues of mental health support for practitioners and across social, political and economic spheres, often beneficiaries were identified by several respondents as the exacerbating already fragile situations. The pandemic, and health impacts of the pandemic increasingly extend beyond the operational restrictions that accompanied it, also forced the physical in a socially distanced environment. a rapid adaptation of the way peacebuilding was delivered by local and international actors. Above all, this background paper depicts the ways in which the pandemic has magnified the structural inequalities and Using illustrative examples provided by peacebuilding injustices driving violence and unrest in fragile contexts. This organisations around the world, this background paper awareness must be transformed into increased resources attempts to understand better the new environments in and support for local peacebuilding practitioners to which peacebuilders are operating, focusing on conflict address the structural drivers of conflict, drawing upon their dynamics that have arisen in the last year and looking at contextual knowledge of conflict dynamics and their strong how peacebuilders are addressing these. It also explores presence and networks in isolated and conflict-affected the ways in which local practitioners are using their skills, areas.
    [Show full text]